E-Mails S-100 through S-149S-100. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding reported Soviet "plasma stealth" technologyS-101. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a Lens Construction Proposal to industryS-102. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding web sources on quantum "fiber bundles"S-103. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding potentially GOOD NEWS concerning fundingS-104. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Jack Saratti's refusing to challenge Einstein on other topicsS-105. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding ideas for improving the UNITEL newsletterS-106. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding geometric "cones" with monopole interactionsS-107. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding accidental divulging of confidential informationS-108. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's ranking in the Aerospace Top-100S-109. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a quantum strings ruleS-110. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding uses of supercomputersS-111. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding uses of compact power-plantsS-112. from Ken Myers regarding information on ORMES room-temperature superconductors

S-114. from Bob King regarding the Great Pyramid & strange happenings in AntarcticaS-115. from Bob King regarding ORMESS-116. from Bob King regarding an article about the Eldridge motor generators and stuff on the Pyramid mysteriesS-117. from Bob King regarding useful references on Pyramid-related issuesS-118. from Ken Myers regarding his comments on an ORMEs documentS-119. from Bob King on finding related web-sitesS-120. from Dr. Arkadiusz Jadczyk on his opinion of a site that proposes an additional universal "repulsive" forceS-121. from Dr. Arkadiusz Jadczyk on saying I shouldn't have e-mailed Jack Saratti with the same questionS-122. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti with his opinion on the site that suggested a universal "repulsive" forceS-123. from Dr. Arkadiusz Jadczyk regarding Tom BeardenS-124. from Matt ("Madtz" at 'The Black Vault') regarding Dr. Sarfatti's response to meS-125. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding UNITEL's physics expert Mike MillerS-126. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding Black Hole physicsS-127. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding selling more stock and proposed book salesS-128. from Jack Sarfatti regarding personal religious beliefs and quantum theory & human consciousnessS-129. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding adapting the UNITEL prototype for mass transitS-130. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL / forward a message from Joe Firmage and MotionSciences.orgS-131. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the personal trials encountered when you're out-of-moneyS-132. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an Israeli "pseudo- quantum computer"S-133. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding past communications with experts in various fieldsS-134. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more info about the Israeli "QC" projectS-135. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the search for the Higgs particleS-136. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a camping encounter with a "Big Foot" type creatureS-137. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding physics and meta-physicsS-138. from Bryan Willoughby regarding UNITEL and TAP-TENS-139. from Tom Mahood requesting to receive no more e-mails from meS-140. from Ken Myers regarding more references to ORMEs and ORMUS substancesS-141. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contacting members of the Senate and Congress

151

S-142. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding preparing for questions by funding committeesS-143. from Bryan Willoughby regarding his personal goals and how they relate to UNITELS-144. from Bryan Willoughby regarding funding research into advanced physics projectsS-145. from Larry Maurer regarding list of Senators & Congressmen contactedS-146. from Bob King regarding "lost science"S-147. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a recent response from Jack SarfattiS-148. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an upcoming T.A.P.-T.E.N. conference in Las VegasS-149. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding recruiting Dr. Fred Wolf as a UNITEL consultant

152

S-100. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding reported Soviet "plasma stealth" technology

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: plasma "stealth"Date : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:17:23 -0800

At 02:29 PM 11/27/01 -0500, you wrote:

> I went to that fighter-board to dig up some past articles. But they are gone now. The moderators appear to only keep 3-month's worth of posts (or 20 "pages", whichever is greater). So all I could find was:

> Plasma Stealth => > http://pub21.ezboard.com/ffighterplanesfighters.showMessage?topicID=1515.topic> > New SOVIET SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS > (a) => > http://pub21.ezboard.com/ffighterplanesfighters.showMessage?topicID=1391.topic> > (b) => > http://pub21.ezboard.com/ffighterplanesfighters.showMessage?topicID=1495.topic> > (c) => > http://pub21.ezboard.com/ffighterplanesfighters.showMessage?topicID=1507.topic>> -- Mark

Mark:

Not proven yet?! I wonder what made those vehicles (that we designed our craft after with an exterior charge) that flew over the skies of Eugene night after night for 2 weeks running, radar-invisible?

Of course, we need to construct a working prototype. And that is all we are asking. I feel that we have way far more than enough information to reduce the risk enough to construct our prototype. That is without even breathing the word "sighting". I will personally bet my life on the fact that our ships will be radar-invisible!

Larry Maurer

S-101. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a Lens Construction Proposal to industry

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: RE: UNITEL, Inc.- Lens Construction ProposalDate : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:14:06 -0800

>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Larry Maurer [mailto:lmaurer@unitelnw.com]

153

>>>> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:59 PM >>>> To: mgaver@qdots.com >>>> Subject: UNITEL, Inc.- Lens Construction Proposal >>>> >>>> Dear Mitch: >>>> >>>> We are wondering if you had any success with obtaining a quote for the construction of our crystallite lens. Our investor's are ready to discuss any agreement conditions, etc. so that we may get started as soon as possible. We are also working with Applied Sciences, Rolls Royce Deutschland and UIC MP Labs on similar projects. It is possible that if your firm could construct our crystallite lens, then perhaps UIC MP Labs could perform the final step of growing the surface layer via MBE vaporization to ensure emission of monochromaticity or lased light from the RF-activated lens. The size and thickness are, of course, variable so that we may start out with a smaller prototype for our initial device for testing purposes. We just need to determine the cost of producing our lens so that we can present a feasible project to be funded by our investors. I hope to hear from you at your earliest convenience. Thank you,>>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> >>>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal >>>> & Director, Engineering >>>> UNITEL, Inc. >>>> (503) 232-2740 >>>> www.unitelnw.com

>> At 04:29 PM 11/27/01 -0800, you wrote: >>> >>> Dear Larry,>>> >>> I spoke with a number of our chemists and engineers as well as our management about this. As I mentioned on the phone, we are very focused on biological applications of quantum dots and do not have any products on the market yet. It would be too far outside of our current focus to bid on this project while we are working hard to get our first products out the door in Biology.>>> >>> Let me know if you have any questions.>>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Mitch Gaver >>> Marketing Manager >>> Quantum Dot Corporation >>> 26118 Research Road >>> Hayward, CA 94545 >>> 510-887-8775 x4141 (phone) >>> 510-783-9729 (FAX) >>> mgaver@qdots.com

154

>> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:04:22 -0800>> To: MGaver@qdots.com>> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>>> Subject: RE: UNITEL, Inc.- Lens Construction Proposal>>>>Dear Mitch:>>>> Thanks for responding to our request for a bid on constructing the crystallite version of our patented laser lens. I understand that our proposal is a bit "outside the box" and not in line with your firm's bio projects and that it is hard to get in focus on something other than what you have been working so hard at. I do have some questions that perhaps you can help me with as we want to find somebody or organization that can assist us in constructing our II-VI compound crystallite lens. Perhaps someone there at Quantum Dot Corp. can suggest where we can find a firm that can provide us with the information to construct our lens in a consulting capacity.>>>> We are prepared to pay for this consulting service who would be working with our lab workers at UIC Microphysics Labs, Chicago, IL or Applied Sciences, Inc., Cedarville, OH as I may have previously mentioned. I also realize, Mitch, that it might take time to familiarize your fellow research associates there at Quantum Dot Corp. if they are willing to take the time to evaluate what we are proposing. Our lens and related technology represents literally $billions of potential profit to your firm. So I sincerely hope that your firm does evaluate our proposal in depth before they decide to not want to be involved in producing our crystallite lens. I hope that we can find a firm that is equally capable of constructing our lens.>>>> It took us several years to find UIC Microphysics Labs with the assistance from EPI, the MBE equipment manufacturers. There were few MBE labs set up to run II-VI compounds and dopants required for our patented superlattice lens. I hope we don't have the same problem of finding another lab capable of constructing our lens or at least consult UIC or Applied Sciences in our attempts to construct the lens there. I know that the Alivisatos Group research group at UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory are capable of constructing our lens. Do you or somebody else at Quantum Dot Corp. know who we could contact there?>>>> We appreciate your efforts to assistance us, Mitch. We are currently negotiating for major funding and we hope we can include a laboratory capable of constructing our lens. Good luck with your bio projects, Mitch. Hopefully we can resolve our quest here in the near future. Please let me know if you can provide us with any information concerning our request. Thank you,>>>> Sincerely,>>>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal >> & Director, Engineering >> UNITEL, Inc. >> (503) 232-2740 >> www.unitelnw.com

> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:07:22 -0800> To: "B.G."@Rolls-Royce.com

155

> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> Subject: Fwd: RE: UNITEL, Inc.- Lens Construction Proposal

> "B.G.":

> FYI-- We are on the lookout for a lab that would be capable of producing our lens made of the II-VI compound/glass crystallite with cadmium sulfide effects.>> Larry>

S-102. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding web sources on quantum "fiber bundles"

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: fiber bundlesDate : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:30:55 -0800

At 11:11 AM 11/27/01 -0500, you wrote:

> In the interim before I make it up to our main public library, I found a web document which referenced that B & P Scientific American article at =>> http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:HxDQKXlKQqo:www.quantumpsychology.com/pdf/Test-ClassicalPsychospinors.pdf+%22Bernstein+%26+Phillips%22&hl=en . > > Also doing a "Google" search on the Internet produced :> > (1) Fractal Strings Fiber Bundles Fractal Gauge Invariant Solitons ...> => http://www.yahouston.com/fractalfiber/ > > (2) RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY,FIBER BUNDLES,KALUZA-KLEIN THEORIES AND ALL THAT..... > => http://www.wspc.com.sg/books/physics/0488.html >(3) Reduction in principal fiber bundles: covariant Euler-Poincaré equations > => http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~shkoller/reduct/reduct.html >> (4) FAILURE OF HIERARCHICAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF FIBER BUNDLES. II, USSR Academy of Sciences =>>http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:BjaiSxy8aGM:www.math.purdue.edu/~agabriel/fiber2.pdf+%22fiber+bundles%22&hl=en >> (5) [time 1085] John Baez on Fibre Bundles... => http://kims.ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/time/199912/0017.html >> (6) Re: fibre bundles - what are they and why are they important =>

156

> => http://www.lns.cornell.edu/spr/1999-11/msg0019116.html >> (7) Dr. Jack & ISSO => http://www.stardrive.org/torsion/sld048.htm >> (8) Natural operations in differential geometry by Ivan Kolar, Jan Slovak and Peter W. Michor> => http://www.emis.de/monographs/KSM/ >> (9) Guide to math needed to study physics => http://216.122.248.60/math/math2.html >> (10) Steenrod's book on fiber bundles is a good reference and contains explicit calculations in low dimension> => http://www.math.niu.edu/~rusin/known-math/97/fibrations.sphere >> (11) Reduction of the Hermitian-Einstein Equation on Kahlerian Fiber Bundles> => http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Reports/kamber/97-029.html >> (12) Steenrod also developed the theory of fiber bundles, and introduced the "Steenrod algebra" of cohomology operations> => http://www.nadn.navy.mil/Users/math/meh/steenrod.html >> (13) Is there a general relation between fiber bundles regarded as manifolds and >compactified dimensions?> => http://www.lns.cornell.edu/spr/2001-07/msg0034079.html >> (14) Topology I and II => http://www.mccme.ru/mathinmoscow/courses/topol12.htm >> (15) Homotopy, Covering Spaces, Manifolds. De Rham theory, Fiber Bundles. Integration of forms on Manifolds: Stoke's Theorem> => http://physics.bu.edu/~youssef/mathematical_physics/MathematicalPhysics.htm >> (16) Vector Bundles and Introduction to Gauge Theory => http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~bradlow/433.html >> (17) homotopy groups; 66. Fibrations the homotopy lifting property; 67. Fiber bundles; 68. Path fibrations and loopspaces; 69. Postnikov towers; 70. Obstruction ...> => http://uk.cambridge.org/mathematics/catalogue/0521795400/ >> (18) [I don't know what this is: building suits-of-armor with fiber bundles that become rigid on impact> => http://groups.yahoo.com/group/battle-sisters/message/4941 ] >> (19) 55R05 Fiber spaces; 55R10 Fiber bundles; 55R12 Transfer; 55R15 Classification; 55R20 Spectral sequences and homology of fiber spaces => http://www.ams.org/mathweb/msc1991/55Rxx.html >> (20) A ``Multi-Argus'' Facility at CFHT... The positionner necessary to place the fiber bundles already exists and is called FIFI. => http://www.cfht.hawaii.edu/Reference/Proceedings/soucail/ >

157

> (21) Algebraic theory of linear differential operators and introduction to geometry of jet spaces / A program of the course at the 1st Italian Diffiety School and at the 1st Russian Diffiety School> => http://diffiety.ac.ru/students/its98/alg1.htm >> (22) Uni- versidad de Sonora. Hamiltonian structures for dynamical systems on fiber bundles.> => http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:_7t6BI9Qai4:www.matmor.unam.mx/eventos/ams-smm/EN/SESIONES/sesionD1/sesionD1.pdf+%22fiber+bundles%22&hl=en >> (23) Hamiltonian structures for dynamical systems on fiber bundles> => http://churipo.matmor.unam.mx/eventos/ams-smm/EN/SESIONES/sesionD1/ >> (24) CERN: Robert's Home Page - ... Livre HyperTexte - HyperText Book: ESPACES FIBRES ET CONNEXIONS. FIBER BUNDLES AND CONNECTIONS. Table ... => http://c.home.cern.ch/c/coque/www/ >> (25) ... of main plasma z= + 450mm z= ± 0mm z= - 450mm R= 750mm R= 900mm SNU SND fiber bundles camera lens R= 750 R= 900 TCV vessel (top view) *three 20Hz Nd:YAG> => http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:-NdjISf2Nko:crppwww.epfl.ch/conferences/HTPD98/rommers.pdf+%22fiber+bundles%22&hl=en >> (26) …and last, your old buddy Dr. "Ark" from the eGroups anti-grav clubs :> => http://www.cassiopaea.org/toc/cassiopaea_K.htm >> Most of the search revealed OPTICAL "fiber bundles" and muscular (nerve) "fiber bundles".>> -- Mark

Hello Mark!

Way to go! What a veritable goldmine of information!! I forwarded it to Mike. It will take a while but I will check out all the URLs listed below. Will be great to gather all the latest info to do an informative film on our propulsion system to show the public.

Sincerely,Larry Maurer

S-103. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding potentially GOOD NEWS concerning funding

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.com

158

Subject : Fwd: Re: Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITELDate : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:04:59 -0800

> ----- Original Message -----

>> From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >> To: <pathfinder@mindspring.com> >> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:24 PM >> Subject: Fwd: Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITEL >> >> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:22:32 -0800 >> To: Paul Kirsh >> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >> Subject: Fwd: Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITEL >> >> Paul: >>>> Perhaps you could post a comment with your wonderful insight? We do have a goldmine of info here, Paul!>> >> Best,>> Larry

> From: "BluEyes" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> Cc: "BluEyes" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>> Subject: Re: Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITEL> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:34:15 -0800> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> > Larry and Team:> > Careful now. Yes, it does look like eyes are upon us~> > Thank you for your diligent work on the agreements for Doug B and Bryan W. All looks good from this end. Of course, we're in the makings of bringing everything that people can possibly imagine into Reality here and now. The shock-factor is something to ponder.> > Best regards,> Bryan Willoughby>.UNITEL Team Corporate Council> Founder - Affirm Technologies, Inc.> Shared Technology Partners> pathfinder@mindspring.com

S-104. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Jack Saratti's refusing to challenge Einstein on other topics

159

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: Fwd: Re: Motion Sciences ProposalDate : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:20:49 -0800

Mark:

I'm still reeling from Sarfatti's statement about Einstein being the know-all, last and final word in physics! What about Minkowsky? Didn't he pick up where Uncle Albert left off (sort of speaking)? I think Einstein was right. But where does Minkowski space, Aharonov-Bohm, and others fit in? No room at the top? Man, that Jack is narrow-minded! A true flatlander in a 3-D holo-world!

Guess where Hal is raising money for ZPE experiments and where it will be applied? SSSssshhhhhh … Loose lips sink ships.

I am still pissed about Jack-ass writing Barrett and badmouthing us. Terence quietly told me to just not even deal with Jack. My, what an evil weird web he spins! Is he running for office? Boy oh boy! Lord, please let us be funded before shithead gets a leg up on the public!

Regards,Larry Maurer

At 02:43 PM 11/27/01 -0500, you forwarded:

> From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com> > To: "Rees, Roderick A" <roderick.a.rees@boeing.com> > Subject: Re: Motion Sciences Proposal > Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:30:28 -0800 >>[Image] >>"Rees, Roderick A" wrote: >

>> You said: "Hal Puthoff, my old fellow student Daryl Leiter, Yilmaz, Schatzer, Eric Davis in http://www.nidsci.org/articles/davis/davis_mufon2001slides.pdf and http://www.nidsci.org/articles/davis/davis_mufon2001.pdf , et-al must FIRST come up with a clear explanation of what the physical foundations of their new theory really are. "

>>> >>> I could not agree more. I have been saying this for years about the approach of a great many players (John Baez, and so on) of mathematical fictions and games like n-dimensional strings, multiple universes, dark matterm and what not.

>>>> Yes, that is so also. Baez is guilty of misrepresenting pure mathematics as theoretical physics. However, Baez's math is consistent and correct. Not so with Hal Puthoff's and Bernie Haisch's current formulation of the SED, ZPE, PV approach to physics at the core of current Dot.Com type vaporware efforts to raise money for zero point energy and UFO propulsion research.>>

160

>> http://www.motionsciences.org/frameset.html?whereAmI=Research&menucolor=%23E1C8C8&location=/research/index.html&whereAmIFlash=3>>>> http://skepdic.com/refuge/firmage.html >> http://www.salon.com/tech/view/2000/07/05/firmage/index.html?CP=SAL&DN=660 >> http://www.parascope.com/nb/articles/firmage.htm

> > BTW dark matter is a fact for which I have an explanation > > http://stardrive.org/Jack/Cosmo1.pdf > http://stardrive.org/Jack/Physics101.pdf >

>> However, I have to remark that this is also what STR and GTR are. In order > to get something tractable, Einstein simplified by neglecting almost everything real.

> > No, you are acting like a crackpot. You can say that about all of theoretical physics.

>> >> It's a perfectly honest and honorable thing to do as long as we remember that "curved space-time" and such like are just simplified descriptions created for the sake of mathematical tractability. Gravity is not just geometry but rather a geometrical form can be made to describe the geometrical effects of gravity - but this is at best a "covering theory". Remember too the "cosmological constant" - a barefaced frig factor revealing Einstein's philosophical attitude to his own theory. Again perfectly honorable as a device to let us step onward, provided we keep in mind that sooner or later it is going to have to be justified by physical explanation.

