s cience t echnology e ngineering m athematics building
DESCRIPTION
STEM Building Hagerstown Community College Hagerstown, Maryland 21742. Craig Owsiany Architectural Engineering – Construction Management. S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building. STEM Building Hagerstown Community College Hagerstown, Maryland 21742. 5 Floors - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742Science Technology Engineering Mathematics Building
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions Southwest View South View Southeast View
•5 Floors•Size: 62, 840 SF•Cost: $15.6 M•Duration: 18 Months
![Page 3: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Typical Lab Typical Floor Plan Energy Lab
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction ManagementScience Technology Engineering Mathematics Building
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
![Page 4: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Background Solutions Goal
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
•Blasting•Non Competent Rock
•Reduce Cost Impact•Maintain Schedule•Ensure Structural Integrity
Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign Structural Breadth
![Page 5: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Structural Analysis Structural Calculations Findings
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction ManagementAnalysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
Structural Breadth
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
• Sum Live and Deal Loads•Compare Against Design Load
Design>Actual=No Redesign
Design<Actual=Redesign Required
Total (lbs)Compacted Soil (4') 496,100 Concrete-Normal Weight (5") 20,834 Concrete-Normal Weight (10") 728,625 Concrete-Normal Weight (12") 498,075 Concrete-Normal Weight (18") 56,306 Concrete-Normal Weight (20") 34,531 Concrete-Light Weight (4 1/4") 251,828 Beams 30,525 Stairs (20") 305,723 Curtain Wall & Metal Panels 23,460 Brick Veneer 92,576 Green Roof 132,688 Ceiling 28,604 Partitions 56,038 HVAC & Plumbing 57,208 Cistern 31,000 Total 2,844,119
Dead LoadsTotal (lbs)
Corridors 3rd Floor & Below 80,990 Corridors Above 3rd Floor 97,188 Classrooms 105,240 Stairs 122,289 Total 405,706
Live LoadsDead Loads Total 2,844,119 Live Loads Total 405,706 Extended Foundation Wall Loads 139,750 Dead+Live 3,249,826 Dead +Live+Extended 3,389,576 Percentage Increase 4.12%
Total Load (P) 3,389,576 Area (A) 1,128
P/A (lbs/sf) 3,006
• Mat slab designed for 8000 psf•Actual Load = 38% of Design Load
• 10-15% load increase would require further investigation
![Page 6: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Cost Impact Savings
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction ManagementAnalysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
Structural Breadth
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
Materials LF $/LF Sq. Ft. $/Sq. Ft. CY $/CY Duration $/Crew TotalFormwork-Lumber 240 0.3 72.00$ Formwork-Plywood 755 1.41 1,064.55$ Lean Concrete 208.8 80 16,704.00$ Backfill -$ Crew 1 960 960.00$ Total 18,800.55$
GC Solution
Materials LF $/LF Sq. Ft. $/Sq. Ft. CY $/CY Duration $/Crew TotalFormwork-Lumber 480 0.3 144.00$ Formwork-Plywood 426 1.41 600.66$ Lean Concrete 20.9 80 1,672.00$ Normal Weight Concrete 34.3 92 3,155.60$ Backfill -$ Crew 2 960 1,920.00$ Total 7,492.26$
Proposed Solution
Materials LF $/LF Sq. Ft. $/Sq. Ft. CY $/CY Duration $/Crew TotalConcrete 299.3 80 23,944.00$ Total 23,944.00$
Triad Solution Cost
Solution CostTriad 23,944.00$ GC 18,800.55$ Proposed 7,492.26$
Totals
Total Savings = $16k
![Page 7: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Background Background Redesign
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction ManagementAnalysis II: Green Roof Redesign
Mechanical Breadth
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
• Conventional Green Roof • 3” Low Profile•Architectural Facets • Negligible Thermal Value • Minimal Educational Value
SF %Aggregate/Stone Gravel 308 15.2%Concrete Tile Pavers 542 26.8%Wood Panel Pavers 396 19.6%Indegenous Vegetation 776 38.4%Total SF 2022 100.0%
Green Roof Takeoffs• LiveRoof System• 6” High Profile• Added Thermal Value • Higher Educational Value
![Page 8: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Conventional Green Roof LiveRoof System Benefits
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction ManagementAnalysis II: Green Roof Redesign
Mechanical Breadth
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
• Faster Installation• Low Maintenance• Immediate Vegetation
![Page 9: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Cost Impact Payback Period
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction ManagementAnalysis II: Green Roof Redesign
Mechanical Breadth
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
$ Markup $ Maintenance Savings Payback Period (years)Conventional Low-LiveRoof Low 24264 1,920.90$ 12.6Conventional High-LiveRoof High 34374 3,639.60$ 9.4Conventional Low-LiveRoof High 46506 1,617.60$ 28.8
Payback Period
• Payback period is 28.8 years for maintenance cost alone.
