school of medicine - u of u school of medicine | …...•advocacy – state what you observed or...
TRANSCRIPT
A N D R E W S M I T H M D , B E T H V U K I N M D , J U L I A W H I T A K E R M D ,
M A D D I E L A S S C H E R N
NEXT STEPS IN INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
HIGH FIDELITY SIMULATION AND DEBRIEFING
INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION (IPE)
“Interprofessional education occurs when students from two or more
professions learn about, from, and with each other to enable effective
collaboration and improve health outcomes. Once students understand
how to work interprofessionally, they are ready to enter the workplace as
a member of the collaborative practice team. This is a key step in
moving health systems from fragmentation to a position of strength.”
Source: World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional
education & collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization.
See http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf.
INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION (IPE)
IPE Competency Domains
1 • Values/Ethics
2 • Roles/Responsibilities
3 • IP Communication
4 • Teams and Teamwork
SIMULATION FOR IPE (EXAMPLE)
Disaster Essentials for Healthcare Professionals • Integration of IPE Core Competencies
• Experience both provider and patient role
• Teamwork skills in high stress environment
ADULT LEARNERS-EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING
• Adults learn best when they are actively engaged
• Experience the events…
• in a concrete fashion
• in a cognitive fashion
• in an emotional fashion
THE BASICS
• Who are your learners?
• What are your educational
goals, objectives and
debriefing points ?
• How will you get them actively enaged? What type
of simulation will you use?
• What resources do you have
at your disposal?
• The nitty gritty details
• L-earners
• E-ducational objectives
• A-ctive involvement
• R-resources
• N-itty gritty details
WHO ARE YOUR LEARNERS?
• What school?
• What year in training?
• What do they already
know?
• What clinical experience
do they have?
• L-earners
• E-ducational objectives
• A-ctive involvement
• R-resources
• N-itty gritty details
WHAT ARE YOUR EDUCATIONAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES?
• Physiology
• Procedural skills
• Communication
• Team training
• Resuscitation skills
• L-earners
• E-ducational objectives
• A-ctive involvement
• R-resources
• N-itty gritty details
MAJOR DEBRIEFING POINTS
• What are my main learning objectives?
• The bulk of your planning time and sim time should be spent here…
HOW WILL YOU ACTIVELY ENGAGE THEM? WHAT TYPE OF SIMULATION WILL YOU USE?
• Standardized patients
• Task trainers
• Low fidelity simulation
• High fidelity simulation
• L-earners
• E-ducational objectives
• A-ctive involvement
• R-resources
• N-itty gritty details
STANDARDIZED PATIENTS
Communication training
• Basics of talking with patients
• Taking a history
• Physical exam skills
• Breaking bad news
• Error disclosure
Points to discuss
• Body language
• Tone of voice
• Words used
TASK TRAINERS
Procedural skills • Prep
• Drape
• Positioning
Anatomy/landmarks/sensitive exams
Examples • LP
• IO
• Intubation
• Bag mask ventilation
• Central lines
• Breast/pelvis models
LOW FIDELITY SIMULATION
• Fidelity refers to the degree of “realism”
• Mannequins can be “low” fidelity but used in a “high” fidelity simulation
• “High” fidelity mannequins are not always needed for a “high” fidelity simulation
• “Low” fidelity mannequins or equipment that give minimal feedback
• Example: PALS training
HIGH FIDELITY SIMULATION
• MORE realistic simulation with high degree of feedback (debriefing)
• “Low” or “high” fidelity mannequins can be used in a “high” fidelity
simulation
• Bigger cost/time and labor utilization so often best for “larger scale” teaching
topics
Examples
• Team resuscitation
• Team communication
• Advanced resuscitation
• Multiple diverse objectives
• i.e. communication WHILE performing a skills
WHICH IS RIGHT FOR YOU?
• Start with your goals and objectives
• Can you accomplish your goals with other modalities?
• Use the lowest fidelity mannequin with lowest resource utilization that is
needed for the objective
• If high fidelity simulation is needed, consider low tech options to deliver
the highest level of realism
THE RESOURCES
• What resources do you
have at your disposal?
• SPs
• Confederates
• Simulation equipment
• How much time do you
have?
• How many learners at a time
• How many faculty
• L-earners
• E-ducational objectives
• A-ctive involvement
• R-resources
• N-itty gritty details
THE NITTY GRITTY DETAILS
• The history • How will you give it to the students?
• Prescripted
• “Door note”
• Ask the bedside nurse/parent
• Phone call
• The physical • What can your tools display?
• Mannequin vs. SP
• “Door note”
• Verbal description/nursing report
• Room set-up & “noise”
• How will it play out? • Static
• Changing
• What will the patient do?
• Can the students intervene?
