satisfy your cle and cpd requirements! patent …...why you should attend rapid changes in patent...

8
® Patent Litigation 2014 Chicago, October 6-7, 2014 New York City, November 10-11, 2014 Cleveland, Columbus and New Brunswick Groupcast Locations, November 10-11, 2014 Live Webcast, November 10-11, 2014 — www.pli.edu NEW! Recent changes in patent law, including an overview of key Supreme Court, Federal Circuit, and District Court decisions, and a discussion of recent proposed legislation NEW! Views from the Bench: District Court Judges share their views on patent litigation, including the impact Patent Rules have had on the desired effect and practical tips for the more efficient handling and disposition of patent cases NEW! Considerations for when alternative dispute resolution proceedings are preferred to, or used in conjunction with, District Court patent litigation ENHANCED! Current trends in patent damages in the post-Uniloc environment, and discussion on patent exhaustion and license agreements NEW! Current strategies in defending against willfulness and the role of opinions Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements! Earn One Hour of Ethics Credit Register Today at www.pli.edu/AHZ4 or Call (800) 260-4PLI

Upload: others

Post on 12-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements! Patent …...Why You Should Attend Rapid changes in patent law make it necessary that, whether you are the plaintiff’s or defendant’s counsel,

®

Patent Litigation 2014

Chicago, October 6-7, 2014New York City, November 10-11, 2014Cleveland, Columbus and New Brunswick Groupcast Locations, November 10-11, 2014Live Webcast, November 10-11, 2014 — www.pli.edu

• NEW! Recent changes in patent law, including an overview of key Supreme Court, Federal Circuit, and District Courtdecisions, and a discussion of recent proposed legislation

• NEW! Views from the Bench: District Court Judges share theirviews on patent litigation, including the impact Patent Ruleshave had on the desired effect and practical tips for the moreefficient handling and disposition of patent cases

• NEW! Considerations for when alternative dispute resolutionproceedings are preferred to, or used in conjunction with,District Court patent litigation

• ENHANCED! Current trends in patent damages in the post-Uniloc environment, and discussion on patent exhaustionand license agreements

• NEW! Current strategies in defending against willfulness andthe role of opinions

Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements!

EarnOne Hour ofEthics Credit

Register Today at www.pli.edu/AHZ4 or Call (800) 260-4PLI

Page 2: Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements! Patent …...Why You Should Attend Rapid changes in patent law make it necessary that, whether you are the plaintiff’s or defendant’s counsel,

Why You Should AttendRapid changes in patent law make it necessary that, whether you are the plaintiff ’s or defendant’s counsel, you areup-to-date on the current state of the law and can quickly develop successful litigation strategies and tactics. This program is taught by a faculty of both outside and in-house lawyers who have earned national reputations inpatent litigation by trying and managing a wide variety of bench and jury patent trials and U.S. Patent Office post-granttrial proceedings, and provides comprehensive coverage of every phase of these patent matters. This year’s programalso features views from U.S. District Court Judges, who will provide their insights on the state of patent litigation andpractical tips for litigants. Through lecture and demonstration, you will be able to hone your patent litigation skills injust two days.

What You Will Learn• NEW! Recent changes in patent law, including an overview of key Supreme Court, Federal Circuit, and

District Court decisions, and a discussion of recent proposed legislation

• NEW! Views from the Bench: District Court Judges share their views on patent litigation, including the impact that Patent Rules have had on the desired effect, as well as practical tips for the more efficient handling anddisposition of patent cases

• NEW! Considerations for when alternative dispute resolution proceedings are preferred to, or used in conjunctionwith, district court patent litigation

• Strategy and tactics in reexamination and post-grant review proceedings

• NEW! Managing multi-party litigation, including efficient strategies for working in joint defense groups and handlingrelated indemnification matters

• ENHANCED! Current trends in patent damages in the post-Uniloc environment, and discussion on patent exhaustionand license agreements

• NEW! Current strategies in defending against willfulness and the role of opinions

Special Features:• Earn ethics credit

• Demonstration: direct and cross of an expert

Who Should AttendPatent litigators and lawyers in patent firms who advise clients in disputes that may lead to litigation, examination orpost-grant proceedings at the Patent Office; general business litigators whose practice includes patent trials; patentprosecutors whose actions in preparing and prosecuting patents are critical in providing support for the proper claimconstruction and in assessing infringement and invalidity issues; and corporate counsel who will have the responsibilityfor supervising patent litigation, interpreting its progress for management, and pursuing opportunities for settlement,as well as those corporate counsel with responsibility for a company’s overall patent strategy.

