section 1: program mission, objectives and outcomes maths phd-2015.pdf · hec guidelines and the...

80
Executive Summary Department of Mathematics at NUST School of Natural Sciences offers PhD in Mathematics degree program. The program started in 2004 and has matured over a span of five years The program requires 18 credit hours of course works, qualifying exam, three seminars, and a thesis of 36 credit hours for the award of degree. The minimum duration of the completion of PhD degree is three years. It is nearly impossible to fulfill all the requirements in three years. After three years, students are liable to pay off campus fee and they may also ask to leave hostel. Therefore, it is suggested that duration be increased. The course work of the program has been designed keeping in view the international standards, HEC guidelines and the national requirements. The main theme of the program is to train students in various fields of Mathematics for their better understanding of Mathematics which leads to lifelong successful careers. The graduates of SNS are serving NUST and other institutes of Pakistan soon after getting their degrees. Also willing graduates easily get post doctoral fellowships abroad in the universities of high repute. This indicates that our institution meets the international standards. A good student-teacher ratio is an essential requirement to maintain quality of education. With the increasing number of students, the department needs to hire more faculty members. The department needs to increase manpower to work more effectively.

Upload: vuongnga

Post on 30-Mar-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Executive Summary

Department of Mathematics at NUST School of Natural Sciences offers PhD in Mathematics

degree program. The program started in 2004 and has matured over a span of five years

The program requires 18 credit hours of course works, qualifying exam, three seminars, and a

thesis of 36 credit hours for the award of degree. The minimum duration of the completion of

PhD degree is three years. It is nearly impossible to fulfill all the requirements in three years.

After three years, students are liable to pay off campus fee and they may also ask to leave

hostel. Therefore, it is suggested that duration be increased.

The course work of the program has been designed keeping in view the international standards,

HEC guidelines and the national requirements.

The main theme of the program is to train students in various fields of Mathematics for their

better understanding of Mathematics which leads to lifelong successful careers.

The graduates of SNS are serving NUST and other institutes of Pakistan soon after getting their

degrees. Also willing graduates easily get post doctoral fellowships abroad in the universities of

high repute. This indicates that our institution meets the international standards.

A good student-teacher ratio is an essential requirement to maintain quality of education. With

the increasing number of students, the department needs to hire more faculty members. The

department needs to increase manpower to work more effectively.

2

National University of Sciences and Technology

School of Natural Sciences (SNS)

Department of Mathematics

Self Assessment Report-2016

(Fall 2004- Spring 2015)

Program: PhD in Mathematics

Submitted to

Quality Enhancement Cell

National University of Sciences and Technology

School of Natural Science

Program Team

1. Tooba Siddiqui Chairperson

2. Mubasher Jamil Member

3. Meraj Mustafa Hashmi Member

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sr. No. Title Page No

Introduction

Criterion 1: Program Mission, Objectives & Outcome

History and setup 7

Mission of National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST)

8

Mission of School of Natural Sciences (SNS) 8

Mission of Department of Mathematics 8

Mission of PhD Program 8

Program Educational Objectives 8

Strategic Plan 10

Program Objectives Assessment 14

Program Learning Outcomes 15

Program Objectives versus Program Outcomes 15

(A) Alumni Survey 16

(B) Graduating Students Exit Survey 26

(C) Employer’s Survey 34

Program Outcomes Measurement 36

Overall performance 37

Faculty Survey 44

Criterion 2: Curriculum Design & Organization

Degree Title 53

Definition of Credit Hour 53

Degree Plan 53

Assessment of MS Mathematics Program Curriculum 53

Theory, Problem Analysis & Solution Design 54

Requirements for the Program Curriculum 54

Comparison of SNS Program with HEC requirements 54

4

Information technology component 55

Course Outlines 56

Communication Skills 56

Criterion 3: Laboratories & Computing Facilities

Introduction 56

Safety Procedures for all Labs 57

Adequate Computing Infrastructure and Facilities 59

Criterion 4: Student Support & Guidance

Completion of Program 59

Interaction between Students, Faculty and Teaching Assistants

59

Guidance and Qualified Advising 60

Structure of Courses 60

Guidance to Students 63

Students Counseling & Advisory System 63

Criterion 5: Process Control

MS Program at Department of Mathematics, School of Natural Sciences, NUST

64

Eligibility Criteria 64

Entrance Examination 64

Selection Procedure 64

Waiting List 64

Rejection of application 64

Migration 64

International Students 64

Admission 64

Entrance Test 64

Merit List 65

Clearance 65

Accommodation 65

5

Standards 65

Admission Process 65

Program Registration and Monitoring 65

Registration and Monitoring of Students 65

Recruiting and Training Highly Qualified Faculty 65

Class Audit Report 66

Criterion6: Faculty

Adequate Coverage of Program Areas 69

Full Time Faculty 70

Time for Scholarly Activities 71

Motivation and Job Satisfaction 71

Criterion 7: Institutional Facilities

New Trends in Learning 71

Library Facilities 72

Classrooms and Faculty Offices 73

Hostel Facilities 72

Convocation Hall/Auditorium 73

Sports Facilities 73

Transport Facilities 73

Medical Facilities 73

Criterion 8: Institutional Support

Faculty Retaining Measures 74

Research Support 74

Support and Facilities for the Faculty 74

Graduate Students, Assistance and PhD Students 74

Financial Resources for Library 75

Criterion 9: Research, Development and Innovation

Research Support and Collaborations 75

Research Projects 78

6

Annexure-A: Findings of the Assessment Team

Annexure-B: Implementation Plan

Annexure-C: Rubric Evaluation

Annexure-D: List of Activities attended by SNS Researchers

7

History and Setup:

SNS (School of Natural Sciences) former CAMP (Centre for Advanced Mathematics and

Physics) was established in May 2004, in the campus of EME College Rawalpindi. It was shifted

to academic Block-I, H-12 Campus in June 2010 and then shifted to the present building in

September 2013. CAMP was renamed to SNS in December 2013.

The first Director General of the institute was Prof. Asghar Qadir who joined EME College after

the approval of Post-graduate program in Mathematics, of the college. The Post-graduate

program in Mathematics of the EME College was prepared under the headship of Brgd. M.

Rafique, HoD Basic Sciences and Humanities at that time. Then, for the benefit of community of

Mathematics and Physics, it was decided to establish a new research centre with the name

Centre for Advanced Mathematics and Physics. The first faculty of SNS was a Russian

Professor who joined SNS under the HEC foreign faculty hiring program. Under this program

some other Russian professors also served SNS. In May 2011, after the retirement of Prof.

Asghar Qadir, Prof. Azad A. Siddiqui joined SNS as Director General (Principal).

In the beginning, SNS started a four year MPhil leading to PhD program in Mathematics only. In

the program, students were required to complete a course work of 48 hours which consists of

four core courses as well. They were also required to qualify their comprehensive exam to enter

in the research phase. In the research phase, they submit their thesis for 36 credits on the

bases of their research. After four years, in 2008, MPhil leading to PhD program in Physics,

having the same structure, was started. Since 2010, BS Undergraduate program in

Mathematics is also on track. From September 2014, two programs BS Undergraduate program

in Physics and MS Chemistry have been started. Hopefully, BS Undergraduate program in

Chemistry will also be started very soon.

Since 2011, a split MPhil program (now MS program) has been launched. After the completion

of MS students may get register themselves in PhD program. A direct PhD program was also

started in fall 2011. Students of other universities may join SNS through direct PhD program.

The PhD program requires 18 credit hours of course work and a thesis for 36 credits. The

minimum duration of the completion of the degree is three years. Up till now more than 15

students have been graduated under this program. Hopefully, the number will increase in

coming years.

Being a research institute, soon after the establishment, SNS is organizing

Workshops/Conferences of national and international level. The first such activity was held after

five months of its establishment i.e. in October 2004. SNS has organized five national and six

international Workshops/Conferences. Apart from this national and international activities, SNS

also runs weekly seminar series during both fall and spring semesters. In the weekly seminar

series, SNS invites faculty from leading universities of Pakistan. SNS has established firm and

productive collaborations right from its very beginning. Several faculty members and students

have benefited with such collaborations.

8

Criterion 1: Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes

Standard 1-1: The program must have documented measurable objectives that support

college and institution mission statements.

Mission of NUST:

The mission of NUST is to develop as a comprehensive, research-led university with a focus on

Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

Mission of School of Natural Sciences:

The mission of SNS is to promote sciences, develop a culture of research and produce quality

human resource in sciences.

Mission of Department of Mathematics:

Our mission is to promote a culture of research and produce quality human resource in

Mathematics.

Mission of PhD Program in Mathematics:

The mission of PhD program in Mathematics is to produce ethically and professionally sound

good researchers who can perform their duties in a good manner.

Program Educational Objectives The broad objectives of the PhD program in Mathematics are to teach students basic concepts of Mathematics, empower them with computational skills to solve Mathematical problems using computers and to provide appropriate mathematical background to their needs. In addition to this, the program is structured in such a manner that the students can learn some advanced concepts through their course and research work. Objective #1 – Core Concepts To impart education to students in a manner that infuses core and advanced

mathematical concept

Objective #2 –Skills & Tools

To teach students computational skills, Department of Mathematics shall be able to:

a) Analyze and model real world problems based on mathematical and engineering principles and solve such problems by utilizing their skills.

b) Be able to use theoretical knowledge to implement practical solutions c) Be able to think and work independently when involved in problem solving d) Continue in pursuit of higher learning and enlightenment throughout their life e) Exhibit superior communication and presentation skills in report writing and

presentations.

9

Objective #3 – Professional Practice & Ethics To provide students with a professional learning experience that instills a sense of

professional ethics in their personal discipline. The graduates from the Department of

Mathematics must not only be mathematically competent but also ethically and professionally

capable of creating job market in Pakistan.

Objective #4 – Research Culture

To inculcate a culture of research in students and to inspire them towards a career of

innovation.

The first objective is geared towards providing quality education to students with strong basic

concepts. The second objective is aimed at producing quality graduates with necessary training

in essential tools and technologies and equipped them with skills required by the industry and

essential to succeed in professional life. The third objective is aligned with the department’s

vision of producing graduates with a sense of professional responsibility and carrying out such

responsibility in line with utmost standards of professional ethics. The fourth objective focuses

on training students in research methodologies and inspiring them to innovate.

