safety, sitting, emergency planning isues for smr ... · july 2011 ) - assessment of indonesia...
TRANSCRIPT
SAFETY, SITTING, EMERGENCY PLANNING ISUES
FOR SMR DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
PANDE Made Udiyani
National Nuclear Energy Agency (BATAN)
Republic of Indonesia
INPRO Dialogue Forum on Legal and Institutional Issues in The Global
Deployment of Small Modular Reactors
Outlines
• Introduction
• Overview of Indonesian Energy Policy
• Technology Assessment for SMR case
• Implementation of technology assessment methodology, case study in West Kalimantan.
• Preparing for constructing HTGR type of experimental power reactor (RDE)
• Safety, sitting, emergency planning issues for SMR deployment in INDONESIA
• Resume
Introduction• Study on national economic and energy sources of Indonesia had shown that
nuclear energy will be included as part of energy sources in our national energy mix policy in addition to fossil energy source, gas, water and other new and renewable energy.
• As an archipelago country, Indonesia consists of 5 big islands and more than thousand medium and small islands with various electricity ratio and industrial development scale. This encourages Indonesia to consider to use Small Medium Sized reactor as an alternative nuclear energy supply.
• Preliminary technology assessment on various SMR has been started, indeed the SMR is grouped into Light Water Reactor, Gas Cooled Reactor, and Solid Cooled Reactor. From its location or sites, they were grouped into Land Based reactor and Water Based Reactor .
Introduction (cont’d)
• Mostly, the Nuclear Power rules, criteria and requirements in Indonesia had
been developed for LWR type reactor and land based construction.
• Some island areas in Indonesia such as Bangka Belitung, West and East
Kalimantan, Kalimantan had signed MOU between local government and
BATAN to implement nuclear technology development in their territorial.
• Currently, Indonesia is now working on a program for constructing 10 MW
HTGR type of reactor of experimental power reactor, called RDE, in area of
Research and Development Technology, Serpong.
• This presentation will describe our experience during providing RDE (SMR)
conceptual design on the safety, sitting, emergency planning issues for
deployment in Indonesia
• Indonesia consists of around 17,500 islands. The big islands are: Java, Sumatra, Kalimantan, Sulawesi and Papua. Total area of 1.9 million square miles
• Population is around 250 millions people with birth rate of 1.21% (2015)
• High demand and supply of energy in the future
• SMR technology is much more appropriate for small and medium islands to support their own development whereas Large NPP for the large Islands
Overview of Indonesia Energy Policy
10/18/2016 5
NUCLEAR ENERGY POLICY
• In order to accelerate national development,
President of Republic Indonesia issued
Presidential Instruction No.1/2010 regarding
Accelerating National Development Including
Nuclear and
• Government Regulation No. 5/2010 on
National Medium Term Development that Include
Nuclear Power Plant as part of alternative energy.
• Study on NPP’s capacity projection indicated:
Indonesia will include SMR in its energy supply in
2031, but the study on SMR-HTGR Technology
has been started since 2014 (Indonesia nuclear
energy outlook, 2014)
10/18/2016 9
NUCLEAR ENERGY POLICY (Cont’d)
• In line with Indonesia nuclear Infrastructure development progress in
phase 1 and up coming phase 2, four main activities are recently in
progress i.e.:
- Feasibility Study in Bangka-Belitung island for 3 years (contract signed 15
July 2011 )
- Assessment of Indonesia Nuclear Energy System (2012-2014), using
INPRO Methodology
- Implementation of technology assessment with case study in West
Kalimantan
- Feasibility study and preparing conceptual design for Experimental Power
Reactor of around 10 MWth in Research and Development Technology
Serpong area. This reactor is planned to be operational in 2021.
10/18/2016 10
• Selection is done by Kepner-Tregoe decision making methodology,
combined with Multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT).
• This methodology is useful for organizing the essential elements of a
technology that is formatted in a structure giving priority or weighting to
each element of the technology.
• Evaluate each technology based on priority or weighting factor combined
with a value that indicates the ability of technology meets the criteria.
• The final results of this methodology is the ranking of technological
options according weight and level of satisfaction for each element.
Technology Assessment for SMR case
10/18/2016 11
Elements for decision making
Weight SMR-1 SMR-2 SMR 3
% Satisfact
ion level
Score Satisfact
ion level
Score Satisfact
ion level
Score
1. Site Characteristics and parameters
consideration 15
2. Grid Consideration 10
3. Nuclear Reactor Safety 15
4. Main Parameter of NPP 10
5.Nuclear Fuel material and Nuclear Fuel
Cycle Characteristic and performance10
6. Owner scope of supply 10
7. Issues or everything related things to
technology supplier10
8. Construction Management Capability 5
9. Technology transfer and technical
support10
10. Cost and competitive economics 5
Scoring template
1. Safety Assessment
Criteria/Requirements Design criteria
Nuclear Reactor
Safety
Regulatory requirements and standards are used to form the bases for
the NPP design
Regulations in the Member State on radiation and safety for nuclear
power plant sitting
Safety approach (e.g. fully active, fully passive, combination).
