schur functors for the symplectic group
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [Moskow State Univ Bibliote]On: 22 December 2013, At: 16:59Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Communications in AlgebraPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lagb20
Schur functors for the symplecticgroupMihalis Maliakas aa School of Mathematics , University of Minnesota ,Minneapolis, MN, 55455Published online: 27 Jun 2007.
To cite this article: Mihalis Maliakas (1991) Schur functors for the symplectic group,Communications in Algebra, 19:1, 297-324, DOI: 10.1080/00927879108824141
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00927879108824141
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoeveras to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Anyopinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of theauthors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracyof the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verifiedwith primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and otherliabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connectionwith, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
COMMUNICATIONS I N A L G E B R A , 1 9 ( 1 ) , 297-324 (1991)
SCHUR FUNCTORS FOR THE SYMPLECTIC GROUP
Mihalis Maliakas
School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this work is to describe some new connections between the characteristic-free representation theories of the symplectic group and the corresponding general linear group (Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.6) .
INTRODUCTION
The theory of Schur functors for the general linear
group has enjoyed a rapid growth over the past two
decades. However the corresponding theory for the other
classical groups is less developed. For some results in
this direction we refer to [4] and [5]. De Concini
defines in [2] a Z-form of the rational representations
of the symplectic group and proves for this a standard
basis theorem. We want to investigate the connections
between De Concini's Schur functor for the symplectic
group and the Schur functor for the corresponding
Copyright @ 1991 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
298 MALIAKAS
general linear group considered by Akin. Buchsbaum and
Weyman in [ I ] .
Let R be any commutative ring with 1 and let F
be a symplectic R-module of rank 2r . This means that
F is free of rank 2r and there exists an " F E A ~ F *
such that the induced map, F + F* , is an isomorphism.
Fix a partition A = (A > A . A ) with X1 < r. 1 - 2
By LAF (resp. VAF) we will denote the Schur module
corresponding to A for the general linear group GL(F)
(resp. for the symplectic group Sp(F)) . We refer to
section 1 and the beginning of section 2 for the various
definitions. Our first main result states that VAF is
the cokernel of an explicit Sp(F) - map between (skew)
Schur modules for GL(F). Namely. let w!') E A'F . where t E a+, be the t-th divided power of
wF. 1
(Informally one may think of wit) as - t! wFnwF". . . A W ~ )
Using the description of LAF in terms of generators
and relations ([I]) we show that the map
A -2t A2 Ak f
A n Fan Fa . . .an F - n l ~ a n Fa.. .en% .
where f = ~ ( ~ ) 8 1 8 . . .81 . induces a map between the F
corresponding GL(F)-modules, LA/(2t)
F - LAF, and thus we have an Sp(F)-map
- W~ : = LA/(2t) - L F , A
where the sum ranges from t = 1 to [h1/2] . Using
the work of DeConcini, 121. we show: -
coker wF = VAF . The dual statement holds for the Weyl
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP 299
modules (Proposition 2.5). Our other main result shows
that the Schur module VA(F@G) for Sp(F@G)
corresponding to the sum. F@G , of two symplectic
modules has a characteristic free decomposition into
Z V7F 8 LAI7G . i.e. VA(F@G) admits a natural O>LA
Sp(F) x Sp(G) filtration, which we construct
explicitly, whose associated graded object is isomorphic
to the previous sum (Theorem 2.6). This generalizes to
the symplectic case Theorem 11.4.11 of [I] for p=(O).
1.BACKGROUNG MATERIAL
In this section we will recall briefly some
fundamental facts concerning Schur and Weyl modules for
the general linear group that will be needed in :he next
section, thus establishing our notation. Our basic
reference here is [I] where the reader will find a
detailed and complete account of Schur functors and
Schur complexes.