>> Sorry, but you are very much like my well-meaning but misguided naive friend Joe Firmage. You show that a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing. The path to Hell is paved with good intentions.>>-- "What I cannot create, I do not understand." Richard Feynman

S-105. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding ideas for improving the UNITEL newsletter

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: the UNITEL newsletterDate : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:44:29 -0800

At 07:57 AM 11/27/01 -0500, you wrote:

> Good morning, Mr. Maurer -- > >The newsletter looked good. It portrayed UNITEL as a "rising star" rather than a "setting sun". I gather that you have 2 "prototypes" -- the superlattice laser lens and the smart skin

161

(which was of interest to Rolls Royce). The revised "initial effort" would appear to be to market the smart skin and use those funds to build HOLO-1 and then down-the-line.>> You might want to consider organizing the newsletter in a style similar to your website. Progress is easier to track this way by comparing the current newsletter to past ones. Having a section devoted to quantum computing and any progress; smart skin; medical applications; interstellar; new applications (such as the "stumpblaster" and the "people mover" train); a section devoted to stock values and offerings; a section devoted to on-going negotiations; and perhaps an "editor's corner" of personal rants-and-raves and "why are they ignoring this potential gold mine of technology?". This way, you're sure to command the attention of physicians who could care less about computers; and vice versa. >> Once you decide on a format, keep it more-or-less the same in future newsletters. (Of course, if something just looks bad, by all means improve it. Consistency has to take a back seat when it comes to correcting errors or making things easier-to-read/understand.) I would also note (while being careful to not divert interest away from UNITEL) what other companies are doing in these areas. To emphasize what UNITEL is proposing is not science-fiction (that "Tdimension" company is doing anti-grav with their inferior dye-based laser) and even sowing the seeds of "conspiracy" or "DoD favorite contractors" (choosing your words carefully not to cause libel suits or come off sounding like "sour grapes").>> I wouldn't be satisfied with 500 recipients, though. How many requested to be placed on the UNITEL mailing list? Your campaign should be two-tiered: reach the investors with money as well as the common public who can put pressure on the government (who will in turn give incentives to the investors). 50,000 would be a better number. Send out the newsletter twice-a-year, or even once-per-quarter like a stock dividend report. Bulk-mail via an automatic mail-merge program should be fast and cheap via the Internet.> > The bad thing about all those Yahoo! and MSN clubs/groups/communities is that they have relatively few members. When I had that small entrepreneurial model-photo studio, I watched a lot of Michigan-based Charles Lewis's videos on how to take photos and then market them. He suggested finding store windows to place samples , but said a boutique that averages 5.5 people-a-day won't do you as much good as a 10,000 person-a-day store like SEARS. (What negates his great idea is store politics -- local franchises are locked into just about everything they do-or-say from the home office. I even offered to take photos of any slow-moving merchandise with models and sets of their own choosing and enlarging the images to window-size. All for FREE! But only if they would let me place a small card at the base of the image giving the Studio's name and phone number. None of them would do it.)>>Why did the AVCO thing fail? No other company seemed to pick up on it. I remember reading about something similar as the first choice for the space shuttle (still being designed). But they chose the more expensive "tiles" option and I surmised that the former was still too based in theory and they had engineering "bugs" to work out. But that's been 30+ years ago. Surely they've gotten the bugs worked out by now. Unless they found that it simply won't work. That would have been a first step toward a primitive "Star Trek" Shields-On. The Russians have a black box that uses plasma sheathing that allegedly can make any plane radar-invisible, thus having no need for smart-skin or RAM coatings. But as far as I can tell, it hasn't appeared in any combat aircraft yet. Don't know if they've run into similar problems or what the hold-up is.>

162

> Marshall Barnes was asked to appear on a segment of "Unexplained Mysteries" (or some show with a name like that) on 'The Learning Channel' or 'The History Channel'. It was a 1-hour long show divided into two 30-minute segments. One of these was to deal with the Philadelphia Experiment -- fact or fiction? He came loaded with his arsenal of research (that was pre-approved) only to be told that he couldn't use a lot of it for time concerns. They ended up not using the majority of what little they filmed of him. He and his claims came off looking like Jack's crackpots. He was furious and went on a long Internet campaign detailing how he was promised this and then lied to. I can find some of those discussions if you want me to. He is convinced that other "powers-that-be" had their own agenda and wanted to mute the P-X story as it was drawing attention to something else. I cite this as an example to be VERY CAUTIOUS about dealing with any documentary film companies, whether they work for Hugh Hefner or for the Vatican.>> I'm probably a good "barometer" for the stuff you want to reveal in your book. By that I mean, the questions I ask and the technical levels I possess are indicative of most of the people who post at these sites or who are likely to read your book. In fact -- judging from some of my posts at 'The Black Vault' and that modern fighter board, my technical background (and I don't know s**t about modern physics) is above that of most of the people who read these boards. These are the same people who will comprise the majority of your book's audience. Don't be like Sarfatti. Don't use math, and try to keep these new underlying physical principles (like Hilbert space, fiberbundles, etc.) as minimal as possible. Write like Kaku or Moon (Montauk) -- their style was very easy to read, even for a politician! You have options here: you could write the book in a non-technical generalized style, then place the technical physics details in long footnotes (like Kaku did in "Hyperspace") or in appendices (like Moon and Nichols did in those Montauk books). Or do like Lazar was going to do (with a second, more detailed videotape) -- write a second book with all the equations and stuff for a critical peer review by fellow scientists. >And admit when you know something 'works' but can't explain why. Ask for suggestions/comments/help. If you approach it this way (in effect asking others to jump on-board and help you try to explain the mystery of why UNITEL's device works), you're more apt to win their hearts and support rather than their skepticism if you try to ram something you can't totally explain down their throats.>> I'd have to see some economics of mining operations. Are these minerals (to be minded on the Moon) going to be completely depleted on Earth? Is that the reason for yesterday's CNN article? With "slave labor", it can't cost that much to mind this stuff in South Africa or wherever it's buried. But on the Moon! You have to figure out ways to convert lunar soil & rocks into water & oxygen for humans. You have to supply food. You have to build radiation-resistant housing. I can't believe robots are going to do all the digging. None of this stuff is going to be laying around on the surface. A human would have to be personally directing robots on-site. And I'm not even assuming the to-and-from transportation costs. Gold would have to be $100,000-an-ounce to make this worthwhile. Or at least that's my initial gut reaction. And like I said, I tend to be a pretty good indication of what the middle-of-the-road believer-in-science is feeling.>> Bob King (who alleged that teleportation and not radar invisibility was the real purpose of the Philadelphia Experiment all along) said in an email to me that UNITEL just bought an existing patent when the old one expired and is trying to improve on it. All along I thought your ideas came solely from your "close encounter". Then in yesterday's email you mentioned one of your "mentors". I was trying to fit this in with what Mr. King said. One

163

of my next projects is to go through all of these emails that you sent me and try to organize them (chronologically by progress, for a start) so a compilation of them won't come off looking "disjointed" like Corso's and Moon's/Nichol's stuff. I'm trying to put together a better "supplemental" document and make it available at the UNITEL link at my site (replacing the haphazard makeshift one that's currently there). And I can email people and tell them more can be gleaned from this document. (I'm assuming I can get this done faster than your book. And it might serve as a rough draft for the book anyway.) Early-on we have to decide how much (if any) of your "close encounter" do you want to reveal. I'm guessing that people are more inclined to accept your ideas if they think it came from Einstein-like physical insights rather than one of Tesla's telepathic communications with Mars. (And who knows? Tesla may have been right because I'm convinced they are covering up something concerning Mars. Gore was briefed upon it before he left office while the election was still in doubt.)> That's all that I can think of for now. I'm going to get started on reviewing all those emails and re-writing/editing them if I have to in order to simplify it for most people. And I WILL try to find that Scientific American article on fiberbundles!>> Later --> -- Mark

Mark:

I liked your idea about the newsletter. It would really benefit us if we could reach the masses with our cold hard facts! I think we could at least pay our bills if we could sell our stock in small affordable packages of say 10-to-25 shares at $16.80 a share. This would make nice gifts for friends and family and, at the same time help us float above Sarfatti water! Just a thought.

Would you want to get involved in any promo or public representative spots? After I attended the sickening little get-together with the great Dr. Greer and his little flying circus of fantasy mind-control followers, I think the public really deserves what we have to offer; the truth in everyone's future of space propulsion and quantum computers. After all, there really is nothing more stranger or powerful than the truth!

This doesn't have to be boring either. We could have musicians, clowns (Sarfatti for one- hee hee :-), T-shirts, hats, etc. a veritable StarTrek/Greatful Dead/ super-skates movement that everyone could get behind and enjoy all the way to the stars!

Just a curious thought.....

Best regards,Larry Maurer

S-106. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding geometric "cones" with monopole interactions

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Coneheads on Parade!

164

Date : Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:34:34 -0800Attachment : cone.jpg (132k), cone-2.jpg (142k)

Here is a cone with monopole interaction

S-107. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding accidental divulging of confidential information

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : So. You want Submarine duty in our Tuna can?Date : Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:22:43 -0800

At 09:55 AM 11/28/01 -0500, you wrote:

> I'm curious about the timing of this potential funding offer from a "covert ops" group. Please DON'T tell me any of the details because I don't want to be privy to something I may accidentally slip in my enthusiasm about UNITEL's efforts. That's why I didn't want you to send me your CAD drawings. I'm a people-person and enjoying talking with anyone. Sometimes my excitement overrides my common sense and I shoot-off my mouth when I should have kept it shut. I don't want to jinx UNITEL or possibly give its secrets away to a competitor (patented-or-not). And if this funding comes about, I don't want to be shadowed by the Men-In-Black and Whackenhut employees and all that. (Of course, it might be too late for that as they probably would ask you for all people acquainted with your latest offers. If that's the case, tell them to offer me a job -- I've been ready-to-move for years. I just don't want to take any mind-control drugs or have implants.)>> But I did pass on to Tom Mahood who was an earlier skeptic of UNITEL's. I never did hear back from him but I took that to mean he was impressed by Rolls-Royce's interest and (since Tom is working on similar breakthrough propulsion projects) he was going to give

165

you another look. It would be personally rewarding to me if I knew that my recent e-mails to Tom resulting in him attracting attention to UNITEL by these "black" groups. Or if someone read something at my site and routed it to a higher power. But maybe not ... in the final analysis, who cares as long as you get the go-ahead funding to create the lens.>> But promise me one thing, Mr. Maurer: if it doesn't violate national security, you'll help me get one of the first "rides"!>> -- Mark

Mark :

Don't worry about getting involved with the Military. That's why I told you I suspect. That's all you'll get from me anyway. We shall see what happens with a ride in the future.

Regards,Larry Maurer

S-108. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding its ranking in the Top-100 in Aerospace

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: UNITEL in the "Top 100"Date : Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:29:41 -0800

At 01:35 PM 11/28/01 -0500, you wrote:

> It appears you have another supporter. On a SPACE.com message board => http://uplink.space.com/2/OpenTopic?q=Y&a=frm&s=874094803&f=545099473 , 'gfresh' posted "UNITEL Ranked 59th on BizWiz Top 100 Aerospace Charts" (-> http://www.bizwiz.com/cgi-bin/top100.cgi?top100index=Aerospace )

Whoops! I sent the last reply off without saying anything. I wanted to thank you for sending me this information. We really appreciate it!

Best,Larry Maurer

S-109. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a quantum strings rule

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Re: Stan Deyo and Electrogravitic PropulsionDate : Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:41:17 -0800Attachment : mod-2.jpg (870k)

166

Mark :

Another rule of quantum strings that works in our favor is that only one end-point is required to move at SOL. The other end (ship) can hover or perform any maneuver on the x,y,z axis. The dielectric force plays a dominant role in creating the quantum "system" that is found throughout all particle systems that is 2 bodies held together by a spring-like structure. Much more to come!

Regards,Larry Maurer

S-110. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding uses of supercomputers

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Re: article on uses of supercomputersDate : Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:18:07 -0800

>>At 10:24 AM 11/28/01 -0800, you wrote:>>>>>Hi, >>> saw this article may be of interest to you. best, Paul>>>>>> http://abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/TechTV/techtv_supercomputer011128.html

> At 01:40 PM 11/28/01 -0800, you wrote: >>>> Paul: >>>>Thanks for sending me the information! I have been thinking that we could offer a special investment package on a bulk email of selling our shares at $16.80 (normally at a

167

$1,000 minimum) per share in lots of 10 to 25 for the Christmas season only. This would give everyone a chance to give their children, relatives and/or friends a gift that would last for many years and potentially grow to a sizeable quantity of profit. The stock certificate would give the recipient a chance to be a part of our new and exciting, innovative corporation that is developing prototypes of quantum computers, aerospace EM laser propulsion and other industrial applications of our patented laser system. What do you think?

> From: Paul Kirsh <pkirsh@ucla.edu>> To: lmaurer@unitelnw.com> Subject: Re: NIH fund granting> At 03:26 PM 11/28/01 -0800, you wrote:>

> Hi,>> Yes, whatever it takes to raise money and perhaps this is a good time of year to ask. I also

think it is worth systematically going through the lists of venture capitalists and having appointments set up with them every single day for the next several months. Equally, it would be worth reviewing the STTR grant from the NIH I mentioned and starting to prepare that. I just sat in on a meeting where grant decisions were made for investigators in our institute here. The judges are just as cold and self-preserving as one imagines they are. So one must really carefully understand potential critiques and address them one by one.

>> Chiefly, I think money-givers are looking for a record of productivity. Without the basic

capital to be productive, then one must chose cheaper projects or hold off till the application is stronger. It is very hard. It also requires focus. But you know this. I will do what I can to help. As I have said before, UNITEL is about the only thing that interests me-- in particular, safe, interstellar travel. Perhaps I too should set more modest goals. Sorry if I sound negative. Maybe I need more sleep. One day at-a-time. Let me know when you have a revised newsletter. It should be 6-8 pages I think, with lots of little pictures.>> best, Paul

S-111. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding uses of supercomputers

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: new e-mail "diary" URLDate : Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:30:22 -0800

At 09:23 PM 11/28/01 -0500, you wrote:

> To speed up downloading (for computers with modems), I split up that single, long Word document of all my e-mails into smaller documents. They are indexed and referenced from http://www.stealthskater.com/UFO_Private.htm .>> I sent portions of Stan Deyo's book off to you today. You should get it by Friday. He seemed to have a pretty good description of electro-gravitic flight principles. (This is not MQT nor anti-grav by rotating plasma streams.) The theory doesn't seem too terribly

168

complicated (indeed it was proposed back in the 50's). The catch seemed to be having light-weight materials (possibly superconductive) and a light-weight, very powerful power generator capable of supplying millions of volts to the capacitors embedded in the hull. In his design he did have a "plasmoid" well ... I don't know what that was about. You might want to check it out to see if anything there applies to your "hovering mode". He also took exception to some of Einstein's stuff -- not from the point of knocking the parts of his theories that 'work', but rather addressing the parts that "prohibit" other events from occurring.>> -- Mark

Mark:

Thanks for the valuable info. We are certainly open to all ideas of a powerplant design. Until now we thought we would use a proton exchanger plant that Yoshinari Minami proposed we use. Very small, lightweight, and very powerful energy producer. I shall check the design.

Regards,Larry Maurer

S-112. from Ken Myers regarding information on ORMES room-temperature superconductors

From : Ken Myers <sprite_mkii@yahoo.com>To : stealthskaters@yahoo.comSubject :ORMESDate : Sun, 2 Dec 2001 18:26:27 -0800 (PST)

Would you please tell me if you have a separate location on your site for this general subject?

Our on-line group has been trying to follow the progress of the wpg research but it seems that current, post-1999 information has dried up. No one, it appears, wishes to "go public". David Hudson has, it appears, faded away.

I was very glad to have stumbled across your references.

Thanks and regardsKensprite_MkII@yahoo.com

S-114. from Bob King regarding the Great Pyramid & strange happenings in Antarctica

From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: the Pyramids and AnarcticaDate : Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:42:35 +1300

Hi ya Mark,169

Sunday, December 02, 2001, 3:59:45 AM, you wrote:> Using the Montauk boards as an example, I found out the hard way some stuff might not be 3 months later.

I agree. A lot of stuff that's published seems to change.

> -- like Simon's www.abovetopsecret.com which is always funning out-of-funds. So when they go away, they're gone for good.

I haven't seen that site but my first question would be 'where does he get his info from'? Probably his mind most of the time.

Okay. I was just wondering. One thing I would like you to have a few thoughts about though when you have the time. If the 'top piece' of the Great Pyramid was ever actually in place, then how did they get it there (as it is accepted that even today we could not place a block of that size and weight [450+tons] at that height)? (The issue behind this is that if that could be achieved then we may just begin to understand how they were built in the first place.) We could not even today place the roof beams across the 'Kings chamber'

> Did you read about the mysterious incidents happening at Antarctica? Why does so much happen down there and not at the North Pole?

I think the main reason is that Antarctica is 'land' and the North Pole is water.

> I mean, you got dozens of nations building camps down there. For WHAT???!

No idea myself.

> Those 2 women who were hiking across Antarctica had their route re-routed by U.S. government agents. Why? Could it have something to do with the 8 CIA/NSA agents who got mysteriously ill at some off-limits site down there and had to be secretly flown out in bad weather?

I heard about it but I have no ideas.

> Reports at Rense.com and Art Bell and Hoaglund said they found a warm body of water …

That I have also heard about. By warm, they mean it never freezes. But that could be to do with underground volcanic activity.

> … that led somewhere and contained a mysterious monolith (shades of Boylan!).

I did hear about that!

> I can try to find the URLs for those stories if they're still archived on those sites if you want me to.

170

No thanks. It's just a side issue for me.

--Regards,bob mailto:bobking@xtra.co.nz

S-115. from Bob King regarding ORMEs

From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: ORMESDate : Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:20:14 +1300

Hi ya Mark,

Wednesday, December 05, 2001, 12:29:59 PM, you wrote:> This is a strange one. Few people e-mail me about my site. But I received the following e-mail about some ORMES articles I posted (I found them on Shelley Palmer's Montauk Board). No-one I've talked to ever heard of ORMES (Orbitally Re-arranged Monoatomic Elements) capable of room-temperature superconductivity. If Larry Maurer of UNITEL was aware of them, he didn't let on, discussing mostly his "smart-skin" that appears to have been derived from the old AVCO company.

I have no idea what they are on about except for a piece further down the message which I will comment on.

> Mark Farmer said he heard rumors of the military developing a "null field" for optical invisibility.

The above has been developed to a point. But I don't know anything about it.

> But this doesn't sound like that. It really sounds more like the tales of the legendary Incunabula "egg". Although both articles are posted at my site, I've included them for your convenience after this guy's e-mail.

> Don't know what to make of this. Have I inadvertently stumbled on some secret if all references to them seemed to have been pulled off the web?

Could be. Sorry I can't help.

>>" No one it appears, wishes to "go public". David Hudson has it appears, faded away."

Who is D Hudson?

>>"Yes, Fred. I have done quite a bit of research into ORMES (orbitally re-arranged monoatomic elements). They are body temperature superconductors that exhibit other very unusual properties as well, such as the ability to "tunnel" out of sealed containers. I

171

have not ingested them personally, but I know people who have. They occur naturally within the body and in many foods. People who have ingested them over a period of time tell me that they seem to cause an increase in certain psychic abilities, their effects are similar to kundalini awakening. I believe they are related to the philosopher's stone. In the cells of our bodies there are structures called microtubules. There is much evidence that suggests that this is the physical location where our consciousness affects our bodies -- this is the mind-body interface."

This is rubbish as far as I am concerned.

>> Re: Einstein's Work Faces major Revisions As Speed-of-Light Might Change>> >>"It seems to me, though, that my periodic mentioning of monatomics has hit some kind of nerve. It seems to be more than a coincidence that things came to a "head" when I started discussing ORMES and microtubules on the other board. As for my recent silence, I have been disgusted by the recent turn of events and no longer wish to post that much. Why should I freely give away my work so that others can sell it in their books? I would like to give away what I find to be important so that they CANNOT sell it."

If he is so concerned, he is quite able to copyright it and/or patent any specific ideas.

>> But I have grown too tired and disgusted with the circus. I am only interested in the science. But here is a hint for you guys anyway. The UNITEL craft was mentioned on this board. What does 'crystallography', the UNITEL craft, and monatomic material have in common? SUPERCONDUCTIVITY! Notice the term "Bose-Einstein Condensate" on the UNITEL site explaining how their craft works. Superconductors are in a crystalline state because of Cooper pairing of the electrons. I am convinced that the Incunabula "egg" -- if it existed -- would have been made of a superconductive film that would contain and reflect magnetic fields generated by the occupant. Also it would not be necessary to have an "egg" at all if the "traveler" was sufficiently 'advanced'. This all ties in nicely with the subject of this thread about Einstein and his ridiculous speed-of-light limitations. The Delta-T antenna is a good example of Einstein being wrong, and there are many others. If you have an antenna that radiates a rotating magnetic field, the further out from the center of the antenna the faster the field rotates. The circumference of any spinning object rotates faster than the center. For example, if "something" spins at a mere 1 revolution-per-second at its center, if it is large enough where the circumference is greater than 186,000 miles, then the outer edge of this "something" exceeds the speed-of-light. If the frequencies applied to the antenna are high enough, superluminal velocities may be achieved within the frame of the antenna itself. The speed of anything is only limited by your reference point."

What is said above is correct but nothing new.

I managed to lose some of the message. But the one relating to Einstein being wrong about the speed-of-light is correct and has now been proven to be wrong. Many things in theUuniverse exceed the speed-of-light. The whole thing is very complex and involved and I have no intention of trying to explain it in a few words. As an example (for you): if nothing could exceed the speed-of-light, then there would be no limit as to how far back in time we could see. And yet there is.

--

172

Regards,bob mailto:bobking@xtra.co.nz

S-116. from Bob King regarding an article about the Eldridge motor generators and stuff on the Pyramid mysteries

From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: another site on the "Delta-T" ; includes stuff on pyramidsDate : Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:03:42 +1300

Hi ya Mark,

Thursday, December 06, 2001, 5:46:52 AM, you wrote:

> I found this site by accident. It looks too "New Age-y" for my tastes. But it did have a good description of some of the generators that may have been aboard the Eldridge at => http://members.aol.com/BDelphin/Bi05002.htm .

Filed for ref.

I would comment though that many different writers have described the generators which is of not the slightest use in reproducing them. I also note the 'may' have been aboard. How can they describe something they have never seen? This goes back to the biggest mistake the Powers-that-Be made while the War was in full progress which was to scuttle the Eldridge and so lose the knowledge that was on board.

> Another article at => http://members.aol.com/BDelphin/Bi05005.htm showed a design for the "Delta-T". In the Table-of-Contents at => http://hometown.aol.com/BDelphin/contents.htm , …

Filed, thanks.

> I noticed some stuff about Egypt and the pyramids. I don't know enough about that topic, but thought you might want to take a look.

Yep, I'll get around to it. The problem though is that it's all speculation and Hawass is of no help because he just says what the Govt. allows him to say. No one can even get the Egyptian Govt. to refute or admit whether they have continued with the exploration of the passage way the Gutenburg opened up with his robot.

--Regards,bob mailto:bobking@xtra.co.nz

S-117. from Bob King regarding useful references on Pyramid-related issues

173

From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: pyramid resourcesDate : Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:52:06 +1300

Hi ya Mark,

Friday, December 07, 2001, 1:24:56 AM, you wrote:

> Could you recommend some reference material to bring me up-to-speed on the pyramid stuff?

Sorry-- I can't help. As you say, it appears all spread around in bits and pieces. I don't have the web addresses but you could try 'andrewcollins' website.

