sampling procedures and tables for inspection by …

75
NO T ME ASUREMENT MVF MIL - ST O-1D5E 10 MAY 1989 SUPERSEDI NG MIL - STD-1D5D 29 APRIL 1963 MILITARY’ STANDARD SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY AITRIBUTES I AMS C N/A ARE A QC I C ~~. Appr oved f or publi c r e l ee s e ; dlstrl butl on is unli mit ed . Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Upload: others

Post on 25-Oct-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

N O T MEASUREMENT

MVF

MIL-ST O -1D5E

10 M AY 1989

SUPERSEDIN G

MIL-STD-1D5D

29 APRIL 1963

MILITARY’ STANDARD

SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLESFOR INSPECTION BY AITRIBUTES

I

A MSC N / A AREA Q CIC

~~. A p prov e d for public rele ese; dlstrlbutlon is unlimite d.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 2: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MIL-STO-1O5E

DEP~ OF DEFENSEWashington,EC 20301

SN-lPL13KPRKEDUWS AND TABLESFOR INSPECTIONBY ~

1. ‘hismilitarystaxiardis approvedfor use by all Ceprwmts and Agenciesof * ~t of Mf==e.

2. Ikneficial~ts (recmmmdations,additions,deletims) and anyprtinent data whiti may be of use in inprovingthis documnt shouldbeaddressedto:

CcmmnderUs. Army Armment Researdn,Develop-rentandEnginerinq Center

ATIN: SKAR-BAC-S/BldcJ. 6PicatinnyArsenal,NJ 07806-5000

by using&“ self-addressedStandardization~t -r ovww.ntProposal(ODForm 1426)am=ring at the md of thisdommnt or letter.

ii

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 3: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MII-S’ID-105E

‘ItLisp.blitationprovidez.sampliqproceduresand referene tablesfor use inplanningand conductinginspectionby attributes.‘Thesamplingconceptis basedon the prokbilistic reaxrente of eventshhena seriesof lots or Mxhes areprtducedin a stableenvimrmmt.

‘Mispublicationshouldix usedto guidethe user in the rk?velqzwntof an~ion strategythatprmides a cost effectiveq+math to attwamfidmm in prcchxtanpliance with con-~actualtechn.iralrquimmnts. Tneuser is wrned of the asmmxl risksrelativeco * rhozensanplesizeadMK-

Mili@ ~ifications should~t ~t~ r .”equmrents for use of wficssIIQlingplans,nor shouldtheyprovideAQL’sor Ll?D’sas a requimmnt.

Sal@ing plans for continuous,ratherthan lot ~ion, are containedinMllAIV-1235, “’Singleand Mlci-Level ContinuousSanplingPmcedxes and Tablesfor I .nscectionby Attrihxes”.

iii

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 4: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MIL-STC-105E

Paragraph1.

1.11.2

2.

2.1

3.

3.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.93.103.113.123.133.143.153.163.173.183.193.203.213.223.23

4.

4.14.24.34.4

——..

SCOPE...............................................

-se ....................................-.”.”-”A@ication .......................................

REmwKED lxKuMmrs.................................

Non applicable....................................

DEFIMTICMS................... ......................

_t*leCmlity-1 (ML)[email protected](~) ....................AverageGutgoingQualityLimit (=L) .............Classificationof Defects.........................CriticalDefect...................................CriticalDefective...........:....................Cefect............................................Defective..........................................DefectsPer Hul@redun.its.........................Inspection........................................Inspectionby Attributes..........................I_ctor Bat* ......................................I.mor EatchSize.................................MajorDefect......................................MajorDefective...................................MinorDefect......................................MinorEefective...................................PercentDefective..................................P-ss Average...................................Sanpl e............................................Sa@e SizeCede Letter...........................san@ing Plan.....................................Unit of Prcdmt...................................

GmJ=m~s --------------------------------

WrittenProcedures................................Noncunformnm ....................................Formtirm and Identificationof lots or Batches...ML ...............................................

4.4.1 AQL Use...........................................4.4.2 Limitation........................................4.4.3 Chasing ins.................. ...................

11

1

1

1

222222 .,2333333333344.4444

4

4455555

iv

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 5: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

mL?S’m-lo5s

C@m2?l’s - C Q ntinu e d.

Pa.ragra@4.54.5.14.5.24.5.34.64.74.7.14.7.24.7.34.7.44.84.94.9.14.9.24.9.34.9.44.104.10.14.10.1.14.10.1.24.10.1.34.10.1.44.10.24.114.124.12.14.12.2

sa71Qlhg.........................................RepresentativeSanding..........................Tim20f S.a@@ .................................~&irrP&tiple Saupling......................

.............................SwitchiqP~ .............................Mxm.lcoTightened............. .................Ti@tened to Norml ..............................Noz-mlto Famed ................................Reducedtot+xm.l................ ................DkxmtinuationofInspection. ...................San@ing Plans...................................~ion==l.. ................... ............Clxk?l.ettera.....................................Maining sanplin Golan.........................TYF=of*l%l Plens..........................Determinationofkxeptabi.lity....................PercentDefectiveInspection.....................SingleSa@ingP lab........... ..................CoubleSamplingPlan.............................tiltipleSa@ingP lab.......... .................Sp2CialProce&re forRdweclIrsection. ....... .D!2fectsPer [email protected] Protectkn... ...................

...........................................-t%-=-i=ic ~ ..................AverageSa@e SizeCurvea.:.....................

5. TABLES...............................................

TableI.II-A.

II-B.

11<.

III-A.

III-B.

III-C.

San@e SizeCede I.etters.........................Shgle SenpMng Plansfor Nonm.1~ion Mster table)....................:.

SingleSaWMng Plansfor Tight&InspectionMaster table)......................

SingleSanpM.ngPlansfor ReducedIrqection (M3stertable)......................

CoubleSamplingPlansfor Normal~ion 043stertable)......................

CuubleSanplingPlansfor Tightened~ion (Mastertable)......................

CoubleSa@ing Plansfor ReducedI~ion (Masterteble)......................

v

q

5

:56666667177788888

t!9,9999

11

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 6: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

CcNIENrs - Cclnthuled.

TableIV-A.

IV-B.

Iv-c.

V-A.

V-B.

\T-A.

VI-B.

VII-A.

VII-B.

VIII.Ix.

MTL-S’IC-105E

M.dtipleSapling Plans for Nornksl~im (~ert~le) ................... ...

MiltipleSamplingPlans for TightenedInspection(Msstertable)......................

[email protected]@ingPlans for Reduced~im (Msstertable)......................

AveragzDutgoingQualityLimitFacLorsforNormal~ion (Stiglesampling)............

Average@tgoing @ality LimitFactorsforTightenedIn-ion (SingleSan@ng) .........

Limittig(Xality (inPercentDefective)forwhicha Pa = 10% (forNormal ~ion,Singlesanplti g).............................

LimitingQuality (inCefectsper HundredUnits)forwhich the Pa = 10% (forNormal~im, StigleSa@ing) ...................

limiting@it y (inPercentDefective)forwhichthe Pa = 5% (forNormsl I.nsp?ction,Singlesanplin g).............................

Ltitk.g CMality (inDefectsper Hundred’Wits) forwhiti the Pa = 5% (forNormsl~ction, Si.ngle*ling) ....................

LimitNun&rsfor P&ducaiInspection.............AverageSa@e Size Cumes for DoubleandtWltipleSampling...............................

Sa@ing Plans and ~rating CharacteristicCurves (andData) for:

X-A. Sa@e SizeCc& I.etterA........................X-B. San@e SizeCode b?tterB........................x-c. SanpleSizeCa5e LetterC...:....................X-D. San’pleSizeCcxieLetterD........................X-E. Sa@e SizeCede LetterE........................X-F. San@e SizeCede LetterF........................x-G. Sa@e SizeCo& LetterG........................X-H. San@e SizeCode I.etterH........................X-J. San@e SizeCock LetterJ........................X-K. SanpleSizeCcrZeI.etterK........................X-L. San@e SizeCo& LetterL........................x-M. Sa@e SizeCcck LetterM........................X-N. San@e SizeCode Lectern........................x-P. SanpleSizeCode LetterP........................x-Q. San@e S$zeCmie IetterQ........................X-R. San@e SizeCock LetterR........................

20

22

24

26

27

28

29

30

3132

33

34363840424446485052545658606264

/

/’

vi

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 7: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MR-.5TD-1OSE

)

x-s.

PanCJraph6.

6.16.26.3

CmnENrs - amnued.

~

Sa@e Size Cc@e Letters........................ 66

twnzs............................................ 61

IntendedUse................................... 67,SubjectTezm (keywozd)Listing................_fmp=viousIs sue.,................ ... :

aNmlDIrK tamRIAL .............................. 68

vii

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 8: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

W*1OSE

,,

sJueLIK P~ AND TAEESFCR lNSP~ICM BY ATmmlm2S,

1. -DE

1.1 Purpose. ~s publicationestablisheslot or batchsanplingplans adprcesiuresfor inspectionby attributes.‘mis @limtion shallnot be “interpretedco ~ or am flictwith any contractualm@xwmtS. me Wrds‘Bae”’, “~”, “~tile”, etct refer~y to ~ ~tr~o~s use oftheqling plarscontainedin thisstandard~donotitrplym agre9mntbythe @vernmm to Saept anyprcduct.GOVS17X~ Shallk as

Eeterndnationof acceptabilityby the&scri&d in amtrectual doam-ems. me San@ing plans

describsdin this standsd are S@iable to A(2L’sof .01~rcent or higherandare thereforenot suitablefora@i~tions wherequalitylemls in the &fectivepartsp millioprangecanbe realized.

1.2 lwl:~$. San@ing plans&signat.e3in this publi=tion are eppli~le,ML not lmt , to impection of Ule follcwing:

a. Fml itens.

c. *rations or services.

d. Materialsin pmmss.

e. Su@ies in storage.

f. Maintenanceqerstions.

9. Dataor remrds.

h. Adniniszrativeprocecbres.

lWse pla ns are inte ndsd primsrilyto M used for a continuingseriesof 10CSor bat-. l?h2plans my alsobe used for the inspectionof isolatedlotsorbacchss,but, in this lattercase,the user is cautionedto consultthe qx3rStingcharacteristiccumes to finda plan wh.itiwill yieldthe &sired protection(Sse4.11).

2.

2.1

3.

PEm@Km IxnMNcs ‘Not ~licable.

DEFINITI@JS

1

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 9: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

mL-s’Imlo5E

3.1 AcceptableCualityLevel (ML). m a continuousseriesof lots isconsidered,the AQL is the qualitylevelwhich,for the purpses of sanplinginspection,is the ltit of a satisfactoryprocessaverage (See3.19).

Nc7rE:A sanplingplan and an AQL are tisen in accordaro?with the riskassunsd.Use of a valueof AQL for a ~ain defector groupof defectsindicatesthatthes~ling Pl~ till a- the -t ~joritY of @ lots or bat- P*- *processaveragelevelof percat &fective (ordefectspar hundredunits)in theselotsor batchesbe no greaterthanthe designatedvalue of AQL. Tnus,the AQL isa desiqaatedvalueof p2rcentdsfective(ordefects~ hurdredunits)for whichlotswill be acceptedITOStof the tfi by the sapling prcedure beingused. Theaanplingplansprovidedhereinare so arrangedthat the prdability of acceptanceat the designatedAQL valuedeps!ndsupon the sanplesize,~ing 9enerallYhi~erfor larges.snplesthan for smallones,for a givenAQL. The AQL done does notidentifythe chancesof accqZing or rejectingindividuallots or batchesM nuredirectlyrelatesto what mightte exp+ctedfran a seriesof lots or batches,providedthe stepsindicatedin thispublicationare taken. It is necessarYtoreferto the ~ating &aracteristiccurveof the plan to deterndnethe relativerisks.

3.2 AverageGutgoingGuality (AD2). For a particularprocessaverage,the 7@ isthe averagequalityof o~tgoingprcductincludingall acceptedlots or batches,plus all reject+ lots or bat&es aftertinerejected’lots or batcheshavekeeneffectively100 ~rcent irqxcted and all defective replacedby non-rkfectives.

3.3 Average cXIt90ingC?JdityLimit (ACQL). TheJKX)Lis the n-axhrnAD2 foragivena~ptance Sa@ing plan.Factorsfor -t ing AD2L VS1= ~ 9iven inTableV-A for each of the singlesapling plans for normalinspectionand inTableV-B for earh of the singlesanplingplans for tightenedinqection.

3.4 Classificationof Defects. A classificationof defectsis the emnerationOfPssible defecLsof the unit of prcductclassifiedaccordingto theirseriousness.

3.5 Criti& Eefect. A criticaldefectis a defectthat jud-t and experienceindicatewouldresultin hazardousor unsafeconditionsfor indivitialsusing,maintaining,or ciqendingupon the product,or a defectthat judgmt ard~rien= indimte is likelyto prevent~rformsne of the tacticalfunctionof amajorend itemsuch as a ship,aircraft,tank,missile,or spacevehicle.

3.6 CriticalDefective. A critid defectiveis a unit of productwhichcontainsone or mre criticsldefectsand nay also concainIMjor and/or&ordefects.

3.7 ,~fe. A defectis any nonconformanceof the unit of productwithef~d requirements.

2

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 10: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MIL-mlosE

3.8 Cefectiw. A defectiveis a unit of procbctwhid containsone or nuredefects.

3.9 Defectspr Hundr@5Units. Ibe nurberof defectsper hundredunitsof anygivenquantityof unitsof productis one hundrd tires .ttienu-&erof tkfectsanltainedtherein (oneor nuredefems bsing~ssible in any unit of product)dividedby the totalnunbsrof tics of product,i.e.:

Defectsper . Nun&r of defects x 100lmldredunits Nun&r of unitsimpe@sd

3.10 -ion. Inspectionis the protessof mssuring, testing,or ~se ~in9 the tit of prtckm with the requirsfmts.

,

3.11 ~on by Attributes. ~ion by atcri.butesis “~on Whersbyeitherthe uruc of prcduct1s classifiedsinplyas defectiveor non-defective,orthe rnm&r of defectsin theunit of prcductis wunted, with respct to a givz2n~~t or set or rqi~ts.

3.12 LOK or Batd. The termlot or batch shallnean “inspectionlot”or“’-Lion batch-,i.e.,a collectionof unitsof productfromwhicha sapieis to be drawn and irspsctedad ray differfrana collectionof unitsdesignatd.. —..—. ... . . .. ..as a La or oacm ror ouer pupses (e.g., prooucuon, snqnent, etc.).

