*section 1 - poursafe · jefferson davis highway, suite 1204, arlington, va 22202-4302, and to the...
TRANSCRIPT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
1996
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION SYSTEM
ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN ACCORD WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 757
CHAPTER 450, 1989 LEGISLATIVE SESSION
JANUARY 1996
PETE WILSON Governor DEAN R. DUNPHY, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency ANNE BERSINGER Acting Director
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE January 1996
3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
1996 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System
6. AUTHOR(S) Helen N. Tashima and Clifford J Helander
5. FUNDING NUMBERS
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
California Department of Motor Vehicles Research and Development Section P.O. Box 932382 Sacramento, CA 94232-3820
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER CAL-DMV-RSS-96-159
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) In this fifth annual report, 1993 and 1994 DUI data from several diverse sources were compiled and cross-referenced for the purpose of developing a single comprehensive DUI data and monitoring system. This report presents crosstabulated information on DUI arrests, convictions, court sanctions, administrative actions and alcohol-involved accidents. In addition, this report provides an evaluation of the effectiveness of alternative court and administrative sanctions (including alcohol treatment programs and license actions) upon the postconviction records of first and second DUI offenders. The postconviction driving records of DUI offenders arrested in 1989, 1991, and 1993 were evaluated for five-, three-, and one-year periods, respectively.
15. NUMBER OF PAGES
137 14. SUBJECT TERMS
Drinking drivers, DUI tracking data system, DUI reporting system, DUI countermeasures, DUI recidivism, alcohol education and rehabilitation, driver license disqualification
16. PRICE CODE
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT
Unclassified
18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE
Unclassified
19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified
20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
None NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (2-89)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18 298-102
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
%
of T
otal
Fat
aliti
es
52.2
48
.9
48.7
50
.1
46.6
46
.6
46.0
44
.1
43.8
37
.7
35.3
%
of T
otal
Inju
ries
21
.9
20.7
20
.1
19.1
18
.2
17.6
17
.5
15.9
14
.5
13.6
12
.5
Felo
ny D
UI A
rres
ts
7200
73
16
8034
84
88
8604
10
448
1294
8 11
220
9803
87
38
7567
Alc
ohol
-Invo
lved
Fat
aliti
es
2607
24
12
2543
27
54
2510
25
09
2382
20
48
1832
15
69
1488
i
DU
I SU
MM
AR
Y S
TATI
STIC
S:
1984
- 19
94
YEA
R
19
84
1985
19
86
1987
19
88
1989
19
90
1991
19
92
1993
19
94
Tota
l DU
I Arr
ests
1 35
2697
34
7797
34
7286
34
9576
32
7186
33
6059
36
6834
31
2571
26
0150
23
3673
20
8844
Mis
dem
eano
r DU
I Arr
ests
34
5497
34
0481
33
9252
34
1088
31
8582
32
5611
35
3886
30
1351
25
0347
22
4935
20
1277
DU
I Con
vict
ions
Rec
eive
d to
Dat
e
(by
year
of a
rres
t)2 24
7288
24
4354
23
9257
24
2449
21
9514
22
5596
r 25
6834
r 22
2419
r 18
4360
r 16
2946
r 14
0513
Pe
rcen
t Con
vict
ed o
f DU
I as o
f
Sept
embe
r 199
5 70
%
70%
69
%
69%
67
%
67%
70
%
71%
71
%r
70%
r 67
%
Estim
ated
Fin
al D
UI C
onvi
ctio
ns3
2473
08r
2443
84r
2393
22r
2423
96r
2197
67r
2261
35r
2598
10r
2257
48r
1881
16r
1701
54r
1531
59
Es
timat
ed F
inal
DU
I Con
vict
ion
Ra
te
70%
70
%
69%
69
%
67%
r 67
%
71%
r 72
%r
72%
r 73
%r
73%
Tota
l Rec
kles
s D
rivin
g C
onvi
ctio
ns4
4471
4 44
386
4406
3 41
724
3992
6 40
456
3961
7 39
386
3418
6 27
835
2737
4
Alc
ohol
-Invo
lved
Rec
kles
s 28
664
2716
3 26
316
2492
2 24
013
2564
6 26
960
2709
3 23
675
1864
5 18
246
Alc
ohol
-Invo
lved
Inju
ries
67
835
6666
7 69
876
6881
6 65
033
6393
7 63
847
5577
9 48
969
4293
6 39
437
Post
conv
ictio
n Su
sp/R
ev
6827
4 76
541
7800
6 78
156
7902
2 90
237
9115
5 10
0858
79
609
6844
1 59
600
Tota
l Man
dato
ry S
usp/
Rev5
98
928
1058
49
1043
33
1036
30
1017
79
1117
03
2336
80
3731
31r
3083
99
2774
47
2436
45
Adm
in P
er S
e/Re
fusa
l Sus
p/Re
v 30
654
2930
8 26
327
2547
4 22
757
2146
6 14
2525
27
2273
r 22
8790
20
9006
18
4045
1 Thes
e to
tals
wer
e re
port
ed b
y th
e D
epar
tmen
t of J
ustic
e, L
aw E
nfor
cem
ent I
nfor
mat
ion
Cen
ter,
and
incl
ude
a sm
all n
umbe
r of d
uplic
ates
(0.9
% i
n 19
94).
2 Thes
e da
ta re
pres
ent a
DM
V m
aste
r file
cou
nt o
f the
num
ber o
f DU
I abs
trac
ts re
ceiv
ed (b
y ye
ar o
f vio
latio
n), m
inus
dup
licat
es.
Thes
e to
tals
do
not i
nclu
de c
onvi
ctio
n ab
stra
cts
not
yet r
ecei
ved.
Thu
s, fo
r the
mos
t rec
ent y
ears
, the
se fi
gure
s w
ill s
ubst
antia
lly u
nder
estim
ate
the
final
con
vict
ion
tota
ls.
3 Th
ese
data
incl
ude
a pr
ojec
ted
num
ber o
f abs
trac
ts n
ot y
et re
ceiv
ed.
This
num
ber i
s ba
sed
on a
n em
piri
cally
der
ived
func
tion
of th
e co
urt a
bstr
act r
epor
ting
rate
.
4 Thes
e to
tals
wer
e ta
ken
from
the
DM
V a
nnua
l Sus
pens
ion
and
Revo
catio
n re
port
s an
d in
clud
e la
te re
port
ing
of c
onvi
ctio
ns fr
om p
rior
yea
rs.
5 Sinc
e 19
91, t
otal
man
dato
ry su
spen
sion
/rev
ocat
ion
exce
eds
the
num
ber o
f DU
I arr
ests
bec
ause
man
y of
fend
ers n
ow re
ceiv
e bo
th a
n A
PS a
nd p
ostc
onvi
ctio
n su
spen
sion
/rev
act
ion.
r Re
vise
d fr
om p
rior
repo
rts.
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
ii
DU
I SU
MM
AR
Y S
TATI
STIC
S:
1984
- 19
94 (c
ontin
ued)
YE
AR
PREC
ON
VIC
TIO
N
Adm
in P
er S
e (A
PS) A
ctio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1196
10
2722
73
2287
90
2090
06
1840
45
Fi
rst -o
ffen
der s
uspe
nsio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
8250
3 18
7527
15
7545
14
4321
12
0582
Repe
at-o
ffen
der s
uspe
nsio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3479
2 74
351
6265
6 57
279
4742
9
Repe
at-o
ffen
der r
evoc
atio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2315
10
395
8589
74
06
6063
Com
mer
cial
dri
ver a
ctio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3739
79
76
6449
58
29
5038
Che
mic
al te
st re
fusa
l act
ions
30
654
2930
8 26
327
2547
4 22
757
2146
6 22
915
2129
6r 17
963r
1566
2 13
264
Te
st re
fusa
l sus
pens
ions
30
654
2548
5 16
352
1487
7 13
720
1239
0 15
128
1090
1r 93
74r
8256
70
22
Te
st re
fusa
l rev
ocat
ions
n/
a 38
23
9975
10
597
9037
90
76
7787
10
395r
8589
r 74
06
6063
TOTA
L A
PS/R
EFU
SAL
AC
TIO
NS
3065
4 29
308
2632
7 25
474
2275
7 21
466
1425
25
2722
73
2287
90
2090
06
1840
45
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
POST
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
Juve
nile
DU
I sus
pens
ions
n/
a 22
00
2219
23
74
1823
19
95
1478
15
76
1202
92
2 87
9
Firs
t-off
ende
r sus
pens
ions
79
10
7057
73
84
7278
66
26
7679
10
408
1357
5 10
673
1020
8 86
96
M
isde
mea
nor
6386
53
46
5592
55
58
5050
56
58
8467
11
547
8989
86
07
7188
Felo
ny
1524
17
11
1792
17
20
1576
20
21
1941
20
28
1684
16
01
1508
Seco
nd-o
ffen
der S
/R a
ctio
ns
4398
0 46
835
4523
4 43
608
4769
8 53
927
5233
4 57
350
4547
8 38
849
3430
0
Mis
dem
eano
r 43
481
4629
2 44
601
4296
4 47
093
5323
8 51
593
5658
3 44
756
3828
5 33
794
Fe
lony
49
9 54
3 63
3 64
4 60
5 68
9 74
1 76
7 72
2 56
4 50
6
Thir
d-of
fend
er re
voca
tions
16
384
1497
0 16
946
1711
8 13
991
1851
4 18
650
1996
3 15
553
1290
8 11
193
M
isde
mea
nor
1638
4 14
970
1694
6 17
118
1367
1 18
182
1821
9 19
595
1523
3 12
644
1097
4
Felo
ny
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
320
332
431
368
320
264
219
Four
th-o
ffen
der r
evoc
atio
ns
n/a
5479
62
23
7778
88
84
8122
82
85
8394
67
03
5554
45
32
TOTA
L PO
STC
ON
VIC
TIO
N A
CTI
ON
S 68
274
7654
1 78
006
7815
6 79
022
9023
7 91
155
1008
58
7960
9 68
441
5960
0
19
84
1985
19
86
1987
19
88
1989
19
90
1991
19
92
1993
19
94
TOTA
L M
AN
DA
TORY
SU
SPEN
SIO
N/
REV
OC
ATI
ON
(S/R
) AC
TIO
NS
9892
8 10
5849
10
4333
10
3630
10
1779
11
1703
23
3680
37
3131
30
8399
27
7447
24
3645
r Revi
sed
from
pri
or re
port
s.
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
HIGHLIGHTS OF 1996 CALIFORNIA DUI-MIS REPORT
DUI arrests continued to decline in 1994 (-10.8%), and have fallen 42% since 1990.
Alcohol-involved traffic fatalities decreased again in 1994 (-5.2%), and have dropped by almost half since 1987 (-46% overall).
The number of persons injured in alcohol-involved accidents during 1994 declined
(-8.1%) for the eighth consecutive year, resulting in a 42.7% reduction in alcohol-involved injuries over the 8-year time period.
13.1% of all 1993 DUI arrests were associated with a reported traffic accident, up
from 11.1% the prior year. 49% of these accidents involved an injury or fatality.
The average blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of a convicted DUI offender, as reported by law enforcement [on administrative per se (APS) forms], was .169% in 1993, which is more than double the California illegal per se BAC limit of .08%. The average BAC reported on 1993 DUI abstracts of conviction was 0.166%, the same as in 1991 and 1992.
Over 1 million license suspension or revocation actions have been taken since the
APS law was enacted in July 1990.
During the first five years of APS implementation, requests for hearings have increased each year, rising from 7% of all APS actions in FY 90/91 to 12% in 94/95. The rate at which APS suspension/revocation actions are upheld after hearing has declined from 87% in FY 90/91 to 80% in 94/95. During the same time period, the sustain rate for chemical test refusal hearings has fallen from 84% to only 72%.
Among 1994 DUI arrestees, Hispanics (46.5%) again constituted the largest
racial/ethnic group, and were arrested at a rate over double their adult population parity (22.5%, 1990 Census).
The average age of a DUI offender in 1994 was 32.9 years. Less than 1% of arrested
DUI offenders are juveniles (under age 18).
iii
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Among convicted DUI offenders in 1993, 67.8% were first offenders and 32.2% were
repeat offenders (one or more prior convictions within the previous 7 years). The proportion of repeat offenders has decreased slightly each year since 1989, when it stood at 37%.
18.8% of 1993 DUI arrest cases did not show any corresponding conviction on DMV
records. This rate is down slightly from 19.2% in 1992, a proportional decrease of 2.1%. (It should be noted that these cases were the first subsequent to the 1993 DUI-MIS report, which identified the problem of DUI convictions not appearing on driver records. The effects of any subsequent system improvements which would reduce the number of nonrecorded DUI convictions should begin to appear with these 1993 DUI arrests, and the nominal 2.1% reduction in the "no record of any conviction" rate may represent initial evidence of the effects of these system improvements).
Alcohol treatment, in conjunction with license restriction, was the most effective
postconviction sanction in reducing subsequent DUI incidents among DUI offenders, by a minimum of 11.8% over other sanction alternatives.
License suspension was the most effective postconviction sanction in reducing the
total accident risk of DUI offenders. With the imposition of preconviction APS suspensions, beginning in July 1990, the postconviction total accident rates of all sanction groups were reduced. Because all DUI offenders were now suspended under the APS law, the incremental impact of postconviction suspension actions became less distinct.
Jail, in the absence of treatment or postconviction suspension, was the least effective
sanction for first offenders in terms of DUI recidivism, with a minimum of 24.7% more DUI incidents than the next least effective sanction.
iv
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
DUI SUMMARY STATISTICS: 1984-1994 i HIGHLIGHTS OF 1996 DUI-MIS REPORT iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1: DUI ARRESTS 4 SECTION 2: CONVICTIONS 10 SECTION 3: POSTCONVICTION SANCTIONS 22 SECTION 4: POSTCONVICTION SANCTION EFFECTIVENESS 28 Evaluation Method and Results 33 Subject Selection and Data Collection 33 Evaluation Design and Analytical Procedures 36 Results of the First Offender Sanction Evaluation 37 Total Accidents 37 DUI Incidents 38 Results of the Second Offender Sanction Evaluation 40 Total Accidents 40 DUI Incidents 42 SECTION 5: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS 45 SECTION 6: ACCIDENTS INVOLVING ALCOHOL 49 DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS 56 REFERENCES 57 GLOSSARY 57
APPENDICES
NUMBER A Chapter 450 (Assembly Bill Number 757 - Friedman) 60
B1 1994 DUI Arrests by County, Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity 61
B2 1993 DUI Convictions by County, Sex and Age 76
B3 Total Conviction Data for 1993 DUI Arrestees by Court 86
B4 1993 DUI Sanctions by County, Court and Offender Status 99
v
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
APPENDICES (continued)
NUMBER PAGE
B5 Demographic and 1-Year Prior and 2-Year Prior Driver Record Variables by Year and Sanction Group for First DUI Offenders 134 B6 Demographic and 1-Year Prior and 2-Year Prior Driver Record Variables by Year and Sanction Group for Second DUI Offenders 135 B7 ZIP Code Census Variables (Covariates) by Year and Sanction Group for First and Second DUI Offenders 136
LIST OF TABLES 1 DUI Arrests by County and Annual Percentage Change from 1992-1994 7
2 1994 DUI Arrests by County and Type of Arrest 8
3a 1994 DUI Arrests by Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity 9
3b 1994 DUI Arrests by Sex, Age, and Race/Ethnicity 9
4 1993 DUI Convictions by Age and Sex 15
5 Matchable 1993 DUI Convictions by Age, Race/Ethnicity and Sex 16
6 Adjusted 1993 DUI Conviction Rates and Relative Likelihood of Conviction, by Age and Race/Ethnicity 16
7 Total Conviction Data for 1993 DUI Arrestees 17
8 Adjudication Status of 1993 DUI Arrests by County 19
9 1993 Reported Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Levels of DUI Convictions 20
10 1993 DUI Convictions by Offender Status and Average Reported BAC Level 21
11 1993 DUI Court Sanctions by DUI Offender Status 24
12 1993 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - First Offenders 25
13 1993 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - Repeat Offenders 26
vi
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
TABLES (continued)
NUMBER PAGE
14 First Offender Sanction Effects on Total Accidents and DUI Incidents by Year 39
15 Second Offender Sanction Effects on Total Accidents and DUI Incidents by Year 42
16 Summary of Significant Results for 1989, 1991, and 1993 First and Second Offender Sanction Groups by Outcome Measures 43
17 Mandatory DUI License Disqualification Actions, 1984-1994 47
18 Administrative Per Se Process Measures 48
19 Race/Ethnicity by Sobriety Code of Accident-Involved 1993 DUI Arrestees 52
20 Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1993 DUI Arrestees by Race/Ethnicity and Type of Arrest 52
21 Adjudication Status by Sobriety Code for Accident-Involved 1993 DUI Arrestees 53
22 Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1993 DUI Arrestees by Type of Arrest and Adjudication Status 53
23 1993 Accident-Involved DUI Arrestees With No Record of Conviction, by County and Type of Arrest 54
24 1-, 3- and 5-Year Total, Fatal/Injury, and Alcohol-Related Accident Means by Offender Status 55
LIST OF FIGURES 1 DUI management information system 2
2 DUI arrests 1984-1994 4
3 Percentage of 1994 DUI arrests and adult population by race/ethnicity 6
vii
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
FIGURES (continued)
NUMBER PAGE
4 DUI abstracts received by DMV and DUI conviction volume and rate estimates, 1984-1994 12
5 Relative likelihood of conviction by race/ethnicity 15
6 Frequency of court-ordered DUI sanctions (1993) 23
7 Adjusted 5-year accident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction 29
8 Adjusted 3-year accident rates of 1991 first offenders by type of sanction 29
9 Adjusted 1-year accident rates of 1993 first offenders by type of sanction 29
10 Adjusted 5-year DUI incident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction 30
11 Adjusted 3-year DUI incident rates of 1991 first offenders by type of sanction 30
12 Adjusted 1-Year DUI incident rates of 1993 first offenders by type of sanction 30
13 Adjusted 5-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1989 second offenders by type of sanction 32
14 Adjusted 3-year accident and DUI incident rates 1991 second offenders by type of sanction 32
15 Adjusted 1-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1993 second offenders by type of sanction 32
16A Adjusted 3-year accident rates for 1991 first offenders by type of sanction and ZIP code average arrival time to work 38
16B Adjusted 1-year accident rates for 1993 second offenders by type of sanction and prior 2-year minor convictions and accidents 41
17 Mandatory DUI license disqualification actions, 1984-1994 46
18 Percentage of total injuries and total fatalities that were alcohol-involved, 1984-1994 50
viii
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
This report is the fifth Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System, produced in response to Assembly Bill 757 (Friedman), Chapter 450, 1989 legislative session (see Appendix A). This bill required the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to "establish and maintain a data and monitoring system to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted" of DUI in order to provide "accurate and up-to-date comprehensive statistics" to enhance "the ability of the Legislature to make informed and timely policy decisions." The need for such a data system had long been documented by numerous authorities, including the 1983 Presidential Commission on Drunk Driving. In responding to this legislative mandate, this report combines and cross-references DUI data from diverse sources and presents them in a single reference. Data sources drawn upon include the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for accident data, Department of Justice (DOJ) for arrest data, and the DMV driver record database. Each of these reporting agencies, however, initially draw their data from diffuse primary sources such as individual law enforcement agencies (arrest and accident reports) and the courts (abstracts of conviction). The general conceptual design of the California DUI management information system (DUI-MIS) is presented in Figure 1. The basic theme of the DUI-MIS is to track the processing of offenders through the DUI system from the point of arrest and to identify the frequency with which offenders flow through each branch of the system process (from law enforcement through adjudication to treatment and license control actions). Figure 1 also illustrates the relationship between offender flow and data collection at each point of the process. The initiating data source for the DUI-MIS is the DUI arrest report, as compiled by the DOJ Law Enforcement Information Center's Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system. Another major objective of this report is to evaluate the effectiveness of court and administrative sanctions on convicted DUI offenders. This is accomplished by examining the postconviction recidivism records (alcohol/drug-related accidents and traffic convictions) of offenders assigned to alternative sanctions, as detailed in the section on "Postconviction Sanction Effectiveness."
1
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
2
DU
I IN
CID
ENTS
Arr
este
d?C
hem
ical
Te
st
Ref
used
?A
ccid
ent
Invo
lved
?C
ompl
aint
Fi
led?
Plea
- B
arga
in?
DU
I C
onvi
ctio
n?R
efer
red
to
Trea
tmen
t?
Lice
nse
Susp
ende
d/
Rev
oked
?
Lice
nse
Rei
nsta
ted?
Trea
tmen
t N
ot
Com
plet
ed?
Arr
est
Rep
ort
Rei
nsta
tem
ent o
n D
river
Rec
ord
Con
vict
ion
of
Less
er O
ffen
seTr
eatm
ent
Dro
pout
Trea
tmen
t R
efer
ral
DU
I C
onvi
ctio
n
Susp
ensi
on/
Rev
ocat
ion
onD
river
Rec
ord
Cou
rt D
ocke
t Es
tabl
ishe
dA
ccid
ent
Rep
ort
Adm
inis
trativ
e Pe
r Se
Sus
pens
ion
Rep
ort
Mon
thly
Arr
est
and
Cita
tion
Reg
iste
r
Aut
omat
ed N
ame
Inde
x Sy
stem
Lice
nse
Susp
ensi
on
and
DU
I Pr
oces
sing
Stat
ewid
e In
tegr
ated
Tra
ffic
R
ecor
d Sy
stem
Abs
tract
of
Con
vict
ion
Driv
er R
ecor
d M
aste
r File
DU
I Dat
a Ex
tract
ion
Mod
ule
DU
I-M
IS
LAW
EN
FOR
CEM
ENT
AD
JUD
ICA
TIV
ETR
EATM
ENT
LIC
ENSE
CO
NTR
OL
Figu
re 1
. D
UI m
anag
emen
t inf
orm
atio
n sy
stem
.
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
It should again be noted that it is not an objective of this report to interpret, analyze or make recommendations based on the data presented. Rather, the primary purpose of a reporting system such as the DUI-MIS is to provide objective data on the operating and performance characteristics of the system for others to assess in making policy decisions, formulating improvements and conducting more in-depth evaluations. An example of how this process can work is provided by local and state agency response to the 1993 DUI-MIS report, which included a section on the tracking of "nonconvicted" DUI arrestees. In response to the identified problem of DUI convictions not being reported or updated to the offender's driver record, the Riverside County District Attorney organized a task force of representatives from law enforcement, the courts, public policy groups, the press, state administrative agencies and the legislature, to address the situation in Riverside County. The involvement of state legislative representatives led to the development of a statewide proposal on behalf of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency to improve the overall integrity of DUI and other traffic conviction data on the driver record database. Representatives of major components of the DUI system, including law enforcement, the courts, prosecutors, and administrative agencies, met in Sacramento to discuss potential improvements in the tracking of DUI offenders. Some of these improvements have already been implemented, such as an ongoing program to identify DUI arrestees with no conviction of record and track their cases back to the court of jurisdiction for final disposition. A legislative proposal to require the reporting to DMV of all DUI failures-to-appear in court (FTAs) is also being considered. Finally, the department recently (March 1995) contracted with a private consulting firm to develop an electronic "audit" procedure for tracking all DUI cases which do not appear as convictions on DMV driver records. It is exactly this feedback process of problem identification, proposed solution and reevaluation which the DUI-MIS was designed to engender. The success of the California DUI-MIS has contributed to a national initiative to design a model DUI reporting system, currently being developed under contract to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
3
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 1: DUI ARRESTS
The information presented below on DUI arrests is based primarily on data collected annually by the Department of Justice (DOJ), Law Enforcement Information Center, Monthly Arrest, and Citation Register (MACR) system. These data are the most current nonaggregated data available on DUI arrests. Table 1: DUI Arrests By County and Annual Percentage Change from 1992-1994. The number of DUI arrests by county for the years 1992-1994 and the percentage changes from 1993 to 1994 are shown in Table 1. Table 2: 1994 DUI Arrests by County and Type of Arrest. This table shows a breakdown of 1994 DUI arrests by felony, misdemeanor, and juvenile arrest type, by county. This table also shows county and statewide DUI arrest rates per 100 licensed drivers. Tables 3a-3b: 1994 DUI Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity. Table 3a crosstabulates age by sex and age by race/ethnicity of 1994 DUI arrestees statewide. The same tabulations by county are found in Appendix Table B1. Table 3b shows the same data crosstabulated by sex and age within race/ethnicity. Figure 2 below displays the trend in DUI arrests from 1984 to 1994.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
NU
MB
ER O
F D
UI A
RR
ESTS
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
FIGURE 2. DUI ARRESTS 1984-1994.
MisdemeanorFelonyTotal
YEAR
4
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Based on the data shown in Figure 2 and Tables 1, 2, 3a, and 3b, the following statements can be made about DUI arrests in California: Statewide Parameters:
DUI arrests decreased by 10.8% in 1994, following a 10.3% decline in 1993. Since 1990, DUI arrests have dropped by 42%.
The DUI arrest rate decreased to 1.0 per 100 licensed drivers in 1994, compared to
rates of 1.1 in 1993, 1.3 in 1992, 1.5 in 1991, and 1.8 in 1990.
Felony DUI arrests (involving bodily injury or death) constitute a relatively small proportion (3.6% in 1994) of all DUI arrests.
County Variation:
25% of all 1994 California DUI arrests occurred in Los Angeles County. Four counties (Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, and San Bernardino) had over 10,000 DUI arrests each, and accounted for almost half (45%) of all arrests.
The 1994 county per capita DUI arrest rates ranged from 0.4 to 7.4 DUI arrests per
100 licensed drivers. Fourteen counties had rates below 1.0: San Francisco (0.4), Contra Costa, and Nevada (0.7), Alameda, Amador, Santa Clara, and Solano (0.8), and El Dorado, Marin, Mariposa, Orange, San Diego, Shasta, and Tuolumne (0.9). Eleven counties had rates of 2.0 or higher and of these, 3 had rates higher than 2.5: Colusa (2.6), Trinity (2.6), and Alpine (7.4). The extremely high rate for Alpine must be viewed with caution because of the extremely small population size of Alpine County (N = 800 licensed drivers in 1994).
Most counties again showed a decline in DUI arrests in 1994. Among the larger
counties, the greatest decline occurred in Santa Clara County (-15.7%). Among other counties, the largest decreases in DUI arrests occurred in Sierra (-43.3%), Amador (-40.0%), San Benito (-25.7%), Del Norte (-24.4%), Imperial (-23.4%), and Mariposa (-23.3%) counties. Among counties showing increases in DUI arrests were Trinity (15.9%), Modoc (14.2%), Alpine (9.3%), Tehama (5.8%), Tuolumne (1.3%), Orange (1.2%), and Lassen (0.4%).
Demographic Characteristics:
The average age of a DUI arrestee in 1994 was 32.9 years. Roughly half (48.9%) of all arrestees were age 30 or younger and almost 80% (78.9%) were age 40 or younger. Less than 1% of all DUI arrests involved juveniles (under age 18). 2.2% of all arrestees were over age 60.
5
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Males comprised 88.4% of all 1994 DUI arrests.
Among 1994 DUI arrestees, Hispanics (46.5%) continued to be the largest
racial/ethnic group, and were arrested at a rate over double their adult population parity (22.5%, 1990 Census). Among other racial/ethnic groups, Blacks (6.7% of arrests, 6.7% of the population) were arrested in proportion with their population parity, while Whites (41.6% of arrests, 61.2% of the population), and Others (5.2% of arrests, 9.7% of the population) were underrepresented among DUI arrestees. The percentage of Hispanic DUI arrestees (46.5%) has increased substantially since 1991 (40.4%), while that of White DUI arrestees (41.6%) has decreased substantially compared to 1991 (49.9%). It should be noted, however, that the absolute numbers of DUI arrests among all racial/ethnic groups declined again in 1994. Figure 3 below shows the percentages of 1994 DUI arrests and 1990 census adult population by race/ethnicity.
Among male 1994 DUI arrestees, 50.1% were Hispanic, 38.1% were White, 6.6%
were Black, and 5.2% were "Other." Among female DUI arrestees, 68.7% were White, 19.1% were Hispanic, 7.5% were Black, and 4.8% were "Other."
In the following 9 counties, Hispanics comprised over 60% of those arrested for
DUI during 1994: Tulare (78.0%), Madera (72.0%), Fresno (71.7%), San Benito (71.3%), Imperial (70.2%), Merced (64.8%), Monterey (64.2%), Los Angeles (62.4%), and Kings (62.0%). In most other counties, the majority of arrestees were White.
The average age of a DUI arrestee varied considerably by race: Blacks were the
oldest with a mean age of 35.2 years, while Hispanics were the youngest, with a mean age of 30.4 years.
61.2
22.5
6.7 9.7
41.646.5
6.7 5.20
20
40
60
80
PER
CEN
TAG
E
White Hispanic Black Other
Figure 3 . Percentage of 1994 DUI arrests and adult population by race/ethnicity.
Adult population
DUI arrests
6
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 1: DUI ARRESTS* BY COUNTY AND ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 1992-1994
COUNTY 1992 1993 1994 % CHANGE 1993-1994
STATEWIDE 258218 231696 206583 -10.8 ALAMEDA 8964 7820 7208 -7.8 ALPINE 65 54 59 9.3 AMADOR 283 305 183 -40.0 BUTTE 1669 1580 1297 -17.9 CALAVERAS 443 334 287 -14.1 COLUSA 411 326 302 -7.4 CONTRA COSTA 5341 4492 4124 -8.2 DEL NORTE 385 401 303 -24.4 EL DORADO 1228 1122 983 -12.4 FRESNO 9066 8158 6860 -15.9 GLENN 402 310 310 0.0 HUMBOLDT 1534 1258 1234 -1.9 IMPERIAL 2672 2148 1645 -23.4 INYO 533 383 346 -9.7 KERN 7262 6443 5095 -20.9 KINGS 1379 1477 1143 -22.6 LAKE 808 690 662 -4.1 LASSEN 278 251 252 0.4 LOS ANGELES 65513 58710 51607 -12.1 MADERA 1592 1452 1159 -20.2 MARIN 2327 1940 1664 -14.2 MARIPOSA 119 146 112 -23.3 MENDOCINO 1057 1033 960 -7.1 MERCED 2639 2431 2138 -12.1 MODOC 131 120 137 14.2 MONO 191 175 157 -10.3 MONTEREY 5170 4968 4423 -11.0 NAPA 1179 1203 1085 -9.8 NEVADA 584 511 481 -5.9 ORANGE 19091 15476 15659 1.2 PLACER 1766 1885 1629 -13.6 PLUMAS 167 217 189 -12.9 RIVERSIDE 10642 9109 8182 -10.2 SACRAMENTO 9463 9316 7904 -15.2 SAN BENITO 422 342 254 -25.7 SAN BERNARDINO 11830 11000 10699 -2.7 SAN DIEGO 19389 17047 15815 -7.2 SAN FRANCISCO 2644 1885 1690 -10.3 SAN JOAQUIN 4704 4444 3936 -11.4 SAN LUIS OBISPO 2550 2444 2351 -3.8 SAN MATEO 4845 5163 4622 -10.5 SANTA BARBARA 4838 4591 3837 -16.4 SANTA CLARA 11840 10871 9164 -15.7 SANTA CRUZ 3469 3206 2645 -17.5 SHASTA 1335 1070 1036 -3.2 SIERRA 51 67 38 -43.3 SISKIYOU 452 410 356 -13.2 SOLANO 2308 2050 1809 -11.8 SONOMA 4558 4075 3245 -20.4 STANISLAUS 3640 3324 2822 -15.1 SUTTER 845 1039 898 -13.6 TEHAMA 551 451 477 5.8 TRINITY 234 220 255 15.9 TULARE 4862 4336 3820 -11.9 TUOLUMNE 380 316 320 1.3 VENTURA 5666 5050 4971 -1.6 YOLO 1704 1363 1202 -11.8 YUBA 747 688 542 -21.2 *DOJ DUI arrest totals with duplicates removed.
7
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 2: 1994 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST
TOTAL TYPE OF ARREST DUI ARRESTS
COUNTY (100%) FELONY JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR PER 100
N N % N % N % LICENSED DRIVERS
STATEWIDE 206583 7426 3.6 1767 0.9 197390 95.5 1.0 ALAMEDA 7208 118 1.6 73 1.0 7017 97.4 0.8 ALPINE 59 1 1.7 0 0.0 58 98.3 7.4 AMADOR 183 11 6.0 0 0.0 172 94.0 0.8 BUTTE 1297 54 4.2 24 1.9 1219 94.0 1.0 CALAVERAS 287 18 6.3 2 0.7 267 93.0 1.0 COLUSA 302 12 4.0 2 0.7 288 95.4 2.6 CONTRA COSTA 4124 130 3.2 40 1.0 3954 95.9 0.7 DEL NORTE 303 14 4.6 6 2.0 283 93.4 1.8 EL DORADO 983 58 5.9 16 1.6 909 92.5 0.9 FRESNO 6860 245 3.6 76 1.1 6539 95.3 1.6 GLENN 310 19 6.1 2 0.6 289 93.2 1.8 HUMBOLDT 1234 56 4.5 17 1.4 1161 94.1 1.4 IMPERIAL 1645 47 2.9 12 0.7 1586 96.4 2.2 INYO 346 22 6.4 2 0.6 322 93.1 2.4 KERN 5095 213 4.2 72 1.4 4810 94.4 1.4 KINGS 1143 27 2.4 23 2.0 1093 95.6 2.0 LAKE 662 8 2.7 6 0.9 638 96.4 1.6 LASSEN 252 10 4.0 3 1.2 239 94.8 1.4 LOS ANGELES 51607 2064 4.0 282 0.5 49261 95.5 1.0 MADERA 1159 36 3.1 10 0.9 1113 96.0 1.9 MARIN 1664 43 2.6 9 0.5 1612 96.9 0.9 MARIPOSA 112 9 8.0 0 0.0 103 92.0 0.9 MENDOCINO 960 19 2.0 6 0.6 935 97.4 1.6 MERCED 2138 66 3.1 24 1.1 2048 95.8 2.0 MODOC 137 5 3.6 3 2.2 129 94.2 2.0 MONO 157 2 1.3 2 1.3 153 97.5 2.0 MONTEREY 4423 140 3.2 9 0.3 4224 95.5 2.0 NAPA 1085 45 4.1 18 1.7 1022 94.2 1.3 NEVADA 481 17 3.5 3 0.6 461 95.8 0.7 ORANGE 15659 321 2.0 88 0.6 15250 97.4 0.9 PLACER 1629 54 3.3 21 1.3 1554 95.4 1.1 PLUMAS 189 7 3.7 1 0.5 181 95.8 1.1 RIVERSIDE 8182 308 3.8 95 1.2 7779 95.1 1.0 SACRAMENTO 7904 472 6.0 70 0.9 7362 93.1 1.1 SAN BENITO 254 111 4.3 1 0.4 242 95.3 1.0 SAN BERNARDINO 10699 436 4.1 71 0.7 10192 95.3 1.1 SAN DIEGO 15815 349 2.2 127 0.8 15339 97.0 0.9 SAN FRANCISCO 1690 139 8.2 11 0.7 1540 91.1 0.4 SAN JOAQUIN 3936 99 2.5 46 1.2 3791 96.3 1.3 SAN LUIS OBISPO 2351 65 2.8 27 1.1 2259 96.1 1.5 SAN MATEO 4622 135 2.9 50 1.1 4437 96.0 1.0 SANTA BARBARA 3837 144 3.8 47 1.2 3646 95.0 1.5 SANTA CLARA 9164 524 5.7 48 0.5 8592 93.8 0.8 SANTA CRUZ 2645 43 1.6 34 1.3 2568 97.1 1.6 SHASTA 1036 64 6.2 5 0.5 967 93.3 0.9 SIERRA 38 0 0.0 2 5.3 36 94.7 1.5 SISKIYOU 356 17 4.8 2 0.6 337 94.7 1.0 SOLANO 1809 64 3.5 26 1.4 1719 95.0 0.8 SONOMA 3245 113 3.5 37 1.1 3095 95.4 1.1 STANISLAUS 2822 133 4.7 34 1.2 2655 94.1 1.1 SUTTER 898 29 3.2 7 0.8 862 96.0 1.9 TEHAMA 477 26 5.5 3 0.6 448 93.9 1.4 TRINITY 255 18 7.1 2 0.8 235 92.2 2.6 TULARE 3820 100 2.6 53 1.4 3667 96.0 2.0 TUOLUMNE 320 12 3.8 2 0.6 306 95.6 0.9 VENTURA 4971 150 3.0 47 0.9 4774 96.0 1.0 YOLO 1202 49 4.1 14 1.2 1139 94.8 1.2 YUBA 542 25 4.6 4 0.7 513 94.6 1.4
8
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
9
TABL
E 3a
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y A
GE,
SEX
AN
D R
AC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y*
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
STA
TEW
IDE
2065
83
100.
0 18
2625
88
.4
2395
8 11
.6
8598
0 41
.6
9608
4 46
.5
1386
4 6.
7 10
655
5.2
UN
DER
18
1767
0.
9 15
36
86.9
23
1 13
.1
800
45.3
81
9 46
.3
82
4.6
66
3.7
18-2
0 13
355
6.5
1221
1 91
.4
1144
8.
6 44
93
33.6
77
23
57.8
57
7 4.
3 56
2 4.
2 21
-30
8593
6 41
.6
7732
4 90
.0
8612
10
.0
2885
1 33
.6
4821
2 56
.1
4832
5.
6 40
41
4.7
31-4
0 61
888
30.0
53
615
86.6
82
73
13.4
27
470
44.4
26
371
42.6
45
91
7.4
3456
5.
6 41
-50
2885
3 14
.0
2483
4 86
.1
4019
13
.9
1536
9 53
.3
9391
32
.5
2312
8.
0 17
81
6.2
51-6
0 10
215
4.9
9022
88
.3
1193
11
.7
5976
58
.5
2660
26
.0
990
9.7
589
5.8
61-7
0 35
95
1.7
3204
89
.1
391
10.9
22
92
63.8
77
7 21
.6
394
11.0
13
2 3.
7 71
& A
BOV
E 97
4 0.
5 87
9 90
.2
95
9.8
729
74.8
13
1 13
.4
86
8.8
28
2.9
MEA
N A
GE
(YEA
RS)
32
.9
32.7
34
.0
35.1
30
.4
35.2
33
.7
*Tab
ulat
ions
for D
UI a
rres
ts b
y ag
e, s
ex, r
ace/
ethn
icity
and
cou
nty
are
foun
d in
App
endi
x Ta
ble
B1.
TA
BLE
3b:
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTS
BY
SEX,
AG
E A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) SE
X A
GE
TOTA
L W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
STA
TEW
IDE
20
6583
10
0.0
8598
0 41
.6
9608
4 46
.5
1386
4 6.
7 10
655
5.2
MA
LE
UN
DER
18
1536
0.
8 62
8 40
.9
770
50.1
79
5.
1 59
3.
8
18-2
0 12
211
6.7
3751
30
.7
7444
61
.0
513
4.2
503
4.1
21
-30
7732
4 42
.3
2320
0 30
.0
4631
9 59
.9
4218
5.
5 35
87
4.6
31
-40
5361
5 29
.4
2182
2 40
.7
2484
5 46
.3
3876
7.
2 30
72
5.7
41
-50
2483
4 13
.6
1245
0 50
.1
8752
35
.2
2029
8.
2 16
03
6.5
51
-60
9022
4.
9 50
51
56.0
25
17
27.9
91
2 10
.1
542
6.0
61
-70
3204
1.
8 19
83
61.9
73
5 22
.9
369
11.5
11
7 3.
7
71 &
ABO
VE
879
0.5
643
73
.2
128
14.6
81
9.
2 27
3.
1
TOTA
L 18
2625
10
0.0
6952
8 38
.1
9151
0
50.1
12
077
6.6
9510
5.
2 FE
MA
LE
UN
DER
18
231
1.0
172
74.5
49
21
.2
3 1.
3 7
3.0
18
-20
1144
4.
8 74
2 64
.9
279
24.4
64
5.
6 59
5.
2
21-3
0 86
12
35.9
56
51
65.6
18
93
22.0
61
4 7.
1 45
4 5.
3
31-4
0 82
73
34.5
56
48
68.3
15
26
18.4
71
5 8.
6 38
4 4.
6
41-5
0 40
19
16.8
29
19
72.6
63
9 15
.9
283
7.0
178
4.4
51
-60
1193
5.
0 92
5 77
.5
143
12
.0
78
6.5
47
3.9
61
-70
391
1.6
309
79.0
42
10
.7
25
6.4
15
3.8
71
& A
BOV
E 95
0.
4 86
90
.5
3 3.
2 5
5.3
1 1.
1
TOTA
L 23
958
100.
0 16
452
68.7
45
74
19.1
17
87
7.5
1145
4.
8
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 2: CONVICTIONS
Data on convictions resulting from court adjudication of DUI arrests are reported directly to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) on court abstracts of conviction. The following tables compile and crosstabulate these conviction data by demographic, geographic, and adjudicative categories. Table 4: 1993 DUI Convictions by Age and Sex. This table crosstabulates statewide DUI conviction information by age and sex. Corresponding county-specific conviction data are presented in Appendix Table B2. Table 5: Matchable 1993 DUI Convictions by Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Sex. This table displays DUI conviction information by age, race/ethnicity, and sex. "Matchable" DUI convictions are those which are traceable to a DUI arrest appearing on the MACR system. Because not all arrests could be matched to an existing record, these conviction totals underestimate the total number of actual convictions. Table 6: Adjusted 1993 DUI Conviction Rates and Relative Likelihood of Conviction, by Age and Race/Ethnicity. This table shows the relative probability of a DUI arrest leading to a DUI conviction, by age and race/ethnicity. DUI conviction totals from categories in Table 5 ("matchable DUI convictions") were increased by the proportion which matchable convictions constituted of "total DUI convictions," shown in Table 7, to arrive at the adjusted DUI conviction rates. Without this adjustment DUI conviction rates would be underestimated using the conviction data from Table 5 because not all reported convictions are "matchable" to an arrest. Table 7: Total Conviction Data for 1993 DUI Arrestees. This table portrays county and statewide DUI-related conviction data as reported to the DMV on court abstracts of conviction. Corresponding court-specific data are shown in Appendix Table B3. Convictions not reported to DMV are considered nonconvictions for the purposes of this report. Actual nonconvictions include cases where the DUI arrest was not filed, not prosecuted, or resulted in a not guilty verdict. The DUI conviction rates by county were calculated by comparing the county conviction totals with DOJ arrest totals. Because not all 1993 DUI arrests have yet been adjudicated, these conviction totals and rates will slightly underestimate the "final" figures. The DUI conviction rates shown in the "DUI Summary Statistics: 1984-1994" table at the very beginning of this report include an estimate of these late convictions, and thus are slightly higher than those shown in
10
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Tables 7 and 8. Conviction variables include felony and misdemeanor DUI convictions, alcohol- and nonalcohol-related reckless driving convictions, convictions of "other" lesser offenses, and DUI convictions dismissed or found unconstitutional. DUI arrest dates from the DOJ MACR system were matched to driver record violation dates to identify nonalcohol-related reckless driving and "other" convictions. The average (mean) adjudication time lags from DUI arrest to conviction, and from conviction to update on the DMV database, were calculated for each county. Table 8: Adjudication Status of 1993 DUI Arrests by County. This table shows the adjudication status (court disposition) of 1993 DUI arrests, by county. Included are the percentages of arrests which have resulted in DUI convictions (misdemeanor or felony), reckless driving convictions (alcohol-related or nonalcohol-related), convictions of "other" offenses, or no reported conviction, as of the date of writing. Again, because not all 1993 DUI arrests have yet been adjudicated, these rates will slightly underestimate the "final" rate for each category, excepting the category "no record of any conviction," which will be slightly reduced (approximately 1-2%) by the eventual adjudication of these few late cases. Table 9: 1993 Reported Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Levels of DUI Convictions. This table shows the frequency of reported BAC levels for DUI convictions. Because of more complete reporting of BAC levels on APS reporting forms (70%), those reports are used, beginning with this year's report, to calculate statewide BAC levels. Abstracts of conviction, which were used in prior evaluations, report BAC levels in only 52% of cases. Table 10: 1993 DUI Convictions by Offender Status and Average Reported BAC Level. This table displays the proportions of convicted DUI offenders by offender status (number of prior convictions), and the average (mean) BAC level from APS reporting forms and abstracts of conviction, for each offense level. Figure 4 (below) shows, for the years 1984 to 1994, the number of DUI abstracts received to date by DMV from the courts, the estimated final number of DUI convictions which will ultimately be received, and the estimated final DUI conviction rate.
11
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
125000
150000
175000
200000
225000
250000
275000
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
YEAR
Estimated final conviction rate 70% 70% 69% 69% 67% 67% 71% 72% 72% 73% 73%
Note . Estimated DUI convictions = see footnote 3 to "DUI Summary Statistics: 1984-1994."
Figure 4 . DUI abstracts received by DMV and DUI conviction volume and rateestimates, 1984-1994.
Estimated final DUI convictions
DUI convictions received to date
Based on these data, the following statements can be made: Statewide Adjudication Parameters:
The estimated DUI conviction rate for 1994 (73%) is the same as the revised estimated rate for 1993.
Among 1993 DUI arrests, 70% have resulted to date in DUI convictions (felony or
misdemeanor). This is the same DUI conviction rate as for corresponding 1992 arrests, as reported last year.
8.9% of 1993 DUI arrests have resulted in reckless driving convictions, with 19% of
these not correctly reported as alcohol-related. Both of these rates are slightly higher than the corresponding 1992 rates.
2.4% of 1993 DUI arrests have resulted in convictions of offenses other than DUI or
reckless driving, as compared with 2.3% such "other" convictions in 1992.
12
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
18.8% of 1993 DUI arrests have not yet resulted in any conviction on DMV's records, compared to 19.2% in 1992. As additional cases are adjudicated and reported by the courts, this figure will decrease slightly.
The average reported BAC level for all convicted DUI offenders in 1993, using APS
reporting forms as the data source, was 0.169%, or more than double the illegal per se BAC limit of 0.08%. The average BAC level of these offenders, using court abstracts of conviction as the data source, was 0.166%, the same as for 1992 offenders. The difference between APS-reported and court-reported BAC levels appears to be primarily attributable to underreporting of the higher BAC levels by the courts.
Average BAC levels increase slightly as a function of the number of prior DUI
convictions, from 0.164% BAC for a first offense to 0.187% BAC for a fourth or subsequent offense.
Among 1993 convicted DUI offenders, 67.8% were first offenders, 21.6% were
second offenders, 7.4% were third offenders, and 3.2% were on their fourth or more offense. (The statutorily defined time period for counting priors in California is seven years.) The proportion of repeat offenders (32.2%) among all convicted DUI offenders has decreased slightly each year since 1989 (at which time 37% of all convictions were repeat offenses).
The average adjudication time lags were 2.7 months from DUI arrest to conviction
and 3.0 months from conviction to update on the DMV database, totalling 5.7 months from arrest to update on the offender's driving record. These time lags were slightly longer than in 1992.
Variation by County:
Among the larger counties, 1993 DUI conviction rates varied from highs of 84.6% in Ventura County and 80.3% in Kern County, to lows of 56.2% in San Bernardino County, and 57.0% in Fresno County. Los Angeles County, which accounted for almost 25% of all DUI arrests in the state, had a DUI conviction rate of 69.9%.
Among the smaller counties, 1993 DUI conviction rates varied from highs of 83.5%
in Tuolumne County, 82.6% in Nevada County, 82.0% in El Dorado County, 81.7% in Lassen County, and 81.1% in Napa County, to a low of 32.7% in Yolo County. In Mariposa County in 1993, there were 34 more reported DUI convictions than arrests, resulting in a "conviction rate" in excess of 100%. (A substantial number of
13
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
federal DUI arrests made at Yosemite National Park are not reported to the DOJ MACR system, however. The addition of these nonreported arrests would substantially reduce the conviction rate for Mariposa County.)
The rates at which DUI arrests were plea-bargained to alcohol-related reckless
driving convictions varied from 22.6% in Mariposa County to 0% in Marin and Ventura counties.
The percentage of DUI arrests that were improperly adjudicated as nonalcohol-
related reckless driving convictions varied from 0% to 8.6%. Five counties had rates of 4% or more: Mono, Del Norte, Imperial, Sierra, and Calaveras.
The percentage of DUI arrests adjudicated as minor convictions ("other"
convictions) varied from 0% to 4.7%. Los Angeles (4.7%) and San Luis Obispo (4.5%) had rates of 4% or more.
In nine counties, the proportion of arrestees not showing a conviction of any offense
exceeded 30%. These counties were Yolo, Trinity, Sutter, Tulare, Plumas, Fresno, Imperial, San Bernardino, and Merced. Seven counties had nonconviction rates of less than 10%: Mariposa, Nevada, Yuba, Tuolumne, Mono, Inyo, and San Mateo.
Variation by Court:
As was true for prior years, the 1993 superior court time lags were generally longer than municipal court time lags, presumably due to the type of DUI case (felony) being adjudicated.
Municipal court time lags from arrest to conviction (for courts with more than one
reported conviction) varied from a high of 5.1 months in the Trona (San Bernardino County) court to a low of 1.2 months for the Los Angeles Metro court, which is also the busiest court in the state.
Demographic Characteristics:
The average age of a convicted DUI offender in 1993 was 33.4 years.
46.5% of 1993 DUI convictees were aged 30 years or younger and 78.3% were 40 years or younger.
14
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Females comprised 12.3% of all 1993 convicted DUI offenders, compared to 12.1% in 1992, 12.2% in 1991, 11.7% in 1990, and 11.4% in 1989.
The racial/ethnic distribution of 1993 DUI convictions (White = 43.7%; Hispanic =
45.0%; Black = 6.5%; Other = 4.7%) generally paralleled that of 1993 arrests, although Whites were somewhat more likely, and other groups somewhat less likely, to be convicted of the offense (as shown in Figure 5 below).
1.040.97 0.99 0.99
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
REL
ATI
VE
PRO
BA
BIL
ITY
White OtherBlackHispanic
Figure 5. Relative likelihood of conviction by race/ethnicity.(Adjusted conviction rate by ethnicity ÷ overall conviction rate.)
TABLE 4: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY AGE AND SEX*
TOTAL MALE FEMALE AGE N % N % N %
STATEWIDE 162254 100.0 142352 87.7 19902 12.3 UNDER 18 548 0.3 495 90.3 53 9.7 18-20 7533 4.6 6905 91.7 628 8.3 21-30 67290 41.5 60207 89.5 7083 10.5 31-40 51729 31.9 44531 86.1 7198 13.9 41-50 23245 14.3 19756 85.0 3489 15.0 51-60 8217 5.1 7200 87.6 1017 12.4 61-70 2994 1.8 2642 88.2 352 11.8 71 & ABOVE 698 0.4 616 88.3 82 11.7 MEAN AGE (YEARS) 33.4 33.3 34.6 *County-specific tabulations of 1993 DUI convictions by age and sex are shown in Appendix Table B2.
15
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
16
TABL
E 5:
MA
TCH
ABL
E 19
93 D
UI C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
BY A
GE,
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
AN
D S
EX
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
AG
E TO
TAL
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
71 P
LUS
0.68
0.
