*section 1 - poursafe · jefferson davis highway, suite 1204, arlington, va 22202-4302, and to the...

146
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN ACCORD WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 757 CHAPTER 450, 1989 LEGISLATIVE SESSION JANUARY 1996 PETE WILSON Governor DEAN R. DUNPHY, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency ANNE BERSINGER Acting Director

Upload: others

Post on 08-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

1996

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT

INFORMATION SYSTEM

ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN ACCORD WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 757

CHAPTER 450, 1989 LEGISLATIVE SESSION

JANUARY 1996

PETE WILSON Governor DEAN R. DUNPHY, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency ANNE BERSINGER Acting Director

Page 2: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE January 1996

3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED

Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

1996 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System

6. AUTHOR(S) Helen N. Tashima and Clifford J Helander

5. FUNDING NUMBERS

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

California Department of Motor Vehicles Research and Development Section P.O. Box 932382 Sacramento, CA 94232-3820

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER CAL-DMV-RSS-96-159

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) In this fifth annual report, 1993 and 1994 DUI data from several diverse sources were compiled and cross-referenced for the purpose of developing a single comprehensive DUI data and monitoring system. This report presents crosstabulated information on DUI arrests, convictions, court sanctions, administrative actions and alcohol-involved accidents. In addition, this report provides an evaluation of the effectiveness of alternative court and administrative sanctions (including alcohol treatment programs and license actions) upon the postconviction records of first and second DUI offenders. The postconviction driving records of DUI offenders arrested in 1989, 1991, and 1993 were evaluated for five-, three-, and one-year periods, respectively.

15. NUMBER OF PAGES

137 14. SUBJECT TERMS

Drinking drivers, DUI tracking data system, DUI reporting system, DUI countermeasures, DUI recidivism, alcohol education and rehabilitation, driver license disqualification

16. PRICE CODE

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT

Unclassified

18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE

Unclassified

19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT

Unclassified

20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

None NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (2-89)

Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18 298-102

Page 3: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

%

of T

otal

Fat

aliti

es

52.2

48

.9

48.7

50

.1

46.6

46

.6

46.0

44

.1

43.8

37

.7

35.3

%

of T

otal

Inju

ries

21

.9

20.7

20

.1

19.1

18

.2

17.6

17

.5

15.9

14

.5

13.6

12

.5

Felo

ny D

UI A

rres

ts

7200

73

16

8034

84

88

8604

10

448

1294

8 11

220

9803

87

38

7567

Alc

ohol

-Invo

lved

Fat

aliti

es

2607

24

12

2543

27

54

2510

25

09

2382

20

48

1832

15

69

1488

i

DU

I SU

MM

AR

Y S

TATI

STIC

S:

1984

- 19

94

YEA

R

19

84

1985

19

86

1987

19

88

1989

19

90

1991

19

92

1993

19

94

Tota

l DU

I Arr

ests

1 35

2697

34

7797

34

7286

34

9576

32

7186

33

6059

36

6834

31

2571

26

0150

23

3673

20

8844

Mis

dem

eano

r DU

I Arr

ests

34

5497

34

0481

33

9252

34

1088

31

8582

32

5611

35

3886

30

1351

25

0347

22

4935

20

1277

DU

I Con

vict

ions

Rec

eive

d to

Dat

e

(by

year

of a

rres

t)2 24

7288

24

4354

23

9257

24

2449

21

9514

22

5596

r 25

6834

r 22

2419

r 18

4360

r 16

2946

r 14

0513

Pe

rcen

t Con

vict

ed o

f DU

I as o

f

Sept

embe

r 199

5 70

%

70%

69

%

69%

67

%

67%

70

%

71%

71

%r

70%

r 67

%

Estim

ated

Fin

al D

UI C

onvi

ctio

ns3

2473

08r

2443

84r

2393

22r

2423

96r

2197

67r

2261

35r

2598

10r

2257

48r

1881

16r

1701

54r

1531

59

Es

timat

ed F

inal

DU

I Con

vict

ion

Ra

te

70%

70

%

69%

69

%

67%

r 67

%

71%

r 72

%r

72%

r 73

%r

73%

Tota

l Rec

kles

s D

rivin

g C

onvi

ctio

ns4

4471

4 44

386

4406

3 41

724

3992

6 40

456

3961

7 39

386

3418

6 27

835

2737

4

Alc

ohol

-Invo

lved

Rec

kles

s 28

664

2716

3 26

316

2492

2 24

013

2564

6 26

960

2709

3 23

675

1864

5 18

246

Alc

ohol

-Invo

lved

Inju

ries

67

835

6666

7 69

876

6881

6 65

033

6393

7 63

847

5577

9 48

969

4293

6 39

437

Post

conv

ictio

n Su

sp/R

ev

6827

4 76

541

7800

6 78

156

7902

2 90

237

9115

5 10

0858

79

609

6844

1 59

600

Tota

l Man

dato

ry S

usp/

Rev5

98

928

1058

49

1043

33

1036

30

1017

79

1117

03

2336

80

3731

31r

3083

99

2774

47

2436

45

Adm

in P

er S

e/Re

fusa

l Sus

p/Re

v 30

654

2930

8 26

327

2547

4 22

757

2146

6 14

2525

27

2273

r 22

8790

20

9006

18

4045

1 Thes

e to

tals

wer

e re

port

ed b

y th

e D

epar

tmen

t of J

ustic

e, L

aw E

nfor

cem

ent I

nfor

mat

ion

Cen

ter,

and

incl

ude

a sm

all n

umbe

r of d

uplic

ates

(0.9

% i

n 19

94).

2 Thes

e da

ta re

pres

ent a

DM

V m

aste

r file

cou

nt o

f the

num

ber o

f DU

I abs

trac

ts re

ceiv

ed (b

y ye

ar o

f vio

latio

n), m

inus

dup

licat

es.

Thes

e to

tals

do

not i

nclu

de c

onvi

ctio

n ab

stra

cts

not

yet r

ecei

ved.

Thu

s, fo

r the

mos

t rec

ent y

ears

, the

se fi

gure

s w

ill s

ubst

antia

lly u

nder

estim

ate

the

final

con

vict

ion

tota

ls.

3 Th

ese

data

incl

ude

a pr

ojec

ted

num

ber o

f abs

trac

ts n

ot y

et re

ceiv

ed.

This

num

ber i

s ba

sed

on a

n em

piri

cally

der

ived

func

tion

of th

e co

urt a

bstr

act r

epor

ting

rate

.

4 Thes

e to

tals

wer

e ta

ken

from

the

DM

V a

nnua

l Sus

pens

ion

and

Revo

catio

n re

port

s an

d in

clud

e la

te re

port

ing

of c

onvi

ctio

ns fr

om p

rior

yea

rs.

5 Sinc

e 19

91, t

otal

man

dato

ry su

spen

sion

/rev

ocat

ion

exce

eds

the

num

ber o

f DU

I arr

ests

bec

ause

man

y of

fend

ers n

ow re

ceiv

e bo

th a

n A

PS a

nd p

ostc

onvi

ctio

n su

spen

sion

/rev

act

ion.

r Re

vise

d fr

om p

rior

repo

rts.

Page 4: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

ii

DU

I SU

MM

AR

Y S

TATI

STIC

S:

1984

- 19

94 (c

ontin

ued)

YE

AR

PREC

ON

VIC

TIO

N

Adm

in P

er S

e (A

PS) A

ctio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1196

10

2722

73

2287

90

2090

06

1840

45

Fi

rst -o

ffen

der s

uspe

nsio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

8250

3 18

7527

15

7545

14

4321

12

0582

Repe

at-o

ffen

der s

uspe

nsio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3479

2 74

351

6265

6 57

279

4742

9

Repe

at-o

ffen

der r

evoc

atio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2315

10

395

8589

74

06

6063

Com

mer

cial

dri

ver a

ctio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3739

79

76

6449

58

29

5038

Che

mic

al te

st re

fusa

l act

ions

30

654

2930

8 26

327

2547

4 22

757

2146

6 22

915

2129

6r 17

963r

1566

2 13

264

Te

st re

fusa

l sus

pens

ions

30

654

2548

5 16

352

1487

7 13

720

1239

0 15

128

1090

1r 93

74r

8256

70

22

Te

st re

fusa

l rev

ocat

ions

n/

a 38

23

9975

10

597

9037

90

76

7787

10

395r

8589

r 74

06

6063

TOTA

L A

PS/R

EFU

SAL

AC

TIO

NS

3065

4 29

308

2632

7 25

474

2275

7 21

466

1425

25

2722

73

2287

90

2090

06

1840

45

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

POST

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

Juve

nile

DU

I sus

pens

ions

n/

a 22

00

2219

23

74

1823

19

95

1478

15

76

1202

92

2 87

9

Firs

t-off

ende

r sus

pens

ions

79

10

7057

73

84

7278

66

26

7679

10

408

1357

5 10

673

1020

8 86

96

M

isde

mea

nor

6386

53

46

5592

55

58

5050

56

58

8467

11

547

8989

86

07

7188

Felo

ny

1524

17

11

1792

17

20

1576

20

21

1941

20

28

1684

16

01

1508

Seco

nd-o

ffen

der S

/R a

ctio

ns

4398

0 46

835

4523

4 43

608

4769

8 53

927

5233

4 57

350

4547

8 38

849

3430

0

Mis

dem

eano

r 43

481

4629

2 44

601

4296

4 47

093

5323

8 51

593

5658

3 44

756

3828

5 33

794

Fe

lony

49

9 54

3 63

3 64

4 60

5 68

9 74

1 76

7 72

2 56

4 50

6

Thir

d-of

fend

er re

voca

tions

16

384

1497

0 16

946

1711

8 13

991

1851

4 18

650

1996

3 15

553

1290

8 11

193

M

isde

mea

nor

1638

4 14

970

1694

6 17

118

1367

1 18

182

1821

9 19

595

1523

3 12

644

1097

4

Felo

ny

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

320

332

431

368

320

264

219

Four

th-o

ffen

der r

evoc

atio

ns

n/a

5479

62

23

7778

88

84

8122

82

85

8394

67

03

5554

45

32

TOTA

L PO

STC

ON

VIC

TIO

N A

CTI

ON

S 68

274

7654

1 78

006

7815

6 79

022

9023

7 91

155

1008

58

7960

9 68

441

5960

0

19

84

1985

19

86

1987

19

88

1989

19

90

1991

19

92

1993

19

94

TOTA

L M

AN

DA

TORY

SU

SPEN

SIO

N/

REV

OC

ATI

ON

(S/R

) AC

TIO

NS

9892

8 10

5849

10

4333

10

3630

10

1779

11

1703

23

3680

37

3131

30

8399

27

7447

24

3645

r Revi

sed

from

pri

or re

port

s.

Page 5: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

HIGHLIGHTS OF 1996 CALIFORNIA DUI-MIS REPORT

DUI arrests continued to decline in 1994 (-10.8%), and have fallen 42% since 1990.

Alcohol-involved traffic fatalities decreased again in 1994 (-5.2%), and have dropped by almost half since 1987 (-46% overall).

The number of persons injured in alcohol-involved accidents during 1994 declined

(-8.1%) for the eighth consecutive year, resulting in a 42.7% reduction in alcohol-involved injuries over the 8-year time period.

13.1% of all 1993 DUI arrests were associated with a reported traffic accident, up

from 11.1% the prior year. 49% of these accidents involved an injury or fatality.

The average blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of a convicted DUI offender, as reported by law enforcement [on administrative per se (APS) forms], was .169% in 1993, which is more than double the California illegal per se BAC limit of .08%. The average BAC reported on 1993 DUI abstracts of conviction was 0.166%, the same as in 1991 and 1992.

Over 1 million license suspension or revocation actions have been taken since the

APS law was enacted in July 1990.

During the first five years of APS implementation, requests for hearings have increased each year, rising from 7% of all APS actions in FY 90/91 to 12% in 94/95. The rate at which APS suspension/revocation actions are upheld after hearing has declined from 87% in FY 90/91 to 80% in 94/95. During the same time period, the sustain rate for chemical test refusal hearings has fallen from 84% to only 72%.

Among 1994 DUI arrestees, Hispanics (46.5%) again constituted the largest

racial/ethnic group, and were arrested at a rate over double their adult population parity (22.5%, 1990 Census).

The average age of a DUI offender in 1994 was 32.9 years. Less than 1% of arrested

DUI offenders are juveniles (under age 18).

iii

Page 6: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Among convicted DUI offenders in 1993, 67.8% were first offenders and 32.2% were

repeat offenders (one or more prior convictions within the previous 7 years). The proportion of repeat offenders has decreased slightly each year since 1989, when it stood at 37%.

18.8% of 1993 DUI arrest cases did not show any corresponding conviction on DMV

records. This rate is down slightly from 19.2% in 1992, a proportional decrease of 2.1%. (It should be noted that these cases were the first subsequent to the 1993 DUI-MIS report, which identified the problem of DUI convictions not appearing on driver records. The effects of any subsequent system improvements which would reduce the number of nonrecorded DUI convictions should begin to appear with these 1993 DUI arrests, and the nominal 2.1% reduction in the "no record of any conviction" rate may represent initial evidence of the effects of these system improvements).

Alcohol treatment, in conjunction with license restriction, was the most effective

postconviction sanction in reducing subsequent DUI incidents among DUI offenders, by a minimum of 11.8% over other sanction alternatives.

License suspension was the most effective postconviction sanction in reducing the

total accident risk of DUI offenders. With the imposition of preconviction APS suspensions, beginning in July 1990, the postconviction total accident rates of all sanction groups were reduced. Because all DUI offenders were now suspended under the APS law, the incremental impact of postconviction suspension actions became less distinct.

Jail, in the absence of treatment or postconviction suspension, was the least effective

sanction for first offenders in terms of DUI recidivism, with a minimum of 24.7% more DUI incidents than the next least effective sanction.

iv

Page 7: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

DUI SUMMARY STATISTICS: 1984-1994 i HIGHLIGHTS OF 1996 DUI-MIS REPORT iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1: DUI ARRESTS 4 SECTION 2: CONVICTIONS 10 SECTION 3: POSTCONVICTION SANCTIONS 22 SECTION 4: POSTCONVICTION SANCTION EFFECTIVENESS 28 Evaluation Method and Results 33 Subject Selection and Data Collection 33 Evaluation Design and Analytical Procedures 36 Results of the First Offender Sanction Evaluation 37 Total Accidents 37 DUI Incidents 38 Results of the Second Offender Sanction Evaluation 40 Total Accidents 40 DUI Incidents 42 SECTION 5: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS 45 SECTION 6: ACCIDENTS INVOLVING ALCOHOL 49 DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS 56 REFERENCES 57 GLOSSARY 57

APPENDICES

NUMBER A Chapter 450 (Assembly Bill Number 757 - Friedman) 60

B1 1994 DUI Arrests by County, Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity 61

B2 1993 DUI Convictions by County, Sex and Age 76

B3 Total Conviction Data for 1993 DUI Arrestees by Court 86

B4 1993 DUI Sanctions by County, Court and Offender Status 99

v

Page 8: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

APPENDICES (continued)

NUMBER PAGE

B5 Demographic and 1-Year Prior and 2-Year Prior Driver Record Variables by Year and Sanction Group for First DUI Offenders 134 B6 Demographic and 1-Year Prior and 2-Year Prior Driver Record Variables by Year and Sanction Group for Second DUI Offenders 135 B7 ZIP Code Census Variables (Covariates) by Year and Sanction Group for First and Second DUI Offenders 136

LIST OF TABLES 1 DUI Arrests by County and Annual Percentage Change from 1992-1994 7

2 1994 DUI Arrests by County and Type of Arrest 8

3a 1994 DUI Arrests by Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity 9

3b 1994 DUI Arrests by Sex, Age, and Race/Ethnicity 9

4 1993 DUI Convictions by Age and Sex 15

5 Matchable 1993 DUI Convictions by Age, Race/Ethnicity and Sex 16

6 Adjusted 1993 DUI Conviction Rates and Relative Likelihood of Conviction, by Age and Race/Ethnicity 16

7 Total Conviction Data for 1993 DUI Arrestees 17

8 Adjudication Status of 1993 DUI Arrests by County 19

9 1993 Reported Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Levels of DUI Convictions 20

10 1993 DUI Convictions by Offender Status and Average Reported BAC Level 21

11 1993 DUI Court Sanctions by DUI Offender Status 24

12 1993 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - First Offenders 25

13 1993 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - Repeat Offenders 26

vi

Page 9: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

TABLES (continued)

NUMBER PAGE

14 First Offender Sanction Effects on Total Accidents and DUI Incidents by Year 39

15 Second Offender Sanction Effects on Total Accidents and DUI Incidents by Year 42

16 Summary of Significant Results for 1989, 1991, and 1993 First and Second Offender Sanction Groups by Outcome Measures 43

17 Mandatory DUI License Disqualification Actions, 1984-1994 47

18 Administrative Per Se Process Measures 48

19 Race/Ethnicity by Sobriety Code of Accident-Involved 1993 DUI Arrestees 52

20 Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1993 DUI Arrestees by Race/Ethnicity and Type of Arrest 52

21 Adjudication Status by Sobriety Code for Accident-Involved 1993 DUI Arrestees 53

22 Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1993 DUI Arrestees by Type of Arrest and Adjudication Status 53

23 1993 Accident-Involved DUI Arrestees With No Record of Conviction, by County and Type of Arrest 54

24 1-, 3- and 5-Year Total, Fatal/Injury, and Alcohol-Related Accident Means by Offender Status 55

LIST OF FIGURES 1 DUI management information system 2

2 DUI arrests 1984-1994 4

3 Percentage of 1994 DUI arrests and adult population by race/ethnicity 6

vii

Page 10: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

FIGURES (continued)

NUMBER PAGE

4 DUI abstracts received by DMV and DUI conviction volume and rate estimates, 1984-1994 12

5 Relative likelihood of conviction by race/ethnicity 15

6 Frequency of court-ordered DUI sanctions (1993) 23

7 Adjusted 5-year accident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction 29

8 Adjusted 3-year accident rates of 1991 first offenders by type of sanction 29

9 Adjusted 1-year accident rates of 1993 first offenders by type of sanction 29

10 Adjusted 5-year DUI incident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction 30

11 Adjusted 3-year DUI incident rates of 1991 first offenders by type of sanction 30

12 Adjusted 1-Year DUI incident rates of 1993 first offenders by type of sanction 30

13 Adjusted 5-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1989 second offenders by type of sanction 32

14 Adjusted 3-year accident and DUI incident rates 1991 second offenders by type of sanction 32

15 Adjusted 1-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1993 second offenders by type of sanction 32

16A Adjusted 3-year accident rates for 1991 first offenders by type of sanction and ZIP code average arrival time to work 38

16B Adjusted 1-year accident rates for 1993 second offenders by type of sanction and prior 2-year minor convictions and accidents 41

17 Mandatory DUI license disqualification actions, 1984-1994 46

18 Percentage of total injuries and total fatalities that were alcohol-involved, 1984-1994 50

viii

Page 11: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

INTRODUCTION

This report is the fifth Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System, produced in response to Assembly Bill 757 (Friedman), Chapter 450, 1989 legislative session (see Appendix A). This bill required the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to "establish and maintain a data and monitoring system to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted" of DUI in order to provide "accurate and up-to-date comprehensive statistics" to enhance "the ability of the Legislature to make informed and timely policy decisions." The need for such a data system had long been documented by numerous authorities, including the 1983 Presidential Commission on Drunk Driving. In responding to this legislative mandate, this report combines and cross-references DUI data from diverse sources and presents them in a single reference. Data sources drawn upon include the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for accident data, Department of Justice (DOJ) for arrest data, and the DMV driver record database. Each of these reporting agencies, however, initially draw their data from diffuse primary sources such as individual law enforcement agencies (arrest and accident reports) and the courts (abstracts of conviction). The general conceptual design of the California DUI management information system (DUI-MIS) is presented in Figure 1. The basic theme of the DUI-MIS is to track the processing of offenders through the DUI system from the point of arrest and to identify the frequency with which offenders flow through each branch of the system process (from law enforcement through adjudication to treatment and license control actions). Figure 1 also illustrates the relationship between offender flow and data collection at each point of the process. The initiating data source for the DUI-MIS is the DUI arrest report, as compiled by the DOJ Law Enforcement Information Center's Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system. Another major objective of this report is to evaluate the effectiveness of court and administrative sanctions on convicted DUI offenders. This is accomplished by examining the postconviction recidivism records (alcohol/drug-related accidents and traffic convictions) of offenders assigned to alternative sanctions, as detailed in the section on "Postconviction Sanction Effectiveness."

1

Page 12: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

2

DU

I IN

CID

ENTS

Arr

este

d?C

hem

ical

Te

st

Ref

used

?A

ccid

ent

Invo

lved

?C

ompl

aint

Fi

led?

Plea

- B

arga

in?

DU

I C

onvi

ctio

n?R

efer

red

to

Trea

tmen

t?

Lice

nse

Susp

ende

d/

Rev

oked

?

Lice

nse

Rei

nsta

ted?

Trea

tmen

t N

ot

Com

plet

ed?

Arr

est

Rep

ort

Rei

nsta

tem

ent o

n D

river

Rec

ord

Con

vict

ion

of

Less

er O

ffen

seTr

eatm

ent

Dro

pout

Trea

tmen

t R

efer

ral

DU

I C

onvi

ctio

n

Susp

ensi

on/

Rev

ocat

ion

onD

river

Rec

ord

Cou

rt D

ocke

t Es

tabl

ishe

dA

ccid

ent

Rep

ort

Adm

inis

trativ

e Pe

r Se

Sus

pens

ion

Rep

ort

Mon

thly

Arr

est

and

Cita

tion

Reg

iste

r

Aut

omat

ed N

ame

Inde

x Sy

stem

Lice

nse

Susp

ensi

on

and

DU

I Pr

oces

sing

Stat

ewid

e In

tegr

ated

Tra

ffic

R

ecor

d Sy

stem

Abs

tract

of

Con

vict

ion

Driv

er R

ecor

d M

aste

r File

DU

I Dat

a Ex

tract

ion

Mod

ule

DU

I-M

IS

LAW

EN

FOR

CEM

ENT

AD

JUD

ICA

TIV

ETR

EATM

ENT

LIC

ENSE

CO

NTR

OL

Figu

re 1

. D

UI m

anag

emen

t inf

orm

atio

n sy

stem

.

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

Page 13: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

It should again be noted that it is not an objective of this report to interpret, analyze or make recommendations based on the data presented. Rather, the primary purpose of a reporting system such as the DUI-MIS is to provide objective data on the operating and performance characteristics of the system for others to assess in making policy decisions, formulating improvements and conducting more in-depth evaluations. An example of how this process can work is provided by local and state agency response to the 1993 DUI-MIS report, which included a section on the tracking of "nonconvicted" DUI arrestees. In response to the identified problem of DUI convictions not being reported or updated to the offender's driver record, the Riverside County District Attorney organized a task force of representatives from law enforcement, the courts, public policy groups, the press, state administrative agencies and the legislature, to address the situation in Riverside County. The involvement of state legislative representatives led to the development of a statewide proposal on behalf of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency to improve the overall integrity of DUI and other traffic conviction data on the driver record database. Representatives of major components of the DUI system, including law enforcement, the courts, prosecutors, and administrative agencies, met in Sacramento to discuss potential improvements in the tracking of DUI offenders. Some of these improvements have already been implemented, such as an ongoing program to identify DUI arrestees with no conviction of record and track their cases back to the court of jurisdiction for final disposition. A legislative proposal to require the reporting to DMV of all DUI failures-to-appear in court (FTAs) is also being considered. Finally, the department recently (March 1995) contracted with a private consulting firm to develop an electronic "audit" procedure for tracking all DUI cases which do not appear as convictions on DMV driver records. It is exactly this feedback process of problem identification, proposed solution and reevaluation which the DUI-MIS was designed to engender. The success of the California DUI-MIS has contributed to a national initiative to design a model DUI reporting system, currently being developed under contract to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

3

Page 14: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 1: DUI ARRESTS

The information presented below on DUI arrests is based primarily on data collected annually by the Department of Justice (DOJ), Law Enforcement Information Center, Monthly Arrest, and Citation Register (MACR) system. These data are the most current nonaggregated data available on DUI arrests. Table 1: DUI Arrests By County and Annual Percentage Change from 1992-1994. The number of DUI arrests by county for the years 1992-1994 and the percentage changes from 1993 to 1994 are shown in Table 1. Table 2: 1994 DUI Arrests by County and Type of Arrest. This table shows a breakdown of 1994 DUI arrests by felony, misdemeanor, and juvenile arrest type, by county. This table also shows county and statewide DUI arrest rates per 100 licensed drivers. Tables 3a-3b: 1994 DUI Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity. Table 3a crosstabulates age by sex and age by race/ethnicity of 1994 DUI arrestees statewide. The same tabulations by county are found in Appendix Table B1. Table 3b shows the same data crosstabulated by sex and age within race/ethnicity. Figure 2 below displays the trend in DUI arrests from 1984 to 1994.

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

NU

MB

ER O

F D

UI A

RR

ESTS

1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994

FIGURE 2. DUI ARRESTS 1984-1994.

MisdemeanorFelonyTotal

YEAR

4

Page 15: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Based on the data shown in Figure 2 and Tables 1, 2, 3a, and 3b, the following statements can be made about DUI arrests in California: Statewide Parameters:

DUI arrests decreased by 10.8% in 1994, following a 10.3% decline in 1993. Since 1990, DUI arrests have dropped by 42%.

The DUI arrest rate decreased to 1.0 per 100 licensed drivers in 1994, compared to

rates of 1.1 in 1993, 1.3 in 1992, 1.5 in 1991, and 1.8 in 1990.

Felony DUI arrests (involving bodily injury or death) constitute a relatively small proportion (3.6% in 1994) of all DUI arrests.

County Variation:

25% of all 1994 California DUI arrests occurred in Los Angeles County. Four counties (Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, and San Bernardino) had over 10,000 DUI arrests each, and accounted for almost half (45%) of all arrests.

The 1994 county per capita DUI arrest rates ranged from 0.4 to 7.4 DUI arrests per

100 licensed drivers. Fourteen counties had rates below 1.0: San Francisco (0.4), Contra Costa, and Nevada (0.7), Alameda, Amador, Santa Clara, and Solano (0.8), and El Dorado, Marin, Mariposa, Orange, San Diego, Shasta, and Tuolumne (0.9). Eleven counties had rates of 2.0 or higher and of these, 3 had rates higher than 2.5: Colusa (2.6), Trinity (2.6), and Alpine (7.4). The extremely high rate for Alpine must be viewed with caution because of the extremely small population size of Alpine County (N = 800 licensed drivers in 1994).

Most counties again showed a decline in DUI arrests in 1994. Among the larger

counties, the greatest decline occurred in Santa Clara County (-15.7%). Among other counties, the largest decreases in DUI arrests occurred in Sierra (-43.3%), Amador (-40.0%), San Benito (-25.7%), Del Norte (-24.4%), Imperial (-23.4%), and Mariposa (-23.3%) counties. Among counties showing increases in DUI arrests were Trinity (15.9%), Modoc (14.2%), Alpine (9.3%), Tehama (5.8%), Tuolumne (1.3%), Orange (1.2%), and Lassen (0.4%).

Demographic Characteristics:

The average age of a DUI arrestee in 1994 was 32.9 years. Roughly half (48.9%) of all arrestees were age 30 or younger and almost 80% (78.9%) were age 40 or younger. Less than 1% of all DUI arrests involved juveniles (under age 18). 2.2% of all arrestees were over age 60.

5

Page 16: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Males comprised 88.4% of all 1994 DUI arrests.

Among 1994 DUI arrestees, Hispanics (46.5%) continued to be the largest

racial/ethnic group, and were arrested at a rate over double their adult population parity (22.5%, 1990 Census). Among other racial/ethnic groups, Blacks (6.7% of arrests, 6.7% of the population) were arrested in proportion with their population parity, while Whites (41.6% of arrests, 61.2% of the population), and Others (5.2% of arrests, 9.7% of the population) were underrepresented among DUI arrestees. The percentage of Hispanic DUI arrestees (46.5%) has increased substantially since 1991 (40.4%), while that of White DUI arrestees (41.6%) has decreased substantially compared to 1991 (49.9%). It should be noted, however, that the absolute numbers of DUI arrests among all racial/ethnic groups declined again in 1994. Figure 3 below shows the percentages of 1994 DUI arrests and 1990 census adult population by race/ethnicity.

Among male 1994 DUI arrestees, 50.1% were Hispanic, 38.1% were White, 6.6%

were Black, and 5.2% were "Other." Among female DUI arrestees, 68.7% were White, 19.1% were Hispanic, 7.5% were Black, and 4.8% were "Other."

In the following 9 counties, Hispanics comprised over 60% of those arrested for

DUI during 1994: Tulare (78.0%), Madera (72.0%), Fresno (71.7%), San Benito (71.3%), Imperial (70.2%), Merced (64.8%), Monterey (64.2%), Los Angeles (62.4%), and Kings (62.0%). In most other counties, the majority of arrestees were White.

The average age of a DUI arrestee varied considerably by race: Blacks were the

oldest with a mean age of 35.2 years, while Hispanics were the youngest, with a mean age of 30.4 years.

61.2

22.5

6.7 9.7

41.646.5

6.7 5.20

20

40

60

80

PER

CEN

TAG

E

White Hispanic Black Other

Figure 3 . Percentage of 1994 DUI arrests and adult population by race/ethnicity.

Adult population

DUI arrests

6

Page 17: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 1: DUI ARRESTS* BY COUNTY AND ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 1992-1994

COUNTY 1992 1993 1994 % CHANGE 1993-1994

STATEWIDE 258218 231696 206583 -10.8 ALAMEDA 8964 7820 7208 -7.8 ALPINE 65 54 59 9.3 AMADOR 283 305 183 -40.0 BUTTE 1669 1580 1297 -17.9 CALAVERAS 443 334 287 -14.1 COLUSA 411 326 302 -7.4 CONTRA COSTA 5341 4492 4124 -8.2 DEL NORTE 385 401 303 -24.4 EL DORADO 1228 1122 983 -12.4 FRESNO 9066 8158 6860 -15.9 GLENN 402 310 310 0.0 HUMBOLDT 1534 1258 1234 -1.9 IMPERIAL 2672 2148 1645 -23.4 INYO 533 383 346 -9.7 KERN 7262 6443 5095 -20.9 KINGS 1379 1477 1143 -22.6 LAKE 808 690 662 -4.1 LASSEN 278 251 252 0.4 LOS ANGELES 65513 58710 51607 -12.1 MADERA 1592 1452 1159 -20.2 MARIN 2327 1940 1664 -14.2 MARIPOSA 119 146 112 -23.3 MENDOCINO 1057 1033 960 -7.1 MERCED 2639 2431 2138 -12.1 MODOC 131 120 137 14.2 MONO 191 175 157 -10.3 MONTEREY 5170 4968 4423 -11.0 NAPA 1179 1203 1085 -9.8 NEVADA 584 511 481 -5.9 ORANGE 19091 15476 15659 1.2 PLACER 1766 1885 1629 -13.6 PLUMAS 167 217 189 -12.9 RIVERSIDE 10642 9109 8182 -10.2 SACRAMENTO 9463 9316 7904 -15.2 SAN BENITO 422 342 254 -25.7 SAN BERNARDINO 11830 11000 10699 -2.7 SAN DIEGO 19389 17047 15815 -7.2 SAN FRANCISCO 2644 1885 1690 -10.3 SAN JOAQUIN 4704 4444 3936 -11.4 SAN LUIS OBISPO 2550 2444 2351 -3.8 SAN MATEO 4845 5163 4622 -10.5 SANTA BARBARA 4838 4591 3837 -16.4 SANTA CLARA 11840 10871 9164 -15.7 SANTA CRUZ 3469 3206 2645 -17.5 SHASTA 1335 1070 1036 -3.2 SIERRA 51 67 38 -43.3 SISKIYOU 452 410 356 -13.2 SOLANO 2308 2050 1809 -11.8 SONOMA 4558 4075 3245 -20.4 STANISLAUS 3640 3324 2822 -15.1 SUTTER 845 1039 898 -13.6 TEHAMA 551 451 477 5.8 TRINITY 234 220 255 15.9 TULARE 4862 4336 3820 -11.9 TUOLUMNE 380 316 320 1.3 VENTURA 5666 5050 4971 -1.6 YOLO 1704 1363 1202 -11.8 YUBA 747 688 542 -21.2 *DOJ DUI arrest totals with duplicates removed.

7

Page 18: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 2: 1994 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST

TOTAL TYPE OF ARREST DUI ARRESTS

COUNTY (100%) FELONY JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR PER 100

N N % N % N % LICENSED DRIVERS

STATEWIDE 206583 7426 3.6 1767 0.9 197390 95.5 1.0 ALAMEDA 7208 118 1.6 73 1.0 7017 97.4 0.8 ALPINE 59 1 1.7 0 0.0 58 98.3 7.4 AMADOR 183 11 6.0 0 0.0 172 94.0 0.8 BUTTE 1297 54 4.2 24 1.9 1219 94.0 1.0 CALAVERAS 287 18 6.3 2 0.7 267 93.0 1.0 COLUSA 302 12 4.0 2 0.7 288 95.4 2.6 CONTRA COSTA 4124 130 3.2 40 1.0 3954 95.9 0.7 DEL NORTE 303 14 4.6 6 2.0 283 93.4 1.8 EL DORADO 983 58 5.9 16 1.6 909 92.5 0.9 FRESNO 6860 245 3.6 76 1.1 6539 95.3 1.6 GLENN 310 19 6.1 2 0.6 289 93.2 1.8 HUMBOLDT 1234 56 4.5 17 1.4 1161 94.1 1.4 IMPERIAL 1645 47 2.9 12 0.7 1586 96.4 2.2 INYO 346 22 6.4 2 0.6 322 93.1 2.4 KERN 5095 213 4.2 72 1.4 4810 94.4 1.4 KINGS 1143 27 2.4 23 2.0 1093 95.6 2.0 LAKE 662 8 2.7 6 0.9 638 96.4 1.6 LASSEN 252 10 4.0 3 1.2 239 94.8 1.4 LOS ANGELES 51607 2064 4.0 282 0.5 49261 95.5 1.0 MADERA 1159 36 3.1 10 0.9 1113 96.0 1.9 MARIN 1664 43 2.6 9 0.5 1612 96.9 0.9 MARIPOSA 112 9 8.0 0 0.0 103 92.0 0.9 MENDOCINO 960 19 2.0 6 0.6 935 97.4 1.6 MERCED 2138 66 3.1 24 1.1 2048 95.8 2.0 MODOC 137 5 3.6 3 2.2 129 94.2 2.0 MONO 157 2 1.3 2 1.3 153 97.5 2.0 MONTEREY 4423 140 3.2 9 0.3 4224 95.5 2.0 NAPA 1085 45 4.1 18 1.7 1022 94.2 1.3 NEVADA 481 17 3.5 3 0.6 461 95.8 0.7 ORANGE 15659 321 2.0 88 0.6 15250 97.4 0.9 PLACER 1629 54 3.3 21 1.3 1554 95.4 1.1 PLUMAS 189 7 3.7 1 0.5 181 95.8 1.1 RIVERSIDE 8182 308 3.8 95 1.2 7779 95.1 1.0 SACRAMENTO 7904 472 6.0 70 0.9 7362 93.1 1.1 SAN BENITO 254 111 4.3 1 0.4 242 95.3 1.0 SAN BERNARDINO 10699 436 4.1 71 0.7 10192 95.3 1.1 SAN DIEGO 15815 349 2.2 127 0.8 15339 97.0 0.9 SAN FRANCISCO 1690 139 8.2 11 0.7 1540 91.1 0.4 SAN JOAQUIN 3936 99 2.5 46 1.2 3791 96.3 1.3 SAN LUIS OBISPO 2351 65 2.8 27 1.1 2259 96.1 1.5 SAN MATEO 4622 135 2.9 50 1.1 4437 96.0 1.0 SANTA BARBARA 3837 144 3.8 47 1.2 3646 95.0 1.5 SANTA CLARA 9164 524 5.7 48 0.5 8592 93.8 0.8 SANTA CRUZ 2645 43 1.6 34 1.3 2568 97.1 1.6 SHASTA 1036 64 6.2 5 0.5 967 93.3 0.9 SIERRA 38 0 0.0 2 5.3 36 94.7 1.5 SISKIYOU 356 17 4.8 2 0.6 337 94.7 1.0 SOLANO 1809 64 3.5 26 1.4 1719 95.0 0.8 SONOMA 3245 113 3.5 37 1.1 3095 95.4 1.1 STANISLAUS 2822 133 4.7 34 1.2 2655 94.1 1.1 SUTTER 898 29 3.2 7 0.8 862 96.0 1.9 TEHAMA 477 26 5.5 3 0.6 448 93.9 1.4 TRINITY 255 18 7.1 2 0.8 235 92.2 2.6 TULARE 3820 100 2.6 53 1.4 3667 96.0 2.0 TUOLUMNE 320 12 3.8 2 0.6 306 95.6 0.9 VENTURA 4971 150 3.0 47 0.9 4774 96.0 1.0 YOLO 1202 49 4.1 14 1.2 1139 94.8 1.2 YUBA 542 25 4.6 4 0.7 513 94.6 1.4

8

Page 19: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

9

TABL

E 3a

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y A

GE,

SEX

AN

D R

AC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y*

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

STA

TEW

IDE

2065

83

100.

0 18

2625

88

.4

2395

8 11

.6

8598

0 41

.6

9608

4 46

.5

1386

4 6.

7 10

655

5.2

UN

DER

18

1767

0.

9 15

36

86.9

23

1 13

.1

800

45.3

81

9 46

.3

82

4.6

66

3.7

18-2

0 13

355

6.5

1221

1 91

.4

1144

8.

6 44

93

33.6

77

23

57.8

57

7 4.

3 56

2 4.

2 21

-30

8593

6 41

.6

7732

4 90

.0

8612

10

.0

2885

1 33

.6

4821

2 56

.1

4832

5.

6 40

41

4.7

31-4

0 61

888

30.0

53

615

86.6

82

73

13.4

27

470

44.4

26

371

42.6

45

91

7.4

3456

5.

6 41

-50

2885

3 14

.0

2483

4 86

.1

4019

13

.9

1536

9 53

.3

9391

32

.5

2312

8.

0 17

81

6.2

51-6

0 10

215

4.9

9022

88

.3

1193

11

.7

5976

58

.5

2660

26

.0

990

9.7

589

5.8

61-7

0 35

95

1.7

3204

89

.1

391

10.9

22

92

63.8

77

7 21

.6

394

11.0

13

2 3.

7 71

& A

BOV

E 97

4 0.

5 87

9 90

.2

95

9.8

729

74.8

13

1 13

.4

86

8.8

28

2.9

MEA

N A

GE

(YEA

RS)

32

.9

32.7

34

.0

35.1

30

.4

35.2

33

.7

*Tab

ulat

ions

for D

UI a

rres

ts b

y ag

e, s

ex, r

ace/

ethn

icity

and

cou

nty

are

foun

d in

App

endi

x Ta

ble

B1.

TA

BLE

3b:

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTS

BY

SEX,

AG

E A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) SE

X A

GE

TOTA

L W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

STA

TEW

IDE

20

6583

10

0.0

8598

0 41

.6

9608

4 46

.5

1386

4 6.

7 10

655

5.2

MA

LE

UN

DER

18

1536

0.

8 62

8 40

.9

770

50.1

79

5.

1 59

3.

8

18-2

0 12

211

6.7

3751

30

.7

7444

61

.0

513

4.2

503

4.1

21

-30

7732

4 42

.3

2320

0 30

.0

4631

9 59

.9

4218

5.

5 35

87

4.6

31

-40

5361

5 29

.4

2182

2 40

.7

2484

5 46

.3

3876

7.

2 30

72

5.7

41

-50

2483

4 13

.6

1245

0 50

.1

8752

35

.2

2029

8.

2 16

03

6.5

51

-60

9022

4.

9 50

51

56.0

25

17

27.9

91

2 10

.1

542

6.0

61

-70

3204

1.

8 19

83

61.9

73

5 22

.9

369

11.5

11

7 3.

7

71 &

ABO

VE

879

0.5

643

73

.2

128

14.6

81

9.

2 27

3.

1

TOTA

L 18

2625

10

0.0

6952

8 38

.1

9151

0

50.1

12

077

6.6

9510

5.

2 FE

MA

LE

UN

DER

18

231

1.0

172

74.5

49

21

.2

3 1.

3 7

3.0

18

-20

1144

4.

8 74

2 64

.9

279

24.4

64

5.

6 59

5.

2

21-3

0 86

12

35.9

56

51

65.6

18

93

22.0

61

4 7.

1 45

4 5.

3

31-4

0 82

73

34.5

56

48

68.3

15

26

18.4

71

5 8.

6 38

4 4.

6

41-5

0 40

19

16.8

29

19

72.6

63

9 15

.9

283

7.0

178

4.4

51

-60

1193

5.

0 92

5 77

.5

143

12

.0

78

6.5

47

3.9

61

-70

391

1.6

309

79.0

42

10

.7

25

6.4

15

3.8

71

& A

BOV

E 95

0.

4 86

90

.5

3 3.

2 5

5.3

1 1.

1

TOTA

L 23

958

100.

0 16

452

68.7

45

74

19.1

17

87

7.5

1145

4.

8

Page 20: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 2: CONVICTIONS

Data on convictions resulting from court adjudication of DUI arrests are reported directly to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) on court abstracts of conviction. The following tables compile and crosstabulate these conviction data by demographic, geographic, and adjudicative categories. Table 4: 1993 DUI Convictions by Age and Sex. This table crosstabulates statewide DUI conviction information by age and sex. Corresponding county-specific conviction data are presented in Appendix Table B2. Table 5: Matchable 1993 DUI Convictions by Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Sex. This table displays DUI conviction information by age, race/ethnicity, and sex. "Matchable" DUI convictions are those which are traceable to a DUI arrest appearing on the MACR system. Because not all arrests could be matched to an existing record, these conviction totals underestimate the total number of actual convictions. Table 6: Adjusted 1993 DUI Conviction Rates and Relative Likelihood of Conviction, by Age and Race/Ethnicity. This table shows the relative probability of a DUI arrest leading to a DUI conviction, by age and race/ethnicity. DUI conviction totals from categories in Table 5 ("matchable DUI convictions") were increased by the proportion which matchable convictions constituted of "total DUI convictions," shown in Table 7, to arrive at the adjusted DUI conviction rates. Without this adjustment DUI conviction rates would be underestimated using the conviction data from Table 5 because not all reported convictions are "matchable" to an arrest. Table 7: Total Conviction Data for 1993 DUI Arrestees. This table portrays county and statewide DUI-related conviction data as reported to the DMV on court abstracts of conviction. Corresponding court-specific data are shown in Appendix Table B3. Convictions not reported to DMV are considered nonconvictions for the purposes of this report. Actual nonconvictions include cases where the DUI arrest was not filed, not prosecuted, or resulted in a not guilty verdict. The DUI conviction rates by county were calculated by comparing the county conviction totals with DOJ arrest totals. Because not all 1993 DUI arrests have yet been adjudicated, these conviction totals and rates will slightly underestimate the "final" figures. The DUI conviction rates shown in the "DUI Summary Statistics: 1984-1994" table at the very beginning of this report include an estimate of these late convictions, and thus are slightly higher than those shown in

10

Page 21: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Tables 7 and 8. Conviction variables include felony and misdemeanor DUI convictions, alcohol- and nonalcohol-related reckless driving convictions, convictions of "other" lesser offenses, and DUI convictions dismissed or found unconstitutional. DUI arrest dates from the DOJ MACR system were matched to driver record violation dates to identify nonalcohol-related reckless driving and "other" convictions. The average (mean) adjudication time lags from DUI arrest to conviction, and from conviction to update on the DMV database, were calculated for each county. Table 8: Adjudication Status of 1993 DUI Arrests by County. This table shows the adjudication status (court disposition) of 1993 DUI arrests, by county. Included are the percentages of arrests which have resulted in DUI convictions (misdemeanor or felony), reckless driving convictions (alcohol-related or nonalcohol-related), convictions of "other" offenses, or no reported conviction, as of the date of writing. Again, because not all 1993 DUI arrests have yet been adjudicated, these rates will slightly underestimate the "final" rate for each category, excepting the category "no record of any conviction," which will be slightly reduced (approximately 1-2%) by the eventual adjudication of these few late cases. Table 9: 1993 Reported Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Levels of DUI Convictions. This table shows the frequency of reported BAC levels for DUI convictions. Because of more complete reporting of BAC levels on APS reporting forms (70%), those reports are used, beginning with this year's report, to calculate statewide BAC levels. Abstracts of conviction, which were used in prior evaluations, report BAC levels in only 52% of cases. Table 10: 1993 DUI Convictions by Offender Status and Average Reported BAC Level. This table displays the proportions of convicted DUI offenders by offender status (number of prior convictions), and the average (mean) BAC level from APS reporting forms and abstracts of conviction, for each offense level. Figure 4 (below) shows, for the years 1984 to 1994, the number of DUI abstracts received to date by DMV from the courts, the estimated final number of DUI convictions which will ultimately be received, and the estimated final DUI conviction rate.

11

Page 22: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

125000

150000

175000

200000

225000

250000

275000

1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994

YEAR

Estimated final conviction rate 70% 70% 69% 69% 67% 67% 71% 72% 72% 73% 73%

Note . Estimated DUI convictions = see footnote 3 to "DUI Summary Statistics: 1984-1994."

Figure 4 . DUI abstracts received by DMV and DUI conviction volume and rateestimates, 1984-1994.

Estimated final DUI convictions

DUI convictions received to date

Based on these data, the following statements can be made: Statewide Adjudication Parameters:

The estimated DUI conviction rate for 1994 (73%) is the same as the revised estimated rate for 1993.

Among 1993 DUI arrests, 70% have resulted to date in DUI convictions (felony or

misdemeanor). This is the same DUI conviction rate as for corresponding 1992 arrests, as reported last year.

8.9% of 1993 DUI arrests have resulted in reckless driving convictions, with 19% of

these not correctly reported as alcohol-related. Both of these rates are slightly higher than the corresponding 1992 rates.

2.4% of 1993 DUI arrests have resulted in convictions of offenses other than DUI or

reckless driving, as compared with 2.3% such "other" convictions in 1992.

12

Page 23: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

18.8% of 1993 DUI arrests have not yet resulted in any conviction on DMV's records, compared to 19.2% in 1992. As additional cases are adjudicated and reported by the courts, this figure will decrease slightly.

The average reported BAC level for all convicted DUI offenders in 1993, using APS

reporting forms as the data source, was 0.169%, or more than double the illegal per se BAC limit of 0.08%. The average BAC level of these offenders, using court abstracts of conviction as the data source, was 0.166%, the same as for 1992 offenders. The difference between APS-reported and court-reported BAC levels appears to be primarily attributable to underreporting of the higher BAC levels by the courts.

Average BAC levels increase slightly as a function of the number of prior DUI

convictions, from 0.164% BAC for a first offense to 0.187% BAC for a fourth or subsequent offense.

Among 1993 convicted DUI offenders, 67.8% were first offenders, 21.6% were

second offenders, 7.4% were third offenders, and 3.2% were on their fourth or more offense. (The statutorily defined time period for counting priors in California is seven years.) The proportion of repeat offenders (32.2%) among all convicted DUI offenders has decreased slightly each year since 1989 (at which time 37% of all convictions were repeat offenses).

The average adjudication time lags were 2.7 months from DUI arrest to conviction

and 3.0 months from conviction to update on the DMV database, totalling 5.7 months from arrest to update on the offender's driving record. These time lags were slightly longer than in 1992.

Variation by County:

Among the larger counties, 1993 DUI conviction rates varied from highs of 84.6% in Ventura County and 80.3% in Kern County, to lows of 56.2% in San Bernardino County, and 57.0% in Fresno County. Los Angeles County, which accounted for almost 25% of all DUI arrests in the state, had a DUI conviction rate of 69.9%.

Among the smaller counties, 1993 DUI conviction rates varied from highs of 83.5%

in Tuolumne County, 82.6% in Nevada County, 82.0% in El Dorado County, 81.7% in Lassen County, and 81.1% in Napa County, to a low of 32.7% in Yolo County. In Mariposa County in 1993, there were 34 more reported DUI convictions than arrests, resulting in a "conviction rate" in excess of 100%. (A substantial number of

13

Page 24: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

federal DUI arrests made at Yosemite National Park are not reported to the DOJ MACR system, however. The addition of these nonreported arrests would substantially reduce the conviction rate for Mariposa County.)

The rates at which DUI arrests were plea-bargained to alcohol-related reckless

driving convictions varied from 22.6% in Mariposa County to 0% in Marin and Ventura counties.

The percentage of DUI arrests that were improperly adjudicated as nonalcohol-

related reckless driving convictions varied from 0% to 8.6%. Five counties had rates of 4% or more: Mono, Del Norte, Imperial, Sierra, and Calaveras.

The percentage of DUI arrests adjudicated as minor convictions ("other"

convictions) varied from 0% to 4.7%. Los Angeles (4.7%) and San Luis Obispo (4.5%) had rates of 4% or more.

In nine counties, the proportion of arrestees not showing a conviction of any offense

exceeded 30%. These counties were Yolo, Trinity, Sutter, Tulare, Plumas, Fresno, Imperial, San Bernardino, and Merced. Seven counties had nonconviction rates of less than 10%: Mariposa, Nevada, Yuba, Tuolumne, Mono, Inyo, and San Mateo.

Variation by Court:

As was true for prior years, the 1993 superior court time lags were generally longer than municipal court time lags, presumably due to the type of DUI case (felony) being adjudicated.

Municipal court time lags from arrest to conviction (for courts with more than one

reported conviction) varied from a high of 5.1 months in the Trona (San Bernardino County) court to a low of 1.2 months for the Los Angeles Metro court, which is also the busiest court in the state.

Demographic Characteristics:

The average age of a convicted DUI offender in 1993 was 33.4 years.

46.5% of 1993 DUI convictees were aged 30 years or younger and 78.3% were 40 years or younger.

14

Page 25: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Females comprised 12.3% of all 1993 convicted DUI offenders, compared to 12.1% in 1992, 12.2% in 1991, 11.7% in 1990, and 11.4% in 1989.

The racial/ethnic distribution of 1993 DUI convictions (White = 43.7%; Hispanic =

45.0%; Black = 6.5%; Other = 4.7%) generally paralleled that of 1993 arrests, although Whites were somewhat more likely, and other groups somewhat less likely, to be convicted of the offense (as shown in Figure 5 below).

1.040.97 0.99 0.99

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

REL

ATI

VE

PRO

BA

BIL

ITY

White OtherBlackHispanic

Figure 5. Relative likelihood of conviction by race/ethnicity.(Adjusted conviction rate by ethnicity ÷ overall conviction rate.)

TABLE 4: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY AGE AND SEX*

TOTAL MALE FEMALE AGE N % N % N %

STATEWIDE 162254 100.0 142352 87.7 19902 12.3 UNDER 18 548 0.3 495 90.3 53 9.7 18-20 7533 4.6 6905 91.7 628 8.3 21-30 67290 41.5 60207 89.5 7083 10.5 31-40 51729 31.9 44531 86.1 7198 13.9 41-50 23245 14.3 19756 85.0 3489 15.0 51-60 8217 5.1 7200 87.6 1017 12.4 61-70 2994 1.8 2642 88.2 352 11.8 71 & ABOVE 698 0.4 616 88.3 82 11.7 MEAN AGE (YEARS) 33.4 33.3 34.6 *County-specific tabulations of 1993 DUI convictions by age and sex are shown in Appendix Table B2.

