sand final presentation
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
1/25
A COMPARISON OFA COMPARISON OFSPECTRAL INDICESSPECTRAL INDICES
FOR DIFFERENTFOR DIFFERENT
TREATMENTSTREATMENTS
Callie SandCarleton College
Student Airborne Research Program
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
2/25
Overview IntroductionCalifornia DroughtMassive Agriculture IndustryMaximization of Water Resources
Experiment
Case Study: Paramount FarmsMASTERField DataIndices!
ResultsComparison of fieldsCalculated Indices
Conclusions and Future Experiments
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
3/25
The Central Valley and KernCount
Major agriculturalregion in CentralValley
Central Valley:
530,000 acres ofalmonds
$2 billion industry 100% of USs supply
75% of worlds supply Soil and climate
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
4/25
Water shortages in California3rd year of drought
Increasing populationAlmonds = long-term investments
How to produce more produce with lesswater?
Central Valley Project: 10% allocation Constant observation of plant stress levels Satellite models versus time-consuming
ground-based measurements
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
5/25
Paramount Farms
Nitrogen/Calcium/Potassium Treatments
Different Water Stress Levels
Part of a larger experiment going on for
several yearsPreviously discovered data: almonds
require more water than previously
thought for optimal production Field Health and Crop Indices
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
6/25
MASTER
MODIS/ASTER airborne simulator
50 spectral bands in four spectral regionsVisible through thermal infrared
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
7/25
6.6 n. mi./min65,000 ft
8 n. mi.
24 in.
LENS 12 in.
LENS
6 in.
LENS
4 n. mi
8 n. mi.
21.4 n. mi.
2 n. mi.
at NADIR
IRIS II
Panoramic Camera
16 n. mi
20 n. mi.
16 n. mi
TMS
MAS, MASTER,
AOCI, MAMS
ER-2 Sensor Coverage
Image courtesy of Jeff Myers
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
8/25
DC-8 Flight
11,500 ft altitude Flew over Paramount Farms and Sheely
Farms
Field data taken July 20-25 Flight data used from FridayCloud coverageMissed ROI
Rough calibration performed to smooth outimage7 meter resolution
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
9/25
Indices: MethodologyOverview
Three types: greenness/canopy health,water, and foliar chemistryWay of analyzing remote sensing
measurementsMultiple ways to analyze various properties of
the image
Limitations in the spectral band
measurements dictated what ones could becalculatedGap from ~1000 to 1600 nm
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
10/25
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
11/25
Indices
Calculate indices using ENVI software
Make each band a different index
Test for correlations: r>.9 indicatessimilar dataOnly use one of the correlated
indices
Pick best choiceFinal indices: NDVI, PI2, WBI
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
12/25
Indices
Comparison of WBI/PI2/NDVI
WBI
PI2: Plant Stress StatusMore fluorescence ~ more stressShort-term health
NDVI: Ranges from -1 to 1
Closer to 1 indicates denser canopy
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
13/25
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
14/25
Treatments & Indices
Use GPS points to map out regionscorresponding to the different treatments12 treatments in all
Take the average of each treatment area
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
15/25
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
16/25
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
17/25
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
18/25
Comparisons
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
19/25
Conclusions
Plots in the best current health overall aretreated with UN 275/KTS 120
Best vegetation coverage (indicator of futurehealth) is UN 275/KTS 75, though UN275/KTS 120 is second-best
However, no strong correlations betweendata
- Wrong map?
- Need more indices that are notavailable
through our MASTER data
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
20/25
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
21/25
Water & Indices
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
22/25
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
23/25
Acknowledgements
NSERC, NASA, UC Davis and everyone involved in datameasurements, Susan Ustin, Shawn Kefauver, entireevapotranspiration team, SARP etc.
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
24/25
References
Almond history.Almond Board of California,
http://www.almond-board.com/index.cfm Glenn, E.; Huete, A.; Nagler, P.; Nelson, S. Relationship between
remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plantphysiological process. Sensors2008, 8, 2136-2160.
Peuelas, J.; Piol, J.; Ogaya, R.; Filella, I. Estimation of the plantwater concentration by the reflectance Water Index WI(R900/R970). Int. J. Remote Sensing1997, 18:13, 2869-2875.
Zarco-Tejada, P.J. et al. Vegetation stress detection throughchlorophyll a+b estimation and fluorescence effects onhyperspectral imagery. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31, 1433-1441.
Petropoulos, G.; Carlson, T.N.; Wooster, M.J.; Islam, S. A reviewof Ts/VI remote-sensing based methods for the retrieval of landsurface energy fluxes and soil surface moisture. Progress inPhysical Geography2009, 33, 224-252:
-
8/14/2019 Sand Final Presentation
25/25
Questions?