3.13 E or Bst~ Size. The lot or batch size is the nunberof unitsof prcductin a lot or batch.

3.14 Msjor Defect. A mjor defectis a &fect, otherthan critical,thatislikelyto resultin failure,or to A= mterially the usabilityof the unitof prcductfor its intendedprpose.

3.15 N!ajorCefective. A mjor defectiveis a unit of prtductwhichcontainsoneor mre msjor *fects, and ray also containminordefectsbut containsno criticaldefect.

3.16 minor Defect. A minordefectis a defectthat is not likelyto reducemateriallythe usabilityof the unit of praiuctfor its intendedpupose, or is a-= frm establiah05stmhrds - littlebearingon the effectiveuse orqeration of the unit.

3.17 Minor Defective. A minordefectiveis a unitof productwhi& containsoneor nxxe minor defectsbut mains no critid or m jordefect.

3

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 11: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MIL-STD-105E

3.18 PercentDefective: The percent&fective of any given quantityof unitsof productis one hundredtk the nun-herof defectiveunitsof prcductcontainedthereindividsdby the totalrnnnkerof unitsof product,i.e.:

PercentDefective = Nwber of defective x 100Nun&r of unitsinspected

3.19 Pnxess Average. The p-ss averageis the averageprcent defectiveoraveragenu&er of defectsper hundredunits (whitieveris .s@icable) of produ~subnittedby the sqplier for originalinspection.Original~ion is thefirstinspectionof a particularquantityof prcductas distinguishedfrcanthe-tiion of PrOdUCttiti has keen resuhn.ittedafterprior rejection.

3.20 Sanple. A .sa@e consistsof one or !mreunitsof prduct drawn fra a lotor batti,the units of the sanplebeing selectedat rancbnwithoutregardto theirquality. The ntnrberof unitsof productin the sa@e is the sa.nplesize.

3.21 SanPle Size Cede Letter. The sanplesizecode letteris a deviceusedalongwith the AQL for locating’a sanplingplanon a table of san’plingplans.

3.22 SanplingPlan. A sanplingplan indicatesthe nunberof unitsof prcductfraneach lot or battiwhi& are to be inspscted(sanplesize or seriesofsa@e sizes)and the criteriafor*tennining the acceptabilityof the lot orbatti (arreptanmand rejectionn-rs) .

3.23 Unit of Product. The unitof productis the thing inspsctedin ordertodetermineits classificationas defedive or non-defectiveor to countthe nunberof defects. It nBy be a stiglearticle,a pair,a set, a length,an ~, anopsratia, a volm, a ccsrponentof an end product,or the end prcductitself.The unit of prcductIMY or nBy not k the sam as the unit of pur&ase, aqply,production,or shipt.

4.1 WrittenProcedures. Writtenproceduresare o~ily develo@ and mdeavailablefor the ~t representative’sreview,upon request. Wnen thewrittenp~ indicateuse of this stadard, they Shall DYl@y with the~S of this standardand referenceappropriateparts as necY2s.SaZy.

4.2 Nonconfonnanm. The extentof noncnnfonranceof productshallbe exprersedeitherin termsof percentdefective‘orin termsof defectsper hundredunits.

4

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 12: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

FKL+TW105S

4.3 Forrnatianad Ick!ntifirationof &s or Batches. The prcductshallbasssn’bledinto icknt.ifiablelots,sublets,batches,oriniuti othermrun2rasmay b? prescribed. Each lotor Mtch shall,as far as is practicable,consistof units of productof a singlet~, grack,class,size,and crqosition,manufactureduncisressentiallyt.& saneainditians,and at essentiallyt& sauetim . Tis310tsor bstchesshallbei&ntified bytheamtractor andshall be keptintactin i@quate and suitablestoragespace.

4.4 AQL.—

4.4.1.AQL use. ‘Me AQL,tqsther with the Sa@e SizeCo& b?tter,is LEA for~ - -1* Plm provi&d hareixl.

4.4.2 Limitation. The sele&n or use of an AQL shallnot iK@y that thecontractorhas t& rightto sqply any &fective.unit of produa.

Ziis%%%%%iy, or for indivicha.1&fects. An AQL for a groupof &f_DifferentAQ1.sray be chosenforgruupsof &fects

my Ix chosenin ackiitionto AQIa for individualdefects,or s@roups, withinthat gfoup. AQL valussof 10.0or lessway be eqxassed titherin prcentdefectiveor in defectspsr llundrqdt5; thoseover lo.o shallbeeqress@kdefectsper hundredunitsonly.

4.5 San@inq.

4.’5.1@xesentative C3tratified)SallQlinq. When ~ropriate, the nunterofunits in the sanpleshallEe selectedin ~rtim to the sizeof subletsorSu&bStCkS, or partsof the lot or hat*, identifiedby m rationalcriterion.When reprasentatives.a@irq ia used,the units frm eati -lot, s&-batdl orpart of the lot or batd shall& sel~”.edat randan.

4.5.2 Tine of SamJ inq1 A .sanplemy be drati afterall the unitsculprisiirqtk lot or batchhave &en assmlsd, or aanpleunitsmay be drawnduringassenblyof the lot or batch,in whiticasethe sizeof the 10C or battiwill be determined&fore any ample unitsaredrawn.If tl-e.5an@eunitsare drawnduring~lyof the lot or htti, and if ths rejectionnun&r is reachedbeforethe lot *Cnl@eta that pxtian of the lot alreadyclxlpletedshallbe rejected. m causeof the defectiveprcductal be determinedand wrrective actiontaken,afterwhich anewlotorbatch~h begun.

4.5.3 Lhubleor FldtipleSaq3Ml-qUssd, Sa

hhendoubleor multiplesanplingis to bech sarpleshallbe selecttioverthe entirelot or batch.

5

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 13: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MIL-S’ID-1O5E

4.6 Inspection P~. Normal~ion willke used at the startof~ion. Normal,tightenedor reducedimpction shallcontinueunchangedforeach classof defectsor defective on succf2ssivelotsor batchesexceptwheretheswitdd.ngpmcedums givenbelowrequire&ange. The tit-9 P~ s~lbe a@ied to each classof defectsor defective independently.

4.7 switdimq Procedures.

4.7.1 Normalto Tightened. When normalinspction is in effect,tightened~ion shallbe institutedwhen 2 out of 2, 3, 4, or 5 consecutivelots orbat&es have been rejettedon originalinspction (i.e., ignoringresutxnittedlotsor batchesfor this procdure)-

4.7.2 Tigirtemdto Normal. When tightenedin-ion is .tieffeet,normal~ion shallEe institutedwhen5 consecutivelots or batcheshave beenconsideredaceptable on origti inqection.

4.7.3 Nod to Reduced. t?nennormalinspectionis in effect,reducedinspectionshallke institutedprovidedthat all of the followingconditionsare satisfied:

a. T’FISpreceding10 lotsor bazches“(ormore, as indicated by the notetoTableVIII) have been on norrnslinspectionand all have been acepted on origha.1~ion; and

The totalnumberof *f ectives(ordefects)in * samles frm thepm&” 10 lots or batde.s (orsutio- nmber as - used for conditim “a”amve) is qua.1to or.less thanthe appliwble n-r gi- in Table~11. Ifdoubleor mltiple san@ing is in use, all sanplesinspectedshouldte ticluded,not “first”sanplesonly; and

c. Productionis at a stezdyrate;and

d.’ Reducedinspectionis consickreddesirable.

4.7.4 RducA to Nor&l. men reducedinspectionis in effect,norml inspectionshallbe institutedif any of the followingoccuron originalinspction:

a. A lot or batch is rejected;or

b. A lot or batch is cmsidered acceptableunder the proceduresOf4.10:1.4,or

c. Productionkecmes irregularor delayed;or

d. Other conditionswarranttit normalin~~~ion shallbe instituted.

6

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 14: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

~-S’ID-105E

4.8 Discontinuationof Inspection. If the cumnul.atimrnnrberof lotsmta~~ in a sequenceof mnsecutivelots on originaltightened~ionreachesfive,the acqxanoe pmcedums~ion w e p~sions of this

of this sllamlardshallbe dismntilnled.stmdard shallnot be resumeduntil

correctiveactionhas teentaken. TigthenedinspecU“onshall thenteusdasif4.7.1had keen invciked.

4.9 ~.mg Plans. .

4.9.1 Inspectionlevel: me “inspectionlevel&termines the relationshipketu=enthe lot or t.atchsize and the ssnplesize. mehsp2ction levelto be usedfor

. -Y Particuk Ze@mnent tillbe as prescribedby the mmractor’s writtenprceddres. l?ireeirqection levels:I, II, and III,are given in TableI forgenemiluse (s&4.1). Normally,InspectionEvel II is used. However,Inspectionml I my & usedwhen lessdiscriminationis needsd,or I.@_dIIImy * used for greauerdiscrimination.Four additionalsfeciallevels:S-1, S-2, S-3, and S-4,aregiven in the dam tableand my ~ used khrerelativelysm.11sanplesizesare ~sary and largesanplingrisks~ or rustbe tolerated.

~

NYIE: In the selectionof inspectionlevelsS-1,co S-4,~ rust be ex-~ised toavoidAQ1.sincnnsist4ntwith+ase impection levels.of the special “

In”othsrwords,thepurpsa~ion levelsis to keep sanplessmll wtiennem.ssary.For

~=, tb5 CO& letterSun&r S-1 go no furtherthanD, equivalentto a Si.@esampleof size 8, but it is of no use to -Se S-1 if tha AQL is 0.10peromr forwfi~ the mininnmsampleis 125.

4.9.2 ~ ~ters. Ssnplesizesare &signatej by-tzxb?letters. TableI shallbe used to findthe applicablecode letterfor the ~icu.lar lot or batdlsizead the prescrikeslirqection level.

4.9.3 Cbta.Wq SanplingPlan. ‘lk AQLandthe cods lettershallbe usedtoobtainthe sartplingplan .&m TablesII, 111, or IV. Wnenno smpling planiSam.ilablefor a givencombinationof AQL and co& letter,the tablesciinxZtheuser to a differentletter. Tne San@esize tokusd is givenbythenewadeletter,not by the originalletter. If thisp~ leadsto differentsanplesizesfor differentclassesof defems, the cede letteraimespmdq to *_ ~le size-ie my ke used for all CI.SSSCSof ckfeci.s.k analternativeto a singlesanplingplanwith an a~ nurr&rofo, theplanwiti m ~ nm&r of 1 with its cor~ ly largersanplesizefor a-igqated AQL (whereavailable),may be used.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 15: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MIL-S’ID-1OSE

4.9.4 Typ2Sof SalIplingPlans. Threet~s of sanpltigplans: Single,Eooble,and mltiple, are given in TablesII, III,and IV, respectively.When severaltypesof plansam2 availablefora givenAQL and code letter,any one my ke used.A decisionas to type of plan,eithersingle,double,or nultiple,when amilablefor a givenAQL and ccxieletter,willusyallyhe based upon the cmparison bet-the administrativediffim.ltyandthe averagesanplesizesof the availableplans.Tne averageaanplesize of mltiple plans is less than for double (exceptiri.thecase correqmndingto singleacce@nce nmber 1) and both of theseare alwayslessthm a singlesanplesize (seeTableIX). Usuallythe ~Stiatimdifficultyfor singlesanplingandthe met per unit of the .san@eare lessthanfordoubleor multiple.

4.10 Determinationof ~ ability.

4.10.1 PercentDefectiveInspection.To determineacceptabilityof a lot orbatchunderperrsmtdef=hive inspection,the a@icable sanplingplan ehallbeused in accordancewith 4.1O.1.1,4.10.1.2,4.10.1.3,and 4.10.1.4.

4.10.1.1 SingleSaq3ltig Plan. Thenunbarof sampleunits inspectedshallbeequalto the ~le size givenby theplan. If the numberof defective foundinthe sanpleis equalto or lessthanthe acceptancenumber,the lot or bst@ Shallbe considereda-ptable. If thenunkerof defective is equalto or greatertithe rejectionnunbr, the lot or battishallbe rejected.

4.10.1.2 DoubleSap q1’ Plan. A n-r of sanpleunits equalto the firstsanplesize givenby the plan shallk ~ed. If the numberof defectivefoundin the firsteanpleis equalto or lessthan the firstaccqtanm number,the lot or bat~ shallbe mnsideredacceptable. If the nuntxrof defectivefoundin the first.san@eis equalto or greaterthan the firstrejectionrmbertthe lot or batti shallbe rejected.If the nmber of defective foundh the~irstsmple is ketweenthe firstaccqtane and rejectionnumbers;a secondsmple of the same size shallbe insp3cted.The nurberof defective foundinthe firstand secondsanplesshallM acnnmlated. If the cumlative nmber of.defective is equalto or lessthanthe secondaqane number,the lot or batdshall* mnsidered acceptable. If the emulative nunterof defective is Wto or greaterthan the ae.mndrej-ion nunber,the lot or batch shall&rejetted.

4.10.1.3 ~tiple Sanple Plan. Undermltiple sapling, the proedure shallmsimilarto that specifiedin 4.10.1.2,exceptthat the nmber of suassivesanplesrequiredto reach a ckcisionmy be as many as seven.

4.10.1.4 ~al Procedurefor-cd Irqectim. Under tied insp52tion,theSwim P~ ~Y terminatewithouteitheracceptanceor rejectioncriteriahatig teen mt. In these circmstantes,the lot or batch will k considereda~able, but normal impsctionwill k reinstatedstartingwith the nx lot orbatch (See4.7.4.b).

8

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 16: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MIL+3IW1OSE

4.10.2 Oefectsp HundredUnitsInspection. To determinet+? a “ ityof alotorbatch un&r*fectspsr hundredunits inspection,the promdum~~fidforpermnt defective inSpettiM aiwve shall& used,exceptthat the word“defects”shallk substitutesfor “Ck!fectives”.