97
0.67
0.
96
0.71
1.
01
0.74
1.
06
0.63
0.
90
TOTA
L BY
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
0.
70
1.00
0.
73
1.04
0.
68
0.97
0.
69
0.99
0.
69
0.99
UN
DER
18
0.47
0.
67
0.54
0.
77
0.41
0.
59
0.30
0.
43
0.49
0.
70
18 to
20
0.62
0.
89
0.66
0.
94
0.60
0.
86
0.59
0.
84
0.62
0.
89
21 to
30
0.68
0.
97
0.72
1.
03
0.65
0.
93
0.67
0.
96
0.66
0.
94
31 to
40
0.72
1.
03
0.74
1.
06
0.72
1.
03
0.70
1.
00
0.71
1.
01
41 to
50
0.75
1.
07
0.75
1.
07
0.76
1.
09
0.71
1.
01
0.73
1.
04
51 to
60
0.75
1.
07
0.75
1.
07
0.77
1.
10
0.74
1.
06
0.69
0.
99
61 to
70
0.74
1.
06
0.75
1.
07
0.74
1.
06
0.75
1.
07
0.69
0.
99
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
STA
TEW
IDE
1439
90
100.
0 50
644
35
.2
1233
9 8.
6 61
307
42.6
35
44
2.5
8120
5.
6 11
99
0.8
6024
4.
2 81
3 0.
6
UN
DER
18
700
0.5
276
39.4
71
10
.1
293
41
.9
11
1.6
18
2.6
2 0.
3 26
3.
7 3
0.4
18-2
0 81
05
5.6
2408
29
.7
433
5.3
4455
55
.0
167
2.1
287
3.5
40
0.5
283
3.
5 32
0.
4
21-3
0 59
954
41.6
17
667
29.5
43
81
7.3
3072
1 51
.2
1466
2.
4 28
11
4.7
392
0.7
2190
3.
7 32
6 0.
5
31-4
0 44
464
30.9
16
030
36.1
42
57
9.6
1744
8 39
.2
1259
2.
8 26
49
6.0
485
1.1
2082
4.
7 25
4 0.
6
41-5
0 20
261
14.1
87
81
43.3
22
12
10.9
60
83
30.0
48
6 2.
4 13
46
6.6
202
1.0
1008
5.
0 14
3 0.
7
51-6
0 72
55
5.0
3612
49
.8
678
9.3
1753
24
.2
116
1.6
657
9.1
64
0.9
337
4.
6 38
0.
5
61-7
0 26
60
1.8
1497
56
.3
257
9.7
477
17.9
31
1.
2 29
2 11
.0
9 0.
3 82
3.
1 15
0.
6
71 &
ABO
VE
591
0.4
373
63.1
50
8.
5 77
13
.0
8 1.
4 60
10
.2
5 0.
8 16
27
2
0.3
TABL
E 6:
AD
JUST
ED 1
993
DU
I CO
NV
ICTI
ON
RA
TES1 A
ND
REL
ATI
VE
LIK
ELIH
OO
D2 O
F C
ON
VIC
TIO
N, B
Y A
GE
AN
D R
AC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y
TO
TAL
BY A
GE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
AG
E A
DJU
STED
RE
LATI
VE
AD
JUST
ED
REL
ATI
VE
AD
JUST
ED
RELA
TIV
E A
DJU
STED
R
ELA
TIV
E A
DJU
STED
RE
LATI
VE
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
LIK
ELIH
OO
D
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
LI
KEL
IHO
OD
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
LIK
ELIH
OO
D
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
LI
KEL
IHO
OD
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
LIK
ELIH
OO
D
R
ATE
RATE
RATE
RA
TE
RA
TE
Adj
uste
d D
UI
Con
vict
ion
Rat
es=
The
mat
chab
le D
UI c
onvi
ctio
n ra
te p
ropo
rtion
ally
adj
uste
d to
the
over
all D
UI c
onvi
ctio
n ra
te.
1 Rel
ativ
e Li
kelih
ood
= A
djus
ted
DU
I Con
vict
ion
Rat
e O
vera
ll To
tal D
UI C
onvi
ctio
n R
ate
2
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
17
TABL
E 7:
TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES*
DU
I
DU
I A
VER
AG
E D
UI A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
UN
CO
NST
***
VIO
LATI
ON
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
UN
TY
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DIS
MIS
SED
**/
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RATE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
TO C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
TO D
MV
UPD
ATE
STA
TEW
IDE
70.0
16
0006
22
48
1658
6 39
31
5552
13
4/30
0 2.
7 3.
0 A
LAM
EDA
67
.8
5249
56
55
5 13
3 27
1 2/
9 3.
3 2.
5 A
LPIN
E 77
.8
42
0 5
0 0
0/0
2.9
2.3
AM
AD
OR
72.1
21
6 4
1 1
2 1/
2 2.
9 4.
4 BU
TTE
70.3
10
97
14
170
33
17
2/11
2.
8 4.
1 C
ALA
VER
AS
62.9
20
5 5
32
14
6 0/
2 2.
3 1.
4 C
OLU
SA
74.9
24
4 1
18
11
4 1/
0 2.
4 4.
5 C
ON
TRA
CO
STA
72
.6
3220
42
43
6 40
52
1/
17
3.6
2.4
DEL
NO
RTE
56.6
22
3 4
58
24
13
1/0
2.8
6.6
EL D
ORA
DO
82
.0
879
42
54
8 8
5 /3
2.
4 5.
3 FR
ESN
O
57.0
45
40
111
489
93
59
1/4
3.7
3.8
GLE
NN
74
.2
226
4 27
1
2 2/
1 2.
3 5.
1 H
UM
BOLD
T 52
.1
646
10
226
22
48
0/1
2.9
4.3
IMPE
RIA
L 51
.7
1103
9
206
100
24
1/0
3.3
1.4
INYO
73
.4
276
5 53
5
8 10
/0
2.9
5.4
KER
N
80.3
51
08
66
418
78
90
8/12
2.
4 4.
6 K
ING
S 68
.0
990
14
65
16
13
3/1
1.8
2.2
LAK
E 72
.2
497
1 43
5
12
0/0
3.3
5.3
LASS
EN
81.7
19
6 9
5 0
2 0/
1 3.
3 1.
7 LO
S A
NG
ELES
69
.9
4053
5 50
1 40
94
1024
27
34
9/72
2.
2 2.
6 M
AD
ERA
62
.1
876
26
116
29
14
2/1
3.5
4.1
MA
RIN
73
.2
1407
13
0
1 45
0/
5 2.
7 4.
1 M
ARI
POSA
****
10
0.0
142
4 33
1
4 0/
0 2.
7 2.
3 M
END
OC
INO
72
.1
735
10
69
16
20
2/0
2.9
3.0
MER
CED
55
.3
1324
20
24
5 62
40
1/
3 4.
2 4.
4 M
OD
OC
58
.3
70
0 17
1
1 2/
0 3.
6 3.
1 M
ON
O
70.3
12
1 2
19
15
2 0/
0 2.
0 2.
1 M
ON
TERE
Y
74.6
36
53
55
406
81
72
1/1
1.5
4.8
*Con
vict
ion
data
by
cour
t are
foun
d in
App
endi
x Ta
ble
B3.
**Th
ese
may
incl
ude
dism
issa
ls o
f pri
or fa
ilure
to a
ppea
r (FT
A) a
bstr
acts
. **
*The
se 1
993
arre
stee
s sho
wed
pri
or D
UIs
dec
lare
d un
cons
titut
iona
l on
thei
r rec
ords
. Th
e co
untie
s re
port
ed h
ere
are
thos
e in
whi
ch th
e cu
rren
t DU
I con
vict
ion
occu
rred
and
no
t nec
essa
rily
thos
e in
whi
ch a
pri
or c
onvi
ctio
n w
as d
ecla
red
unco
nstit
utio
nal.
****
Mor
e co
nvic
tions
than
arr
ests
wer
e re
port
ed, r
esul
ting
in a
per
cent
age
tota
l of 1
00.
(See
pp.
13-
14 fo
r exp
lana
tion.
)
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
18
TABL
E 7:
TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES* -
con
tinue
d
D
UI
D
UI
AV
ERA
GE
DU
I AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
UN
CO
NST
***
VIO
LATI
ON
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
UN
TY
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DIS
MIS
SED
**/
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RATE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
TO C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
TO D
MV
UPD
ATE
N
APA
81
.1
952
24
44
8 7
7/0
2.5
2.9
NEV
AD
A
82.6
41
2 10
43
3
6 0/
3 2.
3 4.
6 O
RAN
GE
77.7
11
920
104
674
81
295
1/20
2.
9 0.
7 PL
AC
ER
79.5
14
78
20
47
26
22
6/2
3.1
3.1
PLU
MA
S 55
.3
120
0 18
0
0 0/
1 2.
0 2.
3 RI
VER
SID
E 64
.8
5792
10
9 33
9 33
2 14
5 8/
5 3.
5 3.
4 SA
CRA
MEN
TO
62.8
56
94
163
1329
32
8 12
7 18
/8
3.0
1.8
SAN
BEN
ITO
75
.4
257
1 35
7
4 0/
13
2.3
7.3
SAN
BER
NA
RDIN
O
56.2
61
43
90
828
294
275
9/8
3.8
2.4
SAN
DIE
GO
77
.8
1318
7 86
79
3 26
5 23
0 1/
11
2.6
3.7
SAN
FRA
NC
ISC
O
59.7
11
15
10
178
60
14
0/1
3.3
1.2
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
71.1
31
13
46
224
68
126
5/1
2.3
2.3
SAN
LU
IS O
BISP
O
67.8
16
43
14
345
39
111
2/0
2.3
5.8
SAN
MA
TEO
76
.3
3896
45
62
4 38
63
0/
10
2.5
4.1
SAN
TA B
ARB
ARA
69
.7
3162
38
61
0 14
2 11
5 2/
2 2.
1 3.
7 SA
NTA
CLA
RA
79.8
85
20
156
607
124
131
2/8
3.4
1.6
SAN
TA C
RU
Z 72
.5
2308
17
29
8 83
27
0/
28
2.2
6.1
SHA
STA
71
.2
749
20
122
7 25
1/
0 2.
5 3.
0 SI
ERRA
56
.7
38
0 8
3 0
0/0
3.0
3.9
SISK
IYO
U
76.1
30
5 7
29
5 2
3/0
3.0
4.1
SOLA
NO
71
.5
1439
28
25
2 20
29
0/
3 2.
0 6.
4 SO
NO
MA
71
.3
2862
42
57
6 42
74
2/
15
2.9
4.7
STA
NIS
LAU
S 68
.2
2226
41
33
8 87
30
0/
7 2.
4 2.
1 SU
TTER
47
.6
484
11
72
3 12
0/
2 2.
3 2.
9 TE
HA
MA
68
.1
301
6 38
8
7 4
/1
2.4
4.8
TRIN
ITY
37.1
79
3
15
2 1
0/0
3.6
2.4
TULA
RE
60.4
25
53
67
56
17
18
1/1
3.0
4.2
TUO
LUM
NE
83.5
25
5 9
23
2 2
0/0
2.7
6.9
VEN
TURA
84
.6
4241
33
0
1 81
6/
2 2.
1 3.
3 YO
LO
32.7
43
8 8
52
14
8 1/
0 3.
9 6.
2 YU
BA
75.0
50
4 12
10
9 8
2 0/
2 2.
2 2.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 8: ADJUDICATION STATUS OF 1993 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY*
DUI CONVICTIONS RECKLESS DRIVING CONVICTIONS % OTHER % NO RECORD COUNTY %
MISDEMEANOR %
FELONY % ALCOHOL
RELATED % NONALCOHOL
RELATED CONVICTIONS OF ANY
CONVICTION
STATEWIDE 69.0 0.9 7.2 1.7 2.4 18.8 ALAMEDA 67.1 0.7 7.1 1.7 3.5 19.9 ALPINE 77.8 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 13.0 AMADOR 70.8 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 26.6 BUTTE 69.4 0.9 10.8 2.1 1.1 15.8 CALAVERAS 61.4 1.5 9.6 4.2 1.8 21.6 COLUSA 74.6 0.3 5.5 3.4 1.2 15.0 CONTRA COSTA 71.7 0.9 9.7 0.9 1.2 15.6 DEL NORTE 55.6 1.0 14.5 6.0 3.2 19.7 EL DORADO 78.3 3.7 4.8 0.7 0.7 11.8 FRESNO 55.6 1.4 6.0 1.1 0.7 35.1 GLENN 72.9 1.3 8.7 0.3 0.6 16.1 HUMBOLDT 51.4 0.8 18.0 1.7 3.8 24.3 IMPERIAL 51.3 0.4 9.6 4.7 1.1 32.9 INYO 72.1 1.3 13.8 1.3 2.1 9.4 KERN 79.3 1.0 6.5 1.2 1.4 10.6 KINGS 67.0 0.9 4.4 1.1 0.9 25.7 LAKE 72.0 0.1 6.2 0.7 1.7 19.1 LASSEN 78.1 3.6 2.0 0.0 0.8 15.5 LOS ANGELES 69.0 0.9 7.0 1.7 4.7 16.7 MADERA 60.3 1.8 8.0 2.0 1.0 26.9 MARIN 72.5 0.7 0.0 0.1 2.3 24.4 MARIPOSA** 97.3 2.7 22.6 0.7 2.7 0.0 MENDOCINO 71.2 1.0 6.7 1.5 1.9 17.7 MERCED 54.5 0.8 10.1 2.6 1.6 30.4 MODOC 58.3 0.0 14.2 0.8 0.8 25.8 MONO 69.1 1.1 10.9 8.6 1.1 9.1 MONTEREY 73.5 1.1 8.2 1.6 1.4 14.1 NAPA 79.1 2.0 3.7 0.7 0.6 14.0 NEVADA 80.6 2.0 8.4 0.6 1.2 7.2 ORANGE 77.0 0.7 4.4 0.5 1.9 15.5 PLACER 78.4 1.1 2.5 1.4 1.2 15.5 PLUMAS 55.3 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 36.4 RIVERSIDE 63.6 1.2 3.7 3.6 1.6 26.3 SACRAMENTO 61.1 1.7 14.3 3.5 1.4 18.1 SAN BENITO 75.1 0.3 10.2 2.0 1.2 11.1 SAN BERNARDINO 55.3 0.8 7.5 2.6 2.5 31.3 SAN DIEGO 77.3 0.5 4.6 1.6 1.3 14.7 SAN FRANCISCO 59.2 0.5 9.4 3.2 0.7 26.9 SAN JOAQUIN 70.0 1.0 5.0 1.5 2.8 19.5 SAN LUIS OBISPO 67.2 0.6 14.1 1.6 4.5 11.9 SAN MATEO 75.5 0.9 12.1 0.7 1.2 9.6 SANTA BARBARA 68.9 0.8 13.3 3.1 2.5 11.4 SANTA CLARA 78.4 1.4 5.6 1.1 1.2 12.3 SANTA CRUZ 72.0 0.5 9.3 2.6 0.8 14.8 SHASTA 69.4 1.9 11.3 0.6 2.3 14.5 SIERRA 56.7 0.0 11.9 4.5 0.0 26.9 SISKIYOU 74.4 1.7 7.1 1.2 0.5 15.1 SOLANO 70.2 1.4 12.3 1.0 1.4 13.8 SONOMA 70.2 1.0 14.1 1.0 1.8 11.8 STANISLAUS 67.0 1.2 10.2 2.6 0.9 18.1 SUTTER 46.6 1.1 6.9 0.3 1.2 44.0 TEHAMA 66.7 1.3 8.4 1.8 1.6 20.2 TRINITY 35.7 1.4 6.8 0.9 0.5 54.8 TULARE 58.9 1.5 1.3 0.4 0.4 37.5 TUOLUMNE 80.7 2.8 7.3 0.6 0.6 7.9 VENTURA 84.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.6 13.8 YOLO 32.1 0.6 3.8 1.0 0.6 61.9 YUBA 73.3 1.7 15.8 1.2 0.3 7.7
*The percentages total to 100 by row (county). **More convictions than arrests were reported resulting in a percentage total over 100. (See pp. 13-14 for explanation.)
19
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 9: 1993 REPORTED* BLOOD ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION
(BAC) LEVELS OF DUI CONVICTIONS
DUI CONVICTIONS ALCOHOL-RECKLESS CONVICTIONS BAC LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENT BAC LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENT
.01 52 0.0 .01 4 0.0
.02 63 0.1 .02 11 0.1
.03 43 0.0 .03 11 0.1
.04 55 0.0 .04 23 0.2
.05 87 0.1 .05 34 0.3
.06 91 0.1 .06 87 0.7
.07 183 0.2 .07 303 2.6
.08 1199 1.1 .08 2439 20.9
.09 2303 2.1 .09 3064 26.3
.10 4680 4.2 .10 2666 22.9
.11 6724 6.1 .11 1442 12.4
.12 7959 7.2 .12 578 5.0
.13 8655 7.8 .13 274 2.4
.14 8866 8.0 .14 175 1.5
.15 8664 7.8 .15 132 1.1
.16 8630 7.8 .16 86 0.7
.17 7987 7.2 .17 78 0.7
.18 7148 6.5 .18 55 0.5
.19 6557 5.9 .19 39 0.3
.20 6117 5.5 .20 26 0.2
.21 5142 4.6 .21 25 0.2
.22 4154 3.8 .22 23 0.2
.23 3413 3.1 .23 18 0.2
.24 2810 2.5 .24 17 0.1
.25 2080 1.9 .25 10 0.1
.26 1716 1.6 .26 7 0.1
.27 1300 1.2 .27 7 0.1
.28 969 0.9 .28 4 0.0
.29 738 0.7 .29 6 0.1
.30 581 0.5 .30 2 0.0
.31 460 0.4 .31 2 0.0
.32 301 0.3 .32 2 0.0
.33 255 0.2
.34 192 0.2
.35 126 0.1
.36 87 0.1
.37 64 0.1
.38 47 0.0
.39 34 0.0
.40 26 0.0
.41 16 0.0
.42 11 0.0
.43 11 0.0
.44 4 0.0
.45 5 0.0
.46 5 0.0
.47 3 0.0
.49 2 0.0
.48 2 0.0 .50+ 5 0.0
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – TOTAL 110618 100.0 TOTAL 11650 100.0
MEAN BAC .169 MEAN BAC .099
*Beginning with this report, the source of BAC data is the APS reporting form for convicted DUI offenders, rather than the abstract of conviction for those offenders, which was the data source in prior reports. This change in data source was made because of the more complete BAC reporting on APS forms (70% of total) versus court abstracts (with only 52% showing BAC levels).
20
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 10: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY OFFENDER STATUS AND AVERAGE REPORTED BAC LEVEL*
DUI OFFENDER STATUS
PERCENT
AVERAGE BAC LEVEL FROM APS
REPORTING FORM (%)
AVERAGE BAC LEVEL FROM CONVICTION
ABSTRACT (%)
STATEWIDE 100.0 .169 .166
1ST DUI 67.8 .164 .162 2ND DUI 21.6 .176 .174 3RD DUI 7.4 .182 .179 4TH+ DUI 3.2 .187 .182
*The differences in reported BAC levels between the two sources appear to be attributable to underreporting of high BAC levels on abstracts of conviction. The higher BAC levels from the APS reporting forms do not necessarily reflect increasing BAC levels among DUI offenders compared to last year's report, but rather reflect a more accurate reporting of BAC levels.
21
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 3: POSTCONVICTION SANCTIONS
Data on court sanctions assigned to convicted DUI offenders were taken from DUI abstracts of conviction for offenders arrested in 1993. Also included are counts of postconviction DMV license actions for selected offender groups, while total counts of all license actions, including Administrative Per Se (APS) license suspensions and revocations, are shown in the Administrative Actions Section. APS actions (effective July 1990) are initiated by law enforcement immediately upon arrest for DUI, and are administered independent of the criminal adjudication process. This section includes the following tables: Table 11: 1993 DUI Court Sanctions by DUI Offender Status. This table shows the frequency of specific court sanctions statewide by number of prior DUI convictions. The specific court sanctions tallied include percentages of probation, jail, alcohol treatment programs (first offender, SB 38 second offender, and 30-month third offender programs), license restriction, court suspension, and ignition interlock. Crosstabulations of sanctions by county, court, and number of prior convictions appear in Appendix Table B4. Table 12: 1993 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - First Offenders. This table displays the frequency of commonly assigned court sanction combinations (such as first offender alcohol program plus license restriction) by county for first DUI offenders. License suspensions include both court and DMV postconviction (non-APS) suspensions. The sanction combination groups portrayed in this table, as well as Table 13, were defined according to the conventions described in the "Evaluation Methods and Results" portion of Section 4: "Postconviction Sanction Effectiveness." Table 13: 1993 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - Repeat Offenders. This table shows the frequency of commonly assigned court sanction combinations by county for second, third, and fourth (or subsequent) DUI offenders. License actions include both court and DMV postconviction (non-APS) license suspensions and revocations. From the data in these and the Appendix tables, it is evident that the use of alternative sanctions varied widely by county, court, and offender status in 1993. For example: Statewide Parameters:
The most frequently applied court sanction among all convicted DUI offenders was probation (95.6%), while the least frequently used court sanction was ignition interlock (1.8%). DUI offenders were sentenced to jail in 78.8% of the cases. (However, in many jurisdictions, jail is often served as community service rather than actual jail time.)
22
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Figure 6 (below) graphically displays the statewide data from Table 11 showing the frequency of specific types of court-ordered sanctions among all convicted DUI offenders. Because virtually all offenders receive more than one type of sanction, the cumulative percentage adds to more than 100%.
95.6
78.8 75.9
39.6
7.2 1.8
0
25
50
75
100
PER
CEN
TAG
E
Figure 6 . Frequency of court-ordered DUI sanctions (1993).
Probation Jail Treatmentprogram
Licenserestriction
Court licensesuspension
Ignitioninterlock
County Variation:
The proportion of first DUI offenders sentenced to jail varied by county from less than 10% in Alpine and Marin counties to 100% in Calaveras County.
Counties such as Calaveras, Glenn, Lake, Lassen, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo,
Sierra, and Stanislaus preferred to assign first offenders to treatment program and jail (over 85%) rather than treatment program and license restriction (less than 5%). Amador, Humboldt, Marin, and San Bernardino counties assigned treatment program and jail to less than 1% of their first offenders. Alpine, Humboldt, Inyo, and Marin counties assigned treatment program and license restriction to over 80% of first offenders.
Counties departing from using typical first offender sanction combinations were
Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial, as shown by relatively high percentages (over 10%) in the "other" category. ("Other" includes license restriction without treatment program assignment, probation only, and other unofficial sanction combinations.)
23
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Court Variation:
In Los Angeles County, two municipal courts (Lancaster and Burbank) used jail as a sanction in more than 95% of their DUI sentences. At the other extreme, three courts (Santa Monica, Malibu, and Calabasas) used jail as a sanction in less than 30% of their DUI sentences.
Variation by Offender Status:
71% of 1993 first DUI offenders were sentenced to jail, compared to 95% of all repeat offenders.
83% of first DUI offenders were assigned to alcohol treatment programs, along with
76% of second offenders, 36% of third offenders, and 17% of fourth or more DUI offenders. (All repeat offenders, however, must eventually complete specified alcohol treatment programs in order to be eligible for license reinstatement.)
10% of first DUI offenders and 28% of second DUI offenders received DMV or court
license suspensions after adjudication. As of July 1990, of course, all DUI offenders with BAC levels of 0.08% or more were also subject to 30 days to one-year administrative license suspension/revocation under the APS law.
Only 5% of repeat DUI offenders were assigned ignition interlock in 1993, in spite
of the mandatory interlock law for repeat offenders (AB 2851 - Freidman), which took effect on July 1, 1993.
TABLE 11: 1993 DUI COURT SANCTIONS BY DUI OFFENDER STATUS*
DUI
OFFENDER STATUS
TOTAL
PROBATION
JAIL
1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL PROGRAM
SB 38 ALCOHOL PROGRAM
30-MONTH PROGRAM
LICENSE
RESTRICTION
COURT
SUSPENSION
IGNITION
INTERLOCK
% % % % % % % %
STATEWIDE 162254 95.6 78.8 57.1 18.6 0.2 39.6 7.2 1.8
1ST DUI 109992 97.5 70.9 81.0 2.1 0.0 36.7 4.7 0.1
2ND DUI 35095 96.2 95.5 8.0 67.3 0.2 61.9 10.6 6.5
3RD DUI 11903 91.0 94.7 4.2 30.0 1.3 16.6 18.4 3.9
4TH+ DUI 5264 61.4 95.7 2.7 14.0 0.4 4.7 11.8 1.4
*Entries represent percentages of 1993 DUI convictees receiving each sanction by offender status. Sanctions within each offender status group (row) are not independent; therefore, row percentages always add to more than 100%. Percentages of sanctions by county and court appear in Appendix Table B4.
24
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 12: 1993 DUI SANCTION COMBINATIONS BY COUNTY - FIRST OFFENDERS
COUNTY TOTAL (100%)
DMV OR COURT SUSPENSION
JAIL
1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL
PROG + JAIL
1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL PROG +
RESTRICTION
SB 38 ALCOHOL PROG +
RESTRICTION*
OTHER
N % % % % % %
STATEWIDE 109992 9.8 5.5 46.8 31.1 4.1 2.7 ALAMEDA 3444 14.5 4.7 74.2 2.6 3.5 0.5 ALPINE 29 0.0 0.0 3.4 82.8 13.8 0.0 AMADOR 127 14.2 81.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 BUTTE 719 24.5 2.2 71.5 1.3 0.3 0.3 CALAVERAS 123 7.3 3.3 89.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 COLUSA 156 13.5 13.5 70.5 1.9 0.6 0.0 CONTRA COSTA 2083 7.8 9.7 78.0 2.0 2.1 0.4 DEL NORTE 136 11.0 15.4 64.0 6.6 0.7 2.2 EL DORADO 564 8.5 12.2 71.1 6.4 0.5 1.2 FRESNO 2876 14.6 7.3 49.8 22.4 2.7 3.1 GLENN 142 7.7 1.4 88.7 0.7 1.4 0.0 HUMBOLDT 418 11.2 1.4 0.7 81.1 3.3 2.2 IMPERIAL 815 2.0 17.8 20.2 43.7 0.9 15.5 INYO 168 4.8 3.0 3.6 81.5 2.4 4.8 KERN 3112 13.1 13.4 65.3 5.5 1.0 1.7 KINGS 653 17.2 6.1 72.4 2.1 2.0 0.2 LAKE 296 6.4 3.7 87.2 1.4 1.4 0.0 LASSEN 131 9.9 1.5 87.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 LOS ANGELES 29815 8.5 3.5 26.4 57.8 1.2 2.6 MADERA 531 10.4 8.9 76.5 0.2 2.3 1.9 MARIN 1013 6.5 0.6 0.3 90.2 1.9 0.5 MARIPOSA 98 13.3 1.0 41.8 40.8 2.0 1.0 MENDOCINO 454 14.1 6.4 70.7 3.7 4.0 1.1 MERCED 817 9.3 4.4 78.2 2.0 4.5 1.6 MODOC 52 13.5 1.9 61.5 15.4 1.9 5.8 MONO 89 2.2 21.3 62.9 5.6 0.0 7.9 MONTEREY 2418 15.6 5.0 78.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 NAPA 665 6.5 6.9 83.2 1.1 1.7 0.8 NEVADA 292 9.6 2.4 64.0 10.3 9.9 3.8 ORANGE 8799 6.3 1.2 11.2 77.7 1.5 2.0 PLACER 1027 7.5 2.8 73.2 12.0 2.1 2.3 PLUMAS 86 4.7 2.3 64.0 16.3 8.1 4.7 RIVERSIDE 4063 4.9 3.0 37.6 38.6 2.9 13.1 SACRAMENTO 3645 7.6 5.1 82.0 0.7 3.0 1.5 SAN BENITO 161 31.7 5.6 60.2 1.2 0.0 1.2 SAN BERNARDINO 4309 10.1 16.2 0.1 0.3 58.5** 14.9 SAN DIEGO 9720 7.6 3.7 49.5 35.2 2.9 1.1 SAN FRANCISCO 859 8.4 3.4 76.7 9.3 1.7 0.5 SAN JOAQUIN 1898 9.5 11.0 77.7 0.6 0.9 0.3 SAN LUIS OBISPO 1084 4.1 1.8 91.1 0.2 2.4 0.5 SAN MATEO 2699 7.0 4.0 85.7 0.9 2.2 0.3 SANTA BARBARA 2039 14.6 0.9 10.4 67.5 0.5 6.1 SANTA CLARA 5423 22.1 5.4 63.7 5.9 1.8 1.1 SANTA CRUZ 1475 10.1 2.8 82.8 2.9 0.5 0.9 SHASTA 423 8.5 4.0 82.3 3.3 0.9 0.9 SIERRA 23 4.3 0.0 91.3 4.3 0.0 0.0 SISKIYOU 210 12.4 20.5 60.0 1.4 3.8 1.9 SOLANO 925 9.6 5.4 78.7 3.0 2.2 1.1 SONOMA 1704 8.6 36.6 51.1 1.7 0.4 1.7 STANISLAUS 1362 6.3 5.3 85.2 1.0 1.9 0.3 SUTTER 314 12.1 4.5 80.6 1.6 0.6 0.6 TEHAMA 205 16.1 2.0 79.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 TRINITY 48 16.7 2.1 81.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 TULARE 1597 9.1 4.6 75.4 1.2 9.3 0.4 TUOLUMNE 153 10.5 5.2 83.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 VENTURA 2961 12.2 3.5 82.4 0.3 1.1 0.4 YOLO 226 11.9 2.7 74.8 4.0 5.8 0.9 YUBA 318 15.1 2.5 80.2 0.9 0.0 1.3
Note: The vast majority of convicted DUI offenders also receive fine and probation. *Includes referral to alcohol clinics and 30-month programs. **The majority of these are referrals to alcohol clinics.
25
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
26
TABL
E 13
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
CO
MBI
NA
TIO
NS
BY C
OU
NTY
- RE
PEA
T O
FFEN
DER
S
2ND
OFF
END
ERS
3RD
OFF
END
ERS
4TH
+ O
FFEN
DER
S
ALA
MED
A
1861
14
.7
53.0
32
.4
1227
48
.6
45.5
5.
9 44
0 61
.3
33.0
5.
7 19
4
STA
TEW
IDE
5226
2 28
.0
42.8
29
.2
3509
5 66
.2
28.8
5.
0 11
903
81.6
13
.6
4.7
5264
MA
DER
A
371
29.8
33
.8
36.4
22
8 71
.9
21.3
6.
7 89
94
.4
0.0
5.6
54
IMPE
RIA
L 29
7 45
.0
29.4
25
.7
218
74.6
23
.8
1.6
63
87.5
12
.5
0.0
16
HU
MBO
LDT
238
35.7
49
.7
14.6
15
7 57
.6
39.4
3.
0 66
93
.3
6.7
0.0
15
BUTT
E 39
2 42
. 8
40.3
16
.9
236
83.2
15
.9
0.9
107
93.9
6.
1 0.
0 49
CA
LAV
ERA
S 87
10
.3
63.8
25
.9
58
77.3
18
.2
4.5
22
71.4
28
.6
0.0
7
LASS
EN
74
21. 2
53
.8
25.0
52
76
.9
23.1
0.
0 13
77
.8
22.2
0.
0 9
MO
NTE
REY
1290
51
.2
4.1
44.7
81
2 86
.5
12.3
1.
2 34
2 91
.9
5.1
2.9
136
CO
NTR
A C
OST
A
1179
16
.2
51.9
31
.9
755
68.5
27
.0
4.5
289
65.9
31
.1
3.0
135
LAK
E 20
2 17
. 4
13.2
69
.4
144
55.3
36
.8
7.9
38
85.0
15
.0
0.0
20
NEV
AD
A
130
15.1
55
.9
29.0
93
56
.0
40.0
4.
0 25
91
.7
8.3
0.0
12
CO
LUSA
89
33
. 3
41.7
25
.0
60
86.4
13
.6
0.0
22
71.4
28
.6
0.0
7
NA
PA
311
13.8
28
.1
58.1
20
3 51
.4
41.4
7.
1 70
89
.5
5.3
5.3
38
ALP
INE
13
62. 5
12
.5
25.0
8
50
.0
50.0
0.
0 2
33.3
66
.7
0.0
3
EL D
ORA
DO
35
7 26
.2
35.7
38
.0
221
73.6
23
.1
3.3
91
80.0
13
.3
6.7
45
FRES
NO
17
75
35.1
38
.4
26.5
11
10
68.9
25
.3
5.8
395
91.9
3.
0 5.
2 27
0
KER
N
2062
70
.4
12.5
17
.1
1261
91
.8
2.0
6.1
537
90.5
1.
9 7.
6 26
4
MER
CED
52
7 16
.9
48.1
35
.0
314
61.7
34
.6
3.8
133
85.0
11
.3
3.8
80
AM
AD
OR
93
35.4
32
.3
32.3
65
37
.5
56.3
6.
3 16
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
INYO
11
3 11
. 8
50.0
38
.2
68
62.1
34
.5
3.4
29
93.8
0.
0 6.
3 16
MA
RIN
40
7 12
.2
72.1
15
.6
294
70.1
23
.0
6.9
87
88.5
11
.5
0.0
26
DEL
NO
RTE
91
48.1
11
.1
40.7
54
61
.5
34.6
3.
8 26
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
11
KIN
GS
351
38.2
43
.8
18.0
21
7 76
.6
18.2
5.
2 77
98
.2
0.0
1.8
57
MO
NO
34
38
. 9
5.6
55.6
18
38
.5
46.2
15
.4
13
33.3
66
.7
0.0
3
GLE
NN
88
33
.3
21.6
45
.1
51
80.0
16
.7
3.3
30
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 7
MA
RIP
OSA
48
15
.6
3.1
81.3
32
50
.0
50.0
0.
0 14
50
.0
50.0
0.
0 2
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
1122
1 24
.3
48.3
27
.4
7946
70
.3
24.0
5.
8 23
79
87.9
6.
0 6.
0 89
6
MEN
DO
CIN
O
291
30.8
37
.8
31.4
18
5 69
.5
23.2
7.
3 82
91
.7
8.3
0.0
24
MO
DO
C
18
21.4
35
.7
42.9
14
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
3 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
1
CO
UN
TY
TOTA
L RE
PEA
T D
UI
LIC
ENSE
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
SB 3
8 PR
OG
RAM
+
REST
RIC
TIO
N
O
THER
TO
TAL
100%
LIC
ENSE
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
+ JA
IL
ALC
OH
OL*
PR
OG
RAM
+
REV
OC
ATI
ON
O
THER
TO
TAL
(100
%)
LIC
ENSE
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
+ JA
IL
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
GRA
M +
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
O
THER
TO
TAL
(100
%)
N
%
%
%
N
%
%
%
N
%
%
%
N
roba
tion.
p
of c
onvi
cted
DU
I offe
nder
s al
so re
ceiv
e fin
e an
d y
orit
Not
e: T
he v
ast m
aj
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SAN
TA C
LAR
A
3253
35
.2
48.5
16
.3
2030
86
.5
10.7
2.
8 78
6 73
.2
23.3
3.
4 43
7
SAN
TA B
AR
BARA
11
61
55.4
7.
9 36
.7
798
59.1
40
.6
0.4
254
88.1
10
.1
1.8
109
27
TABL
E 13
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
CO
MBI
NA
TIO
NS
BY C
OU
NTY
- RE
PEA
T O
FFEN
DER
S - c
ontin
ued
2N
D O
FFEN
DER
S 3R
D O
FFEN
DER
S 4T
H+
OFF
END
ERS
SAN
BER
NA
RD
INO
19
24
30.4
31
.6
38.1
13
53
75.9
19
.2
5.0
402
88.2
7.
7 4.
1 16
9
TULA
RE
1023
32
.1
36.4
31
.6
602
63.0
31
.1
5.9
270
83.4
7.
9 8.
6 15
1
SUTT
ER
181
19.0
44
.8
36.2
10
5 92
.1
7.9
0.0
63
69.2
30
.8
0.0
13
SAC
RAM
ENTO
22
12
32.2
50
.4
17.3
13
49
72.0
22
.1
5.9
543
67.8
27
.8
4.4
320
STA
NIS
LAU
S 90
5 21
.5
26.6
51
.9
567
51.1
46
.3
2.6
227
64.0
35
.1
0.9
111
SAN
LU
IS O
BISP
O
573
12.7
67
.4
19.8
35
3 24
.2
72.5
3.
3 15
3 67
.2
28.4
4.
5 67
SAN
TA C
RU
Z 85
0 48
.4
34.9
16
.7
550
96.7
2.
8 0.
5 21
1 86
.5
9.0
4.5
89
TEH
AM
A
102
32.9
28
.6
38.6
70
60
.9
34.8
4.
3 23
88
.9
11.1
0.
0 9
PLA
CER
47
1 20
.1
52.8
27
.1
343
49.5
47
.6
2.9
105
73.9
26
.1
0.0
23
RIV
ERSI
DE
1838
33
.9
38.7
27
.4
1257
70
.3
21.7
8.
1 39
7 79
.9
15.8
4.
3 18
4
SAN
DIE
GO
35
53
22.9
47
.6
29.5
26
52
51.4
38
.0
10.5
69
4 73
.9
16.4
9.
7 20
7
VEN
TURA
13
13
21.7
51
.2
27.1
93
9 69
.1
28.1
2.
9 27
8 77
.1
18.8
4.
2 96
TUO
LUM
NE
111
12.8
62
.8
24.4
78
26
.9
57.7
15
.4
26
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 7
TRIN
ITY
3 4
34.8
34
.8
30.4
23
66
.7
33.3
0.
0 9
50.0
50
.0
0.0
2
SISK
IYO
U
102
20.7
44
.8
34.5
58
44
.0
56.0
0.
0 25
84
.2
15.8
0.
0 19
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
1261
16
.0
55.5
28
.6
777
53.5
41
.8
4.7
318
88.0
10
.2
1.8
166
ORA
NG
E 32
25
11.8
61
.7
26.4
24
22
28.7
66
.5
4.9
617
76.3
17
.7
5.9
186
SOLA
NO
54
2 18
.3
53.9
27
.8
356
34.7
60
.5
4.8
124
56.5
32
.3
11.3
62
SAN
MA
TEO
12
42
13.3
14
.6
72.1
82
0 32
.5
62.0
5.
5 30
8 75
.4
19.3
5.
3 11
4
YOLO
22
0 9.
0 66
.9
24.1
14
5 80
.4
19.6
0.
0 46
89
.7
10.3
0.
0 29
PLU
MA
S 34
18
. 5
77.8
3.
7 27
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
3 75
.0
0.0
25.0
4
SIER
RA
15
18
. 2
45.5
36
.4
11
66.7
33
.3
0.0
3 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
1
SAN
BEN
ITO
97
55
.4
23.1
21
.5
65
86.7
13
.3
0.0
30
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 2
SON
OM
A
1200
46
.7
27.7
25
.6
703
92.1
4.
8 3.
1 29
2 95
.1
1.0
3.9
205
YUBA
19
8 38
.7
3.2
58.1
12
4 88
.9
11.1
0.
0 54
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
20
SHA
STA
34
6 15
.7
67.1
17
.1
216
37.8
55
.6
6.7
90
75.0
17
.5
7.5
40
SAN
FRA
NC
ISC
O
266
18.4
36
.3
45.3
20
1 75
.0
23.1
1.
9 52
92
.3
7.7
0.0
13
CO
UN
TY
TOTA
L RE
PEA
T D
UI
LIC
ENSE
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
SB 3
8 PR
OG
RAM
+
REST
RIC
TIO
N
O
THER
TO
TAL
100%
LI
CEN
SE
REV
OC
ATI
ON
+
JAIL
ALC
OH
OL*
PR
OG
RAM
+
REV
OC
ATI
ON
O
THER
TO
TAL
(100
%)
LIC
ENSE
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
+ JA
IL
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
GRA
M +
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
O
THER
TO
TAL
(100
%)
N
%
%
%
N
%
%
%
N
%
%
%
N
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 4: POSTCONVICTION SANCTION EFFECTIVENESS
This section presents and describes the results of an evaluation assessing the effectiveness of court and administrative sanctions applied to first and second DUI offendersi. The effectiveness of alternative sanctions is evaluated in terms of postconviction driving record as measured by: 1) total accidents and 2) DUI incidents, including alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions (primarily DUI, also reckless driving and hit-and-run), APS (0.08% BAC or chemical test refusal) suspensions and DUI failure-to-appear notices (FTA). Displayed below in Figures 7-15 are failure proportions from the sanction analyses for 1989, 1991, and 1993 first and second offenders (grouped by sanction assignment) with follow-up time periods of 5-years, 3-years, and 1-year, respectively. (The 1990 and 1992 offenders were not included in this year's report in order to simplify the analyses and reporting of results.) These figures show the proportion of accident- or DUI incident-involved drivers following their conviction. They are followed by a narrative description of the evaluation design, subject selection, data collection, analytical procedures, and evaluation results. The reader is cautioned that license suspension refers to postconviction suspensions only, and does not include preconviction administrative per se license suspensions (which are applied to all offender groups). Based on the data represented in Figures 7-12, the following conclusions can be drawn about first offender sanctions:
The 1989 and 1993 suspended first offender groups had significantly fewer accident-involved drivers than did any other first offender sanction group. The suspended group in both years had 18% fewer accidents than the groups with the next lowest accident rates--program with jail (1989) and program with restriction (1993). The accident rate of the 1991 suspended group was significantly lower than only two groups, the jail-only and program with restriction groups, with the suspended group having 14% and 8.3% fewer accidents, respectively.
iThird or more offenders were not included because a previous study (Tashima & Marelich, 1989) indicated serious confounding due to group differences on prior interventions. In addition, sanctions for third and subsequent offenders do not vary much, due to the statutorily prescribed sanction requirements.
28
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
3.60 5.12 4.53 4.39 4.42
05
10
1520
253035
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
FA
CC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Figure 9 . Adjusted 1-year accident rates of 1993 first offenders by type of sanction.
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
17.95
23.44 21.94 22.06 22.23
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35PR
OPO
RTI
ON
OF
AC
CID
ENT-
INV
OLV
EMEN
TPE
R 1
00 D
RIV
ERS
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Figure 7 . Adjusted 5-year accident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction.
11.52 13.40 11.99 12.56 12.28
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
FA
CC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Figure 8 . Adjusted 3-year accident rates of 1991 first offenders by type of sanction.
29
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
25.88
32.37
25.4322.00
25.95
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35PR
OPO
RTI
ON
OF
DU
I-IN
CID
ENT-
INV
OLV
EMEN
TPE
R 1
00 D
RIV
ERS
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Figure 10 . Adjusted 5-year DUI incident* rates of 1989 first offenders by type ofsanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).
6.4010.03
5.83 4.767.84
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
F D
UI-
INC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Figure 12 . Adjusted 1-year DUI incident* rates of 1993 first offenders by type ofsanction (*alcohol-relatedc accident or violation).
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
17.00
23.99
15.09 13.3116.63
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
F D
UI-
INC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Figure 11 . Adjusted 3-year DUI incident* rates of 1991 first offenders by type ofsanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
30
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
First offenders assigned to first offender treatment programs plus license restriction in 1989, 1991, and 1993 had significantly fewer DUI incidents in the postconviction period than did any other first offender sanction group. This group had 13.5%, 11.8%, and 18.4% fewer DUI incidents, respectively, in 1989, 1991, and 1993 than the group with the next lowest DUI incident rate (program with jail).
In all three years, first offenders sentenced to jail without treatment or
postconviction suspension had a significantly greater proportion (at least 24.7% higher) of DUI incident-involved drivers in the postconviction period than any other first offender sanction group.
Based on the data represented in Figures 13-15, the following conclusions can be drawn about second offender sanctions:
The 1989 and the 1991 suspended second offender groups had 17.1% and 14.3% fewer accident-involved drivers than did the SB 38 program groups over their respective (5-year, 3-year) postconviction periods.
Contrary to prior California studies including the first annual DUI-MIS report (1989
offenders), second offenders suspended in 1993 do not have significantly lower total accident rates than do those assigned to SB 38 treatment programs during the first year following suspension or SB 38 assignment. This change is likely due to the implementation of Administrative Per Se License Suspensions (APS) beginning in July, 1990, whereby all second offenders are suspended for one-year.
Although license suspension and SB 38 treatment programs with APS suspensions
are equally effective in their short-term impact on accidents (post 1-year), license suspension is more effective over a longer time window (3 - 5 years).
In 1989, 1991, and 1993, second offenders who were suspended had a significantly
higher proportion of DUI incident-involved drivers in the subsequent 1-year period than did those who received the SB 38 and license restriction sanction. The respective percentage increases associated with license suspension for the three years (1989, 1991 & 1993) were 20.9%, 31.1%, and 58.3%.
The addition of ignition interlock to the SB 38 program plus restriction sanction
combination for second offenders led to directionally but nonsignificantly lower 1-year subsequent accident and DUI incident rates.
31
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
3.84 3.23 3.01 3.77
10.486.62 5.95
8.62
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
F A
CC
IDEN
T- O
RD
UI-
INC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Figure 15 . Adjusted 1-year accident and DUI incident rates for 1993 second offenders by type of sanction.
ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS
Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Other Other
9.13 10.65 10.23
23.00
17.5520.08
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
F A
CC
IDEN
T- O
RD
UI-
INC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S17.46
21.06
33.49
27.69
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35PR
OPO
RTI
ON
OF
AC
CID
ENT-
OR
DU
I-IN
CID
ENT-
INV
OLV
EMEN
TPE
R 1
00 D
RIV
ERS
Figure 13 . Adjusted 5-year accident and DUI incident rates for 1989 second offendersby type of sanction.
ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS
Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS
Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Other Other
Figure 14 . Adjusted 3-year accident and DUI incident rates for 1991 second offendersby type of sanction.
SB 38/restriction& interlock
SB 38/restriction& interlock
32
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
EVALUATION METHODS AND RESULTS Subject Selection and Data Collection Convicted DUI offenders were identified from monthly abstract update tapes which contain all DUI conviction data reported to DMV by the courts. In the present study, follow-up data from three sets of offenders were evaluated for sanction effectiveness: 1) A 5-year follow-up period for the convicted 1989 DUI offenders who were
evaluated in the first DUI-MIS report. 2) A 3-year follow-up period for convicted 1991 offenders who were evaluated in last
year's DUI-MIS report. 3) A 1-year follow-up period for convicted DUI offenders who were arrested for DUI
in 1993. For each year's annual DUI-MIS report, an additional year of DUI data is added to the sanction analyses. In order to simplify the analyses and reporting of results, the 1990 and 1992 DUI offenders were not included in this year's evaluation. The conviction date in all cases was considered to be the "treatment date" for defining prior and subsequent driving record data, because the penalties and sanctions for the DUI conviction are typically effective as of that date. Since DUI penalties and sanctions are enhanced as a function of the number of prior DUI and alcohol-related reckless driving convictions within the previous seven years, subjects were selected based on the number of such convictions within the seven years prior to their entry DUI arrest. For the 1989, 1991, and 1993 drivers, two groups were selected for this evaluation: 1) first DUI offenders––drivers who had no DUI or alcohol-related reckless driving convictions within the previous seven years, and 2) second DUI offenders––drivers who had one DUI or alcohol-related reckless driving conviction within the previous seven years. Court sanctions are reported to and recorded by DMV in the form of disposition codes on the abstract of conviction. A convicted DUI offender, especially a first offender, might receive any one of many combinations of individual sanctions, including jail, fine, license restriction or suspension, alcohol treatment program, or probation. Therefore, in
33
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
defining sanction combination groups for the purpose of this analysis, the following conventions were used for first offenders: 1) if suspension (non-APS) was one of the sanctions imposed by DMV or the court,
then the offender was included in the suspension group; 2) if suspension (non-APS) was not imposed, but the offender was assigned to an
alcohol treatment program, then the offender was included in one of the treatment groups, according to the type of treatment program (first offender or SB 38) and whether they were also sentenced to license restriction or jail; and
3) if neither suspension nor treatment was imposed, but the offender was sentenced to
jail, then the offender was included in the jail-only group. Fine and probation are generally imposed on most DUI offenders (except that probation is not usually granted to court-suspended first offenders), and for that reason are not included as sanctions evaluated in this report. Also, since July, 1990, all DUI offenders have had their licenses administratively suspended upon DUI arrest. It should be noted that the definition of the sanction combination groups was not an arbitrary analytical convention, but rather a reflection of the most common naturally occurring sanction combinations assigned by the courts. Based on the above taxonomy, five first-offender sanction combination groups are used in this analysis: 1) license suspension, 2) jail, 3) first offender treatment program plus jail, 4) first offender treatment program plus license restriction, and 5) SB 38 (second offender) treatment program plus license restriction (some courts assign this sanction to a small number of first offenders). One limitation of the above hierarchical grouping scheme is that it does not allow for an evaluation of the independent and interactive effects of each sanction as a treatment factor. Taking first offender treatment program plus jail as an example, the approach we used does not allow analysis of the separate effects of jail from the effects of the treatment program. A similar convention was used for grouping second offenders with various sanction combinations; the groups used in this analysis are: 1) license suspension, 2) SB 38 treatment program plus license restriction, 3) a group of 1991 and 1993 second
34
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
offenders ("other") who did not meet the selection criteria of groups 1 or 2, and 4) a fourth group of 1993 second offenders who were ordered to install an ignition interlock device in their vehicles as mandated by AB 2851 (effective July, 1993). This device requires that the offender blow into it prior to starting the vehicle, which will not start if he/she has a BAC of 0.02% or greater. This group was identified by certain vehicle code designations on their abstract of conviction. In examining these abstract disposition codes, it was found that 85% of interlock cases were also referred to SB 38 treatment programs (along with license restrictions), while 27% had their license suspended (non-APS). In order to minimize the confounding of sanctions in this group, only offenders assigned to both the ignition interlock and SB 38 treatment program plus restriction requirements were included in this year's analysis. Although it would be informative to have been able to include the group with both license suspension and ignition interlock, the number of cases was too small to produce statistically reliable estimates. It may be possible to include this group in next year's analysis, when a larger number of these cases will be available. Most of the offenders in the group designated as "other" were originally referred to an SB 38 treatment program, but were suspended as well, either by intent (court sentence to both treatment program and suspension), or neglect (court misreporting of disposition codes and/or the offender's lack of compliance with required procedures, such as failure to provide proof of insurance, program enrollment, pay fees, etc.). Even if the courts amend the mistaken abstracts of conviction, the offenders still need to meet the insurance and program enrollment requirements. The final sanctions ultimately received by this group are unclear, which makes interpretation difficult. The "other" group was not included in the first DUI-MIS 1989 analysis and, therefore, was not included in subsequent reanalyses of the 1989 arrestees. DUI offenders with felony convictions, chemical test refusal suspensions, 'X' license numbers (assigned if no California driver license number can be found), out-of-state ZIP Codes, and irregular or unofficial sanction codes (among first offenders) were excluded from the sanction analyses. Prior driver record data were extracted for the two years (1.75 years for the 1993 cases) preceding an offender's DUI conviction date for all offenders. Appendix Tables B5, B6, and B7 list these prior driver record variables, which were used as covariates in the analyses. The evaluation period for the postconviction driving measures, starting from the conviction date, was five years for the 1989 drivers, three years for the 1991 drivers,
35
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
and one year for the 1993 drivers. A buffer period of six months was allowed between the end of the evaluation period and the data extraction date to allow for processing and reporting the most recent data to DMV. DUI offenders who had less than the full follow-up time period (from conviction date to the buffer period) were excluded. The outcome driving record measures consisted of the proportion of offenders who were involved in: 1) total accidents and 2) DUI incidents (alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions, APS/refusal suspensions, or DUI failures to appear). Evaluation Design and Analytical Procedures Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differences in the proportion of accident- and DUI-incident-involved drivers in each sanction group at the end of the evaluation period. Only the first accident or DUI incident or "failure" was evaluated. This is not an important limitation with these data because the incidence of repeat failures (two or more accidents or DUI incidents) was low over the study time window. More importantly, analysis of repeat failures would be subject to confounding by court sanctions received in connection with the first failure incident. This type of confounding is avoided because multiple incidents were not included in this analysis. Since it was not possible to randomly assign drivers to the various sanction groups, potential biases due to preexisting group differences were statistically controlled by entering into the analyses as covariates biographical data, prior driving record data and ZIP code indices (accident and traffic conviction averages of each driver's ZIP code area, and selected ZIP code variables from the 1990 census data for the 1991 and 1993 drivers). (Tables B5, B6, and B7 show significant group differences on most of these variables.) While this "quasi-experimental" design is subject to a number of limitations in assessing cause-effect relationships, the statistical control of group differences removes at least part of the bias in group assignment and provides a more precise estimate of the relationship between type of sanction and subsequent record. It is likely, of course, that the groups also differ on characteristics not measured by, or reflected in, the covariates. The possibility of uncontrolled biases becomes particularly problematic if sanctions are commonly received by atypical offenders through self- or judicial-selectivity (e.g., drivers of higher socio-economic status might be more likely to receive program with restriction than those of lower status). In all of the analyses for accidents (except 1989 and 1991 second offenders) and DUI incidents for both first and second offenders in all three years, several significant (p<.01) covariate by sanction interactions were evident (statistical significance at p<x means
36
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
that a differential effect between groups would occur by chance less than x% of the time). These significant interactions indicated that the relationship between the covariates and the outcome measure varied across sanction groups, and therefore the covariates were included in the initial analyses for all three data sets to determine the magnitude of the interactions. In all analyses, except three (1989, 1991, and 1993 first offender accidents) where sanction differences were significant (p<.03), the interaction effect was generally one-fourth or less that of the main effect of sanction (chi squares were divided by their respective degrees of freedom to provide an approximate measure of effect size). Since the sanction main effect had substantially greater magnitude than the interaction effects, conclusions about sanction differences were based on analyses that did not include the interactions. The interaction effects of the remaining three analyses were examined and found not to create a serious impact on the sanction main effect. However, interaction effects from the only analysis in which sanction differences were not significant (1993 second offenders) are discussed below because sanction effects on accident rates vary across different levels of prior accidents and prior minor convictions. Results of the First Offender Sanction Evaluation Total Accidents: Figures 7, 8, and 9, and Table 14 display the results of the logistic regression analysis of total accidents for 1989, 1991, and 1993 first offenders. Among the 1989 and 1993 first offenders, the suspended group continued to have the significantly lowest proportion of accident-involved drivers relative to the other sanction groups, with 17.95 (1989) and 3.60 (1993) accident involvements per 100 drivers (see Table 16 for a summary of significant results by sanction groups). The suspended group in both years had 18% fewer accidents than the next lowest group's rates––program with jail (1989) and program with restriction (1993). Although the 1991 suspended group had the lowest proportion of accident-involved drivers, it was significantly lower than that of only two groups, the jail-only and program/restriction groups (by 14% and 8.3%, respectively) . First offenders sentenced to jail-only had a significantly higher accident rate than that of the suspended group for all three years, and were significantly higher than the program/jail group in 1989 and 1991 and the program/restriction group in 1989 and 1993. (It should be noted that the jail-only sanction may actually be a less aversive punishment than other sanctions when community service is substituted for jail time, which is frequently the case.) In this year's analysis of first offenders, there is a fairly strong main effect of sanction differences on accidents, as discussed above. However, there was also an interaction
37
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
effect between sanction and the covariate, Zip code arrival time to work, indicating that in some geographical areas where travel time to work is long, the program/restriction group showed a noticeable rise in its accident rate. However, the other groups generally showed a flat accident rate across all travel times. The pairwise comparisons of the failure rates of the other three groups generally did not show significant differences between them in all three years. Based on the above results, suspension continues to show the strongest effect among first offenders in reducing total accidents, regardless of the length of time in the evaluation period, while jail was generally the least effective sanction (relative to two or three groups) across all time periods.