• Revisit your goals and objectives
• L-earners
• E-ducational objectives
• A-ctive involvement
• R-resources
• N-itty gritty details
BRIDGING THE GAP
• The best simulation takes students from where they are in learning to
where they need to go…
• If the gap is too small, they are bored
• If the gap is too big, they are lost
BUT REALLY… IT IS ALL ABOUT FACILITATION
• Simulation is an ideal way to engage students and enhance their
experiential learning
• But really everything is learning– with the right facilitation
ADULT LEARNERS
• Adults have a set of previous life experiences, personality traits and
relationship patterns that drive their actions.
• Self directed.
• They like their learning to be problem based and meaningful to their
life situation.
• They learn best when they can immediately apply what they are
learning.
ADULT LEARNERS EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING
• Adults learn best when they are actively engaged
• Experience the events in a concrete fashion
• AND in a cognitive fashion
• And in an emotional fashion
DEBRIEFING
What is debriefing
• This term originated in the military to describe the account individuals
gave on returning from a mission
• Defusing-aided the processing of a traumatic event to accelerate
recovery
• Depended on a narrative account of what happened to develop
new strategies
• Also used in experimental psychology
FACILITATOR-LED DEBRIEFING
• A discussion of events, reflection and assimilation of activities into their
cognition to produce long lasting learning.
BREAK THAT DOWN
• Facilitator – led
• Participant discussion of events
• Reflection
• Assimilation of activities into their cognition
• To produce long lasting learning.
FUNDAMENTALS OF DEBRIEFING
• There are emotions involved
• Learners can feel exposed
• Psychological safety and a supportive environment is needed
• how do we do that?
THE ROLE OF THE FACILITATOR
• There is tension between making the participants active and
responsible for their learning and ensuring they are addressing
important issues
• The skill of the debriefer has the highest correlation to the perceived
learning experience
HOW MUCH FACILITATING?
• That depends
• The objectives
• The complexity of the scenario
• The experience of the participants with the scenario and with the
context (sim/clinical)
• Time
• People involved
DEBRIEFING STYLES
• Level of facilitation:
• Teacher style
• The guide
• Fly on the wall
• Level of participant activity:
• Low
• Intermediate
• High
What is the
“best”?
LOW FACILITATOR INVOLVEMENT
• Level of participant activity:
• Low
• Intermediate
• High: the facilitator asks a few questions to guide the discussion
PROFICIENT TO EXPERT LEARNER
• Level of participant activity:
• High: the facilitator asks a few questions and guides the discussion
• How did that feel?
• What could we have done differently?
• What would we do again?
• How will this change your practice?
• Reflection on action
• The experience provides a context for discussion and improving
outcomes
HIGH FACILITATOR INVOLVEMENT
• Level of participant activity:
• Low: the facilitator almost becomes the teacher, socratic method
• Intermediate
• High
THE NOVICE LEARNER
• Level of participant activity:
• Low: the facilitator almost become the teacher, socratic method
• How did that feel?
• Tell me about that?
• Let’s talk about ______
• What do you know about ______
• Didactic session after an experience
• The experience provides a context and exposes knowledge gaps
INTERMEDIATE FACILITATOR INVOLVEMENT
• Level of participant activity:
• Low
• Intermediate: the facilitator is a co-learner-exploring ideas
• High
ADVANCED BEGINNER/PROFICIENT
• Advocacy Inquiry Debriefing
• …a standpoint of curiosity,
mutuality, and respect.
• DO share observations based on
expertise
• DON’T assume a stance of
certainty on WHY it happened…
• ASSUME the participant is
intelligent, educated, and wants
to improve
• ASSUME there is something for
you to learn
ADVANCED BEGINNER/PROFICIENT
Advocacy Inquiry Debriefing
• Advocacy – State what you observed or your
concern clearly
• Don’t play “guess what is in the facilitator’s head”
• Do be honest and open regarding your observations
• Do be cognizant of your tone… does your voice
convey neutrality or hostility?
• Inquiry – Seek to understand why with curiosity and
respect
• Don’t ask leading questions
• Do ask questions regarding action or inaction
• Do use a tone of curiosity
• The statement and question should convey non-
judgmental inquiry while maintaining trust
USE OBJECTIVE TO GUIDE IPE DEBRIEFING
IPEC Objectives for IPE
1. Values & Ethics • Mutual Respect
2. Roles & Responsibilities • Know your role and
other’s roles
3. Interprofessional
Communication • Share expertise
4. Teams & Teamwork • Relinquish autonomy,
focus on the patient
TECHNIQUES AND TIPS
• Set the stage
• Set your expectations
• Tone of voice
• Body language
• Facial expression
• Encourage participants to answer own questions
• Ensure participants do most of the talking
• Adapt level of facilitation to use capabilities of participants (customize)
• Development of a checklist or “debriefing guide” to use during the
debriefing
PITFALLS TO AVOID
• Unwittingly controlling discussion
• Lecturing/ instructor-centered instead of instructor-LED
• Giving own analysis/ evaluation
• Impression that only your perspectives are important
• Interrupting discussion
• Interrogation
• Rigid agenda
• Concentrating on errors
• Not having sufficient time