4.11 Limiting wity Protection.IIY2~hg plansW ~a~ P~-s publimtion = &signed for use wherethe unitsof productare

~XG in a continuingseriesof lotsor batchesover a periodof tim2.‘Mouemr,if the lot or batcA is of an isolatedrbstum,it is cksirableto limitthese.kcdon of sanplingplansto those,associatedwith a dsal~t~ _ ~~1 ~tprcmt& not less than a specifiedlimitingqualityprotection. SsnplingplansforthisPUZFOSScm * seksed by -sing a Limiting~ity (UD - a ~’sriskto te associatedwithit. TablesVI antiVII give valuesof LQ for thethe Cxmnnly used comumr’s risksof 10 percentand 5 ~t respectively.If adifferentvalueof comunT#s risk is rquired, tk O.C. curvesardtkirti-latedvaluesmy be use5. Tmmncept ofmmlyalsobe usem inspacify+lgtheAOL and I~im” Levelsfora seriesof lotsor bat-s, thus fixingndsumnn.sanplesizewherethereis Sam reasonfor avoiding(~fi mm ~ a 9i=mnsmer’s risk)ITCIrethana limitingproportionof &fecti- (orc@f~s) in -Ysinglelot or batti.

4.12 Curves.

4.12.1 @crating maramsristic cumes. ‘me oparating~eristic ~ fornorml irqection, shownin TableX, mte the percentageoflots or batdeswhichmay be enp2rtedto be arceptedunderthe variousSS@ing plansfor a givenproa?ssquality. T& mrves ahcnmare for singleSa@ing; cumes for dmble andmlciple ssa@ing are retchedas closelyas practicable.The O.C. ~ -forAOLs greaterthan 10.0am based on the Poissondistributionad are a#i-cablefor defectsper hundredunits inspe&cion;those for AQLs of 10.0or lessand~le SiZeSof 80 or 1=s are based on the binonialdistrilmtim ad areqlirable for permnt defectiveinspection;those for~ of 10.0 or less @sa m ple sizes largerthan 80 are based the Poissondistributionand are S@icableeitherfor defectsp3r hurdredunits ~ion, or for parent defective-on (* poissm -him being an adequateapproximationto thebinmual distributionunderthesemnd.itiona). Tabulatedvalues,~ to4-4 VS-hIasor pmbabiliciesof ~anm (pa,in percent)are givenforeatiOfthealrvee shown,m in addition,for tighten@ inspection,h for~f~p2r lnmiredunits forAQIsof 10.0or less and San@e sizesof 80 or 1-.

4.12.2 Awsraqe~le SizeCumes. AverageSan@e Size C@FSS for=le andmultipleaa!plingare in TableIX. Theseshow the averagesamplesizesuhirhmybe ~ed to ocmr underthe variousaanplingplans for given levelsof prcKJ2SSquality. lhe curvesassureno curtailrmntof insertion arslare ~roximte tothe extentthat they are baseclupon tttePoissondistribution,and that the Sa@esizesfor doubleand mltiple aanplingare assuredto be O.631nand O.25n~itiY, tie n is the equim.km qle size.

9,

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 17: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MIL-STD-105E

=ICN 5

TABI&SANDmInlES

11

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 18: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

“fABLE

1’—.$amph

Jizecode/eflers

(see4.9.1ad

4.9.2)

!ipecid

i.qwcdon

level,

Gencr81

Inspection

hwda

lxx

cubm

baim

,s.

Is-

2s-

3S-

4I

II11

1

2la

0A

AA

AA

Au

9to

15A

AA

AA

Bc

16to

sA

Au

D0

.C0

26.to

soA

Do

cc

1)E

51to

93B

D“c

cc

EF

91

to

1s0

DB

co.

DF

G

1s1

to28

0B

cD

EE

GII

281

10S30

Bc

.0E

FII

J

sol

101200

cc

EF

GJ

K

iml

to3203

cD

EG

NK

L3?0)

toImoo

cIJ

FG

JL

1!

lmol

tomooo

c0

FN

KN“

N

3s00

110

IW303

IIE

G1

LN

P

Isoo

ol10

Woooo

DE

GJ

NP

o

S003

01m

dover

Dt

IIK.

Nu

n

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 19: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

191*1~ -I AA” I - I1:1, i~-lvv -1. - I

NORMAL14

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 20: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

15

.

SINGLETIGHTENED

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 21: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

I

TABLE

II-C—

Single

sampling

plans/orreduced

inspection

(Mater

table)

(see

4.’3.3

ad4.9.4)

— 5,. d,

.- ..! 4 B c — [) E F — c H J — M L u — N P 0 — n

— 0.01s

— A,R,

6 .

s..+!.

dw

—2 1 1

~ - & t 0 — 1 I 1 — 1 5 11 — 10

— z— ~ 1 1 1 — 2 3 s — 1 ,

3 5 a—1> m II

;02,

Ill 1,1

2,3

165

981

71010

1013

II

50 w 18 — m 11s

m

01 v —m —

I,

1

0-h

ii.,..W11”4pi.”WI..

m..

1!-d.

J“q.,!.

-?.CK+S!+“b.kh

.:2.,tilw

w-..,

hp.<8!”..

0:

,C,vvti=,

~*,,

u.,n“,...+1..

ph.b..

.“..

k !,.

-u.,-,

1-

.--1..

.—

........“.—

t-

11,k

=..,8.%.

...+..

b..k..,.<6,

b.*b

..kh.

..-b..h.

wk..“Ad,

.,9,

,A.1.,,M

.$.,,,,.

-dl..pa.”

P..4,tal,4,

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 22: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

83 ; . . . -.”.”.-.. _==a T

2 ltldl:: 1::1::1::1: il::l::l::l~l

-1,1-1. lf=l’+lO - i--l--1- -1- -1 -,1-= l,slk-””-—l

DOUBLENORMAL17

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 23: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

III-B—

Double

sumpfing

plans/ortightened

inspection

(Mater

lulde)(see

4.9.

3an

d4-

9.41

.+?

[“.

,,,,

~d.

,,.+,1.,..

,..,,,.

..4.

.,,,,

,1,.

, ,,F“.,

?i

*-I

,,

,.!,

,.,

.,,

-“.,

,,

,8+;,.,

s;

“!...

,,9

,,,,.,

0

..,..4

m,:

v,,,.,

,, 1,:

,;I :,”’;

.-J

*s.,

.x!

40

,,n“

,,/

*4

12:

1rl

“8

s...d

:1:

,1,.,,

‘..“4

:,:

,,r,,,,

,H,,,

...

12s

mw

v,,.,

mm

%.

m.x4

\K,.,

,,;

,,,&...

,,5

*m

1,v,,.s

mYm

.4

W,

cm

,,$-

0ml

Ku%.d

ml,

nm.

,,l’,,.

!,..-w

,.ww...1

Ima

Z5m

t’,!,!

w“m

“+.

.Aaw

ton

— ,,,,,

— ,.,

— ., —

— ,,.-,

— ,.,,

— II,“ _ /“1 I : s 12

,.,.”...

!)..,.,,..,.,.,,,,,!....,

..”.

.,,m

,

— ,,,,,

—,,

— 1 r- — 1 7 !12 I* 1, ,, 1’

T4.●1

,,

,.,,,.

,,.,,

u

i

@ , 7- ]

-J T , — o 1 -7 , 7- 6 T 11 T ,5 — 1: —

e-

1!..n?.!..+,.,

,1..hi..

,“”.

II..+

.,,.-#.

-,W...l.1..,.

1..,,

,,,,,A.,m

,.”,.,

,“.W

A..

I,!

,.

—0

I

o-

,!.,n,,,,.q,k,

,,,..I-..

,.”.

,,-

.,,...

=,..*-

“,=

$,.,.4”

.,d

m

-U,.C.”W...%

.4.,,,.q.,,v

,8”k.

.h.-m

,..,,,

.“,+”!.,..+..+

1.1..,.!-.

...tl.hl.l

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 24: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

lm#_Sm-lo5E1

!1 tl~l. Ibldl::l::’1

. . 1 1 1 1 ! 1 I 1 1 1 , 1 , 1

19

DOUBLEREDUCED

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 25: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

,,, ,,,9

w“~.1.

NORMAL20

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 26: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

.- :-+4

z,.

.,:

.4L! c

:2,!

,a,

,:.“

,

.-.

:

,.,.

.*

..d

.

,-b

:.,a.

su.,.

..-4

.*..

...4

. .::

.,* ...

:..-

..

,.. .::

,*8 * -s

::,-

,.,

.4 ---

::

r,..

.W%.-8

.- .W

s,=

,lb,.9!

.-.9J

.-.,

.W

,.I-.

01...4

,,;,b

.1,,

,

,-1,,$

,tim

...

,,,.-.,

,,,h

,,.

.E

.w

t -..1

ma

,*.

*,*..

.*-.

.

TABLE

[V-A

—Muhible

samblin~

idam

/ornormal

in$Peclio~~

(~la

Jl~

table)

(SCw

l.9.3

and

4.9.

4)

..1

.

. ICI

— ,,m

— 1 {., [,M*M!

1,“lb n v n .1 Iiu,, * , ,.1 t n.1

,.10 n?.

●,O

1,8

,,, 2.,

,2,

,..*

.,*,8,11

,11*Y

,>1,3

,11s9

,,4s6

4;,.!.4

*I.,

,,..

,.,-

.-,

..

...+

.

-U-”..+.a#-.

b.-.

...+.

.1--1

.-.”..4.

--.-

$“-.-@

-,-lo-o-

-Lb.

!....+.”

t!..-

-b.1.o.-.

*.-,

-.....”!1

.,,

,.!.

-..

-

...”..-

.&.--e

..!.

..+

”IA

.1.

.l.”

..d

+,

-..6

”.@

-1..

,*.

...4

4..

.,-

----

-d.

1.!

4...

,,“

— ,19

,,

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 27: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

,7

t! I l""'""'""l-"-"--"l-------l-------l= :2====leeeRaeel

11,,111

$@. 1-

/

MULTIPLETIGHTENED

22

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 28: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

M3A3ID-105E

MULTIPLETIGHTENED

23

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 29: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

m

MULTIPLE“REDUCED

24

#,”mn#ln

c)@., .l. *

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 30: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

1

1

( 1

:::2::: ~..-.==C= ..===~fj

,-- . ..-.== ~--------

-.-s=:: -..-.=2C: ..:==~~

.- ”----- .“. .=::----- s= ( 1

-.” . . . ..~ ---s:=: ---=2== --ce= aa.. -”--- ------- .- ..==:-----3s.- ”---- -.. --. ..s -.-~:g: .- .=:==. ..-””- -------- -------- .--. --=:

------- -------- -.. ---.= ---=-r.----.. 6---” .- e - ” ” - .e -””-- .- ””,,.-.

. . . . . . . -------- -------- -----. *

...e.-- .. e---” .e e.”-. .0 -..”..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..- . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..-

..eeoe - . ------ .. 0- - - - .. --..”-

- ::::::: ::::::: :::::::

. . . . . . . “..---..-

- ~ ------- .--*---

.“.. ”.”.

~ ~ -------

MULTIPLEREDUCED

25

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 31: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MLL-STD-ICISE

1 I I I I I

j{ -mu Owk ur - Xaa! Zn. o aI

26

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 32: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MIA3IW105E

I I 1

-. . -.i s : . . : : : :--” I I

I I .

14° I ---1-’” 1=44 Usg ilg I. I I I I I 1 +t] I --VI”-- Ie=-ltia=l=-ol ‘- I

.

AOQLTIGHTENED

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 33: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

VI-A

—Limiting

Quality(in@rcentdejectiue)

/orwhich

Pa=

Zz10

Percent

~~(jorNormal

Inspection,Single

sampling)

.>M

(see

4.11)

!s

— 0.01

— 0,29

— 0,02

— ).46

.20

— 0.04

— 0.73

— 0.31

. D.27

— 0.06

— I.2

1.49

1.43

.33

0,1(

— 1,8

0.78

0,67

D,53

— ).46

Acceptable

Qu.lity

Level

-n R =!code

Sample

<1=,,,,

.i.~

-m

0.010

A2

D3

c5

D8

E13

F20

G32

II

50

J80

K125

L21m

w315

x500

1’

m1)

I250

0.18

II

2000

— 0.15

— 2.0

— 1.2

— 1.1

3.84

).74

— ),59

— 0.2

— 4,5

2.0

1.7

— I.3

1.2

0.94

— 2.77

0,40

0.65

1.0

].:

25

16

11

6.9

12

7.6

10

4.8

6.5

0.2

3.1

4.3

5.4

7.4

2,7

3.3

4.6

5.9

2.1

2,9

3.7

4.9

1.9

2,4

3,1

4,0

1.5

1.9

2,5

3.5

1.2

1.6

2.3

1.0

1.4

6.:

68 41 36 30

27 22 19—

16 14

r

10

58

—54

44

42

— 34

29

24

— 23

l....

..

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 34: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TAL?LE

VI-B—

Limitiog

Qmdity

(inde/ec:$

perhudred

units)

/orwhich

Pa=

10Percen:

(Ior

Nom,al

inspection,Single

farupling)

(=X

4.11)

CA~+

1,,,”

al,,

0.01

A2

II3

c5

00

E13

F20

c32

II50

J20

KIn

Lmil

u315

!i503

1,203

u1250

0.18

IIm

,02

,A6

m

m 7 ,, ,3 ,1

,W 2 49 43 — 23

1: ,9 ,2 I b 1! s!

m 6 ,0 .7 — ,3 ,2 ,94

— ,11

04 1.2

1,1

2,7

2,I

I,9 I,5 1,2

— 1.0

D,6

12 — 4.,

— 4,:

3.:

2) 2., I.! 1,1

— 1.(

4mpI

AJ.

wI;I,

Led

— 1.0’

— 18 1,0

6,1

— 54 4,6

3,1

— 3,1

2,5

2,3

— J

I.5

2,5

4,0

6,5 Im

71

46

2?49

m11

m21

33

1211

2i‘2?