> I've seen bits-and-pieces of it here-and-there, mostly written by New Agers of alternative-religious types whom I don't believe (that's not to say there might not be something there afterall, though). In the past I have tried to tie things -- however loosely -- together under some greater "umbrella". Hence UFOs, the P-X and Montauk (or Plattsburgh), and remote-viewing.

I don't see a lot of proven connections but some consider the flat top of the GP to have been a landing place. Also there is the problem that in spite of all out technology, we couldn't build the darn thing today.

> I have resisted the pyramid stuff because I didn't see how it could relate plus for the reasons already stated above. I may be making a mistake thinking all these phenomena HAVE to be interrelated. Maybe they are not.

I tend to think there is a connection. But that's just a personal opinion.

> To answer an earlier question on how the 450-ton tops were placed, I recall seeing a public television documentary on the huge statues on Easter Island (is that the name of the place??). People had been suggesting that extraterrestrial machines must have been utilized to move those things when there were not enough native people or livestock to accomplish such a feat. But this documentary revealed an alternative hypothesis which did use people in some unique engineering methodology to accomplish the transport. It was "proven" by a research team on a large scale model. I didn't remember too much of it, though.

I do! I also remember other things they tried to do. The erection of the Easter Island statues certainly could be achieved quite easily with enough manpower and virtually no tools. (I won't go into details).

A team from Japan tried to build a 15 meter high pyramid and ignoring the transportation problems they just got the blocks to a position in the desert and went ahead. In spite of the small size of the pyramid they wanted to build, they failed! The blocks were cut to roughly the same size as the ones in the GP and the found the simply could not construct even such a small replica without using modern machinery.

174

It was also pointed out to them afterwards that even today there is no machinery on Earth that could lift and place many of the blocks/beams etc in the GP (and that includes the largest crane in the World). They could have succeeded with their small one if they had used modern machinery but that is a world away from the GP.

It is also an accepted fact that we could not place the beams above the 'Kings Chamber' with anything we have today and also many of the other features that it contains.

> I also want to research the strange goings-on down in Antarctica if you ever come across any resources on that.

Will do. That is all new to me.

--Regards,bob mailto:bobking@xtra.co.nz

S-118. from Ken Myers regarding his comments on an ORMEs document

Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:46:12 -0800 (PST)From: "Ken" <sprite_mkii@yahoo.com>Subject: Re: more ORMESTo: stealthskaters@yahoo.com

"Mark" <stealthskaters@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I came across this lengthy article => http://zz.com/WhiteGoldWeb/ozone1.htm .

Thanks for the article.

My gawd! For a somewhat traditionally trained psychotherapist (Fritz Perls and Gestalt), I find these things suddenly making sense. Where as I used to discount this "stuff", I am pleased to find also that my nigglies were correct.

You made mention of Montauk articles in your last e-mail. I had remembered reading many of the reports some years ago. But I thought due to your reference, I would re-do my exploration. I read the Pulse article and was interested. I then started reading some of posting sites -- hoo boy! -- some of these folk are rather emotionally-challenged.

Still there is reason to believe that we have more to learn or should I say relearn than Western society will admit to.

Again thanks for the reference.Regards Ken

175

S-119. from Bob King on finding related web-sites

From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : refs.Date : Sun, 9 Dec 2001 13:16:22 +1300

Hi ya Mark,

You asked for some refs. to websites and have done a bit of looking around and you may not have seen some of these; I haven't given you the full address as a search will find them from the words listed.

cropcircles.co.ukeden123456-24nikolateslainformantthe montauk projectthe complete nikola.tcrop circle questcrop circle connectorancient egyptandrewcollinsmsss.com

Hope some of these may be of use to you in your quest. If you have any question regarding these sites, just let me know. Had a look around some of the sites you gave me and most of it is conjecture or in a foreign language. Trying to sort out the facts from the fiction is a long job. After all of these years, I have my doubts as to whether the truth of some will ever be known.--Regards, bob

S-120. from Dr. Arkadiusz Jadczyk on his opinion of a site that proposes an additional universal "repulsive" force

From : "Arkadiusz Jadczyk" <lark1@ozline.net>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: substitution of new forces into Einstein's Unified Field TheoryDate : Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:02:28 -0500

On 10 Dec 2001, at 8:59, Mark wrote:

> Dear Laura and Dr. Jadczyk -->> Someone (I assume the author of this site) e-mailed me referencing the article at => http://www.grantchronicles.com/astro19.htm . Sounds like another "twist" using known theories.

Indeed. Notice this piece from Laura's "session" 941007:

176

> "Q: (L) Is Al Bielek a phony?> A: Semi.> Q: (L) Did he work on the Philadelphia project?> A: No.> Q: (L) Was he brainwashed to have fake outrageous memories?> A: No.> Q: (L) Is he lying deliberately?> A: Instructed by government for disinformation dissemination.> Q: (L) Did a space craft of the Lizzies piloted by the Grays crash in Roswell?> A: Yes.> Q: (L) What caused the crash?> A: Ionization.> Q: (L) Were the bodies and the craft recovered by the United States Government?> A: Yes.> Q: (L) Are the Majestic 12 documents...> A: Semi-factual.> Q: (L) Were they dummied up?> A: Near.> Q: (L) Who did this and why?> A: To leak information and disinformation.

>"… version presented by mankind; there are no shortcuts. Considering Albert Einstein’s work, he is correct in his Unified Field Theory with an explanation of new phenomena. He proposed that there are four primary forces in the universe: a vibrational force, which controls the frequencies of matter and energy, nuclear force, gravity, and its opposite and balancing counterpart, the repulsion force.

He doesn't even know what he is talking about. Neither does he know about Einstein's work on unified field theories.

> I don't know if I should send this e-mail to Dr. Sarfatti or not. The last time I did I got back a lengthy response -- 90% of which was in complex math equations -- with a concluding statement insinuating I must be a "moron" (Heaven forbid that I should think outside the accepted dotted lines!).

You would get the same answer this time.

> Maybe the "noose" is being tightened among all these competing theories, somehow reconciling "truths" embedded in each. More food-for-thought ...

Now we have also this piece from 961123:

> "Q: (T) Is Courtney Brown a government disinformation agent?> A: More as an "agent provocateur."> Q: (T) Is he working for the government?> A: Not directly, and remember, the government is not one entity.> Q: (L) Who is primarily backing Courtney Brown?> A: Rockefeller group.

177

> Q: (L) And, is Mike Lindemann and company part of this Rockefeller group at this time?> A: Yes.> Q: (L) Linda Howe?> A: No.> Q: (T) Did Courtney actually do remote viewing to obtain the information in the book?> A: Not really. Not needed.> Q: (T) Does this mean that the whole story is concocted on his part?> A: Semi. Elements of it are factual.> Q: (T) Yes. I could see that there were factual elements. I could also see that there was a LOT that was questionable. That conflicts with EVERYTHING else that has come out from other researchers. This is all totally twisted and different.> A: Close."

So you see, as everywhere else, elements of truth are sandwiched between lies and disinformation in a calculated way so that getting to the true bottom becomes practically impossible.

You may say: "well, that is just channelling". But if you use your own mind, you will get to exactly the same conclusion by logical thinking.

I do not have a mathematical theory of "densities" yet. But I hope I will have it - sooner or later. Work-in-progress, so to say.

Thanks for writing,

Best wishesark

P.S. I will not comment on Jack Sarfatti. Once he called himself a "theatrical physicist". And probably that is what he is. Our web page on "Stargate Conspiracy" (cassiopaea.org/cass/stargate.htm) may help you to locate this phenomenon in a wider context.

#############################################Dr Arkadiusz Jadczykhttp://www.cassiopaea.org/quantum_future/homepage.htm

S-121. from Dr. Arkadiusz Jadczyk on saying I shouldn't have e-mailed Jack Saratti with the same question

From : "Arkadiusz Jadczyk" <lark1@ozline.net>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: substitution of new forces into Einstein's Unified Field TheoryDate : Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:55:36 -0500

On 10 Dec 2001, at 8:59, <stealthskater> wrote:> I don't know if I should send this e-mail to Dr. Sarfatti or not.

Hi Mark,

178

So you DID. And you got the "answer" - what else could you expect? But this time, Jack was not in the mood to add some of his "math". Instead you are invited to buy his book.

Best wishes,

ark

#############################################Dr Arkadiusz Jadczykhttp://www.cassiopaea.org/quantum_future/homepage.htm

S-122. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti with his opinion on the site that suggested a universal "repulsive" force

From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>CC : "Bruce D. Curtis" <brucedcurtis@earthlink.net>, APOLLINAIR <APOLLINAIR@aol.com>, Arkadiusz Jadczyk <lark1@ozline.net>, Yokatta <yokatta@oxy.edu>, "wolfr@usfca.edu" <wolfr@usfca.edu>, Wes Thomas <west@sonic.net>, Wcri <wcri@erols.com>, Vladimir Poponin <v.poponin@worldnet.att.net>, "visions@ntlworld.com" <visions@ntlworld.com>, "vecker@ufomag.com" <vecker@ufomag.com>, UFO Files <WeeklyFiles@filersfiles.com>, Truzzi <truzzi@toast.net>, "tony@isso.org" <tony@isso.org>, steve wolff <swolff@umevoice.com>, Scott Jones <sherlight@ktc.com>, Saul Paul Sirag <sirag@mindspring.com>, Russell Targ <radiant@pacbell.net>, Ron Pandolfi <pandolfi@zzapp.org>, "retecun@tiscalinet.it" <retecun@tiscalinet.it>, Raymond Hudson <Rainman@tree-o-life.org>, "Puthoff@aol.com" <Puthoff@aol.com>, "ParadigmRG@aol.com" <ParadigmRG@aol.com>, "paolaharris@hotmail.com" <paolaharris@hotmail.com>, Mirage <joe@motionsciences.org>, Mike Coyle <vericomm@idiom.com>, "mark@isso.org" <mark@isso.org>, <Mark@k-dunn.freeserve.co.uk>, "manuelfigueroah@teleline.es" <manuelfigueroah@teleline.es>, King Motion Seances <king@motionsciences.org>, Joseph207 <Joseph207@Home.com>, Joel Kohn <jmkohn@sirius.com>, Jeffrey <jeffrey@williamjames.com>, "JDering@sara.com" <JDering@sara.com>, JagdishM <JagdishM@aol.com>, <ItalianPhysicsCenter@YahooGroups.com>, <ira-einhorn@yahoogroups.com>, ira-einhorn Moderator <ira-einhorn-owner@yahoogroups.com>, Hippy Dippy Doo Doo <schwann@webtrance.co.za>, Hinckley & Susan Waitt <info@taggarthouse.com>, Henry Monteith <henrym@roswell.net>, <Hankskids@aol.com>, Hal Fox <halfox@qwest.net>, Glen Lindenstadt <GlenL@pacbell.net>, "Gary G. Ford" <swimp@shaw.ca>, <galactic_diva@mail.telis.net>, Faustin <faustin@sound.photosynthesis.com>, "Eugene F. Mallove" <editor@infinite-energy.com>, "etimes@teleport.com" <etimes@teleport.com>, "ericdavis@nidsci.org" <ericdavis@nidsci.org>, Eldon Byrd <tuc@kiva.net>, Decker1 <decker1@mediaone.net>, David Gladstone <davidg3141@hotmail.com>, David Crockett Williams <gear2000@lightspeed.net>, Damnation Smith <dansmith@clark.net>, "creon@isso.org" <creon@isso.org>, Carrawae <carrawae@nosc.mil>, Brumac <brumac@compuserve.com>, Brotherblue93 <brotherblue93@hotmail.com>, "Bobj137@aol.com" <Bobj137@aol.com>, "bob@sound.photosynthesis.com" <bob@sound.photosynthesis.com>, Bill Wear <billwear@billwear.org>

Subject : Latest idiotic flying saucer pseudoscience!Date : Mon, 10 Dec 2001 07:48:17 -0800

<stealthskater> wrote:179

> Dear Dr. Sarfatti -->> Someone (I assume the author of this site) e-mailed me referencing the article at => http://www.grantchronicles.com/astro19.htm . Sounds like another "twist" using known theories. It's interesting that he believes in a 5-dimensional universe. The new Ekypyrotic alternative to the Inflationary part of the Big-Bang theory also is based on universes created from collisions between 5-dimensional parallel membranes (somehow this is based on superstring and M-brane theories). Also his belief in a 'repulsive' particle (quantum counterpart to the 'graviton') seems to bolster Lazar's claims of witnessing tests where golf balls were bounced off of the alien disc's power field. Didn't Stan Deyo and Richard Crandall suggest "gravity" was the result of 2 interacting "forces" ?>> Taken out-of-context from this site: "First, Bob Lazar is right about element 115 as the primary element that fuels the advanced reactor in spacecraft. ... His theory concludes, that faster-than-light space travel is accomplished by closing the distance between two points with amplified gravity waves. The theory falters, when you have to consider an anchor point in space needs to be established in order to compress linear distances between the initial start point and its destination. ...">>"Curves and folds in the fabric of space and time do not exist in the version presented by mankind; there are no shortcuts. Considering Albert Einstein’s work, he is correct in his Unified Field Theory with an explanation of new phenomena. He proposed that there are four primary forces in the universe: a vibrational force, which controls the frequencies of matter and energy, nuclear force, gravity, and its opposite and balancing counterpart, the repulsion force. The vibrational and repulsion forces are new phenomena, and were dismissed by scientists and are still unknown to general science. Both are key elements for movement to occur in exotic spacecraft. ...">>"The movement of a spacecraft through the cosmos is a multi-step process. Three main steps have to occur in order to achieve travel throughout the universe. Step 1: The creation of an internal gravitational and external repulsion fields to provide gravity and protection of the exterior skin of the ship. Step 2: The ability to engage local gravitational fields emanating from moons, planets and stars. Step 3: Density switching, it is an advanced technology, which can transmute matter and energy to different vibrational levels, allowing access to parallel universes. These steps, none of which to the dismay of mankind involves propulsion. Instead, it is the elimination of an unknown balancing force to gravity, the repulsion force, which is perceived as weightless to mankind when in outer space. The repulsion force, once removed from a craft’s equilibrium as a stationary object, allows the force of gravitational particles flowing towards nearby cosmic objects to attract the spacecraft at speeds approaching the speed-of-light for the corresponding density level or parallel universe. ...">> "The composition and properties of the metal, which make up the exterior of the spacecraft, are similar and different in many ways to what is known here on Earth. The metals are similar in their elemental composition found here on Earth, but differ in the purity of the metals and the structure, placement and number of molecular bonds linking the atoms. This new structure of the atoms can be referred to as Molecular Interlacing, where the atoms arrange themselves in an interlocking pattern based on a crystalline formation of triangles. To visualize the links between the atoms, I will set a pair of hexagons that

180

intersect in the middle of each form at a 90-degree angle and share two opposing angles on their perimeters. ...">> I added a <link> to his site with the rest of the UFO/P-X/Montauk/time-travel/remote-viewing material at http://www.stealthskater/index.htm .>> ALL of these New Age and post-Quantum theories have their share of detractors/skeptics/cynics. Probably like all of the world's religions. The only way to prove which is correct (in this mortal life) is to actually fly a man-made UFO (whose construction was based on one of these theories) or "walk on water" (in the latter case). Maybe all of these theories have some grain of truth in them that will yet be explained in a much more rigorous hypothesis. I would hate to discard an entire theory just for its "bad" parts (like junking an entire car because is radio doesn't work). This is just more food-for-thought (in case you never heard of this guy) ...> > Regards --> -- Mark

Everything above is worthless Cargo Cult pseudoscientific not even wrong garbage! This is the sort of idiocy that gives real work on the physics of UFOs a bad name. It shows how most people are incredibly stupid in this area! I am completely disgusted by what I see above. It's almost as bad as Victor's plan to use David Hudson's Occult Nazi SS derived Ormus "white powder" to power space ships.

BTW 99.9% FREE final version of my book, exposing all this nonsense is now online

http://stardrive.org/Jack/Book.pdf190 pages in 8x11, complete index

soon will be available, both hard and soft cover, from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Borders Books etc.

warning the above file is 9 megabytes and is in secure pdf (i.e,. you can download it, read it off the screen, but it will not print hard copy. You need to buy the book.)

You need FREE Adobe Acrobat version 5 reader to see this file properly.

http://www.adobe.com

Just like we are driving out al Qaeda, we must drive out the toxic cosmologists that "weaken American Science" (Ed Teller) and defraud investors with obvious "vapor ware" that has no chance of working as advertised because it's completely idiotic.

S-123. from Dr. Arkadiusz Jadczyk regarding Tom Bearden

From : Arkadiusz Jadczyk" <lark1@ozline.net>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: that's what I get for asking a question ... !!!Date : Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:00:31 -0500

181

On 10 Dec 2001, at 11:48, you wrote:

> … I don't know anyone other than Bearden who's been publicly pursuing the scalar stuff. (I notice that you did admit that Bearden "knew his math" but you never gave a final conclusion on your appraisal of him.)

Once we are on the subject, see below my "letter" to Col. Bearden which I decided not to send as there were rumors that he has suffered heart attack around this time. And also because I decide that it will not really make any difference:

>> From: "Arkadiusz Jadczyk" <lark1@ozline.net>>> Reply-To: lark1@ozline.net>> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:44:19 -0400>> Dear Dr Bearden,>>>> Yesterday, one of the readers of our site http://www.cassiopaea.org (more than 2000 visitors each day) wrote to me:>>

>>> From: (supressed)>>> To: <ajad@ift.uni.wroc.pl>>>> Subject: The Tom Bearden Website ( http://www.cheniere.org/ )>>> Date sent: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:12:46 -0500>>>>>> I know of you through my viewing of the Cassiopaean Experiment. But I see you are a visionary and a needed force in the alteration of scientific thought today. For several years, I have followed (to the best of my feeble ability) the trail of another such gifted and visionary scientist and thinker, Lt. Col. (U.S. Army, ret) Tom Bearden. I think you need to become better acquainted. I have attached a link to his website herein. Much success to you and your work. Most sincerely -- a follower and seeker, RS

>>>> After that, I downloaded your site for an easy offline study and started to read. The first thing I learned was about Lake Cheniere. I noticed that you are trying to be personal and direct. The same way I do on my website.>>>> But while reading further on, I noticed many differences and it is these differences that I would like to talk about. Our reader suggests that, perhaps, I need to be "better acquainted". But to achieve this end a discussion of potential points of confusion is necessary.>>>> It is normal that doctors and experts often disagree and therefore a second opinion is always helpful. Let me start with just that. Here is the abstract from a paper by W. Rodrigues et co. (http://www.cptec.br/stm/preprints/waldyr6.pdf ) submitted for publication.>>

>>> "Abstract: We show that the AIAS group collection of papers on a "new electrodynamics'' recently published in the Journal of New Energy as well as other papers signed by that group (and also other authors) appearing in other established physical journals and in many books published by leading international publishers (see references) are full of misconceptions and misunderstandings concerning the theory of the electromagnetic field and contain fatal mathematical flaws which invalidates almost all claims done by the authors.">>>

182

>>> The AIAS group includes:>>>>>> "P. K. Anastasoviski, T. E. Bearden, C. Ciubotariu, W. T. Coffey, L. B. Crowell, G. J. Evans, M. E. Evans, R. Flower, S. Jeffers, A. Labounsky, B. Lehnert, M. Meszaros, P. R. Molnar, J. P. Vigier and S. Roy."

>>>> So here is the problem:>>>> W. Rodrigues -- whom you consider as being one of the experts on the subject -->>

>>> (in 052001.htm you write: "Note that every major weapons lab on Earth has now "discovered" longitudinal EM waves and the potential for weaponization. Simply download papers by Rodrigues and Lu from the Los Alamos National Laboratory website."

>>>> considers the papers of the AIAS group (of which you are one of the most important members) as "full of misconceptions and misunderstandings concerning the theory of the electromagnetic field and contain fatal mathematical flaws which invalidates almost all claims done by the authors.">>>> Let me add that I do share his opinion to a large extent.>>>> How are we to understand this curious disparity? Disagreement not about details of secondary importance but about the fundamental issues: misconceptions, misunderstanding, and fatal mathematical flaws - invalidating almost all claims.>>>> How do you manage to quote an expert as a source of validation regarding what you are writing who essentially invalidates what you are writing about?>>> I am trying to predict your possible response to this question. You may choose to answer>>

>>> "I do not have time for -- nor am I interested in -- debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin so-to-speak."

>> as you wrote on your chenerie homepage. But I hope that you agree that it is not "angels" that Rodrigues is talking about. He is talking about misconceptions, misunderstanding, and fatal mathematical flaws. Moreover, you also wrote:>>

>>>"I'm very much impressed with how slowly Science changes ..." (I wonder if you meant "I'm very much concerned about ..." rather than "impressed"?).

>>>> We are talking here about Science and its progress. Rodrigues is a scientist. I am a scientist, too. Why is Science progressing so slowly? Perhaps it is because of misconceptions, misunderstandings, and fatal mathematical flaws.>>>> You are addressing your words to "sharp young grad students and post-docs". In the spirit of Science that can make progress, I would suggest that you quote on your pages also critical opinions about this "new Electrodynamics.">>

183

>> On your homepage, you also write:>>

>>> "Whether a particular model is "right" or "wrong" is not the question. The question is: is it useful and does it predict some new and useful results?"