SF $/SF Total $Conventional Low Profile 2022 14.00$ 28,308.00$ Conventional High Profile 2022 20.00$ 40,440.00$ LiveRoof Low Profile 2022 26.00$ 52,572.00$ LiveRoof High Profile 2022 37.00$ 74,814.00$
Low Profile Markup 2022 12.00$ 24,264.00$ High Profile Markup 2022 17.00$ 34,374.00$ Conventional Low to Live Roof High 2022 23.00$ 46,506.00$
SF $/SF Total $Conventional Low Profile 2022 1.00$ 2,022.00$ Conventional High Profile 2022 2.00$ 4,044.00$ LiveRoof Low Profile 2022 0.05$ 101.10$ LiveRoof High Profile 2022 0.20$ 404.40$
Low Profile Savings 2022 0.95$ 1,920.90$ High Profile Savings 2022 1.80$ 3,639.60$ Conventional Low to Live Roof High 2022 0.80$ 1,617.60$
Estimating Takeoffs-Upfront
Estimating Takeoffs-Maintenance
![Page 10: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Thermal Calculations Thermal Calculations
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction ManagementAnalysis II: Green Roof Redesign
Mechanical Breadth
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
![Page 11: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Conventional Green Roof Heat Loss Current Green Roof Heat Loss Proposed Green Roof Heat Loss
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction ManagementAnalysis II: Green Roof Redesign
Mechanical Breadth
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
Materials Sq. Ft. R-Value Summer: Q=A(To-Ti)/R Winter: Q=A(Ti-To)/RModified SBS Cap Sheet 2022.00 0.70Modified SBS Base-Ply Sheet 2022.00 0.70R-30 Insulation 2022.00 30.00Decking/Concrete 2022.00 0.43Conventional Roof Total (BTU/hr) 2022.00 31.83 101.66 2223.72
Conventional Roof
Materials Sq. Ft. Lb./Sq. Ft. R-Value Conventional Roof R-Value Total R-Value Summer: Q=A(To-Ti)/R Winter: Q=A(Ti-To)/RStone Aggregate 308.00 31.25 0.15 31.83 31.98 15.41 337.14Wood Pavers 396.00 6.13 2.13 31.83 33.95 18.66 408.25Concrete Pavers 542.00 23.00 0.65 31.83 32.48 26.70 584.143" Conventional Green Roof 776.00 23.44 1.43 31.83 33.25 37.34 816.84
VegetationSoilFilter FabricDrainage ChannelRoot Barrier
Architectural Roof Total 98.12 2146.37
Current Green RoofMaterials Sq. Ft. R-Value Conventional Roof R-Value Total R-Value Summer: Q=A(To-Ti)/R Winter: Q=A(Ti-To)/R6" LiveRoof System 2022.00 2.85 31.83 34.68 93.30 2040.95
Prevegetated ModulesRoot Barrier
All Green Roof Total 93.30 2040.95
Proposed Green Roof System
• Low Profile Green Roof• Concrete Pavers• Wood Pavers• Stone Aggregate
• 100% LiveRoof System• High Profile
• 8.2% reduction from conventional roof• 5.0% reduction from current green roof
![Page 12: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Justification Educational Factor Educational Factor
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction ManagementAnalysis II: Green Roof Redesign
Mechanical Breadth
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
• Alternate Energy Program• Mechanical Engineering • Thermal Cameras
• Heat Sensors
![Page 13: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Background Redesign Goal
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
• Stick Built Curtain Wall• Approximately 1/3 of Building Envelope• 9260 SF• Lengthy Installation Time• Site Congestion• Short Lead Time
• Unitized Curtain Wall System• Short Installation Time• Shakeout Not Required• Higher Quality Seals• Long Lead Time
• Reduce curtain wall installation time• Achieve earlier water tight date• Reduce over all schedule
![Page 14: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Schedule Schedule Acceleration