Corporate Political Activities 2014:Complying with Campaign Finance,Lobbying and Ethics LawPatent Litigation 2014

Register Today at www.pli.edu/AHZ4 or Call (800) 260-4PLI

LIVE WEBCASTSame Great Program – From Your LocationThe New York City session of this program is available live via the web at www.pli.edu:

Print the Course Handbook, submit questions electronically and get “real-time” education right from your PC!

If you have any questions, please call PLI’s Customer Service Department at (800) 260-4PLI.

Page 3: Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements! Patent …...Why You Should Attend Rapid changes in patent law make it necessary that, whether you are the plaintiff’s or defendant’s counsel,

Jeanne M. GillsFoley & Lardner LLPChicago

Chair:

Program Attorney: John M. Mola

Michael J. AbernathyK&L Gates LLPChicago

Hugh A. AbramsSidley Austin LLPChicago

Kenneth R. AdamoKirkland & Ellis LLPChicago

Steven BorsandEVP Intellectual PropertyTrading Technologies

International, Inc.Chicago

Samuel A. BrownHusch Blackwell LLPChicago

Gil Calvillo, Ph.D. Owner & PresidentCalvillo & AssociatesLos Angeles

Kara E. F. CenarBryan Cave LLPChicago

Daniel R. CherryHusch Blackwell LLPChicago

Hon. David H. Coar (Ret.)Former District Judge, United

States District Court,Northern District of Illinois

Mediator/ArbitratorJAMSChicago

Tiffany P. CunninghamPerkins Coie LLPChicago

Margaret M. DuncanMcDermott Will & Emery LLPChicago

James R. FergusonMayer Brown LLPChicago

Donald A. GorowskyPresidentFinancial Advisors LLCMinneapolis

David J.F. GrossFaegre Baker Daniels LLPMinneapolis

Clinton H. Hallman, Jr.Chief Counsel, PatentsKraft Foods, Inc.Northfield, Illinois

Julianne M. HartzellMarshall, Gerstein & Borun LLPChicago

Brent A. HawkinsMcDermott Will & Emery LLPChicago

Roy E. HoferLaw Offices of Roy E. HoferBurr Ridge, Illinois

Hon. James F. HoldermanChief JudgeUnited States District Court,

Northern District of IllinoisChicago

Darrick HookerKrieg DeVaultChicago

Keith R. Hummel Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLPNew York City

Christine Abuel PompaFitch, Even, Tabin &

Flannery LLPChicago

George E. QuillinFoley & Lardner LLPWashington, D.C.

Ferlillia V. RobersonKirkland & Ellis LLPChicago

Mindy V. SooterFaegre Baker Daniels LLPDenver

Michelle M. UmbergerPerkins Coie LLPMadison, Wisconsin

FACULTYChicago

Christopher K. HuBlank Rome LLPNew York City

Chair:

George E. BadenochKenyon & Kenyon LLPNew York City

Elaine Herrmann BlaisGoodwin Procter LLPBoston

Carolyn H. BlankenshipSenior Vice President,

Associate General Counsel,Intellectual Property

Thomson ReutersNew York City

Kenneth L. Bressler Blank Rome LLPNew York City

David BrightmanVP, Associate General Counsel

- IP LitigationYahoo! Inc.Sunnyvale, California

Gil Calvillo, Ph.D. Owner & PresidentCalvillo & AssociatesLos Angeles

Arlene L. ChowHogan Lovells US LLPNew York City

Heather A. FaltinSenior Patent CounselComcast Cable

Communications LLCPhiladelphia

Christopher HorganIP Licensing & Litigation

CounselConcert TechnologySan Jose

Keith R. Hummel Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLPNew York City

