rugby players and fairy stories
DESCRIPTION
Rugby players and fairy stories. Rob Waring Notre Dame Seishin University JALT PANSIG May 21, 2011 Matsumoto www.robwaring.org Sponsored by. Fluency vs. Fluent. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Rugby players andfairy stories
Rob WaringNotre Dame Seishin University
JALT PANSIG May 21, 2011 Matsumoto
www.robwaring.org
Sponsored by
Fluency vs. Fluent
A fluent speaker (reader, writer, listener) can process the language automatically, smoothly, and without much effort.Fluency (in ELT) often refers to the development of the skill to become fluent in it (i.e. fluency practice). This often done by:
- speed reading / writing activities- speed word / sentence recognition activities- using graded readers / graded listening materials- pronunciation repetition- etc.
Someone can be fluent but not accurateOur challenge is to help them become fluent and accurate
Fluent Reading = Extensive Reading
This is NOT EXTENSIVE READING
This is LANGUAGE STUDY READING
This is NOT EXTENSIVE READING
This is LANGUAGE STUDY READING
What’s the optimum vocabulary coverage for building fluency?
SlowReading speed
High
% of known vocabulary100%
LowComprehension
High
90% 98%
ReadingPain
(too hard, poor comprehension,
high effort,de-motivating)
Intensive reading
(Instructional level, can learn new words and grammar)
Speed reading practice
(very fast, fluent, high
comprehension, natural reading,
enjoyable)
Extensive reading
(fast, fluent, adequate
comprehension, enjoyable)
A Balanced CurriculumINPUT
ListeningReading
OUTPUTSpeakingWriting
LANGUAGE FOCUS(Study)(Intentional learning)(Explicit knowledge)
Using a dictionaryIntensive readingAsking the teacher‘Teaching’Phonics….
Productive testsSentence / gap fill Pronunciation practiceControlled speaking tasksSentence level writing….
FLUENCY FOCUS(Communication)(Incidental learning)(Implicit knowledge)
Graded ReadingExtensive listeningWatching movies and TVListening to songs
….
Chatting and discussionKeeping a diaryWriting poemsMaking a speech……
What do learners need to know to be ‘good’ at English?
Learners need 4000 word families (7-9000 to read native novels easily) and their inflections and common derivations / multiple meaning sensesAbout 3-40000 common phrasal verbs and idiomsCommon phrases, fixed and semi-fixedCollocations and colligationsRegister, pragmatics, discourse level awarenessPronunciationSome basic grammarSkills and strategiesEtc. Etc. etc.
How long will it take to learn this?
An average word family needs 30-50 meetings for it to be learnt receptively from reading (more for productive use)An average word’s meaning takes 10-15 meetings to learn from intentional studyIntentional vocab learning is 16 times faster than incidentalTo learn the collocations and ‘deeper’ aspects of language learning takes MUCH longer than learning the words alone.There’s little research into the rate learning of collocation, colligation or lexical phrases from readingWe know nothing at all about how long it takes to master a particular grammatical form e.g. a tense, the articles, comparatives
Which collocations?
Transparent ‘weak’ collocations – easy to learn – don’t teachBeautiful flower, look out of a window, read a book, play a game
Specialized collocations – teach only if neededInsolvency act, habeas corpus, spaghetti bolognese
Infrequent collocations – don’t bother teachingRancid butter, a glimmer of hope, circle of friends, by and large
Those that need attention–Highly frequent collocations (not too many of these)
make/do + noun –False friends weak tea, *thin tea; meet friends / *play with friends
Most collocations aren’t worth teaching individually
Collocations will always occur less frequently than the words that make them upIn the British National Corpus (100m words)
Strong occurs 213 times / 1m wordsWind occurs 73 times / 1m wordsStrong wind occurs 3.06 times / 1m words
The ‘difficult’ word compromise occurs 31 timesMost collocations aren’t worth teaching individually
How frequently do lexical phrases occur (BNC)?Raw Rank Word Per million
words177 out of 490222 per cent 382272 such as 321285 of course 309378 for example 238
1538 in front of 651725 all right 582159 as soon as 472491 in general 412970 in addition to 343307 next to 303755 on top of 264378 instead of 215409 in charge of 175987 just about 157396 provided that 117885 as good as 109125 with a view to 8
Raw Rank Word Per million words
11459 in between 613507 by and large 514369 at random 416684 per se 419505 old fashioned 322060 grown up 228441 matter of fact 243572 sq m 148241 fait accompli 151717 straight forward 158511 habeas corpus 174321 self-same 076170 haute cuisine 082928 a good deal 083882 laissez faire 088912 thank you 089371 persona non grata 0
How well are our courses presenting the language students need?