Objective # 5 - Real world applications

An explicit goal of the program is to connect the core knowledge with the real world

applications. The fundamental learning tools have applications in fluid dynamics, electrical and

mechanical engineering, quantum mechanics, material science and many other areas. This not

only fosters multidisciplinary research and education but also allows students to pursue their

careers in engineering, finance, information technology and mathematical biology.

Obective # 6-Technical and Communication Skills:

In our PhD program, a lot of emphasis is put on developing communication skills of the

students. In particular, the speaking and writing skills in English language are emphasized.

During the regular group meetings and two seminars, the faculty guides students about effective

communication. Moreover, students are motivated to write research papers and polish their

articles as well. In some cases, faculty asks students to submit their articles to journals as well

and communicate with journal staff. PhD students are also asked to teach basic courses at

undergraduate level just after qualifying their PhD comprehensive examinations which

rigorously enhances their teaching expertise.

Obective # 7-Research Based Courses:

During PhD coursework, faculty/supervisor recommends his/her students to take at least

one Reading and Research Course. The purpose is to train students to enhance their research

capabilities by doing a comprehensive literature survey and reading advanced texts. The course

is guided by numerous sessions with the supervisor, regular assignments and semester

projects. In some cases, students write research article based on the coursework and become

better prepared for future research.

10

Objective # 8-Intra-NUST Research Collaboration:

At SNS, the faculty and research students are also involved in the intra-NUST research

collaboration. In particular, the collaboration with the faculty of College E&ME, RCMS and

SEECS is actively going on via joint Group Meetings every week and research publications.

Strategic Plan The success of any department lies in the best strategy plans. This plan ensures the quality education and incorporating knowledge with the industry. Below are the detailed strategic programs for efficiently running the department The Department of Mathematics is committed to providing best quality education conducting world-class research. Below we enumerate the department goals. The various elements of each goal are detailed followed by strategies that have to be adopted. Benchmarks are also identified that define the various measures of success, which would be used over the next five years to quantify the achievements and progress. Goal # 1: Graduate Learning

In this section we present plans for quality learning based on a broad curriculum. We

ensure that the students undergo quality training and learning based on a broad curriculum.

Elements

Curriculum must be designed which meets the national needs and international

standards.

In order to achieve excellence in learning best teaching facilities must be available in the

department.

Infrastructure including laboratory, library and software etc. must be available.

Strategies

The department is thrilled to make its syllabus compatible with the recommendations of

Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC).

In order to teach the different courses at PhD program we retain qualified faculty at our

department. Currently, all faculty members hold PhD degrees.

We prefer the textbooks for each course which are internationally followed and taught at

good universities.

11

Benchmarks

We review the curriculum and contents after a regular period of time through deliberation

and discussion at different forums by collecting the inputs and feedbacks from different

corners.

The enrollment of 40 students was targeted and achieved in 2013-14.

Our graduates are easily absorbed in the job market and accepted for higher studies in

reputed national and international universities.

Goal # 2: Workshops and Seminars

One of the teaching imparting sources to the students is through seminars and

workshops. We organize seminars on a weekly basis and workshops and conferences on yearly

basis.

Elements

Seminar held every week in our department.

Highly qualified speakers are invited to deliver seminars.

The attendance is mandatory for PhD students.

Apart from weekly seminar series, PhD student seminar series is also organized in each

semester, where the speakers are PhD students.

Strategies

The key speakers from different universities of Pakistan are invited for the weekly

seminar.

We try to invite experts in different research areas in these seminars.

One of the PhD requirements is that each student has to deliver three seminars. From

2014, this requirement has been modified and now it is mandatory to deliver two

seminars.

Benchmarks

Weekly seminar series is a regular academic activity since the start of the department.

In each seminar, a new speaker is invited.

Many new research areas are introduced through these seminars.

12

We ensure presence of PhD students by maintain their attendance record. Each PhD

student registers Seminar Series as 0-credit course and they clear it by attending 75%

seminars of that semester.

Goal # 3: Professional Ethics

The aim of the study is not only to impart quality education in Mathematics but also to

teach them personal and professional ethics.

Elements

The students are taught to maintain work ethics and uphold it in their lives.

Supervisors and GEC members play a vital role in developing honesty, fairness and

dedication during the course of their research work.

Strategies

School has set up advisory groups to guide students in every possible way.

We guide our research students to strictly adhere to the policy prepared by the HEC on

plagiarism.

Benchmarks

The student’s ethics are routinely observed during the course of teaching and also

observed closely in daily routine at campus.

The employers’ feedback of our graduates is obtained.

In our departments, all the MS and PhD theses are checked through the software

“Turnitin” for plagiarism before the final submission.

Goal # 4: Research and Innovation

Research is an integral part of the PhD program. Following observations are made in this

regard:

Elements

We provide a dedicated research room with necessary computing facilities and seating

arrangements for PhD research students.

We encourage and facilitate students by arranging different financial assistance.

Different research collaborations are established to promote research activities.

Many optional subjects are offered so that the students can choose research field of

their interest.

13

Strategies

It is our utmost effort to induct as many students as possible within our resources. We

remain successful in the last two years.

We are collaborating with different research groups nationally and internationally.

The aim of our department is to offer state of the art courses together with a desire to

excel in research and innovation.

Apart from the supervisors and the GEC members, the PhD theses produced by our

department are examined by one local and two foreign evaluators to ensure highest

quality possible.

Benchmarks

We remain successful in the enrollment of our best graduating MS students in our PhD

program.

Our faculty and PhD students are producing high quality papers in ISI indexed journals.

NUST sponsors to publish in open access journals as well.

Goal # 5: Leadership Training

The following steps are taken to ensure production of leaders:

Elements

Groom leaders of tomorrow.

Provide leadership training to students.

Strategies

The students are exposed to a number of curricular/extra-curricular activities.

Benchmarks

The students are able to successfully organize different academic and other activities.

The PhD students, who successfully qualify the comprehensive Exam, frequently teach

the basic undergraduate level courses at the school. This provides them a great

opportunity to learn the teaching methodologies and strengthen fundamental concepts.

Goal # 6: Industrial Collaboration

The following steps may be considered for industrial collaboration:

14

Elements

Establish contacts with industries.

It will be highly useful for the students to have industrial experience either by visiting

local industries or by working on industrial projects.

Strategies

To expose students to industry related research projects.

Benchmarks

Industrial collaboration is envisaged.

Encourage industry related research projects.

Goal # 7: Human Resource and Infrastructure

Be a leading institution in human resource development and infrastructure utilization.

Elements

Be a leading human resource development department for producing valuable scientific

researchers.

Strategies

The faculty members of the department are well qualified.

Adequate facilities are available to the faculty, students and staff.

Different incentives are available to retain faculty members in the school.

Benchmarks

New disciplines are introduced in the department from time to time.

Establishment of state of the art laboratories and expansion of the existing ones.

Involvement in different career development activities.

Program Objectives Assessment Following table provides an assessment of the Program’s Educational Objectives:

Objectives How Measured When Measured Improvement Identified

Improvement Made

15

Awareness of Core Concepts

Assignments Exams, Quizzes Projects

During and at the end of semester

Needs to be more regular

Regular monitoring by HoD

Practical Skills & tools

Academic Projects,Lab Assignments

During and at the end of semester

Training of latest software required

Improved computational skills required for the research

Professional Practice & Ethics

Meeting with the advisory groups

Thrice a semester Regular progressive monitoring

Students are asked to meet their respective advisors

Research Culture

Papers published, papers presented in conferences, overseas research tours, research collaboration and regular seminars

During and at the end of academic year

Sponsored research projects with private and public sector, active research groups

Projects have been sent to sponsors

Real world applications

Papers published, papers presented in conferences, overseas research tours, research collaboration and regular seminars

During and at the end of academic year

Sponsored research projects with private and public sector, active research groups

Projects have been sent to sponsors

Technical and Communication Skills

Academic projects,lab Assignments, teminars, teaching, Paper writing

During and at the end of academic year

Regular progressive monitoring

Improved communication skills required for the research

Research Based Courses

Assignments and projects

During the academic year

-- --

Intra-NUST

Research

Collaboration

Group meeting and research publications

During the academic year

-- --

Standard 1-2: The program must have documented outcomes for graduating students. It

must be demonstrated that the outcomes support the program objectives and the

graduating students are capable of performing these outcomes.

Program Learning Outcomes

1. Students are fully conversant with the core concepts of the subject.

2. Graduates are competent to apply computational skills effectively in different fields of

mathematics.

16

3. The students follow professional ethics to carry out their assignments.

4. The students have good communications skills.

5. The program develops a good research culture.

6. The program develops a good culture of intra-NUST collaboration.

7. The students are competent to review and extend the good research work of their field.

Program Objectives versus Program Outcomes

Program

Objectives

Program learning outcomes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 √

2a √ √ √

2b √ √

2c √ √ √

2d √ √ √

2e √ √

3 √ √ √

4 √ √

5 √ √ √

6 √ √ √ √

7 √

8 √ √ √ √ √ √

Alumni Survey

The department was able to collect responses from 14 alumni. Participants were asked different questions on the quality of education they received and the level of participation they had at the department. The purpose of this survey was to assess the quality of the academic program. Results of the survey are as follows:

Alumni of the department feel that the program is effective in:

(i) Transferring of knowledge to Students and time management.

(ii) developing communication and interpersonal skills.

They are satisfied with their teachers. They think that the department has good reputation at

national level. But the infrastructure is not satisfactory.

The response against different questions is shown in the following graphs.

