rutland traffic feasibility reports · 4 general observations & discussion ... instructed aecom...

Rutland Traffic Feasibility

Reports

Site 6 – Uppingham

Accident Cluster Site

Document Date: June 2016

Document No.: RCC-ACM-16-06-RP-CE-00001

Contract No.: 60493527

Prepared For: Rutland County Council

Prepared By: AECOM

Rutland CC: Accident Cluster Site, High Street East and West, Uppingham

June 2016

Limitations

AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (hereafter referred to as “AECOM”) has prepared this

Report for the sole use of Rutland County Council (RCC) in accordance with the Agreement under which

our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional

advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and

may not be disclosed by the Client or relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written

agreement of AECOM.

The information contained in this Report is based upon information provided by others and upon the

assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been

requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been

independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report.

The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services are

outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report is based on the conditions encountered and the

information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are

accordingly factually limited by these circumstances.

AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter

affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to AECOM’s attention after the date of the Report.

Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections

or other forward-looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of

the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties

that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. AECOM specifically does

not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report.

Unless otherwise stated in this Report, the assessments made assume that the sites and facilities will

continue to be used for their current purpose without significant changes.

Copyright

© This Report is the copyright of AECOM and its wholly owned subsidiary, AECOM Infrastructure &

Environment UK Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the

addressee is strictly prohibited.

Rutland CC: Accident Cluster Site, Uppingham

June 2016

REVISION SCHEDULE

Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by

- 24 June 2016

First Issue Peter Goodyear

Highway Engineer

Stephen Watson

Senior Project Engineer

Andrew Sherwood

Principal Engineer

AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited

12 Regan Way

Chetwynd Business Park

Chilwell

Nottingham

NG9 6RZ


June 2016

Contents

1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 3

2 Accident Data and Analysis ........................................................... 5

2.1 Accident Data Summary ................................................................................................. 5

2.2 Accident Analysis ........................................................................................................... 5

3 Speed data ....................................................................................... 6

4 General Observations & Discussion ............................................. 6

5 Options Considered ...................................................................... 13

5.1 First Year Rate of Return.............................................................................................. 14

6 Conclusion .................................................................................... 15

7 Recommendations ........................................................................ 15

Appendix A – Accident Data .......................................................................

Appendix B – Speed Data ...........................................................................

Appendix C – Existing Layout and Proposals Drawing ............................


June 2016

1 Introduction

In April 2016 Rutland County Council (RCC) instructed AECOM to carry out a feasibility study to

identify improvements to address the accident cluster site in the vicinity of the Market Place

and the junction between High Street East, High Street West and the A6003.

Figure 1: Location Plan


June 2016

Site Description

The junction is located in the heart of Uppingham town, on the A6003 at the top of a hill, with a

slight stagger between east and west high streets. The road has a number of buildings close to

the carriageway and footways of varying widths. A signalised pedestrian crossing links the two

high streets. To the east of the junction is the Market Place and the main shopping area of the

town along High Street East. The Market Place is generally used for parking but hosts the

market on a Friday and various other special events throughout the year. The high streets and

Market Place are within a conservation area protecting the older portion of the town.

Figure 2: Site Plan


June 2016

2 Accident Data and Analysis

The accident data provided by RCC (See Appendix A) covers the 10 year period from 1st

April

2006 to 31st

March 2016. Analysis of the data demonstrates patterns in the type of accident.

2.1 Accident Data Summary

The following list highlights the main points to note:

• A total of 7 personal injury collisions have occurred within the study area over the past

10 years.

• All collisions were slight and occurred on weekdays, during daylight hours.

• The collision that occurred on 05/08/2013, involved a delivery driver running himself

over, having forgotten to apply his handbrake. This accident is considered to be non-

treatable and has therefore been excluded from the percentages and totals below.

• 5 out of the 6 treatable accidents (83%) are vehicle vs pedestrian.

• 3 out of the 6 treatable accidents (50%) are related to vehicles colliding with

pedestrians when moving off from a parked position.

• 1 out of the 6 treatable accidents (17%) was a vehicle only collision.

• The last recorded accident was 27th

February 2014.

• The Doctors surgery moved from the A6003 London Road in March 2014, there have

been no accidents involving pedestrians after this date.

• All pedestrians involved in accidents were over 70 years of age with an average age of

77.

• Driver ages varied between 22 and 89 with no particular demographic.

