s.2.4 validation activities for scenario 2 (case ferrara)

28
D6.4 S1.4 Validation activities for Scenario 2 – case Ferrara

Upload: sunshineproject

Post on 12-Apr-2017

407 views

Category:

Technology


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

D6.4 S1.4

Validation activities for Scenario 2 –

case Ferrara

Page 2: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Module 1:Analysis of historical series of consumption and weather data

Page 3: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

1.1.a - Daily profiles

Study performed on two buildings, both served by district heating:

• Scuole Poledrelli (see DailyProfiles_Poledrelli.pptx)

• Museo di Storia Naturale (see DailyProfiles_MuseoStoriaNaturale.pptx)

Four quantities plotted:

• measured consumption (red line)

• measured external temperature (blue line)

• required periods of comfort (unshaded surfaces)

• deduced heating system turn on time

Page 4: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

1.1.b - Daily profiles

Scuole Poledrelli:

• Heating system usually off in the weekend

• Heating turn on is anticipated on Mondays and Tuesdays

Museo di Storia Naturale

• Usually on all days

• very regular turn on/of interval

General remarks

• Temperature profile sometimes is unrealistic or incomplete

• As expected consumption trends are inversely proportional to external temperature, with a delay due to thermal inertia.

• Scuole Poledrelli have a higher consumption, but a correct comparison should be done after normalization with heated surface.

Page 5: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

-4

1

6

11

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324

-4

1

6

11

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324

-4

1

6

11

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324

-4

1

6

11

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324

Scuole Poledrelli Museo di Storia Naturale

Martedì 13/01

Mercoledì 14/01

Page 6: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

1.2 - Seasonal profiles

Scuole Poledrelli:

• weekly pattern is clearly visible, with the consumption peaks on Mondays and Tuesdays

• this kind of plot triggers the question, is turning turn off the heating system during weekends more efficient than just living it on?

• the question can be evaluated by measuring and comparing the surface of the "Monday peaks" with that of the "weekend valleys"

• comparison of consumption and temperature curves show

• an inverse proportion on the long term trends

• the possible effect of thermal inertia in the progressive smoothing of the "Monday peak" from one week to the following.

Museo di Storia Naturale:

• Initial peak is unrealistic, consumption scale is different with respect with Scuole Poledrelli

• clear weekly pattern is absent, even if a week-size signal seems to be present, especially on the left part of the curve

• comparison of consumption and temperature curves show an inverse proportion on the long term trends