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
AC
CID
ENTS
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
15 30 45 60MINUTES
Figure 16A . Adjusted 3-year accident rates for 1991 first offendersby type of sanction and ZIP code average arrival time to work.
SB 38 Program & Restriction
Program & Restriction
Jail & Program
Jail
Suspension
DUI Incidents: Figures 10, 11, and 12 and Tables 14 and 16 show that among the first offender groups in 1989, 1991, and 1993, the (statistically significant) lowest proportions of reoffending drivers were in the groups assigned to first-offender treatment program plus license restriction, with failure rates of 22.0, 13.31, and 4.76 per 100 drivers, respectively. This group had 13.5%, 11.8%, and 18.4% fewer DUI incidents, respectively, in 1989, 1991, and 1993 than the group with the next lowest recidivism rate (program with jail). In contrast, the highest recidivism rates occurred with the jail-only groups for all years (32.37, 23.99, and 10.03 for 1989, 1991, and 1993, respectively). Differences in failure proportions among the other three sanction groups were again not significant for the 1989 offenders, but were significantly different among the three groups in 1991 and 1993. The first offender treatment program with jail group in 1991 and 1993 had lower recidivism rates than that of the SB 38 group, and lower rates than that of the 1991 suspended group. Overall, participation in the first-offender treatment
38
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
program with license restriction continues to rank first in its effect on DUI incidents, while the jail-only sanction continues to have the least impact. Results from the first offender sanction analyses on DUI incidents continue to replicate those from previous research studies for all three analyses. Sanction group differences on accidents in this year's analyses continued to be consistent for 1989 and 1993. Among the 1991 first offenders, the suspended group still had the lowest accident rate and was significantly lower than the jail-only and program/restriction groups.
TABLE 14: FIRST OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS
AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR
YEAR
SANCTION
GROUP
SAMPLE
SIZE
NUMBER OF ACCIDENT-INVOLVED,
PER 100 DRIVERS
NUMBER OF DUI- INCIDENT-INVOLVED,
PER 100 DRIVERS
1989 Suspension (5,638) 17.95 25.88
(follow-up period = 5 years) Jail (7,200) 23.44 32.37
1st DUI program & jail
(43,631) 21.94 25.43
1st DUI program & license restriction
(41,228) 22.06 22.00
SB 38 program & license restriction
(4,423) 22.23 25.95
1991 Suspension (10,461) 11.52 17.00
(follow-up period = 3 years) Jail (5,164) 13.40 23.99
1st DUI program & jail
(58,893) 11.99 15.09
1st DUI program & license restriction
(38,147) 12.56 13.31
SB 38 program & license restriction
(6,419) 12.28 16.63
1993 Suspension (6,118) 3.60 6.40
(follow-up period = 1 year) Jail (4,469) 5.12 10.03
1st DUI program & jail
(42,403) 4.53 5.83
1st DUI program & license restriction
(29,567) 4.39 4.76
SB 38 program & license restriction
(3,496) 4.42 7.84
39
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Results of the Second Offender Sanction EvaluationTotal Accidents: Among 1989 and 1991 second offenders, license suspension continued to be significantly more effective than treatment program plus restriction in reducing total accident risk (see Figures 13, 14, and 15, Tables 15 and 16), five years and three years subsequent to their convictions, respectively. The 1989 and 1991 suspended groups, with failure rates (per 100 drivers) of 17.46 and 9.13, respectively, had 17.1% and 14.3% fewer accident-involved drivers than did the SB 38 program groups. This finding is consistent with those of prior studies of second offenders on total accidents. Results of the 1993 analyses were similar to those of the 1990, 1991, and 1992 one-year analyses (reported in the previous three DUI-MIS evaluations) in that significant differences were not evident (although directionally significant at p = .12) among second offenders in their total accident rates. It was noted in last year's report that since license suspension has been consistently effective in reducing accident risk, it was likely that the lack of significant group differences in the one-year period was due to the immediate short-term positive effect of the imposition of one-year APS license suspensions on all second offenders. It was found in the previous three analyses that the accident rate of the SB 38/restriction group had declined toward the level of the suspended group; in this year's analysis, the SB 38 participants show even lower accident rates than the suspended group. Since the one-year follow-up period covers the time window when all second offenders are under APS suspension, it was reasoned that APS suspension would be expected to have a larger effect on the accident rates of previously nonsuspended SB 38 participants than it did on those who were suspended upon conviction. In contrast to the previous evaluations of one-year second-offender accidents, this year's analysis revealed the presence of significant interaction effects which may partially explain the nonsignificance of the sanction main effect. The interaction effects indicated that sanction effects on accident rates varied at different levels of prior 2-year minor convictions and prior 2-year accidents; consequently, these interactions were investigated to determine the magnitude of their effect. Figure 16B portrays the configurations of the accident rates varying by prior 2-year minor convictions and accidents across sanction groups. It can be seen that as the number of prior events increases, the accident rates of the SB 38 participants and the "other" group rise at a higher rate than those of the interlock or suspended group, suggesting that the effectiveness of these sanctions diminishes as prior accidents and minor convictions increase. It is also possible that omitted variables that contribute to group nonequivalancy, and their potential interactions with sanctions and other covariates, may be influencing or underlying these interaction effects.
40
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
FA
CC
IDEN
T- IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
0 1 2 3PRIOR 2-YEAR MINOR CONVICTIONS
Figure 16B . Adjusted 1-year accident rates for 1993 second offenders by type ofsanction and prior 2-year minor convictions and accidents.
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
FA
CC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
0 1 2 3PRIOR 2-YEAR ACCIDENTS
OtherSB 38 & interlock
SB 38 & restrictionSuspension
In both plots, the accident rate of the ignition interlock group is noticeably lower initially and rises at a slower rate than the other sanction groups (except for the suspended group on prior accidents). However, the conclusiveness of this finding may be undermined by the fact that this year's interlock group is quite small (N = 1288) compared to the number of cases in the other groups (see Table 15). In addition, the likely presence of self-selectivity and uncontrolled group biases due to lack of random assignment may be influencing these results. The better prior driving record of the interlock group (see Appendix Table B6) suggests the possibility that this group's driving behavior may be better than that of the other groups even before sanctions were applied. Statistical control of nonequivalent groups only partially removes group bias. Nevertheless, the possibility that the interlock device itself could deter the incidence of drinking and driving for a broader range of prior record categories cannot be rejected. Next year's analysis of a larger interlock group(s) may provide more information on these findings. The results are somewhat more ambiguous for the suspended group because its accident rate declines markedly as prior accidents increase but, conversely, its accident rate rises with an increase in prior minor convictions. These configurations depart noticeably from previous explorations of differential sanction effects across prior minor convictions and prior accidents in that the accident rate of the suspended group usually increased at a much slower rate than that of other sanction groups as prior incidents increased. Also, the direction of the accident rates of the suspended group were similar for both covariates in previous studies. The reason for this change cannot be inferred from these results nor is it clear why the relative effects of the sanctions should be moderated in different ways by the number of prior convictions and accidents. As
41
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
noted above, one possibility is the existence of uncontrolled variables which are affecting the composition and comparability of the various subgroups. In comparing accident rates between first and second offenders, Tables 14 and 15 show that across all years, first offenders continue to show higher accident rates than second offenders, which is a finding that has been apparent in previous DUI studies on accidents, even prior to DUI-MIS evaluations. Last year's analysis revealed significant differences between first and second offenders on 2-year subsequent accidents. As noted in last year's report, the fact that second offenders have longer term sanctions than do first offenders (18-month postconviction suspension or 18-month SB 38 treatment programs) may explain this difference. DUI Incidents: Figures 13, 14, and 15 and Tables 15 and 16 show that in all three years, the suspended groups had significantly higher failure rates (by 20.9%, 31.1%, and 58.3% for 1989, 1991, and 1993, respectively) than corresponding rates for the SB 38 program participants. The third group ("other") in the 1991 and 1993 analyses had failure rates midway between the other two groups. Failure rates of all three groups in 1991 were significantly different from each other. In the 1993 analysis, recidivism rates were significantly different between all groups except between the SB 38 program participants and the SB 38 program plus ignition interlock group. Next year's analyses, when a larger number of offenders are evaluated, should be more informative on the relative effectiveness of the ignition interlock device in combination with suspension and/or SB 38 treatment program.
TABLE 15: SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR
YEAR
SANCTION GROUP
SAMPLE SIZE
NUMBER OF ACCIDENT-INVOLVED,
PER 100 DRIVERS
PERCENTAGE EFFECT
(DIFFERENCE IN FAILURE RATES) GRP 1 - GRP 2
X 100
GRP 2
NUMBER OF DUI
INCIDENT-INVOLVED,
PER 100 DRIVERS
PERCENTAGE EFFECT
(DIFFERENCE IN FAILURE RATES) GRP 1 - GRP 2
X 100
GRP 2 1989 1) Suspension (9,483) 17.46 33.49
(follow-up period = 5 years)
2) SB 38 program & license restriction
(23,929) 21.06 -17.1% 27.69 20.9%
1991 1) Suspension (11,192) 9.13 23.00 (follow-up period = 3 years)
2) SB 38 program & license restriction
(19,309) 10.65 -14.3% 17.55 31.1%
3) Other (12,150) 10.23 20.08 1993 1) Suspension (7,196) 3.84 10.48
(follow-up period = 1 year)
2) SB 38 program & license restriction
(11,753) 3.23 18.9%
6.62 58.3%
3) SB 38 Program/ restriction interlock
(1,288) 3.01 5.95
4) Other (7,942) 3.77 8.62
42
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 16: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT RESULTS FOR 1989, 1991, AND 1993 FIRST AND SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION GROUPS, BY OUTCOME MEASURES
FIRST OFFENDER YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS
GROUP (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 1989 (5-year follow-up period)
(1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 ns S4 ns (2) Jail na S3 S4 ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 ns (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na
1991 (3-year follow-up period) (1) Suspension na S1 ns S1 ns na S1 S3 S4 ns (2) Jail na S3 ns ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na S3 ns na S4 S3 (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na
1993 (1-year follow-up period) (1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 ns S4 S5 (2) Jail na ns S4 ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 S3 (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na
SECOND OFFENDER
YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS GROUP (1) (2) (1) (2)
1989 (5-year follow-up period) (1) Suspension na S1 na S2 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na na
1991 (3-year follow-up period) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3)
(1) Suspension na S1 S1 na S2 S3 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na ns na S2 (3) Other na na
1993 (1-year follow-up period) (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4)
(1) Suspension na S2 ns ns na S2 S3 S4 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na ns S2 na ns S2 (3) SB 38 program & interlock na ns na S3 (4) Other na na
Note: A significant (p<.03 for 1st offenders and p<.06 for 2nd offenders) difference between sanction groups relative to the proportion of accident-involved or DUI-incident-involved drivers is represented by an "S". The group number with the 'S' indicates the group with the better (lower) rate. A nonsignificant difference is indicated by "ns", and "na" means not applicable. Blanks appear in the lower half of each matrix, since the halves are identical.
Overall, findings for the 1989 and 1991 second offenders on accidents replicate previous evaluations indicating that postconviction license suspension continues to be more effective than SB 38 treatment program plus restriction in reducing accidents over 5- and 3-year follow-up periods. Findings from the 1993 second offender analyses were
43
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
similar to previous post-APS one-year evaluations of second offenders in showing no evidence of significant difference between the sanction groups on subsequent accident rates; however, with the addition of a fourth sanction group in this year's analysis (SB 38 treatment program plus ignition interlock), the presence of interaction effects between sanctions and two covariates complicates the interpretation of the sanction main effects. However, the fact that the 1-year accident rates for both the SB 38 treatment program participants and the interlock group were lower than that of the suspended group could be attributed to the short-term impact of APS suspensions. The results on reoffense rates for second offenders continue to be consistent with the findings of prior studies on alcohol-related incidents, indicating that SB 38 programs with license restriction are associated with a reduction in subsequent DUI incidents over all three follow-up periods.
44
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 5: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
Data on DMV administrative license disqualification actions (license suspension or revocation––S/R) taken in DUI cases are presented below. These statutorily mandated actions are initiated by the receipt of either a law enforcement APS report (.08% BAC or chemical test refusal) or court abstract of conviction. It should be noted that multiple actions can result from a single DUI incident––for example, a single DUI arrest frequently will result in both an APS suspension and a mandatory postconviction suspension action. This section includes the following tables and figure: Table 17: Mandatory DUI License Disqualification Actions, 1984-1994. This table shows preconviction (APS) and postconviction license disqualification totals from 1984 through 1994. The postconviction totals include juvenile suspensions, first-offender suspensions, second-offender suspensions and revocations, and third- and fourth-offender revocations. Table 18: Administrative Per Se Process Measures. This table presents APS process measure data for fiscal years 92/93 through 94/95. Figure 17 graphically portrays mandatory DUI license disqualification totals from 1984 through 1994. The following statements are based on the data shown in Tables 17-18 and Figure 17.
During 1991, the first full calendar year of administrative per se license suspension, the total number of DMV DUI suspension/revocation actions increased by 60% over 1990. In 1992, the number of APS actions and total mandatory actions declined by 16% and 17%, respectively, mirroring the 16% decline in DUI arrests during the same period. This decline continued in 1993 and 1994, with DUI arrests as well as mandatory license disqualification actions decreasing by over 10% each year.
In 1994, 184,045 administrative per se license actions were taken. Of these actions,
66% were first-offender actions and 34% were repeat-offender actions.
45
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Chemical test refusal actions have steadily continued to decline, and have
decreased by 57% since 1984.
The number of mandatory postconviction license actions decreased by 13% in 1994.
Since APS was implemented in July 1990, over 1 million (1,178,002) APS suspension or revocation actions had been taken through June 1995.
During the first five years of APS implementation, requests for hearings have
increased each year, rising from 7% of all APS actions in FY 90/91 to 12% in 94/95. The rate at which APS suspension/revocation actions are upheld after hearing has declined from 87% in FY 90/91 to 80% in 94/95. During the same time period, the sustain rate for chemical test refusal hearings has fallen from 84% to only 72%. The underlying reasons for these trends are unclear at present.
During the first 18 months after implementation (on January 1, 1994) of the "zero
tolerance" law for minors, 14,283 suspension actions were taken.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
500000
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
Figure 17 . Mandatory DUI license disqualification actions, 1984-1994.
46
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
47
TABL
E 17
: M
AN
DA
TORY
DU
I LIC
ENSE
DIS
QU
ALI
FIC
ATI
ON
AC
TIO
NS,
198
4-19
94
YEA
R
PREC
ON
VIC
TIO
N
Adm
in P
er S
e (A
PS) A
ctio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1196
10
2722
73
2287
90
2090
06
1840
45
Fi
rst-o
ffen
der s
uspe
nsio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
8250
3 18
7527
15
7545
14
4321
12
0582
Repe
at-o
ffen
der s
uspe
nsio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3479
2 74
351
6265
6 57
279
4742
9
Repe
at-o
ffen
der r
evoc
atio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2315
10
395
8589
74
06
6063
Com
mer
cial
dri
ver a
ctio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3739
79
76
6449
58
29
5038
Che
mic
al te
st re
fusa
l act
ions
30
654
2930
8 26
327
2547
4 22
757
2146
6 22
915
2129
6r 17
963r
1566
2 13
264
Te
st re
fusa
l sus
pens
ions
30
654
2548
5 16
352
1487
7 13
720
1239
0 15
128
1090
1r 93
74r
8256
70
22
Te
st re
fusa
l rev
ocat
ions
n/
a 38
23
9975
10
597
9037
90
76
7787
10
395r
8589
r 74
06
6063
TOTA
L A
PS/R
EFU
SAL
AC
TIO
NS
3065
4 29
308
2632
7 25
474
2275
7 21
466
1425
25
2722
73
2287
90
2090
06
1840
45
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
- - -
- - -
- - PO
STC
ON
VIC
TIO
N
Juve
nile
DU
I sus
pens
ions
n/
a 22
00
2219
23
74
1823
19
95
1478
15
76
1202
92
2 87
9
Firs
t-off
ende
r sus
pens
ions
79
10
7057
73
84
7278
66
26
7679
10
408
1357
5 10
673
1020
8 86
96
M
isde
mea
nor
6386
53
46
5592
55
58
5050
56
58
8467
11
547
8989
86
07
7188
Felo
ny
1524
17
11
1792
17
20
1576
20
21
1941
20
28
1684
16
01
1508
Seco
nd-o
ffen
der S
/R a
ctio
ns
4398
0 46
835
4523
4 43
608
4769
8 53
927
5233
4 57
350
4547
8 38
849
3430
0
Mis
dem
eano
r 43
481
4629
2 44
601
4296
4 47
093
5323
8 51
593
5658
3 44
756
3828
5 33
794
Fe
lony
49
9 54
3 63
3 64
4 60
5 68
9 74
1 76
7 72
2 56
4 50
6
Thir
d-of
fend
er re
voca
tions
16
384
1497
0 16
946
1711
8 13
991
1851
4 18
650
1996
3 15
553
1290
8 11
193
M
isde
mea
nor
1638
4 14
970
1694
6 17
118
1367
1 18
182
1821
9 19
595
1523
3 12
644
1097
4
Felo
ny
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
320
332
431
368
320
264
219
Four
th-o
ffen
der r
evoc
atio
ns
n/a
5479
62
23
7778
88
84
8122
82
85
8394
67
03
5554
45
32
TOTA
L PO
STC
ON
VIC
TIO
N A
CTI
ON
S 68
274
7654
1 78
006
7815
6 79
022
9023
7 91
155
1008
58
7960
9 68
441
5960
0
19
84
1985
19
86
1987
19
88
1989
19
90
1991
19
92
1993
19
94
TOTA
L M
AN
DA
TORY
SU
SPEN
SIO
N/
REV
AO
CA
TIO
N (S
/R) A
CTI
ON
S 98
928
1058
49
1043
33
1036
30
1017
79
1117
03
2336
80
3731
31
3083
99
2774
47
2436
45
orts
. ri
or re
pr Re
vise
d fr
om p
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 18. ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE PROCESS MEASURES
7/92-6/93 7/93-6/94 7/94-6/95
Total APS actions taken (including actions later set aside)1 231,491 211,380 185,266
.082 Suspensions 223,481 200,029 169,845 .08 Revocations 8,010 7,020 5,469 .013 Suspensions N/A 4,331 9,952 Total APS actions set aside 12,548 14,189 13,764 .08 Suspensions set aside 12,373 13,838 13,107 .08 Revocations set aside 175 214 216 .01 Suspensions set aside N/A 137 441 Net total APS actions taken (excluding actions later set aside) 218,943 197,191 171,502 .08 Suspensions 211,108 186,191 156,738 .08 Revocations 7,835 6,806 5,253 .01 Suspensions N/A 4,194 9,511
APS Actions by Offender Status/Occupation:4
APS .08 suspensions for drivers with no prior DUI convictions5 151,752 133,166 114,365
4-month license suspensions 133,614 116,563 95288 30-day suspensions plus 3-month restrictions 5,356 5,584 4,254
30-day suspensions plus 4-month COE6 restrictions N/A N/A 5,022
First-offender chemical test refusals 8,999 7,546 6,527 CDL first offender suspensions/restrictions 3,782 3,473 3,274 Total APS .08 actions taken for drivers with prior DUI convictions 67,191 59,831 47,626 Suspensions 59,355 53,025 42,373 Revocations 7,836 6,806 5,253 Total commercial driver (CDL) APS actions taken 6,190 5,443 4,695 CDL APS suspensions of commercial drivers in commercial vehicles 38 28 28 APS Chemical Test Refusal Process Measures: Total APS refusal actions taken (including actions later set aside) 17,454 15,145 12,696 .08 Suspensions 9,445 8,056 7,027 .08 Revocations 8,009 7,020 5,469 .01 Suspensions N/A 69 200 Total APS refusal actions set aside 619 726 728 .08 Suspensions set aside 444 510 500 .08 Revocations set aside 175 214 216 .01 Suspensions set aside N/A 2 12 Net total APS refusal actions (excluding actions later set aside) 16,835 14,419 11,968 .08 Suspensions 9,001 7,546 6,527 .08 Revocations 7,834 6,806 5,253 .01 Suspensions N/A 67 188 Net .08 APS refusal suspensions for subjects with no prior DUIs 8,999 7,546 6,527 Net .08 APS refusal actions for subjects with prior DUIs 7,836 6,806 5,253 Total .08 and .01 APS refusal hearings scheduled 2,988 2,343 2,133 APS Hearings
Total .08 and .01 hearings scheduled7 24,497 21,682 21,774
.08 hearings held and/or completed 20,587 21,264* 18,300 .01 hearings held and/or completed – – – – – – 888 .08 actions sustained or upheld following a hearing 16,920 15,481* 14,6578 .01 actions sustained or upheld following a hearing – – – – – – 7439 .08 APS refusal hearings held and/or completed 2,712 2,260* 1,836 .08 APS refusal actions sustained or upheld following a hearing 2,220 1,758* 1,32610
*Figure represents the combined total .08 and .01 hearings for FY93/94. 1Action taken on the basis of a chemical test refusal or blood alcohol concentration (BAC) test result. 2.08 refers to APS actions taken subsequent to obtaining evidence of a BAC equal to or in excess of the .08% per se level. Such an action is taken in
conjunction with a DUI arrest. 3.01 refers to APS suspensions taken against drivers under the age of 21 with BACs in excess of .01%. 4All entries in this category exclude actions later set aside but, where possible, include actions taken on the basis of either a chemical test refusal or a
BAC test result. 5Prior DUI convictions consist of any such conviction where the violation occurred within the seven years prior to the current violation. 6Introduced 1/1/95 this restriction allows driving to, from, and during the course-of-employment. 7This figure excludes subsequent departmental review hearings or procedures. In FY93/94 10% of total APS actions resulted in a hearing and increased
to 12% in FY94/95. both numerator and denominator include those actions set aside as a result of the hearing. 8In FY94/95 the .08 APS suspension or revocation was upheld in 80% of the total .08 APS hearings held. 9In FY94/95 the .01 APS suspension or revocation was upheld in 84% of the total .01 APS hearings held.
10In FY93/94 the action was sustained or upheld in 78% of the combined .08 and .01 APS chemical test refusal hearings held and in FY94/95, the action was sustained or upheld in 72% of .08 APS chemical test refusal hearings.
48
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 6: ACCIDENTS INVOLVING ALCOHOL
This section presents data on alcohol-involved accidents, as compiled and reported by the California Highway Patrol, as well as accident data which have been crosstabulated with Department of Justice DUI arrest data. Drivers identified as being under the influence of drugs other than alcohol are also included in the "alcohol-involved accident" category, but typically comprise less than 1% of the total (0% for 1993 data). This section includes the following tables: Table 19: Race/Ethnicity by Sobriety Code of Accident-Involved 1993 DUI Arrestees. This table shows the law enforcement officer determination of sobriety for accident-involved 1993 DUI arrestees, by race/ethnicity. Table 20: Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1993 DUI Arrestees by Race/Ethnicity and Type of Arrest. This table portrays the fatal/injury accident involvement of DUI arrestees, by race/ethnicity and type of arrest (felony, juvenile, or misdemeanor). Table 21: Adjudication Status by Sobriety Code for Accident-Involved 1993 DUI Arrestees. This table crosstabulates accident sobriety codes (from law enforcement accident reports) with the court disposition of the 1993 DUI arrests associated with those accidents. Table 22: Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1993 DUI Arrestees by Type of Arrest and Adjudication Status. This table displays the adjudication status of fatal and injury accident-involved 1993 DUI arrestees, by type of arrest. Table 23: 1993 Accident-Involved DUI Arrestees With No Record of Conviction, by County and Type of Arrest. This table shows the number of accident-involved 1993 DUI arrestees without a corresponding recorded conviction, by type of DUI arrest, by county. Table 24: 1-, 3-, and 5-Year Total, Fatal/Injury, and Alcohol-Related Accident Means by Offender Status. This table shows the average number of total, fatal/injury, and alcohol-related accidents for 1993, 1991, and 1989 DUI arrestees for time periods of 1, 3, and 5 years subsequent to their arrests, respectively, by offender status (number of prior offenses).
49
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Figure 18 (below) shows the annual percentages of traffic injuries and fatalities that were alcohol-involved from 1984 to 1994. The numerical data for this graph are shown on the DUI summary statistics sheet at the beginning of this report.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PER
CEN
TAG
E O
F TO
TAL
INJU
RIE
S A
ND
FA
TALI
TIES
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994YEAR
Figure 18 . Percentage of total injuries and total fatalities that werealcohol-involved, 1984-1994.
InjuriesFatalities
Based on these data, the following statements can be made:
The number of alcohol-involved traffic fatalities decreased by 5.2% in 1994, and has declined by 46% since 1987. The proportion of fatalities which are alcohol-involved has declined from 50.1% in 1987 to 35.3% in 1994.
The proportion of traffic accident injuries that are alcohol-involved has also
declined each year since 1987. Alcohol-involved injuries dropped 8.1% during 1994 and 42.7% from 1987 to 1994.
13.1% of all 1993 DUI arrests were associated with a reported traffic accident,
compared to 11.1% in 1992 and 1991. 49% of these accidents involved an injury or fatality.
In 25% of cases where a DUI offender was arrested in connection with a reported
traffic accident, there is no record of any corresponding conviction. In 91% of these
50
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
nonconvicted cases, the accident report indicated that the driver had been drinking and that their ability was impaired.
Of all 1993 accident-involved DUI arrestees with no record of conviction, 18.5% had
been arrested for felony DUI, down from 19.0% in 1992 and 19.4% in 1991.
6.4% (14,985) of 1993 DUI arrests were associated with a fatal or injury accident, up from 5.7% the previous year. Of these fatal/injury accidents, only 29% (4,376) led to an arrest for felony DUI, and less than 10% (1,475) led to a conviction of felony DUI. Almost 28% (4,154) of DUI arrests stemming from a fatal/injury accident did not result in a reported conviction.
The fatal/injury and total accident risk of DUI offenders generally decreases with
the number of prior DUI convictions for periods up to five years after arrest, while, conversely, the risk of involvement in an alcohol-related accident generally increases with number of priors over the same time periods.
51
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
52
TABL
E 19
: RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
BY S
OBR
IETY
CO
DE
OF
AC
CID
ENT-
INV
OLV
ED 1
993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES*
NO
T RE
PORT
ED
909
3.0
499
54.9
25
1 27
.6
101
11.1
58
6.
4
HBD
-ABI
LITY
IMPA
IRED
(
BAC
.08%
& A
BOV
E)
2873
6 94
.0
1271
9 44
.3
1261
5 43
.9
1914
6.
7 48
8 5.
2
HBD
-NO
T K
NO
WN
IF
IM
PAIR
ED (.
05- .0
79)
615
2.0
283
46.0
26
4 42
.9
46
7.5
22
3.6
HN
BD-H
AD
NO
T BE
EN
DRI
NK
ING
20
8 0.
7 11
4 54
.8
62
29.8
22
10
.6
0 4.
8
JUV
ENIL
E 19
5 1.
3 10
4 53
.3
71
36.4
9
4.6
11
5.6
MIS
DEM
EAN
OR
1041
4 69
.5
5123
49
.2
4037
38
.8
662
6.4
592
5.7
TOTA
L 14
985
100.
0 71
45
47.7
59
92
40.0
10
22
6.8
826
5.5
TOTA
L 30
581
100.
0 13
671
44.7
13
232
43.3
20
94
6.8
1584
5.
2
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
SOBR
IETY
CO
DE
TOTA
L W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
HBD
-NO
T IM
PAIR
ED
(BA
C .0
1%-.0
49%
) 11
3
0.4
56
49
.6
40
35.4
11
9.
7 6
5.3
*For
eac
h s
obri
ety
code
, per
cen
tage
s ar
e ba
sed
on r
ow t
otal
s.
TA
BLE
20:
FATA
L A
ND
INJU
RY A
CC
IDEN
TS O
F 19
93 D
UI A
RRES
TEES
BY
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y A
ND
TYP
E O
F A
RRES
T*
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) TY
PE O
F A
RRES
T TO
TAL
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
FELO
NY
4376
29
.2
1918
43
.8
1884
43
.1
351
8.0
223
5.1
ges
are
base
d on
row
tota
ls.
*For
eac
h ty
pe o
f arr
est,
perc
enta
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
53
TABL
E 21
: A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
STA
TUS
BY S
OBR
IETY
CO
DE
FOR
AC
CID
ENT-
INV
OLV
ED 1
993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES*
TYPE
OF
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
HBD
-NO
T IM
PAIR
ED
(B
AC
.01%
-.049
%)
113
0.
4 22
9.
5 2
1.8
4 3.
5
2 1.
8 16
14
.2
67
59.3
JUV
ENIL
E 19
5
1.3
63
32.3
24
12
.3
2 1.
0 2
1.0
4 2.
1 10
0 51
.3
TOTA
L 30
5 81
100.
0 19
044
62
.3
1510
4.
9 12
16
4.0
399
1.3
748
2.4
7664
25
.1
HBD
-ABI
LITY
IMPA
IRED
(BA
C .0
8% &
ABO
VE)
28
736
94.0
18
235
63
.5
1427
5.
0 11
38
4.0
360
1.3
60
4 2.
1 69
72
24.3
TOTA
L 14
9 85
100.
0 82
50
55.1
14
75
9.8
549
3.7
185
1.2
372
2.5
4154
27
.7
HBD
-NO
T K
NO
WN
IF
IM
PAIR
ED (.
05-.0
79)
615
2.0
308
50.1
38
6.
2 15
2.
4 8
1.3
26
4.2
220
35.8
HN
BD-H
AD
NO
T BE
EN
D
RIN
KIN
G
208
0.7
90
43.3
6
2.
9 12
5.
8 5
2.4
23
11.1
72
34
.6
MIS
DEM
EAN
OR
1041
4 69
.5
6646
63
.8
183
1.8
463
4.4
141
1.4
262
2.5
2719
26
.1
FELO
NY
4376
29
.2
1541
35
.2
1268
29
.0
84
1.9
42
1.0
106
2.4
1335
30
.5
SOBR
IETY
CO
DE
TOTA
L M
ISD
EMEA
NO
R D
UI
FELO
NY
DU
I A
LCO
HO
L-RE
CK
LESS
N
ON
ALC
OH
OL-
REC
KLE
SS
OTH
ER
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
S N
O R
ECO
RD O
F A
NY
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
NO
T RE
PORT
ED
909
3.0
389
42.8
37
4.
1 47
5.
2 24
2.
6 79
8.
7
333
36.6
*For
eac
h so
brie
ty c
ode,
per
cent
ages
are
bas
ed o
n ro
w to
tals
.
TABL
E 22
: FA
TAL
AN
D IN
JURY
AC
CID
ENTS
OF
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y TY
PE O
F A
RRE
ST A
ND
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N S
TATU
S*
TYPE
OF
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TY
PE O
F A
RRES
T TO
TAL
MIS
DEM
EAN
OR
DU
I FE
LON
Y D
UI
ALC
OH
OL-
REC
KLE
SS
NO
NA
LCO
HO
L-RE
CK
LESS
O
THER
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
NO
REC
ORD
OF
AN
Y C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
ges a
re b
ased
on
row
tota
ls.
*For
eac
h ty
pe o
f arr
est,
perc
enta
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 23: 1993 ACCIDENT-INVOLVED* DUI ARRESTEES WITH NO RECORD OF
CONVICTION, BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST
TYPE OF ARREST COUNTY FELONY DUI JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR DUI
TOTAL (100%) N % N % N %
STATEWIDE 6972 1291 18.5 148 2.1 5533 79.4 ALAMEDA 252 15 6.0 4 1.6 233 92.5 ALPINE 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 00.0 AMADOR 10 3 30.0 0 0.0 7 70.0 BUTTE 34 6 17.6 0 0.0 28 82.4 CALAVERAS 9 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 100.0 COLUSA 8 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 100.0 CONTRA COSTA 124 23 18.5 2 1.6 99 79.8 DEL NORTE 8 1 12.5 0 0.0 7 87.5 EL DORADO 35 12 34.3 2 5.7 21 60.0 FRESNO 296 41 13.9 8 2.7 247 83.4 GLENN 16 2 12.5 0 0.0 14 87.5 HUMBOLDT 48 9 18.8 3 6.3 36 75.0 IMPERIAL 61 16 26.2 0 0.0 45 73.8 INYO 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 KERN 169 26 15.4 5 3.0 138 81.7 KINGS 17 1 5.9 0 0.0 16 94.1 LAKE 17 7 41.2 0 0.0 10 58.8 LASSEN 16 5 31.3 0 0.0 11 68.8 LOS ANGELES 1839 309 16.8 41 2.2 1489 81.0 MADERA 57 7 12.3 2 3.5 48 84.2 MARIN 59 13 22.0 0 0.0 46 78.0 MARIPOSA 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 100.0 MENDOCINO 34 5 14.7 0 0.0 29 85.3 MERCED 75 20 26.7 1 1.3 54 72.0 MODOC 4 1 25.0 0 0.0 3 75.0 MONO 5 1 20.0 0 0.0 4 80.0 MONTEREY 115 6 13.9 9 7.8 90 78.3 NAPA 28 9 32.1 2 7.1 17 60.7 NEVADA 11 0 0.0 0 0.0 11 100.0 ORANGE 487 70 14.4 5 1.0 412 84.6 PLACER 53 19 35.8 0 0.0 34 64.2 PLUMAS 9 6 66.7 0 0.0 3 33.3 RIVERSIDE 414 89 21.5 3 0.7 322 77.8 SACRAMENTO 255 96 7.6 9 3.5 150 58.8 SAN BENITO 22 11 50.0 0 0.0 11 50.0 SAN BERNARDINO 499 120 24.0 3 0.6 376 75.4 SAN DIEGO 56 80 17.5 9 2.0 367 80.5 SAN FRANCISCO 84 22 26.2 0 0.0 62 73.8 SAN JOAQUIN 132 13 9.8 10 7.6 109 82.6 SAN LUIS OBISPO 47 6 12.8 1 2.1 40 85.1 SAN MATEO 99 11 11.1 4 4.0 84 84.8 SANTA BARBARA 69 15 21.7 2 2.9 52 75.4 SANTA CLARA 184 43 23.4 4 2.2 137 74.5 SANTA CRUZ 50 2 4.0 2 4.0 46 92.0 SHASTA 42 17 40.5 1 2.4 24 57.1 SIERRA 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 SISKIYOU 16 1 6.3 0 0.0 15 93.8 SOLANO 64 10 15.6 0 0.0 54 84.4 SONOMA 99 13 13.1 2 2.0 84 84.8 STANISLAUS 110 23 20.9 2 1.8 85 77.3 SUTTER 10 4 40.0 0 0.0 6 60.0 TEHAMA 22 4 18.2 0 0.0 18 81.8 TRINITY 7 1 14.3 3 42.9 3 42.9 TULARE 176 22 12.5 4 2.3 150 85.2 TUOLUMNE 6 0 0.0 3 50.0 3 50.0 VENTURA 111 23 20.7 0 0.0 88 79.3 YOLO 80 17 21.2 1 1.2 62 77.5 YUBA 15 5 33.3 1 6.7 9 60.0 *These cases include only arrestees whose accidents showed alcohol or drug-impaired sobriety codes.
54
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
55
TABL
E 24
: 1-
, 3- A
ND
5-Y
EAR
TOTA
L,
FATA
L/IN
JUR
Y A
ND
ALC
OH
OL-
RELA
TED
A
CC
IDEN
T M
EAN
S BY
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S
TO
TAL
AC
CID
ENTS
FA
TAL/
INJU
RY A
CC
IDEN
TS
ALC
OH
OL-
RELA
TED
AC
CID
ENTS
ALL
.0
400
.120
1 .1
903
.014
9 .0
456
.072
6 .0
127
.034
0 .0
536
1ST
DU
I .0
432
.127
3 .2
010
.015
8 .0
470
.074
3 .0
117
.030
5 .0
487
2ND
DU
I .0
366
.111
1 .1
885
.013
8 .0
441
.073
7 .0
152
.039
3 .0
599
3RD
DU
I .0
287
.096
7 .1
402
.011
8 .0
405
.060
8 .0
153
.044
2 .0
650
4TH
+ D
UI
.021
8 .0
935
.128
5 .0
099
.039
3 .0
611
.012
5 .0
463
.070
8
DU
I O
FFEN
DER
ST
ATU
S
1-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
3 A
RRES
TEES
)
3-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
1 A
RRES
TEES
)
5-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(198
9 A
RRES
TEES
)
1-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
3 A
RRES
TEES
)
3-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
1 A
RRES
TEES
)
5-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(198
9 A
RRES
TEES
)
1-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
3 A
RRES
TEES
)
3-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
1 A
RRES
TEES
)
5-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(198
9 A
RRES
TEES
)
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS
DUI Arrest Data: Arrest data are reported to the Department of Justice (DOJ), Law Enforcement Information Center, by individual law enforcement agencies throughout the state. As such, these data are subject to reporting errors such as incorrect names, birthdates or arrest dates. Nonreporting of arrest data due to error or omission can also occur; for example, in 1989 and 1991 the San Bernardino Police Department reported no DUI arrests, while reporting hundreds of DUI arrests in 1988, 1990, 1992, 1993 and 1994. When data are entered into DOJ's Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system, only the highest-order offense is included. Therefore, in cases where a DUI arrest is made in conjunction with, for example, an auto theft arrest, that DUI arrest will not be included in the database. This results in a slight but systematic underreporting of the number of DUI arrests annually. DUI Conviction Data: Abstracts of conviction for DUI and other traffic-related offenses are reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) by courts throughout the state. As abstracts are received (either hard copy, magnetic tape or through direct electronic access from the courts) they are entered onto the DMV driver record database. Abstracts without an identifying driver license number are run through the automated name index (ANI) system in order to match the abstract with an existing driver record; in cases where no such match can be made, an "X" numbered record is created to store the abstract. The total number of DUI abstracts of conviction received by DMV from the courts is tallied monthly and annually. Since this workload total includes abstracts which amend, correct or dismiss prior abstracts of conviction, it tends to overestimate the actual number of convictions which have occurred. Conviction data are also subject to reporting and nonreporting errors similar to those for DUI arrests. For example, the 1993 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System documented that thousands of DUI convictions showing in court records do not appear on the DMV driver record database. Alcohol-Involved Accident Data: Accident data are reported to the California Highway Patrol (CHP) by local law enforcement agencies and district offices of the CHP. As such, these data are subject to reporting and nonreporting errors similar to those occurring in both DUI arrest and conviction data. While most local law enforcement agencies will investigate and file reports on accidents involving injury or death, the investigation and reporting of property-damage-only accidents varies widely by local jurisdiction. Data are entered onto CHP's Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and output in annual published reports.
56
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
REFERENCES California Department of Finance. (1991). California statistical abstract, 1991.
Sacramento, CA: Author. California Department of Motor Vehicles. (1984-87). An evaluation of the California
drunk driving countermeasure system. Volumes 1-8. Sacramento, CA: Author. California Highway Patrol. (1995). 1994 annual report of fatal and injury motor vehicle
traffic collisions. Sacramento, CA: Author. Helander, C. J. (1989). Development of a California DUI management information
system. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles. Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1995). Annual report of the California DUI
management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 145). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1994). Annual report of the California DUI
management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 143). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1992). Annual report of the California DUI
management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 134). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tashima, H. N., Marowitz, L. A., DeYoung, D. J., & Helander, C. J. (1993). Annual
report of the California DUI management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 138). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
GLOSSARY
ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE (APS) Administrative per se ("on-the-spot") license suspension or revocation occurs immediately pursuant to lawful arrest of a person driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or more, or one who refuses a chemical test. Upon arrest, the driver's license is immediately confiscated by the law enforcement officer and an order of suspension or revocation served. The driver is issued a temporary license and allowed due process through administrative review. In July 1990,
57
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
California became the 28th state to implement APS. In January 1994, California enacted a "zero tolerance" statute which requires the administrative suspension of any driver under age 21 with a BAC of 0.01% or greater, or who refuses to be tested.
ALCOHOL-INVOLVED ACCIDENT
Alcohol-involved accidents are those in which the investigating law enforcement officer indicates on the accident report that the driver "had been drinking (HBD)." Accidents involving drivers who are determined to be under the influence of drugs other than alcohol (typically less than 1% of all accidents) are also included in the alcohol-involved accident category.
ALCOHOL-RELATED RECKLESS DRIVING
Commonly called a "wet" reckless, alcohol-related reckless driving refers to an arrest/conviction incident which originated as a DUI arrest. DUI arrests involving drugs which are reduced to reckless driving are also referred to as alcohol-involved or "wet" reckless driving. "Wet" reckless convictions count as priors for the purposes of enhanced penalties upon subsequent conviction of DUI.
ALPHA
Alpha is the investigator's acceptable risk or probability level of making a Type 1 error (generally chosen to be small--e.g., 1% or .01, 5% or .05). There is always some risk of a Type 1 error, so alpha cannot be zero. Alpha is also called the significance level, because it is the criterion for claiming statistical significance.
BAC
Blood alcohol concentration, or BAC, is a measure of the percent, by weight, of alcohol in a person's blood. Statutorily, BAC is based upon grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or per 210 liters of breath.
CONVICTION Conviction of an offense, as used in this report, refers to the receipt by DMV of a court abstract of conviction. In a small proportion of cases, an offender may be convicted of an offense but that conviction is not reported to DMV. Such cases would functionally be treated by DMV as though the offender had not been convicted. Because convictions can be amended, corrected, dismissed or simply not reported at all, the conviction totals reported herein are dynamic and subject to change.
COVARIATE A variable used to statistically adjust the results of an analysis for differences (on that variable) existing among subjects prior to the comparison of treatment effects.
DUI
DUI is an acronym for "driving under the influence" of alcohol and/or drugs, a violation of Sections 23152 or 23153 of the California Vehicle Code.
58
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
LOGISTIC REGRESSION Logistic regression analysis is a statistical procedure evaluating the linear relationship between various factors and the occurrence or nonoccurrence of an outcome event. In this study, the procedure was used to explain the relationship between the various sanctions and the proportion of DUI offenders who incurred accidents and/or DUI incidents.
MAJOR CONVICTION Major convictions include primarily DUI convictions, but also reckless driving and hit-and-run convictions.
p
p stands for probability. For example, if p<.05, the probability is less than 5 chances in 100 that the difference you found is by chance alone.
QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS
Quasi-experimental designs refer to analyses where the comparison groups are not equivalent on characteristics other than the treatment conditions because random assignment was not used. Caution should be excercised when interpreting the results because of possible confounding of group bias with treatment effects. Covariates are used to statistically reduce group differences prior to the comparison of treatment effects.
SIGNIFICANT (STATISTICALLY)
If the result of a statistical test is significant, this means that the difference found is very unlikely by chance alone. How unlikely is determined by alpha.
59
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
APPENDIX A
Assembly Bill No. 757
CHAPTER 450 An act to add Section 1821 to the Vehicle Code. relating to driving offenses.
(Approved by Governor September 14, 1989. Filed with Secretary of State September 15, 1989.)
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 757, Friedman. Driving offenses: intervention programs: evaluation. Under existing law, the Department of Motor Vehicles maintains records of driver's offenses reported by the courts. Including violations of the prohibitions against driving while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage, any drug, or both, driving with an excessive blood-alcohol concentration, or driving while addicted to any drug. This bill would, additionally, require the department to establish and maintain a data and monitoring system, as specified, to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted of those violations relating to alcohol and drugs, and to report thereon annually to the Legislature. The bill would declare legislative findings. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares as follows: (a) Drivers under the influence of drugs or alcohol continue to present a grave danger to the citizens of this state. (b) The Legislature has taken stern action to deter this crime and punish its offenders and has provided a range of sanctions available to the courts to use at their discretion. (c) No system exists to monitor and evaluate the efficacy of these measures or to determine the achievement of the Legislature's goals. (d) This lack of accurate and up-to-date comprehensive statistics hampers the ability of the Legislature to make informed and timely policy decisions. (e) It is essential that the Legislature acquire this information, from available resources, as soon as practicable, and that this information be updated and transmitted annually to the Legislature. SEC. 2. Section 1821 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 1821: The department shall establish and maintain a data and monitoring system to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted of violations of Section 23152 or 23153. The system may include a recidivism tracking system. The recidivism tracking system may include, but not be limited to, jail sentencing, license restriction, license suspension. Level I (first offender) and II (multiple offender) alcohol and drug education and treatment program assignment, alcohol and drug education treatment program readmission and dropout rates, adjudicating court, length of jail term, actual jail or alternative sentence served, type of treatment program assigned, actual program compliance status, subsequent accidents related to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and subsequent convictions of violations of Section 23152 or 23153. The department shall submit an annual report of its evaluations to the Legislature. The evaluations shall include a ranking of the relative efficacy of criminal penalties, other sanctions, and intervention programs and the various combinations thereof.
60
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
61
APP
END
IX B
ALP
INE
18-2
0 1
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 1
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
STA
TE T
OTA
L
2065
83
1826
25
88.4
23
958
11.6
85
980
41.6
96
084
46.5
13
864
6.7
1065
5 5.
2 A
LAM
EDA
U
ND
ER 1
8 73
68
93
.2
5 6.
8 31
42
.5
30
41.1
9
12.3
3
4.1
18
-20
432
393
91.0
39
9.
0 16
7 38
.7
150
34.7
73
16
.9
42
9.7
21
-30
2764
24
37
88.2
32
7 11
.8
1100
39
.8
911
33.0
46
2 16
.7
291
10.5
31-4
0 22
54
1907
84
.6
347
15.4
10
64
47.2
50
4 22
.4
457
20.3
22
9 10
.2
41
-50
1084
89
8 82
.8
186
17.2
53
7 49
.5
184
17.0
24
8 22
.9
115
10.6
51-6
0 40
4 36
4 90
.1
40
9.9
209
51.7
53
13
.1
105
26.0
37
9.
2
61-7
0 16
8 15
2 90
.5
16
9.5
84
50.0
16
9.
5 57
33
.9
11
6.5
71
& A
BOV
E 29
26
89
.7
3 10
.3
23
79.3
3
10.3
2
6.9
1 3.
4
TOTA
L 72
08
6245
86
.6
963
13.4
32
15
44.6
18
51
25.7
14
13
19.6
72
9 10
.1
21
-30
21
18
85.7
3
14.3
12
57
.1
3 14
.3
0 0.
0 6
28.6
31-4
0 19
16
84
.2
3 15
.8
15
78.9
1
5.3
0 0.
0 3
15.8
41-5
0 12
11
91
.7
1 8.
3 10
83
.3
0 0.
