safety in control design

Upload: lawrence-okyere-ofori

Post on 14-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    1/23

    INSTRUMENTATION ANDCONTROLS FOR SAFETY

    M. B. Jennings

    CHE 185

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    2/23

    INHERENTLY SAFE DESIGN

    PROCESS RISK MANAGEMENT METHODS USEDDURING THE DESIGN PHASE CAN BE PUTINTO 4 CATEGORIES: Inherent

    PassiveActive

    Procedural

    TARGET IS A FAIL-SAFE INSTALLATION

    FROM: Dennis C. Hendershot and Kathy Pearson-Dafft, Safety ThroughDesign in the Chemical Process Industry: Inherently SaferProcess Design , AIChE Process Plant Safety Symposium,27OCT98

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    3/23

    INHERENT SAFETY DESIGN

    Inherent Eliminating the hazard by usingmaterials and process conditions which are non-hazardous.

    Minimize Reduce quantities of hazardous substances

    Substitute Use less hazardous substances

    Moderate Use less hazardous process conditions, lesshazardous forms of materials, or configure facilities tominimize impact from hazardous material releases or

    uncontrolled energy release Simplify Configure facilities to simplify operation

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    4/23

    PASSIVE SAFE DESIGN

    Passive Minimizing the hazard by processand equipment design features which reduceeither the frequency or consequence of the

    hazard without the active functioning of anydevice.

    Location of facilities separation of ignitionsources and fuels from other facilities

    Design equipment for design pressure in excess ofthe adiabatic pressure from a reaction.

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    5/23

    ACTIVE SAFE DESIGN

    Active Using facilities to detect and correctprocess conditions:

    controls

    safety interlocks

    monitoring systems for hazards that develop overa long term

    and emergency shutdown systems to detect andcorrect process deviations.

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    6/23

    PROCEDURAL SAFE DESIGN

    Procedural Prevention or minimization ofincident impacts using:

    Safe operating procedures and operator

    trainingAdministrative safety checks

    Management of Change

    Planned emergency response

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    7/23

    DESIGN IN OVERALL SAFETY MANAGEMENTArt M. Dowell, III, Layer of Protection Analysis, 1998 PROCESS PLANT SAFETY

    SYMPOSIUM, October 27, 1998 Houston, TX

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    8/23

    DESIGN OF SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEMS

    ACTIVE INHERENTLY SAFE DESIGNPROCEDURE (Separate instrumentationand control component in CHE 165

    Design) First Level Alarm systems for out of

    range situations and operator action

    Second Level Interlock systems toautomatically activate safety devices

    Third Level Devices to minimize impact

    of out of control conditions

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    9/23

    USE OF HAZAN AND HAZOP

    PHAs (Process Hazards Analysis) Areused to define areas of concern

    HAZAN and HAZOP provide a summary

    of the type of risk associated withvarious process locations and operations

    Frequency should be determined

    Intensity should be determined

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    10/23

    OVERPRESSURIZATION EXAMPLE

    OVERPRESSURIZATION IS THE SUBJECT OFNUMEROUS CODES & REGULATIONS

    AIChE Design Institute for Emergency ReliefSystems (DIERS)

    OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119 Process SafetyManagement of Highly Hazardous Chemicals

    NFPA 30 Flammable & Combustible Liquids

    API RP 520 and API RP 521 Pressure Relieving

    Devices and Depressurization SystemsASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code

    ASME Performance Test Code 25, Safety & ReliefValves

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    11/23

    SOURCES OF OVERPRESSURIZATION

    API 521 LISTS THE FOLLOWINGCATEGORIES OF SOURCES

    API RP

    521 Item

    No.

    Overpressure Cause API RP

    521 Item

    No.

    Overpressure Cause

    1 Closed outlets on vessels 10 Abnormal heat or vapor input

    2 Cooling water failure to condenser 11 Split exchanger tube

    3 Top-tower reflux failure 12 Internal explosions

    4 Side stream reflux failure 13 Chemical Reaction

    5 Lean oil failure to absorber 14 Hydraulic expansion

    6 Accumulation of noncondensables 15 Exterior fire

    7 Entrance of highly volatile material 16 Power failure (steam, electric, or other)

    8 Overfilling Storage or Surge Vessel Other

    9 Failure of automatic control

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    12/23

    FIRST LEVEL DESIGN

    HOW ARE SOURCES ADDRESSED FOR ASTORAGE TANK?

    Item 1 in previous list - Closed ou t lets on vessels

    Would be a concern for a nozzle used for pressure control

    in the tank, during filling operations. Perhaps a temporary blind flange would have been left in place after a

    maintenance operation.

    A pressure relief valve may malfunction.