Page 7: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Scuole Poledrelli

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Satu

rday

, 27

Dec

em

ber

Mo

nd

ay, 2

9 D

ece

mb

erW

edn

esd

ay, 3

1 D

ecem

be

rFr

iday

, 02

Jan

uar

ySu

nd

ay, 0

4 J

anu

ary

Tues

day

, 06

Jan

uar

yTh

urs

day

, 08

Jan

uar

ySa

turd

ay, 1

0 J

anu

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 1

2 J

anu

ary

Wed

nes

day

, 14

Jan

uar

yFr

iday

, 16

Jan

uar

ySu

nd

ay, 1

8 J

anu

ary

Tues

day

, 20

Jan

uar

yTh

urs

day

, 22

Jan

uar

ySa

turd

ay, 2

4 J

anu

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 2

6 J

anu

ary

Wed

nes

day

, 28

Jan

uar

yFr

iday

, 30

Jan

uar

ySu

nd

ay, 0

1 F

ebru

ary

Tues

day

, 03

Feb

ruar

yTh

urs

day

, 05

Fe

bru

ary

Satu

rday

, 07

Fe

bru

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 0

9 F

eb

ruar

yW

edn

esd

ay, 1

1 F

ebru

ary

Frid

ay, 1

3 F

eb

ruar

ySu

nd

ay, 1

5 F

ebru

ary

Tues

day

, 17

Feb

ruar

yTh

urs

day

, 19

Fe

bru

ary

Satu

rday

, 21

Fe

bru

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 2

3 F

eb

ruar

yW

edn

esd

ay, 2

5 F

ebru

ary

Frid

ay, 2

7 F

eb

ruar

ySu

nd

ay, 0

1 M

arch

Tues

day

, 03

Mar

chTh

urs

day

, 05

Mar

chSa

turd

ay, 0

7 M

arch

Mo

nd

ay, 0

9 M

arch

Wed

nes

day

, 11

Mar

chFr

iday

, 13

Mar

chSu

nd

ay, 1

5 M

arch

Tues

day

, 17

Mar

chTh

urs

day

, 19

Mar

chSa

turd

ay, 2

1 M

arch

Mo

nd

ay, 2

3 M

arch

Wed

nes

day

, 25

Mar

chFr

iday

, 27

Mar

chSu

nd

ay, 2

9 M

arch

Tues

day

, 31

Mar

chTh

urs

day

, 02

Ap

ril

Satu

rday

, 04

Ap

ril

Mo

nd

ay, 0

6 A

pri

lW

edn

esd

ay, 0

8 A

pri

lFr

iday

, 10

Ap

ril

Sun

day

, 12

Ap

ril

Tues

day

, 14

Ap

ril

kWh

T °

Temperatura Consumi

Page 8: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Satu

rday

, 27

Dec

em

ber

Mo

nd

ay, 2

9 D

ece

mb

erW

edn

esd

ay, 3

1 D

ecem

be

rFr

iday

, 02

Jan

uar

ySu

nd

ay, 0

4 J

anu

ary

Tues

day

, 06

Jan

uar

yTh

urs

day

, 08

Jan

uar

ySa

turd

ay, 1

0 J

anu

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 1

2 J

anu

ary

Wed

nes

day

, 14

Jan

uar

yFr

iday

, 16

Jan

uar

ySu

nd

ay, 1

8 J

anu

ary

Tues

day

, 20

Jan

uar

yTh

urs

day

, 22

Jan

uar

ySa

turd

ay, 2

4 J

anu

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 2

6 J

anu

ary

Wed

nes

day

, 28

Jan

uar

yFr

iday

, 30

Jan

uar

ySu

nd

ay, 0

1 F

ebru

ary

Tues

day

, 03

Feb

ruar

yTh

urs

day

, 05

Fe

bru

ary

Satu

rday

, 07

Fe

bru

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 0

9 F

eb

ruar

yW

edn

esd

ay, 1

1 F

ebru

ary

Frid

ay, 1

3 F

eb

ruar

ySu

nd

ay, 1

5 F

ebru

ary

Tues

day

, 17

Feb

ruar

yTh

urs

day

, 19

Fe

bru

ary

Satu

rday

, 21

Fe

bru

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 2

3 F

eb

ruar

yW

edn

esd

ay, 2

5 F

ebru

ary

Frid

ay, 2

7 F

eb

ruar

ySu

nd

ay, 0

1 M

arch

Tues

day

, 03

Mar

chTh

urs

day

, 05

Mar

chSa

turd

ay, 0

7 M

arch

Mo

nd

ay, 0

9 M

arch

Wed

nes

day

, 11

Mar

chFr

iday

, 13

Mar

chSu

nd

ay, 1

5 M

arch

Tues

day

, 17

Mar

chTh

urs

day

, 19

Mar

chSa

turd

ay, 2

1 M

arch

Mo

nd

ay, 2

3 M

arch

Wed

nes

day

, 25

Mar

chFr

iday

, 27

Mar

chSu

nd

ay, 2

9 M

arch

Tues

day

, 31

Mar

chTh

urs

day

, 02

Ap

ril

Satu

rday

, 04

Ap

ril

Mo

nd

ay, 0

6 A

pri

lW

edn

esd

ay, 0

8 A

pri

lFr

iday

, 10

Ap

ril

Sun

day

, 12

Ap

ril

Tues

day

, 14

Ap

ril

kWh

T °

Temperatura Consumi

Museo di Storia Naturale

Page 9: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Gas consumption data are measured with optical reader attached to the analogic gas meters:

• Data is gathered via radio in local concentrators that deliver them via GPRS to the pilot head-end server.

• Reading frequency is hourly but often the reading fails and the measure is postpones to the following hour.

• This is what causes the measurement jumps in the historical series.

We have analysed consumption data for one pilot building served by gas heating to verify the quality of data.

Palazzina Energia/Patrimonio:

• Impact of measurement jumps is heavy, to the point that data is scarcely useful

• Gas consumption includes also hot water preparation, as can be derived from the non-null consumption values outside of the heating season.

