sanderson 1993
TRANSCRIPT
8/17/2019 Sanderson 1993
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sanderson-1993 1/7
ALGINATES AND GELLAN GUM: COMPLEMENTARY
GELLING
AGENTS
George
R.
Sanderson and David Ortega
Kelco Division of Merck and Co., Inc., San Diego, California, USA
ABSTRACT
Alginates and gellan gum both have a high affinity for calcium ions. Their ability to
form gels with these ions is not only well known but is also exploited in many applications.
Alginate gels are usually formed in the cold, without recourse to heating, while gellan gum
gels are normally prepared by heating and cooling. These two polymers can thus be
considered
to
be complementary rather than competitive gelling agents.
The similarities and differences between the monovalent alginate salts, notably sodium
alginate, and KELCOGEL gellan gum are discussed in terms of their properties and
applications. This information is useful to the end user when trying to decide which
of
the
two hydrocolloids should be used in a particular application. It has also enabled alginate
and KELCOGEL to be used effectively together in some products. Specific examples are
described.
INTRODUCTION
Alginates, derived from a variety of brown seaweeds, have been known for over a
century. They are linear polymers composed of the salts of Q-mannuronic and L-guluronic
acid. The properties of a particular alginate depend on the relative proportions of these two
monomers in the molecule and, more specifically, the size and distribution of the so-called
block regions. These block regions are segments of the polymer chain composed solely
of
either mannuronic or guluronic acid.
Hydrocolloids are frequently classified as thickeners or gelling agents. Alginate is
somewhat
of
an exception in that it functions both as a thickener and a gelling agent.
Although all polyvalent cations with the exception of magnesium are capable of forming
gels with alginate
l
,
the only ion of relevance for foods is calcium. It has been said that the
reactivity displayed by alginate towards calcium is its strength and weakness
2
.
Proper
control
of
calcium ions can enable a wide variety of products to be formulated
3
;
improper
control invariably leads to singular lack of success. Fig. 1 shows the effects obtained by
mixing different concentrations of calcium ions with different concentrations of an alginate
composed of a high ratio of mannuronic to guluronic acid. The term conversion refers to
the amount of calcium ion added relative to the amount required to theoretically convert
sodium alginate to its calcium form. Thus, a calcium conversion
of
1.0, for example, means
sufficient calcium to convert sodium alginate on a stoichiometric basis to its calcium form.
In practical terms, this amount is approximately 0.1 g
of
calcium ion per 1.0 g
of
sodium
alginate. As implied in the figure, increasing the calcium ion concentration progressively
Food Hydrocolloids: Structures Properties
and
Functions
Edited by K. Nishinari and
E.
Doi, Plenum Press, New York, 1994
83
8/17/2019 Sanderson 1993
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sanderson-1993 2/7
2.0
_ 1.0
:.Ii
c
o
'E
0.5
c
8
CD
iii
c
'0
«
0.2
0.1
L-_ . . . . L . -_ -1 . . . _ - - -L - . _ . . . . L . -_ . . . . L_
0.2 0.4
0.6 O.B
1.0
1.2
Calcium Conversion
Fig. 1 Influence
of
calcium
ion
level on alginate rheology
increases intermolecular assocIatIOn resulting
in
a progressive increase in viscosity.
subsequently the formation of thixotropic solutions. and ultimately gel formation. in which
interchain association is permanent.
In the preparation of alginate gels. calcium ion control is essential in order to avoid
premature gelation and the formation
of
undesirable. broken gels. There are three general
methods of making gels. namely diffusion setting. internal setting and setting by cooling.