>>>> Well, Science is all about that. It is about right and wrong models, right and wrong theories. Right theories accelerate progress. Wrong theories slow it down or stop it completely. Moreover, deciding which are "right" and which are "wrong" models is objective to a large extent. But deciding what is useful and what is not is largely subjective. Useful for "whom" and for what purpose? For instance, in a military environment, wrong theories can be useful for disinforming enemies.>>>> You may also bring up the point that:>>

>>> "Abstract mathematics is a wonderful exercise and set of models. But the physics is in the concepts which the mathematical symbols represent and which the mathematical operations manipulate. The physics is not in the mathematics itself per se."

>>>> Certainly here we agree. But the point is that you yourself are discussing mathematics (for instance, the use of quaternions). And it is the AIAS application of mathematics that contains "fatal mathematical flaws invalidating almost all claims".>>>> Let me move to another subject that is bothering me -- your paper with Walter Rosnthal. "On a testable unification of ElectroMagnetism, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics", you wrote:>>

>>> (1) Since the quaternion is a hypernumber, Maxwell's theory was a hyperspatial theory . (2) Heaviside discarded its unified field theory aspects. In short, Heaviside (..) threw out electrogravitation in the process.

>>>> I know that the paper with Rosethal is not the first one where these statements appeared. In "Background for pursuing Scalar Electromagnetics" (1992), you wrote:>>

>>> "… till remained and infolded inside itself (i.e., it then consisted of) scalar and vector functions of the yet-present-and-interacting component vectors."

>>>> And further:>>

>>> "If you want to know what all the fuss about the difference between Maxwell's 200-odd quaternion equations EM theory [40] and the Heaviside/Gibbs four vector equations curtailment/subset, just look at the difference between a zero vector result and a quaternion resultant in an interaction where the vector resultant is zero but the scalar component of the quaternion resultant remains. Specifically, look mathematically at the internal functional nature of that remaining scalar resultant -- the part that's thrown away in the present theory."

>>

>>>> Well, in the original Maxwell equations the scalar component is decoupled from vector components. Thus the statement above is at least misleading. It is not precise enough to be called "wrong" and you are not helping the reader by writing down the formula. That is what

184

Maxwell theory is about. Concepts that are numerically related to experiments by exact mathematical formulas.>>>> These statements of yours about importance of quaternions in Maxwell equations have been repeated endless numbers of times on the Internet and in "Free Energy" publications. They were also discussed, in particular, on Jack Sarfatti's list with the conclusion>>

>>> "It appears that Bearden's claims here are discredited.">>>> which is similar to being diagnosed as suffering from "misconceptions, misunderstanding, and fatal mathematical flaws invalidating almost all claims." In the case of quaternions, there are no fatal mathematical flaws because you are not supporting your statements by equations. Evans and other AIAS members are doing this and that is where Rodrigues directs his criticism.>>>> I researched the subject myself (being a theoretical physicist with an expert knowledge of algebra and unified field theories) and came to the same conclusion. Moreover, as far as I know, you never answered this public criticism which is something unusual among scientists. (Even worse, Richard Hoagland is perpetuating your statements as "scientifically proven" as you have a PhD degree!)>>>> I am thinking and am trying to understand your motivations. And I am trying to learn something this way.>>>> Certainly you were working in a different milieu than I was working in. Different from that in which most scientists are working which is free research and free choice of topics in an academic environment. While I was looking for topics of great theoretical appeal, you were being given problems that needed to be solved. And solved in a short time.>>>> For me, solving a problem means (a) understand what is going on, (b) relate it to the rest of science, and (c) make a theory that is free of contradictions. For you, solving a problem means (a) finding how the damned thing works, (b) copy it, (c) then improve and make it usable in a controlled manner. Whether there is a consistent theory explaining what is really going on is of no importance. Creating theories should be left to those who have nothing better to do.>>>> Is it your opinion? That is most definitely the impression your writing is conveying. How else should the reader of your web pages understand "Whether a particular model is "right" or "wrong" is not the question...?">>>> And yet you value theories. You support Evans and AIAS group. You quote Einstein and you aim at improving Einstein's relativity and Maxwell's electromagnetism. You aim (or at least so you say) at creating a unified field theory of Electrogravity.>>>> But how such a theory can be built if its foundations contain fatal mathematical errors and when the story you have propagated about suppressing quaternions "is discredited" is beyond me.>>>> Can a better theory be built on a such doubtful foundation?>>>> Many questions. I would really like to have some insightful answer. Not because of my personal curiosity but because of what, as I think, is at stake. The very fate of Humanity is at stake -- this is what I think.

185

>>>> Let me try to be more precise. I totally agree with you that "There is a special time bomb ticking away for all of Humanity." But I do not agree that>>

>>> "We have within our grasp the final technology. It is a 2-edged sword of nearly unlimited power. We can overcome the Cosmos and conquer physical Reality itself. Or we can utterly destroy ourselves and our planet. From the tree of knowledge, we have eaten the final fruit that deals with this physical world. We can mold our physical reality as we will and make of it a Utopia or a Hell."

>>>> "WE" who?>>>> Sincerely,>> ark

S-124. from Matt ("Madtz" at 'The Black Vault') regarding Dr. Sarfatti's response to me

From : "Bob Dobbs" <psychickmatt@hotmail.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: this is what I get for asking an honest question !Date : Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:19:41 -0600

> From: stealthskater@hotmail.com> To: psychickmatt@hotmail.com> Subject: this is what I get for asking an honest question !> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:38:04 -0500

> Matt --

> I sent you the <link> to that guy's site on a repulsive force in addition to gravity and the "density-shifting" stuff. I had seen both of these subjects in other places. He just sent me an e-mail out-of-the-blue. He must have gotten to my site from a message I posted somewhere.>> So I thought I'd see what some people had to think about his stuff. I made the mistake of asking Dr. Jack Sarfatti. I just asked a simple question and quoted a few sentences take out-of-context from this guy's paper and provided a <link> for the full document. Then I get slammed hard by this demi-god who seems to be a bright guy but has never won a Nobel Prize or received a patent as far as I can tell. Worse yet, he used my name in his PUBLIC response to me! It's people like him who discourage other people from pursuing science. He say's he teaches a basic physics course at CalTech. I can't believe anyone can teach with an attitude/temperament like that.>> -- Mark

Wow! And he even compared your information to Al'Queda.

186

What an asshole!

S-125. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding UNITEL's physics expert Mike Miller

From : "Arkadiusz Jadczyk" <lark1@ozline.net>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: UNITELDate : Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:07:54 -0500

On 10 Dec 2001, at 19:54, <stealthskater> wrote:

> I have MANY more e-mails that I keep in a semi-private on-line "diary" of e-mails from everybody (Sarfatti, Mahood, Chica, Boylan, Maccabee etc. included). But as you can see, it doesn't sound like a "con" scheme to me

OK. So Miller knows all about physics. That makes me happy. I wish them good luck. No kidding!

BTW , working on a new web page re: Bearden and AIAS . Just the facts.

Bestark

S-126. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding Black Hole physics

From : "Arkadiusz Jadczyk" <lark1@ozline.net>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: desktop publishing tipDate : Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:32:00 -0500

On 12 Dec 2001, at 9:30, <stealthskater> wrote:

> (1) Do black holes have a finite size? And (2) if more material is squeezed into the "jar" than would seem physically possible, it must go into the "pouch" of one of these extra dimensions??? (my corrolary to Sarfatti's Feynmann quote: "I have difficulty explaining what I cannot picture in my mind")

The concept of "size" -- which we think we know what it means in our environment -- becomes problematic in strong gravitational fields. How do you want to measure size? By the time it takes for light to travel around the black hole? How will you make it travel around and not being sucked in?

Black hole physics is incomplete. We know that quantum effects becomes important. But Hawking's method of doing it is only approximately correct (and, in fact, it is wrong). But I do not have a correct model either (not yet).

ark

187

> Concerning Deyo and electro-gravitic flight, I'm convinced it's taking place today. I think his theories describe the aerodynamics okay, but I don't think these craft are necessarily using his ideas for power generation. He is a lot like Bearden. Everything they say sounds half-way good and seems to-be-based in theory. Yet they never have anything concrete that works! I'd investigate how they are powering the "Dark Star" or if they are using MHD to create power at the same time they are minimizing certain gravitational effects through rotating plasma. Maybe one process can yield multiple dividends. >> -- Mark

S-127. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding selling more stock and proposed book sales

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : SOS!!Date : Sun, 16 Dec 2001 22:15:29 -0800

At 09:30 AM 11/29/01 -0500, you wrote:

> Good morning, Mr. Maurer -- >> I have a copy of an article I read in a computer magazine back in 1997-8. It's a home and I can dig it up if you need the details. IBM's latest design for their next generation supercomputer will require innovative design and engineering breakthroughs in self-repairing circuits. It will be tennis-court sized. As I recall they were looking at a 5-year project once they got funding.>> The first test problem was to simulate how a particular protein unfolded and folded. Apparently the key to protein reactions is not so much "chemical" but more geometric or stereo-chemical. I know in chemical reactor design, the rate-determining part of the overall process might not be the chemical reaction itself but rather the time it took for a molecule to diffuse-or-tunnel through a particular regime or attach itself to an "active site" on the catalyst. It seems that proteins can undergo billions of possible "folds". Current supercomputers would take decades to do this simulation. IBM hopes their design can solve it in 1 year. (That still seems like a long time to me. I'm relying on memory here until I can get the article.) >> The point of all this is you're competing for funds with a "proven" and favorite-son of industry and government. There may be more out there with similar designs (Cray?). The good part is their design was not a "quantum" computer which most "experts" believe is still decades away from practicality. And you know the guys with money can be pretty "judgmental" and conservative sometimes. It's a shame we can't find someone like Howard Hughes with billions and one foot in-the-grave and he wants to experience space travel before he dies. Maybe demonstrating how long it would take UNITEL's quantum computer to solve this protein simulation (compared to IBM's 1-year ... and that's just with ONE protein!) before the NIH would cause them to overcome their skepticisms.>> -- Mark

188

Hi Mark:

Sorry for the delay in my reply. My computer crashed (and burned) as I explained in the hand-written letter I sent you awhile back. I repaired it with a new mother board ($180).

We are experiencing a terrible time right now with the screwed-up economy. We are willing to sell small amounts of stock to all of our supporters to get through this period of waiting for completion of our negotiations with the major investors we have been meeting with for the last few months. We have made excellent progress with more than one interested financial organization and they have expressed their sincere desire to fund us, most likely by the end of January 2002. Unfortunately, our bills are piling up and it is hard to tread water until January.

I have been working night&day on our book that we want to publish soon. I could send you the updated version via email if you like. I believe that our autobiography book if put together professionally should be worth a considerable amount of money and quite possibly be a "best seller". We have a great editor (Paul Kirsch) who has written articles for Wired magazine and the Wall Street Journal. The book should not only provide UNITEL with cash flow profits from sales of the book but also enlighten the public to our important projects that will really help out when we go public with our IPO on the stock market.

While we are waiting for the forthcoming meetings with major financial backers, we could really use some funds to keep afloat, pay for computer repairs, and the like. So we are prepared to sell small amounts of stock at an attractive price (at $16.80 we will sell 2-for-1 one shares for a up to $1,000) to get through this screwed-up economy and its gloomy outlook.

I tell you the engineering trade is damn near dead here in Portland. I know you mentioned that you could not help us much with investment. However we only need a small amount of funding to make it through this waiting period. If you know anyone at all that can help us in this dire time, please let me know. Through faith, hard work, and team effort, we will be successful!

Best wishes for the holidays!

Larry Maurer UNITEL, Inc.

S-128. from Jack Sarfatti regarding personal religious beliefs and quantum theory & human consciousness

From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>To : sarfatti@well.comSubject : Re: Destiny Matrix reader feedbackDate : Mon, 24 Dec 2001 09:13:49 -0800

Pclamont... wrote:

> Greetings, Dr. Sarfatti. I apologize for this intrusion on your time. I just located your website and have enjoyed it immensely. I will visit often in order to read it all. The subject matter is fascinating and the text is well-written. I could never tire of the study of time

189

travel, interdimensional travel and so on. I am a biologist but physics is my passion. I am especially fond of Erwin Schroedinger and wave mechanics. If I may I would like to ask a question. I noticed your mention of Jesus. May I ask what inspired you to believe in Jesus?

What do you mean? Do you mean my online book Destiny Matrix (soon to be in paper) http://stardrive.org/Jack/Book.pdf 11megs FINAL FORM (at least ~ 99.9 %typo format corrected)

posted last night ?

That last chapter is by my 88 year-old father Hyman Sarfatti, not me. I have nothing against Jesus, of course. But I am not religious in the old-fashioned way like my mystical Dad. I am more in the tradition of English skepticism and French Rationalism, Roger Bacon, Hobbes, Locke, Voltaire. His views should not be confused with my own.

I wanted him to see his ideas in print before he passes to the other side. (Like Kip Thorne wanting gravity wave data for John Archibald Wheeler who's now ~92). Although he (and my mom) are both mobile, hale and hearty with no major ailments.

> The reason I ask is that I used to be a Christian with a belief that death was not absolute. However, I became an atheist when I entered college. I began to associate religion with ignorant people. However, I have found that there are extremely intelligent people such as yourself who are somewhat religious, so I am not so certain anymore.

I have a physical theory of Consciousness that produces plausible numbers for humans like ~0.3 seconds for the objectively clocked resolving time of a subjective inner conscious moment based on 1018

qubits in the brain -- the actual number of hydrophobically-caged electrons inside microtubules (see Penrose's "Shadows of the Mind" and Hameroff's webpage). The power dissipation needed to maintain our stream of consciousness is only ~ 10-2watts. All of these numbers are tied to the Hubble parameter H which in my theory is related to a local cosmological /\(x) field that is the cosmological consciousness pump!

That is, locally, the cosmological field pumping our stream of inner consciousness is

/\(x) = (c/H(x))2 = [1/Lp*(x)]2[1 - Lp*(x)3 psi(x,Future)psi(x,Past)]

Lp*(x) is locally variable Planck scale from hyperspace.

psi is spontaneous broken phase symmetry LOCAL order parameter of quantum vacuum whose partial cohering of the random zero point fluctuations of the false vacuum creates classical curved space-time from Josephson phase modulation and the local cosmological field /\(x) from local amplitude modulation. The two are coupled together of course.

psi(x,Future) is Aharonov's "destiny vector"

psi(x,Past) is Aharonov's "history vector"

i.e., "Spirits of Christmas Future and Christmas Past, eh?" ;-)

Both Past and Future inputs generate our subjective inner experiences of the Present.

N*2h ~ (e2/hc)(mc2/H)

190

is Post-Quantum Backaction ~ Quantum Action (or "It takes Two to Tango"). When you look into the abyss, the abyss looks back at you.

N*2 10-27 ~ 10-2 10-27 1021 1017

N*2 ~ 10-2 1021 1017 ~ 1036

N* ~ 1018 observed anatomical number of caged electron SETs in the human brain

T ~ 1/HN* ~ 0.1sec for duration of moment of inner consciousness. More on this in my second book Super Cosmos.

These equations besides explaining consciousness also explain, I think, how to make "vacuum propellers" for flight without ejecting propellant (Bianchi identities on the quantum coherence corrected local Einstein geometrodynamic field equation) and how to make time-machine/stargates connecting the universes next door to us in what Hawking calls "O Brane New World" (The Universe in a Nutshell) and what "dark matter" really is.

It's a unified simple pretty picture unifying Consciousness with Gravity as Penrose sees through the glass darkly and as we also did back in 1974 in Space-Time and Beyond (a silly immature work of course).

We do not need the "Flat Earth Physics" of Haisch, Rueda, and Puthoff that corresponds to the "false vacuum" where psi(x) = 0. In that case, gravity in the form of classical curved space-time cannot even come into being because the negative anti-gravity quantum pressure from the Zero Point fluctuations of the gauge force and source fields is too large and overpowers their positive Zero Point energy density fluctuations.

You need to break the internal phase symmetry to compensate this effect. When you do that, you get classical gravity in a globally self-consistent way like Andre Sakharov hoped for in 1967.

> I realize that you are a very busy person and apologize if I am being an inconvenience. If you are unable to contact me I certainly understand. I thank you kindly for your time and wish you all the best.> Very truly yours,> Chris ....> USA

S-129. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding adapting prototype for mass transit

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: MSNBC News Link: Levitating cars above freewaysDate : Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:49:12 -0800

> stealthskater@hotmail.com sent you this MSNBC News Link: >

191

> ** Levitating cars above freeways ** > A proposed rapid transit system would levitate commuters to work in their own cars, gliding above the freeway. > => http://www.msnbc.com/modules/exports/ct_email.asp?/news/674375.asp

Mark:

Sounds a lot like our car ferry design based on the "Superman" ride at Six Flags amusement park in Southern California that I sent you. I think that ours is much more feasible though. Can't wait to build a prototype. After all, our design has been tried and tested with the public for many years with no accidents or problems. 6 tons at 110 mph in 7 seconds! And you can drive your own car when you get to your destination!

I have the Autocad drawing to send you if you can download it. Let me know and I will send the drawing to you. We have to be careful not to divulge too much information as the idea is not proprietarily protected. We need to get attention to this design as I believe it is the most feasible because it has been tested so thoroughly with the public. Quite the workhorse, eh?! We shall see! It's tough when you are poor and have big ideas!

Keep up the good faith, my friend!

Larry

S-130. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL / forward a message from Joe Firmage and MotionSciences.org

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Motion Sciences - December 2001Date : Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:52:33 -0800

> Mailing-List: contact firmage_bulletin-help@firmage.org; run by ezmlm > X-No-Archive: yes > List-Post: <mailto:firmage_bulletin@firmage.org> > List-Help: <mailto:firmage_bulletin-help@firmage.org> > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:firmage_bulletin-unsubscribe@firmage.org> > List-Subscribe: <mailto:firmage_bulletin-subscribe@firmage.org> > From: Joe Firmage <j@firmage.org> > Reply-to: info@motionsciences.org > Delivered-To: mailing list firmage_bulletin@firmage.org > Delivered-To: moderator for firmage_bulletin@firmage.org > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 01:08:16 -0800 > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) > X-Accept-Language: en > To: firmage_bulletin@firmage.org > Subject: Motion Sciences - December 2001 > X-RCPT-TO: <unitel@unitelnw.com> > > Hello friend,

192

> > This message is the first of the monthly physics reviews from the people at Motion Sciences Organization. We had hoped to initiate this series of monthly newsletters in October, but recent world events have delayed our schedules. We thank you for your patience. > > This first message has been broadcast to Friends, Members and Sponsors of the Motion Sciences Community, and also a broader group of people who have expressed interest in these subjects in the past. To receive this monthly review in the future, please consider supporting our work by joining the Motion Sciences Community (go to http://motionsciences.org ). We are trying to change the world for the better, and we need and appreciate your support! > > You'll find below links to some of the most fascinating discoveries being made at the frontier of Science today.> > I've also included links below to the vocal prerelease of the "Sound of Harmony" -- the soundtrack to our hit online movie ENGAGE. They are effective antidotes to the depression and discouragement that has followed from the tragic events of September 11. Download the movie and the MP3 vocal soundtrack from the links below, send them to your friends, and enjoy! > > My friend, there is a new kind of future awaiting us all, if we have the courage and the will to make it so. > > Joe Firmage , Chairman Motion Sciences Organization > > ___ > > MOTION SCIENCES 21ST CENTURY PHYSICS REVIEW - SEPTEMBER 2001 > > SERIOUS DOUBT CAST ON PHYSICS' CONCEPT OF MASS >The widely reported reanalysis of the Large Electron Positron (LEP) Collider data at CERN is casting serious doubt upon the existence of the Higgs particle. According to a Dec. 5 report in the New Scientist: "The legendary particle that physicists thought explained why matter has mass probably does not exist. So say researchers who have spent a year analyzing data from the LEP accelerator at the CERN nuclear physics lab near Geneva." See CNN's early coverage of this bit of science history in the making at http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/science/12/06/physics.reut/index.html . >> This news has direct relevance to the work of Motion Sciences Organization. Working with our partners, Motion Sciences' theoretical studies division, the California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics, has uncovered a promising connection between the electromagnetic quantum vacuum (also called the zero-point field) and the origin of mass. This approach is significant because it does not require a Higgs field. Visit http://motionsciences.org/research to learn more about our work. >> OBJECTS MOVED BY THE POWER OF LIGHT > > As reported in May 2001 by James Meek, Science Correspondent for Guardian Unlimited: >Researchers in Scotland have come up with a laser device able to grip and twist objects at a distance. The device, invented by a team from the physics department at St Andrews University, is able to

193

rotate microscopic objects, such as a tiny glass rod, twice the thickness of a human hair, with nothing more than the power of light. >> "We've only just begun to realize the possibilities for what we might do with this technology," said Kishan Dholakia, one of the researchers who wrote a paper on the "tractor beam" published in the journal Science. >>Particles of light have a tiny amount of mass and high velocity, meaning laser beams exert a slight force on objects they touch. >> This property has already been used to create "laser tweezers", tightly focused beams which can trap microscopic objects and move them from place to place. But those lasers could not, like traditional tweezers in a human hand, turn most objects around. >> By using two lasers together, the St Andrews team created an interference pattern in the form of a spiral of light which traps an object in the arms. Adjusting the beams causes the spiral to rotate, taking the object with it. >> As well as the glass rod, which could be used to stir tiny amounts of liquid, the scientists have rotated a hamster chromosome, showing how their technique could be used to study the innermost workings of cells for medical research. >> Another use for the "tractor beam" is in nanotechnology, the science of building microscopic machines from components not much larger than a few molecules. >> "Our technique could be used to drive motors, mixers, centrifuges, and other rotating parts in cheap, tiny, automated technologies of the future," Dr Dholakia said. >> Another member of the team, Michael McDonald, said it would not be practical to scale up the beam to move bigger objects. The power of the lasers used was very low, but that did not mean that a laser 100 times as powerful would be able to move an object 100 times as big. >> BUCKYBALLS SHATTER TEMPERATURE RECORD FOR SUPERCONDUCTIVITY IN CARBON-BASED MATERIAL >> As reported on PhysicsWeb.org : >> Physicists have achieved superconductivity in carbon-60 at 54 K - the highest temperature yet in the material - and they think they can do even better. Bertram Batlogg and co-workers at Bell Laboratories in the US broke the record by adding positive charges - instead of electrons - to carbon-60 crystals. They believe this is the highest superconducting temperature attained so far in a non-copper-oxide material (J H Schon et al 2000 Nature 408 549). >> Read more at http://physicsweb.org/article/news/4/12/1 . >> U.S. HAS HEAVILY RESEARCHED GRAVITY PROPULSION TECHNOLOGIES FOR DECADES, ACCORDING TO A TOP DEFENSE JOURNALIST >> As reported by Bradley Perrett of Reuters on September 9, 2001: The U.S. military may have conducted serious research into anti-gravity based on Nazi studies, a top defense journalist suggests in a new book.