1.3 - Gas consumption profiles

Page 10: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Ufficio Energia/Patrimonio:

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Satu

rday

, 27

Dec

em

ber

Tues

day

, 30

Dec

emb

er

Frid

ay, 0

2 J

anu

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 0

5 J

anu

ary

Thu

rsd

ay, 0

8 J

anu

ary

Sun

day

, 11

Jan

uar

y

Wed

nes

day

, 14

Jan

uar

y

Satu

rday

, 17

Jan

uar

y

Tues

day

, 20

Jan

uar

y

Frid

ay, 2

3 J

anu

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 2

6 J

anu

ary

Thu

rsd

ay, 2

9 J

anu

ary

Sun

day

, 01

Feb

ruar

y

Wed

nes

day

, 04

Feb

ruar

y

Satu

rday

, 07

Fe

bru

ary

Tues

day

, 10

Feb

ruar

y

Frid

ay, 1

3 F

eb

ruar

y

Mo

nd

ay, 1

6 F

eb

ruar

y

Thu

rsd

ay, 1

9 F

eb

ruar

y

Sun

day

, 22

Feb

ruar

y

Wed

nes

day

, 25

Feb

ruar

y

Satu

rday

, 28

Fe

bru

ary

Tues

day

, 03

Mar

ch

Frid

ay, 0

6 M

arch

Mo

nd

ay, 0

9 M

arch

Thu

rsd

ay, 1

2 M

arch

Sun

day

, 15

Mar

ch

Wed

nes

day

, 18

Mar

ch

Satu

rday

, 21

Mar

ch

Tues

day

, 24

Mar

ch

Frid

ay, 2

7 M

arch

Mo

nd

ay, 3

0 M

arch

Thu

rsd

ay, 0

2 A

pri

l

Sun

day

, 05

Ap

ril

Wed

nes

day

, 08

Ap

ril

Satu

rday

, 11

Ap

ril

Tues

day

, 14

Ap

ril

T °

-4

1

6

11

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324

Sabato 10/01

Page 11: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Module 2:Test of suggestion service

Page 12: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

The aim of this activity is to test the Heating System Suggestion service on the same two pilot buildings in Ferrara:

- Scuole Elementari Poledrelli

- Museo di Storia Naturale

The Suggestion service normally takes in input the forecasted weather condition for the following day.

However, in order to perform a test on a long baseline, for the test the suggestion service was run on an historical series of past observed data during part of the last winter season.

2.1 - The Suggestion service

Page 13: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

The suggestion service is designed to activate on days with out-of-the-average weather.

It has been determined that on 90% of cases the absolute value of the difference between the average temperature of one day and the average temperature of the preceding day fall within 3°C for Ferrara. Days that fall outside this value are considered out-of the average.

The first plot shows the profiles of the following variables:

(temperatures on the left axis, temperature difference on the right axis)

• Maximum measured daily outside temperature (red line)

• Average measured daily outside temperature (green line)

• Minimum measured daily outside temperature (blue line)

• Out-of-the-average days (red dots)

The second plot shows the distribution of the absolute value of difference between temperature averages. The tail of the distribution is highlighted and it represents the numerosity of the out-of-the-average days.

2.2 - Service triggering

Page 14: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Identifying out-of-the-average days:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