II13

N24

8,4

12Is

19

7,4

9,4

1216

5.9

7.1

1014

4.9

6,4

9,0

6,0

S,6

3.s

10 78 67 51 46 31 31 25 n

— 15 — 120

’10

— 84 71 59 — 68 40 35 — —

— 25 E la 13(

— 12( 91 71 h! St

6 i 1 ? 1, 1( 1(

la i 3% 311

2s 22(

,60

~ m lol

— w m

w ii 61( w la tic

u i 94 v 61

Et ii 30 I@ —

m z Ikax

1 1- 0 In m

vi

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 35: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

VII-A—Limiiing

Quality(in

percentdefecii.e)

forwhich

Pa=.

sPercetat

gs(fo

rNormal

Inspection,Single

s~mpling)

$;(see

4.11)

. 0

cede

S.mple

lett

erqize

A2

B3

c5

D8

E13

F20

G32

H50

J80

K125

L200

M315

N500

P800

v1250

R2000

— 0.01(

— — ).24

— —

— 0.01

— .38

— 0.0

2

— ,60 ,24

— 0.0

4(

— ).% — ).38

— 1.32

— 0.06

— .5 .59

.50

— .39

Acceptable

Quality

Level

— 0.1

0

— !.4 .% .79

.62

— .53

0.1

5

— 3.7

— 1.s

1.3

).97

).84

).66

— 0.25

— 5.8

2.4

2.0

— 1.6

1.3

[.1

— 1.05

— 0.4(

— &9

1.8

1.2

2.5

— 2.1

1.6

1.4

— .1 —

0.651.0

21

14

9.1

5.8

7.7

5.0

,6.2

3.9

5.3

3.3

4.2

2.6

3.4

2.1

2.7

1.0

2.4

1.5

I.5

— 31 14 12 9,4

8.4

6.6

5.4

— 4.4

3.8

— 2,5

— 45 — 22 — 18 15 13 — 11 8.5

7.0

— 6.1

4.0

63 32 28 23 2G 16 14 11 9.6

. —

6.5

7B 41 41 34 30 2s 20 18 15

10

66— 60 50 46 — 37 32 26 — 24 —

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 36: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

VII-B—Limiting

Quality(in

da/cc/sPerhundred

unifs)/orwhich

Pa=

.5Percent

(/or

Nor

n,til

Insp

ect

ion,

Sin

gle

smtt

plin

g)-

(SC

!?4.

11)

Gdo

so.+

1,11,1

,!tl

A2

B3

cs

o8

E13

Fm

G32

nw

Im

~Ii

In

L200

u31s

Nm

P6m

QI=

t,m

ml-

s~

g -n n

,01 ,24

01!

,J6

m ‘.C4

,.2(

— 26 — ,s 39 SO — .39

,11

,4 v ,. ,7 ,6 s

).1!

1,0

.2 .3 .91

.64

,63

).2 5.0

1.4

Lo 1.6

1.3

1.1

— SE —

Accqltabh

IJdil,

IA*,I

— 0.41

— 9.1

3.0

1.2

2.s

— !.1 1.6

1.4

— 1.1

).6 Is i.9 i.O !,9 1.3

— L6 !.1 1.0

1.5

1.1

22 9: 7.!

h s: 4,:

3.4

2.1

Z4 —

15

2.s

4.0

63 MO

Im

a

24

E9

3142

2432

29

U20

2423

1316

2126

9.1

1316

21

6A11

Itla

&68.s

II15

5,4

7.0

9.6

6.4

61

3.8

10

$5 ?3 m E2

41 36 27 — 24

— 6s — WI

%0

10 — 2J0

170

,s0

— —

— m — m w 340

— 270

220

1s m w 64(

— m IIc

— ‘5 05 n 61(

— w 44

1

7worn

tmm

ml

140

010

110

rlo 1

Im — Ku

Im —

i w E

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 37: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

I

I

I al... ... ... .-- I’--- I== I

I :1 . . . ‘... ... . . . “.. -1--1

-A=-

lIMITNUMBERS 32

. . . . . . . . . . ..--m

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 38: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

MXIAID-105E

. :+

33AVERAGE

SAMPLE SIZE

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 39: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

3=-

TABLE

X-A

—Tables

jot-samp!esize

code

letter:

A

CNAR

TA

-CP

ERAT

INC

CNAR

ACTI

RIST

ICCU

RV[S

FOR

SING

LESA

MPL

iNC

PLAN

SW

*t,,101

1.07s

,,,,(,,,,”

m,,,

ICn”e.

1.,&&.le

-d..ltipl,

S..plinK.-

..trhed

...l..d,

..prwtiir.blp)

,K,:,-rr.n

1,.,

om . . :“ ., . 10 ,.. ... !!! .

ul’hl.l

I)111:S11!,11WF.11LIITSb

hI-I-.1

d.ki;v.

f,.W.’,<

10:i.

d?frm

V,h..,rw,l..it.

k.W;.

>10)

,..,

I,F..-...,.

“,4,”.,,!.

0..!,!,!...!.!La;.,1..-1

,..P-,..,

TABL

[X-

A-1

-,TA

BULA

TIO

VALU

[SFO

RW

ERAT

ING

CNAR

ACTI

RIST

ICCU

RWS

FOR

SING

LESA

MPL

ING

PLAN

S

au”

I“

w,

I0.!431

1.4,

I21

nI

41.2

I09

1I

16I

175

I23!

I305

I174

I5

17

I6

29

I8

59

I9

77

I;;

I;.;.

1,

,,

,2.%

17,0

I409

a.]

111

I199

I2.s

I202

I18I

I462

wI

715

I995

I1121

cm

”I

511

15

.2,

12

L6

15

51

10

7.,

I1M

12

11

12

12

1M

I14

12

1S

15

1W

]8

12

t10

71

ilZ

dl

.--

..

,7s0

1).1

184

WI

ML

121

?1I

?9U

342

431

521

61’2

7%914

1?14

1154

-1oo

291

31.1

019

134

188

284

.J83

Km512

631

131

-+22

1081

I.ti]

15-13

250

S&o

69.2

Ili196

22:

31I

184

540

6’,1

161

870

ID27

1218

Iwu

1128

Ill0

ma

115

!Q1

5.0

116

150

2.17

31s

288

526

657

722

848

I972

!w1

133;

1512

1.!42

‘2015

1II

W,o

210

112

a502

6$s

mB70

[OX

I1141

I1272

I1S29

I1710

Im

I?270

x~

4065

Iw120

x“~

~14mlX]6ml~l’W

]~l

!I

11

Ii

1“A.r?,,.bk

U“.liq

l....!.

hi,!+..<d

im.I”clknl

I

“.”

,-.,

*-.A

b-

.1...1.-.-,

r.!..-

1..1.”.

?.*+

.I-.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 40: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABL

EX-

A-2

-SA

MPL

ING

PIAN

SF@

SAM

PLE

SIZE

COOE

I.MW

A

L.J

Ln

v=

Aeqi.bl.

l)dil,

b“ls

(-lImvelml

.,,,4,.

6,S

,,sx

,,,5

%40

6s,00

,50

x“

x“

x-

x1

02

0c

n.

kc

R,

4,

WA

.R.

A.R.

k%

klb

kR.

A.II.

kR.

ACIt,

AcR.

A,R,

SCR4

A.II.

A.R,

kIl.

ACR

v01

)2

2334

s6

7B09

10II

1213

11Is

In19

21n

21Ss

YJl

u..

lbu-

V.

‘i’*

~,.)

I.W”

lam

,&itCi

I.)I,)

t.){0)

l.)(.1

(.)l,)

P)1.1

W(.1

Dc

n

v‘

..

..

,.

..

..

..

.

‘:;b-

~10

IsB

40As

,00

1ss

xm

~6m

x6s0

~lox

~

At,q!.bl.

lj,.th,

bet.

I,isbt.ud

I.tpraim)

—.

U...*.I

osb*T.mI

,9.+,

d-cd,I.ucf

la.hicb

UCCW

*C*

●E4

-i-t

:..

●m

bw

Im9

.JU

M..

kc

+.,

.,e

n.b

aN

eir

ct.

m...

t.t

u.,.i””le

,*wlil”

PI*.&a.*(-91trm*11.cl,.1*KS&I*

U.

u“+1.

M@.”

(0(.IW

M.11..I,

.,,4

l.twf

0).

c.”. l.ti..

..+. it* 2

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 41: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

X-B—Tobles

foxjutnplesize

code

[et$er:B

TABL

IX-

E-I

-lA

BULA

1[D

VALU

ESFO

RCH

RATI

NGCN

ARAC

TIRI

STIC

CURW

SfO

RSI

NCII

SAM

PLIN

GPL

4NS

I4CCW

UWOndit,

L-d.

(.-.1

I.OFIIO.)

r.4,0

I4.0

15I

7340

G,m]~],w.]~]solxlalx

16YJ]XIICOI

p(1.pm

w.t*fccll.d

p(1.&lPC,,pa

b.”ti

-Il.)

9?.0

0,134

0,135

a,vl

14.s

‘37,4

S9.5

%,9

117

159

203

24?

14s

.419

51

?65I

941

1027

%,0

1.70

l.?!

11.B

27.3

45,3

87.!

133

1s7

mm

m41s

WW

laIw

I1s2

$00

1.6

1.51

17.1

X.7

9,2

Im13s

181

231

m3U

64541

116

m1131

1222

750

9.14

9.59

12.0

s1.6

8&5

141

19?

223

ml

347

4mm

~~

W3

1249

1344

%0

m.6

‘m1

5?9

w1

In!89

m209.

3%422

W622

ml

mIon

1!49

Im

’350

310

43,2

09,0

131

170

247

123

Ml

WW

ma

124

832

1M5

1152

13.W

1644

10.0

9.6

76.3

I,30

171

221

m192

4U511

593

67I

an939

116S

1211

Mm

Ilw

soal

W.*

133

210

356

3$4

4s3

dnl

%3

w130

m1~

1241

I356

1113

In%

1,0

18.5

151

nlm

115

437

$33

3.30

611

161

641019

Ills

1392

1s13

19$1

‘3069

6,5

6,s

%10

6S100

x1=

x=

x4W

~ml

~IKO

~

IAcc.pt.bleO..li$y1..?.1.I!irh!..rd

i.,?=

li=ml

I

,“.,

,,-,.

,,...!,.!..

A,.p...

..........-.I...4

,.-btik”

1...--.4

..!!..

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 42: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TAEL

[X-

6-2

-SA

MPL

ING

PIAN

SFOR

SAMPL[

SIZE

CO

O[L

ESTE

R:B

Cm.m.

I.*i.*

,Ssipt,

*itt 3

r.m..

I.ti.e

s.d, d,, 1 2 4

Twe

d*.m

pli.~

d,.

m,!,

WI,

Wtiole

10 , u.!

d, ,,,, c — Is —

— 6s — KI

— 5f — 1: 51 — +6 — Im —

— 1$4

— kcIl.

—2 — (c

II(— 18

19

—,<.,,h,

406s

Is2s

— AcI

— 2 — o > — ++ — 40 —

40ml

— kI

— H:

— 11I

52 — ++ 2

lax

— ,.n

— 141!

,.n

v

kr

c1{

—cm — u,,

cd .,,, A

c1c1

L.n

3 — I t; — ++ — 65 —

1B

10I

— s 21

1?\

v

v

. — .

3 II

61 IsI

7II

819

— * z —

91’

!3‘2

— ++ — 4m —

52 ,41

— + — bso

112

113

— +!-

:

23:

52!

— * — loco

cd .?!1,

1)—

*4+-

— 1s4

.++ z —

+!-

— 2s0

*

L-—

,,,lb

6.S

<,,5

to25

. . . = .

kc.p,.mc.

..”!-,

11.i..,

i....rd~t

t:,,.i.ql.

,.”,di.”

,,l..

,1”,,

(“,It,,”,l,,ly

,**W

1,11,,

[)

1;9.drd,l.

..n.+4i.n

pi,.

.I.w.

{W.It.rwt

W*1V.,.

C&!.ttw

0)

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 43: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

w al

TABLE

X-C—

Tables

forsample~izecode

letter:C

CHAR

TC

-CF

ERAT

ING

CMRA

CTER

ISTI

CCU

RVES

FOR

SING

LESA

MPL

ING

PLAN

S(Cur.c.f.r

.bsblc..d

.dt!ple

...plln~.

=nm

itbed..

cl.=!,

.,prmlddd

E;C$W%-W

?Caccllr0,

L(7TS

&cctnl.n

(?.,

Cxrt:clm

mat

AcCW

TCO(P.!

lmm

.w

la00

.m

..

“.

..

mm

mm

,.

,.

0.

.0C8,

wlm?slm

,mIcOtm.

aWIM!MDC

4aa,nnl,mlza

UUALITYOFSlillulnm

LoTS

(p,

i.WW<.Id.ktl.c

t-AfJL’.<

IO;1.d+.!,

w.b-d

..il.

(c.AO

L’.>101

“...,

,,I-..

“..

...A...,!*,.,*,,,,

L...!.,.(XW

l.,..-.,

..........

TABL

EX-

C-1

-IA

BULA

TEO

VALU

ESFC

flCP

ERAT

ING

CNAR

ACSE

RIST

ICCU

RVES

FC$I

SING

LESA

MPL

ING

PLAN

S

IAec.po.b!e lJ..li(T

l..,

d.4.c...Ii.m..

!iwl

1

p.2,3

In2

.510

155

40+.5

]~11.lx]lsolx]zwl~]wo

Ixlwa

P(i”

P?me.1dri..,~wl

p(i.

Mt.,.

Frkdfd

..il.

)

-““all

1.71

0.301

I?.

91I0.72I16.5I

31

.5I

50

,II

70

,1I

95

.4I

12211301

ZNISI

I343

391

wI

618

....

...

----

,.

93.0

I!.02I

1,6

4I.O

J1.11

164

21.3

S2,3I

T%6

9J.V

In1$4

165

249

m]V6

449

639

671

W,o

2.W

11.2

I?,11

10.6

22.0

X.9

610

93,1

ICV

110

17J

m27J

15!39

482

619

I111

Ix.

...

I,0

,I

,.,,

I10

,I

.21.

5I

W.7

IB,

.,I

119

IIJ

1[1

72

1~

S1

24

51

11

E[3

14

1M

51

5(2

17

49

16

06

1,,..

....

..-----

..’-

50.0

12,9

3t.4

IJ.9

33,6

51.3

73.4

111

1s1

171

213

m293

373

W553

6!1

&33

aw

8.0

24.2

456

21.7

51.9

70.4

!02

148

1V4

216

ml

304

348

i33

W

10.0

621

691

97.2

$~

26.9

5L.4

16,I

n,a

106

IJ6

183

235

263

309

3%401

4%244

649

7.56

1010

1076

IS.o

wI

65

.7S

9.9

94

,91

%1

s52

10

26

32

6$

J-

38

Vm

$3

4K

S7

45

B!4

10

64

11

31

1,0

60

.27

7.0

92

.II1

,1

44

20

12

62

]m

w103

4s,

m612

601

63s

W1171

1261

,,,~

,,0,$

a40

~x

IWx

1~x

mx

~x

~x

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 44: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

Tpd

●#u d- SJ*

D4J.

U.dtid.

3 6 — —

TARl

fX-

C-2

-SA

MPL

ING

PLANS

FOR

SAMP1.f

SIZE

COD[

lfTTIR:

C

v — v K tbs.

