section 2 - listing of non-historic bridges · 2019. 5. 10. · section 2. listing of non-historic...
TRANSCRIPT
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-02134BSBL Not eligible14480Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 192 87 346
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: CSX RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-02134CNBL Not eligible14470Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 192 87 346
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: CSX RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-02214BNBL Not eligible14530Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 218 87 359
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: SOUTHERN RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-02214BSBL Not eligible14540Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 218 87 359
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: SOUTHERN RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-03153 Not eligible14420Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 113 87 330
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: LUTZ CREEK
473
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-03154 Not eligible14430Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 129 87 336
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: THURMAN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-03448B Not eligible14550Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 239 87 360
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: PATOKA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-04078BNBL Not eligible14490Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 211 87 359
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: S FORK RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-04078JBSB Not eligible14500Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 211 87 360
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: S FORK RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-04079BNBL Not eligible14510Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 216 87 359
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: N FORK RICHLAND CREEK
474
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-26-04079JBSB Not eligible14520Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 216 87 359
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: N FORK RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
056-26-06260A Not eligible19890Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 293 87 329
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 56 Feature Crossed: ROBB CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
057-26-03004B Not eligible20550Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 227 87 203
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 57 Feature Crossed: OLD CHANNEL PATOKA RIVE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
057-26-03322A Not eligible20530Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 197 87 222
Composite steel beam-floor beam system
303C
//Feature Carried: SR 57 Feature Crossed: UPPER KEG CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
064-26-01152D Not eligible22840Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 237 87 448
Steel thru truss310B
//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: MAUCKS POND
475
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
064-26-04615B Not eligible22860Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 214 87 363
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 64 (SR 65) Feature Crossed: RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
064-26-04616B Not eligible22870Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 214 87 359
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 64 (SR 65) Feature Crossed: US 41
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
065-26-00313 Not eligible23210Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 145 87 418
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 65 Feature Crossed: BLACK RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
065-26-03901A Not eligible23250Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 234 87 330
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 65 Feature Crossed: PATOKA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
065-26-03993A Not eligible23260Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 237 87 328
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 65 Feature Crossed: PATOKA RIVER OVERFLOW
476
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
065-26-04150A Not eligible23220Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 201 87 413
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 65 Feature Crossed: INDIAN CAMP CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
065-26-04151A Not eligible23230Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 203 87 413
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 65 Feature Crossed: SKELTON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
065-26-04152B Not eligible23240Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 205 87 413
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 65 Feature Crossed: BLAIR DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
065-26-06478A Not eligible23270Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 260 87 295
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 65 Feature Crossed: BRANCH FORD DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
068-26-01614 Not eligible24400Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 117 87 281
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 68 Feature Crossed: BARN BRANCH
477
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
165-26-06361 Not eligible28540Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 168 87 451
Reinforced concrete box - under fill
119C
//Feature Carried: SR 165 Feature Crossed: BRANCH MAUMEE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
168-26-03720 Not eligible28660Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 152 87 293
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 168 Feature Crossed: SNAKE RUN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
168-26-03721A Not eligible28670Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 152 87 257
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 168 Feature Crossed: MILLER'S BRANCH #1
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
168-26-03722A Not eligible28690Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 152 87 241
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 168 Feature Crossed: HOFFMAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
168-26-03735A Not eligible28680Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 152 87 257
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 168 Feature Crossed: MILLER'S BRANCH #2
478
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
168-26-04274B Not eligible28650Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 152 87 312
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 168 Feature Crossed: PIGEON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00004 Not eligible2600004Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 25.3 087 26.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CR 450N Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00015 Not eligible2600008Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.3 087 43.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BLAIR ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MCCARTY DITC
This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
00016 Not eligible2600009Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.4 087 42.9
Riveted plate girder - floor beam system
303F
//Feature Carried: BLAIR ROAD Feature Crossed: MCCARTY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00022 Not eligible2600014Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 24.4 087 37.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BINGHAM ROAD Feature Crossed: HULL DITCH
479
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00026 Not eligible2600018Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.6 087 43.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: BURKETT ROAD Feature Crossed: BLAIR DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00029 Not eligible2600021Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.3 087 44.2
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: J.D. THOMPSON ROAD Feature Crossed: HIGGINBOTHAM DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00035 Not eligible2600025Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 19.1 087 40.9
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: BENSON ROAD Feature Crossed: LOEFLER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00037 Not eligible2600026Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.2 087 46.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: JOHNSON ROAD Feature Crossed: SCOTT DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00067 Not eligible2600043Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.7 087 32.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CARUTHERS ROAD Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK
480
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
00085 Not eligible2600058Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 25.0 087 26.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: MT. TABOR ROAD Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.
00103 Not eligible2600069Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.6 087 35.4
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: OLD US 41 Feature Crossed: DITCH TO PATOKA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00104 Not eligible2600070Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.6 087 36.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: WILLIAMS ROAD Feature Crossed: BROWN DITCH LATERAL #12
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00119 Not eligible2600083Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.3 087 28.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: OSBORNE ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH TO MUDDY FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00121 Not eligible2600085Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.2 087 29.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: KEUSTER ROAD Feature Crossed: SAND CREEK
481
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00122 Not eligible2600086Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.2 087 29.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: KEUSTER ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00144 Not eligible2600104Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.8 087 24.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BEASLEY ROAD Feature Crossed: KEG CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00147 Not eligible2600106Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.3 087 23.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CR 350S Feature Crossed: KELLEE BR W. FORK KEG CR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00157 Not eligible2600111Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.9 087 26.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: KING ROAD Feature Crossed: LOST CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00158 Not eligible2600308Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.9 087 26.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: N. KING ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH LOST CREEK
482
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00159 Not eligible2600112Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.6 087 26.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CR 650E Feature Crossed: MCCLELLAN LATERAL #2
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00160 Not eligible2600113Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.8 087 26.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: T. BEASLEY ROAD Feature Crossed: LOST CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00161 Not eligible2600114Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.3 087 26.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: MARION KING ROAD Feature Crossed: FRANCISCO LATERAL #1
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00165 Not eligible2600118Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.9 087 21.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MARSHALL ROAD Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00166 Not eligible2600119Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.9 087 24.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MELTON ROAD Feature Crossed: KEG CREEK
483
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00168 Not eligible2600121Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 19.6 087 22.0
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SHY ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST FORK OF KEG CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00169 Not eligible2600122Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 19.4 087 24.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: OATSVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH W. FORK KEG CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00179 Not eligible2600130Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.7 087 20.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST FORK OF KEG CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00202 Not eligible2600145Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 12.9 087 43.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: L. WILSON ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BLACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00203 Not eligible2600146Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 15.0 087 45.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COOK ROAD Feature Crossed: BARREN CREEK
484
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00204 Not eligible2600147Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 15.3 087 46.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SHARP ROAD Feature Crossed: BARREN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00208 Not eligible2600150Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 13.8 087 42.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MOUNTS ROAD Feature Crossed: PUDDING BELLY RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00209 Not eligible2600151Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 13.8 087 42.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MOUNTS ROAD Feature Crossed: BLACK RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00213 Not eligible2600154Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.0 087 46.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MAUCK ROAD Feature Crossed: BARREN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00214 Not eligible2600155Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.4 087 46.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MAUCK ROAD Feature Crossed: HIGGENBOTHAM DITCH
485
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00216 Not eligible2600157Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.1 087 35.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CR 175W Feature Crossed: SANDY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00217 Not eligible2600158Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 13.8 087 38.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: GENUNG ROAD Feature Crossed: TOOPS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00221 Not eligible2600162Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.4 087 39.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BARNETT ROAD Feature Crossed: BOOK RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00226 Not eligible2600166Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.1 087 35.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: J.E. JOYCE ROAD Feature Crossed: BR. OF W. FORK PIGEON CK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00235 Not eligible2600171Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.2 087 35.0
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: GENUNG ROAD Feature Crossed: WEST FORK PIGEON CREEK
486
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00245 Not eligible2600178Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.7 087 31.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CR 200E Feature Crossed: TOOPS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00253 Not eligible2600183Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 12.8 087 32.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: POHL ROAD Feature Crossed: HURRICANE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00266 Not eligible2600191Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.7 087 31.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: NEUBLING ROAD Feature Crossed: TOOPS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00276 Not eligible2600322Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.2 087 25.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: KOHLMEIRE ROAD Feature Crossed: MILLERS BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00281 Not eligible2600206Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 12.1 087 22.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: S. COUNTY LINE RD. Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BIG CREEK
487
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00290 Not eligible2600323Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.0 087 26.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MCCULLOUGH ROAD Feature Crossed: DITCH TO SMITH FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00294 Not eligible2600218Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 15.6 087 24.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: KOERNER ROAD Feature Crossed: HALFMOON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00327 Not eligible2600241Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 11.0 087 40.8
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: NEWMAN ROAD Feature Crossed: NEWMAN LATERAL
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00329 Not eligible2600242Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 11.4 087 40.8
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: ENDICOT ROAD Feature Crossed: NEWMAN LATERAL
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00331 Not eligible2600244Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 11.9 087 40.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: EMERSON ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH TO NEWMAN LATE
488
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00338 Not eligible2600247Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 26.2 087 29.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CR 620N Feature Crossed: GOOSE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00339 Not eligible2600248Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 26.7 087 33.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: STEELMAN CHAPEL RD Feature Crossed: ROBB CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00340 Not eligible2600249Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 26.4 087 30.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: STEELMAN CHAPEL RD Feature Crossed: TRIPPET DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00351 Not eligible2600252Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 10.8 087 30.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: WEIS ROAD Feature Crossed: HURRICANE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00354 Not eligible2600254Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 11.7 087 31.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: KEISTER ROAD Feature Crossed: HURRICANE CREEK
489
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00356 Not eligible2600256Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 11.7 087 29.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BUSSING ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF PIGEON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00364 Not eligible2600263Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 12.2 087 28.8
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: NORDHORN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF PIGEON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00373 Not eligible2600267Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.9 087 19.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROUSH ROAD Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK PATOKA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00376 Not eligible2600269Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 13.9 087 43.5
Timber beam702A
//Feature Carried: ANTIOCH CHURCH RD. Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RAILROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00378 Not eligible2600270Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 15.6 087 44.1
Timber beam702A
//Feature Carried: J.D. THOMPSON ROAD Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RAILROAD
490
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00380 Not eligible2600272Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.3 087 22.5
Timber girder702B
//Feature Carried: CR 450S Feature Crossed: BIG FOUR RAILROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00403 Not eligible2600284Gibson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 12.5 087 39.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CEDAR GROVE ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF NEWMAN LATE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(13)21-27-01844A Not eligible4790Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 346 85 494
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: MARION ROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(15)21-27-01954A Not eligible3890Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 294 85 377
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 15 Feature Crossed: BACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(15)21-27-01955A Not eligible3900Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 306 85 390
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 15 Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
491
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(18)21-27-01633A Not eligible4810Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 342 85 455
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(18)21-27-01634A Not eligible4800Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 345 85 483
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(35)22-27-01075A Not eligible11190Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 289 85 407
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 35 & SR 22 Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(35)22-27-04723 Not eligible11180Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 294 85 378
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 35 & SR 22 Feature Crossed: BACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(35)22-27-04724B Not eligible11170Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 294 85 376
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 35 & SR 22 Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER
492
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(5)221-27-04040A Not eligible1506Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 360 85 303
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 5 Feature Crossed: BLACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-27-00003B Not eligible2570Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 293 85 404
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-27-00032D Not eligible2620Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 356 85 392
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: HUMMEL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-27-01944 Not eligible2580Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 301 85 402
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: DRY FORK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-27-01950D Not eligible2610Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 351 85 397
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER & ST.