15

Page 26: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

16

TABL

E 5:

MA

TCH

ABL

E 19

93 D

UI C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

BY A

GE,

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

AN

D S

EX

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

AG

E TO

TAL

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

71 P

LUS

0.68

0.

97

0.67

0.

96

0.71

1.

01

0.74

1.

06

0.63

0.

90

TOTA

L BY

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

0.

70

1.00

0.

73

1.04

0.

68

0.97

0.

69

0.99

0.

69

0.99

UN

DER

18

0.47

0.

67

0.54

0.

77

0.41

0.

59

0.30

0.

43

0.49

0.

70

18 to

20

0.62

0.

89

0.66

0.

94

0.60

0.

86

0.59

0.

84

0.62

0.

89

21 to

30

0.68

0.

97

0.72

1.

03

0.65

0.

93

0.67

0.

96

0.66

0.

94

31 to

40

0.72

1.

03

0.74

1.

06

0.72

1.

03

0.70

1.

00

0.71

1.

01

41 to

50

0.75

1.

07

0.75

1.

07

0.76

1.

09

0.71

1.

01

0.73

1.

04

51 to

60

0.75

1.

07

0.75

1.

07

0.77

1.

10

0.74

1.

06

0.69

0.

99

61 to

70

0.74

1.

06

0.75

1.

07

0.74

1.

06

0.75

1.

07

0.69

0.

99

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

STA

TEW

IDE

1439

90

100.

0 50

644

35

.2

1233

9 8.

6 61

307

42.6

35

44

2.5

8120

5.

6 11

99

0.8

6024

4.

2 81

3 0.

6

UN

DER

18

700

0.5

276

39.4

71

10

.1

293

41

.9

11

1.6

18

2.6

2 0.

3 26

3.

7 3

0.4

18-2

0 81

05

5.6

2408

29

.7

433

5.3

4455

55

.0

167

2.1

287

3.5

40

0.5

283

3.

5 32

0.

4

21-3

0 59

954

41.6

17

667

29.5

43

81

7.3

3072

1 51

.2

1466

2.

4 28

11

4.7

392

0.7

2190

3.

7 32

6 0.

5

31-4

0 44

464

30.9

16

030

36.1

42

57

9.6

1744

8 39

.2

1259

2.

8 26

49

6.0

485

1.1

2082

4.

7 25

4 0.

6

41-5

0 20

261

14.1

87

81

43.3

22

12

10.9

60

83

30.0

48

6 2.

4 13

46

6.6

202

1.0

1008

5.

0 14

3 0.

7

51-6

0 72

55

5.0

3612

49

.8

678

9.3

1753

24

.2

116

1.6

657

9.1

64

0.9

337

4.

6 38

0.

5

61-7

0 26

60

1.8

1497

56

.3

257

9.7

477

17.9

31

1.

2 29

2 11

.0

9 0.

3 82

3.

1 15

0.

6

71 &

ABO

VE

591

0.4

373

63.1

50

8.

5 77

13

.0

8 1.

4 60

10

.2

5 0.

8 16

27

2

0.3

TABL

E 6:

AD

JUST

ED 1

993

DU

I CO

NV

ICTI

ON

RA

TES1 A

ND

REL

ATI

VE

LIK

ELIH

OO

D2 O

F C

ON

VIC

TIO

N, B

Y A

GE

AN

D R

AC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y

TO

TAL

BY A

GE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

AG

E A

DJU

STED

RE

LATI

VE

AD

JUST

ED

REL

ATI

VE

AD

JUST

ED

RELA

TIV

E A

DJU

STED

R

ELA

TIV

E A

DJU

STED

RE

LATI

VE

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

LIK

ELIH

OO

D

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

LI

KEL

IHO

OD

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

LIK

ELIH

OO

D

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

LI

KEL

IHO

OD

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

LIK

ELIH

OO

D

R

ATE

RATE

RATE

RA

TE

RA

TE

Adj

uste

d D

UI

Con

vict

ion

Rat

es=

The

mat

chab

le D

UI c

onvi

ctio

n ra

te p

ropo

rtion

ally

adj

uste

d to

the

over

all D

UI c

onvi

ctio

n ra

te.

1 Rel

ativ

e Li

kelih

ood

= A

djus

ted

DU

I Con

vict

ion

Rat

e O

vera

ll To

tal D

UI C

onvi

ctio

n R

ate

2

Page 27: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

17

TABL

E 7:

TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES*

DU

I

DU

I A

VER

AG

E D

UI A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

UN

CO

NST

***

VIO

LATI

ON

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

UN

TY

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DIS

MIS

SED

**/

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RATE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

TO C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

TO D

MV

UPD

ATE

STA

TEW

IDE

70.0

16

0006

22

48

1658

6 39

31

5552

13

4/30

0 2.

7 3.

0 A

LAM

EDA

67

.8

5249

56

55

5 13

3 27

1 2/

9 3.

3 2.

5 A

LPIN

E 77

.8

42

0 5

0 0

0/0

2.9

2.3

AM

AD

OR

72.1

21

6 4

1 1

2 1/

2 2.

9 4.

4 BU

TTE

70.3

10

97

14

170

33

17

2/11

2.

8 4.

1 C

ALA

VER

AS

62.9

20

5 5

32

14

6 0/

2 2.

3 1.

4 C

OLU

SA

74.9

24

4 1

18

11

4 1/

0 2.

4 4.

5 C

ON

TRA

CO

STA

72

.6

3220

42

43

6 40

52

1/

17

3.6

2.4

DEL

NO

RTE

56.6

22

3 4

58

24

13

1/0

2.8

6.6

EL D

ORA

DO

82

.0

879

42

54

8 8

5 /3

2.

4 5.

3 FR

ESN

O

57.0

45

40

111

489

93

59

1/4

3.7

3.8

GLE

NN

74

.2

226

4 27

1

2 2/

1 2.

3 5.

1 H

UM

BOLD

T 52

.1

646

10

226

22

48

0/1

2.9

4.3

IMPE

RIA

L 51

.7

1103

9

206

100

24

1/0

3.3

1.4

INYO

73

.4

276

5 53

5

8 10

/0

2.9

5.4

KER

N

80.3

51

08

66

418

78

90

8/12

2.

4 4.

6 K

ING

S 68

.0

990

14

65

16

13

3/1

1.8

2.2

LAK

E 72

.2

497

1 43

5

12

0/0

3.3

5.3

LASS

EN

81.7

19

6 9

5 0

2 0/

1 3.

3 1.

7 LO

S A

NG

ELES

69

.9

4053

5 50

1 40

94

1024

27

34

9/72

2.

2 2.

6 M

AD

ERA

62

.1

876

26

116

29

14

2/1

3.5

4.1

MA

RIN

73

.2

1407

13

0

1 45

0/

5 2.

7 4.

1 M

ARI

POSA

****

10

0.0

142

4 33

1

4 0/

0 2.

7 2.

3 M

END

OC

INO

72

.1

735

10

69

16

20

2/0

2.9

3.0

MER

CED

55

.3

1324

20

24

5 62

40

1/

3 4.

2 4.

4 M

OD

OC

58

.3

70

0 17

1

1 2/

0 3.

6 3.

1 M

ON

O

70.3

12

1 2

19

15

2 0/

0 2.

0 2.

1 M

ON

TERE

Y

74.6

36

53

55

406

81

72

1/1

1.5

4.8

*Con

vict

ion

data

by

cour

t are

foun

d in

App

endi

x Ta

ble

B3.

**Th

ese

may

incl

ude

dism

issa

ls o

f pri

or fa

ilure

to a

ppea

r (FT

A) a

bstr

acts

. **

*The

se 1

993

arre

stee

s sho

wed

pri

or D

UIs

dec

lare

d un

cons

titut

iona

l on

thei

r rec

ords

. Th

e co

untie

s re

port

ed h

ere

are

thos

e in

whi

ch th

e cu

rren

t DU

I con

vict

ion

occu

rred

and

no

t nec

essa

rily

thos

e in

whi

ch a

pri

or c

onvi

ctio

n w

as d

ecla

red

unco

nstit

utio

nal.

****

Mor

e co

nvic

tions

than

arr

ests

wer

e re

port

ed, r

esul

ting

in a

per

cent

age

tota

l of 1

00.

(See

pp.

13-

14 fo

r exp

lana

tion.

)

Page 28: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

18

TABL

E 7:

TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES* -

con

tinue

d

D

UI

D

UI

AV

ERA

GE

DU

I AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

UN

CO

NST

***

VIO

LATI

ON

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

UN

TY

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DIS

MIS

SED

**/

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RATE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

TO C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

TO D

MV

UPD

ATE

N

APA

81

.1

952

24

44

8 7

7/0

2.5

2.9

NEV

AD

A

82.6

41

2 10

43

3

6 0/

3 2.

3 4.

6 O

RAN

GE

77.7

11

920

104

674

81

295

1/20

2.

9 0.

7 PL

AC

ER

79.5

14

78

20

47

26

22

6/2

3.1

3.1

PLU

MA

S 55

.3

120

0 18

0

0 0/

1 2.

0 2.

3 RI

VER

SID

E 64

.8

5792

10

9 33

9 33

2 14

5 8/

5 3.

5 3.

4 SA

CRA

MEN

TO

62.8

56

94

163

1329

32

8 12

7 18

/8

3.0

1.8

SAN

BEN

ITO

75

.4

257

1 35

7

4 0/

13

2.3

7.3

SAN

BER

NA

RDIN

O

56.2

61

43

90

828

294

275

9/8

3.8

2.4

SAN

DIE

GO

77

.8

1318

7 86

79

3 26

5 23

0 1/

11

2.6

3.7

SAN

FRA

NC

ISC

O

59.7

11

15

10

178

60

14

0/1

3.3

1.2

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

71.1

31

13

46

224

68

126

5/1

2.3

2.3

SAN

LU

IS O

BISP

O

67.8

16

43

14

345

39

111

2/0

2.3

5.8

SAN

MA

TEO

76

.3

3896

45

62

4 38

63

0/

10

2.5

4.1

SAN

TA B

ARB

ARA

69

.7

3162

38

61

0 14

2 11

5 2/

2 2.

1 3.

7 SA

NTA

CLA

RA

79.8

85

20

156

607

124

131

2/8

3.4

1.6

SAN

TA C

RU

Z 72

.5

2308

17

29

8 83

27

0/

28

2.2

6.1

SHA

STA

71

.2

749

20

122

7 25

1/

0 2.

5 3.

0 SI

ERRA

56

.7

38

0 8

3 0

0/0

3.0

3.9

SISK

IYO

U

76.1

30

5 7

29

5 2

3/0

3.0

4.1

SOLA

NO

71

.5

1439

28

25

2 20

29

0/

3 2.

0 6.

4 SO

NO

MA

71

.3

2862

42

57

6 42

74

2/

15

2.9

4.7

STA

NIS

LAU

S 68

.2

2226

41

33

8 87

30

0/

7 2.

4 2.

1 SU

TTER

47

.6

484

11

72

3 12

0/

2 2.

3 2.

9 TE

HA

MA

68

.1

301

6 38

8

7 4

/1

2.4

4.8

TRIN

ITY

37.1

79

3

15

2 1

0/0

3.6

2.4

TULA

RE

60.4

25

53

67

56

17

18

1/1

3.0

4.2

TUO

LUM

NE

83.5

25

5 9

23

2 2

0/0

2.7

6.9

VEN

TURA

84

.6

4241

33

0

1 81

6/

2 2.

1 3.

3 YO

LO

32.7

43

8 8

52

14

8 1/

0 3.

9 6.

2 YU

BA

75.0

50

4 12

10

9 8

2 0/

2 2.

2 2.

0

Page 29: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 8: ADJUDICATION STATUS OF 1993 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY*

DUI CONVICTIONS RECKLESS DRIVING CONVICTIONS % OTHER % NO RECORD COUNTY %

MISDEMEANOR %

FELONY % ALCOHOL

RELATED % NONALCOHOL

RELATED CONVICTIONS OF ANY

CONVICTION

STATEWIDE 69.0 0.9 7.2 1.7 2.4 18.8 ALAMEDA 67.1 0.7 7.1 1.7 3.5 19.9 ALPINE 77.8 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 13.0 AMADOR 70.8 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 26.6 BUTTE 69.4 0.9 10.8 2.1 1.1 15.8 CALAVERAS 61.4 1.5 9.6 4.2 1.8 21.6 COLUSA 74.6 0.3 5.5 3.4 1.2 15.0 CONTRA COSTA 71.7 0.9 9.7 0.9 1.2 15.6 DEL NORTE 55.6 1.0 14.5 6.0 3.2 19.7 EL DORADO 78.3 3.7 4.8 0.7 0.7 11.8 FRESNO 55.6 1.4 6.0 1.1 0.7 35.1 GLENN 72.9 1.3 8.7 0.3 0.6 16.1 HUMBOLDT 51.4 0.8 18.0 1.7 3.8 24.3 IMPERIAL 51.3 0.4 9.6 4.7 1.1 32.9 INYO 72.1 1.3 13.8 1.3 2.1 9.4 KERN 79.3 1.0 6.5 1.2 1.4 10.6 KINGS 67.0 0.9 4.4 1.1 0.9 25.7 LAKE 72.0 0.1 6.2 0.7 1.7 19.1 LASSEN 78.1 3.6 2.0 0.0 0.8 15.5 LOS ANGELES 69.0 0.9 7.0 1.7 4.7 16.7 MADERA 60.3 1.8 8.0 2.0 1.0 26.9 MARIN 72.5 0.7 0.0 0.1 2.3 24.4 MARIPOSA** 97.3 2.7 22.6 0.7 2.7 0.0 MENDOCINO 71.2 1.0 6.7 1.5 1.9 17.7 MERCED 54.5 0.8 10.1 2.6 1.6 30.4 MODOC 58.3 0.0 14.2 0.8 0.8 25.8 MONO 69.1 1.1 10.9 8.6 1.1 9.1 MONTEREY 73.5 1.1 8.2 1.6 1.4 14.1 NAPA 79.1 2.0 3.7 0.7 0.6 14.0 NEVADA 80.6 2.0 8.4 0.6 1.2 7.2 ORANGE 77.0 0.7 4.4 0.5 1.9 15.5 PLACER 78.4 1.1 2.5 1.4 1.2 15.5 PLUMAS 55.3 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 36.4 RIVERSIDE 63.6 1.2 3.7 3.6 1.6 26.3 SACRAMENTO 61.1 1.7 14.3 3.5 1.4 18.1 SAN BENITO 75.1 0.3 10.2 2.0 1.2 11.1 SAN BERNARDINO 55.3 0.8 7.5 2.6 2.5 31.3 SAN DIEGO 77.3 0.5 4.6 1.6 1.3 14.7 SAN FRANCISCO 59.2 0.5 9.4 3.2 0.7 26.9 SAN JOAQUIN 70.0 1.0 5.0 1.5 2.8 19.5 SAN LUIS OBISPO 67.2 0.6 14.1 1.6 4.5 11.9 SAN MATEO 75.5 0.9 12.1 0.7 1.2 9.6 SANTA BARBARA 68.9 0.8 13.3 3.1 2.5 11.4 SANTA CLARA 78.4 1.4 5.6 1.1 1.2 12.3 SANTA CRUZ 72.0 0.5 9.3 2.6 0.8 14.8 SHASTA 69.4 1.9 11.3 0.6 2.3 14.5 SIERRA 56.7 0.0 11.9 4.5 0.0 26.9 SISKIYOU 74.4 1.7 7.1 1.2 0.5 15.1 SOLANO 70.2 1.4 12.3 1.0 1.4 13.8 SONOMA 70.2 1.0 14.1 1.0 1.8 11.8 STANISLAUS 67.0 1.2 10.2 2.6 0.9 18.1 SUTTER 46.6 1.1 6.9 0.3 1.2 44.0 TEHAMA 66.7 1.3 8.4 1.8 1.6 20.2 TRINITY 35.7 1.4 6.8 0.9 0.5 54.8 TULARE 58.9 1.5 1.3 0.4 0.4 37.5 TUOLUMNE 80.7 2.8 7.3 0.6 0.6 7.9 VENTURA 84.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.6 13.8 YOLO 32.1 0.6 3.8 1.0 0.6 61.9 YUBA 73.3 1.7 15.8 1.2 0.3 7.7

*The percentages total to 100 by row (county). **More convictions than arrests were reported resulting in a percentage total over 100. (See pp. 13-14 for explanation.)

19

Page 30: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 9: 1993 REPORTED* BLOOD ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION

(BAC) LEVELS OF DUI CONVICTIONS

DUI CONVICTIONS ALCOHOL-RECKLESS CONVICTIONS BAC LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENT BAC LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENT

.01 52 0.0 .01 4 0.0

.02 63 0.1 .02 11 0.1

.03 43 0.0 .03 11 0.1

.04 55 0.0 .04 23 0.2

.05 87 0.1 .05 34 0.3

.06 91 0.1 .06 87 0.7

.07 183 0.2 .07 303 2.6

.08 1199 1.1 .08 2439 20.9

.09 2303 2.1 .09 3064 26.3

.10 4680 4.2 .10 2666 22.9

.11 6724 6.1 .11 1442 12.4

.12 7959 7.2 .12 578 5.0

.13 8655 7.8 .13 274 2.4

.14 8866 8.0 .14 175 1.5

.15 8664 7.8 .15 132 1.1

.16 8630 7.8 .16 86 0.7

.17 7987 7.2 .17 78 0.7

.18 7148 6.5 .18 55 0.5

.19 6557 5.9 .19 39 0.3

.20 6117 5.5 .20 26 0.2

.21 5142 4.6 .21 25 0.2

.22 4154 3.8 .22 23 0.2

.23 3413 3.1 .23 18 0.2

.24 2810 2.5 .24 17 0.1

.25 2080 1.9 .25 10 0.1

.26 1716 1.6 .26 7 0.1

.27 1300 1.2 .27 7 0.1

.28 969 0.9 .28 4 0.0

.29 738 0.7 .29 6 0.1

.30 581 0.5 .30 2 0.0

.31 460 0.4 .31 2 0.0

.32 301 0.3 .32 2 0.0

.33 255 0.2

.34 192 0.2

.35 126 0.1

.36 87 0.1

.37 64 0.1

.38 47 0.0

.39 34 0.0

.40 26 0.0

.41 16 0.0

.42 11 0.0

.43 11 0.0

.44 4 0.0

.45 5 0.0

.46 5 0.0

.47 3 0.0

.49 2 0.0

.48 2 0.0 .50+ 5 0.0

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – TOTAL 110618 100.0 TOTAL 11650 100.0

MEAN BAC .169 MEAN BAC .099

*Beginning with this report, the source of BAC data is the APS reporting form for convicted DUI offenders, rather than the abstract of conviction for those offenders, which was the data source in prior reports. This change in data source was made because of the more complete BAC reporting on APS forms (70% of total) versus court abstracts (with only 52% showing BAC levels).

20

Page 31: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 10: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY OFFENDER STATUS AND AVERAGE REPORTED BAC LEVEL*

DUI OFFENDER STATUS

PERCENT

AVERAGE BAC LEVEL FROM APS

REPORTING FORM (%)

AVERAGE BAC LEVEL FROM CONVICTION

ABSTRACT (%)

STATEWIDE 100.0 .169 .166

1ST DUI 67.8 .164 .162 2ND DUI 21.6 .176 .174 3RD DUI 7.4 .182 .179 4TH+ DUI 3.2 .187 .182

*The differences in reported BAC levels between the two sources appear to be attributable to underreporting of high BAC levels on abstracts of conviction. The higher BAC levels from the APS reporting forms do not necessarily reflect increasing BAC levels among DUI offenders compared to last year's report, but rather reflect a more accurate reporting of BAC levels.

21

Page 32: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 3: POSTCONVICTION SANCTIONS

Data on court sanctions assigned to convicted DUI offenders were taken from DUI abstracts of conviction for offenders arrested in 1993. Also included are counts of postconviction DMV license actions for selected offender groups, while total counts of all license actions, including Administrative Per Se (APS) license suspensions and revocations, are shown in the Administrative Actions Section. APS actions (effective July 1990) are initiated by law enforcement immediately upon arrest for DUI, and are administered independent of the criminal adjudication process. This section includes the following tables: Table 11: 1993 DUI Court Sanctions by DUI Offender Status. This table shows the frequency of specific court sanctions statewide by number of prior DUI convictions. The specific court sanctions tallied include percentages of probation, jail, alcohol treatment programs (first offender, SB 38 second offender, and 30-month third offender programs), license restriction, court suspension, and ignition interlock. Crosstabulations of sanctions by county, court, and number of prior convictions appear in Appendix Table B4. Table 12: 1993 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - First Offenders. This table displays the frequency of commonly assigned court sanction combinations (such as first offender alcohol program plus license restriction) by county for first DUI offenders. License suspensions include both court and DMV postconviction (non-APS) suspensions. The sanction combination groups portrayed in this table, as well as Table 13, were defined according to the conventions described in the "Evaluation Methods and Results" portion of Section 4: "Postconviction Sanction Effectiveness." Table 13: 1993 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - Repeat Offenders. This table shows the frequency of commonly assigned court sanction combinations by county for second, third, and fourth (or subsequent) DUI offenders. License actions include both court and DMV postconviction (non-APS) license suspensions and revocations. From the data in these and the Appendix tables, it is evident that the use of alternative sanctions varied widely by county, court, and offender status in 1993. For example: Statewide Parameters:

The most frequently applied court sanction among all convicted DUI offenders was probation (95.6%), while the least frequently used court sanction was ignition interlock (1.8%). DUI offenders were sentenced to jail in 78.8% of the cases. (However, in many jurisdictions, jail is often served as community service rather than actual jail time.)

22

Page 33: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Figure 6 (below) graphically displays the statewide data from Table 11 showing the frequency of specific types of court-ordered sanctions among all convicted DUI offenders. Because virtually all offenders receive more than one type of sanction, the cumulative percentage adds to more than 100%.

95.6

78.8 75.9

39.6

7.2 1.8

0

25

50

75

100

PER

CEN

TAG

E

Figure 6 . Frequency of court-ordered DUI sanctions (1993).

Probation Jail Treatmentprogram

Licenserestriction

Court licensesuspension

Ignitioninterlock

County Variation:

The proportion of first DUI offenders sentenced to jail varied by county from less than 10% in Alpine and Marin counties to 100% in Calaveras County.

Counties such as Calaveras, Glenn, Lake, Lassen, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo,

Sierra, and Stanislaus preferred to assign first offenders to treatment program and jail (over 85%) rather than treatment program and license restriction (less than 5%). Amador, Humboldt, Marin, and San Bernardino counties assigned treatment program and jail to less than 1% of their first offenders. Alpine, Humboldt, Inyo, and Marin counties assigned treatment program and license restriction to over 80% of first offenders.

Counties departing from using typical first offender sanction combinations were

Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial, as shown by relatively high percentages (over 10%) in the "other" category. ("Other" includes license restriction without treatment program assignment, probation only, and other unofficial sanction combinations.)

23

Page 34: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Court Variation:

In Los Angeles County, two municipal courts (Lancaster and Burbank) used jail as a sanction in more than 95% of their DUI sentences. At the other extreme, three courts (Santa Monica, Malibu, and Calabasas) used jail as a sanction in less than 30% of their DUI sentences.

Variation by Offender Status:

71% of 1993 first DUI offenders were sentenced to jail, compared to 95% of all repeat offenders.

83% of first DUI offenders were assigned to alcohol treatment programs, along with

76% of second offenders, 36% of third offenders, and 17% of fourth or more DUI offenders. (All repeat offenders, however, must eventually complete specified alcohol treatment programs in order to be eligible for license reinstatement.)

10% of first DUI offenders and 28% of second DUI offenders received DMV or court

license suspensions after adjudication. As of July 1990, of course, all DUI offenders with BAC levels of 0.08% or more were also subject to 30 days to one-year administrative license suspension/revocation under the APS law.

Only 5% of repeat DUI offenders were assigned ignition interlock in 1993, in spite

of the mandatory interlock law for repeat offenders (AB 2851 - Freidman), which took effect on July 1, 1993.

TABLE 11: 1993 DUI COURT SANCTIONS BY DUI OFFENDER STATUS*

DUI

OFFENDER STATUS

TOTAL

PROBATION

JAIL

1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL PROGRAM

SB 38 ALCOHOL PROGRAM

30-MONTH PROGRAM

LICENSE

RESTRICTION

COURT

SUSPENSION

IGNITION

INTERLOCK

% % % % % % % %

STATEWIDE 162254 95.6 78.8 57.1 18.6 0.2 39.6 7.2 1.8

1ST DUI 109992 97.5 70.9 81.0 2.1 0.0 36.7 4.7 0.1

2ND DUI 35095 96.2 95.5 8.0 67.3 0.2 61.9 10.6 6.5

3RD DUI 11903 91.0 94.7 4.2 30.0 1.3 16.6 18.4 3.9

4TH+ DUI 5264 61.4 95.7 2.7 14.0 0.4 4.7 11.8 1.4

*Entries represent percentages of 1993 DUI convictees receiving each sanction by offender status. Sanctions within each offender status group (row) are not independent; therefore, row percentages always add to more than 100%. Percentages of sanctions by county and court appear in Appendix Table B4.

24

Page 35: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 12: 1993 DUI SANCTION COMBINATIONS BY COUNTY - FIRST OFFENDERS

COUNTY TOTAL (100%)

DMV OR COURT SUSPENSION

JAIL

1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL

PROG + JAIL

1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL PROG +

RESTRICTION

SB 38 ALCOHOL PROG +

RESTRICTION*

OTHER

N % % % % % %

STATEWIDE 109992 9.8 5.5 46.8 31.1 4.1 2.7 ALAMEDA 3444 14.5 4.7 74.2 2.6 3.5 0.5 ALPINE 29 0.0 0.0 3.4 82.8 13.8 0.0 AMADOR 127 14.2 81.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 BUTTE 719 24.5 2.2 71.5 1.3 0.3 0.3 CALAVERAS 123 7.3 3.3 89.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 COLUSA 156 13.5 13.5 70.5 1.9 0.6 0.0 CONTRA COSTA 2083 7.8 9.7 78.0 2.0 2.1 0.4 DEL NORTE 136 11.0 15.4 64.0 6.6 0.7 2.2 EL DORADO 564 8.5 12.2 71.1 6.4 0.5 1.2 FRESNO 2876 14.6 7.3 49.8 22.4 2.7 3.1 GLENN 142 7.7 1.4 88.7 0.7 1.4 0.0 HUMBOLDT 418 11.2 1.4 0.7 81.1 3.3 2.2 IMPERIAL 815 2.0 17.8 20.2 43.7 0.9 15.5 INYO 168 4.8 3.0 3.6 81.5 2.4 4.8 KERN 3112 13.1 13.4 65.3 5.5 1.0 1.7 KINGS 653 17.2 6.1 72.4 2.1 2.0 0.2 LAKE 296 6.4 3.7 87.2 1.4 1.4 0.0 LASSEN 131 9.9 1.5 87.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 LOS ANGELES 29815 8.5 3.5 26.4 57.8 1.2 2.6 MADERA 531 10.4 8.9 76.5 0.2 2.3 1.9 MARIN 1013 6.5 0.6 0.3 90.2 1.9 0.5 MARIPOSA 98 13.3 1.0 41.8 40.8 2.0 1.0 MENDOCINO 454 14.1 6.4 70.7 3.7 4.0 1.1 MERCED 817 9.3 4.4 78.2 2.0 4.5 1.6 MODOC 52 13.5 1.9 61.5 15.4 1.9 5.8 MONO 89 2.2 21.3 62.9 5.6 0.0 7.9 MONTEREY 2418 15.6 5.0 78.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 NAPA 665 6.5 6.9 83.2 1.1 1.7 0.8 NEVADA 292 9.6 2.4 64.0 10.3 9.9 3.8 ORANGE 8799 6.3 1.2 11.2 77.7 1.5 2.0 PLACER 1027 7.5 2.8 73.2 12.0 2.1 2.3 PLUMAS 86 4.7 2.3 64.0 16.3 8.1 4.7 RIVERSIDE 4063 4.9 3.0 37.6 38.6 2.9 13.1 SACRAMENTO 3645 7.6 5.1 82.0 0.7 3.0 1.5 SAN BENITO 161 31.7 5.6 60.2 1.2 0.0 1.2 SAN BERNARDINO 4309 10.1 16.2 0.1 0.3 58.5** 14.9 SAN DIEGO 9720 7.6 3.7 49.5 35.2 2.9 1.1 SAN FRANCISCO 859 8.4 3.4 76.7 9.3 1.7 0.5 SAN JOAQUIN 1898 9.5 11.0 77.7 0.6 0.9 0.3 SAN LUIS OBISPO 1084 4.1 1.8 91.1 0.2 2.4 0.5 SAN MATEO 2699 7.0 4.0 85.7 0.9 2.2 0.3 SANTA BARBARA 2039 14.6 0.9 10.4 67.5 0.5 6.1 SANTA CLARA 5423 22.1 5.4 63.7 5.9 1.8 1.1 SANTA CRUZ 1475 10.1 2.8 82.8 2.9 0.5 0.9 SHASTA 423 8.5 4.0 82.3 3.3 0.9 0.9 SIERRA 23 4.3 0.0 91.3 4.3 0.0 0.0 SISKIYOU 210 12.4 20.5 60.0 1.4 3.8 1.9 SOLANO 925 9.6 5.4 78.7 3.0 2.2 1.1 SONOMA 1704 8.6 36.6 51.1 1.7 0.4 1.7 STANISLAUS 1362 6.3 5.3 85.2 1.0 1.9 0.3 SUTTER 314 12.1 4.5 80.6 1.6 0.6 0.6 TEHAMA 205 16.1 2.0 79.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 TRINITY 48 16.7 2.1 81.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 TULARE 1597 9.1 4.6 75.4 1.2 9.3 0.4 TUOLUMNE 153 10.5 5.2 83.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 VENTURA 2961 12.2 3.5 82.4 0.3 1.1 0.4 YOLO 226 11.9 2.7 74.8 4.0 5.8 0.9 YUBA 318 15.1 2.5 80.2 0.9 0.0 1.3

Note: The vast majority of convicted DUI offenders also receive fine and probation. *Includes referral to alcohol clinics and 30-month programs. **The majority of these are referrals to alcohol clinics.

25

Page 36: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

26

TABL

E 13

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

CO

MBI

NA

TIO

NS

BY C

OU

NTY

- RE

PEA

T O

FFEN

DER

S

2ND

OFF

END

ERS

3RD

OFF

END

ERS

4TH

+ O

FFEN

DER

S

ALA

MED

A

1861

14

.7

53.0

32

.4

1227

48

.6

45.5

5.

9 44

0 61

.3

33.0

5.

7 19

4

STA

TEW

IDE

5226

2 28

.0

42.8

29

.2

3509

5 66

.2

28.8

5.

0 11

903

81.6

13

.6

4.7

5264

MA

DER

A

371

29.8

33

.8

36.4

22

8 71

.9

21.3

6.

7 89

94

.4

0.0

5.6

54

IMPE

RIA

L 29

7 45

.0

29.4

25

.7

218

74.6

23

.8

1.6

63

87.5

12

.5

0.0

16

HU

MBO

LDT

238

35.7

49

.7

14.6

15

7 57

.6

39.4

3.

0 66

93

.3

6.7

0.0

15

BUTT

E 39

2 42

. 8

40.3

16

.9

236

83.2

15

.9

0.9

107

93.9

6.

1 0.

0 49

CA

LAV

ERA

S 87

10

.3

63.8

25

.9

58

77.3

18

.2

4.5

22

71.4

28

.6

0.0

7

LASS

EN

74

21. 2

53

.8

25.0

52

76

.9

23.1

0.

0 13

77

.8

22.2

0.

0 9

MO

NTE

REY

1290

51

.2

4.1

44.7

81

2 86

.5

12.3

1.

2 34

2 91

.9

5.1

2.9

136

CO

NTR

A C

OST

A

1179

16

.2

51.9

31

.9

755

68.5

27

.0

4.5

289

65.9

31

.1

3.0

135

LAK

E 20

2 17

. 4

13.2

69

.4

144

55.3

36

.8

7.9

38

85.0

15

.0

0.0

20

NEV

AD

A

130

15.1

55

.9

29.0

93

56

.0

40.0

4.

0 25

91

.7

8.3

0.0

12

CO

LUSA

89

33

. 3

41.7

25

.0

60

86.4

13

.6

0.0

22

71.4

28

.6

0.0

7

NA

PA

311

13.8

28

.1

58.1

20

3 51

.4

41.4

7.

1 70

89

.5

5.3

5.3

38

ALP

INE

13

62. 5

12

.5

25.0

8

50

.0

50.0

0.

0 2

33.3

66

.7

0.0

3

EL D

ORA

DO

35

7 26

.2

35.7

38

.0

221

73.6

23

.1

3.3

91

80.0

13

.3

6.7

45

FRES

NO

17

75

35.1

38

.4

26.5

11

10

68.9

25

.3

5.8

395

91.9

3.

0 5.

2 27

0

KER

N

2062

70

.4

12.5

17

.1

1261

91

.8

2.0

6.1

537

90.5

1.

9 7.

6 26

4

MER

CED

52

7 16

.9

48.1

35

.0

314

61.7

34

.6

3.8

133

85.0

11

.3

3.8

80

AM

AD

OR

93

35.4

32

.3

32.3

65

37

.5

56.3

6.

3 16

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

12

INYO

11

3 11

. 8

50.0

38

.2

68

62.1

34

.5

3.4

29

93.8

0.

0 6.

3 16

MA

RIN

40

7 12

.2

72.1

15

.6

294

70.1

23

.0

6.9

87

88.5

11

.5

0.0

26

DEL

NO

RTE

91

48.1

11

.1

40.7

54

61

.5

34.6

3.

8 26

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

11

KIN

GS

351

38.2

43

.8

18.0

21

7 76

.6

18.2

5.

2 77

98

.2

0.0

1.8

57

MO

NO

34

38

. 9

5.6

55.6

18

38

.5

46.2

15

.4

13

33.3

66

.7

0.0

3

GLE

NN

88

33

.3

21.6

45

.1

51

80.0

16

.7

3.3

30

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 7

MA

RIP

OSA

48

15

.6

3.1

81.3

32

50

.0

50.0

0.

0 14

50

.0

50.0

0.

0 2

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

1122

1 24

.3

48.3

27

.4

7946

70

.3

24.0

5.

8 23

79

87.9

6.

0 6.

0 89

6

MEN

DO

CIN

O

291

30.8

37

.8

31.4

18

5 69

.5

23.2

7.

3 82

91

.7

8.3

0.0

24

MO

DO

C

18

21.4

35

.7

42.9

14

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

3 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

1

CO

UN

TY

TOTA

L RE

PEA

T D

UI

LIC

ENSE

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

SB 3

8 PR

OG

RAM

+

REST

RIC

TIO

N

O

THER

TO

TAL

100%

LIC

ENSE

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

+ JA

IL

ALC

OH

OL*

PR

OG

RAM

+

REV

OC

ATI

ON

O

THER

TO

TAL

(100

%)

LIC

ENSE

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

+ JA

IL

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

GRA

M +

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

O

THER

TO

TAL

(100

%)

N

%

%

%

N

%

%

%

N

%

%

%

N

roba

tion.

p

of c

onvi

cted

DU

I offe

nder

s al

so re

ceiv

e fin

e an

d y

orit

Not

e: T

he v

ast m

aj

Page 37: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SAN

TA C

LAR

A

3253

35

.2

48.5

16

.3

2030

86

.5

10.7

2.

8 78

6 73

.2

23.3

3.

4 43

7

SAN

TA B

AR

BARA

11

61

55.4

7.

9 36

.7

798

59.1

40

.6

0.4

254

88.1

10

.1

1.8

109

27

TABL

E 13

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

CO

MBI

NA

TIO

NS

BY C

OU

NTY

- RE

PEA

T O

FFEN

DER

S - c

ontin

ued

2N

D O

FFEN

DER

S 3R

D O

FFEN

DER

S 4T

H+

OFF

END

ERS

SAN

BER

NA

RD

INO

19

24

30.4

31

.6

38.1

13

53

75.9

19

.2

5.0

402

88.2

7.

7 4.

1 16

9

TULA

RE

1023

32

.1

36.4

31

.6

602

63.0

31

.1

5.9

270

83.4

7.

9 8.

6 15

1

SUTT

ER

181

19.0

44

.8

36.2

10

5 92

.1

7.9

0.0

63

69.2

30

.8

0.0

13

SAC

RAM

ENTO

22

12

32.2

50

.4

17.3

13

49

72.0

22

.1

5.9

543

67.8

27

.8

4.4

320

STA

NIS

LAU

S 90

5 21

.5

26.6

51

.9

567

51.1

46

.3

2.6

227

64.0

35

.1

0.9

111

SAN

LU

IS O

BISP

O

573

12.7

67

.4

19.8

35

3 24

.2

72.5

3.

3 15

3 67

.2

28.4

4.

5 67

SAN

TA C

RU

Z 85

0 48

.4

34.9

16

.7

550

96.7

2.

8 0.

5 21

1 86

.5

9.0

4.5

89

TEH

AM

A

102

32.9

28

.6

38.6

70

60

.9

34.8

4.

3 23

88

.9

11.1

0.

0 9

PLA

CER

47

1 20

.1

52.8

27

.1

343

49.5

47

.6

2.9

105

73.9

26

.1

0.0

23

RIV

ERSI

DE

1838

33

.9

38.7

27

.4

1257

70

.3

21.7

8.

1 39

7 79

.9

15.8

4.

3 18

4

SAN

DIE

GO

35

53

22.9

47

.6

29.5

26

52

51.4

38

.0

10.5

69

4 73

.9

16.4

9.

7 20

7

VEN

TURA

13

13

21.7

51

.2

27.1

93

9 69

.1

28.1

2.

9 27

8 77

.1

18.8

4.

2 96

TUO

LUM

NE

111

12.8

62

.8

24.4

78

26

.9

57.7

15

.4

26

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 7

TRIN

ITY

3 4

34.8

34

.8

30.4

23

66

.7

33.3

0.

0 9

50.0

50

.0

0.0

2

SISK

IYO

U

102

20.7

44

.8

34.5

58

44

.0

56.0

0.

0 25

84

.2

15.8

0.

0 19

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

1261

16

.0

55.5

28

.6

777

53.5

41

.8

4.7

318

88.0

10

.2

1.8

166

ORA

NG

E 32

25

11.8

61

.7

26.4

24

22

28.7

66

.5

4.9

617

76.3

17

.7

5.9

186

SOLA

NO

54

2 18

.3

53.9

27

.8

356

34.7

60

.5

4.8

124

56.5

32

.3

11.3

62

SAN

MA

TEO

12

42

13.3

14

.6

72.1

82

0 32

.5

62.0

5.

5 30

8 75

.4

19.3

5.

3 11

4

YOLO

22

0 9.

0 66

.9

24.1

14

5 80

.4

19.6

0.

0 46

89

.7

10.3

0.

0 29

PLU

MA

S 34

18

. 5

77.8

3.

7 27

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

3 75

.0

0.0

25.0

4

SIER

RA

15

18

. 2

45.5

36

.4

11

66.7

33

.3

0.0

3 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

1

SAN

BEN

ITO

97

55

.4

23.1

21

.5

65

86.7

13

.3

0.0

30

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 2

SON

OM

A

1200

46

.7

27.7

25

.6

703

92.1

4.

8 3.

1 29

2 95

.1

1.0

3.9

205

YUBA

19

8 38

.7

3.2

58.1

12

4 88

.9

11.1

0.

0 54

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

20

SHA

STA

34

6 15

.7

67.1

17

.1

216

37.8

55

.6

6.7

90

75.0

17

.5

7.5

40

SAN

FRA

NC

ISC

O

266

18.4

36

.3

45.3

20

1 75

.0

23.1

1.

9 52

92

.3

7.7

0.0

13

CO

UN

TY

TOTA

L RE

PEA

T D

UI

LIC

ENSE

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

SB 3

8 PR

OG

RAM

+

REST

RIC

TIO

N

O

THER

TO

TAL

100%

LI

CEN

SE

REV

OC

ATI

ON

+

JAIL

ALC

OH

OL*

PR

OG

RAM

+

REV

OC

ATI

ON

O

THER

TO

TAL

(100

%)

LIC

ENSE

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

+ JA

IL

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

GRA

M +

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

O

THER

TO

TAL

(100

%)

N

%

%

%

N

%

%

%

N

%

%

%

N

Page 38: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 4: POSTCONVICTION SANCTION EFFECTIVENESS

This section presents and describes the results of an evaluation assessing the effectiveness of court and administrative sanctions applied to first and second DUI offendersi. The effectiveness of alternative sanctions is evaluated in terms of postconviction driving record as measured by: 1) total accidents and 2) DUI incidents, including alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions (primarily DUI, also reckless driving and hit-and-run), APS (0.08% BAC or chemical test refusal) suspensions and DUI failure-to-appear notices (FTA). Displayed below in Figures 7-15 are failure proportions from the sanction analyses for 1989, 1991, and 1993 first and second offenders (grouped by sanction assignment) with follow-up time periods of 5-years, 3-years, and 1-year, respectively. (The 1990 and 1992 offenders were not included in this year's report in order to simplify the analyses and reporting of results.) These figures show the proportion of accident- or DUI incident-involved drivers following their conviction. They are followed by a narrative description of the evaluation design, subject selection, data collection, analytical procedures, and evaluation results. The reader is cautioned that license suspension refers to postconviction suspensions only, and does not include preconviction administrative per se license suspensions (which are applied to all offender groups). Based on the data represented in Figures 7-12, the following conclusions can be drawn about first offender sanctions:

The 1989 and 1993 suspended first offender groups had significantly fewer accident-involved drivers than did any other first offender sanction group. The suspended group in both years had 18% fewer accidents than the groups with the next lowest accident rates--program with jail (1989) and program with restriction (1993). The accident rate of the 1991 suspended group was significantly lower than only two groups, the jail-only and program with restriction groups, with the suspended group having 14% and 8.3% fewer accidents, respectively.

iThird or more offenders were not included because a previous study (Tashima & Marelich, 1989) indicated serious confounding due to group differences on prior interventions. In addition, sanctions for third and subsequent offenders do not vary much, due to the statutorily prescribed sanction requirements.

28

Page 39: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

3.60 5.12 4.53 4.39 4.42

05

10

1520

253035

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

FA

CC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Figure 9 . Adjusted 1-year accident rates of 1993 first offenders by type of sanction.

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

17.95

23.44 21.94 22.06 22.23

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35PR

OPO

RTI

ON

OF

AC

CID

ENT-

INV

OLV

EMEN

TPE

R 1

00 D

RIV

ERS

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Figure 7 . Adjusted 5-year accident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction.

11.52 13.40 11.99 12.56 12.28

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

FA

CC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Figure 8 . Adjusted 3-year accident rates of 1991 first offenders by type of sanction.

29

Page 40: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

25.88

32.37

25.4322.00

25.95

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35PR

OPO

RTI

ON

OF

DU

I-IN

CID

ENT-

INV

OLV

EMEN

TPE

R 1

00 D

RIV

ERS

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Figure 10 . Adjusted 5-year DUI incident* rates of 1989 first offenders by type ofsanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).

6.4010.03

5.83 4.767.84

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

F D

UI-

INC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Figure 12 . Adjusted 1-year DUI incident* rates of 1993 first offenders by type ofsanction (*alcohol-relatedc accident or violation).

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

17.00

23.99

15.09 13.3116.63

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

F D

UI-

INC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Figure 11 . Adjusted 3-year DUI incident* rates of 1991 first offenders by type ofsanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

30

Page 41: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

First offenders assigned to first offender treatment programs plus license restriction in 1989, 1991, and 1993 had significantly fewer DUI incidents in the postconviction period than did any other first offender sanction group. This group had 13.5%, 11.8%, and 18.4% fewer DUI incidents, respectively, in 1989, 1991, and 1993 than the group with the next lowest DUI incident rate (program with jail).

In all three years, first offenders sentenced to jail without treatment or

postconviction suspension had a significantly greater proportion (at least 24.7% higher) of DUI incident-involved drivers in the postconviction period than any other first offender sanction group.

Based on the data represented in Figures 13-15, the following conclusions can be drawn about second offender sanctions:

The 1989 and the 1991 suspended second offender groups had 17.1% and 14.3% fewer accident-involved drivers than did the SB 38 program groups over their respective (5-year, 3-year) postconviction periods.

Contrary to prior California studies including the first annual DUI-MIS report (1989

offenders), second offenders suspended in 1993 do not have significantly lower total accident rates than do those assigned to SB 38 treatment programs during the first year following suspension or SB 38 assignment. This change is likely due to the implementation of Administrative Per Se License Suspensions (APS) beginning in July, 1990, whereby all second offenders are suspended for one-year.

Although license suspension and SB 38 treatment programs with APS suspensions

are equally effective in their short-term impact on accidents (post 1-year), license suspension is more effective over a longer time window (3 - 5 years).

In 1989, 1991, and 1993, second offenders who were suspended had a significantly

higher proportion of DUI incident-involved drivers in the subsequent 1-year period than did those who received the SB 38 and license restriction sanction. The respective percentage increases associated with license suspension for the three years (1989, 1991 & 1993) were 20.9%, 31.1%, and 58.3%.

The addition of ignition interlock to the SB 38 program plus restriction sanction

combination for second offenders led to directionally but nonsignificantly lower 1-year subsequent accident and DUI incident rates.

31

Page 42: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

3.84 3.23 3.01 3.77

10.486.62 5.95

8.62

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

F A

CC

IDEN

T- O

RD

UI-

INC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Figure 15 . Adjusted 1-year accident and DUI incident rates for 1993 second offenders by type of sanction.

ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS

Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Other Other

9.13 10.65 10.23

23.00

17.5520.08

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

F A

CC

IDEN

T- O

RD

UI-

INC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S17.46

21.06

33.49

27.69

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35PR

OPO

RTI

ON

OF

AC

CID

ENT-

OR

DU

I-IN

CID

ENT-

INV

OLV

EMEN

TPE

R 1

00 D

RIV

ERS

Figure 13 . Adjusted 5-year accident and DUI incident rates for 1989 second offendersby type of sanction.

ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS

Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS

Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Other Other

Figure 14 . Adjusted 3-year accident and DUI incident rates for 1991 second offendersby type of sanction.

SB 38/restriction& interlock

SB 38/restriction& interlock

32

Page 43: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

EVALUATION METHODS AND RESULTS Subject Selection and Data Collection Convicted DUI offenders were identified from monthly abstract update tapes which contain all DUI conviction data reported to DMV by the courts. In the present study, follow-up data from three sets of offenders were evaluated for sanction effectiveness: 1) A 5-year follow-up period for the convicted 1989 DUI offenders who were

evaluated in the first DUI-MIS report. 2) A 3-year follow-up period for convicted 1991 offenders who were evaluated in last

year's DUI-MIS report. 3) A 1-year follow-up period for convicted DUI offenders who were arrested for DUI

in 1993. For each year's annual DUI-MIS report, an additional year of DUI data is added to the sanction analyses. In order to simplify the analyses and reporting of results, the 1990 and 1992 DUI offenders were not included in this year's evaluation. The conviction date in all cases was considered to be the "treatment date" for defining prior and subsequent driving record data, because the penalties and sanctions for the DUI conviction are typically effective as of that date. Since DUI penalties and sanctions are enhanced as a function of the number of prior DUI and alcohol-related reckless driving convictions within the previous seven years, subjects were selected based on the number of such convictions within the seven years prior to their entry DUI arrest. For the 1989, 1991, and 1993 drivers, two groups were selected for this evaluation: 1) first DUI offenders––drivers who had no DUI or alcohol-related reckless driving convictions within the previous seven years, and 2) second DUI offenders––drivers who had one DUI or alcohol-related reckless driving conviction within the previous seven years. Court sanctions are reported to and recorded by DMV in the form of disposition codes on the abstract of conviction. A convicted DUI offender, especially a first offender, might receive any one of many combinations of individual sanctions, including jail, fine, license restriction or suspension, alcohol treatment program, or probation. Therefore, in

33

Page 44: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

defining sanction combination groups for the purpose of this analysis, the following conventions were used for first offenders: 1) if suspension (non-APS) was one of the sanctions imposed by DMV or the court,

then the offender was included in the suspension group; 2) if suspension (non-APS) was not imposed, but the offender was assigned to an

alcohol treatment program, then the offender was included in one of the treatment groups, according to the type of treatment program (first offender or SB 38) and whether they were also sentenced to license restriction or jail; and

3) if neither suspension nor treatment was imposed, but the offender was sentenced to

jail, then the offender was included in the jail-only group. Fine and probation are generally imposed on most DUI offenders (except that probation is not usually granted to court-suspended first offenders), and for that reason are not included as sanctions evaluated in this report. Also, since July, 1990, all DUI offenders have had their licenses administratively suspended upon DUI arrest. It should be noted that the definition of the sanction combination groups was not an arbitrary analytical convention, but rather a reflection of the most common naturally occurring sanction combinations assigned by the courts. Based on the above taxonomy, five first-offender sanction combination groups are used in this analysis: 1) license suspension, 2) jail, 3) first offender treatment program plus jail, 4) first offender treatment program plus license restriction, and 5) SB 38 (second offender) treatment program plus license restriction (some courts assign this sanction to a small number of first offenders). One limitation of the above hierarchical grouping scheme is that it does not allow for an evaluation of the independent and interactive effects of each sanction as a treatment factor. Taking first offender treatment program plus jail as an example, the approach we used does not allow analysis of the separate effects of jail from the effects of the treatment program. A similar convention was used for grouping second offenders with various sanction combinations; the groups used in this analysis are: 1) license suspension, 2) SB 38 treatment program plus license restriction, 3) a group of 1991 and 1993 second

34

Page 45: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

offenders ("other") who did not meet the selection criteria of groups 1 or 2, and 4) a fourth group of 1993 second offenders who were ordered to install an ignition interlock device in their vehicles as mandated by AB 2851 (effective July, 1993). This device requires that the offender blow into it prior to starting the vehicle, which will not start if he/she has a BAC of 0.02% or greater. This group was identified by certain vehicle code designations on their abstract of conviction. In examining these abstract disposition codes, it was found that 85% of interlock cases were also referred to SB 38 treatment programs (along with license restrictions), while 27% had their license suspended (non-APS). In order to minimize the confounding of sanctions in this group, only offenders assigned to both the ignition interlock and SB 38 treatment program plus restriction requirements were included in this year's analysis. Although it would be informative to have been able to include the group with both license suspension and ignition interlock, the number of cases was too small to produce statistically reliable estimates. It may be possible to include this group in next year's analysis, when a larger number of these cases will be available. Most of the offenders in the group designated as "other" were originally referred to an SB 38 treatment program, but were suspended as well, either by intent (court sentence to both treatment program and suspension), or neglect (court misreporting of disposition codes and/or the offender's lack of compliance with required procedures, such as failure to provide proof of insurance, program enrollment, pay fees, etc.). Even if the courts amend the mistaken abstracts of conviction, the offenders still need to meet the insurance and program enrollment requirements. The final sanctions ultimately received by this group are unclear, which makes interpretation difficult. The "other" group was not included in the first DUI-MIS 1989 analysis and, therefore, was not included in subsequent reanalyses of the 1989 arrestees. DUI offenders with felony convictions, chemical test refusal suspensions, 'X' license numbers (assigned if no California driver license number can be found), out-of-state ZIP Codes, and irregular or unofficial sanction codes (among first offenders) were excluded from the sanction analyses. Prior driver record data were extracted for the two years (1.75 years for the 1993 cases) preceding an offender's DUI conviction date for all offenders. Appendix Tables B5, B6, and B7 list these prior driver record variables, which were used as covariates in the analyses. The evaluation period for the postconviction driving measures, starting from the conviction date, was five years for the 1989 drivers, three years for the 1991 drivers,

35

Page 46: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

and one year for the 1993 drivers. A buffer period of six months was allowed between the end of the evaluation period and the data extraction date to allow for processing and reporting the most recent data to DMV. DUI offenders who had less than the full follow-up time period (from conviction date to the buffer period) were excluded. The outcome driving record measures consisted of the proportion of offenders who were involved in: 1) total accidents and 2) DUI incidents (alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions, APS/refusal suspensions, or DUI failures to appear). Evaluation Design and Analytical Procedures Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differences in the proportion of accident- and DUI-incident-involved drivers in each sanction group at the end of the evaluation period. Only the first accident or DUI incident or "failure" was evaluated. This is not an important limitation with these data because the incidence of repeat failures (two or more accidents or DUI incidents) was low over the study time window. More importantly, analysis of repeat failures would be subject to confounding by court sanctions received in connection with the first failure incident. This type of confounding is avoided because multiple incidents were not included in this analysis. Since it was not possible to randomly assign drivers to the various sanction groups, potential biases due to preexisting group differences were statistically controlled by entering into the analyses as covariates biographical data, prior driving record data and ZIP code indices (accident and traffic conviction averages of each driver's ZIP code area, and selected ZIP code variables from the 1990 census data for the 1991 and 1993 drivers). (Tables B5, B6, and B7 show significant group differences on most of these variables.) While this "quasi-experimental" design is subject to a number of limitations in assessing cause-effect relationships, the statistical control of group differences removes at least part of the bias in group assignment and provides a more precise estimate of the relationship between type of sanction and subsequent record. It is likely, of course, that the groups also differ on characteristics not measured by, or reflected in, the covariates. The possibility of uncontrolled biases becomes particularly problematic if sanctions are commonly received by atypical offenders through self- or judicial-selectivity (e.g., drivers of higher socio-economic status might be more likely to receive program with restriction than those of lower status). In all of the analyses for accidents (except 1989 and 1991 second offenders) and DUI incidents for both first and second offenders in all three years, several significant (p<.01) covariate by sanction interactions were evident (statistical significance at p<x means

36

Page 47: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

that a differential effect between groups would occur by chance less than x% of the time). These significant interactions indicated that the relationship between the covariates and the outcome measure varied across sanction groups, and therefore the covariates were included in the initial analyses for all three data sets to determine the magnitude of the interactions. In all analyses, except three (1989, 1991, and 1993 first offender accidents) where sanction differences were significant (p<.03), the interaction effect was generally one-fourth or less that of the main effect of sanction (chi squares were divided by their respective degrees of freedom to provide an approximate measure of effect size). Since the sanction main effect had substantially greater magnitude than the interaction effects, conclusions about sanction differences were based on analyses that did not include the interactions. The interaction effects of the remaining three analyses were examined and found not to create a serious impact on the sanction main effect. However, interaction effects from the only analysis in which sanction differences were not significant (1993 second offenders) are discussed below because sanction effects on accident rates vary across different levels of prior accidents and prior minor convictions. Results of the First Offender Sanction Evaluation Total Accidents: Figures 7, 8, and 9, and Table 14 display the results of the logistic regression analysis of total accidents for 1989, 1991, and 1993 first offenders. Among the 1989 and 1993 first offenders, the suspended group continued to have the significantly lowest proportion of accident-involved drivers relative to the other sanction groups, with 17.95 (1989) and 3.60 (1993) accident involvements per 100 drivers (see Table 16 for a summary of significant results by sanction groups). The suspended group in both years had 18% fewer accidents than the next lowest group's rates––program with jail (1989) and program with restriction (1993). Although the 1991 suspended group had the lowest proportion of accident-involved drivers, it was significantly lower than that of only two groups, the jail-only and program/restriction groups (by 14% and 8.3%, respectively) . First offenders sentenced to jail-only had a significantly higher accident rate than that of the suspended group for all three years, and were significantly higher than the program/jail group in 1989 and 1991 and the program/restriction group in 1989 and 1993. (It should be noted that the jail-only sanction may actually be a less aversive punishment than other sanctions when community service is substituted for jail time, which is frequently the case.) In this year's analysis of first offenders, there is a fairly strong main effect of sanction differences on accidents, as discussed above. However, there was also an interaction

37

Page 48: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

effect between sanction and the covariate, Zip code arrival time to work, indicating that in some geographical areas where travel time to work is long, the program/restriction group showed a noticeable rise in its accident rate. However, the other groups generally showed a flat accident rate across all travel times. The pairwise comparisons of the failure rates of the other three groups generally did not show significant differences between them in all three years. Based on the above results, suspension continues to show the strongest effect among first offenders in reducing total accidents, regardless of the length of time in the evaluation period, while jail was generally the least effective sanction (relative to two or three groups) across all time periods.