AR_

M — d I —

.

— . — 4.0

z — id 1“ .* “m

E — 6,3

— 6,S

— d b ma

at. 0 — 10 —

— 25 — $-l

I — 1 I — ++ — 60 —

— 60 — LB !6 — ‘5 il — * — 65 —

G — LE 8! — 11 I11

— +’+

— Im —

— mm

— U-@l

oII

— 59 213

— + z —

% — k-l!

1212

— 61(

Is1(

— * — E4 —

— x — S-E

11,

— I1{

la — 4+ — 50 —

— ma

— &t 12 — I1(

$2 — +$. G —

z — in!

I42

— 313

2SI

— + — w —

— — s-e u“ Al n — —

u““u

.&..*ti

.U@t.

d“,049

t,..,

k4-k,

WCeptar.

,,+“j..,lm

e,,

u,...lld..

kc,

@.**

m.

N-i..

...

..Uu

aid,

●npll*

d..

a..

(or,It,?m,

ho,y

.“<d

,,,,”

{}

VW4044.0..t6lt6

PIO.It-.

(w*ltwmt

Iv*IY

LIMc8dI

Iattw

0]

d“ . — —

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 45: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

X-D

—Tables

forsamplesize

code

letter:D

CNAR

TD

-OP

ERAT

INC

CNAR

ACIE

RIST

ICcu

Rws

FGR

slNc

LE5A

MFI

LING

’PL

ANS

ICsm

e.l.

, d-Lie

.sd_.ltipl.

.qli.c

.“~dc6cd

...l.selr

upm

ctlmbld

P.”CC”T0,

LOTS

.XPKTUI

mw

“Ccl,”l.

,,.,

m . . m . I@ . . ❑ ,, .I.im,ma

imtco,ca

1JWLIT%

OFSUBW

7TED

LOTS

(P,i.win,.,

dclcc!iw

laAQ

L’.<10

Indekt.

pmh.nA’ed.-it.

kAO

L’.>

IO)

“..,

n-“—

..A-F.

M.a..!!!,1.”!.Imt’.l1..-1

1-!...

TABL

EX-

O-1

-TA

BUM

TEO

VALU

ESFO

RC+

’ERA

TINC

CNAR

ACCE

RIST

ICCU

RVES

FCX7

SING

LESA

MPL

ING

PUNS

hm-p

lk@

.litvIx.rl.

(-l!.sr.xti.ml

2’,

‘“5

6’5

‘01,5

6510

I15

35I

40]~1651x]

,mlx],.l~lis0]x]6m

p(1.perm.tdcfec,i.d

plia

dtlcctsP,

6.u.d~donhd

9?.0

0.126

1,91

I6,06

O.l,d

1,2.5

665

10,2

I22,3

Ix.]