Research suggests a typical language courses:• do not systematically recycle the grammatical forms outside
the presentation unit / lesson• have an almost random vocabulary selection (mostly based
on topic) without much regard to frequency or usefulness • rarely, if ever, recycle taught words either later in the unit,
the book, or the series• provide little additional practice in review units or workbooks• ha an overwhelming focus on new material in each lesson
The number of words a learner will probably learn from course work plus graded readers
Probably known Partially Known Probably unknown
50+ 30-49 20-29 10-19 5-9 1-4 Total
Course book only 523 210 229 472 580 1,261 3,275
Data from Sequences, Foundations, Page Turners and Footprints by Heinle Cengage 225,000 60,800 570,000 174,000 (=1,029,000)
Add one reader a
week1,023 283 250 539 570 1,325 3,990
Add two readers a
week1,372 380 367 694 877 2,882 6,572
Uptake rates
When learning only from a course book over (3 years):Only 962 words will be learnt well (29.4%)A further 1,052 will be partially known (32.1% )1,261 words are likely to be forgotten (38.5%)
Adding one graded reader per week:1,556 words (40.0%) will be learnt well, plus 1,109 words
(27.8%) will be partially known and only 33.2% unknown.Adding two graded readers per week:
They will know 2,119 words well, plus partially know another 1,571 words
Notes:
40 function words (in, of, the, by etc.) accounted for 41.2% of the total words in the series
Typically one’s productive vocabulary is 20-25% of the receptive
Probably available
Partially available
Course book only 200 250
Add one reader / week 325 250
Add two readers / week 580 380
This does not include the learning of collocations, colligations, idioms, phrases, multiple meanings, lexical chunks, sentence heads… etc.
How many words do Japanese students meet in JH/ SH?
Types Tokens
Horizon 1, 2, 3 (Junior High) 1,124 9,440
Powwow I, II, Reading (Senior High) 2,857 27,221
Centre tests (680 types / 3000 tokens average per test) x 4
1,000 12,000
College Entrance tests (590 types / 1600 tokens average per test) x4
1,000 6,400
A total of approximately 55,000 running words will be met (not counting juku and self-study).A generous estimate is 100,000 words and about 3,500 types over 6 years.Listening input would be approximately 10% of this.
A linear structure to our syllabuses
• Each unit has something new• Little focus on the recycling of vocab, grammar and so on• The theory is “We’ve done that, they have learnt it, so we can move
on.” i.e. teaching causes learning
Unit 1
Be verb
Simple adjectives
Unit 2
Simple present
Daily routines
Unit 3
Present continuous
Sporting activities
Unit 4
can
Abilities
Unit 5
….
…..
What does this all imply?
A linear course structure • is focused on introducing new words and grammatical
features, not deepening knowledge of them• often leaves a lot to the forgetting curve • isn’t strong at building in repetitions of words and grammar
features for long-term acquisition to take place• is not focused on deepening and consolidating older
knowledge because the focus is always on new things
So what needs to happen?
We have to ensure our curriculums and courses:• build in some recycling and repetition of words and grammar
structures• give students chances to see how the grammar and
vocabulary are used together in real language• give students chances to deepen and consolidate the
language they learn in their course books (or they forget it)• allow students to develop their own ‘sense’ of how the
language works• give students chances to use language rather than just study
it
Course work and Graded Readers work together
Consolidating and deepening language knowledge
GRADED READING (Extensive Reading)
Unit 1
Be verb
Unit 2
Simple present
Unit 3
Present continuous
Unit 4
can
Unit 5
…. Introducing language
How are we going to teach what?
Discrete knowledge ‘Fuzzy’ knowledge
Individual wordsImportant lexical phrasesFalse friendsLoanwordsImportant collocations and colligationsBasic grammatical patternsImportant phrasal verbs, idioms etc.Word, phrase and sentence level awareness
Register, Genre …Pragmatic knowledgeRestrictions on useMost collocations and collocationsA ‘sense’ of a word’s meaning and useA ‘sense’ of how grammar fits with lexis - the tenses, articles etc.Discourse level awareness
Intentional learning Incidental learning
Selection issues – what do we teach?Sequence issues – in what order?
