sarc report for kipp academy of innovation€¦ · last updated: 2/1/2016 last updated: 1/26/2016...

KIPP Academy of Innovation

By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information aboutthe condit ion and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educat ional agencies (LEAs) are required toprepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, w ith specific act ivit ies to addressstate and local priorit ies. Addit ionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent w ith data reported in the SARC.

For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Educat ion (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.

For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.

For addit ional information about the school, parents/guardians, and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.

DataQuest

Internet Access

California Department of Education

School Accountability Report CardReported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year

Published During 2015-16

DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains addit ional information about this school and comparisons of the school tothe district , the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, highschool graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners.

Internet access is available at public libraries and other locat ions that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at librariesand public locat ions is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrict ions may include the hours of operat ion, the length of t ime that aworkstat ion may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstat ion, and the ability to print documents.

Alice Lai, School LeaderPrincipal, KIPP Academy of Innovation

KIPP Academy of Innovat ion is a tuit ion-free public S.T.E.A.M. charter middle school that opened in August 2014 in EastLos Angeles. KIPP Academy of Innovat ion current ly serves 252 5th and 6th grade students, and w ill add one grade eachyear unt il we reach capacity in 2017 w ith students in fifth through eighth grade. KIPP Academy of Innovat ion is a proudmember of a nat ional network of KIPP (Knowledge is Power Program) schools. The school is operated by KIPP LASchools, a charter management organizat ion.

We believe that all children have an unalienable right to determine their own dest iny. At the center of this fundamentalbelief is the idea that all children deserve a high-quality educat ion that provides them w ith the freedom, knowledge, andcourage to choose their paths to and through college and beyond. At KAI, our students are 21st century learners andleaders, who confident ly think outside the box, bravely remain ahead of the curve, and solve problems that don’t yetexist.

KIPP Academy of Innovat ion students have access to cutt ing edge curriculum, instruct ion, and resources on a daily basis.Rigorous literacy instruct ion, an interdisciplinary STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics)curriculum, and small group intervent ion and accelerat ion provide KAI innovators w ith the necessary challenging academicfoundat ion and crit ical character development to succeed to and through college and beyond.

KIPP Academy of Innovat ion4800 East Cesar Chavez AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90022-1307

Phone: 323-406-8000E-mail: [email protected]

About Our SchoolAbout Our School

ContactContact

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/

http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/

http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/

mailto:[email protected]

Last updated: 1/26/2016


About This School

Contact Information - Most Recent YearContact Information - Most Recent Year

District Contact Information - Most Recent Year

District Name Los Angeles Unified

Phone Number (213) 241-1000

Superintendent Ramon Cort ines

E-mail Address ramon.cort [email protected]

Web Site www.lausd.net

School Contact Information - Most Recent Year

School Name KIPP Academy of Innovat ion

Street 4800 East Cesar Chavez Avenue

City, State, Zip Los Angeles, Ca, 90022-1307

Phone Number 323-406-8000

Principal Alice Lai, School Leader

E-mail Address [email protected]

Web Site www.kippla.org/innovat ion

County-District-School (CDS) Code

19647330128512

School Description and Mission Statement - Most Recent YearSchool Description and Mission Statement - Most Recent Year

At KIPP Academy of Innovat ion, we believe in the relent less pursuit of excellence beyond college for all children. We believe that excellent schools and strongpartnerships transform communit ies in preparat ion for the 21st century and beyond. We believe that by educat ing the whole child, our students are empoweredto transform their lives, the communit ies they live in, and the world at large. We foster a genuine love of learning by creat ing a collaborat ive culture of inquiry andlearning through discovery.

W ith rigorous literacy based instruct ion as the gateway to learning, interdisciplinary STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) curricula,and a deep culture of character development, our students are empowered as 21st century learners and leaders to innovate and compete in the global arena.