0 0
0.0
2 16
.7
51
-60
5 4
80.0
1
20.0
1
20.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0 4
80.0
71 &
ABO
VE
1 1
100.
0 0
0.0
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 59
51
86
.4
8 13
.6
40
67.8
4
6.8
0 0.
0 15
25
.4
AM
AD
OR
18-2
0 5
5 10
0.0
0 0.
0 4
80.0
1
20.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 45
38
84
.4
7 15
.6
36
80.0
8
17.8
0
0.0
1 2.
2
31-4
0 51
33
64
.7
18
35.3
50
98
.0
1 2.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
41-5
0 47
40
85
.1
7 14
.9
43
91.5
4
8.5
0 0.
0 0
0.0
51
-60
23
20
87.0
3
13.0
22
95
.7
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 4.
3
61-7
0 8
8 10
0.0
0 0.
0 8
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 4
4 10
0.0
0 0.
0 4
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
183
148
80.9
35
19
.1
167
91.3
14
7.
7 0
0.0
2
1.1
BUTT
E U
ND
ER 1
8 24
21
87
.5
3 12
.5
18
75.0
4
16.7
1
4.2
1 4.
2
18-2
0 98
87
88
.8
11
11.2
77
78
.6
18
18.4
2
2.0
1 1.
0
21-3
0 48
8 42
9 87
.9
59
12.1
33
9 69
.5
117
24.0
18
3.
7 14
2.
9
31-4
0 40
0 32
7 81
.8
73
18.2
32
7 81
.8
51
12.8
9
2.3
13
3.3
41
-50
178
144
80.9
34
19
.1
53
86.0
17
9.
6 2
1.1
6 3.
4
51-6
0 72
62
86
.1
10
13.9
65
90
.3
6 8.
3
0 0.
0 1
1.4
61
-70
27
24
88.9
3
11.1
24
88
.9
3 11
.1
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 10
10
10
0.0
0 0.
0 9
90.0
1
10.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 12
97
1104
85
.1
193
14.9
10
12
78.0
21
7 16
.7
32
2.5
36
2.8
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
62
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
CA
LAV
ERA
S U
ND
ER 1
8 2
2 10
0.0
0 0.
0 1
50.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 9
9 10
0.0
0 0.
0 9
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
21
-30
68
53
77.9
5
22.1
62
91
.2
6 8.
8 0
0.0
0 0.
0
31-4
0 98
72
73
.5
26
26.5
86
87
.8
11
11.2
0
0.0
1 1.
0
41-5
0 67
56
83
.6
11
16.4
61
91
.0
5 7.
5 0
0.0
1 1.
5
51-6
0 24
21
87
.5
3 12
.5
24
100.
0 0
0.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
61-7
0 16
15
93
.8
1 6.
3 12
75
.0
3 18
.8
0 0.
0 1
6.3
71
& A
BOV
E 3
2 66
.7
1 33
.3
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
287
230
80.1
57
19
.9
258
89.9
26
9.
1 0
0.0
3
1.0
CO
LUSA
U
ND
ER 1
8 2
2 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
2 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
14
13
92.9
1
7.1
2 14
.3
12
85.7
0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 11
2 10
7 95
.5
5 4.
5 28
25
.0
79
70.5
2
1.8
3 2.
7
31-4
0 86
75
87
.2
11
12.8
43
50
.0
36
41.9
2
2.3
5 5.
8
41-5
0 56
51
91
.1
5 8.
9
34
60.7
20
35
.7
0 0.
0 2
3.6
51
-60
17
14
82.4
3
17.6
12
70
.6
5 29
.4
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
-70
15
12
80.0
3
20.0
13
86
.7
1 6.
7 1
6.7
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 30
2 27
4 90
.7
28
9.3
132
43.7
15
5 51
.3
5 1.
7 10
3.
3 C
ON
TRA
U
ND
ER 1
8 40
37
92
.5
3
7.5
21
52.5
13
32
.5
3 7.
5 3
7.5
CO
STA
18
-20
265
235
88.7
30
11
.3
116
43.8
10
4 39
.2
34
12.8
11
4.
2
21-3
0 14
32
1248
87
.2
184
12.8
66
5 46
.4
457
31.9
24
2 16
.9
68
4.7
31
-40
1274
10
33
81.1
24
1 18
.9
703
55.2
26
0 20
.4
248
19.5
63
4.
9
41-5
0 68
1 56
2 82
.5
119
17.5
39
4 57
.9
111
16.3
14
7 21
.6
29
4.3
51
-60
298
256
85.9
42
14
.1
181
60.7
30
10
.1
75
25.2
12
4.
0
61-7
0 98
91
92
.9
7 7.
1 59
60
.2
10
10.2
28
28
.6
1 1.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
36
30
83.3
6
16.7
23
63
.9
2 5.
6 11
30
.6
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 41
24
3492
84
.7
632
15.3
21
62
52.4
98
7 23
.9
788
19.1
18
7 4.
5 D
EL N
ORT
E U
ND
ER 1
8 6
6 10
0.0
0 0.
0 5
83.3
0
0.0
0 0.
0 1
16.7
18-2
0 16
13
81
.3
3 18
.8
11
68.8
1
6.3
0 0.
0 4
25.0
21-3
0 91
76
83
.5
15
16.5
68
74
.7
13
14.3
2
2.2
8 8.
8
31-4
0 95
78
82
.1
17
17.9
77
81
.1
9 9.
5 2
2.1
7 7.
4
41-5
0 64
55
85
.9
9 14
.1
56
87.5
4
6.3
0 0.
0 4
6.3
51
-60
17
13
76.5
4
23.5
15
88
.2
0 0.
0 0
0.0
2 11
.8
61
-70
11
7 63
.6
4 36
.4
10
90.9
1
9.1
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 3
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0 3
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
303
251
82.8
52
17
.2
245
80.9
28
9.
2 4
1.3
26
8.6
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
63
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
-
EL D
ORA
DO
U
ND
ER 1
8 16
15
93
.8
1 6.
3 16
10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
18
-20
52
45
86.5
7
13.5
46
88
.5
6 11
.5
0 0.
0 0
0.0
21
-30
290
249
85.9
41
14
.1
235
81.0
51
17
.6
2 0.
7 2
0.7
31
-40
360
286
79.4
74
20
.6
323
89.7
24
6.
7 6
1.7
7 1.
9
41-5
0 18
4 14
7 79
.9
37
20.1
17
1 92
.9
10
5.4
1 0.
5 2
1.1
51
-60
60
52
86.7
8
13.3
56
93
.3
3 5.
0 1
1.7
0 0.
0
61-7
0 18
15
83
.3
3 16
.7
18
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 3
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0 3
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
983
812
82.6
17
1 17
.4
868
88.3
94
9.
6 10
1.
0 11
1.
1 FR
ESN
O
UN
DER
18
76
74
97.4
2
2.6
18
23.7
55
72
.4
2 2.
6 1
1.3
18
-20
576
544
94.4
32
5.
6 93
16
.1
451
78.3
8
1.4
24
4.2
21
-30
3107
29
11
93.7
19
6 6.
3 48
9 15
.7
2420
77
.9
88
2.8
110
3.5
31
-40
1914
17
01
88.9
21
3 11
.1
444
23.2
13
05
68.2
59
3.
1 10
6 5.
5
41-5
0 79
0 69
9 88
.5
91
11.5
23
6 29
.9
476
60.3
40
5.
1 38
4.
8
51-6
0 29
3 26
6 90
.8
27
9.2
97
33.1
16
5 56
.3
15
5.1
16
5.5
61
-70
80
73
91.3
7
8.8
36
45.0
37
46
.3
1 1.
2 6
7.5
71
& A
BOV
E 24
24
10
0.0
0 0.
0 12
50
.0
11
45.8
1
4.2
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 68
60
6292
91
.7
568
8.3
1425
20
.8
4920
71
.7
214
3.1
301
4.4
GLE
NN
U
ND
ER 1
8 2
2 10
0.0
0 0.
0 1
50.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 17
16
94
.1
1 5.
9 7
41.2
9
52.9
1
5.9
0 0.
0
21-3
0 11
2 10
1 90
.2
11
9.8
43
38.4
69
61
.6
0 0.
0 0
0.0
31
-40
93
81
87.1
12
12
.9
59
63.4
28
30
.1
0 0.
0 6
6.5
41
-50
60
53
88.3
7
11.7
43
71
.7
16
26.7
0
0.0
1 1.
7
51-6
0 17
16
94
.1
1 5.
9 14
82
.4
3 17
.6
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
-70
8 8
100.
0 0
0.0
8 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
1 1
100.
0 0
0.0
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
HU
MBO
LDT
UN
DER
18
17
10
58.8
7
41.2
17
10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 31
0 27
8 89
.7
32
10.3
17
6 56
.8
126
40.6
1
0.3
7 2.
3
18
-20
113
95
84.1
18
15
.9
92
81.4
10
8.
8 1
0.9
10
8.8
21
-30
400
327
81.8
73
18
.2
315
78.8
49
12
.3
6 1.
5 30
7.
5
31-4
0 37
3 31
2 83
.6
61
16.4
31
9 85
.5
18
4.8
6 1.
6 30
8.
0
41-5
0 21
9 18
3 83
.6
36
16.4
20
2 92
.2
2 0.
9 3
1.4
12
5.5
51
-60
73
62
84.9
11
15
.1
67
91.8
4
5.5
0 0.
0 2
2.7
61
-70
27
21
77.8
6
22.2
24
88
.9
2 7.
4 0
0.0
1 3.
7
71 &
ABO
VE
12
10
83.3
2
16.7
11
91
.7
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 8.
3
TOTA
L 12
34
1020
82
.7
214
17.3
10
47
84.8
85
6.
9 16
1.
3 86
7.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
64
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
IMPE
RIA
L U
ND
ER 1
8 12
12
10
0.0
0 0.
0 3
25.0
8
66.7
0
0.0
1 8.
3
18-2
0 89
86
96
.6
3 3.
4 20
22
.5
67
75.3
2
2.2
0 0.
0
21-3
0 55
2 50
0 90
.6
52
9.4
119
21.6
41
2 74
.6
10
1.8
11
2.0
31
-40
531
470
88.5
61
11
.5
125
23.5
37
7 71
.0
7 1.
3 22
4.
1
41-5
0 28
1 24
9 88
.6
32
11.4
77
27
.4
192
68.3
4
1.4
8 2.
8
51-6
0 10
1 94
93
.1
7 6.
9 36
35
.6
58
57.4
2
2.0
5 5.
0
61-7
0 64
60
93
.8
4 6.
3 26
40
.6
36
56.3
0
0.0
2 3.
1
71 &
ABO
VE
15
14
93.3
1
6.7
10
66.7
5
33.3
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 16
45
1485
90
.3
160
9.7
416
25.3
11
55
70.2
25
1.
5 49
3.
0 IN
YO
UN
DER
18
2 1
50.0
1
50.0
2
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
24
23
95.8
1
4.2
11
45.8
4
16.7
0
0.0
9 37
.5
21
-30
94
80
85.1
14
14
.9
49
52.1
27
28
.7
0 0.
0 18
19
.1
31
-40
112
90
80.4
22
19
.6
74
66.1
20
17
.9
0 0.
0 18
16
.1
41
-50
65
59
90.8
6
9.2
49
75.4
6
9.2
0 0.
0 10
15
.4
51
-60
33
30
90.9
3
9.1
27
81.8
4
12.1
1
3.0
1 3.
0
61-7
0 13
12
92
.3
1 7.
7 11
84
.6
2 15
.4
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 3
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0 3
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
KER
N
UN
DER
18
72
64
88.9
8
11.1
40
55
.6
26
36.1
5
6.9
1 1.
4
TOTA
L 34
6 29
8 86
.1
48
13.9
22
6 65
.3
63
18.2
1
0.3
56
16.2
18
-20
383
364
95.0
19
5.
0 13
0 33
.9
232
60.6
19
5.
0 2
0.5
21
-30
1990
18
18
91.4
17
2 8.
6 62
8 31
.6
1254
63
.0
91
4.6
17
0.9
31
-40
1596
13
84
86.7
21
2 13
.3
674
42.2
79
6 49
.9
93
5.8
33
2.1
41
-50
669
600
89.7
69
10
.3
367
54.9
25
0 37
.4
39
5.8
13
1.9
51
-60
256
237
92.6
19
7.
4 15
8 61
.7
75
29.3
17
6.
6 6
2.3
61
-70
99
91
91.9
8
8.1
73
73.7
21
21
.2
3 3.
0 2
2.0
71
& A
BOV
E 30
27
90
.0
3 10
.0
26
86.7
4
13.3
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 50
95
4585
90
.0
510
10.0
20
96
41.1
26
58
52.2
26
7 5.
2 74
1.
5 K
ING
S U
ND
ER 1
8 23
15
65
.2
8 34
.8
11
47.8
12
52
.2
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
96
92
95.8
4
4.2
30
31.3
64
66
.7
2 2.
1 0
0.0
21
-30
465
432
92.9
33
7.
1 99
21
.3
332
71.4
23
4.
9 11
2.
4
31-4
0 34
3 30
3 88
.3
40
11.7
97
28
.3
204
59.5
30
8.
7 12
3.
5
41-5
0 15
6 13
6 87
.2
20
12.8
67
42
.9
71
45.5
15
9.
6 3
1.9
51
-60
45
44
97.8
1
2.2
15
33.3
20
44
.4
7 15
.6
3 6.
7
61-7
0 11
11
10
0.0
0 0.
0 6
54.5
5
45.5
0
0.0
0 0.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
4 4
100.
0 0
0.0
3 75
.0
1 25
.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
1143
10
37
90.7
10
6 9.
3 32
8 28
.7
709
62.0
77
6.
7 29
2.
5
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
LAK
E U
ND
ER 1
8 6
5 83
.3
1 16
.7
5 83
.3
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 16
.7
18
-20
43
37
86.0
6
14.0
29
67
.4
10
23.3
2
4.7
2 4.
7
21-3
0 19
7 16
9 85
.8
28
14.2
14
4 73
.1
40
20.3
6
3.0
7 3.
6
31-4
0 21
6 18
0 83
.3
36
16.7
18
6 86
.1
24
11.1
2
0.9
4 1.
9
41-5
0 11
4 91
79
.8
23
20.2
98
86
.0
9 7.
9 4
3.5
3 2.
6
51-6
0 42
35
83
.3
7 16
.7
34
81.0
5
11.9
2
4.8
1 2.
4
61-7
0 33
27
81
.8
6 18
.2
27
81.8
2
6.1
4 12
.1
0 0.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
11
11
100.
0 0
0.0
11
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
662
555
83.8
10
7 16
.2
534
80.7
90
13
.6
20
3.0
18
2.7
LASS
EN
UN
DER
18
3 2
66.7
1
33.3
3
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
19
15
78.9
4
21.1
17
89
.5
1 5.
3 0
0.0
1 5.
3
21-3
0 79
68
86
.1
11
13.9
63
79
.7
8 10
.1
0 0.
0 8
10.1
31-4
0 64
57
89
.1
7 10
.9
56
87.5
4
6.3
1 1.
6 3
4.7
41
-50
53
47
88.7
6
11.3
49
92
.5
0 0.
0 1
1.9
3 5.
7
51-6
0 22
19
86
.4
3 13
.6
20
90.9
1
4.5
1 4.
5 0
0.0
61
-70
11
10
90.9
1
9.1
11
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 1
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 1
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
252
219
86.9
33
13
.1
220
87.3
14
5.
6 3
1.2
15
6.0
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
UN
DER
18
282
258
91.5
24
8.
5 62
22
.0
196
69.5
18
6.
4 6
2.1
18
-20
2990
28
07
93.9
18
3 6.
1 46
7 15
.6
2251
75
.3
140
4.7
132
4.4
21
-30
2318
6 21
311
91.9
18
75
8.1
4096
17
.7
1645
8 71
.0
1518
6.
5 11
14
4.8
31
-40
1549
7 14
046
90.6
14
51
9.4
3893
25
.1
9128
58
.9
1496
9.
7 98
0 6.
3
41-5
0 65
79
5876
89
.3
703
10.7
20
93
31.8
31
32
47.6
80
7 12
.3
547
8.3
51
-60
2237
20
29
90.7
20
8 9.
3 89
4 40
.0
806
36.0
38
6 17
.3
151
6.8
61
-70
665
600
90.2
65
9.
8 31
1 46
.8
193
29.0
13
5 20
.3
26
3.9
71
& A
BOV
E 17
1 15
3 89
.5
18
10.5
10
3 60
.2
29
17.0
35
20
.5
4 2.
3
TOTA
L 51
607
4708
0 91
.2
4527
8.
8 11
919
23.1
32
193
62.4
45
35
8.8
2960
5.
7 M
AD
ERA
U
ND
ER 1
8 10
10
10
0.0
0 0.
0 4
40.0
5
50.0
1
10.0
0
0.0
18
-20
98
98
100.
0 0
0.0
20
20.4
74
75
.5
2 2.
0 2
2.0
21
-30
532
510
95.9
22
4.
1 75
14
.1
443
83.3
9
1.7
5 0.
9
31-4
0 30
7 27
4 89
.3
33
10.7
81
26
.4
208
67.8
12
3.
9 6
2.0
41
-50
154
140
90.9
14
9.
1 54
35
.1
86
55.8
13
8.
4 1
0.6
51
-60
31
29
93.5
2
6.5
14
45.2
12
38
.7
3 9.
7 2
6.5
61
-70
22
18
81.8
4
18.2
13
59
.1
7 31
.8
2 9.
1 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 5
4 80
.0
1 20
.0
4 80
.0
0 0.
0 1
20.0
0
0.0
TO
TAL
1159
10
83
93.4
76
6.
6 26
5 22
.9
835
72.0
43
3.
7 16
1.
4
65
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
66
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
MA
RIN
U
ND
ER 1
8 9
7 77
.8
2
22.2
8
88.9
1
11.1
0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 87
76
87
.4
11
12.6
41
47
.1
33
37.9
4
4.6
9 10
.3
21
-30
608
501
82.4
10
7 17
.6
321
52.8
20
7 34
.0
28
4.6
52
8.6
31
-40
503
404
80.3
99
19
.7
362
72.0
76
15
.1
20
4.0
45
8.9
41
-50
314
230
73.2
84
26
.8
256
81.5
19
6.
1 18
5.
7 21
6.
7
51-6
0 10
4 85
81
.7
19
18.3
94
90
.4
3 2.
9 3
2.9
4 3.
8
61-7
0 32
30
93
.8
2 6.
3 28
87
.5
1 3.
1 2
6.3
1 3.
1
71 &
ABO
VE
7 7
100.
0 0
0.0
5 71
.4
1 14
.3
1 14
.3
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 16
64
1340
80
.5
324
19.5
11
15
67.0
34
1 20
.5
76
4.6
132
7.9
MA
RIPO
SA
18-2
0 2
2 10
0.0
0 0.
0 2
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
21
-30
27
25
92.6
2
7.4
24
88.9
2
7.4
0 0.
0 1
3.7
31
-40
41
32
78.0
9
22.0
35
85
.4
4 9.
8 0
0.0
2 4.
9
41-5
0 28
23
82
.1
5 17
.9
22
78.6
3
10.7
2
7.1
1 3.
6
51-6
0 11
9
81.8
2
18.2
10
90
.9
1 9.
1 0
0.0
0 0.
0
61-7
0 3
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0 3
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
112
94
83.9
18
16
.1
96
85.7
10
8.
9 2
1.8
4 3.
6 M
END
OC
INO
U
ND
ER 1
8 6
4 66
.7
2 33
.3
5 83
.3
1 16
.7
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
61
53
86.9
8
13.1
39
63
.9
18
29.5
0
0.0
4 6.
6
21-3
0 31
7 26
5 83
.6
52
16.4
18
2 57
.4
114
36.0
3
0.9
18
5.7
31
-40
303
234
77.2
69
22
.8
247
81.5
39
12
.9
4 1.
3 13
4.
3
41-5
0 18
6 15
8 84
.9
28
15.1
15
8 84
.9
17
9.1
2 1.
1 9
4.8
51
-60
57
50
87.7
7
12.3
49
86
.0
5 8.
8 1
1.8
2 3.
5
61-7
0 22
18
81
.8
4 18
.2
21
95.5
1
4.5
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 8
7 87
.5
1 12
.5
8 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 96
0 78
9 82
.2
171
17.8
70
9 73
.9
195
20.3
10
1.
0 46
4.
8 M
ERC
ED
UN
DER
18
24
20
83.3
4
16.7
4
16.7
18
75
.0
1 4.
2 1
4.2
18
-20
185
175
94.6
10
5.
4 35
18
.9
142
76.8
2
1.1
6 3.
2
21-3
0 88
0 81
9 93
.1
61
6.9
170
19.3
66
0 75
.0
30
3.4
20
2.3
31
-40
586
521
88.9
65
11
.1
189
32.3
34
3 58
.5
42
7.2
12
2.0
41
-50
313
282
90.1
31
9.
9 11
3 36
.1
157
50.2
27
8.
6 16
5.
1
51-6
0 10
5 97
92
.4
8 7.
6 55
52
.4
45
42.9
5
4.8
0 0.
0
61-7
0 38
36
94
.7
2 5.
3 17
44
.7
18
47.4
1
2.6
2 5.
3
71 &
ABO
VE
7 7
100.
0 0
0.0
3 42
.9
2 28
.6
2 28
.6
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 21
38
1957
91
.5
181
8.5
586
27.4
13
85
64.8
11
0 5.
1 57
2.
7
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
67
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
MO
DO
C
UN
DER
18
3 3
100.
0 0
0.0
2 66
.7
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 33
.3
18
-20
14
12
85.7
2
14.3
9
64.3
5
35.7
0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 35
31
88
.6
4 11
.4
22
62.9
9
25.7
0
0.0
4 11
.4
31
-40
45
35
77.8
10
22
.2
39
86.7
4
8.9
0 0.
0 2
4.4
41
-50
21
20
95.2
1
4.8
18
85.7
1
4.8
0 0.
0 2
9.5
51
-60
9 9
100.
0 0
0.0
9 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
61-7
0 10
8
80.0
2
20.0
9
90.0
1
10.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 13
7 11
8 86
.1
19
13.9
10
8 78
.8
20
14.6
0
0.0
9 6.
6 M
ON
O
UN
DER
18
2 1
50.0
1
50.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0 1
50.0
18-2
0 12
11
91
.7
1 8.
3 6
50.0
1
8.3
0 0.
0 5
41.7
21-3
0 54
52
96
.3
2 3.
7 23
42
.6
16
29.6
1
1.9
14
25.9
31-4
0 48
42
87
.5
6 12
.5
23
47.9
5
10.4
0
0.0
20
41.7
41-5
0 29
25
86
.2
4 13
.8
19
65.5
1
3.4
0 0.
0 9
31.0
51-6
0 7
6 85
.7
1 14
.3
5 71
.4
0 0.
0 0
0.0
2 28
.6
61
-70
3 3
100.
0 0
0.0
2 66
.7
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 33
.3
71
& A
BOV
E 2
2 10
0.0
0 0.
0 1
50.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0 1
50.0
TOTA
L 15
7 14
2 90
.4
15
9.6
80
51.0
23
14
.6
1 0.
6 53
33
.8
MO
NTE
REY
UN
DER
18
59
52
88.1
7
11.9
10
16
.9
49
83.1
0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 38
5 36
3 94
.3
22
5.7
52
13.5
32
0 83
.1
8 2.
1 5
1.3
21
-30
1976
18
51
93.7
12
5 6.
3 40
1 20
.3
1484
75
.1
40
2.0
51
2.6
31
-40
1229
10
82
88.0
14
7 12
.0
476
38.7
66
9 54
.4
52
4.2
32
2.6
41
-50
513
440
85.8
73
14
.2
258
50.3
22
5 43
.9
12
2.3
18
3.5
51
-60
171
148
86.5
23
13
.5
89
52.0
59
34
.5
13
7.6
10
5.8
61
-70
76
67
88.2
9
11.8
38
50
.0
27
35.5
7
9.2
4 5.
3
71 &
ABO
VE
14
14
100.
0 0
0.0
6 42
.9
7 50
.0
0 0.
0 1
7.1
TO
TAL
4423
40
17
90.8
40
6 9.
2 13
30
30.1
28
40
64.2
13
2 3.
0 12
1 2.
7 N
APA
U
ND
ER 1
8 18
16
88
.9
2 11
.1
14
77.8
4
22.2
0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 89
82
92
.1
7 7.
9 30
33
.7
58
65.2
1
1.1
0 0.
0
21-3
0 42
6 39
4 92
.5
32
7.5
171
40.1
24
3 57
.0
3 0.
7 9
2.1
31
-40
276
230
83.3
46
16
.7
158
57.2
10
4 37
.7
5 1.
8 9
3.3
41
-50
169
129
76.3
40
23
.7
129
76.3
37
21
.9
3 1.
8 0
0.0
51
-60
66
59
89.4
7
10.6
51
77
.3
9 13
.6
0 0.
0 6
9.1
61
-70
30
22
73.3
8
26.7
25
83
.3
4 13
.3
1 3.
3 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 11
11
10
0.0
0 0.
0 11
10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 10
85
943
86.9
14
2 13
.1
589
54.3
45
9 42
.3
13
1.2
24
2.2
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
68
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
NEV
AD
A
UN
DER
18
3 2
66.7
1
33.3
3
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
32
28
87.5
4
12.5
30
93
.8
2 6.
3 0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 12
4 10
8 87
.1
16
12.9
10
3 83
.1
17
13.7
2
1.6
2 1.
6
31-4
0 16
7 13
0 77
.8
37
22.2
15
3 91
.6
11
6.6
2 1.
2 1
0.6
41
-50
101
79
78.2
22
21
.8
92
91.1
5
5.0
0 0.
0 4
4.0
51
-60
31
29
93.5
2
6.5
30
96.8
1
3.2
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
-70
16
15
93.8
1
6.3
14
87.5
1
6.3
1 6.
3 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 7
7 10
0.0
0 0.
0 5
71.4
1
14.3
0
0.0
1 14
.3
TO
TAL
481
398
82.7
83
17
.3
430
89.4
38
7.
9 5
1.0
8 1.
7 O
RAN
GE
UN
DER
18
88
71
80.7
17
19
.3
47
53.4
34
38
.6
0 0.
0 7
8.0
18
-20
911
819
89.9
92
10
.1
368
40.4
48
3 53
.0
8 0.
9 52
5.
7
21-3
0 69
49
6186
89
.0
763
11.0
26
88
38.7
37
02
53.3
87
1.
3 47
2 6.
8
31-4
0 46
36
4006
86
.4
630
13.6
23
24
50.1
17
99
38.8
11
3 2.
4 40
0 8.
6
41-5
0 20
33
1719
84
.6
314
15.4
12
31
60.6
55
8 27
.4
42
2.1
202
9.9
51
-60
744
645
86.7
99
13
.3
505
67.9
15
4 20
.7
10
1.3
75
10.1
61-7
0 23
3 19
9 85
.4
34
14.6
17
1 73
.4
43
18.5
6
2.6
13
5.6
71
& A
BOV
E 65
49
75
.4
16
24.6
50
76
.9
9 13
.8
0 0.
0 6
9.2
TO
TAL
1565
9 13
694
87.5
19
65
12.5
73
84
47.2
67
82
43.3
26
6 1.
7 12
27
7.8
PLA
CER
U
ND
ER 1
8 21
19
90
.5
2 9.
5 20
95
.2
1 4.
8 0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 11
4 10
0 87
.7
14
12.3
97
85
.1
15
13.2
1
0.9
1 0.
9
21-3
0 58
2 48
5 83
.3
97
16.7
46
6 80
.1
104
17.9
4
0.7
8 1.
4
31-4
0 52
4 40
1 76
.5
123
23.5
47
8 91
.2
33
6.3
4 0.
8 9
1.7
41
-50
279
225
80.6
54
19
.4
258
92.5
12
4.
3 5
1.8
4 1.
4
51-6
0 74
64
86
.5
10
13.5
65
87
.8
7 9.
5 0
0.0
2 2.
7
61-7
0 28
24
85
.7
4 14
.3
25
89.3
2
7.1
1 3.
6 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 7
7 10
0.0
0 0.
0 6
85.7
1
14.3
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 16
29
1325
81
.3
304
18.7
14
15
86.9
17
5 10
.7
15
0.9
24
1.5
PLU
MA
S U
ND
ER 1
8 1
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 1
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
9 9
100.
0 0
0.0
8 88
.9
1 11
.1
0 0.
0 0
0.0
21
-30
49
41
83.7
8
16.3
42
85
.7
5 10
.2
1 2.
0 1
2.0
31
-40
59
45
76.3
14
23
.7
52
88.1
3
5.1
0 0.
0 4
6.8
41
-50
39
32
82.1
7
17.9
38
97
.4
1 2.
6 0
0.0
0 0.
0
51-6
0 19
16
84
.2
3 15
.8
19
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
-70
12
12
100.
0 0
0.0
12
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 1
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 1
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
189
157
83.1
32
16
.9
173
91.5
10
5.
3 1
0.5
5 2.
6
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SAN
BEN
ITO
U
ND
ER 1
8 1
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
69
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
RIV
ERSI
DE
UN
DER
18
95
86
90.5
9
9.5
29
30.5
56
58
.9
3 3.
2 7
7.4
18
-20
514
477
92.8
37
7.
2 16
6 32
.3
311
60.5
23
4.
5 14
2.
7
21-3
0 31
63
2873
90
.8
290
9.2
1031
32
.6
1859
58
.8
177
5.6
96
3.0
31
-40
2369
20
54
86.7
31
5 13
.3
1013
42
.8
1141
48
.2
145
6.1
70
3.0
41
-50
1276
11
18
87.6
15
8 12
.4
685
53.7
46
2 36
.2
81
6.3
48
3.8
51
-60
499
445
89.2
54
10
.8
287
57.5
15
0 30
.1
45
9.0
17
3.4
61
-70
197
181
91.9
16
8.
1 13
5 68
.5
47
23.9
9
4.6
6 3.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
69
60
87.0
9
13.0
58
84
.1
6 8.
7 3
4.3
2 2.
9
TOTA
L 81
82
7294
89
.1
888
10.9
34
04
41.6
40
32
49.3
48
6 5.
9 26
0 3.
2 SA
CRA
MEN
TO
UN
DER
18
70
61
87.1
9
12.9
29
41
.4
22
31.4
14
20
.0
5 7.
1
18-2
0 48
1 41
5 86
.3
66
13.7
24
1 50
.1
149
31.0
60
12
.5
31
6.4
21
-30
3230
26
89
83.3
54
1 16
.7
1893
58
.6
761
23.6
42
5 13
.2
151
4.7
31
-40
2374
19
2 81
.0
450
19.0
14
54
61.2
41
5 17
.5
392
16.5
11
3 4.
8
41-5
0 11
50
941
81.8
20
9 18
.2
769
66.9
16
3 14
.2
158
13.7
60
5.
2
51-6
0 39
7 35
2 88
.7
45
11.3
27
8 70
.0
43
10.8
54
13
.6
22
5.5
61
-70
152
132
86.8
20
13
.2
97
63.8
20
13
.2
34
22.4
1
0.7
71
& A
BOV
E 50
42
84
.0
8 16
.0
39
78.0
5
10.0
6
12.0
0
0.0
TO
TAL
7904
65
56
82.9
13
48
17.1
48
00
60.7
15
78
20.0
11
43
14.5
38
3 4.
8
18
-20
22
19
86.4
3
13.6
2
9.1
19
86.4
0
0.0
1 4.
5
21-3
0 10
8 99
91
.7
9 8.
3 17
15
.7
87
80.6
1
0.9
3 2.
8
31-4
0 73
63
86
.3
10
13.7
24
32
.9
48
65.8
0
0.0
1 1.
4
41-5
0 34
27
79
.4
7 20
.6
17
50.0
15
44
.1
1 2.
9 1
2.9
51
-60
11
11
100.
0 0
0.0
1 9.
1 9
81.8
0
0.0
1 9.
1
61-7
0 5
5 10
0.0
0 0.
0 3
60.0
2
40.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 25
4 22
5 88
.6
29
11.4
64
25
.2
181
71.3
2
0.8
7 2.
8 SA
N
UN
DER
18
71
61
85.9
10
14
.1
31
43.7
36
50
.7
3 4.
2 1
1.4
BERN
ARD
INO
18
-20
606
564
93.1
42
6.
9 20
8 34
.3
351
57.9
25
4.
1 22
3.
6
21-3
0 42
18
3867
91
.7
351
8.3
1300
30
.8
2467
58
.5
260
6.2
191
4.5
31
-40
3335
29
56
88.6
37
9 11
.4
1434
43
.0
1441
43
.2
290
8.7
170
5.1
41
-50
1616
14
28
88.4
18
8 11
.6
859
53.2
51
8 32
.1
128
7.9
111
6.9
51
-60
591
518
87.6
73
12
.4
341
57.7
15
7 26
.6
55
9.3
38
6.4
61
-70
217
198
91.2
19
8.
8 14
4 66
.4
37
17.1
24
11
.1
12
5.5
71
& A
BOV
E 45
41
91
.1
4 8.
9 28
62
.2
11
24.4
5
11.1
1
2.2
TO
TAL
1069
9 96
33
90.0
10
66
10.0
43
45
40.6
50
18
46.9
79
0 7.
4 54
6 5.
1
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
70
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
-
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
)
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
SAN
DIE
GO
U
ND
ER 1
8 12
7 10
4 81
.9
23
18.1
78
61
.4
39
30.7
3
2.4
7 5.
5
18-2
0 10
18
905
88.9
11
3 11
.1
488
47.9
44
8 44
.0
47
4.6
35
3.4
21
-30
7059
62
55
88.6
80
4 11
.4
3352
47
.5
2929
41
.5
503
7.1
275
3.9
31
-40
4581
39
21
85.6
66
0 14
.4
2442
53
.3
1654
36
.1
309
6.7
176
3.8
41
-50
2073
17
81
85.9
29
2 14
.1
1226
59
.1
613
29.6
13
3 6.
4 10
1 4.
9
51-6
0 66
5 56
8 85
.4
97
14.6
42
5 63
.9
171
25.7
34
5.
1 35
5.
3
61-7
0 22
9 20
0 87
.3
29
12.7
16
0 69
.9
47
20.5
14
6.
1 8
3.5
71
& A
BOV
E 63
62
98
.4
1 1.
6 56
88
.9
3 4.
8 4
6.3
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 15
815
1379
6 87
.2
2019
12
.8
8227
52
.0
5904
37
.3
1047
6.
6 63
7 4.
0
SAN
LU
IS
UN
DER
18
27
24
88.9
3
11.1
19
70
.4
8 29
.6
0 0.
0 0
0.0
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
UN
DER
18
46
41
89.1
5
10.9
18
39
.1
23
50.0
3
6.5
2 4.
3
SAN
U
ND
ER 1
8 11
10
90
.9
1 9.
1 4
36.4
2
18.2
2
18.2
3
27.3
FR
AN
CIS
CO
18
-20
68
57
83.8
11
16
.2
28
41.2
16
23
.5
12
17.6
12
17
.6
21
-30
719
636
88.5
83
11
.5
354
49.2
14
2 19
.7
105
14.6
11
8 16
.4
31
-40
505
457
90.5
48
9.
5 25
3 50
.1
86
17.0
91
18
.0
75
14.9
41-5
0 24
4 21
4 87
.7
30
12.3
15
4 63
.1
26
10.7
37
15
.2
27
11.1
51-6
0 93
81
87
.1
12
12.9
59
63
.4
7 7.
5 17
18
.3
10
10.8
61-7
0 41
38
92
.7
3 7.
3 30
73
.2
1 2.
4 7
17.1
3
7.3
71
& A
BOV
E 9
9 10
0.0
0 0.
0 4
44.4
1
11.1
4
44.4
0
0.0
TO
TAL
1690
15
02
88.9
18
8 11
.1
886
52.4
28
1 16
.6
275
16.3
24
8 14
.7
18
-20
312
286
91.7
26
8.
3 92
29
.5
190
60.9
16
5.
1 14
4.
5
21-3
0 15
03
1378
91
.7
125
8.3
507
33.7
86
7 57
.7
72
4.8
57
3.8
31
-40
1164
10
19
87.5
14
5 12
.5
546
46.9
48
4 41
.6
82
7.0
52
4.5
41
-50
590
523
88.6
67
11
.4
360
61.0
18
7 31
.7
28
4.7
15
2.5
51
-60
219
195
89.0
24
11
.0
137
62.6
61
27
.9
17
7.8
4 1.
8
61-7
0 83
79
95
.2
4 4.
8 37
44
.6
33
39.8
12
14
.5
1 1.
2
71 &
ABO
VE
19
18
94.7
1
5.3
16
84.2
2
10.5
0
0.0
1 5.
3
TOTA
L 39
36
3539
89
.9
397
10.1
17
13
43.5
18
47
46.9
23
0 5.
8 14
6 3.
7
OBI
SPO
18
-20
187
150
80.2
37
19
.8
129
69.0
52
27
.8
4 2.
1 2
1.1
21
-30
912
789
86.5
12
3 13
.5
598
65.6
28
1 30
.8
15
1.6
18
2.0
31
-40
666
547
82.1
11
9 17
.9
514
77.2
13
3 20
.0
11
1.7
8 1.
2
41-5
0 36
6 29
3 80
.1
73
19.9
30
0 82
.0
53
14.5
6
1.6
7 1.
9
51-6
0 12
4 11
1 89
.5
13
10.5
98
79
.0
20
16.1
1
0.8
5 4.
0
61-7
0 49
44
89
.8
5 10
.2
43
87.8
5
10.2
0
0.0
1 2.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
20
17
85.0
3
15.0
18
90
.0
2 10
.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
2351
19
75
84.0
37
6 16
.0
1719
73
.1
554
23.6
37
1.
6 41
1.
7
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
71
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
SAN
MA
TEO
U
ND
ER 1
8 50
42
84
.0
8 16
.0
19
38.0
22
44
.0
4 8.
0 5
10.0
18-2
0 26
9 24
5 91
.1
24
8.9
88
32.7
13
8 51
.3
21
7.8
22
8.2
21
-30
1804
15
70
87.0
23
4 13
.0
687
38.1
84
2 46
.7
110
6.1
165
9.1
31
-40
1423
12
20
85.7
20
3 14
.3
699
49.1
43
9 30
.9
128
9.0
157
11.0
41-5
0 69
1 56
4 81
.6
127
18.4
40
2 58
.2
136
19.7
88
12
.7
65
9.4
51
-60
267
237
88.8
30
11
.2
163
61
.0
45
16.9
40
15
.0
19
7.1
61
-70
91
89
97.8
2
2.2
55
60.4
14
15
.4
16
17.6
6
6.6
71
& A
BOV
E 27
25
92
.6
2 7.
4 17
63
.0
1 3.
7 5
18.5
4
14.8
TOTA
L 46
22
3992
86
.4
630
13.6
21
30
46.1
16
37
35.4
41
2 8.
9 44
3 9.
6 SA
NTA
U
ND
ER 1
8 47
39
83
.0
8 17
.0
23
48.9
24
51
.1
0 0.
0 0
0.0
BARB
ARA
18
-20
339
284
83.8
55
16
.2
157
46.3
17
0 50
.1
7 2.
1 5
1.5
21
-30
1755
15
33
87.4
22
2 12
.6
692
39.4
99
8 56
.9
33
1.9
32
1.8
31
-40
1057
85
7 81
.1
200
18.9
54
4 51
.5
452
42.8
42
4.
0 19
1.
8
41-5
0 41
9 35
5 84
.7
64
15.3
25
0 59
.7
141
33.7
18
4.
3 10
2.
4
51-6
0 14
2 11
6 81
.7
26
18.3
10
3 72
.5
30
21.1
6
4.2
3 2.
1
61-7
0 60
52
86
.7
8 13
.3
45
75.0
11
18
.3
2 3.
3 2
3.3
71
& A
BOV
E 18
16
88
.9
2 11
.1
16
88.9
2
11.1
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 38
37
3252
84
.8
585
15.2
18
30
47.7
18
28
47.6
10
8 2.
8 71
1.
9 SA
NTA
CLA
RA
UN
DER
18
48
32
66.7
16
33
.3
19
39.6
25
52
.1
4 8.
3 0
0.0
18
-20
491
450
91.6
41
8.
4 11
5 23
.4
323
65.8
15
3.
1 38
7.
7
21-3
0 38
11
3412
89
.5
399
10.5
12
50
32.8
20
88
54.8
16
7 4.
4 30
6 8.
0
31-4
0 29
25
2519
86
.1
406
13.9
12
73
43.5
11
90
40.7
17
8 6.
1 28
4 9.
7
41-5
0 13
04
1116
85
.6
188
14.4
64
6 49
.5
462
35.4
76
5.
8 12
0 9.
2
51-6
0 45
4 38
5 84
.8
69
15.2
24
4 53
.7
135
29.7
33
7.
3 42
9.
3
61-7
0 10
9 91
83
.5
18
16.5
67
61
.5
30
27.5
6
5.5
6 5.
5
71 &
ABO
VE
22
21
95.5
1
4.5
14
63.6
5
22.7
3
13.6
0
0.0
TO
TAL
9164
80
26
87.6
11
38
12.4
36
28
39.6
42
58
46.5
48
2 5.
3 79
6 8.
7 SA
NTA
CR
UZ
UN
DER
18
34
27
79.4
7
20.6
18
52
.9
15
44.1
0
0.0
1 2.
9
18-2
0 21
6 18
7 86
.6
29
13.4
97
44
.9
113
52.3
0
0.0
6 2.
8
21-3
0 10
38
885
85.3
15
3 14
.7
458
44.1
54
0 52
.0
16
1.5
24
2.3
31
-40
808
667
82.5
14
1 17
.5
483
59.8
29
9 37
.0
11
1.4
15
1.9
41
-50
397
330
83.1
67
16
.9
284
71.5
10
1 25
.4
5 1.
3 7
1.8
51
-60
96
79
82.3
17
17
.7
73
76.0
21
21
.9
0 0.
0 2
2.1
61
-70
43
37
86.0
6
14.0
32
74
.4
8 18
.6
0 0.
0 3
7.0
71
& A
BOV
E 13
11
84
.6
2 15
.4
11
84.6
2
15.4
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 26
45
2223
84
.0
422
16.0
14
56
55.0
10
99
41.6
32
1.
2 58
2.
2
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SISK
IYO
U
UN
DER
18
2 1
50.0
1
50.0
2
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
72
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
SHA
STA
U
ND
ER 1
8 5
4 80
.0
1 20
.0
4 80
.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 20
.0
18
-20
56
45
80.4
11
19
.6
49
87.5
6
10.7
1
1.8
0 0.
0
21-3
0 27
7 23
1 83
.4
46
16.6
24
7 89
.2
14
5.1
3 1.
1 13
4.
7
31-4
0 35
5 29
2 82
.3
63
17.7
32
3 91
.0
14
3.9
4 1.
1 14
3.
9
41-5
0 22
4 18
9 84
.4
35
15.6
19
5 87
.1
14
6.3
4 1.
8 11
4.
9
51-6
0 73
60
82
.2
13
17.8
68
93
.2
1 1.
4 1
1.4
3 4.
1
61-7
0 35
33
94
.3
2 5.
7 32
91
.4
0 0.
0 0
0.0
3 8.
6
71 &
ABO
VE
11
11
100.
0 0
0.0
10
90.9
0
0.0
0 0.
0 1
9.1
TO
TAL
1036
86
5 83
.5
171
16.5
92
8 89
.6
49
4.7
13
1.3
46
4.4
SIER
RA
UN
DER
18
2 2
100.
0 0
0.0
2 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 7
6 85
.7
1 14
.3
7 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
31-4
0 13
11
84
.6
2 15
.4
13
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
41
-50
10
9 90
.0
1 10
.0
9 90
.0
0 0.
0 1
10.0
0
0.0
51
-60
4 4
100.
0 0
0.0
3 75
.0
0 0.
0 1
25.0
0
0.0
61
-70
2 1
50.0
1
50.0
2
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
38
33
86.8
5
13.2
36
94
.7
0 0.
0 2
5.3
0 0.
0
18
-20
14
12
85.7
2
14.3
11
78
.6
0 0.
0 0
0.0
3 21
.4
21
-30
108
90
83.3
18
16
.7
87
80.6
11
10
.2
1 0.
9 9
8.3
31
-40
119
96
80.7
23
19
.3
96
80.7
14
11
.8
3 2.
5 6
5.0
41
-50
72
65
90.3
7
9.7
62
86.1
5
6.9
1 1.
4 4
5.6
51
-60
24
22
91.7
2
8.3
22
91.7
0
0.0
0 0.
0 2
8.3
61
-70
9 7
77.8
2
22.2
8
88.9
0
0.0
0 0.
0 1
11.1
71 &
ABO
VE
8 7
87.5
1
12.5
8
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
356
300
84.3
56
15
.7
296
83.1
30
8.
4 5
1.4
25
7.0
SOLA
NO
U
ND
ER 1
8 26
18
69
.2
8 30
.8
19
73.1
2
7.7
1 3.
8 4
15.4
18-2
0 12
2 11
6 95
.1
6 4.
9 55
45
.1
42
34.4
17
13
.9
8 6.
6
21-3
0 65
4 59
5 91
.0
59
9.0
286
43.7
22
0 33
.6
116
17.7
32
4.
9
31-4
0 53
1 43
8 82
.5
93
17.5
28
7 54
.0
105
19.8
12
0 22
.6
19
3.6
41
-50
300
253
84.3
47
15
.7
187
62.3
40
13
.3
59
19.7
14
4.
7
51-6
0 12
5 11
5 92
.0
10
8.0
77
61.6
19
15
.2
24
19.2
5
4.0
61
-70
40
34
85.0
6
15.0
22
55
.0
5 12
.5
13
32.5
0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 11
8
72.7
3
27.3
10
90
.9
0 0.
0 1
9.1
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 18
09
1577
87
.2
232
12.8
94
3 52
.1
433
23.9
35
1 19
.4
82
4.5
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
73
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
SON
OM
A
UN
DER
18
37
28
75.7
9
24.3
33
89
.2
3 8.
1 1
2.7
0 0.
0
18-2
0 21
5 19
9 92
.6
16
7.4
107
49.8
10
1 47
.0
3 1.
4 4
1.9
21
-30
1218
10
67
87.6
15
1 12
.4
660
54.2
51
8 42
.5
11
0.9
29
2.4
31
-40
971
783
80.6
18
8 19
.4
689
71.0
22
9 23
.6
10
1.0
43
4.4
41
-50
500
398
79.6
10
2 20
.4
399
79.8
70
14
.0
6 1.
2 25
5.
0
51-6
0 19
3 15
5 80
.3
38
19.7
16
3 84
.5
23
11.9
2
1.0
5 2.
6
61-7
0 79
63
79
.7
16
20.3
69
87
.3
6 7.
6 0
0.0
4 5.
1
71 &
ABO
VE
32
29
90.6
3
9.4
29
90.6
1
3.1
1 3.
1 1
3.1
TO
TAL
3245
27
22
83.9
52
3 16
.1
2149
66
.2
951
29.3
34
1.
0 11
1 3.
4 ST
AN
ISLA
US
UN
DER
18
34
34
100.
0 0
0.0
19
55.9
15
44
.1
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
192
176
91.7
16
8.
3 76
39
.6
112
58.3
3
1.6
1 0.
5
21-3
0 11
16
1024
91
.8
92
8.2
445
39.9
62
0 55
.6
22
2.0
29
2.6
31
-40
869
757
87.1
11
2 12
.9
441
50.7
38
0 43
.7
23
2.6
25
2.9
41
-50
399
349
87.5
50
12
.5
227
56.9
15
0 37
.6
9 2.
3 13
3.
3
51-6
0 14
2 13
1 92
.3
11
7.7
94
66.2
40
28
.2
2 1.
4 6
4.2
61
-70
60
54
90.0
6
10.0
44
73
.3
13
21.7
1
1.7
2 3.
3
71 &
ABO
VE
10
10
100.
0 0
0.0
7 70
.0
2 20
.0
0 0.
0 1
10.0
TOTA
L 28
22
2535
89
.8
287
10.2
13
53
47.9
13
32
47.2
60
2.
1 77
2.
7 SU
TTER
U
ND
ER 1
8 7
6 85
.7
1 14
.3
3 42
.9
2 28
.6
2 28
.6
0 0.
0
18-2
0 60
58
96
.7
2 3.
3 30
50
.0
21
35.0
2
3.3
7 11
.7
21
-30
330
294
89.1
36
10
.9
168
50.9
13
3 40
.3
10
3.0
19
5.8
31
-40
298
253
84.9
45
15
.1
200
67.1
74
24
.8
4 1.
3 20
6.
7
41-5
0 12
9 11
7 90
.7
12
9.3
95
73.6
22
17
.1
3 2.
3 9
7.0
51
-60
53
52
98.1
1
1.9
33
62.3
12
22
.6
0 0.
0 8
15.1
61-7
0 16
15
93
.8
1 6.
3 11
68
.8
4 25
.0
1 6.
3 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 5
5 10
0.0
0 0.
0 5
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
898
800
89.1
98
10
.9
545
60.7
26
8 29
.8
22
2.4
63
7.0
TEH
AM
A
UN
DER
18
3 3
100.
0 0
0.0
2 66
.7
1 33
.3
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
24
22
91.7
2
8.3
16
66.7
8
33.3
0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 15
4 13
2 85
.7
22
14.3
98
63
.6
51
33.1
1
0.6
4 2.
6
31-4
0 16
0 12
5 78
.1
35
21.9
12
7 79
.4
29
18.1
0
0.0
4 2.
5
41-5
0 92
78
84
.8
14
15.2
77
83
.7
12
13.0
0
0.0
3 3.
3
51-6
0 27
21
77
.8
6 22
.2
26
96.3
1
3.7
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
-70
13
11
84.6
2
15.4
12
92
.3
1 7.
7 0
0.0
0 0.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
4 4
100.
0 0
0.0
4 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 47
7 39
6 83
.0
81
17.0
36
2 75
.9
103
21.6
1
0.2
11
2.3
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
74
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) C
OU
NTY
A
GE
TOTA
L M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
TRIN
ITY
UN
DER
18
2 2
100.
0 0
0.0
2 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 7
7 10
0.0
0 0.
0 7
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
21
-30
58
46
79.3
12
20
.7
54
93.1
0
0.0
0 0.
0 4
6.9
31
-40
93
78
83.9
15
16
.1
84
90.3
6
6.5
0 0.
0 3
3.2
41
-50
63
55
87.3
8
12.7
62
98
.4
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 1.
6
51-6
0 24
23
95
.8
1 4.
2 24
10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
61-7
0 7
4 57
.1
3 42
.9
7 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
1 1
100.
0 0
0.0
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 25
5 21
6 84
.7
39
15.3
24
1 94
.5
6 2.
4 0
0.0
8 3.
1 TU
LARE
U
ND
ER 1
8 53
52
98
.1
1 1.
9 14
26
.4
37
69.8
0
0.0
2 3.
8
18-2
0 34
8 33
3 95
.7
15
4.3
54
15.5
28
3 81
.3
3 0.
9 8
2.3
21
-30
1719
16
38
95.3
81
4.
7 22
7 13
.2
1447
84
.2
17
1.0
28
1.6
31
-40
1077
98
5 91
.5
92
8.5
201
18.7
82
6 76
.7
15
1.4
35
3.2
41
-50
421
386
91.7
35
8.
