sand creek ranch pud potable water and waste treatment ... · pud potable water and waste treatment...

Sand Creek Ranch Conservation Community

______________________________________________________________________________

Sand Creek Ranch Conservation

Community

PUD Potable Water and Waste Treatment Report

For

Wyoming DEQ

By

Weston EngineerinG

Judith Mackie

Note

This document contains both letter and Tabloid size pages. To print the whole thing on letter size paper: File - Print - Page Scaling - Reduce to Printer Margins

SSAANNDD CCRREEEEKK RRAANNCCHH PPLLAANNNNEEDD UUNNIITT DDEEVVEELLOOPPMMEENNTT

JOHNSON COUNTY, WYOMING

RREEPPOORRTT FFOORR MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR

SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS DEQ-WQD CHAPTER 23

FEBRUARY 2007

PREPARED FOR:

Sand Creek, the Ranch Preservation Co., LLC

SUBMITTED TO:

WYOMING DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY DIVISION

PREPARED BY:

Weston Engineering, Inc.

INTRODUCTION This document is prepared for Sand Creek, the Ranch Preservation Co., LLC, to aid in obtaining approval of the Department of Environmental Quality – Water Quality Division (DEQ) and the Johnson County Planner for the Sand Creek Ranch Planned Unit Development (PUD) outside Buffalo, Wyoming. This document is formatted to facilitate review of the DEQ following the requirements of DEQ rules and regulations found in Chapters 8, 11, 12, and 23. Figure 1 provides the topography and major geographic features within the development and all areas within one mile of the development boundaries. The base map is adapted from the USGS Lake DeSmet West (1977), Lake DeSmet East (1970), North Ridge (1993), and Buffalo (1970) 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles. Sand Creek Ranch PUD is located in Johnson County in Sections 17, 18, 19, and 20, Township 51 North, Range 82 West and Section 13, Township 51 North, Range 83 West. The proposed development consists of 99 one-acre lots contained within an 850 acre parcel. Approximately 750 acres will be held in common by the homeowners. The Sand Creek Ranch PUD will use individual on-site septic systems and water supply wells because of the low density of the housing units. Covenants and by-laws will allow for installation of wells and adsorption systems on common owned land if needed, on a case-by-case basis. It is possible that at some locations on the PUD that clustered homes may share an adsorption system or water well. This situation will be addressed on a case-by-case basis depending upon the benefits of such systems.

SAND CREEK RANCHPUD APPLICATION

LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1

N

WESTON

SCALE

SEO PERMITTED WELL LOCATIONS

HOME SITE LOCATIONS

SAND CREEK RANCH PUD

KEY

T51N

R 83 W R 82 W

SPRING COLLECTION POINT

19272

50073

6262819271

19273

Site Suitability for Individual Water Supply And Wastewater Systems Sand Creek Ranch Planned Unit Development, Johnson County Wyoming

2

CHAPTER 23 - SECTION 7 (a)(i) Type of Sewage System Disposal of domestic sewage will be made with individual on-lot septic systems with adsorption systems. Individual homeowners will be responsible for obtaining permits to install the disposal systems and hiring experienced installers. The Sand Creek Ranch PUD homeowners association will review all building plans prior to construction to ensure that the plans meet the development’s restrictive covenants and that they serve not only the good of the individual homeowner, but the community as a whole. At some locations on the PUD up to four homes may share a common adsorption system. At this time it is expected that no more than four homes will share an adsorption system to avoid the requirements of an underground injection control (UIC) permit. (a)(ii-iii) Adequacy of Sewer System Based on the general layout of this development, including the lot size of one acre, lot density, and subsurface conditions, individual on-lot septic disposal is adequate for this development. The Sand Creek Ranch PUD emphasizes residential clusters consisting of between two and 12 homes surrounded by undeveloped natural and agricultural lands. The remainder of this section of the report addresses the details of the sewer system assessment and compliance with applicable rules and regulations. (b)(i-v) New Central Sewage System This section is not applicable to the Sand Creek Ranch PUD because individual on-site septic systems will be used for wastewater disposal. It is anticipated that no more than four- three bedroom homes will be connected to an individual adsorption system to avoid being classified as an UIC facility. (c)(i-iii) Connection to Existing Central Sewage System This section is not applicable to the Sand Creek Ranch PUD because on-site septic systems will be used for wastewater disposal. (d) On-Lot Sewer System (d)(i) Groundwater and Impermeable Soils Separation Soils mapping on the Sand Creek Ranch PUD indicates that there are a total of 14 soil types on the development where houses and/or adsorption systems may be located. Soils mapping was recently completed for the Sand Creek Ranch area by the Buffalo, Wyoming office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The results of the soils mapping are provided on Figure 2 and descriptions are provided in Table 1. Weston Engineering, Inc. (WESTON) supervised the excavation of a 10-foot deep test pit in each of the soil types. General descriptions of the materials encountered, the thickness of the soils, and the depth to seasonal high groundwater are provided in Table 1. Detailed descriptions of the excavated materials, with photographs, are provided in Appendix A. Four of the fourteen soil types, 67A, 229D, 500, and E33C, have soils less than 10 feet thick. As observed in Table 1, two of the soils have thicknesses of only 7.5 feet. To ensure that the minimum separation of 4 feet from the base of the adsorption system to bedrock is attained as required by DEQ Rules and Regulations Chapter 11, Section 36 (c)(i)., the base must be buried no deeper than 3.5 feet below grade. This condition affects only three home sites in the east-central part of the development.

SAN

D C

REEK

RA

NC

HPU

D A

PPLICA

TION

SOILS M

AP

FIGU

RE 2 NW

ESTON

SCA

LE1" = 1,100'

Percolation Test S

itesS

OU

RC

E: N

RC

S B

UFFA

LO FIE

LD O

FFICE

TAB

LE 1 SO

ILS SUM

MA

RY TA

BLE

SOIL

TYPE

SO

IL NA

ME

SO

IL DESC

RIPTIO

N

SO

IL TH

ICK

NESS

(feet)

DEPTH

TO

SEASO

NA

L HIG

H

GR

OU

ND

WA

TER

(feet)

PER

CO

LATIO

N TEST

RESU

LTS (m

inutes per inch) 4A

Recluse – W

ages Com

plex

Pale brow

n clay loam

> 11.0

9.0

10, 10, 80

67A

Moskee Sandy Loam

Light grayish brown sandy loam

7.5

7.5

8.9, 40, 40

200DE

Cragola-Shingle-N

ihill Com

plex

Pale brown gravelly, clay loam

> 10.0

> 10.0

13.3, 16, 20

229D

Shingle-Taluce Com

plex

Light yellowish sandy loam

7.5

7.5

10, 26.7, 80

265AB Kishona-Zigw

eid- Cam

bria C

omplex

Pale brow

n sandy loam

> 10.0

> 10.0

5.3, 8, 8

283

Terro-Orpha-Taluce C

omplex

Light brow

nish gray sandy loam

> 10.0

9.0

40, 20, 40

367C

D

Bowbac-H

iland Com

plex

Yellowish brow

n sandy clay loam

> 10.0

> 10.0

20, 20, 40

500

Haverdad-W

orthenton Com

plex

Pale brown silty loam

9.5

> 10.0

8.9, 10, 16

508 H

argreave-Lambm

an Com

plex

Brown sandy loam

> 10.0

9.0

13.3, 13.3, 40

509 Kishona-Zigw

eid Com

plex

Pale brown sandy loam

> 10.0

> 10.0

40, 40, 40

E33C

Hiland Sandy C

lay Loam

Yellow

ish brown sandy clay loam

8.0

> 10.0

20, 26.6, 26.6

E67D

Moskee Sandy C

lay Loam

Light grayish brow

n sandy clay loam

> 10.0

> 10.0

8.9, 10, 20

H

36 N

uncho Loam

D

ark grayish brown clay loam

> 10.0

> 10.0

26, 26, 40

X48 H

eldt Clay Loam

Brow

nish gray silty clay

> 10.0

4.5

No Testing


3

Soils excavated from the test pits were examined for evidence of the presence of groundwater. Evidence for shallow groundwater includes wet soils, iron staining, and mottling of materials. As found in Appendix A, minor iron staining was observed at shallow depths in soil types 229D, 500, 508, 509, and E67D. However, with the exception of soil type 229D, these soils have been subjected to flood irrigation for decades and the iron staining is not believed to be from naturally occurring shallow groundwater. Due to drought conditions limiting irrigation water supplies, these soils have not been irrigated for over three years and no evidence of moisture was observed in the test pits. Without flood irrigation occurring on the home sites, sufficient separation between the adsorption system and the seasonal high groundwater can be achieved. Soil type 229D has not been irrigated and the iron staining is likely to be a relict of water sitting on top of low permeability clay. This soil type also has a percolation rate of 80 minutes per inch and will require special considerations when designing a domestic waste water disposal system. At the eastern end of the proposed development seven home sites are located near soil type X48. Vegetation on the ground surface suggested that shallow groundwater was present and excavation indicated that groundwater is present at a depth of 4.5 feet below the ground surface. Solutions for ensuring that at least four feet of separation is maintained between the base of the adsorption system and seasonal high groundwater include 1) installation of a pumped mounded adsorption system or 2) pumping leachate to adsorption systems located on ground without shallow groundwater located to the west of the impacted lots. This condition will impact up to seven home sites located adjacent to the X48 soil in the eastern part of the development. (d)(ii) Soil Percolation Tests Per DEQ Rules and Regulations Chapter 23, Section 7(d)(ii)(B), percolation tests are required for every third lot, or for each soil type as mapped by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), whichever requires the least number of percolation tests. A total of 39 percolation test holes, three in each mapped soil type, were drilled to a depth of 36 inches within the proposed subdivision. The locations of the percolation test holes are provided on Figure 2. The test holes were all approximately three feet deep and the percolation tests were run on the bottom 18-24 inches of the hole. The percolation tests were performed in accordance with procedures set forth in DEQ Rules and Regulations Chapter 11, Part D, Appendix A. Approximately three inches of gravel was placed in the bottom of the holes and the holes were filled with 24-inches of water. After allowing the test holes to soak overnight, the percolation tests were performed, with fluid level measurements being conducted every 10 minutes. The percolation test sheets are contained in Appendix B. The percolation rates are summarized, by soil type, in Table 1. The fastest percolation rate was 5.3 minutes per inch in soil type 265AB. Two soils, 4A and 229D, located on the west side of the proposed development had percolation rates of 80 minutes per inch. These percolation rates do not meet the acceptable range of less than one minute per inch per Chapter 11 Part D Section 36 (d) or greater than 60 minutes per inch per Chapter 11 Part D Section 38 (b). Table 2 provides a summary of the slowest percolation rate for each soil type tested, as well as the soil loading rate and minimum square footage for an adsorption field using chamber system units. It is assumed that each home will have three bedrooms and a daily wastewater production rate of 450 gallons and that each chamber will have an equivalent area of 35.4 square feet. For the purpose of this analysis it is assumed that a bed layout will be used for the adsorption system.