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
• Original Duration: 40 Days
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
• New Duration: 20 Days
Stick Built System1. Deliver Materials2. Shakeout3. Install Sills and Jambs4. Install Mullions5. Glaze6. Caulk
Unitized System1. Deliver Modules2. Set Module3. Caulk
![Page 15: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Lead Time Installation Time
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
Week Stick Built System Unitized System
1-6 Obtain materials Obtain materials
7 Fabricate/Deliver Fabricate/Deliver
8 Fabricate/Deliver Fabricate/Deliver
9-12 Fabricate/Deliver
Week Stick Built System Unitized System
1 Deliver/Frame Deliver/Install/Caulk
2 Deliver/Frame/Dimension Deliver/Install/Caulk
3 Deliver/Frame/Dimension Deliver/Install/Caulk
4 Deliver/Frame/Dimension/Glaze/Caulk Deliver/Install/Caulk
5 Deliver/Frame/Dimension/Glaze/Caulk
6 Deliver/Frame/Dimension/Glaze/Caulk
7 Glaze/Caulk
8 Glaze/Caulk
• Stick Built: 8 Weeks• Unitized: 12 Weeks
• Stick Built: 8 Weeks• Unitized: 4 Weeks
![Page 16: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Sequencing – Areas of Concern Resequencing
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
• Reduced Curtain Wall Installation
• Earlier Water Tight Date
• Finishes
• MEP Rough Ins
• Begin MEP rough ins 1 week early.
• Stack MEP rough ins and finishes on 3rd, 4th and 5th floors.
• Sync water tight date and completion of rough ins.
![Page 17: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Accelerated Schedule
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
• Overall schedule reduced by 44 days
![Page 18: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Analysis I Analysis II Analysis III
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Lessons Learned
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
Mat Slab Redesign
• Current mat slab will support additional load
• Redesign not required
• Further attention given at a 10-15% load increase
Green Roof Redesign
• Cannot place an R-Value on living organisms
• Using an R-Value alone will not produce accurate heat transfer results
• Offers great value as an education tool
Curtain Wall Redesign
• 44 days saved
• Higher quality product
• Resequencing, not accelerating the schedule
• “We are sequencing trades in a manner to optimize productivity for all trades involved.”
![Page 19: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Acknowledgements
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
General Contractor• Greg Ramirez, Senior Project Manager• Eric Osborne, Senior Superintendent• Brett Robinson, Field Engineer
Owner• Dawn Baker, Facilities Project
Coordinator• Robert Spong, Facilities Management
and Planning Director• Gerard Rath, Owner Rep.
Architect• Mark Merolla, Architect
Structural Engineer• Chris Johnson, Structural Engineer
Penn State AE Faculty• Bob Holland• Rob Leicht
![Page 20: S cience T echnology E ngineering M athematics Building](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/568164c0550346895dd6d1e4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Questions
Craig OwsianyArchitectural Engineering – Construction Management
Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
STEM BuildingHagerstown Community College
Hagerstown, Maryland 21742
Outline
o Overview
o Analysis I: Mat Slab Redesign
o Analysis II: Green Roof Redesign
o Analysis III: Curtain Wall Redesign
o Conclusion/Findings
o Acknowledgments
o Questions
Questions?