Defence in depth programme in design and multi-barrier approaches for
operational transients and accidents, both with and without core damage
Degree of diversity and redundancy in providing the above key safety
features:
Spent fuel pool safety:
Defence against external events ;
Severe accident releases and response:
Safety equipment testing and survelliance requirements
Classification of components and related quality requirements
1. Safety Assessment (Cont’d)
Criteria/Requirements Design criteria
Nuclear Reactor
Safety
Reliance on off-site power
Probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) scope, maturity and
results
Safety margins against deterministic requirements
Plant control and protection logic architecture
Provisions to ensure a high level of safety
Due consideration of human factors engineering (including
equipment accessibility post-accident).
Fuel and water supply for diesel generator, emergency feedwater
and primary system make-up.
Integration of technical specifications with safety analysis report
(SAR) and PSA.
Completeness of operating technical specifications (OTS), SAR
and PSA.
2. Sitting Assessment
Criteria/Requirements Design criteria
Ambient site environmental conditions and ecology, including
seismic, flooding, wetlands, population density;
Heat sink temperature, condenser cooling water source and
extent of water resources;
Site specific
consideration
Predicted magnitude and frequency of all external events (design
and safety considerations);
Site size requirements, boundary conditions, population,
neighbours and environs;
Transportation routes/facilities and access to required
infrastructure for construction and operation;
Site development and preparation requirements;
Site structure plan; single- or multi-unit site requirements.
3. Emergency planning
Criteria/Requirements Design criteria
Radiological releases to the environment
(normal operation and accident);
Impact & Emergency Countermeasure :
-Short Countermeasure (Evacuation,
Sheltering)
-Long Countermeasure (Relocation, Food Band)
Emergency Preparedness
SMR Status
Light Water Reactor:
(Carem, SMART, mPower, KLT 40)
Heavy Water Reactor :
(EC6, PHWR-220, AHWR 300)
Gas Cooled Reactors
(HTR-PM, PBMR, GT-MHR)
Liquid Metal Cooled Reactor
(4S,SVBR, PRISM)
SMR Technology Availability
10/18/2016 17
Technology availability (cont’d)
• Classification according to the fuel :
- UO2, MOX, Thorium
• Classification according to fuel loading schema:
- Fuel loading-unloading in the site
- Without fuel loading in the site
• According location
- Land based
- Floating Reactor (KLT-40, Flexblue)
• Application
- Electrical production and cogeneration (desalination, district heating,
hydrogen production)
STATUS NUMBER REACTOR
In- Operation 4 CNP-300, PHWR-220, HTR-10 (demo) 4S (demo)
Site /under
construction
4 CAREM-27, KLT-40, HTR-PM, PFBR-500
Detail 6 SMART (approval), ABV-6M, RITM-200, WWER-300,
SVBR-100 (2017 construction), PERISM
Basic 7 IRIS, mPower, NuScale, Westinghouse SMR, EC6,
AHWR300-LEU, PBMR (complete)
Conceptual/
Preliminary
11 FBNR, Flexblue, IMR, SHELF, VK-300, VBER-300,
UNITTHERM, GT_MHR, EM2, BRESTOD-300, G4M
Table Status of Nuclear Power Plant SMR
10/18/2016 19
Implementation of technology assessment methodology, case
study in West Kalimantan
• The electricity grid in West Kalimantan is around 350 MW and
projected to 3500 MW for 25 years. To maintain stability of the grid,
the power of NPP will be 10%, means in the range of 35 MW to 350
MW.
• The assessment was based on 10 element of decision making in
where site and safety issues are included.
• The result shows the ranking of SMR that meet Indonesia’s
requirements, but unfortunately, it can not be displayed here.