4

TABLE 2 PERCOLATION RATES, SOIL LOADING RATES,

AND ADSORPTION FIELD SIZE SUMMARY TABLE

SOIL TYPE

SLOWEST PERCOLATION

RATE (minutes per inch)

SOIL LOADING RATE

(gallons per day per square foot)

MINIMUM ADSORPTION FIELD

SIZE (square feet)

4A

80

NA

NA

67A

40

0.35

692

200DE

20

0.46

524

229D

80

NA

NA

265AB

8

0.68

355

283

40

0.35

692

367CD

40

0.35

692

500

16

0.505

486

508

40

0.35

692

509

40

0.35

692

E33C

26.6

0.41

580

E67D

20

0.46

524

H36

40

0.35

692

X48

No Testing

NA

NA

NA= Not applicable - mounded adsorption system will be required. (d)(iii) Slopes of Lots Figure 3 is a detailed land surface slope map of the Sand Creek Ranch PUD. The slopes depicted on the map were computed from aerial photography ESRI DEM grid files from a digital terrain model with a resolution of six inch pixels. DEQ-WQD Rules and Regulations Chapter 11 Part D Section 36 (e)(i) indicates that for slopes of less than 15%, percolation rates must be between one and 60 minutes per inch and for percolation rates of between 46 and 60 minutes per inch the maximum slope allowed is 15%. There are 11 home sites in the western and south central part of the proposed development on which the surface slopes are between 12 and 15 percent. Six of the eleven home sites are adjacent to land with slopes of less than 12 percent on which adsorption systems could easily be located. These sites are on soil types 4A, 229D, and 508. The slowest percolation rate for soil types 4A and 229D, on which the other five home sites are located, were 80 minutes per inch, which exceeds the rate allowable for a conventional adsorption system; therefore, a mounded system will be required or leachate will have to be pumped to a more suitable location. Because the Sand Creek Ranch PUD will allow installation

NWESTO

N

SCA

LE1" = 1,070'

SAN

D C

REEK

RA

NC

HPU

D A

PPLICA

TION

LAN

D SLO

PE MA

P FIG

UR

E 3

SO

UR

CE

: FOLE

Y G

RO

UP

GIS 2006


5

of adsorption fields on property managed by the homeowner’s association, pumping leachate to a suitable location to the east where slopes are less steep is a likely solution. Johnson County requires that domestic waste water disposal systems be designed by a professional engineer, which will ensure that any adsorption system be designed to meet both DEQ and Johnson County standards. The slowest percolation rate for soil type 500 is 40 minutes per inch, which is suitable for slopes up to 20%. All adsorption systems will be set at least 15 feet from any break in slope that exceeds 15 degrees to meet DEQ Rules and Regulations Chapter 11 Part D Section 36 (e)(ii). (d)(iv) USGS Map Figure 1 is a 1:24,000 scale base map showing the water sheds, drainages, and water bodies both within the Sand Creek Ranch PUD and within one mile of its boundaries. The Sand Creek Ranch PUD lies within the watersheds of Sand Creek and French Creek. Eighty-nine home sites lie within the Sand Creek drainage, while the 10 home sites south of the Hopkins Ditch in the south central part of the proposed development lie within the French Creek drainage. While several of the home sites are near ephemeral drainages and the mainstem of Sand Creek, all adsorption systems will maintain adequate separation distances from bodies of water as required in DEQ Rules and Regulations Chapter 11 Part D Section 35 (a)(i). (d)(v) Replacement Adsorption System Area As indicated in Table 2, it is anticipated that the maximum square footage of an adsorption field for a three bedroom home at Sand Creek Ranch will be 692 square feet. A replacement field of the same size should be easily sited on the one acre lots each PUD will have. If site conditions do not allow for installation of a replacement adsorption system, then the replacement fields can be located on lands held in common with approval from the homeowner’s association. In the event that a four bedroom home is built on one of the lots, the corresponding adsorption system would have a square footage of 916 square feet. Both the adsorption system and a replacement system should fit on most lots, or could be located on the commonly owned property with approval from the homeowner’s association. (d)(vi & vi A) Population-Wastewater Type There are 99 single-family residential dwelling lots proposed in the Sand Creek Ranch PUD. Current plans anticipate that the vast majority of the housing units will have three bedrooms, with a few homes having two bedrooms and a few with four bedrooms. Although it is expected that many of the homeowners in the Sand Creek Ranch PUD will be retirees with two persons per home; however, for the purpose of facilities design it is assumed that there will be 3 persons per home. Using this assumption the maximum population of the development at build out is 297 persons. No commercial, industrial, or multiple use development will be allowed and generated wastewater will be domestic in nature. (d)(vii) Groundwater and Surface Water Protection (d)(vii)(A)(I-III) Geology The Sand Creek Ranch PUD lies on the Wasatch Formation. The Wasatch Formation consists of interbedded claystones, sandstones, conglomerates, and coal beds (Whitcomb and others, 1966). Whitcomb and others (1966) report that the Wasatch Formation is between 1,000 and 2,000 feet in northern Johnson County, but no wells for which lithologic logs are available in the vicinity of the Sand Creek Ranch PUD have been reported to fully penetrate the Wasatch Formation. Even with lithologic logs, determining the contact between the Wasatch Formation and the underlying Fort Union Formation can be difficult (Whitcomb and others, 1966). A coal bed methane gas well in Section 20, Township 51 North, Range 82 West (API Number 49-019-


6

21128) was slated in 1999 to produce gas from a coal seam in the upper Fort Union Formation from a depth of 920 feet; however, the well was never drilled. According to geologic mapping by Hodson and others (1973) and Whitcomb and others (1966) there are no geologic structures, including faults, fractures, or karst features, in the area of the proposed development. The Wasatch Formation dips at 5 degrees to the east-northeast as measured on a sandstone outcrop in the SE ¼ Section 18, Township 51 North, Range 82 West. (d)(vii)(B)(I-IV) Groundwater Two distinct intervals of groundwater are encountered beneath the Sand Creek Ranch PUD. Shallow groundwater is observed at a small spring at an elevation of 4,920 feet in the NE ¼ NE ¼ Section 19, Township 51 North, Range 82 West and in a slough at an elevation of 4,850 feet in the SW ¼ SW ¼ Section 17, Township 51 North, Range 82 West. The spring in Section 19 was discharging between one and two gallons per minute on January 18, 2007. No water was observed moving at the slough in Section 19 and water only observed at a depth of 4.5 feet in a back hoe test pit. Although sandstones were not observed at either of these locations, it is likely that the source of the shallow groundwater is from drainage of a sandstone bed buried at a shallow depth. Five permitted water wells are located on the Sand Creek Ranch PUD. The wells vary in depth from 82 to 150 feet. Details for the wells in the Sand Creek Ranch PUD are summarized in Table 3 and copies of the statements of completion for the wells are provided in Appendix C. Jenkins #1 (U.W. 50073), which is 140 feet deep, has the highest production rate, of the five wells at 12 gallons per minute (gpm). The lithologic log for Jenkins #1 does not indicate that thick layers of shale or claystone overlay the production intervals (120-140 feet), but the fact that the well flows at the ground surface while the water is being produced from a depth of between 120 and 140 feet does indicate that the aquifer is confined. The statement of completion for Jenkins #3 (U.W. 42476), which is located a few hundred feet northeast of the Sand Creek Ranch PUD, is also included in Appendix C. The statements of completion and lithologic logs for U.W. 42726 and U.W. 62628 indicate that water is produced from sandstones and coal beds that underlie low permeability shales. The fact that the water levels in these two wells rises significantly above the production intervals indicates that the sandstones that yield water to the wells is confined. The low permeability shales prevent mingling of the shallow groundwater observed in the spring and slough from mixing with the deeper water. This is verified by the difference in water levels between the shallow groundwater and the water in the wells. An attempt was made to measure the water levels in the five Sand Creek Ranch water wells. A water level could not be obtained from Jenkins #1 because the well flows when it is not pumped and the wellhead is sealed. The water in Camino #2 was frozen at the ground surface, which prevented measurement of the water level. The water levels measured in the remaining three wells and the results are provided in Table 3. Water levels have not been routinely measured in the wells therefore the seasonal variations in water levels is not known. In a memorandum written by the State Engineers Office on August 26, 1985, water levels were measured in several area wells to investigate whether water levels had declined. The summer season water levels were found to be “somewhat lower” than water levels reported on statements of completion, but the decreases in water levels were attributed to increased lawn irrigation. A copy of the memorandum is contained in Appendix C attached to the statement of completion for U.W. 27905. (d)(vii)(C) Aquifer Classification (d)(vii)(C)(I) State Engineer Well Search The Wyoming State Engineer’s Office database was accessed from the internet on December 13, 2006 to conduct an inventory of permitted water wells located within one mile the proposed

TAB

LE 3 SA

ND

CR

EEK R

AN

CH

PUD

EXISTIN

G W

ELLS SUM

MA

RY

SEO

PERM

IT N

UM

BER

LO

CA

TION

*

WELL N

AM

E

WELL

ELEVATIO

N

(feet, asl)

TO

TAL

DEPTH

(feet)

STA

TIC

WA

TER

LEVEL (feet)***

PR

OD

UC

ING

IN

TERVA

L (feet)

YIELD

(gpm

)

ELEVATIO

N

OF STA

TIC

WA

TER

LEVEL (feet, asl)

19271

S

WS

E 18, 51, 82

C

amino #2

4,920

135

U

nknown

U

nknown

3

Unknow

n

19272

NE

SE

18, 51, 82

Cam

ino #3

4,890

150

3.5

Unknow

n 1

4,886.5

19273

N

ES

W 19, 51, 82

H

euermann #1

5,043

145

10

Unknow

n 5

5,033

50073

S

WS

W 17, 51, 82

Jenkins #1

4,860

140

U

nknown**

120-140

12

Unknow

n

62628

SW

SE

18, 51, 82

Jenkins Ranch #2

4,930

82 17

62-82

8

4,913 * ¼

, ¼ S

ection, Township, R

ange, ** Well flow

s when not being pum

ped, ***Water levels m

easured 1/10/07, Cam

ino #2 frozen


7

development boundary. A copy of the well search is contained in Table 4. The locations of the wells are plotted by quarter-quarter section. In many quarter-quarter sections the wells are too numerous to plot, therefore Figure 4 contains each section divided into quarter-quarters and the number of wells present in that area. (d)(vii)(C)(II-III) Groundwater Class Water samples were collected from the spring in the NE ¼ NE ¼ Section 19 and from Jenkins #1 for submission to an EPA certified laboratory for analysis. The analyses on each source were performed for the constituents listed in DEQ Rules and Regulations Chapter 8 Table 1, for determining the class of underground water. The results of the water quality sampling are summarized in Table 4 and copies of the analytical reports are provided in Appendix D. During sampling, the sample from the well was mistakenly identified as being from Jenkins Well No. 3, when in fact is was collected from Jenkins #1. Comparison of the results of the analyses demonstrate, that with the exception of pH, water from the confined aquifer which Jenkins #1 taps meets all the standards for Class I water. The pH of 6.13 standard units is below the lower threshold of 6.5 standard units. No nitrates or nitrates were detected in the well water. The spring in Section 19 is not developed and is therefore not sanitary, which accounts for the bacterial contamination observed in the laboratory results. Comparison of the results of the water quality analyses from the spring to the standards set by DEQ indicates that the water does not meet the requirements for either Class I or Class II water. The spring water exceeds the concentration of aluminum for Class II water, the hydrogen sulfide (as sulfide) for Class I water, the iron concentration for both Class I and Class II water, the manganese concentration for both Class I and Class II water, the oil and grease concentration for Class I water, the phenol concentration for Class I water, and the gross alpha concentration for both Class I and Class II water. (d)(vii)(D)&(d)(viii) Septic System Models The DEQ-WQD Chapter 23 Appendix A, Wehrmann Nitrate Model was used to estimate the cumulative nitrate loading from the proposed Sand Creek Ranch PUD. In an effort to be conservative in this modeling effort the Wehrmann model was run for all 99 lots of the subdivision. The quantity of infiltration used in the model was estimated to be from precipitation. The Wyoming water resources data system reports that the Buffalo area received an average of 15 inches of precipitation between 1971 and 2000. Because Wyoming’s climate is dry it is assumed that only 10-percent of precipitation infiltrates into the ground and reaches the vadose zone. The total acreage of the subdivision is 850 acres and for the purposes of this model it is assumed that the homes will have an average of three bedrooms. The hydraulic conductivity or “K” value was estimated from percolation testing. Six of the 13 tested soil types had percolation rates of 40 minutes per inch, which yields an estimated hydraulic conductivity of 3.0 feet per day. Using this value maximized the model’s nitrate output resulting in a worst-case scenario. The hydraulic gradient was calculated using a three point solution based on the water levels and elevations of the water wells with State Engineer’s Office permit numbers U.W. 19273, 62628, and 32622. Although these wells produce water from the confined aquifer the consistent dips of the formations make it likely that shallow groundwater will either follow the same gradient or follow the surface topography. The calculated hydraulic gradient is 0.037 feet per foot in a direction of North 33 degrees East. It was assumed that each lot would have one-half acre of irrigated lawn per lot, although actual irrigated acreage will likely be only one-quarter acre per lot. The ambient nitrate levels were obtained from the water quality analyses, which were non-detect. Based on these inputs the model predicts that the 99 lots will result in a total cumulative nitrate load of 1.0 mg/L, which is a full order of magnitude lower than the 10 mg/L maximum concentration allowed in the WDEQ Chapter 23 Rules and Regulations.

