sd36 surrey - inquiry teams oct.2010

53
Developing Readers Inquiry into Student Learning Teams 2010-2011 Welcome School Teams! October 1, 2010 SD 36 (Surrey)

Upload: christensenlea

Post on 11-Apr-2017

839 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Developing ReadersInquiry into Student Learning Teams2010-2011

Welcome School Teams!October 1, 2010SD 36 (Surrey)

Page 2: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Agenda

Getting Started… Welcome, Introductions and Smarty Pants Learning Intentions

Anchoring our Work Developing Readers: Past and Present And the research says…

Inquiry into Student Learning Moving from Questions into Action Establishing School-based Inquiry Groups

Lunch Inquiry Group Action Plans/School Team planning Next Steps…

Page 3: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Smarty Pants!

What do you hope to gain from being here today?

When you think about your students’ learning, what are you wondering about? What’s puzzling?

What kinds of classroom assessment are you thinking of using this year?

Describe your students (their learning styles, their strengths, their areas of need).

Page 4: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Learning Intentions

If students are not told where they are going, it is unlikely that they will arrive.

S. Clarke (2005)

Page 5: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Learning Intentions

I understand what inquiry in the context of my work with DR will look like;

I can craft a meaningful, manageable inquiry question that reflects my students and my classroom context;

I can explain how my question is intended to impact student learning in my class;

I can connect my inquiry question to one of the bones on the fish (research).

Page 6: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Structures don’t create learning…they support it.

Page 7: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

DR…Past structures Collaborative RAD marking District Workshops School Team sessions School Network meetings Planning/debriefs with helping teachers Collaborative lesson planning “Opening Doors” to observe student

learning Lesson Study model of inquiry

Page 8: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

DR Structure for 2010-2011

Collaborative

I N Q U I R Y

Page 9: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

DR: Guiding Principles

Assessment needs to inform instruction Teachers need to engage students in direct,

explicit instruction Instruction must focus on how to engage and

support all learners Proficient readers know how to construct

meaning Meaningful social interactions lead to

construction of knowledge

Teachers – not programs – make the difference for students’ learning

Page 10: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Take FiveIn your school teams, take five minutes to

reflect on your past learning, your work with your students, and the structures that helped support your work.

What was successful?What was challenging?

Page 11: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

What Makes a Difference?

The research says…

Page 12: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Improving Student Learning

Instructional Improvements(Classroom-based)

Structural Improvements(School-based)

1. Explicit Instruction2. Instruction Embedded in

Content3. Motivation & Engagement4. Text-Based Collaborative

Learning5. Strategic Tutoring6. Diverse Texts7. Intensive Writing8. A Technology Component9. Ongoing Formative

Assessment of Students

1. Extended Time for Literacy2. Professional Development3. Ongoing Summative Assessment of Students and Programs4.Teacher Teams5.Leadership6. A Comprehensive and Coordinated Literacy Program

Page 13: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

YIKES!

The list is somewhat overwhelming.

Are there any practices that REALLY make a difference?

Page 14: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

What Makes a Difference?

15 – 3 = 0

Page 15: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Biancarosa and Snow (2004/2006)

Without the following three elements as the foundation:

1. professional development2. ongoing formative assessment of students3. ongoing summative assessment of students and programs

…we cannot hope to effect major change in student achievement, no matter what instructional innovations are introduced.

Page 16: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

"Assessment explicitly designed to promote learning is the single most powerful tool we have for raising achievement.”

P. Black & D. Wiliam 1998.

W H Y ??

Page 17: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Inside the BLACK BOX (Parameters of the Meta-Analysis:10 000 students; 250 studies from 5

countries)

Three questions: 1. Is there evidence that improving formative

assessment raises standards?2. Is there evidence that there is room for improvement?3. Is there evidence about how to improve formative

assessment?

