sea lamprey vs. zebra mussels greg lee – [email protected] christine hucal - [email protected] doug...
TRANSCRIPT
Sea Lamprey Vs. Zebra Sea Lamprey Vs. Zebra MusselsMussels
Greg Lee – [email protected] Lee – [email protected] Hucal - [email protected] Hucal - [email protected] Galante - [email protected] Galante - [email protected]
Section 8 Group 3
dnr.wi.gov/.../critter/invert/zebramussel.htm www-biol.paisley.ac.uk/.../lampr65_mouth.htm
IntroductionIntroduction
There have been numerous invasive There have been numerous invasive species introduced into the Great species introduced into the Great LakesLakes
Some examples include: sea Some examples include: sea lamprey, zebra muscles, carp, milfoil, lamprey, zebra muscles, carp, milfoil, white perch and many otherswhite perch and many others
Certain invasive species have a Certain invasive species have a larger impact on the ecosystem larger impact on the ecosystem compared to otherscompared to others
The questionThe question
Between zebra mussels and sea Between zebra mussels and sea lamprey, which invasive species has lamprey, which invasive species has a larger impact on their newly a larger impact on their newly invaded ecosystems?invaded ecosystems?
Our Hypothesis: Compared to sea Our Hypothesis: Compared to sea lamprey, we believe that the zebra lamprey, we believe that the zebra mussels have a larger impact on the mussels have a larger impact on the Great Lakes Region.Great Lakes Region.
Background information for sea Background information for sea lampreylamprey
Invaded the Great Lakes Region around Invaded the Great Lakes Region around 1932 (Coble 1990)1932 (Coble 1990)
Gained access into region after the Gained access into region after the completion of Welland Canal around completion of Welland Canal around Niagara Falls (Coble 1990)Niagara Falls (Coble 1990)
The average matured sea lamprey has a The average matured sea lamprey has a life span of 18 months. They spawn in June life span of 18 months. They spawn in June and then die after they spawn(Coble 1990) and then die after they spawn(Coble 1990)
Mature sea lampreys ascend tributaries Mature sea lampreys ascend tributaries from April to September (Coble 1990)from April to September (Coble 1990)
Background (cont)Background (cont)
Non-parasitic ammocoetes remain in substrate for Non-parasitic ammocoetes remain in substrate for 4-8 yrs (Coble 1990)4-8 yrs (Coble 1990)
Metamorphosize in July and mature in 1-1.5 yrs Metamorphosize in July and mature in 1-1.5 yrs (Coble 1990)(Coble 1990)
Shaped like eels and feed Shaped like eels and feed
by attaching to native by attaching to native
fish (such as lake trout) fish (such as lake trout)
and suck blood and other and suck blood and other
body fluids out ofbody fluids out of
them (Fetterolf 2006)them (Fetterolf 2006)
www.scar.utoronto.ca/~youson/lamprey-photo.htm
Background info on Zebra MusselsBackground info on Zebra Mussels
Dreissena polymorpha; a molluskDreissena polymorpha; a mollusk First found in Great Lakes Region in First found in Great Lakes Region in
1988 (Graham 2006)1988 (Graham 2006) Feed by filtering algaeFeed by filtering algae No natural predators in Great Lakes No natural predators in Great Lakes
region (Charlton 2006)region (Charlton 2006)
www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/zebra_mussels.html
Background (cont)Background (cont)
Known as “ecosystem engineers” Known as “ecosystem engineers” (Zhu 2006)(Zhu 2006)
Able to move by muscular foot Able to move by muscular foot Feed and breathe by filtering water Feed and breathe by filtering water
through extensible tubes called through extensible tubes called siphons (Encyclopedia.com)siphons (Encyclopedia.com)
Can filter a quart of water per day Can filter a quart of water per day (Encyclopedia.com)(Encyclopedia.com)
Effects of Sea Lamprey in Great Effects of Sea Lamprey in Great Lakes RegionLakes Region
Mainly impact fish communitiesMainly impact fish communities Suggested to have caused a decline in Suggested to have caused a decline in
burbot, trout, whitefish and herring burbot, trout, whitefish and herring (Fetterolf 2006)(Fetterolf 2006)
Most notable Most notable
damage damage
was seen in Lakewas seen in Lake
Trout Trout
(Fetterolf 2006)(Fetterolf 2006)
www.umesc.usgs.gov/.../tech_assistance.html
Effects (Cont)Effects (Cont)
Sea Lamprey suggested to be major Sea Lamprey suggested to be major cause of decline of Lake Trout in Lake cause of decline of Lake Trout in Lake Michigan and Huron but not Superior Michigan and Huron but not Superior (Coble 1990)(Coble 1990)
Even so, this hypothesis is still under Even so, this hypothesis is still under further investigation because decline of further investigation because decline of Lake Trout was shown to have occurred Lake Trout was shown to have occurred within a year of sea lamprey within a year of sea lamprey introduction which isn’t enough time to introduction which isn’t enough time to have caused such a drastic decline have caused such a drastic decline (Coble 1990)(Coble 1990)