SAND CREEK RANCHPUD APPLICATION

WELL LOCATION MAP FIGURE 4

N

WESTON

SCALE

SEO PERMITTED WELL LOCATIONSSEE TABLE 5.

6 8

9 5 8 15

12 6 5

6

8

9

8

3

SAND CREEK RANCH BOUNDARY

131021

116311

116312

18099

66097

56422

10344030475

103426

21917

109499

161195

121610

110960

113818

147016

118663

5225155143

17458

116590

86346

125132

114708

13005432381

103158

85250

64852

95361

12545662628

19271 18728

42726

19272

19273

35/8/191 48643

84853

11630739/2/94

7626

169420

169419131024

13724

29737361

15108125738

16043

39/2/1703266246248

1465

2833011777311842832522

341941447971020032608811857

43602116304

27902

15108 SEO PERMITTED WELL LOCATION AND PERMIT NUMBER


8

WDEQ Chapter 23 Appendix B, Minimum isolation distance was used to calculate the vertical travel time and 2 year horizontal travel time for each lot. The vertical travel time is calculated to be 89 days based on 315 inches for “AP” and the total volumetric soil moisture was estimated from the Table 1 provided by WDEQ. The depth to seasonal high groundwater was estimated to be 10 feet, which was indicated from most of the soil test pits on the site. The two year horizontal time of travel distance is calculated to be 712 feet, based on inputs of 3 feet/day for K, a hydraulic gradient of 0.037 feet/foot and an effective porosity of 10-percent. This predict indicates that neighboring properties should not be affected by wastewater disposal from the Sand Creek Ranch PUD and that what little fluid may leave the property will have an estimated nitrate concentration of 1 mg/L.


9

TABLE 4 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTS

SEO Permit Number

Water Quality Standard

Class I Water*

Water Quality Standard

Class II Water*

Jenkins # 1 U.W. 50073

Spring NE ¼ NE ¼ Section 19

Total Depth (feet)

-

-

140

Ground Level

Formation - - Wasatch Wasatch Date Collected - - 1/11/07 1/18/07

Aluminum (mg/L)

-

5.0

ND

7.4

Ammonia (mg/L)

0.5

-

0.09

0.30

Arsenic (mg/L) 0.05 0.1 ND 0.004 Barium (mg/L) 1.0 - ND 0.3 Boron (mg/L) 0.75 0.75 ND 0.2

Cadmium (mg/L)

0.01

0.01

ND

ND

Chloride (mg/L) 250 100.0 9 4 Chromium

(mg/L)

0.05

0.1

ND

ND Copper (mg/L) 1.0 0.2 ND ND Cyanide (mg/L) 0.2 - ND ND Fluoride (mg/L) 1.4-2.4 - 0.1 0.2

Hydrogen Sulfide (mg/L)

0.05

-

ND

11.4

Iron (mg/L) 0.3 5.0 ND 42.1 Lead (mg/L) 0.05 5.0 ND ND Manganese

(mg/L)

0.05

0.2

0.01

0.79 Mercury (mg/L) 0.002 - ND ND

Nitrate as N (mg/L)

10

-

ND

ND

Nitrite as N (mg/L)

1.0

-

ND

ND

Oil and Grease Virtually Free 10.0 ND 6.5 Phenol (mg/L) 0.001 - ND 0.027

Selenium (mg/L) 0.01 0.02 ND ND Silver (mg/L) 0.05 - ND ND

Sulfate (mg/L) 250 200.0 96 108 Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L)

500 2000.0 318 446

Uranium 5.0 5.0 ND 0.0292 Zinc (mg/L) 5.0 2.0 0.08 0.03

pH (S.U.) 6.5 – 8.5 4.5-9.0 6.13 7.84 Gross Alpha

(pCi/L)

15

15

ND

30.2 +/-1.6 *Source DEQ-WQD Chapter 8, Table 1. ND = NOT DETECTED


10

CHAPTER 23 - SECTION 8 (a)(i) Type of Water Supply The water supply needs for the Sand Creek Ranch PUD will be met with on-site wells. It is anticipated that individual wells will be drilled to meet the needs of each lot owner. As stated above, if water supply wells need to be drilled off of the one-acre fee lots to meet minimum offsets from wastewater disposal facilities and adsorption system replacement reservations, then the lot owners will have the ability to site wells on the lands owned in common. It may be preferable to have groups of homes share a common water well. Up to three homes can be connected to a single well and remain a domestic water well under the State Engineer’s Office rules and regulations. Installation of a common well to be shared among homeowners would require installation of storage facilities and booster pumps to each home. Figures 5 and 6 are generic designs, previously approved by DEQ-WQD, for storage and distribution systems for three homes sharing a water well within a subdivision. Minor adjustments to this design could be required for site specific conditions and to account for actual production of the water well. Any such system should be designed by a professional engineer. (a)(ii) Average and Maximum Water Usage It is assumed that the 99 lots will have an average population of 3.5 persons. The build-out population of the Sand Creek Ranch PUD, if a home is built on each lot, will be 347 persons. DEQ-WQD Rules and Regulations Chapter 12 Section 8 (a) states that a design rate 125 gallons per day per person can be used for an average daily demand and a rate of 340 gallons per day per person can be used for a peak day demand if no consumption data are available. Application of these per capita demands to the build out population of 347 persons results in an average daily demand of 43,375 gallons (30 gpm) and a peak daily demand of 117,980 gallons (82 gpm). Sand Creek Ranch has territorial surface water rights that will be transferred to the Sand Creek Ranch PUD homeowners association. Water rights on the individual 99 fee lots will be managed for each lot by the homeowners association. The Sand Creek Ranch PUD will have an irrigation system that allows for lawn watering for use by the home owners using a portion of the appropriated water rights. Architectural covenants will limit the size of irrigated lawns and lots will have up to 500 gallons per day for watering from the surface water source. This supplemental source of supply will serve to significantly reduce the peak daily demand on the potable water supply sources; therefore, the actual peak daily demand will be lower than the 82 gpm projected above. (a)(iii) Water Well - Septic System Compatibility As described previously, water wells drilled to depths below 80 feet exhibit a significant degree of confinement and leachate from septic systems is not likely to migrate into the sandstones yielding drinking water to wells. Furthermore, the nitrate modeling indicates that in a worst-case scenario the nitrate concentrations could rise by only one mg/L. Since the confined aquifer beneath the Sand Creek Ranch PUD has an effective nitrate concentration of 0 mg/L, the model predicts that the nitrate concentration would be far below the maximum contaminant level of 10 mg/L. (a)(iv) Surface and Groundwater Rights Currently several surface water and groundwater rights are held by Sand Creek Ranch. Table 3 provides details of the permitted wells for which rights are held by Sand Creek Ranch. Copies of the statements of completion are provided in Appendix C. A water rights inventory was compiled by Mr. Frank Carr of Water Right Services in 2004. The report provided by Mr. Carr is provided in Appendix F. Sand Creek Ranch will be transferring all existing water rights to the Sand Creek Ranch PUD for management for use by the ranch community.

SAN

D C

REEK

RA

NC

HPU

D A

PPLICA

TION

STOR

AG

E / PUM

P CO

NTR

OL VA

ULT D

ETAILS

FIGU

RE 5

SCA

LE1" = 2'

WA

TTS 742-2

CH

EC

K V

ALVE

BALL VALV

E

STE

EL R

UN

GSTE

PS IN

TO V

AULT (2)

LIGH

T INSEA

LED

GLO

BEPU

MP C

ON

TRO

LB

OX C

IRC

UIT BR

EAKER

BO

X

24-INC

HFR

OS

T-FRE

EM

ANW

AYS (2)

BR

AS

S U

NIO

N

40 / 70 #P

RE

SS

UR

ESW

ITCH

0 - 100 #P

RE

SS

UR

E G

AU

GE

119 GA

LLON

PR

ES

SU

RE

TAN

KS

1 1/4-INC

HH

DP

E LIN

E TO

RE

SID

EN

CE

S1 1/4-IN

CH

HD

PE

LINE

FRO

M W

ELL

VAU

LT DIM

ENSIO

NS

HE

IGH

T = 8 FEE

TLE

NG

TH = 8 FEE

TW

IDTH

= 6 FEE

T

1,000 WA

TTH

EA

TER

BALL VALV

E

SAN

D C

REEK

RA

NC

HPU

D A

PPLICA

TION

SCH

EMA

TIC D

ISTRIB

UTIO

N PIPELIN

E DIA

GR

AM

FIGU

RE 6

1 1/4-INC

HH

DP

E LIN

E TO

RE

SID

EN

CE

S

1 1/4-INC

H H

DP

E LIN

EFR

OM

WE

LL

STOR

AG

E AN

DPU

MP C

ON

TRO

LV

AU

LT

RE

SID

EN

CE

RE

SID

EN

CE

RE

SID

EN

CE

10 GP

M FLO

W R

ES

TRIC

TOR

WATTS 742-2 C

HE

CK VALVE

MU

LLER

MA

RK

II CU

RB

STO

P

10 GP

M FLO

W R

ES

TRIC

TOR

WATTS 742-2 C

HE

CK VALVE

MU

LLER

MA

RK

II CU

RB

STO

P

10 GP

M FLO

W R

ES

TRIC

TOR

WATTS 742-2 C

HE

CK VALVE

MU

LLER

MA

RK

II CU

RB

STO

P

WE

LL

TEE

FITTING

TEE

FITTING

NO

SCA

LE

SEE DETA

ILSIN

FIGU

RE 5


11

(a)(v) Mitigation of Impacts To date there have been no documented impacts to surrounding property owners as a function of groundwater withdrawals. It is not anticipated that impacts will occur as a result of developing a groundwater supply for the 99 lots on the Sand Creek Ranch PUD. The potential for further impact is further lessened by the ability of the Sand Creek Ranch PUD to use existing surface water irrigation rights to meet peak day demands on potable water that are a result of limited lawn watering. If impacts are proven to be the result of this subdivision, the homeowners would be forced to reduce water usage, and/or drill wells deeper, such that they are not all impacting the same production intervals. (b) Connection to Existing Water Supply System This section is not applicable to the Sand Creek Ranch PUD because individual water wells will be used to meet the water demands of the residents. (c) Common Water Supply System This section is not applicable to the Sand Creek Ranch PUD because individual or clustered water wells will be used to meet the water demands of the residents. (d) Groundwater Quantity and Quality As detailed in Table 3, the five water wells are located on the Sand Creek Ranch PUD yield between one and 12 gpm. A review of Table 5, the permitted water well summary table, indicates that 100 wells in the vicinity yield between 10 and 20 gpm. A well with a capacity of five gpm will provide adequate water for a single family dwelling, especially if irrigation of lawns is partially satisfied with surface water. Whitcomb and others (1966) documented a pump test on a well in the SE ¼ SE ¼ Section 33, Township 51 North, Range 82 West, which is approximately two miles southeast of the Sand Creek Ranch PUD. The well was pump tested at 70 gpm for four hours with 46 feet of drawdown. The specific capacity was computed to be 1.5 gpm per foot of drawdown. These well data indicate that the likelihood of obtaining adequate quantities of water for the Sand Creek Ranch PUD is excellent. The overall quality of water from Jenkins #1 is very good, as demonstrated in Table 4. The TDS is well below the recommended level of 500 mg/L. The only deviation from the standards for a public water supply source is the pH, which is slightly below the minimum standard of 6.5 standard units. Similar qualities can be expected from wells drilled to similar depths.