• Postcodes of the drivers involved indicate that the majority of drivers were locals, with

50% of drivers living within 3 mile radius.

2.2 Accident Analysis

No personal injury accidents have occurred on High Street West or at the junction between High

Street East, High Street West and the A6003. Of the three accidents which resulted from

vehicles colliding with pedestrians when moving off from a parked position, two occurred on

High Street East and one occurred in the Market Place.

Between 2006 and 2013, the vehicular exit from the Market Place onto the A6003 (London

Road) was the site of two collisions involving pedestrians and one vehicle only collision.

However, it is likely that the relocation of the doctors surgery in 2014 has significantly reduced

pedestrian traffic and hence the potential for pedestrian collisions in this location.

The substandard visibility for vehicles exiting the Market Place at this point is considered to be

the main contributory factor to the vehicle only accident which occurred in this location.

However, due to the low number of vehicle only accidents which have occurred within the study

area over the past 10 years, there is not considered to be a significant vehicle-only accident

problem.


June 2016

A high proportion of the treatable accidents have involved pedestrians. However, due to the

low number and severity of accidents occurring within the study area, along with the fact that

no accidents have occurred within the last two years there is not considered to be a significant

pedestrian accident problem at this site. However, it should be noted that all the pedestrian

accidents have involved elderly pedestrians. This report will consider whether engineering

measures can be put in place which will reduce the risk to elderly and vulnerable pedestrians.

3 Speed data

A speed survey was completed by RCC using a static camera. Speed readings were taken

between High street East and Leamington Terrace in order to assess the 85th

percentile speed

within the 30mph restriction. The data collected between 19/10/2015 and 26/10/2015 shows

the 85th

percentile speed to be 27mph in both directions along the A6003 (see Appendix B).

4 General Observations & Discussion

The following observations are based on site visits undertaken on 1st

April and 9th

May 2016:

• Parking provision within Uppingham includes the Market Place and on-street parking in

addition to pay and display facilities at the Co-operative supermarket and North Street

East car park.

• Parking provision within the Market Place is reduced on market days and during special

events, resulting in a reduction in free parking during peak periods.

• Parking on High Street East is provided in on-street parking bays with single and double

yellow lines providing additional restrictions to manage parking (see Photographs 1&2).

Photograph 1 – Looking west along High Street East from between the Market Place and Queen

Street.


June 2016

Photograph 2 - Looking east along High Street East from between the Market Place and Queen

Street.

Shoppers, blue badge holders and delivery drivers were observed using the single and double

yellow lines for parking, causing obstructions on the high street (see Photograph 3).

Photograph 3 - Looking east along High Street East from the A6003 London Road. Note: the car

parked on double yellow lines is displaying a blue permit.


June 2016

A6003, High Street East and West Junction Layout: The junction between High Street East, High

Street West and the A6003 (see Photograph 4) is a staggered crossroads with a bend on the

approach from the north and a hill on the approach from the south. Forward visibility along the

A6003 is limited by the alignment and the proximity of the buildings to the road. The one way

systems on the High Street East and West prohibit vehicles from exiting the High Streets onto

the A6003. Accident data does not indicate that there is a safety problem at this junction.

Photograph 4 – The pelican crossing on the A6003 London Road looking north.

Market Place Exit Junction Layout: The exit from the Market Place on to the A6003 is a one way

junction approached by a narrow section of carriageway bordered by buildings (see Photograph

5). Visibility for traffic exiting the junction is substandard due to the proximity of the A6003 to

the surrounding buildings (see Photographs 6 & 7). Based on OS data and measured from a

2.4m set-back, the stopping sight distance of 70m is achieved to the north of the junction. To

the south only a distance of approximately 7m is achieved. Alterations to the road layout in

order to improve the visibility are not feasible due to the fact that the highway and footway

widths are constrained by the close proximity of the buildings.


June 2016

Photograph 5 - Ashdale Pharmacy and approach to A6003 from Market Place looking east.

Photograph 6 - The 2.4m visibility splay looking right (north) from Market Place exit onto A6003.

Photograph 7 – The 2.4m visibility splay looking left (south) from Market Place exit onto A6003.


June 2016

Existing pedestrian crossings: The existing pelican crossing (see Photograph 8) provides

pedestrians with a safe location to cross the A6003. During a site visit it was noted that the

crossing appeared to be offset from the current pedestrian desire lines. A number of

pedestrians could be seen crossing the A6003 from the north side of High Street East.

