runberg v. victoria's secret - complaint

Upload: sarah-burstein

Post on 07-Aug-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    1/109

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

     ____________________________________:

    RUNBERG, INC. d/b/a ZEPHYRS, ::Plaintiff, :

    :v. :

    : ______ CIV. _______VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES, INC., :VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES LLC, :VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES :

    BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC., : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED VICTORIA’S SECRET DIRECT LLC, :LIMITED BRANDS, INC., and :SUPPLIER JOHN DOE 1, :

    :::

    Defendants. : ____________________________________:

    COMPLAINT

    PLAINTIFF RUNBERG, INC. D/B/A ZEPHYRS (“Zephyrs” or “the Plaintiff”), by its

    counsel the GIOCONDA LAW GROUP PLLC hereby complains and alleges against DEFENDANTS

    VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES, INC., VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES LLC, VICTORIA’S

    SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC., VICTORIA’S SECRET DIRECT LLC,

    LIMITED BRANDS, INC. (collectively, the “Victoria’s Secret Defendants”), and SUPPLIER

    JOHN DOE 1 (“Supplier John Doe 1”), as follows:

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    2/109

    2

    NATURE OF THE ACTION AND PATENTS-IN-SUIT

    1.  This lawsuit is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of

    the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq., seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive relief,

    monetary damages, attorneys’ fees and costs for the Defendants’ willful patent infringement in

    violation of U.S. Utility Patent No. RE45838E. This lawsuit also seeks damages for the

    Defendants’ willful patent infringement in violation of U.S. Utility Patent No. 8,216,021 B1 

    (attached hereto as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively) (hereinafter, “Zephyrs’ Patents”).

    2.  This lawsuit also seeks a Declaratory Judgment and Order directing the United

    States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) to correct the named inventorship of U.S. 

    Design Patent No. D655,476 S1 (the “VS Push Up Design Patent”, attached as Exhibit 3), to

    reflect that the proper inventor of the design depicted in the VS Push Up Design Patent is Debra

    MacKinnon, the principal of the Plaintiff. This lawsuit also seeks an Order transferring

    ownership of the VS Push Up Design Patent to the Plaintiff.

    3.  Furthermore, this lawsuit seeks a Declaratory Judgment and Order transferring

    ownership of registered Canadian Industrial Design Patent Reg. No. 136170 (attached hereto

    as Exhibit 4) (“the VS Canadian Push Up Design Patent”) to the Plaintiff.

    4.  Finally, this lawsuit seeks monetary damages from the Defendants disgorging the

    unjust enrichment that is a result of the erroneous inventorship complained of herein.

    PARTIES

    5.  PLAINTIFF RUNBERG, INC. D/B/A ZEPHYRS (“Zephyrs”) is a New York

    corporation having its principal place of business at 306 Jersey Avenue, Spring Lake NJ 07762.

    Debra MacKinnon has previously assigned all rights, title and interest to Zephyrs’ Patents to the

    Plaintiff.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    3/109

    3

    6.  Upon information and belief, DEFENDANT VICTORIA’S SECRET

    STORES, INC.  is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business located at Four

    Limited Parkway East, Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068.

    7.  Upon information and belief, DEFENDANT VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES

    LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business located at Four

    Limited Parkway East, Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068.

    8.  Upon information and belief , DEFENDANT VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES

    BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC. is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business

    located at Five Limited Parkway East, Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068.

    9.  Upon information and belief, DEFENDANT VICTORIA’S SECRET DIRECT

    LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business located at Four

    Limited Parkway East, Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068.

    10.  Upon information and belief, DEFENDANT LIMITED BRANDS, INC.  is a

    Delaware corporation with a principal place of business located at Three Limited Parkway,

    Columbus, Ohio 43230. Upon information and belief, Defendant Limited Brands, Inc. is directly

    and/or indirectly involved in managing the retail and online business of the other Victoria’s

    Secret Defendants.

    11.  Upon information and belief, DEFENDANT SUPPLIER JOHN DOE 1  is an

    unnamed, unidentified entity that actively supplies, manufactures and/or distributes the

    Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ Infringing Products, complained of herein.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 3 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    4/109

    4

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    12.  This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the

    United States, 35 U.S.C. § 271, §§ 1331 and 1338(a). This is also an action for correction of

     patent inventorship arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 256.

    13.  This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants as they have

    regularly transacted business in New York, regularly done or solicited business in New York,

    contracted to supply products in New York, derived substantial revenues from products sold and

    used in New York, and/or sold the infringing products in New York or offered the infringing

     products for sale in New York and in this Judicial District. Venue in this District is, therefore,

     proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1391(c).

    RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    Zephyrs and the Inventor’s Background

    14.  Debra MacKinnon, the principal of Zephyrs and the inventor (the “Inventor”) of

    the technology at issue here, has many years of experience in the fashion and accessory industry.

    15. 

    Zephyrs is a small, woman-owned company.

    16.  Zephyrs is a designer and supplier of high quality intimate apparel, including

    women’s lingerie, hosiery and fashion accessories such as the Kidney-Shaped Push Up Inserts at

    issue in this case.

    17.  While visiting the International Lingerie Show in Paris, France on January 24-27,

    2008, Ms. MacKinnon first independently conceived the idea of a Kidney Shaped Silicone Push

    Up Insert.

    18.  Ms. MacKinnon’s inventive concept was to develop a true anatomically correct

     push up insert to create lift and cleavage while maintaining a natural appearance underneath

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 4 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    5/109

    5

    clothing.

    19.  Ms. MacKinnon had discovered that there existed a commercial need for a soft

    shaping insert that is anatomically designed to conform and push up the breasts, thereby

    increasing volume and cleavage, while providing a natural shape.

    20.  Ms. MacKinnon thus invented a novel Kidney-Shaped Push Up Insert that would

    embody this unique invention (the “Invention”, see Figures 1 – 3 below):

    FIG. 1

    FIG. 2 

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 5 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    6/109

    6

    FIG. 3

    21.  At that time, the push up inserts sold in the retail marketplace were fairly generic,

    and were sold by many large retailers, such as Wal-Mart and Victoria’s Secret, at prices ranging

    from $20.00 to $58.00 per pair.

    22.  Ms. MacKinnon’s idea was to create a unique product to sell to Victoria’s Secret,

    with whom she already had an established working relationship and was supplying a wide

    variety of products.

    23.  Upon returning to the United States, at its own expense, Zephyrs commissioned

    the services of a sculptor to make a series of plaster molds, to create prototypes of the Kidney

    Shaped Push Up Inserts that she had invented.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 6 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    7/109

    7

    24.  Prototypes created from these molds were tested on various models by Zephyrs to

    determine where best to locate the volume and where to taper the edges.