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

AC

CID

ENTS

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

15 30 45 60MINUTES

Figure 16A . Adjusted 3-year accident rates for 1991 first offendersby type of sanction and ZIP code average arrival time to work.

SB 38 Program & Restriction

Program & Restriction

Jail & Program

Jail

Suspension

DUI Incidents: Figures 10, 11, and 12 and Tables 14 and 16 show that among the first offender groups in 1989, 1991, and 1993, the (statistically significant) lowest proportions of reoffending drivers were in the groups assigned to first-offender treatment program plus license restriction, with failure rates of 22.0, 13.31, and 4.76 per 100 drivers, respectively. This group had 13.5%, 11.8%, and 18.4% fewer DUI incidents, respectively, in 1989, 1991, and 1993 than the group with the next lowest recidivism rate (program with jail). In contrast, the highest recidivism rates occurred with the jail-only groups for all years (32.37, 23.99, and 10.03 for 1989, 1991, and 1993, respectively). Differences in failure proportions among the other three sanction groups were again not significant for the 1989 offenders, but were significantly different among the three groups in 1991 and 1993. The first offender treatment program with jail group in 1991 and 1993 had lower recidivism rates than that of the SB 38 group, and lower rates than that of the 1991 suspended group. Overall, participation in the first-offender treatment

38

Page 49: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

program with license restriction continues to rank first in its effect on DUI incidents, while the jail-only sanction continues to have the least impact. Results from the first offender sanction analyses on DUI incidents continue to replicate those from previous research studies for all three analyses. Sanction group differences on accidents in this year's analyses continued to be consistent for 1989 and 1993. Among the 1991 first offenders, the suspended group still had the lowest accident rate and was significantly lower than the jail-only and program/restriction groups.

TABLE 14: FIRST OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS

AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR

YEAR

SANCTION

GROUP

SAMPLE

SIZE

NUMBER OF ACCIDENT-INVOLVED,

PER 100 DRIVERS

NUMBER OF DUI- INCIDENT-INVOLVED,

PER 100 DRIVERS

1989 Suspension (5,638) 17.95 25.88

(follow-up period = 5 years) Jail (7,200) 23.44 32.37

1st DUI program & jail

(43,631) 21.94 25.43

1st DUI program & license restriction

(41,228) 22.06 22.00

SB 38 program & license restriction

(4,423) 22.23 25.95

1991 Suspension (10,461) 11.52 17.00

(follow-up period = 3 years) Jail (5,164) 13.40 23.99

1st DUI program & jail

(58,893) 11.99 15.09

1st DUI program & license restriction

(38,147) 12.56 13.31

SB 38 program & license restriction

(6,419) 12.28 16.63

1993 Suspension (6,118) 3.60 6.40

(follow-up period = 1 year) Jail (4,469) 5.12 10.03

1st DUI program & jail

(42,403) 4.53 5.83

1st DUI program & license restriction

(29,567) 4.39 4.76

SB 38 program & license restriction

(3,496) 4.42 7.84

39

Page 50: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Results of the Second Offender Sanction EvaluationTotal Accidents: Among 1989 and 1991 second offenders, license suspension continued to be significantly more effective than treatment program plus restriction in reducing total accident risk (see Figures 13, 14, and 15, Tables 15 and 16), five years and three years subsequent to their convictions, respectively. The 1989 and 1991 suspended groups, with failure rates (per 100 drivers) of 17.46 and 9.13, respectively, had 17.1% and 14.3% fewer accident-involved drivers than did the SB 38 program groups. This finding is consistent with those of prior studies of second offenders on total accidents. Results of the 1993 analyses were similar to those of the 1990, 1991, and 1992 one-year analyses (reported in the previous three DUI-MIS evaluations) in that significant differences were not evident (although directionally significant at p = .12) among second offenders in their total accident rates. It was noted in last year's report that since license suspension has been consistently effective in reducing accident risk, it was likely that the lack of significant group differences in the one-year period was due to the immediate short-term positive effect of the imposition of one-year APS license suspensions on all second offenders. It was found in the previous three analyses that the accident rate of the SB 38/restriction group had declined toward the level of the suspended group; in this year's analysis, the SB 38 participants show even lower accident rates than the suspended group. Since the one-year follow-up period covers the time window when all second offenders are under APS suspension, it was reasoned that APS suspension would be expected to have a larger effect on the accident rates of previously nonsuspended SB 38 participants than it did on those who were suspended upon conviction. In contrast to the previous evaluations of one-year second-offender accidents, this year's analysis revealed the presence of significant interaction effects which may partially explain the nonsignificance of the sanction main effect. The interaction effects indicated that sanction effects on accident rates varied at different levels of prior 2-year minor convictions and prior 2-year accidents; consequently, these interactions were investigated to determine the magnitude of their effect. Figure 16B portrays the configurations of the accident rates varying by prior 2-year minor convictions and accidents across sanction groups. It can be seen that as the number of prior events increases, the accident rates of the SB 38 participants and the "other" group rise at a higher rate than those of the interlock or suspended group, suggesting that the effectiveness of these sanctions diminishes as prior accidents and minor convictions increase. It is also possible that omitted variables that contribute to group nonequivalancy, and their potential interactions with sanctions and other covariates, may be influencing or underlying these interaction effects.

40

Page 51: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

FA

CC

IDEN

T- IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

0 1 2 3PRIOR 2-YEAR MINOR CONVICTIONS

Figure 16B . Adjusted 1-year accident rates for 1993 second offenders by type ofsanction and prior 2-year minor convictions and accidents.

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

FA

CC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

0 1 2 3PRIOR 2-YEAR ACCIDENTS

OtherSB 38 & interlock

SB 38 & restrictionSuspension

In both plots, the accident rate of the ignition interlock group is noticeably lower initially and rises at a slower rate than the other sanction groups (except for the suspended group on prior accidents). However, the conclusiveness of this finding may be undermined by the fact that this year's interlock group is quite small (N = 1288) compared to the number of cases in the other groups (see Table 15). In addition, the likely presence of self-selectivity and uncontrolled group biases due to lack of random assignment may be influencing these results. The better prior driving record of the interlock group (see Appendix Table B6) suggests the possibility that this group's driving behavior may be better than that of the other groups even before sanctions were applied. Statistical control of nonequivalent groups only partially removes group bias. Nevertheless, the possibility that the interlock device itself could deter the incidence of drinking and driving for a broader range of prior record categories cannot be rejected. Next year's analysis of a larger interlock group(s) may provide more information on these findings. The results are somewhat more ambiguous for the suspended group because its accident rate declines markedly as prior accidents increase but, conversely, its accident rate rises with an increase in prior minor convictions. These configurations depart noticeably from previous explorations of differential sanction effects across prior minor convictions and prior accidents in that the accident rate of the suspended group usually increased at a much slower rate than that of other sanction groups as prior incidents increased. Also, the direction of the accident rates of the suspended group were similar for both covariates in previous studies. The reason for this change cannot be inferred from these results nor is it clear why the relative effects of the sanctions should be moderated in different ways by the number of prior convictions and accidents. As

41

Page 52: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

noted above, one possibility is the existence of uncontrolled variables which are affecting the composition and comparability of the various subgroups. In comparing accident rates between first and second offenders, Tables 14 and 15 show that across all years, first offenders continue to show higher accident rates than second offenders, which is a finding that has been apparent in previous DUI studies on accidents, even prior to DUI-MIS evaluations. Last year's analysis revealed significant differences between first and second offenders on 2-year subsequent accidents. As noted in last year's report, the fact that second offenders have longer term sanctions than do first offenders (18-month postconviction suspension or 18-month SB 38 treatment programs) may explain this difference. DUI Incidents: Figures 13, 14, and 15 and Tables 15 and 16 show that in all three years, the suspended groups had significantly higher failure rates (by 20.9%, 31.1%, and 58.3% for 1989, 1991, and 1993, respectively) than corresponding rates for the SB 38 program participants. The third group ("other") in the 1991 and 1993 analyses had failure rates midway between the other two groups. Failure rates of all three groups in 1991 were significantly different from each other. In the 1993 analysis, recidivism rates were significantly different between all groups except between the SB 38 program participants and the SB 38 program plus ignition interlock group. Next year's analyses, when a larger number of offenders are evaluated, should be more informative on the relative effectiveness of the ignition interlock device in combination with suspension and/or SB 38 treatment program.

TABLE 15: SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR

YEAR

SANCTION GROUP

SAMPLE SIZE

NUMBER OF ACCIDENT-INVOLVED,

PER 100 DRIVERS

PERCENTAGE EFFECT

(DIFFERENCE IN FAILURE RATES) GRP 1 - GRP 2

X 100

GRP 2

NUMBER OF DUI

INCIDENT-INVOLVED,

PER 100 DRIVERS

PERCENTAGE EFFECT

(DIFFERENCE IN FAILURE RATES) GRP 1 - GRP 2

X 100

GRP 2 1989 1) Suspension (9,483) 17.46 33.49

(follow-up period = 5 years)

2) SB 38 program & license restriction

(23,929) 21.06 -17.1% 27.69 20.9%

1991 1) Suspension (11,192) 9.13 23.00 (follow-up period = 3 years)

2) SB 38 program & license restriction

(19,309) 10.65 -14.3% 17.55 31.1%

3) Other (12,150) 10.23 20.08 1993 1) Suspension (7,196) 3.84 10.48

(follow-up period = 1 year)

2) SB 38 program & license restriction

(11,753) 3.23 18.9%

6.62 58.3%

3) SB 38 Program/ restriction interlock

(1,288) 3.01 5.95

4) Other (7,942) 3.77 8.62

42

Page 53: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 16: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT RESULTS FOR 1989, 1991, AND 1993 FIRST AND SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION GROUPS, BY OUTCOME MEASURES

FIRST OFFENDER YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS

GROUP (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 1989 (5-year follow-up period)

(1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 ns S4 ns (2) Jail na S3 S4 ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 ns (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na

1991 (3-year follow-up period) (1) Suspension na S1 ns S1 ns na S1 S3 S4 ns (2) Jail na S3 ns ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na S3 ns na S4 S3 (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na

1993 (1-year follow-up period) (1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 ns S4 S5 (2) Jail na ns S4 ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 S3 (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na

SECOND OFFENDER

YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS GROUP (1) (2) (1) (2)

1989 (5-year follow-up period) (1) Suspension na S1 na S2 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na na

1991 (3-year follow-up period) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3)

(1) Suspension na S1 S1 na S2 S3 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na ns na S2 (3) Other na na

1993 (1-year follow-up period) (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4)

(1) Suspension na S2 ns ns na S2 S3 S4 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na ns S2 na ns S2 (3) SB 38 program & interlock na ns na S3 (4) Other na na

Note: A significant (p<.03 for 1st offenders and p<.06 for 2nd offenders) difference between sanction groups relative to the proportion of accident-involved or DUI-incident-involved drivers is represented by an "S". The group number with the 'S' indicates the group with the better (lower) rate. A nonsignificant difference is indicated by "ns", and "na" means not applicable. Blanks appear in the lower half of each matrix, since the halves are identical.

Overall, findings for the 1989 and 1991 second offenders on accidents replicate previous evaluations indicating that postconviction license suspension continues to be more effective than SB 38 treatment program plus restriction in reducing accidents over 5- and 3-year follow-up periods. Findings from the 1993 second offender analyses were

43

Page 54: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

similar to previous post-APS one-year evaluations of second offenders in showing no evidence of significant difference between the sanction groups on subsequent accident rates; however, with the addition of a fourth sanction group in this year's analysis (SB 38 treatment program plus ignition interlock), the presence of interaction effects between sanctions and two covariates complicates the interpretation of the sanction main effects. However, the fact that the 1-year accident rates for both the SB 38 treatment program participants and the interlock group were lower than that of the suspended group could be attributed to the short-term impact of APS suspensions. The results on reoffense rates for second offenders continue to be consistent with the findings of prior studies on alcohol-related incidents, indicating that SB 38 programs with license restriction are associated with a reduction in subsequent DUI incidents over all three follow-up periods.

44

Page 55: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 5: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

Data on DMV administrative license disqualification actions (license suspension or revocation––S/R) taken in DUI cases are presented below. These statutorily mandated actions are initiated by the receipt of either a law enforcement APS report (.08% BAC or chemical test refusal) or court abstract of conviction. It should be noted that multiple actions can result from a single DUI incident––for example, a single DUI arrest frequently will result in both an APS suspension and a mandatory postconviction suspension action. This section includes the following tables and figure: Table 17: Mandatory DUI License Disqualification Actions, 1984-1994. This table shows preconviction (APS) and postconviction license disqualification totals from 1984 through 1994. The postconviction totals include juvenile suspensions, first-offender suspensions, second-offender suspensions and revocations, and third- and fourth-offender revocations. Table 18: Administrative Per Se Process Measures. This table presents APS process measure data for fiscal years 92/93 through 94/95. Figure 17 graphically portrays mandatory DUI license disqualification totals from 1984 through 1994. The following statements are based on the data shown in Tables 17-18 and Figure 17.

During 1991, the first full calendar year of administrative per se license suspension, the total number of DMV DUI suspension/revocation actions increased by 60% over 1990. In 1992, the number of APS actions and total mandatory actions declined by 16% and 17%, respectively, mirroring the 16% decline in DUI arrests during the same period. This decline continued in 1993 and 1994, with DUI arrests as well as mandatory license disqualification actions decreasing by over 10% each year.

In 1994, 184,045 administrative per se license actions were taken. Of these actions,

66% were first-offender actions and 34% were repeat-offender actions.

45

Page 56: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Chemical test refusal actions have steadily continued to decline, and have

decreased by 57% since 1984.

The number of mandatory postconviction license actions decreased by 13% in 1994.

Since APS was implemented in July 1990, over 1 million (1,178,002) APS suspension or revocation actions had been taken through June 1995.

During the first five years of APS implementation, requests for hearings have

increased each year, rising from 7% of all APS actions in FY 90/91 to 12% in 94/95. The rate at which APS suspension/revocation actions are upheld after hearing has declined from 87% in FY 90/91 to 80% in 94/95. During the same time period, the sustain rate for chemical test refusal hearings has fallen from 84% to only 72%. The underlying reasons for these trends are unclear at present.

During the first 18 months after implementation (on January 1, 1994) of the "zero

tolerance" law for minors, 14,283 suspension actions were taken.

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

500000

1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994

Figure 17 . Mandatory DUI license disqualification actions, 1984-1994.

46

Page 57: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

47

TABL

E 17

: M

AN

DA

TORY

DU

I LIC

ENSE

DIS

QU

ALI

FIC

ATI

ON

AC

TIO

NS,

198

4-19

94

YEA

R

PREC

ON

VIC

TIO

N

Adm

in P

er S

e (A

PS) A

ctio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1196

10

2722

73

2287

90

2090

06

1840

45

Fi

rst-o

ffen

der s

uspe

nsio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

8250

3 18

7527

15

7545

14

4321

12

0582

Repe

at-o

ffen

der s

uspe

nsio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3479

2 74

351

6265

6 57

279

4742

9

Repe

at-o

ffen

der r

evoc

atio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2315

10

395

8589

74

06

6063

Com

mer

cial

dri

ver a

ctio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3739

79

76

6449

58

29

5038

Che

mic

al te

st re

fusa

l act

ions

30

654

2930

8 26

327

2547

4 22

757

2146

6 22

915

2129

6r 17

963r

1566

2 13

264

Te

st re

fusa

l sus

pens

ions

30

654

2548

5 16

352

1487

7 13

720

1239

0 15

128

1090

1r 93

74r

8256

70

22

Te

st re

fusa

l rev

ocat

ions

n/

a 38

23

9975

10

597

9037

90

76

7787

10

395r

8589

r 74

06

6063

TOTA

L A

PS/R

EFU

SAL

AC

TIO

NS

3065

4 29

308

2632

7 25

474

2275

7 21

466

1425

25

2722

73

2287

90

2090

06

1840

45

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

- - -

- - -

- - PO

STC

ON

VIC

TIO

N

Juve

nile

DU

I sus

pens

ions

n/

a 22

00

2219

23

74

1823

19

95

1478

15

76

1202

92

2 87

9

Firs

t-off

ende

r sus

pens

ions

79

10

7057

73

84

7278

66

26

7679

10

408

1357

5 10

673

1020

8 86

96

M

isde

mea

nor

6386

53

46

5592

55

58

5050

56

58

8467

11

547

8989

86

07

7188

Felo

ny

1524

17

11

1792

17

20

1576

20

21

1941

20

28

1684

16

01

1508

Seco

nd-o

ffen

der S

/R a

ctio

ns

4398

0 46

835

4523

4 43

608

4769

8 53

927

5233

4 57

350

4547

8 38

849

3430

0

Mis

dem

eano

r 43

481

4629

2 44

601

4296

4 47

093

5323

8 51

593

5658

3 44

756

3828

5 33

794

Fe

lony

49

9 54

3 63

3 64

4 60

5 68

9 74

1 76

7 72

2 56

4 50

6

Thir

d-of

fend

er re

voca

tions

16

384

1497

0 16

946

1711

8 13

991

1851

4 18

650

1996

3 15

553

1290

8 11

193

M

isde

mea

nor

1638

4 14

970

1694

6 17

118

1367

1 18

182

1821

9 19

595

1523

3 12

644

1097

4

Felo

ny

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

320

332

431

368

320

264

219

Four

th-o

ffen

der r

evoc

atio

ns

n/a

5479

62

23

7778

88

84

8122

82

85

8394

67

03

5554

45

32

TOTA

L PO

STC

ON

VIC

TIO

N A

CTI

ON

S 68

274

7654

1 78

006

7815

6 79

022

9023

7 91

155

1008

58

7960

9 68

441

5960

0

19

84

1985

19

86

1987

19

88

1989

19

90

1991

19

92

1993

19

94

TOTA

L M

AN

DA

TORY

SU

SPEN

SIO

N/

REV

AO

CA

TIO

N (S

/R) A

CTI

ON

S 98

928

1058

49

1043

33

1036

30

1017

79

1117

03

2336

80

3731

31

3083

99

2774

47

2436

45

orts

. ri

or re

pr Re

vise

d fr

om p

Page 58: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 18. ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE PROCESS MEASURES

7/92-6/93 7/93-6/94 7/94-6/95

Total APS actions taken (including actions later set aside)1 231,491 211,380 185,266

.082 Suspensions 223,481 200,029 169,845 .08 Revocations 8,010 7,020 5,469 .013 Suspensions N/A 4,331 9,952 Total APS actions set aside 12,548 14,189 13,764 .08 Suspensions set aside 12,373 13,838 13,107 .08 Revocations set aside 175 214 216 .01 Suspensions set aside N/A 137 441 Net total APS actions taken (excluding actions later set aside) 218,943 197,191 171,502 .08 Suspensions 211,108 186,191 156,738 .08 Revocations 7,835 6,806 5,253 .01 Suspensions N/A 4,194 9,511

APS Actions by Offender Status/Occupation:4

APS .08 suspensions for drivers with no prior DUI convictions5 151,752 133,166 114,365

4-month license suspensions 133,614 116,563 95288 30-day suspensions plus 3-month restrictions 5,356 5,584 4,254

30-day suspensions plus 4-month COE6 restrictions N/A N/A 5,022

First-offender chemical test refusals 8,999 7,546 6,527 CDL first offender suspensions/restrictions 3,782 3,473 3,274 Total APS .08 actions taken for drivers with prior DUI convictions 67,191 59,831 47,626 Suspensions 59,355 53,025 42,373 Revocations 7,836 6,806 5,253 Total commercial driver (CDL) APS actions taken 6,190 5,443 4,695 CDL APS suspensions of commercial drivers in commercial vehicles 38 28 28 APS Chemical Test Refusal Process Measures: Total APS refusal actions taken (including actions later set aside) 17,454 15,145 12,696 .08 Suspensions 9,445 8,056 7,027 .08 Revocations 8,009 7,020 5,469 .01 Suspensions N/A 69 200 Total APS refusal actions set aside 619 726 728 .08 Suspensions set aside 444 510 500 .08 Revocations set aside 175 214 216 .01 Suspensions set aside N/A 2 12 Net total APS refusal actions (excluding actions later set aside) 16,835 14,419 11,968 .08 Suspensions 9,001 7,546 6,527 .08 Revocations 7,834 6,806 5,253 .01 Suspensions N/A 67 188 Net .08 APS refusal suspensions for subjects with no prior DUIs 8,999 7,546 6,527 Net .08 APS refusal actions for subjects with prior DUIs 7,836 6,806 5,253 Total .08 and .01 APS refusal hearings scheduled 2,988 2,343 2,133 APS Hearings

Total .08 and .01 hearings scheduled7 24,497 21,682 21,774

.08 hearings held and/or completed 20,587 21,264* 18,300 .01 hearings held and/or completed – – – – – – 888 .08 actions sustained or upheld following a hearing 16,920 15,481* 14,6578 .01 actions sustained or upheld following a hearing – – – – – – 7439 .08 APS refusal hearings held and/or completed 2,712 2,260* 1,836 .08 APS refusal actions sustained or upheld following a hearing 2,220 1,758* 1,32610

*Figure represents the combined total .08 and .01 hearings for FY93/94. 1Action taken on the basis of a chemical test refusal or blood alcohol concentration (BAC) test result. 2.08 refers to APS actions taken subsequent to obtaining evidence of a BAC equal to or in excess of the .08% per se level. Such an action is taken in

conjunction with a DUI arrest. 3.01 refers to APS suspensions taken against drivers under the age of 21 with BACs in excess of .01%. 4All entries in this category exclude actions later set aside but, where possible, include actions taken on the basis of either a chemical test refusal or a

BAC test result. 5Prior DUI convictions consist of any such conviction where the violation occurred within the seven years prior to the current violation. 6Introduced 1/1/95 this restriction allows driving to, from, and during the course-of-employment. 7This figure excludes subsequent departmental review hearings or procedures. In FY93/94 10% of total APS actions resulted in a hearing and increased

to 12% in FY94/95. both numerator and denominator include those actions set aside as a result of the hearing. 8In FY94/95 the .08 APS suspension or revocation was upheld in 80% of the total .08 APS hearings held. 9In FY94/95 the .01 APS suspension or revocation was upheld in 84% of the total .01 APS hearings held.

10In FY93/94 the action was sustained or upheld in 78% of the combined .08 and .01 APS chemical test refusal hearings held and in FY94/95, the action was sustained or upheld in 72% of .08 APS chemical test refusal hearings.

48

Page 59: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 6: ACCIDENTS INVOLVING ALCOHOL

This section presents data on alcohol-involved accidents, as compiled and reported by the California Highway Patrol, as well as accident data which have been crosstabulated with Department of Justice DUI arrest data. Drivers identified as being under the influence of drugs other than alcohol are also included in the "alcohol-involved accident" category, but typically comprise less than 1% of the total (0% for 1993 data). This section includes the following tables: Table 19: Race/Ethnicity by Sobriety Code of Accident-Involved 1993 DUI Arrestees. This table shows the law enforcement officer determination of sobriety for accident-involved 1993 DUI arrestees, by race/ethnicity. Table 20: Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1993 DUI Arrestees by Race/Ethnicity and Type of Arrest. This table portrays the fatal/injury accident involvement of DUI arrestees, by race/ethnicity and type of arrest (felony, juvenile, or misdemeanor). Table 21: Adjudication Status by Sobriety Code for Accident-Involved 1993 DUI Arrestees. This table crosstabulates accident sobriety codes (from law enforcement accident reports) with the court disposition of the 1993 DUI arrests associated with those accidents. Table 22: Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1993 DUI Arrestees by Type of Arrest and Adjudication Status. This table displays the adjudication status of fatal and injury accident-involved 1993 DUI arrestees, by type of arrest. Table 23: 1993 Accident-Involved DUI Arrestees With No Record of Conviction, by County and Type of Arrest. This table shows the number of accident-involved 1993 DUI arrestees without a corresponding recorded conviction, by type of DUI arrest, by county. Table 24: 1-, 3-, and 5-Year Total, Fatal/Injury, and Alcohol-Related Accident Means by Offender Status. This table shows the average number of total, fatal/injury, and alcohol-related accidents for 1993, 1991, and 1989 DUI arrestees for time periods of 1, 3, and 5 years subsequent to their arrests, respectively, by offender status (number of prior offenses).

49

Page 60: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Figure 18 (below) shows the annual percentages of traffic injuries and fatalities that were alcohol-involved from 1984 to 1994. The numerical data for this graph are shown on the DUI summary statistics sheet at the beginning of this report.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

PER

CEN

TAG

E O

F TO

TAL

INJU

RIE

S A

ND

FA

TALI

TIES

1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994YEAR

Figure 18 . Percentage of total injuries and total fatalities that werealcohol-involved, 1984-1994.

InjuriesFatalities

Based on these data, the following statements can be made:

The number of alcohol-involved traffic fatalities decreased by 5.2% in 1994, and has declined by 46% since 1987. The proportion of fatalities which are alcohol-involved has declined from 50.1% in 1987 to 35.3% in 1994.

The proportion of traffic accident injuries that are alcohol-involved has also

declined each year since 1987. Alcohol-involved injuries dropped 8.1% during 1994 and 42.7% from 1987 to 1994.

13.1% of all 1993 DUI arrests were associated with a reported traffic accident,

compared to 11.1% in 1992 and 1991. 49% of these accidents involved an injury or fatality.

In 25% of cases where a DUI offender was arrested in connection with a reported

traffic accident, there is no record of any corresponding conviction. In 91% of these

50

Page 61: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

nonconvicted cases, the accident report indicated that the driver had been drinking and that their ability was impaired.

Of all 1993 accident-involved DUI arrestees with no record of conviction, 18.5% had

been arrested for felony DUI, down from 19.0% in 1992 and 19.4% in 1991.

6.4% (14,985) of 1993 DUI arrests were associated with a fatal or injury accident, up from 5.7% the previous year. Of these fatal/injury accidents, only 29% (4,376) led to an arrest for felony DUI, and less than 10% (1,475) led to a conviction of felony DUI. Almost 28% (4,154) of DUI arrests stemming from a fatal/injury accident did not result in a reported conviction.

The fatal/injury and total accident risk of DUI offenders generally decreases with

the number of prior DUI convictions for periods up to five years after arrest, while, conversely, the risk of involvement in an alcohol-related accident generally increases with number of priors over the same time periods.

51

Page 62: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

52

TABL

E 19

: RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

BY S

OBR

IETY

CO

DE

OF

AC

CID

ENT-

INV

OLV

ED 1

993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES*

NO

T RE

PORT

ED

909

3.0

499

54.9

25

1 27

.6

101

11.1

58

6.

4

HBD

-ABI

LITY

IMPA

IRED

(

BAC

.08%

& A

BOV

E)

2873

6 94

.0

1271

9 44

.3

1261

5 43

.9

1914

6.

7 48

8 5.

2

HBD

-NO

T K

NO

WN

IF

IM

PAIR

ED (.

05- .0

79)

615

2.0

283

46.0

26

4 42

.9

46

7.5

22

3.6

HN

BD-H

AD

NO

T BE

EN

DRI

NK

ING

20

8 0.

7 11

4 54

.8

62

29.8

22

10

.6

0 4.

8

JUV

ENIL

E 19

5 1.

3 10

4 53

.3

71

36.4

9

4.6

11

5.6

MIS

DEM

EAN

OR

1041

4 69

.5

5123

49

.2

4037

38

.8

662

6.4

592

5.7

TOTA

L 14

985

100.

0 71

45

47.7

59

92

40.0

10

22

6.8

826

5.5

TOTA

L 30

581

100.

0 13

671

44.7

13

232

43.3

20

94

6.8

1584

5.

2

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

SOBR

IETY

CO

DE

TOTA

L W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

HBD

-NO

T IM

PAIR

ED

(BA

C .0

1%-.0

49%

) 11

3

0.4

56

49

.6

40

35.4

11

9.

7 6

5.3

*For

eac

h s

obri

ety

code

, per

cen

tage

s ar

e ba

sed

on r

ow t

otal

s.

TA

BLE

20:

FATA

L A

ND

INJU

RY A

CC

IDEN

TS O

F 19

93 D

UI A

RRES

TEES

BY

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y A

ND

TYP

E O

F A

RRES

T*

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) TY

PE O

F A

RRES

T TO

TAL

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

FELO

NY

4376

29

.2

1918

43

.8

1884

43

.1

351

8.0

223

5.1

ges

are

base

d on

row

tota

ls.

*For

eac

h ty

pe o

f arr

est,

perc

enta

Page 63: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

53

TABL

E 21

: A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

STA

TUS

BY S

OBR

IETY

CO

DE

FOR

AC

CID

ENT-

INV

OLV

ED 1

993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES*

TYPE

OF

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

HBD

-NO

T IM

PAIR

ED

(B

AC

.01%

-.049

%)

113

0.

4 22

9.

5 2

1.8

4 3.

5

2 1.

8 16

14

.2

67

59.3

JUV

ENIL

E 19

5

1.3

63

32.3

24

12

.3

2 1.

0 2

1.0

4 2.

1 10

0 51

.3

TOTA

L 30

5 81

100.

0 19

044

62

.3

1510

4.

9 12

16

4.0

399

1.3

748

2.4

7664

25

.1

HBD

-ABI

LITY

IMPA

IRED

(BA

C .0

8% &

ABO

VE)

28

736

94.0

18

235

63

.5

1427

5.

0 11

38

4.0

360

1.3

60

4 2.

1 69

72

24.3

TOTA

L 14

9 85

100.

0 82

50

55.1

14

75

9.8

549

3.7

185

1.2

372

2.5

4154

27

.7

HBD

-NO

T K

NO

WN

IF

IM

PAIR

ED (.

05-.0

79)

615

2.0

308

50.1

38

6.

2 15

2.

4 8

1.3

26

4.2

220

35.8

HN

BD-H

AD

NO

T BE

EN

D

RIN

KIN

G

208

0.7

90

43.3

6

2.

9 12

5.

8 5

2.4

23

11.1

72

34

.6

MIS

DEM

EAN

OR

1041

4 69

.5

6646

63

.8

183

1.8

463

4.4

141

1.4

262

2.5

2719

26

.1

FELO

NY

4376

29

.2

1541

35

.2

1268

29

.0

84

1.9

42

1.0

106

2.4

1335

30

.5

SOBR

IETY

CO

DE

TOTA

L M

ISD

EMEA

NO

R D

UI

FELO

NY

DU

I A

LCO

HO

L-RE

CK

LESS

N

ON

ALC

OH

OL-

REC

KLE

SS

OTH

ER

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

S N

O R

ECO

RD O

F A

NY

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

NO

T RE

PORT

ED

909

3.0

389

42.8

37

4.

1 47

5.

2 24

2.

6 79

8.

7

333

36.6

*For

eac

h so

brie

ty c

ode,

per

cent

ages

are

bas

ed o

n ro

w to

tals

.

TABL

E 22

: FA

TAL

AN

D IN

JURY

AC

CID

ENTS

OF

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y TY

PE O

F A

RRE

ST A

ND

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N S

TATU

S*

TYPE

OF

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TY

PE O

F A

RRES

T TO

TAL

MIS

DEM

EAN

OR

DU

I FE

LON

Y D

UI

ALC

OH

OL-

REC

KLE

SS

NO

NA

LCO

HO

L-RE

CK

LESS

O

THER

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

NO

REC

ORD

OF

AN

Y C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

ges a

re b

ased

on

row

tota

ls.

*For

eac

h ty

pe o

f arr

est,

perc

enta

Page 64: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 23: 1993 ACCIDENT-INVOLVED* DUI ARRESTEES WITH NO RECORD OF

CONVICTION, BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST

TYPE OF ARREST COUNTY FELONY DUI JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR DUI

TOTAL (100%) N % N % N %

STATEWIDE 6972 1291 18.5 148 2.1 5533 79.4 ALAMEDA 252 15 6.0 4 1.6 233 92.5 ALPINE 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 00.0 AMADOR 10 3 30.0 0 0.0 7 70.0 BUTTE 34 6 17.6 0 0.0 28 82.4 CALAVERAS 9 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 100.0 COLUSA 8 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 100.0 CONTRA COSTA 124 23 18.5 2 1.6 99 79.8 DEL NORTE 8 1 12.5 0 0.0 7 87.5 EL DORADO 35 12 34.3 2 5.7 21 60.0 FRESNO 296 41 13.9 8 2.7 247 83.4 GLENN 16 2 12.5 0 0.0 14 87.5 HUMBOLDT 48 9 18.8 3 6.3 36 75.0 IMPERIAL 61 16 26.2 0 0.0 45 73.8 INYO 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 KERN 169 26 15.4 5 3.0 138 81.7 KINGS 17 1 5.9 0 0.0 16 94.1 LAKE 17 7 41.2 0 0.0 10 58.8 LASSEN 16 5 31.3 0 0.0 11 68.8 LOS ANGELES 1839 309 16.8 41 2.2 1489 81.0 MADERA 57 7 12.3 2 3.5 48 84.2 MARIN 59 13 22.0 0 0.0 46 78.0 MARIPOSA 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 100.0 MENDOCINO 34 5 14.7 0 0.0 29 85.3 MERCED 75 20 26.7 1 1.3 54 72.0 MODOC 4 1 25.0 0 0.0 3 75.0 MONO 5 1 20.0 0 0.0 4 80.0 MONTEREY 115 6 13.9 9 7.8 90 78.3 NAPA 28 9 32.1 2 7.1 17 60.7 NEVADA 11 0 0.0 0 0.0 11 100.0 ORANGE 487 70 14.4 5 1.0 412 84.6 PLACER 53 19 35.8 0 0.0 34 64.2 PLUMAS 9 6 66.7 0 0.0 3 33.3 RIVERSIDE 414 89 21.5 3 0.7 322 77.8 SACRAMENTO 255 96 7.6 9 3.5 150 58.8 SAN BENITO 22 11 50.0 0 0.0 11 50.0 SAN BERNARDINO 499 120 24.0 3 0.6 376 75.4 SAN DIEGO 56 80 17.5 9 2.0 367 80.5 SAN FRANCISCO 84 22 26.2 0 0.0 62 73.8 SAN JOAQUIN 132 13 9.8 10 7.6 109 82.6 SAN LUIS OBISPO 47 6 12.8 1 2.1 40 85.1 SAN MATEO 99 11 11.1 4 4.0 84 84.8 SANTA BARBARA 69 15 21.7 2 2.9 52 75.4 SANTA CLARA 184 43 23.4 4 2.2 137 74.5 SANTA CRUZ 50 2 4.0 2 4.0 46 92.0 SHASTA 42 17 40.5 1 2.4 24 57.1 SIERRA 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 SISKIYOU 16 1 6.3 0 0.0 15 93.8 SOLANO 64 10 15.6 0 0.0 54 84.4 SONOMA 99 13 13.1 2 2.0 84 84.8 STANISLAUS 110 23 20.9 2 1.8 85 77.3 SUTTER 10 4 40.0 0 0.0 6 60.0 TEHAMA 22 4 18.2 0 0.0 18 81.8 TRINITY 7 1 14.3 3 42.9 3 42.9 TULARE 176 22 12.5 4 2.3 150 85.2 TUOLUMNE 6 0 0.0 3 50.0 3 50.0 VENTURA 111 23 20.7 0 0.0 88 79.3 YOLO 80 17 21.2 1 1.2 62 77.5 YUBA 15 5 33.3 1 6.7 9 60.0 *These cases include only arrestees whose accidents showed alcohol or drug-impaired sobriety codes.

54

Page 65: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

55

TABL

E 24

: 1-

, 3- A

ND

5-Y

EAR

TOTA

L,

FATA

L/IN

JUR

Y A

ND

ALC

OH

OL-

RELA

TED

A

CC

IDEN

T M

EAN

S BY

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S

TO

TAL

AC

CID

ENTS

FA

TAL/

INJU

RY A

CC

IDEN

TS

ALC

OH

OL-

RELA

TED

AC

CID

ENTS

ALL

.0

400

.120

1 .1

903

.014

9 .0

456

.072

6 .0

127

.034

0 .0

536

1ST

DU

I .0

432

.127

3 .2

010

.015

8 .0

470

.074

3 .0

117

.030

5 .0

487

2ND

DU

I .0

366

.111

1 .1

885

.013

8 .0

441

.073

7 .0

152

.039

3 .0

599

3RD

DU

I .0

287

.096

7 .1

402

.011

8 .0

405

.060

8 .0

153

.044

2 .0

650

4TH

+ D

UI

.021

8 .0

935

.128

5 .0

099

.039

3 .0

611

.012

5 .0

463

.070

8

DU

I O

FFEN

DER

ST

ATU

S

1-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

3 A

RRES

TEES

)

3-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

1 A

RRES

TEES

)

5-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(198

9 A

RRES

TEES

)

1-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

3 A

RRES

TEES

)

3-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

1 A

RRES

TEES

)

5-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(198

9 A

RRES

TEES

)

1-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

3 A

RRES

TEES

)

3-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

1 A

RRES

TEES

)

5-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(198

9 A

RRES

TEES

)

Page 66: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS

DUI Arrest Data: Arrest data are reported to the Department of Justice (DOJ), Law Enforcement Information Center, by individual law enforcement agencies throughout the state. As such, these data are subject to reporting errors such as incorrect names, birthdates or arrest dates. Nonreporting of arrest data due to error or omission can also occur; for example, in 1989 and 1991 the San Bernardino Police Department reported no DUI arrests, while reporting hundreds of DUI arrests in 1988, 1990, 1992, 1993 and 1994. When data are entered into DOJ's Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system, only the highest-order offense is included. Therefore, in cases where a DUI arrest is made in conjunction with, for example, an auto theft arrest, that DUI arrest will not be included in the database. This results in a slight but systematic underreporting of the number of DUI arrests annually. DUI Conviction Data: Abstracts of conviction for DUI and other traffic-related offenses are reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) by courts throughout the state. As abstracts are received (either hard copy, magnetic tape or through direct electronic access from the courts) they are entered onto the DMV driver record database. Abstracts without an identifying driver license number are run through the automated name index (ANI) system in order to match the abstract with an existing driver record; in cases where no such match can be made, an "X" numbered record is created to store the abstract. The total number of DUI abstracts of conviction received by DMV from the courts is tallied monthly and annually. Since this workload total includes abstracts which amend, correct or dismiss prior abstracts of conviction, it tends to overestimate the actual number of convictions which have occurred. Conviction data are also subject to reporting and nonreporting errors similar to those for DUI arrests. For example, the 1993 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System documented that thousands of DUI convictions showing in court records do not appear on the DMV driver record database. Alcohol-Involved Accident Data: Accident data are reported to the California Highway Patrol (CHP) by local law enforcement agencies and district offices of the CHP. As such, these data are subject to reporting and nonreporting errors similar to those occurring in both DUI arrest and conviction data. While most local law enforcement agencies will investigate and file reports on accidents involving injury or death, the investigation and reporting of property-damage-only accidents varies widely by local jurisdiction. Data are entered onto CHP's Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and output in annual published reports.

56

Page 67: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

REFERENCES California Department of Finance. (1991). California statistical abstract, 1991.

Sacramento, CA: Author. California Department of Motor Vehicles. (1984-87). An evaluation of the California

drunk driving countermeasure system. Volumes 1-8. Sacramento, CA: Author. California Highway Patrol. (1995). 1994 annual report of fatal and injury motor vehicle

traffic collisions. Sacramento, CA: Author. Helander, C. J. (1989). Development of a California DUI management information

system. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles. Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1995). Annual report of the California DUI

management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 145). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1994). Annual report of the California DUI

management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 143). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1992). Annual report of the California DUI

management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 134). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Tashima, H. N., Marowitz, L. A., DeYoung, D. J., & Helander, C. J. (1993). Annual

report of the California DUI management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 138). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

GLOSSARY

ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE (APS) Administrative per se ("on-the-spot") license suspension or revocation occurs immediately pursuant to lawful arrest of a person driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or more, or one who refuses a chemical test. Upon arrest, the driver's license is immediately confiscated by the law enforcement officer and an order of suspension or revocation served. The driver is issued a temporary license and allowed due process through administrative review. In July 1990,

57

Page 68: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

California became the 28th state to implement APS. In January 1994, California enacted a "zero tolerance" statute which requires the administrative suspension of any driver under age 21 with a BAC of 0.01% or greater, or who refuses to be tested.

ALCOHOL-INVOLVED ACCIDENT

Alcohol-involved accidents are those in which the investigating law enforcement officer indicates on the accident report that the driver "had been drinking (HBD)." Accidents involving drivers who are determined to be under the influence of drugs other than alcohol (typically less than 1% of all accidents) are also included in the alcohol-involved accident category.

ALCOHOL-RELATED RECKLESS DRIVING

Commonly called a "wet" reckless, alcohol-related reckless driving refers to an arrest/conviction incident which originated as a DUI arrest. DUI arrests involving drugs which are reduced to reckless driving are also referred to as alcohol-involved or "wet" reckless driving. "Wet" reckless convictions count as priors for the purposes of enhanced penalties upon subsequent conviction of DUI.

ALPHA

Alpha is the investigator's acceptable risk or probability level of making a Type 1 error (generally chosen to be small--e.g., 1% or .01, 5% or .05). There is always some risk of a Type 1 error, so alpha cannot be zero. Alpha is also called the significance level, because it is the criterion for claiming statistical significance.

BAC

Blood alcohol concentration, or BAC, is a measure of the percent, by weight, of alcohol in a person's blood. Statutorily, BAC is based upon grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or per 210 liters of breath.

CONVICTION Conviction of an offense, as used in this report, refers to the receipt by DMV of a court abstract of conviction. In a small proportion of cases, an offender may be convicted of an offense but that conviction is not reported to DMV. Such cases would functionally be treated by DMV as though the offender had not been convicted. Because convictions can be amended, corrected, dismissed or simply not reported at all, the conviction totals reported herein are dynamic and subject to change.

COVARIATE A variable used to statistically adjust the results of an analysis for differences (on that variable) existing among subjects prior to the comparison of treatment effects.

DUI

DUI is an acronym for "driving under the influence" of alcohol and/or drugs, a violation of Sections 23152 or 23153 of the California Vehicle Code.

58

Page 69: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

LOGISTIC REGRESSION Logistic regression analysis is a statistical procedure evaluating the linear relationship between various factors and the occurrence or nonoccurrence of an outcome event. In this study, the procedure was used to explain the relationship between the various sanctions and the proportion of DUI offenders who incurred accidents and/or DUI incidents.

MAJOR CONVICTION Major convictions include primarily DUI convictions, but also reckless driving and hit-and-run convictions.

p

p stands for probability. For example, if p<.05, the probability is less than 5 chances in 100 that the difference you found is by chance alone.

QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS

Quasi-experimental designs refer to analyses where the comparison groups are not equivalent on characteristics other than the treatment conditions because random assignment was not used. Caution should be excercised when interpreting the results because of possible confounding of group bias with treatment effects. Covariates are used to statistically reduce group differences prior to the comparison of treatment effects.

SIGNIFICANT (STATISTICALLY)

If the result of a statistical test is significant, this means that the difference found is very unlikely by chance alone. How unlikely is determined by alpha.

59

Page 70: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

APPENDIX A

Assembly Bill No. 757

CHAPTER 450 An act to add Section 1821 to the Vehicle Code. relating to driving offenses.

(Approved by Governor September 14, 1989. Filed with Secretary of State September 15, 1989.)

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 757, Friedman. Driving offenses: intervention programs: evaluation. Under existing law, the Department of Motor Vehicles maintains records of driver's offenses reported by the courts. Including violations of the prohibitions against driving while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage, any drug, or both, driving with an excessive blood-alcohol concentration, or driving while addicted to any drug. This bill would, additionally, require the department to establish and maintain a data and monitoring system, as specified, to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted of those violations relating to alcohol and drugs, and to report thereon annually to the Legislature. The bill would declare legislative findings. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares as follows: (a) Drivers under the influence of drugs or alcohol continue to present a grave danger to the citizens of this state. (b) The Legislature has taken stern action to deter this crime and punish its offenders and has provided a range of sanctions available to the courts to use at their discretion. (c) No system exists to monitor and evaluate the efficacy of these measures or to determine the achievement of the Legislature's goals. (d) This lack of accurate and up-to-date comprehensive statistics hampers the ability of the Legislature to make informed and timely policy decisions. (e) It is essential that the Legislature acquire this information, from available resources, as soon as practicable, and that this information be updated and transmitted annually to the Legislature. SEC. 2. Section 1821 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 1821: The department shall establish and maintain a data and monitoring system to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted of violations of Section 23152 or 23153. The system may include a recidivism tracking system. The recidivism tracking system may include, but not be limited to, jail sentencing, license restriction, license suspension. Level I (first offender) and II (multiple offender) alcohol and drug education and treatment program assignment, alcohol and drug education treatment program readmission and dropout rates, adjudicating court, length of jail term, actual jail or alternative sentence served, type of treatment program assigned, actual program compliance status, subsequent accidents related to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and subsequent convictions of violations of Section 23152 or 23153. The department shall submit an annual report of its evaluations to the Legislature. The evaluations shall include a ranking of the relative efficacy of criminal penalties, other sanctions, and intervention programs and the various combinations thereof.

60

Page 71: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

61

APP

END

IX B

ALP

INE

18-2

0 1

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 1

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

STA

TE T

OTA

L

2065

83

1826

25

88.4

23

958

11.6

85

980

41.6

96

084

46.5

13

864

6.7

1065

5 5.

2 A

LAM

EDA

U

ND

ER 1

8 73

68

93

.2

5 6.

8 31

42

.5

30

41.1

9

12.3

3

4.1

18

-20

432

393

91.0

39

9.

0 16

7 38

.7

150

34.7

73

16

.9

42

9.7

21

-30

2764

24

37

88.2

32

7 11

.8

1100

39

.8

911

33.0

46

2 16

.7

291

10.5

31-4

0 22

54

1907

84

.6

347

15.4

10

64

47.2

50

4 22

.4

457

20.3

22

9 10

.2

41

-50

1084

89

8 82

.8

186

17.2

53

7 49

.5

184

17.0

24

8 22

.9

115

10.6

51-6

0 40

4 36

4 90

.1

40

9.9

209

51.7

53

13

.1

105

26.0

37

9.

2

61-7

0 16

8 15

2 90

.5

16

9.5

84

50.0

16

9.

5 57

33

.9

11

6.5

71

& A

BOV

E 29

26

89

.7

3 10

.3

23

79.3

3

10.3

2

6.9

1 3.

4

TOTA

L 72

08

6245

86

.6

963

13.4

32

15

44.6

18

51

25.7

14

13

19.6

72

9 10

.1

21

-30

21

18

85.7

3

14.3

12

57

.1

3 14

.3

0 0.

0 6

28.6

31-4

0 19

16

84

.2

3 15

.8

15

78.9

1

5.3

0 0.

0 3

15.8

41-5

0 12

11

91

.7

1 8.

3 10

83

.3

0 0.