Photo 8 –Taken from the North side of the junction between A6003 and High Street East looking

south.

Whilst there are no formal pedestrian crossings along High Street East, there are a number of

dropped crossings (see Photographs 9 & 10) but pedestrians typically cross the High Street

between parked vehicles. However, during site visits, pedestrians were observed crossing the

road easily and safely as a result of the low traffic volume and speed.


June 2016

Photograph 9 - The passage way beside the Falcon Hotel has double yellow lines with a no-

loading restriction.

Photograph 10 - Passageway leading to private residences to the north.


June 2016

Pedestrian desire lines: The highest pedestrian movements are centred around the Market

Place and along the high streets. Within this area there appear to be no specific desire lines with

pedestrians crossing between numerous local businesses at oblique angles to the road. There

are a number of passageways (see Photographs 9, 10 & 11) on the north side of High Street East

that lead towards car parks and small businesses to the north. These passageways see

concentrations of pedestrian activity and the two larger passageways have parking restrictions

and dropped crossings at the roadside. Since the Doctors surgery has relocated it is likely that

there has been a reduction in the number of pedestrians crossing the A6003 London Road at the

vehicular exit located to the south of the Market Place.

Photograph 11 – Looking North towards Crown passage from High Street East.

Surfacing Signage and Road Markings:

• Signage is generally good, providing clear directions for the one-way system.

• Road markings are worn, particularly the ‘NO ENTRY’ marking on High Street East and

the ‘zig-zag’ markings on the approach to the pedestrian crossing (See Photographs 3 &

8).

• The road surfacing and high friction surfacing are generally in good condition.

Existing speed limit: The existing 30mph for the A6003 London Road appears to be appropriate

and is well observed. This is due to a combination of the street scene, the alignment of the road,

the limited forward visibility and traffic calming measures. The accident data indicates that none

of the collisions have been attributed to speed and the 85th

percentile speeds are within the

30mph speed limit.


June 2016

5 Options Considered

Option 1 - Kerb build out crossing locations: Introduce kerb build-out crossing locations on

High Street East in addition to widening the footway on High Street East near to its junction with

the A6003 (see drawing in Appendix C). The improvements would need to be introduced

sympathetically within the conservation area to maintain the character of the Market Place and

High Street. At detailed design the impact on large vehicles entering the High Street, the

carriageway width, surface water drainage and Traffic Regulation Orders would need to be fully

considered.

Advantages:

• Encourages pedestrian desire lines that reduce conflict with vehicles.

• Improved visibility from/to pedestrians crossing.

• Reduced likelihood of pedestrians crossing between parked vehicles.

• Reduced width of road for pedestrians crossing.

• Dropped kerbs providing improved crossing facilities for mobility impaired users.

Disadvantages:

• Small reduction in on-street parking.

• Some pedestrians may still choose to cross between parked vehicles.

Option 2 - Designated Pedestrian Routes within Market Place: Introduce a designated

pedestrian route across the north side of the Market Place in addition to designated pedestrian

routes within the Market Place itself in order to reduce the conflict between pedestrians and

vehicles.

Advantages:

• Encourage pedestrian desire lines that reduce conflict with vehicles.

• Highlight the presence of pedestrians to vehicles.

Disadvantages:

• May reduce the number of parking spaces available.

• Not all of the designated pedestrian routes could be used on market days.

• Some interaction between pedestrians and vehicles is unavoidable and pedestrians may

choose not to use the designated routes.

Option 3 – Stop Sign and Stop Line at Market Place Exit onto London Road: Provision of a

regulatory stop sign to Diag. No. 601.1 with accompanying stop line on the exit from the market

place (See drawing in Appendix C) would prohibit vehicles from exiting the junction without

stopping. Based on an assessment using OS mapping data the junction appears to meet the

requirements for the provision of a stop line as set out in Traffic Signs Manual - Chapter 3.

Advantages:

• Prohibits motorists from exiting the junction without stopping.

• Highlights the substandard visibility and encourages motorists to exercise caution when

exiting the junction.

• Reduces the potential for vehicle / pedestrian conflicts at the junction.


June 2016

Disadvantages

• Does not improve the substandard visibility at the junction.

• Some motorists may fail to comply with the stop sign.

• Due to the narrow width of the exit there may be no suitable options for mounting the

stop sign without risk of the sign being struck by vehicles.