Let R be a commutative ring with identity. F a
free R-module of finite rank, and A/p a skew-partition
i.e. h and p are partitions, A = (A1.A 2.....Ak) and
p = (pl,p 2,...,pk) , with hi-pi > 0 . By AF,SF and DF
we will denote the exterior algebra, the symmetric
algebra and the divided power algebra of F
respectively. We will use the following notation
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
MALIAKAS
D F@D F@.. .8 D F . In general if - h2-v2 Ak-pk
a = (a l,a2,...,ak) is a sequence of integers we put
a 1 ak A(F;a) = A F8 . . . @A F and similarly for S(F;a) and
D(F;a) . If there is no danger of confusion we will
often write A(a) for A(F;a) and similarly we write
S(a) and D(a) . By we will denote the transpose
(or conjucate) of the partition h . The Schur module.
L F , of the general linear group , GL(F) ,
corresponding to the skew-partition A/p is defined in
[l.chapter 111 as the image of a natural GL(F) - map
d F : A(A/p) - s(~/G) . Similarly the Weyl module, KAIpF , of GL(F) is defined
as the image of a natural GL(F) - map
' F : D(A/p) - A ( X / C ) . dA/p
(In [I] the term "coschur" is used for KAIpF instead
of "Weyl"). There is a useful description of LAIvF in
terms of generators and relations which we now outline
We will use this description in Section 2. For each
pair of adjacent rows, (Ai.Ai+l)/(pi.pi+l) . of A/v
define the map
as the sum of compositions of multiplication and
diagonalization
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
Now put
where k is the number of rows of the partition
h . This defines a map from
THEOREM 1.1. ([I] Thm 11.2.11). The composition
dh/pF Onh/p is zero.
In fact more is true.
THEOREM 1.2 ([I] Thm 11.2.16). (i) L F is a free
R-module with a basis in one to one correspondence with
the standard tableaux of shape h/p with entries from
the set (1.2 , . . . , n) , where n = rank F . (ii) There
is a canonical isomorphism LAlUF cz coker h/p '
Now let . G be a second free R-module of finite
rank. In section 2 we will also need the followrng.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
302 MALIAKAS
THEOREM 1.3 ([I] Thm 11. 4.11). LhIp (FQG) admits a
natural filtration whose associated graded module is
isomorphic to H L F 8 LhI,G . ,A29
Note that for partitions a = (a . a k ) and
p = (P l,...,Pk) we write a C /3 if ai < Pi for all
i = 1 , . . . . k . The explicit description of the
filtration on L (FOG) that was constructed in [ I ]
in order to prove the above theorem will be recalled and
utilized in the proof of Theorem 2.6.
If p = (0) we write LhF for LXIpF . Over a
field of characteristic zero the modules LhF , as
h = (A l,...,hk) ranges over all partitions with
hl rank F , form a complete set of inequivalent
irreducible polynomial representations of GL(F) .
partitions h,p and v we denote the multiplicty
LAF in LVF8L F by ( v ) . The integers (v,p P
have a well-known combinatorial description. The
Littlewood - Richardson rule for skew-partitions gi
the decomposition of LhlpF which will be needed 1
For
0 f
A
ve s
ater
THEOREM 1.4. If R contains the rationals, then there
is a canonical isomorphism Lh,pF 2 H (v,p;h)LvF . where the sum ranges over all partitions v .
We have concentrated our attention mainly on Schur
modules. For the corresponding results on Weyl modules
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP 303
we once again refer to [ I ] . For further use we recall
here a duality statement.
PROPOSITION 1.5. (i) There is a canonical isomorphism
* (LAlpF)* - K-,_(F ) . where F* = HomR(F.R) . (ii) If
A l.l
R contains the rationals then there is a canonical
isomorphism L F 1 K- _F . Alp
We end this section by remarking that the Sthur
functor (i.e. the functor L ( -1 defined for every
pair (R.F) . where R is a commutative ring with
identity and F is a finitely generated free R-nodule)
is, in light of Theorem 1.2, a universally free functor
that is. LAlyF is free and commutes with change of the
base ring R .
2. SCHUR AND WEYL MODULES FOR THE
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
In this section we show in a characteristic - free
setting that the Schur module for the symplectic group.
Sp(F) , is the cokernel of an explicit Sp(F) - map
between (skew) Schur modules for GL(F) (Theorem 2.2).