Constance S. HuttnerBudd Larner P.C.Short Hills, New Jersey

Hon. Edward A. Infante(Ret.) Former Chief Magistrate

Judge, U.S. District Court,Northern District ofCalifornia

JAMSSan Francisco

Gene W. LeeRopes & Gray LLPNew York City

Eric J. LobenfeldHogan Lovells US LLPNew York City

Hon. Colleen McMahonDistrict JudgeUnited States District Court,

Southern District of New York

New York City

Nicholas K. MitrokostasGoodwin Procter LLPBoston

Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.President and Founder,

IPWatchdog.comIP Watchdog, Inc.Leesburg, Virginia

Garreth SarosiFormer Deputy

General Counsel Metropcs/T-MobileRichardson, Texas

Vincent A. Thomas Senior Managing Director,

Co-Leader, IntellectualProperty

FTI Consulting, Inc.Chicago

Hon. Mary Pat ThyngeChief Magistrate JudgeUnited States District Court,

District of DelawareWilmington, Delaware

Hon. William G. YoungDistrict JudgeUnited States District Court,

District of MassachusettsBoston

Jeffrey T. ZachmannCounsel - Corporate LitigationIBM CorporationArmonk, New York

New York City, Groupcast Locations and Live Webcast

Page 4: Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements! Patent …...Why You Should Attend Rapid changes in patent law make it necessary that, whether you are the plaintiff’s or defendant’s counsel,

Morning Session: 9:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.

9:00Program OverviewCHI: Jeanne M. GillsNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Christopher K. Hu

9:15Recent Developments and Changes in PatentLaw and Their Effects on Patent LitigationThis session is a broad review of the important decisions of theSupreme Court, Federal Circuit and District Courts over thepast year, as well as of still-emerging and developing effects ofthe America Invents Act (AIA) and proposed patent legislation(e.g., the Innovation Act (H.R. 3309)). Key trends anddeveloping patent law doctrines will also be covered.CHI: Margaret M. Duncan, Brent A. HawkinsNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Elaine Herrmann Blais, Nicholas K. Mitrokostas

10:15Willful Infringement, Current DefensiveStrategies and the Role of Opinions This session will discuss willful infringement and the currentstrategies companies are taking to defend against it. It willdiscuss how courts are applying the Seagate Technology casetoday, and the rise of motions to dismiss willfulness at thepleading stage. Strategies for protection without opinions, andthe question of whether willfulness based solely on post-filingconduct is becoming extinct, will also be discussed. The role ofopinions in defending against willfulness and their possibleimportance in inducement cases will also be explained. CHI: Clinton H. Hallman, Jr., Christine Abuel PompaNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: David Brightman, Heather A. Faltin

11:15 Networking Break

11:30The Patentability of Business Methods: The Continuing Search for a Clear RuleThe long-awaited decision of the U. S. Supreme Court in Bilskiin 2010 was expected to clarify the law with respect to thepatentability of business methods. However, the SupremeCourt’s “flexible” test of patentability, which includes, but is notlimited to, the pre-existing “machine or transformation test,”does not provide a clear resolution of the issue. SubsequentFederal Circuit decisions, including CyberSource, Ultramercialand Dealertrack, make clear that the courts are still searchingfor the boundary between patentable and unpatentable subjectmatter. This session will explore recent developments in thelaw governing the patentabilty of business methods.CHI: Steven Borsand, Tiffany P. Cunningham, Michelle M. UmbergerNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Carolyn H. Blankenship

12:30 Lunch Break

Afternoon Session: 1:45 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.

