rutherford & chekene october 9, 2010
DESCRIPTION
PEER/NEES Column Blind Prediction Modeling Approach. RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE October 9, 2010. Background. Thanks: José Restrepo , Stephen Mahin, PEER, NEES Great opportunity for practitioners Benefit to our practice Colleagues: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENEOctober 9, 2010
PEER/NEES Column Blind PredictionModeling Approach
Background• Thanks:
• José Restrepo, Stephen Mahin, PEER, NEES• Great opportunity for practitioners• Benefit to our practice
• Colleagues: • Joe Maffei, Karl Telleen, Marko Schotanus,
Andreas Schellenberg
• Preliminary Model• SAP2000 v14.1
• Elastic frame element with cracked stiffness properties
• Two concentrated plasticity fiber hinges• 6 EQ run time 10 hours
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE
SeismoStruct Fiber Model• Force-Based Frame Element
(infrmFB)• 1 frame element• Unconfined cover concrete, confined core
concrete, longitudinal reinforcing materials• 700 fibers• 10 integration segments• Force-based element
• No discretization• Exact solution
• Global damping parameters
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE
Material Models• Unconfined Concrete (con_tl)
• Trilinear Concrete:• f’c = 6 kip/in2
• Ec = 4,400 kip/in2
• Confined Concrete (con_cc)• Mander Nonlinear Constant Confinement
Pressure Concrete:
• Peak Strain = ec = 0.003
• Mander Confinement kc = 1.2
• Longitudinal Reinforcing Steel (stl_mn)• Menegotto-Pinto Steel with post elastic buckling:
• fy = 75 kip/in2
• Transverse steel spacing and size
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE
Damping• Damping Model
• Rayleigh, mass proportional, stiffness proportional?• How much equivalent viscous damping, z?• Initial Stiffness, tangent stiffness?
• Previous Research on Bridge Piers• Sakai , 2007
• Failure: longitudinal bar buckling/fracture
• Elastic Response: z = 2% Rayleigh• Inelastic Response: z = 0.1% Rayleigh
• Priestley, 2007• Failure: longitudinal bar buckling/fracture• Damping: z = 2.0% tangent stiffness or no
elastic damping
• Lessons• Damping, materials, failure modes
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENEFrom Priestley et al, 2007
Ground Motions
• Time Series• Residual displacement
offset• Baseline correct?• Filter?
• Result• Minimal difference in peak
results
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Original Record
Filtered Record
Acc
eler
atio
n (g
)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Original Record
Filtered Record
Dis
plac
emen
t (cm
)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30Original Record
Filtered Record
Dis
plac
emen
t (cm
)
0.01 0.1 1 10 1000
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8
Original Record
Filtered Record
Frequency (hz)
Four
ier A
mpl
itude