U.o

59.6

16,2

91,2

123

I151

I21s

W353

w

95,0

0.639

-~11.1

0,541

~~~

102

11.1

32,7

49,8

sa.7

71.1

I96.1

116

Is186

249

221

399

432

50.0

1.31

6.22

,.

,----

)14?4

a1

Ir

I,

1s,0

3,s

12.1

22,I

].m12.0

21.6

31,1

52.1

74.5

8s.s

108

1sIS

193

234

303

339

w206

..A.

....

----

----

---1]

=.0

I5.9

521

554

2m3

43.3

11.1

U,7

49,0

d3.9

%9

121

135

163

193

?11

272

312

391

U2577

611

100

25,0

4116

51.8

=,6

486

w.,

n5.5

116

147

162

!93

m252

339

W631

419

ml

612

5,0

31.2

41,1

54.0

31,4

59.3

10,7

W,9

111

164

184

212

Ml

2N114

378

usm

655

707

I,0

13,8

59.0

70:1

57.6

610

105

126

Ium

?18

2s2

263

llBm

6i9

522

M712

776

2,5

10x

2.5

,015

25.

x6

xID3

x,30

x7s2

x033

x

I,,

7I

,“,>

I665

i,1,8

I21,0

I39.6

i3.2

I67.9

I07.8

IKM

IIn

I171

i201

I166

IX

m..

,.m,

1,,,

””1

,641,,.0

12J6

I(s.91

70.91

$5.911m

1[13

1154

1122

I233

I171

I366

I1!

I4CWI.2.IC

(MM

Le.tl,[iig+m=d

I.v.xlim

]1

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 46: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

I

mJb5.

M.lllpl.

TA81

1X-

O-2

-SM

PLIN

GPL

ANS

FOR

SMW

.ESI

ZECO

DEI.E

IW.R

:D

— c-.

M..

..+ .i” .8 s 10

1 4 6 0 10 12 14

— ,“,*

,

M — v v — v ,,,lb

2,s

— 1.5

— :n — — . — . — 2s

— !,5 — :0 1..

M ,,,( c ti

< !14

JO*

,m ,,,( f 1,0

Att+.bl.

@.lity

La..l.

(-li..~clirnl

8.0.

6.s

10Is

n

, n.A,

R.4.

hA.

fl.A.

R.

1223

1456

h &02

0314

2s“t”

1234

4561

e

.2,2

-3.4

.203

03Is

0201

14?6

0114

2sJ1

1314

3658

13J5

4619

1115

61910

b,5

toIs

nM

k.pt.bl,

0-1;,,I.r..

hIliabl-rd

i.w-cdd

U....!

..bs.w..l

.0.91

..1..

Cdc1.!1..1-

+k~

.-tP

-.*

-4“1.c!;m

““b.-

.“.

..il.h

l..

Accvl.mce

*,

[email protected]

U..ti.’lt

..wllq

tin.*ta.c

(waltmmtI**V

U*.cti

letter

C)

kc.pt.ut

mFndtt*d

.0tbi*

..+.

*in*.

— cm,.

I.ni..

.H,l. .iti e

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 47: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

,P w

TABLE

X-E—T~bles

forsample~izecode

[etter:E

CHAR

T[

-CP

IRAT

INC

CNAR

ACTE

RIS

TIC

CURV

ESFO

RSI

NGL[

SAM

PLIN

GPI

ANS

,?#r

r\l!!

!’,”,

,twbro,,

,mwo

IC.,.,,

k,h.bl.

.ndwlti,,lr

mqll.”

.-..,cbed

,,.16,+

.,p,..,

ic,bl.)

,!,,!’,,,,,,.,

,A’JLtTV

WStWITTEli

LOTS

(P,i.r.~,m

,4?1?<1!..

hAW

.S.<

ID:h

d.f..,.

r.rkm.++

-1,.

I-A13L’,>101

“..,

,Ia...

“,-...

-,,-.,4,.

Lb.!,,,,,...,.,,lJ_,.,

b—,

,.q..,l,..

TAB1[X-[-l -

TABU

LAIID

VALU

ESFW

lCf

ERAT

INC

CHAR

ACTE

RIST

ICCU

RVES

,FO

RSI

NGLE

SAM

PLIN

GPI

ANS

111(

1!11

111

Ammt,bl,

&,Ii,,

Le.,1,(-.1

I.,w,Io.)

r,1.0

4.0

6.5

101,0

4,0

6,5

10IS

a1~1

io1~1

.l~[,m

lx]

,wl~l

250

I,G

.F.r,.s

d.fcctl..l

o(i,

dcfec!.F,

h.”drwlunit.1

*,O0.U77

1,11

1,s0

!6.13

0.0111

1.1s

I3.2s

6.33

13.7

I‘2’2,4

27.0

I36.1

46.9

51.s

1%6

96,7

IlJ1

1S’2

I219

Z2sI

,.,

I

1.S]

$22

I12,9

[20.6

I20.2

I4].6

IS9,0

I667

IE2.1

Iw,,

I111

I144

I,4,

I213

I‘L16

I.121

I344

I

930

0.294

2..91.

6,64

11,1

0.395

2.73

6,29

I0.5

20.I

10,6

26,I

(7.s

5V,2

71.1

92.7

11s

I51

I73

Wo

0,8U2

4.11

0,130

14,2

0,810

4,09

0,40

11,4

24.2

246

1s6

15,s

4!,8

54.0

64,2

19.2

116

123

16s

16261

2a2

75.0

2,19

1.{1

13,6

I9,9

t.tl

7.19

13,3

19.5

32.5

45,0

52,6

66.3

80,2

94.}

122

144

887

2Xm

110

30.0

$19

12.6

Z9.o

n,

I,

2s.0

10.1

19.4

2%0

26,1

10.7

20.1

YJ.1

I39,3

57.1

?4.s

r12.1

lm1Il

l)34

167

I192

2*I

2s6

3ss

379

10.0

)6,2

16,B

%,0

48.4

17,1

29.9

40,9

51.4

71.3

SQ.5

Im119

137

I1ss

I’m217

I2691

m13Rs

1414

som

,631,6

41.0

49,5

22.0

16.S

4s1

Iso.

M19

101

Ill110

I,029,8

41,3

%,6

5s.1

2s.4

$1.1

11

1I

II

II

II

11

1

1.5

6,2

10x

Is6.$

,01

,51,,

1~1

401=]6$

t~]120/~1

lsO/~]2W]~

!1

1.1

IIsa

Isa

m232

2ss

313

40?

43s

64.1

71.3

1101

1123

113s

!55

I116

I196

I2SS

I264

I121

I349

ILSO

]471

I

1,

11.

.1

I.

.1

1.

kc.p.bl,

Ou.m,1,.,1,

(,;,hl.m

rdI“,r.rr,k.)

I

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 48: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

:-. I*I”

●1” — 13 1 16 —

> 6 9 12 1$ 10 n .

!. TABLEX-E-2-

SAMPLING

PUNS

FMSAMPLE

SIZE

CODC

LEfTfR:

E

v — v G ,bta u-

— I,0

f— — . — . — 1.s

— M —

R— J“ a D 2 —

— x — ,P — u“

+ “m (i — ‘3,s

4m.#1.

C9dll,

k“!,

(UmI

kink.)

M4.

06.6

10Is

=x

ax

65x

lm~

130

~m

~

,RlAcfh

MR.AS5k

kn,

ACn$AC

n.At

wAC

5196Cn,

A,fftAC

fkACk

A.n,Ac

*AC

R.tin

I123

14S6

7809

101!

111314

Is10

l!21

‘u373A

10al

(1u

6663

b

b ,*01

01I

415

3131

S96

10711

9laII

16s~

11a

27s

a11

.&“t-

)1lb

1561

89II

11It

1315

1!8

19n

14a

37343s

1736

S353

%s?

*

,!

●Z

●1

.404

0405

0611

18

1*310

412

6IS

616

a

.1

030

31s

1621

36J*

410

612

114

1011

1119

lb3s

1137

0?03

14

26Jo

496

10T

11I

13II

1113

1911

1419

?f7636

2?59

0114

25

37s

106

II8

II10

MII

171$

3219

s24

II7736

1766

6049

1314

36

S8J

II912

IIIs

111111mi5

a827

3331

Id40

(955

$3s

1315

4619

1011

1114

Nl?

ma21

25n

s11

n49

6165

4761

bbtd64

11Is

679

1011

1414

15la

19n13

am12

5337s

6a19

5354

nn7773

4.0

6,5

101$

=x

@x

~~

Imx

1=~

mx

W f30

ci-

U“.ti

p

v- A.

-lla

-

— c- M.

w .lrl

13

1 16 —3 6 9 11 15 18 3J —

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 49: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

I+ Q

TABLE

X-F—

Tabies

jors~mplesize

code

letter:F

CHAR

TF

-OP

ERAT

ING

CHAR

ACTE

RIST

ICCU

RVES

FLW

ISING

L[SAMPLING

PLANS

lT,cchlmmm

mrmto

TOOOK

[(k...

3Mdad?

.ndm.hiple

.mpll,”

.*.,,hed

..CI.=lt

s.prm,ic.b!~)

,Cclr,,..,,.0,

v!$,,.,Tv

,,!:WU\WrTF.t,

!,,,rz

l,,h~,rm,

&f,c,l..

k+$uI:,<10;1.&l,,,,

pmbe.d,r,l..,,,

kA@

’,>

IO)

“.,,

,,..”,

“........

AC,w.,,

C..,,,r,..”,.,Aw.,

,-—,

,..P,,,”,

TABL

EX-

F-1

-lA

BULA

TID

VALU

ESFO

R&

’[RAT

ING

CtLA

RACT

IRIS

TIC

CURV

ESFO

RSI

NGLE

SAM

PLIN

GPL

ANS

IIA.c.,r,hl.

()”,l;,,

L,,.1,

(.,m”.lIn,m,;.n)

I

Iv.

%

O.Owl

0,141

O.z%

1,70

0,327

2M

1.41

481E2,

1.9

4.12

(W6,

23

5,51

8,12

o.M

12,7

I065

2s10

6.S

lU0,65

2,5

4,0

6510

,51~123

I40

Ixjfi

pli.

v=..,

+1.cli.el

*I,.,.

p,hd,d

.nh,

)

w.0

0,052?

0.1s9

2,21

4.33

9.7s

!4.5

17.5

23.9

30,s

37,6

S!,l

62.9

9s.0

0.2%

1,81

In1,14

14,0

19.9

23,5

WE

M.4

4&2

b2,2

14,5

5.10

OS5

2,69

5,44

901

16,6

’273

21.2

3s,1

43,2

51,3

M.4

01.2

75.0

1.41

481

8,70

128

21.6

2?.8

34.2

43,1

52.1

6!.1

79,5

93,1

143.1

5.3.3

5.2.3

73.3

91.1

Im

11.1

40.4

24,0

6$1

76.1

81,0

Im122

41,4

152.9

65,0

71.o

22.9

108

124

141

1P(i” s8.

91

83.1

15,.9

21.1

E23.0

!0.0

34,R

41,5

+

6.93

13,5

11.5

19.4E19

.625,5

26.6

31,3

B

5,0

13,9

21,6

2?,2

w.!

!S6

)s,0

23.7

11.5

ma

52,6

65.2

12,2

B4,6

97,2

IwIll

151

1.0

~,6

ZJ9

3s,8

42.1

63.2

2.20

32.2

42,0

52.2

65.5

mo

B7.O

101

114

127

1s3

I72

1.0

4,0

6,2

10x

1.0

4,0

6,3

1015

x‘

x@

x~

~

IAc..p.bl,

Qb.liq

!,.,4.

hi”hmmdi.,pm

irdI

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 50: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

u.

Eullallm

aD: :--

F45

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 51: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

X-G

—Toh[es

/orsamplesize

code

letter:G

CNAR

Tc

-oP

IRAT

ING

CNAR

ACT[

R15T

ICCu

Rv[5

Foff

SINI

WSA

MPL

ING

PLAN

Swacmrorton

CIPICTI..mw

,Cclrl,

o,,.,

&irem,,$.d

,..1.,,1,,,

Pmc,l..2W

(c.-..

1.rA.M.

..d.Ultipl,.qi;~

:

UUALITYOFs1WWn611

1075

(,,inmm..,

d.1.ril.?

(“r.l!)l.,.t

In1..i.ki.

W,b..,kd

..i#.

k.AO

Lb>

10)

..,.,

,’,.,.

..,-,....

.,!.*.W

!+.,.,L,.,,.,,U...,

b,...,e,,”.

TABL

[X-

C-1

-TA

BULA

T[D

VALU

ESfo

R~E

RATI

NGC~

RAc~

RIST

ICCU

RV[S

FOR

SING

LESA

MPL

ING

PLAN

S

Acr.p#.hl.IJn.li,yL...l.

(nm.1

I.,mn;..)

P.0.40

II,5

254.0

6.5

100.40

I.sI2s4.0 I

6,5

I10

lx]

,5[xl

251~1

,0

p(i”

I.m..l

M.rti.cl

o(i.

Akl.

PIh“.kd

.“;1.1

-,00,0114

0.471

1.60

1.61

9.s6

9.13

0,0314

0,4s4

1.16

1,57

!.68

9,26

11.0

14.9

19.1

U.(

31.1

39,3

%,0

O,lf.a

1.12

l,a4,38

8,S0

13.1

0.16.2

1.1!

z.%

4.21

8.11

12,4

14,7

19.3

?4,0

28,9

30.9

46,5

mu

0.2?7

1.67

3.49

5,56

10.2

15,1

0,129

I.M3.44

5.45

9,05

14,6

17,0

21.9

17,0

1;.2

42,7

50.6

15,0

0S95

3.0)

5,42

7.9t

)3:4

19.0

O,!w

3,20

S40

7.92

13.2

10,6

21.4

26,9

12.6

18,2

49,1

S8,4

50.0

2.14

5,19

8,27

11,4

11,5

23,7

2.11

5,2{

a.%

1Is

17.7

24.0

27,1

13,3

19.6

45,8

58,1

67,7

a.o

4.24

8.1!

11.9

15.$

22.3

29.0

4.33

0,41

12.3

16,0

22.2

2s,3

13,8

40,7

47,6

54,6

61.9

no

)0.0

6,94

11,6

15.8

19.7

21,I

34.1

1,20

12,2

)6,6

m.9

2%0

36,8

40,6

48.1.

3.S6

62,9

77.4

22.I

5,0

8.94

14,0

18,4

22.s

30.1

37.1

9.36

14.8

19.1

14,2

YZ9

41.1

4s.1

S3.O

@2.B

fa6

22.4

94.5

1.0

11,4

19,0

23.6

28.1

33,0

43.t

14,4

73,7

26,3

31.4

41.0

50.0

54.4

.S0

71.3

7V.5

95.6

I07

0.6!

2.5

4.0

6.5

10x

0,65

2,5

,,06.5

,0x,

,$x

.x

,,~

,.

,\

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 52: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

1

:

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 53: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

X-H

—Ta&les

/or

Sample

size

code

letter:H

CHAR

IH

-CH

RATI

NGCt

MRA

CTER

15TI

C13

1RVE

5FO

RSI

NGLE

5AAI

P11N

LIPU

N5,C

,r.,

.,o,

I.rns

,.,,

.,C*,

I!,I>

,w{Cw.ts

bdouble.d

❑),ipl.

...+z.U

.=..t.b,d

...l.ulr

..w.ctlc.bl.)

AC.CP,,,”!F.!

BI)tlA1.lTYoFsln

Ml~Ell

LOT2

(p,i.r.rrcr.t

d$f.ctlwe

(wAO

L(.tlti

inW.ct,wf

h.mirtd..it,

(.,4UL’,>

10)

“.,,

,,”,.

”,”...”

,m.p.,,.

m.l,,,t,”

b,,a.,,

b.-,

,..@,,,..,

TABL

EX%

l-

lABU

IATE

OVA

LUES

FOR

OPfR

ATIN

GCH

ARAC

TfRI

STIC

CURV

ESFO

RSI

NCII

SAM

PLIN

GPU

NS

II

Ac..ptahl,4)w.1197[.e.,1,(.urn.l

i.$vctiwl

II

P.10

.251

1011

.5125

140

16.5

1X1

101-

11

11

11

1.

.I

11

I1

II

I,.,

,-.,--

,/

P(i.

IWC..J

d.1.r,ivrl

99.0

O.oml

O,ml

O.JM

I.66

1,69

6,01

1,3&

10,1

%.0

0,103

0,J15

l.td

2,)8

5.36

52t

9.1?

12,9

500

0210

107

2,22

3,5J

6,41

9.54

112

14,5

75,0

0.574

1.92

1,46

5.10

0,51

12,0

138

11.s

$20

I.M3.33

5.31

1,29

81.3

1$.2

17,2

21.2

so2,73

5,m

1.69

10.0

1,.5

10.8

21.0

25.2

E100 so Lo

4,50

1.56

10.J

I2,9

17,2

22,4

24.1

29.1

5,82

9.14

12.1

14,6

19,9

24,7

2?,0

31.6

8,00

12.6

15.8

18.7

24.2

m.2

31.7

361

0,40

1,3

2,3

4,0

6,5

~10

~

4,61

1.78

10.3

13,4

18.5

215

26.0

20.8

35.6

40.3

49..

5.W

9,49

12,6

155

21.0

%,2

m,9

33,$

2a9

an53!

60.5

9.21

13.2

16,8

ml

26.2

12.0

?40

40,3

4$6

50.9

6).1

6A,1

0.40

1,5

2,5

4063

~10

~IS

~25

~

9.5

1s.

tI

IA..ep.bl,

w.l;tr

l,..c

Is(,IR+I..-IIn,w.li.nl

I

“..,

,,-.,

,W,lt.,h

...4..-,.,

,,,..,,,.

,-.I...,

,.I.._

,.,,,.,!.p,..6.4

..”..

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 54: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABL

fX-

H-2

-SA

MPL

ING

PLAN

SFC

RSW

LESI

ZECO

DELE

flER:

H

IIAm

.@l.

0..!11,

1#.d.(-$1

I.opctb.)

Ic.”.

T,F=

dr-

.1

1“1..

.mtAiq

,C.qJa‘s

““o

n0.

23O

,Mx

065

1,0

1.$

1,5

4,0

#-6,5

x,0

x1,

x2s

!~:;?

d1.

Ach

Atm

AcII?

ACnl

ACn,

kn.

kII*

kcn?

hek

hem

ACR,

4.n,

ACn,

AtHe

Aclb

ACm

Acn,

zi.~.