    25.  Over the course of several months, Ms. MacKinnnon laboriously created more

    than twenty (20) iterations before finally arriving at the final prototype, each version of which

    further reduced the invention to practice.

    26.  The final plaster mold was dispatched by Zephyrs to Bridge Chip Company,

    Zephyrs’ Chinese supplier (“Bridge Chip”) in February 2008 to produce products made of ultra

    soft silicone.

    27. 

    On February 13, 2008, Bridge Chip informed Ms. MacKinnon that its factory

    would be closed for the Chinese New Year, and would not reopen until February 16, 2008.

    28.  Bridge Chip confirmed the earliest time that it could complete producing a sample

    would be February 27, 2008, which would have been too late to receive in time for Ms.

    MacKinnon’s planned meeting with the Victoria’s Secret Defendants in Columbus, Ohio on

    March 4, 2008.

    29. 

    On or about March 4, 2008, Ms. MacKinnon met in person with Ms. Heather

     Naughton and Ms. Laurie Jeannine Wirgler at Victoria’s Secret’s headquarters in Columbus,

    Ohio, and first presented foam mockups of Ms. MacKinnon’s Invention.

    30.  Ms. MacKinnon informed Ms. Naughton and Ms. Wirgler during the March 4,

    2008 meeting that prototypes were currently being developed, but that the factory was closed for

    the Chinese New Year, and that Zephyrs would later forward a finished rendition.

    31.  Ms. MacKinnon again described the concept of her invention in writing to

    Victoria’s Secret on June 11, 2008: “This is a true anatomically designed Push Up unlike other

     products in the market which create volume only.”

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 7 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    8/109

    8

    32.  Furthermore, Bridge Chip, Zephyrs’ Chinese factory experienced difficulty in

     producing the Kidney Shaped Push Up Inserts according to Zephyrs’ precise specifications, due

    to the nature of the silicone material that is poured into the molds.

    33.  Consequently, Zephyrs did not approve the final samples until July 2, 2008.

    34.  On July 18, 2008, Zephyrs wrote to Ms. Wirgler that Zephyrs had “sent [her] the

    only complete set of Engineered Push Ups and our original sample…”

    35.  Attached to that e-mail were files in .PDF form with details for the Engineered

    Push Ups.

    36. 

    On July 22, 2008, Ms. Wirgler responded in writing, thanking Zephyrs.

    37.  Zephyrs wrote to Victoria’s Secret on July 25, 2008, informing Victoria’s Secret

    that Zephyrs, through its own outside patent counsel, was preparing to file a provisional patent

    application, and that Zephyrs would be happy to offer Victoria’s Secret an exclusive license for

    the lifetime of the product: “We have already filed a provision patent application for this item.

    We would be happy to offer VS an exclusive domestic license for the lifetime of the product,

    however this would require a commitment to patent fees, development costs and minimum order

    quantities.”

    38.  Indeed, on behalf of Zephyrs, the law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery LLP

    (“McDermott”) filed a provisional utility patent application on the original shaping insert design

    on July 31, 2008.

    39.  Ms. MacKinnon wrote to Victoria’s Secret making absolutely clear: “The

    Engineered Push Up is an original concept created by Zephyrs.”

    40.  Zephyrs and Ms. MacKinnon have always owned the entire right and title to the

    Invention.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 8 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    9/109

    9

    41.  During all the in-person meetings with Ms. Wirgler and Ms. Naughton in

    Columbus, Ohio, Ms. MacKinnon continued to express her belief that the invention was entirely

    her own invention and intellectual property, and that Zephyrs was interested in offering an

    exclusive license to Victoria’s Secret for the commercial embodiment of the invention, not

     jointly owning any patents on her Invention.

    42.  Ms. MacKinnon also informed Victoria’s Secret that Zephyrs had already retained

    its own outside counsel (McDermott) to prosecute a utility patent application, and Zephyrs

     provided the provisional patent application to Victoria’s Secret.

    43. 

    Consequently, Victoria’s Secret participated in a meeting with its own in-house

    and New York patent counsel, and Zephyrs was required to produce all documents pertaining to

    Zephyrs’ independent development of the product, which Zephyrs did in good faith.

    44.  During the New York meeting with the Victoria’s Secret’s counsel, neither Ms.

     Naughton nor Ms. Wirgler were able to produce documents to Zephyrs or Victoria’s Secret’s

    Counsel demonstrating any input from these Victoria’s Secret employees to the Invention.

    45. 

    In good faith, Zephyrs shared copies of its pending provisional utility patent

    application with Victoria’s Secret’s Counsel at that time.

    46.  Victoria’s Secret’s Counsel appeared to elect not to pursue the matter further, and

    later, Victoria’s Secret placed significant purchase orders for supply of the product covered by

    the Invention.

    47.  With Victoria’s Secret’s approval and awareness, Zephyrs invested its own

    employees’ time and its own money in retaining outside counsel to protect Ms. MacKinnon’s

    Invention with a utility patent filed at its own substantial expense.

    48.  The Invention claimed in Zephyrs’ provisional utility patent application (and the

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 9 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    10/109

    10

    Invention that was later claimed in the ‘021 Patent) were entirely conceived and reduced to

     practice by Ms. MacKinnon as the only properly named Inventor.

    49.  This application was duly examined by the USPTO, which ultimately issued U.S.

    Patent No. 8,216,021 B1 on July 10, 2012 (the “’021 Patent”).

    50.  The ‘021 Patent was infringed by the Victoria’s Secret Defendants.

    51.  Subsequently, in 2013, the Plaintiff discovered errors in the language describing

    certain ratios depicted in the ‘021 Patent.

    52.  These errors were brought to the attention of the USPTO by the timely filing of a

    Reissue Application.

    53.  The Plaintiff incurred significant expenses and legal fees clarifying the claims of

    the ‘021 Patent.

    54.  Claims in the ‘021 Patent have now been clarified by the USPTO, and the ‘021

    Patent reissued as RE45838E on January 12, 2016.

    The Defendants’ Infringing Products

    55. 

    The specific identity of the Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ supplier is not yet

    known, but this unknown supplier represents yet another party who has infringed upon Zephyrs’

    Patents.

    56.  On information and belief, the Victoria’s Secret Defendants own and/or manage

    approximately 1,000 retail stores in all fifty states, through which they do substantial business.

    57.  Through the Victoria’s Secret print catalog and online distribution through

    VictoriasSecret.com, the Victoria’s Secret Defendants reach more than 390 million customers

    each year.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 10 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    11/109

    11

    58.  The infringing products are sold by the Victoria’s Secret Defendants under the

    Victoria’s Secret brand “STYLE SECRETS SHAPING INSERTS,” Item # SH-313-762 (Exhibit

    5):

    Victoria’s Secret “Style Secrets” Shaping InsertsPackaging

    (Front View)

    Victoria’s Secret “Style Secrets” Packaging(Reverse View)

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 11 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    12/109

    12

    FIG. 4

    59. 