The dual statement holds for the Weyl modules. We also
describe a characteristic-free decomposition of the
Schur module for the symplectic group corresponding to
the sum of two free modules (Theorem 2 . 6 . )
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
MALIAKAS
Unless otherwise stated our ground ring, R , will
be any commutative ring (with 1). Let F be a free
R-module of finite rank. Recall that AF* can be made
a left AF-module in a natural way: Since F is free of
finite rank we have a natural Hopf-algebra isomorphism
AF* - (AF)* . ( 1 )
Now let a € ASF* . b € AtF* , s 1 t and A(a)=Pai(t) @ i
ai(s-t)' . where A(a) is the image of a under the
s-t * diagonalization h:ASF*+ AtF*@ A F. The action of AF
on AF* is defined by b(a) = Z<ai(t) ,b>ai(s-t) ' . i
where <ai(t),b> is the value of b of the image of
ai(t) under (1).
DEFINITION 2.1. Let F have even rank, say 2r. Then
F is called a symplectic module if there exists an
e 1 ement wF of A ~ F * such that the map F + F* . defined by x + x(wF) . is an R-ismorphism
From this point on F will be a symp lectic module.
There exists a basis of F , {ei) . i = 1.2. . . . , 2r such
that under the identification F F* we have
wF = elAe +e Ae 2r 2 2r-1 + . . . + e Ae
r r+l (2 1 (see [ 4 ] ) . We will sometimes drop the subscript F and
r - write w = 2 e.Ae- , where i = 2r+l-i . Using w we
1 i = 1 i
define an alternating bilinear form, < > , on F by
setting <x,y> = xAy(w) . If we use (2) we have
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
1. if i j = 2 and i<j
<ei,ej> = {-I. if i+j = 2r+l and i>j
1 0 , otherwise.
The symplectic group Sp(F) is defined as the
group of all R-automorphisms, f, of F . such that <f(x),f(y)> = <x.y> for all x,y E F .
Now let A'= (A l,....Ak) be a partition with
Al < r . We use the terminology "Schur module for
Sp(F) " and the notation VAF for the representation of
Sp(F) that in [2 , Definition 5.11 is called
"symplectic Specht module" and is denoted by Ah . As
an R-module VAF is free with a basis given by the
(right canonical) symplectic standard tableaux of shape
A with entries out of 1,2. . . . , 2r . ([2,Thm. 4.81). If
R is a field of characteristic zero, then the modules
VAF , as A ranges over all partitions with A I I r ,
form a complete set of inequivalent irreducible
representations of Sp(F) ([2,Thm 4.111).
Let X 5 LAF be the R-submodule of L F generated A
by all elements of the form
hi-2t where x E A i
F and w(~) E A ~ ~ F stands for the
t-th divided power of w . 1.e.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
MALIAKAS
',( t), H e Ae- Aei Ae- A...Aei Ae- ,
l<il<. . . < i <r '1 i 1 2 i2 t i t t -
where ?=2r+l-i .
(Recall that the map d F was considered in section 1) A
It is clear that X is an Sp(F)-submodule of LhF
Our starting point is the following observation
which follows immediately from the proof of
Theorem 2.4 of [2]. (Notice that all the relations
described by Proposition [2, 1.7(2)]-and hence by
Proposition [2. 1.81-corresponding to A are precisely
those given by X above. As for the other relations
used in the proof of Theorem [2. 2.41 we note that these
are given by the image of the map OA of section 1 and
we recall that L F = coker II ) . h A
In view of (4) we will usually write
LhF V F - 0 where a is the obvious map. By A
[A1/2] we will denote the largest integer less than or
A 1 equal to - 2 -
THEOREM 2.2. Let F be a symplectic module of rank 2r
and let A = (A l.....Ak) be a partition with Al r .
Then: (i) For every integer t < [A1/2] the map
induces an Sp(F)-map
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
Lh/(2t)F + LhF '
(ii) There is an exact sequence of Sp(F)-modules
- where w is the indicated sum of the maps given by part
(i).