The first procedure is the simplest and. as the name implies. gels are formed by allowing
calcium ions to diffuse into a solution
of
alginate. Diffusion setting is used in the
production
of
fabricated onion rings and structured pimiento strip for stuffed olives, and to
encapsulate various core materials in a gelled alginate skin. A simplified illustration of the
formation
of
blackcurrants consisting
of
blackcurrant puree encapsulated by an outer skin
of
alginate gel is shown is Fig. 2
4
, The rate determining step
in
the diffusion process is the
time taken for the calcium ions to diffuse through the alginate solution. The effectiveness of
84
I---- ? co-axial tubes
fruit
puree mix - - -H(: f - t+---a lg inate
mix
pulsed) continuous)
~
setting bath
containing calcium salt.
e.g.,
calcium lactate
I
/
Fig. 2 Co-extrusion system for preparing blackcurrants
8/17/2019 Sanderson 1993
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sanderson-1993 3/7
the technique
is
therefore limited to the setting
of
thin films, through which diffusion time
is
short.
In
situations in which diffusion
is
not practical, internal setting can be used. This is
done by controlled release
of
calcium ions from particles
of
a calcium salt dispersed
throughout the system. Rate
of
calcium release depends on the inherent solubility
of
the
calcium salt used, the amount present, particle size and pH. Salts commonly used include
dicalcium phosphate anhydrous and calcium sulfate dihydrate. Calcium release can be
further controlled by inclusion
of
calcium sequestrants and the use
of
slowly dissolving
acids and short mixing times. Internal or bulk setting can be successfully used to prepare a
wide variety
of
food products. These include products which are prepared by reconstitution
of
a dry mix using water
or
milk. A prerequisite to success is designing the dry mix to
ensure that the alginate has time to hydrate before sufficient calcium to cause gelation is
released.
Table 1
Alginate dessert gel formulation.
Ingredients
Water
Sugar
Sodium alginate (KELTONE
HV)
Adipic acid
Sodium tripolyphosphate
Calcium carbonate
Color
Flavor
84.75
13.92
0.49
0.41
0.31
0.08
0.01
0.D3
100.00
A third but less common method
of
forming alginate gels is setting by cooling. Table
I shows a simple formulation for an alginate dessert gel, prepared by adding a mixture
of
the dry ingredients to boiling water and cooling. Although useful, the resulting gel is weak,
and a limitation to preparing alginate gels by cooling is the fact that it is not possible to
achieve the high degree
of
conversion from sodium to calcium alginate needed to give
strong gels since the required levels of calcium cause the alginate to gel, even at elevated
temperatures. These gels, however, tend to be thermodynamically more stable than internal
or diffusion set gels since the calcium required for gelation is present throughout the system
in
soluble form and
is
not fed progressively to the alginate from an external source as in the
case of diffusion setting or by diffusion from the surface
of
a dissolving particle of calcium
salt as in internal setting.
Unlike
alginates, geIlan
gum has only been known
for over a
decade. Despite
this
short existence, it has already been extensively researched and is approved for foods in
Japan. Approval in non-standardized jams and jellies and icings and frostings has also been
granted in the U.S. and approval for general food use is anticipated in the near future.
Fig. 3 Native geIIan
gum primary
structure
85
8/17/2019 Sanderson 1993
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sanderson-1993 4/7
Gellan gum, a microbial polysaccharide derived from the organism
Pseudomonas elodea
is
a linear polymer with a tetrasaccharide repeat unit consisting of glucose, glucuronic acid,
glucose and rhamnose
5
,6.
As
shown in Fig. 3, there
is
also one glycerate substituent per
repeal and one acetate approximately every second repeat. The form of the gum in which
the acyl substituents have been removed
is
marketed by Kelco as KELCOGEL gellan gum.
KELCOGEL reacts with mono- and polyvalent cations to form a gel. These gels are
normally prepared by adding the appropriate ion to a hot solution of the gum and cooling.
Divalent ions are much more efficient than monovalent ions and, by way
of
example, gels
of
optimal gel strength require around 0.4% sodium but only in the region
of
0.016%
calcium. Since low levels of dissolved calcium promote gel formation and hence inter
molecular association, they also prevent chain dissociation or hydration. This potential
problem is easily overcome by the inclusion of a calcium sequestrant such as sodium
citrate,7,8 and, by manipulation of the relative concentrations of dissolved calcium and
sequestrant, it is possible to hydrate KELCOGEL at any desired temperature. In other
words, if desired, KELCOGEL can be hydrated at room temperature. These solutions, like
their alginate counterparts, can be converted to a gel by diffusion setting. However, in the
case of the KELCOGEL solutions, the gelling ion can be not only calcium but other ions
such as sodium, potassium or magnesium.