0 0

0.0

2 16

.7

51

-60

5 4

80.0

1

20.0

1

20.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0 4

80.0

71 &

ABO

VE

1 1

100.

0 0

0.0

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 59

51

86

.4

8 13

.6

40

67.8

4

6.8

0 0.

0 15

25

.4

AM

AD

OR

18-2

0 5

5 10

0.0

0 0.

0 4

80.0

1

20.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 45

38

84

.4

7 15

.6

36

80.0

8

17.8

0

0.0

1 2.

2

31-4

0 51

33

64

.7

18

35.3

50

98

.0

1 2.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

41-5

0 47

40

85

.1

7 14

.9

43

91.5

4

8.5

0 0.

0 0

0.0

51

-60

23

20

87.0

3

13.0

22

95

.7

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 4.

3

61-7

0 8

8 10

0.0

0 0.

0 8

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 4

4 10

0.0

0 0.

0 4

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

183

148

80.9

35

19

.1

167

91.3

14

7.

7 0

0.0

2

1.1

BUTT

E U

ND

ER 1

8 24

21

87

.5

3 12

.5

18

75.0

4

16.7

1

4.2

1 4.

2

18-2

0 98

87

88

.8

11

11.2

77

78

.6

18

18.4

2

2.0

1 1.

0

21-3

0 48

8 42

9 87

.9

59

12.1

33

9 69

.5

117

24.0

18

3.

7 14

2.

9

31-4

0 40

0 32

7 81

.8

73

18.2

32

7 81

.8

51

12.8

9

2.3

13

3.3

41

-50

178

144

80.9

34

19

.1

53

86.0

17

9.

6 2

1.1

6 3.

4

51-6

0 72

62

86

.1

10

13.9

65

90

.3

6 8.

3

0 0.

0 1

1.4

61

-70

27

24

88.9

3

11.1

24

88

.9

3 11

.1

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 10

10

10

0.0

0 0.

0 9

90.0

1

10.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 12

97

1104

85

.1

193

14.9

10

12

78.0

21

7 16

.7

32

2.5

36

2.8

Page 72: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

62

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

CA

LAV

ERA

S U

ND

ER 1

8 2

2 10

0.0

0 0.

0 1

50.0

1

50.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 9

9 10

0.0

0 0.

0 9

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

21

-30

68

53

77.9

5

22.1

62

91

.2

6 8.

8 0

0.0

0 0.

0

31-4

0 98

72

73

.5

26

26.5

86

87

.8

11

11.2

0

0.0

1 1.

0

41-5

0 67

56

83

.6

11

16.4

61

91

.0

5 7.

5 0

0.0

1 1.

5

51-6

0 24

21

87

.5

3 12

.5

24

100.

0 0

0.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

61-7

0 16

15

93

.8

1 6.

3 12

75

.0

3 18

.8

0 0.

0 1

6.3

71

& A

BOV

E 3

2 66

.7

1 33

.3

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

287

230

80.1

57

19

.9

258

89.9

26

9.

1 0

0.0

3

1.0

CO

LUSA

U

ND

ER 1

8 2

2 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

2 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

14

13

92.9

1

7.1

2 14

.3

12

85.7

0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 11

2 10

7 95

.5

5 4.

5 28

25

.0

79

70.5

2

1.8

3 2.

7

31-4

0 86

75

87

.2

11

12.8

43

50

.0

36

41.9

2

2.3

5 5.

8

41-5

0 56

51

91

.1

5 8.

9

34

60.7

20

35

.7

0 0.

0 2

3.6

51

-60

17

14

82.4

3

17.6

12

70

.6

5 29

.4

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

-70

15

12

80.0

3

20.0

13

86

.7

1 6.

7 1

6.7

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 30

2 27

4 90

.7

28

9.3

132

43.7

15

5 51

.3

5 1.

7 10

3.

3 C

ON

TRA

U

ND

ER 1

8 40

37

92

.5

3

7.5

21

52.5

13

32

.5

3 7.

5 3

7.5

CO

STA

18

-20

265

235

88.7

30

11

.3

116

43.8

10

4 39

.2

34

12.8

11

4.

2

21-3

0 14

32

1248

87

.2

184

12.8

66

5 46

.4

457

31.9

24

2 16

.9

68

4.7

31

-40

1274

10

33

81.1

24

1 18

.9

703

55.2

26

0 20

.4

248

19.5

63

4.

9

41-5

0 68

1 56

2 82

.5

119

17.5

39

4 57

.9

111

16.3

14

7 21

.6

29

4.3

51

-60

298

256

85.9

42

14

.1

181

60.7

30

10

.1

75

25.2

12

4.

0

61-7

0 98

91

92

.9

7 7.

1 59

60

.2

10

10.2

28

28

.6

1 1.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

36

30

83.3

6

16.7

23

63

.9

2 5.

6 11

30

.6

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 41

24

3492

84

.7

632

15.3

21

62

52.4

98

7 23

.9

788

19.1

18

7 4.

5 D

EL N

ORT

E U

ND

ER 1

8 6

6 10

0.0

0 0.

0 5

83.3

0

0.0

0 0.

0 1

16.7

18-2

0 16

13

81

.3

3 18

.8

11

68.8

1

6.3

0 0.

0 4

25.0

21-3

0 91

76

83

.5

15

16.5

68

74

.7

13

14.3

2

2.2

8 8.

8

31-4

0 95

78

82

.1

17

17.9

77

81

.1

9 9.

5 2

2.1

7 7.

4

41-5

0 64

55

85

.9

9 14

.1

56

87.5

4

6.3

0 0.

0 4

6.3

51

-60

17

13

76.5

4

23.5

15

88

.2

0 0.

0 0

0.0

2 11

.8

61

-70

11

7 63

.6

4 36

.4

10

90.9

1

9.1

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 3

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0 3

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

303

251

82.8

52

17

.2

245

80.9

28

9.

2 4

1.3

26

8.6

Page 73: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

63

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

-

EL D

ORA

DO

U

ND

ER 1

8 16

15

93

.8

1 6.

3 16

10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

18

-20

52

45

86.5

7

13.5

46

88

.5

6 11

.5

0 0.

0 0

0.0

21

-30

290

249

85.9

41

14

.1

235

81.0

51

17

.6

2 0.

7 2

0.7

31

-40

360

286

79.4

74

20

.6

323

89.7

24

6.

7 6

1.7

7 1.

9

41-5

0 18

4 14

7 79

.9

37

20.1

17

1 92

.9

10

5.4

1 0.

5 2

1.1

51

-60

60

52

86.7

8

13.3

56

93

.3

3 5.

0 1

1.7

0 0.

0

61-7

0 18

15

83

.3

3 16

.7

18

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 3

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0 3

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

983

812

82.6

17

1 17

.4

868

88.3

94

9.

6 10

1.

0 11

1.

1 FR

ESN

O

UN

DER

18

76

74

97.4

2

2.6

18

23.7

55

72

.4

2 2.

6 1

1.3

18

-20

576

544

94.4

32

5.

6 93

16

.1

451

78.3

8

1.4

24

4.2

21

-30

3107

29

11

93.7

19

6 6.

3 48

9 15

.7

2420

77

.9

88

2.8

110

3.5

31

-40

1914

17

01

88.9

21

3 11

.1

444

23.2

13

05

68.2

59

3.

1 10

6 5.

5

41-5

0 79

0 69

9 88

.5

91

11.5

23

6 29

.9

476

60.3

40

5.

1 38

4.

8

51-6

0 29

3 26

6 90

.8

27

9.2

97

33.1

16

5 56

.3

15

5.1

16

5.5

61

-70

80

73

91.3

7

8.8

36

45.0

37

46

.3

1 1.

2 6

7.5

71

& A

BOV

E 24

24

10

0.0

0 0.

0 12

50

.0

11

45.8

1

4.2

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 68

60

6292

91

.7

568

8.3

1425

20

.8

4920

71

.7

214

3.1

301

4.4

GLE

NN

U

ND

ER 1

8 2

2 10

0.0

0 0.

0 1

50.0

1

50.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 17

16

94

.1

1 5.

9 7

41.2

9

52.9

1

5.9

0 0.

0

21-3

0 11

2 10

1 90

.2

11

9.8

43

38.4

69

61

.6

0 0.

0 0

0.0

31

-40

93

81

87.1

12

12

.9

59

63.4

28

30

.1

0 0.

0 6

6.5

41

-50

60

53

88.3

7

11.7

43

71

.7

16

26.7

0

0.0

1 1.

7

51-6

0 17

16

94

.1

1 5.

9 14

82

.4

3 17

.6

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

-70

8 8

100.

0 0

0.0

8 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

1 1

100.

0 0

0.0

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

HU

MBO

LDT

UN

DER

18

17

10

58.8

7

41.2

17

10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 31

0 27

8 89

.7

32

10.3

17

6 56

.8

126

40.6

1

0.3

7 2.

3

18

-20

113

95

84.1

18

15

.9

92

81.4

10

8.

8 1

0.9

10

8.8

21

-30

400

327

81.8

73

18

.2

315

78.8

49

12

.3

6 1.

5 30

7.

5

31-4

0 37

3 31

2 83

.6

61

16.4

31

9 85

.5

18

4.8

6 1.

6 30

8.

0

41-5

0 21

9 18

3 83

.6

36

16.4

20

2 92

.2

2 0.

9 3

1.4

12

5.5

51

-60

73

62

84.9

11

15

.1

67

91.8

4

5.5

0 0.

0 2

2.7

61

-70

27

21

77.8

6

22.2

24

88

.9

2 7.

4 0

0.0

1 3.

7

71 &

ABO

VE

12

10

83.3

2

16.7

11

91

.7

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 8.

3

TOTA

L 12

34

1020

82

.7

214

17.3

10

47

84.8

85

6.

9 16

1.

3 86

7.

0

Page 74: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

64

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

IMPE

RIA

L U

ND

ER 1

8 12

12

10

0.0

0 0.

0 3

25.0

8

66.7

0

0.0

1 8.

3

18-2

0 89

86

96

.6

3 3.

4 20

22

.5

67

75.3

2

2.2

0 0.

0

21-3

0 55

2 50

0 90

.6

52

9.4

119

21.6

41

2 74

.6

10

1.8

11

2.0

31

-40

531

470

88.5

61

11

.5

125

23.5

37

7 71

.0

7 1.

3 22

4.

1

41-5

0 28

1 24

9 88

.6

32

11.4

77

27

.4

192

68.3

4

1.4

8 2.

8

51-6

0 10

1 94

93

.1

7 6.

9 36

35

.6

58

57.4

2

2.0

5 5.

0

61-7

0 64

60

93

.8

4 6.

3 26

40

.6

36

56.3

0

0.0

2 3.

1

71 &

ABO

VE

15

14

93.3

1

6.7

10

66.7

5

33.3

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 16

45

1485

90

.3

160

9.7

416

25.3

11

55

70.2

25

1.

5 49

3.

0 IN

YO

UN

DER

18

2 1

50.0

1

50.0

2

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

24

23

95.8

1

4.2

11

45.8

4

16.7

0

0.0

9 37

.5

21

-30

94

80

85.1

14

14

.9

49

52.1

27

28

.7

0 0.

0 18

19

.1

31

-40

112

90

80.4

22

19

.6

74

66.1

20

17

.9

0 0.

0 18

16

.1

41

-50

65

59

90.8

6

9.2

49

75.4

6

9.2

0 0.

0 10

15

.4

51

-60

33

30

90.9

3

9.1

27

81.8

4

12.1

1

3.0

1 3.

0

61-7

0 13

12

92

.3

1 7.

7 11

84

.6

2 15

.4

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 3

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0 3

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

KER

N

UN

DER

18

72

64

88.9

8

11.1

40

55

.6

26

36.1

5

6.9

1 1.

4

TOTA

L 34

6 29

8 86

.1

48

13.9

22

6 65

.3

63

18.2

1

0.3

56

16.2

18

-20

383

364

95.0

19

5.

0 13

0 33

.9

232

60.6

19

5.

0 2

0.5

21

-30

1990

18

18

91.4

17

2 8.

6 62

8 31

.6

1254

63

.0

91

4.6

17

0.9

31

-40

1596

13

84

86.7

21

2 13

.3

674

42.2

79

6 49

.9

93

5.8

33

2.1

41

-50

669

600

89.7

69

10

.3

367

54.9

25

0 37

.4

39

5.8

13

1.9

51

-60

256

237

92.6

19

7.

4 15

8 61

.7

75

29.3

17

6.

6 6

2.3

61

-70

99

91

91.9

8

8.1

73

73.7

21

21

.2

3 3.

0 2

2.0

71

& A

BOV

E 30

27

90

.0

3 10

.0

26

86.7

4

13.3

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 50

95

4585

90

.0

510

10.0

20

96

41.1

26

58

52.2

26

7 5.

2 74

1.

5 K

ING

S U

ND

ER 1

8 23

15

65

.2

8 34

.8

11

47.8

12

52

.2

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

96

92

95.8

4

4.2

30

31.3

64

66

.7

2 2.

1 0

0.0

21

-30

465

432

92.9

33

7.

1 99

21

.3

332

71.4

23

4.

9 11

2.

4

31-4

0 34

3 30

3 88

.3

40

11.7

97

28

.3

204

59.5

30

8.

7 12

3.

5

41-5

0 15

6 13

6 87

.2

20

12.8

67

42

.9

71

45.5

15

9.

6 3

1.9

51

-60

45

44

97.8

1

2.2

15

33.3

20

44

.4

7 15

.6

3 6.

7

61-7

0 11

11

10

0.0

0 0.

0 6

54.5

5

45.5

0

0.0

0 0.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

4 4

100.

0 0

0.0

3 75

.0

1 25

.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

1143

10

37

90.7

10

6 9.

3 32

8 28

.7

709

62.0

77

6.

7 29

2.

5

Page 75: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

LAK

E U

ND

ER 1

8 6

5 83

.3

1 16

.7

5 83

.3

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 16

.7

18

-20

43

37

86.0

6

14.0

29

67

.4

10

23.3

2

4.7

2 4.

7

21-3

0 19

7 16

9 85

.8

28

14.2

14

4 73

.1

40

20.3

6

3.0

7 3.

6

31-4

0 21

6 18

0 83

.3

36

16.7

18

6 86

.1

24

11.1

2

0.9

4 1.

9

41-5

0 11

4 91

79

.8

23

20.2

98

86

.0

9 7.

9 4

3.5

3 2.

6

51-6

0 42

35

83

.3

7 16

.7

34

81.0

5

11.9

2

4.8

1 2.

4

61-7

0 33

27

81

.8

6 18

.2

27

81.8

2

6.1

4 12

.1

0 0.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

11

11

100.

0 0

0.0

11

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

662

555

83.8

10

7 16

.2

534

80.7

90

13

.6

20

3.0

18

2.7

LASS

EN

UN

DER

18

3 2

66.7

1

33.3

3

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

19

15

78.9

4

21.1

17

89

.5

1 5.

3 0

0.0

1 5.

3

21-3

0 79

68

86

.1

11

13.9

63

79

.7

8 10

.1

0 0.

0 8

10.1

31-4

0 64

57

89

.1

7 10

.9

56

87.5

4

6.3

1 1.

6 3

4.7

41

-50

53

47

88.7

6

11.3

49

92

.5

0 0.

0 1

1.9

3 5.

7

51-6

0 22

19

86

.4

3 13

.6

20

90.9

1

4.5

1 4.

5 0

0.0

61

-70

11

10

90.9

1

9.1

11

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 1

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 1

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

252

219

86.9

33

13

.1

220

87.3

14

5.

6 3

1.2

15

6.0

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

UN

DER

18

282

258

91.5

24

8.

5 62

22

.0

196

69.5

18

6.

4 6

2.1

18

-20

2990

28

07

93.9

18

3 6.

1 46

7 15

.6

2251

75

.3

140

4.7

132

4.4

21

-30

2318

6 21

311

91.9

18

75

8.1

4096

17

.7

1645

8 71

.0

1518

6.

5 11

14

4.8

31

-40

1549

7 14

046

90.6

14

51

9.4

3893

25

.1

9128

58

.9

1496

9.

7 98

0 6.

3

41-5

0 65

79

5876

89

.3

703

10.7

20

93

31.8

31

32

47.6

80

7 12

.3

547

8.3

51

-60

2237

20

29

90.7

20

8 9.

3 89

4 40

.0

806

36.0

38

6 17

.3

151

6.8

61

-70

665

600

90.2

65

9.

8 31

1 46

.8

193

29.0

13

5 20

.3

26

3.9

71

& A

BOV

E 17

1 15

3 89

.5

18

10.5

10

3 60

.2

29

17.0

35

20

.5

4 2.

3

TOTA

L 51

607

4708

0 91

.2

4527

8.

8 11

919

23.1

32

193

62.4

45

35

8.8

2960

5.

7 M

AD

ERA

U

ND

ER 1

8 10

10

10

0.0

0 0.

0 4

40.0

5

50.0

1

10.0

0

0.0

18

-20

98

98

100.

0 0

0.0

20

20.4

74

75

.5

2 2.

0 2

2.0

21

-30

532

510

95.9

22

4.

1 75

14

.1

443

83.3

9

1.7

5 0.

9

31-4

0 30

7 27

4 89

.3

33

10.7

81

26

.4

208

67.8

12

3.

9 6

2.0

41

-50

154

140

90.9

14

9.

1 54

35

.1

86

55.8

13

8.

4 1

0.6

51

-60

31

29

93.5

2

6.5

14

45.2

12

38

.7

3 9.

7 2

6.5

61

-70

22

18

81.8

4

18.2

13

59

.1

7 31

.8

2 9.

1 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 5

4 80

.0

1 20

.0

4 80

.0

0 0.

0 1

20.0

0

0.0

TO

TAL

1159

10

83

93.4

76

6.

6 26

5 22

.9

835

72.0

43

3.

7 16

1.

4

65

Page 76: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

66

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

MA

RIN

U

ND

ER 1

8 9

7 77

.8

2

22.2

8

88.9

1

11.1

0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 87

76

87

.4

11

12.6

41

47

.1

33

37.9

4

4.6

9 10

.3

21

-30

608

501

82.4

10

7 17

.6

321

52.8

20

7 34

.0

28

4.6

52

8.6

31

-40

503

404

80.3

99

19

.7

362

72.0

76

15

.1

20

4.0

45

8.9

41

-50

314

230

73.2

84

26

.8

256

81.5

19

6.

1 18

5.

7 21

6.

7

51-6

0 10

4 85

81

.7

19

18.3

94

90

.4

3 2.

9 3

2.9

4 3.

8

61-7

0 32

30

93

.8

2 6.

3 28

87

.5

1 3.

1 2

6.3

1 3.

1

71 &

ABO

VE

7 7

100.

0 0

0.0

5 71

.4

1 14

.3

1 14

.3

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 16

64

1340

80

.5

324

19.5

11

15

67.0

34

1 20

.5

76

4.6

132

7.9

MA

RIPO

SA

18-2

0 2

2 10

0.0

0 0.

0 2

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

21

-30

27

25

92.6

2

7.4

24

88.9

2

7.4

0 0.

0 1

3.7

31

-40

41

32

78.0

9

22.0

35

85

.4

4 9.

8 0

0.0

2 4.

9

41-5

0 28

23

82

.1

5 17

.9

22

78.6

3

10.7

2

7.1

1 3.

6

51-6

0 11

9

81.8

2

18.2

10

90

.9

1 9.

1 0

0.0

0 0.

0

61-7

0 3

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0 3

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

112

94

83.9

18

16

.1

96

85.7

10

8.

9 2

1.8

4 3.

6 M

END

OC

INO

U

ND

ER 1

8 6

4 66

.7

2 33

.3

5 83

.3

1 16

.7

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

61

53

86.9

8

13.1

39

63

.9

18

29.5

0

0.0

4 6.

6

21-3

0 31

7 26

5 83

.6

52

16.4

18

2 57

.4

114

36.0

3

0.9

18

5.7

31

-40

303

234

77.2

69

22

.8

247

81.5

39

12

.9

4 1.

3 13

4.

3

41-5

0 18

6 15

8 84

.9

28

15.1

15

8 84

.9

17

9.1

2 1.

1 9

4.8

51

-60

57

50

87.7

7

12.3

49

86

.0

5 8.

8 1

1.8

2 3.

5

61-7

0 22

18

81

.8

4 18

.2

21

95.5

1

4.5

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 8

7 87

.5

1 12

.5

8 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 96

0 78

9 82

.2

171

17.8

70

9 73

.9

195

20.3

10

1.

0 46

4.

8 M

ERC

ED

UN

DER

18

24

20

83.3

4

16.7

4

16.7

18

75

.0

1 4.

2 1

4.2

18

-20

185

175

94.6

10

5.

4 35

18

.9

142

76.8

2

1.1

6 3.

2

21-3

0 88

0 81

9 93

.1

61

6.9

170

19.3

66

0 75

.0

30

3.4

20

2.3

31

-40

586

521

88.9

65

11

.1

189

32.3

34

3 58

.5

42

7.2

12

2.0

41

-50

313

282

90.1

31

9.

9 11

3 36

.1

157

50.2

27

8.

6 16

5.

1

51-6

0 10

5 97

92

.4

8 7.

6 55

52

.4

45

42.9

5

4.8

0 0.

0

61-7

0 38

36

94

.7

2 5.

3 17

44

.7

18

47.4

1

2.6

2 5.

3

71 &

ABO

VE

7 7

100.

0 0

0.0

3 42

.9

2 28

.6

2 28

.6

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 21

38

1957

91

.5

181

8.5

586

27.4

13

85

64.8

11

0 5.

1 57

2.

7

Page 77: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

67

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

MO

DO

C

UN

DER

18

3 3

100.

0 0

0.0

2 66

.7

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 33

.3

18

-20

14

12

85.7

2

14.3

9

64.3

5

35.7

0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 35

31

88

.6

4 11

.4

22

62.9

9

25.7

0

0.0

4 11

.4

31

-40

45

35

77.8

10

22

.2

39

86.7

4

8.9

0 0.

0 2

4.4

41

-50

21

20

95.2

1

4.8

18

85.7

1

4.8

0 0.

0 2

9.5

51

-60

9 9

100.

0 0

0.0

9 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

61-7

0 10

8

80.0

2

20.0

9

90.0

1

10.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 13

7 11

8 86

.1

19

13.9

10

8 78

.8

20

14.6

0

0.0

9 6.

6 M

ON

O

UN

DER

18

2 1

50.0

1

50.0

1

50.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0 1

50.0

18-2

0 12

11

91

.7

1 8.

3 6

50.0

1

8.3

0 0.

0 5

41.7

21-3

0 54

52

96

.3

2 3.

7 23

42

.6

16

29.6

1

1.9

14

25.9

31-4

0 48

42

87

.5

6 12

.5

23

47.9

5

10.4

0

0.0

20

41.7

41-5

0 29

25

86

.2

4 13

.8

19

65.5

1

3.4

0 0.

0 9

31.0

51-6

0 7

6 85

.7

1 14

.3

5 71

.4

0 0.

0 0

0.0

2 28

.6

61

-70

3 3

100.

0 0

0.0

2 66

.7

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 33

.3

71

& A

BOV

E 2

2 10

0.0

0 0.

0 1

50.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0 1

50.0

TOTA

L 15

7 14

2 90

.4

15

9.6

80

51.0

23

14

.6

1 0.

6 53

33

.8

MO

NTE

REY

UN

DER

18

59

52

88.1

7

11.9

10

16

.9

49

83.1

0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 38

5 36

3 94

.3

22

5.7

52

13.5

32

0 83

.1

8 2.

1 5

1.3

21

-30

1976

18

51

93.7

12

5 6.

3 40

1 20

.3

1484

75

.1

40

2.0

51

2.6

31

-40

1229

10

82

88.0

14

7 12

.0

476

38.7

66

9 54

.4

52

4.2

32

2.6

41

-50

513

440

85.8

73

14

.2

258

50.3

22

5 43

.9

12

2.3

18

3.5

51

-60

171

148

86.5

23

13

.5

89

52.0

59

34

.5

13

7.6

10

5.8

61

-70

76

67

88.2

9

11.8

38

50

.0

27

35.5

7

9.2

4 5.

3

71 &

ABO

VE

14

14

100.

0 0

0.0

6 42

.9

7 50

.0

0 0.

0 1

7.1

TO

TAL

4423

40

17

90.8

40

6 9.

2 13

30

30.1

28

40

64.2

13

2 3.

0 12

1 2.

7 N

APA

U

ND

ER 1

8 18

16

88

.9

2 11

.1

14

77.8

4

22.2

0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 89

82

92

.1

7 7.

9 30

33

.7

58

65.2

1

1.1

0 0.

0

21-3

0 42

6 39

4 92

.5

32

7.5

171

40.1

24

3 57

.0

3 0.

7 9

2.1

31

-40

276

230

83.3

46

16

.7

158

57.2

10

4 37

.7

5 1.

8 9

3.3

41

-50

169

129

76.3

40

23

.7

129

76.3

37

21

.9

3 1.

8 0

0.0

51

-60

66

59

89.4

7

10.6

51

77

.3

9 13

.6

0 0.

0 6

9.1

61

-70

30

22

73.3

8

26.7

25

83

.3

4 13

.3

1 3.

3 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 11

11

10

0.0

0 0.

0 11

10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 10

85

943

86.9

14

2 13

.1

589

54.3

45

9 42

.3

13

1.2

24

2.2

Page 78: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

68

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

NEV

AD

A

UN

DER

18

3 2

66.7

1

33.3

3

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

32

28

87.5

4

12.5

30

93

.8

2 6.

3 0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 12

4 10

8 87

.1

16

12.9

10

3 83

.1

17

13.7

2

1.6

2 1.

6

31-4

0 16

7 13

0 77

.8

37

22.2

15

3 91

.6

11

6.6

2 1.

2 1

0.6

41

-50

101

79

78.2

22

21

.8

92

91.1

5

5.0

0 0.

0 4

4.0

51

-60

31

29

93.5

2

6.5

30

96.8

1

3.2

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

-70

16

15

93.8

1

6.3

14

87.5

1

6.3

1 6.

3 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 7

7 10

0.0

0 0.

0 5

71.4

1

14.3

0

0.0

1 14

.3

TO

TAL

481

398

82.7

83

17

.3

430

89.4

38

7.

9 5

1.0

8 1.

7 O

RAN

GE

UN

DER

18

88

71

80.7

17

19

.3

47

53.4

34

38

.6

0 0.

0 7

8.0

18

-20

911

819

89.9

92

10

.1

368

40.4

48

3 53

.0

8 0.

9 52

5.

7

21-3

0 69

49

6186

89

.0

763

11.0

26

88

38.7

37

02

53.3

87

1.

3 47

2 6.

8

31-4

0 46

36

4006

86

.4

630

13.6

23

24

50.1

17

99

38.8

11

3 2.

4 40

0 8.

6

41-5

0 20

33

1719

84

.6

314

15.4

12

31

60.6

55

8 27

.4

42

2.1

202

9.9

51

-60

744

645

86.7

99

13

.3

505

67.9

15

4 20

.7

10

1.3

75

10.1

61-7

0 23

3 19

9 85

.4

34

14.6

17

1 73

.4

43

18.5

6

2.6

13

5.6

71

& A

BOV

E 65

49

75

.4

16

24.6

50

76

.9

9 13

.8

0 0.

0 6

9.2

TO

TAL

1565

9 13

694

87.5

19

65

12.5

73

84

47.2

67

82

43.3

26

6 1.

7 12

27

7.8

PLA

CER

U

ND

ER 1

8 21

19

90

.5

2 9.

5 20

95

.2

1 4.

8 0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 11

4 10

0 87

.7

14

12.3

97

85

.1

15

13.2

1

0.9

1 0.

9

21-3

0 58

2 48

5 83

.3

97

16.7

46

6 80

.1

104

17.9

4

0.7

8 1.

4

31-4

0 52

4 40

1 76

.5

123

23.5

47

8 91

.2

33

6.3

4 0.

8 9

1.7

41

-50

279

225

80.6

54

19

.4

258

92.5

12

4.

3 5

1.8

4 1.

4

51-6

0 74

64

86

.5

10

13.5

65

87

.8

7 9.

5 0

0.0

2 2.

7

61-7

0 28

24

85

.7

4 14

.3

25

89.3

2

7.1

1 3.

6 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 7

7 10

0.0

0 0.

0 6

85.7

1

14.3

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 16

29

1325

81

.3

304

18.7

14

15

86.9

17

5 10

.7

15

0.9

24

1.5

PLU

MA

S U

ND

ER 1

8 1

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 1

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

9 9

100.

0 0

0.0

8 88

.9

1 11

.1

0 0.

0 0

0.0

21

-30

49

41

83.7

8

16.3

42

85

.7

5 10

.2

1 2.

0 1

2.0

31

-40

59

45

76.3

14

23

.7

52

88.1

3

5.1

0 0.

0 4

6.8

41

-50

39

32

82.1

7

17.9

38

97

.4

1 2.

6 0

0.0

0 0.

0

51-6

0 19

16

84

.2

3 15

.8

19

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

-70

12

12

100.

0 0

0.0

12

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 1

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 1

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

189

157

83.1

32

16

.9

173

91.5

10

5.

3 1

0.5

5 2.

6

Page 79: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SAN

BEN

ITO

U

ND

ER 1

8 1

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

69

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

RIV

ERSI

DE

UN

DER

18

95

86

90.5

9

9.5

29

30.5

56

58

.9

3 3.

2 7

7.4

18

-20

514

477

92.8

37

7.

2 16

6 32

.3

311

60.5

23

4.

5 14

2.

7

21-3

0 31

63

2873

90

.8

290

9.2

1031

32

.6

1859

58

.8

177

5.6

96

3.0

31

-40

2369

20

54

86.7

31

5 13

.3

1013

42

.8

1141

48

.2

145

6.1

70

3.0

41

-50

1276

11

18

87.6

15

8 12

.4

685

53.7

46

2 36

.2

81

6.3

48

3.8

51

-60

499

445

89.2

54

10

.8

287

57.5

15

0 30

.1

45

9.0

17

3.4

61

-70

197

181

91.9

16

8.

1 13

5 68

.5

47

23.9

9

4.6

6 3.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

69

60

87.0

9

13.0

58

84

.1

6 8.

7 3

4.3

2 2.

9

TOTA

L 81

82

7294

89

.1

888

10.9

34

04

41.6

40

32

49.3

48

6 5.

9 26

0 3.

2 SA

CRA

MEN

TO

UN

DER

18

70

61

87.1

9

12.9

29

41

.4

22

31.4

14

20

.0

5 7.

1

18-2

0 48

1 41

5 86

.3

66

13.7

24

1 50

.1

149

31.0

60

12

.5

31

6.4

21

-30

3230

26

89

83.3

54

1 16

.7

1893

58

.6

761

23.6

42

5 13

.2

151

4.7

31

-40

2374

19

2 81

.0

450

19.0

14

54

61.2

41

5 17

.5

392

16.5

11

3 4.

8

41-5

0 11

50

941

81.8

20

9 18

.2

769

66.9

16

3 14

.2

158

13.7

60

5.

2

51-6

0 39

7 35

2 88

.7

45

11.3

27

8 70

.0

43

10.8

54

13

.6

22

5.5

61

-70

152

132

86.8

20

13

.2

97

63.8

20

13

.2

34

22.4

1

0.7

71

& A

BOV

E 50

42

84

.0

8 16

.0

39

78.0

5

10.0

6

12.0

0

0.0

TO

TAL

7904

65

56

82.9

13

48

17.1

48

00

60.7

15

78

20.0

11

43

14.5

38

3 4.

8

18

-20

22

19

86.4

3

13.6

2

9.1

19

86.4

0

0.0

1 4.

5

21-3

0 10

8 99

91

.7

9 8.

3 17

15

.7

87

80.6

1

0.9

3 2.

8

31-4

0 73

63

86

.3

10

13.7

24

32

.9

48

65.8

0

0.0

1 1.

4

41-5

0 34

27

79

.4

7 20

.6

17

50.0

15

44

.1

1 2.

9 1

2.9

51

-60

11

11

100.

0 0

0.0

1 9.

1 9

81.8

0

0.0

1 9.

1

61-7

0 5

5 10

0.0

0 0.

0 3

60.0

2

40.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 25

4 22

5 88

.6

29

11.4

64

25

.2

181

71.3

2

0.8

7 2.

8 SA

N

UN

DER

18

71

61

85.9

10

14

.1

31

43.7

36

50

.7

3 4.

2 1

1.4

BERN

ARD

INO

18

-20

606

564

93.1

42

6.

9 20

8 34

.3

351

57.9

25

4.

1 22

3.

6

21-3

0 42

18

3867

91

.7

351

8.3

1300

30

.8

2467

58

.5

260

6.2

191

4.5

31

-40

3335

29

56

88.6

37

9 11

.4

1434

43

.0

1441

43

.2

290

8.7

170

5.1

41

-50

1616

14

28

88.4

18

8 11

.6

859

53.2

51

8 32

.1

128

7.9

111

6.9

51

-60

591

518

87.6

73

12

.4

341

57.7

15

7 26

.6

55

9.3

38

6.4

61

-70

217

198

91.2

19

8.

8 14

4 66

.4

37

17.1

24

11

.1

12

5.5

71

& A

BOV

E 45

41

91

.1

4 8.

9 28

62

.2

11

24.4

5

11.1

1

2.2

TO

TAL

1069

9 96

33

90.0

10

66

10.0

43

45

40.6

50

18

46.9

79

0 7.

4 54

6 5.

1

Page 80: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

70

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

-

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

)

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

SAN

DIE

GO

U

ND

ER 1

8 12

7 10

4 81

.9

23

18.1

78

61

.4

39

30.7

3

2.4

7 5.

5

18-2

0 10

18

905

88.9

11

3 11

.1

488

47.9

44

8 44

.0

47

4.6

35

3.4

21

-30

7059

62

55

88.6

80

4 11

.4

3352

47

.5

2929

41

.5

503

7.1

275

3.9

31

-40

4581

39

21

85.6

66

0 14

.4

2442

53

.3

1654

36

.1

309

6.7

176

3.8

41

-50

2073

17

81

85.9

29

2 14

.1

1226

59

.1

613

29.6

13

3 6.

4 10

1 4.

9

51-6

0 66

5 56

8 85

.4

97

14.6

42

5 63

.9

171

25.7

34

5.

1 35

5.

3

61-7

0 22

9 20

0 87

.3

29

12.7

16

0 69

.9

47

20.5

14

6.

1 8

3.5

71

& A

BOV

E 63

62

98

.4

1 1.

6 56

88

.9

3 4.

8 4

6.3

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 15

815

1379

6 87

.2

2019

12

.8

8227

52

.0

5904

37

.3

1047

6.

6 63

7 4.

0

SAN

LU

IS

UN

DER

18

27

24

88.9

3

11.1

19

70

.4

8 29

.6

0 0.

0 0

0.0

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

UN

DER

18

46

41

89.1

5

10.9

18

39

.1

23

50.0

3

6.5

2 4.

3

SAN

U

ND

ER 1

8 11

10

90

.9

1 9.

1 4

36.4

2

18.2

2

18.2

3

27.3

FR

AN

CIS

CO

18

-20

68

57

83.8

11

16

.2

28

41.2

16

23

.5

12

17.6

12

17

.6

21

-30

719

636

88.5

83

11

.5

354

49.2

14

2 19

.7

105

14.6

11

8 16

.4

31

-40

505

457

90.5

48

9.

5 25

3 50

.1

86

17.0

91

18

.0

75

14.9

41-5

0 24

4 21

4 87

.7

30

12.3

15

4 63

.1

26

10.7

37

15

.2

27

11.1

51-6

0 93

81

87

.1

12

12.9

59

63

.4

7 7.

5 17

18

.3

10

10.8

61-7

0 41

38

92

.7

3 7.

3 30

73

.2

1 2.

4 7

17.1

3

7.3

71

& A

BOV

E 9

9 10

0.0

0 0.

0 4

44.4

1

11.1

4

44.4

0

0.0

TO

TAL

1690

15

02

88.9

18

8 11

.1

886

52.4

28

1 16

.6

275

16.3

24

8 14

.7

18

-20

312

286

91.7

26

8.

3 92

29

.5

190

60.9

16

5.

1 14

4.

5

21-3

0 15

03

1378

91

.7

125

8.3

507

33.7

86

7 57

.7

72

4.8

57

3.8

31

-40

1164

10

19

87.5

14

5 12

.5

546

46.9

48

4 41

.6

82

7.0

52

4.5

41

-50

590

523

88.6

67

11

.4

360

61.0

18

7 31

.7

28

4.7

15

2.5

51

-60

219

195

89.0

24

11

.0

137

62.6

61

27

.9

17

7.8

4 1.

8

61-7

0 83

79

95

.2

4 4.

8 37

44

.6

33

39.8

12

14

.5

1 1.

2

71 &

ABO

VE

19

18

94.7

1

5.3

16

84.2

2

10.5

0

0.0

1 5.

3

TOTA

L 39

36

3539

89

.9

397

10.1

17

13

43.5

18

47

46.9

23

0 5.

8 14

6 3.

7

OBI

SPO

18

-20

187

150

80.2

37

19

.8

129

69.0

52

27

.8

4 2.

1 2

1.1

21

-30

912

789

86.5

12

3 13

.5

598

65.6

28

1 30

.8

15

1.6

18

2.0

31

-40

666

547

82.1

11

9 17

.9

514

77.2

13

3 20

.0

11

1.7

8 1.

2

41-5

0 36

6 29

3 80

.1

73

19.9

30

0 82

.0

53

14.5

6

1.6

7 1.

9

51-6

0 12

4 11

1 89

.5

13

10.5

98

79

.0

20

16.1

1

0.8

5 4.

0

61-7

0 49

44

89

.8

5 10

.2

43

87.8

5

10.2

0

0.0

1 2.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

20

17

85.0

3

15.0

18

90

.0

2 10

.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

2351

19

75

84.0

37

6 16

.0

1719

73

.1

554

23.6

37

1.

6 41

1.

7

Page 81: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

71

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

SAN

MA

TEO

U

ND

ER 1

8 50

42

84

.0

8 16

.0

19

38.0

22

44

.0

4 8.

0 5

10.0

18-2

0 26

9 24

5 91

.1

24

8.9

88

32.7

13

8 51

.3

21

7.8

22

8.2

21

-30

1804

15

70

87.0

23

4 13

.0

687

38.1

84

2 46

.7

110

6.1

165

9.1

31

-40

1423

12

20

85.7

20

3 14

.3

699

49.1

43

9 30

.9

128

9.0

157

11.0

41-5

0 69

1 56

4 81

.6

127

18.4

40

2 58

.2

136

19.7

88

12

.7

65

9.4

51

-60

267

237

88.8

30

11

.2

163

61

.0

45

16.9

40

15

.0

19

7.1

61

-70

91

89

97.8

2

2.2

55

60.4

14

15

.4

16

17.6

6

6.6

71

& A

BOV

E 27

25

92

.6

2 7.

4 17

63

.0

1 3.

7 5

18.5

4

14.8

TOTA

L 46

22

3992

86

.4

630

13.6

21

30

46.1

16

37

35.4

41

2 8.

9 44

3 9.

6 SA

NTA

U

ND

ER 1

8 47

39

83

.0

8 17

.0

23

48.9

24

51

.1

0 0.

0 0

0.0

BARB

ARA

18

-20

339

284

83.8

55

16

.2

157

46.3

17

0 50

.1

7 2.

1 5

1.5

21

-30

1755

15

33

87.4

22

2 12

.6

692

39.4

99

8 56

.9

33

1.9

32

1.8

31

-40

1057

85

7 81

.1

200

18.9

54

4 51

.5

452

42.8

42

4.

0 19

1.

8

41-5

0 41

9 35

5 84

.7

64

15.3

25

0 59

.7

141

33.7

18

4.

3 10

2.

4

51-6

0 14

2 11

6 81

.7

26

18.3

10

3 72

.5

30

21.1

6

4.2

3 2.

1

61-7

0 60

52

86

.7

8 13

.3

45

75.0

11

18

.3

2 3.

3 2

3.3

71

& A

BOV

E 18

16

88

.9

2 11

.1

16

88.9

2

11.1

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 38

37

3252

84

.8

585

15.2

18

30

47.7

18

28

47.6

10

8 2.

8 71

1.

9 SA

NTA

CLA

RA

UN

DER

18

48

32

66.7

16

33

.3

19

39.6

25

52

.1

4 8.

3 0

0.0

18

-20

491

450

91.6

41

8.

4 11

5 23

.4

323

65.8

15

3.

1 38

7.

7

21-3

0 38

11

3412

89

.5

399

10.5

12

50

32.8

20

88

54.8

16

7 4.

4 30

6 8.

0

31-4

0 29

25

2519

86

.1

406

13.9

12

73

43.5

11

90

40.7

17

8 6.

1 28

4 9.

7

41-5

0 13

04

1116

85

.6

188

14.4

64

6 49

.5

462

35.4

76

5.

8 12

0 9.

2

51-6

0 45

4 38

5 84

.8

69

15.2

24

4 53

.7

135

29.7

33

7.

3 42

9.

3

61-7

0 10

9 91

83

.5

18

16.5

67

61

.5

30

27.5

6

5.5

6 5.

5

71 &

ABO

VE

22

21

95.5

1

4.5

14

63.6

5

22.7

3

13.6

0

0.0

TO

TAL

9164

80

26

87.6

11

38

12.4

36

28

39.6

42

58

46.5

48

2 5.

3 79

6 8.

7 SA

NTA

CR

UZ

UN

DER

18

34

27

79.4

7

20.6

18

52

.9

15

44.1

0

0.0

1 2.

9

18-2

0 21

6 18

7 86

.6

29

13.4

97

44

.9

113

52.3

0

0.0

6 2.

8

21-3

0 10

38

885

85.3

15

3 14

.7

458

44.1

54

0 52

.0

16

1.5

24

2.3

31

-40

808

667

82.5

14

1 17

.5

483

59.8

29

9 37

.0

11

1.4

15

1.9

41

-50

397

330

83.1

67

16

.9

284

71.5

10

1 25

.4

5 1.

3 7

1.8

51

-60

96

79

82.3

17

17

.7

73

76.0

21

21

.9

0 0.

0 2

2.1

61

-70

43

37

86.0

6

14.0

32

74

.4

8 18

.6

0 0.

0 3

7.0

71

& A

BOV

E 13

11

84

.6

2 15

.4

11

84.6

2

15.4

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 26

45

2223

84

.0

422

16.0

14

56

55.0

10

99

41.6

32

1.

2 58

2.

2

Page 82: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SISK

IYO

U

UN

DER

18

2 1

50.0

1

50.0

2

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

72

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

SHA

STA

U

ND

ER 1

8 5

4 80

.0

1 20

.0

4 80

.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 20

.0

18

-20

56

45

80.4

11

19

.6

49

87.5

6

10.7

1

1.8

0 0.

0

21-3

0 27

7 23

1 83

.4

46

16.6

24

7 89

.2

14

5.1

3 1.

1 13

4.

7

31-4

0 35

5 29

2 82

.3

63

17.7

32

3 91

.0

14

3.9

4 1.

1 14

3.

9

41-5

0 22

4 18

9 84

.4

35

15.6

19

5 87

.1

14

6.3

4 1.

8 11

4.

9

51-6

0 73

60

82

.2

13

17.8

68

93

.2

1 1.

4 1

1.4

3 4.

1

61-7

0 35

33

94

.3

2 5.

7 32

91

.4

0 0.

0 0

0.0

3 8.

6

71 &

ABO

VE

11

11

100.

0 0

0.0

10

90.9

0

0.0

0 0.

0 1

9.1

TO

TAL

1036

86

5 83

.5

171

16.5

92

8 89

.6

49

4.7

13

1.3

46

4.4

SIER

RA

UN

DER

18

2 2

100.

0 0

0.0

2 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 7

6 85

.7

1 14

.3

7 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

31-4

0 13

11

84

.6

2 15

.4

13

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

41

-50

10

9 90

.0

1 10

.0

9 90

.0

0 0.

0 1

10.0

0

0.0

51

-60

4 4

100.

0 0

0.0

3 75

.0

0 0.

0 1

25.0

0

0.0

61

-70

2 1

50.0

1

50.0

2

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

38

33

86.8

5

13.2

36

94

.7

0 0.

0 2

5.3

0 0.

0

18

-20

14

12

85.7

2

14.3

11

78

.6

0 0.

0 0

0.0

3 21

.4

21

-30

108

90

83.3

18

16

.7

87

80.6

11

10

.2

1 0.

9 9

8.3

31

-40

119

96

80.7

23

19

.3

96

80.7

14

11

.8

3 2.

5 6

5.0

41

-50

72

65

90.3

7

9.7

62

86.1

5

6.9

1 1.

4 4

5.6

51

-60

24

22

91.7

2

8.3

22

91.7

0

0.0

0 0.

0 2

8.3

61

-70

9 7

77.8

2

22.2

8

88.9

0

0.0

0 0.

0 1

11.1

71 &

ABO

VE

8 7

87.5

1

12.5

8

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

356

300

84.3

56

15

.7

296

83.1

30

8.

4 5

1.4

25

7.0

SOLA

NO

U

ND

ER 1

8 26

18

69

.2

8 30

.8

19

73.1

2

7.7

1 3.

8 4

15.4

18-2

0 12

2 11

6 95

.1

6 4.

9 55

45

.1

42

34.4

17

13

.9

8 6.

6

21-3

0 65

4 59

5 91

.0

59

9.0

286

43.7

22

0 33

.6

116

17.7

32

4.

9

31-4

0 53

1 43

8 82

.5

93

17.5

28

7 54

.0

105

19.8

12

0 22

.6

19

3.6

41

-50

300

253

84.3

47

15

.7

187

62.3

40

13

.3

59

19.7

14

4.

7

51-6

0 12

5 11

5 92

.0

10

8.0

77

61.6

19

15

.2

24

19.2

5

4.0

61

-70

40

34

85.0

6

15.0

22

55

.0

5 12

.5

13

32.5

0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 11

8

72.7

3

27.3

10

90

.9

0 0.

0 1

9.1

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 18

09

1577

87

.2

232

12.8

94

3 52

.1

433

23.9

35

1 19

.4

82

4.5

Page 83: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

73

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

SON

OM

A

UN

DER

18

37

28

75.7

9

24.3

33

89

.2

3 8.

1 1

2.7

0 0.

0

18-2

0 21

5 19

9 92

.6

16

7.4

107

49.8

10

1 47

.0

3 1.

4 4

1.9

21

-30

1218

10

67

87.6

15

1 12

.4

660

54.2

51

8 42

.5

11

0.9

29

2.4

31

-40

971

783

80.6

18

8 19

.4

689

71.0

22

9 23

.6

10

1.0

43

4.4

41

-50

500

398

79.6

10

2 20

.4

399

79.8

70

14

.0

6 1.

2 25

5.

0

51-6

0 19

3 15

5 80

.3

38

19.7

16

3 84

.5

23

11.9

2

1.0

5 2.

6

61-7

0 79

63

79

.7

16

20.3

69

87

.3

6 7.

6 0

0.0

4 5.

1

71 &

ABO

VE

32

29

90.6

3

9.4

29

90.6

1

3.1

1 3.

1 1

3.1

TO

TAL

3245

27

22

83.9

52

3 16

.1

2149

66

.2

951

29.3

34

1.

0 11

1 3.

4 ST

AN

ISLA

US

UN

DER

18

34

34

100.

0 0

0.0

19

55.9

15

44

.1

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

192

176

91.7

16

8.

3 76

39

.6

112

58.3

3

1.6

1 0.

5

21-3

0 11

16

1024

91

.8

92

8.2

445

39.9

62

0 55

.6

22

2.0

29

2.6

31

-40

869

757

87.1

11

2 12

.9

441

50.7

38

0 43

.7

23

2.6

25

2.9

41

-50

399

349

87.5

50

12

.5

227

56.9

15

0 37

.6

9 2.

3 13

3.

3

51-6

0 14

2 13

1 92

.3

11

7.7

94

66.2

40

28

.2

2 1.

4 6

4.2

61

-70

60

54

90.0

6

10.0

44

73

.3

13

21.7

1

1.7

2 3.

3

71 &

ABO

VE

10

10

100.

0 0

0.0

7 70

.0

2 20

.0

0 0.

0 1

10.0

TOTA

L 28

22

2535

89

.8

287

10.2

13

53

47.9

13

32

47.2

60

2.

1 77

2.

7 SU

TTER

U

ND

ER 1

8 7

6 85

.7

1 14

.3

3 42

.9

2 28

.6

2 28

.6

0 0.

0

18-2

0 60

58

96

.7

2 3.

3 30

50

.0

21

35.0

2

3.3

7 11

.7

21

-30

330

294

89.1

36

10

.9

168

50.9

13

3 40

.3

10

3.0

19

5.8

31

-40

298

253

84.9

45

15

.1

200

67.1

74

24

.8

4 1.

3 20

6.

7

41-5

0 12

9 11

7 90

.7

12

9.3

95

73.6

22

17

.1

3 2.

3 9

7.0

51

-60

53

52

98.1

1

1.9

33

62.3

12

22

.6

0 0.

0 8

15.1

61-7

0 16

15

93

.8

1 6.

3 11

68

.8

4 25

.0

1 6.

3 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 5

5 10

0.0

0 0.

0 5

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

898

800

89.1

98

10

.9

545

60.7

26

8 29

.8

22

2.4

63

7.0

TEH

AM

A

UN

DER

18

3 3

100.

0 0

0.0

2 66

.7

1 33

.3

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

24

22

91.7

2

8.3

16

66.7

8

33.3

0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 15

4 13

2 85

.7

22

14.3

98

63

.6

51

33.1

1

0.6

4 2.

6

31-4

0 16

0 12

5 78

.1

35

21.9

12

7 79

.4

29

18.1

0

0.0

4 2.

5

41-5

0 92

78

84

.8

14

15.2

77

83

.7

12

13.0

0

0.0

3 3.

3

51-6

0 27

21

77

.8

6 22

.2

26

96.3

1

3.7

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

-70

13

11

84.6

2

15.4

12

92

.3

1 7.

7 0

0.0

0 0.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

4 4

100.

0 0

0.0

4 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 47

7 39

6 83

.0

81

17.0

36

2 75

.9

103

21.6

1

0.2

11

2.3

Page 84: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

74

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) C

OU

NTY

A

GE

TOTA

L M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

TRIN

ITY

UN

DER

18

2 2

100.

0 0

0.0

2 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 7

7 10

0.0

0 0.

0 7

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

21

-30

58

46

79.3

12

20

.7

54

93.1

0

0.0

0 0.

0 4

6.9

31

-40

93

78

83.9

15

16

.1

84

90.3

6

6.5

0 0.

0 3

3.2

41

-50

63

55

87.3

8

12.7

62

98

.4

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 1.

6

51-6

0 24

23

95

.8

1 4.

2 24

10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

61-7

0 7

4 57

.1

3 42

.9

7 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

1 1

100.

0 0

0.0

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 25

5 21

6 84

.7

39

15.3

24

1 94

.5

6 2.

4 0

0.0

8 3.

1 TU

LARE

U

ND

ER 1

8 53

52

98

.1

1 1.

9 14

26

.4

37

69.8

0

0.0

2 3.

8

18-2

0 34

8 33

3 95

.7

15

4.3

54

15.5

28

3 81

.3

3 0.

9 8

2.3

21

-30

1719

16

38

95.3

81

4.

7 22

7 13

.2

1447

84

.2

17

1.0

28

1.6

31

-40

1077

98

5 91

.5

92

8.5

201

18.7

82

6 76

.7

15

1.4

35

3.2

41

-50

421

386

91.7

35

8.

3 10

7 25

.4

287

68.2

8

1.9

19

4.5

51

-60

146

135

92.5

11

7.