Proof. (i) Recall (Theorem 1.2) that the relations of
LA/(2t)F are indexed by i . i = 1.2, . . . . k-1 . Let
i 2 2 . For each t , where 0 J t < . consider the diagram:
f A(A1-2t.h 2...hi...hk) + A(Al...Ai.Ai+l...hk)
f A(hl-2t.h 2...hi+hi+l-e,e...A,) + A(hl...Ai+hi+l-l,
e.. .Ak)
where we have written Oi for the appropriate component
of the map Oi that was defined in section 1 and
f = w(t)@l@. . .81 . This diagram clearly commutes.
Now let i=l . We may assume that A is a two
rowed partition, A = (Al.Ag) . For each 8 , where
0 ( e < h2-2t . consider the diagram
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
MALIAKAS
where the vertical maps, O1 . are the appropriate components of the maps Dl defined in section 1. We
want to define Sp(F) maps Po.Pl....,P2t such that
diagram (*) commutes. For each i = 0.1, . . . , 2t let
be the image of w (t) under the diagonalization
A(2t) - A(2t-i,i) .
Define a map
7 : ~ ( ~ ~ - 2 t + ~ ~ - e , e ) - ~ ( h ~ - i + h ~ - e , e + i ) i
by T~(x@Y) = Ex~u~~)(2t-i)@w~~)(i) ' ~ y . Put a
i Pi = (-1) -ri . i = 0.1. . . . , 2t . We prove now that
diagram (*) commutes. Let x E A(A1-2t+h2-P) and
y E A(-!) . For one direction we have, since deg w = 2:
where Zxb(A1-2t)@xb(h2-e)' is the image of x under b
the diagonalization A(Al-2t+A2-@) - A(A1-2t,h2-e) .
We will from this point on use this type of notation
without special mention sinLe i t is self explanatory.
For the other direction using that deg GI = 2 we have:
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
where Wac 2 - s ) ( s - 1 is the image of
~ ( ~ ) ( 2 t - 1 ) € A(2t-1) under the diagonalization a
A(2t-1) + A(2t-s,s-1) . In general for any
i = 0.1, . . . . 2t ,
where Oat 2 - s ) ( s - i ) is the image of
~ ( ~ ) ( 2 t - i ) € A(2t-i) under the diagonalization a
A(2t-i) + A(2t-s,s-i) . Therefore
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
310 MALIAKAS
By rearranging (according to s ) the terms of (5) we
have
ol(Po+P1+. . .+P2t) = Ao+A1+. . .+A2t . where for each s = 0.1. . . . , 2t i t is
and it is understood that o!:)(s-i)' = 0 if s-i < 0 .
We claim that As = 0 for s > 1 . Indeed.
This follows from the co-associativity of
diagonalization and the fact that the composition of
multiplication and diagonalization
A(s) + A(s-i,i) + A(s)
is multiplication by the binomial coefficient
( ) . Now since (-l)i() = 0 , (6) and (7) give i =O
As = 0 . Therefore U ~ ( P ~ + P ~ + . . . + P ~ ~ ) = A. , but
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
proving the commutativity of (*) . Since
is an Sp(F) - map, each 7i is an Sp(F) map and this
concludes the proof of part (i).
(ii) In view of (4) we will show that X = im(;)
Towards this end let Xi be the R-submodule of LhF
generated by all elements of the form (3). where t i > 0
- and ti+l - ti+2 = . . . = tk = 0 . Then obviously
X = B Xi (not a direct sum). i
Claim: We have a chain of submodules
Xk 5 Xk-l 5 . . . 5 X1 . Firstly we note that the claim
follows from the two-rowed case. Indeed, suppose the
claim is true for any two-rowed partition. Take a
generator, a. of Xi given by (3). where i > 2 , and
apply the claim to the partition formed by the i-1 and
i-th rows of a . thus obtaining an element in X i-1 '
Secondly let h = (hl.Xg) . x E A(hl) . Y E A(X2-2t) . and z = d ~(x@u(~)dy) E X2. We will show that i E X I .
h
Towards this end consider the map
O1 : A(h1+2t,h2-2t) + A(hl,X2)
and the element
U(~)AX@~ E A(hl+2t.h2-2t).