17

34%

40%

13%

0%

0% 13%

Math, Science, Humanities and professional discipline, (if applicable)

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Kn

ow

led

ge

20%

20%

47%

0%

0% 13%

Problem formulation and solving skills

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Kn

ow

led

ge

18

27%

7%

33%

20%

0% 13%

Collecting and analyzing appropriate data

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Kn

ow

led

ge

20%

7%

40%

13%

7%

13%

Ability to link theory to practice

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Kn

ow

led

ge

19

20%

20%

33%

7%

13%

7%

Ability to design a system component or process

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Kn

ow

led

ge

7%

20%

33%

33%

0%

7%

IT Knowledge

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Kn

ow

led

ge

20

13%

46% 7%

20%

7%

7%

Oral Communication

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

Ski

lls

13%

33%

13%

27%

7%

7%

Report Writing

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

Ski

lls

21

27%

20%

20%

20%

6%

7%

Presentation Skills

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

Ski

lls

34%

13% 20%

13%

13%

7%

Ability to work in teams

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Inte

rpe

rso

nal

Ski

lls

22

14%

40%

13%

13%

13%

7%

Ability to work in arduous /Challenging situation

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyInte

rpe

rso

nal

Ski

lls

13%

47%

0%

20%

13%

7%

Independent thinking

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Inte

rpe

rso

nal

Ski

lls

23

20%

27%

7%

20%

13%

13%

Appreciation of ethical Values

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Inte

rpe

rso

nal

Ski

lls

20%

33% 20%

20%

0%

7%

Resource and Time Management Skills

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Man

age

me

nt/

Lead

ers

hip

Ski

lls

24

6%

40%

27%

20%

0%

7%

Judgment

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Man

age

me

nt/

Lead

ers

hip

Ski

lls

27%

33%

20%

13%

0%

7%

Discipline

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Man

age

me

nt/

Lead

ers

hip

Ski

lls

25

20%

7%

20% 33%

7%

13%

Infrastructure

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

De

par

tme

nt

Stat

us

20%

34% 20%

13%

0% 13%

Faculty

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

De

par

tme

nt

Stat

us

26

Graduating Students Exit Survey

The department was able to collect responses from 14 graduating students. Participants were asked different questions on the quality of education they received and the level of participation they had at the department. The purpose of this survey is to assess the quality of the academic program. Following is the summary of the survey.

Graduating students of the department feel that the program is effective in

(iii) enhancing teamwork abilities;

(iv) developing analytical and problem solving skills;

(v) independent thinking;

(vi) developing communication skills and planning abilities.

However, they think that the program is heavy and there is a need of co-curricular activities.

The response of students against different questions is shown in the following graphs.

27%

33%

13%

7%

0%

20%

Repute at National Level

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

De

par

tme

nt

Stat

us

27

18%

27%

36%

14%

4%

1%

The work in the program is too heavy and induces a lot of pressure.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

11%

38%

26%

19%

6%

0%

The program is effective in enhancing team-working abilities

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

28

25%

43%

24%

7%

1% 0%

The program administration is effective in supporting learning

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

29%

37%

25%

7%

2% 0%

The program is effective in developing analytical and problem solving skills

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

29

31%

29%

25%

12%

2% 1%

The program is effective in developing independent thinking

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

17%

37% 25%

15%

6% 0%

The program is effective in developing written communication skills

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

30

20%

32%

31%

11%

6% 0%

The program is effective in developing planning abilities

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

28%

26%

33%

6% 7%

0%

The objectives of the program have been fully achieved

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

31

19%

41%

31%

7% 1%

1%

Whether the contents of curriculum are advanced and meet program objectives

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

19%

41%

26%

6%

7%

1%

Faculty was able to meet the program objectives

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

32

22%

35%

33%

8% 2%

0%

Environment was conducive for learning

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

13%

31%

37%

13%

5%

1%

Whether the Infrastructure of the department was good

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

33

8%

18%

32%

29%

11%

2%

Whether the program was comprised of Co-curricular and extra-curricular activities

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

19%

24%

31%

14%

11%

1%

Whether scholarships/ grants were available to students in case of hardship

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Gra

du

atin

g St

ud

en

ts

34

Employers’ Survey

The department was able to collect 9 responses from different departments about graduates of

SNS working there. Participants were asked different questions on the knowledge,

communication skills, interpersonal skills and work skills of the employees and results of some

of the traits are given in the graphs.

These surveys indicate a strong knowledge of the graduating students. Some attention

should be given to train students to link theory to practice. However, the employers are satisfied

with the communication skills and independent thinking of the employees.

0%

33%

67%

0% 0%

Ability to link theory to practice

A: Excellent

B : Very good

C : Good

D: Fair

E : Poor

67%

33%

0% 0% 0%

Math, Science, Humanities and Professional Discipline

A: Excellent

B : Very good

C : Good

D: Fair

E : Poor

35

33%

45%

22%

0% 0%

Oral communication

A: Excellent

B : Very good

C : Good

D: Fair

E : Poor

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

s Sk

ills

0%

67%

22%

0% 11%

Independent Thinking

A: Excellent

B : Very good

C : Good

D: Fair

E : Poor

Inte

rpe

rso

nal

Ski

lls

36

Different surveys were conducted in order to assess the performance of the graduates in light of

the stated program objectives and program outcomes. These surveys include Alumni Survey,

Graduating Student Exit Survey, Employers survey (given in Standard 1-2) Students Course

Evaluation Questionnaire, Teacher Evaluation Form and of graduating students (given in

Standard 1-4).

Annexure–D presents list of activities including workshops/conferences attended by the faculty

of the department of Mathematics.

Standard 1-3: The result of program’s assessment and the extent to which they

are used to improve the program must be documented.

Program Outcomes Measurement

1. According to the surveys, there is a dire need to incorporate extra-curricular activities in the

PhD Mathematics program.

2. The infrastructure of the department should be improved. Students should have dedicated

places for leisure as well as work.

3. There is a need to improve communication skills. Communication skills (preparation of

reports, research presentations etc.) are at least as important for advancement as technical

accomplishments (mathematical models, software development etc.). Such requirement is

essential for having a successful career in industry, research and teaching.

11%

89%

0%

0% 0%

Discipline

A: Excellent

B : Very good

C : Good

D: Fair

E : Poor

Wo

rk S

kills

37

To improve the presentation skills, the student are required to deliver at least two open

seminars in his/her PhD research phase. They are encouraged to teach fundamental courses in

the department after the successful completion of their qualifying examination.

In addition, PhD students register in the “Reading and Research course” (based on their

proposed PhD research topic) which provides them great opportunity to strengthen their report

writing skills.

4. The survey also reveals that students should have thorough IT knowledge. Computer

programming is now becoming an integral part of applied mathematical research. Students for

whom the computations or simulations will be necessary are required to master the needed

programming skills and software packages during their PhD degree duration.

In order to develop computing skills, students are required to carry out computer projects which

involve their PhD research-related mathematical content. Such projects may be carried out

through typical programming languages such as C or FORTRAN or standard software packages

including Matlab, Mathematica, Maple etc. may be used.

Overall performance:

Standard 1-4: The department must assess its overall performance periodically

using quantifiable measures.

There are total 100 students in the PG program of department out of which 23 are enrolled in PhD program. The department has 13 faculty members. The teacher student ratio for this program is not up to the NUST standard.

Most of the PhD students cannot complete their degree in the minimum time period and they request for additional time to complete the degree.

SNS has published more than 400 articles in reputed ISI listed journals and about 60 in non-ISI journals.

Since 2004, 13 projects of SNS have been approved.

Apart from the regular seminar series of each semester, the department has arranged 7 international workshops/seminars.

Parking problem has been resolved.

The research student progress review form indicates that the research students (PhD)

of SNS are satisfied with their respective supervisors in terms of plenty of support,

guidance and patience, however some of them have a concern that the supervisor

(and/or a GEC member) should not be absent on long leave at the finishing/completion

stages of their thesis/defense. This problem may cause delays in checking the thesis

and holding the defense of students. This problem can be remedied internally at the

school level by the concerned HoDs.

38

Course Review report statistics (teacher and subject wise)

Student Course Evaluation Questionnaire: Table 1-4.1 shows a report on student course

evaluation questionnaire.

This report indicates that most of the courses are according to current requirements. While

some of the courses require revision. Mathematics department has already started the revision

of the whole curriculum of PhD/MS courses.

SUBJECT

AVER

AGE RATING

TOTAL

STUDENTS

MATH-805 Computational

Mathematics (PHD 2013) 60 Good 15

MATH-943 Conex Analysis (PHD

2013) 65.15 Good 8

ME-821 Advanced Fluid Mechanics

(PHD 2013) 78.38 Very Good 16

MATH-901 Ordinary Differential

Equation-I (PHD 2013-Morning) 58.59 Satisfactory 8

MATH-903 Partial Differential

Equations-I (PHD 2013) 70.1 Good 29

MATH-905 Symmetry Methods for

Differential Equation-I (PHD 2013) 70.3 Good 5

MATH-909 Continuum Mechanics-I

(PHD 2013) 80.61 Very Good 4

MATH-916 General Relativity (PHD

2013) 71.72 Good 20

MATH-941 Graph Theory (PHD

2013) 81.52 Very Good 6

MATH-949 Combinatorics (PHD

2013) 66.79 Good 17

MATH-806 Functional Analysis

(PHD 2013) 72.53 Good 13

HU-101 Islamic Studies (BS Math

2013) 65.58 Good 35

PHY-112 Applied Physics-II (BS

Math 2013) 62.63 Good 32

39

CS-101 Computer Fundamentals

(BS Math 2013) 64.73 Good 33

MATH-113 Calculus-II (BS Math

2013) 44.24 Satisfactory 33

HU-212 Technical and Business

Writing (BS Math 2013) 63.43 Good 33

HU-222 Professional Ethics (BS

Math2012) 63.93 Good 31

HU-108 Communication and

Interpersonal Skills (BS Math2012) 63.03 Good 32

MATH-223 Linear Algebra-I

(BSMath2012) 70.55 Good 31

MATH-242 Real Analysis-I (BS

Math2012) 64.12 Good 32

MATH-251 Differential Equations-I

(BS Math2012) 55.35 Satisfactory 34

MATH-262 Mathematical

Computing (BS Math2012) 62.69 Good 30

MATH-324 Abstract Algebra (BS

Math2011) 70.91 Good 28

MATH-381 Differential Geometry-I

(BS Math2011) 67.68 Good 28

MATH-371 Mechanics (BS

Math2011) 58.18 Satisfactory 27

MATH-432 Numerical Analysis-II

(BSMath2011)(Elective) 68.48 Good 27

MATH-476 Cryptography

(BS2011)(Elective) 67.88 Good 27

MATH-446 Complex Analysis (BS

Math2010) 76.36 Very Good 13

MATH-474 Mathematical Modeling

(BS Math 2010) 76.97 Very Good 13

HU-214 World History and Physical

Geography (BS Math 2010) 78.79 Very Good 13

40

MATH-901 Ordinary Differential

Equation-I (PHD 2013-Evening) 78.48 Very Good 6

PHY-922 Nanophysics (PHD 2013-

Evening) 0

Feedback

not

completed 3

MATH-372 Special Relativity (BS

Math 2010) 73.33 Good 16

MATH-428 Rings and Fields (BS

Math 2010) 79.39 Very Good 12

MATH-472 Fluid Mechanics (BS

Math 2010) 78.18 Very Good 10

EE-350 Data Communication (BS

Math 2011) 70.61 Good 25

Average 60.85 Good

Table 1-4.1: Statistics for LMS for Student Course Evaluation Questionnaire

Student Feedback for Teachers: The following Table 1-4.2 shows average of students’ feedback

for teachers. The feedback average is excellent.

