sarasota park system

Urban ParkFuture Location

Qianqian Zhao

April 21, 2016

Contents

1. Introduction

Topic

Background

2. Analysis

Accessibility analysis

Suitability analysis

3. Design

Neighborhood Park

4. Conclusion

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/12736811419765574/

Park Classification

Background

Park System

Background

Sarasota

Park System

2. Analysis

• Accessibility Analysis

• Suitability Analysis

• Location Selection

Study Focus

Neighborhood Park

Objective 2.1

Identify residential areas outside neighborhood park service area

Sub-objective 2.1.1 Identify neighborhood park service area

Sub-objective 2.1.2 Identify needy priority of neighborhood park

based on residential density and population density

Objective 2.2

Identify lands with suitable size and land use for neighborhood park

(vacant lots, 1-5 acres)

Objective 2.3

Identify soil most suitable for neighborhood park based on drainage

Objective 2.4

Identify flood free property

Neighborhood Park

Sub-objective 1.1.1

Identify neighborhood park service area

Sub-objective 1.1.2

Identify needy priority of neighborhood park based on residential density and population density

17% age under 18

33% age over 65

Objective 1.2 Objective 1.3 Objective 1.4

Identify lands with suitable size Identify soil most suitable Identify flood free property

Vacant Lots (1-5 acres) Drainage Flood Zone

Neighborhood Park Combined Result

0.36 Objective 1.1 Identify residential areas outside neighborhood park service area

0.32 Objective 1.3 Identify soil most suitable for neighborhood park based on drainage

0.32 Objective 1.4 Identify flood free property

Neighborhood Park Results

Combined Result

Vacant Lot

(1-5 acres)

Neighborhood Park Location Selection

Community Park

Objective 2.1

Identify residential areas outside community park service area

Sub-objective 2.1.1 Identify community park service area

Sub-objective 2.1.2 Identify needy priority of community park based on

residential density and population density

Objective 2.2

Identify lands with suitable size and land use for community park (vacant

lots, 5-20 acres)

Objective 2.3

Identify soil most suitable for community park based on drainage

Objective 2.4


Community Park

Sub-objective 2.1.1

Identify residential areas outside community park service area

Sub-objective 2.1.2

Identify needy priority of community park based on residential density and population density

17% age under 18

31% age over 65

Objective 2.2 Objective 2.3 Objective 2.4

Identify lands with suitable size Identify soil most suitable Identify flood free property

Vacant Lots (5-20 acres) Drainage Flood Zone

Results

Weighted Sum

0.36 Objective 2.1 Identify residential areas outside community park service area

0.32 Objective 2.3 Identify soil most suitable for community park based on drainage


Community Park Result

Combined Result

Vacant Lots

(5-20 acres)

Community Park Parcel Selection

Community Park Result

Parcel Analysis

Regional Park

Objective 3.1

Identify residential areas outside regional park service area

Sub-objective 3.1.1 Identify regional park service area

Sub-objective 3.1.2 Identify needy priority of regional park


Objective 3.2

Identify lands with suitable size and land use for regional park (vacant lots,

>50 acres)

Objective 3.3

Identify soil most suitable for regional park based on drainage

Objective 3.4


Objective 3.5

Identify land proximity to bus routes

Regional Park

Sub-objective 3.1.1

Identify residential areas outside regional park service area

Sub-objective 3.1.2

Identify needy priority of regional park based on residential density and population density

15% age under 18

33% age over 65

Objective 3.2 Objective 3.3

Identify lands with suitable size(>50 acres) Identify soil most suitable


Identify flood free property Identify land proximity to bus routes

Regional Park Combined Result

0.25 Objective 2.1 Identify residential areas outside regional park service area

0.25 Objective 2.3 Identify soil most suitable for regional park based on drainage


0.25 Objective 2.4 Identify land proximity to bus routes

Regional Park Result

Combined Result

Vacant Lots

(>50 acres)

Regional Park Parcel Selection

Location: 110 Sullivan St Ste 11

Land Value: 1952400

Acres: 58.12

Regional Park Result

Parcel Analysis

Sports Complex

Objective 4.1

Identify residential areas outside sports complex service area

Sub-objective 4.1.1 Identify sports complex service area

Sub-objective 4.1.2 Identify needy priority of sports complex


Objective 4.2

Identify lands with suitable size and land use suitable for sports complex

(vacant lots, 25-80 acres)

Objective 4.3

Identify soil most suitable for sports complex based on drainage

Objective 4.4


Objective 4.5

Identify land proximity to bus routes

Sports Complex

Sub-objective 4.1.1

Identify residential areas outside sports complex service area

Sub-objective 4.1.2

Identify needy priority of regional park based on residential density and population density

18% age under 18

30% age over 65


Identify lands with suitable size(>25 acres;<80 acres) Identify soil most suitable


Identify flood free property Identify land proximity to bus routes

Sports Complex Combined Result

0.25 Objective 2.1 Identify residential areas outside sports complex service area

0.25 Objective 2.3 Identify soil most suitable for sports complex based on drainage


0.25 Objective 2.4 Identify land proximity to bus routes

Sports Complex Result

Combined Result

Vacant Lots

(>25 acres; <80 acres)

Sports Complex Parcel Selection

Location: 110 Sheppard Ave E

Land Value: 1864800

Acres: 25.12

Sports Complex Result

Parcel Analysis

Proposed Park Locations

Sports Complex

Neighborhood Park

Regional Park

Community Park

3. Neighborhood Park Design

• Location Selection

• Case Study

• Site Analysis

• Conceptual Design

Neighborhood Park Location Selection

Location: 3200 Alesio Ave

North Port

Land Value: 19000

Acres: 1.50

Parcel Analysis

Sarasota County – Park, Recreation and Natural Resources

Name: Red Rock Park, Sarasota

Size: 1 acre

Amenities: Playground, Multi-purpose field, Picnic facility, Parking area

Activities: Play, Picnicking, Walking

Features:

• playground for children ages 6-12 years old

• “tot lot” for children ages 2-5

• large multi-purpose field to play a pick-up game of baseball or soccer

Name: Shoreland Park, Sarasota

Size: 2 acres

Amenities: Canoe/kayak launch; Picnic table; Parking is limited

Activities: Birding, Fishing, Canoeing/kayaking, Picnicking

Features: neighborhood park allows access to Dryman Bay and Little Sarasota Bay via

South Creek

Case Study

Size: 1.4 acre

Cost: $19.5 million

Open Date: Aug 21, 2010

Location: Located in the West Loop and surrounded by

condominiums

Amenities: Playground, picnic area

Activities: Play, Picnicking, Walking

Features:

• Three zones in the park are delineated by the intersection of

three diagonal paths: a fountain plaza, children’s paly area

and dog park with artificial turf

• Sustainability: recycled tired were used to compose the

rubbery pavement in the children’s play area; earth berms are

covered in native grasses

• In referencing the site’s past as an old infirmary, architectural

terracotta artifacts salvaged from the original building were

embedded within its linear seat walls and the steel walls that

supported the planting beds are meant to oxidize over time

http://landscapevoice.com/adams-sangamon-park/

Case Study: Adams-Sangamon Park, Chicago

Site Analysis

Green space

Residential

Roads

Site

Water Vegetation

Slope

Site Analysis

Design Process

Site People Program

Design Process

Children’s playgroundPaved games courtLow impact recreation options (i.e. outdoor chess tables)

Internal trailsPicnic/sitting areasConservation of natural features

4. Conclusion

• Inequality of park distribution

• Semi developed areas have high potential need

sarasota park system

Presentations & Public Speaking