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P143021W3/4/2002

GSI

5182

7SESW

JOY E. ED

WAR

DS/JAN

IS L. H

ARRIS

EDW

ARD

S/HAR

RIS #

1D

OM

P154071W9/12/2003

GSI

5182

7N

ESWL1

TIMO

THY S &

LORI L KALU

SKALU

S #1

DO

M,ST

O

P161194W8/4/2004

GSI

5182

7SW

NW

CHAR

LES IRIG

ARAY &

CARO

L SN

OBE L

CARO

LINA #

2D

OM

,STO

P168942W7/13/2005

GSI

5182

7SW

SWSU

E & BU

D LED

BETTERLED

BETTER W

ELL #1

DO

MP103158W

7/29/1996G

ST51

827

NW

SER.C. R

OBIN

SON

RO

BINSO

N #

2D

OM

3520

104475

525P110960W

7/20/1998G

ST51

827

SWSW

FTP PARTN

ERSH

IPArk #

2D

OM

8280

55250

275

P113818W1/27/1999

GST

5182

7SW

S WBO

B COM

PTON

MIKEY #

1D

OM

9360

55U

nknown

Unknow

nP114708W

3/24/1999G

ST51

827

SESWL4

KIM/U

RSU

LA SCHW

IRIAN

SCHW

IRIAN

#1

DO

M10

32035

240320

P116590W6/21/1999

GST

5182

7SEN

WKEN

BURTO

NKEN

BURTO

N #

1D

OM

20100

20U

nknown

Unknow

n

P121610W12/20/1999

GST

5182

7N

WSW

MILLER

SAND

CREEK R

ANCH

, LLC

MILLER

#3

DO

M,ST

O7

2207

130210

P125132W4/27/2000

GST

5182

7SESW

L12KELLY D

. & G

EORG

IA A. RICE

RICE 1

DO

M12

12020

Unknow

nU

nknown

P130054W10/18/2000

GST

5182

7SESW

L3SH

AWN

/MICH

ELLE WELSH

WELSH

# 1

DO

M15

52055

Unknow

nU

nknown

P155143W11/19/2003

GST

5182

7N

ENW

FLOYD

D &

LORI L. CU

MM

ING

SCU

MM

ING

S #1

DO

M4

24026

195225

P161195W8/4/2004

GST

5182

7SW

NW

CHAR

LES IRIG

ARAY &

CARO

L SN

OBE L

CARO

LINA #

1D

OM

1060

40U

nknown

Unknow

n

P17458W12/27/1972

GST

5182

7SEN

WM

ARSH

ALL D. JEN

KINS

JENKIN

S #1

DO

M,ST

O10

29060

225244

P32381W3/3/1976

GST

5182

7SW

SECLAIR

& ELO

GEN

E P. RO

BINSO

NPIER

SON

#ž

DO

M3

260260

Unknow

nU

nknown

P5225W4/6/1970

GST

5182

7N

ENW

EDVIG

O &

HELEN

G. W

INTH

ERW

INTH

ER #

1D

OM

6220

31185

220

P85250W5/31/1991

GST

5182

7SW

NE

R. TR

ACY RH

OD

ESR. T. R

HO

DES #

1D

OM

,STO

10124

1896

116

P86346W10/9/1991

GST

5182

7SEN

WTH

OM

AS AND

BARBAR

A D

ENN

ISON

BLUEBIR

D #

1D

OM

10260

220220

260P109570W

4/10/1998U

NA

5182

7N

ENW

HEN

RY &

/OR VED

A M. BAU

ERH

ILLTOP #

1 WELL

DO

M

P165070W2/2/2005

GSI

5182

8SESE

DAVE R

EDD

RO

CK CREEK M

EADO

WS

#3

TST

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P165071W2/2/2005

GSI

5182

8SW

NW

DAVE R

EDD

RO

CK CREEK M

EADO

WS

#1

TST

P165072W2/2/2005

GSI

5182

8SW

SED

AVE RED

DRO

CK CREEK M

EADO

WS

#2

TST

P16243P12/31/1967

GST

5182

8SEN

EALVA TAYLO

R**G

EORG

E TAYLO

RTAYLO

R #

3D

OM

,STO

5900

-4U

nknown

Unknow

n

39/10/163W7/12/2006

UN

A51

828

NESE

DAW

SON

CON

STRU

CTION

, INC.