194

>> In ``The Hunt for Zero Point,'' journalist Nick Cook says, based on a decade's research, he believes by the 1950s the U.S. was seriously working on anti-gravity ``electrogravitics'' technology, which would lift and propel vehicles without wings or thrust. >> ``I feel intuitively that some vehicle has been developed, particularly given that there is this wealth of scientific data out there, and the Americans have never been slow to pick up on this sort of science,'' Cook, the aerospace consultant for Jane's Defense Weekly, told Reuters in an interview.>> Read more at http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/anti_grav_010909.html . >> BLACK HOLE OBSERVATIONS RAISING NEW QUESTIONS >> As reported in the October 2001 issue of Astronomy Magazine: >> Observations from four spacecraft have identified the inner edge of a spinning disk of material around a black hole about 5,000 light-years from Earth. The surprising results show that the disk is much farther from the black hole than astronomers expected. >> Read more at http://astronomy.com/Content/Dynamic/Articles/000/000/000/445wrzvl.asp . >> Separately, in the Sept. 8, 2001 (vol. 160, #10) issue of Science News (offline) is an article about a recently measured X-ray/radio flare-up of the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. The measurements were -- for the first time -- able to pinpoint the location of this black hole to high precision. Investigators have reported that nearby orbiting stars indicate that the event horizon is 30,000 times larger than it is supposed to be for the measured black hole mass as predicted by current theory. And the nearby orbiting matter is 1,500 times farther away from the event horizon than it should be as predicted by current theory. >> AN ANTIDOTE FOR FEELINGS OF DISCOURAGEMENT FROM SEPTEMBER 11 >> After years of preparatory work, on August 13, 2001, Motion Sciences Organization was launched. Along with our launch, we released a special online movie -- ENGAGE -- presenting the context and vision of our Mission. ENGAGE can be downloaded at: >> http://motionsciences.org/engage/vision.movie.html . >> Part of the magic of this online movie its beautiful, energetic soundtrack. We're pleased to introduce a new version of this soundtrack by MSO's Matt King with lyrics by Abby Hasstedt. We encourage you to download the MP3 at: http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/299/kings1ze.html >> Send it to your friends with a link to MotionSciences.org !

S-131. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the personal trials encountered when you're out-of-money

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: Dr. Ark's admission

195

Date : Fri, 21 Dec 2001 17:17:53 -0800

Mark :

I must say I am indeed moved by your honesty and sincerely in your email below. I have put in my comments and answers below to various statements you made. You are right -- we are in kind of a war. The war is with the stick-to-itiveness we have in our stubborn resolve to bring in this valuable technology to our fellow man; against all odds, we shall succeed! Whatever the reason why this responsibility was given to us to bring in this technology to fruition, the fact remains it is up to us to carry on with our endeavors.

At 07:51 AM 12/18/01 -0500, you wrote:

> Mr. Maurer -- >> In spite of their similarities, I have found Dr. Jadczyk ("Ark") to be a little more "diplomatic" than Sarfatti in his exchanges. The trick is to understand where he is coming from and to convince him where you are coming from. >> Like Sarfatti, his strengths are in theoretical physics and he is quick to be skeptical about things whose operations contradict "accepted" physics. His latest essay ha3 been on Tom Bearden and his projects => http://www.cassiopaea.com/perseus/bearden.htm . I think he likes Bearden but has found flaws in his stated physics. >> Both "Ark" and Bearden are 'correct' in their endeavors. Bearden is more of an engineer whose only mistakes have been to postulate the science behind his ideas. Ark's meat-and-potatoes is his expertise in mathematical physics. The classic confrontation between the engineer and the scientist. Given enough time -- and if Bearden can restrain his enthusiasm and stop making statements about physics that don't hold water -- I think the two sides will meet in the middle and indeed help each other. Bearden will produce something unique that will require a new development in physics. I don't think "Ark" (or even the rude Sarfatti) was attacking his ideas so much as his attempts to explain them with his notions of physics. I think "Ark" should have been able to see this and roll-with-the-punches (so-to-speak) while diplomatically correcting Bearden and pointing out flaws in his science (not meaning that the actual project won't/doesn't work!). >> I think the same treatment has been applied to you and UNITEL. Giving them the benefit-of-the-doubt, I don't think it was intentional. I think you may have made some statements (in good faith in your enthusiasm about this new technology) that just didn't stand up to strong scrutiny. Whereas in retrospect you should have said "we got something terrific here and we're only guessing on how it seems to work". I told "Ark" the person at UNITEL he should have been talking with concerning the underlying physics was Mike Miller. I copied excerpts from e-mails you sent me about Mike's interview with Dr. Hwa and his latest project involving storing anti-matter using "solid light". This seem to impress "Ark" and I got the following admission from him : >>>From : "Arkadiusz Jadczyk" <lark1@ozline.net> >>To : stealthskater@hotmail.com>>Subject : Re: UNITEL >>Date : Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:07:54 -0500 >>

196

>>OK. So Miller knows all about physics. That makes me happy. I wish them good luck. No kidding! >>>>BTW , working on a new web page re: Bearden and AIAS . Just the facts. >>>>Best >>ark

This is true. I will be hooking up with Mike to work on our book and get him involved with being more actively involved with negotiations by having his physics presented directly in on negotiations. Especially when it concerns these technical debates.

Michael lives 150 miles away near my old home out in the middle of nowhere. He has been basically counting on me and our business associates here in Portland to get funding for UNITEL to allow us to function more properly. Michael has had continual trouble with his computer and his email which has put a severe hamper on all of us (i.e., no quantum physics support to my engineering claims). I can't do it all but I try. We shall see what we can do about getting together in the near future to overcome this dilemma. At least we have an audience now to come back with the physics to explain why we are right with our engineering designs etc.

>Granted, it's a bit trite ... I imagine he's eating crow a little. But it's an admission, nevertheless, and should be interpreted that others may have been skeptical about UNITEL's claims just because they didn't believe in the stated physics of operation which you may have inadvertently promoted as "FACT" in your enthusiasm. Bearden has done the same thing. I think down deep, everybody (including Sarfatti) would like to see these new things come-to-life. But you have to avoid falling into this trap of stating things as fact instead of postulating a model (to get the ball rolling) and asking for help in "correcting" it to explain its modes of operation. If "Ark", Sarfatti, and Mahood have looked with skepticism on UNITEL's claims (because of the stated physics), then others probably have to. It's probably affected your quest for funding. It's regrettable that you don't have a small prototype working exhibiting behavior that can't be described by current physics. Then you could say "look what we got here! we thought we knew how it worked, but others have pointed out fundamental flaws in our theories. but obviously it's working! we need help on figuring out 'WHY' "

This is true. We should be more careful not to say that "this is the way it is" and instead state that "this is what we think it is, what do you think?" I think this is emulating from the fact that we saw the working craft, however, there is a difference in what we saw and what we say we can build and why we think it works. A matter of wording our response which we shall work on for sure as nothing is guaranteed in this world.

> There may be a growing rift between "Ark" and Sarfatti as evidenced by a closing statement he made in an e-mail : "P.S. I will not comment on Jack Sarfatti. Once he called himself a 'theatrical physicist', and probably that is what he is. Our webpage on "Stargate Conspiracy" http://cassiopaea.org/cass/stargate.htm may help you to locate this phenomenon in a wider context." >> "Ark" and his wife Laura are experiencing financial problems too. I think he's been seeking a consulting job on-the-side for some time. Sarfatti is plugging his new book left-and-right ... I don't know how he earns a living. The state of engineering jobs in Oregon

197

probably is better than here in West Virginia. Years ago I was downsized by a major chemical corporation. I had to take temporary 3-6 month programming jobs out-of-state, being out-of-work for months between assignments. All my savings and life-insurance policies have long been exhausted while attempting to pay off bills. Much later I found a low-paying "permanent" job as a entry-level program in State Government. It's fortunate that I live by myself with no dependents (although it is a very lonely life, and West Virginia has the oldest-per-capita population in the nation). My car is 12 years old and has 300,000+ miles on it. I make repairs when needed -- so far I've dodged getting a new engine (head gasket is shot) and never have touched the transmission (which is the next thing to go). This job -- boring and low-paying as it is -- still beats living on-the-road working these contract assignments. Sometimes I'd sleep in-the-car because I couldn't afford a room. Sometimes eating peanut butter for a few days. It's sort of like war, I guess ...

Sounds all too familiar.

We just dodged a bullet this year when Rolls Royce pulled the plug on our contract and no work for me in the engineering trade. Fortunately we have sold enough stock and acquired enough work (drafting house plans) to survive until UNITEL gets funded next month (knock on wood!). I have been stressed out thinking that I would have to go through all that suffering and starvation again. I will if I have to but damn it! why can't we succeed? We will never quit and our book will get the word out for the public to put pressure on the Powers-that-Be to fund us!

> I don't know how the Government has all this money to give to foreign nations and "grease" lobbyists and so on and yet cancel important projects like UNITEL's and NASA's. I mean, what you're requesting is a drop-in-the-bucket with enormous payoffs. Unless the conspiracists are right and they want to suppress this new technology to keep the oil companies in business. Lazar stated his main reason for "going public" was that he was angry at all these billions of dollars spent on antiquated technology while the new stuff was being kept from developers.>> I have the addresses of Senators and Congressional committees. Do you want me to contact them on your behalf (I could make it sound as if you want the U.S. to get this technology before Japan or India)?

Yes, please do. I have been thinking of ex-POW Navy pilot Sen. John McCain. Hopefully he will take empathy in my originally wanting to be a Navy pilot like himself and see our suffering and perseverance as he went through in North Viet Nam.

Any U.S. Senator will do, however! Let me know. Remember that Sen. Mark O. Hatfield helped us for years!

best, Larry

S-132. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an Israeli "pseudo- quantum computer"

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : RE: Quantum Computer Break-Through

198

Date : Mon, 24 Dec 2001 13:27:27 -0800

Mark:

Here is an interesting correspondence from Fred Alan Wolf concerning the legitimacy of the Israeli quantum computer that supposedly cracked the Bletchly-Park code in 12 milliseconds. We found out later they did actually do that but all information was squelched because of national interests to prevent panic on bank and military code hacking.

Larry

> From: "Fred Alan Wolf" <fawolf@ix.netcom.com>> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> Cc: "Howard Teich" <hteich2001@aol.com>> Subject: RE: Quantum Computer Break-Through> Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:13:40 -0800> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal> Importance: Normal> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> > Just a note. I've looked through the Israeli team (Shamir) paper on "cracking the RSA 512 code." They definitely did not use a QC to do this. They used an entirely different technique based on what is called the quadratic sieve (QS) algorithm.

> Essentially as I understand it, they send the output of a search algorithm into an array of LEDs. The light from the LEDs is then picked up by a sensitive photodetector. The algorithm is based on a clever new way to sample data by assigning prime numbers to the array and looping the algorithm over time (which is based on finding squares of certain number combinations mod n where n is the number to be factored. When a certain mathematical relation occurs (they call it smoothness of a factorization technique) which occurs rarely, the number of LEDs that light up goes up dramatically signally that a smooth combination of numbers has been found. The QS technique relies on finding these rare occurrences from which the prime factors of n are accordingly relatively easy to obtain.

> They use GaAs technology which I am sure you are familiar with. A key is that they don't need a million or more LEDs if they "time-slice" appropriately. They use about 100,000 LEDs in their array. They essentially speed up the operation by using light detection instead of ordinary computer processing. They compare as follows. Typical RAM chips operate at about 100 MHz while GaAs technology can be clocked at 10GHZ. Hence 100 times faster.

S-133. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding past communications with experts in various fields

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : RE: UNITEL, Inc.Date : Mon, 24 Dec 2001 13:27:29 -0800

> From: "Fred Alan Wolf" <fawolf@ix.netcom.com>199

> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> Subject: RE: UNITEL, Inc.> Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 10:59:43 -0800> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal> Importance: Normal> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>>> Larry,>> See my inserted responses below.>> Best Wishes,>> Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D.> Have Brains / Will Travel> San Francisco> email mailto:fawolf@ix.netcom.com>

>> -----Original Message----->> From: Larry Maurer [mailto:lmaurer@unitelnw.com]>> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 2:34 AM>> To: fawolf@ix.netcom.com>> Subject: RE: UNITEL, Inc.>>>> Fred:>>>> I am not sure about what Haisch thinks of us. We have Hal Puthoff rooting for our cause but we got the royal reject from Haisch' Supervisor Ernst Littauer, Lockheed. I don't think Bernie has even seen our QC design but he has heard of our propulsion system design. I don't know how close he is with Hal. But I guess I had better drop the other shoe now before you hear yet another surprise.

>> It seems the woods are full of lions and tigers and bears, oh my! Bernienow heads a different organization>> California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics> 366 Cambridge Ave.> Palo Alto, CA 94306> phone: 650-327-6284, fax: 650-327-6294>admin@calphysics.org>> and is no longer affiliated with Lockheed. I have known him for many years and I believe he is a trustworthy guy. But we are not close. So no fear. Howard and I are planning to visit you on Saturday March 11. Let Howard know if that is okay. We look forward to meeting with you and Ernie and whoever you think would add to the mix.>> Fred>

>> Please do not let this get in the way of our business efforts. I have learned a long time ago not to even mention the word to anyone that our design came from our sightings on 2

200

occasions in late 1981. I brought this up with Hal a couple of weeks ago as he kept asking how we came up with our design.>>>>I met with the Eugene Police Dept. on April 23, 1986 to report the incidences because the EPD was investigating sightings of hundreds of Eugene citizens calling them. They encouraged me to report our incidents to the FBI. Which I did. I called the Eugene office of the FBI to see if they had a record of the report when I met with the Director/Eugene District and 2 other agents.>> The person that answered the phone told me that they weren't sure if they could relinquish that information to the public. I gave her my phone number and I haven't heard anything from them yet. They said when I met with them that they couldn't do anything for me because there was no crime committed.>>>> Anyway, this has nothing to with our quantum computer (QC) business endeavors yet someone might bring it up. So it won't be a big surprise, I am telling you now just in case. I am curious what Joe's people have been saying about us. I can only imagine what they are saying. We shall see.>>>> Howard just called and he wants to set up a meeting on Saturday or the following weekend. That is fine but I want Ernie to be there. It isn't important for Miller to come up because he is more in tune to Physics in general and I am sure that you don't need a physics lecture. It is important for Ernie to be here so I will contact him to set the meeting up. I look forward to the meeting!>>>> Regards,>> Larry Maurer>>

>> At 09:25 AM 02/29/2000 -0800, you wrote:>>>>> Larry,>>>>>> We are in touch with Joe [Firmage] but haven't met with him yet. I am meeting with Bernie Haisch (who is funded by Joe) later this week to discuss possibilities. As far as I know, Jack is not on his board but Jack hints that he has a relationship with him. Jack [Sarfatti] is funded by people. I don't think Joe is funding him.>>>>>> Best Wishes,>>> >>> Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D.>>> Have Brains / Will Travel>>> San Francisco>>> email mailto:fawolf@ix.netcom.com

>>>>>>> -----Original Message----->>>> From: Larry Maurer [mailto:lmaurer@unitelnw.com]>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 1:02 AM>>>> To: fawolf@ix.netcom.com>>>> Subject: RE: UNITEL, Inc.>>>>

201

>>>> Fred:>>>>>>>> Thank God! I was so bummed out after I saw Jack was your partner, etc. that I became depressed enough to accept this whole thing as another let down. First of all, I felt really foolish for sending those long-winded attachments of those simple illustrations that must have made you P-O'd after I read what caliber of expertise you are at in Physics. They were pretty much geared for Howard concerning his questions about why we feel our QC is superior.>>>>>>>> I am not nearly as upset at Jack as I am with Forward. I just think about him as you do now. If somebody is going to put down your ideas, then they ought to at least tell you why and he wouldn't (or couldn't). Rather childish I'd say. Even humorous! I just didn't know what you would say about the situation.>>>> >>>> Don't worry about me not liking Jack at any rate. I just can't wait to prove that we are right and he is wrong someday soon. We shall see what he has to say about us then. Probably be whistling a different tune saying "I didn't get the whole information" or something like that. We'll find out. Maybe we should surprise him by not telling him of your involvement until it gets our publicly! He'll probably choke! hee hee!>>>>>>>> Bob Forward is another thing altogether, though. If we find out that he was on the NASA BPP advisory board and the USAF Advanced Concepts and talked them out of having anything to do with us, we may be looking at a lawsuit. I will let the public decide what to do anyway. Don't worry, I am not on any hard vendetta to get Bob or anything like that. I just hope he takes the bait with this Chiao thing and publicly shoots his mouth off about his "non-acceptance of monopole effects on a Macroscale even though Tomita & Chiao are world famous because of their paper that has been accepted by the Physics Review & Phys Rev Lett community: "Observation of Berry's Topological Phase by use of an optical fiber", Raymond Y. Chiao & Akira Tomita, Phys Rev Lett, 57: 8, Aug 25, 1986, Pgs 937- 940.>>>>>>>> We have been so bantered by the public and investors about why we always get turned down. I just can't believe it and neither can they. These people are the very reason why the public doesn't know anything about the Weizmann Inst cracking the security codes! Again, we shall see what the public says about them!>>>>>>>> At 07:46 AM 02/29/2000 -0800, you wrote:>>>>

>>>>> Dear Larry,>>>>>>>>> Rest assured that anything that passes between us will not go through Jack. Jack is my good friend of many years. But when it comes to his recent egomaniacal childish bantering about how he "sees the truth" with his post-quantum theory, we part company.>>>>>>>>>> I haven't told Jack much about my recent QC ideas because he tends to absorb them into his own theory, claiming then his theory "explains" whatever anyone else comes up with. So I tend to keep secret just what I am working on. Although Jack has been very supportive of my work, he tends to dismiss anyone

202

else's ideas as non-physics if they don't agree with his while maintaining his own as the "only" way to fly. I am suspicious of anyone who makes such claims. I see the universe quite differently as you will see as you get in touch with my work.>>>>>>>>>> I don't know Bob Forward. But again, I sense some egomaniacal meandering. There is a great tendency to become quite selfish about one's own work and thereby dismissive of other people's work when one works on the frontier. I hope that you are mature enough to get through this. I sense that you are. I hadn't realized that you were in touch with Joe Firmage. Has he indicated any interest in your work?

>>>>>>>> Yes. He called several times asking questions. Then -- that's right, you guessed it! -- nothing after that. Someone said that Sarfatti was on his board. Is he? Joe is another question mark and don't worry, he will be calling after the public buys our stock and we don't need him. Wait and see!>>>>

>>>>> Our relationship will be based on QC work only. I am not interested in propulsion systems as interesting as they might be. Hence let me say from the get-go that I will have tough questions about your QC development work as we get into a relationship. I need to make sure that I understand every detail of what you claim. I am a stickler for details. I am continuing to read your attachments and I will from time-to-time present you with questions.