• Requires Police enforcement.

Option 4 – Pedestrianisation of High Street East: Introduce a time-restricted pedestrianised

area on High Street East between the Market Place and Queen Street.

Advantages:

• Removes the potential for conflict between pedestrians and motorists during normal

shopping hours in this section of the High Street.

Disadvantages

• May affect trade within the town centre.

• Significant reduction in the amount of on-street parking available.

• Delivery vehicles unable to access properties or businesses during normal working

hours.

• Likely to require removal of the one-way system currently in place on High Street East

between the Market Place and the A6006.

• Costly to implement.

5.1 First Year Rate of Return

No First Year Rate of Return calculations have been completed for this site since the low

number and frequency of accidents over the past 10 years make it difficult to predict the

accident reduction and cost benefits associated with the engineering options.


June 2016

6 Conclusion

Due to the low number and severity of accidents within the study area, along with the fact that

no accidents have occurred within the last two years, there is not considered to be a significant

accident problem within the extents of this study.

Market Place Exit onto A6003

The relocation of the Doctors Surgery reduces the likelihood of further pedestrian injury

collisions at the exit from the Market Place onto the A6003 without the introduction of

engineering measures. Given the fact that only one vehicle-only accident has occurred at the

exit from the Market Place during the past 10 years, the junction is considered to operate

safely, despite the substandard visibility. The safety measures described in Option 3 are

therefore not currently justified.

Market Place

Since only one pedestrian injury collision has occurred at the Market Place during the past 10

years, the Market Place appears to operate safely, despite the interaction between pedestrians

and vehicles. In order to reduce the potential for conflict the Market Place may benefit from

the introduction of designated pedestrian routes as described in Option 2 but this measure is

not currently justified solely on safety grounds.

High Street East

As there have been only two pedestrian injury accidents during the last 10 years on High Street

East, there is not considered to be a significant safety problem in this location. The

introduction of the kerb build-out crossing locations described in Option 1 is unlikely to be

justified solely on safety grounds based on the current accident record. However, it would

reduce the likelihood of further vehicle/pedestrian conflicts and improve crossing facilities for

the elderly and those with impaired mobility. Pedestrianisation of High Street East (Option 4) is

not currently justified and may lead to secondary conflicts associated with changes to the one-

way system.

7 Recommendations

It is recommended that Rutland County Council monitor the accident record at this site over the

next year to determine whether the recent safe operation of the Market Place, A6006 and High

Street East is maintained. Although none of the pedestrian improvements identified are

currently justified on safety grounds alone, it is recommended that Rutland County Council

consider introducing the measures outlined in Options 1 & 2 in order to improve pedestrian

facilities and reduce the potential for vehicle/pedestrian conflicts.


June 2016


June 2016

Appendix A – Accident Data


June 2016

Tra

ffM

ap

Sti

ck D

iag

ram

Ru

n o

n 2

2/0

4/2

01

6

Acc

sMa

p -

Acc

iden

t A

na

lysi

s S

yst

em

Acc

iden

ts b

etw

een

da

tes

01

/04

/20

06

an

d 3

1/0

3/2

01

6S

elec

tio

n:

No

tes:

Sel

ecte

d u

sin

g M

an

ua

l S

elec

tio

n

12

34

56

7

Po

lice

Ref

:2

01

40

04

33

20

07

03

87

72

01

00

31

24

20

10

05

19

02

00

60

28

32

20

13

01

18

52

01

30

13

53

Day

:T

hurs

day

Wed

nes

day

Tues

day

Fri

day

Thurs

day

Fri

day

Mo

nd

ay

Dat

e:2

7/0

2/2

01

40

6/0

6/2

00

70

1/0

6/2

01

01

0/0

9/2

01

02

0/0

4/2

00

60

5/0

7/2

01

30

5/0

8/2

01

3

Tim

e:0

7:5

50

9:3

01

1:3

51

0:5

41

5:5

51

5:0

01

5:0

5

Vis

ibil

ity:

Lig

ht

Lig

ht

Lig

ht

Lig

ht

Lig

ht

Lig

ht

Lig

ht

Ro

ad C

ond

itio

n:

Wet

/Dam

pD

ryD

ryD

ryD

ryD

ryD

ry

Sev

erit

y:

Sli

ght

Sli

ght

Sli

ght

Sli

ght

Sli

ght

Sli

ght

Sli

ght

Co

nfl

ict:

Stk

Co

n1

.JP

GS

tkC

on2

.JP

GS

tkC

on3

.JP

GS

tkC

on4

.JP

GS

tkC

on5

.JP

GS

tkC

on6

.JP

GS

tkC

on7

.JP

G

Ped

estr

ians:

01

11

11

1

Man

oeu

vre

s:R

ight

No

ne

Rig

ht

No

ne

No

ne

No

ne

No

ne

Eas

ting:

48

66

35

48

66

65

48

66

35

48

66

35

48

66

30

48

66

55

48

66

40

No

rthin

g:

29

96

70

29

96

40

29

96

35

29

96

80

29

96

40

29

96

75

29

96

55

Wea

ther

:F

ine-

no

win

dF

ine-

no

win

dF

ine-

no

win

dF

ine-

no

win

dF

ine-

no

win

dF

ine-

no

win

dF

ine-

no

win

d

Tra

ffMa

pS

tick D

iag

ram

Ru

n o

n 2

2/0

4/2

01

6

Acc

sMa

p - A

ccid

ent A

na

lysis S

ystem

Acc

iden

ts betw

een

da

tes 01

/04

/20

06

an

d 3

1/0

3/2

01

6S

election

:N

otes:

Selected

usin

g M

an

ua

l Selectio

n

Site D

iag

ram

Per

cen

tag

es

Ped

estrian: 8

5

Wet: 1

4

Dark

: 0

Acc

iden

t Fig

ures

Fatal: 0

Serio

us: 0

Slig

ht:7

To

tal:7

20

14

00433

20

13

01185

20

06

02832

20

10

03124

20

13

01353

20

07

03877

20

10

05190

SC

ALE

DA

TE

DR

AW

N B

Y

DR

AW

ING

No.

Colo

ur

codin

g b

y S

EV

ER

ITY

Fa

tal

(0)

Se

rio

us

(0)

Slig

ht

(7)

Se

lec

ted

Ra

ng

e o

f A

cc

ide

nts

be

twe

en

da

tes

01

/04

/20

06

an

d 3

1/0

3/2

01

6

Se

lec

ted

us

ing

Ma

nu

al S

ele

cti

on

Hig

h S

t W

est &

Hig

h S

t E

ast U

pp

ing

ha

m 0

1-0

4-2

00

6 to

31

-03

-20

16

08

/04

/2016

41 : 9

20

T P

urv

is

(c)

Cro

wn

co

pyri

gh

t. A

ll r

igh

ts r

ese

rve

dR

utla

nd

Co

un

ty C

ou

ncil D

istr

ict C

ou

ncil

Lic

en

ce

No

. 1

00

01

80

56

20

16

TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on:04/ 08/2016

AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

(120) months

Notes:

Selected using Manual Selection High St West & High St East Uppingham 10 years

Selection:

andAccidents between dates31/03/201601/04/2006

200602832 20/04/2006 Time 1555 1 1Vehicles Casualties Slight

Fine without high winds Dry Daylight:street lights present

None Single carriageway

V1 TRAV N COLLS WITH PED CROSSING FROM NS.

Road surface

Special Conditions Road Type

Thursday

Occurred on A6003 LONDON ROAD UPPINGHAM OUTSIDE DOCTORS SURGERY.

Vehicle Reference Car Going ahead

No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning

First point of impact Front Age of Driver Breath test Negative

Vehicle direction S Nto

1

39

Driver Postcode LE159AX

Not in restricted lane

FRV Taking pupil to/from schoolJourney

Casualty Reference: Age: Pedestrian SlightSeverity:Male

Pedestrian Direction: E

1 82

Not ApplicableSeatbelt


Fine without high winds Dry Daylight:street lights present


V1 REVERSES FROM PARKING SPACE & COLLS WITH PED.DIRECTIONS UNKNOWN.

Road surface


Wednesday

Occurred on MARKET PLACE UPPINGHAM EXACT LOCATION NOT GIVEN.

Vehicle Reference Car Reversing


First point of impact Back Age of Driver Breath test Driver not contacted

Vehicle direction E Wto

1

40

Driver Postcode


FRV UnknownJourney

Casualty Reference: Age: Pedestrian SlightSeverity:Female

9

1 75

Not ApplicableSeatbelt


Fine without high winds Dry Daylight


V1 TRAV W ON PRIVATE DRIVE TURN R TRAV N & COLLS PED TRAV E CROSSING LONDON ROAD FROM V1 N/S.

