scbda solo and ensemble wind assessment solo and ensemble wind assessment time_____ judge ... _____...
TRANSCRIPT
Go to www.learningsciences.com/bookresources to download this page.Performance Assessment © 2015 Learning Sciences International
Performance Assessment of Complex Processes
SCB
DA
So
lo a
nd E
nsem
ble
Win
d A
sses
smen
t
Tim
e___
____
____
_ J
udge
#__
____
__ S
choo
l___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__ C
ity_
____
____
____
Dat
e __
____
____
____
____
___
Perf
orm
er(s
) N
ames
___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
Gra
de(s
) in
sch
ool_
____
____
___
Year
s E
xper
ienc
e___
____
__ In
stru
men
t(s)
___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Sele
ctio
n___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__ C
ompo
ser/
Arr
ange
r Se
lect
ion_
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
Req
uire
d lis
t?
Y
es
No
Tech
niq
ue
Sco
re5
43
21
Cor
rect
Not
es
+ –
Art
icul
atio
n +
–Fi
nger
ing/
Slid
e +
–
Cor
rect
not
es;
accu
rate
art
icul
atio
n an
d te
chni
cal s
kills
Min
or e
rror
s in
pitc
h,
artic
ulat
ion,
and
te
chni
cal s
kills
Inco
nsis
tent
pitc
hes,
ar
ticul
atio
ns, a
nd
tech
nica
l ski
lls
Min
imal
acc
urac
y in
pi
tche
s, a
rtic
ulat
ion,
an
d te
chni
cal s
kills
Mos
t no
tes,
ar
ticul
atio
ns, a
nd
tech
nica
l ski
lls m
isse
d
Rhy
thm
ic A
ccu
racy
Sco
re5
43
21
Not
e/R
est
Val
ue
+ –
Pul
se
+ –
Rhy
thm
s pe
rfor
med
co
rrec
tlyM
inor
err
ors
in
rhyt
hmic
acc
urac
yIn
cons
iste
nt r
hyth
mic
ac
cura
cyM
inim
al e
rror
s in
rh
ythm
ic a
ccur
acy
Lack
of r
hyth
mic
ac
cura
cy
Ton
eS
core
54
32
1
Bre
athi
ng
+ –
Embo
uchu
re
+ –
Post
ure
+ –
Focu
s an
d re
sona
nce
appr
opri
ate
for
leve
l of
per
form
er(s
)
Min
or in
cons
iste
ncie
s in
focu
s an
d re
sona
nce
Maj
or in
cons
iste
ncie
s in
focu
s an
d re
sona
nce
Con
sist
ent
prob
lem
s in
focu
s an
d re
sona
nce
Focu
s an
d re
sona
nce
poor
Inte
rpre
tati
on
Sco
re5
43
21
Dyn
amic
s +
–B
alan
ce
+ –
Phra
sing
+
–St
yle
+ –
Tem
po
+ –
Con
sist
ent
use
of
expr
essi
ve e
lem
ents
Min
or in
cons
iste
ncie
s in
use
of e
xpre
ssiv
e el
emen
ts
Maj
or in
cons
iste
ncie
s in
use
of e
xpre
ssiv
e el
emen
ts
Mos
t ex
pres
sive
el
emen
ts m
isse
dA
ll ex
pres
sive
el
emen
ts m
isse
d
Into
nat
ion
Sco
re5
43
21
Indi
vidu
al
+ –
With
Acc
ompa
nim
ent
+ –
Into
natio
n ap
prop
riat
e fo
r le
vel
of p
erfo
rmer
Min
or in
cons
iste
ncie
s in
into
natio
nM
ajor
inco
nsis
tenc
ies
in in
tona
tion
Con
sist
ent
prob
lem
s in
into
natio
nIn
tona
tion
poor
Oth
er F
acto
rsS
core
54
32
1
Stag
e Pr
esen
ce
+ –
App
eara
nce
+ –
Mus
ic C
hoic
e +
–Su
peri
orE
xcel
lent
Ave
rage
Fair
Poor
Com
men
ts:
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
Tota
l Poi
nts
Rat
ing
Tabl
eI:
27–3
0 p
oint
sSu
perior
II: 2
1–26
poi
nts
Exc
ellent
Adj
udic
ator
Sig
natu
reIII
: 15–
20 p
oint
sGoo
dIV
: 9–1
4 po
ints
Fair
V: 0
–8Poo
r
Source:
So
uth
Car
olin
a B
and
Dir
ecto
rs A
sso
ciat
ion
, ban
dlin
k.o
rg/s
olo
_an
d_
ense
mb
le/r
eso
urc
es/.
Use
d w
ith
per
mis
sio
n.
Rat
ing
Performance_Assessment_FINAL_ARCHIVE_05-29-15.indd 87 6/15/15 3:29 PM