S. # Semester PhD Courses

Feedback Average

1. Fall 2013 92.16

2. Spring 2014 88.76

3. Fall 2014 86.63

4. Spring 2015 88.20

Table 1-4.2: Final Student Feedback for Teachers from LMS (subject wise)

Faculty Course Review Report:

Faculty course review report (Spring 2014) is given in Table1-4.3. The data is obtained from NUST website.

41

The below table indicates the submission of Faculty Course Review Report for different courses by the relevant faculty members. In these reports faculty members have given their feedbacks about the courses. These reports are available in department and will be used in curriculum revision.

TEACHER SUBJECT SUBMISSIONS

Dr. Muhammad Ishaq MATH-801 Algebra 1

Dr. Mujeebur Rehman MATH-802 Analysis 0

Dr. Mubasher Jamil MATH-803 Geometry 0

Prof. Faiz Ahmad MATH-804 Differential

Equations 1

Dr. Mujeebur Rehman MATH-802 Analysis 0

Dr. Mubasher Jamil MATH-803 Geometry 0

Prof. Faiz Ahmad MATH-804 Differential

Equations 1

Dr. Yousaf Habib

MATH-805 Computational Mathematics 0

Dr. Matloob Anwar MATH-943 Conex

Analysis 1

Dr. Meraj Mustafa Hashmi

ME-821 Advanced Fluid Mechanics 0

Prof. Faiz Ahmad MATH-901 Ordinary

Differential Equation-I 0

Dr. Mujeebur Rehman

MATH-903 Partial Differential Equations-I 1

Dr. Tooba Feroze

MATH-905 Symmetry Methods for Differential

Equation-I 0

Dr. Moniba Shams MATH-909 Continuum

Mechanics-I 1

Dr. Mubasher Jamil MATH-916 General

Relativity 0

Dr. Rashid Farooq MATH-941 Graph Theory 0

Dr. Muhammad Imran MATH-949 Combinatorics 0

Dr. Quanita Kiran MATH-806 Functional

Analysis 0

Prof. Faiz Ahmad MATH-901 Ordinary

Differential Equation-I 0

Table1-4.3: Faculty Course Review Report from LMS

42

Survey of Department Offering PhD Programs Survey of the department offering PhD programs is attached. Research Student Progress Review Form All PhD students in Research phase are submitting the research progress review form in hard form at the end of each semester on regular basis. Hard copies of these forms are available in the department after analysis of these forms it is concluded that students are satisfied with the facilities available in the department for research. Most of the students are satisfied with the level of support from their supervisors.

43

Achievements, Honors and Awards of mathematics department during 2011-2013.

S/No

.

Name of Recipient

of Award

Name of Award,

Honour,

Achievements

Date of

Award

Name of

Awarding

Organizatio

n

b. Prof. Muneer Ahmad Rasheed

(Ex- faculty) Gold Medal in Mathematics 2010 PAS

c. Dr. Tayyab Kamran (Ex-

faculty)

Salam Prize in

Mathematics 2009 -do-

f. Dr. Mubasher Jamil

Dr. Raziuddin Siddiqui

Prize, Research

Productivity Award(2011-

2014), Best research

paper award from HEC,

Young Affiliate with

TWAS

2010

2011-14

2013

PAS, HEC,

PCST, TWAS

Details of international conferences organized by SNS (2004-2015) are given in the following

table.

Sr. No. Name of Conference Dates

1st Italian Pakistan workshop on Relativistic Astrophysics,

Leccee, Italy in collaboration with University of Salento, Italy

June 20-22, 2007

2nd Italian Pakistan workshop on Relativistic Astrophysics,

Pescara, Italy in collaboration with University of Salento, Italy

July 8-10, 2009

1 3rd Italian Pakistan workshop on Relativistic Astrophysics,

Leccee, Italy in collaboration with University of Salento, Italy

Jun 20-22 2011

2 NUST Conference on Mathematical Sciences (NCMS~2011),

SNS, NUST, Islamabad

Nov 17-19 2011

3 NUST Conference on Applications and Methods in Physics,

SNS, NUST, Islamabad

Nov 21-22 2011

4 4th Italian-Pakistani Workshop on Relativistic Astrophysics, SNS,

NUST, Islamabad

Feb 15-17 2013

5 Symmetries, Differential Equations and Applications (SDEA), Jan 27-30 2014

44

SNS, NUST, Islamabad

6 International Workshop on Solutions of Differential Equations

from Transformed Techniques, COMSTECH, Islamabad

Jan 30 –Feb 01,

2014

7 International Workshop on Discrete Structures (IWODS 2014) Mar 05-07, 2014

8 6th International Conference on Recent Developments in Fluid

Mechanics

Mar 17-19, 2015

Following table shows the number of publications and impact factor for each year.

Year

Number of ISI

Publications

Total Impact

Factor

Number of NON-

ISI Publications

2004 4 2.496 -

2005 3 2.211 1

2006 6 5.211 1

2007 25 27.783 6

2008 28 43.412 4

2009 35 71.25 12

2010 49 99.418 10

2011 57 96.988 6

2012 66 96.228 8

2013 51 77.509 8

2014 83 113.075 20

Faculty Survey

The department was able to collect responses from faculty. The results are obtained from NUST website. The purpose of this survey is to assess the feedback from faculty about the Department environment.

The faculty survey reveals that in general faculty of the department is satisfied with the available facilities and the environment. However, faculty is not satisfied with the salary and compensation packages.

45

The result in the form of graphs is as follows:

17%

42%

25%

8%

0% 8%

Your mix of research, teaching and community service

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Facu

lty

Surv

ey

16%

50%

17%

0%

0% 17%

The intellectual stimulation of your work.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyFacu

lty

Surv

ey

46

25%

50%

9%

8%

0% 8%

Type of teaching / research you currently do

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyFacu

lty

Surv

ey

59% 25%

0% 8%

0% 8%

Your interaction with students

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyFacu

lty

Surv

ey

47

42%

42%

0% 8%

0% 8%

Cooperation you receive from colleagues

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyFacu

lty

Surv

ey

25%

42%

25%

0% 0%

8%

The mentoring available to you

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyFacu

lty

Surv

ey

48

25%

50%

17%

0% 0%

8%

Administrative support from the department

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Facu

lty

Surv

ey

8%

58%

17%

0%

0% 17%

Providing clarity about the faculty promotion process

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Facu

lty

Surv

ey

49

9%

67%

8%

8%

0% 8%

Your prospects for advancement and progress through ranks

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Facu

lty

Surv

ey

8%

25%

17%

42%

0% 8%

Salary and compensation package

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyFacu

lty

Surv

ey

50

0%

50%

17%

25%

0% 8%

Job security and stability at the department

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Facu

lty

Surv

ey

9%

25%

25%

25%

8%

8%

Amount of time you have for yourself and family

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Facu

lty

Surv

ey

51

17%

67%

8%

0% 0%

8%

The overall climate at the department

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyFacu

lty

Surv

ey

17%

58%

8%

0%

0% 17%

Whether the department is utilizing your experience and knowledge

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Empty

Facu

lty

Surv

ey

52

9%

8%

67%

8%

0% 8%

Academic Rank

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyFacu

lty

Surv

ey

67%

25%

0%

0% 0%

8%

Years of Service

Strongly agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

EmptyFacu

lty

Surv

ey

53

Criterion 2: Curriculum Design & Organization Degree Title PhD in Mathematics Definition of the Credit Hour

One credit hour requires one contact hour a week in class or three contact hours a week

of laboratory work per semester. (A class of 50 minutes = 1 credit hour, a lab of three hours = 1

credit hour of lab.)

Degree Plan A PhD student is required to complete 18 credit hours course work with CGPA 3.5 or more. Usually, the first two semesters consist of course work. In these semesters student selects courses of his/her own choice from the offered courses in that semester. These courses are offered from the list of approved courses. Each student, then, must qualify comprehensive exams. The comprehensive exam consists of both written and oral (defense of synopsis) exam. After that student enters into the research phase where he/she write and defend thesis for 36 credit hours for the completion of degree. Assessment of MS Mathematics Curriculum

Standard 2-1: The curriculum must be consistent and supports the program

documented objectives.

Following table shows how the group of courses support the program documented

objectives:

Courses or

group of

courses

Objectives

1 2 3 4 5

Optional 1-6 Advanced

mathematics

concepts. Skills

and tools

Analyze and

model real

world

problems

to think and

work

independently

to pursuit

higher

learning

Thesis Research

culture

career of

innovation

training

students in

research

methodology

to pursuit

higher

learning

presentation

skills in report

writing

Table 4: Courses versus Program Objectives

(Standard 2-1 requirement)

54

Theory, Problem Analysis & Solution Design

Standard 2-2: Theoretical background, problems analysis and solution design

must be stressed within the program’s core material.

Requirements for the Program Curriculum

Standard 2-3: The curriculum must satisfy the core requirements for the program, as

specified by the respective accreditation body.