    While the ‘021 Patent application was still pending before the USPTO, from

    September 30, 2011 to July 12, 2012, Zephyrs supplied tens of thousands of packages of the

    Kidney Shaped Push Up Inserts to the Victoria’s Secret Defendants.

    60.  The Victoria’s Secret Defendants sold these Kidney Shaped Push Up Inserts

    through their network of stores and on their website to consumers at $58.00 per package.

    61.  In August 2012, the Victoria’s Secret Defendants purported to “terminate” an

    agreement with Zephyrs based on disagreements.

    62.  Simultaneously, Zephyrs filed a federal lawsuit against the Victoria’s Secret

    Defendants.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 12 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    13/109

    13

    63.  That case was captioned  Runberg, Inc. d/b/a Zephyrs v. Victoria’s Secret Stores,

     Inc., et al., United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, Case

     No. 2:12-CV-722 (the “Prior Lawsuit”).

    64.  The Complaint in the Prior Lawsuit accused the Victoria’s Secret Defendants of

    intentionally breaching the parties’ agreement, by:

    a.  Committing false advertising by misleading consumers about the nature andquality of the hosiery products that they were offering for sale as those designedand previously supplied by Zephyrs, by falsely depicting Zephyrs’ products on the packaging, when they were accused of selling cheaper, lower quality “knockoffs”;

     b.  materially breaching the written Amended Master Sourcing agreement withZephyrs by, inter alia, directly contacting Zephyrs’ suppliers, and by unlawfullyusing Zephyrs’ proprietary information when doing so, in order to reduce oreliminate the volume of sales conducted through Zephyrs; and

    c.  delaying processing usual orders, until and unless Zephyrs acceded to a variety ofunreasonable demands. One particular demand included the parties entering intoa new agreement under which Zephyrs would be required to cede ownership of itsown proprietary information, patents and other intellectual property.

    65.  The Victoria’s Secret Defendants denied each of these allegations, and filed a

    Counterclaim against the Plaintiff alleging that Zephyrs had breached the same agreement.

    66.  In its Counterclaim, Victoria’s Secret alleged, inter alia, that the Plaintiff had

    failed to comply with its brand standards and cited various audits of Zephyrs’ facilities.

    67.  While the ‘021 Patent was not part of the Prior Lawsuit, during the course of

    communications in the Prior Lawsuit, Zephyrs became concerned that the Victoria’s Secret

    Defendants might later choose to infringe upon the Plaintiff’s valid and enforceable U.S. patent

    rights in the Invention.

    68.  Specifically, Zephyrs had become concerned that the Victoria’s Secret Defendants

    might later ask a new supplier to slavishly copy and effectively “knock off” the unique patented

    shaping inserts that she had previously supplied to them.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 13 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    14/109

    14

    69.  Consequently, even though the Victoria’s Secret Defendants were clearly already

    aware of the existence of the ‘021 Patent from prior communications, Zephyrs’ outside counsel

    again placed the Victoria’s Secret Defendants on formal notice of the Plaintiff’s concern about

    this prospect of patent infringement on September 12, 2012, by writing a formal letter to the

    Victoria Secret Defendants’ outside counsel, stating:

    To the extent that Victoria’s Secret apparently intends to sell third parties’ gel-

    shaping inserts, we would like to bring the attached U.S. Patent No. 8,216,021 owned

    by our client to your attention, to ensure that your clients do not infringe it directly

    or indirectly.

    70.  A hard copy of the ‘021 Patent was provided to the Victoria’s Secret Defendants’

    outside counsel at that time.

    71.  The Victoria’s Secret Defendants never responded to this assertion.

    72.  At no time have the Victoria’s Secret Defendants ever claimed that the ‘021

    Patent was invalid.

    73. 

    At no time have the Victoria’s Secret Defendants ever claimed that Zephyrs’

    Patents were invalid.

    74.  At no time have the Victoria’s Secret Defendants ever claimed that the ‘021

    Patent was unenforceable.

    75.  At no time have the Victoria’s Secret Defendants ever claimed that Zephyrs’

    Patents were unenforceable.

    76.  At no time have the Victoria’s Secret Defendants ever claimed that the ‘021

    Patent did not properly name Debra MacKinnon as the sole inventor.

    77.  At no have the Victoria’s Secret Defendants ever claimed that Zephyrs’ Patents

    did not properly name Debra MacKinnon as the sole inventor.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 14 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    15/109

    15

    78.  The Victoria’s Secret Defendants never sought or received any license, express or

    implied, to practice the ‘021 Patent from the Plaintiff.

    79.  The Victoria’s Secret Defendants never sought or received any license, express or

    implied, to practice any of Zephyrs’ Patents.

    80.  Subsequently, the parties to the Prior Lawsuit decided to dismiss their pending

    claims and counterclaims with prejudice.

    81.  At the time that the pending claims and counterclaims in the Prior Lawsuit were

    dismissed with prejudice, the parties made it clear to the Court and to one another that the mutual

    releases that were exchanged and the dismissal related solely to the breach of contract claims

    actually asserted in the Complaint and Counterclaim.

    82.  On the record before the District Court, the parties expressly reserved their rights

    with regard to any unasserted, potential future patent disputes that might arise between them.

    83.   Nonetheless, the Victoria’s Secret Defendants have apparently chosen to slavishly

    copy the Invention, without paying any royalty or receiving any express or implied licenses to

    the Zephyrs Patents.

    84.  The Kidney-Shaped Push Up Inserts are being sold by the Victoria’s Secret

    Defendants in the same packaging under their brand STYLE SECRETS, and for the same price

    to customers, in their stores and on their website.

    85.  The products currently being sold by the Victoria’s Secret Defendants are slavish

    copies, and infringe upon Zephyrs’ Patents.

    86.  Below are comparisons between the figures included in Zephyrs’ Patents, and the

    Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ Kidney-Shaped Push Up Inserts:

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 15 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    16/109

    16

    Figure 3 from U.S. Patent No. RE45838E(Main Surface)

    Victoria’s Secret’s Kidney-Shaped Push UpInsert (Main Surface)

    Figure 6 from U.S. Patent No. RE45838E(Isometric Reverse View)

    Victoria’s Secret’s Kidney-Shaped Push UpInsert (Isometric Reverse View)

    Figure 18 from U.S. Patent No. RE45838E Victoria’s Secret’s Kidney-Shaped Push UpInsert

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 16 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    17/109

    17

    Damages to Zephyrs from the Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ Conduct

    87.  The Victoria’s Secret Defendants have sold, and continue to sell, the infringing

    Kidney Shaped Push Up Inserts to consumers for $58.00 at retail. See Exhibit 5. 