2014-15 SARC - KIPP Academy of Innovation

of 31


www.lausd.net


www.kippla.org/innovation



Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2014-15)Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2014-15)

Grade Level Number of Students

Grade 5 105

Total Enrollment 105

Grade 50

20

40

60

80

100

120

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2014-15)Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2014-15)

Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment

Black or African American 1.0 %

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0.0 %

Asian 0.0 %

Filipino 0.0 %

Hispanic or Lat ino 99.0 %

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0 %

White 0.0 %

Two or More Races 0.0 %

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 91.4 %

English Learners 18.1 %

Students w ith Disabilit ies 4.8 %

Foster Youth 0.0 %

Black or African American

American Indian or A laska Native

Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Latino

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

White

Two or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

English Learners

Students with Disabilities

Foster Youth

1%

99%

91%

18% 4%


of 31



A. Conditions of Learning

State Priority: Basic

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1):

Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credent ialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;Pupils have access to standards-aligned instruct ional materials; andSchool facilit ies are maintained in good repair

Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of posit ions filled by teachers who lack legal authorizat ion to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc.

* Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English learners.

Teacher CredentialsTeacher Credentials

Teachers School District

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

2015-16

With Full Credent ial 5 9

W ithout Full Credent ial

Teachers Teaching Outside SubjectArea of Competence (w ith fullcredent ial)

2013-14 2014-15 2015-164.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

9.5Teachers with Full Credential

Teachers without Full Credential

Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher PositionsTeacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions

Indicator2013-

142014-

152015-

16

Misassignments of Teachers of EnglishLearners

0 0

Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0

Vacant Teacher Posit ions 0 0

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners

Total Teacher Misassignments

Vacant Teacher Positions


of 31


Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools w ith student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those w ith student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.

Year and month in which data were collected: January 2016

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2014-15)Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2014-15)

Location of ClassesPercent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by

Highly Qualified TeachersPercent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by

Highly Qualified Teachers

This School 100.0% 0.0%

All Schools in District 88.0% 12.0%

High-Poverty Schoolsin District

93.0% 7.0%

Low-Poverty Schoolsin District

45.0% 55.0%

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent YearQuality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year

Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of AdoptionFrom Most Recent

Adoption?Percent Students Lacking Own

Assigned Copy

Reading/Language ArtsAchieve3000

Wheatly Curriculum

Fountas and Pinnell Leveled Literacy Intervent ion Sets - 2ndthrough 8th grade

Great Nonfict ion for 3-5

Stem Grades for 3-4

Lat ino Biographies

'If You' Series

'Community and Neighborhood' Series

Yes 0.0 %

MathematicsST Math

Eureka MathSingapore Math

FACEing Math Set

Yes 0.0 %

ScienceTeacher created Curriculum - standards aligned

NGSS Reader Pack

Yes 0.0 %

History-Social ScienceTeacher created Curriculum - standards aligned

History AliveTHe Alexandria Plan: U.S. and World History

Yes 0.0 %

Foreign LanguageN/A

0.0 %

HealthN/A

0.0 %

Visual and Performing ArtsThe Art Teacher's Survival Guide

Art Lab for KidsDrawing Lab for Mixed Media Art ists

Paint Lab

Yes 0.0 %

Science Lab Eqpmt(Grades 9-12)

0.0 %


of 31


of 31



School Facility Good Repair Status - Most Recent YearYear and month in which data were collected: January 2016

Overall Facility Rate - Most Recent YearYear and month in which data were collected: January 2016

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent YearSchool Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year

KIPP Academy of Innovat ion is inspected on a monthly basis. These monthly inspect ions focus on ensuring our facility is kept safe and clean for students, families,and staff. At this moment KIPP Academy of Innovat ion does not have any planned facility improvements.

System Inspected Rating

Repair Needed andAction Taken or

Planned

Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC,Sewer

Good

Interior: Interior Surfaces Good

Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness,Pest/Vermin Infestat ion

Good

Electrical: Electrical Good

Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms,Sinks/Fountains

Good

Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Good

Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs Good

External: Playground/School Grounds,W indows/Doors/Gates/Fences

Good

Overall Rat ing Exemplary


of 31


B. Pupil Outcomes

State Priority: Pupil Achievement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4):

Statew ide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP], Science California Standards Tests); andThe percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that sat isfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the CaliforniaState University, or career technical educat ion sequences or programs of study

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small forstat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less.