www.sgnis.org/publicat/slide/sl_s5.htm www.invasive.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=1354049
Sea Lamprey and Trout Predation Sea Lamprey and Trout Predation Stella ModelStella Model
Trout Population
Trout DeathsTrout Births
Sea lamprey
Population
Trout Birth Rate
Lamprey Births Lamprey Deaths
Phy siollogical ef f iciancy Lamprey Death Rate
Lamprey Predation
Assumptions for Stella model:
1)All death of trout are caused by Sea lamprey2)Trout are the only prey for sea lamprey3)There are no predators for the sea lamprey
4:28 PM Sun, Dec 03, 2006
Untitled
Page 11.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Years
1:
1:
1:
2:
2:
2:
0
1000
2000
500
550
600
1: Trout Population 2: Sea lamprey Population
1
1 1 1
2
2
2
2
Scenario 2: The Trout population was increased by 200% (population 3999) as a result of restoration efforts. Because nothing was done about the sea lamprey, the population declined just as quickly
Scenario 1: Sea lamprey population: 500, trout population: 1333. The sea lamprey population grows as they eventually push the trout to extinction. The sea lamprey population only declines because we assumed that trout were their only prey
4:40 PM Sun, Dec 03, 2006
Untitled
Page 11.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Years
1:
1:
1:
2:
2:
2:
0
2000
4000
0
300
600
1: Trout Population 2: Sea lamprey Population
1
1 1 1
2
2
2
2
Scenario 3: Sea lamprey population was reduced to 100 as a result of recovery efforts. The trout population was restocked by 200% once again (stays at 3999). The trout population still is destroyed by the sea lamprey
4:34 PM Sun, Dec 03, 2006
Untitled
Page 11.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Years
1:
1:
1:
2:
2:
2:
0
2000
4000
0
200
400
1: Trout Population 2: Sea lamprey Population
1
1 1 1
2
2
2
2
•From the information gained using the Stella model, It can be said that the sea lamprey has great impact on the trout population and the population for other large fish within the great lakes
•However, it appears that the sea lamprey only have an effect on these fish and not much else
•Because fish such as Lake trout are In a high trophic level, there is less effect on the total ecosystem
Effects of Zebra Mussels in Great Effects of Zebra Mussels in Great Lakes RegionLakes Region
Since no natural predator, zebra mussel Since no natural predator, zebra mussel population has gotten very largepopulation has gotten very large
Harmed the lake bottoms, affecting fish habitat Harmed the lake bottoms, affecting fish habitat and spawning (Charlton 2004)and spawning (Charlton 2004)
Excrete nutrients which can lead to poor water Excrete nutrients which can lead to poor water quality (Charlton 2004)quality (Charlton 2004)
Promotes formation of algae growth along Promotes formation of algae growth along shorelines and outbreaks of botulism in wildlife shorelines and outbreaks of botulism in wildlife (Sullivan 2006)(Sullivan 2006)
Causes a big gap in food Causes a big gap in food chain by consuming a vast chain by consuming a vast quantity of planktonquantity of plankton (Giacomo 1993)(Giacomo 1993)
dnr.wi.gov/.../critter/invert/zebramussel.htm
Effects (cont)Effects (cont) Increase water clarity by filtering particles and Increase water clarity by filtering particles and
consuming them or binding them in pseudofeces (Zhu consuming them or binding them in pseudofeces (Zhu 2006)2006)
Leads to deeper light penetration and enhances Leads to deeper light penetration and enhances photosynthesis (Zhu 2006)photosynthesis (Zhu 2006)
See expanded distribution See expanded distribution and diversity of macrophytes and diversity of macrophytes due to increasing nutrient due to increasing nutrient availability by mussels availability by mussels (Zhu 2006)(Zhu 2006) Therefore they might Therefore they might actually be increasing actually be increasing biodiversitybiodiversity
http://epod.usra.edu/archive/images/zebra_1.jpg
Spread of Zebra Mussels Spread of Zebra Mussels in North America from in North America from 1988 to 19981988 to 1998 (Charlton 2004)(Charlton 2004)
Because zebra mussels have no natural predators, they have been able to spread across North America through rivers and streams.
Stella Model Representing AreasStella Model Representing Areas
Effected by Zebra MusselsEffected by Zebra Mussels
Introduction of
Zebra Mussels
Algae Growth
Plankton Consumed
Harmed Lake
Bottoms
Filtering and
consumption of particles
Nutrients Excreted
Harmful to Fish
and Habitat
Reduction In
Wildlife Population
Reduction of Biodiversity
Disruption in
Food Chain
Botulism
Water Quality
Water becomes
More Clear
Poor in Nutriants
Increased photosynthesis
Growth of new Pants
Increased Biodiversity
•Zebra mussels have many direct and indirect effects on the great lakes ecosystem
•Because zebra mussels are lower on the trophic level they effect many species that are higher on the trophic level
•They produce a wider ranging effect on a multitude of other native species by altering the environment.