1:45Parallel Patent Reexaminations and PTAB ProceedingsThe filing of reexaminations continues to be a strategy forparties against whom a patent of questionable validity has beenasserted. A reexamination proceeding might be initiated inanticipation of litigation or filed soon after litigation has begun. A parallel reexamination proceeding is usually a basis for seekinga stay of the more costly district court proceeding and/or usedto bring the patentee to the bargaining table. Recent statisticsreflect a sharp rise in the filing of inter partes review (IPR) andcovered business method review (CBM) proceedings followingAIA. This session will cover best practices on these newproceedings including: timing of when to file; how to put forth awinning petition; and whether a Patent Owner should file aPreliminary Response. In addition, this session will address theeffects of any such reexamination or post-grant proceeding onlitigation, including stays, as well as the potential effects oncollateral estoppel, claim construction positions, willfulnesscharges, inequitable conduct claims, and on damages andintervening rights (e.g., if claims are amended). CHI: Hugh A. Abrams, George E. QuillinNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: George E. Badenoch

2:45Alternative Dispute ResolutionThis session will analyze the forms of alternative disputeresolution typically seen in patent cases, including mediationand court-supervised settlement discussions. The timing ofalternative dispute resolution procedures, effective mediationstrategies and mediator-selection criteria will be discussed.This session will also include an experienced mediator as aspeaker who will examine the factors that make for successfuland unsuccessful mediations. CHI: Hon. David H. Coar (Ret.), Roy E. Hofer, Hon. James F. HoldermanNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Christopher Horgan, Hon. Edward A. Infante (Ret.), Garreth Sarosi

3:45 Networking Break

4:00Joint Defense and Indemnification – [Getting Along With Others]Parallel patent infringement actions are often brought at thesame time against multiple defendants. Joint defenseagreements are often entered into for efficiency andconsistency in defending the actions. However, there arenegatives as well as positives and numerous possible pitfalls inentering into joint defense arrangements. This session willdiscuss the legal and practical considerations of workingefficiently with co-defendants and their counsel, includingnegotiating joint defense agreements; managing costs andresponsibilities among numerous parties where positions mayconflict; strategies for when to take the lead and when to ridethe wave; and managing related issues of indemnification/indemnitee interactions.CHI: Samuel A. Brown, Kara E. F. Cenar, Daniel R. CherryNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Jeffrey T. Zachmann

5:00 Adjourn

PROGRAM SCHEDULEDay One: 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

Page 5: Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements! Patent …...Why You Should Attend Rapid changes in patent law make it necessary that, whether you are the plaintiff’s or defendant’s counsel,

Please plan to arrive with enough time to register before the conference begins. A networking breakfast will be available upon your arrival.

Day Two: 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

Morning Session: 9:00 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.

9:00Infringement Based on the Acts of Multiple PartiesIn a world that is increasingly connected by networks withservices provided by multiple entities, and in which complexproducts are made up of components from numerous sources,issues of infringement based on the acts of multiple parties arisefar more frequently. This session will cover the constantly evolvinglaw relating to infringement where not all steps are performed byone entity. The relationship between the entities necessary for afinding of infringement will also be covered, including the effect ofthe Akamai and McKesson Federal Circuit decisions. This sessionwill also discuss recent cases on the standards for determiningother forms of multi-party infringement, including inducement ofinfringement and contributory infringement.CHI: Michael J. AbernathyNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Gene W. Lee

10:00Patent Damages and ExhaustionRecent Federal Circuit and District Court decisions reflect a trendtowards damages awards based less on application of rules thanon evidence of actual harm sustained. This session will coverrecent cases on damages in the aftermath of the Federal Circuit’sUniloc decision, which rejected 25% of an infringer’s anticipatedprofits as a rule of thumb for a reasonable royalty, a rule that hadlong been a reference point for plaintiffs’ experts. The effect of thepatent exhaustion will also be discussed. Other cases on both lostprofits and reasonable royalty damages will be analyzed. The issueof a different royalty rate for ongoing infringing sales where noinjunction is entered will also be addressed.CHI: James R. FergusonNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Kenneth L. Bressler, Vincent A. Thomas

