sand final presentation

Upload: jpeterson1

Post on 30-May-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    1/25

    A COMPARISON OFA COMPARISON OFSPECTRAL INDICESSPECTRAL INDICES

    FOR DIFFERENTFOR DIFFERENT

    TREATMENTSTREATMENTS

    Callie SandCarleton College

    Student Airborne Research Program

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    2/25

    Overview IntroductionCalifornia DroughtMassive Agriculture IndustryMaximization of Water Resources

    Experiment

    Case Study: Paramount FarmsMASTERField DataIndices!

    ResultsComparison of fieldsCalculated Indices

    Conclusions and Future Experiments

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    3/25

    The Central Valley and KernCount

    Major agriculturalregion in CentralValley

    Central Valley:

    530,000 acres ofalmonds

    $2 billion industry 100% of USs supply

    75% of worlds supply Soil and climate

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    4/25

    Water shortages in California3rd year of drought

    Increasing populationAlmonds = long-term investments

    How to produce more produce with lesswater?

    Central Valley Project: 10% allocation Constant observation of plant stress levels Satellite models versus time-consuming

    ground-based measurements

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    5/25

    Paramount Farms

    Nitrogen/Calcium/Potassium Treatments

    Different Water Stress Levels

    Part of a larger experiment going on for

    several yearsPreviously discovered data: almonds

    require more water than previously

    thought for optimal production Field Health and Crop Indices

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    6/25

    MASTER

    MODIS/ASTER airborne simulator

    50 spectral bands in four spectral regionsVisible through thermal infrared

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    7/25

    6.6 n. mi./min65,000 ft

    8 n. mi.

    24 in.

    LENS 12 in.

    LENS

    6 in.

    LENS

    4 n. mi

    8 n. mi.

    21.4 n. mi.

    2 n. mi.

    at NADIR

    IRIS II

    Panoramic Camera

    16 n. mi

    20 n. mi.

    16 n. mi

    TMS

    MAS, MASTER,

    AOCI, MAMS

    ER-2 Sensor Coverage

    Image courtesy of Jeff Myers

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    8/25

    DC-8 Flight

    11,500 ft altitude Flew over Paramount Farms and Sheely

    Farms

    Field data taken July 20-25 Flight data used from FridayCloud coverageMissed ROI

    Rough calibration performed to smooth outimage7 meter resolution

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    9/25

    Indices: MethodologyOverview

    Three types: greenness/canopy health,water, and foliar chemistryWay of analyzing remote sensing

    measurementsMultiple ways to analyze various properties of

    the image

    Limitations in the spectral band

    measurements dictated what ones could becalculatedGap from ~1000 to 1600 nm

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    10/25

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    11/25

    Indices

    Calculate indices using ENVI software

    Make each band a different index

    Test for correlations: r>.9 indicatessimilar dataOnly use one of the correlated

    indices

    Pick best choiceFinal indices: NDVI, PI2, WBI

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    12/25

    Indices

    Comparison of WBI/PI2/NDVI

    WBI

    PI2: Plant Stress StatusMore fluorescence ~ more stressShort-term health

    NDVI: Ranges from -1 to 1

    Closer to 1 indicates denser canopy

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    13/25

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    14/25

    Treatments & Indices

    Use GPS points to map out regionscorresponding to the different treatments12 treatments in all

    Take the average of each treatment area

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    15/25

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    16/25

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    17/25

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    18/25

    Comparisons

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    19/25

    Conclusions

    Plots in the best current health overall aretreated with UN 275/KTS 120

    Best vegetation coverage (indicator of futurehealth) is UN 275/KTS 75, though UN275/KTS 120 is second-best

    However, no strong correlations betweendata

    - Wrong map?

    - Need more indices that are notavailable

    through our MASTER data

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    20/25

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    21/25

    Water & Indices

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    22/25

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    23/25

    Acknowledgements

    NSERC, NASA, UC Davis and everyone involved in datameasurements, Susan Ustin, Shawn Kefauver, entireevapotranspiration team, SARP etc.

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    24/25

    References

    Almond history.Almond Board of California,

    http://www.almond-board.com/index.cfm Glenn, E.; Huete, A.; Nagler, P.; Nelson, S. Relationship between

    remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plantphysiological process. Sensors2008, 8, 2136-2160.

    Peuelas, J.; Piol, J.; Ogaya, R.; Filella, I. Estimation of the plantwater concentration by the reflectance Water Index WI(R900/R970). Int. J. Remote Sensing1997, 18:13, 2869-2875.

    Zarco-Tejada, P.J. et al. Vegetation stress detection throughchlorophyll a+b estimation and fluorescence effects onhyperspectral imagery. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31, 1433-1441.

    Petropoulos, G.; Carlson, T.N.; Wooster, M.J.; Islam, S. A reviewof Ts/VI remote-sensing based methods for the retrieval of landsurface energy fluxes and soil surface moisture. Progress inPhysical Geography2009, 33, 224-252:

  • 8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation

    25/25

    Questions?