school of something faculty of other medical education unit leeds institute of medical education...
TRANSCRIPT
School of somethingFACULTY OF OTHER
Medical Education Unit
Leeds Institute of Medical Education
Workshop:
Pause2Learn: developing the willwill and skillskill for academic performance
John [email protected]
•How do we learn? - SRL perspective
•What we did? - The Pause2Learn course
•Opportunity to explore the site
•Consider how you can use the P2L approach on your course or for Personal Tutoring
Yes No
Success depends on my ability – that is what I am born with
Success depends on the strategies that I use
Yes No
My goal is to complete all of the task at once
My goal is to complete the task in small steps, one at a time
Goal setting
High performers - short term goals - specific
Low performers - vague long term outcome goals
Yes No
I always reflect on how well I have done after a task
I always consider how to change my strategies to ensure that I meet my goals
What is Self Regulated Learning?
“An active process whereby learners set goals for their learning and monitor, regulate and control their cognition, motivation and behaviour”
(Pintrich 2002)
Self Regulated Learning
MONITOR
EVALUATE
PLAN
Schunk, Dale H., & Zimmerman, Barry J. (Eds). (1998). Self-Regulated Learning: From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice. New York: Guilford Press
Self Regulatory Checklist
Planning
Monitoring
Evaluating
After Ertmer P Newby TJ (1996) Instructional Science 24: 1-24
Skill
Will
Self Regulatory Checklist
Planning
• What is the nature of the task?
• What is my goal?
• What kind of information and strategies do I need?
• How much time and resources will I need?
• Do I need to modify environment / others?
• What is my motivation? – ease/ competence
Skill
Will
Self Regulatory Checklist
Monitoring
• Do I have a clear understanding of what I am doing?
• Does the task make sense?
• Am I reaching my goals?
• Do I need to make changes?
• Do I need to modify the environment ?
• Do I need to modify my thoughts /emotions?
Skill
Will
Self Regulatory Checklist
Evaluating
• Have I reached my goal?
• What worked?
• What didn’t work?
• Would I do things differently next time?
• What is the impact on my motivation?
Skill
Will
Self Regulated Learning
Academic Performance
School
College
Motor skill Performance – sport coaching
The evidence!
SRL and academic achievement Zimmerman BJ & Schunk DH (eds) (2001) Self-regulated learning and academic
achievement: Theoretical Perspectives Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Monitoring
- developmental
- trainable
Delclos VR & Harrington C (1991) Effects of strategy monitoring and proactive instruction on children’s problem-solving performance Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 35-42
Cognitive system ES 0.55
Metacognitive system ES 0.72
•Goal selection ES 0.97
•Strategy selection and monitoring ES 0.74
Marzano RJ (1998) Theory-Based Meta-Analysis of Research on Instruction www.mcrel.org
First year – first term
5 weekly group tutored sessions• Reflect on completed questionnaire• Tutor input with powerpoint• Reflect on implications and action plan• Upload reflections to Progress File (Passport to progress)
Beginning each term
Tutored group session to reflect on approaches and changes required
Future approach to structured personal tutor support
Investigating the Influence of Attribution Styles on the Development of Mathematical Talent
Nokelainen P, Tirri K, Merenti-Välimäki H-L Gifted Child Quarterly 2007 51 (1) 64-81
Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)
• Motivation scale (31 items) - intrinsic goal orientation, extrinsic goal orientation, task value, control of learning beliefs, self-efficacy for learning and performance, test anxiety
• Learning scale (31 items) – use of different strategies (rehearsal, elaboration, organisation, critical thinking) and self-regulation processes
• Resource management scale (19 items) – time and study environment, effort regulation, peer learning, help seeking
Pintrich P., Smith D., Garcia T., McKeachie W. "A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire". Technical Report 91-B-004. The Regents of The University of Michigan. 1991.
THE EVALUATION (N=14)
Thirteen students agreed • the course had given them new information about the way that they learn• completing the questionnaire helped them to identify their approach to learning• the opportunity to discuss their approach to learning in the group was useful• the handouts on study strategies were useful.
One student did not find the course useful as he was already aware of
his approach to learning! Medical Education (2010) 44(11) 1122–1123