DAW

SON

WELL #

1D

OM

39/10/89W6/12/2006

UN

A51

828

NESE

SEAN &

LYNETTE D

URRAN

TS &

L DU

RRAN

T WELL

#1

DO

M39/4/307W

9/25/2006U

NA

5182

8SW

SEJO

HN

& CATH

ERIN

E DESCH

DESCH

#1

DO

M39/5/173W

7/18/2006U

NA

5182

8N

ESWD

AN &

MO

NICA D

AUG

HER

TYD

AUG

HER

TY #1

DO

M39/5/186W

7/26/2006U

NA

5182

8N

ESWM

ICHAEL J. CECELIA L IH

NAT

CECE #1

DO

M39/8/78W

6/7/2006U

NA

5182

8SW

NW

MICH

AEL J. CECELIA L IHN

ATCECELIA #

1D

OM

P104525W11/21/1996

GST

5182

16N

ENE

GLEN

MEAN

SG

LEN M

EANS #

4D

OM

14160

2140

160

P16043P4/30/1955

GST

5182

16SW

SWREEVES IN

C.RO

BINSO

N #

1STO

15220

-1U

nknown

Unknow

n

P95286W5/5/1994

GST

5182

16N

WN

ED

ELTON

AND

CARO

L A. H

ERM

ANH

ERM

AN #

1D

OM

16123

1095

119

P28330W10/8/1974

ADJ

5182

17SESW

CARL H

. LARSO

NLAR

SON

#1

STO,IRR

,DO

M40

250150

140250

P42392W3/14/1978

ADJ

5182

17N

WN

ELAN

NY R

. PETERSO

N**PAU

LA M

. PETERSO

NPETER

SON

#3

DO

M20

26070

240260

P159882W6/1/2004

GSE

5182

17SW

NW

DO

NALD

M/TIN

A A SEALSSEALS #

3D

OM

,STO

P159883W6/1/2004

GSE

5182

17SW

NW

DO

NALD

M/TIN

A A SEALSSEALS #

4D

OM

,STO

P173012W2/6/2006

GSI

5182

17N

ENW

GREG

ORY LAU

VERLAU

VER #

1D

OM

P100049W8/15/1995

GST

5182

17N

WSE

L14RICH

ARD

B/MAR

Y ANN

BAYERS

BAYERS #

1D

OM

10220

60180

220

P102003W4/8/1996

GST

5182

17N

ENW

L15,BM

ATTHEW

HEN

RY

LON

GH

ORN

#3

DO

M10

12030

80120

P104511W11/14/1996

GST

5182

17SEN

WL1,B2

JAMES A/O

R FLO

REN

CE E LON

GLO

NG

#1

DO

M,ST

O6

134

411

P106818W7/24/1997

GST

5182

17N

WN

WL13

ORLEN

L FYOCK

FYOCK #

1D

OM

20212

3200

205

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P116304W6/16/1999

GST

5182

17N

ESWL26

GAR

Y L FOSTM

EIER/BAR

BARA

SCHN

ACHTEN

BERG

ER AS JO

INT

TENAN

TSCH

AMBER

LAIN #

1D

OM

15275

150U

nknown

Unknow

n

P116305W6/16/1999

GST

5182

17SEN

EW

ILLIAM CH

RISTEN

SENCH

RISTEN

SEN #

1STO

10100

40U

nknown

Unknow

n

P116306W6/16/1999

GST

5182

17SEN

EW

ILLIAM CH

RISTEN

SENCH

RISTEN

SEN #

2STO

25300

10U

nknown

Unknow

n

P117773W7/26/1999

GST

5182

17SESW

TED/D

ARLEN

E CRISM

ANCR

ISMAN

WELL N

O. 1

DO

M,S T

O7

20025

Unknow

nU

nknown

P117993W7/23/1999

GST

5182

17N

WN

ERobert/Jean Zabloudil

ZAB 31D

OM

16259

28U

nknown

Unknow

nP117999W

7/30/1999G

ST51

8217

SENE

L29G

ary/Cecelia Walters

WALTER

S #1

DO

M18

28045

260275

P118427W8/19/1999

GST

5182

17SW

SEPER

YR/LEN

ORE TH

ORN

ETH

ORN

E #1

DO

M10

13068

100130

P118428W8/20/1999

GST

5182

17SESW

L1W

ILLIAM J/JER

RI LYN

NE

HAN

SENBETZ #

1 WELL

DO

M,ST

O25

18040

Unknow

nU

nknown

P118570W8/17/1999

GST

5182

17N

WSE

L28RICH

ARD

L BOYLE**BETTY M

G

RESS

BOYLE/G

RESS #

2D

OM

18028

122180

P118574W8/27/1999

GST

5182

17N

ENW

RICH

ARD

L/OR CO

NN

IE R

JON

ESJO

NES #

1D

OM

,STO

18275

6070

115

P118656W8/31/1999

GST

5182

17N

WN

EL19

PAULA A W

ILCOX**N

ARCELLA

PRESTO

NPR

ESTON

E AND

W

ILCOX #

1D

OM

20260

70240

260

P119025W9/17/1999

GST

5182

17SEN

ERO

LAND

L/SHIR

LEY A PR

ITCHAR

DPR

ITCHAR

D #

1D

OM

15285

90.5U

nknown

Unknow

n

P119472W9/1/1999

GST

5182

17N

WN

ED

EAN/CAR

OL H

AZLETTH

AZLETT #1

DO

M25

26575

Unknow

nU

nknown

P119473W9/1/1999

GST

5182

17N

WN

ED

EAN/CAR

OL H

AZLET TH

AZLETT #2

DO

M10

14560

Unknow

nU

nknown

P120815W7/27/1999

GST

5182

17N

WN

ESandra Tw

eed yTw

eedy #1

DO

M8

21058

Unknow

nU

nknown

P126286W6/21/2000

GST

5182

17N

WSW

L1ELM

ER/TER

ESE GILL

GILL #

1D

OM

20150

26111

134

P126601W1/11/2000

GST

5182

17SEN

EL6

Edward E. &

Lalene Coo kCook #

1D

OM

12180

82.48U

nknown

Unknow

n

P126603W6/26/2000

GST

5182

17SW

NW

RO

BERT H

. & R

UTH

ANN

E M

CCANN

R &

R ACR

ESD

OM

,STO

250

13U

nknown

Unknow

n

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P131015W11/29/2000

GST

5182

17N

WSE

L12JO

HN

NEPH

I AND

KAREN

KAYE SH

AWAKER

S # 1

DO

M25

260100

145155

P135626W6/13/2001

GST

5182

17SEN

EL4

JAMES / M

ARCIA STR

AIGH

TSTR

AIGH

T # 2

DO

M9

22085

178200

P13719W4/21/1972

GST

5182

17SEN

EFR

ED H

ART

HAR

T #1

STO3

229-1

195228

P144014W4/18/2002

GST

5182

17SW

NE

L43D

ON

ALD M

./TINA A. SEALS

SEALS # 2

DO

M,ST

O12

195-4

165190

P144797W6/13/2002

GST

5182

17N

ENW

BRU

CE C./PEGG

Y J. CHATW

ELLG

OO

SE LAND

ING

# 1

DO

M5

200-4

175195

P1466W4/6/1965

GST

5182

17N

WS W

DU

ANE A. &

CARO

L J. AHLER

SLIM

MER

#2

DO

M,ST

O3

120-6

120

P162384W9/20/2004

GST

5182

17N

ENW

STANLEY AN

D R

AFAELA AR

MSTR

ON

GRAFAELA #

1D

OM

18180

1880

160

P164946W1/20/2005

GST

5182

17SW

NE

L13RO

NN

& D

IANA YELLEN

YELLEN #

2D

OM

,STO

20660

0590

630

P18728P12/31/1942

GST

5182

17SW

S WD

UAN

E A. & CAR

OL J. AH

LERS

CAMIN

O #

1D

OM

1140

-1U

nknown

Unknow

n

P22462W6/18/1973

GST

5182

17SW

NW

SIRM

ON

S PRO

PERTIES

RO

SE #1

DO

M,ST

O10

1720

164170

P26088W3/5/1974

GST

5182

17N

ENW

GREG

ORY A/D

ARLEN

E M

LAUVER

ED R

OSE #

1D

OM

,STO

25150

-4117

149P27553W

8/5/1974G

ST51

8217

NW

SEJO

HN

H. LU

SHER

LUSH

ER #

1D

OM

25180

28120

170

P27902W8/26/1974

GST

5182

17N

WS W

RO

BERT A. &

JEANN

E A. JEN

KINS

JENKIN

S #2

DO

M24

24052

221238

P27903W8/26/1974

GST

5182

17SW

NW

RO

BERT A. &

JEANN

E A. JEN

KINS

JENKIN

S #1

DO

M12

20033

173190

P28331W10/8/1974

GST

5182

17SW

SEL6

ERIC/JILL M

FELBECKRO

GER

S #1

DO

M,S T

O25

31054

304309

P29336W3/17/1975

GST

5182

17SW

SETH

OM

AS R. KLAU

SNE R

KLAUSN

ER #

1D

OM

7204

203U

nknown

Unknow

n

P29567W4/21/1975

GST

5182

17SW

SED

UAN

E S. & CAR

YL K. STAFFO

RD

TOW

NSEN

D #

1D

OM

10226

75U

nknown

Unknow

n

P29731W5/5/1975

GST

5182

17SW

NW

WILLIAM

E. & BETTY A.

MCKIN

STR YM

CKINSTR

Y #1

DO

M,ST

O13

187-6

166186

P30416W7/9/1975

GST

5182

17SEN

EFR

ED M

. HAR

TH

ART #

5D

OM

,STO

8145

125125

145

P31070W9/8/1975

GST

5182

17SEN

EFR

ED M

. HAR

TH

ART #

6D

OM

,STO

12180

140140

180

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P31087W9/25/1975

GST

5182

17N

ESEFR

ED M

. HAR

TH

ART #

7D

OM

,STO

25190

169.5155

190

P31764W12/22/1976

GST

5182

17N

WSE

R. M

. TOW

NSEN

D**M

ARK E.

MEN

GER

ING

MEN

GER

ING

#1

DO

M15

18080

138180

P31915W1/29/1976

GST

5182

17N

WSW

LEO D

AVID EN

NIS

ENN

IS #1

DO

M9

10020

70100

P32511W3/12/1976

GST

5182

17N

WSE

CHAR

LES G. IR

IGAR

AYIR

IGAR

AY #1

DO

M25

13068

100130

P32522W3/25/1976

GST

5182

17SESW

ALLEN &

VIRG

INIA CR

ANE

CRAN

E #1

DO

M16

11020

55108

P33039W4/19/1976

GST

5182

17SEN

EM

. J. SOKO

LSO

KOL #

1D

OM

,STO

8120

6080

120

P33085W5/13/1976

GST

5182

17SEN

WLAN

NY R

. & PAU

LA M.

PETERSO

NPETER

SON

#1

DO

M20

14040

100140

P33658W6/7/1976

GST

5182

17SW

NW

DALE &

ANITA LEISCH

NER

FISH W

ATER W

ELL #1

DO

M10

16075

134U

nknown

P34194W7/22/1976

GST

5182

17N

ENE

JAMES R

. RO

BERTS

RO

BERTS #

1D

OM

10210

58180

210

P34344W8/2/1976

GST

5182

17SEN

WM

. FORREST JEN

KINS

J.C.P.R. #

1D

OM

,STO

15200

50140

200

P34785W9/10/1976

GST

5182

17SEN

ED

OU

GLASS C. &

SHER

RI W

. SCH

ALAMO

NJO

HN

SON

#1

DO

M6

22042

196219

P36098W2/15/1977

GST

5182

17SW

NW

CARL L. &

FAY L. WAU

GH

WAU

GH

#1

DO

M15

1903

130142

P36465W3/14/1977

GST

5182

17N

WN

WM

ORM

AN KEN

ITZERN

. KENITZER

#2

DO

M25

205150

150204

P37995W5/23/1977

GST

5182

17N

WSE

ALLEN D

. AND

PHYLLIS J.

BRO

GE

BRO

GE #

1D

OM

25280

160U

nknown

Unknow

n

P38047W6/2/1977

GST

5182

17SEN

WLAN

NY R

. & PAU

LA M.

PETERSO

NPETER

SON

#2

DO

M25

275140

195275

P40434W10/13/1977

GST

5182

17N

WSE

LARRY &

MAR

ILYN KO

EHLER

KOEH

LERS #

2D

OM

10300

44225

300

P42319W3/2/1978

GST

5182

17N

WN

WL11

CUTIS L TH

OM

PSON

& JO

HN

C. BU

RIE, TR

USTEES TH

E PRAIR

IE TR

UST

MILLER

#1

DO

M,ST

O12

17540

Unknow

n150

P43020W4/25/1978

GST

5182

17SEN

EH

ARVEY L. &

GRACE C.

STRECKER

STRECKER

#1

DO

M10

200180

160200

P43601W5/23/1978

GST

5182

17SW

NW

BENJAM

IN A. AU

STINLEETA #

2D

OM

20105

-685

Unknow

nP43602W

6/5/1978G

ST51

8217

NESW

Melvin W

/Doris A G

erholdPETER

SON

#4

DO

M15

23070

188230

P43604W6/5/1978

GST

5182

17SW

NE

ALMIT &

NAN

CY BERG

LUN

DN

ANCY #

1D

OM

10235

70185

230

P43770W6/12/1978

GST

5182

17SEN

EL10

SHAN

E A LEWIS/LIN

DA J

WALKE R

B S #2

DO

M8

135110

115130

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P44112W7/7/1978

GST

5182

17N

WN

WSH

ERM

AN C. &

ESTHER

L. BU

RN

SSU

SIE Q #

1D

OM

5250

230218

235

P45046W9/21/1978

GST

5182

17N

WN

WKEN

NETH

L. & SU

SAN D

. FR

EEMAN

FREEM

AN #

1D

OM

1075

1473

75P45639W

10/24/1978G

ST51

8217

SENE

L1M

IKE & CH

RISTIN

E SAMIETZ

SAMIETZ #

1D

OM

8150

50130

150

P47172W4/5/1979

GST

5182

17N

WN

EJAM

ES E. & CO

NN

IE L. PORTER

PRO

TER #

1D

OM

20280

90115

Unknow

nP48429W

6/6/1979G

ST51

8217

SWN

EBO

B & M

ARILYN

NEILL

JATON

A #1

DO

M10

260140

205260

P50073W9/24/1979

GST

5182

17SW

S WELIZABETH

R. JEN

KINS

JENKIN

S #1

DO

M,ST

O12

140-4

105140

P52074W5/7/1980

GST

5182

17SW

NE

WAYN

E M. &

JUD

Y M.

SUTH

ERLAN

DN

SS12246D

OM

18280

45260

280

P52227W5/22/1980

GST

5182

17N

WS W

GAR

Y D. &

SHAR

ON

R.

WILLIAM

SESSIE #

1D

OM

1280

2062

80

P52264W5/28/1980

GST

5182

17N

WS W

RICH

ARD

G. &

NAN

CY E. PALLISTE R

PINE LAKE #

1D

OM

1092

2062

92

P52266W5/30/1980

GST

5182

17N

WS W

GREG

ORY LEE &

MAR

Y ANN

G

ARM

ANG

ARM

AN #

1D

OM

20200

45U

nknown

20P52312W

6/4/1980G

ST51

8217

SWN

WJO

HN

HU

NTER

HU

NTER

#1

DO

M10

8528

6585

P52998W7/15/1980

GST

5182

17SEN

ERICH

ARD

& JU

DY SCH

EIHIN

GJ &

R #

1D

OM

15230

140U

nknown

Unknow

n

P56850W5/12/1981

GST

5182

17SEN

EH

ARVEY L. &

GRACE C.

STRECKER

STRECKER

#2

DO

M10

10048

Unknow

nU

nknown

P58102W9/8/1981

GST

5182

17N

WS W

CHAR

LES R. &

DIAN

NE PEN

NA

GO

RSKI

TENN

ESSEE #7

DO

M10

1205

104120

P58971W11/19/1981

GST

5182

17SESE

BUFFALO

FEDER

AL SAVING

S AN

D LO

AN ASSO

CIATION

MACD

ON

ALD #

1D

OM

5200

-4180

200P59332W

1/15/1982G

ST51

8217

NW

SWALFR

ED P. W

EEDEN

WEED

EN #

2D

OM

8130

4120

130P59399W

1/25/1982G

ST51

8217

SWN

WRO

BERT C. M

AYM

AY #1

DO

M10

170-4

145165

P61088W6/7/1982

GST

5182

17N

WSW

ALFRED

P. WEED

ENW

EEDEN

#3

DO

M8

1108

98103

P65213W8/22/1983

GST

5182

17SEN

WJO

HN

C. PEETPEET #

1D

OM

12120

12110

120

P65411W9/8/1983

GST

5182

17SEN

EJAM

ES A. & JO

AN M

. BERN

ING

JOSIE #

1D

OM

12218

40197

215

P69046W11/20/1984

GST

5182

17N

ESWJO

HN

C. & R

OSEM

ARY A. CAR

RCAR

R #

1D

OM

10275

150U

nknown

Unknow

n

P72647W6/9/1986

GST

5182

17N

WS W

GER

ALD J. &

LIND

A K. METZER

METZER

#1

DO

M6

170-4

160170

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P72947W7/17/1986

GST

5182

17SW

NE

URAL H

ORTO

NU

RAL #

1D

OM

,STO

124

28

4P75970W

11/3/1987G

ST51

8217

NW

NW

THO

MAS M

. BAKERKN

OBH

OU

SE #1

DO

M6

19230

183192

P89782W10/2/1992

GST

5182

17SW

NE

L27U

RAL H

ORTO

NU

RAL #

2D

OM

10300

30185

260P99116W

5/5/1995G

ST51

8217

SWSE

L8W

ILLIAM J. U

ICKER, JR

.U

ICKER #

1D

OM

5260

130220

260

P27934W9/19/1974

5182

17SW

NE

WILLIAM

M. &

JOY A. LIN

KH

ART #

1STO

,IRR,D

OM

10183

6362

183P28295W

9/30/197451

8217

SENE

FRED

HAR

TEN

L HAR

T #1

MIS

50229

-1195

228

P55201W1/22/1981

5182

17N

WSW

GAR

RY D

. & CIN

DY LO

U

WAG

GO

NER

JACOB'S W

ELL #2

10130

-4120

130P152141W

7/2/2003G

SE51

8218

NEN

WL1

Gre g R

entonAllim

ax #1-2

DO

M

P95361W5/16/1994

GSE

5182

18SEN

WL1,B1

NU

NZIO

LASPIS ALASPISA #

1D

OM

P118663W9/2/1999

GST

5182

18N

WN

WCH

ARLES A/M

ILDRED

I WAG

NER

Wa gner #

1D

OM

6200

170U

nknown

Unknow

n

P125456W5/11/2000

GST

5182

18SESW

THO

MAS &

JULIA AU

BRE Y

AUBR

EY WELL #

1D

OM

12500

80U

nknown

Unknow

nP135624W

6/13/2001G

ST51

8218

NEN

EL23

WALTER

LIVEZEYLIVEZEY #

1D

OM

19220

6115

150P147016W

9/17/2002G

ST51

8218

NW

NW

L1SCO

TT/JILL MILLS

MILLS #

1D

OM

10325

85310

320

P15086W8/21/1972

GST

5182

18SW

NE

MICH

AEL & LILLIAN

M

ARKO

VSK YM

ARK #

1D

OM

8182

22162

181P157041W

3/15/2004G

ST51

8218

SENE

L6JEFF SH

ELLEYFIR

E BUSTER

#1

DO

M15

1806

105160

P163337W10/25/2004

GST

5182

18N

ENE

DAN

IEL J & KR

ISTINE L TH

IELETH

IELE #1

DO

M6

375-4

250360

P19271P12/31/1942

GST

5182

18SW

SET. G

. JENKIN

SCAM

INO

#2

STO3

135-1

Unknow

nU

nknown

P19272P12/31/1942

GST

5182

18N

ESET. G

. JENKIN

SCAM

INO

#3

STO1

150-1

Unknow

nU

nknown

P40707W9/1/1977

GST

5182

18N

ENE

CHAR

LES C. & D

ON

NA KAYE &

RU

SSELL L. OLD

SCAM

PBELL #1

DO

M25

26025

140260

P42726W3/30/1978

GST

5182

18N

ESEL2

RO

BERT V/N

ANCY J SCH

ETTIGJEN

KINS #

3D

OM

20260

-4U

nknown

Unknow

n

P43663W5/31/1978

GST

5182

18SEN

EM

ILAR F. &

EVELYON

M.