493
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-27-02101C Not eligible2600Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 334 85 406
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: N & S RR & BIKEWAY
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
013-27-01491B Not eligible3400Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 264 85 495
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: GRASSY FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
013-27-03095A Not eligible3410Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 338 85 496
Composite steel beam302G
//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
013-27-03808 Not eligible3380Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 235 85 506
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: SHAY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
015-27-00795B Not eligible3920Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 386 85 426
Composite steel beam302G
//Feature Carried: SR 15 Feature Crossed: METOCINAH CREEK
494
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
015-27-01982C Not eligible3910Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 368 85 416
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 15 Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
018-27-01432A Not eligible4770Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 343 85 498
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
018-27-01433 Not eligible4760Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 346 85 511
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: TAYLOR DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
018-27-02215A Not eligible4830Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 338 85 427
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: N & S RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
018-27-04108A Not eligible4820Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 338 85 428
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: TROY ROAD
495
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
018-27-04766BEBL Not eligible4859Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 332 85 329
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 18 EBL Feature Crossed: TIPPEY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
018-27-06142AWBL Not eligible4840Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 336 85 399
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: SR 18 WBL Feature Crossed: BOOTS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
026-27-03251 Not eligible6910Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 254 85 391
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 26 Feature Crossed: BACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
026-27-04755C Not eligible6930Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 254 85 330
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 26 Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-52-04754A Not eligible39570Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 241 85 330
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 1050 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69
496
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-56-04756A Not eligible39575Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 261 85 328
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: WHEELING PIKE Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-61-04763A Not eligible39700Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 315 85 330
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-65-04768A Not eligible39790Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 349 85 331
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-68-04770A Not eligible39820Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 367 85 322
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00007 Not eligible2700006Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 36.6 085 45.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 WEST Feature Crossed: CART CREEK
497
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00019 Not eligible2700016Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 36.6 085 45.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: CART CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00020 Not eligible2700017Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.3 085 39.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: LAGRO ROAD Feature Crossed: HUMMELS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00022 Not eligible2700019Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 37.1 085 36.9
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 450 NORTH Feature Crossed: HUMMELS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00023 Not eligible2700020Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 34.6 085 33.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 600 EAST Feature Crossed: TIPPY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00032 Not eligible2700025Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 36.6 085 28.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: SWEETSER DITCH
498
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00037 Not eligible2700030Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 37.3 085 29.2
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1000 EAST Feature Crossed: BLACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00038 Not eligible2700031Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.4 085 31.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 800 EAST Feature Crossed: GOFF DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00039 Not eligible2700032Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.2 085 29.1
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1000 EAST Feature Crossed: BLACK CREEK-PRAIRIE BRC
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00070 Not eligible2700048Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.6 085 37.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: MONROE PIKE Feature Crossed: LUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00072 Not eligible2700049Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.7 085 37.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 300 E, BETHLEHAM R Feature Crossed: TRIBUTARY TO LUGAR CREE
499
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00073 Not eligible2700050Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.3 085 37.7
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: STONE ROAD Feature Crossed: LUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00078 Not eligible2700055Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.7 085 34.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 EAST Feature Crossed: LUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00082 Not eligible2700058Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30.1 085 36.9
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: FIRST STREET Feature Crossed: WALNUT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00083 Not eligible2700059Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.3 085 36.9
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 300 E Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WALNUT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00084 Not eligible2700060Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.4 085 37.5
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: 38TH STREET Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER
500
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00091 Not eligible2700064Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.6 085 27.8
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WALNUT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00093 Not eligible2700066Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.4 085 32.5
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 700 EAST Feature Crossed: LUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00098 Not eligible2700070Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.5 085 29.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1000 EAST Feature Crossed: WALNUT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00102 Not eligible2700074Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.2 085 48.8
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: GRASSY FORK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00108 Not eligible2700078Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.4 085 51.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1000 SOUTH Feature Crossed: POLLYWALK DITCH
501
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00109 Not eligible2700079Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.5 085 50.7
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: POLLYWALK DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00110 Not eligible2700080Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.5 085 49.9
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: MIDDLE FORK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00121 Not eligible2700086Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.9 085 42.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 200 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00129 Not eligible2700091Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.1 085 42.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 700 SOUTH Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00130 Not eligible2700092Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.6 085 42.6
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 200 WEST Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
502
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00134 Not eligible2700095Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.8 085 41.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 100 WEST Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00143 Not eligible2700103Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.2 085 38.9
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00144 Not eligible2700104Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.8 085 34.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 EAST Feature Crossed: BARREN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00145 Not eligible2700105Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.2 085 34.7
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 EAST Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00152 Not eligible2700108Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.3 085 38.7
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 150 EAST Feature Crossed: BACK CREEK
503
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00154 Not eligible2700109Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.4 085 38.4
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 350 EAST Feature Crossed: BARREN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00162 Not eligible2700114Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.1 085 33.0
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: ROAD 650 EAST Feature Crossed: FOWLER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00169 Not eligible2700176Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/3/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.1 085 32.9
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: WHEELING PIKE Feature Crossed: BARREN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00170 Not eligible2700119Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.3 085 30.4
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: WHEELING PIKE Feature Crossed: HOPPAS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00185 Not eligible2700127Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.6 085 47.3
Precast concrete slab101B
//Feature Carried: ROAD 600 WEST Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK
504
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00189 Not eligible2700181Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.1 085 50.7
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 900 WEST Feature Crossed: TAYLOR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00198 Not eligible2700182Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.4 085 29.8
Timber trestle702C
//Feature Carried: 2ND STREET Feature Crossed: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00240 Not eligible2700136Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 34.3 085 39.0
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: HORTON AVENUE Feature Crossed: MASSEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00241 Not eligible2700137Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.6 085 33.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 600 EAST Feature Crossed: FOWLER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00247 Not eligible2700142Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.8 085 46.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 WEST Feature Crossed: GRASSY FORK CREEK
505
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00250 Not eligible2700144Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.8 085 41.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: MILLER AVENUE Feature Crossed: LOMAX DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00254 Not eligible2700146Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.5 085 38.7
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: PENNYLVANIA STREET Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00503 Not eligible2700151Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.1 085 39.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 4TH STREET Feature Crossed: BACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00601 Not eligible2700153Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.6 085 37.9
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 9TH STREET Feature Crossed: BACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00603 Not eligible2700154Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.0 085 37.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 2ND STREET Feature Crossed: BACK CREEK
506
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00604 Not eligible2700155Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.2 085 37.8
Precast slab - under fill119F
//Feature Carried: PEARL STREET Feature Crossed: BACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00713 Not eligible2700164Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 34.2 085 39.4
Composite steel beam302G
//Feature Carried: BRANSON STREET Feature Crossed: MASSEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00719 Not eligible2700166Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 34.6 085 39.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: HIGHLAND AVENUE Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00728 Not eligible2700167Grant NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.7 085 39.6
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: WASHINGTON STREET Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(231)157-28-03588A Not eligible27890Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 596 86 558
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 231 Feature Crossed: PLUMMER CREEK
507
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
045-28-03529 Not eligible16810Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 551 86 550
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 45 (SR 58) Feature Crossed: DOANS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
045-28-06236 Not eligible16820Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 551 86 542
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 45 (SR 58) Feature Crossed: BRANCH DOANS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
045-28-08073 Not eligible16825Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 552 86 523
Reinforced concrete box - under fill
119C
//Feature Carried: SR 45 (SR 58) Feature Crossed: DOANS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
054-28-04022A Not eligible19620Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 23 87 64
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 54 Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
057-28-00834A Not eligible20730Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 4 87 10
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: SR 57 Feature Crossed: DIXON DITCH
508
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
058-28-03544A Not eligible20880Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 550 86 415
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
058-28-06267A Not eligible20875Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 553 86 436
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: TOWN BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
059-28-03666A Not eligible21150Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 581 87 112
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: BREWER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
067-28-00938A Not eligible23770Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 552 87 96
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: SR 67 Feature Crossed: BREWER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
157-28-06075B Not eligible27940Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 85 86 597
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 157 Feature Crossed: BRANCH LEMON CREEK
509
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00007 Not eligible2800001Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.6 086 45.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 985 EAST Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00009 Not eligible2800003Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 07.0 086 43.0
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 650 NORTH Feature Crossed: RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00014 Not eligible2800008Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.7 086 47.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 810 EAST Feature Crossed: RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00016 Not eligible2800010Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 03.1 086 43.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH BEECH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00017 Not eligible2800011Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 03.4 086 43.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1130 EAST Feature Crossed: BEECH CREEK
510
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00029 Not eligible2800021Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.6 086 48.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 25 NORTH Feature Crossed: LOST CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00035 Not eligible2800025Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.2 086 41.3
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1360 EAST Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00036 Not eligible2800026Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.9 086 55.1
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 70 SOUTH Feature Crossed: RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00050 Not eligible2800038Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.2 086 47.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 130 SOUTH Feature Crossed: CLIFTY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00051 Not eligible2800039Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 59.3 086 46.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 875 EAST Feature Crossed: LITTLE CLIFTY CREEK
511
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00056 Not eligible2800040Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.7 086 42.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1240 EAST Feature Crossed: SPRING CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00057 Not eligible2800041Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 58.8 086 42.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1250 EAST Feature Crossed: MITCHELL BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00061 Not eligible2800201Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 55.0 087 08.5
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1070 WEST Feature Crossed: BLACK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00065 Not eligible2800045Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 07.2 086 54.1
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 220 EAST Feature Crossed: GOOSE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00066 Not eligible2800046Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 07.3 086 54.0
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 675 NORTH Feature Crossed: GOOSE CREEK
512