>>>>>>>> So am I. That is why we are going to have Prof. Andreas Mandelis, Ph.D., U. of Toronto as a technical Adivisor. UIC has accepted this and aren't put out. Their outlook is good as they said they feel the extra eyes will be welcome. Andreas is on the Board for both the Phys Rev & Phys Rev Lett. He has reviewed everything so far and has acknowledged that everything is so far so good and that we won't know any more until we construct our device. I have his resume and letters of intent plus the contract if you would like to review them.>>>>>>>> Believe me, Fred, that when I say we have top-notch people working on our project, I mean it! There aren't too many experts on II-VI materials. But these guys are the best. If you can point out something they miss, then so be it.>>>>

>>>>> Howard Teich and I are seeking to work with a company like yours -- one at the frontier that is working on the design of a true QC. I intuitively sense that light is the correct medium and that your work is the most promising I've seen so far. We want to develop a "superposition" of Theory and Experiment working together. I see your group as providing a sound experimental physical basis.>>>>> >>>>> What we want to add to this consists of a way of programming that will involve self-referencing (i.e., a way that a QC can "measure" itself). The theory of this has already been developed [David Z. Albert, "On Quantum-Mechanical Automata," Physics Letters. 98A, no. 5, 6 (October 24, 1983), pp. 249-252.]. However, no one yet has explained how to physically realize the theory. I think I see how to do this. I have what I believe is a consistent way to do it. But the only way we will know is actually to build the device and test it. It is easy to put

203

a theory down on paper. But it is another thing to build it. I want to construct the first "HAL 2000". You may be the company that does it.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Wishes,>>>>>>>>>> Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D.>>>>> Have Brains / Will Travel>>>>> San Francisco>>>>> email mailto:fawolf@ix.netcom.com>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Yes, Fred, I can't wait to be in outer-space when we'll hear "Dave... What are you doing? Dave, don't disconnect me!" {hee hee!} At any rate, we really need to set you down with Ernie and Ted Williams to see about integrating your system. Most likely we will have to fly to London this next month and finalize our agreement. Perhaps you may want to go also. We need to finalize our funding first, if that is going to happen. We shall see. Let me know if you want to review any correspondences between Mandelis, UIC, Keele HD, and any other pertinent corresp and I will forward them to you. Let me know.>> >>>>>> Larry Maurer, Principal>>>> & Director, Engineering>>>> www.unitelnw.com>>>> 1-800-248-2609>>>>

>>>>>> -----Original Message----->>>>>> From: Larry Maurer [mailto:lmaurer@unitelnw.com]>>>>>> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 3:50 PM>>> >> To: fawolf@ix.netcom.com>>>>>> Subject: UNITEL, Inc.>>>>>>>>>>>> Fred:>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I am impressed with your impeccable record of fabulous books and overall stature in the Physics community. Bravo, Fred! I must say I had better kick up my level of understanding to a higher level with my communication with you.>>>>>>>>>>>> I have to inform you, however, that even though we have a great team of associates (e.g., Barrett, Froning, Puthoff, Maccone, Minami & Roach), we have come up against a definite wall with Dr's Robert L. Forward and Jack Sarfatti. As a matter of fact, I have recently contacted our friend Aki Tomita (who is Dr. Ray Chiao's co-author/inventor) to contact Dr. Chiao to ask him permission to use a third reference from him as Aki is our liason to Dr. Chiao because of his busy schedule at Berkeley.>>>>>>>>>>>> Forward had rejected our propulsion system design in 1984 at Edwards AFB in a very unfair and rude meeting with the EM Propulsion Unit there. His reason for rejecting our design was he claimed that he didn't believe

204

in monopole theory and disbanned the meeting. We wanted to show how we could produce the same geometrical effects with our laser that Tomita&Chiao did with monopole effects in 1986 applied on a Macro level with RF waveguides and optical fibers. Hal told me in a recent email that Forward attended a NASA conference with Chiao and where he said that he accepts Chio's FTL concepts but he didn't mention his refusal to accept monopole applications.>>>>>>>>>>>> We think that Forward is responsible for NASA turning our BPP grant down and we want him to get his double standard out in the open. I hope Forward wants to debate monopole apps with Chiao in a public forum. Chiao will eat Forward alive! Jack Sarfatti blatantly rejects anything we have going in a group that we no longer belong to because of his backward (i.e., Forward) thinking. Our associates agree with us but do not want to make waves by getting involved with our arguments.>> >> >>>> >> >> Anyway Fred, whether you agree with our aerospace design or not, I hope that their bullshit they will definitely say about us doesn't muddy the business water between us. Neither of them understand our QC system anyway. I just wanted to let you hear it from me before you hear it from Sarfatti or Forward. Let me know what you think about this situation. I hope we can focus on your ideas and designs and how we can implement them with our QC system.>>>>>>>>>>>> We intend on putting some of the investment money into constructing a small prototype of our composite hull with Applied Sciences, Cedarville, OH and Niobium Research, Philomath, OR. We also want to perform a computer simulation of our system with Robert L. Roach, Dave Froning, and Terence Barrett with Flight Unlimited, Flagstaff, AZ. We want to focus on construction and testing of our QC and software writing. But we want to continue with our aerospace research which will be a small portion of the initial funding. Once we go public, we will a lot more funding for research in this area. Let me know if you have any questions. I am available 24/7!>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,>>>>>> Larry Maurer

S-134. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding more info about the Israeli "QC" project

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : RE: Adi Shamir's Twinkle Crypto-project.html Date : Mon, 24 Dec 2001 13:27:49 -0800

> From: "Fred Alan Wolf" <fawolf@ix.netcom.com>> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> Subject: RE: Adi Shamir's Twinkle Crypto-project.html> Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 18:36:37 -0800> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

205

> Importance: Normal> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> > Larry,> No, I don't believe it's a hoax -- just an error as Doug has shown by the apparent misunderstanding of reporters learning about just what Shamir has proposed in his paper. Shamir certainly proposes using LEDs and quantum photo detection in his device. And it is true that the device will indeed crack the RSA code if it is built. But the technique for cracking has nothing to do with quantum computation. It's very easy to be confused about just what is a QC and what is not a QC. To QC or not to QC is the question.>> I am sure the joining of Weizmann with EIQC is coincidental with the Shamir paper if they occurred around the same time period. I know that Weizmann is interested in QC regardless of Shamir's work. If this is still confusing, just look at the Shamir paper. There is no cover up as far as I can tell. The device is buildable and may have already been built. So indeed they may have already cracked RSA 512.>> But they did not use a QC to do it. Just a good ol' classical computer and a very clever inventive mind of Shamir using photo-optical physics.> > Is what I say above clear to you? The important thing to learn from Shamir is that you don't need a QC to crack RSA-512.>> Best Wishes,>> Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D.> Have Brains / Will Travel> San Francisco> email mailto:fawolf@ix.netcom.com>

>> -----Original Message----->> From: Larry Maurer [mailto:lmaurer@unitelnw.com]>> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 9:19 AM>> To: fawolf@ix.netcom.com>> Subject: Re: Adi Shamir's Twinkle Crypto-project.html>>>> Fred:>>>> So essentially what you are saying is that you believe the Ben Hemmersley "No Safety in Numbers" was a hoax? Why would the Weizmann Inst., NEC, JPL et al all join the EIQC? I emailed you a scan (as an attachment) of their document that lists all of these members and has a copy of the Hemmersley article entitled "No Safety in Numbers" in the document? Why would the Weizmann Inst allow their name (listed on the bottom of the cover) to be included in the document that solicits members to join the EIQC if this was all untrue?>>>> Personally I think there is a massive cover-up to keep people scratching their heads while the governments are all scrambling to produce a QC to prevent hacking of the secret codes. Other than that, I only care about our QC optical-NMR device HOLO-1 getting built ASAP. The Israelis only proved (if it is true) the power of QCs. After HOLO-1 is built,

206

then we can fool around with it to see about cracking codes and researching its potential for services, factoring, etc.>>>> Larry Maurer

>>>> At 03:26 PM 02/29/2000 -0800, you wrote:>>>>> Adi Shamir's Twinkle Crypto-projectTo Doug and Larry,>>>>>> I believe Doug erred. This is what you are referring to. If I'm wrong, let me know. It is definitely NOT a quantum computer. Ask Adi himself.>>>>>> Best Wishes,>>>>>> Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D.>>> Have Brains / Will Travel>>> San Francisco>>> email mailto:fawolf@ix.netcom.com

>>>>>>>> 5/12/99>>>>>>>> Adi Shamir's Twinkle Crypto-project>>>>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/05/biztech/articles/02encr.html>>>>>>>> Israeli Scientist Reports Discovery of Advance in Code Breaking>>>> By JOHN MARKOFF>>>>>>>> An Israeli computer scientist is expected to shake up the world of cryptography this week when he introduces a design for a device that could quickly unscramble computer-generated codes that until now have been considered secure enough for financial and government communications.>>>>>>>> In a paper to be presented Tuesday in Prague, the computer scientist Adi Shamir -- one of the world's foremost cryptographers -- will describe a machine (not yet built) that could vastly improve the ability of code breakers to decipher codes thought to be unbreakable in practical terms. They are used to protect everything from financial transactions on the Internet to account balances stored in so-called smart cards

>>>>>>>>>>From: Adi Shamir shamir@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il>>>>>Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:57:33 +0300>>>>>Subject: Re: TWINKLE>>>>>>>>>>Hi,>>>>>The early version of the paper was quietly circulated to a small number of factoring experts and colleagues to get their comments. I'll probably write an expanded version soon. But in the meantime, I am enclosing in the next email the current version which is now in the public domain and can be circulated freely.

207

>>>>>>>>>>Best personal wishes,>>>>>Adi.>>>>>>>>>> The 12-page paper:>>>>> twinkle.eps (370K)>>>>> Zipped:>>>>> twinkle.zip (79K)

S-135. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the search for the Higgs particle

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: what is all this stuff about 'ORMEs' ???Date : Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:11:24 -0800

Mark:

Thanks for the info. I just got a call from Mike Miller saying that they did recently discover the Higgs' particle. I reiterated what I said to Doug Starfield last night that we really aren't concerned about the absolute proof of these particles as long as we can produce the effects such as Tomita&Chiao did in 1986 by producing monopole effects with an optical fiber and/or RF waveguide. That is all we want to do with our laser plasma/ship system. Anyway, Starfield sent me the following URL on the Higgs particle:

Higg's Particle Info: I saw that NPR has their "Science Friday" streaming audio at their site. The

broadcast for the topic dealing with the Higg's Particle was around a week or so ago. So, that shouldn't be too difficult to track down. Here are some links that may get you there:http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/RealAudio.html http://www.npr.org/programs/scifri

Good luck and happy New Year !

Larry Maurer UNITEL, inc.

S-136. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a camping encounter with a "Big Foot" type creature

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: Higgs ???Date : Fri, 28 Dec 2001 23:35:58 -0800

208

attachment: [ Attachment: UNITEL_attachment_136 ]

Mark:

To reiterate, I talked to Mike on the phone today and he is eager to make comments, announcements, etc. on the latest quantum physics information. He briefly mentioned something about the discovery or proof of existence of the Higgs particle. I shall query him further on the subject.

He wants us all to come down to Eugene Hilton where an old high school buddy (Curtis Salgado) is performing (performed with Robert Cray for a while). I just decided that we are staying in Portland and spending New Years at our AT&T friend Hank Barren's house instead because literally everyone's car is breaking down for one reason or another. Rather strange in that these cars (actually mine is a Toyota truck which Kimio Nishino, Manager, Aero-business Dept., Business development Div., Toyota Motor Corp took my picture with when he visited recently.

I just got a Christmas card from Kimio but I didn't tell him I have been going through hell with my truck! Oh well, I prefer Toyotas as they usually don't break down!) were just in the shop for repair. Anyway, Mike is counting on me coming to Eugene to discuss things while we are celebrating new years. I was looking forward to it but I am not going to go through another car break down!

We do need to get Mike his new Office 98 and/or tuneup so he can communicate. Also Paul Kirsch and he are getting ready to publish the Interdimensional Journal and I am involved with assisting all that.

You have to understand that Mike is one of my best friends since 1969. He is the laziest bastard you will ever meet in your life. However, as I mentioned, Mike is a true genius. He is like a cross between Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla. He will have unmatching socks and forget everything that one is supposed to remember. But he lives in a world of Quantum Physics and constantly compares every ordinary everyday event to the Quantum World.

One thing about Mike is he's not boring! I guess our years of mountain climbing we are even at saving each other's life. Perhaps you might want to come out and join us this summer on our annual Mecca trip to climb Mt. Jefferson with our Indian friends, the Quinn brothers. Below is a pic of my son Jason and Walter & Jack Quinn the morning after being visited by what we believe must have been a "Big Foot" or "Sasquatch".

209

Don't get excited. I know what you're thinking: "first UFOs and now Big Foot". You tell me. In the middle of the night on our hike near Mt. Jeff on the reservation, we were driven to camp in this valley because of a severe storm whereby the wind was 30 to 60 mph. I slept directly behind where you see Jason, Walter, and Jack (where they slept) about 30 feet away.

In the middle of the night, I was picked up about 6 feet in the air and dumped out of my sleeping bag onto the ground. All I knew was that it was probably those guys one at each end playing a stupid joke on me by dumping me out of my bag. I simply reacted by grabbing the bag back and instantly rolling myself back in the sleeping bag while yelling "that's not funny!".

The next morning, the first thing I asked was "why did you guys do that?" They had their own horror story to tell as they shook their heads and flatly denied dumping me out of my bag. My son and his bull dog Terra were woken up by some very large creature that Jason thought was a bear but was poking around the dishes. The dog was shivering in fear and did not make a noise. Jason was terrified and stayed awake until long after the creature left. He feared an attack by a bear and stayed very still and definitely not poking his head out of his tent.

Walter got woke up by a very large creature that bumped into him while sleeping in his sleeping bag and was also petrified with fear. The creature also bumped Walt's brother Jack who in turn froze with fear as something very big was stepping around him. The creature then went back to where I was and then dumped me out on the ground.

I hounded these guys for hours and they all stuck to their stories. The picture was taken right after we all woke up. This is the only time I have ever came close to any "Big Foot" sighting or whatever. All I know is that to be dropped out of my bag from that height in that fashion, it would take at least 2 people to perform such a feet. No way could one person do it. Nor could it have been a bear because a bear can't grab a sleeping bag like that. (Someone even told me it had to be a circus bear but I don't know about that one.)

210

I think my son Jason's story was true with the "monkey-like" poking around the dishes. A bear would have just thrashed around making much more noise. At any rate, if it truly is the "Big Foot" abode on the Warm Springs Indian reservation where no tourists or hardly anybody visits, I want to keep it safe and away from public scrutiny and possibly harm. I would, if anything, like to bring the poor creature some food and whatever it needs to survive. Perhaps someday we will cross the creature's path.

It's ironic that there is a lot of information of UFOs and Big Foot. I even have a graphic or two to send concerning the subject. I will send the scanned JPGs to you.

Later,Larry

S-137. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding physics and meta-physics

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: several sets of "new sciences'Date : Sat, 29 Dec 2001 11:58:58 -0800

Hello Mark:

Thanks for your prompt remarks. I will put any proprietary stuff at the top from now on. Below are my answers I have inserted:

At 12:20 PM 12/29/01 -0500, you wrote:

> Dear Mr. Maurer --

> I truly believe that there are several rungs-on-the-ladder (so-to-speak) concerning UFO physics. If we believe Deyo (and others), the United States in addition to other governments have been investigating the underlying principles for 50+ years. Supposedly the best minds (as well as the most "unconventional" a la Bob Lazar) have been hard-at-work. And all this effort has produced minimum results. >> The theories of electro-grav flight have been known for almost as long. You read about it in Deyo's book. I don't mean to simplify it unjustly because it is a step up from traditional transportation. To make it work, one needs new hull materials of various properties, most importantly a very-lightweight power generation capable of producing millions-of-volts and upteen amperes, and a way of preventing the occupants from becoming part of the internal circuit.

Our proposed exterior-charged hull design is to be composed of Niobium-Titanium composite materials that WILL produce vast amounts of electric charge on the hull surface as well as a tremendous amount of Gauss (magnetic charge). This was validated by the record winning electromagnet this last year at 300,000 times stronger than Earth's magnetic field. Our POCs at RRD were pleasantly surprised at our pointing out this record winning group from Cal Berkeley to them. We could almost feel the near horror response of "why haven't we paid attention to niobium & tin composite electromagnets?" One can almost visualize our capped cone craft floating in an anti-grav manner because of the PROVEN PROPERTIES of our design.

211

> A parallel development seems to have taken place in using pressurized plasma metals like Mercury or Sodium to take advantage of a G-R loophole and negate a good portion of gravity as well as generate some of the power needed (through MHD). I don't know the particular hazards to the crew, but I figure this is what comprises most of those huge black triangle objects reported.

We will go far beyond mere negation of Gravity. We are using all the forces -- strong nuclear, colombic, weak nuclear, and of course the "color force" which is 39 orders of magnitude stronger than the force of gravity. That's 39 zeros or 1039.

The 3-part red, green, & blue lens becomes the "hadron face" for the string attachment whereby parallel transport takes place. The ship begins to take on the commuter value that "commutes" up the string in its self-contained EM system with a math I.D. of 137. We are talking about unfathomable power here! There is no way to "fart" a force out of the stern in a conventional manner and come even close to the "attractive" power of our system.

As the negatively-charged ship seeks its projected positive charged "hole" located at the end point of our projected laser plasma with string-like characteristics, it will eventually fall into the "slack" attractive (or Colombic mode) state that preserves the "electron" (ship) and "hole" (projected end point of the laser plasma) like a boson or in this specifically an exciton (or electron-hole state). The great German Physicist Harold Fritzch described this action of attraction to end point of this particle system is so strong that if you tried to separate the two end points, it would be like trying to take a "favorite toy from a child". One could simply visualize the child following ones every move with the favorite toy! Great example!

I must also remind you here that we have yet another quantum law of strings working in our favor. That is "at least one end point must move at the speed-of-light". Which our system does. To show the same example of the self-contained completely independent EM system that we have with our ship to field system, we would like to film my son Jason's bulldog Terra chasing a squirrel (stuffed one or graphically placed) to show the same attractive power. Wherever the squirrel goes racing at high speed, the dog is sure to follow. In our graphics, the dog will turn into the ship and the squirrel will turn into the projected field.

What do you think? Good idea to get our point across? One can only imagine the tremendous forces with this floating and attractive power that can be controlled by feathering the signal and phase conjugate (RF) radar steering techniques to control the ship in velocity and direction on the X,Y,Z axis. In fact, we just discussed doing the graphics of Moose (Terra) and squirrel to illustrate our design. This is basic functioning of how our proposed aerospace vehicle design works.

The former President of Boeing Aerospace C.H. "Charlie" Johnson understood this and found out that Boeing could indeed instill a charge on a charge particle beam. We are trying to locate Charlie to get his valuable input on this matter because he was right in trying to get Boeing involved with our project.

> Note that none of the above has anything to do with faster-than-light or quantum tunneling to traverse large interstellar distances. There must be something to this because I've seen Navy contracts and Los Alamos papers on space-time manipulation for proposed space travel. The fact that these surface at the same time as all this fervor by leading physicists in proposing a 10/11-dimensional Universe is strangely coincidental. This "next-

212

step up-the-ladder" must be even more technologically challenging, both from generating the MQT effects to controlling/navigating them. UNITEL's pioneering work belongs here.

Roger that!

> My gut feeling is that there is yet another step. One that is very distrubing to engineers and physicists because it can't be quantified. This has to do with the mental thing, whatever-the-hell-that-is. I've seen this in so many places. Some are reputable, such as the DIA and CIA and police agencies' use of remote-viewers. Clearly, there is something there or all that money would not have been spent. Puthoff wouldn't have gotten so involved and the Soviets wouldn't have all their corresponding programs (though they tend to "influence" people more than spy like we do). Folklore has it that von Neumann was part of the team examining crashed alien discs, and he was told that to understand all its workings he would have to do his homework in meta-physics. This stuff might have comprised the upper levels of the disks that Lazar and others were forbidden to enter. There must be something up there that is even more top-secret than the stuff Lazar was examining. >> For the sake of argument, if you allow that the best and most ingenious minds of all nationalities have been trying to solve these mysteries for so long and yet produced so little, then maybe Lazar's assertions that some of the technology appeared as "magic" and was truly a new and mystifying physics at least 300 years ahead of where we are today. That's why I get upset with Mahood and others for not having enough of an open mind to at least consider what defies conventional explanation. Has medical science ever satisfactorily explained the successes of chiropracty or accupuncture or alternative medicines in some cases? No they haven't. I'm sure in time they will.

Sorry. We do not want to get into this ESP stuff. We are strictly engineering to the bone McGee!

> Whenever you want an email or drawing to be *confidential*, PLEASE SAY THAT NEAR THE TOP (or even in the Subject line) and I'll be sure to put it in a private folder where I'm less likely to do anything with it. I would never intentionally do anything to jeopardize the jobs of anyone, ESPECIALLY the UNITEL group. I've gotten shafted before myself ... I've been there (sort of still am in the soup), and it's NO FUN ! (If I wasn't convinced I had Al Bundy's luck, then I could be persuaded to think I was being 'punished' for stuff I did in a past life.)