Using Theorem 1 . 1 we have
0 = d A = dh~(x@u(t)~y) +
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
MALI AKAS
euLt)(2t-s) .axb(s) lay) .
Thus in order to show that z E X1 i t is enough to show
that, for all s = 1.2. . . . , 2t ,
We prove this by a descending induction argument on s .
For s = 2t the sum in question is
I dA~(u(t)~xb(h,-2t)@xb(2t) 'Ay) , b
which clearly belongs to X1 . Suppose the statement is
true for s = 2t . 2t-1, . . . . 2t-i+l . Consider the map
01: A(hl+i,A2-i) + h(hl.A2)
and the element
z' = E u(t)~xb(hl-2t+i)@xb(2t-i)'hy E A(hi+i .A2-i) . b
Again we compute:
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
.But notice that the sum
P dh~(w(t)(s)~xbc(Al-s)0w~t)(2t-~) a 'A a.b.c
Axbc(s-2t+i)'Axb(2t-i)'Ay)
is an integral multiple of
P dh~(w(t)(s)~xb(hl-s)0w~t)(2t-s) a qxb(~) O A Y ) . a,b
a
This last sum is, by induction, in Xi for s > 21:-i+l . Hence from (8)
P dh~(u!t)(2t-i)~xb(hl-2t+i)0u(t)(i) 'A a.b
a
Axb(2t-i)'Ay E XI .
This concludes the proof of the claim. The claim
implies that X1 = X , and since im(;) = X1 , we have
finished the proof of the theorem.
COROLLARY 2.3 There is an exact sequence of
Domain Oh+ HA(hl-2t.A2.. . . .hk)a,h
where a = a + ~w(~)010. . .O1 and the h
t=l to t = [h1/2] .
(Al. . . . . hk)+l'hF4 ,
sums range f rorn
Proof. From Theorem 2.2 (and its proof) we have the
following commutative diagram with exact columns and top
row.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
MALIAKAS
Z Domain 0 A/(2t) - Domain
A '
where g = ~w(~)@l@. . .81 and the sums are taken from
t = 1 to t = [A1/2] . The mapping cone theorem gives
the result.
C O R O L L A R Y 2.4 VA is a universally free functor on
symplectic modules.
Proof. VA is the cokernel of map between two
universally free functions and VAF is free over R .
REMARK. If R contains the rationals then all - but
one - of the relations of Theorem 2.2(ii) are redundant
Namely there is an exact sequence of Sp(F) - modules
This follows from the fact w(~) = - wA. Aw t !
t times
Next we wish to introduce the Weyl module for the
symplectic group. A s usual F is a symplectic module
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP 315
of rank 2r . If 2t j s < r , by u(t)V we denote the
dual map
w (t)v : A(s) + A(s-2t) ,
of the multiplication map
where for x E A(s-2t) . w(~)(x) = W(~)AX . An easy
computation shows that
t where T = 2 (i j - 1 and the sum ranges over all
u u u=l
possible choices of il,...,it,jl,...,jt,al,...,:i s-2 t
out of 1.2, . . . . s such that il<j l.....it<jt and
Given a partition h = (A l.....hk) with k < r
put V F = HomR(V_F.R) . This has a natural (lelt) h
h
Sp(F)-module structure in the usual way. We call VAF
the Weyl module for Sp(F) corresponding to h . From
Theorem 2.2 we have immediately the following result.
PROPOSITION 2.5. Let A = (A l.....hk) be a partition
with k j r . Then we have the following.
(a) VA is a universally free functor on
symplectic modules.
h "here is an exact sequence of Sp(F)- nodules
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
MALIAKAS
-v where w is the restriction to KhF of the map
2 w(t)veie.. .el : A(X) - 2 ~(~/(2t)), all the sums are taken from t = 1 to t = [k/2] and
It times
Proof. (a) Let R 4 S be a ring homomorphism. Since
V-F is free over R of finite rank we have h
SBHomR(V-F,R) % HomS(S8VhF,S) . By Corollary 2.4 h
S8V-F 2 V-F(SBF) . Thus S B V ~ F = Vh(s@~) . h h
(b) Dualize the exact sequence of Theorem 2.2 that
corresponds to the partition X . apply Proposition 1.5(i) and recall F Z F* .