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00067 Not eligible2800047Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 07.2 086 52.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 675 NORTH Feature Crossed: GOOSE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00069 Not eligible2800049Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.9 086 47.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 780 EAST Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00088 Not eligible2800062Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 55.1 086 56.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BASE ROAD SOUTH Feature Crossed: DOANS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00089 Not eligible2800063Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 54.7 086 54.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 725 SOUTH Feature Crossed: STONE BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00104 Not eligible2800071Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.4 087 06.5
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: BASE ROAD WEST Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
513
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00115 Not eligible2800077Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.0 086 51.9
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 420 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00118 Not eligible2800079Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.2 086 54.6
Composite steel beam302G
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 440 NORTH Feature Crossed: KELLY BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00119 Not eligible2800080Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.7 086 56.5
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: BASELINE ROAD Feature Crossed: KELLY BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00122 Not eligible2800083Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 02.7 086 57.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 150 NORTH Feature Crossed: MILLER BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00123 Not eligible2800084Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 03.1 086 53.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: SKINNER BRANCH
514
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00126 Not eligible2800087Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 02.2 086 59.2
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 250 WEST Feature Crossed: LATTAS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00128 Not eligible2800089Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.5 086 58.6
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH WHITE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00134 Not eligible2800092Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.9 087 06.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: LATTAS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00135 Not eligible2800093Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 06.5 087 07.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1000 WEST Feature Crossed: LATTAS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00139 Not eligible2800097Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 07.1 087 01.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 650 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH LEMON CREEK
515
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00144 Not eligible2800102Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 06.2 087 00.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 550 NORTH Feature Crossed: SLOAN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00148 Not eligible2800106Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.0 087 10.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00149 Not eligible2800107Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.8 087 13.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1500 WEST Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00154 Not eligible2800109Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.9 087 04.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 700 WEST Feature Crossed: HOWESVILLE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00156 Not eligible2800110Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 03.3 087 07.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1000 WEST Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
516
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00164 Not eligible2800203Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 06.9 087 08.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 625 NORTH Feature Crossed: LATTAS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00165 Not eligible2800116Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.1 087 08.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1100 WEST Feature Crossed: HOWESVILLE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00175 Not eligible2800121Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 03.4 087 13.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 230 NORTH Feature Crossed: GOOSE POND DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00178 Not eligible2800124Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 02.1 087 11.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 75 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH GOOSE POND DITC
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00190 Not eligible2800131Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 59.7 087 07.4
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BEEHUNTER DITCH
517
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00203 Not eligible2800141Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 55.1 087 13.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 730 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SINGER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00204 Not eligible2800142Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 54.5 087 14.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SINGER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00207 Not eligible2800145Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 58.7 087 12.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1450 WEST Feature Crossed: BREWER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00213 Not eligible2800150Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 54.8 086 58.7
Encased steel beam302A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 200 WEST Feature Crossed: BRANCH FIRST CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00229 Not eligible2800159Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.9 087 06.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 50 NORTH Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
518
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00230 Not eligible2800160Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 59.3 087 10.0
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1200 WEST Feature Crossed: HAMILTON DITCH NORTH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00240 Not eligible2800168Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.7 087 04.0
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: FOUR MILE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00242 Not eligible2800169Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.3 086 51.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 475 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00274 Not eligible2800177Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.6 086 59.2
Timber beam702A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 250 WEST Feature Crossed: INDIANA RAILROAD COMPAN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00283 Not eligible2800180Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.8 087 04.9
Timber beam702A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 750 WEST Feature Crossed: INDIANA RAILROAD COMPAN
519
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00301 Not eligible2800182Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.7 086 50.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: CAMP CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00308 Not eligible2800188Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 02.1 086 42.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 90 NORTH Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00310 Not eligible2800189Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.5 087 01.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: FOUR MILE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00321 Not eligible2800193Greene NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.0 087 05.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 800 WEST Feature Crossed: LATTAS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
013-29-05089A Not eligible3340Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 86 85 518
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER
520
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
013-29-05091A Not eligible3350Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 94 85 518
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
019-29-03896B Not eligible4950Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 86 86 8
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 19 Feature Crossed: CICERO CREEK (MORSE RES
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-29-03355 Not eligible9630Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 52 86 77
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: ISSAC JONES DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-29-03542 Not eligible9640Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 57 86 77
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: LINDLEY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-29-03922 Not eligible9620Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 8 86 77
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: STANBROUGH CREEK
521
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-29-04572BNBL Not eligible9650Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 116 86 77
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 31 NBL Feature Crossed: LITTLE CICERO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-29-04572BSBL Not eligible9660Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 116 86 77
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 31 SBL Feature Crossed: LITTLE CICERO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
032-29-01282 Not eligible10640Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26 86 31
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: SLY RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
032-29-01283A Not eligible10650Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26 86 28
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: SLY RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
037-29-01416 Not eligible12490Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 47 85 586
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 37 Feature Crossed: DRY RUN CREEK
522
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
037-29-03982BSBL Not eligible12480Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18 85 598
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 37 SBL Feature Crossed: STONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
038-29-01471A Not eligible12760Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24 85 571
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 38 Feature Crossed: STONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
238-29-03779B Not eligible29920Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 591 85 545
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 238 Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
238-29-03780B Not eligible29930Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 583 85 535
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 238 Feature Crossed: THORPE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
431-29-04830ANBL Not eligible32620Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 591 86 68
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 431 NBL Feature Crossed: COOL CREEK
523
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
431-29-04830ASBL Not eligible32630Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 591 86 68
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 431 SBL Feature Crossed: COOL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
431-29-04831ANBL Not eligible32640Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 597 86 75
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 431 NBL Feature Crossed: COOL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
431-29-04831JASB Not eligible32650Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 597 86 75
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 431 SBL Feature Crossed: COOL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
431-29-04832BSBL Not eligible32660Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 598 86 76
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 431 SBL Feature Crossed: US 31 NBL
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00011 Not eligible2900010Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.4 086 07.9
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 276TH STREET EAST Feature Crossed: BAKER DITCH
524
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00012 Not eligible2900011Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.6 086 09.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: HORTON ROAD Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00019 Not eligible2900017Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 09.6 086 09.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 256TH STREET WEST Feature Crossed: TETER BR. LITTLE CICERO
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00029 Not eligible2900027Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.9 086 14.4
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 146TH STREET WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE EAGLE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00034 Not eligible2900032Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.6 086 10.3
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 96TH STREET WEST Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00043 Not eligible2900040Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.1 086 09.8
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: 136TH STREET WEST Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK
525
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00047 Not eligible2900043Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.9 086 01.5
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: 236TH STREET EAST Feature Crossed: MORSE RESERVOIR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00068 Not eligible2900062Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.0 085 52.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 281ST STREET EAST Feature Crossed: DUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00072 Not eligible2900066Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.6 085 59.8
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: 266TH STREET EAST Feature Crossed: CICERO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00086 Not eligible2900079Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.8 085 58.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: RULON ROAD Feature Crossed: WEASEL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00098 Not eligible2900087Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.4 086 02.4
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: 209TH STREET EAST Feature Crossed: MORSE RESERVOIR
526
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00101 Not eligible2900089Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.1 086 06.0
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: DEMING ROAD Feature Crossed: HINKLE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00106 Not eligible2900094Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.4 086 04.3
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: LITTLE CHICAGO RD. Feature Crossed: MORSE RESERVOIR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00109 Not eligible2900097Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.9 086 03.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: MILL CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: SLY RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00126 Not eligible2900113Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 04.3 085 54.1
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: PRAIRIE BAPTIST RD Feature Crossed: STONY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00147 Not eligible2900134Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.3 086 07.6
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: 161ST STREET EAST Feature Crossed: COOL CREEK
527
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00149 Not eligible2900136Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.9 086 04.3
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: 156TH STREET EAST Feature Crossed: KIRKENDALL CREEK
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
00160 Not eligible2900146Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.4 086 03.9
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: 116TH STREET EAST Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00171 Not eligible2900155Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.7 085 54.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: PRAIRIE BAPTIST RD Feature Crossed: SAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00174 Not eligible2900158Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.6 085 51.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: ATLANTIC AVENUE Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00194 Not eligible2900200Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.3 086 07.6
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RANGELINE ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE COOL CREEK
528
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00201 Not eligible2900201Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.8 086 10.2
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: 236TH STREET WEST Feature Crossed: TETER BROOK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00224 Not eligible2900203Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.4 086 00.7
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: ALLISONVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: STONY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00231 Not eligible2900205Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.7 086 03.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 131ST STREET EAST Feature Crossed: VESTAL DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00232 Not eligible2900206Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.7 086 04.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 131ST STREET EAST Feature Crossed: MITCHENER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00233 Not eligible2900207Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.7 086 06.3
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: 131ST STREET EAST Feature Crossed: COOL CREEK
529
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00236 Not eligible2900182Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 56.2 085 52.4
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: 101ST STREET EAST Feature Crossed: FLATFORK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00251 Not eligible2900208Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.7 086 01.0
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: ALLISONVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: OVERDORFF BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00252 Not eligible2900209Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.3 086 02.1
Reinforced concrete slab - under fill
119A
//Feature Carried: ALLISONVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: SHOEMAKER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00254 Not eligible2900184Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.9 085 55.8
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: 281ST STREET EAST Feature Crossed: WEST FORK BEAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00260 Not eligible2900190Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.3 085 51.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ATLANTIC ROAD Feature Crossed: THORPE CREEK
530
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00261 Not eligible2900191Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 56.5 086 02.9
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: 106TH STREET EAST Feature Crossed: CHEENEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00612 Not eligible2900214Hamilton NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 02.5 086 07.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: WESTFIELD BLVD. Feature Crossed: GRASSY BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(I70)209-30-05132A Not eligible42895Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 496 85 414
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 600 EAST Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-30-05130A Not eligible2480Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 493 85 462
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.
