science online 2012

11
William Gunn Head of Academic Outre ach william.gunn@mendeley. com @mrgunn Writing for Robots Getting your research noticed in the age of algorithms

Upload: william-gunn

Post on 06-May-2015

757 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

My presentation for Science Online 2012 "Writing of Robots: getting your research noticed in the age of algorithms".

TRANSCRIPT

Page 2: Science online 2012
Page 3: Science online 2012
Page 4: Science online 2012

How do people find research?

10 of the 18+ methods don’t involve the publisher at all, including 3/4 of the top methods!

Page 5: Science online 2012

Highly Tweeted articles are 11x more likely to be highly cited. (Eysenbach 2011) http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e123/

The higher the impact factor, the more likely the research is to be retracted, partly due to intense competition.http://bjoern.brembs.net/news766.html.11

Impact Factor is negotiated by the journals and does not reflect actual citations!http://jcb.rupress.org/content/179/6/1091.fullhttp://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291

What matters is who is reading your work!

Page 6: Science online 2012

Make your work available for discoveryPublishing:

• provides RSS feeds• gives download stats• provides machine readable PDFs• Allows easy bookmarking on Mendeley or tweeting

• Allows self-archiving

Writing:• Include DOIs where possible• Cite datasets• Include database identifiers• Link to raw data & make it available (possibly via sharing services)

Page 7: Science online 2012
Page 8: Science online 2012
Page 9: Science online 2012
Page 10: Science online 2012

Public Service Announcement

The government is making decisions on what you’re allowed to do with your publications, mostly without taking input from you. They have taken input, as well as millions of dollars in lobbying contributions, from publishers such as Elsevier (anagram: evil seer)

There is a bill, supported by the Association of American Publishers that will destroy Pubmed Central and prohibit federal agencies from requiring that work published with their funds(taxpayer derived) from being placed in public access repositories.

What you can do:Read about it:http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=807http://poynder.blogspot.com/2012/01/can-aap-members-stay-neutral-in-row.html

• Call your representative and let them know they’ll be held responsible.

• Sign the petition: https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr3699/report• Tell journals you won’t peer review for them if they support RWA• https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p2X0nqY250kYVfVbmXT3Ou

GdhKFif1JtdrOh3hQKy-g

Page 11: Science online 2012

www.mendeley.com

William GunnHead of Academic [email protected]@mrgunn