sample sbm validation form

Upload: duj-ralara

Post on 03-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Sample SBM Validation Form

    1/6

    Name of School:

    STEP 1: Determine the Performance Improvement (60%)

    Thematic Area Rating & Equivalent Points

    Access Enrollment Increase % of Inc45% SY 2009-10: 6061 1 - Marginal: At leat 1% increase

    SY 2010-11: 5007 -1054 2 - Average: At least 7% increase

    SY 2011-12: 4609 -398 3 - High: At least 10% increase

    Ave. % of Increase -15.75

    Efficiency Dropout Rate (DR) % of Dec Baseline: 7.06

    25% SY 2009-10: 4.89 1 - Marginal: At least 25% decrease

    SY 2010-11: 9.11 4.22 2 - Average: At least 50% decrease

    SY 2011-12: 6.51 -2.6 3 - High: Has 0 DR

    Ave. % of Decrease 12.44

    Completion Rate (CR) % of Inc Baseline: 75%

    SY 2009-10: 87.75 1 - Marginal: At leat 5% increase

    SY 2010-11: 77.71 -10.04 2 - Average: At least 7% increase

    SY 2011-12: 93.88 16.17 3 - High: At least 10% increase

    Ave. % of Increase 3.26

    Cohort-Survival Rate (CSR) % of Inc Baseline: 76%

    SY 2009-10: 91.24 1 - Marginal: At leat 5% increase

    SY 2010-11: 80.85 -10.39 2 - Average: At least 7% increase

    SY 2011-12: 82.00 1.15 3 - High: At least 10% increase

    Ave. % of Increase -5.63

    Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR): 10.07

    Quality NAT MPS % of Inc30% SY 2009-10: 37.39 1 - Marginal: 26 - 50 %

    SY 2010-11: 40.79 3.4 2 - Average: 51 - 71 %

    SY 2011-12: 40.50 -0.29 3 - High: 76 - 100 %

    Ave. % of Increase 3.84

    INTERPRETATION Good

    Better

    Best

    Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description

    0.50 - 1.49 Good

    1.50 - 2.49 Better

    2.50 - 3.00 Best

    STEP 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

    Performance Indicators

    SAMPLE SBM VALIDATION FORM

    SBM Principle WEIGHT

    Commulative Scores of Validators per Principle

    Computation

  • 7/28/2019 Sample SBM Validation Form

    2/6

    Leadership 7/5 = 1.4

    Curriculum & Learning 16/10 = 1.6

    Accountability 9/5 = 1.8

    Resource Mangement 10/5 = 2

    Subtotal

    INTERPRETATION GoodBetter

    Best

    Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description

    0.50 - 1.49 Good

    1.50 - 2.49 Better

    2.50 - 3.00 Best

    Step 3: Compute for the Final Rating

    Weight Computation

    60% 0 x 0.60

    40% 1.65 x 0.40

    100%

    INTERPRETATION Developing (Level I)

    Maturing(Level II)

    Advanced (Level III)

    Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description

    0.50 - 1.49 Developing

    1.50 - 2.49 Maturing2.50 - 3.00 Advanced

    A. Performance Improvement

    B. SBM Assessment Score (D-O-D)

    TOTAL

    AREAS

    1.4 x 0.3

    1.6 x 0.3

    1.8 x 0.25

    2 x 0.15

  • 7/28/2019 Sample SBM Validation Form

    3/6

  • 7/28/2019 Sample SBM Validation Form

    4/6

    0.42

    0.48

    0.45

    0.3

    1.65

    Results

    0

    0.66

    0.66

  • 7/28/2019 Sample SBM Validation Form

    5/6

    Average1 Session 1 - Introduction to Access and Revised Framework 3.65

    2 Session 2 - The Revised SBM-PASBE Framework 3.66

    3 Session 3 - Revised Assessment 3.65

    4 Session 4 - The SBM Assessment and Validation Process 3.66

    5 Session 5 - DOD Validating System and Process 3.65

    6 Session 6 - Monitoring and Evaluation 3.657 Session 7 - PASBE:What, Why, and How? 3.66

    8 Workshop Activities 3.65

    9 Time Management 3.75

    10 Training Venue 3.69

    11 Food 3.74

    Overall Rating 3.67

    Legend:

    4-

    3-2-

    1-

    Aspects of the Training

  • 7/28/2019 Sample SBM Validation Form

    6/6

    Verbal InterpretationHighly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Highly SatisfactoryHighly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Highly Satisfactory

    Very SatisfactorySatisfactory

    Not Satisfactory