11:00 Networking Break

11:15Dealing With Experts, Including Rule 26Employee ExpertsExpert witnesses play a critical role in patent litigation withrespect to both liability and damages issues. Often a company’sbest resource on the technology at issue or state of themarketplace is one of its employees. The employee (typically a“non-retained” or “inside” expert) can provide valuableinformation on the state of the prior art or state of the marketand competition, advise on the similarities or differencesbetween the patent claims and the accused products/methods,help keep the company focused on the business issues, and helpidentify outside experts. Any such employee that may be used toprovide expert opinions (in additional to factual testimony) mustlikewise be disclosed as an expert, including disclosure of thesubject matter and underlying opinions and facts to be testifiedon. This session will explore the selection and use of testifyingand non-testifying experts, the use of experts at Markmanhearings, the development of expert opinions, the preparation ofexpert reports, and the discoverability of certain communicationswith the expert. This segment will also consider the use ofevidentiary motions, including Daubert motions and other motionsin limine to exclude or limit expert testimony at trial. A live expertdemonstration will be a component of this session.CHI: Donald A. Gorowsky, David J.F. Gross, Mindy V. SooterNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Arlene L. Chow, Eric J. Lobenfeld

12:15 Lunch Break

Afternoon Session: 1:45 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.

1:45The Art and Science of PersuasionIn theory, the outcome of a patent litigation depends on thefacts and the applicable law, factors over which litigants havelittle if any control. In the real world, winning a patent casedepends on a variety of factors over which the parties havesome control. Where the litigation is brought and tried, how aparty’s message is conveyed and by whom the message isconveyed all impact the final outcome. Accordingly, how a caseis presented at trial must include consideration of the venue,the makeup of the jury, the judge, the attributes of the parties’witnesses, attorneys and representatives, and non-substantivefacts that may color the jury’s perception of the case. This session will look at the many factors that must beconsidered and addressed in presenting a persuasive case attrial, including jury psychology, jury research, effective witnessand attorney selection, preparation and presentation.CHI, NYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Gil Calvillo, Keith R. Hummel

2:45 Networking Break

3:00 Patent Litigation – Views From The BenchPatent litigation has long been recognized as a form of federalcivil litigation that is typically more complex and expensive thanthe ordinary case. Because of this, much has been written aboutpatent litigation, some of it complimentary and some not soflattering. On one hand, patent cases have been described asamong the best-litigated of all federal cases. On the other hand,patent cases have been characterized as over-litigated,excessively contentious and tedious affairs during which far toomany issues are raised at both the trial and appellate levels. This session will feature current Federal District Court Judges,who will offer their views of patent litigation, including what’sgood, what’s bad and what’s unnecessary. The Judges willdiscuss such topics as Local Patent Rules and Practice, managingmulti-party litigation including scheduling issues, use of expertsin patent cases, mediation and settlement of patent cases, andgeneral practice tips for patent counsel.CHI: Kenneth R. Adamo and Ferlillia V. Roberson,Moderators; Hon. James F. HoldermanNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Constance S. Huttner, Moderator;Hon. Colleen McMahon, Hon. Mary Pat Thynge, Hon. William G. Young

4:00Ethical Issues in Patent LitigationIn-house and outside counsel face ethical issues in patentlitigation at every step of the process, from pre-suit Rule 11compliance, throughout the discovery process, and continuingthrough to trial and appeal. The sometimes fuzzy boundarybetween ethical transgression and zealous advocacy will beexplained. Ethical issues relating to conflicts will be covered.USPTO ethical rules that apply to practitioners licensed by the USPTO even when practicing in another forum will also be addressed. CHI: Julianne M. Hartzell, Darrick HookerNYC, CLE, COL, NB & WEB: Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.

5:00 Adjourn

Page 6: Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements! Patent …...Why You Should Attend Rapid changes in patent law make it necessary that, whether you are the plaintiff’s or defendant’s counsel,

PLI’s GuaranteeIt’s simple. If you’re not completely satisfied with the return on your investment from any PLI program,your money will be refunded in full.

PLI’s Nationally Acclaimed Course Handbooks – Now Available Online Our Course Handbooks represent the definitive thinking of the nation’s finest legal minds, and are considered thestandard reference in the field. The Handbook is prepared specifically for this program and stands alone as a permanentreference. The Course Handbook will be available online several days prior to the program!