WILLIAM

SVEN

TLING

#2

DO

M10

200190

190200

P44520W8/7/1978

GST

5182

18SEN

ED

EAN I. AD

DIN

GTO

NAD

DIN

GTO

N #

1D

OM

10285

5220

255P44731W

8/31/1978G

ST51

8218

SENE

JAY DEAN

WILSO

NW

ILSON

#1

DO

M15

187-4

80187

P47707W4/27/1979

GST

5182

18SEN

ETIM

AND

GABR

IELLE GAR

BW

ILD BO

RE #

1D

OM

12160

-4140

155

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P58766W10/27/1981

GST

5182

18N

ENE

L8D

ANIEL J &

KRISTIN

E L THIELE

TENN

ESSEE #8

DO

M6

4520

3045

P61944W9/7/1982

GST

5182

18N

ENE

GLEN

A. JENKIN

SJESSE #

1D

OM

9220

26160

220

P62628W11/30/1982

GST

5182

18SW

SEELIZABETH

R. JEN

KINS

JENKIN

S RAN

CH #

2STO

882

40U

nknown

Unknow

n

P64852W7/27/1983

GST

5182

18N

WN

EM

ICHAEL C. &

LAURE J. W

ALTERD

IAMO

ND

#1

DO

M6

170100

150170

P65427W9/14/1983

GST

5182

18N

ENE

GLEN

A. JENKIN

SRU

STY #1

DO

M5

10025

95100

P65428W9/14/1983

GST

5182

18N

ENE

ALBERT I. AN

D N

ORM

A F. EDD

YFR

EEDO

M #

1D

OM

6200

55190

200

P94754W3/7/1994

GST

5182

18SW

NE

BLAIR KLEIN

WIN

D M

ILL #1

DO

M,ST

O2

16055

135155

P94755W3/7/1994

GST

5182

18SEN

EL5,B1

BLAIR KLEIN

WAG

ON

WH

EEL #1

DO

M,ST

O25

24060

200235

39/3/79W6/7/2006

UN

A51

8218

NW

NW

H. R

ICHAR

D SO

REN

SON

LUCKY #

3D

OM

P84260W1/16/1991

UN

A51

8218

NEN

EL21

JOH

N C. AN

D JAN

E F. RYH

TIVER

PLANCKE #

1D

OM

P19273P12/31/1952

GST

5182

19N

ESWT. G

. JENKIN

SH

EUER

MAN

N #

1STO

5145

-4U

nknown

Unknow

nP169420W

8/9/2005G

SI51

8220

SESEG

EORG

E & H

ELEN M

ATHES

MATH

ES #2

STO

P116307W6/16/1999

GST

5182

20SW

SEG

REG

L/CON

NIE M

GO

DD

ARD

GO

DD

ARD

ARTESIAN

DO

M,ST

O20

160-4

140160

P125738W8/6/1999

GST

5182

20N

WN

EL4

GREG

G/BETH

M YESKIE

Dilw

orth #1

DO

M10

20045

Unknow

nU

nknown

P131024W11/29/2000

GST

5182

20N

WSE

RICH

ARD

J / KATHY L

VERPLAN

CKEKATH

Y LEE # 1

DO

M25

3750

350367

P13724P6/21/1962

GST

5182

20N

WSE

RICH

ARD

J/KATHY L

VERPLAN

CKEJ &

J CON

WAY #

1D

OM

,STO

25390

305305

390

P1465W4/6/1965

GST

5182

20N

ENW

J. CRAIG

AND

DO

NN

A M. SM

ITHLIM

MER

#1

DO

M,ST

O4

310-6

294306

P29737W4/24/1975

GST

5182

20SEN

ECLAR

ENCE T. &

WILM

A COLE

COLE #

1D

OM

10180

16U

nknown

Unknow

nP32662W

3/22/1976G

ST51

8220

NEN

WJO

SEPH SILBER

NAG

ELSILBER

NAG

EL #1

DO

M16

14033

100140

P361W4/17/1958

GST

5182

20SW

NE

A.J. BARKER

BARKER

#2

STO200

60200

P46248W6/23/1978

GST

5182

20N

ENW

RAYM

ON

D L. &

BERN

ADIN

E S. TO

LMAN

**DAVID

C/ELLA G

MO

RG

ANTO

LMAN

#1

DO

M20

10035

80100

39/2/170W7/14/2006

UN

A51

8220

NEN

WCR

AIG &

DO

NN

A SMITH

SMITH

#1

DO

M

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P762G2/27/1958

UN

A51

8220

SESEAR

THU

R J. &

MAR

GAR

ET M.