3 10
7 25
.4
287
68.2
8
1.9
19
4.5
51
-60
146
135
92.5
11
7.
5 62
42
.5
77
52.7
1
0.7
6 4.
1
61-7
0 40
38
95
.0
2 5.
0 20
50
.0
17
42.5
2
5.0
1 2.
5
71 &
ABO
VE
16
15
93.8
1
6.3
8 50
.0
6 37
.5
0 0.
0 2
12.5
TOTA
L 38
20
3582
93
.8
238
6.2
693
18.1
29
80
78.0
46
1.
2 10
1 2.
6 TU
OLU
MN
E U
ND
ER 1
8 2
1 50
.0
1 50
.0
2 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 16
15
93
.8
1 6.
3 15
93
.8
1 6.
3 0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 97
81
83
.5
16
16.5
94
96
.9
1 1.
0 0
0.0
2 2.
1
31-4
0 87
64
73
.6
23
26.4
86
98
.9
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 1.
1
41-5
0 74
58
78
.4
16
21.6
72
97
.3
2 2.
7 0
0.0
0 0.
0
51-6
0 33
28
84
.8
5 15
.2
33
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
-70
7 5
71.4
2
28.6
7
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 4
4 10
0.0
0 0.
0 4
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
320
256
80.0
64
20
.0
313
97.8
4
1.2
0 0.
0 3
0.9
VEN
TURA
U
ND
ER 1
8 47
43
91
.5
4 8.
5 27
57
.4
20
42.6
0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 38
5 34
7 90
.1
38
9.9
121
31.4
25
5 66
.2
4 1.
0 5
1.3
21
-30
2183
19
26
88.2
25
7 11
.8
786
36.0
12
98
59.5
61
2.
8 38
1.
7
31-4
0 14
20
1209
85
.1
211
14.9
71
3 50
.2
632
44.5
46
3.
2 29
2.
0
41-5
0 61
4 51
4 83
.7
100
16.3
36
7 59
.8
211
34.4
16
2.
6 20
3.
3
51-6
0 23
7 19
9 84
.0
38
16.0
14
5 61
.2
78
32.9
7
3.0
7 3.
0
61-7
0 74
66
89
.2
8 10
.8
47
63.5
25
33
.8
2 2.
7 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 11
10
90
.9
1 9.
1 7
63.6
4
36.4
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 49
71
4314
86
.8
657
13.2
22
13
44.5
25
23
50.8
13
6 2.
7 99
2.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
75
TABL
E B1
: 19
94 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
-
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
TO
TAL
1202
10
50
87.4
15
2 12
.6
592
49.3
52
9 44
.0
40
3.3
41
3.
4
TO
TAL
542
453
83.6
89
16
.4
348
64.2
15
7 29
.0
25
4.6
12
2.2
YOLO
U
ND
ER 1
8 14
10
71
.4
4 28
.6
9 64
.3
3 21
.4
2 14
.3
0 0.
0
71
& A
BOV
E 8
7 87
.5
1 12
.5
7 87
.5
1 12
.5
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
- 70
29
24
82.8
5
17.2
18
62
.1
9 31
.0
1 3.
4 1
3.4
51
- 60
74
66
89.2
8
10.8
47
63
.5
21
28.4
3
4.1
3 4.
1
18
-20
101
91
90.1
10
9.
9 49
48
.5
46
45.5
4
4.0
2 2.
0
41
- 50
181
156
86.2
25
13
.8
112
61.9
59
32
.6
7 3.
9 3
1.7
31
- 40
345
293
84.9
52
15
.1
183
53.0
14
1 40
.9
5 1.
4 16
4.
6
21
-30
450
403
89.6
47
10
.4
167
37.1
24
9 55
.3
18
4.0
16
3.6
YUBA
U
ND
ER 1
8 4
4 10
0.0
0 0.
0 2
50.0
2
50.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
61
-70
11
11
100.
0 0
0.0
6 54
.5
5 45
.5
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 3
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0 2
66.7
0
0.0
1 33
.3
0 0.
0
51
-60
34
29
85.3
5
14.7
28
82
.4
5 14
.7
0 0.
0 1
2.9
18
-20
51
43
84.3
8
15.7
26
51
.0
25
49.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
41
- 50
76
58
76.3
18
23
.7
60
78.9
11
14
.5
4 5.
3 1
1.3
21
-30
193
165
85.5
28
14
.5
108
56.0
69
35
.8
10
5.2
6 3.
1
31
- 40
170
140
82.4
30
17
.6
116
68.2
40
23
.5
10
5.9
4 2.
4
con
tinue
d
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
)
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
STATEWIDE 162254 100.0 142352 100.0 19902 100.0
ALAMEDA UNDER 18 28 0.5 24 0.5 4 0.5 18-20 169 3.2 161 3.5 8 1.1 21-30 2002 37.7 1741 38.1 261 35.8 31-40 1780 33.6 1514 33.1 266 36.4 41-50 835 15.7 697 15.2 138 18.9 51-60 337 6.4 295 6.4 42 5.8 61-70 129 2.4 120 2.6 9 1.2 71 & ABOVE 25 0.5 23 0.5 2 0.3 TOTAL 5305 100.0 4575 100.0 730 100.0 ALPINE 21-30 0 23.8 10 28.6 0 0.0 31-40 17 40.5 13 37.1 4 57.1 41-50 11 26.2 9 25.7 2 28.6 51-60 2 4.8 1 2.9 1 14.3 61-70 1 2.4 1 2.9 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 2.4 1 2.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 42 100.0 35 100.0 7 100.0 AMADOR 18-20 9 4.1 8 4.4 1 2.6 21-30 49 22.3 42 23.1 7 18.4 31-40 90 40.9 67 36.8 23 60.5 41-50 47 21.4 41 22.5 6 15.8 51-60 15 6.8 14 7.7 1 2.6 61-70 9 4.1 9 4.9 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.5 1 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 220 100.0 182 100.0 38 100.0 BUTTE UNDER 18 5 0.5 5 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 70 6.3 62 6.7 8 4.3 21-30 397 35.7 343 37.1 54 28.9 31-40 319 28.7 247 26.7 72 38.5 41-50 200 18.0 159 17.2 41 21.9 51-60 82 7.4 73 7.9 9 4.8 61-70 30 2.7 27 2.9 3 1.6 71 & ABOVE 8 0.7 8 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 1111 100.0 924 100.0 187 100.0 CALAVERAS 18-20 5 2.4 5 2.8 0 0.0 21-30 47 22.4 40 22.7 7 20.6 31-40 89 42.4 75 42.6 14 41.2 41-50 50 23.8 39 22.2 11 32.4 51-60 10 4.8 10 5.7 0 0.0 61-70 7 3.3 5 2.8 2 5.9 71 & ABOVE 2 1.0 2 1.1 0 0.0 TOTAL 210 100.0 176 100.0 34 100.0 COLUSA UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 20 8.2 18 8.1 2 8.3 21-30 87 35.5 81 36.7 6 25.0 31-40 78 31.8 69 31.2 9 37.5 41-50 38 15.5 33 14.9 5 20.8 51-60 15 6.1 14 6.3 1 4.2 61-70 5 2.0 4 1.8 1 4.2 71 & ABOVE 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 245 100.0 221 100.0 24 100.0
76
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
CONTRA COSTA UNDER 18 16 0.5 15 0.5 1 0.2 18-20 149 4.6 128 4.6 21 4.2 21-30 1155 35.4 987 35.7 168 33.7 31-40 1071 32.8 890 32.2 181 36.3 41-50 544 16.7 458 16.6 86 17.3 51-60 219 6.7 187 6.8 32 6.4 61-70 96 2.9 88 3.2 8 1.6 71 & ABOVE 12 0.4 11 0.4 1 0.2 TOTAL 3262 100.0 2764 100.0 498 100.0 DEL NORTE UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 4 1.8 4 2.2 0 0.0 21-30 61 26.9 47 25.3 14 34.1 31-40 90 39.6 75 40.3 15 36.6 41-50 43 18.9 36 19.4 7 17.1 51-60 24 10.6 19 10.2 5 12.2 61-70 4 1.8 4 2.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 227 100.0 186 100.0 41 100.0 EL DORADO UNDER 18 4 0.4 4 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 37 4.0 32 4.2 5 3.0 21-30 264 28.7 229 30.4 35 21.0 31-40 371 40.3 288 38.2 83 49.7 41-50 173 18.8 136 18.0 37 22.2 51-60 51 5.5 44 5.8 7 4.2 61-70 16 1.7 16 2.1 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 5 0.5 5 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 921 100.0 754 100.0 167 100.0 FRESNO UNDER 18 19 0.4 15 0.4 4 0.8 18-20 283 6.1 258 6.3 25 4.7 21-30 2002 43.0 1800 43.6 202 38.3 31-40 1482 31.9 1300 31.5 182 34.5 41-50 587 12.6 502 12.2 85 16.1 51-60 200 4.3 177 4.3 23 4.4 61-70 60 1.3 55 1.3 5 0.9 71 & ABOVE 18 0.4 17 0.4 1 0.2 TOTAL 4651 100.0 4124 100.0 527 100.0 GLENN UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 8 3.5 8 3.9 0 0.0 21-30 99 43.0 93 45.1 6 25.0 31-40 64 27.8 53 25.7 11 45.8 41-50 34 14.8 31 15.0 3 12.5 51-60 16 7.0 13 6.3 3 12.5 61-70 6 2.6 5 2.4 1 4.2 71 & ABOVE 2 0.9 2 1.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 230 100.0 206 100.0 24 100.0 HUMBOLDT UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 39 5.9 35 6.8 4 2.9 21-30 234 35.7 192 37.1 42 30.4 31-40 204 31.1 148 28.6 56 40.6 41-50 112 17.1 85 16.4 27 19.6 51-60 43 6.6 38 7.3 5 3.6 61-70 18 2.7 14 2.7 4 2.9 71 & ABOVE 5 0.8 5 1.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 656 100.0 518 100.0 138 100.0
77
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
IMPERIAL UNDER 18 2 0.2 2 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 50 4.5 48 4.6 2 3.3 21-30 357 32.1 343 32.6 14 23.3 31-40 360 32.4 333 31.7 27 45.0 41-50 226 20.3 214 20.3 12 20.0 51-60 70 6.3 68 6.5 2 3.3 61-70 38 3.4 35 3.3 3 5.0 71 & ABOVE 9 0.8 9 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 1112 100.0 1052 100.0 60 100.0 INYO UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.4 0 0.0 18-20 19 6.8 17 7.4 2 3.9 21-30 91 32.4 78 33.9 13 25.5 31-40 90 32.0 69 30.0 21 41.2 41-50 41 14.6 30 13.0 11 21.6 51-60 26 9.3 22 9.6 4 7.8 61-70 12 4.3 12 5.2 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.4 1 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 281 100.0 230 100.0 51 100.0 KERN UNDER 18 24 0.5 22 0.5 2 0.3 18-20 272 5.3 254 5.6 18 2.7 21-30 2118 40.9 1847 40.9 271 41.3 31-40 1679 32.5 1437 31.8 242 36.9 41-50 720 13.9 641 14.2 79 12.0 51-60 246 4.8 215 4.8 31 4.7 61-70 95 1.8 87 1.9 8 1.2 71 & ABOVE 20 0.4 15 0.3 5 0.8 TOTAL 5174 100.0 4518 100.0 656 100.0 KINGS UNDER 18 7 0.7 7 0.8 0 0.0 18-20 59 5.9 52 5.7 7 7.1 21-30 404 40.2 367 40.6 37 7.4 31-40 333 33.2 298 32.9 35 35.4 41-50 137 13.6 125 13.8 12 12.1 51-60 50 5.0 43 4.8 7 7.1 61-70 9 0.9 8 0.9 1 1.0 71 & ABOVE 5 0.5 5 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 1004 100.0 905 100.0 99 100.0 LAKE UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 13 2.6 13 3.2 0 0.0 21-30 109 21.9 87 21.6 22 23.2 31-40 183 36.7 141 35.0 42 44.2 41-50 114 22.9 92 22.8 22 23.2 51-60 39 7.8 33 8.2 6 6.3 61-70 29 5.8 27 6.7 2 2.1 71 & ABOVE 10 2.0 9 2.2 1 1.1 TOTAL 498 100.0 403 100.0 95 100.0 LASSEN UNDER 18 2 1.0 2 1.2 0 0.0 18-20 12 5.9 12 7.1 0 0.0 21-30 60 29.3 46 27.1 14 40.0 31-40 65 31.7 55 32.4 10 28.6 41-50 38 18.5 28 16.5 10 28.6 51-60 14 6.8 14 8.2 0 0.0 61-70 12 5.9 11 6.5 1 2.9 71 & ABOVE 2 1.0 2 1.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 205 100.0 170 100.0 35 100.0
78
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
LOS ANGELES UNDER 18 28 0.1 26 0.1 2 0.1 18-20 1685 4.1 1591 4.3 94 2.5 21-30 18380 44.8 16897 45.4 1483 39.1 31-40 12874 31.4 11574 31.1 1300 34.3 41-50 5451 13.3 4813 12.9 638 16.8 51-60 1880 4.6 1677 4.5 203 5.4 61-70 615 1.5 554 1.5 61 1.6 71 & ABOVE 123 0.3 110 0.3 13 0.3 TOTAL 41036 100.0 37242 100.0 3794 100.0 MADERA UNDER 18 8 0.9 8 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 55 6.1 52 6.3 3 3.6 21-30 367 40.7 344 42.0 23 27.7 31-40 275 30.5 240 29.3 35 42.2 41-50 134 14.9 118 14.4 16 19.3 51-60 46 5.1 40 4.9 6 7.2 61-70 15 1.7 15 1.8 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 2 0.2 2 0.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 902 100.0 819 100.0 83 00.0 MARIN UNDER 18 2 0.1 2 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 47 3.3 40 3.5 7 2.6 21-30 499 35.1 416 36.1 83 31.0 31-40 472 33.2 377 32.7 95 35.4 41-50 278 19.6 214 18.6 64 23.9 51-60 87 6.1 77 6.7 10 3.7 61-70 32 2.3 24 2.1 8 3.0 71 & ABOVE 3 0.2 2 0.2 1 0.4 TOTAL 1420 100.0 1152 100.0 268 100.0 MARIPOSA 18-20 7 4.8 7 5.5 0 0.0 21-30 42 28.8 36 28.3 6 31.6 31-40 64 43.8 57 44.9 7 36.8 41-50 24 16.4 18 14.2 6 31.6 51-60 6 4.1 6 4.7 0 0.0 61-70 3 2.1 3 2.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 146 100.0 127 100.0 19 100.0 MENDOCINO UNDER 18 7 0.9 7 1.1 0 0.0 18-20 46 6.2 43 6.9 3 2.4 21-30 258 34.6 228 36.8 30 24.0 31-40 234 31.4 172 27.7 62 49.6 41-50 123 16.5 102 16.5 21 16.8 51-60 51 6.8 44 7.1 7 5.6 61-70 17 2.3 15 2.4 2 1.6 71 & ABOVE 9 1.2 9 1.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 745 100.0 620 100.0 125 100.0 MERCED UNDER 18 11 0.8 9 0.7 2 1.8 18-20 100 7.4 94 7.6 6 5.4 21-30 598 44.5 559 45.4 39 34.8 31-40 390 29.0 348 28.2 42 37.5 41-50 157 11.7 138 11.2 19 17.0 51-60 56 4.2 53 4.3 3 2.7 61-70 25 1.9 24 1.9 1 0.9 71 & ABOVE 7 0.5 7 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 1344 100.0 1232 100.0 112 100.0
79
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
MODOC 18-20 4 5.7 3 5.4 1 7.1 21-30 25 35.7 20 35.7 5 35.7 31-40 17 24.3 13 23.2 4 28.6 41-50 16 22.9 15 26.8 1 7.1 51-60 5 7.1 2 3.6 3 21.4 61-70 1 1.4 1 1.8 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 2 2.9 2 3.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 70 100.0 56 100.0 14 100.0 MONO 18-20 2 1.6 1 0.9 1 6.3 21-30 33 26.8 29 27.1 4 25.0 31-40 57 46.3 50 46.7 7 43.8 41-50 19 15.4 18 16.8 1 6.3 51-60 8 6.5 7 6.5 1 6.3 61-70 3 2.4 1 0.9 2 12.5 71 & ABOVE 1 0.8 1 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 123 100.0 107 100.0 16 100.0 MONTEREY UNDER 18 25 0.7 22 0.7 3 0.8 18-20 224 6.0 212 6.3 12 3.3 21-30 1759 47.4 1639 49.0 120 32.9 31-40 1071 28.9 926 27.7 145 39.7 41-50 430 11.6 366 10.9 64 17.5 51-60 136 3.7 119 3.6 17 4.7 61-70 52 1.4 48 1.4 4 1.1 71 & ABOVE 11 0.3 11 0.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 3708 100.0 3343 100.0 365 100.0 NAPA UNDER 18 5 0.5 5 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 50 5.1 48 5.6 2 1.6 21-30 397 40.7 360 42.3 37 29.6 31-40 281 28.8 234 27.5 47 37.6 41-50 160 16.4 135 15.9 25 20.0 51-60 53 5.4 43 5.1 10 8.0 61-70 21 2.2 18 2.1 3 2.4 71 & ABOVE 9 0.9 8 0.9 1 0.8 TOTAL 976 100.0 851 100.0 125 100.0 NEVADA UNDER 18 2 0.5 2 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 19 4.5 18 5.1 1 1.4 21-30 101 23.9 89 25.4 12 16.7 31-40 168 39.8 135 38.6 33 45.8 41-50 91 21.6 71 20.3 20 27.8 51-60 20 4.7 18 5.1 2 2.8 61-70 16 3.8 14 4.0 2 2.8 71 & ABOVE 5 1.2 3 0.9 2 2.8 TOTAL 422 100.0 350 100.0 72 100.0 ORANGE UNDER 18 26 0.2 23 0.2 3 0.2 18-20 488 4.1 441 4.2 47 2.9 21-30 5437 45.2 4760 45.9 677 41.2 31-40 3700 30.8 3151 30.4 549 33.4 41-50 1585 13.2 1321 12.7 264 16.0 51-60 563 4.7 496 4.8 67 4.1 61-70 183 1.5 153 1.5 30 1.8 71 & ABOVE 42 0.3 34 0.3 8 0.5 TOTAL 12024 100.0 10379 100.0 1645 100.0
80
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
PLACER UNDER 18 5 0.3 4 0.3 1 0.4 18-20 94 6.3 83 6.8 11 4.0 21-30 523 34.9 439 35.9 84 30.5 31-40 523 34.9 414 33.9 109 39.6 41-50 244 16.3 192 15.7 52 18.9 51-60 74 4.9 62 5.1 12 4.4 61-70 27 1.8 21 1.7 6 2.2 71 & ABOVE 8 0.5 8 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 1498 100.0 1223 100.0 275 100.0 PLUMAS UNDER 18 1 0.8 1 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 2 1.7 2 2.0 0 0.0 21-30 25 20.8 19 18.6 6 33.3 31-40 48 40.0 41 40.2 7 38.9 41-50 24 20.0 20 19.6 4 22.2 51-60 13 10.8 13 12.7 0 0.0 61-70 3 2.5 2 2.0 1 5.6 71 & ABOVE 4 3.3 4 3.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 120 100.0 102 100.0 18 100.0 RIVERSIDE UNDER 18 27 0.5 23 0.4 4 0.5 18-20 271 4.6 252 4.9 19 2.5 21-30 2248 38.1 2017 39.2 231 30.4 31-40 1887 32.0 1608 31.3 279 36.7 41-50 867 14.7 717 13.9 150 19.7 51-60 372 6.3 328 6.4 44 5.8 61-70 179 3.0 158 3.1 21 2.8 71 & ABOVE 50 0.8 37 0.7 13 1.7 TOTAL 5901 100.0 5140 100.0 761 100.0 SACRAMENTO UNDER 18 32 0.5 28 0.6 4 0.4 18-20 236 4.0 210 4.3 26 2.8 21-30 2310 39.4 1929 39.2 381 40.6 31-40 1888 32.2 1566 31.8 322 34.3 41-50 907 15.5 756 15.4 151 16.1 51-60 322 5.5 278 5.7 44 4.7 61-70 138 2.4 128 2.6 10 1.1 71 & ABOVE 24 0.4 23 0.5 1 0.1 TOTAL 5857 100.0 4918 100.0 939 100.0 SAN BENITO UNDER 18 4 1.6 4 1.8 0 0.0 18-20 25 9.7 24 10.5 1 3.3 21-30 99 38.4 90 39.5 9 30.0 31-40 85 32.9 73 32.0 12 40.0 41-50 28 10.9 23 10.1 5 16.7 51-60 15 5.8 12 5.3 3 10.0 61-70 1 0.4 1 0.4 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.4 1 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 258 100.0 228 100.0 30 100.0 SAN BERNARDINO UNDER 18 24 0.4 21 0.4 3 0.4 18-20 252 4.0 234 4.2 18 2.6 21-30 2349 37.7 2115 38.2 234 33.7 31-40 2088 33.5 1831 33.1 257 37.0 41-50 978 15.7 841 15.2 137 19.7 51-60 384 6.2 350 6.3 34 4.9 61-70 124 2.0 115 2.1 9 1.3 71 & ABOVE 34 0.5 31 0.6 3 0.4 TOTAL 6233 100.0 5538 100.0 695 100.0
81
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
SAN DIEGO UNDER 18 33 0.2 29 0.2 4 0.3 18-20 601 4.5 536 4.6 65 4.1 21-30 5976 45.0 5354 45.8 622 39.5 31-40 4070 30.7 3530 30.2 540 34.3 41-50 1711 12.9 1484 12.7 227 14.4 51-60 625 4.7 543 4.6 82 5.2 61-70 201 1.5 172 1.5 29 1.8 71 & ABOVE 56 0.4 50 0.4 6 0.4 TOTAL 13273 100.0 11698 100.0 1575 100.0 SAN FRANCISCO UNDER 18 1 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.0 18-20 37 3.3 32 3.2 5 3.6 21-30 479 42.6 420 42.6 59 42.1 31-40 343 30.5 304 30.9 39 27.9 41-50 170 15.1 144 14.6 26 18.6 51-60 73 6.5 62 6.3 11 7.9 61-70 18 1.6 18 1.8 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 4 0.4 4 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 1125 100.0 985 100.0 140 100.0 SAN JOAQUIN UNDER 18 8 0.3 7 0.3 1 0.3 18-20 157 5.0 151 5.5 6 1.5 21-30 1111 35.2 1003 36.3 108 27.5 31-40 1022 32.4 858 31.0 164 41.7 41-50 556 17.6 480 17.4 76 19.3 51-60 201 6.4 181 6.5 20 5.1 61-70 84 2.7 70 2.5 14 3.6 71 & ABOVE 20 0.6 16 0.6 4 1.0 TOTAL 3159 100.0 2766 100.0 393 100.0 SAN LUIS OBISPO UNDER 18 9 0.5 7 0.5 2 0.7 18-20 111 6.7 94 6.8 17 6.2 21-30 645 38.9 548 39.7 97 35.3 31-40 512 30.9 426 30.8 86 31.3 41-50 255 15.4 205 14.8 50 18.2 51-60 83 5.0 70 5.1 13 4.7 61-70 31 1.9 23 1.7 8 2.9 71 & ABOVE 11 0.7 9 0.7 2 0.7 TOTAL 1657 100.0 1382 100.0 275 100.0 SAN MATEO UNDER 18 15 0.4 14 0.4 1 0.2 18-20 151 3.8 129 3.8 22 4.1 21-30 1590 40.3 1417 41.6 173 32.4 31-40 1284 32.6 1098 32.2 186 34.8 41-50 572 14.5 464 13.6 108 20.2 51-60 223 5.7 193 5.7 30 5.6 61-70 85 2.2 75 2.2 10 1.9 71 & ABOVE 21 0.5 17 0.5 4 0.7 TOTAL 3941 100.0 3407 100.0 534 100.0 SANTA BARBARA UNDER 18 15 0.5 13 0.5 2 0.4 18-20 208 6.5 179 6.6 29 5.8 21-30 1443 45.1 1266 46.9 177 35.5 31-40 936 29.2 771 28.5 165 33.1 41-50 396 12.4 307 11.4 89 17.8 51-60 129 4.0 107 4.0 22 4.4 61-70 60 1.9 46 1.7 14 2.8 71 & ABOVE 13 0.4 12 0.4 1 0.2 TOTAL 3200 100.0 2701 100.0 499 100.0
82
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
SANTA CLARA UNDER 18 36 0.4 32 0.4 4 0.4 18-20 358 4.1 330 4.4 28 2.5 21-30 3587 41.3 3198 42.3 389 34.8 31-40 3015 34.8 2572 34.0 443 39.6 41-50 1154 13.3 964 12.8 190 17.0 51-60 385 4.4 338 4.5 47 4.2 61-70 118 1.4 104 1.4 14 1.3 71 & ABOVE 23 0.3 19 0.3 4 0.4 TOTAL 8676 100.0 7557 100.0 1119 100.0 SANTA CRUZ UNDER 18 17 0.7 14 0.7 3 0.9 18-20 122 5.2 111 5.6 11 3.3 21-30 961 41.3 839 42.2 122 36.1 31-40 749 32.2 636 32.0 113 33.4 41-50 350 15.1 289 14.5 61 18.0 51-60 97 4.2 79 4.0 18 5.3 61-70 20 0.9 13 0.7 7 2.1 71 & ABOVE 9 0.4 6 0.3 3 0.9 TOTAL 2325 100.0 1987 100.0 338 100.0 SHASTA UNDER 18 4 0.5 4 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 29 3.8 26 4.0 3 2.4 21-30 225 29.3 194 30.1 31 24.8 31-40 263 34.2 210 32.6 53 42.4 41-50 166 21.6 144 22.4 22 17.6 51-60 56 7.3 44 6.8 12 9.6 61-70 23 3.0 19 3.0 4 3.2 71 & ABOVE 3 0.4 3 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 769 100.0 644 100.0 125 100.0 SIERRA 18-20 1 2.6 1 3.1 0 0.0 21-30 7 18.4 6 18.8 1 16.7 31-40 17 44.7 14 43.8 3 50.0 41-50 8 21.1 7 21.9 1 16.7 51-60 3 7.9 2 6.3 1 16.7 61-70 2 5.3 2 6.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 38 100.0 32 100.0 6 100.0 SISKIYOU UNDER 18 3 1.0 2 0.8 1 2.0 18-20 15 4.8 12 4.6 3 5.9 21-30 92 29.5 82 31.4 10 19.6 31-40 108 34.6 92 35.2 16 31.4 41-50 57 18.3 44 16.9 13 25.5 51-60 19 6.1 17 6.5 2 3.9 61-70 14 4.5 9 3.4 5 9.8 71 & ABOVE 4 1.3 3 1.1 1 2.0 TOTAL 312 100.0 261 100.0 51 100.0 SOLANO UNDER 18 5 0.3 5 0.4 0 0.0 18-20 90 6.1 79 6.2 11 5.5 21-30 518 35.3 461 36.4 57 28.5 31-40 483 32.9 405 32.0 78 39.0 41-50 234 16.0 200 15.8 34 17.0 51-60 94 6.4 79 6.2 15 7.5 61-70 38 2.6 33 2.6 5 2.5 71 & ABOVE 5 0.3 5 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 1467 100.0 1267 100.0 200 100.0
83
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
SONOMA UNDER 18 17 0.6 16 0.7 1 0.2 18-20 138 4.8 124 5.1 14 3.1 21-30 1070 36.8 931 38.1 139 30.3 31-40 950 32.7 780 31.9 170 37.0 41-50 493 17.0 402 16.4 91 19.8 51-60 153 5.3 125 5.1 28 6.1 61-70 66 2.3 54 2.2 12 2.6 71 & ABOVE 17 0.6 13 0.5 4 0.9 TOTAL 2904 100.0 2445 100.0 459 100.0 STANISLAUS UNDER 18 19 0.8 19 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 119 5.2 115 5.8 4 1.5 21-30 891 39.3 785 39.3 106 39.1 31-40 737 32.5 633 31.7 104 38.4 41-50 337 14.9 297 14.9 40 14.8 51-60 113 5.0 96 4.8 17 6.3 61-70 40 1.8 40 2.0 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 11 0.5 11 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 2267 100.0 1996 100.0 271 100.0 SUTTER UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 45 9.1 41 9.6 4 5.7 21-30 184 37.2 167 39.3 17 24.3 31-40 145 29.3 114 26.8 31 44.3 41-50 76 15.4 66 15.5 10 14.3 51-60 23 4.6 17 4.0 6 8.6 61-70 16 3.2 14 3.3 2 2.9 71 & ABOVE 5 1.0 5 1.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 495 100.0 425 100.0 70 100.0 TEHAMA UNDER 18 2 0.7 2 0.8 0 0.0 18-20 16 5.2 13 5.2 3 5.5 21-30 116 37.8 99 39.3 17 30.9 31-40 100 32.6 79 31.3 21 38.2 41-50 43 14.0 34 13.5 9 16.4 51-60 21 6.8 17 6.7 4 7.3 61-70 7 2.3 6 2.4 1 1.8 71 & ABOVE 2 0.7 2 0.8 0 0.0 TOTAL 307 100.0 252 100.0 55 100.0 TRINITY 18-20 2 2.4 2 2.7 0 0.0 21-30 20 24.4 18 24.0 2 28.6 31-40 24 29.3 21 28.0 3 42.9 41-50 21 25.6 19 25.3 2 28.6 51-60 6 7.3 6 8.0 0 0.0 61-70 6 7.3 6 8.0 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 3 3.7 3 4.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 82 100.0 75 100.0 7 100.0 TULARE UNDER 18 20 0.8 19 0.8 1 0.4 18-20 187 7.1 175 7.4 12 4.5 21-30 1103 42.1 1019 43.3 84 31.8 31-40 821 31.3 710 30.1 111 42.0 41-50 349 13.3 308 13.1 41 15.5 51-60 100 3.8 91 3.9 9 3.4 61-70 34 1.3 28 1.2 6 2.3 71 & ABOVE 6 0.2 6 0.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 2620 100.0 2356 100.0 264 100.0 TUOLUMNE UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0
84
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
18-20 11 4.2 10 4.7 1 2.0 21-30 68 25.8 60 27.9 8 16.3 31-40 86 32.6 68 31.6 18 36.7 41-50 63 23.9 49 22.8 14 28.6 51-60 21 8.0 15 7.0 6 12.2 61-70 10 3.8 8 3.7 2 4.1 71 & ABOVE 4 1.5 4 1.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 264 100.0 215 100.0 49 100.0 VENTURA UNDER 18 15 0.4 15 0.4 0 0.0 18-20 242 5.7 216 5.8 26 4.6 21-30 1885 44.1 1692 45.6 193 34.0 31-40 1282 30.0 1083 29.2 199 35.1 41-50 593 13.9 476 12.8 117 20.6 51-60 177 4.1 155 4.2 22 3.9 61-70 69 1.6 60 1.6 9 1.6 71 & ABOVE 11 0.3 10 0.3 1 0.2 TOTAL 4274 100.0 3707 100.0 567 100.0 YOLO UNDER 18 3 0.7 3 0.8 0 0.0 18-20 33 7.4 25 6.5 8 12.5 21-30 153 34.3 137 35.9 16 25.0 31-40 132 29.6 113 29.6 19 29.7 41-50 85 19.1 68 17.8 17 26.6 51-60 29 6.5 26 6.8 3 4.7 61-70 7 1.6 6 1.6 1 1.6 71 & ABOVE 4 0.9 4 1.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 446 100.0 382 100.0 64 100.0 YUBA UNDER 18 4 0.8 4 0.9 0 0.0 18-20 35 6.8 34 7.7 1 .4 21-30 170 32.9 152 34.4 18 24.3 31-40 163 31.6 132 29.9 31 41.9 41-50 90 17.4 71 16.1 19 25.7 51-60 36 7.0 32 7.2 4 5.4 61-70 14 2.7 13 2.9 1 1.4 71 & ABOVE 4 0.8 4 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 516 100.0 442 100.0 74 100.0
85
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
86
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT
CO
UN
TY
DU
I C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
C
OU
RT
M
ISD
FELO
NY
ALC
OH
OL
N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
O
THER
DU
I DIS
M*/
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
R
ATE
DU
I D
UI
REC
KLE
SS
REC
KLE
SS
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
S U
NC
ON
ST*
* V
IOLA
TIO
N T
O
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
DM
V U
PDA
TE
STA
TEW
IDE
70.0
%
16
0006
22
48
1658
6 39
31
5552
13
4/30
0 2.
7 3.
0 A
LAM
EDA
67
.8%
SU
P O
AK
LAN
D
99
19
0 1
2 0/
0 4.
6 12
.2
JUV
ALA
MED
A
39
0 0
1 2
1/0
2.9
3.1
ALA
MED
A
185
0 15
6
3 0/
0 1.
4 2.
0
BE
RKEL
EY
198
1 24
16
17
1/
1 2.
3 2.
3
FR
EMO
NT
1148
2
73
13
46
0/1
2.9
2.4
PLEA
SAN
TON
65
6 4
115
44
46
0/3
2.9
2.3
OA
KLA
ND
11
86
20
48
37
19
0/2
3.0
1.8
HA
YWA
RD
1738
10
28
0 15
13
6 0/
2 4.
1 2.
5
TO
TAL
5249
56
55
5 13
3 27
1 2/
9 ---
---
A
LPIN
E 77
.8%
SU
P A
LPIN
E 2
0 0
0 0
0/0
5.8
10.8
M
ARK
LEEV
ILLE
40
0
5 0
0 0/
0 2.
8 1.
9
TO
TAL
42
0 5
0 0
0/0
---
---
AM
AD
OR
72.1
%
SUP
AM
AD
OR
4 0
0 0
0 0/
0 7.
9 4.
2
JA
CK
SON
21
2 4
1 1
2 1/
2 2.
8 4.
4
TO
TAL
216
4 1
1 2
1/2
---
---
BUTT
E 70
.3%
SU
P BU
TTE
35
7 0
0 0
0/1
4.6
4.0
JUV
BU
TTE
7 0
0 0
0 0/
0 7.
7 0.
7
C
HIC
O
488
1 81
13
12
1/
6 2.
7 4.
3
G
RID
LEY
52
0 8
1 0
0/0
2.9
3.4
ORO
VIL
LE
366
5 44
18
3
0/0
2.7
3.5
PARA
DIS
E 14
9 1
37
1 2
1/4
2.7
5.5
TOTA
L 10
97
14
170
33
17
2/11
---
---
C
ALA
VER
AS
62.9
%
SUP
CA
LAV
ERA
S 5
2 0
0 1
0/0
4.8
4.9
JV C
ALA
VER
AS
0 1
0 2
0 0/
0 2.
0 0.
4
SA
N A
ND
REA
S 20
0 2
32
12
5 0/
2 2.
2 1.
3
TO
TAL
205
5 32
14
6
0/2
---
---
CO
LUSA
74
.9%
SU
P C
OLU
SA
6 1
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
2 5.
0
JU
V C
OLU
SA
2 0
1 0
0 0/
0 2.
1 10
.5
CO
LUSA
23
6 0
17
11
4 1/
0 2.
4 4.
5
TO
TAL
244
1 18
11
4
1/0
---
---
*The
se m
ay in
clud
e ab
stra
ct d
elet
ions
due
to fa
ilure
to a
ppea
r (FT
A) a
t the
cou
rt h
eari
ng.
**Th
ese
1993
arr
este
es s
how
ed p
rior
DU
Is d
ecla
red
unco
nstit
utio
nal o
n th
eir r
ecor
ds.
The
cour
ts re
port
ed h
ere
are
thos
e of
the
curr
ent D
UI c
onvi
ctio
n an
d no
t nec
essa
rily
thos
e in
whi
ch a
ri
or c
onvi
ctio
n w
as d
ecla
red
unco
nstit
utio
nal.
p
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
87
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
UR
T
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
A
LCO
HO
L
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L
OTH
ER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I R
ECK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
C
ON
TRA
CO
STA
72
.6%
SU
P C
NTR
A C
OST
A
138
22
0 0
2 0/
1 6.
3 2.
1
JU
V C
NTR
A C
OST
A
23
2 2
0 0
0/0
2.5
3.3
CO
NC
ORD
81
2 2
109
6 14
0/
9 3.
3 2.
2
RI
CH
MO
ND
77
4 8
83
8 18
1/
0 4.
0 2.
8
PI
TTSB
URG
61
1 5
84
3 10
0/
3 4.
1 2.
8
W
ALN
UT
CRE
EK
862
3 15
8 23
8
0/4
2.7
2.1
TOTA
L 32
20
42
436
40
52
1/17
---
---
D
EL N
ORT
E 56
.6%
SU
P D
EL N
ORT
E 15
4
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
9 2.
4
C
RESC
ENT
CIT
Y 20
8 0
58
24
13
1/0
2.8
7.0
TOTA
L 22
3 4
58
24
13
1/0
---
---
EL D
ORA
DO
82
.0%
SU
P EL
DO
RAD
O
13
3 0
0 0
0/2
6.0
3.1
JUV
EL
DO
RAD
O
4 4
0 0
0 0/
0 5.
2 2.
5
C
AM
ERO
N P
AR
K
311
13
20
2 3
2/1
2.3
5.0
SO L
AK
E TA
HO
E 25
6 8
19
3 3
2/0
2.5
6.0
PLA
CER
VIL
LE
295
14
15
3 1
1/0
2.2
5.3
TOTA
L 87
9 42
54
8
8 5/
3 ---
---
FR
ESN
O
57.0
%
SUP
FRES
NO
26
7 93
1
0 10
0/
0 4.
2 3.
2
JU
V F
RESN
O
28
2 2
2 0
0/0
5.3
2.4
FRES
NO
25
76
8 27
2 60
22
1/
4 3.
6 3.
0
C
LOV
IS
300
1 52
14
5
0/0
3.9
5.5
CO
ALI
NG
A
258
2 26
3
1 0/
0 2.
8 4.
2
FI
REBA
UG
H
197
1 55
2
4 0/
0 2.
2 6.
0
FO
WLE
R 14
1 1
27
0 1
0/0
3.6
8.9
KER
MA
N
138
1 7
4 0
0/0
4.2
5.7
KIN
GSB
URG
66
0
9 2
2 0/
0 3.
9 5.
7
RE
EDLE
Y M
UN
I 19
3 1
10
1 4
0/0
3.4
4.6
RIV
ERD
ALE
10
0
0 0
1 0/
0 3.
6 12
.4
SAN
GER
11
0 0
6 2
3 0/
0 3.
9 3.
9
SE
LMA
MU
NI
252
1 21
3
6 0/
0 4.
8 3.
7
U
S C
T FR
ESN
O
4 0
1 0
0 0/
0 1.
1 3.
9
TO
TAL
4540
11
1 48
9 93
59
1/
4 ---
---
G
LEN
N
74.2
%
SUP
GLE
NN
7
4 0
0 0
0/1
2.7
4.3
JUV
GLE
NN
2
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.8
0.7
ORL
AN
D
143
0 18
0
1 0/
0 2.
3 5.
7
W
ILLO
WS
74
0 9
1 1
2/0
2.4
4.2
TOTA
L 22
6 4
27
1 2
2/1
---
---
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
88
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
URT
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
ALC
OH
OL
N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
O
THER
DU
I DIS
M*/
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
H
UM
BOLD
T 52
.1%
SU
P H
UM
BOLD
T 8
2 0
0 2
0/0
6.3
9.0
JUV
HU
MBO
LDT
0 1
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
5 3.
9
EU
REK
A
274
6 88
8
15
0/0
2.4
4.5
ARC
ATA
15
6 0
58
6 10
0/
1 3.
0 7.
3
FO
RTU
NA
14
5 1
58
1 10
0/
0 3.
2 1.
3
G
ARB
ERV
ILLE
46
0
20
4 8
0/0
3.8
1.8
HO
OPA
17
0
2 3
3 0/
0 3.
1 4.
4
TO
TAL
646
10
226
22
48
0/1
---
---
IMPE
RIA
L 51
.7%
SU
P IM
PERI
AL
10
1 0
0 1
0/0
4.2
1.9
JUV
IMPE
RIA
L 1
0 0
0 1
1/0
10.8
10
.1
BRA
WLE
Y 22
8 0
12
36
9 0/
0 3.
6 0.
8
C
ALE
XIC
O
523
1 81
45
9
0/0
3.0
1.1
EL C
ENTR
O
339
7 11
3 19
3
0/0
3.5
2.1
WIN
TERH
AV
EN
2 0
0 0
1 0/
0 1.
5 0.
8
TO
TAL
1103
9
206
100
24
1/0
---
---
INYO
73
.4%
SU
P IN
YO
11
2 0
0 1
0/0
2.9
4.0
BISH
OP
245
1 46
4
7 8/
0 2.
9 5.
4
IN
DEP
END
ENC
E 19
2
7 1
0 2/
0 2.
9 6.
5
U
SMA
G B
ISH
OP
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
0 0.
6
TO
TAL
276
5 53
5
8 10
/0
---
---
KER
N
80.3
%
SUP
KER
N
287
37
1 0
1 0/
1 2.
3 2.
4
JU
V K
ERN
37
1
1 0
4 0/
0 1.
8 2.
0
A
RVIN
-LA
MO
NT
366
3 21
7
5 0/
0 2.
4 3.
9
BA
KER
SFIE
LD
2502
15
19
9 17
28
0/
7 2.
6 5.
2
D
ELA
NO
47
8 0
43
2 7
4/0
2.5
3.4
LAK
E IS
ABE
LLA
10
1 1
3 4
0 0/
0 2.
2 4.
2
TA
FT
223
0 21
14
5
2/0
1.5
5.1
SHA
FTER
35
8 2
23
7 14
0/
2 2.
2 5.
7
W
ASC
O M
UN
I 1
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.9
0.9
MO
JAV
E 42
7 5
72
24
18
2/2
2.3
4.5
RID
GEC
REST
32
8 2
34
3 8
0/0
2.1
4.0
TOTA
L 51
08
66
418
78
90
8/12
---
---
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
89
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
URT
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
ALC
OH
OL
N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
O
THER
DU
I DIS
M*/
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
K
ING
S 68
.0%
SU
P K
ING
S 40
3
0 0
1 0/
0 2.
6 1.
1
JU
V K
ING
S 10
0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
5 1.
5
H
AN
FORD
41
5 6
42
3 4
1/1
1.6
3.1
AV
ENA
L 15
0 2
4 5
4 2/
0 1.
8 1.
1
C
ORC
ORA
N
132
3 5
2 0
0/0
2.3
2.7
LEM
OO
RE
243
0 14
6
4 0/
0 1.
6 1.
3
TO
TAL
990
14
65
16
13
3/1
---
---
LAK
E 72
.2%
SU
P LA
KE
8 1
0 0
0 0/
0 7.
6 10
.8
JUV
LA
KE
2 0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
7 1.
2
C
LEA
RLA
KE
208
0 15
1
6 0/
0 4.
2 5.
5
LA
KEP
ORT
27
9 0
28
4 6
0/0
2.4
5.0
TOTA
L 49
7 1
43
5 12
0/
0 ---
---
LA
SSEN
81
.7%
SU
P LA
SSEN
2
2 0
0 0
0/0
5.2
2.2
JUV
LA
SSEN
5
0 0
0 0
0/0
4.9
-6.5
SU
SAN
VIL
LE
189
7 5
0 2
0/1
3.2
1.9
TOTA
L 19
6 9
5 0
2 0/
1 ---
---
LO
S A
NG
ELES
69
.9%
SU
P LO
S A
NG
ELES
21
0 56
1
0 6
0/0
3.4
3.1
SUP
POM
ON
A
232
44
0 0
3 0/
1 2.
8 1.
0
SU
P LA
NC
AST
ER
21
23
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
7 2.
0
SU
P V
AN
NU
YS
61
19
1 1
2 0/
0 4.
0 1.
0
SU
P PA
SAD
ENA
10
9 13
0
0 3
0/0
4.1
1.9
SUP
VA
N N
UYS
48
19
0
0 0
0/0
3.9
1.6
SUP
LON
G B
EAC
H
22
7 0
0 0
0/0
3.6
2.2
SUP
CO
MPT
ON
44
20
0
0 1
0/0
3.4
2.4
SUP
NO
RWA
LK
91
14
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
1 4.
5
SU
P TO
RRA
NC
E 7
0 0
0 0
0/0
2.2
2.2
SUP
S. M
ON
ICA
25
9
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
3 1.
4
JU
V L
A
1 0
0 0
2 0/
0 0.
1 1.
7
LA
JV C
ENTR
L 23
1
2 1
0 0/
0 6.
0 2.
4
A
LHA
MBR
A
1215
3
58
19
24
0/8
2.2
2.8
LAN
CA
STER
61
8 6
58
18
20
0/0
2.5
1.6
BEV
ERLY
HIL
LS
264
2 32
18
9
0/1
2.9
2.1
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
90
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
UR
T
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
A
LCO
HO
L
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L
OTH
ER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I R
ECK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
LO
S A
NG
ELES
BURB
AN
K
474
0 84
38
17
0/
2 1.
6 2.
2
con
tinue
d
WES
T C
OV
INA
32
57
24
178
20
96
0/3
2.9
1.1
CO
MPT
ON
12
75
3 18
6 68
60
0/
2 3.
6 2.
4
C
ULV
ER C
ITY
266
5 39
16
9
0/0
3.2
4.1
DO
WN
EY
794
1 21
10
27
0/
0 2.
9 3.
4
EA
ST L
A
1793
4
101
58
63
0/3
2.3
1.5
EL M
ON
TE
1537
10
57
13
53
2/
1 2.
1 2.
8
G
LEN
DA
LE
825
9 11
5 35
35
0/
1 2.
0 4.
6
IN
GLE
WO
OD
12
70
12
162
48
49
0/3
3.2
2.3
LON
G B
EAC
H
1612
22
26
9 10
5 54
0/
9 1.
9 3.
8
LA
MET
RO
8781
12
83
2 12
4 11
14
3/7
1.2
2.6
BELL
FLO
WER
56
4 4
15
8 21
0/
1 2.
4 2.
5
V
ALE
NC
IA
967
5 10
1 71
16
0/
0 2.
2 2.
9
PA
SAD
ENA
88
3 3
129
55
47
1/2
4.2
3.1
MA
LIBU
19
5 1
53
8 9
0/0
3.7
2.0
CA
LABA
SAS
90
1 43
7
7 0/
0 3.
2 2.
1
PO
MO
NA
12
59
14
51
7 59
2/
0 2.
4 2.
6
H
UN
TNG
TON
PK
10
44
11
18
12
37
0/2
2.2
2.3
MO
NRO
VIA
52
7 5
46
9 22
0/
0 2.
7 2.
7
SA
NTA
MO
NIC
A
349
2 10
9 10
9
0/0
2.4
2.4
TORR
AN
CE
1551
14
26
9 74
12
1 0/
20
2.6
2.4
SOU
TH G
ATE
68
2 3
26
5 17
0/
2 3.
3 3.
2
W
HIT
TIER
98
6 14
24
2
21
0/0
3.1
4.1
HO
LLYW
OO
D
140
0 9
8 9
0/0
2.1
2.4
SAN
FER
NA
ND
O
2227
40
31
7 45
13
1 0/
0 1.
6 3.
2
SA
N P
EDRO
65
5 1
76
22
54
0/2
2.3
4.0
VA
N N
UY
S 28
59
45
517
42
420
1/3
1.4
2.9
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
660
0 93
47
87
0/
0 2.
2 2.
3
A
VA
LON
7
0 0
0 0
0/0
2.7
4.6
USM
AG
BA
KSF
LD
15
0 2
0 0
0/0
5.0
2.4
TOTA
L 40
535
501
4094
10
24
2734
9/
72
---
---
MA
DER
A
62.1
%
SUP
MA
DER
A
41
14
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
9 2.
1
JU
V M
AD
ERA
12
1
0 0
1 0/
0 1.
3 2.
0
C
HO
WC
HIL
LA
178
3 20
3
5 2/
0 4.
6 3.
5
BO
RDEN
20
2 3
38
6 1
0/0
3.0
4.9
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
91
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
UR
T
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
A
LCO
HO
L
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L
OTH
ER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I R
ECK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
M
AD
ERA
MA
DER
A
344
3 32
19
6
0/1
3.3
3.7
c
ontin
ued
BA
SS L
AK
E 99
2
26
1 1
0/0
3.9
6.3
TOTA
L 87
6 26
11
6 29
14
2/
1 ---
---
M
ARI
N
73.2
%
SUP
SAN
RA
FAEL
12
5
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
7 2.
0
JU
V S
AN
RA
FAEL
5
0 0
0 0
0/0
3.3
2.3
SAN
RA
FAEL
13
90
8 0
1 45
0/
5 2.
7 4.
2
TO
TAL
1407
13
0
1 45
0/
5 ---
---
M
ARI
POSA
10
0.0%
SU
P M
ARI
POSA
4
3 0
0 0
0/0
4.2
2.3
2244
5 0
0 1
0 0
0/0
---
---
MA
RIPO
SA
73
0 6
1 4
0/0
3.3
2.3
USM
AG
YO
SEM
IT
65
1 26
0
0 0/
0 1.
9 2.
4
TO
TAL
142
4 33
1
4 0/
0 ---
---
M
END
OC
INO
72
.1%
SU
P U
KIA
H
23
1 2
0 0
0/0
5.2
2.9
JUV
UK
IAH
11
0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
2 1.
6
W
ILLI
TS
133
2 15
1
4 2/
0 3.
1 2.
0
U
KIA
H
369
5 19
9
11
0/0
2.8
3.7
BOO
NV
ILLE
10
0
1 1
0 0/
0 2.
4 3.
3
PT
. ARE
NA
9
0 2
0 0
0/0
4.5
7.7
LITT
LE L
AK
E 3
0 1
0 0
0/0
2.8
0.3
LEG
GET
T 31
0
5 4
3 0/
0 3.
7 3.
0
C
OV
ELO
6
0 0
0 0
0/0
3.7
2.1
FORT
BRA
GG
13
5 2
24
1 2
0/0
2.6
2.0
UK
IAH
5
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.6
0.6
TOTA
L 73
5 10
69
16
20
2/
0 ---
---
M
ERC
ED
55.3
%
SUP
MER
CED
44
4
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
9 2.
4
JU
V M
ERC
ED
26
1 2
0 3
0/0
5.2
5.2
MER
CED
96
4 13
14
9 40
20
0/
0 4.
8 4.
5
LO
S BA
NO
S 29
0 2
94
22
17
1/3
2.2
4.4
TOTA
L 13
24
20
245
62
40
1/3
---
---
MO
DO
C
58.3
%
SUP
MO
DO
C
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 6.
0 4.
6
A
LTU
RAS
69
0 17
1
1 2/
0 3.
6 3.
1
TO
TAL
70
0 17
1
1 2/
0 ---
---
M
ON
O
70.3
%
BRID
GEP
ORT
20
0
1 5
1 0/
0 1.
6 3.
6
M
AM
MO
TH L
AK
E 10
1 2
18
10
1 0/
0 2.
1 1.
