school finance - education week filefunding across districts within a state. the district of...
TRANSCRIPT
52 Education WEEK l January 13, 2011
Wyoming
Rhode island
neW JeRsey
neW yoRk
ConneCtiCut
maRyland
VeRmont
massaChusetts
WisConsin
maine
alaska
neW hampshiRe
kansas
ViRginia
geoRgia
pennsylVania
delaWaRe
West ViRginia
ohio
miChigan
nebRaska
alabama
minnesota
CalifoRnia
oRegon
indiana
aRkansas
ioWa
south CaRolina
louisiana
floRida
neW mexiCo
Washington
illinois
kentuCky
montana
missouRi
noRth dakota
south dakota
aRizona
oklahoma
texas
noRth CaRolina
ColoRado
mississippi
tennessee
utah
neVada
idaho
distRiCt of Columbia3
haWaii3
U.S.5
note: states are ordered based on unrounded scores. 1 figures in this column are adjusted to reflect regional cost differences and weighted for student needs. 2 the Clark County school district enrolls the majority of students in nevada, making its per-pupil spending the statewide median. in addition, Clark County is nevada’s lowest-
spending district. because of these two factors, a value for the mcloone index comparable to other states’ cannot be calculated. nevada’s grade is based on all other available indicators.
3 the district of Columbia and hawaii are single-district jurisdictions. as a result, it is not possible to calculate measures of financial equity, which capture the distribution of funding across districts within a state. the district of Columbia and hawaii do not receive grades for school finance.
4 the district of Columbia does not have a state-level revenue source. 5 the u.s. row reports the indicator value for the average state. souRCe: epe Research Center, 2011
School Finance
A-B+B+B+B+B+BBBB-B-C+C+C+C+C+C+C+CCCCCCCCCCC-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-D+D+D+D+D+D+D+DDDDD-NANAC
eqUity Spending
Wealth-neutrality Score (2008)1
90.387.687.587.386.986.885.982.682.682.582.178.878.378.377.877.777.777.575.675.174.674.574.273.773.773.673.172.772.072.071.971.771.171.171.070.570.568.768.067.267.066.966.666.565.765.765.665.562.3NANA75.3
0.0010.122
-0.0020.1040.0250.2010.1230.0230.0600.110
-0.2290.148
-0.0180.1810.1280.1540.2950.0670.0370.162
-0.1620.1280.0430.0200.0700.0000.0760.0510.1790.2120.1430.0200.0650.1760.0350.0720.1130.0640.0030.0640.0350.0900.1450.1100.2770.164
-0.010-0.0200.317
NANA
0.085
gradeRelationship between
district funding and local property wealth
(negative value indicates higher funding for poorer districts)
McLoone index (2008)1
91.490.190.997.790.693.083.788.691.687.391.287.289.489.490.189.386.594.490.791.592.992.392.491.191.289.892.391.491.094.095.192.991.888.285.791.890.091.090.492.092.690.392.093.688.989.894.7NA2
88.8NANA
90.9
Actual spending as percent of
amount needed to bring all students to median level
Coefficient of Variation
(2008)1
0.1530.1280.1890.1440.1350.1090.2230.1960.1050.2000.3270.1970.1570.1340.1260.1660.1440.0790.1700.1340.1940.1060.1560.1630.1430.1420.1230.1210.1310.1350.1000.2130.1460.1500.1320.2860.1690.2280.1880.1810.1780.1950.1270.2230.1620.1290.1620.1410.224
NANA
0.163
Amount of disparity in
spending across districts (lower value indicates greater equity)
restricted range (2008)1
$4,6664,5968,6576,3815,5493,7847,9117,4002,8545,782
11,4986,0013,7063,7823,8025,0174,6422,0914,5923,6434,3863,0113,8503,1722,9503,6142,9432,8673,6043,8272,7654,0702,5015,2393,2245,1974,4473,8764,3722,9332,7723,9802,6526,2984,4273,0151,6322,7813,256
NANA
$4,286
Difference in per-pupil spending
levels at the 95th and 5th percentiles
per-pupil expend itures
(ppe), adjusted
for regional cost
differences (2008)
$17,11414,31015,59815,01213,28312,23917,05012,55911,37014,08715,42412,84011,6809,8519,897
12,32011,94911,88010,79510,31812,49110,49610,3968,852
10,4679,983
10,54111,36710,05111,5409,810
10,5938,722
10,0309,893
13,22810,53811,62911,2218,4359,1378,4398,2619,5419,4988,5076,5258,2288,633
13,31112,457
$11,223
percent of students in districts with ppe
at or above U.S.
average (2008)1
100.0100.0100.0100.0100.088.999.664.176.496.469.141.972.648.552.888.47.0
31.424.620.318.130.533.527.213.410.08.59.9
28.110.718.119.127.46.9
22.215.715.610.34.33.3
10.85.2
20.64.31.71.0
10.44.0
100.0100.040.6
Spending index (2008)1
100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.098.8
100.097.497.098.997.191.597.695.195.299.592.190.790.584.790.490.592.389.284.182.784.887.492.187.586.889.790.784.986.385.585.478.674.071.983.180.786.975.578.357.481.568.8
100.0100.089.3
percent of total taxable
resources spent
on education
(2008)
4.24.35.04.34.24.55.53.84.14.84.14.14.13.44.34.22.54.64.54.73.64.13.73.53.44.54.23.64.52.93.64.03.23.73.73.83.82.92.83.73.33.42.83.04.02.93.73.13.7
NA4
3.53.8
Per-pupil spending levels weighted by the degree to which districts meet
or approach the national average for expenditures (cost and student need
adjusted)
% %
% % %
100.0%