    88.  Furthermore, on information and belief, Supplier John Doe 1, the Victoria’s

    Secret Defendants’ unknown supplier, is manufacturing, distributing and selling the infringing

    Kidney Shaped Push Up Inserts.

    89.   No royalties whatsoever have been paid to the Plaintiff or the Inventor for these

     profitable sales, thus unjustly and unlawfully enriching the Defendants at the Plaintiff’s expense.

    The Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ Willfulness

    90.  Upon information and belief, all the Defendants have attempted to unlawfully

    increase their profits by, inter alia, infringing upon Zephyrs’ Patents without paying any royalty

    or receiving any express or implied license from the Plaintiff.

    91.  Furthermore, the Victoria’s Secret’s Defendants have profited unlawfully by

    erroneously claiming ownership of the Plaintiff’s Invention in the Kidney Shaped Push Up

    Inserts.

    Erroneous Inventorship Claimed In the U.S. Design Patent

    92.  The Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ law firm filed a design patent application with

    the USPTO on March 31, 2010, namely U.S. Design Patent Application No. US 29/349,417.

    93.  The VS Push Up Design Patent erroneously named Laurie Jeannine Wirgler and

    Heather Naughton, the two Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ employees to whom Ms. MacKinnon

    had disclosed the Invention, as the inventors.

    94.  On information and belief, Laurie Jeannine Wirgler and Heather Naughton

    assigned the VS Push Up Design Patent to Defendant Victoria’s Secret Brand Management, Inc.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 17 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    18/109

    18

    95.  The VS Push Up Design Patent application erroneously omitted Debra

    MacKinnon as the inventor.

    96.  Instead, VS’ Push Up Design Patent application erroneously named Laurie

    Jeannine Wirgler and Heather Naughton as inventors. See Exhibit 3. 

    Erroneous Inventorship Claimed In the Defendants’ Canadian Patent

    97.  Furthermore, on or about June 30, 2010, the Victoria’s Secret Defendants’

    correspondent law firm filed a formal industrial design application with the Canadian Patent

    Office, which became Canadian Patent Registration No. 136170 on or about January 27, 2011.

    98. 

    The VS Canadian Push-Up Design Patent application erroneously omitted Debra

    MacKinnon as the inventor.

    99.  The VS Canadian Push-Up Design Patent application erroneously named Laurie

    Jeannine Wirgler and Heather Naughton as the only inventors. See Exhibit 4. 

    FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

    (AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS)

    INFRINGEMENT OF ZEPHYRS’ RE45838E PATENT

    IN VIOLATION OF 35 U.S.C. § 271

    100.  The Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs

    1 to 99 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.

    101.  Upon information and belief, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271, the Defendants are

    and have been directly infringing, contributing to the infringement of, and/or inducing others to

    infringe Zephyrs’ RE45838E  Patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell in the

    United States, or importing into the United States, products or processes that practice the

    inventions claimed in the RE45838E Patent.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 18 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    19/109

    19

    102.  As a result of the Defendants’ unlawful infringement of the RE45838E Patent, the

    Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer damages.

    103.  The Plaintiff is entitled to recover from the Defendants the damages suffered by it

    as a result of their unlawful acts.

    104.  On information and belief, the Defendants intend to continue their unlawful

    infringing activities, and the Plaintiff continues to and will continue to suffer irreparable harm -

    for which there is no adequate remedy at law - from such unlawful infringing activities unless

    this Court enjoins the Defendants from further infringing activities.

    SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

    (AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS)

    PAST INFRINGEMENT OF ZEPHYRS’ U.S. PATENT 8,216,021 B1

    IN VIOLATION OF 35 U.S.C. § 271

    105.  The Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs

    1 to 104 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.

    106.  Upon information and belief, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271, the Defendants

    directly infringed, contributing to the infringement of, and/or induced others to infringe Zephyrs’

    U.S. Patent 8,216,021 by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell in the United States, or

    importing into the United States, products or processes that practice the inventions claimed in the

    ‘021 Patent.

    107.  As a result of the Defendants’ unlawful infringement of the ‘021 Patent, the

    Plaintiff has suffered damages.

    108.  The Plaintiff is entitled to recover from the Defendants the damages suffered by it

    as a result of their unlawful acts.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 19 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    20/109

    20

    THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    CORRECTION OF INVENTORSHIP OF

    U.S. DESIGN PATENT D655,476 S1

    PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 256

    (AGAINST DEFENDANT

    VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.)

    109.  The Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs

    1 to 108 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.

    110.  As described herein, U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1 erroneously lists

    Heather Naughton and Laura Jeannine Wirgler, and not Debra MacKinnon, as inventors.

    111. 

    Debra MacKinnon is the only proper inventor that should have been named as the

    rightful inventor of U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1.

    112.  On information and belief, on or about March 31, 2010, Heather Naughton

    executed a written assignment, purporting to assign all right, title and interest to U.S. Design

    Patent No. D655,476 S1 to Defendant Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management.

    113.  On information and belief, on or about April 30, 2010, Laura Jeannine Wirgler

    executed a written assignment, purporting to assign all right, title and interest in U.S. Design

    Patent No. D655,476 S1 to Defendant Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.

    114.  On information and belief, on or about June 21, 2010, Defendant Victoria’s Secret

    Stores Brand Management, Inc.’s correspondent, Ward & Olivo, 382 Springfield Avenue,

    Summit NJ 07901, filed both such Assignments with the USPTO 

    115. 

    For all the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiff seeks a Certificate, pursuant to 35

    U.S.C. § 256, to correct the inventorship of U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1 to reflect that

    Debra MacKinnon is the only rightful inventor.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 20 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    21/109

    21

    FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF PATENT ASSIGNMENTS OF

    U.S. DESIGN PATENT D655,476 S1 UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a)

    (AGAINST DEFENDANTVICTORIA’S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.)

    116.  The Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs

    1 to 115 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.

    117.  As described herein, U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1 erroneously lists

    Heather Naughton and Laura Jeannine Wirgler, and not Debra MacKinnon, as the only inventors.

    118. 

    Debra MacKinnon is the only inventor that should have been named as the

    rightful inventor of U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1.

    119.  On information and belief, on or about March 31, 2010, Heather Naughton

    executed a written assignment, purporting to assign all right, title and interest in U.S. Design

    Patent No. D655,476 S1 to Defendant Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management.

    120.  On information and belief, on or about April 30, 2010, Laura Jeannine Wirgler

    executed a written assignment, purporting to assign all right, title and interest in U.S. Design

    Patent No. D655,476 S1 to Defendant Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.

