sec electrolysis replication
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Sec Electrolysis Replication
1/8
Associate J-PA
What we see in this first picture of work submitted by J-PA is that he is driving a
large LED panel at the same time he is exciting a multi diode SGGS cell. Secondly
we see that the cell contains six diode emitters and all have large bubble masses
forming on their Anodes. The reason for the large slow release bubbling can be foundat SGGS and is a function of the field intensity per unit area. It is seen that a large jar
is being used in the experiment and a large strip conductor is being used to couple the
excitation to the water.
J-PA(1)
In this close-up view we also note that the L3 coil connected to the Exciter is quite
large and obviously presenting a much larger inductance than 125uH. The usage of a
larger coil (higher inductance and impedance) will change the resonate peak of the
excitation signal which greatly affects the expected gas production.
J_PA(2)
http://67.76.235.52/SGGS.htmhttp://67.76.235.52/SGGS.htm -
8/9/2019 Sec Electrolysis Replication
2/8
Again we see the large bubbles growing on the Anode leads and very few breaking
free to release the gas to the surface. As the field density is increased the bubble will
begin to release and shrink to a small size as they will not be retained as long before
release.
J_PA(3)
-
8/9/2019 Sec Electrolysis Replication
3/8
The following is a very nice picture of the experimental set-up, showing the
breadboard Exciter, the battery, LED panel, L3 coil and the SGGS cell.
J_PA(4)
-
8/9/2019 Sec Electrolysis Replication
4/8
Italy is an EE and is fortunate in having access to a Spectrum Analyzer (SA) along
with other more common equipment used by experimenters.
We cannot express enough how valuable an SA is in all of the Spatial Energy
Coherence or SEC research. Oscilloscopes, DVM's, Frequency Counters and RF
Voltmeters are all valuable, yet the SA is the instrument of choice as it provides a
window into the Frequency Domain where SEC is fully grounded and understood.
In the following picture Italy(1) showing an SA capture of his experiment, could not
be any more telling of what is taking place. The SA Marker is placed on the 6.5MHz
spike, which is seen not to be the frequency with the maximum energy content. Ratherthe second frequency to the right on the display is the maximum signal (at least of
what is shown). This is a direct indication that the Exciter is not producing the correct
output to produce maximum electrolysis on the test cell. See SGGS for more detail.
Italy(1)
http://67.76.235.52/SGGS.htmhttp://67.76.235.52/SGGS.htm -
8/9/2019 Sec Electrolysis Replication
5/8
Italy(2)
-
8/9/2019 Sec Electrolysis Replication
6/8
Italy(3)
-
8/9/2019 Sec Electrolysis Replication
7/8
We see in Italy(4) that the Exciter is driving a standard L3 via a variable tuning
capacitor. This coupling method is similar to what is provided on the 18-1e Exciter
Boards and is correct, except the standard L3 may not allow for correct frequency
adjustment. The reason for this is that the correct frequency is a function of not only
the Exciter tuning, but also the Cload and L3 along with the excitation strip and
volume of water in the cell.
Italy(4)
-
8/9/2019 Sec Electrolysis Replication
8/8