School Improvement Plan

February 2, 2010

Amy Digman, Lisa Greenstein, Lisa Merideth, Megan Stryjewski, Kim Tooley

Kirkwood At A Glance

• 1 Early childhood Center• 5 Elementary Schools• 2 Middle Schools• 1 High School• Total Enrollment- 5,026

• Missouri School Improvement- Accredited• Distinction in Performance

Kirkwood Demographics

Free/ Reduced Asian/ Hispanic African American White0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

KirkwoodMissouri

District Details

• Attendance Rate- 94.7/ MO 95.1• Graduation Rate- 97.1%/ MO 85%• Dropout Rate- 1.4%/ MO 4.3• Staff to Student Ratio- 17/ MO 17• Administrator to Student Ratio- 232/ MO 187• Average Staff Experience- 12.2 yrs/ MO 13.8• Average Teacher Salary-$62,140/ MO $46,089• Average Admin Salary-$127,462/ MO $82,274

2009 District MAP Results

District Improvement Level 2• Comm Arts- Not Met (4 of 7 groups Met)• Mathematics- Not Met (4 of 6 groups Met)• Attendance Rate- Met• Graduation Rate- Met

• Met- 4 Elementary Schools• Not Met- 1 High School, 2 Middle Schools, 1

Elementary School

Kirkwood District Framework

• Kirkwood Strategic Plan

• Planning Form

• School Improvement Plans: November 2008

Procedures for Developing CSIP: Written Document

• Kirkwood School District's Strategic Planning Process• A Coordinating Committee, including 15 members of the School District staff and 15 members of

the community, met June 12-14, 2007 to frame the new strategic plan. Their work included (see Framework): Beliefs Mission Objectives Parameters

• A strategic planning process has been used by Kirkwood Schools since 1991 to invite wide-spread participation in district directions and initiatives. Three different strategic plans have been written and implemented, each lasting a 5 year period resulting in notable district improvements and programs (see History). The last plan was concluded in May 2007.

• Eleven committees are now being convened to develop action plans for each of the eleven strategies. An action plan is a step-by-step outline of what needs to be done to implement the stated strategy. Committees will work through December to draft their ideas. Any Kirkwood School District staff member, parent or community member is welcome to join a strategy committee.

• For each strategy, there will be action plans written that detail how we might implement the strategy. The committee writing action plans determines how many action plans are needed. In our last strategic plan, one strategy had only 5 action plans and one strategy had 30 action plans. Each action plan includes one objective and a series of step-by-step actions that are recommended in order to reach the objective and contribute to reaching the strategy (see Action Plan Samples).

Procedures for Developing CSIP: District Perspective

• Plan revised every 5 years• Parties involved in the development and

revision- – Coordinating and Strategy committees• 15 staff/ 15 community members• Co-chaired by one staff and one parent• Over 200 people including staff, parents and

community members• Open participation

Procedures for Developing CSIP: District Perspective

• Data used includes: Surveys, student achievement scores, budget, facilities (everything available is reviewed)

• Annual update meetings with original 30 coordinating committee members to evaluate and monitor plan

Procedures for Developing CSIP: Building Perspective

• Retreat committee hears ideas from the strategy groups (recommendations regarding goals with action plans)

• Site level creates SIP teams (administrators, staff, parents)

• School vision- set goals• School has to show what strategy it would

connect to (strategic plan)• School submits school improvement plan

Components of CSIP: District Perspective

• Learning• Achievement• Program• Community Support• Data• Planning

Components of CSIP

• Beliefs, Mission, Objectives, & Parameters• 11 strategies• Each strategy contains:– Summary of Specific Action Plan Objectives– Objectives– Action Steps

CSIP Goals, Objectives, Strategies, and Action Steps

• 11 strategies • Each strategy had a committee of parents,

teachers, administrators, & community members

• Each strategy contains multiple objectives• Each objective includes multiple action steps

CSIP Goals, Objectives, Strategies, and Action Steps

• Strategy 1: We will continuously collect and analyze student data to maximize instruction that meets the unique needs of the student.

• Strategy 2: We will provide a safe and welcoming school community in which all students, staff and community members feel they belong.

• Strategy 3: We will address the unique needs of each student through the development and implementation of individual education plans.

• Strategy 4: Our educators will have the skills to effectively use innovative instructional strategies, instructional design, and resources that enable students to achieve academic excellence.

• Strategy 5: We will develop in each student the character and social skills needed to be effective learners and make meaningful contributions to the world around.

(CONTINUED)

CSIP Goals, Objectives, Strategies, and Action Steps

• Strategy 6: Our students will understand and appreciate world cultures, including their own.

• Strategy 7: Each child will develop a wide range of interests through the provision of multiple opportunities.

• Strategy 8: Students will become excellent problem solvers and decision makers in their personal lives and in a global context.

• Strategy 9: We will provide support for families to enable them to more effectively be involved in the education process.

• Strategy 10: We will develop mutually beneficial partnerships with alumni and community so they can be actively involved in supporting our mission.

• Strategy 11: We will develop a process to continually analyze and upgrade our facilities in order to support our mission and objectives.

CSIP Goals, Objectives, Strategies, and Action Steps

Example of Action PlanStrategy: We will continuously collect and analyze student data to maximize

instruction that meets the unique needs of each student. Objective: Collect, organize, and store dataAction Steps:1. Collect qualitative and quantitative data on a continuous basis.2. Evaluate district assessments to: avoid redundant collection, assess reliability

3. Provide appropriate data collection tools for: screening, diagnosing, progress monitoring, mastery assessment

4. Store data in a centralized location5. Review data collected to ensure accuracy6. Continuously assess the process and tools of data collection7. Build regular time into schedules for data collection

Data Used in Developing the Plan

• MAP scores• Qualitative data (surveys)• Tungston• District common assessments• Teacher observations• DRA• SRI• Aims Web

Explanation of Federal Grants, Technology Plans, & ePeGS

• Technology Plan

Methods of Evaluating & Monitoring: Building Perspective

• Prioritize goals• Shrink gap between current reality and vision• Retreat committee revisits and revises

Methods of Evaluating & Monitoring: District Perspective

• Annual update meeting• Original 30 committee members• Then individual administrators from each

building involved• Monitored by committee updates and

administrator check-ins/meetings (monthly)

Strengths of CSIP: District Perspective

• Built on collaboration• Ever changing to fit the needs of the district• Leads all stakeholders towards common goals

Strengths of CSIP: Building Perspective

• Builds consistency and continuity across the district

• Living and breathing document• Many stakeholders involved

Strengths of CSIP: Our Perspective

• Connection between district and individual building plans

• Multi-year plan• Process included many people...community

members, administrators, teachers• Building level plans are extremely detailed and

focused• Represents their values and beliefs

Weaknesses of CSIP: District Perspective

• Plan could always be stronger but at this time we are very pleased with the plan we have.

• Always will be the challenges of funding, student achievement expectations and changing personnel

• Was unaware that the 2009 plan was not on the website, did not know the reason for this

Weaknesses of CSIP: Building Perspective

• Many obstacles during the five years – Shifting personnel– Economics– Change in Board of Education members

Weaknesses of CSIP: Our Perspective

• District Improvement Plan is not included in the eBook

• Lack of explicit alignment to budget• Lack of explicit alignment from strategic plan

and school improvement plans• 2009-2010 plans are not posted on webpage

Recommendations for Kirkwood

• Continue to share through eBooks• Create clear connections between strategic

plan and school improvement• Clear and measurable timelines for reaching

goals• Clear explanations of funding and money

expenditures