Road surface


Tuesday

Occurred on A6003 LONDON ROAD UPPINGHAM JW PRIVATE DRIVE TO MARKET PLACE CAR PARK.

Vehicle Reference Car Turning right


First point of impact Offside Age of Driver Breath test Driver not contacted

Vehicle direction E Nto

1

46

Driver Postcode LE5 9XA


FRV UnknownJourney

NoLeft hand drive


Pedestrian Direction: E

1 74

Not ApplicableSeatbelt Not a cyclistCycle helmet

1Registered to: Rutland County Council



(120) months

Notes:


Selection:




None One way street

V1 ON HIGH ST EAST REVERSES TRAV W FROM PARKED POSITION IN C/WAY & COLLS PED TRAV S CROSSING ROAD

FROM BEHIND V1.

Road surface


Friday

Occurred on C8406 HIGH STREET EAST UPPINGHAM JW ORANGE STREET.

Vehicle Reference Van or Goods <= 3.5 tonnes mgw Reversing


First point of impact Back Age of Driver Breath test Negative

Vehicle direction E Wto

1

30

Driver Postcode LE678QJ


FRV Journey as part of workJourney

NoLeft hand drive


Pedestrian Direction: S

1 71





V1 PARKED FACING E HIGH ST EAST ON WESTBOUND C/WAY MOVES OFF TRAV E & COLLS FOOT PED STEPPING OFF

FOOTWAY INTO C/WAY.

Road surface


Friday

Occurred on C8406 HIGH STREET EAST UPPINGHAM. OUTSIDE MARKET PLACE.

Vehicle Reference Car Moving off


First point of impact Nearside Age of Driver Breath test Driver not contacted

Vehicle direction W Eto

1

77

Driver Postcode LE159UA


FRV UnknownJourney

NoLeft hand drive


Pedestrian Direction: 0

1 87





(120) months

Notes:


Selection:





V1 PARKED MAKING A DELIVERY. V1 ROLLS BACK NOT HAVING HAD THE HANDBRAKE CORRECTLY APPLIED & COLLS

PED (DRIVER V1) UNLOADING AT REAR.

Road surface


Monday

Occurred on A6003 LONDON ROAD UPPINGHAM. OUTSIDE MARKET PLACE.

Vehicle Reference Van or Goods <= 3.5 tonnes mgw Parked


First point of impact Back Age of Driver Breath test Not provided (medical)

Vehicle direction Park Parkedto

1

22

Driver Postcode NN189EH

Footway (pavement)

FRV Journey as part of workJourney

NoLeft hand drive

Casualty Reference: Age: Pedestrian SlightSeverity:Male

Pedestrian Direction: 0

1 22



Fine without high winds Wet/Damp Daylight


V1 TRAV W ON MARKET PLACE TURNS R TRAV N & COLLS V2 TRAV S LONDON RD.

Road surface


Thursday

Occurred on A6003 LONDON ROAD UPPINGHAM JW MARKET PLACE.

Vehicle Reference Car Turning right


First point of impact Offside Age of Driver Breath test Not requested

Vehicle direction E Nto

1

89

Driver Postcode LE159UA


UnknownFRV OtherJourney

NoLeft hand drive

Casualty Reference: Age: Driver/rider SlightSeverity:Male2 89

UnknownSeatbelt Not a cyclistCycle helmet

Vehicle Reference Car Going ahead


First point of impact Front Age of Driver Breath test Not requested

Vehicle direction N Sto

2

52

Driver Postcode PE8 5BP


UnknownFRV Commuting to/from workJourney

NoLeft hand drive

Casualty Reference: Age: Driver/rider SlightSeverity:Female1 52

Worn and independently confirmedSeatbelt Not a cyclistCycle helmet




(120) months

Notes:


Selection:


Accidents involving:

Motor vehicles

only (excluding

2-wheels)

2-wheeled motor

vehicles

Pedal cycles

Total

Fatal Serious Slight Total

Casualties:

Vehicle driver

Passenger

Motorcycle rider

Cyclist

Pedestrian

Total

Fatal Serious Slight Total

7

7 0 0 7

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 7

0 0 2 2

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 6 6

8 8 0 0

Horses & other

Other

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0



June 2016

Appendix B – Speed Data


June 2016

Approaching Oakham

Between Leamington Terrace and High Street East (Approaching towards Town)