8
TO
TAL
121
2 19
15
2
0/0
---
---
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
92
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
UR
T
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
A
LCO
HO
L
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L
OTH
ER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I R
ECK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
M
ON
TERE
Y 74
.6%
SU
P M
ON
TERE
Y 10
5 21
0
0 0
0/0
1.9
2.0
JUV
MO
NTE
REY
17
3 2
1 1
0/0
3.8
3.3
MO
NTE
REY
988
9 16
7 48
17
0/
1 1.
6 6.
6
SA
LIN
AS
1692
13
16
7 28
42
0/
0 1.
3 2.
1
K
ING
CIT
Y 84
1 9
69
4 12
1/
0 1.
5 8.
8
U
SMA
G M
ON
TERY
10
0
1 0
0 0/
0 4.
4 1.
8
TO
TAL
3653
55
40
6 81
72
1/
1 ---
---
N
APA
81
.1%
SU
P N
APA
41
17
0
0 1
0/0
2.2
1.8
NA
PA
911
7 44
8
6 7/
0 2.
5 3.
0
TO
TAL
952
24
44
8 7
7/0
---
---
NEV
AD
A
82.6
%
SUP
NEV
AD
A
13
7 0
0 0
0/0
3.9
2.8
NEV
AD
A C
ITY
265
2 29
0
3 0/
2 2.
1 4.
8
TR
UC
KEE
MU
NI
134
1 14
3
3 0/
1 2.
3 4.
5
TO
TAL
412
10
43
3 6
0/3
---
---
ORA
NG
E 77
.7%
SU
P SA
NTA
AN
A
159
38
0 0
6 0/
1 5.
3 -0
.1
JUV
ORA
NG
E 47
0
0 1
0 0/
0 4.
5 2.
4
FU
LLER
TON
31
98
24
102
11
72
0/3
2.2
0.5
WES
TMIN
STER
23
87
13
100
22
46
0/1
2.9
1.5
LAG
UN
A H
ILLS
17
30
7 22
2 14
58
0/
0 3.
4 2.
0
N
EWPO
RT B
EAC
H
2030
7
157
27
56
1/8
2.3
1.5
SAN
TA A
NA
M
UN
I 23
33
15
93
6 57
0/
7 3.
6 -1
.4
USM
AG
S A
NA
5
0 0
0 0
0/0
2.9
3.1
S A
NA
PRO
VST
29
0
0 0
0 0/
0 0.
6 0.
7
TU
STIN
PRO
VO
ST
2 0
0 0
0 0/
0 0.
3 0.
5
TO
TAL
1192
0 10
4 67
4 81
29
5 1/
20
---
---
PLA
CER
79
.5%
SU
P PL
AC
ER
18
6 0
0 0
0/0
5.6
4.3
JUV
PLA
CER
10
0
0 1
0 0/
0 1.
6 3.
1
A
UBU
RN
521
5 24
3
5 0/
1 3.
1 3.
0
C
OLF
AX
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
9 0.
6
RO
SEV
ILLE
66
2 3
17
17
10
4/1
3.2
3.5
FORE
ST H
ILL
3 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
7 0.
7
TA
HO
E C
ITY
263
6 6
5 1
2/0
2.5
2.3
TOTA
L 14
78
20
47
26
22
6/2
---
---
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
93
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
UR
T
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
A
LCO
HO
L
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L
OTH
ER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I R
ECK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
PL
UM
AS
55.3
%
SUP
PLU
MA
S 3
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.9
9.5
QU
INC
Y 11
7 0
18
0 0
0/0
2.0
2.1
TOTA
L 12
0 0
18
0 0
0/0
---
---
RIV
ERSI
DE
64.8
%
SUP
RIV
ERSI
DE
99
26
0 3
0 0/
0 5.
3 3.
5
SU
P IN
DIO
52
7 13
41
25
11
1/
0 4.
6 4.
3
JU
V R
IVER
SID
E 1
0 0
0 0
0/0
3.0
2.7
JUV
RIV
ERSI
DE
21
3 1
0 0
0/0
4.1
2.5
JUV
IND
IO
7 0
0 0
0 0/
0 5.
6 2.
2
C
ORO
NA
54
0 5
52
48
15
0/0
3.1
1.6
HEM
ET
486
6 64
4
15
2/0
3.5
2.3
BAN
NIN
G
320
2 23
4
13
1/1
2.4
2.7
IND
IO
1012
4
71
51
23
0/1
3.3
6.9
MO
REN
O V
ALL
EY
1639
35
8
179
37
2/0
3.5
1.9
PALM
SPR
ING
S 16
5 2
8 1
2 0/
2 3.
3 5.
7
BL
YTH
E 20
2 3
16
2 7
0/0
1.7
6.9
PERR
IS
761
10
55
15
21
2/1
3.9
2.0
ELSI
NO
RE
8 0
0 0
1 0/
0 4.
0 2.
9
TC
MA
RCH
AFB
4
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.2
1.5
TOTA
L 57
92
109
339
332
145
8/5
---
---
SAC
RAM
ENTO
62
.8%
SU
P SA
CTO
28
4 94
0
0 6
0/1
3.1
2.0
JUV
SA
CTO
TRF
48
3
4 0
1 1/
0 2.
5 6.
2
SA
CRA
MEN
TO
5113
66
12
89
315
115
17/7
3.
0 1.
5
EL
K G
ROV
E 11
7 0
19
7 1
0/0
2.1
5.4
GA
LT
63
0 7
3 2
0/0
3.4
6.7
WA
LNU
T G
ROV
E 53
0
9 3
2 0/
0 2.
1 5.
5
U
SMA
G S
AC
TO
3 0
0 0
0 0/
0 8.
1 6.
5
U
S C
T SA
CTO
13
0
1 0
0 0/
0 7.
9 4.
1
TO
TAL
5694
16
3 13
29
328
127
18/8
---
---
SA
N B
ENIT
O
75.4
%
JUV
SA
N B
ENIT
O
7 0
0 0
0 0/
0 5.
1 4.
8
H
OLL
ISTE
R 25
0 1
35
7 3
0/13
2.
2 7.
4
TO
TAL
257
1 35
7
4 0/
13
---
---
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
94
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
UR
T
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
A
LCO
HO
L
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L
OTH
ER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I R
ECK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
SA
N
56.2
%
SUP
SAN
BER
ND
O
37
15
0 0
2 1/
1 6.
4 3.
1
BER
NA
RDIN
O
SU
P R
CU
CA
MN
GA
45
6
0 0
3 0/
0 5.
9 2.
9
SU
P V
ICTO
RVIL
LE
11
4 0
0 0
0/0
7.2
3.2
SUP
BARS
TOW
24
6
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
9 3.
1
SU
P JO
SHU
A T
REE
5 1
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
1 4.
2
JU
V T
F S
BERN
DO
27
0
0 0
0 1/
0 2.
4 4.
7
JU
V S
AN
BER
ND
O
5 1
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
5 2.
9
JU
V R
CU
CM
NG
A
4 0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
5 -1
.0
CH
INO
36
9 6
7 12
16
2/
0 3.
5 1.
7
BA
RSTO
W
311
3 10
1 22
22
0/
1 3.
7 3.
9
RE
DLA
ND
S 18
5 1
1 17
16
1/
0 2.
7 2.
7
S
BERN
-CEN
TRA
L 12
31
16
68
33
44
0/0
4.5
1.8
FON
TAN
A
908
14
211
46
28
0/2
4.8
1.5
VIC
TORV
ILLE
68
7 3
134
30
43
1/2
3.6
4.4
RNC
HO
C
UC
MN
GA
16
84
7 77
83
64
1/
0 3.
0 1.
8
BIG
BEA
R LA
KE
118
2 49
17
4
0/0
4.2
2.4
TWIN
PEA
KS
141
4 31
7
8 0/
0 3.
7 1.
2
N
EED
LES
150
0 49
10
12
0/
0 3.
6 5.
2
TR
ON
A
9 0
0 2
1 0/
0 5.
1 6.
8
29
PA
LMS
192
1 10
0 15
12
2/
2 3.
4 5.
6
TO
TAL
6143
90
82
8 29
4 27
5 9/
8 ---
---
SA
N D
IEG
O
77.8
%
SUP
SAN
DIE
GO
63
11
1
0 0
0/0
1.5
3.3
SUP
VIS
TA
80
20
0 0
1 0/
0 3.
1 3.
2
SU
P C
HU
LA V
ISTA
56
12
0
0 0
0/0
2.0
3.1
SUP
EL C
AJO
N
2 0
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
2 16
.6
JUV
SA
N D
IEG
O
51
3 1
0 4
0/0
2.9
4.7
EL C
AJO
N
2460
4
280
102
32
0/0
2.4
5.3
VIS
TA
3935
25
19
5 31
17
1/
5 2.
3 3.
0
SA
N M
ARC
OS
4 0
0 0
5 0/
0 4.
8 1.
7
SA
N D
IEG
O M
UN
I 47
09
2 27
6 12
8 15
8 0/
5 3.
1 2.
9
C
HU
LA V
ISTA
17
77
9 40
4
13
0/0
2.2
5.2
NA
TIO
NA
L C
ITY
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 ---
---
U
S D
IST
SD
2 0
0 0
0 0/
0 0.
1 2.
2
M
IRA
MA
R N
AV
AL
15
0 0
0 0
0/0
0.1
1.5
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
95
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
UR
T
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
A
LCO
HO
L
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L
OTH
ER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I R
ECK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
SA
N D
IEG
O
SA
N D
IEG
O N
AV
15
0
0 0
0 0/
1 0.
8 1.
7
cont
inue
d
TC S
DIE
GO
NA
V
17
0 0
0 0
0/0
0.8
2.9
TOTA
L 13
187
86
793
265
230
1/11
---
---
SA
N F
RAN
CIS
CO
59
.7%
SU
P SA
N F
RAN
3
4 0
0 1
0/0
7.0
5.4
JUV
SA
N F
RAN
4
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.1
3.2
SAN
FRA
NC
ISC
O
1103
6
178
60
13
0/1
3.2
1.1
US
DIS
T C
T SF
5
0 0
0 0
0/0
9.3
2.9
TOTA
L 11
15
10
178
60
14
0/1
---
---
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
71.1
%
SUP
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
59
6 0
1 0
1/0
4.4
1.6
JUV
SA
N JO
AQ
UIN
1
1 0
1 0
0/0
2.8
1.8
LOD
I 64
5 4
52
11
54
3/1
2.0
2.2
MA
NTE
CA
39
0 9
24
6 25
1/
0 2.
5 2.
2
TR
AC
Y 29
7 6
30
9 8
0/0
2.0
2.0
STO
CK
TON
17
21
20
118
40
39
0/0
2.3
2.4
TOTA
L 31
13
46
224
68
126
5/1
---
---
SAN
L O
BISP
O
67.8
%
SUP
S L
OBI
SPO
48
7
1 0
1 0/
0 3.
6 2.
7
S
LUIS
OBI
SPO
15
91
7 34
4 39
11
0 2/
0 2.
2 5.
9
U
SMA
G S
L O
BISP
O
4 0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
9 4.
8
TO
TAL
1643
14
34
5 39
11
1 2/
0 ---
---
SA
N M
ATE
O
76.3
%
SUP
SAN
MA
TEO
11
6 19
1
0 0
0/3
4.3
1.5
JUV
SA
N M
ATE
O
22
2 2
0 2
0/0
3.5
4.3
SO S
AN
FRA
N
1737
13
22
3 17
16
0/
2 2.
2 4.
3
RE
DW
OO
D C
ITY
2021
11
39
8 21
43
0/
5 2.
5 4.
2
TO
TAL
3896
45
62
4 38
63
0/
10
---
---
SAN
TA
69.7
%
SUP
S BA
RBA
RA
30
5
0 0
2 0/
0 4.
4 0.
3
BA
RBA
RA
SU
P SN
TA M
ARI
A
43
3 0
0 1
0/0
2.3
0.9
JUV
S B
ARB
ARA
8
2 0
0 2
0/0
2.0
2.2
SAN
TA B
ARB
ARA
17
77
3 44
5 10
6 83
0/
0 2.
4 3.
8
SA
NTA
MA
RIA
81
6 21
67
32
18
1/
1 1.
6 2.
3
LO
MPO
C
295
2 45
1
6 0/
1 1.
8 6.
4
SO
LVA
NG
19
2 2
53
3 3
1/0
2.1
5.9
VA
ND
NBE
RG A
FB
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 0.
3 2.
9
TO
TAL
3162
38
61
0 14
2 11
5 2/
2 ---
---
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
96
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
UR
T
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
A
LCO
HO
L
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L
OTH
ER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I R
ECK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
SA
NTA
CLA
RA
79.8
%
SUP
SAN
TA C
LAR
A
536
114
2 1
2 0/
1 3.
3 1.
7
JU
V S
AN
TA C
LARA
54
4
1 0
1 0/
0 3.
3 4.
8
LO
S G
ATO
S 20
8 1
14
1 4
0/0
2.8
0.4
PALO
ALT
O
740
3 48
5
7 0/
0 3.
1 1.
5
SA
N JO
SE
5100
23
39
7 85
78
2/
5 3.
6 1.
7
TR
AF-
SAN
JOSE
2
0 0
0 11
0/
0 2.
9 0.
9
SA
NTA
CLA
RA
390
1 18
3
5 0/
2 3.
1 1.
6
SU
NN
YV
ALE
80
9 3
76
20
19
0/0
3.1
1.3
GIL
ROY
681
7 51
9
4 0/
0 3.
2 0.
8
TO
TAL
8520
15
6 60
7 12
4 13
1 2/
8 ---
---
SA
NTA
CR
UZ
72.5
%
SUP
SAN
TA C
RUZ
67
10
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
6 3.
8
JU
V S
AN
TA C
RUZ
26
1 5
2 0
0/0
4.0
2.0
SAN
TA C
RU
Z 14
21
4 20
0 78
24
0/
18
2.3
5.6
WA
TSO
NV
ILLE
79
4 2
93
3 3
0/10
2.
0 7.
2
TO
TAL
2308
17
29
8 83
27
0/
28
---
---
SHA
STA
71
.2%
SU
P RE
DD
ING
25
4
1 0
0 0/
0 4.
8 2.
7
JU
V S
HA
STA
5
1 0
0 0
0/0
2.6
0.8
BURN
EY
39
0 9
1 2
0/0
3.1
2.0
RED
DIN
G
679
15
110
6 21
1/
0 2.
4 3.
1
U
S M
AG
RED
DIN
G
1 0
2 0
0 0/
0 6.
6 0.
3
TO
TAL
749
20
122
7 25
1/
0 ---
---
SI
ERRA
56
.7%
D
OW
NIE
VIL
LE
38
0 8
3 0
0/0
3.0
3.9
TOTA
L 38
0
8 3
0 0/
0 ---
---
SI
SKIY
OU
76
.1%
SU
P SI
SKIY
OU
5
0 0
0 0
0/0
4.3
2.1
JUV
SIS
KIY
OU
4
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.3
4.0
DO
RRIS
15
0
0 0
1 1/
0 4.
4 3.
1
W
EED
12
2 0
12
1 0
2/0
2.8
4.7
WEE
D JU
ST
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 6.
7 0.
7
TU
LELA
KE
22
0 2
2 0
0/0
4.7
6.1
YREK
A
136
7 15
2
1 0/
0 2.
8 3.
5
TO
TAL
305
7 29
5
2 3/
0 ---
---
SO
LAN
O
71.5
%
SUP
SOLA
NO
58
11
1
0 0
0/0
2.8
4.5
JUV
SO
LAN
O
9 0
0 1
1 0/
0 5.
7 3.
0
FA
IRFI
ELD
10
32
11
238
6 21
0/
2 1.
8 7.
1
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
97
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
UR
T
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
A
LCO
HO
L
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L
OTH
ER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I R
ECK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
SO
LAN
O
BE
NIC
IA
2 0
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
8 0.
9
cont
inue
d
VA
LLEJ
O
332
6 13
13
7
0/1
2.4
4.9
TC T
RAV
IS A
FB
6 0
0 0
0 0/
0 0.
2 4.
0
TO
TAL
1439
28
25
2 20
29
0/
3 ---
---
SO
NO
MA
71
.3%
SU
P SO
NO
MA
12
2 12
0
0 1
0/1
5.0
3.4
JUV
SO
NO
MA
28
0
0 1
3 0/
0 2.
4 3.
9
SA
NTA
RO
SA
2712
30
57
6 41
70
2/
14
2.8
4.8
TOTA
L 28
62
42
576
42
74
2/15
---
---
ST
AN
ISLA
US
68.2
%
SUP
STA
NIS
LAU
S 84
11
1
0 1
0/1
3.3
2.0
JUV
STA
NIS
LAU
S 25
3
1 0
0 0/
0 2.
4 3.
9
M
OD
ESTO
18
20
23
296
65
25
0/4
2.4
2.1
OA
KD
ALE
1
0 0
0 0
0/1
2.3
0.8
TURL
OC
K
296
4 40
22
4
0/1
2.2
2.0
TOTA
L 22
26
41
338
87
30
0/7
---
---
SUTT
ER
47.6
%
SUP
SUTT
ER
21
5 0
1 0
0/0
4.3
0.8
JUV
SU
TTER
1
0 0
0 0
0/0
3.8
1.3
YUBA
CIT
Y 46
2 6
72
2 12
0/
2 2.
2 3.
0
TO
TAL
484
11
72
3 12
0/
2 ---
---
TE
HA
MA
68
.1%
SU
P TE
HA
MA
13
2
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
7 1.
9
JU
V T
EHA
MA
5
0 0
0 0
0/0
2.3
6.7
CO
RNIN
G
86
0 9
0 2
1/1
2.6
4.9
RED
BLU
FF
197
4 29
8
5 3/
0 2.
2 5.
0
TO
TAL
301
6 38
8
7 4/
1 ---
---
TR
INIT
Y 37
.1%
SU
P TR
INIT
Y 2
1 0
0 0
0/0
6.5
-5.3
W
EAV
ERV
ILLE
77
2
15
2 1
0/0
3.5
2.7
TOTA
L 79
3
15
2 1
0/0
---
---
TULA
RE
60.4
%
SUP
TULA
RE
96
29
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
3 4.
1
JU
V T
ULA
RE
30
3 0
0 1
0/0
3.1
4.9
DIN
UBA
MU
NI
545
2 10
7
4 0/
0 3.
3 7.
3
EX
ETER
MU
NI
58
2 1
0 0
0/0
4.6
2.6
LIN
DSY
-EXE
TER
148
0 6
0 0
0/0
3.3
3.9
PORT
ERV
ILLE
52
5 9
19
0 7
1/1
3.2
2.8
TULA
RE
337
2 5
2 1
0/0
2.7
5.9
VIS
ALI
A
739
20
15
8 5
0/0
2.8
2.5
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
98
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1993
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
D
UI
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
CO
URT
MIS
D
FE
LON
Y
ALC
OH
OL
N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
O
THER
DU
I DIS
M*/
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
D
MV
UPD
ATE
TU
LARE
WO
OD
LK-E
XETE
R 73
0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
8 2.
5
cont
inue
d
DIN
UBA
JUST
1
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.8
4.2
USM
AG
3 R
IVER
S 1
0 0
0 0
0/0
0.1
2.3
TOTA
L 25
53
67
56
17
18
1/1
---
---
TUO
LUM
NE
83.5
%
SUP
TUO
LUM
NE
14
4 0
0 0
0/0
3.4
9.0
JUV
TU
OLU
MN
E 1
0 0
0 0
0/0
2.4
2.2
SON
ORA
19
8 5
19
2 2
0/0
2.8
7.9
CO
LUM
BIA
1
0 0
0 0
0/0
0.7
10.6
JA
MES
TOW
N
41
0 4
0 0
0/0
2.3
1.4
TOTA
L 25
5 9
23
2 2
0/0
---
---
VEN
TURA
84
.6%
SU
P V
ENTU
RA
34
9 0
0 1
0/0
2.4
5.0
JUV
VEN
TURA
12
0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
5 3.
4
V
ENTU
RA JU
ST
4195
24
0
1 80
6/
2 2.
1 3.
3
TO
TAL
4241
33
0
1 81
6/
2 ---
---
YO
LO
32.7
%
SUP
WO
OD
LAN
D
22
4 0
1 0
0/0
6.3
2.0
JUV
YO
LO
4 1
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
3 3.
3
W
EST
SAC
TO
26
0 3
0 0
0/0
3.5
18.3
W
OO
DLA
ND
38
5 3
49
13
3 1/
0 3.
8 5.
7
D
AV
IS
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
0 0.
8
TO
TAL
438
8 52
14
8
1/0
---
---
YUBA
75
.0%
SU
P YU
BA
18
3 0
0 0
0/1
2.1
3.9
JUV
YU
BA
6 0
0 0
0 0
1.1
7.9
MA
RYSV
ILLE
47
0 9
109
8 2
0/1
2.3
1.8
TC B
EALE
AFB
10
0
0 0
0 0/
0 0.
9 1.
0
TO
TAL
504
12
109
8 2
0/2
---
---
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
99
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S*
CO
UN
TY
C
OU
RT
DU
I O
FFEN
DER
TOTA
L PR
OBA
TIO
N
JAIL
1S
T O
FFEN
DER
A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
SB
38
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
STA
TEW
IDE
1622
54
95.4
78
.8
57.1
18
.6
0.2
39.6
7.
2 1.
8 A
LAM
EDA
SU
P O
AK
LAN
D
1ST
DU
I 10
60
.0
100.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 12
66
.7
75.0
8.
3 16
.7
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 17
58
.8
94.1
0.
0 29
.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
79
55.7
97
.5
0.0
32.9
0.
0 1.
3 2.
5 1.
3
TO
TAL
118
57.6
94
.9
0.8
29.7
0.
0 1.
7 1.
7 0.
8
JUV
ALA
MED
A
1ST
DU
I 36
83
.3
13.9
63
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
69.4
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
3 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 39
84
.6
12.8
59
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
64.1
0.
0
ALA
MED
A
1ST
DU
I 12
7 10
0.0
100.
0 90
.6
0.8
0.0
0.8
1.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 41
10
0.0
100.
0 7.
3 85
.4
0.0
85.4
2.
4 4.
9
3R
D D
UI
13
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
46.2
0.
0 30
.8
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 25
.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
185
100.
0 10
0.0
64.3
23
.2
0.0
21.6
1.
6 1.
1
BERK
ELEY
1S
T D
UI
137
98.5
65
.7
61.3
18
.2
0.0
25.5
3.
6 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
41
100.
0 92
.7
2.4
51.2
0.
0 48
.8
0.0
9.8
3RD
DU
I 16
10
0.0
93.8
0.
0 12
.5
0.0
12.5
6.
3 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 5
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 19
9 99
.0
74.4
42
.7
24.1
0.
0 28
.6
3.0
2.0
FR
EMO
NT
1ST
DU
I 73
5 99
.7
99.3
87
.9
6.1
0.0
3.7
0.4
0.1
2ND
DU
I 27
1 10
0.0
98.9
5.
2 90
.0
0.0
55.7
0.
4 5.
9
3R
D D
UI
107
99.1
10
0.0
1.9
73.8
0.
0 12
.1
3.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
37
91.9
94
.6
0.0
64.9
0.
0 10
.8
2.7
0.0
TOTA
L 11
50
99.5
99
.1
57.6
34
.1
0.0
17.0
0.
8 1.
5
PLEA
SAN
TON
1S
T D
UI
449
100.
0 92
.9
94.0
1.
8 0.
0 2.
4 5.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
154
99.4
98
.1
9.1
87.0
0.
6 83
.8
2.6
0.6
3RD
DU
I 52
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 76
.9
0.0
30.8
51
.9
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
5 60
.0
100.
0 0.
0 40
.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
660
99.5
94
.7
66.1
27
.9
0.2
23.6
8.
5 0.
2
OA
KLA
ND
1S
T D
UI
865
99.5
99
.3
87.6
3.
0 0.
0 4.
0 7.
9 0.
9
2N
D D
UI
246
99.6
99
.2
6.1
86.2
0.
4 87
.4
4.1
19.5
3R
D D
UI
64
100.
0 92
.2
3.1
50.0
0.
0 64
.1
18.8
6.
3
4T
H+
DU
I 31
96
.8
90.3
3.
2 41
.9
0.0
51.6
25
.8
19.4
TO
TAL
1206
99
.5
98.7
64
.3
23.5
0.
1 25
.5
8.1
5.5
H
AYW
ARD
1S
T D
UI
1085
89
.0
95.9
66
.0
2.5
0.0
5.1
6.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 45
9 83
.7
96.9
4.
1 59
.9
0.0
57.7
8.
5 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
171
90.1
99
.4
3.5
31.0
0.
0 12
.9
7.6
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
33
63.6
10
0.0
0.0
15.2
0.
0 3.
0 3.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1748
87
.2
96.6
42
.4
20.6
0.
0 19
.6
6.9
0.0
*Ent
ries
repr
esen
t per
cent
ages
of 1
993
DU
I con
vict
ees r
ecei
ving
eac
h sa
nctio
n by
cou
nty,
cou
rt a
nd o
ffend
er st
atus
.
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
100
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ALP
INE
SUP
ALP
INE
4TH
+ D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
MA
RKLE
EVIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 29
10
0.0
3.4
86.2
10
.3
0.0
96.6
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
8 10
0.0
75.0
25
.0
37.5
0.
0 75
.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
40
100.
0 25
.0
70.0
20
.0
0.0
90.0
0.
0 0.
0 A
MA
DO
R
SUP
AM
AD
OR
4TH
+ D
UI
4 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 4
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0
JAC
KSO
N
1ST
DU
I 12
7 92
.9
96.1
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
8 9.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
65
98.5
10
0.0
0.0
63.1
0.
0 63
.1
27.7
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
16
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
56.3
0.
0 18
.8
62.5
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 8
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
62.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
216
94.4
97
.7
0.0
23.1
0.
0 20
.8
20.8
0.
0 BU
TTE
SUP
BUTT
E 1S
T D
UI
7 85
.7
100.
0 14
.3
28.6
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
30
26.7
10
0.0
3.3
6.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 42
38
.1
100.
0 4.
8 9.
5 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
BU
TTE
1ST
DU
I 7
100.
0 85
.7
42.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
7 10
0.0
85.7
42
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
C
HIC
O
1ST
DU
I 34
2 96
.8
97.4
90
.1
0.6
0.0
1.8
12.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
98
94.9
98
.0
6.1
71.4
0.
0 66
.3
13.3
3.
1
3R
D D
UI
42
83.3
10
0.0
2.4
21.4
0.
0 11
.9
50.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 7
71.4
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
57.1
0.
0
TO
TAL
489
94.9
97
.8
64.4
16
.6
0.0
15.5
16
.2
0.6
G
RID
LEY
1ST
DU
I 30
80
.0
100.
0 76
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
14
57.1
10
0.0
7.1
42.9
0.
0 50
.0
42.9
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
7 28
.6
100.
0 0.
0 14
.3
0.0
14.3
71
.4
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
52
65.4
10
0.0
46.2
13
.5
0.0
15.4
32
.7
0.0
O
ROV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
231
67.1
95
.7
61.9
0.
0 0.
0 2.
6 33
.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 89
40
.4
100.
0 1.
1 36
.0
0.0
33.7
60
.7
0.0
3RD
DU
I 42
21
.4
97.6
0.
0 14
.3
0.0
4.8
90.5
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 9
11.1
10
0.0
0.0
11.1
0.
0 11
.1
77.8
0.
0
TO
TAL
371
54.2
97
.0
38.8
10
.5
0.0
10.5
47
.7
0.0
PA
RAD
ISE
1ST
DU
I 10
2 99
.0
95.1
94
.1
0.0
0.0
1.0
8.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 32
90
.6
100.
0 0.
0 68
.8
0.0
65.6
18
.8
0.0
3RD
DU
I 14
92
.9
100.
0 14
.3
14.3
0.
0 14
.3
64.3
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 15
0 96
.7
96.7
65
.3
16.0
0.
0 16
.0
16.0
0.
0 C
ALA
VER
AS
SUP
CA
LAV
ERA
S 1S
T D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
101
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
4TH
+ D
UI
4 75
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 7
57.1
10
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0 14
.3
14.3
0.
0
JUV
CA
LAV
RAS
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
SA
N A
ND
REA
S 1S
T D
UI
121
98.3
10
0.0
93.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
8 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
57
100.
0 10
0.0
7.0
86.0
0.
0 78
.9
0.0
8.8
3RD
DU
I 21
95
.2
100.
0 4.
8 23
.8
0.0
19.0
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 20
2 98
.0
100.
0 58
.4
27.7
0.
0 25
.2
0.5
2.5
CO
LUSA
SU
P C
OLU
SA
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 5
40.0
10
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
7 57
.1
100.
0 14
.3
42.9
0.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
JU
V C
OLU
SA
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
C
OLU
SA
1ST
DU
I 15
3 97
.4
97.4
79
.1
0.7
0.0
2.6
6.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 59
10
0.0
98.3
5.
1 64
.4
0.0
59.3
8.
5 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
22
95.5
10
0.0
0.0
13.6
0.
0 13
.6
40.9
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
236
97.9
97
.9
52.5
17
.8
0.0
17.8
10
.6
0.0
CO
NTR
A C
OST
A
SUP
C C
OST
A
1ST
DU
I 34
85
.3
91.2
11
.8
23.5
0.
0 2.
9 5.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
12
83.3
91
.7
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 8.
3 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
25
72.0
96
.0
0.0
36.0
0.
0 0.
0 4.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 89
74
.2
95.5
0.
0 31
.5
0.0
0.0
3.4
0.0
TOTA
L 16
0 76
.9
94.4
2.
5 31
.9
0.0
0.6
4.4
0.0
JU
V C
CO
STA
1S
T D
UI
24
95.8
0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 25
96
.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 52
.0
0.0
C
ON
CO
RD
1S
T D
UI
528
99.6
97
.0
61.2
1.
7 0.
0 4.
2 3.
6 0.
2
2N
D D
UI
177
100.
0 97
.7
1.7
77.4
0.
0 74
.0
13.0
19
.8
3RD
DU
I 97
10
0.0
95.9
0.
0 12
.4
0.0
10.3
19
.6
6.2
4TH
+ D
UI
12
100.
0 83
.3
0.0
16.7
0.
0 25
.0
25.0
16
.7
TOTA
L 81
4 99
.8
96.8
40
.0
19.7
0.
0 20
.4
7.9
5.4
RI
CH
MO
ND
1S
T D
UI
490
98.4
99
.2
93.7
3.
1 0.
0 2.
4 1.
6 0.
2
2N
D D
UI
219
98.2
99
.1
5.9
80.8
0.
0 82
.6
1.4
7.3
3RD
DU
I 56
98
.2
100.
0 0.
0 82
.1
0.0
33.9
3.
6 7.
1
4T
H+
DU
I 17
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 70
.6
0.0
23.5
0.
0 5.
9
TO
TAL
782
98.3
99
.2
60.4
32
.0
0.0
27.6
1.
7 2.
8
PITT
SBU
RG
1ST
DU
I 37
8 96
.3
97.9
83
.9
1.9
0.0
6.3
10.1
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
164
87.8
10
0.0
2.4
72.0
0.
0 71
.3
19.5
4.
9
3R
D D
UI
62
25.8
10
0.0
0.0
9.7
0.0
8.1
17.7
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 12
33
.3
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
616
85.7
98
.7
52.1
21
.3
0.0
23.7
13
.1
1.3
W
ALN
UT
CR
EEK
1S
T D
UI
629
99.7
97
.9
96.7
1.
1 0.
0 3.
5 4.
1 0.
2
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
102
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2ND
DU
I 18
2 99
.5
98.4
4.
9 90
.7
0.0
47.8
3.
8 11
.5
3RD
DU
I 49
93
.9
100.
0 6.
1 24
.5
0.0
14.3
24
.5
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
5 80
.0
100.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
865
99.2
98
.2
71.7
21
.4
0.0
13.4
5.
3 2.
5 D
EL N
OR
TE
SUP
DEL
NO
RTE
1ST
DU
I 4
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
25
.0
25.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 11
9.
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.1
0.0
TOTA
L 19
36
.8
89.5
0.
0 0.
0 5.
3 5.
3 10
.5
0.0
C
RES
CEN
T C
ITY
1ST
DU
I 13
2 95
.5
93.9
75
.0
1.5
0.0
7.6
3.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 52
96
.2
96.2
28
.8
50.0
0.
0 34
.6
1.9
0.0
3RD
DU
I 24
79
.2
95.8
25
.0
37.5
0.
0 4.
2 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
208
93.8
94
.7
57.7
17
.8
0.0
13.9
2.
4 0.
0 EL
DO
RAD
O
SUP
EL D
ORA
DO
1S
T D
UI
8 87
.5
37.5
50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
7 57
.1
85.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
16
75.0
62
.5
25.0
6.
3 0.
0 0.
0 6.
3 0.
0
JUV
EL
DO
RAD
O
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 8
62.5
75
.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
CA
MER
ON
PA
RK
1ST
DU
I 19
5 99
.0
99.0
88
.7
0.5
0.0
0.5
2.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 80
10
0.0
93.8
10
.0
63.8
0.
0 72
.5
0.0
12.5
3R
D D
UI
38
100.
0 71
.1
7.9
13.2
0.
0 39
.5
0.0
13.2
4T
H+
DU
I 11
10
0.0
72.7
0.
0 27
.3
0.0
54.5
0.
0 27
.3
TOTA
L 32
4 99
.4
93.5
56
.8
18.5
0.
0 24
.7
1.2
5.6
SO
LA
KE
TAH
OE
1ST
DU
I 17
1 10
0.0
95.9
72
.5
1.8
0.0
2.3
2.3
0.6
2ND
DU
I 67
95
.5
97.0
7.
5 64
.2
0.0
55.2
4.
5 7.
5
3R
D D
UI
18
88.9
94
.4
5.6
44.4
0.
0 16
.7
5.6
5.6
4TH
+ D
UI
8 62
.5
100.
0 0.
0 37
.5
0.0
12.5
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
264
97.0
96
.2
49.2
21
.6
0.0
17.0
3.
0 2.
7
PLA
CER
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 18
8 99
.5
94.7
85
.1
0.0
0.0
20.2
2.
1 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
72
98.6
98
.6
8.3
77.8
0.
0 54
.2
1.4
0.0
3RD
DU
I 33
10
0.0
100.
0 9.
1 21
.2
0.0
21.2
18
.2
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
16
68.8
10
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 37
.5
0.0
TOTA
L 30
9 97
.7
96.4
54
.7
21.0
0.
0 27
.2
5.5
0.0
FRES
NO
SU
P FR
ESN
O
1ST
DU
I 10
5 54
.3
92.4
0.
0 1.
0 0.
0 1.
0 1.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
41
51.2
97
.6
0.0
4.9
0.0
4.9
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 30
26
.7
96.7
0.
0 3.
3 0.
0 3.
3 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 18
4 27
.2
96.2
0.
0 0.
5 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
360
37.8
95
.3
0.0
1.4
0.0
1.1
0.3
0.0
JU
V F
RESN
O
1ST
DU
I 28
92
.9
46.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 7.
1 32
.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
103
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 30
93
.3
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6.
7 30
.0
0.0
FR
ESN
O
1ST
DU
I 16
66
99.1
92
.7
80.0
2.
8 0.
0 29
.8
0.2
0.1
2ND
DU
I 65
0 99
.1
97.7
7.
2 62
.2
0.0
63.2
0.
0 3.
4
3R
D D
UI
214
98.1
95
.3
5.1
28.0
0.
0 21
.0
0.5
1.4
4TH
+ D
UI
54
98.1
90
.7
5.6
14.8
0.
0 11
.1
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 25
84
99.0
94
.2
53.9
20
.1
0.0
37.1
0.
2 1.
0
CLO
VIS
1S
T D
UI
198
99.0
63
.6
84.8
1.
5 0.
0 52
.5
3.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 73
10
0.0
93.2
5.
5 63
.0
0.0
57.5
6.
8 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
26
100.
0 84
.6
3.8
23.1
0.
0 15
.4
26.9
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 30
1 99
.3
73.1
57
.5
18.3
0.
0 49
.8
6.3
0.0
C
OA
LIN
GA
1S
T D
UI
187
99.5
97
.9
90.9
3.
7 0.
0 4.
3 2.
1 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
54
100.
0 10
0.0
31.5
64
.8
0.0
20.4
9.
3 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
19
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
84.2
0.
0 10
.5
5.3
0.0
TOTA
L 26
0 99
.6
98.5
71
.9
22.3
0.
0 8.
1 3.
8 0.
0
FIR
EBA
UG
H
1ST
DU
I 13
2 98
.5
93.9
57
.6
3.0
0.0
47.7
1.
5 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
44
100.
0 10
0.0
2.3
29.5
0.
0 36
.4
2.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 14
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 28
.6
0.0
14.3
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 8
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 19
8 99
.0
96.0
38
.9
10.6
0.
0 40
.9
1.5
0.0
FO
WLE
R 1S
T D
UI
91
97.8
97
.8
92.3
1.
1 0.
0 4.
4 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
35
100.
0 97
.1
8.6
77.1
0.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 14
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
21.4
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 14
2 98
.6
97.9
61
.3
21.1
0.
0 6.
3 2.
1 0.
0
KER
MA
N
1ST
DU
I 81
96
.3
92.6
79
.0
9.9
0.0
4.9
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 41
97
.6
100.
0 9.
8 75
.6
0.0
22.0
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
13
100.
0 92
.3
0.0
61.5
0.
0 15
.4
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
4 25
.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
139
95.0
92
.8
48.9
33
.8
0.0
10.8
0.
0 0.
0
KIN
GSB
URG
1S
T D
UI
41
100.
0 97
.6
97.6
0.
0 0.
0 2.
4 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
16
100.
0 87
.5
18.8
81
.3
0.0
68.8
12
.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 9
100.
0 77
.8
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 11
.1
22.2
0.
0
TO
TAL
66
100.
0 92
.4
66.7
19
.7
0.0
19.7
6.
1 0.
0
REED
LEY
MU
NI
1ST
DU
I 11
9 99
.2
98.3
92
.4
4.2
0.0
6.7
0.0
0.8
2ND
DU
I 53
96
.2
98.1
5.
7 75
.5
1.9
28.3
0.
0 22
.6
3RD
DU
I 16
93
.8
87.5
6.
3 31
.3
0.0
12.5
0.
0 12
.5
4TH
+ D
UI
6 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
194
96.4
97
.4
58.8
25
.8
0.5
12.9
0.
0 7.
7
RIV
ERD
ALE
1S
T D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 75
.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
6 10
0.0
100.
0 16
.7
83.3
0.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 10
10
0.0
100.
0 40
.0
60.0
0.
0 40
.0
0.0
0.0
SA
NG
ER
1ST
DU
I 62
95
.2
93.5
71
.0
4.8
1.6
3.2
1.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 36
97
.2
94.4
11
.1
66.7
0.
0 47
.2
2.8
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
104
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
3RD
DU
I 12
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
25.0
16
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 11
0 96
.4
94.5
43
.6
28.2
0.
9 20
.0
3.6
0.0
SE
LMA
MU
NI
1ST
DU
I 16
1 96
.9
96.3
80
.1
3.7
0.0
26.7
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
58
93.1
94
.8
10.3
70
.7
0.0
70.7
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
27
92.6
92
.6
3.7
25.9
0.
0 14
.8
3.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
7 10
0.0
100.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0
TO
TAL
253
95.7
95
.7
54.2
21
.3
0.0
34.8
0.
8 0.
0
US
CT
FRES
NO
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
4 50
.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 G
LEN
N
SUP
GLE
NN
1S
T D
UI
2 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 5
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0 20
.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
4 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 11
63
.6
100.
0 0.
0 9.
1 0.
0 9.
1 27
.3
0.0
JU
V G
LEN
N
1ST
DU
I 2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O
RLA
ND
1S
T D
UI
89
97.8
97
.8
93.3
2.
2 0.
0 0.
0 3.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
31
100.
0 96
.8
3.2
74.2
0.
0 54
.8
16.1
6.
5
3R
D D
UI
21
90.5
90
.5
4.8
14.3
0.
0 19
.0
42.9
4.
8
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
143
97.2
96
.5
59.4
19
.6
0.0
14.7
13
.3
2.1
W
ILLO
WS
1ST
DU
I 49
10
0.0
100.
0 95
.9
0.0
0.0
2.0
4.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 15
10
0.0
100.
0 6.
7 60
.0
0.0
46.7
26
.7
6.7
3RD
DU
I 9
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 33
.3
55.6
11
.1
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 74
10
0.0
100.
0 64
.9
16.2
0.
0 14
.9
16.2
2.
7 H
UM
BOLD
T SU
P H
UM
BOLD
T 1S
T D
UI
3 10
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
4 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 10
40
.0
70.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
HU
MBO
LDT
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EU
REK
A
1ST
DU
I 18
0 95
.6
16.7
83
.9
2.2
0.0
86.1
9.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
64
96.9
90
.6
9.4
59.4
0.
0 62
.5
29.7
1.
6
3R
D D
UI
26
96.2
96
.2
0.0
23.1
0.
0 3.
8 46
.2
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
10
70.0
90
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
280
95.0
43
.6
56.1
17
.1
0.0
70.0
18
.9
0.4
A
RCA
TA
1ST
DU
I 96
89
.6
43.8
85
.4
1.0
0.0
84.4
9.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
44
84.1
90
.9
9.1
68.2
0.
0 77
.3
18.2
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
16
93.8
93
.8
0.0
75.0
0.
0 25
.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
156
88.5
62
.2
55.1
27
.6
0.0
76.3
16
.0
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
105
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
FO
RTU
NA
1S
T D
UI
103
95.1
15
.5
85.4
7.
8 0.
0 93
.2
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 27
10
0.0
85.2
14
.8
70.4
0.
0 96
.3
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 15
93
.3
60.0
6.
7 26
.7
20.0
33
.3
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 14
6 95
.9
33.6
63
.7
21.9
2.
1 87
.0
0.0
0.0
G
ARB
ERV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
27
92.6
22
.2
88.9
3.
7 0.
0 92
.6
7.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 14
10
0.0
78.6
42
.9
35.7
0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
100.
0 80
.0
60.0
20
.0
0.0
60.0
40
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 46
95
.7
45.7
71
.7
15.2
0.
0 91
.3
8.7
0.0
H
OO
PA
1ST
DU
I 8
62.5
75
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
50.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
6 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
66.7
33
.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 17
70
.6
88.2
23
.5
29.4
0.
0 47
.1
41.2
0.
0 IM
PERI
AL
SUP
IMPE
RIA
L 1S
T D
UI
2 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 8
100.
0 87
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
11
100.
0 72
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
27.3
0.
0
JUV
IMPE
RIA
L 1S
T D
UI
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
BRA
WLE
Y 1S
T D
UI
152
100.
0 50
.7
82.2
1.
3 0.
0 44
.7
0.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 53
10
0.0
92.5
7.
5 81
.1
0.0
71.7
0.
0 9.
4
3R
D D
UI
19
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
47.4
0.
0 26
.3
10.5
10
.5
4TH
+ D
UI
4 10
0.0
75.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 25
.0
TOTA
L 22
8 10
0.0
64.9
56
.6
24.6
0.
0 49
.6
1.3
3.5
C
ALE
XIC
O
1ST
DU
I 42
5 99
.8
27.5
60
.9
0.7
0.0
73.2
0.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
80
100.
0 85
.0
18.8
33
.8
0.0
50.0
2.
5 2.
5
3R
D D
UI
17
100.
0 10
0.0
5.9
5.9
0.0
17.6
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 52
4 99
.8
38.9
52
.5
5.9
0.0
67.6
0.
6 0.
4
EL C
ENTR
O
1ST
DU
I 23
3 99
.6
55.4
60
.9
0.9
0.0
31.8
1.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
84
98.8
82
.1
17.9
48
.8
0.0
47.6
6.
0 3.
6
3R
D D
UI
27
100.
0 88
.9
11.1
22
.2
0.0
29.6
7.
4 7.
4
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
346
99.4
64
.7
46.2
14
.2
0.0
35.3
3.
2 1.
4
WIN
TERH
AV
EN
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
100.
0 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
INYO
SU
P IN
YO
1ST
DU
I 4
50.0
50
.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 16
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
13
23.1
84
.6
7.7
0.0
0.0
7.7
0.0
0.0
BI
SHO
P 1S
T D
UI
158
96.8
18
.4
88.6
2.
5 0.
0 89
.2
0.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 52
10
0.0
92.3
5.
8 86
.5
0.0
88.5
3.
8 5.
8
3R
D D
UI
26
73.1
84
.6
3.8
38.5
0.
0 7.
7 11
.5
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
106
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
4TH
+ D
UI
10
80.0
30
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
246
94.3
41
.5
58.5
24
.0
0.0
76.8
2.
8 1.
2
IND
EPEN
DEN
CE
1ST
DU
I 5
100.
0 20
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 80
.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 15
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 93
.3
0.0
93.3
0.
0 6.
7
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 21
10
0.0
81.0
23
.8
71.4
0.
0 85
.7
0.0
4.8
U
SMA
G B
ISH
OP
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
KER
N
SUP
KER
N
1ST
DU
I 96
76
.0
100.
0 5.
2 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 3.
1 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
46
65.2
95
.7
2.2
2.2
0.0
2.2
4.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 18
55
.6
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 16
4 44
.5
97.0
0.
0 0.
0 1.
8 0.
0 4.
9 0.
0
TO
TAL
324
57.4
97
.8
1.9
0.3
0.9
0.3
4.0
0.0
JU
V K
ERN
1S
T D
UI
36
97.2
2.
8 83
.3
0.0
0.0
2.8
5.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 38
97
.4
2.6
81.6
0.
0 0.
0 2.
6 5.
3 0.
0
ARV
IN L
AM
ON
T 1S
T D
UI
227
90.7
79
.7
65.6
1.
8 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
94
89.4
89
.4
10.6
25
.5
0.0
10.6
5.
3 2.
1
3R
D D
UI
42
100.
0 92
.9
9.5
0.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
7.1
4TH
+ D
UI
6 83
.3
83.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 16
.7
16.7
0.
0
TO
TAL
369
91.3
83
.7
44.2
7.
6 0.
0 3.
8 1.
6 1.
4
BAK
ERSF
IELD
1S
T D
UI
1560
97
.9
99.1
78
.3
0.2
0.1
1.3
0.5
0.5
2ND
DU
I 62
4 96
.8
94.1
9.
1 11
.1
0.0
17.1
1.
8 5.
1
3R
D D
UI
281
90.7
92
.5
2.1
0.0
0.0
6.8
3.9
6.4
4TH
+ D
UI
52
78.8
90
.4
5.8
0.0
0.0
9.6
3.8
9.6
TOTA
L 25
17
96.4
96
.9
51.2
2.
9 0.
0 6.
0 1.
3 2.
5
DEL
AN
O
1ST
DU
I 25
3 99
.6
60.5
77
.5
2.4
0.4
43.5
11
.1
0.8
2ND
DU
I 14
9 10
0.0
94.0
6.
0 45
.6
0.0
40.3
39
.6
4.0
3RD
DU
I 61
10
0.0
82.0
1.
6 6.
6 0.
0 23
.0
70.5
14
.8
4TH
+ D
UI
15
100.
0 93
.3
6.7
6.7
0.0
20.0
73
.3
6.7
TOTA
L 47
8 99
.8
74.7
43
.3
16.5
0.
2 39
.1
29.5
3.
8
LAK
E IS
ABE
LLA
1S
T D
UI
65
92.3
92
.3
73.8
0.
0 1.
5 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
30
100.
0 10
0.0
3.3
43.3
0.
0 40
.0
3.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
102
95.1
95
.1
48.0
13
.7
1.0
11.8
1.
0 0.
0
TAFT
1S
T D
UI
141
97.2
34
.8
63.8
0.
7 0.
0 48
.2
27.7
1.
4
2N
D D
UI
60
100.
0 71
.7
5.0
38.3
0.
0 58
.3
23.3
33
.3
3RD
DU
I 16
10
0.0
68.8
12
.5
0.0
0.0
43.8
37
.5
25.0
4T
H+
DU
I 6
100.
0 83
.3
0.0
16.7
0.
0 33
.3
33.3
50
.0
TOTA
L 22
3 98
.2
48.4
42
.6
11.2
0.
0 50
.2
27.4
13
.0
SH
AFT
ER
1ST
DU
I 22
1 99
.5
97.7
80
.5
5.4
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 88
97
.7
92.0
4.
5 60
.2
0.0
48.9
2.
3 20
.5
3RD
DU
I 40
95
.0
87.5
2.
5 5.
0 0.
0 17
.5
7.5
7.5
4TH
+ D
UI
11
81.8
90
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.1
0.0
9.1
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
107
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 36
0 98
.1
95.0
50
.8
18.6
0.
0 14
.7
1.4
6.1
W
ASC
O
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
M
OJA
VE
1ST
DU
I 28
5 99
.6
96.5
78
.6
0.7
0.0
2.1
5.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 10
1 98
.0
98.0
4.
0 42
.6
1.0
42.6
26
.7
0.0
3RD
DU
I 36
86
.1
97.2
2.
8 2.
8 0.
0 2.
8 47
.2
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
10
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
432
98.1
97
.0
53.0
10
.6
0.2
11.6
14
.4
0.0
RI
DG
ECRE
ST
1ST
DU
I 22
8 10
0.0
97.8
91
.2
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 66
98
.5
100.
0 3.
0 42
.4
0.0
34.8
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
36
91.7
10
0.0
2.8
11.1
0.
0 5.
6 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
330
98.8
98
.5
63.9
10
.0
0.0
7.6
0.0
0.0
KIN
GS
SUP
KIN
GS
1ST
DU
I 6
33.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
34
8.8
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 14
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 43
14
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 18
.6
0.0
JU
V K
ING
S 1S
T D
UI
9 77
.8
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 55
.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
10
80.0
10
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
HA
NFO
RD
1ST
DU
I 26
6 96
.2
95.9
81
.6
3.4
0.0
3.0
14.7
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
99
88.9
10
0.0
4.0
60.6
0.
0 59
.6
18.2
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
43
69.8
10
0.0
0.0
14.0
0.
0 7.
0 62
.8
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
13
38.5
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
53.8
0.
0
TO
TAL
421
90.0
97
.4
52.5
17
.8
0.0
16.6
21
.6
0.0
A
VEN
AL
1ST
DU
I 11
2 99
.1
100.
0 94
.6
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 29
10
0.0
100.
0 48
.3
48.3
0.
0 75
.9
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 9
77.8
10
0.0
22.2
33
.3
0.0
55.6
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 15
2 97
.4
100.
0 80
.3
11.2
0.
0 18
.4
0.7
0.0
C
ORC
OR
AN
1S
T D
UI
78
94.9
98
.7
47.4
2.
6 0.
0 0.
0 24
.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 39
92
.3
100.
0 2.
6 51
.3
0.0
33.3
25
.6
0.0
3RD
DU
I 12
66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
33.3
33
.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 83
.3
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 13
5 91
.1
99.3
28
.1
18.5
0.
0 12
.6
26.7
0.
0
LEM
OO
RE
1ST
DU
I 18
2 95
.6
95.6
85
.2
2.2
0.0
7.1
4.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 48
79
.2
100.
0 10
.4
56.3
0.
0 54
.2
12.5
4.
2
3R
D D
UI
11
63.6
10
0.0
9.1
27.3
0.