Page 18: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Terminology...Formative Assessment

Assessment for Learning

Assessment as Learning

Diagnostic Assessment

...all those activities undertaken by teachers and/or by students which provide information to be used as feedback to modify teaching and learning activities... Black and Wiliam, 1998

Page 19: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Initial FindingsThe answer to all three questions was a resounding,

“YES!”1. Is there evidence that improving formative

assessment raises standards? Significant learning gains (students learned in 6

or 7 months what would otherwise take a year); Effect size between 0.4 – 0.7; greater gains were made by “low achievers”

Page 20: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Formative Assessment…

Impact on Motivation and Engagement

Kluger and deNisi (1996) Meta-analysis - 607 studies and 23 000 students Feedback had a NEGATIVE impact on

achievement in 33% of studies

Butler, 1988

Page 21: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Motivation TheoryDRIVE theory:

ATTRIBUTION theory: Success/failure is due to four causes: Ability Effort Luck Task difficulty

Success Oriented Failure Avoidant• strive for success •positive associations toward new challenges...bring it on!

• fear failure• discouraged by new challenges because of anticipated failure; set up “handicaps” to ensure failure isn’t about them, but about circumstances

Page 22: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Not all feedback is equal…

When feedback is… Descriptive (not evaluative); Connected to clear criteria and learning

goals Timely (and kids see that their EFFORT

makes a difference)

it is a powerful approach to improving learning…particularly for students who are the lowest achievers.

Page 23: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

The right conditions for feedbackExample:

Assignment (focusses on coverage):Read chapter 3 and take notes in preparation

for a quiz tomorrow. Compared to…

Learning Intention:I can explain why people were dissatisfied with

their quality of life in Canada after WWI, and I can describe what people did to try and improve their situations.

Page 24: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Take Five

In your school teams, take five minutes to discuss the impact this research may have on your work with students.

Page 25: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Collaborative Inquiry... Some anchors Together we’re better. The power of working together must

impact the kids and their learning.

Think BIG, and start small. Your inquiry is about YOUR kids and YOUR classroom.

Page 26: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Think BIG: Start with a wondering...

Context: Your classroom (choose one block)

Literacy and Learning Connection: DR Principles + Biancarosa and Snow

What’s puzzling, intriguing or perplexing you?

YOUR kids’ learning

Page 27: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Take Two…on your own

On a sticky note, jot down what you’re wondering about your students…Whole class?Small group?

Page 28: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010
Page 29: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Which “bone” fits? Learning Intention: I can connect my inquiry question (wondering) to

one of the bones on the fish (research).Activity: Using the fishbone as a guide, talk with a partner about

where your wondering(s) might best fit. Post your wondering(s) on the Big Idea sheets. Do a Gallery Walk and note what others are wondering

thus far.

Page 30: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Five Corners

Learning Intention: I can explain how my question (wondering) is

intended to impact student learning in my class.

Activity: Gather with others to discuss your wondering

and share your explanation about how it is intended to impact student learning.

Page 31: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

From Thinking BIG to starting small...

Learning Intention: I can craft a meaningful, manageable inquiry

question that reflects my students and my classroom context.

Activity: With a partner, take your wondering(s) and use the

criteria to move it to a meaningful, manageable question.

Page 32: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Criteria for a meaningful question: Grounded in a measureable, classroom-based

formative assessment (e.g. Perf. Standards, RAD, Sharon Jeroski’s Oral Language rubric, etc.);

You don’t already know the answer; Found in your daily classroom experience; Focusses on what you believe will impact

student learning Other…?

Page 33: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Criteria for a manageable question:

o…focusses on one block or a smaller group of students with similar needso…is embedded in your daily classroom work (not an add on) o…is written in simple language and is clearly statedo…should be narrow enough to offer insight and not so broad as to be overwhelming

Page 34: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

From BIG to Manageable...

Page 35: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Bone: Social Interactions

BIG… Why are my students so off-topic during small group discussions?