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (School Year 2014-15)California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (School Year 2014-15)

Subject

Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards

School District State

English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 62.0% 33.0% 44.0%

Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 53.0% 25.0% 33.0%


of 31


Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy.

Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used tocalculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students w ith scores.

* Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA)

Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15)Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15)

ELA - Grade 3ELA - Grade 3

Student GroupTotal

EnrollmentNumberTested

PercentTested

PercentAchievement

Level 1*

PercentAchievement

Level 2*

PercentAchievement

Level 3*

PercentAchievement

Level 4*

All Students -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Male -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Female -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Black or African American -- -- -- -- -- -- --

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Asian -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Hispanic or Lat ino -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Nat ive Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- -- -- --

White -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Two or More Races -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- -- -- --

English Learners -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Students w ith Disabilit ies -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Students Receiving MigrantEducat ion Services

-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --


of 31






Student GroupTotal


PercentTested

PercentAchievement

Level 1*

PercentAchievement

Level 2*

PercentAchievement

Level 3*

PercentAchievement

Level 4*

All Students -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Male -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Female -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Asian -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- --



White -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Two or More Races -- -- -- -- -- -- --





-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --


of 31






Student GroupTotal


PercentTested

PercentAchievement

Level 1*

PercentAchievement

Level 2*

PercentAchievement

Level 3*

PercentAchievement

Level 4*

All Students 103 102 99.0% 18.0% 21.0% 38.0% 24.0%

Male 103 50 48.5% 28.0% 18.0% 38.0% 16.0%

Female 103 52 50.5% 8.0% 23.0% 38.0% 31.0%

Black or African American 103 1 1.0% -- -- -- --

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Hispanic or Lat ino 103 101 98.1% 18.0% 21.0% 38.0% 24.0%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 103 93 90.3% 19.0% 20.0% 42.0% 18.0%

English Learners 103 18 17.5% 28.0% 39.0% 33.0% 0.0%

Students w ith Disabilit ies 103 5 4.9% -- -- -- --


103 1 1.0% -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --


of 31





ELA- ELA- Grade 6Grade 6

Student GroupTotal


PercentTested

PercentAchievement

Level 1*

PercentAchievement

Level 2*

PercentAchievement

Level 3*

PercentAchievement

Level 4*

All Students -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Male -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Female -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Asian -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- --



White -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Two or More Races -- -- -- -- -- -- --





-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --


of 31






Student GroupTotal


PercentTested

PercentAchievement

Level 1*

PercentAchievement

Level 2*

PercentAchievement

Level 3*

PercentAchievement

Level 4*

All Students -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Male -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Female -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Asian -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- --



White -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Two or More Races -- -- -- -- -- -- --





-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --


of 31





CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics

Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15)Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15)

Mathematics - Grade 3Mathematics - Grade 3

Student GroupTotal


PercentTested

PercentAchievement

Level 1*

PercentAchievement

Level 2*

PercentAchievement

Level 3*

PercentAchievement

Level 4*

All Students -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Male -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Female -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Asian -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- --



White -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Two or More Races -- -- -- -- -- -- --





-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --


of 31






Student GroupTotal


PercentTested

PercentAchievement

Level 1*

PercentAchievement

Level 2*

PercentAchievement

Level 3*

PercentAchievement

Level 4*

All Students -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Male -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Female -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Asian -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- --



White -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Two or More Races -- -- -- -- -- -- --





-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --


of 31






Student GroupTotal


PercentTested

PercentAchievement

Level 1*

PercentAchievement

Level 2*

PercentAchievement

Level 3*

PercentAchievement

Level 4*

All Students 103 102 99.0% 11.0% 36.0% 27.0% 25.0%

Male 103 50 48.5% 14.0% 36.0% 26.0% 24.0%

Female 103 52 50.5% 8.0% 37.0% 29.0% 27.0%

Black or African American 103 1 1.0% -- -- -- --

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Hispanic or Lat ino 103 101 98.1% 11.0% 37.0% 27.0% 26.0%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 103 93 90.3% 12.0% 38.0% 28.0% 23.0%

English Learners 103 18 17.5% 28.0% 39.0% 33.0% 0.0%

Students w ith Disabilit ies 103 5 4.9% -- -- -- --


103 1 1.0% -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --


of 31






Student GroupTotal


PercentTested

PercentAchievement

Level 1*

PercentAchievement

Level 2*

PercentAchievement

Level 3*

PercentAchievement

Level 4*

All Students -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Male -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Female -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Asian -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Filipino -- -- -- -- -- -- --



White -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Two or More Races -- -- -- -- -- -- --





-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- --


of 31



Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less.