5 62

42

.5

77

52.7

1

0.7

6 4.

1

61-7

0 40

38

95

.0

2 5.

0 20

50

.0

17

42.5

2

5.0

1 2.

5

71 &

ABO

VE

16

15

93.8

1

6.3

8 50

.0

6 37

.5

0 0.

0 2

12.5

TOTA

L 38

20

3582

93

.8

238

6.2

693

18.1

29

80

78.0

46

1.

2 10

1 2.

6 TU

OLU

MN

E U

ND

ER 1

8 2

1 50

.0

1 50

.0

2 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 16

15

93

.8

1 6.

3 15

93

.8

1 6.

3 0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 97

81

83

.5

16

16.5

94

96

.9

1 1.

0 0

0.0

2 2.

1

31-4

0 87

64

73

.6

23

26.4

86

98

.9

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 1.

1

41-5

0 74

58

78

.4

16

21.6

72

97

.3

2 2.

7 0

0.0

0 0.

0

51-6

0 33

28

84

.8

5 15

.2

33

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

-70

7 5

71.4

2

28.6

7

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 4

4 10

0.0

0 0.

0 4

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

320

256

80.0

64

20

.0

313

97.8

4

1.2

0 0.

0 3

0.9

VEN

TURA

U

ND

ER 1

8 47

43

91

.5

4 8.

5 27

57

.4

20

42.6

0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 38

5 34

7 90

.1

38

9.9

121

31.4

25

5 66

.2

4 1.

0 5

1.3

21

-30

2183

19

26

88.2

25

7 11

.8

786

36.0

12

98

59.5

61

2.

8 38

1.

7

31-4

0 14

20

1209

85

.1

211

14.9

71

3 50

.2

632

44.5

46

3.

2 29

2.

0

41-5

0 61

4 51

4 83

.7

100

16.3

36

7 59

.8

211

34.4

16

2.

6 20

3.

3

51-6

0 23

7 19

9 84

.0

38

16.0

14

5 61

.2

78

32.9

7

3.0

7 3.

0

61-7

0 74

66

89

.2

8 10

.8

47

63.5

25

33

.8

2 2.

7 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 11

10

90

.9

1 9.

1 7

63.6

4

36.4

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 49

71

4314

86

.8

657

13.2

22

13

44.5

25

23

50.8

13

6 2.

7 99

2.

0

Page 85: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

75

TABL

E B1

: 19

94 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

-

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

TO

TAL

1202

10

50

87.4

15

2 12

.6

592

49.3

52

9 44

.0

40

3.3

41

3.

4

TO

TAL

542

453

83.6

89

16

.4

348

64.2

15

7 29

.0

25

4.6

12

2.2

YOLO

U

ND

ER 1

8 14

10

71

.4

4 28

.6

9 64

.3

3 21

.4

2 14

.3

0 0.

0

71

& A

BOV

E 8

7 87

.5

1 12

.5

7 87

.5

1 12

.5

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

- 70

29

24

82.8

5

17.2

18

62

.1

9 31

.0

1 3.

4 1

3.4

51

- 60

74

66

89.2

8

10.8

47

63

.5

21

28.4

3

4.1

3 4.

1

18

-20

101

91

90.1

10

9.

9 49

48

.5

46

45.5

4

4.0

2 2.

0

41

- 50

181

156

86.2

25

13

.8

112

61.9

59

32

.6

7 3.

9 3

1.7

31

- 40

345

293

84.9

52

15

.1

183

53.0

14

1 40

.9

5 1.

4 16

4.

6

21

-30

450

403

89.6

47

10

.4

167

37.1

24

9 55

.3

18

4.0

16

3.6

YUBA

U

ND

ER 1

8 4

4 10

0.0

0 0.

0 2

50.0

2

50.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

61

-70

11

11

100.

0 0

0.0

6 54

.5

5 45

.5

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 3

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0 2

66.7

0

0.0

1 33

.3

0 0.

0

51

-60

34

29

85.3

5

14.7

28

82

.4

5 14

.7

0 0.

0 1

2.9

18

-20

51

43

84.3

8

15.7

26

51

.0

25

49.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

41

- 50

76

58

76.3

18

23

.7

60

78.9

11

14

.5

4 5.

3 1

1.3

21

-30

193

165

85.5

28

14

.5

108

56.0

69

35

.8

10

5.2

6 3.

1

31

- 40

170

140

82.4

30

17

.6

116

68.2

40

23

.5

10

5.9

4 2.

4

con

tinue

d

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

)

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Page 86: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

STATEWIDE 162254 100.0 142352 100.0 19902 100.0

ALAMEDA UNDER 18 28 0.5 24 0.5 4 0.5 18-20 169 3.2 161 3.5 8 1.1 21-30 2002 37.7 1741 38.1 261 35.8 31-40 1780 33.6 1514 33.1 266 36.4 41-50 835 15.7 697 15.2 138 18.9 51-60 337 6.4 295 6.4 42 5.8 61-70 129 2.4 120 2.6 9 1.2 71 & ABOVE 25 0.5 23 0.5 2 0.3 TOTAL 5305 100.0 4575 100.0 730 100.0 ALPINE 21-30 0 23.8 10 28.6 0 0.0 31-40 17 40.5 13 37.1 4 57.1 41-50 11 26.2 9 25.7 2 28.6 51-60 2 4.8 1 2.9 1 14.3 61-70 1 2.4 1 2.9 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 2.4 1 2.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 42 100.0 35 100.0 7 100.0 AMADOR 18-20 9 4.1 8 4.4 1 2.6 21-30 49 22.3 42 23.1 7 18.4 31-40 90 40.9 67 36.8 23 60.5 41-50 47 21.4 41 22.5 6 15.8 51-60 15 6.8 14 7.7 1 2.6 61-70 9 4.1 9 4.9 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.5 1 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 220 100.0 182 100.0 38 100.0 BUTTE UNDER 18 5 0.5 5 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 70 6.3 62 6.7 8 4.3 21-30 397 35.7 343 37.1 54 28.9 31-40 319 28.7 247 26.7 72 38.5 41-50 200 18.0 159 17.2 41 21.9 51-60 82 7.4 73 7.9 9 4.8 61-70 30 2.7 27 2.9 3 1.6 71 & ABOVE 8 0.7 8 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 1111 100.0 924 100.0 187 100.0 CALAVERAS 18-20 5 2.4 5 2.8 0 0.0 21-30 47 22.4 40 22.7 7 20.6 31-40 89 42.4 75 42.6 14 41.2 41-50 50 23.8 39 22.2 11 32.4 51-60 10 4.8 10 5.7 0 0.0 61-70 7 3.3 5 2.8 2 5.9 71 & ABOVE 2 1.0 2 1.1 0 0.0 TOTAL 210 100.0 176 100.0 34 100.0 COLUSA UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 20 8.2 18 8.1 2 8.3 21-30 87 35.5 81 36.7 6 25.0 31-40 78 31.8 69 31.2 9 37.5 41-50 38 15.5 33 14.9 5 20.8 51-60 15 6.1 14 6.3 1 4.2 61-70 5 2.0 4 1.8 1 4.2 71 & ABOVE 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 245 100.0 221 100.0 24 100.0

76

Page 87: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

CONTRA COSTA UNDER 18 16 0.5 15 0.5 1 0.2 18-20 149 4.6 128 4.6 21 4.2 21-30 1155 35.4 987 35.7 168 33.7 31-40 1071 32.8 890 32.2 181 36.3 41-50 544 16.7 458 16.6 86 17.3 51-60 219 6.7 187 6.8 32 6.4 61-70 96 2.9 88 3.2 8 1.6 71 & ABOVE 12 0.4 11 0.4 1 0.2 TOTAL 3262 100.0 2764 100.0 498 100.0 DEL NORTE UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 4 1.8 4 2.2 0 0.0 21-30 61 26.9 47 25.3 14 34.1 31-40 90 39.6 75 40.3 15 36.6 41-50 43 18.9 36 19.4 7 17.1 51-60 24 10.6 19 10.2 5 12.2 61-70 4 1.8 4 2.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 227 100.0 186 100.0 41 100.0 EL DORADO UNDER 18 4 0.4 4 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 37 4.0 32 4.2 5 3.0 21-30 264 28.7 229 30.4 35 21.0 31-40 371 40.3 288 38.2 83 49.7 41-50 173 18.8 136 18.0 37 22.2 51-60 51 5.5 44 5.8 7 4.2 61-70 16 1.7 16 2.1 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 5 0.5 5 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 921 100.0 754 100.0 167 100.0 FRESNO UNDER 18 19 0.4 15 0.4 4 0.8 18-20 283 6.1 258 6.3 25 4.7 21-30 2002 43.0 1800 43.6 202 38.3 31-40 1482 31.9 1300 31.5 182 34.5 41-50 587 12.6 502 12.2 85 16.1 51-60 200 4.3 177 4.3 23 4.4 61-70 60 1.3 55 1.3 5 0.9 71 & ABOVE 18 0.4 17 0.4 1 0.2 TOTAL 4651 100.0 4124 100.0 527 100.0 GLENN UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 8 3.5 8 3.9 0 0.0 21-30 99 43.0 93 45.1 6 25.0 31-40 64 27.8 53 25.7 11 45.8 41-50 34 14.8 31 15.0 3 12.5 51-60 16 7.0 13 6.3 3 12.5 61-70 6 2.6 5 2.4 1 4.2 71 & ABOVE 2 0.9 2 1.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 230 100.0 206 100.0 24 100.0 HUMBOLDT UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 39 5.9 35 6.8 4 2.9 21-30 234 35.7 192 37.1 42 30.4 31-40 204 31.1 148 28.6 56 40.6 41-50 112 17.1 85 16.4 27 19.6 51-60 43 6.6 38 7.3 5 3.6 61-70 18 2.7 14 2.7 4 2.9 71 & ABOVE 5 0.8 5 1.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 656 100.0 518 100.0 138 100.0

77

Page 88: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

IMPERIAL UNDER 18 2 0.2 2 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 50 4.5 48 4.6 2 3.3 21-30 357 32.1 343 32.6 14 23.3 31-40 360 32.4 333 31.7 27 45.0 41-50 226 20.3 214 20.3 12 20.0 51-60 70 6.3 68 6.5 2 3.3 61-70 38 3.4 35 3.3 3 5.0 71 & ABOVE 9 0.8 9 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 1112 100.0 1052 100.0 60 100.0 INYO UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.4 0 0.0 18-20 19 6.8 17 7.4 2 3.9 21-30 91 32.4 78 33.9 13 25.5 31-40 90 32.0 69 30.0 21 41.2 41-50 41 14.6 30 13.0 11 21.6 51-60 26 9.3 22 9.6 4 7.8 61-70 12 4.3 12 5.2 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.4 1 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 281 100.0 230 100.0 51 100.0 KERN UNDER 18 24 0.5 22 0.5 2 0.3 18-20 272 5.3 254 5.6 18 2.7 21-30 2118 40.9 1847 40.9 271 41.3 31-40 1679 32.5 1437 31.8 242 36.9 41-50 720 13.9 641 14.2 79 12.0 51-60 246 4.8 215 4.8 31 4.7 61-70 95 1.8 87 1.9 8 1.2 71 & ABOVE 20 0.4 15 0.3 5 0.8 TOTAL 5174 100.0 4518 100.0 656 100.0 KINGS UNDER 18 7 0.7 7 0.8 0 0.0 18-20 59 5.9 52 5.7 7 7.1 21-30 404 40.2 367 40.6 37 7.4 31-40 333 33.2 298 32.9 35 35.4 41-50 137 13.6 125 13.8 12 12.1 51-60 50 5.0 43 4.8 7 7.1 61-70 9 0.9 8 0.9 1 1.0 71 & ABOVE 5 0.5 5 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 1004 100.0 905 100.0 99 100.0 LAKE UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 13 2.6 13 3.2 0 0.0 21-30 109 21.9 87 21.6 22 23.2 31-40 183 36.7 141 35.0 42 44.2 41-50 114 22.9 92 22.8 22 23.2 51-60 39 7.8 33 8.2 6 6.3 61-70 29 5.8 27 6.7 2 2.1 71 & ABOVE 10 2.0 9 2.2 1 1.1 TOTAL 498 100.0 403 100.0 95 100.0 LASSEN UNDER 18 2 1.0 2 1.2 0 0.0 18-20 12 5.9 12 7.1 0 0.0 21-30 60 29.3 46 27.1 14 40.0 31-40 65 31.7 55 32.4 10 28.6 41-50 38 18.5 28 16.5 10 28.6 51-60 14 6.8 14 8.2 0 0.0 61-70 12 5.9 11 6.5 1 2.9 71 & ABOVE 2 1.0 2 1.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 205 100.0 170 100.0 35 100.0

78

Page 89: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

LOS ANGELES UNDER 18 28 0.1 26 0.1 2 0.1 18-20 1685 4.1 1591 4.3 94 2.5 21-30 18380 44.8 16897 45.4 1483 39.1 31-40 12874 31.4 11574 31.1 1300 34.3 41-50 5451 13.3 4813 12.9 638 16.8 51-60 1880 4.6 1677 4.5 203 5.4 61-70 615 1.5 554 1.5 61 1.6 71 & ABOVE 123 0.3 110 0.3 13 0.3 TOTAL 41036 100.0 37242 100.0 3794 100.0 MADERA UNDER 18 8 0.9 8 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 55 6.1 52 6.3 3 3.6 21-30 367 40.7 344 42.0 23 27.7 31-40 275 30.5 240 29.3 35 42.2 41-50 134 14.9 118 14.4 16 19.3 51-60 46 5.1 40 4.9 6 7.2 61-70 15 1.7 15 1.8 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 2 0.2 2 0.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 902 100.0 819 100.0 83 00.0 MARIN UNDER 18 2 0.1 2 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 47 3.3 40 3.5 7 2.6 21-30 499 35.1 416 36.1 83 31.0 31-40 472 33.2 377 32.7 95 35.4 41-50 278 19.6 214 18.6 64 23.9 51-60 87 6.1 77 6.7 10 3.7 61-70 32 2.3 24 2.1 8 3.0 71 & ABOVE 3 0.2 2 0.2 1 0.4 TOTAL 1420 100.0 1152 100.0 268 100.0 MARIPOSA 18-20 7 4.8 7 5.5 0 0.0 21-30 42 28.8 36 28.3 6 31.6 31-40 64 43.8 57 44.9 7 36.8 41-50 24 16.4 18 14.2 6 31.6 51-60 6 4.1 6 4.7 0 0.0 61-70 3 2.1 3 2.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 146 100.0 127 100.0 19 100.0 MENDOCINO UNDER 18 7 0.9 7 1.1 0 0.0 18-20 46 6.2 43 6.9 3 2.4 21-30 258 34.6 228 36.8 30 24.0 31-40 234 31.4 172 27.7 62 49.6 41-50 123 16.5 102 16.5 21 16.8 51-60 51 6.8 44 7.1 7 5.6 61-70 17 2.3 15 2.4 2 1.6 71 & ABOVE 9 1.2 9 1.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 745 100.0 620 100.0 125 100.0 MERCED UNDER 18 11 0.8 9 0.7 2 1.8 18-20 100 7.4 94 7.6 6 5.4 21-30 598 44.5 559 45.4 39 34.8 31-40 390 29.0 348 28.2 42 37.5 41-50 157 11.7 138 11.2 19 17.0 51-60 56 4.2 53 4.3 3 2.7 61-70 25 1.9 24 1.9 1 0.9 71 & ABOVE 7 0.5 7 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 1344 100.0 1232 100.0 112 100.0

79

Page 90: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

MODOC 18-20 4 5.7 3 5.4 1 7.1 21-30 25 35.7 20 35.7 5 35.7 31-40 17 24.3 13 23.2 4 28.6 41-50 16 22.9 15 26.8 1 7.1 51-60 5 7.1 2 3.6 3 21.4 61-70 1 1.4 1 1.8 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 2 2.9 2 3.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 70 100.0 56 100.0 14 100.0 MONO 18-20 2 1.6 1 0.9 1 6.3 21-30 33 26.8 29 27.1 4 25.0 31-40 57 46.3 50 46.7 7 43.8 41-50 19 15.4 18 16.8 1 6.3 51-60 8 6.5 7 6.5 1 6.3 61-70 3 2.4 1 0.9 2 12.5 71 & ABOVE 1 0.8 1 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 123 100.0 107 100.0 16 100.0 MONTEREY UNDER 18 25 0.7 22 0.7 3 0.8 18-20 224 6.0 212 6.3 12 3.3 21-30 1759 47.4 1639 49.0 120 32.9 31-40 1071 28.9 926 27.7 145 39.7 41-50 430 11.6 366 10.9 64 17.5 51-60 136 3.7 119 3.6 17 4.7 61-70 52 1.4 48 1.4 4 1.1 71 & ABOVE 11 0.3 11 0.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 3708 100.0 3343 100.0 365 100.0 NAPA UNDER 18 5 0.5 5 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 50 5.1 48 5.6 2 1.6 21-30 397 40.7 360 42.3 37 29.6 31-40 281 28.8 234 27.5 47 37.6 41-50 160 16.4 135 15.9 25 20.0 51-60 53 5.4 43 5.1 10 8.0 61-70 21 2.2 18 2.1 3 2.4 71 & ABOVE 9 0.9 8 0.9 1 0.8 TOTAL 976 100.0 851 100.0 125 100.0 NEVADA UNDER 18 2 0.5 2 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 19 4.5 18 5.1 1 1.4 21-30 101 23.9 89 25.4 12 16.7 31-40 168 39.8 135 38.6 33 45.8 41-50 91 21.6 71 20.3 20 27.8 51-60 20 4.7 18 5.1 2 2.8 61-70 16 3.8 14 4.0 2 2.8 71 & ABOVE 5 1.2 3 0.9 2 2.8 TOTAL 422 100.0 350 100.0 72 100.0 ORANGE UNDER 18 26 0.2 23 0.2 3 0.2 18-20 488 4.1 441 4.2 47 2.9 21-30 5437 45.2 4760 45.9 677 41.2 31-40 3700 30.8 3151 30.4 549 33.4 41-50 1585 13.2 1321 12.7 264 16.0 51-60 563 4.7 496 4.8 67 4.1 61-70 183 1.5 153 1.5 30 1.8 71 & ABOVE 42 0.3 34 0.3 8 0.5 TOTAL 12024 100.0 10379 100.0 1645 100.0

80

Page 91: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

PLACER UNDER 18 5 0.3 4 0.3 1 0.4 18-20 94 6.3 83 6.8 11 4.0 21-30 523 34.9 439 35.9 84 30.5 31-40 523 34.9 414 33.9 109 39.6 41-50 244 16.3 192 15.7 52 18.9 51-60 74 4.9 62 5.1 12 4.4 61-70 27 1.8 21 1.7 6 2.2 71 & ABOVE 8 0.5 8 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 1498 100.0 1223 100.0 275 100.0 PLUMAS UNDER 18 1 0.8 1 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 2 1.7 2 2.0 0 0.0 21-30 25 20.8 19 18.6 6 33.3 31-40 48 40.0 41 40.2 7 38.9 41-50 24 20.0 20 19.6 4 22.2 51-60 13 10.8 13 12.7 0 0.0 61-70 3 2.5 2 2.0 1 5.6 71 & ABOVE 4 3.3 4 3.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 120 100.0 102 100.0 18 100.0 RIVERSIDE UNDER 18 27 0.5 23 0.4 4 0.5 18-20 271 4.6 252 4.9 19 2.5 21-30 2248 38.1 2017 39.2 231 30.4 31-40 1887 32.0 1608 31.3 279 36.7 41-50 867 14.7 717 13.9 150 19.7 51-60 372 6.3 328 6.4 44 5.8 61-70 179 3.0 158 3.1 21 2.8 71 & ABOVE 50 0.8 37 0.7 13 1.7 TOTAL 5901 100.0 5140 100.0 761 100.0 SACRAMENTO UNDER 18 32 0.5 28 0.6 4 0.4 18-20 236 4.0 210 4.3 26 2.8 21-30 2310 39.4 1929 39.2 381 40.6 31-40 1888 32.2 1566 31.8 322 34.3 41-50 907 15.5 756 15.4 151 16.1 51-60 322 5.5 278 5.7 44 4.7 61-70 138 2.4 128 2.6 10 1.1 71 & ABOVE 24 0.4 23 0.5 1 0.1 TOTAL 5857 100.0 4918 100.0 939 100.0 SAN BENITO UNDER 18 4 1.6 4 1.8 0 0.0 18-20 25 9.7 24 10.5 1 3.3 21-30 99 38.4 90 39.5 9 30.0 31-40 85 32.9 73 32.0 12 40.0 41-50 28 10.9 23 10.1 5 16.7 51-60 15 5.8 12 5.3 3 10.0 61-70 1 0.4 1 0.4 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.4 1 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 258 100.0 228 100.0 30 100.0 SAN BERNARDINO UNDER 18 24 0.4 21 0.4 3 0.4 18-20 252 4.0 234 4.2 18 2.6 21-30 2349 37.7 2115 38.2 234 33.7 31-40 2088 33.5 1831 33.1 257 37.0 41-50 978 15.7 841 15.2 137 19.7 51-60 384 6.2 350 6.3 34 4.9 61-70 124 2.0 115 2.1 9 1.3 71 & ABOVE 34 0.5 31 0.6 3 0.4 TOTAL 6233 100.0 5538 100.0 695 100.0

81

Page 92: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

SAN DIEGO UNDER 18 33 0.2 29 0.2 4 0.3 18-20 601 4.5 536 4.6 65 4.1 21-30 5976 45.0 5354 45.8 622 39.5 31-40 4070 30.7 3530 30.2 540 34.3 41-50 1711 12.9 1484 12.7 227 14.4 51-60 625 4.7 543 4.6 82 5.2 61-70 201 1.5 172 1.5 29 1.8 71 & ABOVE 56 0.4 50 0.4 6 0.4 TOTAL 13273 100.0 11698 100.0 1575 100.0 SAN FRANCISCO UNDER 18 1 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.0 18-20 37 3.3 32 3.2 5 3.6 21-30 479 42.6 420 42.6 59 42.1 31-40 343 30.5 304 30.9 39 27.9 41-50 170 15.1 144 14.6 26 18.6 51-60 73 6.5 62 6.3 11 7.9 61-70 18 1.6 18 1.8 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 4 0.4 4 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 1125 100.0 985 100.0 140 100.0 SAN JOAQUIN UNDER 18 8 0.3 7 0.3 1 0.3 18-20 157 5.0 151 5.5 6 1.5 21-30 1111 35.2 1003 36.3 108 27.5 31-40 1022 32.4 858 31.0 164 41.7 41-50 556 17.6 480 17.4 76 19.3 51-60 201 6.4 181 6.5 20 5.1 61-70 84 2.7 70 2.5 14 3.6 71 & ABOVE 20 0.6 16 0.6 4 1.0 TOTAL 3159 100.0 2766 100.0 393 100.0 SAN LUIS OBISPO UNDER 18 9 0.5 7 0.5 2 0.7 18-20 111 6.7 94 6.8 17 6.2 21-30 645 38.9 548 39.7 97 35.3 31-40 512 30.9 426 30.8 86 31.3 41-50 255 15.4 205 14.8 50 18.2 51-60 83 5.0 70 5.1 13 4.7 61-70 31 1.9 23 1.7 8 2.9 71 & ABOVE 11 0.7 9 0.7 2 0.7 TOTAL 1657 100.0 1382 100.0 275 100.0 SAN MATEO UNDER 18 15 0.4 14 0.4 1 0.2 18-20 151 3.8 129 3.8 22 4.1 21-30 1590 40.3 1417 41.6 173 32.4 31-40 1284 32.6 1098 32.2 186 34.8 41-50 572 14.5 464 13.6 108 20.2 51-60 223 5.7 193 5.7 30 5.6 61-70 85 2.2 75 2.2 10 1.9 71 & ABOVE 21 0.5 17 0.5 4 0.7 TOTAL 3941 100.0 3407 100.0 534 100.0 SANTA BARBARA UNDER 18 15 0.5 13 0.5 2 0.4 18-20 208 6.5 179 6.6 29 5.8 21-30 1443 45.1 1266 46.9 177 35.5 31-40 936 29.2 771 28.5 165 33.1 41-50 396 12.4 307 11.4 89 17.8 51-60 129 4.0 107 4.0 22 4.4 61-70 60 1.9 46 1.7 14 2.8 71 & ABOVE 13 0.4 12 0.4 1 0.2 TOTAL 3200 100.0 2701 100.0 499 100.0

82

Page 93: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

SANTA CLARA UNDER 18 36 0.4 32 0.4 4 0.4 18-20 358 4.1 330 4.4 28 2.5 21-30 3587 41.3 3198 42.3 389 34.8 31-40 3015 34.8 2572 34.0 443 39.6 41-50 1154 13.3 964 12.8 190 17.0 51-60 385 4.4 338 4.5 47 4.2 61-70 118 1.4 104 1.4 14 1.3 71 & ABOVE 23 0.3 19 0.3 4 0.4 TOTAL 8676 100.0 7557 100.0 1119 100.0 SANTA CRUZ UNDER 18 17 0.7 14 0.7 3 0.9 18-20 122 5.2 111 5.6 11 3.3 21-30 961 41.3 839 42.2 122 36.1 31-40 749 32.2 636 32.0 113 33.4 41-50 350 15.1 289 14.5 61 18.0 51-60 97 4.2 79 4.0 18 5.3 61-70 20 0.9 13 0.7 7 2.1 71 & ABOVE 9 0.4 6 0.3 3 0.9 TOTAL 2325 100.0 1987 100.0 338 100.0 SHASTA UNDER 18 4 0.5 4 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 29 3.8 26 4.0 3 2.4 21-30 225 29.3 194 30.1 31 24.8 31-40 263 34.2 210 32.6 53 42.4 41-50 166 21.6 144 22.4 22 17.6 51-60 56 7.3 44 6.8 12 9.6 61-70 23 3.0 19 3.0 4 3.2 71 & ABOVE 3 0.4 3 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 769 100.0 644 100.0 125 100.0 SIERRA 18-20 1 2.6 1 3.1 0 0.0 21-30 7 18.4 6 18.8 1 16.7 31-40 17 44.7 14 43.8 3 50.0 41-50 8 21.1 7 21.9 1 16.7 51-60 3 7.9 2 6.3 1 16.7 61-70 2 5.3 2 6.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 38 100.0 32 100.0 6 100.0 SISKIYOU UNDER 18 3 1.0 2 0.8 1 2.0 18-20 15 4.8 12 4.6 3 5.9 21-30 92 29.5 82 31.4 10 19.6 31-40 108 34.6 92 35.2 16 31.4 41-50 57 18.3 44 16.9 13 25.5 51-60 19 6.1 17 6.5 2 3.9 61-70 14 4.5 9 3.4 5 9.8 71 & ABOVE 4 1.3 3 1.1 1 2.0 TOTAL 312 100.0 261 100.0 51 100.0 SOLANO UNDER 18 5 0.3 5 0.4 0 0.0 18-20 90 6.1 79 6.2 11 5.5 21-30 518 35.3 461 36.4 57 28.5 31-40 483 32.9 405 32.0 78 39.0 41-50 234 16.0 200 15.8 34 17.0 51-60 94 6.4 79 6.2 15 7.5 61-70 38 2.6 33 2.6 5 2.5 71 & ABOVE 5 0.3 5 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 1467 100.0 1267 100.0 200 100.0

83

Page 94: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1993 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

SONOMA UNDER 18 17 0.6 16 0.7 1 0.2 18-20 138 4.8 124 5.1 14 3.1 21-30 1070 36.8 931 38.1 139 30.3 31-40 950 32.7 780 31.9 170 37.0 41-50 493 17.0 402 16.4 91 19.8 51-60 153 5.3 125 5.1 28 6.1 61-70 66 2.3 54 2.2 12 2.6 71 & ABOVE 17 0.6 13 0.5 4 0.9 TOTAL 2904 100.0 2445 100.0 459 100.0 STANISLAUS UNDER 18 19 0.8 19 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 119 5.2 115 5.8 4 1.5 21-30 891 39.3 785 39.3 106 39.1 31-40 737 32.5 633 31.7 104 38.4 41-50 337 14.9 297 14.9 40 14.8 51-60 113 5.0 96 4.8 17 6.3 61-70 40 1.8 40 2.0 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 11 0.5 11 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 2267 100.0 1996 100.0 271 100.0 SUTTER UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 45 9.1 41 9.6 4 5.7 21-30 184 37.2 167 39.3 17 24.3 31-40 145 29.3 114 26.8 31 44.3 41-50 76 15.4 66 15.5 10 14.3 51-60 23 4.6 17 4.0 6 8.6 61-70 16 3.2 14 3.3 2 2.9 71 & ABOVE 5 1.0 5 1.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 495 100.0 425 100.0 70 100.0 TEHAMA UNDER 18 2 0.7 2 0.8 0 0.0 18-20 16 5.2 13 5.2 3 5.5 21-30 116 37.8 99 39.3 17 30.9 31-40 100 32.6 79 31.3 21 38.2 41-50 43 14.0 34 13.5 9 16.4 51-60 21 6.8 17 6.7 4 7.3 61-70 7 2.3 6 2.4 1 1.8 71 & ABOVE 2 0.7 2 0.8 0 0.0 TOTAL 307 100.0 252 100.0 55 100.0 TRINITY 18-20 2 2.4 2 2.7 0 0.0 21-30 20 24.4 18 24.0 2 28.6 31-40 24 29.3 21 28.0 3 42.9 41-50 21 25.6 19 25.3 2 28.6 51-60 6 7.3 6 8.0 0 0.0 61-70 6 7.3 6 8.0 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 3 3.7 3 4.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 82 100.0 75 100.0 7 100.0 TULARE UNDER 18 20 0.8 19 0.8 1 0.4 18-20 187 7.1 175 7.4 12 4.5 21-30 1103 42.1 1019 43.3 84 31.8 31-40 821 31.3 710 30.1 111 42.0 41-50 349 13.3 308 13.1 41 15.5 51-60 100 3.8 91 3.9 9 3.4 61-70 34 1.3 28 1.2 6 2.3 71 & ABOVE 6 0.2 6 0.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 2620 100.0 2356 100.0 264 100.0 TUOLUMNE UNDER 18 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0

84

Page 95: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

18-20 11 4.2 10 4.7 1 2.0 21-30 68 25.8 60 27.9 8 16.3 31-40 86 32.6 68 31.6 18 36.7 41-50 63 23.9 49 22.8 14 28.6 51-60 21 8.0 15 7.0 6 12.2 61-70 10 3.8 8 3.7 2 4.1 71 & ABOVE 4 1.5 4 1.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 264 100.0 215 100.0 49 100.0 VENTURA UNDER 18 15 0.4 15 0.4 0 0.0 18-20 242 5.7 216 5.8 26 4.6 21-30 1885 44.1 1692 45.6 193 34.0 31-40 1282 30.0 1083 29.2 199 35.1 41-50 593 13.9 476 12.8 117 20.6 51-60 177 4.1 155 4.2 22 3.9 61-70 69 1.6 60 1.6 9 1.6 71 & ABOVE 11 0.3 10 0.3 1 0.2 TOTAL 4274 100.0 3707 100.0 567 100.0 YOLO UNDER 18 3 0.7 3 0.8 0 0.0 18-20 33 7.4 25 6.5 8 12.5 21-30 153 34.3 137 35.9 16 25.0 31-40 132 29.6 113 29.6 19 29.7 41-50 85 19.1 68 17.8 17 26.6 51-60 29 6.5 26 6.8 3 4.7 61-70 7 1.6 6 1.6 1 1.6 71 & ABOVE 4 0.9 4 1.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 446 100.0 382 100.0 64 100.0 YUBA UNDER 18 4 0.8 4 0.9 0 0.0 18-20 35 6.8 34 7.7 1 .4 21-30 170 32.9 152 34.4 18 24.3 31-40 163 31.6 132 29.9 31 41.9 41-50 90 17.4 71 16.1 19 25.7 51-60 36 7.0 32 7.2 4 5.4 61-70 14 2.7 13 2.9 1 1.4 71 & ABOVE 4 0.8 4 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 516 100.0 442 100.0 74 100.0

85

Page 96: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

86

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT

CO

UN

TY

DU

I C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

C

OU

RT

M

ISD

FELO

NY

ALC

OH

OL

N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

O

THER

DU

I DIS

M*/

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

R

ATE

DU

I D

UI

REC

KLE

SS

REC

KLE

SS

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

S U

NC

ON

ST*

* V

IOLA

TIO

N T

O

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

DM

V U

PDA

TE

STA

TEW

IDE

70.0

%

16

0006

22

48

1658

6 39

31

5552

13

4/30

0 2.

7 3.

0 A

LAM

EDA

67

.8%

SU

P O

AK

LAN

D

99

19

0 1

2 0/

0 4.

6 12

.2

JUV

ALA

MED

A

39

0 0

1 2

1/0

2.9

3.1

ALA

MED

A

185

0 15

6

3 0/

0 1.

4 2.

0

BE

RKEL

EY

198

1 24

16

17

1/

1 2.

3 2.

3

FR

EMO

NT

1148

2

73

13

46

0/1

2.9

2.4

PLEA

SAN

TON

65

6 4

115

44

46

0/3

2.9

2.3

OA

KLA

ND

11

86

20

48

37

19

0/2

3.0

1.8

HA

YWA

RD

1738

10

28

0 15

13

6 0/

2 4.

1 2.

5

TO

TAL

5249

56

55

5 13

3 27

1 2/

9 ---

---

A

LPIN

E 77

.8%

SU

P A

LPIN

E 2

0 0

0 0

0/0

5.8

10.8

M

ARK

LEEV

ILLE

40

0

5 0

0 0/

0 2.

8 1.

9

TO

TAL

42

0 5

0 0

0/0

---

---

AM

AD

OR

72.1

%

SUP

AM

AD

OR

4 0

0 0

0 0/

0 7.

9 4.

2

JA

CK

SON

21

2 4

1 1

2 1/

2 2.

8 4.

4

TO

TAL

216

4 1

1 2

1/2

---

---

BUTT

E 70

.3%

SU

P BU

TTE

35

7 0

0 0

0/1

4.6

4.0

JUV

BU

TTE

7 0

0 0

0 0/

0 7.

7 0.

7

C

HIC

O

488

1 81

13

12

1/

6 2.

7 4.

3

G

RID

LEY

52

0 8

1 0

0/0

2.9

3.4

ORO

VIL

LE

366

5 44

18

3

0/0

2.7

3.5

PARA

DIS

E 14

9 1

37

1 2

1/4

2.7

5.5

TOTA

L 10

97

14

170

33

17

2/11

---

---

C

ALA

VER

AS

62.9

%

SUP

CA

LAV

ERA

S 5

2 0

0 1

0/0

4.8

4.9

JV C

ALA

VER

AS

0 1

0 2

0 0/

0 2.

0 0.

4

SA

N A

ND

REA

S 20

0 2

32

12

5 0/

2 2.

2 1.

3

TO

TAL

205

5 32

14

6

0/2

---

---

CO

LUSA

74

.9%

SU

P C

OLU

SA

6 1

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

2 5.

0

JU

V C

OLU

SA

2 0

1 0

0 0/

0 2.

1 10

.5

CO

LUSA

23

6 0

17

11

4 1/

0 2.

4 4.

5

TO

TAL

244

1 18

11

4

1/0

---

---

*The

se m

ay in

clud

e ab

stra

ct d

elet

ions

due

to fa

ilure

to a

ppea

r (FT

A) a

t the

cou

rt h

eari

ng.

**Th

ese

1993

arr

este

es s

how

ed p

rior

DU

Is d

ecla

red

unco

nstit

utio

nal o

n th

eir r

ecor

ds.

The

cour

ts re

port

ed h

ere

are

thos

e of

the

curr

ent D

UI c

onvi

ctio

n an

d no

t nec

essa

rily

thos

e in

whi

ch a

ri

or c

onvi

ctio

n w

as d

ecla

red

unco

nstit

utio

nal.

p

Page 97: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

87

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

UR

T

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

A

LCO

HO

L

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L

OTH

ER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I R

ECK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

C

ON

TRA

CO

STA

72

.6%

SU

P C

NTR

A C

OST

A

138

22

0 0

2 0/

1 6.

3 2.

1

JU

V C

NTR

A C

OST

A

23

2 2

0 0

0/0

2.5

3.3

CO

NC

ORD

81

2 2

109

6 14

0/

9 3.

3 2.

2

RI

CH

MO

ND

77

4 8

83

8 18

1/

0 4.

0 2.

8

PI

TTSB

URG

61

1 5

84

3 10

0/

3 4.

1 2.

8

W

ALN

UT

CRE

EK

862

3 15

8 23

8

0/4

2.7

2.1

TOTA

L 32

20

42

436

40

52

1/17

---

---

D

EL N

ORT

E 56

.6%

SU

P D

EL N

ORT

E 15

4

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

9 2.

4

C

RESC

ENT

CIT

Y 20

8 0

58

24

13

1/0

2.8

7.0

TOTA

L 22

3 4

58

24

13

1/0

---

---

EL D

ORA

DO

82

.0%

SU

P EL

DO

RAD

O

13

3 0

0 0

0/2

6.0

3.1

JUV

EL

DO

RAD

O

4 4

0 0

0 0/

0 5.

2 2.

5

C

AM

ERO

N P

AR

K

311

13

20

2 3

2/1

2.3

5.0

SO L

AK

E TA

HO

E 25

6 8

19

3 3

2/0

2.5

6.0

PLA

CER

VIL

LE

295

14

15

3 1

1/0

2.2

5.3

TOTA

L 87

9 42

54

8

8 5/

3 ---

---

FR

ESN

O

57.0

%

SUP

FRES

NO

26

7 93

1

0 10

0/

0 4.

2 3.

2

JU

V F

RESN

O

28

2 2

2 0

0/0

5.3

2.4

FRES

NO

25

76

8 27

2 60

22

1/

4 3.

6 3.

0

C

LOV

IS

300

1 52

14

5

0/0

3.9

5.5

CO

ALI

NG

A

258

2 26

3

1 0/

0 2.

8 4.

2

FI

REBA

UG

H

197

1 55

2

4 0/

0 2.

2 6.

0

FO

WLE

R 14

1 1

27

0 1

0/0

3.6

8.9

KER

MA

N

138

1 7

4 0

0/0

4.2

5.7

KIN

GSB

URG

66

0

9 2

2 0/

0 3.

9 5.

7

RE

EDLE

Y M

UN

I 19

3 1

10

1 4

0/0

3.4

4.6

RIV

ERD

ALE

10

0

0 0

1 0/

0 3.

6 12

.4

SAN

GER

11

0 0

6 2

3 0/

0 3.

9 3.

9

SE

LMA

MU

NI

252

1 21

3

6 0/

0 4.

8 3.

7

U

S C

T FR

ESN

O

4 0

1 0

0 0/

0 1.

1 3.

9

TO

TAL

4540

11

1 48

9 93

59

1/

4 ---

---

G

LEN

N

74.2

%

SUP

GLE

NN

7

4 0

0 0

0/1

2.7

4.3

JUV

GLE

NN

2

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.8

0.7

ORL

AN

D

143

0 18

0

1 0/

0 2.

3 5.

7

W

ILLO

WS

74

0 9

1 1

2/0

2.4

4.2

TOTA

L 22

6 4

27

1 2

2/1

---

---

Page 98: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

88

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

URT

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

ALC

OH

OL

N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

O

THER

DU

I DIS

M*/

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

H

UM

BOLD

T 52

.1%

SU

P H

UM

BOLD

T 8

2 0

0 2

0/0

6.3

9.0

JUV

HU

MBO

LDT

0 1

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

5 3.

9

EU

REK

A

274

6 88

8

15

0/0

2.4

4.5

ARC

ATA

15

6 0

58

6 10

0/

1 3.

0 7.

3

FO

RTU

NA

14

5 1

58

1 10

0/

0 3.

2 1.

3

G

ARB

ERV

ILLE

46

0

20

4 8

0/0

3.8

1.8

HO

OPA

17

0

2 3

3 0/

0 3.

1 4.

4

TO

TAL

646

10

226

22

48

0/1

---

---

IMPE

RIA

L 51

.7%

SU

P IM

PERI

AL

10

1 0

0 1

0/0

4.2

1.9

JUV

IMPE

RIA

L 1

0 0

0 1

1/0

10.8

10

.1

BRA

WLE

Y 22

8 0

12

36

9 0/

0 3.

6 0.

8

C

ALE

XIC

O

523

1 81

45

9

0/0

3.0

1.1

EL C

ENTR

O

339

7 11

3 19

3

0/0

3.5

2.1

WIN

TERH

AV

EN

2 0

0 0

1 0/

0 1.

5 0.

8

TO

TAL

1103

9

206

100

24

1/0

---

---

INYO

73

.4%

SU

P IN

YO

11

2 0

0 1

0/0

2.9

4.0

BISH

OP

245

1 46

4

7 8/

0 2.

9 5.

4

IN

DEP

END

ENC

E 19

2

7 1

0 2/

0 2.

9 6.

5

U

SMA

G B

ISH

OP

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

0 0.

6

TO

TAL

276

5 53

5

8 10

/0

---

---

KER

N

80.3

%

SUP

KER

N

287

37

1 0

1 0/

1 2.

3 2.

4

JU

V K

ERN

37

1

1 0

4 0/

0 1.

8 2.

0

A

RVIN

-LA

MO

NT

366

3 21

7

5 0/

0 2.

4 3.

9

BA

KER

SFIE

LD

2502

15

19

9 17

28

0/

7 2.

6 5.

2

D

ELA

NO

47

8 0

43

2 7

4/0

2.5

3.4

LAK

E IS

ABE

LLA

10

1 1

3 4

0 0/

0 2.

2 4.

2

TA

FT

223

0 21

14

5

2/0

1.5

5.1

SHA

FTER

35

8 2

23

7 14

0/

2 2.

2 5.

7

W

ASC

O M

UN

I 1

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.9

0.9

MO

JAV

E 42

7 5

72

24

18

2/2

2.3

4.5

RID

GEC

REST

32

8 2

34

3 8

0/0

2.1

4.0

TOTA

L 51

08

66

418

78

90

8/12

---

---

Page 99: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

89

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

URT

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

ALC

OH

OL

N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

O

THER

DU

I DIS

M*/

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

K

ING

S 68

.0%

SU

P K

ING

S 40

3

0 0

1 0/

0 2.

6 1.

1

JU

V K

ING

S 10

0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

5 1.

5

H

AN

FORD

41

5 6

42

3 4

1/1

1.6

3.1

AV

ENA

L 15

0 2

4 5

4 2/

0 1.

8 1.

1

C

ORC

ORA

N

132

3 5

2 0

0/0

2.3

2.7

LEM

OO

RE

243

0 14

6

4 0/

0 1.

6 1.

3

TO

TAL

990

14

65

16

13

3/1

---

---

LAK

E 72

.2%

SU

P LA

KE

8 1

0 0

0 0/

0 7.

6 10

.8

JUV

LA

KE

2 0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

7 1.

2

C

LEA

RLA

KE

208

0 15

1

6 0/

0 4.

2 5.

5

LA

KEP

ORT

27

9 0

28

4 6

0/0

2.4

5.0

TOTA

L 49

7 1

43

5 12

0/

0 ---

---

LA

SSEN

81

.7%

SU

P LA

SSEN

2

2 0

0 0

0/0

5.2

2.2

JUV

LA

SSEN

5

0 0

0 0

0/0

4.9

-6.5

SU

SAN

VIL

LE

189

7 5

0 2

0/1

3.2

1.9

TOTA

L 19

6 9

5 0

2 0/

1 ---

---

LO

S A

NG

ELES

69

.9%

SU

P LO

S A

NG

ELES

21

0 56

1

0 6

0/0

3.4

3.1

SUP

POM

ON

A

232

44

0 0

3 0/

1 2.

8 1.

0

SU

P LA

NC

AST

ER

21

23

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

7 2.

0

SU

P V

AN

NU

YS

61

19

1 1

2 0/

0 4.

0 1.

0

SU

P PA

SAD

ENA

10

9 13

0

0 3

0/0

4.1

1.9

SUP

VA

N N

UYS

48

19

0

0 0

0/0

3.9

1.6

SUP

LON

G B

EAC

H

22

7 0

0 0

0/0

3.6

2.2

SUP

CO

MPT

ON

44

20

0

0 1

0/0

3.4

2.4

SUP

NO

RWA

LK

91

14

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

1 4.

5

SU

P TO

RRA

NC

E 7

0 0

0 0

0/0

2.2

2.2

SUP

S. M

ON

ICA

25

9

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

3 1.

4

JU

V L

A

1 0

0 0

2 0/

0 0.

1 1.

7

LA

JV C

ENTR

L 23

1

2 1

0 0/

0 6.

0 2.

4

A

LHA

MBR

A

1215

3

58

19

24

0/8

2.2

2.8

LAN

CA

STER

61

8 6

58

18

20

0/0

2.5

1.6

BEV

ERLY

HIL

LS

264

2 32

18

9

0/1

2.9

2.1

Page 100: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

90

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

UR

T

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

A

LCO

HO

L

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L

OTH

ER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I R

ECK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

LO

S A

NG

ELES

BURB

AN

K

474

0 84

38

17

0/

2 1.

6 2.

2

con

tinue

d

WES

T C

OV

INA

32

57

24

178

20

96

0/3

2.9

1.1

CO

MPT

ON

12

75

3 18

6 68

60

0/

2 3.

6 2.

4

C

ULV

ER C

ITY

266

5 39

16

9

0/0

3.2

4.1

DO

WN

EY

794

1 21

10

27

0/

0 2.

9 3.

4

EA

ST L

A

1793

4

101

58

63

0/3

2.3

1.5

EL M

ON

TE

1537

10

57

13

53

2/

1 2.

1 2.

8

G

LEN

DA

LE

825

9 11

5 35

35

0/

1 2.

0 4.

6

IN

GLE

WO

OD

12

70

12

162

48

49

0/3

3.2

2.3

LON

G B

EAC

H

1612

22

26

9 10

5 54

0/

9 1.

9 3.

8

LA

MET

RO

8781

12

83

2 12

4 11

14

3/7

1.2

2.6

BELL

FLO

WER

56

4 4

15

8 21

0/

1 2.

4 2.

5

V

ALE

NC

IA

967

5 10

1 71

16

0/

0 2.

2 2.

9

PA

SAD

ENA

88

3 3

129

55

47

1/2

4.2

3.1

MA

LIBU

19

5 1

53

8 9

0/0

3.7

2.0

CA

LABA

SAS

90

1 43

7

7 0/

0 3.

2 2.

1

PO

MO

NA

12

59

14

51

7 59

2/

0 2.

4 2.

6

H

UN

TNG

TON

PK

10

44

11

18

12

37

0/2

2.2

2.3

MO

NRO

VIA

52

7 5

46

9 22

0/

0 2.

7 2.

7

SA

NTA

MO

NIC

A

349

2 10

9 10

9

0/0

2.4

2.4

TORR

AN

CE

1551

14

26

9 74

12

1 0/

20

2.6

2.4

SOU

TH G

ATE

68

2 3

26

5 17

0/

2 3.

3 3.

2

W

HIT

TIER

98

6 14

24

2

21

0/0

3.1

4.1

HO

LLYW

OO

D

140

0 9

8 9

0/0

2.1

2.4

SAN

FER

NA

ND

O

2227

40

31

7 45

13

1 0/

0 1.

6 3.

2

SA

N P

EDRO

65

5 1

76

22

54

0/2

2.3

4.0

VA

N N

UY

S 28

59

45

517

42

420

1/3

1.4

2.9

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

660

0 93

47

87

0/

0 2.

2 2.

3

A

VA

LON

7

0 0

0 0

0/0

2.7

4.6

USM

AG

BA

KSF

LD

15

0 2

0 0

0/0

5.0

2.4

TOTA

L 40

535

501

4094

10

24

2734

9/

72

---

---

MA

DER

A

62.1

%

SUP

MA

DER

A

41

14

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

9 2.

1

JU

V M

AD

ERA

12

1

0 0

1 0/

0 1.

3 2.

0

C

HO

WC

HIL

LA

178

3 20

3

5 2/

0 4.

6 3.

5

BO

RDEN

20

2 3

38

6 1

0/0

3.0

4.9

Page 101: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

91

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

UR

T

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

A

LCO

HO

L

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L

OTH

ER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I R

ECK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

M

AD

ERA

MA

DER

A

344

3 32

19

6

0/1

3.3

3.7

c

ontin

ued

BA

SS L

AK

E 99

2

26

1 1

0/0

3.9

6.3

TOTA

L 87

6 26

11

6 29

14

2/

1 ---

---

M

ARI

N

73.2

%

SUP

SAN

RA

FAEL

12

5

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

7 2.

0

JU

V S

AN

RA

FAEL

5

0 0

0 0

0/0

3.3

2.3

SAN

RA

FAEL

13

90

8 0

1 45

0/

5 2.

7 4.

2

TO

TAL

1407

13

0

1 45

0/

5 ---

---

M

ARI

POSA

10

0.0%

SU

P M

ARI

POSA

4

3 0

0 0

0/0

4.2

2.3

2244

5 0

0 1

0 0

0/0

---

---

MA

RIPO

SA

73

0 6

1 4

0/0

3.3

2.3

USM

AG

YO

SEM

IT

65

1 26

0

0 0/

0 1.

9 2.

4

TO

TAL

142

4 33

1

4 0/

0 ---

---

M

END

OC

INO

72

.1%

SU

P U

KIA

H

23

1 2

0 0

0/0

5.2

2.9

JUV

UK

IAH

11

0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

2 1.

6

W

ILLI

TS

133

2 15

1

4 2/

0 3.

1 2.

0

U

KIA

H

369

5 19

9

11

0/0

2.8

3.7

BOO

NV

ILLE

10

0

1 1

0 0/

0 2.

4 3.

3

PT

. ARE

NA

9

0 2

0 0

0/0

4.5

7.7

LITT

LE L

AK

E 3

0 1

0 0

0/0

2.8

0.3

LEG

GET

T 31

0

5 4

3 0/

0 3.

7 3.

0

C

OV

ELO

6

0 0

0 0

0/0

3.7

2.1

FORT

BRA

GG

13

5 2

24

1 2

0/0

2.6

2.0

UK

IAH

5

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.6

0.6

TOTA

L 73

5 10

69

16

20

2/

0 ---

---

M

ERC

ED

55.3

%

SUP

MER

CED

44

4

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

9 2.

4

JU

V M

ERC

ED

26

1 2

0 3

0/0

5.2

5.2

MER

CED

96

4 13

14

9 40

20

0/

0 4.

8 4.

5

LO

S BA

NO

S 29

0 2

94

22

17

1/3

2.2

4.4

TOTA

L 13

24

20

245

62

40

1/3

---

---

MO

DO

C

58.3

%

SUP

MO

DO

C

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 6.

0 4.

6

A

LTU

RAS

69

0 17

1

1 2/

0 3.

6 3.

1

TO

TAL

70

0 17

1

1 2/

0 ---

---

M

ON

O

70.3

%

BRID

GEP

ORT

20

0

1 5

1 0/

0 1.

6 3.

6

M

AM

MO

TH L

AK

E 10

1 2

18

10

1 0/

0 2.

1 1.

8

TO

TAL

121

2 19

15

2

0/0

---

---

Page 102: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

92

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

UR

T

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

A

LCO

HO

L

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L

OTH

ER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I R

ECK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

M

ON

TERE

Y 74

.6%

SU

P M

ON

TERE

Y 10

5 21

0

0 0

0/0

1.9

2.0

JUV

MO

NTE

REY

17

3 2

1 1

0/0

3.8

3.3

MO

NTE

REY

988

9 16

7 48

17

0/

1 1.