    121.  On information and belief, on or about June 21, 2010, Defendant Victoria’s Secret

    Stores Brand Management, Inc.’s correspondent, Ward & Olivo, 382 Springfield Avenue,

    Summit NJ 07901, filed both such Assignments with the USPTO 

    122.  For all the foregoing reasons, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a), the Plaintiff seeks

    a Declaratory Judgment that these assignments executed by the named inventors and filed with

    the USPTO were invalid ab initio.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 21 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    22/109

    22

    FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF OWNERSHIP OF

    U.S. DESIGN PATENT D655,476 S1 UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a)

    (AGAINST DEFENDANTVICTORIA’S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.)

    123.  The Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs

    1 to 122 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.

    124.  For all the foregoing reasons, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a), the Plaintiff seeks

    a Declaratory Judgment that it is the only rightful owner of U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1.

    SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

    UNLAWFUL CONVERSION UNDER NEW YORK LAW

    (AGAINST THE VICTORIA’S SECRET DEFENDANTS)

    125.  The Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs

    1 to 124 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.

    126.  The conduct of the Victoria’s Secret Defendants as alleged herein violates the

     New York common law against conversion, the unlawful exercise of ownership over the tangible

     property of the Plaintiff, a New York corporation.

    127.  U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1 is a tangible manifestation of the intellectual

     property rightfully belonging to the Plaintiff.

    128.  U.S. Canadian Design Patent No. 136170 is a tangible manifestation of the

    intellectual property rightfully belonging to the Plaintiff.

    129.  As a result of the Defendants’ unlawful conduct as complained of herein, the

    Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer damages.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 22 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    23/109

    23

    130.  The Plaintiff is entitled to recover from the Defendants the damages suffered by it

    as a result of their unlawful acts.

    131.  On information and belief, the Defendants intend to continue their unlawful

    infringing activities, and the Plaintiff continues to and will continue to suffer irreparable harm -

    for which there is no adequate remedy at law - from such unlawful infringing activities unless

    this Court enjoins the Defendants from further infringing activities.

    SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

    UNJUST ENRICHMENT UNDER NEW YORK LAW

    (AGAINST THE VICTORIA’S SECRET DEFENDANTS)

    132.  The Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs

    1 to 131 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.

    133.  As a result of the Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ unlawful conduct as complained

    of herein, the Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer damages.

    134.  The Plaintiff is entitled to recover from the Victoria’s Secret Defendants the

    damages suffered by it as a result of their unlawful acts.

    135.  On information and belief, the Victoria’s Secret Defendants intend to continue

    their unlawful infringing activities, and the Plaintiff continues to and will continue to suffer

    irreparable harm - for which there is no adequate remedy at law - from such unlawful infringing

    activities unless this Court enjoins the Victoria’s Secret Defendants from further infringing

    activities.

    136.  The Victoria’s Secret Defendants have benefitted at the Plaintiff’s expense, by the

    conduct complained of herein.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 23 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    24/109

    24

    137.  Equity and good conscience require restitution from the Victoria’s Secret

    Defendants to the Plaintiff.

    138.  Therefore, the Plaintiff seeks disgorgement of the Victoria’s Secret Defendants’

     profits attributable to the sale of all products claimed by U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1.

    139.  The Plaintiff also seeks disgorgement of the Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ profits

    attributable to the sale of all products claimed by Canadian Design Patent Reg. No. 136170.

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays for the following relief:

    a. 

    That the Defendants be declared to have infringed, induced others to infringe

    and/or committed acts of contributory infringement with respect to the claims of

    Zephyrs’ Patents as alleged above;

     b.  That the Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, and all those

     persons acting or attempting to act in active concert or in participation with them

    or acting on their behalf be immediately, preliminarily and permanently enjoined

    from further infringement of Zephyrs’ RE45838E Patent;

    c.  That the Defendants be ordered to account for and pay to Plaintiff all damages

    caused to it by reason of their infringement of Zephyrs’ Patents pursuant to 35

    U.S.C. § 284;

    d.  That the Defendants be ordered to pay treble damages for willful infringement of

    Zephyrs’ Patents pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;

    e.  That the inventorship of U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1 be ordered to be

    corrected to reflect Debra MacKinnon as the sole rightful inventor;

    f.  That U.S. Design Patent No. D655,476 S1 be ordered to be transferred to the

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 24 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    25/109

    25

    Plaintiff and ownership declared in its favor under 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a);

    g.  That Canadian Registration No. 136170 be ordered to be transferred to the

    Plaintiff and ownership declared in its favor;

    h.  That all unlawful profits attributable to the Victoria’s Secret Defendants’ acts of

    unjust enrichment be disgorged and paid to the Plaintiff;

    i.  That this case be declared exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and that Plaintiff be

    awarded its attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs incurred in this action;

     j.  That Plaintiff be granted pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the damages

    caused to it by reason of the Defendants’ infringement of the patents-in-suit;

    k.  That the Defendants be ordered to pay all costs associated with this action; and

    l.  That the Plaintiff be granted such other and additional relief as the Court deems

     just and proper.

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 25 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    26/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 26 of 26

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    27/109

     

    EXHIBIT 1

    UNITED STATES

    REISSUED PATENT

    RE 45,838 E

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    28/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    29/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 3 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    30/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 4 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    31/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 5 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    32/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 6 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    33/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 7 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    34/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 8 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    35/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 9 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    36/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 10 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    37/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 11 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    38/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 12 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    39/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 13 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    40/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 14 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    41/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 15 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    42/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 16 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    43/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 17 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    44/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 18 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    45/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 19 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    46/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 20 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    47/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 21 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    48/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 22 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    49/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 23 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    50/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 24 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    51/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 25 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    52/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 26 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    53/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 27 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    54/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-1 Filed 01/25/16 Page 28 of 28

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    55/109

     

    EXHIBIT 2

    UNITED STATES

    PATENT

    US 8,216,021 B1

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    56/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    57/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 3 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    58/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 4 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    59/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 5 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    60/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 6 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    61/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 7 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    62/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 8 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    63/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 9 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    64/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 10 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    65/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 11 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    66/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 12 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    67/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 13 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    68/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 14 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    69/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 15 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    70/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 16 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    71/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 17 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    72/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 18 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    73/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 19 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    74/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 20 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    75/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 21 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    76/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 22 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    77/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 23 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    78/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 24 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    79/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 25 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    80/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 26 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    81/109

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-2 Filed 01/25/16 Page 27 of 27

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    82/109

     

    EXHIBIT 3

    UNITED STATES

    PATENT

    US D655,476 S

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    83/109

      1 2 ) United

    States

    Design Patent 1 0 )

    P a t e n t N 0 . :

    Naughton

    t

    a l .