Log in to www.pli.edu, go to My Online Library and click on the Course Materials tab. You can review the material orprepare questions to raise at the program. You will have access to the Course Handbook for one year from the program date. All attendees at the live program and Groupcast locations will also receive a bound or flash drive copy.

Pro Bono EffortsSince 1933, PLI has been the comprehensive resource for the training and development needs of legal professionals.PLI is heavily involved in pro bono and research and development activities to ensure that all practicing attorneysand law students remain on the cutting edge. These activities include awarding full and partial scholarships to ourInstitutes and Programs, assisting public interest organizations in their training needs, and helping law studentsbecome first-rate attorneys by posting free lectures on our web site. For more information, go online to pro-bono.pli.edu.

PLI ScholarshipsPLI is pleased to make scholarships available for all programs. To apply, visit www.pli.edu/probono

Register Today at www.pli.edu/AHZ4 or Call (800) 260-4PLI

Unlimited Annual AccessIndividual Privileged Members have the complete freedom to attend allof PLI’s 400+ annual programs and Live Webcasts for one flat annual fee.For just $3,495 you can get the training you need. Contact [email protected] for more information.

Page 7: Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements! Patent …...Why You Should Attend Rapid changes in patent law make it necessary that, whether you are the plaintiff’s or defendant’s counsel,

Location/Hotel Information: Visit us on the Web atwww.pli.edu or call us at (800) 260-4PLI for information aboutseminar locations and hotel accommodations for this program.Payment Policy: Registration fees are due in advance.Attendees may pay by check, Visa, MasterCard, AmericanExpress or Diners Club.Cancellations: All cancellations received 3 business days priorto the program will be refunded 100%. If you do not cancelwithin the allotted time period, payment is due in full. You maysubstitute another individual to attend the program.CLE/CPD Credit: PLI programs offer CLE credit in all U.S.jurisdictions that have mandatory CLE requirements and someforeign jurisdictions with CPD requirements. Please checkwww.pli.edu/credit for credit details, eligibility and approval

status for your particular jurisdiction(s). New York: In accordancewith the requirements of the Continuing Legal Education Board,this non-transitional continuing legal education course has beenapproved for a maximum of 14 credit hours, of which 13 credithours can be applied toward the Professional Practice requirementand 1 credit hour can be applied toward the Ethics requirement.California: This activity is approved for MCLE credit in the amountof 12 hours, of which 1 hour will apply to legal ethics. Special Needs: If you have special needs as addressed by theAmericans with Disabilities Act, please notify Customer Serviceat least two weeks prior to your program.Email: [email protected] Us On The Web: www.pli.edu/AHZ4

MAIL:Practising Law Institute 1177 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036

F O U R E A S Y W AY S T O R E G I S T E R

REGISTRATION/HOTEL INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT WWW.PLI.EDU

FAX: (800) 321-0093 Open 24 Hours!

PHONE: (800) 260-4PLI Monday - Friday, 9 a.m. - 6 p.m.,

Eastern Time

WEB: www.pli.edu/AHZ4

Fax or mail completed Registration/Order Formon back cover

Gain all-inclusive access to PLI’s eBook library

24/7 access to nearly 4,000 segments of legal research in 23 practice areas

Treatises | Course Handbooks | Answer Books | Legal Forms | Program Transcripts

For more information, contact PLI Library Relations

(877) 900-5291 | [email protected] | www.pli.edu/Discover

PLI is the largest producer of Online CLE content. Our Online Library contains more than 2,800 hours ofOn-Demand web programs, MP3s and MP4s. Almost all of our programs are recorded and archivedwithin two weeks of delivery. Entire programs or individual web segments may then be viewed 24/7 viaboth streaming video and audio.

Each On-Demand program features the video and/or audio of the program, along with downloadable Course Materials and an application for CLE credit. PLI anywhere, anytime you want it.

PLI On-Demand. The easiest way to complete your MCLE requirement.