Remark. If R contains the rationals we have a natural
isomorphism V F u VAF , where X is as in the previous x proposition. However no such isomorphism exists over
- Z. Thus the modules VhF form a second Z-form of
rational representations of Sp(F) .
Next we deal with the following problem. Let F
and G be two symplectic modules. Then F@G is a
symplectic module and the question is whether Vh(F@G)
has a characteristic-free decomposition analogous to
Theorem 1.3. The answer is given by the next result.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP 31 7
THEOREM 2.6. Let F and G be symplectic modules and
let h = (A l.....hk) be a partition with Al J r ,
where rkF = 2r . Then F@G is a symplectic module and
VA(F@G) admits a natural filtration whose associated
graded object is isomorphic to
For the proof-of this we will need a classical
character formula of D.E. Littlewood. Let R = C the
complex numbers. If H is a 2r-dimensional sy:nplectic
vector space over C and if h = (A l,....hk) is a
partition with hl < r we will denote the (forlcal)
character of LhH by xH(A) . while by qH(h) we will
denote the (formal) character of VhH . If
al>a >. . . 2 >as > 0 , where the ai are integers, let
(al.a 2.....aslal-l.a2-l,...,a -1) be the partition
pictured below
The diagonal consists of s boxes; the i-th rolw
consists of a.+i boxes and the j-th column co~nsists of
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
318 MALIAKAS
a.+j-1 boxes. Put lhl = hl+. . .+Ak . Ihl is called J
the wieght of h . From [3,Prop. 1.5.3(2)] and Theorem
1.4 we have the following.
where p runs over all partitions and a runs over all
partitions (al.. . . .as lal-1.. . . .a -1). a >a > . . . >a >O . 1 2
REMARK: In [6] we construct an exact sequence over
Sp(F) (in characteristic zero) whose Euler - Poincare
characteristic is given by Prop. 2.7 above. However our
construction is valid only under an extra condition on
A , namely r+l > Ihl .
LEMMA 2.8. Using the notation of Theorem 2.6 we have:
rank Vh(FQG) = rank 2 V F@Lhl7G OC-rCh
Proof. By the universal freeness of the functors Lh/?
and V7 we may assume R = C . Now we have
~ ~ ( 7 ) = I(-l) 1u1/2xF(7/u) (u as in Prop. 2.7) u
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
xFOG(h/u) = X xF(-r/u)x (h1-r) (Thm 1.3) . 0579 G
Hence X ~~(-r)~~(h/-r)= 8 Z(-l)'a"2x (T/U)%~(X/T)= O c _ 7 9 0 9 9 a
F
= 8(-1) I f f 112 YFBG("u) = OIFBG(X). a
Now the desired equality of ranks follows.
We order the subpartitions of h
lexicographically. For example the subpartitions of
X = (2,l.l) are ordered as follows:
( 0 ( 1 ( I ) < ( l l ) < ( 2 (21)< ( 2 1 ) . Recall
that there is a natural isomorphism
Define a filtration. {M7}7Ch . on LX(F@G) as f~llows.
Consider for each a 5 h the map
which is obtained by tensoring the maps
A(F;ui) 8 A(G;hi-ai) A(F@G;hi) .
(This last map sends f8g to fAg) .
Now put
M7 = dA(F@G)(im( 2 A(F;a) 8 A(G;h/a) - A(F@(:;X)) , ai7 09
where a i 7 means o is lexicographically greater
than or equal to 7 . Also let
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
320 MALIAKAS
THEOREM 2.9 (11,Thm. II.4.11]). There is an isomorphism
induced by the map \L, of (9)
For further use we note that for x @...@x E 1 k
A(F:-r) and yl@ . . . 8yk € h(G;h/~) we have
Now we are ready for the:
Proof of Theorem 2.6. Note that, since
W A((F@G)*;~) 2 A(F ;~)@F*@G*@A(G*;~),
F@G is a symplectic module because we may take
"FBG = "F + W G . ( 1 1)
Now we define the following total ordering among
subpartitions of h . For U.T h put a < T if
1 0 1 < I T I or i f 1 0 1 = I T I and a ) T .
