scaling up climate information services

1
Scaling Up Climate Smart Informa3on Services within the Climate Smart Agriculture Framework From Weather to Climate Time Scales Informa(on needs depend on decisions With increasing lead (me: Decisions more context and farmerspecific Informa(on more uncertain, more complex Therefore the scope of services needed increases Climate services must be more than extension of weather services Key Challenges to Effec3ve Services for Smallholder Farmers Salience: tailoring content, scale, format, lead(me to farm decision making Legi*macy: giving farmers an effec(ve voice in design and delivery Access: providing (mely access to remote rural communi(es with marginal infrastructure Equity: ensuring that women, poor, socially marginalized benefit Integra*on: climate services as part of a larger package of support Good Prac3ce Lessons Fostering Salience: Coproduc(on of services requires enabling ins(tu(onal frameworks that support sustained interac(ons among climate and agricultural ins(tu(ons and farmers. To be relevant, climate informa(on must be at the local scale of farm decisionmaking. Seamless suites of informa(on and advisories, at a range of lead (mes, enable farmers to manage evolving risks. Fostering Legi1macy: Give farmers an effec(ve voice in the codesign, co produc(on and evalua(on of services. Integra(ng local and scien(fic knowledge fosters trust and meaningful dialog. Fostering Access: Use of complex, probabilis(c informa(on for seasonal planning is best facilitated through group interac(on. Scalable communica(on channels (ICT, interac(ve radio) can extend the reach and reduce cost of interac(ons. Fostering Equity: Equitable services require proac(ve targe(ng of women and other socially marginalized groups. Learning from Good Prac3ce Reviewed 18 case studies: Mali, India na(onal agrometeorology advisory program evalua(ons 16 other ini(a(ves in Africa and South Asia How do they address the 5 key challenges? Common approaches? Generalizable lessons? What will it take for climate services to work for smallholder farmers – at scale? Partnerships, processes for coproduc(on of services The vulnerable engaged and targeted Alexa Jay 1 , Arame Tall 2 and James Hansen 3 Enhanced hydromet service capacity to provide farmer relevant informa(on Scalable communica(on channels Scalable services balanced with contextspecific needs 1 CCAFS Flagship 2 Communica(ons Officer, IRI, New York. [email protected] 2 CCAFS Flagship 2 Climate Services Coordinator, IFPRI, Washington, DC. [email protected] 3 CCAFS Flagship 2 Leader, IRI, New York. [email protected] haps://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/42445

Category:

Environment


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Scaling  Up  Climate  Smart  Informa3on  Services  within  the  Climate  Smart  Agriculture  Framework  

From  Weather  to  Climate  Time  Scales  

§  Informa(on  needs  depend  on  decisions  

§  With  increasing  lead  (me:  

•  Decisions  more  context-­‐  and  farmer-­‐specific  

•  Informa(on  more  uncertain,  more  complex  

•  Therefore  the  scope  of  services  needed  increases  

§  Climate  services  must  be  more  than  extension  of  weather  services  

Key  Challenges  to  Effec3ve  Services  for  Smallholder  Farmers  

§  Salience:  tailoring  content,  scale,  format,  lead-­‐(me  to  farm  decision-­‐making  

§  Legi*macy:  giving  farmers  an  effec(ve  voice  in  design  and  delivery  

§  Access:  providing  (mely  access  to  remote  rural  communi(es  with  marginal  infrastructure  

§  Equity:  ensuring  that  women,  poor,  socially  marginalized  benefit  

§  Integra*on:  climate  services  as  part  of  a  larger  package  of  support  

Good  Prac3ce  Lessons  Fostering  Salience:  

§  Co-­‐produc(on  of  services  requires  enabling  ins(tu(onal  frameworks  that  support  sustained  interac(ons  among  climate  and  agricultural  ins(tu(ons  and  farmers.  

§  To  be  relevant,  climate  informa(on  must  be  at  the  local  scale  of  farm  decision-­‐making.  

§  Seamless  suites  of  informa(on  and  advisories,  at  a  range  of  lead  (mes,  enable  farmers  to  manage  evolving  risks.  

Fostering  Legi1macy:  

§  Give  farmers  an  effec(ve  voice  in  the  co-­‐design,  co-­‐produc(on  and  evalua(on  of  services.  

§  Integra(ng  local  and  scien(fic  knowledge  fosters  trust  and  meaningful  dialog.  

Fostering  Access:  

§  Use  of  complex,  probabilis(c  informa(on  for  seasonal  planning  is  best  facilitated  through  group  interac(on.  

§  Scalable  communica(on  channels  (ICT,  interac(ve  radio)  can    extend  the  reach  and  reduce  cost  of  interac(ons.  

Fostering  Equity:  

§  Equitable  services  require  proac(ve  targe(ng  of  women  and  other  socially  marginalized  groups.    

Learning  from  Good  Prac3ce  

§  Reviewed  18  case  studies:  

•  Mali,  India  na(onal  agrometeorology  advisory  program  evalua(ons  

•  16  other  ini(a(ves  in  Africa  and  South  Asia  

§  How  do  they  address  the  5  key  challenges?  

§  Common  approaches?  

§  Generalizable  lessons?  

What  will  it  take  for  climate  services  to  work  for    smallholder  farmers  –  at  scale?  

§  Partnerships,  processes  for  co-­‐produc(on  of  services  

§  The  vulnerable  engaged  and  targeted  

Alexa  Jay1,  Arame  Tall2  and  James  Hansen3  

§  Enhanced  hydro-­‐met  service  capacity  to  provide  farmer-­‐relevant  informa(on  

§  Scalable  communica(on  channels  

§  Scalable  services  balanced  with  context-­‐specific  needs  

1  CCAFS  Flagship  2  Communica(ons  Officer,  IRI,  New  York.    [email protected]    2  CCAFS  Flagship  2  Climate  Services  Coordinator,  IFPRI,  Washington,  DC.    [email protected]    3  CCAFS  Flagship  2  Leader,  IRI,  New  York.    [email protected]    

haps://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/42445