California Standards Tests Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2014-15)

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less.

California Standards Tests for All Students in Science – Three-Year ComparisonCalifornia Standards Tests for All Students in Science – Three-Year Comparison

Subject

Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)


2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) -- -- 91.0% -- -- 46.0% -- -- 56.0%

Student Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

All Students in the LEA 46.0%

All Students at the School 91.0%

Male 85.0%

Female 96.0%

Black or African American --

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive --

Asian --

Filipino --

Hispanic or Lat ino 91.0%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander --

White --

Two or More Races --

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 90.0%

English Learners 83.0%

Students w ith Disabilit ies --

Students Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services --

Foster Youth --


of 31

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8):

Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical educat ion


of 31



C. Engagement

State Priority: Parental Involvement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3):

Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite

State Priority: Pupil Engagement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5):

High school dropout rates; andHigh school graduat ion rates

Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent YearOpportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year

All families are encouraged to have an act ive role At KIPP Academy of Innovat ion. Families are invited to part icpate in various school events and meetingsthroughout the year, such as Coffee w ith the Principal, parent educat ion workshops, student-led Conferences, and Team and Family act ivit ies. In spring 2014parents were involved w ith the development of the 2014-15 LCAP. Families are also given the opportunity to be leaders in the school's community bypart icipat ing in the Innovat ion Parent Council and by co-facilitat ing school-w ide fundraising efforts. In addit ion, parents are welcomed to serve as volunteers oncampus and assist w ith student supervision. Volunteer opportunites are announced via our weekly Family Bullet in, calls, not ices, and school website.

Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate)Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate)

Indicator


2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Dropout Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.1% 11.4% 11.5%

Graduat ion Rate 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.60 68.10 70.20 78.87 80.44 80.95

Dropout/Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Chart

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0Dropout Rate

Graduation Rate


of 31

Completion of High School Graduation RequirementsCompletion of High School Graduation Requirements

Student Group

Graduating Class of 2014


All Students -- 70 84

Black or African American -- 62 76

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive -- 64 78

Asian -- 79 92

Filipino -- 90 96

Hispanic or Lat ino -- 72 81

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- 59 83

White -- 72 89

Two or More Races -- 74 82

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- 69 81

English Learners -- 38 50

Students w ith Disabilit ies -- 43 61

Foster Youth -- -- --


of 31




State Priority: School Climate

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6):

Pupil suspension rates;Pupil expulsion rates; andOther local measures on the sense of safety

School Safety Plan - Most Recent Year

Suspensions and ExpulsionsSuspensions and Expulsions


Rate 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Suspensions 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.7 1.3 0.9 5.1 4.4 3.8

Expulsions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1

Suspensions

2012-13 2013-14 2014-150.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0School Suspensions

District Suspensions

State Suspensions

Expulsions

2012-13 2013-14 2014-150.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12School Expulsions

District Expulsions

State Expulsions

KIPP Academy of Innovat ion's Emergency Reponse Plan for the 2016-16 school year was implemented in August 2015. All aspects of the plan - descript ions ofemergency response roles, types of evacuat ions, evacuat ion and drill procedures, locat ion of emergency supplies, emergency signals, and evacuat ion routes -were reviewed and discussed w ith all staff members in September 2015. Monthly drills are conducted and every classroom is equipped w ith a copy of the site'sEmergency Reponse Plan, evacuat ion map, and an emergency backpack.


of 31




D. Other SARC InformationThe information in this sect ion is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorit ies for LCFF.

Note: Cells w ith NA values do not require data.

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)

* Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).

Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2014-15)Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2014-15)

AYP Criteria School District State

Made AYP Overall Yes Yes

Met Part icipat ion Rate - English Language Arts Yes Yes

Met Part icipat ion Rate - Mathematics Yes Yes

Met Percent Proficient - English Language Arts N/A No

Met Percent Proficient - Mathematics N/A No

Met Attendance Rate Yes

Met Graduat ion Rate N/A N/A

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2015-16)Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2015-16)

Indicator School District

Program Improvement Status In PI

First Year of Program Improvement 2004-2005

Year in Program Improvement Year 5

Number of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A 654

Percent of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A 82.6%

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Grade Level Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+

K

1

2

3

4

5 32.0 0 3 0

6

Other


of 31



* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information isreported by subject area rather than grade level.

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2014-15)

Note: Cells w ith N/A values do not require data.

*One Full T ime Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full t ime; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full t ime.

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Subject Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+

English

Mathematics

Science

Social Science

Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor

Academic Counselor

Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) N/A

Library Media Teacher (librarian) N/A

Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) N/A

Psychologist 0.3 N/A

Social Worker 0.2 N/A

Nurse 0.2 N/A

Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.2 N/A

Resource Specialist (non-teaching) N/A

Other 0.5 N/A


of 31



For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Cert ificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ .

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15)Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15)

KIPP Academy of Innovat ion offers an afterschool program that is ASES funded. The main goal of our afterschool program is to support students by providingliteracy and enrichment act ivit ies. Everyday students receive academic assistance in the core subject areas of reading, language artes, mathematics and science.They also part icipate in extracurricular act ivit ies such as drill, photography, music, dance, sports, and cheerleading.

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14)Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14)

Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category

Beginning Teacher Salary $39,788 $43,165

Mid-Range Teacher Salary $63,553 $68,574

Highest Teacher Salary $78,906 $89,146

Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $105,723 $111,129

Average Principal Salary (Middle) $115,222 $116,569

Average Principal Salary (High) $116,595 $127,448

Superintendent Salary $350,000 $234,382

Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 35.0% 38.0%

Percent of Budget for Administrat ive Salaries 5.0% 5.0%

Teacher Salary Chart

Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

Principal Salary Chart

Average Principal Salary

(Elementary)


(Middle)


(High)

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000


of 31

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/



Note: Cells w ith N/A values do not require data.

*Where there are student course enrollments.

Note : AP means Advanced Placement.

Professional Development – Most Recent Three Years

Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2014-15)Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2014-15)

Subject Number of AP Courses Offered* Percent of Students In AP Courses

Computer Science N/A

English N/A

Fine and Performing Arts N/A

Foreign Language N/A

Mathematics N/A

Science N/A

Social Science N/A

All Courses --

Professional development begins w ith an intensive KAI Summer On-Boarding for all teammates. At the end of KAI Summer On-Boarding, all KAI teachers have aclear understanding of the why behind our KIPP Academy of Innovat ion vision, mission, and core values. By conduct ing community walks, scavenger hunts, andhome visits, our KAI teachers have a stronger understanding and appreciat ion of the beauty, value, and richness of the community in which we w ill one day serve526 innovators.

Professional development throughout the year cont inues to reinforce and build upon the momentum from the KAI Summer On-Boarding. Logist ically, KAIProfessional Development w ill occur on a weekly basis on Monday afternoons from 1:30 – 3:30pm. KAI Staff Professional Development Plan for the year w ill fallunder two umbrellas 1) Transformational and 2) Transact ional. We spend 80% of weekly PD focusing on the transformational and 20% focusing on thetransact ion. For our founding year, our umbrella topics that transform the quality of classroom instruct ion are 1) Data Driven Instruct ion, and 2) Everyone is areading teacher, and 3) Design Thinking. In addit ion to school-based professional development, KAI also partners w ith other outside organizat ions to provide moreindividualized professional development. Depending on the needs of the team, this means sending some teachers to the Lucy Calkins Reader’s Workshop Trainingor a Design Thinking Inst itute Workshop.


of 31

sarc report for kipp academy of innovation€¦ · last updated: 2/1/2016 last updated: 1/26/2016...

Documents