Jov

0112

2334

56

1809

10It

1213

14Is

M19

2122

Aw

u..

u.*

u..

xv

.*

02

01

14

1s

3717

596

107

It9

11II

16A

1%L?.

IOlla

J2rba!c

6A12

3445

67

09II

1212

1315

!618

19n

2!26n

MG

KJ

83v

..2

.2.1

.4

06o~

0s06

11

18

29A

u

26.

201

01I

516

2138

396

106

127

1416

J902

0114

2b

184

Q6

101

12n

13II

1713

IQ29

*ltivl*

3203

It2s

17

s10

6II

813

1015

121?

1622

I*25

$2

.65

II24

16s.

n1

IIv

1211

15II

1111

20JJ23

SJ9

65

23IJ

1$46

1‘A

1012

1214

14!1

13to

1123

27-

3111

78

912

J*S

619

10t]

14I*

Isla

19n

?22s.%

J21)

1738

91

...slb”

040

,,,0

x0,6s

1.0

Is25

do65

x10

~Is

xa

~“$’

Accrp.tk

ti.lior

L..el-ltim

h,c.rdio.rm

inl

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 55: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

w 0

TABLE

X-]—

Tab/es

)orsamplesize

code

le!ter:

]

pg;:~rmm

CNAR

TJ

-OP

ERAT

ING

CNAR

ACTE

R151

1CCU

RVfS

FOR

SING

LESA

MPL

ING’

PIAN

S

Accw

ll.n,

,.,

(C.!...

1.,dmM.-d

..lliple

...pliq

m..t.hed

.S.l.tcly

..p“.tlc.

U.)

UU4LtTYOFSUBW

’TF.D

L07S

1P,1.F.=..t

dtlrc!l.c

f.,AU

L’.(10:i.d.fici.

Vrh..dwd..It.10I40L’.>10)

,.0.!

nr.

“c-..

.4...,*.

0..,,,,

L“.,.

,MJL’.,1..-.,,.

q.t,k,

TAB1

.fX-

J-1

-TA

BUIA

TEO

VALI

JES

FOR

CPIR

ATIN

G“C

HARA

CTER

ISTI

CCU

RVES

FOR

SING

LES~

PLIN

CPI

ANS

II

k.,w

.l,i.

w.litr

1,,.el.

I,m.1

I..nm

,i.m)

I

h0,15I0,

65I

1,0I

1.sI2.5

I4,0]~1

651>1

,00,,510,85

j,,0

I,.,

j,,2

I,,,

1~]

,,,1~1

,,lx]

,,

p(i.

ptrc.,

&kti..)

PII”

6.(..1.

r=.hm

.kd

En;,,)

99.0

0.0116

0.la7

0,530

1.04

?.28

1.?1

4,s1

6.17

722

9,,6

0,01?6

0.186

0.%5

I,03

2.23

3,63

4.38

5,%

1.62

9.33

12.9

1s.7

9s.0

0,0341

0.U6

1.03

1.13

3,22

5.01

6,M

1.93

9.8’?

11,9

~,m,

0.444

Im1.71

3,21

4,93

537

7.71

9.61

11.6

15.6

18,6

W.o

0.132

O.ml

1.32

2,22

1,99.

S,VI

6.26

0.93

11,0

13,2

0.!32

O,E&s

I.%2,10

3,94

5,82

6,79

0.18

10,8

12.9

17.1

2L,3

15,0

0,359

1.3Q1

2.16

3.10

S,m

1.W

8.6]

109

13,2

1s,5

0,260

1,20

2.16

3,11

5.27

1.!5

8,55

10,6

13,0

15,3

19.9

73,4

S2.0

0.233

2.W

3,21

4,51

7.26

9.X

10,8

13,3

15,8

18,3

0,.%5

2.10

3.34

4,39

7.W

9.s9

10,8

13.3

15,6

10,3

23,3

27,1

23.0

1.7?

3,33

4.04

6.39

9,14

11,9

13,3

16,0

18,6

21,3

1.73

3,31

493

6.39

9,28

!2.!

I3.5

16.3

19.0

11.1

27.2

31,2

10,0

2,84

4.78

6,52

816

11,1

14,1

15,7

18,6

21,4

24,2

2.82

4,05

6.&5

8,33

11,6

14.7

16.2

19.3

22,2

2..2

30.9

35.7

5.6

3,b2

5.79

7.66

9.48

12.7

1S,8

11.3

20.3

‘r,2

26,0

3.74

5,93

1,27

9,69

13.1

16.4

18.0

‘31,2

24,3

27.4

3.4

37.8

I,05,59

8.01

10.1

120

15.6

10,9

m,5

2.16

?6.6

‘N.5

5.16

am10,5

12,6

16.4

m,o

21.8

2S2

m,s

31.B

3.2

42.9

0,25

I,01.5

2540

x6,5

x10

xon

Lo1s

2.5

4.0

~6,,

~10

~15

~

Accembl.O

u.llw

Lt.ds(,k$,t.d

iwul!..l

“..,,,

.-,,,,!.,,,,.,

,”-,

,.-.

,.*,,.

,.-,.!...,

,.b

...

,.,.

.,,.

~!,..bd

“,,.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 56: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

51

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 57: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

ITABLE

X-K—

Tables

forsamplesize

code

letter:K

Ct14

RTK

-OP

ERAT

ING

CHAR

ACIS

RIST

ICCU

RIIIS

FOR

SING

IISA

MPL

ING

PIAN

S{ti

me,

Imdm

bl. uddupl,

.npllq

-■uch6

.,clod,..PM

IC064.)

~8;c~;;rm

~;rc”crm

ortars

Uruxrn

m“c

ACCIPTCD

1,.,

ACCC

~Ml

(h,

laIm

m.

..

m,.

.w

.*w

m.

,W.

m.

Ill!,

o,..

t.s.

*.9,,,

,.....

es

,0,,

mm

dltun

*1FW

llwrrm

LtllS

[,.1.PnW,t

*l?cti.e

lWw

.’,<

10;I

ndt

k,,

*,h.+

,“1,,(m

Arjr,

>10)

k.,

,Im.

“e....,.,

Ac,.p.b,V.,,”,b“,,

,“QLW

b—,

+,..

TABL

Ex-

K-I

-TA

BWAF

IDVA

LU[5

FOR

WIR

ATIN

GCI

WRA

CTER

ISTI

CCU

RVES

FOR

51NG

tfM

AIp

LIN

CP

LAN

S

II

A,ce.,.bl,Odorb.,ls

(-.1

I..ca,lm)

I

It

v.0.10

I0,40I

0,65

1.0

II.5

I2.5

IX1’”jx

I6,S

IXJ’”

I

W.o

O,ma

0.119

0.3W

0,6S9

1.As

1.32

2,81

3,82

4,8a

5.!6

8.ss

10,1

92.0

0,0610

0,266

0.626

Im2,09

3.16

3,76

4,94

6,1S

7.60

9.95

11.9

W,o

0.w63

0.423

0,s52

I.10

2.s2

3.11

LS5

S,62

6,92

8,24

10.9

13.0

7s.0

0.220

0,7W

1ss2

2.02

3..32

e.rk

S41

6,w

8.36

9.79

12.7

14.9

20.0

0,5s5

1,36

2,14

2,94

4,5s

6,14

6,94

0,53

10.1

!1,7

14,9

11.3

5,0

III!2,1s

3.!6

4,W

S.91

1.7s

8,66

106

12,2

11,9

I1.4

23,0

10.0

I.US.11

4.3s

~.34.

~,,,

7,42

9.62

10.4

12,3

14.2

16.1

19,1

32.s

S.o

2.40

S,m

$94

6,20

10.s

11,s

11,6

1s.6

17.s

21.4

24.3

I.03,6s

S.sl

6.12

0.06

10.s

12,6

!0.3

16.2

1.s.3

29.4

14,s

21.s

0,1s

0,65

1,0

1,5

2,5

x4.

0x

6,5

x10

x

0 1%

IA..xp.bl.Cu.lhrL-,1.Wbw.d

l..patiad

1

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 58: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

.,, ,,*

do: +..

53

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 59: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

X-L—Tables

forsampIesize

code

htter:L

~m

~o

~q

Clw

uL

-GW

.UAT

ING

CK4R

ACT’

ERIS

TIC

CURW

SFC

MSI

NGLE

SAW

LING

PIAN

S

=Ulc

n1,

.1IG

w=c

(m&

U.-d

-A@

,u=

Plhs

M●

olch

6■

,d

,od

r.,

,14

A4

,)

#m “ . m cc w . m . n ,1

*“

*.*,.*

u,.,

,.m,,

*,*,.,

,,>,,,,

,,,,..D

[M~

WM

LI1?

G?61FM21ED

W72

b.1.~n’r.:

4rfml..

kAO

L’*~I@

h&

l-u

F?h6

A-I

Uk+

AOL,,>

10)

$,“,

n,..,.

----

O_m,,l...b

(firm%)1.d

-~

TAEL

EX-

L-1

-TA

BUT.

AIID

VAIII

SFI

XCW

RATI

NCCt

14RA

ClER

ISTI

CCU

RVIS

FOR

SING

LESW

LINC

PUNS

m

IA

=NdI

.I.JS,III,LA,

(-iIS.FtiI

P.O,*

I0.s

I0,40

10.62

11.0

I1,s

Jx

I25

1xl

8.01X1”

,(l.

pm

Nl

401R

u”.&

f-,

pm

bBD

4d.1

,.)

W.o

Q.*

].I

0,075

I0,118I

0.412

IOmz

I1.43

II,1s

8.29

I3,s

I3.76

I5,17

I6.29

?50

0.02

40.

173

S.4W

0,68

3l,

liI.w

1.33

I3.

WJ.

u4.

6J6,Jl

7,4s

50.0

0.O

ig0,

3M0.

331

o.nt

1ss

$32

;.n3.s1

4.Q

$.1$

4.44

m,12

22.0

0.144

0,461

0.666

Ill6.11

3.!8

1,63

4.31

5,21

6,11

7,9S

9.34

Jao

0.34

7O

.rw1,

361.

I!42,

643.

664,

225.

226.33

732

9,32

10,8

5,0

Osw

In1,

$6t.s

3,71

4.63

$.40

6S1

7.61

0,70

10,9

12,5

\1

0.0

1.1

5i.w

l.sd

3.34

4.64

$W6.20

7,70

D.w

10

.112.4

14,1

S.o

l.%1.37

3.1s

3.66

S,a

6W1.22

#.u

9,72

10,9

13,3

8s,1

1,0

1.30

J,?l

4,m

so’s

6.4

2m

mkm

10.1

11,4

11,7

1s.3

11,2

0.10

0,60

0.65

I,01,s

x2,

s~

4,0

“x6.

5x

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 60: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

IABL

[X-

L-2

-SA

MPL

ING

PLAN

SFO

RSA

MPL

ESI

ZECO

O[~R

:L

——

u-l.

5)!

S@k

c.”. I.#i..

.,M

l,oitt

m

Is m

w Im 150

WI

‘2s2

Iol 1-350

— t,.,*.,

. cIt

v — v — v ,,,(b.,

0,10

— 0,052

— kn

— 01 —

.

— 0,10

— 0,10

— ,.11,

— K

x

Ac

cqll,

blc

0001

11,Le.el,(m-l

Im.w

ctb

d

x — ,n,

— u.. me

#tlel

N 0,15

0,15

— cR!

— 0- d .4ttc*

M

— 0.8

0,22

— klb

— 11

02 12 02 ,‘1

02 01 II 11 23

O,u

l

040

065

1.0

,.$x

2,5

ICR.

A.m

ACR,

A.lb

A.n-

ACR,

2334

s6

1889

10II

B]

14

2s

31

31

S*

)44

56

79

9II

12

12

13

02

.3.

40

40

40

s

D)

OJ

ts

16

27

16

D)

14

26

38

49

61

0

I4

2s

3,1

s10

bII

o13

263b

58

1II

912

II1

5

IS4

61

91

01

21

2It

14

17

6s

61

91

0II

16

14

Is1

6(9

06

21

,0,.

,~

,,5

~

1CCC$4MOdl,

1#.cloM66w,d

l“*pcclld

x4,

0x

kIl.

AC

R,4,

RI

12

13

14

Is1

81

9

61

07

11

9la

IS1

6w

19

n2

4

06

17

18

Jv

6to

61

2

11

28

II1

11

7

1015

1217

1622

1417

IIm

22s

10a

1123

21

29

[1n

7226

32

U

4,0

x6s

I:hb#

6,2

6.5

kn,

A<U

11‘?2

A

II1

6A

lziz

l

29

A

rN

13

19

1922

Es IIu

1?J9

x“$

u......P..6i..I..+.

d..cd.l.,!..

lo..l.ki.c.rwac..4

+ctkm

..+..

U?...ikbl.

u.?

w.!

-b..-!

..+.

01..calllet,,,1s4-MA

.Ccwl.b-

.96ml-ii-

..fabt*

mOW.11.t.le.

AU+4.-*

-,Il+c,k

.+,

u.,ok”+.0.!+,.”

d.,ohm,(w*R*-:

$,0Ir019cdl

1,110?

9)

k,p,

m,

wpt

timd

●Itbl.to+

.1[..

Cnn

.I.,;..

II* Zw — 250

50 lW !50

ml

m m MO

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 61: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

X-M

—Tables

/orsample

size

code

letter:M

CNAR

TM

-CP

ERAT

INC

CHAR

ACTE

RIST

ICCU

RVES

FIX

SING

LESA

MPL

ING

PLAN

Srrmccnl

orWn

Urulco

70*C

(Cwre.lotLW4*

mad..IIIPICc.apllw

-cma!chtd*8c1o.cI,IIpm

cdc.hld

ACcc,,l

n(,.,

UI m

TABL

EX-

M-1

-TA

BULA

TED

VALU

ESFO

RW

ERAT

ING

CjlA

RACT

ERST

ICCU

RVES

FOR

SING

LESA

MPL

ING

PLAN

S

II

Acc.phbl,Omll,,L...l,

(.-,1

I.,pr,im

)

P.0.040

0.15

I0,25

0.40

0.%

I1.0

Ix

1,5

Ix

I2.

3x

4,0

p(i.m-m

defrctl.tmi.W-1,

w.b.r.imi..it,l

9,0

0.ml!9

0.C412

0,13s

026!

0,%1

0,921

1,11

1.51

I.94

2.31

3,38

3.W

%.0

0.0161

0,111

0.260

0,414

0.8,0

1,?6

1.49

1,96

2,44

‘3.94

3,%

4.73

50.0

0,0115

0.169

0,1$4

0,534

I,m

1,40

1.72

2.23

2.74

3.21

4,34

5.16

7S.0

0.D213

0.325

O.MO

O.zm

I,34

1.E9

2,17

2,74

3,31

1.69

5,G5

5,91

30,0

0.220

0.531

0.349

1.17

1ml

2,43

2.75

3,39

4.02

4,ti

5,93

6,m

2s.0

0.440

0.835

1,26

I.62

2,36

3,07

3,43

4.11

4,63

5.s2

6.90

1.92

10.0

0.731

1.27

1,69

2.12

2,94

3.76

4.13

4.89

,3.64

6.39

1.26

B.%

5.0

0.951

I,51

lm2.46

3.34

4.17

4.s

S,32

6.17

6,?s

n.41

9,m

I.01.46

2.11

Z61

3,!9

4,16

S.08

5,52

6.40

1,14

8.08

9.7I

10.9

0.063

0.75

0,40

0,6

I,0

x1,

5x

2,3

x1,0

x

Ac..pI.blc

@.lltr

L..cI.

(,i~ht,m

dImp.c,im)

““,

Au+...

....A.

.-1.w

-P.,-

...i”h.

....n”.titi

.*

-.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 62: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

LJJ

Zh#l,

Limb!?

Mdlbb

k.. .,I..

.+.

,1,, m 230

Ua 20 Ito 240

X0 Ua 430

WI

TABL

fx-

M-2

-SA

MPL

ING

f’lA

NsFm

S~U

slZE

COOE

lfIIE

R:M

v — v -G7 lb..

MA

— D,ou

— :n — I — — — .W —

— O,w

— :n — u“ ma

L-* L 2 —

— 0,10

z — : Iii — Um COa

.,*, P — 0.10

u“ ti ..,,.! N

— 0.1$

AcctPstdclJudityL-d,

lnum

dI.spxdd

0.1s

0,%

0,40

D:65

‘“x

ISx

2.5

x4,0

‘t: 4,0

kn.

ACn,

Ac11,At

15ck

R*A.

n.Ac

Wk

n,AC

R.Ac

lbA.

IkAc

n

I1

’33

34,

S610

0910

II11

1314

Is18

Iv21

2’3

A

0r

0314

2s37

J)s

96

101

It*

1411

16A

I234

{,561

89

1112

1283

IS16

1019

3334

2627

*z

●2

.3tt

0404

0s

061?

1829

A

.2

0103

Islb

213

039

a10

612

714

0203

1426

384

96

101

1?8

$311

11II

10

0114

251

7s

106

II8

1310

Is12

17!6

2219

?5

I3

2416

S81

119

12II

Isla

1111

22?2

Z5=2

7

13

3s46

7910

1212

1416

17!0

‘m:1

23n

29II

13

2345

67*

1013

1414

Isla

1921

n2s

7532

2131

M

0,?5

O,*O

0,6$.

,,0~

1.s

~2.5

~4,0

x‘;;

Acctpb!e

Odty

Ix.ds

(Iitkcnd

iwcd.d

A-u......Fx.d.,

$.+.

.1...4

1.1!”lx-Mcb

UCq..cr

.dI.Iwd-

.-,.

-...II.M..

c-.

hi..

.Q#< .iu 31

5

am 4m m #m 210

3m am au YA

2

6-U.ew.,

..btc~.l

..wI.

min.C06.I.tt..

la-M

t6oc.vl.nc.

.dmire!i..-+..

.....ll.ble.

Ac-

Acc,pl,8c*

.*dcl.

It.-

M,lQc,les..ACI.

=::

u..01.,1.,-puq

PI.,

●ta.,

(0,,It.rm

l1.,1““,,C,-

1*11,.

0)

Amq.,mc,

m~d,,,d

,,,Ai,..@

.,”.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 63: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

T.4B

LEX-

N—Tables

/or

~amp!e

$ize

code

her

:N

IT”c

c”,

0,m

CWR1

N-

CWRA

TINC

CNAR

ACTF

RIST

ICcu

RvES

FCR

SING

LESA

MPL

ING

PLAN

SCB

rtm

toIV

01AccCrl20#P.,

IC.rm

kbad.

...4.m!,lpl..qll.,