6 6.

6

SA

LIN

AS

1692

13

16

7 28

42

0/

0 1.

3 2.

1

K

ING

CIT

Y 84

1 9

69

4 12

1/

0 1.

5 8.

8

U

SMA

G M

ON

TERY

10

0

1 0

0 0/

0 4.

4 1.

8

TO

TAL

3653

55

40

6 81

72

1/

1 ---

---

N

APA

81

.1%

SU

P N

APA

41

17

0

0 1

0/0

2.2

1.8

NA

PA

911

7 44

8

6 7/

0 2.

5 3.

0

TO

TAL

952

24

44

8 7

7/0

---

---

NEV

AD

A

82.6

%

SUP

NEV

AD

A

13

7 0

0 0

0/0

3.9

2.8

NEV

AD

A C

ITY

265

2 29

0

3 0/

2 2.

1 4.

8

TR

UC

KEE

MU

NI

134

1 14

3

3 0/

1 2.

3 4.

5

TO

TAL

412

10

43

3 6

0/3

---

---

ORA

NG

E 77

.7%

SU

P SA

NTA

AN

A

159

38

0 0

6 0/

1 5.

3 -0

.1

JUV

ORA

NG

E 47

0

0 1

0 0/

0 4.

5 2.

4

FU

LLER

TON

31

98

24

102

11

72

0/3

2.2

0.5

WES

TMIN

STER

23

87

13

100

22

46

0/1

2.9

1.5

LAG

UN

A H

ILLS

17

30

7 22

2 14

58

0/

0 3.

4 2.

0

N

EWPO

RT B

EAC

H

2030

7

157

27

56

1/8

2.3

1.5

SAN

TA A

NA

M

UN

I 23

33

15

93

6 57

0/

7 3.

6 -1

.4

USM

AG

S A

NA

5

0 0

0 0

0/0

2.9

3.1

S A

NA

PRO

VST

29

0

0 0

0 0/

0 0.

6 0.

7

TU

STIN

PRO

VO

ST

2 0

0 0

0 0/

0 0.

3 0.

5

TO

TAL

1192

0 10

4 67

4 81

29

5 1/

20

---

---

PLA

CER

79

.5%

SU

P PL

AC

ER

18

6 0

0 0

0/0

5.6

4.3

JUV

PLA

CER

10

0

0 1

0 0/

0 1.

6 3.

1

A

UBU

RN

521

5 24

3

5 0/

1 3.

1 3.

0

C

OLF

AX

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

9 0.

6

RO

SEV

ILLE

66

2 3

17

17

10

4/1

3.2

3.5

FORE

ST H

ILL

3 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

7 0.

7

TA

HO

E C

ITY

263

6 6

5 1

2/0

2.5

2.3

TOTA

L 14

78

20

47

26

22

6/2

---

---

Page 103: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

93

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

UR

T

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

A

LCO

HO

L

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L

OTH

ER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I R

ECK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

PL

UM

AS

55.3

%

SUP

PLU

MA

S 3

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.9

9.5

QU

INC

Y 11

7 0

18

0 0

0/0

2.0

2.1

TOTA

L 12

0 0

18

0 0

0/0

---

---

RIV

ERSI

DE

64.8

%

SUP

RIV

ERSI

DE

99

26

0 3

0 0/

0 5.

3 3.

5

SU

P IN

DIO

52

7 13

41

25

11

1/

0 4.

6 4.

3

JU

V R

IVER

SID

E 1

0 0

0 0

0/0

3.0

2.7

JUV

RIV

ERSI

DE

21

3 1

0 0

0/0

4.1

2.5

JUV

IND

IO

7 0

0 0

0 0/

0 5.

6 2.

2

C

ORO

NA

54

0 5

52

48

15

0/0

3.1

1.6

HEM

ET

486

6 64

4

15

2/0

3.5

2.3

BAN

NIN

G

320

2 23

4

13

1/1

2.4

2.7

IND

IO

1012

4

71

51

23

0/1

3.3

6.9

MO

REN

O V

ALL

EY

1639

35

8

179

37

2/0

3.5

1.9

PALM

SPR

ING

S 16

5 2

8 1

2 0/

2 3.

3 5.

7

BL

YTH

E 20

2 3

16

2 7

0/0

1.7

6.9

PERR

IS

761

10

55

15

21

2/1

3.9

2.0

ELSI

NO

RE

8 0

0 0

1 0/

0 4.

0 2.

9

TC

MA

RCH

AFB

4

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.2

1.5

TOTA

L 57

92

109

339

332

145

8/5

---

---

SAC

RAM

ENTO

62

.8%

SU

P SA

CTO

28

4 94

0

0 6

0/1

3.1

2.0

JUV

SA

CTO

TRF

48

3

4 0

1 1/

0 2.

5 6.

2

SA

CRA

MEN

TO

5113

66

12

89

315

115

17/7

3.

0 1.

5

EL

K G

ROV

E 11

7 0

19

7 1

0/0

2.1

5.4

GA

LT

63

0 7

3 2

0/0

3.4

6.7

WA

LNU

T G

ROV

E 53

0

9 3

2 0/

0 2.

1 5.

5

U

SMA

G S

AC

TO

3 0

0 0

0 0/

0 8.

1 6.

5

U

S C

T SA

CTO

13

0

1 0

0 0/

0 7.

9 4.

1

TO

TAL

5694

16

3 13

29

328

127

18/8

---

---

SA

N B

ENIT

O

75.4

%

JUV

SA

N B

ENIT

O

7 0

0 0

0 0/

0 5.

1 4.

8

H

OLL

ISTE

R 25

0 1

35

7 3

0/13

2.

2 7.

4

TO

TAL

257

1 35

7

4 0/

13

---

---

Page 104: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

94

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

UR

T

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

A

LCO

HO

L

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L

OTH

ER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I R

ECK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

SA

N

56.2

%

SUP

SAN

BER

ND

O

37

15

0 0

2 1/

1 6.

4 3.

1

BER

NA

RDIN

O

SU

P R

CU

CA

MN

GA

45

6

0 0

3 0/

0 5.

9 2.

9

SU

P V

ICTO

RVIL

LE

11

4 0

0 0

0/0

7.2

3.2

SUP

BARS

TOW

24

6

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

9 3.

1

SU

P JO

SHU

A T

REE

5 1

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

1 4.

2

JU

V T

F S

BERN

DO

27

0

0 0

0 1/

0 2.

4 4.

7

JU

V S

AN

BER

ND

O

5 1

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

5 2.

9

JU

V R

CU

CM

NG

A

4 0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

5 -1

.0

CH

INO

36

9 6

7 12

16

2/

0 3.

5 1.

7

BA

RSTO

W

311

3 10

1 22

22

0/

1 3.

7 3.

9

RE

DLA

ND

S 18

5 1

1 17

16

1/

0 2.

7 2.

7

S

BERN

-CEN

TRA

L 12

31

16

68

33

44

0/0

4.5

1.8

FON

TAN

A

908

14

211

46

28

0/2

4.8

1.5

VIC

TORV

ILLE

68

7 3

134

30

43

1/2

3.6

4.4

RNC

HO

C

UC

MN

GA

16

84

7 77

83

64

1/

0 3.

0 1.

8

BIG

BEA

R LA

KE

118

2 49

17

4

0/0

4.2

2.4

TWIN

PEA

KS

141

4 31

7

8 0/

0 3.

7 1.

2

N

EED

LES

150

0 49

10

12

0/

0 3.

6 5.

2

TR

ON

A

9 0

0 2

1 0/

0 5.

1 6.

8

29

PA

LMS

192

1 10

0 15

12

2/

2 3.

4 5.

6

TO

TAL

6143

90

82

8 29

4 27

5 9/

8 ---

---

SA

N D

IEG

O

77.8

%

SUP

SAN

DIE

GO

63

11

1

0 0

0/0

1.5

3.3

SUP

VIS

TA

80

20

0 0

1 0/

0 3.

1 3.

2

SU

P C

HU

LA V

ISTA

56

12

0

0 0

0/0

2.0

3.1

SUP

EL C

AJO

N

2 0

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

2 16

.6

JUV

SA

N D

IEG

O

51

3 1

0 4

0/0

2.9

4.7

EL C

AJO

N

2460

4

280

102

32

0/0

2.4

5.3

VIS

TA

3935

25

19

5 31

17

1/

5 2.

3 3.

0

SA

N M

ARC

OS

4 0

0 0

5 0/

0 4.

8 1.

7

SA

N D

IEG

O M

UN

I 47

09

2 27

6 12

8 15

8 0/

5 3.

1 2.

9

C

HU

LA V

ISTA

17

77

9 40

4

13

0/0

2.2

5.2

NA

TIO

NA

L C

ITY

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 ---

---

U

S D

IST

SD

2 0

0 0

0 0/

0 0.

1 2.

2

M

IRA

MA

R N

AV

AL

15

0 0

0 0

0/0

0.1

1.5

Page 105: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

95

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

UR

T

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

A

LCO

HO

L

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L

OTH

ER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I R

ECK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

SA

N D

IEG

O

SA

N D

IEG

O N

AV

15

0

0 0

0 0/

1 0.

8 1.

7

cont

inue

d

TC S

DIE

GO

NA

V

17

0 0

0 0

0/0

0.8

2.9

TOTA

L 13

187

86

793

265

230

1/11

---

---

SA

N F

RAN

CIS

CO

59

.7%

SU

P SA

N F

RAN

3

4 0

0 1

0/0

7.0

5.4

JUV

SA

N F

RAN

4

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.1

3.2

SAN

FRA

NC

ISC

O

1103

6

178

60

13

0/1

3.2

1.1

US

DIS

T C

T SF

5

0 0

0 0

0/0

9.3

2.9

TOTA

L 11

15

10

178

60

14

0/1

---

---

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

71.1

%

SUP

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

59

6 0

1 0

1/0

4.4

1.6

JUV

SA

N JO

AQ

UIN

1

1 0

1 0

0/0

2.8

1.8

LOD

I 64

5 4

52

11

54

3/1

2.0

2.2

MA

NTE

CA

39

0 9

24

6 25

1/

0 2.

5 2.

2

TR

AC

Y 29

7 6

30

9 8

0/0

2.0

2.0

STO

CK

TON

17

21

20

118

40

39

0/0

2.3

2.4

TOTA

L 31

13

46

224

68

126

5/1

---

---

SAN

L O

BISP

O

67.8

%

SUP

S L

OBI

SPO

48

7

1 0

1 0/

0 3.

6 2.

7

S

LUIS

OBI

SPO

15

91

7 34

4 39

11

0 2/

0 2.

2 5.

9

U

SMA

G S

L O

BISP

O

4 0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

9 4.

8

TO

TAL

1643

14

34

5 39

11

1 2/

0 ---

---

SA

N M

ATE

O

76.3

%

SUP

SAN

MA

TEO

11

6 19

1

0 0

0/3

4.3

1.5

JUV

SA

N M

ATE

O

22

2 2

0 2

0/0

3.5

4.3

SO S

AN

FRA

N

1737

13

22

3 17

16

0/

2 2.

2 4.

3

RE

DW

OO

D C

ITY

2021

11

39

8 21

43

0/

5 2.

5 4.

2

TO

TAL

3896

45

62

4 38

63

0/

10

---

---

SAN

TA

69.7

%

SUP

S BA

RBA

RA

30

5

0 0

2 0/

0 4.

4 0.

3

BA

RBA

RA

SU

P SN

TA M

ARI

A

43

3 0

0 1

0/0

2.3

0.9

JUV

S B

ARB

ARA

8

2 0

0 2

0/0

2.0

2.2

SAN

TA B

ARB

ARA

17

77

3 44

5 10

6 83

0/

0 2.

4 3.

8

SA

NTA

MA

RIA

81

6 21

67

32

18

1/

1 1.

6 2.

3

LO

MPO

C

295

2 45

1

6 0/

1 1.

8 6.

4

SO

LVA

NG

19

2 2

53

3 3

1/0

2.1

5.9

VA

ND

NBE

RG A

FB

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 0.

3 2.

9

TO

TAL

3162

38

61

0 14

2 11

5 2/

2 ---

---

Page 106: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

96

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

UR

T

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

A

LCO

HO

L

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L

OTH

ER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I R

ECK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

SA

NTA

CLA

RA

79.8

%

SUP

SAN

TA C

LAR

A

536

114

2 1

2 0/

1 3.

3 1.

7

JU

V S

AN

TA C

LARA

54

4

1 0

1 0/

0 3.

3 4.

8

LO

S G

ATO

S 20

8 1

14

1 4

0/0

2.8

0.4

PALO

ALT

O

740

3 48

5

7 0/

0 3.

1 1.

5

SA

N JO

SE

5100

23

39

7 85

78

2/

5 3.

6 1.

7

TR

AF-

SAN

JOSE

2

0 0

0 11

0/

0 2.

9 0.

9

SA

NTA

CLA

RA

390

1 18

3

5 0/

2 3.

1 1.

6

SU

NN

YV

ALE

80

9 3

76

20

19

0/0

3.1

1.3

GIL

ROY

681

7 51

9

4 0/

0 3.

2 0.

8

TO

TAL

8520

15

6 60

7 12

4 13

1 2/

8 ---

---

SA

NTA

CR

UZ

72.5

%

SUP

SAN

TA C

RUZ

67

10

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

6 3.

8

JU

V S

AN

TA C

RUZ

26

1 5

2 0

0/0

4.0

2.0

SAN

TA C

RU

Z 14

21

4 20

0 78

24

0/

18

2.3

5.6

WA

TSO

NV

ILLE

79

4 2

93

3 3

0/10

2.

0 7.

2

TO

TAL

2308

17

29

8 83

27

0/

28

---

---

SHA

STA

71

.2%

SU

P RE

DD

ING

25

4

1 0

0 0/

0 4.

8 2.

7

JU

V S

HA

STA

5

1 0

0 0

0/0

2.6

0.8

BURN

EY

39

0 9

1 2

0/0

3.1

2.0

RED

DIN

G

679

15

110

6 21

1/

0 2.

4 3.

1

U

S M

AG

RED

DIN

G

1 0

2 0

0 0/

0 6.

6 0.

3

TO

TAL

749

20

122

7 25

1/

0 ---

---

SI

ERRA

56

.7%

D

OW

NIE

VIL

LE

38

0 8

3 0

0/0

3.0

3.9

TOTA

L 38

0

8 3

0 0/

0 ---

---

SI

SKIY

OU

76

.1%

SU

P SI

SKIY

OU

5

0 0

0 0

0/0

4.3

2.1

JUV

SIS

KIY

OU

4

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.3

4.0

DO

RRIS

15

0

0 0

1 1/

0 4.

4 3.

1

W

EED

12

2 0

12

1 0

2/0

2.8

4.7

WEE

D JU

ST

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 6.

7 0.

7

TU

LELA

KE

22

0 2

2 0

0/0

4.7

6.1

YREK

A

136

7 15

2

1 0/

0 2.

8 3.

5

TO

TAL

305

7 29

5

2 3/

0 ---

---

SO

LAN

O

71.5

%

SUP

SOLA

NO

58

11

1

0 0

0/0

2.8

4.5

JUV

SO

LAN

O

9 0

0 1

1 0/

0 5.

7 3.

0

FA

IRFI

ELD

10

32

11

238

6 21

0/

2 1.

8 7.

1

Page 107: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

97

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

UR

T

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

A

LCO

HO

L

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L

OTH

ER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I R

ECK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

SO

LAN

O

BE

NIC

IA

2 0

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

8 0.

9

cont

inue

d

VA

LLEJ

O

332

6 13

13

7

0/1

2.4

4.9

TC T

RAV

IS A

FB

6 0

0 0

0 0/

0 0.

2 4.

0

TO

TAL

1439

28

25

2 20

29

0/

3 ---

---

SO

NO

MA

71

.3%

SU

P SO

NO

MA

12

2 12

0

0 1

0/1

5.0

3.4

JUV

SO

NO

MA

28

0

0 1

3 0/

0 2.

4 3.

9

SA

NTA

RO

SA

2712

30

57

6 41

70

2/

14

2.8

4.8

TOTA

L 28

62

42

576

42

74

2/15

---

---

ST

AN

ISLA

US

68.2

%

SUP

STA

NIS

LAU

S 84

11

1

0 1

0/1

3.3

2.0

JUV

STA

NIS

LAU

S 25

3

1 0

0 0/

0 2.

4 3.

9

M

OD

ESTO

18

20

23

296

65

25

0/4

2.4

2.1

OA

KD

ALE

1

0 0

0 0

0/1

2.3

0.8

TURL

OC

K

296

4 40

22

4

0/1

2.2

2.0

TOTA

L 22

26

41

338

87

30

0/7

---

---

SUTT

ER

47.6

%

SUP

SUTT

ER

21

5 0

1 0

0/0

4.3

0.8

JUV

SU

TTER

1

0 0

0 0

0/0

3.8

1.3

YUBA

CIT

Y 46

2 6

72

2 12

0/

2 2.

2 3.

0

TO

TAL

484

11

72

3 12

0/

2 ---

---

TE

HA

MA

68

.1%

SU

P TE

HA

MA

13

2

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

7 1.

9

JU

V T

EHA

MA

5

0 0

0 0

0/0

2.3

6.7

CO

RNIN

G

86

0 9

0 2

1/1

2.6

4.9

RED

BLU

FF

197

4 29

8

5 3/

0 2.

2 5.

0

TO

TAL

301

6 38

8

7 4/

1 ---

---

TR

INIT

Y 37

.1%

SU

P TR

INIT

Y 2

1 0

0 0

0/0

6.5

-5.3

W

EAV

ERV

ILLE

77

2

15

2 1

0/0

3.5

2.7

TOTA

L 79

3

15

2 1

0/0

---

---

TULA

RE

60.4

%

SUP

TULA

RE

96

29

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

3 4.

1

JU

V T

ULA

RE

30

3 0

0 1

0/0

3.1

4.9

DIN

UBA

MU

NI

545

2 10

7

4 0/

0 3.

3 7.

3

EX

ETER

MU

NI

58

2 1

0 0

0/0

4.6

2.6

LIN

DSY

-EXE

TER

148

0 6

0 0

0/0

3.3

3.9

PORT

ERV

ILLE

52

5 9

19

0 7

1/1

3.2

2.8

TULA

RE

337

2 5

2 1

0/0

2.7

5.9

VIS

ALI

A

739

20

15

8 5

0/0

2.8

2.5

Page 108: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

98

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1993

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

D

UI

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

CO

URT

MIS

D

FE

LON

Y

ALC

OH

OL

N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

O

THER

DU

I DIS

M*/

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

D

MV

UPD

ATE

TU

LARE

WO

OD

LK-E

XETE

R 73

0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

8 2.

5

cont

inue

d

DIN

UBA

JUST

1

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.8

4.2

USM

AG

3 R

IVER

S 1

0 0

0 0

0/0

0.1

2.3

TOTA

L 25

53

67

56

17

18

1/1

---

---

TUO

LUM

NE

83.5

%

SUP

TUO

LUM

NE

14

4 0

0 0

0/0

3.4

9.0

JUV

TU

OLU

MN

E 1

0 0

0 0

0/0

2.4

2.2

SON

ORA

19

8 5

19

2 2

0/0

2.8

7.9

CO

LUM

BIA

1

0 0

0 0

0/0

0.7

10.6

JA

MES

TOW

N

41

0 4

0 0

0/0

2.3

1.4

TOTA

L 25

5 9

23

2 2

0/0

---

---

VEN

TURA

84

.6%

SU

P V

ENTU

RA

34

9 0

0 1

0/0

2.4

5.0

JUV

VEN

TURA

12

0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

5 3.

4

V

ENTU

RA JU

ST

4195

24

0

1 80

6/

2 2.

1 3.

3

TO

TAL

4241

33

0

1 81

6/

2 ---

---

YO

LO

32.7

%

SUP

WO

OD

LAN

D

22

4 0

1 0

0/0

6.3

2.0

JUV

YO

LO

4 1

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

3 3.

3

W

EST

SAC

TO

26

0 3

0 0

0/0

3.5

18.3

W

OO

DLA

ND

38

5 3

49

13

3 1/

0 3.

8 5.

7

D

AV

IS

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

0 0.

8

TO

TAL

438

8 52

14

8

1/0

---

---

YUBA

75

.0%

SU

P YU

BA

18

3 0

0 0

0/1

2.1

3.9

JUV

YU

BA

6 0

0 0

0 0

1.1

7.9

MA

RYSV

ILLE

47

0 9

109

8 2

0/1

2.3

1.8

TC B

EALE

AFB

10

0

0 0

0 0/

0 0.

9 1.

0

TO

TAL

504

12

109

8 2

0/2

---

---

Page 109: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

99

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S*

CO

UN

TY

C

OU

RT

DU

I O

FFEN

DER

TOTA

L PR

OBA

TIO

N

JAIL

1S

T O

FFEN

DER

A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

SB

38

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

STA

TEW

IDE

1622

54

95.4

78

.8

57.1

18

.6

0.2

39.6

7.

2 1.

8 A

LAM

EDA

SU

P O

AK

LAN

D

1ST

DU

I 10

60

.0

100.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 12

66

.7

75.0

8.

3 16

.7

0.0

8.3

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 17

58

.8

94.1

0.

0 29

.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

79

55.7

97

.5

0.0

32.9

0.

0 1.

3 2.

5 1.

3

TO

TAL

118

57.6

94

.9

0.8

29.7

0.

0 1.

7 1.

7 0.

8

JUV

ALA

MED

A

1ST

DU

I 36

83

.3

13.9

63

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

69.4

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

3 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 39

84

.6

12.8

59

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

64.1

0.

0

ALA

MED

A

1ST

DU

I 12

7 10

0.0

100.

0 90

.6

0.8

0.0

0.8

1.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 41

10

0.0

100.

0 7.

3 85

.4

0.0

85.4

2.

4 4.

9

3R

D D

UI

13

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

46.2

0.

0 30

.8

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 25

.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

185

100.

0 10

0.0

64.3

23

.2

0.0

21.6

1.

6 1.

1

BERK

ELEY

1S

T D

UI

137

98.5

65

.7

61.3

18

.2

0.0

25.5

3.

6 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

41

100.

0 92

.7

2.4

51.2

0.

0 48

.8

0.0

9.8

3RD

DU

I 16

10

0.0

93.8

0.

0 12

.5

0.0

12.5

6.

3 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 5

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 19

9 99

.0

74.4

42

.7

24.1

0.

0 28

.6

3.0

2.0

FR

EMO

NT

1ST

DU

I 73

5 99

.7

99.3

87

.9

6.1

0.0

3.7

0.4

0.1

2ND

DU

I 27

1 10

0.0

98.9

5.

2 90

.0

0.0

55.7

0.

4 5.

9

3R

D D

UI

107

99.1

10

0.0

1.9

73.8

0.

0 12

.1

3.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

37

91.9

94

.6

0.0

64.9

0.

0 10

.8

2.7

0.0

TOTA

L 11

50

99.5

99

.1

57.6

34

.1

0.0

17.0

0.

8 1.

5

PLEA

SAN

TON

1S

T D

UI

449

100.

0 92

.9

94.0

1.

8 0.

0 2.

4 5.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

154

99.4

98

.1

9.1

87.0

0.

6 83

.8

2.6

0.6

3RD

DU

I 52

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 76

.9

0.0

30.8

51

.9

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

5 60

.0

100.

0 0.

0 40

.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

660

99.5

94

.7

66.1

27

.9

0.2

23.6

8.

5 0.

2

OA

KLA

ND

1S

T D

UI

865

99.5

99

.3

87.6

3.

0 0.

0 4.

0 7.

9 0.

9

2N

D D

UI

246

99.6

99

.2

6.1

86.2

0.

4 87

.4

4.1

19.5

3R

D D

UI

64

100.

0 92

.2

3.1

50.0

0.

0 64

.1

18.8

6.

3

4T

H+

DU

I 31

96

.8

90.3

3.

2 41

.9

0.0

51.6

25

.8

19.4

TO

TAL

1206

99

.5

98.7

64

.3

23.5

0.

1 25

.5

8.1

5.5

H

AYW

ARD

1S

T D

UI

1085

89

.0

95.9

66

.0

2.5

0.0

5.1

6.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 45

9 83

.7

96.9

4.

1 59

.9

0.0

57.7

8.

5 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

171

90.1

99

.4

3.5

31.0

0.

0 12

.9

7.6

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

33

63.6

10

0.0

0.0

15.2

0.

0 3.

0 3.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1748

87

.2

96.6

42

.4

20.6

0.

0 19

.6

6.9

0.0

*Ent

ries

repr

esen

t per

cent

ages

of 1

993

DU

I con

vict

ees r

ecei

ving

eac

h sa

nctio

n by

cou

nty,

cou

rt a

nd o

ffend

er st

atus

.

Page 110: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

100

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ALP

INE

SUP

ALP

INE

4TH

+ D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

MA

RKLE

EVIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 29

10

0.0

3.4

86.2

10

.3

0.0

96.6

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

8 10

0.0

75.0

25

.0

37.5

0.

0 75

.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

40

100.

0 25

.0

70.0

20

.0

0.0

90.0

0.

0 0.

0 A

MA

DO

R

SUP

AM

AD

OR

4TH

+ D

UI

4 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 4

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0

JAC

KSO

N

1ST

DU

I 12

7 92

.9

96.1

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

8 9.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

65

98.5

10

0.0

0.0

63.1

0.

0 63

.1

27.7

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

16

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

56.3

0.

0 18

.8

62.5

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 8

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

62.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

216

94.4

97

.7

0.0

23.1

0.

0 20

.8

20.8

0.

0 BU

TTE

SUP

BUTT

E 1S

T D

UI

7 85

.7

100.

0 14

.3

28.6

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

30

26.7

10

0.0

3.3

6.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 42

38

.1

100.

0 4.

8 9.

5 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

BU

TTE

1ST

DU

I 7

100.

0 85

.7

42.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

7 10

0.0

85.7

42

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C

HIC

O

1ST

DU

I 34

2 96

.8

97.4

90

.1

0.6

0.0

1.8

12.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

98

94.9

98

.0

6.1

71.4

0.

0 66

.3

13.3

3.

1

3R

D D

UI

42

83.3

10

0.0

2.4

21.4

0.

0 11

.9

50.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 7

71.4

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

57.1

0.

0

TO

TAL

489

94.9

97

.8

64.4

16

.6

0.0

15.5

16

.2

0.6

G

RID

LEY

1ST

DU

I 30

80

.0

100.

0 76

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

14

57.1

10

0.0

7.1

42.9

0.

0 50

.0

42.9

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

7 28

.6

100.

0 0.

0 14

.3

0.0

14.3

71

.4

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

52

65.4

10

0.0

46.2

13

.5

0.0

15.4

32

.7

0.0

O

ROV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

231

67.1

95

.7

61.9

0.

0 0.

0 2.

6 33

.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 89

40

.4

100.

0 1.

1 36

.0

0.0

33.7

60

.7

0.0

3RD

DU

I 42

21

.4

97.6

0.

0 14

.3

0.0

4.8

90.5

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 9

11.1

10

0.0

0.0

11.1

0.

0 11

.1

77.8

0.

0

TO

TAL

371

54.2

97

.0

38.8

10

.5

0.0

10.5

47

.7

0.0

PA

RAD

ISE

1ST

DU

I 10

2 99

.0

95.1

94

.1

0.0

0.0

1.0

8.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 32

90

.6

100.

0 0.

0 68

.8

0.0

65.6

18

.8

0.0

3RD

DU

I 14

92

.9

100.

0 14

.3

14.3

0.

0 14

.3

64.3

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 15

0 96

.7

96.7

65

.3

16.0

0.

0 16

.0

16.0

0.

0 C

ALA

VER

AS

SUP

CA

LAV

ERA

S 1S

T D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

Page 111: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

101

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

4TH

+ D

UI

4 75

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 7

57.1

10

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0 14

.3

14.3

0.

0

JUV

CA

LAV

RAS

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

SA

N A

ND

REA

S 1S

T D

UI

121

98.3

10

0.0

93.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

8 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

57

100.

0 10

0.0

7.0

86.0

0.

0 78

.9

0.0

8.8

3RD

DU

I 21

95

.2

100.

0 4.

8 23

.8

0.0

19.0

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 20

2 98

.0

100.

0 58

.4

27.7

0.

0 25

.2

0.5

2.5

CO

LUSA

SU

P C

OLU

SA

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 5

40.0

10

0.0

0.0

40.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

7 57

.1

100.

0 14

.3

42.9

0.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

JU

V C

OLU

SA

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

C

OLU

SA

1ST

DU

I 15

3 97

.4

97.4

79

.1

0.7

0.0

2.6

6.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 59

10

0.0

98.3

5.

1 64

.4

0.0

59.3

8.

5 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

22

95.5

10

0.0

0.0

13.6

0.

0 13

.6

40.9

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

236

97.9

97

.9

52.5

17

.8

0.0

17.8

10

.6

0.0

CO

NTR

A C

OST

A

SUP

C C

OST

A

1ST

DU

I 34

85

.3

91.2

11

.8

23.5

0.

0 2.

9 5.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

12

83.3

91

.7

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 8.

3 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

25

72.0

96

.0

0.0

36.0

0.

0 0.

0 4.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 89

74

.2

95.5

0.

0 31

.5

0.0

0.0

3.4

0.0

TOTA

L 16

0 76

.9

94.4

2.

5 31

.9

0.0

0.6

4.4

0.0

JU

V C

CO

STA

1S

T D

UI

24

95.8

0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 25

96

.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 52

.0

0.0

C

ON

CO

RD

1S

T D

UI

528

99.6

97

.0

61.2

1.

7 0.

0 4.

2 3.

6 0.

2

2N

D D

UI

177

100.

0 97

.7

1.7

77.4

0.

0 74

.0

13.0

19

.8

3RD

DU

I 97

10

0.0

95.9

0.

0 12

.4

0.0

10.3

19

.6

6.2

4TH

+ D

UI

12

100.

0 83

.3

0.0

16.7

0.

0 25

.0

25.0

16

.7

TOTA

L 81

4 99

.8

96.8

40

.0

19.7

0.

0 20

.4

7.9

5.4

RI

CH

MO

ND

1S

T D

UI

490

98.4

99

.2

93.7

3.

1 0.

0 2.

4 1.

6 0.

2

2N

D D

UI

219

98.2

99

.1

5.9

80.8

0.

0 82

.6

1.4

7.3

3RD

DU

I 56

98

.2

100.

0 0.

0 82

.1

0.0

33.9

3.

6 7.

1

4T

H+

DU

I 17

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 70

.6

0.0

23.5

0.

0 5.

9

TO

TAL

782

98.3

99

.2

60.4

32

.0

0.0

27.6

1.

7 2.

8

PITT

SBU

RG

1ST

DU

I 37

8 96

.3

97.9

83

.9

1.9

0.0

6.3

10.1

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

164

87.8

10

0.0

2.4

72.0

0.

0 71

.3

19.5

4.

9

3R

D D

UI

62

25.8

10

0.0

0.0

9.7

0.0

8.1

17.7

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 12

33

.3

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

616

85.7

98

.7

52.1

21

.3

0.0

23.7

13

.1

1.3

W

ALN

UT

CR

EEK

1S

T D

UI

629

99.7

97

.9

96.7

1.

1 0.

0 3.

5 4.

1 0.

2

Page 112: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

102

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

2ND

DU

I 18

2 99

.5

98.4

4.

9 90

.7

0.0

47.8

3.

8 11

.5

3RD

DU

I 49

93

.9

100.

0 6.

1 24

.5

0.0

14.3

24

.5

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

5 80

.0

100.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

865

99.2

98

.2

71.7

21

.4

0.0

13.4

5.

3 2.

5 D

EL N

OR

TE

SUP

DEL

NO

RTE

1ST

DU

I 4

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

25

.0

25.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 11

9.

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

9.1

0.0

TOTA

L 19

36

.8

89.5

0.

0 0.

0 5.

3 5.

3 10

.5

0.0

C

RES

CEN

T C

ITY

1ST

DU

I 13

2 95

.5

93.9

75

.0

1.5

0.0

7.6

3.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 52

96

.2

96.2

28

.8

50.0

0.

0 34

.6

1.9

0.0

3RD

DU

I 24

79

.2

95.8

25

.0

37.5

0.

0 4.

2 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

208

93.8

94

.7

57.7

17

.8

0.0

13.9

2.

4 0.

0 EL

DO

RAD

O

SUP

EL D

ORA

DO

1S

T D

UI

8 87

.5

37.5

50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

7 57

.1

85.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

16

75.0

62

.5

25.0

6.

3 0.

0 0.

0 6.

3 0.

0

JUV

EL

DO

RAD

O

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 8

62.5

75

.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

CA

MER

ON

PA

RK

1ST

DU

I 19

5 99

.0

99.0

88

.7

0.5

0.0

0.5

2.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 80

10

0.0

93.8

10

.0

63.8

0.

0 72

.5

0.0

12.5

3R

D D

UI

38

100.

0 71

.1

7.9

13.2

0.

0 39

.5

0.0

13.2

4T

H+

DU

I 11

10

0.0

72.7

0.

0 27

.3

0.0

54.5

0.

0 27

.3

TOTA

L 32

4 99

.4

93.5

56

.8

18.5

0.

0 24

.7

1.2

5.6

SO

LA

KE

TAH

OE

1ST

DU

I 17

1 10

0.0

95.9

72

.5

1.8

0.0

2.3

2.3

0.6

2ND

DU

I 67

95

.5

97.0

7.

5 64

.2

0.0

55.2

4.

5 7.

5

3R

D D

UI

18

88.9

94

.4

5.6

44.4

0.

0 16

.7

5.6

5.6

4TH

+ D

UI

8 62

.5

100.

0 0.

0 37

.5

0.0

12.5

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

264

97.0

96

.2

49.2

21

.6

0.0

17.0

3.

0 2.

7

PLA

CER

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 18

8 99

.5

94.7

85

.1

0.0

0.0

20.2

2.

1 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

72

98.6

98

.6

8.3

77.8

0.

0 54

.2

1.4

0.0

3RD

DU

I 33

10

0.0

100.

0 9.

1 21

.2

0.0

21.2

18

.2

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

16

68.8

10

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 37

.5

0.0

TOTA

L 30

9 97

.7

96.4

54

.7

21.0

0.

0 27

.2

5.5

0.0

FRES

NO

SU

P FR

ESN

O

1ST

DU

I 10

5 54

.3

92.4

0.

0 1.

0 0.

0 1.

0 1.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

41

51.2

97

.6

0.0

4.9

0.0

4.9

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 30

26

.7

96.7

0.

0 3.

3 0.

0 3.

3 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 18

4 27

.2

96.2

0.

0 0.

5 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

360

37.8

95

.3

0.0

1.4

0.0

1.1

0.3

0.0

JU

V F

RESN

O

1ST

DU

I 28

92

.9

46.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 7.

1 32

.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Page 113: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

103

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 30

93

.3

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6.

7 30

.0

0.0

FR

ESN

O

1ST

DU

I 16

66

99.1

92

.7

80.0

2.

8 0.

0 29

.8

0.2

0.1

2ND

DU

I 65

0 99

.1

97.7

7.

2 62

.2

0.0

63.2

0.

0 3.

4

3R

D D

UI

214

98.1

95

.3

5.1

28.0

0.

0 21

.0

0.5

1.4

4TH

+ D

UI

54

98.1

90

.7

5.6

14.8

0.

0 11

.1

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 25

84

99.0

94

.2

53.9

20

.1

0.0

37.1

0.

2 1.

0

CLO

VIS

1S

T D

UI

198

99.0

63

.6

84.8

1.

5 0.

0 52

.5

3.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 73

10

0.0

93.2

5.

5 63

.0

0.0

57.5

6.

8 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

26

100.

0 84

.6

3.8

23.1

0.

0 15

.4

26.9

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 30

1 99

.3

73.1

57

.5

18.3

0.

0 49

.8

6.3

0.0

C

OA

LIN

GA

1S

T D

UI

187

99.5

97

.9

90.9

3.

7 0.

0 4.

3 2.

1 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

54

100.

0 10

0.0

31.5

64

.8

0.0

20.4

9.

3 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

19

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

84.2

0.

0 10

.5

5.3

0.0

TOTA

L 26

0 99

.6

98.5

71

.9

22.3

0.

0 8.

1 3.

8 0.

0

FIR

EBA

UG

H

1ST

DU

I 13

2 98

.5

93.9

57

.6

3.0

0.0

47.7

1.

5 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

44

100.

0 10

0.0

2.3

29.5

0.

0 36

.4

2.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 14

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 28

.6

0.0

14.3

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 8

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 19

8 99

.0

96.0

38

.9

10.6

0.

0 40

.9

1.5

0.0

FO

WLE

R 1S

T D

UI

91

97.8

97

.8

92.3

1.

1 0.

0 4.

4 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

35

100.

0 97

.1

8.6

77.1

0.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 14

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

21.4

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 14

2 98

.6

97.9

61

.3

21.1

0.

0 6.

3 2.

1 0.

0

KER

MA

N

1ST

DU

I 81

96

.3

92.6

79

.0

9.9

0.0

4.9

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 41

97

.6

100.

0 9.

8 75

.6

0.0

22.0

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

13

100.

0 92

.3

0.0

61.5

0.

0 15

.4

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

4 25

.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

139

95.0

92

.8

48.9

33

.8

0.0

10.8

0.

0 0.

0

KIN

GSB

URG

1S

T D

UI

41

100.

0 97

.6

97.6

0.

0 0.

0 2.

4 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

16

100.

0 87

.5

18.8

81

.3

0.0

68.8

12

.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 9

100.

0 77

.8

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 11

.1

22.2

0.

0

TO

TAL

66

100.

0 92

.4

66.7

19

.7

0.0

19.7

6.

1 0.

0

REED

LEY

MU

NI

1ST

DU

I 11

9 99

.2

98.3

92

.4

4.2

0.0

6.7

0.0

0.8

2ND

DU

I 53

96

.2

98.1

5.

7 75

.5

1.9

28.3

0.

0 22

.6

3RD

DU

I 16

93

.8

87.5

6.

3 31

.3

0.0

12.5

0.

0 12

.5

4TH

+ D

UI

6 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

194

96.4

97

.4

58.8

25

.8

0.5

12.9

0.

0 7.

7

RIV

ERD

ALE

1S

T D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 75

.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

6 10

0.0

100.

0 16

.7

83.3

0.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 10

10

0.0

100.

0 40

.0

60.0

0.

0 40

.0

0.0

0.0

SA

NG

ER

1ST

DU

I 62

95

.2

93.5

71

.0

4.8

1.6

3.2

1.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 36

97

.2

94.4

11

.1

66.7

0.

0 47

.2

2.8

0.0

Page 114: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

104

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

3RD

DU

I 12

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

25.0

16

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 11

0 96

.4

94.5

43

.6

28.2

0.

9 20

.0

3.6

0.0

SE

LMA

MU

NI

1ST

DU

I 16

1 96

.9

96.3

80

.1

3.7

0.0

26.7

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

58

93.1

94

.8

10.3

70

.7

0.0

70.7

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

27

92.6

92

.6

3.7

25.9

0.

0 14

.8

3.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

7 10

0.0

100.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0

TO

TAL

253

95.7

95

.7

54.2

21

.3

0.0

34.8

0.

8 0.

0

US

CT

FRES

NO

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

4 50

.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 G

LEN

N

SUP

GLE

NN

1S

T D

UI

2 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 5

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0 20

.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

4 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 11

63

.6

100.

0 0.

0 9.

1 0.

0 9.

1 27

.3

0.0

JU

V G

LEN

N

1ST

DU

I 2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

O

RLA

ND

1S

T D

UI

89

97.8

97

.8

93.3

2.

2 0.

0 0.

0 3.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

31

100.

0 96

.8

3.2

74.2

0.

0 54

.8

16.1

6.

5

3R

D D

UI

21

90.5

90

.5

4.8

14.3

0.

0 19

.0

42.9

4.

8

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

143

97.2

96

.5

59.4

19

.6

0.0

14.7

13

.3

2.1

W

ILLO

WS

1ST

DU

I 49

10

0.0

100.

0 95

.9

0.0

0.0

2.0

4.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 15

10

0.0

100.

0 6.

7 60

.0

0.0

46.7

26

.7

6.7

3RD

DU

I 9

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 33

.3

55.6

11

.1

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 74

10

0.0

100.

0 64

.9

16.2

0.

0 14

.9

16.2

2.

7 H

UM

BOLD

T SU

P H

UM

BOLD

T 1S

T D

UI

3 10

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

4 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 10

40

.0

70.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

HU

MBO

LDT

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

EU

REK

A

1ST

DU

I 18

0 95

.6

16.7

83

.9

2.2

0.0

86.1

9.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

64

96.9

90

.6

9.4

59.4

0.

0 62

.5

29.7

1.

6

3R

D D

UI

26

96.2

96

.2

0.0

23.1

0.

0 3.

8 46

.2

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

10

70.0

90

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

280

95.0

43

.6

56.1

17

.1

0.0

70.0

18

.9

0.4

A

RCA

TA

1ST

DU

I 96

89

.6

43.8

85

.4

1.0

0.0

84.4

9.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

44

84.1

90

.9

9.1

68.2

0.

0 77

.3

18.2

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

16

93.8

93

.8

0.0

75.0

0.

0 25

.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

156

88.5

62

.2

55.1

27

.6

0.0

76.3

16

.0

0.0

Page 115: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

105

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

FO

RTU

NA

1S

T D

UI

103

95.1

15

.5

85.4

7.

8 0.

0 93

.2

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 27

10

0.0

85.2

14

.8

70.4

0.

0 96

.3

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 15

93

.3

60.0

6.

7 26

.7

20.0

33

.3

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 14

6 95

.9

33.6

63

.7

21.9

2.

1 87

.0

0.0

0.0

G

ARB

ERV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

27

92.6

22

.2

88.9

3.

7 0.

0 92

.6

7.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 14

10

0.0

78.6

42

.9

35.7

0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

100.

0 80

.0

60.0

20

.0

0.0

60.0

40

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 46

95

.7

45.7

71

.7

15.2

0.

0 91

.3

8.7

0.0

H

OO

PA

1ST

DU

I 8

62.5

75

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

50.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

6 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

66.7

33

.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 17

70

.6

88.2

23

.5

29.4

0.

0 47

.1

41.2

0.

0 IM

PERI

AL

SUP

IMPE

RIA

L 1S

T D

UI

2 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 8

100.

0 87

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

11

100.

0 72

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

27.3

0.

0

JUV

IMPE

RIA

L 1S

T D

UI

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

BRA

WLE

Y 1S

T D

UI

152

100.

0 50

.7

82.2

1.

3 0.

0 44

.7

0.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 53

10

0.0

92.5

7.

5 81

.1

0.0

71.7

0.

0 9.

4

3R

D D

UI

19

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

47.4

0.

0 26

.3

10.5

10

.5

4TH

+ D

UI

4 10

0.0

75.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 25

.0

TOTA

L 22

8 10

0.0

64.9

56

.6

24.6

0.

0 49

.6

1.3

3.5

C

ALE

XIC

O

1ST

DU

I 42

5 99

.8

27.5

60

.9

0.7

0.0

73.2

0.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

80

100.

0 85

.0

18.8

33

.8

0.0

50.0

2.

5 2.

5

3R

D D

UI

17

100.

0 10

0.0

5.9

5.9

0.0

17.6

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 52

4 99

.8

38.9

52

.5

5.9

0.0

67.6

0.

6 0.

4

EL C

ENTR

O

1ST

DU

I 23

3 99

.6

55.4

60

.9

0.9

0.0

31.8

1.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

84

98.8

82

.1

17.9

48

.8

0.0

47.6

6.

0 3.

6

3R

D D

UI

27

100.

0 88

.9

11.1

22

.2

0.0

29.6

7.

4 7.

4

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

346

99.4

64

.7

46.2

14

.2

0.0

35.3

3.

2 1.

4

WIN

TERH

AV

EN

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

100.

0 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

INYO

SU

P IN

YO

1ST

DU

I 4

50.0

50

.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 16

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

13

23.1

84

.6

7.7

0.0

0.0

7.7

0.0

0.0

BI

SHO

P 1S

T D

UI

158

96.8

18

.4

88.6

2.

5 0.

0 89

.2

0.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 52

10

0.0

92.3

5.

8 86

.5

0.0

88.5

3.

8 5.

8

3R

D D

UI

26

73.1

84

.6

3.8

38.5

0.

0 7.

7 11

.5

0.0

Page 116: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

106

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

4TH

+ D

UI

10

80.0

30

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

246

94.3

41

.5

58.5

24

.0

0.0

76.8

2.

8 1.

2

IND

EPEN

DEN

CE

1ST

DU

I 5

100.

0 20

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 80

.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 15

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 93

.3

0.0

93.3

0.

0 6.

7

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 21

10

0.0

81.0

23

.8

71.4

0.

0 85

.7

0.0

4.8

U

SMA

G B

ISH

OP

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

KER

N

SUP

KER

N

1ST

DU

I 96

76

.0

100.

0 5.

2 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 3.

1 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

46

65.2

95

.7

2.2

2.2

0.0

2.2

4.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 18

55

.6

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 16

4 44

.5

97.0

0.

0 0.

0 1.

8 0.

0 4.

9 0.

0

TO

TAL

324

57.4

97

.8

1.9

0.3

0.9

0.3

4.0

0.0

JU

V K

ERN

1S

T D

UI

36

97.2

2.

8 83

.3

0.0

0.0

2.8

5.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 38

97

.4

2.6

81.6

0.

0 0.

0 2.

6 5.

3 0.

0

ARV

IN L

AM

ON

T 1S

T D

UI

227

90.7

79

.7

65.6

1.

8 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

94

89.4

89

.4

10.6

25

.5

0.0

10.6

5.

3 2.

1

3R

D D

UI

42

100.

0 92

.9

9.5

0.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

7.1

4TH

+ D

UI

6 83

.3

83.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 16

.7

16.7

0.

0

TO

TAL

369

91.3

83

.7

44.2

7.

6 0.

0 3.

8 1.

6 1.

4

BAK

ERSF

IELD

1S

T D

UI

1560

97

.9

99.1

78

.3

0.2

0.1

1.3

0.5

0.5

2ND

DU

I 62

4 96

.8

94.1

9.

1 11

.1

0.0

17.1

1.

8 5.

1

3R

D D

UI

281

90.7

92

.5

2.1

0.0

0.0

6.8

3.9

6.4

4TH

+ D

UI

52

78.8

90

.4

5.8

0.0

0.0

9.6

3.8

9.6

TOTA

L 25

17

96.4

96

.9

51.2

2.

9 0.

0 6.

0 1.

3 2.

5

DEL

AN

O

1ST

DU

I 25

3 99

.6

60.5

77

.5

2.4

0.4

43.5

11

.1

0.8

2ND

DU

I 14

9 10

0.0

94.0

6.

0 45

.6

0.0

40.3

39

.6

4.0

3RD

DU

I 61

10

0.0

82.0

1.

6 6.

6 0.

0 23

.0

70.5

14

.8

4TH

+ D

UI

15

100.

0 93

.3

6.7

6.7

0.0

20.0

73

.3

6.7

TOTA

L 47

8 99

.8

74.7

43

.3

16.5

0.

2 39

.1

29.5

3.

8

LAK

E IS

ABE

LLA

1S

T D

UI

65

92.3

92

.3

73.8

0.

0 1.

5 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

30

100.

0 10

0.0

3.3

43.3

0.

0 40

.0

3.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

102

95.1

95

.1

48.0

13

.7

1.0

11.8

1.

0 0.

0

TAFT

1S

T D

UI

141

97.2

34

.8

63.8

0.

7 0.

0 48

.2

27.7

1.

4

2N

D D

UI

60

100.

0 71

.7

5.0

38.3

0.

0 58

.3

23.3

33

.3

3RD

DU

I 16

10

0.0

68.8

12

.5

0.0

0.0

43.8

37

.5

25.0

4T

H+

DU

I 6

100.

0 83

.3

0.0

16.7

0.

0 33

.3

33.3

50

.0

TOTA

L 22

3 98

.2

48.4

42

.6

11.2

0.

0 50

.2

27.4

13

.0

SH

AFT

ER

1ST

DU

I 22

1 99

.5

97.7

80

.5

5.4

0.0

0.9

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 88

97

.7

92.0

4.

5 60

.2

0.0

48.9

2.

3 20

.5

3RD

DU

I 40

95

.0

87.5

2.

5 5.

0 0.

0 17

.5

7.5

7.5

4TH

+ D

UI

11

81.8

90

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

9.1

0.0

9.1

Page 117: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

107

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 36

0 98

.1

95.0

50

.8

18.6

0.

0 14

.7

1.4

6.1

W

ASC

O

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

M

OJA

VE

1ST

DU

I 28

5 99

.6

96.5

78

.6

0.7

0.0

2.1

5.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 10

1 98

.0

98.0

4.

0 42

.6

1.0

42.6

26

.7

0.0

3RD

DU

I 36

86

.1

97.2

2.

8 2.

8 0.

0 2.

8 47

.2

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

10

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

30.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

432

98.1

97

.0

53.0

10

.6

0.2

11.6

14

.4

0.0

RI

DG

ECRE

ST

1ST

DU

I 22

8 10

0.0

97.8

91

.2

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 66

98

.5

100.

0 3.

0 42

.4

0.0

34.8

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

36

91.7

10

0.0

2.8

11.1

0.

0 5.

6 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

330

98.8

98

.5

63.9

10

.0

0.0

7.6

0.0

0.0

KIN

GS

SUP

KIN

GS

1ST

DU

I 6

33.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

34

8.8

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 14

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 43

14

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 18

.6

0.0

JU

V K

ING

S 1S

T D

UI

9 77

.8

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 55

.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

10

80.0

10

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

HA

NFO

RD

1ST

DU

I 26

6 96

.2

95.9

81

.6

3.4

0.0

3.0

14.7

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

99

88.9

10

0.0

4.0

60.6

0.

0 59

.6

18.2

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

43

69.8

10

0.0

0.0

14.0

0.

0 7.

0 62

.8

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

13

38.5

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

53.8

0.

0

TO

TAL

421

90.0

97

.4

52.5

17

.8

0.0

16.6

21

.6

0.0

A

VEN

AL

1ST

DU

I 11

2 99

.1

100.

0 94

.6

0.0

0.0

0.9

0.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 29

10

0.0

100.

0 48

.3

48.3

0.

0 75

.9

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 9

77.8

10

0.0

22.2

33

.3

0.0

55.6

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 15

2 97

.4

100.

0 80

.3

11.2

0.

0 18

.4

0.7

0.0

C

ORC

OR

AN

1S

T D

UI

78

94.9

98

.7

47.4

2.

6 0.

0 0.

0 24

.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 39

92

.3

100.

0 2.

6 51

.3

0.0

33.3

25

.6

0.0

3RD

DU

I 12

66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

33.3

33

.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 83

.3

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 13

5 91

.1

99.3

28

.1

18.5

0.

0 12

.6

26.7

0.

0

LEM

OO

RE

1ST

DU

I 18

2 95

.6

95.6

85

.2

2.2

0.0

7.1

4.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 48

79

.2

100.

0 10

.4

56.3

0.

0 54

.2

12.5

4.

2

3R

D D

UI

11

63.6

10

0.0

9.1

27.3

0.

0 27

.3

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

243

90.5

96

.7

66.3

14

.0

0.0

17.3

6.

2 0.

8 LA

KE

SUP

LAK

E 1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

7 28

.6

85.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

9 33

.3

88.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

Page 118: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

108

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

JU

V L

AK

E 1S

T D

UI

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

C

LEA

RLA

KE

1ST

DU

I 12

7 10

0.0

100.