Preparation of gels by internal setting, although not impossible
9
, 10, is more difficult to
achieve with KELCOGEL than alginates. This is because inclusion
of
a sequestrant to
control the release of
the divalent ions in the system, so effective in preparing internal set
alginate gels, frequently in itself prevents hydration since the amount of sequestrant
required gives rise to too much sodium.
In summarizing a comparison and contrast of alginates and KELCOGEL in the context
of
food systems, the following key issues emerge. They both form gels with calcium ions.
Unlike alginates, KELCOGEL also forms gels with other ions, notably sodium, potassium
and magnesium. Excess
of
these ions can cause precipitation which can also be induced by
excess acid, i.e., hydrogen ions. (It has been suggested that precipitation with calcium
andlor
acid, as practiced in alginate production, could be used in the manufacture
of
gellan
gum.) Setting by cooling, diffusion setting and internal setting can all be used to produce
gels using either alginates or KELCOGEL. However, setting by cooling is usually the
method of choice with KELCOGEL while setting in the cold is frequently preferred with
alginates.
In view of the similarities between the two polymers, it seemed desirable to investigate
whether or not the two in combination could be used to advantage. In this respect, an
obvious area to study was mixed gels formed by cooling hot solutions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Gel Preparation
Gellan gum (KELCOGEL, Lot No. 86-0082) and sodium alginate (KELTONE HV,
Lot No. 85l20A), alone and in combination, were dispersed in cold deionized (Arrowhead)
water and the dispersions/solutions heated to 90°C under agitation in a Helmco-Lacy Hot
Cup. Calcium or magnesium ions were added using the appropriate quantities of 0.5M
stock solution. The hot polysaccharide solutions were then poured into ring molds (13mm
height, 28mm inside diam.), covered with plastic cover slips and allowed to stand overnight
at room temperature to cool.
Specific gum concentrations evaluated were in % by weight: 0.2% KELCOGEL,
0.6% KELTONE HV, and 0.2% KELCOGEL
+
0.6% KELTONE HV.
The specific calcium ion concentrations used were: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and lOmM; these same
concentrations were also used for the magnesium ion.
Gel Texture Measurement
After overnight storage at room temperature, the gel discs, in the cases where gels had
86
8/17/2019 Sanderson 1993
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sanderson-1993 5/7
formed, were carefully removed from the ring molds and evaluated using an Instron
Universal Testing Machine, Model No. 4201, as previously described
l l
.
RESULTS
AND
DISCUSSION
Using calcium ions, gels were formed with KELCOGEL. The textural parameters for
these gels are shown in Figures 4 - 6. The results are totally as expected
II,
12. Hardness
(Fig. 4) rapidly increases to a maximum and then gradually declines with increasing,
calcium ion concentration. Modulus (Fig. 5) shows
a
more symmetrical increase and
decrease while gel brittleness (Fig. 6) increases (lower % brittleness
=
more brittle) fairly
2.5
_ - -
D,
2
B
- G
...>-,
- ---G -
--- "
-
Q)
e----
u
' S-.
0
.2
U,
1.5
:§.