.m..tcLd

..cb,.1,

..WIc.bh)

ma m m m . . . m m ,. .

...

,.

,.,,

0,.,

,,

,,,,

.,,,

,,0

,,,

,,,

,,,

,)1°!Llr>(W

Sllli$tlIrl:ll

Lrl12(,,

h.pace.,

.!,If.,iv<(.”

412V,c10,Inhk,.

whwndmdml,,

(wNV.

>101

F..,

rip.

“.-.,

k,.p.,1,

O.d,!,

L“.1.(,W.,

,..-,

+..,-.

TABL

EX-

N-1

-TA

BUIA

TID

VALU

[SFC

#W

ERAI

ING

CHAR

ACTE

RIST

ICCU

RVES

FMSI

NGLE

SAM

PLIN

GPL

ANS

A.ce~.b!e

QtI.litTL...!,

(-dl..~c!io.)

l’.0,025

I0,10

I0.15

0.2.5

I0,40

I0,65

1,

xI

I .0x

I1.

5 IX125

P(inwrctM

~fcr,iw

mi.dtfcci.c.rbm

.dmdnniid

90.0

O,CWO1

o.ozw

0.l?d72

0,165

0537

0,59I

0.701

0.934

1.22

I.W

2,01

2.31

930

0Illo>

0.111

0.164

0.211

0523

0,7%

0,939

1.27

1,54

1.95

2.49

2.90

9.30

0,0211

0,105

o.2m

0,349

0620

0.93I

Im1,40

1,73

Z,w

2.73

1.2s

1s.0

0,0513

0.192

0.345

0.507

0,06(

1.19

I37

1,72

Z.m

2.6

1.10

3.14

W.o

O,ln

0,234

0.55s

0,134

I.IJ

1.53

1.1.7

2.13

2.35

2.93

3.13

4.23

mo

0,277

0,S29

0784

I.02

1.48

1.96

2,16

Z.m

3,M

3.43

4.55

4.99

I0,0

0461

0.77

81,26

I .34

1.85

2.33

2,63

3.09

3.s4

4,03

8.95

5,44

30D599

0,949

1,?6

1.35

2,10

2.35

2.09

3,57

3.3P

4.28

5,34

6,c5

1,0

0,9’2!

1.33

I.W2,0!

2,62

],m3,48

4,03

+,%

.5.0?

6,12

6,01

0040

0.15

02s

0.40

0,65

x10

x1,s

x’35

x

[k<w.ble

%.!h,

L..d.

(tl”h!,..d

i.,m,lod

I“..!m

..,-.

““,b*“

,.b,,h.-,

-,.-,,.,,,.,..

“--..,-,,..

,.,&

,,4.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 64: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

I I I I

N59

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 65: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

m 0

TABLE

X-P

—Tables

jors~mplesize

code

letler:P

uIMLI

TVOFSU

1lM

ITTW

LUI’S(v

inw~,

,&l,d

l”k,AQ

L’,

<I&1

“dc(me,w.bm

dmd❑-II,f=

AOV.

>10)

sm.,%-..

“.-----

k.qdi.

0..1!,,L.-Io

,Aw.1b.—1

I.w!!...

TABL

EX-

P-1

-TA

BULA

IED

VALU

ESFO

RCP

ERAT

ING

cHAR

ACIE

RIST

ICCu

RV[s

FOR

SING

LESA

MPL

ING

PLAN

S

A=ep,

*le

(J””Ii,,1,..,1,

(“m,,l

l..ph”)

P.0015

OW.5

0,10

0.15

0.25

0,40

xI

0.6

IX

IIQ

IXI

1.5

Pli.

mm

.:,J

.kli.

.m

drkt

.w

,hndwdnit.)

9?0

0,00126

0,0186

0.0s45

0.1212

0.223

0,363

MM

0.596

tl$z

0.93s

129

1.s1

95,0

O,ciwl

0.0444

0.102

0.!11

0.3n

0.498

O.W

0.771

0,%1

1,16

I.S4

1.06

$00

0.0132

0,066

0.138

0.218

0,.?ld

0,542

0.679

0,.378

I,m

I.m1,71

2.03

7S0

O,o.wl

O,lm

0,216

0,317

owl

0.745

0.252

I.0s

I.30

I.53

1.39

2.34

50,0

O,w

0,210

0.334

0,4s9

0.lQ

0.939

1,m

1.33

t.W

I,m2.33

2,11

%,0

0.113

0,331

0.493

0.639

0.922

1.21

1.xla

1,$0

2.1?

2.72

3.12

10.0

O,m

o,48b

0.365

0.035

1.16

1.47

I,62

I.93

2.22

2.52

1.0?

3s2

5,0

0,3J4

0.593

O.ml

0,969

1.31

I,M

I,W2.12

243

2,74

3.34

3.78

I.00.576

0,230

I.03

1,26

1,64

Z.m

2.18

2.52

2.83

3.18

].m?

4.29

O.ws

0.10

0.15

O.z

O.ul

xO.&s

x1,0

x15

x

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 66: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

.,

61

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 67: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

X-Q

—T~bIe~

forstimpiejizecode

letter:Q

CNAR

TQ

-OP

ERAT

ING

CtM

RAC&

TIC

CURV

ESFD

RSI

NGLE

SAM

PLIN

GPI

ANS

?19C

UI0,

mtx

mcr

wm

otUc

r?rr

n,,.

,(G

-,IW

&W

,,~

ml(lpl.,-pll,,

,mm,tckb

.,do,+

,.pm

c,ldl.)

:m . . m m m . ❑ m ,. ,

m w

0,,,,

,.,,

,,.,.,

,.,,.,

.,.,

,,0,.,

1,1,,s

,.,1.,

M,,,

,,,,,,

,,,,.,

,,,,,

,,,,.,

WJALITYOFSU12WTHlL(T7S{p,1.~mrm!belccilm

1-AW

L’.<10:i.‘60recmperh+

❑l,.k

AOU.

>10)

m..,-.

,.—..“

k.?!.).

0“1,,

l..!

.,W

.1k

.--1

.-!4

TABL

EX-

O-1

-TA

BULA

TED

VALU

ESFI

XEW

RATI

NGCH

ARAC

TERI

STIC

CURV

ESFO

RSI

NGLE

SAM

PLIN

GPI

ANS

Aec.p.bk

Ch.lity

Lvv.lm(s-.1

i.ovlim)

p.0,010

IO,MO

0.(%5

I0

.10

I0,

2sI

0,25

Ix

I0.

40x

I0,62

Ix

I1,

0

F.(i”

rrc,.t

*I-I.,

Cctdtc,,

pmhddwnll.

W.o

O.atwn

0,0119

0,0249

0.0+29

0.10

0,232

0,281

0342

0.489

0.5W

own

I.01

95,0

0,20410

0.0204

o.aW

0,10s

0,2W

0,318

0.316

0494

0.61S

o.7&2

0.99s

1.19

w,0

0,2W

410.M2S

0s822

0.140

O,al

o.3n

0,43

s0.

262

0.692

0s24

I,w1.30

1s,0

0,0224

0.076V

0,1?4

0.m3

0.23s

0.176

0.241

0,6W

0.634

0.979

1.27

1.49

so0.255s

0,124

0.214

0.294

0,(54

0.614

0,694

0,022

1.01

1.17

!,49

1,13

‘2s0

0.111

0,215

0.314

0.409

0.s%

0.77S

0,864

1,M

1,22

1.39

1.14

2.02

10.0

0,5s4

0.111

0.m

0.s54

0.742”

0.942

1.M

1.?7

1.42

1.61

I.%2,25

5,0

0,2!0

0,290

0,%

0,6?3

0,641

1,02

1.)s

I.s5

1.56

1,7s

2.14

2.42

1.0

0.?44

0,221

0,672

0,024

I.s

1.20

1.29

1.61

lm2.04

2.U

1,75

0.01

s0065

0.10

0,!5

0,2s

xo~

~0,65

x1,0

x

Amdle

OdlI,

Le..l.

lllnhe..d

k~,i..)

)ht.,

,,,,.l...

@...I.&.

.*l..,,.%-

tl..*,

....t...l..t.

”.h

s!-,

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 68: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

0! u

Tpd

Mqsiq

#**

ckJ&4*

udll#*

— 1%9.

14”

— Ino SW Ma

— m 6s0

963

ma

Ins

Ism

Sms

TABL

2X-

O-2

-SA

MPL

ING

PIAN

SFO

RSA

WLf

SIZE

COLM

IfllIR

,Q

x - sn

— U90

(an. R

0.01

0

— I,O1O

— ,R,

I

— . — . — 1.013

u“ L% P z

z — P.R*

Acc9pt66*09dll,

b-lo

(m-d

IqlmkOl

B.033

Oo1o

0.0%

0,10

0,1s

0,a

CR#

ACR,

k.R*

A.R.

kIl.

ACR?

It

2314

s6

70

lb.

~o

10s

161

s37

lmll-

It34

6s6

79P

II

*!

●l

●s

*4

04

,1

030s

1s

I6!

0201

14,

26

36

0314

1s3

1s

Ioi

13

2436

s9

111

13

3s46

19

1011

214s

619

1013

11

1,06

00,

06s

0,10

0,1s

o.n

x

x0,s0

~0,63

~1,0

hno

kafh

ACn.

A.R,

hR,

klb

c~10

1112

1314

M16

1931

a

315-

610

1II*

1411

16

II12

11u

Is16

1819

2928

3639

049s

0611

1I

1$

11S6

394

106

It1

16

696

101

116

13II

1113

19

611

813

101s

121?

1629

19=’

912

II15

1411

11

n33

953s

39

12la

1111In30

nn

39

39

3133

16Is

1819

21n

‘nZo

333s

393s

0,60

x06s

x1.0

x

,4

— c-v

Id..

Em Isa

31$

Ala

96s

nm tsn 1s90

330s

k=

Aarpl-c.

-n.

=R.\tctlm

-t=

u“Olwl,,0+*,

d,..bc.

m:

=Acm$4nu

-pm

lud

uIU,*+*

aim.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 69: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABLE

X.R

—Tables

/orsample,size

code

letter:R

CNAR

TR

-W

’ERA

TING

CMRA

CmRI

STIC

CURV

ESFI

XSI

NGLE

SAM

PLIN

G”PI

ANS

19.9CIM1orWn

Ltwcw.

m9L

,.,,,,7,,,!

(,-,

lCUr.eS1.,dnublcd

m,l,lpl,,,m

pliq

.*n.ctrhed,,.!..,1,.,pm

<,i,,hld

1“0

. 00 a w !0 . . . ,,

0,1

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.s

0.6

*,,

0,,

0,,

,,,

,,,

,,,

,,,

,,,

,

(Q1

’11

.IC

YCl’$1IIVIT7K11

L073

IV.

1“r.rrcnl

d,(<,,l.F

I.,AI)U.~

10,1“dek,.

~,h“ndmd.“1,.I-

AOL’.>10)

w..,

n,.,,

“,...,

,“k.p,h,,

I+,

m,L“.,.

IAm.,

l.,“ml

,..pd-,

lABI

IX-

R-1

-lA

BUIA

TED

VALU

[SFO

R‘O

PERA

TING

CNAR

ACTE

RIS

TIC

CURV

ESFO

RSI

NGLE

SAM

PLIN

GPL

ANS

A...pblnln

G.11,,ti.,ls

(m,m,l1,.F.c,I.”)

P.0.025

O,LUO

0.26

10,10

0,15

Ix

I0.5

Ix

0,40

Ix

I0,ti

p(1.Fmrrd

dtfec,l.e

ordefect.pr

h..dmd

❑i,.]

W.o

o,m74]

0,0218

0,0412

0.C%

?20,145

0.175

0.279

0.W5

0,311

0,511

O.dw

P5.o

0,0170

0.04w

O.c+.m

0,)31

O,lw

o.a5

0.3W

O.lw

0,4d2

0+.Z2

0.145

W,o

O,mm

0,(651

o.mn

0,150

0.731

0.?72

0,35I

0.132

0,51s

0,644

0,.912

no0,040!

0.mM

0,127

0,211

0,290

0.342

0.411

0.s21

0,612

O,w

0,934

50.0

0,mm

0,124

0.181

0.2E4

O,m

0,133

0s22

0,62.7

0.7U

0.933

I,m

25,0

0,11s

0,196

O,ms

0,311

0,004

0,540

0,651

0.761

0,070

1.W

t.n

!0.0

O.lW

0,264

0.334

0,W

0s09

0,650

0.770

O.ml

t.01

1,24

1.41

so0.231

0.315

O.W

0.S26

0,627

0.172

O,W

0.972

1.W

1.21

1.51

1.0

0.132

0,4m

Owl

O,dc,s

0..9m

0,8m

I.32

1.14

I.27

Is]

1.?2

O.o1o

0,2+.5

0.10

0,1$

x0,2$

x0,40

w0.65

x

LAm

,P,bl,

Q.I.llt,Lm

,l,Oi,h!e,edi“,pcc,im)

I

n.,

N1.kd...

ba”,

tltu.

u.hl....41u!l.”l..m..-.l.m.

.**.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 70: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

?j

1X1

.

.* ..*

65

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 71: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

TABL.E

X-S—Tables

/orsamplesize

code

letter:S

Ac=

Accept.mcemnber

Re=

RejectionIIwnber

a=

Accept-

MCpitted

mIM*●9+*

dm.

TTPO

ofm

+ir#

p!u

Shgla

Ml.

Multiple

I

cmu-

3130

‘znCa

Uca

w 16UI

2400

3KI0

40CQ

4S03

m

Aceqmblo@llw

bnl

(Mrmdinspalkd

xA.

m

12

02

12

#2

02

03

13

13

23

0.025

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 72: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

,

Mlvsm-loss

6. 6

6.1 Inten&d Use. [email protected] p~ end tables for insperzionbyattrti~tended to ke used in the aquj.sicim of Eefensennteria.1.

6.2 subjectTerm (I@?yWord)Listi.nq.

Aceptable CuaMty Level (A(Z)

merage ~goirq Qdality(~)

Defect

Dsfective

Lat or Batch

ProcessAversge

S.an@e

SalrplilqPlan

unit of Prcduct

6.3 changes fran P-ous Issue.this revisionto icientify&mqesthe extm.siveneasof the rhanges.

Vertkal lines O= asterisks ars not ussd in

with eesperx to the pwlous issuedue to

67

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 73: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

Custodians:Army-mNavy - OSAir For@ - 23

Review Activities:A=&’ -m, E& T’LAV, ERNavy- As, m, NC, m, s,

SH, ‘ID,YDDLA - S.S,GS, SSOSD-IP, SO

r

mL-SID-105S

c#aJJDINc FmTzNAL

UserActivities:Army-mD?&l - ES, SS

68

PreparingActivity:Army-AR

(ProjectC?3C-0085)

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 74: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

lft$~Uc m~s: h ● wnLia uiIU ●ffo!t to d OU? cIarId mfiAiO a daummb better, III. DoD Qr.xide9 LbEI form fo? UIC incnmeau and ~tioca for im~m-nta. AU W- 0! miliwy aadudu8-.rnttial tioa docunxnfJ am iariiad to wuride

-tietu l%is form may km doti.d. fotdm! dmu rho limo imd-ti, tvmd done b. Imm +* (m IWT STWV.@. ~Jkd. In bkak 6. be u #pacirIc u pmibko ●bout pu’ticub prc.blern uus such S8 wrdiw -hick required in~wion. m

m rixid. ==idv*. Ian. UUMIIOUI. or -u i=omcukihlc. A on PIvpoad wordim ctunc_ dtkb woutd tidkc the~bk=. Ehwinbtak 6uIyrmMrkJn0t mtitnaapmirm~xofti docunma:. lfbto c k 7nfEtte d out. a n

UkmOdwdgeamcltdfbumitodto you-wlixllodvakobtyoakmo. kblyau COUUnmIbm”wcckuduldm bckn6

(P* dON ah b)

OEPAFITLIENl OF THE ARMY

111111 m. . . ‘“ I.iEdOWkCtAL ●IJSNES

-uAt.Tv Fom ●n,v ATs IJSE UOa BUSINESS REPLY MAIL.PIR67 CLASS PERMIT NO. mom wASHINGTON O C,

PO-AGE WILL BE P41O BV THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Us. AmrYNu.swmr PISEMcH, D5ElJ3~FmmxREFmKa??rER

m: SKAR- arlc -sPICATIWNY~, NJ 07806-5000

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

Page 75: SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND TABLES FOR INSPECTION BY …

HA NDARDIZATI O N D O CUMENT IMPRO VEMENT PROP OSAL(se eIiutnulimu . R+ sid e)

DOCUMENT NUMaE ❑ 2. 00 CUUENT TITLEMEL-~105E SAMPUNG~ANDTABLES FCIRINSP~ICNBY~MAME OF c.umutnttm OnuNIuTIOw 4. TYPE OP 0RCANIZ4TION (M+ H)

•1VENDOR

l’-J m,.

aoonz”waamg’ Clw, am-. ZIP C*)

❑ u4N”E=Arr””E”

❑ OTHER (Stirj,,

●ROeLllU AREM

. r— W.au, d Wmdlv

k—wc9aikW

. -/nmlOndo t. ~.,

,? EMAFIES

NAME OF SUBMITTER it.-w Hal. Ml) - Oc.,,mlti 8. WOBK TELEPHONE NUMBER (l”elud# .4-Co&) - O,ptl.w..l

h8A1L1NG AODnE= lSfm.1, City, SUti, ZIP Cdl - OothmU s. OATE 06 SUBMISSION fYYMMDD)

fift FORM 4 fihf! .“ ..,,----- .- .-. .- ——.—. ——-

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com