040-30-01709A Not eligible14000Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 475 85 369
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: SIX MILE CREEK
531
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-30-04588A Not eligible13950Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 467 85 569
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-30-04589A Not eligible13960Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 469 85 514
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
052-30-00519A Not eligible19220Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 439 85 561
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: DOE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
052-30-00520B Not eligible19230Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 436 85 547
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: WEST LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
052-30-00521B Not eligible19240Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 432 85 530
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
532
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
052-30-00522B Not eligible19250Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 428 85 513
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: WAGNER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
052-30-04008A Not eligible19260Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 424 85 499
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
234-30-03770A Not eligible29750Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 541 85 480
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 234 Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-102-05129A Not eligible42865Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 493 85 477
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: FORTVILLE PIKE Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-106-05131A Not eligible42890Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 494 85 437
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 400 EAST Feature Crossed: I-70
533
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-110-05134 Not eligible42920Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 496 85 387
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 850 EAST Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-112-05136 Not eligible42950Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 497 85 364
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 1050 EAST Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00002 Not eligible3000010Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.4 085 52.8
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: CR 600 N Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00007 Not eligible3000035Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.0 085 43.2
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 900 N Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00022 Not eligible3000110Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.0 085 36.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CR 900 N Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
534
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00024 Not eligible3000120Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.0 085 37.7
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: CR 900 N Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00026 Not eligible3000130Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 48.2 085 36.4
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CR 1050 E Feature Crossed: SIX MILE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00027 Not eligible3000135Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.8 085 39.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: NASHVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00050 Not eligible3000250Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 51.5 085 41.3
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: CR 500 N Feature Crossed: BRANDYWINE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00058 Not eligible3000290Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 47.9 085 56.3
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CR 100 N Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
535
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00060 Not eligible3000300Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 48.8 085 49.8
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 200 N Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00062 Not eligible3000310Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 49.7 085 49.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 300 N Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00075 Not eligible3000375Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 42.0 085 51.4
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CR 300 W Feature Crossed: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00076 Not eligible3000380Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 41.9 085 51.8
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 600 S Feature Crossed: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00080 Not eligible3000400Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 44.6 085 49.2
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CR 300 S Feature Crossed: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
536
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00110 Not eligible3000550Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 44.5 085 41.0
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 300 S Feature Crossed: NAMELESS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00114 Not eligible3000570Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 45.6 085 44.7
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: MORRISTOWN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BRANDYWINE C
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00118 Not eligible3000590Hancock NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 51.3 085 49.0
Cont prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
605
//Feature Carried: FORTVILLE PIKE Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(337)135-31-02264B Not eligible31660Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 132 86 76
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 337 Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK & LNA&C RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
062-31-01451A Not eligible22290Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 141 86 137
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 62 Feature Crossed: BLUE RIVER
537
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
062-31-03093A Not eligible22280Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 139 86 139
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 62 Feature Crossed: BLUE RIVER OVERFLOW
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
064-31-06286 Not eligible23130Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 202 86 130
Reinforced concrete slab - under fill
119A
//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: BRANCH BLUE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
111-31-01682 Not eligible25530Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 60 85 548
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 111 Feature Crossed: POFFEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
335-31-01906 Not eligible31590Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 172 86 46
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 335 Feature Crossed: CRANDALL BRANCH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
462-31-04571A Not eligible32810Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 139 86 152
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 462 Feature Crossed: BLUE RIVER
538
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
462-31-06547 Not eligible32820Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 134 86 150
Reinforced concrete slab - under fill
119A
//Feature Carried: SR 462 Feature Crossed: ROCK CREEK
This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
P000-31-07079A Not eligible60260Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 109 86 167
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: COLD FRIDAY ROAD Feature Crossed: POTATO RUN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00015 Not eligible3100011Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.4 086 06.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BIG INDIAN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF INDIAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00029 Not eligible3100018Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.6 086 04.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BIG INDIAN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRUSH HEAP CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00036 Not eligible3100023Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 08.8 086 03.0
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: NEW MIDDLETOWN RD Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
539
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00046 Not eligible3100029Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 03.5 085 58.9
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: BUENA VISTA ROAD Feature Crossed: MOSQUITO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00056 Not eligible3100065Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 07.7 086 13.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROCKY HOLLOW ROAD Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00068 Not eligible3100005Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.1 085 59.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ZOLLMAN ROAD Feature Crossed: PANTHER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00087 Not eligible3100053Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 08.3 086 00.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BLACK CHAPEL ROAD Feature Crossed: MIDDLE FORK BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00091 Not eligible3100057Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.5 086 05.9
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: TEE ROAD Feature Crossed: RACCOON BRANCH
540
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00099 Not eligible3100052Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 06.5 085 59.8
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: HULSE ROAD Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00110 Not eligible3100070Harrison NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 01.5 086 02.2
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: MOSQUITO CREEK RD. Feature Crossed: WEST BRANCH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(236)136-32-01525A Not eligible29870Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/6/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 509 86 379
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 236 Feature Crossed: E FK BIG WALNUT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(236)136-32-03506A Not eligible29840Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 513 86 402
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 236 Feature Crossed: WEST FK BIG WALNUT CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
036-32-00398BWBL Not eligible11660Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 458 86 251
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 36 WBL Feature Crossed: WHITE LICK CREEK
541
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
036-32-03986AWBL Not eligible11670Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 458 86 247
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 36 WBL Feature Crossed: LINGEMAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
039-32-01849 Not eligible13210Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 467 86 326
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: SHIRLEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
039-32-01851 Not eligible13240Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 493 86 326
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: BARNETTS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
039-32-02437C Not eligible13200Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 451 86 317
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: CSX RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
039-32-04425A Not eligible13260Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 535 86 324
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: I-74
542
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
040-32-00678C Not eligible13760Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 382 86 385
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-32-01840C Not eligible13770Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 403 86 307
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-32-01841A Not eligible13780Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 412 86 274
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: CARTERSBURG BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-32-01842A Not eligible13790Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/6/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 413 86 268
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: WEST FK WHITE LICK CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-32-01843C Not eligible13800Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 421 86 244
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: WHITE LICK CREEK
543
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
075-32-03713 Not eligible24770Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 423 86 392
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 75 Feature Crossed: WEST FORK MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.
136-32-00618A Not eligible26940Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/6/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 507 86 241
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 136 Feature Crossed: BIG WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
136-32-04091A Not eligible26930Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 514 86 263
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 136 Feature Crossed: LITTLE WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
236-32-03861A Not eligible29850Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 516 86 385
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 236 Feature Crossed: M FORK BIG WALNUT CREEK
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
I74-54-04962A Not eligible44330Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 545 86 338
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 200 WEST Feature Crossed: I-74
544
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I74-58-04427A Not eligible44360Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 529 86 307
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 75 EAST Feature Crossed: I-74
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I74-60-04428A Not eligible44370Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 528 86 284
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 275 EAST Feature Crossed: I-74
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I74-62-04430A Not eligible44400Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 528 86 264
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 500 EAST Feature Crossed: I-74
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
I74-66-04434A Not eligible44450Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 511 86 225
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CR 600N/56TH ST. Feature Crossed: I-74
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I74-68-04435A Not eligible44460Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 502 86 208
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CR 1000E/HUNTER RD Feature Crossed: I-74
545
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I74-69-04436A Not eligible44490Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 499 86 197
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: COUNTY LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00001 Not eligible3200001Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.6 086 38.6
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 900 N Feature Crossed: W FORK BIG WALNUT CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00005 Not eligible3200003Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/6/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.6 086 39.8
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: LADOGA ROAD Feature Crossed: W FORK BIG WALNUT CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00007 Not eligible3200005Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.8 086 37.2
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: RD 800 N Feature Crossed: MID FK BIG WALNUT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00009 Not eligible3200007Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.8 086 36.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: RD 475 W Feature Crossed: MID FK BIG WALNUT CREEK
546
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00014 Not eligible3200011Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.9 086 30.9
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RD 75 E Feature Crossed: BIG PRAIRIE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00015 Not eligible3200012Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.3 086 31.8
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RD 975 N Feature Crossed: ROSS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00019 Not eligible3200015Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 53.0 086 27.5
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RD 400 E Feature Crossed: KEENEY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00020 Not eligible3200016Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.6 086 26.4
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: RD 500 E Feature Crossed: W FORK WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00029 Not eligible3200021Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.6 086 23.5
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: RD 1000 N Feature Crossed: ETTER DITCH
547
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00031 Not eligible3200023Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.8 086 24.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 650 E Feature Crossed: THOMPSON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00034 Not eligible3200026Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.0 086 21.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: RD 700 N Feature Crossed: SCHOOL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00035 Not eligible3200027Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 54.1 086 21.1
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RD 950 N Feature Crossed: BATZ DRAIN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00043 Not eligible3200034Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 51.1 086 21.1
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 1000 E Feature Crossed: SCHOOL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00049 Not eligible3200039Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 48.7 086 24.7
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: RD 350 N Feature Crossed: WHITE LICK CREEK
548
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00051 Not eligible3200041Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 50.5 086 27.5
Encased steel beam302A
//Feature Carried: RD 550 N Feature Crossed: BRANCH WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00053 Not eligible3200043Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 46.6 086 26.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 100 N Feature Crossed: ABNER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00055 Not eligible3200045Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 46.5 086 24.9
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 91 N Feature Crossed: BRANCH WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00069 Not eligible3200055Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 48.6 086 25.5
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 575 E Feature Crossed: BRANCH WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00077 Not eligible3200062Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 46.9 086 31.4
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: WASHINGTON ST Feature Crossed: W FORK WHITE LICK CREEK
549
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00082 Not eligible3200211Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 49.2 086 40.6
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: RD 400 N Feature Crossed: BRANCH BIG WALNUT CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00084 Not eligible3200066Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 48.7 086 38.9
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 350 N Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF RAMP RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00092 Not eligible3200071Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 51.3 086 36.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: RD 650 N Feature Crossed: E FORK BIG WALNUT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00093 Not eligible3200072Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 48.1 086 37.1
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 525 W Feature Crossed: RAMP RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00109 Not eligible3200080Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 47.4 086 35.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 400 W Feature Crossed: RAMP RUN
550
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00112 Not eligible3200083Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 45.2 086 36.3
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 450 W Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00122 Not eligible3200088Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 43.9 086 34.9
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: RD 200 S Feature Crossed: BRANCH E FORK MILL CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00123 Not eligible3200089Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 42.1 086 34.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: RD 400 S Feature Crossed: BRANCH E FORK MILL CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00125 Not eligible3200091Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 41.7 086 38.2
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: RD 450 S Feature Crossed: CRITTENDEN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00126 Not eligible3200092Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 41.7 086 37.9
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RD 450 S Feature Crossed: BRANCH W FORK MILL CREE
551
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00127 Not eligible3200093Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 42.0 086 36.6
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 475 W Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00136 Not eligible3200102Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 38.7 086 37.6
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: RD 550 W Feature Crossed: EAST FORK MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00139 Not eligible3200105Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 41.3 086 36.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: RD 500 S Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00141 Not eligible3200107Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 39.9 086 39.9
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: MASTEN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00146 Not eligible3200212Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 41.1 086 34.4
Encased steel beam302A
//Feature Carried: REEVES ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH E FORK MILL CREE
552
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00153 Not eligible3200117Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 38.9 086 34.6
Encased steel beam302A
//Feature Carried: RD 300 W Feature Crossed: BOYD DRAIN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00163 Not eligible3200122Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 44.8 086 33.7
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RD 200 W Feature Crossed: EAST FORK MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00168 Not eligible3200127Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 43.0 086 33.9
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 300 S Feature Crossed: EAST FORK MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00175 Not eligible3200134Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 42.1 086 34.4
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 400 S Feature Crossed: EAST FORK MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00180 Not eligible3200139Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 44.7 086 30.8
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CARTERSBURG ROAD Feature Crossed: BR W FK WHITE LICK CREEK
553
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00185 Not eligible3200143Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 44.1 086 28.0
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 300 E Feature Crossed: COSNER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00188 Not eligible3200146Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 38.4 086 31.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: RD 0 Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MUD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00191 Not eligible3200149Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 36.1 086 32.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: TUDOR ROAD Feature Crossed: MYNATT DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00192 Not eligible3200150Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 36.0 086 28.6
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 1100 S Feature Crossed: MCCRACKEN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00193 Not eligible3200151Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 36.9 086 28.3
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 1000 S Feature Crossed: BRANCH MCCRACKEN CREE
554
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00198 Not eligible3200153Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 38.1 086 27.1
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: RD 425 E Feature Crossed: MCCRACKEN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00200 Not eligible3200155Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 39.1 086 27.8
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RD 375 E Feature Crossed: BRANCH MCCRACKEN CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00201 Not eligible3200156Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 38.7 086 28.3
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: RD 800 S Feature Crossed: MCCRACKEN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00203 Not eligible3200158Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 39.7 086 27.4
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 400 E Feature Crossed: BR W FK WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00212 Not eligible3200162Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 46.5 086 20.2
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 1050 E Feature Crossed: COX DITCH
555