N° Period Date Time

Average

speed

[Mile/h ] Category1 Category2 Category3 Category4 Total

00:00:00

1 19/10/2015 00-24h 24 4 1613 94 55 1766

2 20/10/2015 00-24h 24 19 2767 196 107 3089

3 21/10/2015 00-24h 24 15 2745 199 106 3065

4 22/10/2015 00-24h 25 8 2903 207 110 3228

5 23/10/2015 00-24h 24 19 2973 229 106 3327

6 24/10/2015 00-24h 24 10 2484 90 45 2629

7 25/10/2015 00-24h 25 13 2174 37 22 2246

8 26/10/2015 00-24h 24 9 1738 123 61 1931

Stop Average = 24 Mile/h 97 / 0 % 19397 / 91 %1175 / 6 % 612 / 3 % 21281 / 100%

Date Time Class C1 / 1 - 15 C2 / 16 - 30C3 / 31 - 35C4 / 36 - 40C5 / 41 - 45C6 / 46 - 50C7 / 51 - 55C8 / 56 - 60C9 / 61 - 150Total Average [Mile/h ] Excess. speed [%] V85 [Mile/h ]

00:00:00

19/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 18 0 27

24:00:00 Category2 23 1540 45 4 1 0 0 0 0 1613 24 0 27

24:00:00 Category3 1 92 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 24 0 27

24:00:00 Category4 1 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 23 0 26

1 Total volume 26 1689 46 4 1 0 0 0 0 1766 24 0 27

20/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 7 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 17 0 26

24:00:00 Category2 45 2631 80 9 2 0 0 0 0 2767 24 0 28

24:00:00 Category3 9 183 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 196 23 0 27

24:00:00 Category4 4 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 22 0 25

2 Total volume 65 2929 83 10 2 0 0 0 0 3089 24 0 28

21/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 13 0 24

24:00:00 Category2 26 2620 91 8 0 0 0 0 0 2745 24 0 27

24:00:00 Category3 4 194 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 199 23 0 26

24:00:00 Category4 0 105 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 22 0 25

3 Total volume 38 2926 92 9 0 0 0 0 0 3065 24 0 27

22/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 18 0 22

24:00:00 Category2 26 2756 107 11 3 0 0 0 0 2903 25 0 28

24:00:00 Category3 3 195 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 207 24 0 27

24:00:00 Category4 1 108 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 23 0 25

4 Total volume 32 3065 115 13 3 0 0 0 0 3228 25 0 28

23/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 16 0 24

24:00:00 Category2 30 2835 91 17 0 0 0 0 0 2973 24 0 27

24:00:00 Category3 4 217 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 229 23 0 26

24:00:00 Category4 1 104 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 22 0 25

5 Total volume 43 3167 99 18 0 0 0 0 0 3327 24 0 27

24/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 8 0 12

24:00:00 Category2 27 2364 79 11 3 0 0 0 0 2484 24 0 28

24:00:00 Category3 2 84 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 90 24 0 27

24:00:00 Category4 1 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 23 0 27

6 Total volume 39 2493 80 14 3 0 0 0 0 2629 24 0 27

25/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 17 0 27

24:00:00 Category2 15 2075 72 8 3 1 0 0 0 2174 25 0 28

24:00:00 Category3 1 35 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 24 0 27

24:00:00 Category4 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 23 0 25

7 Total volume 20 2140 74 8 3 1 0 0 0 2246 25 0 28

26/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 14 0 25

24:00:00 Category2 21 1630 79 8 0 0 0 0 0 1738 24 0 28

24:00:00 Category3 2 120 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 23 0 26

24:00:00 Category4 1 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 22 0 25

8 Total volume 28 1815 80 8 0 0 0 0 0 1931 24 0 28

/ 1 Total global Category1 43 53 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 15 0 25




Statistics Total volume 291 20224 669 84 12 1 0 0 0 21281 24 0 27

Receding

Between Leamington Terrace and High Street East (Approaching towards Town)