BARKER

BEYDLER

#1

STO,IRR

,DO

M180

140-6

Unknow

nU

nknown

P169419W8/9/2005

GSI

5182

21N

WSW

GEO

RG

E & H

ELEN M

ATHES

MATH

ES #3

STOP15108P

9/2/1955G

ST51

8221

NW

NW

WAR

REN

D. ATTER

ATTER #

1STO

3120

20100

12038/4/555W

4/4/2006U

NA

5182

21N

ESEW

ARREN

ATTERATTER

RAN

CH #

2M

IS39/2/94W

6/14/2006U

NA

5182

21SW

SWG

EORG

E & H

ELEN M

ATHES

MATH

ES #4

STOP84853W

4/8/1991G

ST51

8229

SWN

WM

ARCIE M

CSTAYM

. MCSTAY #

1D

OM

5380

358360

380P84853W

4/8/1991G

ST51

8229

SWN

WM

ARCIE M

CSTAYM

. MCSTAY #

1D

OM

5380

358360

380P84853W

4/8/1991G

ST51

8229

SWN

WM

ARCIE M

CSTAYM

. MCSTAY #

1D

OM

5380

358360

380P48643W

6/12/1979G

ST51

8230

NW

NE

JOH

N D

. & PH

YLLIS J. HALL

HALL #

2STO

8140

40120

130P48643W

6/12/1979G

ST51

8230

NW

NE

JOH

N D

. & PH

YLLIS J. HALL

HALL #

2STO

8140

40120

130P48643W

6/12/1979G

ST51

8230

NW

NE

JOH

N D

. & PH

YLLIS J. HALL

HALL #

2STO

8140

40120

130

P92840W9/20/1993

GST

5183

11N

WS W

JOH

N K. M

CKINLEY

LMS SPR

ING

#1

STO3

5-4

Unknow

nU

nknown

P92841W9/20/1993

GST

5183

11SESW

JOH

N K. M

CKINLE Y

LMS SPR

ING

#2

STO5

10-4

Unknow

nU

nknown

P92840W9/20/1993

GST

5183

11N

WS W

JOH

N K. M

CKINLEY

LMS SPR

ING

#1

STO3

5-4

Unknow

nU

nknown

P92841W9/20/1993

GST

5183

11SESW

JOH

N K. M

CKINLE Y

LMS SPR

ING

#2

STO5

10-4

Unknow

nU

nknown

P92840W9/20/1993

GST

5183

11N

WS W

JOH

N K. M

CKINLEY

LMS SPR

ING

#1

STO3

5-4

Unknow

nU

nknown

P92841W9/20/1993

GST

5183

11SESW

JOH

N K. M

CKINLE Y

LMS SPR

ING

#2

STO5

10-4

Unknow

nU

nknown

P105938W5/8/1997

GST

5183

12SESE

L6RO

NALD

JOE W

AGN

ERW

AGN

ER #

1D

OM

10200

9160

200

P109499W4/9/1998

GST

5183

12N

WSE

L4,B1G

ARY/TAM

ARA KR

AMER

KRAM

ER #

1D

OM

15240

10150

240P109649W

4/15/1998G

ST51

8312

SESEL2

MICH

AEL MEYER

MEYER

#1

DO

M8

18015

120180

P133961W4/12/2001

GST

5183

12SESE

L5JACK L. / KATH

ERIN

MO

REY

MO

REY #

1D

OM

6240

10165

240P105938W

5/8/1997G

ST51

8312

SESEL6

RO

NALD

JOE W

AGN

ERW

AGN

ER #

1D

OM

10200

9160

200

P109499W4/9/1998

GST

5183

12N

WSE

L4,B1G

ARY/TAM

ARA KR

AMER

KRAM

ER #

1D

OM

15240

10150

240P109649W

4/15/1998G

ST51

8312

SESEL2

MICH

AEL MEYER

MEYER

#1

DO

M8

18015

120180

P133961W4/12/2001

GST

5183

12SESE

L5JACK L. / KATH

ERIN

MO

REY

MO

REY #

1D

OM

6240

10165

240P105938W

5/8/1997G

ST51

8312

SESEL6

RO

NALD

JOE W

AGN

ERW

AGN

ER #

1D

OM

10200

9160

200

P109499W4/9/1998

GST

5183

12N

WSE

L4,B1G

ARY/TAM

ARA KR

AMER

KRAM

ER #

1D

OM

15240

10150

240

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P109649W4/15/1998

GST

5183

12SESE

L2M

ICHAEL M

EYERM

EYER #

1D

OM

8180

15120

180P133961W

4/12/2001G

ST51

8312

SESEL5

JACK L. / KATHER

IN M

OREY

MO

REY #

1D

OM

6240

10165

240

P103426W8/8/1996

GST

5183

13N

WN

WL6

RO

N CH

APIN/D

R. G

RAN

CE G

OSAR

JOH

NSO

N #

1D

OM

10260

39210

258

P103440W8/5/1996

GST

5183

13SW

NE

MICH

AEL/LILLAIN M

M

ARKO

VSK YM

ARK #

5STO

2320

97305

315

P115878W5/20/1999

GST

5183

13N

ENE

WES G

UY

GU

Y #1

DO

M15

20416

Unknow

nU

nknown

P116666W7/6/1999

GST

5183

13N

ENE

DAVID

& BECKY SPEN

CERSU

TTON

#1

DO

M10

38020

260280

P125226W5/10/2000

GST

5183

13N

ENE

L13RAN

DY &

LESLIE ERW

INSTEW

ART M

ISSED IT

#1

DO

M12

42040

280380

P138687W9/7/2001

GST

5183

13N

ENE

L5ALLEN

HEN

TSCHH

ENTSCH

# 1

DO

M13

22034

182200

P145005W6/6/2002

GST

5183

13N

ENE

ALAN W

./JERI T. TO

LMAN

HO

OT #

1STO

,MIS

25380

68360

370P21917W

3/27/1973G

ST51

8313

NW

NW

HELEN

K. RAU

CHRAU

CH #

1STO

1064

2834

50

P30475W7/18/1975

GST

5183

13SW

NW

MICH

AEL AND

LILLIAN

MAR

KOVSK Y

LILY 1D

OM

,STO

8165

38135

155

P56422W4/16/1981

GST

5183

13N

ESEG

ERRY J. &

OR M

ARIE G

. M

ILLERM

ILLER #

1D

OM

7315

60300

312

P66097W12/12/1983

GST

5183

13SESE

GER

RY J. AN

D O

R M

ARIE G

. M

ILLERM

ILLER #

2D

OM

,STO

10240

30225

235P86495W

10/30/1991G

ST51

8313

NEN

EALAN

W. TO

LMAN

TOLM

AN #

1D

OM

14678

50646

666P87246W

3/4/1992G

ST51

8313

NEN

EALAN

W. TO

LMAN

TOLM

AN #

2STO

5177

90151

17539/10/5W

4/28/2006U

NA

5183

13N

ENE

JACOB &

SHAN

ELL HATCH

ALIVIA #1

DO

M

P103439W8/5/1996

GST

5183

14SW

NE

MICH

AEL/LILLAIN M

M

ARKO

VSK YM

ARK #

4STO

0140

93103

130P136888W

7/17/2001G

ST51

8314

NEN

WJO

H / M

ARTIN

E MAR

KOVSKY

MAR

KOVSKY #

2D

OM

12395

175365

385P154183W

9/2/2003G

ST51

8314

NW

SWJO

HN

K. MCKIN

LEYCO

RRAL W

ELLSTO

10240

20212

230

P156929W3/9/2004

GST

5183

14N

WS W

WILLIAM

& PAU

LA WO

OD

WARD

MO

LLY & ABBY #

1D

OM

10365

176327

345P21918W

3/27/1973G

ST51

8314

SWN

WH

ELEN K. R

AUCH

RAU

CH #

2D

OM

6170

16140

148

P32863W4/27/1976

GST

5183

14N

WS W

GAR

Y MAR

SHALL

MAR

SHALL #

1D

OM

8251

55U

nknown

Unknow

n

P39402W8/1/1977

GST

5183

14SW

S WL12B5

WILLIAM

F. & SU

SAN KR

ECHKR

ECH-12

DO

M10

295150

287294

P50950W1/17/1980

GST

5183

14N

WSW

ALBERT G

. & CH

YERL J.

TOW

NSEN

DH

EATHER

#1

DO

M7

235145

225230

TAB

LE 5STA

TE ENG

INEER

'S OFFIC

E WELL D

ATA

BA

SE SEAR

CH

Perm

it #P

riority

Status

Township

Range

Section

Qtrqtr

LotsA

pplicant

Facility Nam

eU

sesY

ld A

ctW

ell D

epthStatic D

epthM

wbz

TopM

wbz

Bottom

P57694W7/29/1981

GST

5183

14N

WSW

DO

NALD

W. M

ILLERD

W M

ILLER #

1D

OM

5247

130236

246

P58400W10/6/1981

GST

5183

14SW

S WD

ENN

IS S. & BO

NN

IE J. EBER

HAR

DT

EBERH

ARD

T #1

DO

M4

18095

170174

P18099P10/4/1963

GST

5183

24N

ENW

JOH

N D

. & PH

YLLIS J. HAL L

HALL #

1STO

8105

4090

105

P116311W6/16/1999

GST

5183

25N

ENW

GRAN

T GREG

ORY

WILLIAM

S #1

DO

M,ST

O20

2017

Unknow

nU

nknown

P116312W6/16/1999

GST

5183

25N

ENW

GRAN

T GREG

ORY

WILLIAM

S #2

DO

M5

380200

Unknow

nU

nknown

P131021W11/29/2000

GST

5183

25N

ENW

GRAN

T GREG

ORY

WILLIAM

NO

. 3D

OM

10460

95150

18039/1/338W

10/12/2006U

NA

5183

25N

ENW

GRAN

T GREG

ORY

WILLIAM

#4

DO

M


12

REFERENCES CITED Hodson, W.G. and others, 1973, Water Resources of the Powder River Basin and Adjacent Areas, Northeastern Wyoming; USGS Hydrologic Atlas HA 465, 4 plates. Whitcomb, H.A. and others, 1966, Ground-Water Resources and Geology of Northern and Central Johnson County; USGS Water Supply Paper 1806, 99 pp, 2 plates. Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Water Quality Rules and Regulations, Chapters 8, 11, 12, and 23. Wyoming State Engineer’s Office, various, water well database, accessed on-line December 13, 2006.

APPENDIX A

SOIL TYPE DESCRIPTION

1

SOIL TYPE 4A DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 – 1.0 Top soil 1.0 – 7.0 Clay loam 7.0 – 9.0 Clay loam with minor iron staining 9.0 – 11.0 Silty clay loam with caliche with significant iron staining, from seasonal

high groundwater?

2

SOIL TYPE 67A DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 0.5 Top soil with organic matter 0.5 - 3.0 Sandy loam 4.5 - 7.5 Clay loam 7.5 – 8.0 Rusty sandstone 8.0 – 10.0 Claystone and sandstone bedrock

3

APPENDIX A SOIL TYPE 200DE DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 – 1.0 Top soil 1.0 – 10.0 Sandy loam

4

SOIL TYPE 229D DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 0.25 Top soil 0.25 – 3.0 Sandy loam with minor iron staining 3.0 - 7.5 Weathered clay loam

7.5 – 10.0 Sandstone with minor iron staining, likely from irrigation

5

SOIL TYPE 265AB DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 0.33 Top soil 0.33 - 2.75 Sand 2.75 – 10.0 Sandy loam

6

SOIL TYPE 283 DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 – 1.0 Top soil 1.0 – 5.0 Sandy loam 5.0 – 9.0 Silty clay loam 9.0 – 10.0 Clay rich siltstone (wet)

7

SOIL TYPE 367CD DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 0.75 Top soil 0.75 – 8.0 Sandy clay loam 8.0 – 9.0 Damp sandy clay loam 9.0 – 10.0 Weathered sand

8


Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 0.5 Top soil 0.5 – 7.0 Silty loam 7.0 - 8.5 Sandy loam, with minor iron staining from irrigation? 8.5 - 9.5 Sandy loam

9.5 – 10.0 Weathered silty sandstone

9


Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 0.5 Top soil 0.5 – 9.0 Sandy loam 9.0 - 10.0 Sandy loam with minor iron staining, possibly from irrigation

10


Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 1.5 Top soil 1.5 - 4.5 Silty clay loam with minor iron staining from irrigation

4.5 – 10.0 Sandy loam with minor clay

11

SOIL TYPE E33C DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 0.5 Top soil 0.5 - 6.5 Silty sandy loam 6.5 - 8.0 Sandy clay loam

8.0 – 10.0 Blocky shale

12

SOIL TYPE E67D DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 0.33 Top soil 0.33 - 8.5 Sandy clay loam with minor iron staining from irrigation 8.5 – 10.0 Clayey sand loam

13

SOIL TYPE H 36 DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 - 1.5 Top soil 1.5 – 10.0 Sand clay loam

14

SOIL TYPE X48 DESCRIPTION

Interval (feet)

Description

0 – 1.0 Top soil 1.0 – 10.0 Silty clay loam

APPENDIX B

PERCOLATION TESTSHEET

PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS For

Soil Type 283 1. Performed by: _________Levi J. Hime_____________ Test Date(s): ___1 – 19- 2007__

Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 2 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 3 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: __S283_South_ S283 Middle S283_North Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 35 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 19” _20”__ __18_” 3/8” _3/8” 2/8”

1 ___10____ 19 3/8” 20 3/8” 18 2/8” 2/8” _4/8” 2/8”

2 ___20____ 19 5/8” 20 7/8” 18 4/8” 2/8” _4/8” 2/8”

3 ___30____ 19 7/8” 21 3/8” 18 6/8” 2/8” _4/8” 2/8”

4 ___40____ 20 1/8” 21 7/8” 19 0/8”

5 ___50____

6 ___60____

7 ___70____

8 ___80____

9 ___90____

10 ___100___

11 ___110___

12 ___120___ Final Drop

(NOT Total) =

2/8”

4/8”

2/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___40___ ___20___ _40_ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __40__ mpi.


Soil Type S 4 A

1. Performed by: _________Levi J. Hime_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 4 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 5 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____S 4 A ___ ____S 4 A ___ ____S 4 A ___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 37 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 19 4/8” 18 4/8” 19 0/8” 8/8” 8/8” 1/8”

1 ___10____ 20 4/8” 19 4/8” 19 1/8” 8/8” 8/8” 1/8”

2 ___20____ 21 4/8” 20 4/8” 19 2/8” 8/8” 8/8” 1/8”

3 ___30____ 22 4/8” 21 4/8” 19 3/8” 8/8” 8/8” 1/8”

4 ___40____ 23 4/8” 22 4/8” 29 4/8”

5 ___50____

6 ___60____

7 ___70____

8 ___80____

9 _________

10 _________

11 _________

12 _________ Final Drop

(NOT Total) =

8/8”

8/8”

1/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = __10__ __10__ _80_ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __80__ mpi.


Soil Type S 67 A 1. Performed by: _________Levi J. Hime_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 6 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 7 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ___S 67 A___ ___S 67 A___ ___S 67 A___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 36 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 19 6/8” 18 6/8” 19 1/8” 10/8” 2/8” 8/8”

1 ___10____ 18 0/8” 19 0/8” 22 2/8” 9/8” 2/8” 7/8”

2 ___20____ 19 1/8” 19 2/8” 24 3/8” 9/8” 2/8” 6/8”

3 ___30____ 20 2/8” 19 4/8” 26 1/8” 9/8” 2/8” 5/8”

4 ___40____ 21 3/8” 19 6/8” 27 7/8” 9/8” 2/8” 5/8”

5 ___50____ 22 4/8” 20 0/8” 29 5/8”

6 _______

7 _______

8 _______

9 _______

10 ______

11 ______

12 ______ Final Drop

(NOT Total) =

9/8”

2/8”

2/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___8.88___ ___40___ _40_ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __40__ mpi.


Soil Type 217 1. Performed by: _________Ben J. Jordan_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 8 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 9 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____200 DE___ ____200 DE___ ____200 DE___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 35 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 17 6/8” 17 3/8” 18 5/8” 12/8” 7/8” 8/8”

1 ___10____ 19 2/8” 18 2/8” 19 5/8” 9/8” 5/8” 6/8”

2 ___20____ 20 3/8” 18 7/8” 20 3/8” 9/8” 4/8” 4/8”

3 ___30____ 21 5/8” 19 4/8” 20 7/8” 7/8” 4/8” 5/8”

4 ___40____ 22 3/8” 20 0/8” 21 4/8” 6/8” 4/8” 5/8”

5 ___--____ 23 1/8” 20 4/8” 22 1/8” 6/8” 4/8” 5/8”

6 ___50____ 23 7/8” 21 0/8” 22 6/8”

7 ___60____

8 ___70____

9 ___80____

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

6/8”

4/8”

5/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___13.3___ ___20___ __16__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __20__ mpi.