    A PAH pressure switch (

    P) could be installed if there wasmeasurable difference between the Normal Operating

    Pressure and the Maximum Allowable Working Pressure.

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    13/23

    SECOND LEVEL DESIGN

    HOW ARE SOURCES ADDRESSED FOR ASTORAGE TANK? Item 1 in previous list - Closed ou t lets on vessels

    Add a pressure relief valve to allow gas to leave thetank and be directed to an appropriate flare orscrubber.

    Set point needs to be at or slightly above theMaximum Allowable Working Pressure

    Need an interlock to: Alarm to indicate valve has been activated and receiving

    unit (flare or scrubber) is activated.

    Shut down a valve in the tank fill line and/or shut off apump used for filling.

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    14/23

    THIRD LEVEL DESIGN

    HOW ARE SOURCES ADDRESSED FOR ASTORAGE TANK?

    Item 1 in previous list - Closed ou t lets on vessels

    Add a rupture disc to relieve to either a flare or

    scrubber.

    This level is to protect the equipment from failure

    on a major scale

    Need to have an indication that the rupture dischas opened typically a wire across the disc

    Need to determine actions necessary when the

    disc opens

    stop filling, start flare, etc.

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    15/23

    OTHER DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

    A large storage tank is filled manually byan operator opening and closing a valve.Once a year, the tank overfills as the

    operator is distracted by other activities.A high pressure alarm is added to thetank. After the alarm is added, the tankis typically overfilled twice a year.

    Why?

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    16/23

    EXAMPLE 1

    After the alarm was installed, theoperator relied on it to indicate a highlevel and did not supervise the filling

    closely. The alarm loop turned out tohave a failure rate of twice per year, sothe system was not as reliable as themanual operation.

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    17/23

    OTHER CONSIDERATIONSEXAMPLE 2

    Fail-safe valves are either Air-to-Open or Air-to-Close, which equate to Fail Closed and FailOpen, respectively. Recommend the correctvalve for the following processes:

    1. Flammable solvent heated by steam in a heatexchanger. Valve is on the steam supply line.

    2. Exothermic reaction. Valve is on the reactantfeed line.

    3. Endothermic reaction. Valve is on thereactant feed line.

    4. Gas-fired utility furnace. Valve is on the gassupply line.

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    18/23

    EXAMPLE 2 - CONTINUED

    SPECIFY EITHER FAIL-CLOSED OR FAIL-OPEN FOR THE VALVES IN THESE SYSTEMS

    5. Remote-operated valve on the drain for astorage tank.

    6. Remote-operated valve on the fill line to astorage tank.

    7. Gas-fired Combustion furnace. Valve is on

    the air supply line.8. Steam supply line. Valve controls the

    downstream steam pressure from the boiler.

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    19/23

    EXAMPLE 2SOLUTIONS 1

    1. Valve to FAIL-CLOSED to preventoverheating the solvent

    2. Valve to FAIL-CLOSED to avoid a

    runaway reaction3. Valve to FAIL-CLOSED to avoid reactor

    thermal stresses.

    4. Valve to FAIL-CLOSED to stop gas flowto uncontrolled combustion.

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    20/23

    EXAMPLE 2SOLUTIONS 2

    5. Valve to FAIL-CLOSED to preventdraining material from tank

    6. Valve to FAIL-CLOSED to prevent

    overfilling tank7. Valve to FAIL-OPEN to maximize air

    flow to furnace

    8. Valve to FAIL-OPEN to avoid localizedoverpressure of line

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    21/23

    EXAMPLE 3

    4 kg of water is trapped in between inletand discharge block valves in a pump.The pump continues to operate at 1 hp.

    What is the rate of temperature increase inC/hr if the cP for the water is constant at 1kcal/(kg C)?

    What will happen if the pump continues to

    operate?

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    22/23

    EXAMPLE 3 SOLUTION - 1

    Assume adiabatic conditions for thecalculations: Set up a heat balance:Q m Cp T Tref

    Take the derivative with respect to time and

    rearrange to getdQ

    dtm C

    p

    dT

    dt . And

    resolving to getdT

    dt

    1

    m Cp

    dQ

    dt

    Using conversions:1 hp 0.178kcal

    sec

    m 4 kg dQ/dt 0.178kcal

    sec Cp 1

    kcal

    kg C

    dT/dt1

    m CpdQ/dt dT/dt 160.2

    C

    hr

    3 SO O 2

  • 7/30/2019 Safety in Control Design

    23/23

    EXAMPLE 3 SOLUTION - 2

    Allowing the pump to continue to runwill eventually result in high pressuresteam formation. This could result in the

    pump exploding. Adding a thermal switch or a high

    pressure switch to shut down the pumpcan prevent this from occurring.