The PhD degree requires a total of at least 54 credit hours comprises of 18 credits of

courses and thirty six credits for the thesis which meets HEC requirement.

Standard 2-4: The curriculum must satisfy the major requirements for the program, as

specified by the respective accreditation body.

The PhD in mathematics program satisfies all the requirement of HEC.

Standard 2-5: The curriculum must satisfy general education, arts, and professional and

other discipline requirements for the program, as specified by the respective

accreditation body.

Not Applicable

Comparison of SNS Mathematics Program with HEC Requirements Following table shows a comparison of the PhD Mathematics Program at SNS with HEC proposed program. Semester-wise Breakdown

Course Work

HEC Proposed PhD Mathematics Program at SNS

First Semester

Course Title Cr. Hours Course Title Cr. Hours

Optional -1 3 Optional -1 3

Optional -2 3 Optional -2 3

Optional -3 3 Optional -3 3

Second Semester

Optional -1 3 Optional -1 3

Optional -2 3 Optional -2 3

Optional -3 3 Optional -3 3

Total 18 18

Course work of 18 credit hours preferably in the first year is required to be completed and followed by a comprehensive examination for granting candidacy as PhD research.

Research Work

HEC Proposed PhD Mathematics Program at SNS

Comprehensive Examination Comprehensive Examination before starting the research work

55

PhD Thesis Credit Hours are not fixed 36 Credit Hours

Research Paper Acceptance/publication of at least one research paper in an HEC approved “X” category journal is a

Acceptance/publication of at least two research papers in an HEC approved journals/ international conferences of repute out of which at least one paper must be accepted/ published in an HEC approved “X” category journal;

Only those publications will be considered in which student is the first author

Plagiarism Test The Plagiarism Test must be conducted on the Dissertation before its submission to the two foreign experts

The Plagiarism Test must be conducted on the Thesis before its submission to the two foreign experts

Evaluation of thesis

by at least two PhD experts from technologically/academically advanced foreign countries in addition to local Committee

by at least two PhD experts from technologically/academically advanced foreign countries in addition to local Committee (GEC)

Defense of Dissertation

An open defense of Dissertation is essential part of PhD Program after positive evaluation

An open defense of Dissertation is essential part of PhD Program after positive evaluation

From the above table, it is clear that the PhD Mathematics Program at SNS is in line with the HEC requirements.

Information Technology Component

Standard 2-6: Information technology component of the curriculum must be

integrated throughout the program.

No course is dedicated for information technology. However, some courses in the

curriculum contain information technology components:

Semester Course

I-II Computational Mathematics-I&II

I-II Optimization theory –I&II

Table 6: Courses with Information technology component

(Standard 2-6 requirement)

56

Course Outlines Course outlines are available in admin office of SNS. Communication Skills Standard 2-7: Oral and written communication skills of the students must be developed

and applied in the program.

Thesis writing and defense of the thesis is compulsory for all the graduating students. This practice develops oral and written communication skills.

Criterion 3: Laboratories and Computing Facilities

Introduction There are 3 labs and 3 research rooms in the School of Natural Sciences (SNS), their

names are as follows:

1. Computer lab 2. Research room 1 3. Research room 2 4. Research room 3

The detailed information about all the above mentioned labs is as follows: (1) Computer Lab

Lab In charge: Saqib Hayat Lab Engineer: -- Lab Staff: Zaheer Khan Abbasi Covered Area: 696.88 sqft Objectives: The objective of this lab is to conduct exercises related to

the subject of MS Mathematics.

Related Subjects: Mathematics Major Apparatus:a) 40 Computers

b) 01 Multimedia Projector (2) Research room 1

Incharge: Saqib Hayat Engineer: --

Lab Staff: Waqas Saleem Covered Area: 373.66 sqft Objectives: The objective of this lab is to conduct research work

related to the subject of mathematics.

Related Subjects: Mathematics Major Apparatus: 5 Computers

57

(3) Research room 2

Incharge: Saqib Hayat Lab Engineer: Lab Staff: Waqas Saleem Covered Area: 275.33 sqft Objectives: The objective of this lab is to conduct research work

related to the subject of mathematics.

Related Subjects: Mathematics Major Apparatus: 5 Computers

(4) Research room 3

Lab Incharge: Saqib Hayat Lab Engineer: --- Lab Staff: Waqas Saleem Covered Area: 614.33 sqft Objectives: The objective of this lab is to conduct research work

related to the subject of mathematics. Related Subjects: Mathematics Major Apparatus: a) 1 Computer

b) 1 Printer c) 1 Scanner

Safety Procedures for all Labs Laboratory Safety Precautions

Never eat, drink or smoke while working in the laboratory.

Do not any equipment unless you are trained and approved as a user by your supervisor.

Wear safety glasses or face shields when working with hazardous materials and/or

equipment

Clothing: When handling dangerous substance, wear gloves, laboratory coats, and safety

shield or glasses. Shorts and sandals should not be worn in the lab at any time. Shoes

are required when working in the machine shops.

If you have long hair or loose clothes, make sure it is tied back or confined.

Keep the work area clear of all materials except those needed for your work Coats should

be hung in the hall or placed in locker. Extra books, purses, etc. should be kept away

from equipment that requires air flow or ventilation to prevent overheating.

58

Equipment Failure - if a place of equipment fails while being used, report it immediately to

your lab assistant or tutor. Never try to fix the problem yourself because you could harm

yourself and others.

If leaving a lab unattended, turn off all ignition sources and lock the doors.

Never pipette anything by mouth.

Know the location of the fire extinguisher, eye wash, and safety shower in your lab and

know how to use them.

Notify your instructor immediately after any injury, fire or explosion, or spill.

Clean up your work area before leaving.

General Safety Guidelines

Your personal laboratory safety depends mostly on you.

Never do unauthorized experiments.

Do not touch anything with which you are not completely familiar.

Keep your lab space clean and organized.

Do not leave an on-going experiment unattended.

Always inform your instructor if you break a thermometer. Do not clean mercury yourself.

Never, ever look into any laser beam. No matter how low power or “eye safe” you may

think it is.

Never taste anything. Never pipette by mouth; use a bulb.

Check your glassware for cracks and chips each time your use it. Cracks could cause the

glassware to fall during use and cause serious injury to you or lab mates.

Obtain permission before operating any high voltage equipment.

Maintain unobstructed access to all exits, fire extinguishers, electrical panels, emergency

showers, and eye washes.

Do not use corridors for storage or work areas.

Do not store heavy items above table height. Any overhead storage of supplies on top of

cabinets should be limited to lightweight items only.

Standards Lab Manuals/Documentation/Instructions Standard 3-1: Laboratory manuals/documentation/instructions for experiments must be

available and readily accessible to faculty and students.

Each lab maintains the necessary manuals/instructions for experiments. Faculty members and

students are entitled to get issued these manuals for limited period.

59

For graduate studies, these laboratories have sufficient facilities and are comparable with other

engineering/sciences institutions in Islamabad.

Adequate Personnel Support for Labs Standard 3-2: There must be adequate support personnel for instruction and maintaining

the laboratories.

There is adequate lab support in terms of personnel.

Each lab is looked after by a qualified lab staff.

Details of lab staff of the department are as follows:

a. Name: Waqas Saleem Designation: Lab Attendant Qualification: BS Electronics, Sarhad University, Islamabad, 2014.

b. Name: Zaheer khan Abbasi Designation: Lab Attendant Qualification: DAE Computer Technology, PBTE Lahore, 2011

Adequate Computing Infrastructure and Facilities Standard 3-3: The University computing infrastructure and facilities must be adequate to

support program’s objectives.

All faculty members and students have access to adequate computing facilities.

All faculty members are provided with PCs in their offices along with accessories.

There are adequate computer labs in the school. Details are already shown above.

These labs are easily accessible by the students and all of them remain open till 05:00 p.m.

The labs and faculty offices are equipped with internet facilities as well.

The computing facilities, in general, are similar to those found in major reputable universities of the world.

Criterion 4: Student Support & Guidance Completion of Program:

Standard 4-1: Courses must be offered with sufficient frequency and number for

students to complete the program in a timely manner.

The students are required to study a set of core courses in the first semester. These courses

are offered every year. Optional courses may also be offered twice a year, if required.

Interaction between Students, Faculty and Teaching Assistants:

Standard 4-2: Courses in the major area must be structured to ensure effective

interaction between students, faculty and teaching assistants.

60

All courses are taught by one faculty member at a time. The students can interact with faculty

during office hours. Research students meet their supervisors whenever they need assistance.

Guidance and Qualified Advising:

Standard 4-3: Guidance on how to complete the program must be available to all

students and access to qualified advising must be available to make course decisions

and career choices.

The courses of PhD Mathematics Program are so structured to ensure effective interaction

between students and faculty. The following principles are observed in order to ensure effective interaction between students and faculty in the courses offered:

Classes are made of small number of students.

Students are required to attend their classes regularly and remain punctual in the class.

Faculty members are required to display their office hours as well as announce it to their students.

Each faculty member is advisor of a group of students. Students can share their problems with their respective advisors. These advisors are available to make course decisions as well.

Typically a given PhD Mathematics course includes as part of the “Course Work” a final exam, two one-hour exams, a number of quizzes, and a number of homework assignments. This scheme encourages students to be in constant contact with their instructors and subject material.

After the completion of 18 credit hours, students start their research work and qualifying the comprehensive exam from the core courses, students start their research work. This activity augments student/faculty interaction.