0 27
.3
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
243
90.5
96
.7
66.3
14
.0
0.0
17.3
6.
2 0.
8 LA
KE
SUP
LAK
E 1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
7 28
.6
85.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
9 33
.3
88.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
108
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
JU
V L
AK
E 1S
T D
UI
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
C
LEA
RLA
KE
1ST
DU
I 12
7 10
0.0
100.
0 89
.0
2.4
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 59
98
.3
100.
0 22
.0
74.6
0.
0 39
.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 18
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 72
.2
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 20
8 98
.6
100.
0 60
.6
29.3
0.
0 15
.4
0.0
0.0
LA
KEP
OR
T 1S
T D
UI
167
95.2
98
.2
92.2
1.
2 0.
0 2.
4 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
85
97.6
10
0.0
3.5
84.7
0.
0 14
.1
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 19
31
.6
100.
0 0.
0 15
.8
0.0
5.3
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
8 62
.5
100.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
279
90.7
98
.9
56.3
28
.3
0.0
6.5
0.0
0.0
LASS
EN
SUP
LASS
EN
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 4
75.0
10
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
LA
SSEN
1S
T D
UI
5 20
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
5 20
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
SUSA
NV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
125
99.2
99
.2
96.8
1.
6 0.
0 0.
8 2.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
50
96.0
10
0.0
16.0
80
.0
0.0
74.0
0.
0 8.
0
3R
D D
UI
13
23.1
10
0.0
0.0
23.1
0.
0 7.
7 0.
0 7.
7
4T
H+
DU
I 8
25.0
10
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 12
.5
12.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
196
90.3
99
.5
65.8
24
.0
0.0
20.4
2.
0 2.
6 LO
S A
NG
ELES
SU
P LA
1S
T D
UI
94
78.7
95
.7
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.2
0.0
2ND
DU
I 25
52
.0
100.
0 0.
0 8.
0 0.
0 4.
0 4.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
18
44.4
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
129
38.0
97
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
0.0
TOTA
L 26
6 54
.1
97.4
0.
4 0.
8 0.
0 0.
4 2.
6 0.
0
SUP
POM
ON
A
1ST
DU
I 74
81
.1
97.3
0.
0 27
.0
0.0
4.1
6.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 25
52
.0
92.0
0.
0 12
.0
0.0
4.0
8.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 30
46
.7
100.
0 0.
0 13
.3
0.0
0.0
6.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
147
30.6
10
0.0
0.0
10.2
0.
0 0.
0 7.
5 0.
0
TO
TAL
276
47.8
98
.6
0.0
15.2
0.
0 1.
4 7.
2 0.
0
SUP
LAN
CA
STR
1S
T D
UI
23
73.9
10
0.0
4.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 6
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
5 40
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 10
10
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
44
54.5
10
0.0
2.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.8
0.
0
SUP
VA
N N
UYS
1S
T D
UI
53
66.0
83
.0
7.5
0.0
0.0
3.8
28.3
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
20
55.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
15
.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 14
42
.9
100.
0 0.
0 7.
1 0.
0 0.
0 28
.6
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
60
25.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0
TO
TAL
147
45.6
93
.9
2.7
0.7
0.0
2.7
21.8
0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
109
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
SU
P PA
SAD
ENA
1S
T D
UI
40
72.5
90
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.5
10
.0
0.0
STA
TUS
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2ND
DU
I 10
10
0.0
90.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
.0
10.0
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
10
40.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
62
54.8
98
.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.8
0.0
TOTA
L 12
2 63
.1
95.1
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6.
6 6.
6 0.
0
SUP
LON
G B
CH
1S
T D
UI
17
88.2
76
.5
17.6
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 5.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
8 25
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
29
72.4
86
.2
10.3
3.
4 0.
0 0.
0 3.
4 0.
0
SUP
CO
MPT
ON
1S
T D
UI
24
62.5
41
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
5 60
.0
60.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 32
40
.6
71.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
64
53.1
56
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.1
0.0
SU
P N
OR
WA
LK
1ST
DU
I 26
76
.9
80.8
0.
0 3.
8 0.
0 0.
0 3.
8 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
9 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
5 40
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 65
20
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 1.
5 0.
0
TO
TAL
105
39.0
95
.2
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
SU
P TO
RRA
NC
E 1S
T D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 7
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SU
P SA
NTA
1S
T D
UI
10
90.0
90
.0
20.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
M
ON
ICA
2N
D D
UI
4 75
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
3 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
17
23.5
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 34
47
.1
97.1
5.
9 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
LA
CO
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
LA
CN
TL
1ST
DU
I 24
83
.3
45.8
16
.7
0.0
0.0
4.2
8.3
0.0
TOTA
L 24
83
.3
45.8
16
.7
0.0
0.0
4.2
8.3
0.0
A
LHA
MBR
A
1ST
DU
I 83
0 94
.0
59.4
81
.8
0.5
0.0
54.2
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
288
92.0
94
.8
6.6
44.4
0.
0 42
.7
0.3
4.9
3RD
DU
I 92
81
.5
93.5
0.
0 3.
3 5.
4 5.
4 1.
1 2.
2
4T
H+
DU
I 8
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 12
18
92.4
70
.6
57.3
11
.1
0.4
47.5
0.
2 1.
3
LAN
CA
STER
1S
T D
UI
442
99.5
99
.3
95.2
2.
0 0.
2 2.
0 0.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
139
98.6
97
.1
7.9
84.2
2.
2 84
.9
0.0
11.5
3R
D D
UI
38
100.
0 44
.7
2.6
13.2
55
.3
13.2
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 5
80.0
60
.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
624
99.2
95
.2
69.4
21
.0
4.3
21.2
0.
6 2.
6
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
110
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
BE
VER
LY H
ILLS
1S
T D
UI
219
99.1
62
.6
89.5
1.
4 0.
5 80
.8
1.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 35
94
.3
91.4
20
.0
68.6
0.
0 82
.9
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 11
90
.9
100.
0 0.
0 9.
1 0.
0 0.
0 45
.5
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 26
6 98
.1
67.7
76
.7
10.5
0.
4 77
.8
3.0
0.0
BU
RBA
NK
1S
T D
UI
362
100.
0 99
.4
84.8
1.
1 0.
0 47
.5
11.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
81
100.
0 98
.8
6.2
65.4
0.
0 55
.6
22.2
1.
2
3R
D D
UI
30
93.3
96
.7
3.3
13.3
3.
3 16
.7
63.3
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 47
4 99
.4
99.2
66
.0
12.9
0.
2 46
.8
16.5
0.
2
WES
T C
OV
INA
1S
T D
UI
2469
98
.5
64.6
94
.9
1.1
0.0
62.5
3.
2 0.
1
2N
D D
UI
645
96.6
96
.9
8.7
80.3
0.
3 82
.2
6.2
22.8
3R
D D
UI
155
93.5
85
.8
3.2
30.3
12
.3
16.8
12
.3
6.5
4TH
+ D
UI
12
100.
0 83
.3
0.0
33.3
16
.7
16.7
8.
3 8.
3
TO
TAL
3281
97
.9
72.0
73
.3
18.1
0.
7 64
.0
4.2
4.9
C
OM
PTO
N
1ST
DU
I 95
0 98
.4
88.8
85
.6
1.7
0.0
69.4
6.
0 0.
1
2N
D D
UI
242
96.7
96
.3
14.5
66
.9
0.0
78.9
7.
0 8.
7
3R
D D
UI
73
94.5
93
.2
8.2
24.7
1.
4 32
.9
12.3
4.
1
4T
H+
DU
I 13
76
.9
100.
0 15
.4
15.4
0.
0 23
.1
38.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
1278
97
.7
90.6
67
.0
15.5
0.
1 68
.6
6.9
2.0
C
ULV
ER C
ITY
1ST
DU
I 19
9 98
.0
18.6
93
.0
1.5
0.5
83.9
6.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
52
90.4
78
.8
15.4
65
.4
0.0
71.2
13
.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 18
77
.8
94.4
0.
0 38
.9
5.6
50.0
22
.2
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
271
95.2
35
.8
71.2
16
.2
0.7
78.6
8.
5 0.
0
DO
WN
EY
1ST
DU
I 57
9 98
.4
24.7
89
.3
1.9
0.0
82.6
8.
6 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
162
97.5
89
.5
15.4
67
.9
3.1
69.8
18
.5
1.9
3RD
DU
I 51
10
0.0
84.3
9.
8 45
.1
7.8
23.5
41
.2
2.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
33.3
33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 79
5 98
.4
42.0
68
.8
18.4
1.
1 76
.0
12.8
0.
5
EAST
LA
1S
T D
UI
1330
99
.5
48.3
88
.3
0.5
0.0
78.0
4.
9 0.
1
2N
D D
UI
334
99.7
91
.9
11.7
67
.4
0.0
74.6
7.
8 9.
3
3R
D D
UI
118
98.3
94
.1
0.0
11.9
2.
5 7.
6 8.
5 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 15
10
0.0
100.
0 13
.3
0.0
0.0
13.3
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1797
99
.5
59.8
67
.7
13.6
0.
2 72
.2
5.6
1.8
EL
MO
NTE
1S
T D
UI
1094
99
.5
62.3
87
.6
1.3
0.0
51.2
10
.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 34
3 98
.5
94.5
6.
1 71
.1
0.0
70.8
14
.6
3.2
3RD
DU
I 10
2 97
.1
96.1
2.
0 20
.6
3.9
11.8
9.
8 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 8
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
1547
99
.1
71.9
63
.4
18.0
0.
3 52
.7
11.4
0.
7
GLE
ND
ALE
1S
T D
UI
609
99.3
51
.7
89.7
1.
6 0.
0 67
.3
1.1
0.3
2ND
DU
I 15
4 99
.4
93.5
8.
4 70
.8
2.6
73.4
1.
3 14
.3
3RD
DU
I 58
87
.9
86.2
0.
0 10
.3
10.3
13
.8
6.9
5.2
4TH
+ D
UI
13
92.3
10
0.0
0.0
15.4
0.
0 7.
7 0.
0 0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
111
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 83
4 98
.4
62.6
67
.0
15.2
1.
2 63
.8
1.6
3.
2
ING
LEW
OO
D
1ST
DU
I 96
1 88
.4
38.7
82
.4
1.1
0.0
72.3
12
.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 23
6 86
.4
86.4
19
.1
61.0
0.
4 67
.8
10.6
2.
1
3R
D D
UI
77
79.2
92
.2
3.9
31.2
6.
5 24
.7
19.5
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 8
75.0
10
0.0
12.5
50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1282
87
.4
51.1
65
.6
14.3
0.
5 68
.5
12.3
0.
4
LON
G B
EAC
H
1ST
DU
I 11
60
98.7
40
.2
87.8
0.
9 0.
1 64
.8
0.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 36
5 98
.6
91.8
12
.1
66.3
0.
0 60
.5
1.4
0.8
3RD
DU
I 94
95
.7
94.7
4.
3 25
.5
3.2
20.2
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 15
53
.3
100.
0 0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1634
98
.1
55.4
65
.2
17.0
0.
2 60
.8
0.7
0.2
LA
MET
RO
1ST
DU
I 67
06
99.6
59
.5
92.2
1.
2 0.
0 55
.0
0.4
0.1
2ND
DU
I 16
16
99.3
96
.7
10.3
81
.3
0.1
65.0
5.
3 10
.0
3RD
DU
I 42
0 95
.5
95.7
4.
3 19
.0
1.7
14.0
1.
7 3.
6
4T
H+
DU
I 51
84
.3
98.0
11
.8
7.8
2.0
3.9
5.9
0.0
TOTA
L 87
92
99.2
68
.3
72.5
16
.8
0.1
54.6
1.
4 2.
1
BELL
FLO
WER
1S
T D
UI
392
99.7
31
.9
79.6
0.
8 0.
0 70
.2
5.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 13
5 10
0.0
94.8
8.
9 55
.6
0.0
60.0
11
.1
1.5
3RD
DU
I 40
97
.5
90.0
0.
0 15
.0
10.0
12
.5
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
568
99.6
51
.1
57.0
14
.8
0.7
63.6
6.
7 0.
4
VA
LEN
CIA
1S
T D
UI
665
91.1
40
.5
81.5
1.
4 0.
0 62
.1
2.1
0.2
2ND
DU
I 21
7 91
.7
94.9
4.
6 66
.4
0.9
63.6
0.
9 14
.7
3RD
DU
I 64
64
.1
93.8
1.
6 15
.6
4.7
3.1
1.6
3.1
4TH
+ D
UI
26
26.9
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.8
0.0
TOTA
L 97
2 87
.8
57.7
56
.9
16.8
0.
5 56
.9
1.9
3.6
PA
SAD
ENA
1S
T D
UI
649
98.9
49
.5
92.6
0.
5 0.
0 92
.9
1.2
0.0
2ND
DU
I 16
4 98
.8
83.5
12
.2
70.7
0.
6 83
.5
4.9
0.0
3RD
DU
I 55
90
.9
98.2
1.
8 25
.5
1.8
14.5
12
.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
18
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0 5.
6 5.
6 0.
0
TO
TAL
886
98.4
59
.8
70.2
15
.3
0.2
84.5
2.
7 0.
0
MA
LIBU
1S
T D
UI
151
98.7
12
.6
90.1
2.
0 0.
0 89
.4
1.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 29
96
.6
79.3
13
.8
75.9
0.
0 82
.8
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 11
10
0.0
72.7
9.
1 54
.5
18.2
45
.5
18.2
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 5
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
196
98.5
28
.1
71.9
15
.8
1.0
83.7
2.
6 0.
0
CA
LABA
SAS
1ST
DU
I 70
10
0.0
2.9
95.7
0.
0 1.
4 92
.9
1.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 18
10
0.0
83.3
22
.2
72.2
0.
0 88
.9
5.6
5.6
3RD
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
33.3
66
.7
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
91
100.
0 22
.0
79.1
16
.5
1.1
91.2
2.
2 1.
1
POM
ON
A
1ST
DU
I 94
2 96
.0
39.6
87
.9
1.3
0.0
58.8
4.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
243
91.4
88
.1
9.5
60.9
0.
0 55
.1
10.3
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
69
79.7
10
0.0
5.8
13.0
0.
0 10
.1
24.6
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 19
57
.9
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 52
.6
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
112
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 12
73
93.6
53
.0
67.2
13
.3
0.0
54.6
7.
5 0.
0
HU
NTI
NG
TON
PK
1S
T D
UI
784
99.4
48
.9
76.5
1.
7 0.
0 50
.8
2.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 21
9 99
.1
92.2
10
.0
63.9
0.
0 57
.1
0.9
5.5
3RD
DU
I 48
95
.8
95.8
4.
2 31
.3
2.1
16.7
2.
1 2.
1
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 75
.0
0.0
25.0
25
.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
1055
99
.1
60.1
59
.1
16.0
0.
2 50
.3
2.5
1.2
M
ON
ROV
IA
1ST
DU
I 41
2 99
.5
34.7
83
.3
0.5
0.2
74.0
9.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
84
98.8
85
.7
10.7
58
.3
0.0
66.7
16
.7
0.0
3RD
DU
I 34
10
0.0
85.3
2.
9 2.
9 11
.8
11.8
26
.5
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
532
99.4
46
.2
66.4
9.
8 0.
9 68
.6
11.5
0.
0
SAN
TA M
ON
ICA
1S
T D
UI
268
97.4
12
.3
88.1
2.
6 0.
0 84
.0
4.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 67
91
.0
83.6
17
.9
53.7
0.
0 62
.7
7.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 16
75
.0
93.8
6.
3 12
.5
6.3
12.5
18
.8
0.0
TOTA
L 35
1 95
.2
29.6
70
.9
12.8
0.
3 76
.6
6.0
0.0
TO
RRA
NC
E 1S
T D
UI
1181
98
.3
32.9
90
.9
1.2
0.0
89.9
1.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
279
96.1
89
.6
12.9
71
.0
0.0
83.5
4.
7 1.
4
3R
D D
UI
81
93.8
79
.0
7.4
7.4
12.3
16
.0
9.9
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
24
66.7
79
.2
4.2
0.0
16.7
8.
3 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1565
97
.2
46.1
71
.4
13.9
0.
9 83
.7
2.6
0.3
SO
UTH
GA
TE
1ST
DU
I 49
7 95
.8
56.3
86
.7
1.6
0.0
50.5
6.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
142
95.1
91
.5
14.1
69
.0
0.0
71.8
12
.7
0.7
3RD
DU
I 43
90
.7
90.7
4.
7 30
.2
0.0
37.2
7.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 68
5 95
.2
66.0
66
.1
17.5
0.
0 54
.0
7.6
0.1
W
HIT
TIER
1S
T D
UI
678
94.1
39
.8
75.7
1.
5 0.
0 76
.3
2.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 23
5 92
.8
94.9
7.
2 70
.2
0.4
70.2
3.
8 1.
7
3R
D D
UI
77
83.1
90
.9
1.3
11.7
7.
8 10
.4
13.0
1.
3
4T
H+
DU
I 10
80
.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
.0
0.0
10.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1000
92
.8
57.3
53
.1
18.5
0.
7 69
.1
3.8
0.5
H
OLL
YWO
OD
1S
T D
UI
114
97.4
49
.1
81.6
0.
9 0.
0 50
.9
4.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 22
95
.5
100.
0 4.
5 59
.1
0.0
72.7
9.
1 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
140
97.1
58
.6
67.1
12
.1
0.0
54.3
5.
0 0.
0
SAN
FER
NA
ND
O
1ST
DU
I 16
53
99.3
50
.9
85.0
1.
4 0.
1 39
.7
5.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 42
0 97
.9
93.6
12
.1
64.0
0.
7 59
.5
6.7
0.5
3RD
DU
I 15
5 95
.5
91.0
3.
9 14
.2
6.5
9.7
5.2
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
39
35.9
97
.4
5.1
0.0
2.6
0.0
5.1
0.0
TOTA
L 22
67
97.7
62
.3
64.6
13
.9
0.7
40.6
5.
9 0.
1
SAN
PED
RO
1ST
DU
I 46
7 10
0.0
56.1
93
.8
1.7
0.0
53.3
2.
6 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
142
100.
0 93
.0
8.5
77.5
1.
4 54
.9
14.8
2.
8
3R
D D
UI
45
100.
0 88
.9
8.9
40.0
6.
7 8.
9 6.
7 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 65
6 10
0.0
66.5
69
.4
20.7
0.
8 50
.6
5.5
0.6
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
113
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
V
AN
NU
YS
1ST
DU
I 20
92
99.2
40
.6
91.5
2.
9 0.
2 60
.6
0.4
0.1
2ND
DU
I 58
5 97
.9
93.2
7.
2 81
.5
1.7
83.4
1.
0 3.
4
3R
D D
UI
174
90.8
87
.4
1.7
40.8
10
.9
32.2
2.
3 4.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 53
37
.7
90.6
3.
8 11
.3
3.8
9.4
1.9
0.0
TOTA
L 29
04
97.3
54
.9
67.5
21
.1
1.2
62.5
0.
7 1.
0
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
1ST
DU
I 48
8 98
.8
34.0
81
.6
2.3
0.0
73.6
1.
8 0.
6
2N
D D
UI
140
98.6
90
.7
9.3
79.3
0.
0 83
.6
2.1
24.3
3R
D D
UI
28
100.
0 78
.6
7.1
35.7
0.
0 25
.0
7.1
14.3
4T
H+
DU
I 4
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 66
0 98
.5
48.3
62
.6
20.0
0.
0 73
.2
2.1
6.2
A
VA
LON
1S
T D
UI
2 10
0.0
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
5 10
0.0
60.0
0.
0 60
.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
7 10
0.0
57.1
28
.6
42.9
0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
U
SMA
G
1ST
DU
I 11
90
.9
9.1
90.9
0.
0 0.
0 81
.8
0.0
0.0
BRK
SFLD
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
15
93.3
26
.7
73.3
0.
0 6.
7 60
.0
0.0
0.0
MA
DER
A
SUP
MA
DER
A
1ST
DU
I 15
66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 8
75.0
87
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 25
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 28
50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 14
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 55
56
.4
98.2
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 16
.4
0.0
JU
V M
AD
ERA
1S
T D
UI
11
90.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 13
84
.6
15.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
C
HO
WC
HIL
LA
1ST
DU
I 10
4 98
.1
100.
0 94
.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 52
96
.2
100.
0 11
.5
71.2
0.
0 71
.2
9.6
0.0
3RD
DU
I 19
10
0.0
100.
0 5.
3 31
.6
0.0
26.3
31
.6
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 83
.3
100.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
TO
TAL
181
97.2
10
0.0
59.1
23
.8
0.0
23.2
9.
9 0.
0
BORD
EN
1ST
DU
I 11
9 95
.8
83.2
87
.4
5.0
0.0
3.4
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 60
93
.3
85.0
8.
3 76
.7
0.0
68.3
1.
7 10
.0
3RD
DU
I 20
95
.0
65.0
5.
0 5.
0 0.
0 5.
0 10
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 66
.7
83.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
205
94.1
82
.0
53.7
25
.9
0.0
22.4
1.
5 2.
9
MA
DER
A
1ST
DU
I 22
0 97
.7
98.2
88
.6
2.3
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 81
97
.5
96.3
17
.3
61.7
0.
0 19
.8
2.5
1.2
3RD
DU
I 36
91
.7
100.
0 5.
6 30
.6
0.0
2.8
19.4
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 10
60
.0
90.0
20
.0
10.0
0.
0 10
.0
10.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
347
96.0
97
.7
61.4
19
.3
0.0
5.5
2.9
0.3
BA
SS L
AK
E 1S
T D
UI
62
100.
0 80
.6
35.5
1.
6 1.
6 1.
6 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
27
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
48.1
0.
0 40
.7
3.7
3.7
3RD
DU
I 10
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 30
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
114
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 10
1 10
0.0
88.1
21
.8
16.8
1.
0 11
.9
2.0
1.0
MA
RIN
SU
P SA
N R
AFA
EL
1ST
DU
I 5
100.
0 60
.0
40.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 60
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 11
81
.8
100.
0 9.
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 63
.6
0.0
TOTA
L 17
82
.4
88.2
17
.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
58.8
0.
0
JUV
SA
N R
AFA
EL
1ST
DU
I 5
40.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 5
40.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
SA
N R
AFA
EL
1ST
DU
I 10
03
99.9
6.
0 94
.6
2.0
0.0
94.0
5.
0 0.
2
2N
D D
UI
293
100.
0 88
.4
8.5
85.0
0.
0 94
.2
3.4
29.7
3R
D D
UI
87
100.
0 80
.5
1.1
26.4
0.
0 46
.0
50.6
28
.7
4TH
+ D
UI
15
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0 13
.3
46.7
6.
7
TO
TAL
1398
99
.9
28.9
69
.7
21.1
0.
0 90
.2
7.9
8.2
MA
RIP
OSA
SU
P M
ARI
POSA
1S
T D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 7
85.7
10
0.0
14.3
57
.1
0.0
28.6
0.
0 0.
0
MA
RIPO
SA
1ST
DU
I 49
98
.0
95.9
93
.9
0.0
2.0
4.1
6.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 17
10
0.0
100.
0 11
.8
76.5
0.
0 5.
9 17
.6
5.9
3RD
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
28.6
0.
0 0.
0 14
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 73
98
.6
97.3
65
.8
20.5
1.
4 4.
1 9.
6 1.
4
USM
AG
1S
T D
UI
47
95.7
59
.6
83.0
4.
3 0.
0 83
.0
4.3
0.0
YO
SEM
ITE
2ND
DU
I 14
10
0.0
92.9
14
.3
78.6
0.
0 7.
1 71
.4
0.0
3RD
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0 25
.0
75.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 66
97
.0
69.7
62
.1
24.2
0.
0 62
.1
22.7
0.
0 M
END
OC
INO
SU
P U
KIA
H
1ST
DU
I 4
50.0
50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 7
0.0
14.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 13
38
.5
76.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 7.
7 0.
0
TO
TAL
24
29.2
54
.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.2
0.0
JU
V U
KIA
H
1ST
DU
I 11
45
.5
9.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.1
54.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
11
45.5
9.
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 9.
1 54
.5
0.0
W
ILLI
TS
1ST
DU
I 80
93
.8
95.0
83
.8
3.8
0.0
7.5
3.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 36
91
.7
100.
0 5.
6 69
.4
0.0
66.7
2.
8 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
16
75.0
93
.8
6.3
31.3
0.
0 6.
3 12
.5
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 13
5 90
.4
96.3
51
.9
25.2
0.
0 23
.0
4.4
0.0
U
KIA
H M
UN
I 1S
T D
UI
227
93.8
93
.4
79.3
4.
8 0.
0 6.
6 3.
5 0.
4
2N
D D
UI
100
93.0
10
0.0
8.0
62.0
0.
0 48
.0
18.0
1.
0
3R
D D
UI
41
80.5
97
.6
9.8
22.0
0.
0 7.
3 53
.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
TO
TAL
374
91.7
95
.7
51.3
22
.2
0.0
17.6
13
.4
0.5
BO
ON
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 9
88.9
88
.9
0.0
44.4
0.
0 11
.1
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
115
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 10
90
.0
90.0
0.
0 40
.0
0.0
10.0
0.
0 0.
0
PT. A
REN
A
1ST
DU
I 8
100.
0 10
0.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 37
.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 9
100.
0 10
0.0
66.7
11
.1
0.0
11.1
33
.3
0.0
LI
TTLE
LA
KE
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 3
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
LEG
GET
T 1S
T D
UI
16
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
11
81.8
90
.9
9.1
54.5
0.
0 36
.4
18.2
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
31
93.5
96
.8
61.3
19
.4
0.0
12.9
12
.9
0.0
C
OV
ELO
1S
T D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
33.3
33
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
6 83
.3
100.
0 16
.7
33.3
0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
FO
RT B
RAG
G
1ST
DU
I 90
10
0.0
97.8
87
.8
3.3
0.0
3.3
14.4
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
33
100.
0 10
0.0
15.2
78
.8
0.0
54.5
12
.1
0.0
3RD
DU
I 12
10
0.0
100.
0 8.
3 58
.3
0.0
25.0
50
.0
8.3
4TH
+ D
UI
2 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 13
7 99
.3
97.8
62
.0
26.3
0.
0 17
.5
17.5
0.
7
UK
IAH
1S
T D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 5
100.
0 10
0.0
80.0
20
.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0 0.
0 M
ERC
ED
SUP
MER
CED
1S
T D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
40.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
36
66.7
97
.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
27.8
0.
0
TO
TAL
48
68.8
97
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
22.9
0.
0
JUV
MER
CED
1S
T D
UI
20
5.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 4
25.0
25
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 27
11
.1
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 18
.5
0.0
MER
CED
SU
P M
ERC
ED
1ST
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
5 40
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 36
66
.7
97.2
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 27
.8
0.0
TOTA
L 48
68
.8
97.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 22
.9
0.0
JU
V M
ERC
ED
1ST
DU
I 20
5.
0 5.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 25
.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
27
11.1
11
.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
18.5
0.
0
MER
CED
1S
T D
UI
606
98.8
96
.4
83.0
6.
4 0.
0 6.
6 1.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
240
99.2
98
.3
7.5
77.5
0.
4 65
.8
2.5
0.4
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
116
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
3RD
DU
I 94
97
.9
100.
0 6.
4 40
.4
0.0
21.3
24
.5
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
37
83.8
10
0.0
2.7
21.6
0.
0 10
.8
21.6
0.
0
TO
TAL
977
98.3
97
.3
54.0
27
.7
0.1
22.7
4.
8 0.
1
LOS
BAN
OS
1ST
DU
I 18
7 10
0.0
96.3
92
.5
3.2
0.0
3.7
1.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 69
10
0.0
100.
0 7.
2 84
.1
0.0
68.1
1.
4 1.
4
3R
D D
UI
30
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
36.7
0.
0 3.
3 3.
3 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 6
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 16
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 29
2 10
0.0
97.6
61
.0
26.4
0.
0 18
.8
1.7
0.3
MO
DO
C
SUP
MO
DO
C
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
ALT
UR
AS
1ST
DU
I 52
96
.2
75.0
84
.6
1.9
0.0
23.1
9.
6 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
14
78.6
78
.6
0.0
64.3
0.
0 42
.9
7.1
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 69
88
.4
76.8
63
.8
14.5
0.
0 26
.1
11.6
0.
0 M
ON
O
BRID
GEP
OR
T 1S
T D
UI
16
100.
0 62
.5
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 6.
3 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
66.7
0.
0 33
.3
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 20
10
0.0
70.0
10
.0
10.0
0.
0 15
.0
0.0
5.0
M
AM
OTH
LK
ES
1ST
DU
I 73
98
.6
49.3
80
.8
0.0
0.0
5.5
1.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 15
10
0.0
73.3
6.
7 60
.0
0.0
46.7
0.
0 6.
7
3R
D D
UI
12
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0 33
.3
8.3
25.0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
TOTA
L 10
3 99
.0
60.2
58
.3
18.4
0.
0 14
.6
1.9
4.9
MO
NTE
REY
SU
P M
ON
TERE
Y
1ST
DU
I 15
73
.3
100.
0 6.
7 13
.3
0.0
6.7
20.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
12
83.3
83
.3
0.0
8.3
0.0
8.3
8.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 8
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
91
75.8
89
.0
8.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
27.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
126
76.2
90
.5
7.1
2.4
0.0
1.6
23.0
0.
0
JUV
MO
NTE
REY
1S
T D
UI
18
88.9
44
.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
44.4
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 20
90
.0
40.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 40
.0
0.0
M
ON
TERE
Y 1S
T D
UI
710
99.2
99
.0
88.2
1.
0 0.
0 1.
3 12
.8
0.3
2ND
DU
I 19
9 99
.0
100.
0 2.
5 28
.6
0.0
15.1
70
.9
1.0
3RD
DU
I 76
98
.7
98.7
2.
6 3.
9 0.
0 2.
6 64
.5
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
12
83.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
58.3
0.
0
TO
TAL
997
98.9
99
.2
63.5
6.
7 0.
0 4.
1 28
.9
0.4
SA
LIN
AS
1ST
DU
I 11
38
98.2
98
.5
86.7
1.
9 0.
0 0.
2 5.
4 0.
4
2N
D D
UI
376
99.2
99
.2
8.2
67.0
0.
0 10
.1
55.1
0.
8
3R
D D
UI
165
97.6
10
0.0
3.0
23.0
0.
0 1.
8 53
.9
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
26
100.
0 10
0.0
11.5
30
.8
0.0
0.0
50.0
3.
8
TO
TAL
17
05
98.4
98
.8
60.2
18
.8
0.0
2.5
21.7
0.
5
KIN
G C
ITY
1ST
DU
I 53
0 99
.1
99.2
65
.3
0.9
0.0
0.8
31.7
0.
2
2N
D D
UI
220
98.2
99
.1
3.2
28.2
0.
0 19
.1
72.7
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
93
97.8
10
0.0
0.0
2.2
0.0
0.0
64.5
0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
117
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
4TH
+ D
UI
7 10
0.0
85.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 71
.4
0.0
TOTA
L 85
0 98
.7
99.2
41
.5
8.1
0.0
5.4
46.2
0.
1
USM
AG
1S
T D
UI
7 10
0.0
28.6
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
71.4
0.
0 0.
0
M
ON
TERE
Y
2ND
DU
I 3
100.
0 66
.7
66.7
33
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
10
100.
0 40
.0
90.0
10
.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0 0.
0 N
APA
SU
P N
APA
1S
T D
UI
22
77.3
86
.4
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 13
.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 6
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
29
10.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 58
41
.4
94.8
19
.0
5.2
0.0
0.0
5.2
0.0
N
APA
1S
T D
UI
643
99.5
98
.4
90.2
1.
7 0.
0 2.
0 1.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
197
98.5
99
.5
6.6
84.3
0.
0 64
.5
0.0
4.1
3RD
DU
I 69
95
.7
100.
0 4.
3 47
.8
0.0
34.8
7.
2 8.
7
4T
H+
DU
I 9
100.
0 88
.9
0.0
22.2
0.
0 11
.1
11.1
11
.1
TOTA
L 91
8 99
.0
98.7
64
.9
23.1
0.
0 18
.0
1.6
1.6
NEV
AD
A
SUP
NEV
AD
A
1ST
DU
I 10
80
.0
70.0
30
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
8 25
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 37
.5
0.0
TOTA
L 20
50
.0
85.0
15
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
45.0
0.
0
NEV
AD
A C
ITY
1ST
DU
I 18
3 98
.4
88.0
77
.6
12.0
0.
0 29
.5
1.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 62
98
.4
100.
0 3.
2 82
.3
0.0
83.9
1.
6 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
20
95.0
10
0.0
0.0
30.0
0.
0 15
.0
10.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 26
7 98
.1
91.8
53
.9
29.6
0.
0 40
.8
1.9
0.0
TR
UC
KEE
MU
NI
1ST
DU
I 99
96
.0
90.9
80
.8
7.1
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 29
10
0.0
96.6
13
.8
82.8
0.
0 65
.5
0.0
6.9
3RD
DU
I 5
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 60
.0
20.0
20
.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
TOTA
L 13
5 97
.0
92.6
62
.2
27.4
0.
0 19
.3
0.7
3.0
ORA
NG
E SU
P SA
NTA
AN
A
1ST
DU
I 40
77
.5
90.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 2.
5 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
18
77.8
94
.4
0.0
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 5.
6 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
14
64.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
125
58.4
92
.8
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
TOTA
L 19
7 64
.5
92.9
0.
0 1.
5 0.
0 0.
0 1.
5 0.
0
JUV
ORA
NG
E 1S
T D
UI
47
95.7
34
.0
78.7
2.
1 0.
0 14
.9
66.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
47
95.7
34
.0
78.7
2.
1 0.
0 14
.9
66.0
0.
0
FULL
ERTO
N
1ST
DU
I 23
70
99.5
31
.9
93.1
1.
5 0.
0 63
.2
5.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 65
0 98
.9
95.5
5.
4 86
.9
0.0
67.8
2.
0 5.
1
3R
D D
UI
185
97.8
97
.8
3.2
67.6
0.
0 13
.0
1.1
4.3
4TH
+ D
UI
17
88.2
10
0.0
5.9
47.1
0.
0 11
.8
0.0
5.9
TOTA
L 32
22
99.2
48
.9
69.8
22
.7
0.0
61.0
4.
7 1.
3
WES
TMIN
STER
1S
T D
UI
1755
99
.3
12.6
92
.4
1.4
0.0
94.1
0.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
504
98.2
92
.3
6.9
82.1
0.
0 90
.9
2.0
25.8
3R
D D
UI
125
100.
0 91
.2
4.0
73.6
0.
8 28
.8
0.8
12.8
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
118
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
4TH
+ D
UI
16
87.5
68
.8
6.3
43.8
0.
0 56
.3
6.3
25.0
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 24
00
99.0
33
.8
69.3
22
.4
0.0
89.8
1.
0 6.
3
LAG
UN
A H
ILLS
1S
T D
UI
1279
10
0.0
10.2
90
.2
1.3
0.0
89.8
6.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
374
100.
0 96
.3
2.9
83.2
0.
0 85
.0
9.6
0.0
3RD
DU
I 76
10
0.0
96.1
2.
6 61
.8
0.0
7.9
2.6
1.3
4TH
+ D
UI
8 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1737
10
0.0
32.9
67
.2
21.9
0.
0 85
.0
7.3
0.1
N
EWPO
RT B
CH
1S
T D
UI
1534
99
.8
15.3
93
.2
2.0
0.0
89.6
5.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
399
99.7
97
.0
3.3
87.5
0.
0 77
.2
20.3
4.
5
3R
D D
UI
98
94.9
99
.0
2.0
75.5
0.
0 12
.2
9.2
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 50
.0
100.
0 16
.7
33.3
0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 20
37
99.4
35
.5
71.0
22
.4
0.0
83.3
8.
7 0.
9
SAN
TA A
NA
1S
T D
UI
1748
99
.7
24.2
95
.7
1.6
0.1
81.6
2.
6 0.
1
2N
D D
UI
472
98.5
94
.3
7.8
86.4
0.
0 85
.2
3.6
7.8
3RD
DU
I 11
9 97
.5
95.8
3.
4 78
.2
0.0
22.7
5.
0 6.
7
4T
H+
DU
I 14
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 92
.9
0.0
14.3
0.
0 7.
1
TO
TAL
2353
99
.4
42.3
72
.8
23.0
0.
0 78
.9
2.9
2.0
SN
TA A
NA
PV
ST
1ST
DU
I 24
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
29
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TUST
IN P
VST
1S
T D
UI
2 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 PL
AC
ER
SUP
PLA
CER
1S
T D
UI
7 71
.4
71.4
42
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
6 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
9 44
.4
88.9
0.
0 22
.2
0.0
11.1
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
24
58.3
87
.5
12.5
12
.5
0.0
4.2
4.2
0.0
JU
V P
LAC
ER
1ST
DU
I 10
10
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
10
10.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
A
UBU
RN M
UN
I 1S
T D
UI
360
99.4
90
.6
92.2
2.
2 0.
0 10
.8
3.1
0.8
2ND
DU
I 12
7 10
0.0
99.2
3.
9 81
.1
0.0
75.6
3.
1 27
.6
3RD
DU
I 30
10
0.0
83.3
0.
0 30
.0
0.0
40.0
46
.7
33.3
4T
H+
DU
I 9
88.9
10
0.0
0.0
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 52
6 99
.4
92.4
64
.1
23.0
0.
0 27
.9
6.1
9.1
C
OLF
AX
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
RO
SEV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
458
99.3
90
.4
88.2
2.
8 0.
0 11
.1
3.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 15
6 96
.8
94.9
10
.3
76.9
0.
0 67
.3
6.4
9.0
3RD
DU
I 48
93
.8
93.8
8.
3 54
.2
2.1
39.6
10
.4
10.4
4T
H+
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 66
5 98
.3
91.7
63
.8
24.4
0.
2 26
.5
5.0
2.9
FO
REST
HIL
L 1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
119
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 3
100.
0 10
0.0
33.3
66
.7
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
TAH
OE
CIT
Y 1S
T D
UI
190
99.5
10
0.0
94.2
3.
2 0.
0 28
.9
3.2
0.0
2ND
DU
I 53
98
.1
100.
0 3.
8 81
.1
0.0
79.2
0.
0 13
.2
3RD
DU
I 24
10
0.0
83.3
0.
0 54
.2
4.2
45.8
25
.0
12.5
4T
H+
DU
I 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
269
98.9
98
.5
67.3
23
.0
0.4
40.1
4.
8 3.
7 PL
UM
AS
SUP
PLU
MA
S 1S
T D
UI
2 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
3 33
.3
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
Q
UIN
CY
1ST
DU
I 84
98
.8
95.2
82
.1
8.3
0.0
28.6
1.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
27
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
81.5
0.
0 77
.8
3.7
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
117
99.1
96
.6
59.8
24
.8
0.0
39.3
1.
7 0.
0 R
IVER
SID
E SU
P RI
VER
SID
E 1S
T D
UI
55
81.8
96
.4
5.5
1.8
0.0
3.6
1.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 21
85
.7
95.2
0.
0 52
.4
0.0
42.9
4.
8 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
9 77
.8
100.
0 22
.2
0.0
0.0
22.2
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 40
52
.5
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
125
72.8
97
.6
4.0
9.6
0.0
10.4
1.
6 0.
0
SUP
IND
IO
1ST
DU
I 34
6 98
.6
11.0
3.
8 0.
6 0.
0 87
.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 10
5 99
.0
81.9
1.
9 42
.9
0.0
92.4
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
55
98.2
10
0.0
0.0
14.5
0.
0 78
.2
1.8
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
34
44.1
97
.1
0.0
5.9
0.0
23.5
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
540
95.2
39
.3
2.8
10.6
0.
0 83
.1
0.2
0.0
JU
V R
IVER
SID
E 1S
T D
UI
25
88.0
20
.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
60
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 25
88
.0
20.0
4.
0 0.
0 0.
0 12
.0
60.0
0.
0
JUV
IND
IO
1ST
DU
I 7
85.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 7
85.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
C
ORO
NA
1S
T D
UI
391
99.7
64
.5
92.8
0.
3 0.
0 49
.9
1.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 11
3 98
.2
95.6
27
.4
69.0
0.
0 71
.7
1.8
0.0
3RD
DU
I 34
94
.1
100.
0 14
.7
20.6
0.
0 14
.7
50.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
28.6
28
.6
0.0
14.3
28
.6
0.0
TOTA
L 54
5 99
.1
73.6
73
.6
16.1
0.
0 51
.7
5.1
0.0
H
EMET
1S
T D
UI
316
99.7
71
.2
91.1
3.
8 0.
0 76
.9
0.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 11
4 10
0.0
95.6
14
.9
79.8
0.
0 93
.0
0.9
0.0
3RD
DU
I 32
10
0.0
100.
0 9.
4 50
.0
0.0
31.3
3.
1 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 30
93
.3
96.7
0.
0 46
.7
0.0
6.7
16.7
0.
0
TO
TAL
492
99.4
80
.3
62.6
27
.0
0.0
73.4
1.
8 0.
0
BAN
NIN
G
1ST
DU
I 22
5 97
.8
47.6
91
.6
1.8
0.0
64.0
1.
8 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
68
100.
0 88
.2
4.4
82.4
4.
4 79
.4
2.9
0.0
3RD
DU
I 23
10
0.0
95.7
8.
7 52
.2
0.0
26.1
30
.4
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
16.7
16
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 32
2 98
.4
60.6
65
.5
23.6
0.
9 63
.7
4.3
0.0
IN
DIO
1S
T D
UI
639
99.5
6.
6 76
.1
2.0
0.0
93.1
1.
3 0.
2
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
120
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2ND
DU
I 29
9 99
.0
90.0
7.
0 81
.9
0.0
93.0
0.
7 1.
7
3R
D D
UI
54
96.3
88
.9
5.6
40.7
0.
0 37
.0
18.5
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 24
91
.7
75.0
4.
2 12
.5
0.0
20.8
20
.8
0.0
TOTA
L 10
16
99.0
37
.1
50.3
27
.9
0.0
88.4
2.
5 0.
6
MO
REN
O V
LY
1ST
DU
I 12
22
99.7
79
.1
88.1
5.
0 0.
0 1.
1 0.
0 0.
1
2N
D D
UI
313
98.7
97
.8
60.1
28
.4
1.3
22.4
0.
0 2.
2
3R
D D
UI
116
98.3
99
.1
77.6
7.
8 0.
0 5.
2 0.
0 2.
6
4T
H+
DU
I 23
95
.7
95.7
56
.5
4.3
0.0
4.3
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 16
74
99.3
84
.2
81.7
9.
6 0.
2 5.
4 0.
0 0.
7
PALM
SPR
ING
S 1S
T D
UI
121
100.
0 4.
1 71
.1
0.8
0.0
96.7
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
35
100.
0 88
.6
14.3
77
.1
0.0
88.6
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
8 87
.5
87.5
25
.0
12.5
0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 16
7 99
.4
27.5
55
.7
17.4
0.
0 90
.4
0.0
0.0
BL
YTH
E 1S
T D
UI
145
98.6
37
.2
83.4
1.
4 0.
0 77
.2
2.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 45
10
0.0
88.9
11
.1
73.3
0.
0 84
.4
2.2
0.0
3RD
DU
I 13
10
0.0
92.3
15
.4
53.8
0.
0 23
.1
7.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
205
99.0
52
.7
62.4
20
.5
0.0
74.6
2.
4 0.
0
PER
RIS
1ST
DU
I 56
4 99
.6
39.9
92
.9
4.3
0.0
70.9
0.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
140
98.6
90
.0
14.3
76
.4
0.0
85.7
0.
7 0.
7
3R
D D
UI
52
96.2
92
.3
1.9
38.5
0.
0 25
.0
1.9
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
15
73.3
93
.3
0.0
20.0
0.
0 20
.0
6.7
0.0
TOTA
L 77
1 98
.7
53.6
70
.7
20.0
0.
0 69
.5
0.6
0.1
EL
SIN
OR
E 1S
T D
UI
3 10
0.0
33.3
66
.7
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 8
100.
0 75
.0
25.0
50
.0
0.0
87.5
0.
0 0.
0
TC M
ARC
H A
FB
1ST
DU
I 4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
4 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
SAC
RAM
ENTO
SU
P SA
CTO
1S
T D
UI
67
76.1
98
.5
44.8
11
.9
0.0
1.5
7.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 56
83
.9
100.
0 10
.7
21.4
0.
0 3.
6 7.
1 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
37
51.4
10
0.0
0.0
27.0
0.
0 0.
0 8.
1 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 21
8 59
.2
99.1
2.
3 32
.6
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
TOTA
L 37
8 65
.1
99.2
10
.8
26.7
0.
0 0.
8 6.
1 0.
0
JUV
SA
CTO
TRF
1S
T D
UI
49
28.6
28
.6
8.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
53.1
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
51
31.4
31
.4
7.8
2.0
0.0
2.0
51.0
0.
0
SAC
RAM
ENTO
1S
T D
UI
3363
99
.3
97.6
89
.9
1.8
0.0
2.1
0.2
0.0
2ND
DU
I 12
29
99.6
98
.9
5.5
64.8
0.
0 62
.8
0.5
0.6
3RD
DU
I 48
7 98
.6
98.2
2.
3 24
.4
0.0
9.2
0.8
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
100
98.0
98
.0
1.0
21.0
0.
0 11
.0
3.0
0.0
TOTA
L 51
79
99.3
98
.0
59.9
19
.2
0.0
17.4
0.
4 0.
1
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
121
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
EL
K G
ROV
E 1S
T D
UI
81
100.
0 97
.5
90.1
0.
0 0.
0 2.
5 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
30
96.7
96
.7
0.0
66.7
0.
0 66
.7
3.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 6
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 11
7 99
.1
97.4
62
.4
18.8
0.
0 19
.7
0.9
0.0
G
ALT
1S
T D
UI
36
100.
0 10
0.0
8.3
83.3
0.
0 0.
0 2.
8 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
19
100.
0 94
.7
0.0
73.7
0.
0 57
.9
10.5
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
6 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 16
.7
0.0
16.7
50
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
63
100.
0 98
.4
6.3
71.4
0.
0 19
.0
12.7
0.
0
WA
LNU
T G
RO
VE
1ST
DU
I 39
10
0.0
92.3
10
.3
82.1
0.
0 10
.3
2.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 12
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 91
.7
0.0
91.7
8.
3 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
53
98.1
92
.5
7.5
81.1
0.
0 28
.3
3.8
0.0
U
SMA
G S
AC
TO
1ST
DU
I 3
100.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 3
100.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
U
S C
T SA
CTO
1S
T D
UI
7 10
0.0
42.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 28
.6
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 13
10
0.0
69.2
15
.4
0.0
0.0
15.4
0.
0 0.
0 SA
N B
ENIT
O
JUV
S B
ENIT
O
1ST
DU
I 6
66.7
16
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
83.3
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 7
71.4
28
.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
85.7
0.
0
HO
LLIS
TER
1S
T D
UI
155
96.8
98
.1
68.4
0.
0 0.
0 1.
9 21
.3
1.3
2ND
DU
I 64
93
.8
85.9
3.
1 39
.1
0.0
53.1
20
.3
39.1
3R
D D
UI
30
100.
0 76
.7
0.0
13.3
0.
0 30
.0
3.3
20.0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 25
1 96
.0
92.4
43
.0
11.6
0.
0 18
.3
18.7
13
.1
SAN
SU
P SA
N B
ERN
1S
T D
UI
14
57.1
92
.9
7.1
0.0
0.0
7.1
7.1
0.0
B
ERN
ARD
INO
2ND
DU
I 9
44.4
88
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 4
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 25
60
.0
96.0
0.
0 4.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
52
57.7
94
.2
1.9
1.9
0.0
3.8
1.9
0.0
SU
P RA
NC
HO
1S
T D
UI
16
62.5
10
0.0
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 6.
3 0.
0 0.
0
C
UC
AM
NG
A
2ND
DU
I 6
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 4
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
25
48.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 51
52
.9
100.
0 3.
9 0.
0 0.
0 2.
0 0.
0 0.
0
SUP
VIC
TORV
LE
1ST
DU
I 5
80.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 9
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
15
26.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SU
P BA
RST
OW
1S
T D
UI
5 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
33.3
10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
122
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
4TH
+ D
UI
21
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
30
3.3
100.
0 0.
0 3.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
SUP
JOSH
UA
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
T
REE
4TH
+ D
UI
5 80
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 6
83.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0
JUV
TR
F SA
N
1ST
DU
I 27
85
.2
0.0
85.2
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
BER
NA
RDIN
O
TOTA
L 27
85
.2
0.0
85.2
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
JU
V S
AN
BER
NO
1S
T D
UI
6 83
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
6 83
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
RA
NC
HO
1S
T D
UI
4 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
C
UC
AM
NG
A
TOTA
L 4
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
C
HIN
O
1ST
DU
I 26
3 97
.7
8.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
86.7
0.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
94
98.9
91
.5
0.0
83.0
0.
0 89
.4
3.2
1.1
3RD
DU
I 17
10
0.0
88.2
0.
0 58
.8
0.0
64.7
5.
9 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 37
5 97
.9
32.5
0.
0 24
.3
0.0
86.1
1.
3 0.
3
BARS
TOW
1S
T D
UI
224
96.9
46
.9
0.4
2.2
0.0
53.1
5.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
71
93.0
90
.1
0.0
76.1
0.
0 57
.7
19.7
4.
2
3R
D D
UI
16
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
31.3
0.
0 18
.8
6.3
6.3
4TH
+ D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 31
4 94
.6
59.9
0.
3 20
.4
0.0
51.9
9.
2 1.
3
RED
LAN
DS
1ST
DU
I 12
6 94
.4
14.3
0.
8 0.
8 0.
0 77
.0
1.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 38
92
.1
71.1
0.
0 28
.9
0.0
57.9
13
.2
0.0
3RD
DU
I 12
10
0.0
83.3
0.
0 8.
3 0.
0 16
.7
8.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
10
100.
0 80
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
186
94.6
33
.9
0.5
7.0
0.0
65.6
4.
3 0.
0
S BE
RN C
NTR
L 1S
T D
UI
877
96.1
24
.6
0.3
1.9
0.0
69.2
10
.6
0.2
2ND
DU
I 25
8 95
.0
85.7
0.
0 57
.0
0.0
62.4
17
.1
3.9
3RD
DU
I 91
81
.3
86.8
0.
0 15
.4
0.0
22.0
9.
9 1.
1
4T
H+
DU
I 21
57
.1
81.0
0.
0 9.
5 0.
0 0.
0 4.
8 0.
0
TO
TAL
1247
94
.1
42.7
0.
2 14
.4
0.0
63.2
11
.8
1.0
FO
NTA
NA
1S
T D
UI
630
99.7
13
.7
0.3
1.1
0.0
74.4
6.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
211
99.1
66
.8
0.0
64.5
0.
0 80
.1
11.4
1.
4
3R
D D
UI
69
98.6
81
.2
0.0
18.8
0.
0 24
.6
42.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 12
10
0.0
75.0
0.
0 41
.7
0.0
33.3
33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 92
2 99
.5
31.7
0.
2 17
.5
0.0
71.5
10
.7
0.3
V
ICTO
RVIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 46
8 98
.1
28.8
0.