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00217 Not eligible3200165Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 39.8 086 23.8
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: RD 725 E Feature Crossed: BRANCH WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00222 Not eligible3200170Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 39.2 086 21.3
Encased steel beam302A
//Feature Carried: RD 750 S Feature Crossed: BR E FK WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00223 Not eligible3200171Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 39.7 086 20.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: RD 700 S Feature Crossed: E FORK WHITE LICK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00228 Not eligible3200174Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 39.7 086 20.2
Encased steel beam302A
//Feature Carried: RD 1050 E Feature Crossed: FLYNN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00243 Not eligible3200185Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 43.1 086 22.7
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RD 300 S Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF CLARKS CREEK
556
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00244 Not eligible3200186Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 43.4 086 22.9
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: RD 800 E Feature Crossed: BRANCH CLARKS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00245 Not eligible3200187Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 43.4 086 22.9
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: DAN JONES ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH CLARKS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00246 Not eligible3200188Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 43.8 086 22.9
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: DAN JONES ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH CLARKS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00252 Not eligible3200193Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 44.0 086 25.8
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: RD 525 E Feature Crossed: ABNER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00260 Not eligible3200200Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 38.5 086 32.5
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: RD 100 W Feature Crossed: BRANCH MUD CREEK
557
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00261 Not eligible3200201Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 36.9 086 32.9
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: RD 1000 S Feature Crossed: STOUT-RICHARDSON DRAIN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00290 Not eligible3200215Hendricks NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 45.5 086 22.8
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: RD 800 E Feature Crossed: CONRAIL RAILROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
003-33-02095B Not eligible880Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 482 85 268
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: US 40 & ABANDONED RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
003-33-02277BNBL Not eligible920Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 584 85 231
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 3 NBL Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RAILROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
003-33-02277BSBL Not eligible930Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 584 85 232
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 3 SBL Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RAILROAD
558
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
036-33-01495A Not eligible11750Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 3 85 291
Reinforced concrete girder - under fill
119D
//Feature Carried: US 36 Feature Crossed: HONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
036-33-03698A Not eligible11770Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 3 85 208
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 36 Feature Crossed: BIG BLUE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
036-33-04608B Not eligible11760Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 3 85 227
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 36 Feature Crossed: SR 3
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
038-33-04063A Not eligible12910Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 559 85 231
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 38 Feature Crossed: BIG BLUE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
038-33-04582A Not eligible12900Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 560 85 271
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 38 Feature Crossed: DUCK CREEK
559
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
038-33-05124A Not eligible12930Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 551 85 134
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 38 Feature Crossed: SYMONDS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-33-01710 Not eligible14010Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 476 85 341
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: DUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-33-01767C Not eligible14030Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 478 85 312
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: BIG BLUE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-33-01768 Not eligible14040Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 482 85 285
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-33-03594 Not eligible14050Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 482 85 258
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
560
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
040-33-03595 Not eligible14060Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 484 85 215
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: FLATROCK RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
103-33-05149A Not eligible25250Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 512 85 212
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 103 Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
109-33-03472 Not eligible25350Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 498 85 326
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 109 Feature Crossed: CENTRAL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
109-33-05139A Not eligible25370Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 505 85 333
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 109 Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
234-33-04592A Not eligible29760Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 559 85 282
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 234 Feature Crossed: BRANCH DUCK CREEK
561
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-116-05141A Not eligible43020Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 507 85 326
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: GRANT CITY ROAD Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-116-05142 Not eligible43030Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 507 85 310
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: KENNARD ROAD Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-118-05143A Not eligible43040Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 510 85 298
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: GREENSBORO PIKE Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-120-05146 Not eligible43090Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 513 85 274
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 350 WEST Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-124-05169 Not eligible43140Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 512 85 235
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 25 WEST Feature Crossed: I-70
562
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-128-05151A Not eligible43170Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 512 85 187
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 400 EAST Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I70-130-05152B Not eligible43200Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 512 85 158
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: WILBUR WRIGHT RD Feature Crossed: I-70
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
P000-33-07540A Not eligible60520Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 576 85 219
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO RD 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: BIG BLUE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00003 Not eligible3300002Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 06.6 085 49.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CR 600 WEST Feature Crossed: HONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00007 Not eligible3300006Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.4 085 45.5
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 850 N Feature Crossed: BELL CREEK
563
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00013 Not eligible3300012Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.0 085 52.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: MIDDLETOWN ROAD Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00015 Not eligible3300014Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.0 085 48.0
Reinforced concrete box107B
//Feature Carried: 500 W Feature Crossed: HONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00038 Not eligible3300030Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.5 085 49.1
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: 700 N Feature Crossed: HONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00040 Not eligible3300032Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.9 085 44.4
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: 600 N Feature Crossed: BELL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00061 Not eligible3300046Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.9 085 36.5
Reinforced concrete box107B
//Feature Carried: 100 E Feature Crossed: LICK BRANCH
564
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00063 Not eligible3300048Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.8 085 33.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: HILLSBORO ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE BLUE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00068 Not eligible3300051Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.5 085 24.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 300 N Feature Crossed: FLATROCK RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00070 Not eligible3300053Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.6 085 30.2
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: MESSICK ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE BLUE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00080 Not eligible3300059Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.8 085 21.9
Reinforced concrete box107B
//Feature Carried: 875 N Feature Crossed: LITTLE STONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00127 Not eligible3300087Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.5 085 32.2
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: 325 E Feature Crossed: SUNCREST BROOK
565
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00130 Not eligible3300090Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.3 085 29.0
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 500 E Feature Crossed: FLATROCK RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00135 Not eligible3300094Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.4 085 20.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 400 S Feature Crossed: SYMONDS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00146 Not eligible3300103Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.3 085 46.8
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: GREENSBORO PIKE Feature Crossed: DUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00158 Not eligible3300110Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 51.8 085 54.2
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: GRANT CITY ROAD Feature Crossed: MONTGOMERY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00169 Not eligible3300159Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 47.2 085 53.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: COUNTY LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: MONTGOMERY CREEK
566
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00188 Not eligible3300162Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 47.3 085 44.2
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: COUNTY LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00193 Not eligible3300126Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 48.7 085 42.4
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: 200 W Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00194 Not eligible3300127Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.4 085 20.3
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: CR 250 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF FLATROCK RIVE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00198 Not eligible3300129Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 51.6 085 34.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 500 S Feature Crossed: FLATROCK RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00200 Not eligible3300130Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 51.7 085 23.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 500 S Feature Crossed: GLUE RUN
567
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00201 Not eligible3300131Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 50.7 085 22.0
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 875 E Feature Crossed: LICK BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00242 Not eligible3300147Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 47.8 085 49.8
Reinforced concrete box - under fill
119C
//Feature Carried: OLD US 40 Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00248 Not eligible3300150Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 48.5 085 56.3
Cont reinforced concrete box
207B
//Feature Carried: 850 S Feature Crossed: GOOSE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00249 Not eligible3300151Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 52.8 085 53.8
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: 350 S Feature Crossed: JUDGE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00254 Not eligible3300154Henry NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.5 085 32.7
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: HILLSBORO ROAD Feature Crossed: COLONY CREEK
568
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
019-34-04213A Not eligible5000Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 270 86 20
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 19 Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
022-34-01347A Not eligible5690Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 294 86 215
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 22 Feature Crossed: PETES RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
026-34-01438B Not eligible6850Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 253 85 522
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 26 Feature Crossed: M FORK WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
026-34-03105A Not eligible6790Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 251 86 167
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 26 Feature Crossed: WEST FORK HONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-34-03607 Not eligible9760Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 254 86 77
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: LITTLE WILDCAT CREEK
569
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-34-03647ANBL Not eligible9770Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 272 86 70
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 31 NBL Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-34-03647JASB Not eligible9780Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 272 86 70
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 31 SBL Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-34-03648BNBL Not eligible9790Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 292 86 65
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 31 NBL Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-34-03648JCSB Not eligible9800Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 292 86 65
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 31 SBL Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
213-34-03750A Not eligible28900Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 275 85 574
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 213 Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
570
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00003 Not eligible3400041Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.8 086 17.6
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00006 Not eligible3400003Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.6 086 20.8
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1150 WEST Feature Crossed: S FORK OF LTL DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00007 Not eligible3400004Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.6 086 20.8
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1150 WEST Feature Crossed: PETE'S RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00008 Not eligible3400042Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.0 086 18.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 900 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00009 Not eligible3400005Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.2 086 16.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 800 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE DEER CREEK
571
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00011 Not eligible3400044Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.4 086 20.8
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1150 WEST Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00013 Not eligible3400007Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.3 086 16.0
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 250 SOUTH Feature Crossed: EAST FORK OF HONEY CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00015 Not eligible3400008Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.3 086 16.3
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 750 WEST Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00016 Not eligible3400009Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.9 086 16.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 750 WEST Feature Crossed: EAST FORK OF HONEY CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00019 Not eligible3400047Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.3 086 15.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 600 SOUTH Feature Crossed: EAST FORK OF HONEY CREE
572
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00021 Not eligible3400010Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.6 086 16.9
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 225 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WEST FORK OF HONEY CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00025 Not eligible3400052Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.0 086 16.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 775 WEST Feature Crossed: WEST FORK OF HONEY CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00029 Not eligible3400054Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.4 086 14.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 550 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00033 Not eligible3400013Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.0 086 09.9
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 200 WEST Feature Crossed: W FORK OF LTL WILDCAT C
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00035 Not eligible3400057Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.8 086 13.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE WILDCAT CREEK
573
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00041 Not eligible3400016Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.8 086 12.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 440 WEST Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00045 Not eligible3400017Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.6 086 09.9
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: DIXON ROAD Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00046 Not eligible3400061Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.6 086 07.2
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 550 NORTH Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK OF DEER CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00051 Not eligible3400064Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.7 086 01.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 EAST Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK OF DEER CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00053 Not eligible3400065Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.5 086 01.9
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 EAST Feature Crossed: KOKOMO WATERWORKS RE
574
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00055 Not eligible3400066Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.1 086 04.2
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 EAST Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK OF DEER CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00056 Not eligible3400019Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.7 086 04.2
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 EAST Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00060 Not eligible3400069Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.0 086 05.1
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: S FORK OF KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00064 Not eligible3400073Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.6 086 07.6
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: LAFOUNTAIN STREET Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00066 Not eligible3400075Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.8 086 00.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 600 EAST Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
575
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00069 Not eligible3400077Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.0 086 07.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 50 EAST Feature Crossed: E FORK OF LTL WILDCAT CR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00071 Not eligible3400078Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.4 086 05.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: IZAAK WALTON ROAD Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00072 Not eligible3400079Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.3 086 05.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: IZAAK WALTON ROAD Feature Crossed: MARTIN-YOUNGMAN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00074 Not eligible3400080Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30.4 085 54.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00075 Not eligible3400081Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.6 085 54.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 450 NORTH Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
576
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00077 Not eligible3400022Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.3 085 55.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00078 Not eligible3400023Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.1 085 57.8
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00079 Not eligible3400024Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.1 085 56.7
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: HONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00083 Not eligible3400085Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.1 085 59.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 50 NORTH Feature Crossed: KOKOMO WATERWORKS RE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00084 Not eligible3400025Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.6 085 58.6
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 800 EAST Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
577
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00089 Not eligible3400027Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.3 085 52.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE PIPE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00092 Not eligible3400090Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.0 085 53.0
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1300 EAST Feature Crossed: LITTLE PIPE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00093 Not eligible3400091Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.9 085 51.7
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1400 EAST Feature Crossed: HARPER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00094 Not eligible3400092Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.4 085 51.7
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1400 EAST Feature Crossed: GRASSY FORK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00099 Not eligible3400097Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.5 085 56.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 980 EAST Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK
578
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00101 Not eligible3400099Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.0 085 52.6
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1330 EAST Feature Crossed: GRASSY FORK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00102 Not eligible3400100Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.6 085 56.1
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1020 EAST Feature Crossed: ROBERTS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00106 Not eligible3400028Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.0 085 53.4
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1250 EAST Feature Crossed: GRASSY FORK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00107 Not eligible3400029Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.0 085 53.4
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1250 EAST Feature Crossed: MIDDLE FORK DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00109 Not eligible3400031Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.4 085 55.1
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1100 EAST Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
579
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00110 Not eligible3400032Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.0 085 55.1
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1100 EAST Feature Crossed: ROBERTS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00113 Not eligible3400105Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.1 085 59.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00114 Not eligible3400033Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.1 085 54.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00115 Not eligible3400034Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.1 085 54.2