'"
[J
'"
J
c
"E
'
c
-0-
0.2 KGEL-Mg++
0.5
- - EJ-
0.2 KGEL-Ca++
0.2 KGEUO.6 KTHV-Mg++
0
0
2 4
6 8 10
12
Ion Concentration (millimolar)
Fig. 4 Influence of ion concentration (Ca++ or Mg++) on gel hardness
rapidly up to a calcium ion concentration
of
around 6mM and then starts to level
off
at
higher calcium. With solutions of 0.6% KELTONE HV, attempts to prepare gels with
between 2 and lOmM calcium were unsuccessful since as little as 2mM calcium resulted in
immediate precipitation of the alginate from the hot solution. Additional tests showed that,
even by reducing the alginate concentration to 0.2% and the added calcium ion con
centration to 0.5mM, gelation could not be prevented. These results demonstrate that,
unlike KELCOGEL, unbuffered sodium alginate has minimal to zero tolerance for calcium
ions at elevated temperatures. In other words, gelation cannot be prevented by use
of
4.5
4
3.5
ILl
/
C\I
E
3
. 2
/
'"
2.5
"
;
0
2
/
::::;
1.5
I )
[']
/
- 0.2 KGEL-Mg++
rY'
- - 8 -
0.2 KGEL
-Ga++
0.5
0
2
4 6
Ion Concentration (millimolar)
Fig. 5 Influence of ion concentration (Ca++ or Mg++) on gel modulus
8
8/17/2019 Sanderson 1993
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sanderson-1993 6/7
45
-D-
0.2 KGEL-Mg++
40
0........
- - EJ-
0.2 KGEL-Ca++
Q
"'---
Q
0.2 KGEUO.6 KTHV-Mg++
35
"
'"
Gl
'
30
0-
'
- -S - _
25
'0
__
0
20
..
15
0 2
4
6 8
10 12
Ion Concentration (millimolar)
Fig. 6 Influence of ion concentration (Ca++ orMg++) on gel brittleness
elevated temperatures. Precipitation was also observed when 2 - lOmM calcium was added
to hot solutions
of
0.6% KELTONE HV
10.2
KELCOGEL. At the higher levels
of
added
calcium, precipitation was accompanied by gelation on cooling. These results strongly
suggested that the alginate was again precipitating from solution while, at higher levels of
added calcium, sufficient remained unbound by the alginate and available to cause the
KELCOGEL to gel on cooling. Thus, even in the presence of KELCOGEL, alginate still
displays minimal tolerance to added calcium at elevated temperature.
Interpreted superficially, these findings would argue against the practicality of
preparing useful alginate and mixed alginatelgellan gels by cooling in the presence
of
calcium ions. However, in the case of alginates, commercial products prepared in this
manner, such as the example in Table I, are well known. Useful combinations of alginate
and gellan gum that produce dessert gels on cooling have also been recently developed
13
.
A basic difference between these practical systems and the model gels described in this
paper is that the former are buffered with a sequestrant such as citrate or phosphate which
controls the calcium availability to the gelling polysaccharides. Another difference is that,
in the commercial gels, the calcium is frequently introduced through controlled dissolution
of calcium carbonate dispersed throughout the system while, in the model gels, the required
calcium is added in concentrated, predissolved form from a stock solution. Although, as
indicated, dessert gels containing both alginate and KELCOGEL have been formulated, the
nature of the resulting gels and how the calcium ions partition between the alginate,
KELCOGEL and sequestrant have still
to
be determined. This work is in progress.
With magnesium as the gelling ion, results are quite different. As anticipated, no gels
were formed with these ions and alginate. However, gels were obtained with both 0.2%
KELCOGEL and 0.2% KELCOGELlO.6% KELTONE HV. Figures
4 -
6 show that the
gels produced with magnesium and KELCOGEL are similar, although not identical, in
texture to those obtained with calcium, confirming that magnesium and calcium ions
interact similarly with KELCOGELi4. When magnesium ions were added to the
gellanlalginate combination, the gel strength peaks, for both hardness and modulus (Fig.
4
and 5), shifted to higher ion concentrations relative to the respective peaks for magnesium
and KELCOGEL. Similar behavior is observed for gels made with KELCOGEL in
combination with a sequestrant such as sodium citrate. It therefore appears that the
magnesium ions, although not able to promote interchain association and gelation of the
alginate, are nevertheless binding with the alginate to form a soluble complex. In other
words, the alginate is functioning as a sequestrant for magnesium ions. Inspection of the
viscosities of alginate solutions containing 0 - lOmM magnesium (Table 2) shows that
viscosity decreases with increasing magnesium ion concentration. This suggests increased
binding as the ion concentration is increased, with an accompanying increase in charge
8/17/2019 Sanderson 1993
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sanderson-1993 7/7
screening and reduction in viscosity. The viscosity measurements also show that the
magnesium/alginate interaction
is
not time dependent, in keeping with magnesium s
inability to promote interchain association.