Page 8: Satisfy Your CLE and CPD Requirements! Patent …...Why You Should Attend Rapid changes in patent law make it necessary that, whether you are the plaintiff’s or defendant’s counsel,

(Use

Str

ee

t A

dd

ress

fo

r U

PS

De

live

ry)

NON-

PROF

IT

ORGA

NIZA

TION

U.S.

POS

TAGE

PAID

PRAC

TISI

NG L

AWIN

STIT

UTE

Please re

gister m

e for the fo

llowing session:

The information below is re

quired to properly process your C

LE certifica

te:

Stat

e:

____

____

____

_Ba

r ID#

__

____

____

___

Stat

e: _

____

____

____

Bar I

D# _

____

____

____

Stat

e:

____

____

____

_Ba

r ID#

__

____

____

___

Whe

n Re

gist

erin

g, P

leas

e Re

fer

to P

riorit

y Co

de: A

HZ4

Make necessary corre

ctions on mailing ad

dress.

Pate

nt L

itiga

tion

2014

PRIO

RITY

COD

E: A

HZ4

8A50

0

Prac

tisin

g La

w In

stitu

te11

77 A

venu

e of

the

Amer

icas

New

Yor

k, N

Y 10

036

5186

9 Ch

icag

o Se

min

ar,*

Oct

ober

6-7

, 201

4, U

nive

rsity

of C

hica

go G

leac

her C

ente

r, $1

,695

2

5187

0 N

ew Y

ork

City

Sem

inar

,* N

ovem

ber 1

0-11

, 201

4, P

LI Ne

w Y

ork

Cent

er, $

1,69

52

5528

1 Cl

evel

and

Grou

pcas

t Loc

atio

n,*

Nove

mbe

r 10-

11, 2

014,

Cle

vela

nd M

etro

polit

an

Bar A

ssoc

iatio

n, $

1,69

52

5528

0 Co

lum

bus

Grou

pcas

t Loc

atio

n,*

Nove

mbe

r 10-

11, 2

014,

Col

umbu

s Ba

r Ass

ocia

tion,

$1,

6952

5509

9 N

ew B

runs

wic

k Gr

oupc

ast L

ocat

ion,

* No

vem

ber 1

0-11

, 201

4, N

ew J

erse

y In

stitu

te

for C

ontin

uing

Leg

al E

duca

tion,

$1,

6952

Live

Web

cast

,* N

ovem

ber 1

0-11

, 201

4, #

5187

2, $

1,69

52

2 Privilege

d Mem

ber F

ee: $

051

871

Cour

se H

andb

ook

only,

$22

0

My

Emai

l add

ress

is:_

____

____

____

____

____

__ P

leas

e se

nd m

e Em

ail u

pdat

es o

n PL

I pro

gram

s an

d se

rvice

s.

FREE Shipp

ing and Ha

ndling in th

e Un

ited States, U

.S. P

ossessions and

Canad

a on all prep

aid Pu

blica

tion pu

rchases. CA, FL, IL, M

A, M

D, NJ, NY, OH

, PA, RI,

TX, V

A and DC

resid

ents please ad

d ap

plica

ble sales tax to th

e price

of P

ublications.

*Include

s Co

urse Handb

ook, in either bound

volum

e or flash drive

form

at fo

r program

atte

ndees, and

in digital format fo

r Web

cast participants.

All atte

ndees will have access to a dow

nloada

ble version of th

e Ha

ndbo

ok several days prior to the prog

ram.

Nam

e___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

Title

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_

Firm

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

Addr

ess_

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

City

/Sta

te/Z

ip__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

Phon

e __

____

____

____

____

___

Fax

____

____

____

____

____

_Em

ail__

____

____

____

____

____

Plea

se s

end

me:

Pu

blica

tions

Cat

alog

In

stitu

tes

and

Prog

ram

s Ca

talo

g

Info

rmat

ion

on P

LI M

embe

rshi

p

Pra

ctis

ing

Law

In

stit

ute

®REGISTRATIO

N/O

RDER FORM

Regi

ster

Tod

ay!C

all (

800)

260

-4PL

I • w

ww

.pli.

edu/

AHZ4