Soil Type 229 D 1. Performed by: _________Ben J. Jordan_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 10 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 11 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____229 D____ ____229 D____ ____229 D____ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 36 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 19 5/8” 18 3/8” 18 3/8” 3/8” 14/8” 1/8”

1 ___10____ 20 0/8” 20 1/8” 18 4/8” 3/8” 12/8” 0/8”

2 ___20____ 20 3/8” 21 5/8” 18 4/8” 3/8” 10/8” 0/8”

3 ___30____ 20 6/8” 22 7/8” 18 4/8” 3/8” 8/8” 1/8”

4 ___40____ 21 1/8” 23 7/8” 18 5/8” 3/8” 8/8”

5 ___50____ 21 4/8” 24 7/8” 8/8”

6 ___60____ 25 5/8”

7 _______

8 _______

9 _______

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

3/8”

8/8”

1/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = __26.6__ __10__ __80__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __80__ mpi.


Soil Type 265 AB 1. Performed by: _________Ben J. Jordan_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 12 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 13 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ___265 AB___ ___265 AB___ ___265 AB___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 36 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 18 2/8” 19 7/8” 16 5/8” 16/8” 15/8” 12/8”

1 ___10____ 20 2/8” 21 6/8” 18 1/8” 15/8” 12/8” 10/8”

2 ___20____ 22 1/8” 23 2/8” 19 3/8” 14/8” 12/8” 10/8”

3 ___30____ 23 7/8” 24 6/8” 20 5/8” 15/8” 10/8” 10/8”

4 ___40____ 26 4/8” 26 0/8” 21 7/8” 15/8” 10/8” 10/8”

5 ___50____ 27 3/8” 27 2/8” 23 1/8” 15/8” 10/8”

6 ___60____ 29 2/8” 28 4/8”

7 _______

8 _______

9 _______

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

15/8”

10/8”

10/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___10___ ___8___ __8__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __8__ mpi.


Soil Type 367 CD 1. Performed by: _________Levi J. Hime_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 14 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 15 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____367cd____ ___367cd____ ___367cd___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 35 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 17 1/8” 19 2/8” 17 1/8” 3/8” 2/8” 7/8”

1 ___10____ 17 4/8” 19 4/8” 18” 4/8” 4/8” 4/8”

2 ___20____ 18 1/8” 20” 18 4/8” 4/8” 2/8” 4/8”

3 ___30____ 18 5/8” 20 2/8” 19” 4/8” 2/8” 4/8”

4 ___40____ 19 1/8” 20 4/8” 19 4/8” 4/8” 2/8” 4/8”

5 ___50____ 19 5/8” 20 6/8” 20”

6 ___60____

7 ___70____

8 ___80____

9 ___90____

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

4/8”

2/8”

4/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___20___ __40___ __40__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __40__ mpi.


Soil Type 500 1. Performed by: _________Ben J. Jordan_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 16 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 17 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____500____ ___500____ ___500___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 35 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 18 6/8” 17 7/8” 19 4/8” 10/8” 6/8” 10/8”

1 ___10____ 20 0/8” 18 5/8” 20 6/8” 8/8” 7/8” 11/8”

2 ___20____ 21 0/8” 19 4/8” 22 1/8” 8/8” 5/8” 9/8”

3 ___30____ 22 0/8” 20 1/8” 23 2/8” 8/8” 5/8” 9/8”

4 ___40____ 23 0/8” 20 6/8” 24 3/8” 8/8” 5/8” 9/8”

5 ___50____ 24 0/8” 21 3/8” 25 4/8”

6 ___60____

7 ___70____

8 ___80____

9 ___90____

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

8/8”

5/8”

9/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___10___ __16___ __8.8__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __16__ mpi.


Soil Type 508 1. Performed by: _________Levi J. Hime_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 18 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 19 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____508____ ___508____ ___508___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 36 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 23” 19 7/8” 20 2/8” 2/8” 7/8” 7/8”

1 ___10____ 23 2/8” 20 6/8” 21 1/8” 2/8” 6/8” 6/8”

2 ___20____ 23 4/8” 21 4/8” 21 7/8” 2/8” 6/8” 6/8”

3 ___30____ 23 6/8” 22 2/8” 22 5/8” 2/8” 6/8” 6/8”

4 ___40____ 24” 23” 23 7/8”

5 ___50____

6 ___60____

7 ___70____

8 ___80____

9 ___90____

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

2/8”

6/8”

6/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___40___ __13.3___ __13.3__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __40__ mpi.


Soil Type 509 1. Performed by: _________Levi J. Hime_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 20 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 21 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____509____ ___509____ ___509___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 36 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 26 6/8” 19 6/8” 23” 4/8” 4/8” 4/8”

1 ___10____ 27 2/8” 20 2/8” 23 4/8” 4/8” 4/8” 4/8”

2 ___20____ 27 6/8” 20 6/8” 24” 2/8” 2/8” 2/8”

3 ___30____ 28” 21” 24 2/8” 2/8” 2/8” 2/8”

4 ___40____ 28 2/8” 21 2/8” 24 4/8” 2/8” 2/8” 2/8”

5 ___50____ 28 4/8” 21 4/8” 24 6/8”

6 ___60____

7 ___70____

8 ___80____

9 ___90____

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

2/8”

2/8”

2/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___40___ __40___ __40__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __40__ mpi.


Soil Type E 33C 1. Performed by: _________Levi J. Hime_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 22 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 23 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____33C____ ___33C____ ___33C___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 36 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 26 4/8” 28 5/8” 21 7/8” 4/8” 4/8” 4/8”

1 ___10____ 27” 29 1/8” 22 3/8” 4/8” 3/8” 3/8”

2 ___20____ 27 4/8” 29 4/8” 22 6/8” 4/8” 3/8” 3/8”

3 ___30____ 28” 29 7/8” 23 1/8” 4/8” 3/8” 3/8”

4 ___40____ 28 4/8” 30 2/8” 23 4/8” 4/8” 3/8” 3/8”

5 ___50____ 29” 30 5/8” 23 7/8”

6 ___60____

7 ___70____

8 ___80____

9 ___90____

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

4/8”

3/8”

3/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___20___ __26.6__ __26.6__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __26.6__ mpi.


Soil Type 67 D 1. Performed by: _________Levi J. Hime_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 24 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 25 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____67d____ ___67d____ ___67d___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 36 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 18 6/8” 21 7/8” 20 2/8” 10/8” 4/8” 9/8”

1 ___10____ 20” 22 3/8” 21 3/8” 9/8” 4/8” 8/8”

2 ___20____ 21 1/8” 22 7/8” 22 3/8” 9/8” 4/8” 8/8”

3 ___30____ 22 2/8” 23 3/8” 23 3/8” 9/8” 4/8” 8/8”

4 ___40____ 23 3/8” 23 7/8” 24 3/8”

5 ___50____

6 ___60____

7 ___70____

8 ___80____

9 ___90____

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

9/8”

4/8”

8/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___8.88___ __20___ __10__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __20__ mpi.


Soil Type H 36 1. Performed by: _________Levi J. Hime_____________ Test Date(s): ___01 – 19- 2007__ Credentials or Status of Tester: ____________Geologist___________________________ ( Owner, contractor, installer, engineer, geologist, sanitarian, soil scientist, or other) 26 The time interval (ti) between water level measurements was: _____ 10______ minutes. 27 TEST DATA: The test holes were PRESOAKED for: _____ hours, or __X _ overnight. Test Hole # is: ____H 36____ ___H 36____ ___H 36___ Hole depth ( inches ) = 36 36 36

Interval Number

Elapsed Time

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Water Level / Drop

Start = ___0____ 19 3/8” 21 1/8” 21 2/8” 6/8” 2/8” 4/8”

1 ___10____ 20 1/8” 21 6/8” 21 6/8” 3/8” 2/8” 3/8”

2 ___20____ 20 4/8” 22” 22 1/8” 2/8” 4/8” 4/8”

3 ___30____ 20 6/8” 22 4/8” 22 5/8” 3/8” 2/8” 3/8”

4 ___40____ 21 1/8” 22 6/8” 23” 3/8” 2/8” 3/8”

5 ___50____ 21 4/8” 23” 23 3/8” 3/8” 2/8” 3/8”

6 ___60____ 21 7/8” 23 2/8” 23 6/8”

7 ___70____

8 ___80____

9 ___90____

10 ______

11 ______


(NOT Total) =

3/8”

2/8”

3/8” Perc rate(mpi) is: [ ti / Final Drop ] = ___26.6___ __40___ __26.6__ a. If 6 or more holes were tested, the average perc rate was: ______ mpi, or b. If 3 to 5 holes were tested, the slowest perc rate (largest number) was: __40__ mpi.

APPENDIX C

SAND CREEK PUDWELL LOGS

APPENDIX D

WATER QUALITY

APPENDIX E

NITRATE MODELS

AP

PE

ND

IX E

Appendix A

, Chapter 23, C

umulative N

itrate Loading Analysis

NO

TE: Enter data into RED

boxes ON

LY!

(Vi) gpdLength (ft)

Width (ft)

Infiltration (ft/day)L &

W (ft)

Gross A

cre s1,135,513

6,084.96,084.9

4.10E-03

6,084.9850.0

(Vs) gpd# B

edrooms

gpd/lot# Lots

29,7003.0

300.099.0

(Vb) gpdK

(ft/day)i (ft/ft)

A (ft^2)

L (ft)b (ft)

99,6343.0

0.03700120,000

4,000.030.0

(Vp) gpdgpd/Lot

# LotsLaw

n Irr. (acres)

Same

Aquifer?

Y=1; N=0

00

99.00.50

0.0N

ote: Vp > 0 only if pum

ping from sam

e aquifer zone as Vs receptor aquifer zone; otherw

ise Vp = 0

Lawn irrigation assum

es net 18 gallons/ft^2/year for bluegrass (Source: N

RC

S, Laram

ie County)

WEH

RM

AN

N N

ITRA

TE MO

DE L

Co (m

g/L)

(Vi) Vol of Infiltration (gpd)

(Ci)

Infiltration (m

g/L)

(Vs) Vol of Leach Fields (gpd)

(Cs) Leach

Nitrate

(mg/L)

(Vb) Vol of A

mbient

Subdivision (gpd)

(Cb)

Am

bient N

itrate (m

g/L)

(Vp) Wells

pumped

(gpd)

(Cp) W

ell N

itrates (m

g/L)1.0

1,135,5130.05

29,70040.0

99,6340.0

00.0

1.0

Co = V

iCi + V

sCs + V

bCb - V

pCp / (V

i + Vs + V

b - Vp)

PA

GE

1

APPENDIX E

Appendix B, Chapter 23, Minimum Isolation Distance Analysis

Calculating the vertical travel time (VT) in the vadose zone (bacteria & virus die-off an(Modified from Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Chapter 17)

VT = d[TH]/0.5(AP)(1 mL/cm3) Note: (0.5 * AP) assumes 50% infiltrates and 50% lost to evaporation/evapot

Instructions: Enter data in blue boxes (ONLY)

ENTER AP (precipitation + pro-rated leach field infiltration) 315 inches/yearENTER TH (volumetric soil moisture obtained from Table 1) 0.321 mL/cm3

ENTER d (depth to seasonal high groundwater beneath leach field) 10 feet10

(Metric conversions - do not alter)AP 800 cm/yrd 304 cm

Note: AP changes throughout the State, d and TH change from site to site.One must multiply denominator by 1 mL/cm 3 to cancel TH units

VT (vertical travel time in vadose zone) = 0.244 yearsVT (vertical travel time in vadose zone) = 89 days

Calculating the horizontal travel time distance (HD) in the groundwater (Fetter, C.W. 1994. Applied Hydrogeology, 3rd ed, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 691 pp.)

HD =((730-(VT*365)))(Ki/n)

ENTER K (horizontal hydraulic conductivity) 3 feet/dayENTER i (gradient) 0.03700 feet/feetENTER n (effective porosity) 0.1VT (vertical travel time) 89 days (calculaHD (2 year horizontal travel time distance) 712 feet HD (2 year horizontal travel time distance) 712 feet (compe(If HD is less than 100 feet, use 100 feet)

PAGE 2

APPENDIX F

WATER RIGHTS SEARCH

sand creek ranch pud potable water and waste treatment ... · pud potable water and waste treatment...

Documents