-13

-8

-3

2

7

12

17

22

27

32

Thu

rsd

ay, 0

1 J

anu

ary

Sun

day

, 04

Jan

uar

y

We

dn

esd

ay, 0

7 J

anu

ary

Satu

rday

, 10

Jan

uar

y

Tue

sday

, 13

Jan

uar

y

Frid

ay, 1

6 J

anu

ary

Mo

nd

ay, 1

9 J

anu

ary

Thu

rsd

ay, 2

2 J

anu

ary

Sun

day

, 25

Jan

uar

y

We

dn

esd

ay, 2

8 J

anu

ary

Satu

rday

, 31

Jan

uar

y

Tue

sday

, 03

Fe

bru

ary

Frid

ay, 0

6 F

eb

ruar

y

Mo

nd

ay, 0

9 F

ebru

ary

Thu

rsd

ay, 1

2 F

ebru

ary

Sun

day

, 15

Feb

ruar

y

We

dn

esd

ay, 1

8 F

ebru

ary

Satu

rday

, 21

Feb

ruar

y

Tue

sday

, 24

Fe

bru

ary

Frid

ay, 2

7 F

eb

ruar

y

Mo

nd

ay, 0

2 M

arch

Thu

rsd

ay, 0

5 M

arch

Sun

day

, 08

Mar

ch

We

dn

esd

ay, 1

1 M

arch

Satu

rday

, 14

Mar

ch

Tue

sday

, 17

Mar

ch

Frid

ay, 2

0 M

arch

Mo

nd

ay, 2

3 M

arch

Thu

rsd

ay, 2

6 M

arch

Sun

day

, 29

Mar

ch

We

dn

esd

ay, 0

1 A

pri

l

Satu

rday

, 04

Ap

ril

Tue

sday

, 07

Ap

ril

Frid

ay, 1

0 A

pri

l

Mo

nd

ay, 1

3 A

pri

l

Thu

rsd

ay, 1

6 A

pri

l

Sun

day

, 19

Ap

ril

We

dn

esd

ay, 2

2 A

pri

l

Satu

rday

, 25

Ap

ril

Tue

sday

, 28

Ap

ril

Frid

ay, 0

1 M

ay

Mo

nd

ay, 0

4 M

ay

Thu

rsd

ay, 0

7 M

ay

Sun

day

, 10

May

We

dn

esd

ay, 1

3 M

ay

Satu

rday

, 16

May

Tue

sday

, 19

May

Frid

ay, 2

2 M

ay

Mo

nd

ay, 2

5 M

ay

Thu

rsd

ay, 2

8 M

ay

Sun

day

, 31

May

T° Min T° Max T° Media Differenza

Profilo di T ° min, max e media nell’anno 2015

I giorni “anomali” sono quelli che presentano un ΔT ° > 3° tra due date continue di riferimento

Page 15: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Distribution of absolute values of daily average temperature differences:

Distribuzione ΔT°

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

distribution cumulative

Secondo la curva cumulativa nel periodo di riferimento circa il 18 % dei giorni hanno un ΔT ° > 3°Questi vengono analizzati al fine di verificare l’attendibilità del servizio di suggestion, come segue :

Page 16: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

The Simulation has then been run on a sub-portion of the span of the previous plot.

The outcome is shown in the following slide for both pilot buildings,:

• Scuole Poledrelli on the left and

• Museo di Storia Naturale on the right.

The top plots describe the heating system turn-on phase:

(hours on the left axis, temperatures on the right axis)

• Maximum measured daily outside temperature (red line)

• Minimum measured daily outside temperature (blue line)

• Suggested turn-on time (red triangles)

• Measured turn-on time (green triangles)

Bottom plots describe the heating system shutting down:

• Suggested shutting-down time (red diamonds)

• Measured shutting-down time (green diamonds)

2.3 - Suggested turn on/off times

Page 17: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Suggestion:

Poledrelli :

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

/01

/20

15

16

/01

/20

15

18

/01

/20

15

20

/01

/20

15

22

/01

/20

15

24

/01

/20

15

26

/01

/20

15

28

/01

/20

15

30

/01

/20

15

01

/02

/20

15

ho

ur

of

the

day

Accensione

Estimated on

off

Measured on

off

T min

T max

-7

-2

3

8

13

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Exte

rnal

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C

]

Spegnimento

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

14

/01

/20

15

16

/01

/20

15

18

/01

/20

15

20

/01

/20

15

22

/01

/20

15

24

/01

/20

15

26

/01

/20

15

28

/01

/20

15

30

/01

/20

15

01

/02

/20

15

Exte

rnal

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C

]

-7

-2

3

8

13

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Exte

rnal

Te

mp

era

ture

[°C

]

ho

ur

of

the

day

Museo :

Page 18: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

It must be stressed that:

• measured turn-on / shut-down times have been deduced from consumption profiles with an approximation of +/- 30 minutes

• suggested turn-on / shut-down times have been computed by the suggestion service using the measured weather data for each day

• we have no way to verify if either the measured or suggested turn on/off profile succeeds in achieving the desired internal comfort profile, because we have no data describing internal temperature.

The aim of the test is instead to verify:

• how often the Suggestion service is triggered in a real scenario

• how different is the pattern of suggested turn on/off profiles with respect to what operators do out of their experience (the measured profiles)

2.3.a - Aim of the test

Page 19: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

The analysis of the plots reveals that:

• Suggested turn-on times are very sensitive to the daily minimum temperature (and much less to the maximum), while shut-down times are almost insensitive.

• The relative dependence of suggested turn-on time with respect to external temperature throughout the days is a significative feature to compare with measured one to evaluate if the suggestion service is well tuned.

• On the contrary, it is not significative to compare the absolute values of suggested turn-on times with corresponding measured ones, because, as already pointed out, we have no way to evaluate the effectiveness in guaranteeing the required comfort of either of them.

• The same reasoning applies in principle to shut-down times, even if they do not show any relative variation throughout the days.

2.3.b - Test analysis

Page 20: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

The suggestion service computes also the expected internal temperature profile of the building (estimated under the assumption of heating system always OFF). The profile is useful to determine whether the effect of outside temperature and solar irradiation are enough to allow a comfort level inside the building or if heating is necessary.