0 89

.0

2.4

0.0

1.6

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 59

98

.3

100.

0 22

.0

74.6

0.

0 39

.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 18

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 72

.2

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 20

8 98

.6

100.

0 60

.6

29.3

0.

0 15

.4

0.0

0.0

LA

KEP

OR

T 1S

T D

UI

167

95.2

98

.2

92.2

1.

2 0.

0 2.

4 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

85

97.6

10

0.0

3.5

84.7

0.

0 14

.1

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 19

31

.6

100.

0 0.

0 15

.8

0.0

5.3

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

8 62

.5

100.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

279

90.7

98

.9

56.3

28

.3

0.0

6.5

0.0

0.0

LASS

EN

SUP

LASS

EN

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 4

75.0

10

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

LA

SSEN

1S

T D

UI

5 20

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

5 20

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

SUSA

NV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

125

99.2

99

.2

96.8

1.

6 0.

0 0.

8 2.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

50

96.0

10

0.0

16.0

80

.0

0.0

74.0

0.

0 8.

0

3R

D D

UI

13

23.1

10

0.0

0.0

23.1

0.

0 7.

7 0.

0 7.

7

4T

H+

DU

I 8

25.0

10

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 12

.5

12.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

196

90.3

99

.5

65.8

24

.0

0.0

20.4

2.

0 2.

6 LO

S A

NG

ELES

SU

P LA

1S

T D

UI

94

78.7

95

.7

1.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.2

0.0

2ND

DU

I 25

52

.0

100.

0 0.

0 8.

0 0.

0 4.

0 4.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

18

44.4

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

129

38.0

97

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.3

0.0

TOTA

L 26

6 54

.1

97.4

0.

4 0.

8 0.

0 0.

4 2.

6 0.

0

SUP

POM

ON

A

1ST

DU

I 74

81

.1

97.3

0.

0 27

.0

0.0

4.1

6.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 25

52

.0

92.0

0.

0 12

.0

0.0

4.0

8.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 30

46

.7

100.

0 0.

0 13

.3

0.0

0.0

6.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

147

30.6

10

0.0

0.0

10.2

0.

0 0.

0 7.

5 0.

0

TO

TAL

276

47.8

98

.6

0.0

15.2

0.

0 1.

4 7.

2 0.

0

SUP

LAN

CA

STR

1S

T D

UI

23

73.9

10

0.0

4.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

8.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 6

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

5 40

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 10

10

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

44

54.5

10

0.0

2.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

6.8

0.

0

SUP

VA

N N

UYS

1S

T D

UI

53

66.0

83

.0

7.5

0.0

0.0

3.8

28.3

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

20

55.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10.0

15

.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 14

42

.9

100.

0 0.

0 7.

1 0.

0 0.

0 28

.6

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

60

25.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0

TO

TAL

147

45.6

93

.9

2.7

0.7

0.0

2.7

21.8

0.

0

Page 119: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

109

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

SU

P PA

SAD

ENA

1S

T D

UI

40

72.5

90

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

17.5

10

.0

0.0

STA

TUS

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

2ND

DU

I 10

10

0.0

90.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

.0

10.0

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

10

40.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

62

54.8

98

.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.8

0.0

TOTA

L 12

2 63

.1

95.1

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6.

6 6.

6 0.

0

SUP

LON

G B

CH

1S

T D

UI

17

88.2

76

.5

17.6

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 5.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

8 25

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

29

72.4

86

.2

10.3

3.

4 0.

0 0.

0 3.

4 0.

0

SUP

CO

MPT

ON

1S

T D

UI

24

62.5

41

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

8.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

5 60

.0

60.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 32

40

.6

71.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

64

53.1

56

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.1

0.0

SU

P N

OR

WA

LK

1ST

DU

I 26

76

.9

80.8

0.

0 3.

8 0.

0 0.

0 3.

8 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

9 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

5 40

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 65

20

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 1.

5 0.

0

TO

TAL

105

39.0

95

.2

0.0

1.0

0.0

0.0

1.9

0.0

SU

P TO

RRA

NC

E 1S

T D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 7

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

SU

P SA

NTA

1S

T D

UI

10

90.0

90

.0

20.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

M

ON

ICA

2N

D D

UI

4 75

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

3 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

17

23.5

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 34

47

.1

97.1

5.

9 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

LA

CO

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

LA

CN

TL

1ST

DU

I 24

83

.3

45.8

16

.7

0.0

0.0

4.2

8.3

0.0

TOTA

L 24

83

.3

45.8

16

.7

0.0

0.0

4.2

8.3

0.0

A

LHA

MBR

A

1ST

DU

I 83

0 94

.0

59.4

81

.8

0.5

0.0

54.2

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

288

92.0

94

.8

6.6

44.4

0.

0 42

.7

0.3

4.9

3RD

DU

I 92

81

.5

93.5

0.

0 3.

3 5.

4 5.

4 1.

1 2.

2

4T

H+

DU

I 8

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 12

18

92.4

70

.6

57.3

11

.1

0.4

47.5

0.

2 1.

3

LAN

CA

STER

1S

T D

UI

442

99.5

99

.3

95.2

2.

0 0.

2 2.

0 0.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

139

98.6

97

.1

7.9

84.2

2.

2 84

.9

0.0

11.5

3R

D D

UI

38

100.

0 44

.7

2.6

13.2

55

.3

13.2

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 5

80.0

60

.0

0.0

0.0

40.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

624

99.2

95

.2

69.4

21

.0

4.3

21.2

0.

6 2.

6

Page 120: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

110

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

BE

VER

LY H

ILLS

1S

T D

UI

219

99.1

62

.6

89.5

1.

4 0.

5 80

.8

1.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 35

94

.3

91.4

20

.0

68.6

0.

0 82

.9

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 11

90

.9

100.

0 0.

0 9.

1 0.

0 0.

0 45

.5

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 26

6 98

.1

67.7

76

.7

10.5

0.

4 77

.8

3.0

0.0

BU

RBA

NK

1S

T D

UI

362

100.

0 99

.4

84.8

1.

1 0.

0 47

.5

11.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

81

100.

0 98

.8

6.2

65.4

0.

0 55

.6

22.2

1.

2

3R

D D

UI

30

93.3

96

.7

3.3

13.3

3.

3 16

.7

63.3

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 47

4 99

.4

99.2

66

.0

12.9

0.

2 46

.8

16.5

0.

2

WES

T C

OV

INA

1S

T D

UI

2469

98

.5

64.6

94

.9

1.1

0.0

62.5

3.

2 0.

1

2N

D D

UI

645

96.6

96

.9

8.7

80.3

0.

3 82

.2

6.2

22.8

3R

D D

UI

155

93.5

85

.8

3.2

30.3

12

.3

16.8

12

.3

6.5

4TH

+ D

UI

12

100.

0 83

.3

0.0

33.3

16

.7

16.7

8.

3 8.

3

TO

TAL

3281

97

.9

72.0

73

.3

18.1

0.

7 64

.0

4.2

4.9

C

OM

PTO

N

1ST

DU

I 95

0 98

.4

88.8

85

.6

1.7

0.0

69.4

6.

0 0.

1

2N

D D

UI

242

96.7

96

.3

14.5

66

.9

0.0

78.9

7.

0 8.

7

3R

D D

UI

73

94.5

93

.2

8.2

24.7

1.

4 32

.9

12.3

4.

1

4T

H+

DU

I 13

76

.9

100.

0 15

.4

15.4

0.

0 23

.1

38.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

1278

97

.7

90.6

67

.0

15.5

0.

1 68

.6

6.9

2.0

C

ULV

ER C

ITY

1ST

DU

I 19

9 98

.0

18.6

93

.0

1.5

0.5

83.9

6.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

52

90.4

78

.8

15.4

65

.4

0.0

71.2

13

.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 18

77

.8

94.4

0.

0 38

.9

5.6

50.0

22

.2

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

271

95.2

35

.8

71.2

16

.2

0.7

78.6

8.

5 0.

0

DO

WN

EY

1ST

DU

I 57

9 98

.4

24.7

89

.3

1.9

0.0

82.6

8.

6 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

162

97.5

89

.5

15.4

67

.9

3.1

69.8

18

.5

1.9

3RD

DU

I 51

10

0.0

84.3

9.

8 45

.1

7.8

23.5

41

.2

2.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

33.3

33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 79

5 98

.4

42.0

68

.8

18.4

1.

1 76

.0

12.8

0.

5

EAST

LA

1S

T D

UI

1330

99

.5

48.3

88

.3

0.5

0.0

78.0

4.

9 0.

1

2N

D D

UI

334

99.7

91

.9

11.7

67

.4

0.0

74.6

7.

8 9.

3

3R

D D

UI

118

98.3

94

.1

0.0

11.9

2.

5 7.

6 8.

5 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 15

10

0.0

100.

0 13

.3

0.0

0.0

13.3

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1797

99

.5

59.8

67

.7

13.6

0.

2 72

.2

5.6

1.8

EL

MO

NTE

1S

T D

UI

1094

99

.5

62.3

87

.6

1.3

0.0

51.2

10

.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 34

3 98

.5

94.5

6.

1 71

.1

0.0

70.8

14

.6

3.2

3RD

DU

I 10

2 97

.1

96.1

2.

0 20

.6

3.9

11.8

9.

8 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 8

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

1547

99

.1

71.9

63

.4

18.0

0.

3 52

.7

11.4

0.

7

GLE

ND

ALE

1S

T D

UI

609

99.3

51

.7

89.7

1.

6 0.

0 67

.3

1.1

0.3

2ND

DU

I 15

4 99

.4

93.5

8.

4 70

.8

2.6

73.4

1.

3 14

.3

3RD

DU

I 58

87

.9

86.2

0.

0 10

.3

10.3

13

.8

6.9

5.2

4TH

+ D

UI

13

92.3

10

0.0

0.0

15.4

0.

0 7.

7 0.

0 0.

0

Page 121: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

111

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 83

4 98

.4

62.6

67

.0

15.2

1.

2 63

.8

1.6

3.

2

ING

LEW

OO

D

1ST

DU

I 96

1 88

.4

38.7

82

.4

1.1

0.0

72.3

12

.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 23

6 86

.4

86.4

19

.1

61.0

0.

4 67

.8

10.6

2.

1

3R

D D

UI

77

79.2

92

.2

3.9

31.2

6.

5 24

.7

19.5

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 8

75.0

10

0.0

12.5

50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1282

87

.4

51.1

65

.6

14.3

0.

5 68

.5

12.3

0.

4

LON

G B

EAC

H

1ST

DU

I 11

60

98.7

40

.2

87.8

0.

9 0.

1 64

.8

0.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 36

5 98

.6

91.8

12

.1

66.3

0.

0 60

.5

1.4

0.8

3RD

DU

I 94

95

.7

94.7

4.

3 25

.5

3.2

20.2

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 15

53

.3

100.

0 0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1634

98

.1

55.4

65

.2

17.0

0.

2 60

.8

0.7

0.2

LA

MET

RO

1ST

DU

I 67

06

99.6

59

.5

92.2

1.

2 0.

0 55

.0

0.4

0.1

2ND

DU

I 16

16

99.3

96

.7

10.3

81

.3

0.1

65.0

5.

3 10

.0

3RD

DU

I 42

0 95

.5

95.7

4.

3 19

.0

1.7

14.0

1.

7 3.

6

4T

H+

DU

I 51

84

.3

98.0

11

.8

7.8

2.0

3.9

5.9

0.0

TOTA

L 87

92

99.2

68

.3

72.5

16

.8

0.1

54.6

1.

4 2.

1

BELL

FLO

WER

1S

T D

UI

392

99.7

31

.9

79.6

0.

8 0.

0 70

.2

5.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 13

5 10

0.0

94.8

8.

9 55

.6

0.0

60.0

11

.1

1.5

3RD

DU

I 40

97

.5

90.0

0.

0 15

.0

10.0

12

.5

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

568

99.6

51

.1

57.0

14

.8

0.7

63.6

6.

7 0.

4

VA

LEN

CIA

1S

T D

UI

665

91.1

40

.5

81.5

1.

4 0.

0 62

.1

2.1

0.2

2ND

DU

I 21

7 91

.7

94.9

4.

6 66

.4

0.9

63.6

0.

9 14

.7

3RD

DU

I 64

64

.1

93.8

1.

6 15

.6

4.7

3.1

1.6

3.1

4TH

+ D

UI

26

26.9

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.8

0.0

TOTA

L 97

2 87

.8

57.7

56

.9

16.8

0.

5 56

.9

1.9

3.6

PA

SAD

ENA

1S

T D

UI

649

98.9

49

.5

92.6

0.

5 0.

0 92

.9

1.2

0.0

2ND

DU

I 16

4 98

.8

83.5

12

.2

70.7

0.

6 83

.5

4.9

0.0

3RD

DU

I 55

90

.9

98.2

1.

8 25

.5

1.8

14.5

12

.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

18

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0 5.

6 5.

6 0.

0

TO

TAL

886

98.4

59

.8

70.2

15

.3

0.2

84.5

2.

7 0.

0

MA

LIBU

1S

T D

UI

151

98.7

12

.6

90.1

2.

0 0.

0 89

.4

1.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 29

96

.6

79.3

13

.8

75.9

0.

0 82

.8

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 11

10

0.0

72.7

9.

1 54

.5

18.2

45

.5

18.2

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 5

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

196

98.5

28

.1

71.9

15

.8

1.0

83.7

2.

6 0.

0

CA

LABA

SAS

1ST

DU

I 70

10

0.0

2.9

95.7

0.

0 1.

4 92

.9

1.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 18

10

0.0

83.3

22

.2

72.2

0.

0 88

.9

5.6

5.6

3RD

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

33.3

66

.7

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

91

100.

0 22

.0

79.1

16

.5

1.1

91.2

2.

2 1.

1

POM

ON

A

1ST

DU

I 94

2 96

.0

39.6

87

.9

1.3

0.0

58.8

4.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

243

91.4

88

.1

9.5

60.9

0.

0 55

.1

10.3

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

69

79.7

10

0.0

5.8

13.0

0.

0 10

.1

24.6

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 19

57

.9

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 52

.6

0.0

Page 122: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

112

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 12

73

93.6

53

.0

67.2

13

.3

0.0

54.6

7.

5 0.

0

HU

NTI

NG

TON

PK

1S

T D

UI

784

99.4

48

.9

76.5

1.

7 0.

0 50

.8

2.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 21

9 99

.1

92.2

10

.0

63.9

0.

0 57

.1

0.9

5.5

3RD

DU

I 48

95

.8

95.8

4.

2 31

.3

2.1

16.7

2.

1 2.

1

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 75

.0

0.0

25.0

25

.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

1055

99

.1

60.1

59

.1

16.0

0.

2 50

.3

2.5

1.2

M

ON

ROV

IA

1ST

DU

I 41

2 99

.5

34.7

83

.3

0.5

0.2

74.0

9.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

84

98.8

85

.7

10.7

58

.3

0.0

66.7

16

.7

0.0

3RD

DU

I 34

10

0.0

85.3

2.

9 2.

9 11

.8

11.8

26

.5

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

532

99.4

46

.2

66.4

9.

8 0.

9 68

.6

11.5

0.

0

SAN

TA M

ON

ICA

1S

T D

UI

268

97.4

12

.3

88.1

2.

6 0.

0 84

.0

4.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 67

91

.0

83.6

17

.9

53.7

0.

0 62

.7

7.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 16

75

.0

93.8

6.

3 12

.5

6.3

12.5

18

.8

0.0

TOTA

L 35

1 95

.2

29.6

70

.9

12.8

0.

3 76

.6

6.0

0.0

TO

RRA

NC

E 1S

T D

UI

1181

98

.3

32.9

90

.9

1.2

0.0

89.9

1.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

279

96.1

89

.6

12.9

71

.0

0.0

83.5

4.

7 1.

4

3R

D D

UI

81

93.8

79

.0

7.4

7.4

12.3

16

.0

9.9

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

24

66.7

79

.2

4.2

0.0

16.7

8.

3 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1565

97

.2

46.1

71

.4

13.9

0.

9 83

.7

2.6

0.3

SO

UTH

GA

TE

1ST

DU

I 49

7 95

.8

56.3

86

.7

1.6

0.0

50.5

6.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

142

95.1

91

.5

14.1

69

.0

0.0

71.8

12

.7

0.7

3RD

DU

I 43

90

.7

90.7

4.

7 30

.2

0.0

37.2

7.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 68

5 95

.2

66.0

66

.1

17.5

0.

0 54

.0

7.6

0.1

W

HIT

TIER

1S

T D

UI

678

94.1

39

.8

75.7

1.

5 0.

0 76

.3

2.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 23

5 92

.8

94.9

7.

2 70

.2

0.4

70.2

3.

8 1.

7

3R

D D

UI

77

83.1

90

.9

1.3

11.7

7.

8 10

.4

13.0

1.

3

4T

H+

DU

I 10

80

.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

.0

0.0

10.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1000

92

.8

57.3

53

.1

18.5

0.

7 69

.1

3.8

0.5

H

OLL

YWO

OD

1S

T D

UI

114

97.4

49

.1

81.6

0.

9 0.

0 50

.9

4.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 22

95

.5

100.

0 4.

5 59

.1

0.0

72.7

9.

1 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

140

97.1

58

.6

67.1

12

.1

0.0

54.3

5.

0 0.

0

SAN

FER

NA

ND

O

1ST

DU

I 16

53

99.3

50

.9

85.0

1.

4 0.

1 39

.7

5.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 42

0 97

.9

93.6

12

.1

64.0

0.

7 59

.5

6.7

0.5

3RD

DU

I 15

5 95

.5

91.0

3.

9 14

.2

6.5

9.7

5.2

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

39

35.9

97

.4

5.1

0.0

2.6

0.0

5.1

0.0

TOTA

L 22

67

97.7

62

.3

64.6

13

.9

0.7

40.6

5.

9 0.

1

SAN

PED

RO

1ST

DU

I 46

7 10

0.0

56.1

93

.8

1.7

0.0

53.3

2.

6 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

142

100.

0 93

.0

8.5

77.5

1.

4 54

.9

14.8

2.

8

3R

D D

UI

45

100.

0 88

.9

8.9

40.0

6.

7 8.

9 6.

7 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 65

6 10

0.0

66.5

69

.4

20.7

0.

8 50

.6

5.5

0.6

Page 123: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

113

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

V

AN

NU

YS

1ST

DU

I 20

92

99.2

40

.6

91.5

2.

9 0.

2 60

.6

0.4

0.1

2ND

DU

I 58

5 97

.9

93.2

7.

2 81

.5

1.7

83.4

1.

0 3.

4

3R

D D

UI

174

90.8

87

.4

1.7

40.8

10

.9

32.2

2.

3 4.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 53

37

.7

90.6

3.

8 11

.3

3.8

9.4

1.9

0.0

TOTA

L 29

04

97.3

54

.9

67.5

21

.1

1.2

62.5

0.

7 1.

0

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

1ST

DU

I 48

8 98

.8

34.0

81

.6

2.3

0.0

73.6

1.

8 0.

6

2N

D D

UI

140

98.6

90

.7

9.3

79.3

0.

0 83

.6

2.1

24.3

3R

D D

UI

28

100.

0 78

.6

7.1

35.7

0.

0 25

.0

7.1

14.3

4T

H+

DU

I 4

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 66

0 98

.5

48.3

62

.6

20.0

0.

0 73

.2

2.1

6.2

A

VA

LON

1S

T D

UI

2 10

0.0

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

5 10

0.0

60.0

0.

0 60

.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

7 10

0.0

57.1

28

.6

42.9

0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

U

SMA

G

1ST

DU

I 11

90

.9

9.1

90.9

0.

0 0.

0 81

.8

0.0

0.0

BRK

SFLD

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

15

93.3

26

.7

73.3

0.

0 6.

7 60

.0

0.0

0.0

MA

DER

A

SUP

MA

DER

A

1ST

DU

I 15

66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 8

75.0

87

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 25

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 28

50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 14

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 55

56

.4

98.2

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 16

.4

0.0

JU

V M

AD

ERA

1S

T D

UI

11

90.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 13

84

.6

15.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

C

HO

WC

HIL

LA

1ST

DU

I 10

4 98

.1

100.

0 94

.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 52

96

.2

100.

0 11

.5

71.2

0.

0 71

.2

9.6

0.0

3RD

DU

I 19

10

0.0

100.

0 5.

3 31

.6

0.0

26.3

31

.6

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 83

.3

100.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

TO

TAL

181

97.2

10

0.0

59.1

23

.8

0.0

23.2

9.

9 0.

0

BORD

EN

1ST

DU

I 11

9 95

.8

83.2

87

.4

5.0

0.0

3.4

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 60

93

.3

85.0

8.

3 76

.7

0.0

68.3

1.

7 10

.0

3RD

DU

I 20

95

.0

65.0

5.

0 5.

0 0.

0 5.

0 10

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 66

.7

83.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

205

94.1

82

.0

53.7

25

.9

0.0

22.4

1.

5 2.

9

MA

DER

A

1ST

DU

I 22

0 97

.7

98.2

88

.6

2.3

0.0

0.5

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 81

97

.5

96.3

17

.3

61.7

0.

0 19

.8

2.5

1.2

3RD

DU

I 36

91

.7

100.

0 5.

6 30

.6

0.0

2.8

19.4

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 10

60

.0

90.0

20

.0

10.0

0.

0 10

.0

10.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

347

96.0

97

.7

61.4

19

.3

0.0

5.5

2.9

0.3

BA

SS L

AK

E 1S

T D

UI

62

100.

0 80

.6

35.5

1.

6 1.

6 1.

6 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

27

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

48.1

0.

0 40

.7

3.7

3.7

3RD

DU

I 10

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 30

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

Page 124: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

114

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 10

1 10

0.0

88.1

21

.8

16.8

1.

0 11

.9

2.0

1.0

MA

RIN

SU

P SA

N R

AFA

EL

1ST

DU

I 5

100.

0 60

.0

40.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 60

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 11

81

.8

100.

0 9.

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 63

.6

0.0

TOTA

L 17

82

.4

88.2

17

.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

58.8

0.

0

JUV

SA

N R

AFA

EL

1ST

DU

I 5

40.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 5

40.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

SA

N R

AFA

EL

1ST

DU

I 10

03

99.9

6.

0 94

.6

2.0

0.0

94.0

5.

0 0.

2

2N

D D

UI

293

100.

0 88

.4

8.5

85.0

0.

0 94

.2

3.4

29.7

3R

D D

UI

87

100.

0 80

.5

1.1

26.4

0.

0 46

.0

50.6

28

.7

4TH

+ D

UI

15

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0 13

.3

46.7

6.

7

TO

TAL

1398

99

.9

28.9

69

.7

21.1

0.

0 90

.2

7.9

8.2

MA

RIP

OSA

SU

P M

ARI

POSA

1S

T D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 7

85.7

10

0.0

14.3

57

.1

0.0

28.6

0.

0 0.

0

MA

RIPO

SA

1ST

DU

I 49

98

.0

95.9

93

.9

0.0

2.0

4.1

6.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 17

10

0.0

100.

0 11

.8

76.5

0.

0 5.

9 17

.6

5.9

3RD

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

28.6

0.

0 0.

0 14

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 73

98

.6

97.3

65

.8

20.5

1.

4 4.

1 9.

6 1.

4

USM

AG

1S

T D

UI

47

95.7

59

.6

83.0

4.

3 0.

0 83

.0

4.3

0.0

YO

SEM

ITE

2ND

DU

I 14

10

0.0

92.9

14

.3

78.6

0.

0 7.

1 71

.4

0.0

3RD

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0 25

.0

75.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 66

97

.0

69.7

62

.1

24.2

0.

0 62

.1

22.7

0.

0 M

END

OC

INO

SU

P U

KIA

H

1ST

DU

I 4

50.0

50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 7

0.0

14.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 13

38

.5

76.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 7.

7 0.

0

TO

TAL

24

29.2

54

.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.2

0.0

JU

V U

KIA

H

1ST

DU

I 11

45

.5

9.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

9.1

54.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

11

45.5

9.

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 9.

1 54

.5

0.0

W

ILLI

TS

1ST

DU

I 80

93

.8

95.0

83

.8

3.8

0.0

7.5

3.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 36

91

.7

100.

0 5.

6 69

.4

0.0

66.7

2.

8 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

16

75.0

93

.8

6.3

31.3

0.

0 6.

3 12

.5

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 13

5 90

.4

96.3

51

.9

25.2

0.

0 23

.0

4.4

0.0

U

KIA

H M

UN

I 1S

T D

UI

227

93.8

93

.4

79.3

4.

8 0.

0 6.

6 3.

5 0.

4

2N

D D

UI

100

93.0

10

0.0

8.0

62.0

0.

0 48

.0

18.0

1.

0

3R

D D

UI

41

80.5

97

.6

9.8

22.0

0.

0 7.

3 53

.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

TO

TAL

374

91.7

95

.7

51.3

22

.2

0.0

17.6

13

.4

0.5

BO

ON

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 9

88.9

88

.9

0.0

44.4

0.

0 11

.1

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Page 125: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

115

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 10

90

.0

90.0

0.

0 40

.0

0.0

10.0

0.

0 0.

0

PT. A

REN

A

1ST

DU

I 8

100.

0 10

0.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 37

.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 9

100.

0 10

0.0

66.7

11

.1

0.0

11.1

33

.3

0.0

LI

TTLE

LA

KE

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 3

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

LEG

GET

T 1S

T D

UI

16

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

11

81.8

90

.9

9.1

54.5

0.

0 36

.4

18.2

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

31

93.5

96

.8

61.3

19

.4

0.0

12.9

12

.9

0.0

C

OV

ELO

1S

T D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

33.3

33

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

6 83

.3

100.

0 16

.7

33.3

0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

FO

RT B

RAG

G

1ST

DU

I 90

10

0.0

97.8

87

.8

3.3

0.0

3.3

14.4

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

33

100.

0 10

0.0

15.2

78

.8

0.0

54.5

12

.1

0.0

3RD

DU

I 12

10

0.0

100.

0 8.

3 58

.3

0.0

25.0

50

.0

8.3

4TH

+ D

UI

2 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 13

7 99

.3

97.8

62

.0

26.3

0.

0 17

.5

17.5

0.

7

UK

IAH

1S

T D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 5

100.

0 10

0.0

80.0

20

.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0 0.

0 M

ERC

ED

SUP

MER

CED

1S

T D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

40.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

36

66.7

97

.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

27.8

0.

0

TO

TAL

48

68.8

97

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

22.9

0.

0

JUV

MER

CED

1S

T D

UI

20

5.0

5.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 4

25.0

25

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 27

11

.1

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 18

.5

0.0

MER

CED

SU

P M

ERC

ED

1ST

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

5 40

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 36

66

.7

97.2

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 27

.8

0.0

TOTA

L 48

68

.8

97.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 22

.9

0.0

JU

V M

ERC

ED

1ST

DU

I 20

5.

0 5.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 25

.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

27

11.1

11

.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

18.5

0.

0

MER

CED

1S

T D

UI

606

98.8

96

.4

83.0

6.

4 0.

0 6.

6 1.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

240

99.2

98

.3

7.5

77.5

0.

4 65

.8

2.5

0.4

Page 126: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

116

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

3RD

DU

I 94

97

.9

100.

0 6.

4 40

.4

0.0

21.3

24

.5

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

37

83.8

10

0.0

2.7

21.6

0.

0 10

.8

21.6

0.

0

TO

TAL

977

98.3

97

.3

54.0

27

.7

0.1

22.7

4.

8 0.

1

LOS

BAN

OS

1ST

DU

I 18

7 10

0.0

96.3

92

.5

3.2

0.0

3.7

1.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 69

10

0.0

100.

0 7.

2 84

.1

0.0

68.1

1.

4 1.

4

3R

D D

UI

30

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

36.7

0.

0 3.

3 3.

3 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 6

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 16

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 29

2 10

0.0

97.6

61

.0

26.4

0.

0 18

.8

1.7

0.3

MO

DO

C

SUP

MO

DO

C

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

ALT

UR

AS

1ST

DU

I 52

96

.2

75.0

84

.6

1.9

0.0

23.1

9.

6 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

14

78.6

78

.6

0.0

64.3

0.

0 42

.9

7.1

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 69

88

.4

76.8

63

.8

14.5

0.

0 26

.1

11.6

0.

0 M

ON

O

BRID

GEP

OR

T 1S

T D

UI

16

100.

0 62

.5

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 6.

3 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

66.7

0.

0 33

.3

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 20

10

0.0

70.0

10

.0

10.0

0.

0 15

.0

0.0

5.0

M

AM

OTH

LK

ES

1ST

DU

I 73

98

.6

49.3

80

.8

0.0

0.0

5.5

1.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 15

10

0.0

73.3

6.

7 60

.0

0.0

46.7

0.

0 6.

7

3R

D D

UI

12

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0 33

.3

8.3

25.0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

TOTA

L 10

3 99

.0

60.2

58

.3

18.4

0.

0 14

.6

1.9

4.9

MO

NTE

REY

SU

P M

ON

TERE

Y

1ST

DU

I 15

73

.3

100.

0 6.

7 13

.3

0.0

6.7

20.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

12

83.3

83

.3

0.0

8.3

0.0

8.3

8.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 8

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

91

75.8

89

.0

8.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

27.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

126

76.2

90

.5

7.1

2.4

0.0

1.6

23.0

0.

0

JUV

MO

NTE

REY

1S

T D

UI

18

88.9

44

.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

44.4

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 20

90

.0

40.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 40

.0

0.0

M

ON

TERE

Y 1S

T D

UI

710

99.2

99

.0

88.2

1.

0 0.

0 1.

3 12

.8

0.3

2ND

DU

I 19

9 99

.0

100.

0 2.

5 28

.6

0.0

15.1

70

.9

1.0

3RD

DU

I 76

98

.7

98.7

2.

6 3.

9 0.

0 2.

6 64

.5

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

12

83.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

58.3

0.

0

TO

TAL

997

98.9

99

.2

63.5

6.

7 0.

0 4.

1 28

.9

0.4

SA

LIN

AS

1ST

DU

I 11

38

98.2

98

.5

86.7

1.

9 0.

0 0.

2 5.

4 0.

4

2N

D D

UI

376

99.2

99

.2

8.2

67.0

0.

0 10

.1

55.1

0.

8

3R

D D

UI

165

97.6

10

0.0

3.0

23.0

0.

0 1.

8 53

.9

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

26

100.

0 10

0.0

11.5

30

.8

0.0

0.0

50.0

3.

8

TO

TAL

17

05

98.4

98

.8

60.2

18

.8

0.0

2.5

21.7

0.

5

KIN

G C

ITY

1ST

DU

I 53

0 99

.1

99.2

65

.3

0.9

0.0

0.8

31.7

0.

2

2N

D D

UI

220

98.2

99

.1

3.2

28.2

0.

0 19

.1

72.7

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

93

97.8

10

0.0

0.0

2.2

0.0

0.0

64.5

0.

0

Page 127: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

117

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

4TH

+ D

UI

7 10

0.0

85.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 71

.4

0.0

TOTA

L 85

0 98

.7

99.2

41

.5

8.1

0.0

5.4

46.2

0.

1

USM

AG

1S

T D

UI

7 10

0.0

28.6

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

71.4

0.

0 0.

0

M

ON

TERE

Y

2ND

DU

I 3

100.

0 66

.7

66.7

33

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

10

100.

0 40

.0

90.0

10

.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0 0.

0 N

APA

SU

P N

APA

1S

T D

UI

22

77.3

86

.4

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 13

.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 6

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

29

10.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 58

41

.4

94.8

19

.0

5.2

0.0

0.0

5.2

0.0

N

APA

1S

T D

UI

643

99.5

98

.4

90.2

1.

7 0.

0 2.

0 1.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

197

98.5

99

.5

6.6

84.3

0.

0 64

.5

0.0

4.1

3RD

DU

I 69

95

.7

100.

0 4.

3 47

.8

0.0

34.8

7.

2 8.

7

4T

H+

DU

I 9

100.

0 88

.9

0.0

22.2

0.

0 11

.1

11.1

11

.1

TOTA

L 91

8 99

.0

98.7

64

.9

23.1

0.

0 18

.0

1.6

1.6

NEV

AD

A

SUP

NEV

AD

A

1ST

DU

I 10

80

.0

70.0

30

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

8 25

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 37

.5

0.0

TOTA

L 20

50

.0

85.0

15

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

45.0

0.

0

NEV

AD

A C

ITY

1ST

DU

I 18

3 98

.4

88.0

77

.6

12.0

0.

0 29

.5

1.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 62

98

.4

100.

0 3.

2 82

.3

0.0

83.9

1.

6 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

20

95.0

10

0.0

0.0

30.0

0.

0 15

.0

10.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 26

7 98

.1

91.8

53

.9

29.6

0.

0 40

.8

1.9

0.0

TR

UC

KEE

MU

NI

1ST

DU

I 99

96

.0

90.9

80

.8

7.1

0.0

3.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 29

10

0.0

96.6

13

.8

82.8

0.

0 65

.5

0.0

6.9

3RD

DU

I 5

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 60

.0

20.0

20

.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

TOTA

L 13

5 97

.0

92.6

62

.2

27.4

0.

0 19

.3

0.7

3.0

ORA

NG

E SU

P SA

NTA

AN

A

1ST

DU

I 40

77

.5

90.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 2.

5 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

18

77.8

94

.4

0.0

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 5.

6 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

14

64.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

125

58.4

92

.8

0.0

0.8

0.0

0.0

0.8

0.0

TOTA

L 19

7 64

.5

92.9

0.

0 1.

5 0.

0 0.

0 1.

5 0.

0

JUV

ORA

NG

E 1S

T D

UI

47

95.7

34

.0

78.7

2.

1 0.

0 14

.9

66.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

47

95.7

34

.0

78.7

2.

1 0.

0 14

.9

66.0

0.

0

FULL

ERTO

N

1ST

DU

I 23

70

99.5

31

.9

93.1

1.

5 0.

0 63

.2

5.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 65

0 98

.9

95.5

5.

4 86

.9

0.0

67.8

2.

0 5.

1

3R

D D

UI

185

97.8

97

.8

3.2

67.6

0.

0 13

.0

1.1

4.3

4TH

+ D

UI

17

88.2

10

0.0

5.9

47.1

0.

0 11

.8

0.0

5.9

TOTA

L 32

22

99.2

48

.9

69.8

22

.7

0.0

61.0

4.

7 1.

3

WES

TMIN

STER

1S

T D

UI

1755

99

.3

12.6

92

.4

1.4

0.0

94.1

0.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

504

98.2

92

.3

6.9

82.1

0.

0 90

.9

2.0

25.8

3R

D D

UI

125

100.

0 91

.2

4.0

73.6

0.

8 28

.8

0.8

12.8

Page 128: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

118

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

4TH

+ D

UI

16

87.5

68

.8

6.3

43.8

0.

0 56

.3

6.3

25.0

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 24

00

99.0

33

.8

69.3

22

.4

0.0

89.8

1.

0 6.

3

LAG

UN

A H

ILLS

1S

T D

UI

1279

10

0.0

10.2

90

.2

1.3

0.0

89.8

6.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

374

100.

0 96

.3

2.9

83.2

0.

0 85

.0

9.6

0.0

3RD

DU

I 76

10

0.0

96.1

2.

6 61

.8

0.0

7.9

2.6

1.3

4TH

+ D

UI

8 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1737

10

0.0

32.9

67

.2

21.9

0.

0 85

.0

7.3

0.1

N

EWPO

RT B

CH

1S

T D

UI

1534

99

.8

15.3

93

.2

2.0

0.0

89.6

5.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

399

99.7

97

.0

3.3

87.5

0.

0 77

.2

20.3

4.

5

3R

D D

UI

98

94.9

99

.0

2.0

75.5

0.

0 12

.2

9.2

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 50

.0

100.

0 16

.7

33.3

0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 20

37

99.4

35

.5

71.0

22

.4

0.0

83.3

8.

7 0.

9

SAN

TA A

NA

1S

T D

UI

1748

99

.7

24.2

95

.7

1.6

0.1

81.6

2.

6 0.

1

2N

D D

UI

472

98.5

94

.3

7.8

86.4

0.

0 85

.2

3.6

7.8

3RD

DU

I 11

9 97

.5

95.8

3.

4 78

.2

0.0

22.7

5.

0 6.

7

4T

H+

DU

I 14

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 92

.9

0.0

14.3

0.

0 7.

1

TO

TAL

2353

99

.4

42.3

72

.8

23.0

0.

0 78

.9

2.9

2.0

SN

TA A

NA

PV

ST

1ST

DU

I 24

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

29

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TUST

IN P

VST

1S

T D

UI

2 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 PL

AC

ER

SUP

PLA

CER

1S

T D

UI

7 71

.4

71.4

42

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

6 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

9 44

.4

88.9

0.

0 22

.2

0.0

11.1

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

24

58.3

87

.5

12.5

12

.5

0.0

4.2

4.2

0.0

JU

V P

LAC

ER

1ST

DU

I 10

10

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

10

10.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

A

UBU

RN M

UN

I 1S

T D

UI

360

99.4

90

.6

92.2

2.

2 0.

0 10

.8

3.1

0.8

2ND

DU

I 12

7 10

0.0

99.2

3.

9 81

.1

0.0

75.6

3.

1 27

.6

3RD

DU

I 30

10

0.0

83.3

0.

0 30

.0

0.0

40.0

46

.7

33.3

4T

H+

DU

I 9

88.9

10

0.0

0.0

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 52

6 99

.4

92.4

64

.1

23.0

0.

0 27

.9

6.1

9.1

C

OLF

AX

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

RO

SEV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

458

99.3

90

.4

88.2

2.

8 0.

0 11

.1

3.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 15

6 96

.8

94.9

10

.3

76.9

0.

0 67

.3

6.4

9.0

3RD

DU

I 48

93

.8

93.8

8.

3 54

.2

2.1

39.6

10

.4

10.4

4T

H+

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 66

5 98

.3

91.7

63

.8

24.4

0.

2 26

.5

5.0

2.9

FO

REST

HIL

L 1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

Page 129: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

119

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 3

100.

0 10

0.0

33.3

66

.7

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

TAH

OE

CIT

Y 1S

T D

UI

190

99.5

10

0.0

94.2

3.

2 0.

0 28

.9

3.2

0.0

2ND

DU

I 53

98

.1

100.

0 3.

8 81

.1

0.0

79.2

0.

0 13

.2

3RD

DU

I 24

10

0.0

83.3

0.

0 54

.2

4.2

45.8

25

.0

12.5

4T

H+

DU

I 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

269

98.9

98

.5

67.3

23

.0

0.4

40.1

4.

8 3.

7 PL

UM

AS

SUP

PLU

MA

S 1S

T D

UI

2 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

3 33

.3

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

Q

UIN

CY

1ST

DU

I 84

98

.8

95.2

82

.1

8.3

0.0

28.6

1.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

27

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

81.5

0.

0 77

.8

3.7

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

117

99.1

96

.6

59.8

24

.8

0.0

39.3

1.

7 0.

0 R

IVER

SID

E SU

P RI

VER

SID

E 1S

T D

UI

55

81.8

96

.4

5.5

1.8

0.0

3.6

1.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 21

85

.7

95.2

0.

0 52

.4

0.0

42.9

4.

8 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

9 77

.8

100.

0 22

.2

0.0

0.0

22.2

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 40

52

.5

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

125

72.8

97

.6

4.0

9.6

0.0

10.4

1.

6 0.

0

SUP

IND

IO

1ST

DU

I 34

6 98

.6

11.0

3.

8 0.

6 0.

0 87

.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 10

5 99

.0

81.9

1.

9 42

.9

0.0

92.4

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

55

98.2

10

0.0

0.0

14.5

0.

0 78

.2

1.8

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

34

44.1

97

.1

0.0

5.9

0.0

23.5

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

540

95.2

39

.3

2.8

10.6

0.

0 83

.1

0.2

0.0

JU

V R

IVER

SID

E 1S

T D

UI

25

88.0

20

.0

4.0

0.0

0.0

12.0

60

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 25

88

.0

20.0

4.

0 0.

0 0.

0 12

.0

60.0

0.

0

JUV

IND

IO

1ST

DU

I 7

85.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 7

85.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

C

ORO

NA

1S

T D

UI

391

99.7

64

.5

92.8

0.

3 0.

0 49

.9

1.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 11

3 98

.2

95.6

27

.4

69.0

0.

0 71

.7

1.8

0.0

3RD

DU

I 34

94

.1

100.

0 14

.7

20.6

0.

0 14

.7

50.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

28.6

28

.6

0.0

14.3

28

.6

0.0

TOTA

L 54

5 99

.1

73.6

73

.6

16.1

0.

0 51

.7

5.1

0.0

H

EMET

1S

T D

UI

316

99.7

71

.2

91.1

3.

8 0.

0 76

.9

0.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 11

4 10

0.0

95.6

14

.9

79.8

0.

0 93

.0

0.9

0.0

3RD

DU

I 32

10

0.0

100.

0 9.

4 50

.0

0.0

31.3

3.

1 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 30

93

.3

96.7

0.

0 46

.7

0.0

6.7

16.7

0.

0

TO

TAL

492

99.4

80

.3

62.6

27

.0

0.0

73.4

1.

8 0.

0

BAN

NIN

G

1ST

DU

I 22

5 97

.8

47.6

91

.6

1.8

0.0

64.0

1.

8 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

68

100.

0 88

.2

4.4

82.4

4.

4 79

.4

2.9

0.0

3RD

DU

I 23

10

0.0

95.7

8.

7 52

.2

0.0

26.1

30

.4

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

16.7

16

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 32

2 98

.4

60.6

65

.5

23.6

0.

9 63

.7

4.3

0.0

IN

DIO

1S

T D

UI

639

99.5

6.

6 76

.1

2.0

0.0

93.1

1.

3 0.

2

Page 130: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

120

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

2ND

DU

I 29

9 99

.0

90.0

7.

0 81

.9

0.0

93.0

0.

7 1.

7

3R

D D

UI

54

96.3

88

.9

5.6

40.7

0.

0 37

.0

18.5

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 24

91

.7

75.0

4.

2 12

.5

0.0

20.8

20

.8

0.0

TOTA

L 10

16

99.0

37

.1

50.3

27

.9

0.0

88.4

2.

5 0.

6

MO

REN

O V

LY

1ST

DU

I 12

22

99.7

79

.1

88.1

5.

0 0.

0 1.

1 0.

0 0.

1

2N

D D

UI

313

98.7

97

.8

60.1

28

.4

1.3

22.4

0.

0 2.

2

3R

D D

UI

116

98.3

99

.1

77.6

7.

8 0.

0 5.

2 0.

0 2.

6

4T

H+

DU

I 23

95

.7

95.7

56

.5

4.3

0.0

4.3

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 16

74

99.3

84

.2

81.7

9.

6 0.

2 5.

4 0.

0 0.

7

PALM

SPR

ING

S 1S

T D

UI

121

100.

0 4.

1 71

.1

0.8

0.0

96.7

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

35

100.

0 88

.6

14.3

77

.1

0.0

88.6

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

8 87

.5

87.5

25

.0

12.5

0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 16

7 99

.4

27.5

55

.7

17.4

0.

0 90

.4

0.0

0.0

BL

YTH

E 1S

T D

UI

145

98.6

37

.2

83.4

1.

4 0.

0 77

.2

2.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 45

10

0.0

88.9

11

.1

73.3

0.

0 84

.4

2.2

0.0

3RD

DU

I 13

10

0.0

92.3

15

.4

53.8

0.

0 23

.1

7.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

205

99.0

52

.7

62.4

20

.5

0.0

74.6

2.

4 0.

0

PER

RIS

1ST

DU

I 56

4 99

.6

39.9

92

.9

4.3

0.0

70.9

0.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

140

98.6

90

.0

14.3

76

.4

0.0

85.7

0.

7 0.

7

3R

D D

UI

52

96.2

92

.3

1.9

38.5

0.

0 25

.0

1.9

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

15

73.3

93

.3

0.0

20.0

0.

0 20

.0

6.7

0.0

TOTA

L 77

1 98

.7

53.6

70

.7

20.0

0.

0 69

.5

0.6

0.1

EL

SIN

OR

E 1S

T D

UI

3 10

0.0

33.3

66

.7

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 8

100.

0 75

.0

25.0

50

.0

0.0

87.5

0.

0 0.

0

TC M

ARC

H A

FB

1ST

DU

I 4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

4 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

SAC

RAM

ENTO

SU

P SA

CTO

1S

T D

UI

67

76.1

98

.5

44.8

11

.9

0.0

1.5

7.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 56

83

.9

100.

0 10

.7

21.4

0.

0 3.

6 7.

1 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

37

51.4

10

0.0

0.0

27.0

0.

0 0.

0 8.

1 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 21

8 59

.2

99.1

2.

3 32

.6

0.0

0.0

5.0

0.0

TOTA

L 37

8 65

.1

99.2

10

.8

26.7

0.

0 0.

8 6.

1 0.

0

JUV

SA

CTO

TRF

1S

T D

UI

49

28.6

28

.6

8.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

53.1

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

51

31.4

31

.4

7.8

2.0

0.0

2.0

51.0

0.

0

SAC

RAM

ENTO

1S

T D

UI

3363

99

.3

97.6

89

.9

1.8

0.0

2.1

0.2

0.0

2ND

DU

I 12

29

99.6

98

.9

5.5

64.8

0.

0 62

.8

0.5

0.6

3RD

DU

I 48

7 98

.6

98.2

2.

3 24

.4

0.0

9.2

0.8

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

100

98.0

98

.0

1.0

21.0

0.

0 11

.0

3.0

0.0

TOTA

L 51

79

99.3

98

.0

59.9

19

.2

0.0

17.4

0.

4 0.

1

Page 131: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

121

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

EL

K G

ROV

E 1S

T D

UI

81

100.

0 97

.5

90.1

0.

0 0.

0 2.

5 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

30

96.7

96

.7

0.0

66.7

0.

0 66

.7

3.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 6

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 11

7 99

.1

97.4

62

.4

18.8

0.

0 19

.7

0.9

0.0

G

ALT

1S

T D

UI

36

100.

0 10

0.0

8.3

83.3

0.

0 0.

0 2.

8 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

19

100.

0 94

.7

0.0

73.7

0.

0 57

.9

10.5

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

6 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 16

.7

0.0

16.7

50

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

63

100.

0 98

.4

6.3

71.4

0.

0 19

.0

12.7

0.

0

WA

LNU

T G

RO

VE

1ST

DU

I 39

10

0.0

92.3

10

.3

82.1

0.

0 10

.3

2.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 12

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 91

.7

0.0

91.7

8.

3 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

53

98.1

92

.5

7.5

81.1

0.

0 28

.3

3.8

0.0

U

SMA

G S

AC

TO

1ST

DU

I 3

100.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 3

100.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

U

S C

T SA

CTO

1S

T D

UI

7 10

0.0

42.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 28

.6

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 13

10

0.0

69.2

15

.4

0.0

0.0

15.4

0.

0 0.

0 SA

N B

ENIT

O

JUV

S B

ENIT

O

1ST

DU

I 6

66.7

16

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

83.3

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 7

71.4

28

.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

85.7

0.

0

HO

LLIS

TER

1S

T D

UI

155

96.8

98

.1

68.4

0.

0 0.

0 1.

9 21

.3

1.3

2ND

DU

I 64

93

.8

85.9

3.

1 39

.1

0.0

53.1

20

.3

39.1

3R

D D

UI

30

100.

0 76

.7

0.0

13.3

0.

0 30

.0

3.3

20.0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 25

1 96

.0

92.4

43

.0

11.6

0.

0 18

.3

18.7

13

.1

SAN

SU

P SA

N B

ERN

1S

T D

UI

14

57.1

92

.9

7.1

0.0

0.0

7.1

7.1

0.0

B

ERN

ARD

INO

2ND

DU

I 9

44.4

88

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 4

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 25

60

.0

96.0

0.

0 4.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

52

57.7

94

.2

1.9

1.9

0.0

3.8

1.9

0.0

SU

P RA

NC

HO

1S

T D

UI

16

62.5

10

0.0

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 6.

3 0.

0 0.

0

C

UC

AM

NG

A

2ND

DU

I 6

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 4

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

25

48.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 51

52

.9

100.

0 3.

9 0.

0 0.

0 2.

0 0.

0 0.

0

SUP

VIC

TORV

LE

1ST

DU

I 5

80.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 9

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

15

26.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

SU

P BA

RST

OW

1S

T D

UI

5 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

33.3

10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Page 132: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

122

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

4TH

+ D

UI

21

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

30

3.3

100.

0 0.

0 3.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

SUP

JOSH

UA

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

T

REE

4TH

+ D

UI

5 80

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 6

83.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0

JUV

TR

F SA

N

1ST

DU

I 27

85

.2

0.0

85.2

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

BER

NA

RDIN

O

TOTA

L 27

85

.2

0.0

85.2

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

JU

V S

AN

BER

NO

1S

T D

UI

6 83

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

6 83

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

RA

NC

HO

1S

T D

UI

4 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

C

UC

AM

NG

A

TOTA

L 4

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C

HIN

O

1ST

DU

I 26

3 97

.7

8.0

0.0

1.1

0.0

86.7

0.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

94

98.9

91

.5

0.0

83.0

0.

0 89

.4

3.2

1.1

3RD

DU

I 17

10

0.0

88.2

0.

0 58

.8

0.0

64.7

5.

9 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 37

5 97

.9

32.5

0.

0 24

.3

0.0

86.1

1.

3 0.

3

BARS

TOW

1S

T D

UI

224

96.9

46

.9

0.4

2.2

0.0

53.1

5.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

71

93.0

90

.1

0.0

76.1

0.

0 57

.7

19.7

4.

2

3R

D D

UI

16

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

31.3

0.

0 18

.8

6.3

6.3

4TH

+ D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 31

4 94

.6

59.9

0.

3 20

.4

0.0

51.9

9.

2 1.

3

RED

LAN

DS

1ST

DU

I 12

6 94

.4

14.3

0.

8 0.

8 0.

0 77

.0

1.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 38

92

.1

71.1

0.

0 28

.9

0.0

57.9

13

.2

0.0

3RD

DU

I 12

10

0.0

83.3

0.

0 8.

3 0.

0 16

.7

8.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

10

100.

0 80

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

186

94.6

33

.9

0.5

7.0

0.0

65.6

4.

3 0.

0

S BE

RN C

NTR

L 1S

T D

UI

877

96.1

24

.6

0.3

1.9

0.0

69.2

10

.6

0.2

2ND

DU

I 25

8 95

.0

85.7

0.

0 57

.0

0.0

62.4

17

.1

3.9

3RD

DU

I 91

81

.3

86.8

0.

0 15

.4

0.0

22.0

9.

9 1.

1

4T

H+

DU

I 21

57

.1

81.0

0.

0 9.

5 0.

0 0.

0 4.

8 0.

0

TO

TAL

1247

94

.1

42.7

0.

2 14

.4

0.0

63.2

11

.8

1.0

FO

NTA

NA

1S

T D

UI

630

99.7

13

.7

0.3

1.1

0.0

74.4

6.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

211

99.1

66

.8

0.0

64.5

0.

0 80

.1

11.4

1.

4

3R

D D

UI

69

98.6

81

.2

0.0

18.8

0.

0 24

.6

42.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 12

10

0.0

75.0

0.

0 41

.7

0.0

33.3

33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 92

2 99

.5

31.7

0.

2 17

.5

0.0

71.5

10

.7

0.3

V

ICTO

RVIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 46

8 98

.1

28.8

0.

0 2.

6 0.

0 72

.9

1.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 16

3 98

.8

79.8

0.