0 2.
6 0.
0 72
.9
1.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 16
3 98
.8
79.8
0.
0 71
.2
0.0
83.4
3.
1 1.
2
3R
D D
UI
45
88.9
88
.9
0.0
35.6
0.
0 33
.3
8.9
2.2
4TH
+ D
UI
14
35.7
10
0.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
7.1
21.4
0.
0
TO
TAL
690
96.4
46
.2
0.0
21.0
0.
0 71
.4
2.5
0.4
RA
NC
HO
1S
T D
UI
1212
95
.5
31.6
0.
0 1.
3 0.
0 60
.4
2.2
0.0
CU
CM
NG
A
2ND
DU
I 36
7 92
.6
89.1
0.
0 73
.0
0.0
80.9
4.
4 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
94
60.6
91
.5
0.0
24.5
0.
0 29
.8
9.6
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
123
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
4TH
+ D
UI
18
50.0
94
.4
0.0
22.2
0.
0 22
.2
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 16
91
92.5
48
.1
0.0
18.4
0.
0 62
.7
3.1
0.0
BI
G B
EAR
LAK
E 1S
T D
UI
83
97.6
15
.7
0.0
3.6
0.0
85.5
2.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
27
96.3
88
.9
0.0
74.1
0.
0 81
.5
14.8
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
9 88
.9
100.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
11.1
22
.2
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 12
0 96
.7
39.2
0.
0 20
.0
0.0
79.2
6.
7 0.
0
TWIN
PEA
KS
1ST
DU
I 10
5 97
.1
23.8
1.
9 1.
9 0.
0 71
.4
3.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 28
10
0.0
96.4
0.
0 78
.6
0.0
32.1
53
.6
0.0
3RD
DU
I 9
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
22.2
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
33.3
33
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 14
5 96
.6
42.8
1.
4 16
.6
0.0
57.9
14
.5
0.0
N
EED
LES
1ST
DU
I 99
98
.0
13.1
0.
0 3.
0 0.
0 68
.7
11.1
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
41
100.
0 36
.6
0.0
53.7
0.
0 73
.2
12.2
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
10
100.
0 80
.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0 20
.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
150
98.7
24
.0
0.0
18.0
0.
0 66
.7
14.0
0.
0
TRO
NA
1S
T D
UI
5 10
0.0
20.0
80
.0
20.0
0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 4
100.
0 50
.0
25.0
25
.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
25.0
TO
TAL
9 10
0.0
33.3
55
.6
22.2
22
.2
77.8
0.
0 11
.1
JO
SHU
A T
REE
1ST
DU
I 13
9 98
.6
7.9
0.0
2.9
0.0
87.8
4.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
33
100.
0 54
.5
0.0
81.8
0.
0 84
.8
3.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 20
10
0.0
95.0
0.
0 15
.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 19
3 99
.0
25.4
0.
0 17
.6
0.0
78.2
4.
7 0.
0 SA
N D
IEG
O
SUP
SAN
DIE
GO
1S
T D
UI
21
85.7
10
0.0
14.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
13
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
7.7
0.0
7.7
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
100.
0 80
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
35
60.0
10
0.0
0.0
5.7
0.0
2.9
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 74
77
.0
98.6
4.
1 4.
1 0.
0 2.
7 0.
0 0.
0
SUP
VIS
TA
1ST
DU
I 50
86
.0
96.0
6.
0 2.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
19
84.2
10
0.0
5.3
10.5
0.
0 5.
3 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 28
85
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
100
86.0
98
.0
4.0
4.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
SU
P C
HU
LA
1ST
DU
I 27
81
.5
100.
0 3.
7 7.
4 0.
0 7.
4 0.
0 0.
0
V
ISTA
2N
D D
UI
9 55
.6
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
6 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 26
50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
68
64.7
10
0.0
1.5
2.9
0.0
2.9
0.0
0.0
SU
P EL
CA
HO
N
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
JU
V S
AN
DIE
GO
1S
T D
UI
53
3.8
5.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.4
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
124
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 54
3.
7 7.
4 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 59
.3
0.0
EL
CA
JON
1S
T D
UI
1764
98
.1
97.6
85
.0
2.3
0.0
3.9
2.7
0.1
2ND
DU
I 52
4 96
.4
98.5
6.
5 69
.8
0.0
70.6
3.
6 11
.6
3RD
DU
I 15
6 92
.3
98.7
5.
8 47
.4
0.0
39.7
10
.9
3.8
4TH
+ D
UI
20
80.0
90
.0
5.0
40.0
0.
0 15
.0
5.0
0.0
TOTA
L 24
64
97.2
97
.8
62.7
19
.8
0.0
20.4
3.
4 2.
8
VIS
TA
1ST
DU
I 29
12
98.0
99
.5
84.6
3.
1 0.
0 2.
4 8.
4
0.7
2ND
DU
I 79
9 95
.9
96.5
7.
8 66
.8
0.0
50.3
14
.9
21.9
3R
D D
UI
206
94.2
87
.9
5.3
25.7
0.
0 19
.9
37.9
18
.9
4TH
+ D
UI
43
81.4
88
.4
7.0
23.3
0.
0 16
.3
30.2
11
.6
TOTA
L 39
60
97.2
98
.2
64.1
17
.3
0.0
13.1
11
.5
6.0
SA
N M
ARC
OS
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0
.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
4 75
.0
100.
0 50
.0
25.0
0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
SA
N D
IEG
O
1ST
DU
I 35
37
99.4
95
.4
91.8
3.
7 0.
0 90
.9
1.1
0.5
2ND
DU
I 91
7 98
.6
94.1
9.
3 77
.5
0.0
85.0
2.
4 14
.5
3RD
DU
I 21
9 91
.8
95.9
3.
7 57
.1
0.0
41.6
0.
0 13
.2
4TH
+ D
UI
38
89.5
92
.1
0.0
34.2
0.
0 26
.3
2.6
5.3
TOTA
L 47
11
98.8
95
.1
70.9
20
.8
0.0
86.9
1.
3 3.
8
CH
ULA
VIS
TA
1ST
DU
I 13
05
98.0
76
.2
89.0
3.
2 0.
0 27
.9
5.2
0.0
2ND
DU
I 36
8 97
.3
97.8
8.
2 76
.6
0.0
66.8
9.
8 6.
3
3R
D D
UI
98
96.9
92
.9
4.1
45.9
0.
0 20
.4
45.9
1.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 15
80
.0
100.
0 0.
0 46
.7
0.0
26.7
20
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 17
86
97.6
81
.7
67.0
21
.1
0.0
35.5
8.
5 1.
3
NA
T C
ITY(
76)
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
U
S D
IST
SD
1ST
DU
I 2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
M
IRA
MA
R N
AV
1S
T D
UI
15
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 15
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
SAN
DIE
GO
NA
V
1ST
DU
I 15
46
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
46.7
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
15
46.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 46
.7
0.0
0.0
TC
S D
IEG
O N
AV
1S
T D
UI
17
70.6
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 70
.6
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 17
70
.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
70.6
0.
0 0.
0 SA
N
SUP
SAN
FRA
N
1ST
DU
I 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
FRA
NC
ISC
O
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
4 25
.0
75.0
25
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
7 42
.9
85.7
14
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
71.4
0.
0
JUV
SA
N F
RAN
1S
T D
UI
4 25
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 4
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
SAN
FRA
N
1ST
DU
I 84
9 97
.4
99.2
88
.3
2.1
0.0
11.2
0.
0 0.
1
2N
D D
UI
200
98.5
97
.0
9.0
71.0
0.
5 56
.0
0.5
1.5
3RD
DU
I 51
84
.3
98.0
2.
0 23
.5
0.0
5.9
2.0
2.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
125
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
4TH
+ D
UI
9 77
.8
100.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
11.1
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1109
96
.8
98.7
69
.3
15.6
0.
1 19
.0
0.2
0.5
U
S D
IST
CT
SF
1ST
DU
I 4
100.
0 25
.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 5
100.
0 40
.0
60.0
20
.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 SA
N JO
AQ
UIN
SU
P SN
JOA
QU
N
1ST
DU
I 14
57
.1
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 42
.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 7
100.
0 85
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
28.6
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
5 80
.0
80.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 40
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
39
59.0
89
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.8
0.
0
TO
TAL
65
64.6
80
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.8
0.
0
JUV
SN
JOA
QU
N
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
LO
DI
1ST
DU
I 40
9 98
.3
98.0
79
.2
0.0
0.0
0.5
15.2
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
159
100.
0 99
.4
6.9
59.1
0.
0 62
.3
22.6
18
.2
3RD
DU
I 51
10
0.0
84.3
2.
0 13
.7
0.0
29.4
72
.5
17.6
4T
H+
DU
I 30
86
.7
73.3
0.
0 3.
3 0.
0 33
.3
70.0
23
.3
TOTA
L 64
9 98
.3
96.1
51
.8
15.7
0.
0 19
.4
24.0
6.
9
MA
NTE
CA
1S
T D
UI
237
100.
0 99
.6
90.3
0.
8 0.
0 3.
0 3.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
95
98.9
97
.9
5.3
83.2
0.
0 87
.4
2.1
14.7
3R
D D
UI
46
95.7
82
.6
0.0
8.7
0.0
23.9
65
.2
17.4
4T
H+
DU
I 21
81
.0
81.0
4.
8 9.
5 0.
0 23
.8
57.1
14
.3
TOTA
L 39
9 98
.2
96.2
55
.1
21.8
0.
0 26
.6
13.0
6.
3
TRA
CY
1ST
DU
I 18
5 99
.5
98.9
65
.4
2.2
0.0
1.1
1.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 80
10
0.0
95.0
3.
8 86
.3
0.0
90.0
2.
5 30
.0
3RD
DU
I 32
96
.9
81.3
0.
0 21
.9
0.0
37.5
53
.1
37.5
4T
H+
DU
I 6
66.7
83
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 30
3 98
.7
95.7
40
.9
26.4
0.
0 28
.7
7.6
11.9
STO
CK
TON
1S
T D
UI
1051
99
.8
99.6
86
.6
1.7
0.0
1.2
6.6
0.1
2ND
DU
I 43
6 10
0.0
99.3
4.
6 82
.8
0.0
84.9
5.
5 11
.9
3RD
DU
I 18
4 10
0.0
97.3
12
.5
67.9
0.
0 37
.0
41.8
12
.0
4TH
+ D
UI
70
98.6
98
.6
45.7
20
.0
0.0
14.3
37
.1
4.3
TOTA
L 17
41
99.8
99
.3
56.6
29
.8
0.0
26.5
11
.3
4.5
SAN
LU
IS
SUP
S L
OBI
SPO
1S
T D
UI
20
90.0
25
.0
65.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 65
.0
0.0
O
BISP
O
2N
D D
UI
4 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 28
57
.1
89.3
3.
6 7.
1 0.
0 0.
0 35
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 55
69
.1
67.3
25
.5
5.5
0.0
1.8
41.8
0.
0
S LU
IS O
BISP
O
1ST
DU
I 10
61
99.7
99
.4
94.3
2.
5 0.
1 1.
2 0.
4 0.
1
2N
D D
UI
349
98.6
99
.7
10.3
80
.8
0.0
77.7
0.
6 3.
2
3R
D D
UI
149
97.3
99
.3
3.4
76.5
0.
0 10
.7
10.1
4.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 39
71
.8
97.4
5.
1 46
.2
0.0
0.0
20.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
15
98
98.6
99
.4
65.3
27
.5
0.1
18.8
1.
8 1.
1
USM
AG
SL
OBI
SP
1ST
DU
I 3
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 4
100.
0 25
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
126
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
SAN
MA
TEO
SU
P SA
N M
ATE
O
1ST
DU
I 43
88
.4
95.3
46
.5
11.6
2.
3 7.
0 0.
0 2.
3
2N
D D
UI
7 85
.7
100.
0 0.
0 57
.1
0.0
42.9
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
15
86.7
10
0.0
6.7
13.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 70
74
.3
95.7
0.
0 12
.9
0.0
4.3
1.4
4.3
TOTA
L 13
5 80
.7
96.3
15
.6
14.8
0.
7 6.
7 0.
7 3.
0
JUV
SA
N M
ATE
O
1ST
DU
I 22
68
.2
4.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.5
45.5
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
24
70.8
8.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 4.
2 41
.7
0.0
SO
SN
FR
AN
SCO
1S
T D
UI
1282
99
.4
98.6
91
.3
2.0
0.0
0.9
2.7
0.1
2ND
DU
I 32
8 97
.9
98.5
5.
2 83
.8
0.0
40.5
47
.0
18.9
3R
D D
UI
133
88.0
98
.5
2.3
64.7
0.
0 16
.5
15.0
10
.5
4TH
+ D
UI
7 71
.4
100.
0 0.
0 57
.1
0.0
14.3
0.
0 14
.3
TOTA
L 17
50
98.1
98
.6
68.0
22
.3
0.0
9.6
11.9
4.
5
RED
WO
OD
CIT
Y 1S
T D
UI
1352
97
.6
98.0
90
.5
3.8
0.0
1.9
0.3
0.4
2ND
DU
I 48
4 97
.1
99.4
4.
1 87
.2
0.2
42.8
1.
0 16
.5
3RD
DU
I 16
0 91
.9
98.1
6.
3 71
.9
0.0
21.2
0.
6 15
.6
4TH
+ D
UI
36
50.0
97
.2
2.8
30.6
0.
0 13
.9
0.0
13.9
TO
TAL
2032
96
.2
98.3
61
.8
29.5
0.
0 13
.4
0.5
5.7
SAN
TA
SUP
SNTA
BA
RB
1ST
DU
I 7
71.4
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0
BA
RBA
RA
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 25
40
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 35
48
.6
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 17
.1
0.0
SU
P SN
TA
1ST
DU
I 17
82
.4
29.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 5.
9 0.
0
M
ARI
A
2ND
DU
I 2
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 25
36
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
46
56.5
69
.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.2
0.0
JU
V S
NTA
1S
T D
UI
8 37
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
37.5
0.
0
B
ARB
ARA
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
10
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
SA
NTA
1S
T D
UI
1176
97
.4
97.4
88
.9
0.7
0.0
84.0
13
.4
0.0
BA
RBA
RA
2ND
DU
I 46
3 96
.5
98.3
6.
9 25
.9
0.0
32.6
74
.3
1.9
3RD
DU
I 12
4 94
.4
100.
0 2.
4 62
.1
0.0
3.2
91.9
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 17
76
.5
100.
0 0.
0 52
.9
0.0
0.0
94.1
0.
0
TO
TAL
1780
96
.8
97.8
60
.7
12.0
0.
0 64
.2
35.4
0.
5
SAN
TA M
AR
IA
1ST
DU
I 51
8 99
.4
69.3
84
.4
1.5
0.0
81.9
13
.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 20
3 99
.0
98.5
5.
4 66
.5
0.5
36.9
64
.5
3.9
3RD
DU
I 79
97
.5
98.7
0.
0 17
.7
0.0
5.1
88.6
3.
8
4T
H+
DU
I 37
70
.3
100.
0 0.
0 2.
7 0.
0 2.
7 29
.7
2.7
TOTA
L 83
7 97
.8
80.5
53
.5
18.9
0.
1 60
.2
33.8
1.
4
LOM
POC
1S
T D
UI
191
99.5
13
.1
92.7
0.
0 0.
0 1.
6 3.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
79
100.
0 87
.3
13.9
63
.3
0.0
57.0
17
.7
21.5
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
127
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
.
3RD
DU
I 27
10
0.0
81.5
7.
4 18
.5
11.1
22
.2
51.9
14
.8
TOTA
L 29
7 99
.7
39.1
64
.0
18.5
1.
0 18
.2
11.8
7.
1
SOLV
AN
G
1ST
DU
I 12
1 10
0.0
22.3
64
.5
3.3
0.0
82.6
10
.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 48
10
0.0
93.8
0.
0 75
.0
0.0
77.1
16
.7
8.3
3RD
DU
I 20
95
.0
95.0
0.
0 20
.0
0.0
30.0
55
.0
5.0
4TH
+ D
UI
5 80
.0
100.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
20.0
20
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 19
4 99
.0
49.5
40
.2
23.2
0.
0 74
.2
17.0
2.
6
VA
ND
ENBE
RG
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AFB
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SAN
TA C
LARA
SU
P SN
TA C
LAR
1ST
DU
I 16
6 81
.3
93.4
48
.2
7.8
0.0
6.0
5.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 88
72
.7
100.
0 2.
3 51
.1
0.0
5.7
5.7
0.0
3RD
DU
I 60
48
.3
100.
0 1.
7 31
.7
0.0
0.0
3.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
336
47.6
98
.2
0.3
29.2
0.
0 0.
3 0.
6 0.
3
TO
TAL
650
59.7
97
.4
12.9
26
.9
0.0
2.5
2.8
0.2
JU
V S
NTA
CLA
R 1S
T D
UI
58
100.
0 36
.2
93.1
0.
0 0.
0 3.
4 25
.9
0.0
TOTA
L 58
10
0.0
36.2
93
.1
0.0
0.0
3.4
25.9
0.
0
LOS
GA
TOS
1ST
DU
I 14
8 96
.6
96.6
81
.8
2.7
0.0
4.7
4.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 41
95
.1
100.
0 7.
3 68
.3
0.0
56.1
14
.6
0.0
3RD
DU
I 16
93
.8
100.
0 0.
0 6.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
209
96.2
97
.6
59.3
16
.7
0.0
14.4
6.
2 0.
0
PALO
ALT
O
1ST
DU
I 53
5 98
.9
95.7
86
.4
0.9
0.0
3.6
6.0
0.4
2ND
DU
I 12
9 98
.4
98.4
6.
2 80
.6
0.0
80.6
4.
7 22
.5
3RD
DU
I 72
97
.2
75.0
2.
8 12
.5
0.0
27.8
8.
3 20
.8
4TH
+ D
UI
7 10
0.0
100.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 74
3 98
.7
94.2
63
.7
15.9
0.
0 19
.2
5.9
6.2
SA
N JO
SE
1ST
DU
I 32
73
90.9
97
.2
69.2
2.
0 0.
0 4.
9 15
.6
0.1
2ND
DU
I 12
91
82.0
99
.1
2.2
56.2
0.
0 55
.9
26.3
4.
4
3R
D D
UI
486
73.0
97
.7
0.0
10.3
0.
2 6.
6 9.
1 1.
6
4T
H+
DU
I 73
63
.0
95.9
0.
0 4.
1 0.
0 2.
7 6.
8 1.
4
TO
TAL
5123
86
.5
97.7
44
.8
16.5
0.
0 17
.9
17.5
1.
3
SAN
JOSE
TR
F 1S
T D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
SAN
TA C
LARA
1S
T D
UI
269
97.0
92
.2
77.0
2.
6 0.
0 8.
2 10
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 87
97
.7
100.
0 6.
9 72
.4
0.0
69.0
6.
9 6.
9
3R
D D
UI
33
97.0
93
.9
3.0
9.1
0.0
12.1
12
.1
6.1
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
391
97.2
94
.1
54.7
18
.9
0.0
22.3
9.
5 2.
0
SUN
NY
VA
LE
1ST
DU
I 56
2 98
.0
63.0
87
.7
1.2
0.0
37.9
2.
8 0.
2
2N
D D
UI
187
97.3
96
.3
8.6
76.5
0.
0 80
.7
4.8
10.7
3R
D D
UI
56
100.
0 94
.6
3.6
8.9
0.0
17.9
8.
9 7.
1
4T
H+
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
28.6
0.
0
TO
TAL
812
98.0
73
.2
62.9
19
.1
0.0
46.1
3.
9 3.
1
GIL
ROY
1S
T D
UI
410
98.5
98
.3
83.7
2.
2 0.
0 5.
1 8.
0 0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
128
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2ND
DU
I 20
7 96
.6
99.0
2.
4 66
.2
0.0
64.3
14
.5
5.3
3RD
DU
I 63
95
.2
98.4
0.
0 9.
5 0.
0 6.
3 6.
3 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 8
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 68
8 97
.7
98.5
50
.6
22.1
0.
0 23
.0
9.7
1.6
SAN
TA C
RU
Z
SUP
SNTA
CRU
Z 1S
T D
UI
13
100.
0 10
0.0
53.8
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 53
.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 10
90
.0
90.0
0.
0 20
.0
0.0
10.0
40
.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 8
75.0
75
.0
25.0
0.
0 12
.5
0.0
87.5
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 46
76
.1
89.1
15
.2
4.3
4.3
2.2
43.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
77
81.8
89
.6
20.8
5.
2 3.
9 2.
6 49
.4
0.0
JU
V S
NTA
CRU
Z 1S
T D
UI
27
85.2
3.
7 66
.7
0.0
0.0
22.2
51
.9
0.0
TOTA
L 27
85
.2
3.7
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 22
.2
51.9
0.
0
SAN
TA C
RUZ
1ST
DU
I 92
6 99
.6
94.6
90
.1
0.6
0.0
5.8
4.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 34
4 99
.1
98.8
7.
8 61
.0
0.0
61.6
24
.4
2.6
3RD
DU
I 11
6 10
0.0
98.3
4.
3 4.
3 0.
0 5.
2 72
.4
0.9
4TH
+ D
UI
39
94.9
92
.3
2.6
7.7
2.6
2.6
76.9
2.
6
TO
TAL
14
25
99.4
95
.9
60.8
15
.7
0.1
19.2
17
.0
0.8
W
ATS
ON
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 50
9 10
0.0
98.4
90
.4
0.2
0.0
1.0
8.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 19
6 10
0.0
99.5
5.
1 26
.5
0.0
25.0
74
.0
1.0
3RD
DU
I 87
10
0.0
98.9
2.
3 0.
0 0.
0 1.
1 97
.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 79
6 10
0.0
98.7
59
.3
6.7
0.0
6.9
35.1
0.
3 SH
AST
A
SUP
RED
DIN
G
1ST
DU
I 3
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
6 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
19
10.5
10
0.0
5.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.3
0.0
TOTA
L 29
27
.6
100.
0 3.
4 6.
9 0.
0 0.
0 6.
9 0.
0
JUV
SH
AST
A
1ST
DU
I 5
20.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 6
33.3
10
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
BU
RNEY
1S
T D
UI
26
96.2
96
.2
84.6
0.
0 0.
0 11
.5
7.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 12
83
.3
100.
0 8.
3 75
.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0 8.
3
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
39
92.3
97
.4
59.0
25
.6
0.0
33.3
5.
1 2.
6
RED
DIN
G
1ST
DU
I 38
9 97
.7
96.1
91
.0
1.0
0.0
3.6
3.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 19
7 96
.4
97.5
8.
6 83
.2
0.0
83.2
1.
5 4.
6
3R
D D
UI
87
97.7
97
.7
6.9
59.8
0.
0 14
.9
3.4
1.1
4TH
+ D
UI
21
57.1
10
0.0
4.8
33.3
0.
0 14
.3
9.5
0.0
TOTA
L 69
4 96
.1
96.8
54
.5
32.7
0.
0 28
.0
3.0
1.4
U
SMA
G R
EDN
G
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SIER
RA
D
OW
NIE
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 23
95
.7
95.7
95
.7
0.0
0.0
4.3
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 11
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 81
.8
0.0
72.7
18
.2
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 33
.3
33.3
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
129
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TOTA
L 38
97
.4
97.4
57
.9
26.3
0.
0 26
.3
7.9
0.0
SISK
IYO
U
SUP
SISK
IYO
U
4TH
+ D
UI
5 20
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
5 20
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
SIS
KIY
OU
1S
T D
UI
4 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
DO
RRIS
1S
T D
UI
12
100.
0 10
0.0
16.7
8.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 15
10
0.0
100.
0 13
.3
13.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
WEE
D
1ST
DU
I 80
98
.8
93.8
82
.5
2.5
0.0
5.0
5.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 26
10
0.0
100.
0 7.
7 80
.8
0.0
65.4
0.
0 23
.1
3RD
DU
I 14
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 71
.4
0.0
21.4
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
122
99.2
95
.9
55.7
28
.7
0.0
19.7
3.
3 4.
9
WEE
D JU
ST
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TU
LELA
KE
1ST
DU
I 17
10
0.0
88.2
23
.5
5.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 5
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 22
10
0.0
90.9
18
.2
18.2
0.
0 0.
0 4.
5 0.
0
YREK
A
1ST
DU
I 96
94
.8
96.9
70
.8
4.2
0.0
0.0
10.4
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
26
100.
0 92
.3
0.0
73.1
0.
0 61
.5
23.1
23
.1
3RD
DU
I 9
100.
0 66
.7
0.0
33.3
0.
0 66
.7
0.0
44.4
4T
H+
DU
I 12
33
.3
91.7
0.
0 8.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 8.
3
TO
TAL
143
90.9
93
.7
47.6
18
.9
0.0
15.4
11
.2
7.7
SOLA
NO
SU
P SO
LAN
O
1ST
DU
I 9
88.9
10
0.0
22.2
22
.2
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
4 75
.0
100.
0 25
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 8
87.5
10
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
48
70.8
10
0.0
8.3
29.2
0.
0 0.
0 39
.6
0.0
TOTA
L 69
75
.4
100.
0 10
.1
34.8
0.
0 0.
0 43
.5
0.0
JU
V S
OLA
NO
1S
T D
UI
9 88
.9
0.0
88.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 55
.6
0.0
TOTA
L 9
88.9
0.
0 88
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
55.6
0.
0
FAIR
FIEL
D
1ST
DU
I 68
5 98
.4
98.8
83
.6
2.2
0.0
1.8
4.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 25
5 96
.1
97.3
6.
7 80
.8
0.0
67.8
3.
9 0.
8
3R
D D
UI
92
91.3
97
.8
3.3
65.2
0.
0 7.
6 5.
4 1.
1
4T
H+
DU
I 11
90
.9
100.
0 0.
0 54
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 10
43
97.1
98
.4
56.9
27
.5
0.0
18.4
4.
5 0.
3
BEN
ICIA
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
2 50
.0
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
V
ALL
EJO
1S
T D
UI
215
99.5
91
.2
94.4
2.
8 0.
0 10
.2
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 97
97
.9
94.8
10
.3
75.3
0.
0 55
.7
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 23
87
.0
91.3
0.
0 60
.9
0.0
26.1
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
100.
0 33
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
338
98.2
91
.7
63.0
27
.8
0.0
24.3
0.
0 0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
130
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TC
TRA
VIS
AFB
1S
T D
UI
6 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
6 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0 0.
0 SO
NO
MA
SU
P SO
NO
MA
1S
T D
UI
11
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
18.2
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
6 33
.3
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 11
3 49
.6
99.1
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 1.
8 0.
0
TO
TAL
134
53.0
99
.3
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
JU
V S
ON
OM
A
1ST
DU
I 26
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 28
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 3.
6 0.
0
SAN
TA R
OSA
1S
T D
UI
1667
96
.9
96.5
54
.5
0.4
0.0
3.4
0.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 69
5 94
.1
99.7
2.
7 45
.8
0.0
45.5
0.
0 0.
3
3R
D D
UI
288
91.3
10
0.0
1.7
5.2
0.0
4.5
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
92
72.8
10
0.0
1.1
2.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 27
42
94.8
97
.8
34.1
12
.4
0.0
14.1
0.
5 0.
1 ST
AN
ISLA
US
SUP
STA
NIS
LAU
S 1S
T D
UI
14
64.3
92
.9
7.1
14.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
8 87
.5
87.5
0.
0 37
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 8
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 65
76
.9
100.
0 4.
6 21
.5
0.0
0.0
4.6
0.0
TOTA
L 95
75
.8
97.9
4.
2 21
.1
0.0
0.0
3.2
0.0
JU
V S
TAN
ISLA
US
1S
T D
UI
28
50.0
42
.9
35.7
0.
0 0.
0 3.
6 92
.9
0.0
TOTA
L 28
50
.0
42.9
35
.7
0.0
0.0
3.6
92.9
0.
0
MO
DES
TO
1ST
DU
I 11
26
98.9
98
.8
90.2
2.
1 0.
1 1.
1 0.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
485
98.8
99
.6
11.8
75
.5
0.2
39.8
1.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
192
96.9
98
.4
5.7
50.5
0.
0 8.
3 2.
6 1.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 40
87
.5
100.
0 0.
0 55
.0
0.0
2.5
2.5
0.0
TOTA
L 18
43
98.4
99
.0
58.8
27
.6
0.1
12.0
0.
8 0.
1
OA
KD
ALE
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TURL
OC
K
1ST
DU
I 19
4 99
.5
95.4
91
.2
2.6
0.0
5.7
0.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 74
98
.6
90.5
16
.2
67.6
0.
0 37
.8
8.1
4.1
3RD
DU
I 26
96
.2
92.3
3.
8 42
.3
0.0
7.7
23.1
7.
7
4T
H+
DU
I 6
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
300
99.0
94
.0
63.3
23
.0
0.0
13.7
4.
3 1.
7 SU
TTER
SU
P SU
TTER
1S
T D
UI
8 10
0.0
100.
0 37
.5
37.5
0.
0 0.
0 37
.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
20.0
80
.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0 20
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
9 77
.8
100.
0 0.
0 44
.4
0.0
0.0
44.4
0.
0
TO
TAL
26
76.9
96
.2
11.5
30
.8
3.8
0.0
38.5
0.
0
JUV
SU
TTER
1S
T D
UI
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
YUBA
CIT
Y 1S
T D
UI
305
99.0
98
.0
90.8
0.
3 0.
0 2.
3 8.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
101
100.
0 10
0.0
7.9
81.2
0.
0 75
.2
12.9
1.
0
3R
D D
UI
58
100.
0 10
0.0
1.7
6.9
0.0
5.2
86.2
0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
131
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
4TH
+ D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 46
8 99
.4
98.7
61
.1
18.6
0.
0 18
.4
20.1
0.
2 TE
HA
MA
SU
P TE
HA
MA
1S
T D
UI
7 28
.6
100.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 8
12.5
10
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
15
20.0
10
0.0
6.7
6.7
0.0
0.0
6.7
0.0
JU
V T
EHA
MA
1S
T D
UI
3 10
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
5 80
.0
60.0
0.
0 20
.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0
CO
RNIN
G
1ST
DU
I 56
94
.6
96.4
91
.1
0.0
0.0
3.6
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 25
92
.0
100.
0 24
.0
64.0
0.
0 12
.0
4.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
60.0
10
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
86
91.9
97
.7
66.3
22
.1
0.0
5.8
1.2
0.0
RE
D B
LUFF
1S
T D
UI
139
89.2
97
.1
84.2
1.
4 0.
0 2.
9 8.
6 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
44
70.5
10
0.0
4.5
54.5
0.
0 50
.0
25.0
2.
3
3R
D D
UI
18
33.3
10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 27
.8
27.8
0.
0
TO
TAL
201
80.1
98
.0
59.2
15
.9
0.0
15.4
13
.9
0.5
TRIN
ITY
SUP
TRIN
ITY
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 3
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
W
EAV
ERV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
48
89.6
10
0.0
83.3
4.
2 0.
0 0.
0 8.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
23
95.7
10
0.0
26.1
65
.2
0.0
60.9
13
.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
14.3
42
.9
0.0
28.6
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
79
92.4
10
0.0
59.5
26
.6
0.0
20.3
8.
9 0.
0 TU
LARE
SU
P TU
LARE
1S
T D
UI
36
66.7
10
0.0
5.6
0.0
0.0
2.8
13.9
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
12
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 7
42.9
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
70
60.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
TOTA
L 12
5 61
.6
100.
0 1.
6 0.
8 0.
0 1.
6 8.
0 0.
0
JUV
TU
LARE
1S
T D
UI
32
62.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 3.
1 53
.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
33
63.6
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 3.
0 51
.5
0.0
D
INU
BA
1ST
DU
I 32
9 98
.8
99.4
87
.8
3.6
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 13
8 97
.1
95.7
10
.1
35.5
0.
0 40
.6
1.4
10.9
3R
D D
UI
64
93.8
89
.1
7.8
12.5
0.
0 20
.3
3.1
14.1
4T
H+
DU
I 16
75
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 12
.5
0.0
TOTA
L 54
7 97
.1
97.3
56
.3
12.6
0.
0 13
.5
1.1
4.4
EX
ETER
1S
T D
UI
32
96.9
96
.9
93.8
3.
1 0.
0 0.
0 3.
1 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
17
100.
0 10
0.0
11.8
82
.4
0.0
70.6
11
.8
0.0
3RD
DU
I 8
87.5
10
0.0
0.0
37.5
0.
0 12
.5
25.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 60
96
.7
98.3
53
.3
33.3
0.
0 21
.7
10.0
0.
0
LIN
DSY
-EX
ETER
1S
T D
UI
104
100.
0 10
0.0
92.3
4.
8 0.
0 3.
8 9.
6 0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
132
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2ND
DU
I 29
96
.6
100.
0 13
.8
75.9
0.
0 72
.4
3.4
0.0
3RD
DU
I 10
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 30
.0
0.0
10.0
50
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
5 10
0.0
100.
0 20
.0
40.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
148
99.3
10
0.0
68.2
21
.6
0.0
17.6
10
.8
0.0
PO
RTER
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 31
8 98
.1
98.7
90
.9
2.5
0.0
2.2
0.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 12
7 98
.4
96.9
8.
7 78
.0
0.0
62.2
9.
4 1.
6
3R
D D
UI
78
96.2
10
0.0
5.1
25.6
0.
0 9.
0 41
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
11
90.9
10
0.0
0.0
45.5
0.
0 9.
1 54
.5
0.0
TOTA
L 53
4 97
.8
98.5
56
.9
24.7
0.
0 17
.6
9.9
0.4
TU
LAR
E 1S
T D
UI
208
100.
0 10
0.0
63.9
26
.0
0.0
25.0
1.
0 0.
5
2N
D D
UI
86
100.
0 98
.8
11.6
61
.6
0.0
59.3
5.
8 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
35
94.3
94
.3
5.7
42.9
0.
0 37
.1
2.9
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
10
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.
0 10
.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 33
9 99
.4
99.1
42
.8
36.3
0.
0 34
.5
2.4
0.3
V
ISA
LIA
1S
T D
UI
489
99.4
97
.8
78.3
14
.7
0.0
5.1
2.5
0.2
2ND
DU
I 17
2 98
.3
95.3
14
.5
71.5
0.
0 60
.5
1.7
14.0
3R
D D
UI
62
98.4
93
.5
4.8
62.9
0.
0 30
.6
24.2
14
.5
4TH
+ D
UI
36
63.9
97
.2
2.8
11.1
0.
0 11
.1
19.4
5.
6
TO
TAL
759
97.4
96
.8
54.3
31
.4
0.0
20.0
4.
9 4.
7
WO
OD
LAK
E-
1ST
DU
I 48
10
0.0
100.
0 91
.7
4.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EXE
TER
2ND
DU
I 19
10
0.0
100.
0 5.
3 89
.5
0.0
68.4
10
.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 6
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 16
.7
16.7
0.
0
TO
TAL
73
100.
0 10
0.0
61.6
28
.8
0.0
19.2
4.
1 0.
0
DIN
UBA
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
USM
AG
3 R
VR
S
1ST
DU
I 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TUO
LUM
NE
SUP
TUO
LUM
NE
1ST
DU
I 8
87.5
10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 7
28.6
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 18
50
.0
100.
0 22
.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
JU
V T
UO
LUM
NE
1ST
DU
I 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SO
NO
RA
1S
T D
UI
115
97.4
10
0.0
92.2
0.
9 0.
0 0.
0 4.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
67
97.0
10
0.0
6.0
86.6
0.
0 77
.6
3.0
3.0
3RD
DU
I 21
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 61
.9
0.0
19.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
203
97.5
10
0.0
54.2
35
.5
0.0
27.6
3.
4 1.
0
CO
LUM
BIA
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JAM
ESTO
WN
1S
T D
UI
28
100.
0 10
0.0
96.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
9 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 88
.9
0.0
88.9
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
41
100.
0 10
0.0
65.9
26
.8
0.0
26.8
0.
0 0.
0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
133
TABL
E B4
: 19
93 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8 A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
VEN
TURA
SU
P V
ENTU
RA
1ST
DU
I 6
83.3
66
.7
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 16
.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 7
71.4
85
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
28
39.3
92
.9
3.6
7.1
0.0
3.6
17.9
0.
0
TO
TAL
43
51.2
88
.4
7.0
4.7
0.0
2.3
18.6
0.
0
JUV
VEN
TURA
1S
T D
UI
10
100.
0 40
.0
0.0
10.0
20
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 12
83
.3
50.0
0.
0 8.
3 16
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
V
ENTU
RA M
UN
I 1S
T D
UI
2945
98
.2
98.8
88
.0
1.4
0.0
1.2
10.2
0.
1
2N
D D
UI
932
98.3
99
.6
14.6
66
.2
0.0
69.4
14
.3
5.5
3RD
DU
I 27
6 98
.6
99.3
9.
4 29
.0
0.0
22.1
62
.3
4.0
4TH
+ D
UI
66
68.2
83
.3
9.1
24.2
0.
0 7.
6 42
.4
3.0
TOTA
L 42
19
97.7
98
.7
65.4
17
.9
0.0
17.8
15
.0
1.6
YO
LO
SUP
WO
OD
LAN
D
1ST
DU
I 10
80
.0
90.0
10
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 15
53
.3
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 26
65
.4
96.2
3.
8 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 15
.4
0.0
JU
V Y
OLO
1S
T D
UI
5 40
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
5 40
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0
WES
T SA
CTO
1S
T D
UI
19
100.
0 10
0.0
94.7
5.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
26
100.
0 10
0.0
73.1
15
.4
0.0
3.8
0.0
0.0
W
OO
DLA
ND
1S
T D
UI
192
97.9
96
.4
87.0
6.
8 0.
0 7.
8 3.
1 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
143
99.3
10
0.0
7.0
85.3
0.
0 81
.8
2.1
0.0
3RD
DU
I 40
95
.0
92.5
2.
5 17
.5
0.0
12.5
5.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 13
76
.9
100.
0 0.
0 23
.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 38
8 97
.4
97.4
45
.9
37.4
0.
0 35
.3
2.8
0.0
D
AV
IS
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 Y
UBA
SU
P YU
BA
1ST
DU
I 6
66.7
50
.0
16.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
13
38.5
92
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
23.1
0.
0
TO
TAL
21
52.4
81
.0
4.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
28.6
0.
0
JUV
YU
BA
1ST
DU
I 6
83.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
33.3
0.
0
TO
TAL
6 83
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
33
.3
0.0
M
ARY
SVIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 29
7 99
.3
69.4
90
.6
0.3
0.0
1.0
4.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 12
2 10
0.0
99.2
10
.7
60.7
0.
0 13
.1
57.4
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
53
98.1
10
0.0
1.9
11.3
0.
0 0.
0 30
.2
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
7 10
0.0
100.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
42.9
0.
0
TO
TAL
479
99.4
80
.8
59.3
16
.9
0.0
4.0
21.1
0.
0
TC B
EALE
AFB
1S
T D
UI
9 22
.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 10
20
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
134
TABL
E B5
: D
EMO
GRA
PHIC
2-Y
EAR
PRIO
R D
RIV
ER R
ECO
RD V
ARI
ABL
ES
BY
YEA
R A
ND
SA
NC
TIO
N G
ROU
P FO
R FI
RST
DU
I OFF
END
ERS
YE
AR
SA
MPL
E PE
RCEN
T M
EAN
PE
RC
ENT
2-YE
AR
PRIO
R IN
CID
ENTS
PER
100
DRI
VER
S Z
IP C
OD
E A
CC
IDEN
T A
ND
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
IND
ICES
**
GRO
UP
SI
ZE
FE
MA
LE
A
GE
CO
MM
ERC
IAL
DRI
VER
S TO
TAL
AC
CID
ENTS
A
LCO
HO
L A
CC
IDEN
TS
MA
JOR
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
MIN
OR
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
S TO
TAL
AC
CID
ENTS
IN
JURY
A
CC
IDEN
TS
MA
JOR
VIO
LATI
ON
S M
OV
ING
V
IOLA
TIO
NS
1989
Susp
ensi
on
5,63
8 12
.3
25.9
1.
4 3.
74
1.90
.3
4 16
.07
2.86
.8
7 .2
2 6.
64
Jail
7,20
0 13
.6
31.9
3.
4 3.
19
1.60
.2
1 11
.29
2.95
.9
5 .2
4 6.
78
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
jail
43,6
31
14.9
32
.7
3.6
2.88
1.
45
.15
10.7
6 2.
84
.86
.22
6.68
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
41,2
28
15.5
32
.8
2.9
3.06
1.
47
.12
9.31
3.
11
.91
.21
6.46
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
4,42
3 14
.0
33.7
3.
6 3.
27
1.78
.3
2 8.
96
3.01
.9
5 .2
5 6.
24
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
54.2
* F
= 57
1.2*
X
2 =
94.
1*
F =
34.4
* F
= 25
.9*
F =
52.0
* F
= 27
7.2*
F
= 80
1.8*
F
= 45
1.5*
F
= 21
7.2*
F
= 20
0.4*
1991
Susp
ensi
on
10,4
61
11.7
27
.7
1.8
3.42
1.
84
.84
14.3
3 2.
79
.86
.20
6.13
Jail
5,16
4 13
.2
31.6
3.
7 2.
89
1.54
.3
3 12
.24
2.74
.8
7 .2
1 5.
94
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
jail
58,8
93
16.4
32
.9
3.5
2.82
1.
46
.16
10.3
3 2.
74
.84
.20
6.10
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
38,1
47
16.2
32
.6
2.6
3.05
1.
45
.12
9.99
2.
99
.89
.19
5.98
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
6,41
9 14
.7
33.1
3.
5 3.
01
1.66
.4
5 9.
81
2.88
.9
1 .2
2 5.
80
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
183.
7*
F =
568.
5*
X2
= 12
5.9*
F
= 31
.6*
F =
28.3
* F
= 51
7.8*
F
= 20
2.2*
F
= 11
26.6
* F
= 39
2.6*
F
= 35
2.5*
F
= 22
5.7*
1993
1.
75-Y
EAR
PRIO
R IN
CID
ENTS
PER
100
DRI
VER
S
Susp
ensi
on
6,11
8 12
.6
28.1
1.
5 3.
03
1.65
.8
0 12
.53
1.54
.4
5 .1
0 3.
45
Jail
4,46
9 15
.6
32.6
3.
3 2.
90
1.55
.3
2 10
.76
1.53
.4
6 .1
0 3.
35
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
jail
42,4
03
16.4
33
.8
3.3
2.64
1.
53
.14
8.16
1.
53
.45
.10
3.35
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
29,5
67
15.8
33
.7
2.7
2.88
1.
63
.10
8.24
1.
67
.47
.09
3.48
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
3,49
6 13
.8
34.3
4.
0 2.
84
1.60
.3
8 8.
03
1.58
.4
8 .1
0 3.
18
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
68.5
* F
= 39
7.3*
X
2 =
81.2
* F
= 14
.9*
F =
3.6*
F
= 36
4.1*
F
= 19
4.0*
F
= 95
4.4*
F
= 19
3.1*
F
= 20
2.6*
F
= 30
7.5*
*St
atis
tical
sig
nific
ance
at p
<.05
, (tw
o-ta
iled)
. **
The
ZIP
Cod
e in
dice
s fo
r the
199
3 ca
ses a
re b
ased
on
3.25
yea
rs o
f dri
ver r
ecor
d da
ta w
here
as th
e in
dice
s for
the
1989
and
199
1 dr
iver
s ar
e ba
sed
on 5
yea
rs o
f dat
a.
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
135
TABL
E B6
: D
EMO
GRA
PHIC
2-Y
EAR
PRIO
R D
RIV
ER R
ECO
RD V
ARI
ABL
ES
BY
YEA
R A
ND
SA
NC
TIO
N G
ROU
P FO
R SE
CO
ND
DU
I OFF
END
ERS
YE
AR
SA
MPL
E PE
RCEN
T M
EAN
PE
RC
ENT
2-YE
AR
PRIO
R IN
CID
ENTS
PER
100
DRI
VER
S ZI
P C
OD
E A
CC
IDEN
T A
ND
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
IND
ICES
**
GR
OU
P
SIZE
FEM
ALE
AG
E C
OM
MER
CIA
L D
RIV
ERS
TOTA
L A
CC
IDEN
TS
ALC
OH
OL
AC
CID
ENTS
M
AJO
R C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
MIN
OR
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
S TO
TAL
AC
CID
ENTS
IN
JURY
A
CC
IDEN
TS
MA
JOR
VIO
LATI
ON
S M
OV
ING
V
IOLA
TIO
NS
1989
Susp
ensi
on
9,48
3 8.
9 32
.1
2.4
3.80
2.
34
5.04
13
.75
2.86
.8
9 .2
3 6.
57
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
23,9
29
10.4
34
.7
3.7
3.36
1.
88
3.37
10
.21
2.97
.8
9 .2
2 6.
63
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
17.7
* F
= 46
0.6*
X
2 =
36.6
* F
= 36
.4*
F =
72.2
* F
= 75
5.4*
F
= 36
3.8*
F
= 15
8.5*
F
= .1
.7
F =
34.7
* F
= 8.
9*
1991
Susp
ensi
on
11,1
92
8.5
33.0
2.
8 3.
31
2.00
4.
93
12.3
0 2.
71
.86
.21
6.08
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
19,3
09
10.6
34
.2
3.0
3.21
1.
81
3.55
10
.60
2.85
.8
7 .2
0 6.
07
Oth
er
12,1
50
9.5
33.7
3.
5 3.
41
2.03
4.
49
11.3
1 2.
80
.86
.20
6.02
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
35.6
* F
= 50
.8*
X2
= 9.
7*
F =
4.4*
F
= 11
.9*
F =
269.
2*
F =
45.9
* F
= 18
7.4*
F
= 14
.1*
F =
70.8
* F
= 13
.8*
1993
1.
75-Y
EAR
PRIO
R IN
CID
ENTS
PER
100
DRI
VER
S
Susp
ensi
on
7,19
6 8.
7 33
.6
2.3
2.76
1.
78
3.95
9.
57
1.50
.4
6 .1
1 3.
42
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
11,7
53
11.1
34
.9
3.0
2.88
1.
82
2.76
7.
99
1.58
.4
6 .1
0 3.
39
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
Inte
rloc
k 1,
288
9.6
35.0
2.
4 2.
58
1.61
2.
45
7.63
1.
60
.46
.09
3.40
Oth
er
7,94
2 9.
3 34
.6
3.0
2.90
1.
96
3.63
8.
66
1.55
.4
5 .1
0 3.
38
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
34.7
* F
= 45
.66*
X
2 =
10.6
* F
= 1.
97
F =
.85
F =
112.
5*
F =
25.2
* F
= 93
.4*
F =
12.6
* F
= 14
1.0*
F
= 7.
3*
*
Stat
istic
ally
sig
nific
ance
at p
<.05
, (tw
o-ta
iled)
. **
The
ZIP
Cod
e in
dice
s fo
r the
199
3 ca
ses a
re b
ased
on
3.25
yea
rs o
f dri
ver r
ecor
d da
ta w
here
as th
e in
dice
s for
the
1989
and
199
1 dr
iver
s ar
e ba
sed
on 5
yea
rs o
f dat
a.
1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Oth
er
7,94
2 20
.4
NA
5.
8 N
A
14.6
4.
9 44
.8
26.3
Susp
ensi
on
7,19
6 20
.3
NA
5.
9 N
A
16.0
5.
2 45
.3
25.5
136
TABL
E B7
: ZI
P C
OD
E C
ENSU
S V
ARI
ABL
ES (C
OV
ARI
ATE
S) B
Y YE
AR
AN
D S
AN
CTI
ON
GRO
UP
FOR
FIRS
T A
ND
SEC
ON
D D
UI O
FFEN
DER
S
YEA
R FI
RST
OFF
END
ERS
GR
OU
P
SAM
PLE
SI
ZE
MO
NTH
S IN
ST
UD
Y
PERC
ENT
OTH
ER
TRA
NSP
ORT
ATI
ON
PE
RC
ENT
LEA
VE
WO
RK A
T 4
PM
PER
CEN
T A
GE
55
AN
D A
BOV
E PE
RC
ENT
ELEM
. ED
UC
ATI
ON
PE
RC
ENT
UN
EMPL
OY
ED
PER
CEN
T RE
NTI
NG
TR
AV
EL T
IME
TO
WO
RK (M
IN.)
1991
Susp
ensi
on
10,4
61
44.3
N
A
NA
17
.0
16.2
5.
3 45
.4
26.2
Ja
il 5,
164
44.2
N
A
NA
17
.3
16.0
5.
3 44
.0
26.0
1s
t DU
I pro
gram
& ja
il 58
,893
44
.3
NA
N
A
17.9
13
.1
4.7
43.6
26
.0
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
38,1
47
44.4
N
A
NA
17
.3
14.2
4.
5 47
.4
27.3
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
6,41
9 43
.9
NA
N
A
16.7
11
.6
5.0
40.4
28
.6
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
F
= 26
.4*
F =
108.
2*
F =
272.
2*
F =
356.
4*
F =
462.
2*
F =
708.
1*
1993
Susp
ensi
on
6,11
8 20
.3
10.5
N
A
NA
15
.2
5.0
NA
26
.0
Jail
4,46
9 20
.5
9.8
NA
N
A
13.8
4.
8 N
A
26.5
1s
t DU
I pro
gram
& ja
il 42
,403
20
.6
10.4
N
A
NA
13
.4
4.7
NA
25
.9
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
29,5
67
20.5
11
.5
NA
N
A
15.0
4.
6 N
A
27.5
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
3,49
6 20
.2
7.9
NA
N
A
12.2
4.
9 N
A
28.5
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
F
= 23
.3*
F =
168.
3*
F =
112.
8*
F =
48.5
*
F =
636.
8*
SEC
ON
D O
FFEN
DER
S
1991
Susp
ensi
on
11,1
92
44.0
N
A
NA
17
.3
NA
5.
2 4.
5 25
.5
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
19,3
09
43.9
N
A
NA
17
.6
NA
4.
6 4.
4 26
.6
Oth
er
12,1
50
44.2
N
A
NA
17
.8
NA
4.
8 4.
4 26
.5
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
F
= 25
.1*
F =
14.8
*
F =
267.
2*
F =
5.9*
F
= 18
3.4*
1993
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
11,7
53
20.5
N
A
5.7
NA
13
.8
4.7
44.3
26
.7
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m/
rest
rict
ion
& in
terl
ock
1,28
8 17
.2
NA
5.
5 N
A
14.1
4.
6 44
.7
27.2
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
F
= 29
7.4*
F =
24.7
*
F =
48.9
* F
= 81
.0*
F =
5.7*
F
= 87
.4*
*St
atis
tical
sig
nific
ance
at p
<.05
, (tw
o-ta
iled)
. **
The
ZIP
Cod
e in
dice
s fo
r the
199
3 ca
ses a
re b
ased
on
3.25
yea
rs o
f dri
ver r
ecor
d da
ta w
here
as th
e in
dice
s for
199
1 dr
iver
s are
bas
ed o
n 5
year
s of
dat
a. T
hese
cen
sus
vari
able
s wer
e no
t app
lied
to th
e 19
89 d
rive
rs
s
ince
thes
e va
riab
les w
ere
not a
vaila
ble
until
afte
r 199
0.