•They impact the environment both in a positive and negative way
Analysis of Stella Chart
Take Home MessagesTake Home Messages Sea lamprey as a whole only affect small subset of fish Sea lamprey as a whole only affect small subset of fish
population with very little secondary affectspopulation with very little secondary affects The effect of sea lamprey are still under further The effect of sea lamprey are still under further
investigation as to whether or not they truly have a investigation as to whether or not they truly have a dramatic impact on the decline certain species of fishdramatic impact on the decline certain species of fish
Zebra mussels on the other hand are known to be Zebra mussels on the other hand are known to be “ecosystem engineers” and have a larger effect on their “ecosystem engineers” and have a larger effect on their newly acquired environment as a whole.newly acquired environment as a whole.
Images:Images:-Zebra Mussels clogging -Zebra Mussels clogging a pipe. (Left)a pipe. (Left)-Shopping cart that -Shopping cart that resided in Zebra musselresided in Zebra mussel infested waters for a few infested waters for a few months. (Right)months. (Right)
www.miseagrant.umich.edu/photos/ais/zmussel.html www.fnal.gov/.../archive_2006/today06-05-04.html
BibliographyBibliography Aldridge, D.C., Elliot, P., and Moggridge, G.D. 2003. Microencapsulated Aldridge, D.C., Elliot, P., and Moggridge, G.D. 2003. Microencapsulated
BioBullets for the Control of Biofoulling zebra mussels. Environmental BioBullets for the Control of Biofoulling zebra mussels. Environmental Science and Technology 40.3: 975-979Science and Technology 40.3: 975-979
Bially, A., & Macisaac, H. J. 2000. Fouling mussels (Bially, A., & Macisaac, H. J. 2000. Fouling mussels (DreissenaDreissena spp.) colonize spp.) colonize soft sediments in Lake Erie and facilitate benthic invertebrates. soft sediments in Lake Erie and facilitate benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 43(1): 85-97
Coble, D.W., Bruesewitz, R.E., Fratt, T.W., and Scheirer, J.W. 1990. Lake Coble, D.W., Bruesewitz, R.E., Fratt, T.W., and Scheirer, J.W. 1990. Lake Trout, Sea lampreys, and Overfishing in the Upper Great Lakes: A Review Trout, Sea lampreys, and Overfishing in the Upper Great Lakes: A Review and Reanalysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119:985-and Reanalysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119:985-995995
Giacomo, R.S., and Randell, N.G. 1993. Invasion of the Zebra Mussels. Civil Engineering 63: 56-58
Reed, T., Wielgus, S.J., Barnes, A.K., Schiefelbein, J.J., and Fettes, A.L. 2004. Refugia and Local Controls: Benthic Invertebrate Dynamics in Lower Green Bay, Lake Michigan following Zebra Mussel Invasion. Great Lakes Res. 30(3):390–396
Zhu, B., Fitzgerald, D.G., Mayer, C.M., Rudstam, L.G., and Mills, E.L. 2006. Zhu, B., Fitzgerald, D.G., Mayer, C.M., Rudstam, L.G., and Mills, E.L. 2006. Alteration of Ecosystem Function by Zebra mussels in Oneida Lake: Alteration of Ecosystem Function by Zebra mussels in Oneida Lake: Impacts on Submerged Macrophytes. Ecosystems 9:1017-1028 Impacts on Submerged Macrophytes. Ecosystems 9:1017-1028
Internet ReferencesInternet References Charlton, M. “Are Zebra Mussels Reshaping Great Lakes Charlton, M. “Are Zebra Mussels Reshaping Great Lakes
Shorelines?” 2004. <http://www.nwri.ca/envirozine/issue35-Shorelines?” 2004. <http://www.nwri.ca/envirozine/issue35-e.html > e.html >
Fetterlof, C. “Sea lamprey in the Great Lakes”. 2003.Fetterlof, C. “Sea lamprey in the Great Lakes”. 2003. <<http://biology.usgs.gov/s+t/SNT/noframe/g1129.htm> Graham, L. “Invasives Destroying Great Lakes Food Chain”. Graham, L. “Invasives Destroying Great Lakes Food Chain”.
2006.2006. <http://glrc.org/transcript.php3?story_id=3213><http://glrc.org/transcript.php3?story_id=3213> Sullivan, P. “Invasive Species Starts to take a Toll”. 2006.Sullivan, P. “Invasive Species Starts to take a Toll”. 2006. < http://www.record-eagle.com/2006/nov/18bird.htm>< http://www.record-eagle.com/2006/nov/18bird.htm> http://http://www.encyclopedia.com/SearchResults.aspx?Qwww.encyclopedia.com/SearchResults.aspx?Q
=zebra%20mussels=zebra%20mussels