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00117 Not eligible3400106Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.9 085 55.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: ROBERTS DITCH
580
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00118 Not eligible3400107Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.9 085 54.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: ROBERTS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00130 Not eligible3400111Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.7 086 08.0
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: WASHINGTON STREET Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00131 Not eligible3400112Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.3 086 21.0
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 25 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WILDCAT CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00136 Not eligible3400035Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.4 086 14.7
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 250 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WILLIAM VOGUS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00156 Not eligible3400115Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.4 085 51.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1400 EAST Feature Crossed: LITTLE PIPE CREEK
581
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00159 Not eligible3400117Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.7 086 15.9
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 320 SOUTH Feature Crossed: EAST FORK OF HONEY CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00160 Not eligible3400118Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.6 086 19.1
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WILDCAT CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00501 Not eligible3400119Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.0 086 07.0
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: OHIO AVENUE Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00503 Not eligible3400121Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.0 086 08.5
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: MCCANN STREET Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00505 Not eligible3400123Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.0 086 07.8
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: MAIN STREET Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
582
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00510 Not eligible3400036Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.8 086 06.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SOUTHWAY BOULEVARD Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00511 Not eligible3400128Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.6 086 09.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: MARKLAND AVENUE Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00512 Not eligible3400129Howard NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.0 086 07.3
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: LINCOLN ROAD Feature Crossed: KOKOMO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(5)I69-72-04771A Not eligible39865Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 393 85 303
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 5 Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(9)37-35-02368ANBL Not eligible2700Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 521 85 321
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 9 NBL Feature Crossed: N & S RR
583
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(9)37-35-02368ASBL Not eligible2710Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 521 85 321
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 9 SBL Feature Crossed: N & S RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(9)37-35-05206BNBL Not eligible2680Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 506 85 317
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 9 NBL Feature Crossed: LOON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(9)37-35-05206JBSB Not eligible2690Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 506 85 317
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 9 SBL Feature Crossed: LOON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(9)37-35-05207A Not eligible2720Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 526 85 320
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: WABASH RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
003-35-03178A Not eligible1250Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 478 85 215
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: ROCK CREEK
584
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
003-35-03858B Not eligible1270Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 495 85 204
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: WABASH RIVER OVERFLOW
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
003-35-05412B Not eligible1260Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 492 85 206
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: WABASH RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
005-35-05992B Not eligible1520Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 508 85 282
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 5 Feature Crossed: WABASH RIVER /HUNT. RES.
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-35-04990D Not eligible2730Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 543 85 289
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: US 24
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
009-35-05425ANBL Not eligible2640Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 450 85 344
Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam
602
//Feature Carried: SR 9 NBL Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
585
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
009-35-05425ASBL Not eligible2650Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 450 85 344
Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam
602
//Feature Carried: SR 9 SBL Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-35-05426ANBL Not eligible2660Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 465 85 341
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: SR 9 NBL Feature Crossed: MAJENICA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-35-05426ASBL Not eligible2670Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 465 85 341
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: SR 9 SBL Feature Crossed: MAJENICA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-35-05601 Not eligible2630Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 439 85 344
Reinforced concrete box - under fill
119C
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
016-35-03783A Not eligible4400Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 550 85 327
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 16 Feature Crossed: CLEAR CREEK
586
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
024-35-04991AEBL Not eligible6120Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 539 85 277
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: OLD SR 37 SBL Feature Crossed: US 24 EBL
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
024-35-07581 Not eligible6115Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 544 85 295
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: US 24 Feature Crossed: HUNTINGTON DRAIN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
105-35-04676A Not eligible25300Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 522 85 362
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 105 Feature Crossed: WABASH RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
124-35-04778B Not eligible26190Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 446 85 248
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 124 Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
124-35-05448A Not eligible26160Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 446 85 306
Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam
602
//Feature Carried: SR 124 Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
587
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
124-35-05449 Not eligible26150Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 444 85 328
Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam
602
//Feature Carried: SR 124 Feature Crossed: RICHLAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
124-35-05617A Not eligible26170Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 445 85 298
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 124 Feature Crossed: BROOK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
224-35-04782B Not eligible29100Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 497 85 213
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 224 Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-74-05123 Not eligible39890Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 410 85 289
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 1000 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-75-04774 Not eligible39900Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 419 85 280
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 900 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69
588
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-82-04773 Not eligible39950Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 463 85 234
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO RDS 300E & 400S Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-84-04779 Not eligible39960Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 472 85 231
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-85-04780 Not eligible39990Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 481 85 230
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-91-04783 Not eligible40040Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 525 85 207
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: I-69
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I69-93-04784 Not eligible40070Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 543 85 202
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CR 500N /HOSLER RD Feature Crossed: I-69
589
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
P000-35-07058A Not eligible60050Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 463 85 338
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: PARK ROAD Feature Crossed: MAJENICA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00011 Not eligible3500007Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 43.5 085 32.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 700 S Feature Crossed: POND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00013 Not eligible3500009Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 44.0 085 32.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 500 W Feature Crossed: POND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00015 Not eligible3500011Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 44.4 085 30.4
Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam
602
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 300 W Feature Crossed: BROOK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00016 Not eligible3500012Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 43.8 085 30.5
Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam
602
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 300 W Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
590
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00023 Not eligible3500017Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 41.9 085 26.5
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 900 S Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00033 Not eligible3500025Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 47.6 085 20.1
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 600 E Feature Crossed: ROCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00036 Not eligible3500026Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 47.9 085 20.6
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 300 S Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF ROCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00040 Not eligible3500030Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 46.2 085 32.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 400 S Feature Crossed: MAJENICA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00042 Not eligible3500031Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 44.8 085 29.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 200 W Feature Crossed: BROOK CREEK
591
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00047 Not eligible3500115Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 46.2 085 30.4
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 400 S Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MAJENICA CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00067 Not eligible3500039Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 53.8 085 24.8
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 200 E Feature Crossed: LITTLE WABASH RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00075 Not eligible3500047Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 54.6 085 21.3
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 500 E Feature Crossed: FLAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00085 Not eligible3500053Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 53.3 085 36.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 800 W Feature Crossed: SILVER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00093 Not eligible3500059Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 58.6 085 32.7
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 500 W Feature Crossed: BROWN DITCH
592
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00100 Not eligible3500063Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 58.7 085 30.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 300 W Feature Crossed: EAST FORK CLEAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00107 Not eligible3500070Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 56.3 085 22.8
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: MAHON ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE WABASH RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00116 Not eligible3500077Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 59.4 085 21.0
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 1100 N Feature Crossed: ABOITE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00132 Not eligible3500087Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 50.6 085 33.1
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 100 N Feature Crossed: LOON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00145 Not eligible3500093Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 52.5 085 28.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: TAYLOR STREET Feature Crossed: RABBIT RUN DITCH
593
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00149 Not eligible3500113Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 48.1 085 26.0
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 100 E Feature Crossed: LOON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00151 Not eligible3500095Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 42.9 085 32.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 500 W Feature Crossed: POND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00702 Not eligible3500110Huntington NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 51.4 085 36.2
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: MCKEEVER STREET Feature Crossed: LOON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(11)31A-36-04655B Not eligible10290Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16 85 534
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 11 Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-36-01773 Not eligible9200Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 31 85 499
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: QUADE DITCH
594
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-36-03392A Not eligible9120Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 519 85 492
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: LEWIS BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-36-04249C Not eligible9130Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 542 85 493
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-36-01257A Not eligible18510Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 525 86 86
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: GOSS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-36-01340 Not eligible18480Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 526 86 132
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: CLEAR SPRING CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-36-01721C Not eligible18540Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 529 86 68
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 50 (SR 135) Feature Crossed: WAYMAN DITCH
595
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-36-03104B Not eligible18530Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 529 86 74
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: SMALLWOOD DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-36-04081A Not eligible18640Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 579 85 492
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: MUTTON CREEK DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-36-04101A Not eligible18650Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 581 85 480
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: STORM CREEK DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-36-05106AEBL Not eligible18620Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 575 85 512
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 50 EBL Feature Crossed: SANDY BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-36-05106AWBL Not eligible18630Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 575 85 512
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 50 WBL Feature Crossed: SANDY BRANCH
596
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
058-36-03059B Not eligible20970Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 572 86 109
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: BRANCH BEE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
058-36-06272B Not eligible20960Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 575 86 117
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: BRANCH BEE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
058-36-06275B Not eligible21030Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 1 86 59
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: BRANCH RUNT RUN
This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
135-36-03180A Not eligible26480Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 530 86 68
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 135 Feature Crossed: WAYMAN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
250-36-03888 Not eligible30500Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 511 85 550
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 250 Feature Crossed: GRASSY FORK
597
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
250-36-04246B Not eligible30560Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 506 85 490
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 250 Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
250-36-06401B Not eligible30550Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 507 85 504
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 250 Feature Crossed: EAST ARM GRASSY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
256-36-03370B Not eligible30840Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 446 85 507
Steel thru truss310B
//Feature Carried: SR 256 Feature Crossed: MUSCATATUCK RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-37-04243A Not eligible35090Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 477 85 492
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 600 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-44-04248A Not eligible35110Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 534 85 487
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: COMMISKEY PIKE Feature Crossed: I-65
598
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-52-04254A Not eligible35250Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 591 85 506
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: ENOS ROAD Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-52-05042 Not eligible35280Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 599 85 512
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 800 N Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-53-04650 Not eligible35290Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 3 85 518
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: REDDING ROAD Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-57-04657 Not eligible35420Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 24 85 543
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: COUNTY LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00026 Not eligible3600020Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 58.8 086 13.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CORNETT ROAD Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK SALT CREEK
599
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00027 Not eligible3600021Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.3 086 03.7
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: EWING ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST FK WHITE RIVER OVFL
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00051 Not eligible3600209Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 54.5 086 07.7
Aluminum arch911
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 450W Feature Crossed: BALLARD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00052 Not eligible3600030Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 55.6 086 07.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 350N Feature Crossed: BALLARD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00062 Not eligible3600040Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.5 086 08.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 550W Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SALT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00070 Not eligible3600046Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 55.1 086 04.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 225W Feature Crossed: WEST BRANCH
600
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00093 Not eligible3600062Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.9 086 00.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 600N Feature Crossed: BEATTY WALKER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00095 Not eligible3600064Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.5 085 55.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 1000N Feature Crossed: EAST FORK WHITE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00101 Not eligible3600068Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 59.8 085 55.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 800N Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WHITE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00102 Not eligible3600069Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.5 085 53.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 1000N Feature Crossed: KOBBE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00104 Not eligible3600071Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 56.8 085 54.5
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: AIRPORT RD. Feature Crossed: VON FANGE DITCH
601
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00122 Not eligible3600216Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 54.3 085 54.9
Cont reinforced concrete box - under fill
219B
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 200N Feature Crossed: GRASSY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00149 Not eligible3600094Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.4 085 57.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 400S Feature Crossed: POND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00153 Not eligible3600098Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.3 085 51.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 50N Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF VERNON FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00156 Not eligible3600101Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 47.7 085 53.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 800E Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF RIDER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00161 Not eligible3600176Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 56.7 085 55.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SCHLETER ROAD Feature Crossed: VON FANGE DITCH
602
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
00165 Not eligible3600110Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.5 085 56.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 475E Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF POND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00176 Not eligible3600118Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 50.3 086 00.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 300S Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF POND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00177 Not eligible3600119Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.0 086 00.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 125E Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF POND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00183 Not eligible3600122Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.5 085 55.4
Simple steel beam - floor beam system
303H
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 500S Feature Crossed: GRASSY FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00202 Not eligible3600136Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 47.9 086 11.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 800W Feature Crossed: HINDERLIDER DITCH
603
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00208 Not eligible3600141Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.5 086 08.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 100N Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MCHARGUE DIT
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00215 Not eligible3600145Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 50.8 086 13.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 1025W Feature Crossed: DRY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00254 Not eligible3600168Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.0 086 03.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: VALLONIA ROAD Feature Crossed: HOUGH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00277 Not eligible3600148Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 47.2 085 53.3
Steel thru truss310B
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 650S Feature Crossed: RIDER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00336 Not eligible3600214Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 54.4 086 12.8
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 200N Feature Crossed: BRANCH CLEAR SPRING CK.