For example the subpartitions of h = (2.1.1) are
ordered as follows(O)< (I)< (2)< (1,1)< (2.1)< (1.1,1)<
< (21.1) . Define a filtration. {N7ITLh . on Lh(FBG)
as follows. Put
N7 = dh(F@G)(im( H A(F;a)@A(G;A/o) + A(F@G;h))) 6<7
U ~ A
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
and
So N (0
= LAG and NA = LA(F@G) . Consider the
natural projection
LA(F@G) a VA(F@G) + 0 .
We thus have a natural filtration, { U ( N ~ ) ) ~ ~ ~ . 0 x 1 -
VA(F@G) . The claim is that there is a natural
Sp(F) x Sp(G) surjection
Indeed, by Theorem 2.9 we have a natural GL(F) x GL(G)
surjection -
M L7F O LAI7G A 2 - 0 . (12 )
hi 7
Now from the defintiion of M7 we have
M7 A 7 - - - - ( 1 3 )
M7
where A7 = dh(F@G)(im(A(F;-r)OA(G;h/7) + A(F@G;h))) .
Since the map dA(F@G) restricted to the image of
A(F;u) 8 A(G:A/u) + A(F@G;A) preserves the weighr of
the partition, u . corresponding to F we have:
N7 - As in (13) - - A 7 . Thus from (12),(13) and (14)
7 N7
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
3 22 MALIAKAS
and the definition of the ordering " 5 " there exists a
natural surjection
and hence there is a natural Sp(F) x Sp(G) surjection
which we call a . By Theorem 2.2 our claim will 7
follow if we show that a is zero on the image of 7
where 7 = ( 7 1,...,7k) . Let x = x @...@xk E 1
A ( F : ~ ~ - 2 t . 7 ~ , . . . , 7 ~ ) and y = yl@ . . . @yk E
A(G;Al--r1.A2-72....,A -7 ) . We have k k
Notice that
because deg w = deg uG = 2 . Now from (11) and the
relations in VA(F@G) we have
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
SYMPLECTIC GROUP
Each summand of the right hand side of (15) lies in
a(Nq) . because in each case the F-content (i.e. the weight of the partition corresponding to F ) is
strictly less than 171 . This proves our claim. We
thus have an (R-module) surjection
B VqF8LA,7G + VA(F@G) + 0 , 7 9
which by Lemma 2.8 is an isomorphism. This ends the
proof of the theorem.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. The results of this paper are
contained in the authors Ph.D. dissertation (Brandeis
University). I would like to express my deep gratitude
to Professor David Buchsbaum for most generously sharing
his time and insights. Also many thanks are due to
Professor Jerzy Weyman for some enlightening
discussions.
REFERENCES
K. Akin, D. Buchsbaum, J. Weyman: Schur functors and Schur complexes. Adv. in Math. vol. 44 No. 3, 207-278 (1982).
C. DeConcini: Symplectic standard tableaux. Adv. in Math. 34, 1-27 (1979)
K. Koike, I. Terada: Young diagramatic methods for the representation theory of the classical groups of type Bn.Cn.Dn . J. Alg. 107, 466-511 (1987).
G. Lancaster, J. Towber: Representation functors and flag algebras for the classical groups I. J. Alg. 5 9 , 16-38 (1979).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013
5. G. Lancaster. J. Towber: Representation functors and flag algebras for the classical groups 1 1 . J . Alg. 94. 265-316 (1985).
6. M. Maliakas: Representation-theoretic realizations of two classical character formulas of D.E. Littlewood. Communications in Algebra g, 2 7 1 - 2 9 6 ( 1 9 9 1 )
Received: December 1 9 8 9
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Mos
kow
Sta
te U
niv
Bib
liote
] at
16:
59 2
2 D
ecem
ber
2013