0 71

.2

0.0

83.4

3.

1 1.

2

3R

D D

UI

45

88.9

88

.9

0.0

35.6

0.

0 33

.3

8.9

2.2

4TH

+ D

UI

14

35.7

10

0.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

7.1

21.4

0.

0

TO

TAL

690

96.4

46

.2

0.0

21.0

0.

0 71

.4

2.5

0.4

RA

NC

HO

1S

T D

UI

1212

95

.5

31.6

0.

0 1.

3 0.

0 60

.4

2.2

0.0

CU

CM

NG

A

2ND

DU

I 36

7 92

.6

89.1

0.

0 73

.0

0.0

80.9

4.

4 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

94

60.6

91

.5

0.0

24.5

0.

0 29

.8

9.6

0.0

Page 133: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

123

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

4TH

+ D

UI

18

50.0

94

.4

0.0

22.2

0.

0 22

.2

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 16

91

92.5

48

.1

0.0

18.4

0.

0 62

.7

3.1

0.0

BI

G B

EAR

LAK

E 1S

T D

UI

83

97.6

15

.7

0.0

3.6

0.0

85.5

2.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

27

96.3

88

.9

0.0

74.1

0.

0 81

.5

14.8

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

9 88

.9

100.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

11.1

22

.2

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 12

0 96

.7

39.2

0.

0 20

.0

0.0

79.2

6.

7 0.

0

TWIN

PEA

KS

1ST

DU

I 10

5 97

.1

23.8

1.

9 1.

9 0.

0 71

.4

3.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 28

10

0.0

96.4

0.

0 78

.6

0.0

32.1

53

.6

0.0

3RD

DU

I 9

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

22.2

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

33.3

33

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 14

5 96

.6

42.8

1.

4 16

.6

0.0

57.9

14

.5

0.0

N

EED

LES

1ST

DU

I 99

98

.0

13.1

0.

0 3.

0 0.

0 68

.7

11.1

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

41

100.

0 36

.6

0.0

53.7

0.

0 73

.2

12.2

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

10

100.

0 80

.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0 20

.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

150

98.7

24

.0

0.0

18.0

0.

0 66

.7

14.0

0.

0

TRO

NA

1S

T D

UI

5 10

0.0

20.0

80

.0

20.0

0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 4

100.

0 50

.0

25.0

25

.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

25.0

TO

TAL

9 10

0.0

33.3

55

.6

22.2

22

.2

77.8

0.

0 11

.1

JO

SHU

A T

REE

1ST

DU

I 13

9 98

.6

7.9

0.0

2.9

0.0

87.8

4.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

33

100.

0 54

.5

0.0

81.8

0.

0 84

.8

3.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 20

10

0.0

95.0

0.

0 15

.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 19

3 99

.0

25.4

0.

0 17

.6

0.0

78.2

4.

7 0.

0 SA

N D

IEG

O

SUP

SAN

DIE

GO

1S

T D

UI

21

85.7

10

0.0

14.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

13

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

7.7

0.0

7.7

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

100.

0 80

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

35

60.0

10

0.0

0.0

5.7

0.0

2.9

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 74

77

.0

98.6

4.

1 4.

1 0.

0 2.

7 0.

0 0.

0

SUP

VIS

TA

1ST

DU

I 50

86

.0

96.0

6.

0 2.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

19

84.2

10

0.0

5.3

10.5

0.

0 5.

3 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 28

85

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

100

86.0

98

.0

4.0

4.0

0.0

1.0

1.0

0.0

SU

P C

HU

LA

1ST

DU

I 27

81

.5

100.

0 3.

7 7.

4 0.

0 7.

4 0.

0 0.

0

V

ISTA

2N

D D

UI

9 55

.6

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

6 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 26

50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

68

64.7

10

0.0

1.5

2.9

0.0

2.9

0.0

0.0

SU

P EL

CA

HO

N

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

JU

V S

AN

DIE

GO

1S

T D

UI

53

3.8

5.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

60.4

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

Page 134: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

124

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 54

3.

7 7.

4 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 59

.3

0.0

EL

CA

JON

1S

T D

UI

1764

98

.1

97.6

85

.0

2.3

0.0

3.9

2.7

0.1

2ND

DU

I 52

4 96

.4

98.5

6.

5 69

.8

0.0

70.6

3.

6 11

.6

3RD

DU

I 15

6 92

.3

98.7

5.

8 47

.4

0.0

39.7

10

.9

3.8

4TH

+ D

UI

20

80.0

90

.0

5.0

40.0

0.

0 15

.0

5.0

0.0

TOTA

L 24

64

97.2

97

.8

62.7

19

.8

0.0

20.4

3.

4 2.

8

VIS

TA

1ST

DU

I 29

12

98.0

99

.5

84.6

3.

1 0.

0 2.

4 8.

4

0.7

2ND

DU

I 79

9 95

.9

96.5

7.

8 66

.8

0.0

50.3

14

.9

21.9

3R

D D

UI

206

94.2

87

.9

5.3

25.7

0.

0 19

.9

37.9

18

.9

4TH

+ D

UI

43

81.4

88

.4

7.0

23.3

0.

0 16

.3

30.2

11

.6

TOTA

L 39

60

97.2

98

.2

64.1

17

.3

0.0

13.1

11

.5

6.0

SA

N M

ARC

OS

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0

.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

4 75

.0

100.

0 50

.0

25.0

0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

SA

N D

IEG

O

1ST

DU

I 35

37

99.4

95

.4

91.8

3.

7 0.

0 90

.9

1.1

0.5

2ND

DU

I 91

7 98

.6

94.1

9.

3 77

.5

0.0

85.0

2.

4 14

.5

3RD

DU

I 21

9 91

.8

95.9

3.

7 57

.1

0.0

41.6

0.

0 13

.2

4TH

+ D

UI

38

89.5

92

.1

0.0

34.2

0.

0 26

.3

2.6

5.3

TOTA

L 47

11

98.8

95

.1

70.9

20

.8

0.0

86.9

1.

3 3.

8

CH

ULA

VIS

TA

1ST

DU

I 13

05

98.0

76

.2

89.0

3.

2 0.

0 27

.9

5.2

0.0

2ND

DU

I 36

8 97

.3

97.8

8.

2 76

.6

0.0

66.8

9.

8 6.

3

3R

D D

UI

98

96.9

92

.9

4.1

45.9

0.

0 20

.4

45.9

1.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 15

80

.0

100.

0 0.

0 46

.7

0.0

26.7

20

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 17

86

97.6

81

.7

67.0

21

.1

0.0

35.5

8.

5 1.

3

NA

T C

ITY(

76)

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

U

S D

IST

SD

1ST

DU

I 2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

M

IRA

MA

R N

AV

1S

T D

UI

15

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 15

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

SAN

DIE

GO

NA

V

1ST

DU

I 15

46

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

46.7

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

15

46.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 46

.7

0.0

0.0

TC

S D

IEG

O N

AV

1S

T D

UI

17

70.6

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 70

.6

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 17

70

.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

70.6

0.

0 0.

0 SA

N

SUP

SAN

FRA

N

1ST

DU

I 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

FRA

NC

ISC

O

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

4 25

.0

75.0

25

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

7 42

.9

85.7

14

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

71.4

0.

0

JUV

SA

N F

RAN

1S

T D

UI

4 25

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 4

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

SAN

FRA

N

1ST

DU

I 84

9 97

.4

99.2

88

.3

2.1

0.0

11.2

0.

0 0.

1

2N

D D

UI

200

98.5

97

.0

9.0

71.0

0.

5 56

.0

0.5

1.5

3RD

DU

I 51

84

.3

98.0

2.

0 23

.5

0.0

5.9

2.0

2.0

Page 135: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

125

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

4TH

+ D

UI

9 77

.8

100.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

11.1

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1109

96

.8

98.7

69

.3

15.6

0.

1 19

.0

0.2

0.5

U

S D

IST

CT

SF

1ST

DU

I 4

100.

0 25

.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 5

100.

0 40

.0

60.0

20

.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 SA

N JO

AQ

UIN

SU

P SN

JOA

QU

N

1ST

DU

I 14

57

.1

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 42

.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 7

100.

0 85

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

28.6

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

5 80

.0

80.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 40

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

39

59.0

89

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

30.8

0.

0

TO

TAL

65

64.6

80

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.8

0.

0

JUV

SN

JOA

QU

N

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

LO

DI

1ST

DU

I 40

9 98

.3

98.0

79

.2

0.0

0.0

0.5

15.2

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

159

100.

0 99

.4

6.9

59.1

0.

0 62

.3

22.6

18

.2

3RD

DU

I 51

10

0.0

84.3

2.

0 13

.7

0.0

29.4

72

.5

17.6

4T

H+

DU

I 30

86

.7

73.3

0.

0 3.

3 0.

0 33

.3

70.0

23

.3

TOTA

L 64

9 98

.3

96.1

51

.8

15.7

0.

0 19

.4

24.0

6.

9

MA

NTE

CA

1S

T D

UI

237

100.

0 99

.6

90.3

0.

8 0.

0 3.

0 3.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

95

98.9

97

.9

5.3

83.2

0.

0 87

.4

2.1

14.7

3R

D D

UI

46

95.7

82

.6

0.0

8.7

0.0

23.9

65

.2

17.4

4T

H+

DU

I 21

81

.0

81.0

4.

8 9.

5 0.

0 23

.8

57.1

14

.3

TOTA

L 39

9 98

.2

96.2

55

.1

21.8

0.

0 26

.6

13.0

6.

3

TRA

CY

1ST

DU

I 18

5 99

.5

98.9

65

.4

2.2

0.0

1.1

1.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 80

10

0.0

95.0

3.

8 86

.3

0.0

90.0

2.

5 30

.0

3RD

DU

I 32

96

.9

81.3

0.

0 21

.9

0.0

37.5

53

.1

37.5

4T

H+

DU

I 6

66.7

83

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.7

33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 30

3 98

.7

95.7

40

.9

26.4

0.

0 28

.7

7.6

11.9

STO

CK

TON

1S

T D

UI

1051

99

.8

99.6

86

.6

1.7

0.0

1.2

6.6

0.1

2ND

DU

I 43

6 10

0.0

99.3

4.

6 82

.8

0.0

84.9

5.

5 11

.9

3RD

DU

I 18

4 10

0.0

97.3

12

.5

67.9

0.

0 37

.0

41.8

12

.0

4TH

+ D

UI

70

98.6

98

.6

45.7

20

.0

0.0

14.3

37

.1

4.3

TOTA

L 17

41

99.8

99

.3

56.6

29

.8

0.0

26.5

11

.3

4.5

SAN

LU

IS

SUP

S L

OBI

SPO

1S

T D

UI

20

90.0

25

.0

65.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 65

.0

0.0

O

BISP

O

2N

D D

UI

4 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 28

57

.1

89.3

3.

6 7.

1 0.

0 0.

0 35

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 55

69

.1

67.3

25

.5

5.5

0.0

1.8

41.8

0.

0

S LU

IS O

BISP

O

1ST

DU

I 10

61

99.7

99

.4

94.3

2.

5 0.

1 1.

2 0.

4 0.

1

2N

D D

UI

349

98.6

99

.7

10.3

80

.8

0.0

77.7

0.

6 3.

2

3R

D D

UI

149

97.3

99

.3

3.4

76.5

0.

0 10

.7

10.1

4.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 39

71

.8

97.4

5.

1 46

.2

0.0

0.0

20.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

15

98

98.6

99

.4

65.3

27

.5

0.1

18.8

1.

8 1.

1

USM

AG

SL

OBI

SP

1ST

DU

I 3

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 4

100.

0 25

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

Page 136: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

126

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

SAN

MA

TEO

SU

P SA

N M

ATE

O

1ST

DU

I 43

88

.4

95.3

46

.5

11.6

2.

3 7.

0 0.

0 2.

3

2N

D D

UI

7 85

.7

100.

0 0.

0 57

.1

0.0

42.9

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

15

86.7

10

0.0

6.7

13.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 70

74

.3

95.7

0.

0 12

.9

0.0

4.3

1.4

4.3

TOTA

L 13

5 80

.7

96.3

15

.6

14.8

0.

7 6.

7 0.

7 3.

0

JUV

SA

N M

ATE

O

1ST

DU

I 22

68

.2

4.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.5

45.5

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

24

70.8

8.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 4.

2 41

.7

0.0

SO

SN

FR

AN

SCO

1S

T D

UI

1282

99

.4

98.6

91

.3

2.0

0.0

0.9

2.7

0.1

2ND

DU

I 32

8 97

.9

98.5

5.

2 83

.8

0.0

40.5

47

.0

18.9

3R

D D

UI

133

88.0

98

.5

2.3

64.7

0.

0 16

.5

15.0

10

.5

4TH

+ D

UI

7 71

.4

100.

0 0.

0 57

.1

0.0

14.3

0.

0 14

.3

TOTA

L 17

50

98.1

98

.6

68.0

22

.3

0.0

9.6

11.9

4.

5

RED

WO

OD

CIT

Y 1S

T D

UI

1352

97

.6

98.0

90

.5

3.8

0.0

1.9

0.3

0.4

2ND

DU

I 48

4 97

.1

99.4

4.

1 87

.2

0.2

42.8

1.

0 16

.5

3RD

DU

I 16

0 91

.9

98.1

6.

3 71

.9

0.0

21.2

0.

6 15

.6

4TH

+ D

UI

36

50.0

97

.2

2.8

30.6

0.

0 13

.9

0.0

13.9

TO

TAL

2032

96

.2

98.3

61

.8

29.5

0.

0 13

.4

0.5

5.7

SAN

TA

SUP

SNTA

BA

RB

1ST

DU

I 7

71.4

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0

BA

RBA

RA

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 25

40

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 35

48

.6

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 17

.1

0.0

SU

P SN

TA

1ST

DU

I 17

82

.4

29.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 5.

9 0.

0

M

ARI

A

2ND

DU

I 2

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 25

36

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

46

56.5

69

.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.2

0.0

JU

V S

NTA

1S

T D

UI

8 37

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

37.5

0.

0

B

ARB

ARA

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

10

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

SA

NTA

1S

T D

UI

1176

97

.4

97.4

88

.9

0.7

0.0

84.0

13

.4

0.0

BA

RBA

RA

2ND

DU

I 46

3 96

.5

98.3

6.

9 25

.9

0.0

32.6

74

.3

1.9

3RD

DU

I 12

4 94

.4

100.

0 2.

4 62

.1

0.0

3.2

91.9

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 17

76

.5

100.

0 0.

0 52

.9

0.0

0.0

94.1

0.

0

TO

TAL

1780

96

.8

97.8

60

.7

12.0

0.

0 64

.2

35.4

0.

5

SAN

TA M

AR

IA

1ST

DU

I 51

8 99

.4

69.3

84

.4

1.5

0.0

81.9

13

.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 20

3 99

.0

98.5

5.

4 66

.5

0.5

36.9

64

.5

3.9

3RD

DU

I 79

97

.5

98.7

0.

0 17

.7

0.0

5.1

88.6

3.

8

4T

H+

DU

I 37

70

.3

100.

0 0.

0 2.

7 0.

0 2.

7 29

.7

2.7

TOTA

L 83

7 97

.8

80.5

53

.5

18.9

0.

1 60

.2

33.8

1.

4

LOM

POC

1S

T D

UI

191

99.5

13

.1

92.7

0.

0 0.

0 1.

6 3.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

79

100.

0 87

.3

13.9

63

.3

0.0

57.0

17

.7

21.5

Page 137: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

127

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

.

3RD

DU

I 27

10

0.0

81.5

7.

4 18

.5

11.1

22

.2

51.9

14

.8

TOTA

L 29

7 99

.7

39.1

64

.0

18.5

1.

0 18

.2

11.8

7.

1

SOLV

AN

G

1ST

DU

I 12

1 10

0.0

22.3

64

.5

3.3

0.0

82.6

10

.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 48

10

0.0

93.8

0.

0 75

.0

0.0

77.1

16

.7

8.3

3RD

DU

I 20

95

.0

95.0

0.

0 20

.0

0.0

30.0

55

.0

5.0

4TH

+ D

UI

5 80

.0

100.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

20.0

20

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 19

4 99

.0

49.5

40

.2

23.2

0.

0 74

.2

17.0

2.

6

VA

ND

ENBE

RG

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

AFB

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

SAN

TA C

LARA

SU

P SN

TA C

LAR

1ST

DU

I 16

6 81

.3

93.4

48

.2

7.8

0.0

6.0

5.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 88

72

.7

100.

0 2.

3 51

.1

0.0

5.7

5.7

0.0

3RD

DU

I 60

48

.3

100.

0 1.

7 31

.7

0.0

0.0

3.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

336

47.6

98

.2

0.3

29.2

0.

0 0.

3 0.

6 0.

3

TO

TAL

650

59.7

97

.4

12.9

26

.9

0.0

2.5

2.8

0.2

JU

V S

NTA

CLA

R 1S

T D

UI

58

100.

0 36

.2

93.1

0.

0 0.

0 3.

4 25

.9

0.0

TOTA

L 58

10

0.0

36.2

93

.1

0.0

0.0

3.4

25.9

0.

0

LOS

GA

TOS

1ST

DU

I 14

8 96

.6

96.6

81

.8

2.7

0.0

4.7

4.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 41

95

.1

100.

0 7.

3 68

.3

0.0

56.1

14

.6

0.0

3RD

DU

I 16

93

.8

100.

0 0.

0 6.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

209

96.2

97

.6

59.3

16

.7

0.0

14.4

6.

2 0.

0

PALO

ALT

O

1ST

DU

I 53

5 98

.9

95.7

86

.4

0.9

0.0

3.6

6.0

0.4

2ND

DU

I 12

9 98

.4

98.4

6.

2 80

.6

0.0

80.6

4.

7 22

.5

3RD

DU

I 72

97

.2

75.0

2.

8 12

.5

0.0

27.8

8.

3 20

.8

4TH

+ D

UI

7 10

0.0

100.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 74

3 98

.7

94.2

63

.7

15.9

0.

0 19

.2

5.9

6.2

SA

N JO

SE

1ST

DU

I 32

73

90.9

97

.2

69.2

2.

0 0.

0 4.

9 15

.6

0.1

2ND

DU

I 12

91

82.0

99

.1

2.2

56.2

0.

0 55

.9

26.3

4.

4

3R

D D

UI

486

73.0

97

.7

0.0

10.3

0.

2 6.

6 9.

1 1.

6

4T

H+

DU

I 73

63

.0

95.9

0.

0 4.

1 0.

0 2.

7 6.

8 1.

4

TO

TAL

5123

86

.5

97.7

44

.8

16.5

0.

0 17

.9

17.5

1.

3

SAN

JOSE

TR

F 1S

T D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

SAN

TA C

LARA

1S

T D

UI

269

97.0

92

.2

77.0

2.

6 0.

0 8.

2 10

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 87

97

.7

100.

0 6.

9 72

.4

0.0

69.0

6.

9 6.

9

3R

D D

UI

33

97.0

93

.9

3.0

9.1

0.0

12.1

12

.1

6.1

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

391

97.2

94

.1

54.7

18

.9

0.0

22.3

9.

5 2.

0

SUN

NY

VA

LE

1ST

DU

I 56

2 98

.0

63.0

87

.7

1.2

0.0

37.9

2.

8 0.

2

2N

D D

UI

187

97.3

96

.3

8.6

76.5

0.

0 80

.7

4.8

10.7

3R

D D

UI

56

100.

0 94

.6

3.6

8.9

0.0

17.9

8.

9 7.

1

4T

H+

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

28.6

0.

0

TO

TAL

812

98.0

73

.2

62.9

19

.1

0.0

46.1

3.

9 3.

1

GIL

ROY

1S

T D

UI

410

98.5

98

.3

83.7

2.

2 0.

0 5.

1 8.

0 0.

0

Page 138: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

128

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

2ND

DU

I 20

7 96

.6

99.0

2.

4 66

.2

0.0

64.3

14

.5

5.3

3RD

DU

I 63

95

.2

98.4

0.

0 9.

5 0.

0 6.

3 6.

3 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 8

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 68

8 97

.7

98.5

50

.6

22.1

0.

0 23

.0

9.7

1.6

SAN

TA C

RU

Z

SUP

SNTA

CRU

Z 1S

T D

UI

13

100.

0 10

0.0

53.8

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 53

.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 10

90

.0

90.0

0.

0 20

.0

0.0

10.0

40

.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 8

75.0

75

.0

25.0

0.

0 12

.5

0.0

87.5

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 46

76

.1

89.1

15

.2

4.3

4.3

2.2

43.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

77

81.8

89

.6

20.8

5.

2 3.

9 2.

6 49

.4

0.0

JU

V S

NTA

CRU

Z 1S

T D

UI

27

85.2

3.

7 66

.7

0.0

0.0

22.2

51

.9

0.0

TOTA

L 27

85

.2

3.7

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 22

.2

51.9

0.

0

SAN

TA C

RUZ

1ST

DU

I 92

6 99

.6

94.6

90

.1

0.6

0.0

5.8

4.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 34

4 99

.1

98.8

7.

8 61

.0

0.0

61.6

24

.4

2.6

3RD

DU

I 11

6 10

0.0

98.3

4.

3 4.

3 0.

0 5.

2 72

.4

0.9

4TH

+ D

UI

39

94.9

92

.3

2.6

7.7

2.6

2.6

76.9

2.

6

TO

TAL

14

25

99.4

95

.9

60.8

15

.7

0.1

19.2

17

.0

0.8

W

ATS

ON

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 50

9 10

0.0

98.4

90

.4

0.2

0.0

1.0

8.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 19

6 10

0.0

99.5

5.

1 26

.5

0.0

25.0

74

.0

1.0

3RD

DU

I 87

10

0.0

98.9

2.

3 0.

0 0.

0 1.

1 97

.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 79

6 10

0.0

98.7

59

.3

6.7

0.0

6.9

35.1

0.

3 SH

AST

A

SUP

RED

DIN

G

1ST

DU

I 3

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

6 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

19

10.5

10

0.0

5.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

5.3

0.0

TOTA

L 29

27

.6

100.

0 3.

4 6.

9 0.

0 0.

0 6.

9 0.

0

JUV

SH

AST

A

1ST

DU

I 5

20.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

40.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 6

33.3

10

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

BU

RNEY

1S

T D

UI

26

96.2

96

.2

84.6

0.

0 0.

0 11

.5

7.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 12

83

.3

100.

0 8.

3 75

.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0 8.

3

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

39

92.3

97

.4

59.0

25

.6

0.0

33.3

5.

1 2.

6

RED

DIN

G

1ST

DU

I 38

9 97

.7

96.1

91

.0

1.0

0.0

3.6

3.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 19

7 96

.4

97.5

8.

6 83

.2

0.0

83.2

1.

5 4.

6

3R

D D

UI

87

97.7

97

.7

6.9

59.8

0.

0 14

.9

3.4

1.1

4TH

+ D

UI

21

57.1

10

0.0

4.8

33.3

0.

0 14

.3

9.5

0.0

TOTA

L 69

4 96

.1

96.8

54

.5

32.7

0.

0 28

.0

3.0

1.4

U

SMA

G R

EDN

G

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

SIER

RA

D

OW

NIE

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 23

95

.7

95.7

95

.7

0.0

0.0

4.3

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 11

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 81

.8

0.0

72.7

18

.2

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 33

.3

33.3

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Page 139: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

129

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TOTA

L 38

97

.4

97.4

57

.9

26.3

0.

0 26

.3

7.9

0.0

SISK

IYO

U

SUP

SISK

IYO

U

4TH

+ D

UI

5 20

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

5 20

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

SIS

KIY

OU

1S

T D

UI

4 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

DO

RRIS

1S

T D

UI

12

100.

0 10

0.0

16.7

8.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 15

10

0.0

100.

0 13

.3

13.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

WEE

D

1ST

DU

I 80

98

.8

93.8

82

.5

2.5

0.0

5.0

5.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 26

10

0.0

100.

0 7.

7 80

.8

0.0

65.4

0.

0 23

.1

3RD

DU

I 14

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 71

.4

0.0

21.4

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

122

99.2

95

.9

55.7

28

.7

0.0

19.7

3.

3 4.

9

WEE

D JU

ST

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TU

LELA

KE

1ST

DU

I 17

10

0.0

88.2

23

.5

5.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 5

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 22

10

0.0

90.9

18

.2

18.2

0.

0 0.

0 4.

5 0.

0

YREK

A

1ST

DU

I 96

94

.8

96.9

70

.8

4.2

0.0

0.0

10.4

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

26

100.

0 92

.3

0.0

73.1

0.

0 61

.5

23.1

23

.1

3RD

DU

I 9

100.

0 66

.7

0.0

33.3

0.

0 66

.7

0.0

44.4

4T

H+

DU

I 12

33

.3

91.7

0.

0 8.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 8.

3

TO

TAL

143

90.9

93

.7

47.6

18

.9

0.0

15.4

11

.2

7.7

SOLA

NO

SU

P SO

LAN

O

1ST

DU

I 9

88.9

10

0.0

22.2

22

.2

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

4 75

.0

100.

0 25

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 8

87.5

10

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

48

70.8

10

0.0

8.3

29.2

0.

0 0.

0 39

.6

0.0

TOTA

L 69

75

.4

100.

0 10

.1

34.8

0.

0 0.

0 43

.5

0.0

JU

V S

OLA

NO

1S

T D

UI

9 88

.9

0.0

88.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 55

.6

0.0

TOTA

L 9

88.9

0.

0 88

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

55.6

0.

0

FAIR

FIEL

D

1ST

DU

I 68

5 98

.4

98.8

83

.6

2.2

0.0

1.8

4.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 25

5 96

.1

97.3

6.

7 80

.8

0.0

67.8

3.

9 0.

8

3R

D D

UI

92

91.3

97

.8

3.3

65.2

0.

0 7.

6 5.

4 1.

1

4T

H+

DU

I 11

90

.9

100.

0 0.

0 54

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 10

43

97.1

98

.4

56.9

27

.5

0.0

18.4

4.

5 0.

3

BEN

ICIA

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

2 50

.0

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

V

ALL

EJO

1S

T D

UI

215

99.5

91

.2

94.4

2.

8 0.

0 10

.2

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 97

97

.9

94.8

10

.3

75.3

0.

0 55

.7

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 23

87

.0

91.3

0.

0 60

.9

0.0

26.1

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

100.

0 33

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

338

98.2

91

.7

63.0

27

.8

0.0

24.3

0.

0 0.

0

Page 140: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

130

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TC

TRA

VIS

AFB

1S

T D

UI

6 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

6 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0 0.

0 SO

NO

MA

SU

P SO

NO

MA

1S

T D

UI

11

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

18.2

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

6 33

.3

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 11

3 49

.6

99.1

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 1.

8 0.

0

TO

TAL

134

53.0

99

.3

0.0

1.5

0.0

0.0

1.5

0.0

JU

V S

ON

OM

A

1ST

DU

I 26

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 28

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 3.

6 0.

0

SAN

TA R

OSA

1S

T D

UI

1667

96

.9

96.5

54

.5

0.4

0.0

3.4

0.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 69

5 94

.1

99.7

2.

7 45

.8

0.0

45.5

0.

0 0.

3

3R

D D

UI

288

91.3

10

0.0

1.7

5.2

0.0

4.5

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

92

72.8

10

0.0

1.1

2.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 27

42

94.8

97

.8

34.1

12

.4

0.0

14.1

0.

5 0.

1 ST

AN

ISLA

US

SUP

STA

NIS

LAU

S 1S

T D

UI

14

64.3

92

.9

7.1

14.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

8 87

.5

87.5

0.

0 37

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 8

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 65

76

.9

100.

0 4.

6 21

.5

0.0

0.0

4.6

0.0

TOTA

L 95

75

.8

97.9

4.

2 21

.1

0.0

0.0

3.2

0.0

JU

V S

TAN

ISLA

US

1S

T D

UI

28

50.0

42

.9

35.7

0.

0 0.

0 3.

6 92

.9

0.0

TOTA

L 28

50

.0

42.9

35

.7

0.0

0.0

3.6

92.9

0.

0

MO

DES

TO

1ST

DU

I 11

26

98.9

98

.8

90.2

2.

1 0.

1 1.

1 0.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

485

98.8

99

.6

11.8

75

.5

0.2

39.8

1.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

192

96.9

98

.4

5.7

50.5

0.

0 8.

3 2.

6 1.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 40

87

.5

100.

0 0.

0 55

.0

0.0

2.5

2.5

0.0

TOTA

L 18

43

98.4

99

.0

58.8

27

.6

0.1

12.0

0.

8 0.

1

OA

KD

ALE

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TURL

OC

K

1ST

DU

I 19

4 99

.5

95.4

91

.2

2.6

0.0

5.7

0.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 74

98

.6

90.5

16

.2

67.6

0.

0 37

.8

8.1

4.1

3RD

DU

I 26

96

.2

92.3

3.

8 42

.3

0.0

7.7

23.1

7.

7

4T

H+

DU

I 6

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

300

99.0

94

.0

63.3

23

.0

0.0

13.7

4.

3 1.

7 SU

TTER

SU

P SU

TTER

1S

T D

UI

8 10

0.0

100.

0 37

.5

37.5

0.

0 0.

0 37

.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

20.0

80

.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0 20

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

9 77

.8

100.

0 0.

0 44

.4

0.0

0.0

44.4

0.

0

TO

TAL

26

76.9

96

.2

11.5

30

.8

3.8

0.0

38.5

0.

0

JUV

SU

TTER

1S

T D

UI

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

YUBA

CIT

Y 1S

T D

UI

305

99.0

98

.0

90.8

0.

3 0.

0 2.

3 8.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

101

100.

0 10

0.0

7.9

81.2

0.

0 75

.2

12.9

1.

0

3R

D D

UI

58

100.

0 10

0.0

1.7

6.9

0.0

5.2

86.2

0.

0

Page 141: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

131

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

4TH

+ D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 46

8 99

.4

98.7

61

.1

18.6

0.

0 18

.4

20.1

0.

2 TE

HA

MA

SU

P TE

HA

MA

1S

T D

UI

7 28

.6

100.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 8

12.5

10

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

15

20.0

10

0.0

6.7

6.7

0.0

0.0

6.7

0.0

JU

V T

EHA

MA

1S

T D

UI

3 10

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

5 80

.0

60.0

0.

0 20

.0

0.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0

CO

RNIN

G

1ST

DU

I 56

94

.6

96.4

91

.1

0.0

0.0

3.6

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 25

92

.0

100.

0 24

.0

64.0

0.

0 12

.0

4.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

60.0

10

0.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

86

91.9

97

.7

66.3

22

.1

0.0

5.8

1.2

0.0

RE

D B

LUFF

1S

T D

UI

139

89.2

97

.1

84.2

1.

4 0.

0 2.

9 8.

6 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

44

70.5

10

0.0

4.5

54.5

0.

0 50

.0

25.0

2.

3

3R

D D

UI

18

33.3

10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 27

.8

27.8

0.

0

TO

TAL

201

80.1

98

.0

59.2

15

.9

0.0

15.4

13

.9

0.5

TRIN

ITY

SUP

TRIN

ITY

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 3

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

W

EAV

ERV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

48

89.6

10

0.0

83.3

4.

2 0.

0 0.

0 8.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

23

95.7

10

0.0

26.1

65

.2

0.0

60.9

13

.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

14.3

42

.9

0.0

28.6

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

79

92.4

10

0.0

59.5

26

.6

0.0

20.3

8.

9 0.

0 TU

LARE

SU

P TU

LARE

1S

T D

UI

36

66.7

10

0.0

5.6

0.0

0.0

2.8

13.9

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

12

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

8.3

0.0

8.3

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 7

42.9

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

70

60.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

TOTA

L 12

5 61

.6

100.

0 1.

6 0.

8 0.

0 1.

6 8.

0 0.

0

JUV

TU

LARE

1S

T D

UI

32

62.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 3.

1 53

.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

33

63.6

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 3.

0 51

.5

0.0

D

INU

BA

1ST

DU

I 32

9 98

.8

99.4

87

.8

3.6

0.0

1.5

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 13

8 97

.1

95.7

10

.1

35.5

0.

0 40

.6

1.4

10.9

3R

D D

UI

64

93.8

89

.1

7.8

12.5

0.

0 20

.3

3.1

14.1

4T

H+

DU

I 16

75

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 12

.5

0.0

TOTA

L 54

7 97

.1

97.3

56

.3

12.6

0.

0 13

.5

1.1

4.4

EX

ETER

1S

T D

UI

32

96.9

96

.9

93.8

3.

1 0.

0 0.

0 3.

1 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

17

100.

0 10

0.0

11.8

82

.4

0.0

70.6

11

.8

0.0

3RD

DU

I 8

87.5

10

0.0

0.0

37.5

0.

0 12

.5

25.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 60

96

.7

98.3

53

.3

33.3

0.

0 21

.7

10.0

0.

0

LIN

DSY

-EX

ETER

1S

T D

UI

104

100.

0 10

0.0

92.3

4.

8 0.

0 3.

8 9.

6 0.

0

Page 142: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

132

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

2ND

DU

I 29

96

.6

100.

0 13

.8

75.9

0.

0 72

.4

3.4

0.0

3RD

DU

I 10

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 30

.0

0.0

10.0

50

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

5 10

0.0

100.

0 20

.0

40.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

148

99.3

10

0.0

68.2

21

.6

0.0

17.6

10

.8

0.0

PO

RTER

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 31

8 98

.1

98.7

90

.9

2.5

0.0

2.2

0.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 12

7 98

.4

96.9

8.

7 78

.0

0.0

62.2

9.

4 1.

6

3R

D D

UI

78

96.2

10

0.0

5.1

25.6

0.

0 9.

0 41

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

11

90.9

10

0.0

0.0

45.5

0.

0 9.

1 54

.5

0.0

TOTA

L 53

4 97

.8

98.5

56

.9

24.7

0.

0 17

.6

9.9

0.4

TU

LAR

E 1S

T D

UI

208

100.

0 10

0.0

63.9

26

.0

0.0

25.0

1.

0 0.

5

2N

D D

UI

86

100.

0 98

.8

11.6

61

.6

0.0

59.3

5.

8 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

35

94.3

94

.3

5.7

42.9

0.

0 37

.1

2.9

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

10

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

10.0

0.

0 10

.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 33

9 99

.4

99.1

42

.8

36.3

0.

0 34

.5

2.4

0.3

V

ISA

LIA

1S

T D

UI

489

99.4

97

.8

78.3

14

.7

0.0

5.1

2.5

0.2

2ND

DU

I 17

2 98

.3

95.3

14

.5

71.5

0.

0 60

.5

1.7

14.0

3R

D D

UI

62

98.4

93

.5

4.8

62.9

0.

0 30

.6

24.2

14

.5

4TH

+ D

UI

36

63.9

97

.2

2.8

11.1

0.

0 11

.1

19.4

5.

6

TO

TAL

759

97.4

96

.8

54.3

31

.4

0.0

20.0

4.

9 4.

7

WO

OD

LAK

E-

1ST

DU

I 48

10

0.0

100.

0 91

.7

4.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

EXE

TER

2ND

DU

I 19

10

0.0

100.

0 5.

3 89

.5

0.0

68.4

10

.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 6

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 16

.7

16.7

0.

0

TO

TAL

73

100.

0 10

0.0

61.6

28

.8

0.0

19.2

4.

1 0.

0

DIN

UBA

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

USM

AG

3 R

VR

S

1ST

DU

I 1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TUO

LUM

NE

SUP

TUO

LUM

NE

1ST

DU

I 8

87.5

10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 7

28.6

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 18

50

.0

100.

0 22

.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

JU

V T

UO

LUM

NE

1ST

DU

I 1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

SO

NO

RA

1S

T D

UI

115

97.4

10

0.0

92.2

0.

9 0.

0 0.

0 4.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

67

97.0

10

0.0

6.0

86.6

0.

0 77

.6

3.0

3.0

3RD

DU

I 21

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 61

.9

0.0

19.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

203

97.5

10

0.0

54.2

35

.5

0.0

27.6

3.

4 1.

0

CO

LUM

BIA

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JAM

ESTO

WN

1S

T D

UI

28

100.

0 10

0.0

96.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

9 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 88

.9

0.0

88.9

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

41

100.

0 10

0.0

65.9

26

.8

0.0

26.8

0.

0 0.

0

Page 143: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

133

TABL

E B4

: 19

93 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8 A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

VEN

TURA

SU

P V

ENTU

RA

1ST

DU

I 6

83.3

66

.7

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 16

.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 7

71.4

85

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

28

39.3

92

.9

3.6

7.1

0.0

3.6

17.9

0.

0

TO

TAL

43

51.2

88

.4

7.0

4.7

0.0

2.3

18.6

0.

0

JUV

VEN

TURA

1S

T D

UI

10

100.

0 40

.0

0.0

10.0

20

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 12

83

.3

50.0

0.

0 8.

3 16

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

V

ENTU

RA M

UN

I 1S

T D

UI

2945

98

.2

98.8

88

.0

1.4

0.0

1.2

10.2

0.

1

2N

D D

UI

932

98.3

99

.6

14.6

66

.2

0.0

69.4

14

.3

5.5

3RD

DU

I 27

6 98

.6

99.3

9.

4 29

.0

0.0

22.1

62

.3

4.0

4TH

+ D

UI

66

68.2

83

.3

9.1

24.2

0.

0 7.

6 42

.4

3.0

TOTA

L 42

19

97.7

98

.7

65.4

17

.9

0.0

17.8

15

.0

1.6

YO

LO

SUP

WO

OD

LAN

D

1ST

DU

I 10

80

.0

90.0

10

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10.0

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 15

53

.3

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 26

65

.4

96.2

3.

8 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 15

.4

0.0

JU

V Y

OLO

1S

T D

UI

5 40

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

5 40

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0

WES

T SA

CTO

1S

T D

UI

19

100.

0 10

0.0

94.7

5.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

40.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

26

100.

0 10

0.0

73.1

15

.4

0.0

3.8

0.0

0.0

W

OO

DLA

ND

1S

T D

UI

192

97.9

96

.4

87.0

6.

8 0.

0 7.

8 3.

1 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

143

99.3

10

0.0

7.0

85.3

0.

0 81

.8

2.1

0.0

3RD

DU

I 40

95

.0

92.5

2.

5 17

.5

0.0

12.5

5.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 13

76

.9

100.

0 0.

0 23

.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 38

8 97

.4

97.4

45

.9

37.4

0.

0 35

.3

2.8

0.0

D

AV

IS

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 Y

UBA

SU

P YU

BA

1ST

DU

I 6

66.7

50

.0

16.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

13

38.5

92

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

23.1

0.

0

TO

TAL

21

52.4

81

.0

4.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

28.6

0.

0

JUV

YU

BA

1ST

DU

I 6

83.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

33.3

0.

0

TO

TAL

6 83

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

33

.3

0.0

M

ARY

SVIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 29

7 99

.3

69.4

90

.6

0.3

0.0

1.0

4.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 12

2 10

0.0

99.2

10

.7

60.7

0.

0 13

.1

57.4

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

53

98.1

10

0.0

1.9

11.3

0.

0 0.

0 30

.2

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

7 10

0.0

100.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

42.9

0.

0

TO

TAL

479

99.4

80

.8

59.3

16

.9

0.0

4.0

21.1

0.

0

TC B

EALE

AFB

1S

T D

UI

9 22

.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 10

20

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Page 144: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

134

TABL

E B5

: D

EMO

GRA

PHIC

2-Y

EAR

PRIO

R D

RIV

ER R

ECO

RD V

ARI

ABL

ES

BY

YEA

R A

ND

SA

NC

TIO

N G

ROU

P FO

R FI

RST

DU

I OFF

END

ERS

YE

AR

SA

MPL

E PE

RCEN

T M

EAN

PE

RC

ENT

2-YE

AR

PRIO

R IN

CID

ENTS

PER

100

DRI

VER

S Z

IP C

OD

E A

CC

IDEN

T A

ND

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

IND

ICES

**

GRO

UP

SI

ZE

FE

MA

LE

A

GE

CO

MM

ERC

IAL

DRI

VER

S TO

TAL

AC

CID

ENTS

A

LCO

HO

L A

CC

IDEN

TS

MA

JOR

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

MIN

OR

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

S TO

TAL

AC

CID

ENTS

IN

JURY

A

CC

IDEN

TS

MA

JOR

VIO

LATI

ON

S M

OV

ING

V

IOLA

TIO

NS

1989

Susp

ensi

on

5,63

8 12

.3

25.9

1.

4 3.

74

1.90

.3

4 16

.07

2.86

.8

7 .2

2 6.

64

Jail

7,20

0 13

.6

31.9

3.

4 3.

19

1.60

.2

1 11

.29

2.95

.9

5 .2

4 6.

78

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

jail

43,6

31

14.9

32

.7

3.6

2.88

1.

45

.15

10.7

6 2.

84

.86

.22

6.68

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

41,2

28

15.5

32

.8

2.9

3.06

1.

47

.12

9.31

3.

11

.91

.21

6.46

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

4,42

3 14

.0

33.7

3.

6 3.

27

1.78

.3

2 8.

96

3.01

.9

5 .2

5 6.

24

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

54.2

* F

= 57

1.2*

X

2 =

94.

1*

F =

34.4

* F

= 25

.9*

F =

52.0

* F

= 27

7.2*

F

= 80

1.8*

F

= 45

1.5*

F

= 21

7.2*

F

= 20

0.4*

1991

Susp

ensi

on

10,4

61

11.7

27

.7

1.8

3.42

1.

84

.84

14.3

3 2.

79

.86

.20

6.13

Jail

5,16

4 13

.2

31.6

3.

7 2.

89

1.54

.3

3 12

.24

2.74

.8

7 .2

1 5.

94

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

jail

58,8

93

16.4

32

.9

3.5

2.82

1.

46

.16

10.3

3 2.

74

.84

.20

6.10

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

38,1

47

16.2

32

.6

2.6

3.05

1.

45

.12

9.99

2.

99

.89

.19

5.98

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

6,41

9 14

.7

33.1

3.

5 3.

01

1.66

.4

5 9.

81

2.88

.9

1 .2

2 5.

80

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

183.

7*

F =

568.

5*

X2

= 12

5.9*

F

= 31

.6*

F =

28.3

* F

= 51

7.8*

F

= 20

2.2*

F

= 11

26.6

* F

= 39

2.6*

F

= 35

2.5*

F

= 22

5.7*

1993

1.

75-Y

EAR

PRIO

R IN

CID

ENTS

PER

100

DRI

VER

S

Susp

ensi

on

6,11

8 12

.6

28.1

1.

5 3.

03

1.65

.8

0 12

.53

1.54

.4

5 .1

0 3.

45

Jail

4,46

9 15

.6

32.6

3.

3 2.

90

1.55

.3

2 10

.76

1.53

.4

6 .1

0 3.

35

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

jail

42,4

03

16.4

33

.8

3.3

2.64

1.

53

.14

8.16

1.

53

.45

.10

3.35

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

29,5

67

15.8

33

.7

2.7

2.88

1.

63

.10

8.24

1.

67

.47

.09

3.48

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

3,49

6 13

.8

34.3

4.

0 2.

84

1.60

.3

8 8.

03

1.58

.4

8 .1

0 3.

18

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

68.5

* F

= 39

7.3*

X

2 =

81.2

* F

= 14

.9*

F =

3.6*

F

= 36

4.1*

F

= 19

4.0*

F

= 95

4.4*

F

= 19

3.1*

F

= 20

2.6*

F

= 30

7.5*

*St

atis

tical

sig

nific

ance

at p

<.05

, (tw

o-ta

iled)

. **

The

ZIP

Cod

e in

dice

s fo

r the

199

3 ca

ses a

re b

ased

on

3.25

yea

rs o

f dri

ver r

ecor

d da

ta w

here

as th

e in

dice

s for

the

1989

and

199

1 dr

iver

s ar

e ba

sed

on 5

yea

rs o

f dat

a.

Page 145: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

135

TABL

E B6

: D

EMO

GRA

PHIC

2-Y

EAR

PRIO

R D

RIV

ER R

ECO

RD V

ARI

ABL

ES

BY

YEA

R A

ND

SA

NC

TIO

N G

ROU

P FO

R SE

CO

ND

DU

I OFF

END

ERS

YE

AR

SA

MPL

E PE

RCEN

T M

EAN

PE

RC

ENT

2-YE

AR

PRIO

R IN

CID

ENTS

PER

100

DRI

VER

S ZI

P C

OD

E A

CC

IDEN

T A

ND

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

IND

ICES

**

GR

OU

P

SIZE

FEM

ALE

AG

E C

OM

MER

CIA

L D

RIV

ERS

TOTA

L A

CC

IDEN

TS

ALC

OH

OL

AC

CID

ENTS

M

AJO

R C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

MIN

OR

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

S TO

TAL

AC

CID

ENTS

IN

JURY

A

CC

IDEN

TS

MA

JOR

VIO

LATI

ON

S M

OV

ING

V

IOLA

TIO

NS

1989

Susp

ensi

on

9,48

3 8.

9 32

.1

2.4

3.80

2.

34

5.04

13

.75

2.86

.8

9 .2

3 6.

57

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

23,9

29

10.4

34

.7

3.7

3.36

1.

88

3.37

10

.21

2.97

.8

9 .2

2 6.

63

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

17.7

* F

= 46

0.6*

X

2 =

36.6

* F

= 36

.4*

F =

72.2

* F

= 75

5.4*

F

= 36

3.8*

F

= 15

8.5*

F

= .1

.7

F =

34.7

* F

= 8.

9*

1991

Susp

ensi

on

11,1

92

8.5

33.0

2.

8 3.

31

2.00

4.

93

12.3

0 2.

71

.86

.21

6.08

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

19,3

09

10.6

34

.2

3.0

3.21

1.

81

3.55

10

.60

2.85

.8

7 .2

0 6.

07

Oth

er

12,1

50

9.5

33.7

3.

5 3.

41

2.03

4.

49

11.3

1 2.

80

.86

.20

6.02

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

35.6

* F

= 50

.8*

X2

= 9.

7*

F =

4.4*

F

= 11

.9*

F =

269.

2*

F =

45.9

* F

= 18

7.4*

F

= 14

.1*

F =

70.8

* F

= 13

.8*

1993

1.

75-Y

EAR

PRIO

R IN

CID

ENTS

PER

100

DRI

VER

S

Susp

ensi

on

7,19

6 8.

7 33

.6

2.3

2.76

1.

78

3.95

9.

57

1.50

.4

6 .1

1 3.

42

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

11,7

53

11.1

34

.9

3.0

2.88

1.

82

2.76

7.

99

1.58

.4

6 .1

0 3.

39

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

Inte

rloc

k 1,

288

9.6

35.0

2.

4 2.

58

1.61

2.

45

7.63

1.

60

.46

.09

3.40

Oth

er

7,94

2 9.

3 34

.6

3.0

2.90

1.

96

3.63

8.

66

1.55

.4

5 .1

0 3.

38

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

34.7

* F

= 45

.66*

X

2 =

10.6

* F

= 1.

97

F =

.85

F =

112.

5*

F =

25.2

* F

= 93

.4*

F =

12.6

* F

= 14

1.0*

F

= 7.

3*

*

Stat

istic

ally

sig

nific

ance

at p

<.05

, (tw

o-ta

iled)

. **

The

ZIP

Cod

e in

dice

s fo

r the

199

3 ca

ses a

re b

ased

on

3.25

yea

rs o

f dri

ver r

ecor

d da

ta w

here

as th

e in

dice

s for

the

1989

and

199

1 dr

iver

s ar

e ba

sed

on 5

yea

rs o

f dat

a.

Page 146: *Section 1 - PourSafe · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington,

1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Oth

er

7,94

2 20

.4

NA

5.

8 N

A

14.6

4.

9 44

.8

26.3

Susp

ensi

on

7,19

6 20

.3

NA

5.

9 N

A

16.0

5.

2 45

.3

25.5

136

TABL

E B7

: ZI

P C

OD

E C

ENSU

S V

ARI

ABL

ES (C

OV

ARI

ATE

S) B

Y YE

AR

AN

D S

AN

CTI

ON

GRO

UP

FOR

FIRS

T A

ND

SEC

ON

D D

UI O

FFEN

DER

S

YEA

R FI

RST

OFF

END

ERS

GR

OU

P

SAM

PLE

SI

ZE

MO

NTH

S IN

ST

UD

Y

PERC

ENT

OTH

ER

TRA

NSP

ORT

ATI

ON

PE

RC

ENT

LEA

VE

WO

RK A

T 4

PM

PER

CEN

T A

GE

55

AN

D A

BOV

E PE

RC

ENT

ELEM

. ED

UC

ATI

ON

PE

RC

ENT

UN

EMPL

OY

ED

PER

CEN

T RE

NTI

NG

TR

AV

EL T

IME

TO

WO

RK (M

IN.)

1991

Susp

ensi

on

10,4

61

44.3

N

A

NA

17

.0

16.2

5.

3 45

.4

26.2

Ja

il 5,

164

44.2

N

A

NA

17

.3

16.0

5.

3 44

.0

26.0

1s

t DU

I pro

gram

& ja

il 58

,893

44

.3

NA

N

A

17.9

13

.1

4.7

43.6

26

.0

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

38,1

47

44.4

N

A

NA

17

.3

14.2

4.

5 47

.4

27.3

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

6,41

9 43

.9

NA

N

A

16.7

11

.6

5.0

40.4

28

.6

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

F

= 26

.4*

F =

108.

2*

F =

272.

2*

F =

356.

4*

F =

462.

2*

F =

708.

1*

1993

Susp

ensi

on

6,11

8 20

.3

10.5

N

A

NA

15

.2

5.0

NA

26

.0

Jail

4,46

9 20

.5

9.8

NA

N

A

13.8

4.

8 N

A

26.5

1s

t DU

I pro

gram

& ja

il 42

,403

20

.6

10.4

N

A

NA

13

.4

4.7

NA

25

.9

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

29,5

67

20.5

11

.5

NA

N

A

15.0

4.

6 N

A

27.5

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

3,49

6 20

.2

7.9

NA

N

A

12.2

4.

9 N

A

28.5

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

F

= 23

.3*

F =

168.

3*

F =

112.

8*

F =

48.5

*

F =

636.

8*

SEC

ON

D O

FFEN

DER

S

1991

Susp

ensi

on

11,1

92

44.0

N

A

NA

17

.3

NA

5.

2 4.

5 25

.5

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

19,3

09

43.9

N

A

NA

17

.6

NA

4.

6 4.

4 26

.6

Oth

er

12,1

50

44.2

N

A

NA

17

.8

NA

4.

8 4.

4 26

.5

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

F

= 25

.1*

F =

14.8

*

F =

267.

2*

F =

5.9*

F

= 18

3.4*

1993

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

11,7

53

20.5

N

A

5.7

NA

13

.8

4.7

44.3

26

.7

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m/

rest

rict

ion

& in

terl

ock

1,28

8 17

.2

NA

5.

5 N

A

14.1

4.

6 44

.7

27.2

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

F

= 29

7.4*

F =

24.7

*

F =

48.9

* F

= 81

.0*

F =

5.7*

F

= 87

.4*

*St

atis

tical

sig

nific

ance

at p

<.05

, (tw

o-ta

iled)

. **

The

ZIP

Cod

e in

dice

s fo

r the

199

3 ca

ses a

re b

ased

on

3.25

yea

rs o

f dri

ver r

ecor

d da

ta w

here

as th

e in

dice

s for

199

1 dr

iver

s are

bas

ed o

n 5

year

s of

dat

a. T

hese

cen

sus

vari

able

s wer

e no

t app

lied

to th

e 19

89 d

rive

rs

s

ince

thes

e va

riab

les w

ere

not a

vaila

ble

until

afte

r 199

0.