Wilco

> Two places you could tell (and possibly sell) your story to are Jeff Rense (Sightings!) and Art Bell. But you might be shooting yourself in-the-foot if it comes out before you get funding. What non-thinking, conservative (with no imagination) investor [this is NOT the Firmage or Bearden type] would pour millions into something partly designed on a UFO sighting? I don't know how your book will affect this quest. Guess it depends on how it is written. That's why I took notice when Bryan was posting messages that he was the new CEO of TAP-TEN and on UNITEL's board-of-directors (not just a sales rep). About the only thing that could compare to a UFO is a "time machine", and both of these might scare off the more conservative. I wish people would not be like that because too many of our inventions came from people like Tesla and the Wright brothers who were labeled as nuts. But unfortunately, it's a fact-of-life.

213

A mutual friend of Mike and mine from Blachly Oregon -- Harry Hess -- works in Las Vegas a lot and recently installed a radio tower for Art Bell. Harry came home from work and told Mike that he talked all afternoon to Art about Miller and UNITEL. Art is completely flabbergasted and wants to push UNITEL and get Mike on his show. We need to do this while the iron is hot!

> Did that document about "Dirty Secrets" (behind past military programs) help soothe your ego a little? I put it out on the 'Science' section of my site . I also added 10 ORMEs documents there just in case there IS anything to this stuff that seems to have some origins in alchemy myth.

I don't know about "soothe". However, it's good to know that our suspicions are somewhat confirmed. This is why we aren't even going to try for these grants that someone else always seems to get and not us. I think it is up to the public to apply pressure on our government as I am sure that the public will be outraged at how we have been continually overlooked and we still have this ancient WWII German rocket technology being funded.

It's time for the new quantum technology to enter the picture. We don't have a war to accelerate technology. Just public awareness to fight the powers-that-be and bring this wonderful technology (that we know works) to fruition!

Best,Larry

S-138. from Bryan Willoughby regarding UNITEL and TAP-TEN

From : "Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comCC : "BluEyes" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>Subject : Enjoyment in sharing Date : Sat, 29 Dec 2001 17:06:54 -0800

Hi Mark,

What one can learn when simply listening to the winds of change.

As you may know, I will be overseas for a few weeks. There's much going on and it is of good tidings. Not the 4-star accommodations but that's fine with me. I work best when I am in the moment!

Thanks from all of us for sharing your collective experiences and knowledge. We all need to allow this for all our peace and happiness to be fulfilled. So many, forget or sometimes try to ignore that we're "one''.

Enjoyed reading your writing to Larry@UNITEL and TAP-TEN Group. It's amazing, how many times I mentioned to Larry and the UNITEL team, that they have to ''let go'' of the idea of any '''benevolent'' funding coming from the gov~darpa~nasa~ there's just no way to conceive such an idea as good, in my perception. Well, I believe after bringing this forward again and again, when ever I saw a 'steering' going toward anything like this, it's finally instilled in Larry's collective mind.

214

This will come to fruition, Mark. I know you realize that it is just about time that it happens. A private group, non-agency, very capable, that I know very well, very much is in support of funding such projects globally, specifically, free-energy- and other quantum technologies. This is a multi-national league of investors and business constituents. They are very alert and aware to what is happening out there...they're off the grid, (so-to-speak), and will not let anything discourage or befall them that will distract or take-down the edge that they've built for so long. Even to this date, I personally do not relate their name, until we clear the path to do so. Guess, there's just too much training that I have been through, and far too much that has hindered my own progress, that I will allow me to forsake my missions here on earth. It's imperative that we stay positive and strong for the sake of humankind. My personal missions collectively are extensive...from invention of my own diverse technologies and energies uncovered and decoded once again in this earthplane's history...to the process of seeing all the 'good' creative energies and innovations come through that are charged to do so. One cannot go it alone as we know. It's TEAM Orientation that will Integrate all this in to it's highest vibrations and synchronicities.

Enjoy the moments. And yes, they are forever ''now''.

Mark, believe you are of good spirit and accord. Please allow any communications that you feel is important to anything you are doing, and feel collective of. We are one source of 'light' as we travel through this sphere's projections of reality.

So, if you have spoken somewhat with Larry, then you will know a little more about me. I am a team player, that does 'whatever it takes' to make things go upward and onward ~

Realizing, in the most benevolent of ways, we are challenged to safeguard the people and the innovations that are coming into focus. This is not like the military-government works their darkened schemes, but to give to the people what they are justly due to have. Ultra Low Cost Housing, Energy, and Transportation around the world, and beyond in exploration. Listing the veil of the parasitic and the malevolent, and striking a new harmonic chord in the hearts of all.

HAPPY NEW YEARS and May Your Trail Be Light~

Please, if there's anything i can do to assist, always know you can ask anything and I will do my utmost. We may not have lots of money in these days, but we do have all the heart that one can resonate!

All the best regards,~bryanBest regards, ~Bryan Willoughby

UNITEL Corporate Board AdvisoryTechnology Advisory CouncilFounder - Affirm Technologies, Inc. Shared Technology Partners Phone 858.342.9103 Fax 419.793.3557Ceo- TAP-TEN Research Grouppathfinder@mindspring.com

215

S-139. from Tom Mahood requesting to receive no more e-mails from me

Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 16:38:15 -0800 To: stealthskaters@yahoo.comFrom: "Tom Mahood" <tlmahood@home.com Subject: Re: what is all this stuff about "ORMEs" ???

At 11:46 AM 12/28/01 -0800, you wrote:

> Hi Tom -->> In all your research have you ever heard of some alchemic-type materials called "ORMEs"?>> Now before you laugh, I've been seeing this stuff mentioned on health boards, science boards, and even Montauk sites. I never heard of it before. It apparently has not only health benefits but also anti-grav and superconductivity claims. A "David Hudson" supposedly got some patents on it.>> Sitchin says his translations revealed that our race was originally created to mine gold for some ET race. If true, maybe this gold was intended for later "reformulation" into ORMEs. We've all heard about Reich and his "orgone" and how his books were burned and his works erased from history books. And I know you've read Bearden's stuff on the Priore "healing machine". Perhaps it's just a coincidence, but it seems that anything along these lines that has other (i.e., non-UFO) applications to human health gets "erased" (for lack of a better word). I don't see that happening to rumors of Element-115 or electro-grav flight or back-engineering of crashed alien craft.>> Anyway, I did a "Google" (www.google.com) search on both 'ormes' and 'ormus' and had the following hits:>> http://monatomic.earth.com/david-hudson/patent-us-1.html> http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm> http://lyghtforce.com/WhiteGold/ormus.htm> http://members.aol.com/yggdras/paraphysics/BCarter.htm> alchemy => http://www.greatdreams.com/alchemy.htm> http://www.biodynamics.com/discussion/_disc1/000000a0.htm> http://www.elgrial.com/ingles/04_productos/ormus_whitegold/ormus-ingles.htm> http://www.soulinvitation.com/ormus/ .>> Some of these sounded too "Crowley-ish" or "cult-ish" for me -- I prefer a more scientific explanation -- but then much science has evolved from trying to explain "Old Wives' tales & remedies". But such terms as Josephson tunneling and "laser-like" performance/properties are attributed to this stuff. I attached 2 sample documents to save you from browsing the above sites if you're not interested.

Mark :

216

Please take me off your mailing list (or whatever) for this stuff. I think the great bulk of this is nonsense and have no interest in it.

Tom

S-140. from Ken Myers regarding more references to ORMEs and ORMUS substances

Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 06:56:19 -0800 (PST) From: "Ken" <sprite_mkii@yahoo.com>Subject: Re: ... and still more ORMEs !!! To: stealthskaters@yahoo.com

Good Morning. It is as I am writing this, anyway. I remember Sitchin making that statement and wondering why the mining via the ocean. As time and info has unfolded, I have come to see that seawater could well be the most usable form for making the pure white gold.

As to Reich, I remember studying him in undergrad school where he was presented as being an important contributor to the psych field. In grad school, I was impressed with his view of the so-called "abnormal field". But I got caught up in Gestalt and resolving my own stuff and never pursued the good Wilheim.

Regarding the stuff, I have always thought that the white pure gold and ORMEs and all the other 'names' are a key to a vast world we have in our so-called modern world no idea of. Given the last 100 years and the people that are currently running the U.S. government, we won't become aware any time soon.

Ken

S-141. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contacting members of the Senate and Congress

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: I'm contacting the Senators ...Date : Tue, 01 Jan 2002 17:28:10 -0800

At 10:34 PM 12/31/01 -0500, you wrote:

> Since you're so handy with a gun, I may need you if the "M-I-B" come after me. I just sent e-mails on your behalf to several Senators. I included the UNITEL URL as well as that of my own site (which had some complaints and innuendos about government policies). With my luck, I can see this backfiring on me -- you get a big government grant, and I get on their shit-list and branded a reactionary or something. But I'd do again ... you've made a believer out of me.>> If any of their representatives contact you, please resist the temptation to engage in a physics debate with their experts by yourself. Postpone it until you have Mike at your side.

217

I'm sure some of these guys are trying to get funding for their own pet projects, and they'd like nothing more than to nip your stuff in-the-bud and keep all the money for themselves.>> HAPPY NEW YEAR !!!>> -- Mark

Don't worry. I will get Mike alerted. I would never ever try to take on any Physics debate without Mike. That just goes without saying. I am ready, willing, and able to take on any of these rotten paid-off so-and-so's! We have Boeing, Honda R&D, and RR under our belts already for tried and true hard core technical revues of our proposed projects. We are more than ready to take on the World!

Let 'er rip, Mark! I promise I will never let you down! Its all Guns&Glory from here on out!!

Best wishes,

Happy New YearLarry

S-142. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding preparing for questions by funding committees

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.comTo : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Re: play "Devil's Advocate" to prepare Date : Tue, 01 Jan 2002 17:47:04 -0800

At 09:28 AM 1/1/02 -0500, you wrote:

> ... and one more thing before I forget, to prepare for in case these Senators send some tech people to quiz you and Mike. If you can't do it yourself, get one of your associates to play the role of Devil's Advocate and come up with questions that someone not familiar with UNITEL would ask. One -- and I don't know how you're going to do this -- I would suggest that you come up with something other than a visual UFO sighting/examination to base your design on. I don't know if you can use Avco's stuff or if that pertained to "smart-skin". Maybe later on you can say your sighting confirmed your basic concepts plus gave you ideas for some modifications. > Then two -- and this is one I'm still not clear on -- why the need for these difficult-to-build Type-whatever semiconductors? I can get you a rainbow of laser lights using conventional materials. If these materials do not currently exist, what makes you think they will function that way? Why can't you use readily available materials to produce these wave packets?> > Playing some of these "games" is part of doing your homework in preparation for a grilling. Again resist the temptation to engage them all alone -- have Mike and maybe Bryan alongside you. First impressions are most important, and you may have only one chance going this route.>> -- Mark

218

Mark:

Pleased be advised that we have not -- and in the future we will not -- mention anything about our sightings. That is only for our autobiography. We stand on what we know and present the facts as they relate to our technical description.

Secondly, our patented design calls for the materials described therein. The II-VI semiconducting compounds are readily accepted and are available. It's the market that has called for other materials like III-V and silicon etc. But the market is about to change (from 2-D black&white to 3-D color holograms).

You have a prominent seat to watch the whole thing go down, my friend!

Best, Larry

S-143. from Bryan Willoughby regarding his personal goals and how they relate to UNITEL

From: "Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.comTo: stealthskaters@yahoo.comCC: "BluEyes" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>Subject: AwareDate: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 03:00:38 -0800

We have much in common, Mark ...so much Synchronicity.

Have you also been trained or self-trained to Remote View? Other useable OBE nature, as I know it is for good only...as nature would want this to be used. My passions are my work and others, in Free Energy, Alternative healing, knowledge tapping, and most any research and development from history to now, in the now that is.

There is so much to share...we'll have to meet one day, I believe... I will be back January 20th, from these meetings also, know you can email any time you like.

I also am interested and do make investment to things I believe can be in nature's benevolent place for us to share on earth.... this includes maintaining, re-building, and overall any business or idea based invention and good work planned and creative.

Again, I am happy that you are with UNITEL's visions too...I know I have tried my most to steer them from many countless areas of govern control .... it's for the better that we 'know' there's a lighter way.

Light and Harmony to all ~bryan

THANK FOR SHARING - Indeed, SHARING IS CARING....there's no other way to 'be'.

219

S-144. from Bryan Willoughby regarding his personal goals and how they relate to UNITEL

From: "Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.com> To: stealthskaters@yahoo.comCC: "BluEyes" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>Subject: Re: meta-physicsDate: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 10:49:18 -0800

----- Original Message ----- >> Hi Bryan --> > As a former chemical engineer, I tend to believe in things that I can build with my hands or prove mathematically, similar to Bob Lazar and Larry Maurer. As I have gotten older and read truly amazing things, I have gotten more "humbled" and realize that there may really be sciences left to be discovered. I have tried to pass that by Larry (meta-physics, the type von Neumann said was the "key" to UFOs and what Sarfatti is trying to nail down mathematically), but that is a big No-No subject with Larry. It's somewhat ironic that as distressed he is with others for not considering UNITEL's revolutionary concepts, he himself falls in a similar trap. Kaku said the same thing about Einstein in his quest for the "theory of everything" -- had Einstein allowed for more dimensions to interact with normal 3D space (as he did with time), he would have found simplification of Nature's laws (as is now being done with 10-dimensional superstrings and 11-dimension m-branes). But that is obviously a "sore point" with Larry. We are all human and have such things, and I don't want to push it with him. I wonder, though, if this meta-physical stuff is what Lazar was saying what appeared to be 200-300 years ahead of our present technology, so much that it appeared as "magic".>> It's a shame "Moon", Nichols, and Matheny have been so discredited recently. I really think there is something to the events attributed to Montauk, the P-X, and Incunabula, although these guys' greed seems to have thwarted an easy investigation. Marshall Barnes was one of the principles who blew-the-whistle on them. And it was that Barnes' archived chat that first made me aware of UNITEL.>> I rarely watch television. And even more rarely news-type broadcasts as I can get all that off the Internet. I've probably watched NBC's "DATELINE" 4 times in my life. And 2 of those times just happened to be interviews with Col. Corso and David Morehouse. I had heard of Roswell before but never remote-viewing. After those interviews I went out and purchased their books and began studying the subjects even more.>> Morehouse has drawn his share of critics. Tom Mahood thinks Morehouse, Brown, and Dames are "flakes" but has high regard for Buchanon and McMoneagle. A long time ago I remember hearing about a world championship chess match between the Russian champion (I believe it was Karpov, the champion before the current one Kasparov). He was playing against a former Soviet who defected (to Bulgaria, I think). Anyway the challenger complained (in vain) that the Soviets were loading the front rows in the audience with psychics who were trying to confuse his mind. I thought that was nonsense until years later I saw the remote-viewing interviews and then learned that the Soviets tend to use this more to "influence" people whereas we use it more for psychic espionage. I learned that remote-viewing can "influence" quantum events, and that Lyn Buchanon was supposed to have "fried" an Army laptop by causing its internal> circuitry to fail (although it can't be used

220

against non-quantum mechanisms like a steam engine). Sarfatti, "Ark" and others are trying to propose mathematical bases to explain this. Maybe the ORMEs stuff comes into play here.>> Although I don't want to believe in pre-destiny, it does seem strange that I would see those 2 tv shows when I rarely watch that program. (If it is pre-destiny, I'm going to kick somebody's butt when I get to the "other side" for all the crap I've been put through in my life. Unless I'm being "punished" for something I did in a past life, there's just no excuse for dumping on me like this. My experiences parallel Larry's recent life to some extent.)>> Never had remote-viewing experiences or OBE that I'm aware of. Diego contacted me from that Argentina time-travel site to say most of the circuits there are from Steven Gibbs and are designed for OBE. I do have a few episodes of missing-time a long time ago but nothing for 20 years.>> You know, if you could time-travel or teleport (the way Taylor Kramer and his father were suggesting), why would you need a spaceship? Just turn on the 'Stargate' (Montauk) or power-up the "Egg" (Incunabula) and off-you-go. No fuss, no muss. Obviously if ETs are for real and doing this, it has to be more complicated unless their machines are a combination flight vehicle and an "Egg".>> But I hope your trip is successful for Larry's sake. I hate to see honest dreams unfulfilled and unselfish sacrifices go-for-naught. Good luck and fortune on your trip!>> -- Mark

Yes indeed, Mark !

What I would most like to state here and now, is that you and I have a whole lot in common, my friend. One day we will gather together and speak of such parts. Also, if you happen to see an opportunity in something I will share with you today -- on business side -- please don't hesitate to email me right away...I will include this after my initial subjects that we are sharing today.

Here's what I have found to be a part of the whole...not speaking negatively to or about anyone such person. Larry, is against most of Sarfatti's work and reports. Such as due perhaps to the ''manner'' that Jack portrays and delivers his thoughts and feelings. I think much mental anguish in both of them these days...perhaps the 'shift of the world's paradigm' is happening...I won't try to put my finger on it right now...

ORME"s I know (or at least so strongly believe) have a lot to do with the natural energies of our existence on earth, and the caliber of what we are able to scope into use here...hopefully benevolently for everyone's sake.

My take on string theory, kind of got shortened...I will tell you about that later...

Mark, what I know about RV, from my training...is the main part, is it can be used almost without discovery, and that it is in my estimation that the ''influences'' outweigh the ''forcing'' of the mind. Perhaps the clearest way to say this...is that what you manifest has to come from the spiritual, as you put it, the metaphysical...another dimensionality...it's perception, my friend...I do believe that makes all of this so very remarkable.

221

Yes, I believe in Magic ... you would understand my sense of meaning... Let the Magic live on!!

I will share much more..

My time is here and now with the things that I am gathering to do.. i have relations with a private telecommunications carrier, and I need to raise about 60K dollars in a few days liquid....I seem to have my hands full of this moment's situations....but I know it will come through. My other work that I do will take a huge step when this happens. Mark, no pushing things on you, but if you might could use a ''lift'' with ''financial tooling'' etc...if you know any one open-minded and fully capable of seeing and opportunity to immediate make return on their risk, and ready to triple their investment in 15 days or less time, let me know. I am well into the final stages of working on a nice project right now, that I have already signed an irrevocable contract, on one of my basic inventions in telecom, a little device that saves money on bandwidth on copper lines..(not like DSL's expensive set-up) it's a small thing, but third countries think it is far more than what they have...they're right, it can and would save them millions per their cost per year. They know this to be true now, as they've completely approved with tests in their locations. It's simple technology which does not turn me on....but hey, it truly helps others, their willing to give a generous amount, to get a fantastic savings to integrate a simple and quick method in a matter months they will be fully integrated, as at this moment are already pre-manufacturing the devices, as per my agreement... that's why the Irrevocable Agreement was made initiated. They want to immediately integrate, and the assurety bond that I will protect their investment on, is applied in full for one year. That protects all of us well. I just need a quick movement of cash, to supply an Assurety Bond for the deal to take full effect. I already have a Certificate of Deposit registered in my name for a specified amount, that will deliver plenty enough to set a generous finder's fee for You, and give to the Investor what I mentioned. (Ex- 60K yields in 15 days, 180K Total-- which is 60 Original, and 120K Return on Loan) That Deposit will activate in my name, once I come through with the Assurance Bond in their Office. That's why I only need 15 days max for payment of loan. The institution that we chose is a world bank, top 100. We've done everything good. It's going to happen. Just this little part that I need filling, regards the guaranteed bond and a couple shipping costs that i need to take care of, seals the deal. Total needed, if you happen to know anyone at all, that would want to start off this new year with a windfall. I meant what I said, it is pure quick profit. Not a get rich quick thing...I have already signed the dotted lines...

With a portion of this, I plan to assist to catapult the technologies of quantum, some more of my inventions.. with Larry and UNITEL's system methods, and others that are planned and uncovered....so that we can get the right 'fit' Lead Investor/Group into the picture with us there and every where we need them. Some will grow perhaps just with my tools, however, I know some will need an amount beyond my personal abilities for now. Larry and others have only to know I am working on building their work toward greater possibilities. I have not specifically told them about my immediate contract on my telecom inventions.

Of course, if it was not for the quickness of my situation needing to happen, i would easily just wait things out, but so many others are counting on me...funny, I have personally invested and R&D'd about 300K thousand this year from my hand to other areas...and here I am, perhaps you are too, living the life of a pauper...but God, I am so blessed to know what I know, and do what I do....I did Let Go and Let GOD know I am here to do my part in my path for others...it's all about our missions on Earth and beyond...that to me, my friend, is Truly Quantum Awareness...

Oh, if you are wondering, why not get a loan short-term at the bank, I have consigned for others, and it has affected my credit too much for now.

222

Thanks for everything we share. It's indeed a pleasure...and we'll get together very soon indeed .. and in fact sooner than we can imagine perhaps !!

Let me know your thoughts and feelings about any thing you wish to ~ always open my friend ~

Remember, it's not 'the money' that truly matters...it's how you use what you have got in knowledge, power etc...it's ALL WEALTH which is ENERGY !!!

Always in light and harmony~~bryan

pathfinder@mindspring.com

S-145. from Larry Maurer regarding list of Senators & Congressmen contacted

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: list of Senators & Congressmen contactedDate : Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:27:03 -0800

Thanks, Mark ! We shall see what happens!