The complete list of elective courses is given below Structure of Courses

Code Elective Courses CHs Institute Pre-Requisites

MATH 805 Computational

Mathematics 3 SNS None

MATH 806 Functional Analysis 3 SNS None

MATH 901 Ordinary Differential

Equation-I 3 SNS None

MATH 902 Ordinary Differential

Equations-II 3 SNS

MATH-901 Ordinary

Differential Equations-I

61

MATH 903 Partial Differential

Equations-I 3 SNS None

MATH 904 Partial Differential

Equations-II 3 SNS

MATH-903 Partial

Differential Equations-I

MATH 905 Symmetry Methods for

Differential Equations-I 3 SNS None

MATH 906 Symmetry Methods for

Differential Equations-II 3 SNS

MATH-905 Symmetry

Methods for Differential

Equations-I

MATH 907 Functional Methods for

Differential Equations 3 SNS None

MATH 908 Fixed Point Theory 3 SNS None

MATH 909 Continuum Mechanics-I 3 SNS None

MATH 910 Continuum Mechanics-II 3 SNS MATH-909 Continuum

Mechanics-I

MATH 911 Special Functions 3 SNS None

MATH 912 Transform Methods 3 SNS None

MATH 913 Asymptotic Methods 3 SNS None

MATH 914 Mathematical Modeling 3 SNS None

MATH 915 Complex Methods 3 SNS None

MATH 916 General Relativity 3 SNS None

MATH 917 Cosmology 3 SNS None

MATH 918 Spinor Formalism 3 SNS None

MATH 919 Stellar Structures 3 SNS None

MATH 920 Relativistic Astrophysics 3 SNS None

62

MATH 921 Relativistic Astrophysics of

the Galactic Centre 3 SNS None

MATH 922 Classical Field Theory 3 SNS None

MATH 923 Quantum Mechanics 3 SNS None

MATH 924 Quantum Field Theory 3 SNS None

MATH 925 Quantum Field Theory in

Curved Spaces 3 SNS None

MATH 926 Particle Physics 3 SNS None

MATH 927 Foundations of Quantum

Mechanics 3 SNS None

MATH 928 Celestial Mechanics 3 SNS None

MATH 929 Thermodynamics 3 SNS None

MATH 930 Statistical Mechanics 3 SNS None

MATH 931 Electromagnetism-I 3 SNS None

MATH 932 Electromagnetism-II 3 SNS MATH-931

Electromagnetism-I

MATH 933 Gravitational Lenses 3 SNS None

MATH 934 Optimization Theory-I 3 SNS None

MATH 935 Optimization Theory II 3 SNS MATH-934 Optimization

Theory-I

MATH 936 Advanced Computational

Mathematics-I 3 SNS

MATH-805 Computational

Mathematics

MATH 937 Advanced Computational

Mathematics II 3 SNS

MATH-936 Advanced

Computational Mathematics-I

MATH 938 Stochastic Methods-I 3 SNS None

63

MATH 940 Stochastic Methods-II 3 SNS MATH-938 Stochastic

Methods-I

MATH 941 Graph Theory 3 SNS None

MATH 942 Topology 3 SNS None

MATH 943 Convex Analysis 3 SNS None

MATH 944 Semigroup Theory of

Operators 3 SNS None

MATH 945 Lie Group Representation 3 SNS None

MATH 949 Combinatorics 3 SNS None

Guidance to Students Upon joining NUST handbooks are given to all students. The handbook contains detailed information about

Degree program

Semester system

Graduation requirements

Examinations policy

Retest policy

Failure conditions

Relegation conditions

Withdrawal conditions

Cheating and plagiarism penalties

Relevant program requirements In addition to this, these instructions are also available to students on the school website.

Student Counseling & Advisory System

Every faculty member is assigned a group of students (MS) to act as official advisor of that group.

The advisor formally spends some time with the group discussing various issues of concern with students, updating them on administrative policies and listening to and solving their problems.

The students of the group are free to contact their advisor whenever they need guidance.

64

Utmost importance is given to the privacy and personal concerns of the students in such matters.

Criterion 5: Process Control Standard 5-1: The process by which students are admitted to the program must be based

on quantitative and qualitative criteria and clearly documented. This process must be

periodically evaluated to ensure that it is meeting its objectives.

MS Program at Department of Mathematics, School of Natural Sciences, NUST

This section explains the criteria and procedure of entrance to National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST) in general. Department of Mathematics follows the same guidelines. Eligibility Criteria

For admission in the PhD program, GAT is mandatory and the result of last degree is also important. Admissions are open to all students irrespective of the gender. Entrance Examination For admission in the program eligible candidates appear in an interview. Date of interview is sent by e-mail or post Selection Procedure

A list of selected candidates shall be prepared and send to HQ NUST for the completion of necessary official requirements. Waiting List

There will be no waiting list. Rejection of Application

Any irregularity in the application may lead to its rejection Migration In PhD Mathematics migration from any other national or international institute is not allowed. International Students Admission

The eligibility criterion for foreign students is same as for local students. Entrance Test

Foreign students/Pakistanis living abroad also appear in the interview.

65

Merit List

There is no merit list. Clearance

Cases of foreign students, finally selected for admission in NUST constituent

colleges/institutes will be referred to the Govt. of Pakistan for clearance. Security clearance will

be obtained from the concerned authorities as per the requirement. Those who could not able to

get clearance will not be eligible for admission.

Accommodation

Accommodation to the foreign students under NUST arrangement is preferred. Standards School sends recommendations/ deficiencies to the main office NUST. Main office

NUST sends offer letters to eligible students.

Admissions Process

The admissions process is described in detail in Criterion 5-1. Program Registration and Monitoring Standard 5-2: The process by which students are registered in the program and

monitoring of students progress to ensure timely completion of the program must be

documented. This must be periodically evaluated to ensure that it is meeting with its

objectives.

Completed registration forms are sent to NUST main office. On receipt of registration cards, the same are distributed among the students. NUST main office is responsible for the registration of the students.

The contents of all new courses are evaluated in a departmental meeting where all the shortcomings or improvements are suggested and incorporated. After getting approval from Faculty Board of Studied (FBS) and then from Academic Council Meeting (ACM) the courses are offered. The students are also asked to submit an evaluation report of each course. This evaluation or student feedback is also discussed with individuals and shortcomings are identified and remedial measures are taken to improve upon previous performances.

The department follows NUST statutes which clearly state the graduation criteria. The analysis that whether a student meets the graduation criteria is done by the Examination Branch at School of Natural Sciences and strictly follows the NUST policy in this regard. Recruiting and Training Highly Qualified Faculty

Standard 5-3: The process of recruiting and retaining highly qualified faculty

members must be in place and clearly documented. Also process and procedures

66

for faculty evaluation, promotion must be consistent with institution mission

statement. These processes must be periodically evaluated to ensure that it is

meeting its objectives.

SNS has a strict policy of hiring or recommending the faculty of only the highest calibre. This process starts with receipt of CV and application from an interested individual who wishes to join our department. The application is discussed in house first with the department faculty and then, if found capable, with the Principal. If the applicant meets baseline criteria, he/she is invited for an interview and asked to prepare a presentation in his/her area of interest. This presentation is attended by faculty of the department. Faculty members from other departments and heads of other departments may also join the session. The applicant is evaluated on the basis of various parameters including presentation skills, teaching ability, research potential, expression etc.

If the applicant is considered well suited for the job, the case is sent to the HR Dte main office NUST for final selection.

Standard 5-4: The process and procedures used to ensure that teaching and delivery of course material to the students emphasizes active learning and that course learning outcomes are met. The process must be periodically evaluated to ensure that it is meeting its objectives. To ensure that the teaching and delivery of course material to the students is meeting the required standards, the Head of the Department visits each course class at least twice per semester and a written report is prepared according to the prescribed proforma (as shown below in NUST proforma on Class Audit Report). In the light of this report, the teaching is assessed and in case of any deficiency, the teacher is advised in time to take ample and required measures. Thisclass audit is included in the final ACR of the teacher.

Further, the students give Faculty Feedback twice a semester which assesses the teacher’s performance and his/her justification towards the course material covered and its understanding.

The students submit a Course Evaluation Report at the end of the semester and the suggestions and input from the students is recorded for future improvement.

Performance Evaluation of Faculty – NUST

Class Audit Report (to be filled by the Reporting Officer)

Course Code: Course Title:

Instructor: Class:

5 4 3 2 1

67

Topic: Date:

Sr. # Areas Being

Evaluated

Comments Rating

1. Objective & Goals The faculty made a clear statement of the objectives of the session at

the beginning of class or at another appropriate time

2. Preparation The faculty was well prepared for class with necessary materials

3. Subject Matter

Expertise

The faculty presented material at a level appropriate to the course

4. Teaching Methodology When appropriate, the faculty combined methods of instruction

(instruction (visual, auditory, etc) to accommodate various student

learning styles

5. Responsiveness The professor was attentive to student questions and comments and

provided clear explanations and examples

6. Classroom

Management

The faculty demonstrated effective classroom management skills

7. Organization The faculty presented the material in an organized manner

8. Clarity The faculty presented instructional material clearly

9. Respect The faculty encourages mutual respect

Non-Classroom Observations

10. Course outline The faculty syllabus conforms to the existing course outline of record

11. Syllabus The faculty’s syllabus includes a description of course content,

contact information, office hours if applicable, the means by which

students will be evaluated, grading standards and other relevant

information

12. Student Evaluation

Process

The faculty participated in the evaluation in professional and timely

manner in light of Part II, Chapter 04 of NUST statutes

13. Professional

Obligation

The faculty meets professional obligations outside of class (submits

rosters and grades on time)

14. Curriculum

Development

Adds and introduces new techniques for effective teaching. The

faculty reviews the curriculum in the light of latest

developments/requirements

Page 1

Excellent Very Good Good Average Poor

68

Performance Evaluation of Faculty – NUST

Sr. # Areas Being

Evaluated

Comments Rating

15. Student Facilitation The Faculty assists and facilities the students during office hours

and provides necessary guidance

16. Value addition The faculty related theory with practical problems and establishers

relevance of the industry with academic concepts

17. Fairness The faculty treats and evaluates all the students fairly

18. Conduct of

lab/projects

The faculty conducts the lab/projects timely and effectively

19. Punctual Conduct of

Assessment Means

Assignments, quizzes, one hour tests, mid term and final

examinations were designed, conducted, marked and discussed on

time

20. Knowledge of NUST

statues

Faculty has clear understanding & knowledge of the NUST statues

regarding academic standards & related requirements

21. Total Marks:

Total Points Scored based on the following formula =

For Teaching Focused : (Total Marks ÷ 100 x 20)

For Research Focused : (Total Marks ÷ 100 x 5)

For Hybrid Focused : (Total Marks ÷ 100 x 10)

a. Strong Areas:

b. Suggestions to Improve: He/She has been advised to:

(Name and Signature)

Page 2

69

Standard 5-5: The process that ensures that graduates have completed the requirements of the program must be based on standards, effective and clearly documented procedures. This process must be periodically evaluated to ensure that it is meeting its objectives.