Manageable…Will daily opportunities for partner talk (e.g. turn and talk, think/pair/share) improve my students’ ability to have meaningful group discussions during literature circles?

Page 36: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Bone: Proficient Readers

BIG…How can I help my students be better readers so they `get it`.

Manageable…Will concentrating on more modelling and guided practice impact my students’ ability to accurately summarize and synthesize information?

Page 37: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Bone: Assessment

BIG...My students aren’t studying and reviewing their assignments and notes for tests.

Manageable… How will sharing learning intentions and using descriptive feedback impact my students’ achievement on unit tests?

Page 38: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Bone: Engaging all Learners

BIG…What can I do to support my most vulnerable students?

Manageable…How might differentiating content and process in my Medieval unit impact my six most vulnerable students’ learning?

Page 39: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

From Thinking Big to starting small …

o Use the organizer to help you refine your wondering into an inquiry question. o The following framework may be helpful:

How will __________ impact __________ ? (action/activity) (student learning)

Page 40: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Time for Lunch!

Page 41: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Collaboration...

The power of working together must impact the kids and their learning.

Page 42: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Inquiry Framework for 2010-2011

Phase One: Preparing for Inquiry Choose a formative assessment Define your question Begin to develop your action plan Consider how ongoing classroom assessment will

inform your inquiry Establish a small “Inquiry Group” (2-4 teachers who will

support one another’s inquiry) Meet with your school team to begin discussions about

budget and plans for release time

Page 43: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Budget Information

o Budget numbers have not yet been finalized.o We do have minimum numbers for you:

o teams of 3-5 will have a minimum of 4 release dayso teams of 6 and up will have a minimum of 7 release days

o A portion of your funding can be used for professional resources to support your inquiry.

Page 44: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Release Time: Some Options

Collaborative lesson planning “Opening Doors” and observing student

learning (Who’s “getting it” and how do you know? Who’s “not getting it” and how do you know?)

Debriefing observations/lessons with your inquiry group

Page 45: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Phase Two: Getting Started

Meet with your school team to share action plans, ideas, and finalize your budget;

Regularly meet with and email your Inquiry Group and helping teacher to explore ideas, ask questions, share successes...keep one another on track;

Plan dates for collaboration time – get them into the calendar ASAP.

Page 46: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Phase Three: Moving into Action

This is where the heart of your plan plays out; continue to gather evidence of learning

“Evidence” could be…• Student samples• Rubrics (e.g. performance standards)• Conversations• Summative assessments• Other…

Page 47: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Phase Three (continued)

o Keep this question at the centre of your work: Is this making a difference for my students’

learning? How do I know that? o Continue to meet regularly with your Inquiry Group and helping teacher to wrestle with questions, share ideas and successes... o Choose a final, summative assessment as a measure of students’ learning

Page 48: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Phase Four: Putting it All Together

Meet with your whole school team and helping teacher to reflect on and share:What you learned How your inquiry impacted students’ learning What might you do next

C E L E B R A T E

Page 49: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Take Five

What questions do you have?

What ideas are beginning to take shape?

Page 50: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Brainstorming and Planning

Learning Intention:I understand what inquiry in the context of

my work with DR will look like

Activity: Before leaving today, aim to reach the

above learning intention by completing the following:

Page 51: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

With Your Whole School Team...

Decide on your next meeting date/time. Brainstorm possible structures/ideas for using

release time. Brainstorm professional titles that would support

your inquiries. Move into Inquiry Groups for some planning time

(those teachers you’ll be working with most closely over the year).

Page 52: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

In Your Inquiry Group...

Help one another refine your inquiry questions;

Decide on your next meeting time. Confirm with your helping teacher;

Fill in your group’s section of the “ISL Team Plan” (yellow sheet);

Think about your action plan; jot some initial notes.

Page 53: SD36 Surrey - Inquiry teams Oct.2010

Thank you!

We’re looking forward to an exciting year ahead.

Thank you for your ongoing dedication and efforts

to make a difference for kids!