Larry

At 09:55 AM 1/2/02 -0500, you wrote: >Mr. Maurer -- >> The attached EXCEL spreadsheet contains those members of Congress that I e-mailed. I'm hoping most of the e-mail addresses are correct. Be aware that the "filtering" of correspondence begins with very low-level aids. That's why I sent out so many, allowing for early discardment by those who don't know what you're talking about.>> I also stated in my e-mail that I knew you to be a proud & patriotic American who had grown somewhat disillusioned and -- like any other person with a dream -- was being forced by the "system" to seek funding overseas. I added that I'd hate to see this technology developed by another country when it was invented here and the U.S. has to buy machines back from Japan or France. That may be considered "low-blow" and "sneaky" ... but it's more the truth than not, and whatever at-this-point I'll use whatever I think will get their attention.>>Hopefully you won't be fielding questions from all of them on every other day. That would wear you out. Maybe if it seems that's going to be the case, you could tell them to get together and arrange for a group conference. Then again you have to be careful because you don't want to act too standoff-ish and drive them away. >>Now we'll sit back since "the seeds have been sown" and see if anything grows out of all this.>

e-mail address   State Party     

S E N A T E http://www.senate.gov/contacting/index_by_state.cfm

223

john_mccain@mccain.senate.gov John McCain AZ R

senator_byrd@byrd.senate.gov Robert C. Byrd WV D

senator_stevens@stevens.senate.gov Ted Stevens AR R

senator@feinstein.senate.gov Diane Feinstein CA D

senatorlott@lott.senate.gov Trent Lott MS R

jesse_helms@helms.senate.gov Jesse Helms NC R

senator_domenici@domenici.senate.gov Pete Domenici NM R

senator_thompson@thompson.senate.gov Fred Thompson TN R

phil_gramm@gramm.senate.gov Phil Gramm TX R

senator@warner.senate.gov John Warner VA R

senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov Patrick Leahy VT D

senator@rockefeller.senate.gov Jay Rockefeller WV D

senator@shelby.senate.gov Richard Shelby AL Rsenator.hutchinson@hutchinson.senate.gov Tim Hutchinson AR Rsenator@mcconnell.senate.gov Mitch McConnell KY Rsenator@kennedy.senate.gov Edward Kennedy MA Dsenator@collins.senate.gov Susan Collins ME Rsenator@levin.senate.gov Carl Levin MI Dsenatorlott@lott.senate.gov Trent Lott MS Ropinion@smith.senate.gov Bob Smith NH Rsenator_reid@reid.senate.gov Harry Reid NV Dsenator@hutchison.senate.gov Kay Bailey Hutchison TX Rsenator_murray@murray.senate.gov Patt Murray WA D

C O N G R E S S http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/Subcommittee on Defense

Bill.Young@mail.house.gov C.W. Bill Young FL Rjoe.skeen@mail.house.gov Joe Skeen NM Rrodney.frelinghuysen@mail.house.gov Rodney Frelinghuysen NJ Rmartin.sabo@mail.house.gov Martin O. Sabo MN D

Subcommittee on Energy & Water Dev.sonny.callahan@mail.house.gov Sonny Callahan AL Rlatham.ia05@mail.house.gov Tom Latham IA Rdoolittle@mail.house.gov John T. Doolittle CA Rjclyburn@mail.house.gov James C. Clyburn SC D

Subcommittee on Military Constructionrobert.aderholt@mail.house.gov Robert B. Aderholt AL R

Special Oversight Panel on DOE Reorg.mail.gibbons@mail.house.gov Jim Gibbons NV Rcymck@mail.house.gov Cynthia A. McKinney GA Djames.langevin@mail.house.gov James R. Langevin RI D

Permanent Select Committee on Intelligenceporter.goss@mail.house.gov Porter Goss FL RRep.Boehlert@mail.house.gov Sherwood L. Boehlert NY Rtellhoek@mail.house.gov Peter Hoekstra MI RRichard.BurrNC05@mail.house.gov Richard Burr NC Rsf.nancy@mail.house.gov Nancy Pelosi CA Djane.harman@mail.house.gov Jane Harman CA D

224

bishop.email@mail.house.gov Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. GA Dalcee.pubhastings@mail.house.gov Alcee L. Hastings FL D

House Committee on ScienceRep.Morella@mail.house.gov Constance A. Morella MD Rdana@mail.house.gov Dana Rohrabacher CA Rrep.smith@mail.house.gov Nick Smith MI Rrep.ehlers@mail.house.gov Vernon J. Ehlers MI Rgil.gutknecht@mail.house.gov Gil Gutknecht MN Rcannon.ut03@mail.house.gov Chris Cannon UT Rrep.hart@mail.house.gov Melissa A. Hart PA Rrmhall@mail.house.gov Ralph M. Hall TX Djim.barcia-pub@mail.house.gov James A. Barcia MI Dlynn.rivers@mail.house.gov Lynn N. Rivers MI Dzoe.lofgren@mail.house.gov Zoe Lofgren CA Dweiner@mail.house.gov Anthony Weiner NY Dbrian.baird@mail.house.gov Brian Baird WA Dmike.honda@mail.house.gov Mike Honda CA D

S-146. from Bob King regarding "lost science"

From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : reply Date : Tue, 1 Jan 2002 10:23:41 +1300

Hi ya, Mark:,

Thanks for keeping me in touch with things, appreciate that. Is there any easy way you can restrict the line length of what you send to about 65 chars. If not, that's okay. It just takes me ages to edit it all so I can read it.:-)

> Some recent developments which I have preserved in my e-mail "diary" http://www.stealthskater.com/Email_Diary.htm .

OK.

> Dr. Jack Sarfatti -- the theoretical physicist who's not afraid to put himself out on a theoretical limb trying to quantify such quasi-scientific notions as "meta"physics -- gives a curious insight into his personal religious beliefs in E-Mail #128.

Yes, it's a pity Mankind's religious beliefs always seem to get in the way of progress.

> A lot of scientists have similar attitudes, preferring to replace the supernatural with more advanced hypotheses on Universal Consciousness. Only dying will tell if they are right.

Debatable!

225

> And yet he himself refuses to contemplate another possibility. Legends on the Philadelphia Experiment report the crew went "crazy" . … …

Strange. Has he read the reality of what happened?

> If any part of the Montauk Project story is true, … … …

Most of it is.

> … …one of the reasons this research continued was to explore meta-physics to see if this technology could be utilized without dire consequences to biological life. The Department-of-Energy has given contracts to explore interstellar travel via manipulating space-time geometry … … …

I don't think they will achieve that in our lifetime. They lost the chance when they destroyed Tesla's work by scuttling the Eldridge.

>… …Mr. Maurer isn't the only engineer/physicist who is reluctant to confront these metaphysical notions. Apparently it upset Tom Mahood (a principal contributor in David Darlington's "Area 51 - the Dreamland Chronicles" who exposed certain flaws in Bob Lazar's stories) that he requested me not to send him any more material of this kind. E-Mail #139. … …

A man with a closed mind will achieve nothing

> … …In a similar way, I think what has prevented mankind from truly achieving vast leaps is its refusal to investigate phenomena that to-date has been lacking any rigorous mathematically-based definitions. … …

Agreed. That's why Tesla working on his own achieved what we still consider impossible.

> … … Again, all of the above and more are presented at http://www.stealthskater/index.htm .

On file; when I have some time to really get at it.

> HAPPY NEW YEAR , Bob !!!

Reciprocated;

> (Maybe all of our efforts will finally yield something!)

As much as I would like to think so, I consider that the truths from the past are long gone in bureaucratic disorganization. They will have to be re-discovered.--Regards, bob mailto:bobking@xtra.co.nz

226

S-147. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a recent response from Jack Sarfatti

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Fwd: Re: Fwd: Email From Mr. Hamilton "Returning to the TAP-TEN Fold! (I'ts About Time!")Date : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 10:28:59 -0800

Bingo!

See, stealthskater! I don't have to do anything! Jack-ass comes to me! Ha ha! I can see nothing but a libel/slander suit for this fellow in the future. We'll see what he does next. I for one am not going to be baited by him. I shall not respond to this email.

Best, Larry

> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 19:31:09 -0800 > From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Email From Mr. Hamilton > "Returning to the TAP-TEN Fold! (I'ts About Time!") > To: Gary Voss <vosstech@yahoo.com> > Cc: rgrunt@yahoo.com, pathfinder@mindspring.com, foresight@foresight.org, vadim@belrus.kuban.ru, zyzygyz@yahoo.com, wcri@erols.com, yokatta@oxy.edu, UriGeller@compuserve.com, WeeklyFiles@filersfiles.com, Puthoff@aol.com, CloudRider@aol.com, ericdavis@nidsci.org, lcrowell@swcp.com, achenbachj@washpost.com, joe@motionsciences.org, eic@scitechperspectives.co.uk, wgough@Pacbell.net, v.poponin@worldnet.att.net, swolff@umevoice.com, meru1@well.com, sherlight@ktc.com, radiant@Pacbell.net, SFORACLE@prodigy.net, JagdishM@aol.com, GeorgeWeis@aol.com, Karel.Havik@cec.eu.int, jeffrey@williamjames.com, Joseph207@home.com, mosca@optonline.net, vericomm@idiom.com, ItalianPhysicsCenter@YahooGroups.com, ibison@earthtech.org, tsmith@innerx.net, jsarfatti@earthlink.net, creon@nas.nasa.gov, editor@infinite-energy.com, tuc@kiva.net, brotherblue93@hotmail.com, karastjepan@yahoo.com, sirag@mindspring.com, pandolfi@zzapp.org, gear2000@lightspeed.net, fawolf@ix.netcom.com, dansmith@clark.net, b.hiley@bbk.ac.uk, hpstapp@lbl.gov, hpd@mppmu.mpg.de, dpeat@fdavidpeat.com, jcs-online@YahooGroups.com, bpiechocinska@hotmail.com, june.shippey@ntlworld.com, swimp@shaw.ca, gbekkum@ix.netcom.com, zukav@zukav.com, GlenL@Pacbell.net, Hankskids@aol.com, henrym@roswell.net, hjf35@earthlink.net, ijamieson@netzero.net, JPVerhey@Abz.nl, jazras@hotmail.com, jeanmillay@hotmail.com, jfwoodward@juno.com, jmkohn@sirius.com, celeste@simplecom.net, maritimus@usa.net, office@faraday.ru, Jacin_Young43614@yahoo.com, iasos@nbn.com, kloskie@hotmail.com, halfox@qwest.net, aldarow@zahav.net.il, krisbook@juno.com, crossword_puzzle_solver@yahoo.com, m_littles@yahoo.com, herman@antioch-college.edu, energyconsultant@wanadoo.fr, KARMA4U@webtv.net, susannordling@cherokee.k12.ga.us, nanojbl@home.com, bjmbh2001@yahoo.com, rjoshua@sprintmail.com, tolimak@nettaxi.com, JCampbell@nevcogen.com, surferjr@yahoo.com, lmaurer@unitelnw.com > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) > X-Accept-Language: en > X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >

227

> Would you stop using this open list with your goofy worthless nonsense? Thanks.

S-148. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an upcoming T.A.P.-T.E.N. conference in Las Vegas

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comDate : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 10:39:41 -0800forwarded message attached :

>Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 10:37:31 -0800 >To: vosstech@yahoo.com >From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >Subject: Re: Fwd: Email From Mr. Hamilton "Returning to the TAP-TEN Fold! (It's About Time!") >>Hello Gary: >Excellent letter. I look forward to the meeting in San Diego. Also please be advised that all mail recipients are not friendly to our cause. You probably realize that already. Let's just stay positive and carry on our plans for the future. I would appreciate it very much also if you brought Michael Miller to the meeting as he is anxious to discuss new quantum physics in our discussions. I hope you will tape the discussion because we are going to discuss Nobel Prize-worthy technical information. Please keep us abreast of the proceedings with investors, etc.>>Sincerely, >>Larry D. Maurer, Principal>& Director, Engineering>UNITEL, Inc.>www.unitelnw.com >(503) 232-2740

>> At 07:19 PM 1/2/02 -0800, you wrote: >>> http://greetings.yahoo.comX-Apparently-To: vosstech@yahoo.com via web13301.mail.yahoo.com; 06 Dec 2001 10:54:03 -0800 (PST) >> Received: from f23.law3.hotmail.com (EHLO hotmail.com) (209.185.241.23) by mta437.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Dec 2001 10:54:01 -0800 (PST) >> Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:52:07 -0800 >> Received: from 164.67.133.120 by lw3fd.law3.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 06 Dec 2001 18:52:07 GMT >> X-Originating-IP: [164.67.133.120] >> From: "Bill Hamilton" <skywatcher22@hotmail.com> >> To: vosstech@yahoo.com >> Subject: Re: TAP-TEN Welcomes New CEO! >> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 18:52:07 +0000 >> Mime-Version: 1.0

228

>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed >> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Dec 2001 18:52:07.0808 (UTC) >> FILETIME=[1AC7F000:01C17E87] >> Content-Length: 3540 >> >> Gary, >> >> I seem to be losing track of what is going on with your TAP-TEN projects. Your alliance with UNITEL surprised me. I first became aware of them some few years ago but have not seen anything developed from that quarter.>> >> Perhaps I should plan to attend your meeting in Vegas next November. Sounds interesting. >> >> I live in Palmdale (home of Aerospace in California). So remember this if you ever pass this way and want to talk. >> >> My primary interest has been antigravity and field propulsion but I also have an avid interest in time travel. I believe that some have spontaneously displaced in time, but it seems a rare occurrence. I have written an essay on time travel at my URL: http://home.earthlink.net/~skywatcher22/TimeTravel.html . >> >> Good luck on your past and future ventures... >> >> Bill Hamilton >> Executive Director >> Skywatch International, Inc. >> websites: >> http://home.earthlink.net/~skywatcher22 >> http://home.earthlink.net/~skywatcher12 >> http://home.earthlink.net/~xplorerx >> http://home.earthlink.net/~xplorerx2 >>

>>> From: Gary Voss <vosstech@yahoo.com> >>> To: Bill@skywatch-international.org >>> Subject: TAP-TEN Welcomes New CEO! >>> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:33:38 -0800 (PST) >>> >>> Please everyone give a warm "Welcome" to our newly elected CEO Mr. "Bryan Willoughby" as he recently joined us & has come aboard TAP-TEN to provide us with an abundantly strong support to further assist our most benevolent mission to humanity and continue with our commitment to our members & associates.>>>>>> Brian Willoughby is the founder of "Affirm Technologies" here in Silicon Valley, California, and wears another hat as acting administrative coordinator on the board of UNITEL Inc. as Corporate Team Council and has become our newest Team Member CEO of TAP-TEN Research. >>> >>> Larry Maurer (UNITEL Inc. Chief Administrator of Projects Engineering) has been in touch with us and we have signed Non-Disclosure Documents between us as a precursor to developing join affirmative action partnership to jointly work on some

229

of our latest patent to design prototype alternative Energy Power & Propulsion & Aerospace Engineering R&D. >>> >>> Larry plans to fly into San Diego to meet with some of our administrative members of TAP-TEN Research to address plans to further business relations to begin this new join venture process, including all of the necessary legal documentation that will implement our business infrastructure prior to meeting with a few private "Angel-Investors" that are also in part of our network who share a common interest with our benevolent goals to contribute to the evolutionary emancipation of humanity in bringing into fruitious physical presentation by demonstration of our ability to maintain our commitment to providing these alternative solutions to free energy or greatly reduced costs to those required to purchase power from the grid making it virtually closer to that goal, and provide the world with better alternative solutions to modern medicine & human longevity without the complications of profiting from human suffering while suppression of a cure is much closer than the great Pharmakia Industry and old Rockerfella's money would allow for our people to admit to this great scandal & we all deep down know that there is definitely something that does sound afoul about that either we, or anyone else debates against such a thing.>>>>>> As a reminder, we will be holding our first TAP-TEN Research network meeting & conference Expo at the Las Vegas Luxor in Nov. (2002) which will carry the theme "Seeing is Believing" so all anyone has to do to "Believe" in what we are truly capable of doing within our TAP-TEN Research Network, is to physically produce their bodies during our Expo, and they Will definitely "SEE" which will inevitably make it more so difficult not to Believe in what is before them in demonstration of several of our latest cutting edge prototypes will provide them with! This is going to be a truly remarkable event. Don't wait until the last moment, make plans to join us there & bring friends & family with you. In the mean-"Time" pass the word about our organization and what we're about as word of mouth would have it a better & stronger voice that gets recognized and provides better results than your standard advertising would ever do. Larry Maurer & other UNITEL Inc Members as well as Mr. Alex Frolov, Director of Faraday Labs, St. Petersburg Russia will be present at our TAP-TEN Research Expo on behalf of being an affiliation of our network and will provide us with some keynote speakers during this event to discuss about their experience R&D ventures from past- present including a brief introduction and mission goals between us. >>>>>> Hope to see you there! >>> >>> ---Gary Voss >>> Executive Director, >>> TAP-TEN research Foundation >>> 627 H. St. Ste. A279 >>> San Diego, CA. 91910 >>> (619) 387-7300 Ext.4312 >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tapten >>> http://www.Tap-Ten.com >>> >>> UNITEL Inc.,

230

>>> UNITEL Inc., is a technology development company that owns a generic patent with ten (10) claims both in the US (No. 4,817,102, March 28, 1989) and in Japan (No.1,864,717, August 8, 1994), with patents approved but not yet received in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom (No. 89906639.3, September 11, 1990) on a system with multiple applications. This generic quantum electronics system design applications include computing and aerospace propulsion. UNITEL is prepared to build a prototype quantum computer system entitled HOLO-1. HOLO-1 uses a specially designed crystal laser lens to store, retrieve, and process data using light instead of electricity. http://www.unitelnw.com >>>>>> Website Of: Mr. Alexander V. Frolov, Russian Native Engineer, Inventor, & Author of many published works relating to a broad range of topics such as gravitation, electrogravitation, new energy, time rate control theory (time machine), reactionless propulsion, warp drive technology, plasma electrolysis, hydrogen energetics, aging problem, Tesla research, ether science, ether dynamics, n-dimensional, electric spacecraft, four dimensional conception of matter, thermogravitation, gyroscopical drive, Tesla, Chernetsky, Frolov, gradient dielectric technologies for electric space drive, warp drive, space time curvature, temporal displacement, teleportation, and DNA resonance. http://alexfrolov.narod.ru

S-149. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding recruiting Dr. Fred Wolf

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: RE: UNITEL Aerospace & ElectronicsDate : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:53:46 -0800

Mark:

I think we need to bolster our professional status with more credentials. Otherwise we are starting to look like a scam in lieu of all of the "TAP-TEN" Yahoo! groups, etc. Besides, Fred is Jack-ass's Achilles tendon, my friend. It is worth it to hire Fred to help Mike "gun the dogs down"!

Best,Larry

> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:50:08 -0800 > To: fawolf@ix.netcom.com > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: RE: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics > > Fred:>> Maybe I am reading between the lines. But would you be interested in joining our technical team on a consulting basis? Michael can always use the credentials even though he has proven his knowledge of quantum physics time-and-time again with world-class Ph.D-level physicists.>

231

> We hope to be funded within a short period of time and perhaps Mike and I could come down to the Bay area and spend a little time discussing the possibilities. Everything that we have presented in the past and intend to present in the future is based on well-accepted facts. I think that once you check out what we have to offer that you will find that we have a very sound (and patented) platform to stand on.>> I know that you would maintain a professional unbiased posture in examining the facts that we have to present so that you can make a decision to join our efforts (with pay) to construct and test prototypes of the quantum technology that we advance. If for some reason that you find our proposed projects unacceptable, then we would understand. We just want to acquire unbiased professional acceptance of our ideas. The more credentials we have to present at this time, the better off we will be.>> This is just a thought here, Fred. Please let me know your thoughts here. Perhaps you may have some supportive information from your own point of view. Certainly we will give you credit for any independent discoveries you may produce through your own work. If you are too busy to get involved, I understand. I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you,

> Sincerely, >> Larry D. Maurer, Principal > & Director, Engineering > www.unitelnw.com > (503) 232-2740

>> At 08:11 AM 1/2/02 -0800, you wrote: >>> Hi Larry, >>>> We haven't pursued any new business plans for about a year. Our plans for financing also evaporated. Dr Teich has gone back to his regular profession of psychological counseling and I am back contentedly writing books. I wish you good luck with your plans.>>>> Best Wishes, >>>> Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D. >> Have Brains / Will Travel >> San Francisco >> email fawolf@ix.netcom.com <mailto:fawolf@ix.netcom.com> >> http://home.ix.netcom.com/~fawolf >>

>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Larry Maurer [mailto:lmaurer@unitelnw.com] >>> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 7:24 PM >>> To: fawolf@ix.netcom.com >>> Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics >>> >>> Dear Dr. Wolf: >>>

232

>>> It has been quite a while since we last corresponded. Our aerospace projects are getting underway as well as initiation of our computer system with UIC and KHD. My regards for a Happy New Year. I hope you are doing okay. Perhaps there is some interest in our proposed quantum system? Michael Miller is frothing at the bit to discuss the latest scientific information. Give our regards to Howard Teich, too! Good luck with your physics aspirations, Fred!>>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal >>> & Director, Engineering >>> UNITEL, Inc. >>> www.unitelnw.com >>> (503) 232-2740

<= previous E-mails 050-099 next E-mails 150-199 =>

if on the Internet, press <BACK> on your browser to return to the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)

else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE> this file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'

233