To ensure that the students are meeting the requirements of completing the course:

Attendance is maintained on LMS and is updated regularly. The deficient students are warned in time to recover. A student failing to meet the attendance requirement is disallowed to sit in the final exam according to the NUST Rules.

The students are given appropriate number of quizzes, assignments, projects and presentations which are evaluated and assessed throughout the semester. This activity reflects the understanding level of the students for the course. Any measures required are then taken and the students are duly notified of any deficiencies.

Two Sessional/One Hour Tests are conducted during the semester. The questions in these exams are selected according the course taught and to check the understanding of the student. The result from the sessional exams gives a clear picture whether or not the students have met the objectives of the course.

Before the final exam, the students are given the aggregate result of the assessments carried till then which gives a clear picture to the student to set their targets and recover any deficiencies. This helps the student to give attention to the ignored material of the course and cover it in time.

The final result is discussed at the departmental level and each deficient student is assessed individually. The grading for each course is discussed in the departmental board of studies and later approved in the Faculty board of studies meeting. In light of the discussion through FBS, appropriate actions are taken.

In most deficient cases, not only the students are advised by their respective advisors (advisors are the faculty members in the department) but also their parents are informed, if required, to take measures for improvement.

Criterion 6: Faculty

Adequate coverage of program areas:

Standard 6-1: There must be enough full time faculty who are committed to the program

to provide adequate coverage of the program areas/courses with continuity and stability.

The interests and qualifications of all faculty members must be sufficient to teach all

courses, plan, modify and update courses and curricula. All faculty members must have

a level of competence that would normally be obtained through graduate work in the

discipline. All faculty must hold a PhD in the discipline.

As a reputed institution of higher scientific and technical education in the country, NUST

seeks excellence in all of its programs and activities. High quality dedicated faculty is a cardinal aspect of NUST's programs. The excellent teacher-to-student ratio in the constituent colleges and institutes ensures that instruction, research and development are integrated to make the institution innovative and responsive.

70

All faculty members at the Department of Mathematics hold PhD degree and they are full-time faculty members. They are committed to the program development and course coverage in addition to maintaining academic standards. The interest and qualifications of the faculty members are sufficient to plan, teach, modify and update all offered MS courses, and curriculum. Full-Time Faculty The list (as on May 31, 2015) of full-time faculty members of the Department of Mathematics is shown in the following table:

Sr. # Name Designation

1. Prof. Azad A. Siddiqui Principal

2. Dr. Rashid Farooq HoD Mathematics

3. Prof. Faiz Ahmad Consultant

4. Dr. Tooba Feroze Associate Professor

5. Dr. Matloob Anwar Assistant Professor

6. Dr. Meraj Mustafa Hashmi Assistant Professor

7. Dr. Mubasher Jamil Assistant Professor

8. Dr. Khaula Naeem Khan Assistant Professor (on leave)

9. Dr. Moniba Shams Assistant Professor

10. Dr. Muhammad Imran Assistant Professor

11. Dr. Yousaf Habib Assistant Professor

12. Dr. Mujeebur Rehman Assistant Professor

13. Dr. Muhammad Ishaq Assistant Professor

14. Dr. M. Asif Farooq Assistant Professor

15. Dr. Abid Ali Lashari Assistant Professor (on leave)

The following table indicates the various program areas and the number of faculty

members in each area:

Program Areas of Specialization

Courses Offered in Each Area Number of Faculty

Members

Number of Faculty with PhD Degree

Algebra and Analysis

Functional Analysis, Fixed Point Theory,

Special Functions, Topology, Convex

Analysis, Semigroup Theory of

Operators, Lie Group Representation.

4 4

Computational Mathematics

Computational Mathematics 5 5

71

Discrete Mathematics

Combinatorics, Optimization Theory-I,

Graph Theory.

3 3

Differential Equations

Ordinary Differential Equation-I, Partial

Differential Equations I, Mathematical

Modeling.

6 6

Mathematical Physics

Symmetry Methods for Differential

Equations I, General Relativity,

Cosmology.

4 4

Fluid Mechanics Advanced Fluid Mechanics, Continuum

Mechanics-I.

3 3

Faculty members have their complete resumes included in Annexure-D.

Time for Scholarly Activities:

Standard 6-2: All faculty members must remain current in the discipline and sufficient

time must be provided for scholarly activities and professional development. Also,

effective programs for faculty development must be in place.

NUST sponsors PhD study and research for outstanding faculty members. Faculty members are regularly sent abroad for presenting papers or to attend conferences. Faculty member desirous of going abroad for postdoctoral research are encouraged to do so by allowing them leave for this purpose. Faculty members can apply for postdoctoral program with full support from NUST and other sponsored programs.

In addition to all the above mentioned compelling packages, university provides access

to the digital resources to add value into the learning and research environment. The digital resources include publication from all academic institutes, consulting firms and books in the electronic form.

Motivation and Job Satisfaction:

Standard 6-3: All faculty members should be motivated and have job satisfaction to excel

in their profession.

Faculty input through a survey on programs for faculty motivation and job satisfaction is carried out. The purpose of this survey is to assess faculty members’ satisfaction level and the effectiveness of programs in place to help them progress and excel in their profession. The report of a survey is given in Criterion 1-4.

Criterion 7: Institutional Facilities

New Trends in Learning:

Standard 7-1: The institution must have the infrastructure to support new trends

in learning such as e-learning.

72

The faculty and students have access to computers and internet. The technical support personnel are readily accessible and work hard to troubleshoot and fix problems related with hardware and software. Printing and copying facilities are also available for the faculty members within the department. All of the above factors help in implementing modern trends in learning, including e-Learning.

Library Facilities:

Standard 7-2: The library must possess an up-to-date technical collection relevant to the

program and must be adequately staffed with professional personnel.

SNS has a library with covered area of 608 sqft. It has around 2150 hard copies of

books and about 2500 electronic copies of books. The library of SNS has a reasonable collection of books to meet the requirements of the School. The library not only provides course and reference books for the students but also maintains resources for the research students. Library staff comprises of an experienced Library Assistant who is assisted by one Library Attendant.

Library Equipment: -

(1) Photostat Machine – Nil (2) Personal Computer for online search – One (3) Personal Computer for Catalog Search – One (4) Personal Computer for CDROM Search – One (5) Dell Server – One (6) Laser Printer – One (7) Dot Matrix Printer – Nil (8) Scanner – Nil

Journals:- Subscription to following journals through online search access:

(1) Full Access of HEC digital library. (2) General Relativity and Gravitation from 2005-2007 in H/B.

Magazines:-

(1) National Geographic - Continue (2) Science Illustrated – 2012 editions (3) Physics Today – 2012 editions (4) American Physics – 2012 editions

Classrooms and Faculty Offices:

Standard 7-3: Classrooms must be adequately equipped and offices must be adequate to

enable faculty to carry out their responsibilities.

73

Classrooms Classrooms are equipped with adequate desks and chairs for students. All classrooms

are air conditioned. Most of the classrooms are equipped with computes, multimedia projects, slide screens, speakers and other educational aids. Each classroom also has a white board with adequate supply of markers and erasers. It is ensured that classrooms are properly ventilated and hygienically conditioned. Faculty Offices

Each faculty member at the School is allocated office space. Some faculty members are

allocated independent offices whereas others have shared offices. Due to the shortage of offices in the school, some faculty members are provided offices in other School of NUST. Each faculty member is provided a personal computer with internet connectivity. Individual desk space with regular supply of stationary is available. Printing facility is also provided to all faculty members.

Hostel Facilities NUST provides a reasonable hostel facility. Convocation Hall/ Auditorium: There is no auditorium in the School, however, NUST has an auditorium named as Jinnah Auditorium to organize convocations, seminars and other such activities. Sports Facilities: There are reasonable sports facilities available. Transport Facilities: NUST provides transportation to all willing students, faculty and staff. Medical Facilities: There is a medical centre in the campus where qualified doctors including a female doctor are available round the clock for necessary consultation and treatment.

Criterion 8: Institutional Support

Standard 8-1: There must be sufficient support and financial resources to attract

and retain high quality faculty and provide the means for them to maintain

competence as teachers and scholars.

In general, NUST has been successful in securing sufficient support and financial resources to attract excellent faculty members and to provide all possible means to maintain competence in teaching and scholarly work.

74

Faculty Retaining Measures

NUST has a good promotion policy so that a faculty member is promoted to the next rank soon after he/she becomes eligible.

NUST provides on campus accommodation to a large proportion of faculty members.

NUST provides on campus free outdoor medical facility and a comprehensive medical insurance policy.

NUST has introduced Gratuity and Defined Contribution Pension scheme for NUST contractual employees, as end of contract benefits.

On campus Day Care Center and Montessori School for children and pick and drop facility to in living who study in schools outside the campus.

Research Support

Standard 8-2: There must be adequate number of high quality graduate

students, research assistants and Ph.D.

Research Support is provided to all the students interested in research and development

activities in their areas of interest. This support includes funding for Fee Waiver / TVF for

Courses and Lab Demonstrations. NUST also provides NUST need base scholarships to a

large number of deserving students.

Standard 8-3: Financial resources must be provided to acquire and maintain

library holdings, laboratories and computing facilities.