N° Period Date Time

Average speed

[Mile/h ] Category1 Category2 Category3 Category4 Total

00:00:00

1 19/10/2015 00-24h 21 53 2133 72 61 2319

2 20/10/2015 00-24h 21 94 3236 160 113 3603

3 21/10/2015 00-24h 21 138 3229 156 103 3626

4 22/10/2015 00-24h 21 100 3278 154 127 3659

5 23/10/2015 00-24h 20 161 3664 184 111 4120

6 24/10/2015 00-24h 21 108 2934 86 49 3177

7 25/10/2015 00-24h 22 69 2357 42 20 2488

8 26/10/2015 00-24h 21 72 1575 121 73 1841

Stop Average = 21 Mile/h 795 / 3 % 22406 / 90 %975 / 4 % 657 / 3 % 24833 / 100%

Date Time Class C1 / 1 - 15 C2 / 16 - 30 C3 / 31 - 35C4 / 36 - 40C5 / 41 - 45C6 / 46 - 50C7 / 51 - 55C8 / 56 - 60C9 / 61 - 150Total Average [Mile/h ] Excess. speed [%] V85 [Mile/h ]

00:00:00

19/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 8 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 19 0 24

24:00:00 Category2 154 1929 43 7 0 0 0 0 0 2133 21 0 25

24:00:00 Category3 6 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 21 0 24

24:00:00 Category4 12 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 19 0 22

1 Total volume 180 2089 43 7 0 0 0 0 0 2319 21 0 25

20/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 26 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 18 0 24

24:00:00 Category2 312 2863 55 6 0 0 0 0 0 3236 21 0 25

24:00:00 Category3 31 127 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 19 0 25

24:00:00 Category4 23 89 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 19 0 23

2 Total volume 392 3147 58 6 0 0 0 0 0 3603 21 0 25

21/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 51 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 17 0 23

24:00:00 Category2 252 2914 58 3 1 0 0 1 0 3229 21 0 25

24:00:00 Category3 24 131 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 20 0 25

24:00:00 Category4 23 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 19 0 23

3 Total volume 350 3212 59 3 1 0 0 1 0 3626 21 0 25

22/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 38 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 17 0 23

24:00:00 Category2 206 3019 52 0 1 0 0 0 0 3278 21 0 25

24:00:00 Category3 16 137 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 20 0 24

24:00:00 Category4 21 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 19 0 22

4 Total volume 281 3324 53 0 1 0 0 0 0 3659 21 0 25

23/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 63 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 17 0 22

24:00:00 Category2 348 3260 52 3 1 0 0 0 0 3664 21 0 25

24:00:00 Category3 31 151 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 19 0 24

24:00:00 Category4 24 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 19 0 23

5 Total volume 466 3596 54 3 1 0 0 0 0 4120 20 0 25

24/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 24 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 19 0 23

24:00:00 Category2 173 2708 50 2 1 0 0 0 0 2934 21 0 25

24:00:00 Category3 6 78 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 22 0 26

24:00:00 Category4 8 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 20 0 26

6 Total volume 211 2910 53 2 1 0 0 0 0 3177 21 0 25

25/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 14 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 19 0 25

24:00:00 Category2 97 2219 37 4 0 0 0 0 0 2357 22 0 25

24:00:00 Category3 0 41 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 21 0 24

24:00:00 Category4 4 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 18 0 19

7 Total volume 115 2331 38 4 0 0 0 0 0 2488 22 0 25

26/10/2015 00:00:00 Category1 23 48 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 18 0 23

24:00:00 Category2 116 1430 26 2 1 0 0 0 0 1575 21 0 25

24:00:00 Category3 18 100 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 121 20 0 25

24:00:00 Category4 13 59 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 73 19 0 23

8 Total volume 170 1637 29 4 1 0 0 0 0 1841 21 0 25





Statistics Total volume 2165 22246 387 29 5 0 0 1 0 24833 21 0 25


June 2016

Appendix C – Existing Layout and Proposals Drawing


June 2016


June 2016

ABOUT AECOM

In a complex and unpredictable world, where growing

demands have to be met with finite resources, AECOM

brings experience gained from improving quality of life in

hundreds of places.

We bring together economists, planners, engineers,

designers and project managers to work on projects at every

scale. We engineer energy efficient buildings and we build

new links between cities. We design new communities and

regenerate existing ones. We are the first whole

environments business, going beyond buildings and

infrastructure.

Our Europe teams form an important part of our worldwide

network of nearly 100,000 staff in 150 countries. Through

360 ingenuity, we develop pioneering solutions that help our

clients to

see further and go further.

www.aecom.com

Follow us on Twitter: @aecom

rutland traffic feasibility reports · 4 general observations & discussion ... instructed aecom...

Documents