    USO0D655476S

    US

    D 6 5 5 , 4 7 6

    S

    4 5 )

    Date o f P a t e n t : * 1 ,

    Mar. 1 3 ,

    2012

    5 4 )

    7 5 )

    7 3 )

    * * )

    2 1 )

    2 2 )

    5 1 )

    5 2 )

    5 8 )

    5 6 )

    PAIR

    OF PUSH-UP

    BRA

    PADS

    I n v e n t o r s : H e a t h e r N a u g h t o n , C o l u m b u s , OH

    U S ) ;

    Laura

    J e a n n i n e

    W i r g l e r ,

    A r d m o r e , PA U

    )

    A s s i g n e e : V i c t or i a ’ s S e c r e t S t o r e s Brand

    M a n a g e m e n t , I n c . , R e y n o l d s b u r g ,

    OH

    U s )

    Term: 14 Years

    A p p l .

    N o . :

    2 9 / 3 4 9 , 4 1 7

    F i l e d :

    Mar.

    3 1 , 2010

    LOC 9) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    02-01

    US. l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    .

    D2/706

    Field of

    Classi?cation Search

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D2/700,

    D 2 / 7 0 1 ,

    7 0 3 , 7 0 6 , 7 0 7 , 7 0 8 , 7 0 9 , 7 1 8 , 7 2 0 ,

    D 2 / 7 2 1 , 7 2 3 , 7 3 1 , 7 3 7 , 7 3 8 ,

    8 5 3 , 8 5 7 , 8 6 0 ,

    D 2 / 8 6 3 , 8 6 4 ,

    9 9 9 ;

    2 / 6 7 ,

    6 9 ,

    1 0 9 , 1 1 3 , 1 1 4 ,

    2 / 2 4 4 , 2 4 7 ,

    2 4 8 ,

    2 4 9 , 2 5 0 , 2 5 1 , 2 5 2 , 2 5 3 ,

    2 / 2 5 4 ,

    2 6 7 ;

    4 5 0 / 1 , 5 4 , 5 5 , 5 6 , 5 7 , 6 5 , 8 9 ;

    6 0 2 / 6 7 ;

    6 0 4 / 3 0 4 ,

    3 8 5 . 1 4 , 3 8 6 , 3 8 8

    S e e

    a p p l i c a t i o n

    ? l e f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h

    h i s t o r y .

    References Cited

    U . S .

    PATENT DOCUMENTS

    1 6 2,86 9 A

    5/1875 Tallman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . 450/57

    D35,666

    S

    *

    2/1902

    Wade

    D2/706

    2,061,402

    A 1 1 /1 936 Hollar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . 450/53

    2 , 3 4 2 , 0 7 6

    A

    2 / 1 9 4 6 H e r b e n e r

    2,578,954 A 12/1951

    Van

    Leuven, J r .

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450/49

    2 , 6 6 4 , 5 7 1

    A

    1 / 1 9 5 4

    Kempel

    2,793,369 A 5/1957

    Panighini . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . 450/53

    2 , 8 3 4 , 3 5 2

    A 5 / 1 9 5 8 U l l i a n

    2,843,130

    A 7/1958 Block

    t

    a 1 .

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    450/34

    3,384,091 A 5/1968 Block . . . . . . 450/54

    3,399,678 A 9/1968 Faron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450/55

    3 , 4 9 4 , 3 6 5

    A

    2 / 1 9 7 0 B e a l s

    3 , 6 2 0 , 2 2 2

    A

    1 1 / 1 9 7 1

    B l o c k

    D234,445 S * 3/1 975 Greenblatt

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    .. D2/706

    4 , 8 1 6 , 0 0 4

    A

    3 / 1 9 8 9

    Emanuel

    4 , 9 9 2 , 0 7 4

    A

    2 / 1 9 9 1 D i a Z

    5,050,595 A

    9/1 991

    Krafft

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 607/108

    5,098,330 A 3/ 19 9 2

    Greenberg

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . 450/55

    5 , 3 3 4 , 0 8 2

    A

    8 / 1 9 9 4

    B a r k e r

    5 , 3 4 0 , 3 5 2

    A

    8 / 1 9 9 4 N a k a n i s h i e t a 1 .

    5 , 6 9 3 , 1 6 4 A 1 2 / 1 9 9 7 Chang

    D400,337

    S

    * 11/1998

    Snyder,

    J r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D2/70 1

    6 , 1 0 1 , 6 3 0

    A

    8 / 2 0 0 0 Lee

    6 , 2 2 4 , 4 5 8

    B1

    5 / 2 0 0 1

    Chen

    6 , 2 8 3 , 8 2 0

    B1

    9 / 2 0 0 1

    Huang

    6,361,398

    B1* 3/2002

    Knapp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . 450/37

    6 , 3 6 8 , 1 7 9

    B1 4 / 2 0 0 2

    Kang

    6 , 4 0 2 , 5 8 5

    B1 6 / 2 0 0 2

    G a t t o

    e t

    a 1 .

    D 4 6 2 , 1 5 3

    S 9 / 2 0 0 2

    Nadsady

    t

    a 1 .

    6 , 4 4 3 , 8 0 6 B1 9 / 2 0 0 2

    F a n g

    6 , 5 4 4 , 1 0 0

    B1

    4 / 2 0 0 3 Nadsady t a 1 .

    7,001,241

    B2

    2/2006 Gorringe e t a 1 .

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    450/81

    2010/0029176

    A1

    2/2010 Chen et a 1 .

    . . . . . . .

    . . . .

    2 0 1 0/0 180358 A1* 7/2010 Drummond

    t

    a 1 .

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/67

    * c i t e d by examiner

    Primary Exa miner aren E ldridge

    Powers

    7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , o r Firm ard i n n a ,

    LLC

    5 7 )

    CLAIM

    The o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r a p a i r

    o f

    p u s h - u p

    b r a

    p a d s , a s

    shown and d e s c r i b e d .

    DESCRIPTION

    F I G .

    1

    i s a p e r s p e c t i v e f r o n t view t a k e n from a t o p l e f t s i d e

    of

    a

    p u s h - u p

    b r a p a d ;

    F I G . 2 i s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n view t h e r e o f ;

    F I G .

    3

    i s

    a r i g h t s i d e e l e v a t i o n v i e w t h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 4 i s a l e f t s i d e e l e v a t i o n view t h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 5

    i s a t o p p l a n v i e w t h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 6

    i s

    a

    bottom p l a n view

    t h e r e o f ;

    FIG. 7

    s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n view t h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 8 i s

    a p e r s p e c t iv e f r o n t

    v i e w t a k e n

    from h e t o p r i g h t

    s i d e

    t h e r e o f ; a n d ,

    F I G . 9 i s a

    f r o n t view

    o f two p u s h - u p

    b r a p a d s ,

    w h e r e i n

    t h e

    one

    on

    t h e

    r i g h t

    b r e a s t

    o f

    t h e

    w e a r e r

    i s

    t h e

    p u s h - u p

    b r a

    pad

    shown i n FIGS. 1 - 8 ,

    and

    t h e one

    on

    t h e l e f t b r e a s t of t h e

    w e a r e r

    b e i n g a m i r r o r image t h e r e o f .