604
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00342 Not eligible3600222Jackson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.3 086 08.7
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: GEORGE STREET Feature Crossed: S. BRANCH MEDORA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(231)53-37-00735A Not eligible29450Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 462 87 93
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 231 Feature Crossed: CARPENTER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(231)53-37-00736B Not eligible29460Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 535 87 93
Composite steel beam302G
//Feature Carried: US 231 Feature Crossed: HOWE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(231)53-37-04538A Not eligible29520Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 130 87 120
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 231 Feature Crossed: TYLER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(231)53-37-04539A Not eligible29540Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 148 87 120
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 231 Feature Crossed: JAMES KRUCEK DITCH
605
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(231)53-37-04554A Not eligible29490Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 5 87 91
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 231 Feature Crossed: IROQUOIS RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(231)53-37-04555A Not eligible29530Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 140 87 120
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 231 Feature Crossed: BARNARD DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
014-37-01761B Not eligible3620Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 17 87 99
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 14 Feature Crossed: IROQUOIS RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
014-37-01763B Not eligible3650Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 17 86 599
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SR 14 Feature Crossed: RYAN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
014-37-04307B Not eligible3610Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 8 87 146
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 14 Feature Crossed: ZIMMER DITCH
606
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.
024-37-00456A Not eligible5890Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 460 87 89
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 24 Feature Crossed: CARPENTER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
049-37-03657 Not eligible17900Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 44 87 28
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 49 Feature Crossed: DAVISSON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
049-37-03702B Not eligible17920Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 99 87 28
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 49 Feature Crossed: WOLF CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
114-37-01725A Not eligible25660Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 565 87 128
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 114 Feature Crossed: SAYLER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
114-37-03366B Not eligible25670Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 561 87 78
Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam
602
//Feature Carried: SR 114 Feature Crossed: IROQUOIS RIVER
607
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00001 Not eligible3700001Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 50.1 087 09.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 1200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BICE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00009 Not eligible3700005Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 53.3 086 59.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 310 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF HOWE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00020 Not eligible3700013Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 48.4 087 10.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 1400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: CARPENTER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00022 Not eligible3700015Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 48.4 087 14.2
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: 1400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: MEADEL DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00033 Not eligible3700022Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 50.4 087 00.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 210 EAST Feature Crossed: MCKILLIP DITCH
608
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00088 Not eligible3700059Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 59.8 087 14.2
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: IROQUOIS RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00102 Not eligible3700068Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 58.9 086 59.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: RYAN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00121 Not eligible3700076Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 01.7 087 14.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 1000 WEST Feature Crossed: IROQUOIS RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00123 Not eligible3700078Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 02.3 087 13.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 900 WEST Feature Crossed: IROQUOIS RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00159 Not eligible3700090Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.2 087 01.5
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: OLIVER DITCH
609
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00191 Not eligible3700098Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 08.7 087 04.2
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: 900 NORTH Feature Crossed: WHEATFIELD DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00195 Not eligible3700101Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.9 087 04.0
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 100 WEST Feature Crossed: DAVISSON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00198 Not eligible3700103Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 45.6 087 08.8
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: 1725 SOUTH Feature Crossed: CARPENTER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00210 Not eligible3700107Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.6 087 01.2
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 550 NORTH Feature Crossed: OLIVER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00211 Not eligible3700108Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 06.3 087 00.0
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 250 EAST Feature Crossed: OLIVER DITCH
610
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00215 Not eligible3700111Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 06.5 086 59.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 300 EAST Feature Crossed: OLIVER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00216 Not eligible3700112Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 07.2 086 58.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 400 EAST Feature Crossed: OLIVER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00300 Not eligible3700144Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 13.2 086 58.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: STREET NO. 29 Feature Crossed: DUNNS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00350 Not eligible3700146Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 55.6 087 13.3
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 600 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BR CURTIS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
02001 Not eligible3700150Jasper NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 55.8 087 09.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: GRACE STREET Feature Crossed: IROQUOIS RIVER
611
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
001-38-03354A Not eligible350Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 292 85 91
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
026-38-03410B Not eligible6990Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 271 85 102
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 26 Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
026-38-03411B Not eligible7010Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 267 85 88
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 26 Feature Crossed: BROOKS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
027-38-05221 Not eligible7340Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 248 84 587
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 27 Feature Crossed: LITTLE SALAMONIE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
067-38-04833B Not eligible24330Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 325 84 552
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 67 Feature Crossed: LIMBERLOST CREEK
612
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00054 Not eligible3800145Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30.7 084 58.3
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: BEAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00065 Not eligible3800181Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.9 084 51.2
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: FRANKS DRAIN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00072 Not eligible3800201Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.2 085 11.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 350 NORTH Feature Crossed: TWO MILE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00085 Not eligible3800205Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.1 084 50.0
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: WILSON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00086 Not eligible3800206Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.1 084 48.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: LIMBERLOST CREEK
613
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00094 Not eligible3800094Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.4 085 03.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 WEST Feature Crossed: WEHRLY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00126 Not eligible3800086Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.7 085 02.3
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 75 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00138 Not eligible3800082Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.0 084 59.9
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: BLAINE PIKE Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00146 Not eligible3800040Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.0 084 51.8
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 600 EAST Feature Crossed: MCLAUGHINS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00154 Not eligible3800061Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.6 084 58.1
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE SALAMONIE RIVER
614
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00236 Not eligible3800009Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 21.0 085 10.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 600 SOUTH Feature Crossed: DILL DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00239 Not eligible3800003Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.8 085 11.8
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 1150 WEST Feature Crossed: HALFWAY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00255 Not eligible3800018Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.3 085 01.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 250 WEST Feature Crossed: DAYS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00257 Not eligible3800012Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.4 085 03.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROAD 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BEASON FOX DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00272 Not eligible3800030Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.1 084 48.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: FT RECOVERY ROAD Feature Crossed: SIMPSON CREEK
615
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00277 Not eligible3800059Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.4 084 57.2
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: BOUNDARY PIKE Feature Crossed: LITTLE SALAMONIE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00502 Not eligible3800196Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.8 084 58.5
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: WAYNE STREET Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00604 Not eligible3800212Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 21.0 085 08.9
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: GEORGE & HIGH STS. Feature Crossed: REDKEY RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00701 Not eligible3800043Jay NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 22.8 084 51.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: WOOD STREET Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
007-39-00043A Not eligible1960Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/5/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 534 85 312
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 7 Feature Crossed: CAMP CREEK
616
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
007-39-00409A Not eligible1910Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 473 85 259
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 7 Feature Crossed: CLIFTY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
007-39-04119 Not eligible1900Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 462 85 248
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 7 Feature Crossed: PRESSBERG CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
056-39-00092 Not eligible20350Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/5/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 442 85 204
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 56 Feature Crossed: EAGLE HOLLOW CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
056-39-00204 Not eligible20360Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/5/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 447 85 177
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 56 Feature Crossed: BEE CAMP CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
056-39-00459 Not eligible20380Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 434 85 137
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 56 Feature Crossed: LOST FORK CREEK
617
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
056-39-03612A Not eligible20370Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 440 85 147
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 56 Feature Crossed: INDIAN-KENTUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
256-39-00469A Not eligible30880Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 443 85 326
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 256 Feature Crossed: LITTLE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
356-39-06434B Not eligible31970Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 409 85 340
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 356 Feature Crossed: WOODS FORK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00001 Not eligible3900096Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 44.5 085 23.8
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: FIFTH STREET Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00039 Not eligible3900026Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/3/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 47.0 085 38.4
Rein conc girder (trans girder) floor beam system
103
//Feature Carried: BLAKE RD. Feature Crossed: LEWIS CREEK
618
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00044 Not eligible3900030Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/19/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 47.9 085 36.8
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: 425N Feature Crossed: WALTON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00045 Not eligible3900031Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.7 085 34.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CRADDOCK RD. Feature Crossed: WALTON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00090 Not eligible3900044Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.2 085 22.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 40E-HATCHER HILL Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00092 Not eligible3900046Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/19/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 54.0 085 21.3
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CAMP MEETING RD. Feature Crossed: W FK INDIAN-KENTUCK CR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00108 Not eligible3900059Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 44.9 085 20.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: EAGLE HOLLOW RD. Feature Crossed: EAGLE HOLLOW
619
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00110 Not eligible3900061Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.6 085 15.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: B~BURG-MANVILLE Feature Crossed: INDIAN-KENTUCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00136 Not eligible3900072Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.7 085 37.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 1250W Feature Crossed: LEWIS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00137 Not eligible3900073Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 46.2 085 37.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 1250W Feature Crossed: DRY BRANCH LEWIS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00138 Not eligible3900074Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/19/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 46.2 085 37.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: HENRY RD. Feature Crossed: LEWIS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00140 Not eligible3900076Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.0 085 32.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 425N Feature Crossed: FORK OF BIG CREEK
620
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00143 Not eligible3900079Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.0 085 13.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: LITTLE DOE RUN RD. Feature Crossed: LITTLE DOE RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00145 Not eligible3900081Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 47.2 085 17.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MARTIN RD. Feature Crossed: DOG RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00147 Not eligible3900083Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.5 085 36.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 1130W Feature Crossed: NEILS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00152 Not eligible3900087Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.3 085 15.4
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: 725E~EAST PRONG Feature Crossed: WILSON FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00157 Not eligible3900092Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.9 085 17.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 550E-BARBERSVILLE Feature Crossed: TRIB. TO CANAAN BRANCH
621
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00161 Not eligible3900001Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 41.7 085 35.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 340S Feature Crossed: LITTLE CANEY FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00162 Not eligible3900002Jefferson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/19/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 41.5 085 33.6
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: 350S Feature Crossed: WOODS FK 14 MILE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
003-40-01407A Not eligible760Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 576 85 361
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: NEW BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
003-40-01754D Not eligible770Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 49 85 386
Steel thru truss310B
//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: SAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
003-40-01755A Not eligible780Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/9/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 71 85 385
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: WYALOOSING CREEK
622
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
P000-40-07087 Not eligible60370Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18 85 320