Table
2. Effect
of
magnesium ion concentration on the viscosity
of a 0.6% KELTONE HV solution.
Brookfield L VT Viscosities (6 rpm. spindle
no.
I)
Added Mg++ (mM)
o
hrs. 2 hrs. 24 hrs.
0
101
98
105
2
75
71
74
4
65
58
65
6 54
51
56
8 51
50
53
10 53
49
53
These studies highlight the difficulty associated with forming alginate gels by cooling.
High temperature does not prevent the strong association between alginate and calcium ions
and, unless a buffer
is
included to reduce the free calcium to a low level, precipitation
of
the
alginate results. It has also been shown that, when magnesium
is
used instead
of
calcium,
gels can be produced by cooling solutions containing KELCOGEL in combination with
alginate. In these gels, the alginate functions as a magnesium ion sequestrant and texture
modifier.
In summary, although KELCOGEL rather than alginate
is
the more logical choice for
gels formed by cooling, it
is
possible, from an understanding of the principles
of
gelation, to
make useful gels by cooling solutions containing both KELCOGEL and alginate.
For
completeness, it should also be mentioned that diffusion setting in the cold, normally the
province
of
alginate, can be used to form films from solutions
of KELCOGEL or
KELCOGEL and alginate
l5
.
A particular advantage
of
KELCOGEL
is
that these films can
be formed using sodium ions, from a source such as common salt, to bring about setting.
REFERENCES
I.
R.H. McDowell. Properties of Alginates, Kelco International, London (1986).
2.
W. Bryden, personal communication.
3. W Bryden and G.R. Sanderson. Structured Foods with the Algin/Calcium Reaction, Kelco Division of
Merck and Co., Inc., San Diego (1982).
4. M.E. Sneath, Artificial fruit berries,
British Patent
1,484,562 (1977).
5. M.A. O'Neill , R.R. Selvendran, and V.J. Morris, Structure of the acidic extracellular gelling
polysaccharide produced by
Pselldomollas elodea Carbohydrate Res.
124:
123
(1983).
6. P.E. Jansson, B.Lindberg, and P.A.Sandford, Structural studies of gellan gum, an extracellular
polysaccharide elaborated by Pselldomonas elodea Carbohydrate Res. 124: 135 (1983) .
7.
V.L. Bell,
D.
Ortega, and G.R. Sanderson. The Preparation of KELCOGEL Gellan Gum Gels, Kelco
Division
of
Merck and Co., Inc., San Diego (1989).
8.
V.L. Bell, D. Ortega, and G.R. Sanderson, A comparison of gellan gum, agar, K-carrageenan, and algin,
Cereal Foods World 34
:991
(1989).
9.
J.K. Baird and J.L. Shim, Non-heated gellan gum gels,
U.S.
Patellt 4,503,084 (1985).
10.
J.K. Baird and J.L. Shim, Non-heated gellan gum gels,
U.S. Patellf
4,563,366 (1986).
II. G.R.Sanderson, V.L. Bell, R.C. Clark, and D. Ortega, The texture of gellan gum gels, ill: Gums and
Stabilisers for the Food Industry 4, G.O. Phillips et aI., eds., IRL Press, Oxford (1988).
12.
G.R. Sanderson, Gellan gum,
in:
Food Gels, P.Harris, ed., Elsevier Applied Science, London (1990).
13.
Anon., Use of gellan/algin gum combinations
in
water dessert gels, Research Disclosure 333:69 (1992).
14. G.R. Sanderson and R.C. Clark, Gellan gum, Food Techllology 37:63 (1983).
15. W.F. Chalupa and G.R. Sanderson, patent pending (1992).
KELCOGEL and KELTONE are trademarks of Merck and Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey), Kelco Division,
U.S.A., and are registered
in
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
89