    The l o n g - s h o r t - l o n g b r o k e n l i n e s i n t h e d r a w i n g s d e ? n e t h e

    bounds o f

    t h e

    c l a i m e d d e s i g n and form no p a r t t h e r e o f . The

    p a r t i a l

    human ? g u r e shown n

    b r o k e n

    l i n e s i n

    F I G .

    9

    i l l u s

    t r a t e s

    t h e e n v i r o n m e n t

    i n

    which h e

    d e s i g n i s u s e d

    and f o r m s

    no p a r t

    o f

    t h e c l a i m e d d e s i g n .

    The

    s t i p p l i n g

    shown

    i n

    t h e

    d r a w i n g s

    r e p r e s e n t s s h a d i n g

    o f

    h e p u s h - u p b r a

    p a d .

    1 C l a i m ,

    9 Drawing

    S h e e t s

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    84/109

    US. Patent

    M a r . 1 3 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 1

    o f 9

    US D655,476

    S

    1

    I G

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 3 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    85/109

    U

    . Patent M a r . 1 3 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 2 o f 9

    US D655,476

    S

    F I G

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 4 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    86/109

    US. Patent

    M a r .

    1 3 ,

    2 0 1 2

    S h e e t

    3

    o f 9

    US D655,476 S

    F I G . 3

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 5 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    87/109

    US. Patent

    M a r . 1 3 , 2 0 1 2

    S h e e t 4 o f 9

    US D655,476

    S

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 6 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    88/109

    US. Patent

    M a r . 1 3 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 5

    o f 9

    US D655,476

    S

    F I G . 5

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 7 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    89/109

    US. Patent

    M a r .

    1 3 ,

    2 0 1 2

    S h e e t

    6

    o f 9

    US D655,476 S

    F I G .

    6

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 8 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    90/109

    US. Patent

    M a r . 1 3 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t

    7 o f 9

    US D655,476

    S

    F I G . 7

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 9 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    91/109

    U

    . Patent M a r . 1 3 , 2 0 1 2 S h e e t 8 o f 9

    US D655,476

    S

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 10 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    92/109

    US. Patent

    M a r .

    1 3 ,

    2 0 1 2

    S h e e t

    9

    o f 9

    US D655,476 S

    9

    I G .

    I

    I

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-3 Filed 01/25/16 Page 11 of 11

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    93/109

     

    EXHIBIT 4

    CANADIAN

    INDUSTRIAL DESIGN

    REGISTRATION

    136170

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    94/109

    Details

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canad

    is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources.

    Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information.

    Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility

    requirements.

    Registration number : 136170

    Date of Registration :

    2011-01-27

    Status :

    Registered

    Title: PUSH-UP BRA PAD

    Canadian Classification:

    006-01-Miscellaneous Apparel

    006-09-Clothing Accessories and Fastening Devices

    Other Classes Searched:

    006-02-01-Brassieres

    013-04-03-Bandages, Surgical Pads, Electrode Pads, Adhesive Plasters, Surgical Dressings and Holders

    Therefor

    Description:

    The design consists of the features of shape, ornament, pattern and configuration of the PUSH-UP BRA PAD

    shown in Figure 1 to 9 of the drawings. The portions shown in stippled lines do not form part of the design.

    FIGURE 1 is a perspective left view of the push-up bra pad; FIGURE 2 is a front view of the push-up bra pa

    FIGURE 3 is a rear view of the push-up bra pad; FIGURE 4 is a right side view of the push-up bra pad;

    FIGURE 5 is a left side view of the push-up bra pad; FIGURE 6 is a top view of the push-up bra pad;

    FIGURE 7 is a bottom view of the push-up bra pad; FIGURE 8 is a perspective right view of the push-up bra

    pad, and FIGURE 9 is a front view of the push-up bra pad, the stippled lines representing environment.

    Interested Parties

    Applicant(s) as Filed:

    VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.

    Registered Proprietor(s):

    VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.

    4 LIMITED PKY

    Details

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 12

    http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#applicationorregistrationhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291e.html#statushttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#otherclasseshttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#descriptionhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#interestedpartieshttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#registeredproprietorhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#registeredproprietorhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#applicantshttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#interestedpartieshttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#descriptionhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#otherclasseshttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#classificationcodehttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#titlehttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291e.html#statushttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#dateofregistrationhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#applicationorregistration

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    95/109

    REYNOLDSBURG, 43068

    OHIO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    Current Owner(s):

    VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.4 LIMITED PKY

    REYNOLDSBURG, 43068

    OHIO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    Client Reference Number:

    18414I0026CA01

    Representative for Service:

    SHAPIRO COHEN

    P.O. BOX 13002

    KANATA, K2K 0E2

    ONTARIO, CANADA

    Agent:

    SHAPIRO COHEN

    P.O. BOX 13002

    KANATA, K2K 0E2

    ONTARIO, CANADA

    Term of Protection: 10 years, subject to payment of a maintenance fee.

    Maintenance Fee Paid:

    Yes

    Filing Date:2010-06-30

    Correction(s):

    No

    Convention Priority Claim(s):

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 3 of 12

    http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#representativeforservicehttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#conventionpriorityhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#correctionhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#filingdatehttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#maintenancefeepaidhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#termofprotectionhttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#agenthttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#representativeforservicehttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#clientreferencehttp://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr00291.html#currentowner

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    96/109

    Country Filing Date Application No.

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2010-03-31 29/349,417

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 4 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    97/109

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 5 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    98/109

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 6 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    99/109

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 7 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    100/109

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 8 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    101/109

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 9 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    102/109

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 10 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    103/109

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer 1

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 11 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    104/109

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer 1

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-4 Filed 01/25/16 Page 12 of 12

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    105/109

     

    EXHIBIT 5

    VICTORIA’S SECRET

    WEBSITE PRINTOUT

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-5 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 5

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    106/109

    $58.00  In Stock

    USD  Ship To Search

    Ratings & Reviews

    VS  / Bras  / Strapless & Multi-Way  / Shaping Inserts

    3.7 3 Reviews 

    Write a Review

    S T Y L E S E C R E T S

    Shaping Inserts

    Color Clear

    Quantity

    A D D T O B A G

    $58.00 SH-3

     0

    DescriptionMaximize swell and cleavage with a new and improved design. Comes wit

    silicone enhancers: one adds up to a full cup size for enhanced cleavage;

    adds a demi cup for everyday enhancement. Imported polyurethane.

    Click Image to Enlarge

      i i0LikeLike

    100% of reviewers recommend this product

    Overall Rating Based on 3 Reviews

    3.7 out of 5 Stars

    We want to hear from you!Tell us what you think about this item. It helps us get better at what we do, and ultimately provide you with better products.