The two following picture apply to the two pilot building and describe:

• the estimated internal temperature (green line)

• the measured external temperature (blue line)

• the measured consumption (red line)

• suggested turn on and off times (dashed black line)

• required periods of comfort (unshaded surfaces)

2.4.a – Internal temperature profile

Page 21: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Suggestion:

Poledrelli : Profilo Giornaliero stimato per una data “anomala”, con ΔT° > 3°

-12

-7

-2

3

8

13

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Co

nsu

mp

tio

nkW

h

Venerdì 16/01

Consumption Power ON T° T° Estimated

Page 22: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Suggestion:

Museo : Profilo Giornaliero stimato per una data “anomala”, con ΔT° > 3°

-12

-7

-2

3

8

13

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Co

nsu

mp

tio

nkW

h

Venerdì 16/01

Consumption Power ON T° T° Estimated

Page 23: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Remarks:

• test day (16/01/2015) was chosen because it was one of the few out-of-the-ordinary days available in the test sample, however a more radical example should be tested.

• estimated internal temperatures do not vary a lot for the two pilot buildings.

• building thermal inertia is not considered (internal temperature of the previous day would be needed).

• building occupancy is not considered.

In the last plot of the following slide shows a comparison between

• the estimated internal temperature for a contiguous number of days

• the measured external temperature for the same span of days

It is clearly visible how the estimated internal temperature trends have no delay with respect to outside temperatures as instead you would expect due to thermal inertia of the building.

2.4.b – Internal temperature profile

Page 24: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Suggestion:

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Thu

rsd

ay, 1

5

Frid

ay, 1

6

Satu

rday

, 17

Sun

day

, 18

Mo

nd

ay, 1

9

Tue

sday

, 20

We

dn

esd

ay, 2

1

Thu

rsd

ay, 2

2

Frid

ay, 2

3

Satu

rday

, 24

Sun

day

, 25

Mo

nd

ay, 2

6

Tue

sday

, 27

We

dn

esd

ay, 2

8

Thu

rsd

ay, 2

9

Frid

ay, 3

0

Satu

rday

, 31

Sun

day

, 01

T° Suggested T° Ext

Page 25: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Module 3:Suggestions andFuture activities

Page 26: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Suggested actions:

• Compare weather data for Ferrara coming from Sensor DB with original data from ARPA to verify if unrealistic temperature profiles derive from ingestion.

• Comparison between energy consumption for different buildings should be done after normalization with total heated surface.

• Normalization with respect to degree days should also be used if different time periods are considered.

• Correlations of consumption with irradiation and wind should be also evaluated.

Suggested test:

• keep heating on in the weekend for a couple of weeks, then turn it off in the weekends for another couple of weeks.

• do this in two different periods of Winter, at the beginning of the heating season and at its peak.

• perform the same test in buildings with different thermal inertia

• evaluate the seasonal consumption profile of the building to understand how it responds to thermal inertia and different seasonal condition and ultimately evaluate when is more efficient to keep the heating on during the weekends and when it is not.

Analysis of historical series

Page 27: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

Suggested actions:

• Accuracy of Suggestion service will greatly benefit by adding the modelling of building's thermal inertia. This is visible in the unrealistic relation between the series of external temperatures and estimated internal temperatures that shows how the estimated internal temperature is only reacting to external temperatures and not showing any signs of thermal inertia.

• Test/validation will be more thorough if data on daily occupancy could be collected: daily registries of school canteen users should be asked to the school.

Suggested test:

• a campaign of high-frequency (e.g. 1 hour) indoor temperature measurement has been planned on 2015-2016 heating season for Scuole Elementari Poledrelli.

• two week-long campaigns: beginning of November; 3rd week of December or 2 week of January;

• during the campaigns the heating system will be set with the turn on/off profiles provided by the suggestion service.

• The absolute accuracy of the Suggestion service can be finally evaluated.

Suggestion service

Page 28: S.2.4 Validation Activities for Scenario 2 (case Ferrara)

ww

w.s

un

shin

ep

roje

ct.

eu

SUNSHINE - Smart UrbaN ServIces for Higher eNergy Efficiency (GA no: 325161)

Credits

For more training material and courses visit http://www.sunshineproject.eu/solutions/trainingor contact us directly at [email protected]

Sou

rce:

ww

w.u

nio

neg

eom

etri

.co

m

Thank you!

Luca Giovannini

Sinergis Srl

[email protected]