10/18/2016 20
Preparing for constructing HTGR typeof experimental power reactor (RDE)
• Batan has decided to construct 10 MWth HTGR type reactor of Experimental Power
Reactor with specifications:
Thermal Power : 10 MWth
Average Power density : 2,0 ≤ PD ≤ 4,0 W/cm3
Helium inlet/outlet Temperatur : 250 - 400/700 – 1000 oC
Fuel Element type : UO2
Enrichment U-235 : <20%
Maximum Burn-up : 90.000 MWd/tU
Average Burn-up : 22.000 - 80.000MWd/tU
Year
Reacto
r
Site Permit Applications
Site Permit
Construction License
Commissioning License
Operation License
Commissioning License Applications
Operations LicenseApplications
Construction Activity
Government Regulations No. 2/2014Licensing Applications
Design Approval Applications
Site Evaluation Approval Applications
Site EvaluationsApproval
Design Approval
Doc.for Site Evaluation Approval :1. Site Evaluation Program2. Site Evaluations Management
System
Doc. Site Permit :1. Site Evaluation ImplementationReport2. Management System Implementation Report3. DIQ4. Nuclear Reactor main Data
Doc. For Design Approval:1. Detail Design Document2. Safety Analysis Report
Doc. Construction License:1. Safety Analysis Report2. LCO Document 3. Management System Document 4. Radiation Protection and Safety Doc.5. System Safeguard Doc6. Physical Protection Plan Doc7. Ageing Management Doc8. Decommissioning Program 9. Emergency Preparedness Program 10. Construction Program 11. Environmental Impact License
Doc. Commissioning License:1. Safety Analysis Report2. LCO Document 3. Management System Document 4. Radiation Protection and Safety Doc.5. System Safeguard Doc6. Physical Protection Plan Doc7. Ageing Management Doc8. Decommissioning Program 9. Emergency Preparedness Program 10. Construction Activity Report11. Environmental Impact License12. Technical Specification of Reactor that had been build.
Doc. Operation License:1. Safety Analysis Report2. LCO Document 3. Maintenance Document4. Radiation Protection and Safety Doc.5. System Safeguard Doc6. Physical Protection Plan Doc7. Decommissioning Program 8. Emergency Preparedness Program 9. Management System Document 10. Environmental Impact License Implications Report
Constructions License Applications
10/18/2016 23
Licensing Progress of RDE
Evaluation of Management System of Site Evaluation Implementation Report Licensing Directorate – BAPETEN
Document Construction for License on Progress (BATAN):1.Safety Analysis Report2.LCO Document 3.Management System Document 4.Radiation Protection and Safety Doc.5.System Safeguard Doc6.Physical Protection Plan Doc7.Ageing Management Doc8.Decommissioning Program 9.Emergency Preparedness Program 10.Construction Program 11.Environmental Impact License
2410/18/2016
Innovative approaches to safety, sitting, emergency planning
for SMR issues in Indonesia (1)
• Regulatory body wants of ‘proven’ technology and want SMR technologies to be first
deployed in the country of origin to minimize licensing and performance risks;
• No rules, criteria and requirements were developed yet specifically for water site basis of
reactor such as floating reactors, under water reactor, transportable reactor which are
more complex than LWR, therefore, the SMR technology provider should be able to
support the user to solve their key infrastructure issues of SMR technology application
• Lesson learnt from Fukushima accident, A reliable operation and, probably, a better public
acceptance of SMRs could be achieved through the implementation of passive reactivity
regulation and control systems.
Innovative approaches to safety, sitting, emergency planning
for SMR issues in Indonesia (2)
• The SMR reactor safety innovations with the need for safety standards for
SMR which incidentally is not the same as the standard on Large Reactor.
• Lesson learnt from preparing RDE license, site licensing requirements for
SMR is not the same as the requirements for large reactors
• Possible local governments in Indonesia to build a water-based SMR, is
required sitting and emergency planning such as: fission products
dispersion in water which can be cross country, emergency preparedness to
cross the ocean to another country, infrastructure of emergency, estimation
of exclusion zone. safeguards, physical protection, etc.
RESUME
• SMR can fulfill energy demand in Indonesia. The SMR are also provided to meet energy at small and remote island in Indonesia
• The many types of SMR reactor safety innovations with the need for safety standards for SMR which incidentally is not the same as the standard on Large Reactor
• With better safety behavior of the SMR is designed with no off site emergency system. The issue is whether the public can accept this statement which tends to demand high levels of prudence for nuclear energy.
RESUME (Cont’d)
• With a variety of settings for example vocational ashore, a float KLT40, under sea
(flexblue) whether countries are ready to make rules or sitting?
Especially for floating or submerse SMR?
• Upon this assessment the key infrastructure issues for the SMR in Indonesia is
gap of legal, regulation and institutional aspect to introduce various type of SMR.
It because currently most of the regulation is just applicable for large light water
reactor with the land site base.
• Nevertheless, this obstacle was temporarily solved by adopting common best
practice applicable for large and small and medium reactor for land and water
reactor and provide specific requirement for specific type of SMR.