    W R I T E A R E V I E W

     

    B R A S P A N T I E S L I N G E R I E S L E E P B E A U T Y S W I M S P O R T C L O T H I N G T H E S E M I - A N N U A L S

    0Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-5 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 5

    https://www.victoriassecret.com/https://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267651950203https://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267651950203https://www.victoriassecret.com/commerce2/checkouthttps://www.victoriassecret.com/lovelist/viewhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/secureoverlay/wrapper/medium/account/signin/overlay/showhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/angel-cardhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267651950203https://www.victoriassecret.com/pinkhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/https://www.victoriassecret.com/salehttps://www.victoriassecret.com/clothinghttps://www.victoriassecret.com/victorias-secret-sporthttps://www.victoriassecret.com/swimwearhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/beautyhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/sleepwearhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/lingeriehttps://www.victoriassecret.com/pantieshttps://www.victoriassecret.com/brashttps://www.victoriassecret.com/writeReviewOverlay?productID=160251https://www.victoriassecret.com/bras/strapless-and-multi-way/shaping-inserts-style-secrets?ProductID=160251&CatalogueType=OLS#enlargehttps://www.victoriassecret.com/writeReviewOverlay?productID=160251https://www.victoriassecret.com/bras/strapless-and-multi-way/shaping-inserts-style-secrets?ProductID=160251&CatalogueType=OLS#reviewshttps://www.victoriassecret.com/bras/strapless-and-multi-way/shaping-inserts-style-secrets?ProductID=160251&CatalogueType=OLShttps://www.victoriassecret.com/bras/strapless-and-multi-wayhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/brashttps://www.victoriassecret.com/https://www.victoriassecret.com/https://www.victoriassecret.com/gfoc/overlayhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/gfoc/overlay

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    107/109

    Filter Overall Rating  Age  Sort by

    Was this review helpful?   5 0 Report Inappropriate Review

    Age

    From

    Overall Rating

    Fit Rating: Slightly Large

    FIRECRACKER

    25-34

    Anchorage, AK

    Was this review helpful?   0 0 Report Inappropriate Review

    From

    Overall Rating

    Fit Rating: Runs Large

    KATENGUYEN

    Orlando,Fl

    Was this review helpful?   2 0 Report Inappropriate Review

    Age

    From

    Overall Rating

    KPLEASANTLYSURPRISED2

    45-54

    Dayton,OH

    Pretty big for petite chests

    October 14, 2015

    These are good quality inserts that seem like they will last for a long time if they are

    taken care of. I wear 32A; the smaller of the two inserts was plenty for me. I'm not sure

    I will ever wear the larger of the two. It would be sticking out of my bra!

    I recommend this!

    Veri!ed Purchaser

    Does the job

    September 30, 2015

    Its actualy a bit long in length and is not tucked completely under an A cup size bra.

    There are two pairs and I think the smaller of the two worked better for smaller cupsize.

    I recommend this!

    Veri!ed Purchaser

    They Really Work

    September 12, 2015

    I didn't expect them to help my shape, but they were surprisingly hidden and gave me

    the look I was going for.

    I recommend this!

    Veri!ed Purchaser

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-5 Filed 01/25/16 Page 3 of 5

    https://www.victoriassecret.com/bras/strapless-and-multi-way/shaping-inserts-style-secrets?ProductID=160251&CatalogueType=OLS#https://www.victoriassecret.com/bras/strapless-and-multi-way/shaping-inserts-style-secrets?ProductID=160251&CatalogueType=OLS#

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    108/109

    H E L P

    Customer Service

    Live Chat

    1.800.411.5116

    A C C O U N T

    Your Account

    Order Status

    Love List

    S U B S C R I B E

    Emails

    Catalogues

    Store O"ers & Events

    V S A P P S

    iPhone

    iPad

    Android

    A N G E L C A R D

    Manage Your Card

    Card Bene!ts

    Apply Now

    E M A I L S I G N U P C O N N E C T W I T H V S

    DETAILSF R E E S H I P 1 0 0 DETAILSL O V E B R A S

    DETAILSL O V E B R A S DETAILSL O V E B R A S

    DETAILSU G G S H I P N O C O D E R E Q U I R E D

    Get special o"ers & more!

    Shop Gift Cards Find a Store Shop Catalogues 

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-5 Filed 01/25/16 Page 4 of 5

    https://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267651950203https://www.victoriassecret.com/bras/shop-all-brashttps://www.victoriassecret.com/vsallaccesshttps://instagram.com/victoriassecrethttps://pinterest.com/victoriassecrethttps://www.youtube.com/victoriassecrethttps://twitter.com/victoriassecrethttps://www.facebook.com/victoriassecrethttps://www.victoriassecret.com/catalogue/https://www.victoriassecret.com/store-locatorhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/gifts/gift-cardshttp://window.open%28%27https//c.comenity.net/victoriassecret/public/apply/ApplyIntro.xhtml?CMP=WEB:100112_APPLY_EARLY_REWARDS/%27);void(0);https://www.victoriassecret.com/clothing/ugg-australiahttps://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267652516488https://www.victoriassecret.com/victorias-secret-sport/sports-brashttps://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267670044870https://www.victoriassecret.com/pink/all-brashttps://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267670044870https://www.victoriassecret.com/bras/shop-all-brashttps://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267670044870https://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267651950203https://www.victoriassecret.com/popups/1267651950203https://www.victoriassecret.com/angel-cardhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/angel-card-benefitshttps://c.comenity.net/victoriassecret/https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.victoriassecret.vsaahttps://itunes.apple.com/us/app/victorias-secret-for-ipad/id398746803?mt=8https://itunes.apple.com/app/victorias-secret-all-access/id336860594https://www.victoriassecret.com/CustomerService/SignUp/StoreOfferAndEventshttps://www.victoriassecret.com/catalogue-requesthttps://www.victoriassecret.com/CustomerService/SignUp/SignUpForEmail/https://www.victoriassecret.com/lovelist/viewhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/account/orderstatushttps://www.victoriassecret.com/account/profilehttps://www.victoriassecret.com/contact

  • 8/20/2019 Runberg v. Victoria's Secret - Complaint

    109/109

    Site Map Site Terms & Notices Privacy & Security California Privacy California Transparency Ad Technology Careers SSL Secure Chec

    © 2016 Victoria's Secret. All Rights Reserved.

     Today's O!ers

    Case 1:16-cv-00539 Document 1-5 Filed 01/25/16 Page 5 of 5

    https://www.victoriassecret.com/privacy-and-security/#securityhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/careershttps://www.victoriassecret.com/privacy-and-security?brand=%20bras&overlayType=small#adtechnologyhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/california-transparencyhttps://www.victoriassecret.com/california-privacy-policy/https://www.victoriassecret.com/privacy-and-security/https://www.victoriassecret.com/site-terms-and-notices/https://www.victoriassecret.com/site-map/