Scaffolding issues – how do we consolidate previous learning?
Presentation issues – what method?
Rough gradingEnsuring recycling
Engaging textMatching input text to intentionally
learnt materials
What do we know about ER?Beglar, Hunt and Kite (forthcoming): Learning from graded readers is better than reading ‘anything you like’ Nishizawa et al. (2010) found that the favourite ER materials for rugby players were fairy stories:- let learners decide/ They need to read 300,000 words before the benefits of ER kick in.
Claridge (2005)- patterns of use of structure, discourse markers, redundancy, collocations, and frequency rates are similar in original and graded versions of the same story.
Alshamrani (2003); and Allan, (2009) found GRs aided many aspects of language learning.
Wodinsky and Nation (1988) found that it’s not necessary to pre-learn the vocabulary at the new level if students read at the right level.
Do graded readers aid fluency?
Hafiz and Tudor (1990) found students reading GRs gained significantly in fluency and accuracy; GRs provide models assimilation of knowledge from linguistic input,
Iwahori (2008): ER improved fluency in a Japanese High School
Taguchi, et al. (2004): repeated readings lead to larger gains in vocabulary than reading once: Successful reading is almost impossible without good word decoding skills
Nation (2008) Speed reading practice gains transfer to normal reading
Some objections from teachers and schoolsNice idea but I have no time in my course.
-> If you don’t have graded reading where will the students get the massive exposure they need?
-> How else will they get the ‘sense of language’ they need?-> Where are they going to get the fluency practice?
We don’t have the money for this.-> Ask your schools to reallocate funds so this reading is done; ask
for donations; get some free samples etc.We have to go through our set curriculum.
-> Speak with your course designers to build in graded reading. Re-allocate resources and re-set class hours
We have to prepare the students for tests.-> Research shows students perform better on tests if they have a
general sense of language, than an incohesive‘bitty’ one.
Making them fluent
Give opportunities for fluency….
F ast and efficient reading and listening practiceL ink their practice to real tasks U nderstanding is primary E ncourage speed development work N urture confidence and motivation T ry extensive reading and listening
Finally…
You can review this presentation by downloading it from:www.robwaring.org/presentations/
More information about Graded Reading (Extensive Reading) at…www.extensivereading.net
The First Extensive Reading World Congress, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto. Sept 3-6, 2011
http://erfoundation.org/erwc1/
How much reading should they do?
About a book a week or more.Beginners - A book at week at their ability level• They can meet unknown words easily, so you don’t need to
read much.Intermediates - A book at week at your ability level• They don’t meet unknown words all the time, but your books
are thicker, so you are reading more.Advanced – 2 books at week at your ability level• They rarely meet unknown words, so you have to read more
to meet language you don’t know.
Language (Accuracy) FocusINPUT
ListeningReading
OUTPUTSpeakingWriting
LANGUAGE FOCUS(Study)(Intentional learning)(Explicit learning)
• meet new language (e.g. grammar, vocabulary, lexical patterns)
• notice the features of language points
• learn strategies for dealing with the language (e.g. dictionary skills, reading skills, metacognitive skills)
• create new hypotheses to test
(NB this knowledge stays
largely atomised, discrete and isolated)
• practice / assess new (and partially digested) language points in a controlled way to ensure it is well known and can be used accurately
• check if the form and function of the new language is known
• make connections between discretely learnt language points to more accurately express a communicative intent
• get feedback on accuracy
Fluency (Communication) FocusINPUT
ListeningReading
OUTPUTSpeakingWriting
FLUENCY FOCUS(Communication)(Incidental learning)
• build reading speed, listening fluency and word recognition automaticity
• notice connections between knowledge which was previously isolated and abstract
• meet massive amounts of comprehensible text to consolidate knowledge
• develop a ‘feel’ for the language
• learn to predict
• communicate more smoothly and with less anxiety, effort
• pull together abstract and isolated knowledge through an active constructive process
• learn to communicate by communicating
• get feedback on performance• experiment with language
knowledge to achieve successful communication
• prepare for communication outside the classroom