Support and Facilities for the Faculty Computer Facilities are available to all faculty members Internet Facility is available to all faculty members in office and also WiFi. Technical Support is available in terms of System Administrator and lab technician. Secretarial Support is available to the head of the School. Office Equipment is adequately available in terms of stationary, printers, supplies, furniture, audio/video conferencing equipment, air conditioners and telephones. Graduate Students, Research Assistants and PhD Students

Year Graduate Students

PhDs Research Assistants

2004 0 0 0

2005 0 0 0

2006 0 0 0

2007 0 2 1

2008 0 0 9

2009 1 1 9

2010 6 3 6

75

2011 3 4 7

2012 7 5 8

2013 26 1 5

2014 2 1 0

Current Graduate Student / Faculty Ratio is as per the NUST standards. Financial Resources for Library Financial resources for library, labs and computing facilities are excellent. The detailed list of library equipment was presented in Criterion 7. The following table presents the financial resources for library during the last three years:

Library Budget (Rs. in Millions)

2005-2006 2.0

2006-2007 1.5

2007-2008 1.0

The following is the list of computing facilities available in the School for students:

Lab Computers Laser Printer

Dot-matrix Printer

Color Plotter Type Qty

Central Physics Lab Dual Core 10 - - -

Departmental Physics Lab Dual Core 09 - - -

Under Graduate Computing Lab Core I-7 37 - - -

Research Cubicles (PhD Scholars) Dual Core 01 1 - -

Research Cubicles (MPhil Scholars) - M Core 2 Due 05 - - -

Research Cubicles (MPhil Scholars) - F Core 2 Due 05 - - -

Library Dual Core 04 1 - -

Laptops for Research Student Laptop 16 - - -

Criterion 9: Research, Development & Innovation Standard 9-1: The University should provide an environment which is

encouraging and conductive for the RD&I activities. Mention the institutional

facilities and incentives for the RD&I.

Research Support and Collaborations

SNS provides computer and internet facilities and relevant literature to its faculty and

students for research.

On publishing articles in journals, cases of relevant researches are recommended to

Research Dte. for publication reward.

76

Researchers are encouraged to develop research collaborations at national/international

levels. In this regard, different international collaborations have been developed. Details

are given in the following table:

S.

No.

MoU Signing Organizations Signing

Date

Expiry

Date

Visits (2014-15)

1. University of Witwatersrand,

Johannesburg, South Africa

01 July,

2011

30 June,

2015

(Renewal

under

process)

Prof. Asghar Qadir will visit University of

the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South

Africa during July 20 to August 30, 2015

vide NIO letter no. 0972/02/NUST/NIO

(IC) dated 29 May, 2015.

Support from NUST: Nil

Support from Wits, South Africa: Full

support

2. Department of Mathematics and

Physics “Ennio De Giogi”

University of Salento, Arnesano,

Lecce, Italy

July,

2012

11 July,

2016

Prof. Asghar Qadir will visit

Department of Mathematics & Physics

of Salento University, Lecce, Italy

during June 30 to July 18, 2015 vide

QA letter no. 0972/02/NUST/NIO (IC)

dated 29 May, 2015.

Support from NUST: Travel expenses

of Rs. 9,000/-

Support from Lecce, Italy:

Remaining full support

3. Research Institute for

Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto

University, Japan

17 Nov,

2011

16 Nov,

2016

4. Abdus Salam International Centre

for Theoretical Physics (AS-ICTP)

Italy

2 April,

2015

31 Dec,

2016 Dr. Shahid Iqbal visited Abdus Salam

International Centre for Theoretical

Physics (AS-ICTP), Italy during 08-21

February, 2015 vide QA letter no.

0972/02/NUST/NIO (IC) dated 2

December, 2014.

Support from NUST: Nil

Support from AS-ICTP, Italy: Full

support

Prof. Asghar Qadir, visited Abdus

Salam International Centre for

Theoretical Physics (AS-ICTP), Italy

during 23 June to 22 August, 2014 vide

vide QA letter no. 0972/02/NUST/QA

(IC) dated 15 May, 2014.

Support from NUST: Some local

travel support

Support from AS-ICTP, Italy:

77

Remaining full support

5. Yukawa Institute for Theoretical

Physics, Kyoto University, Japan

26 Dec,

2013

25 Dec,

2018

Dr. Mubasher Jamil visited Yukawa

Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto

University, Kyoto, Japan during 18 August

to 20 September 2014 vide QA letter no.

0972/02/NUST/NIO dated 7 August, 2014.

Support from NUST: Nil

Support from Kyoto University,

Japan: Full support

6. Moulay Ismail University,

Marjane 2, BP: 298, Meknes,

Maroc

1

Februar

y, 2014

Indefinite

period

7. The Computer Simulation, Inje

University, Gimhae, Korea

Mar 19,

2015

18 March,

2019

8. School of Material Science and

Engineering, University of Science

and Technology, Beijing

July,

2014

Indefinite

period

Dr. Qurat Ul Ain visited University of

Science & Technology Beijing (USTB)

during 16 June – 15 July, 2014 vide QA

letter no. 0972/02/NUST/QA (IC) dated 9

June, 2014.

Support from NUST: Ticket (both

ways) & Living Allowance

Support from USTB, Beijing: Local

hospitality

S. No MoU Signing Organizations Date of Signing Expiry Date Remarks

1. Head School of Mining

Engineering (Wits Mining)

05 September

2012

2 nominees will

spend 6 months with

Wits Mining

Laboratories

Technicians in 2013

or 2014 at Wits

Mining

2. Abdus Salam International

Centre for Theoretical Physics

(As-ICTP) Italy

01 January 2010 31st December,

2012

3. Universita Del Salento (Formally

known as universita Di Lecce),

Italy

March 2007 March 2011

78

Standard 9-2: The faculty should publish their research in the journals of high

repute with high impact factor (ISI, Scopus Refereed) and present them in high

level conferences. Attach the detailed list of publication in international and

national journals and proceedings of the conferences.

Faculty of mathematics department at SNS, generally, publishes their work in ISI/Scopus

indexed journals. The detailed list of publication in international and national journals and

proceedings of the conferences is given in Annexure-E.

Standard 9-3: The faculty should encourage in collaborative research projects at

national and international level and have a detailed account of projects

(completed, on-going and submitted for funding).

Faculty of mathematics always tries to submit projects to different funding agencies. Detail of

completed, on-going and submitted and delayed projects is given in Tables 9-3.1, 9-3.2, 9-3.3

and 9-3.4.

Research Projects

Table 9-3.1: Project Proposals Submitted

S.

No

Project Title Name of PI Date of

Submission

Funding

Agency

Cost of

Project

Duration

of Project

1. Fractional Integral Transforms on

the Spaces of Generalized

Functions

Dr. Khaula

Naeem Khan

August 2011 HEC

(NRPU)

1.072

Millions

24 Months

2. Spacetimes Symmetries and

Symmetries of Differential

Equations

Dr. Tooba

Feroze

August 2011 HEC

(NRPU)

2.0786

Millions

18 Months

3. Fixed Point Theorems for Multi-

Valued Maps

Dr. Tayyab

Kamran

September

2011

HEC

(NRPU)

3.327

Millions

36 Months

4. Classification of Static Plane

Symmetric Spacetimes

Dr. Tooba

Feroze

April 2012 PSF 0.441

Millions

12 Months

5. Numerical Simulation for

Unsteady Compressible Flows

Dr.

Muhammad

Asif Farooq

November

2012

HEC

(IPFP)

0.5

Millions

9 Months

6. Certain Classes of Analytic

Functions Related with

Generalized Conic Domains

Dr. Fiaz

Amber

January

2013

HEC

(IPFP)

0.5

Millions

9 Months

79

7. Infinite Sums in a Multinormed

Space

Dr. Khaula

Naeem

August 2013 HEC

(NRPU)

0.9591

Millions

12 Months

8. A Study of Conserved Forms Dr. Tooba

Feroze

July 2013 HEC

(NRPU)

1.38805

Millions

12 Months

9. Graph Labelings and their

Application

Dr.

Muhammad

Imran

December

2013

ISESCO 10,000

US$

24 Months

Table 9-3.2: Completed Projects

Table 9-3.3: Ongoing Projects

S. No Project Title Name of PI Funded

By

Cost (in

Millions)

Progress

% age

Reasons

for Delay

Publicati

ons

1. Dark Energy and Cosmic

Accelerated Expansion

Dr.

Mubasher

Jamil

HEC

(NRPU)

1.819682 Completed Waiting

for

Installmen

4

S. No Project Title Name of PI Funded

By

Cost (in

Millions)

Progress

% age

Paper

Published

1. Homogenization in Underground

Flows

Dr.

Anvarbeck

Meirmanov

HEC

(FFHP)

1.000 Completed 1

2. Equilibrium and Dynamics of a

Non-isothermal Free Liquid Film

Dr.Vladislav

V.

Pukhnachev

HEC

(FFHP)

1.000 Completed 3

3. Modern Mathematical Analysis for

Phenomena of Anisotropic

Diffusion and Acoustic Wave

Propagation in Porous Media

Dr. Sergei

Sazhenkov

HEC

(FFHP)

1.000 Completed 3

4. Conformal Symmetries in General

Relativity

Dr. Khalid

Saifullah

HEC

(NRPU)

0.802 Completed 9

5. On Metric Dimension (Location

Number) of Connected Graphs

Dr.

Muhammad

Imran

HEC

(IPFP)

0.376

Completed 2

80

ts

2. Classification of Ordinary

Differential Equations by

Linearization and its

Generalizations

Prof. Asghar

Qadir

HEC

(NRPU)

1.000652 65%

3. Resolvability in Graphs

and its Applications

Dr.

Muhammad

Imran

HEC 1.502447 40%

Table 9-3.4: Delayed Projects

S. No Project Title Name of PI Funded

By

Cost (in

Millions)

Progress

% age

Reasons

for Delay

Paper

Published

1. Theoretical Studies of

General Relativity

Phenomena in Black

Holes & Gravitation

Lenses

Prof.

Alexander

Fyodorovich

Zakharov

HEC

(FFHP)

1.00

Completed PI left

Pakistan

3

2. Analysis of Novel

Electromagnetic

Metamaterials

Dr.

Muhammad

Raza

HEC

(IPFP)

0.45 Completed Funds not

received

0

3. Minimal Depth and

Trivial Modification

Dr.

Muhammad

Ishaq

HEC

(IPFP)

0.50 Completed Funds not

received

1

Standard 9-4: The department should support faculty in establishing university-

industry linkage and create patent. The relevant information be included in the

report.

Under Faculty Development Program, mathematics department encourages MS students to

complete their PhDs in industrial and financial mathematics