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: ENTRANCE Feature Crossed: DRAINAGE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00002 Not eligible4000002Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/9/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 06.5 085 46.6
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 900 WEST Feature Crossed: ROCK CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00013 Not eligible4000013Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.7 085 45.9
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: MUTTON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00014 Not eligible4000014Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.7 085 46.9
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE MUTTON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00016 Not eligible4000016Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.5 085 41.1
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 400 WEST Feature Crossed: TWO MILE CREEK
623
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00018 Not eligible4000018Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.8 085 47.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: MUTTON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00019 Not eligible4000019Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 59.9 085 45.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 100 NORTH Feature Crossed: STORM CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00023 Not eligible4000125Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.6 085 34.5
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 200 EAST Feature Crossed: BEAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00035 Not eligible4000033Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.8 085 38.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 675 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SAND CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00041 Not eligible4000039Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/8/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.4 085 35.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 90 EAST Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK
624
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00042 Not eligible4000040Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 02.2 085 33.1
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 300 EAST Feature Crossed: PLEASANT RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00043 Not eligible4000041Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 03.1 085 31.8
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 450 EAST Feature Crossed: BRUSH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00049 Not eligible4000047Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 06.6 085 27.4
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 860 NORTH Feature Crossed: FINCH BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00052 Not eligible4000050Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.5 085 30.2
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: B'VILLE/SAN JAC PK Feature Crossed: SO. FORK VERNON FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00053 Not eligible4000051Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 59.1 085 31.2
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 500 EAST Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK
625
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00058 Not eligible4000055Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 07.2 085 34.2
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 975 NORTH Feature Crossed: ICE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00059 Not eligible4000056Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/9/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 07.8 085 31.5
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1000 NORTH Feature Crossed: ICE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00065 Not eligible4000060Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/8/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 59.4 085 36.7
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: RIPLEY STREET Feature Crossed: SO. FORK VERNON FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00072 Not eligible4000066Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.9 085 40.4
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 600 SOUTH Feature Crossed: TEA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00074 Not eligible4000067Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.1 085 38.1
Encased steel beam302A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 120 WEST Feature Crossed: DAVIES BRANCH
626
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00075 Not eligible4000068Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 50.5 085 37.5
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 75 WEST Feature Crossed: BEAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00077 Not eligible4000070Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.2 085 34.8
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BEAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00078 Not eligible4000071Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.3 085 34.5
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 200 EAST Feature Crossed: FORK OF BEAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00080 Not eligible4000072Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 55.6 085 35.3
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: TURKEY RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00081 Not eligible4000073Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 56.0 085 35.2
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 130 EAST Feature Crossed: TURKEY RUN
627
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00083 Not eligible4000075Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/8/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 55.0 085 29.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 350 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BEAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00086 Not eligible4000078Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/8/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.7 085 39.8
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: COMMISKEY PIKE Feature Crossed: COFFEE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00087 Not eligible4000079Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.3 085 43.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 650 WEST Feature Crossed: TEA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00088 Not eligible4000080Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.2 085 43.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 650 WEST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF TEA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00093 Not eligible4000085Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.4 085 39.4
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: DUCK BRANCH
628
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00094 Not eligible4000086Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 55.1 085 43.1
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 600 WEST Feature Crossed: POLLY BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00097 Not eligible4000089Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.0 085 42.7
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 550 WEST Feature Crossed: BRUSHY FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00116 Not eligible4000107Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.1 085 42.3
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 520 WEST Feature Crossed: TWO MILE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00145 Not eligible4000112Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/9/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.5 085 45.1
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 780 WEST Feature Crossed: NETTLE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00146 Not eligible4000113Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 08.4 085 27.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 900 EAST Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
629
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00153 Not eligible4000118Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.4 085 41.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 400 WEST Feature Crossed: COFFEE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00158 Not eligible4000121Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 50.7 085 37.2
Encased steel beam302A
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 950 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BEAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00167 Not eligible4000128Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 7/8/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 59.1 085 41.1
Timber beam702A
//Feature Carried: BASE LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: CSX RAILROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00170 Not eligible4000135Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.7 085 39.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 225 WEST Feature Crossed: BR VERNON FK MUSCATATU
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00180 Not eligible4000136Jennings NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 59.6 085 37.6
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: W. LONG STREET Feature Crossed: NO NAME CREEK
630
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-41-01765 Not eligible9410Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 335 86 54
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: HIGH BRIDGE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-41-03530BNBL Not eligible9330Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 243 85 596
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 31 NBL Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-41-03530BSBL Not eligible9340Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 243 85 596
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 31 SBL Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-41-03531ANBL Not eligible9350Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 257 86 3
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 31 NBL Feature Crossed: AMITY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-41-03531ASBL Not eligible9360Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 257 86 3
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 31 SBL Feature Crossed: AMITY DITCH
631
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-41-03532ANBL Not eligible9370Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 271 86 21
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 31 NBL Feature Crossed: YOUNGS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-41-03532ASBL Not eligible9380Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 271 86 21
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 31 SBL Feature Crossed: YOUNGS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
031-41-03534 Not eligible9400Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 300 86 41
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: CANARY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
037-41-03976ANBL Not eligible12410Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 365 86 130
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 37 NBL Feature Crossed: HONEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
037-41-04516BNBL Not eligible12390Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 339 86 149
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 37 NBL Feature Crossed: BLUFF CREEK
632
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
135-41-03161A Not eligible26710Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 231 86 141
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SR 135 Feature Crossed: BARNES CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
252-41-03548A Not eligible30730Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 247 86 6
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 252 Feature Crossed: YOUNGS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00005 Not eligible4100005Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.6 086 13.2
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 625 WEST Feature Crossed: SOUTH PRONG STOTTS CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00021 Not eligible4100019Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 24.2 086 02.5
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 325 EAST Feature Crossed: HERRIOTTS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00023 Not eligible4100020Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.7 086 02.3
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: MAUXFERRY ROAD Feature Crossed: BUCKHART CREEK
633
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00054 Not eligible4100043Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 29.9 086 11.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 150 NORTH Feature Crossed: NORTH PRONG STOTTS CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00056 Not eligible4100045Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 29.3 086 14.7
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 750 WEST Feature Crossed: HENDERSON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00060 Not eligible4100046Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.8 086 14.9
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 775 WEST Feature Crossed: KOOTS FORK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00071 Not eligible4100056Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 32.2 086 13.2
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 625 WEST Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00076 Not eligible4100060Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 33.9 086 10.7
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 WEST Feature Crossed: HONEY CREEK
634
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00096 Not eligible4100075Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 37.4 086 01.1
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 440 EAST Feature Crossed: LEATHERWOOD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00097 Not eligible4100076Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 36.9 085 59.4
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 600 EAST Feature Crossed: LEATHERWOOD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00099 Not eligible4100078Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 33.1 085 58.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00100 Not eligible4100108Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 33.1 085 59.4
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: CUTSINGER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00103 Not eligible4100081Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 34.9 085 59.1
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 700 NORTH Feature Crossed: LEATHERWOOD CREEK
635
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00106 Not eligible4100084Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 22.6 086 09.5
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 WEST Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00109 Not eligible4100087Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.6 086 00.3
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 350 SOUTH Feature Crossed: AMITY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00136 Not eligible4100094Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 37.5 086 10.6
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 WEST Feature Crossed: PLEASANT RUN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00137 Not eligible4100095Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 37.2 086 10.0
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: LEISURE LANE Feature Crossed: PLEASANT RUN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00148 Not eligible4100096Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 33.2 086 06.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CENTERLINE ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST GRASSY CREEK
636
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00152 Not eligible4100110Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.9 086 09.7
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SOUTH PRONG STOTTS CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00158 Not eligible4100116Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.4 085 58.2
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 725 EAST Feature Crossed: DRAINAGE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00173 Not eligible4100146Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 33.0 086 04.9
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: BREWER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00604 Not eligible4100119Johnson NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 37.9 086 07.0
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: MADISON AVENUE Feature Crossed: PLEASANT RUN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(50)67-42-04624A Not eligible18180Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 422 87 299
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: OLD SR 67 Feature Crossed: US 50
637
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(58)67-42-01204A Not eligible23750Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 525 87 129
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: SINGER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-42-02290ANBL Not eligible14760Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 423 87 291
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-42-02290ASBL Not eligible14770Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 423 87 291
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-42-02291BSBL Not eligible14720Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 414 87 295
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: 2 CITY STR & CSX RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-42-02291JBNB Not eligible14710Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 414 87 295
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: 2 CITY STS & CSX RR
638
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-42-04637B Not eligible14730Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 421 87 291
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: HILLCREST ROAD Feature Crossed: US 41
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-42-04638ANBL Not eligible14740Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 422 87 291
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: SNAPP CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-42-04638ASBL Not eligible14750Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 422 87 291
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: SNAPP CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-42-02285BEBL Not eligible18160Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 425 87 305
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 50 EBL Feature Crossed: CSX RR, FT KNOX ROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-42-02285BWBL Not eligible18170Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 425 87 305
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 50 WBL Feature Crossed: CSX RR, FT KNOX ROAD
639
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-42-02286BEBL Not eligible18190Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 421 87 298
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 50 EBL Feature Crossed: SNAPP CR. & ABANDONED R
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-42-02286BWBL Not eligible18200Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 421 87 298
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 50 WBL Feature Crossed: SNAPP CR. & ABANDONED R
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-42-04626 Not eligible18210Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 418 87 297
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: HILLCREST ROAD Feature Crossed: US 50 & RAMPS
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-42-04627EEBL Not eligible18220Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 417 87 297
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 50 EBL Feature Crossed: US 41 & 6TH STREET
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
050-42-04627EWBL Not eligible18230Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 417 87 296
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 50 WBL Feature Crossed: US 41 & 6TH STREET
640
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
058-42-03241A Not eligible20840Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 527 87 125
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: GARDNER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
058-42-06366B Not eligible20810Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 527 87 193
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: BRANCH MARIA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
061-42-01161 Not eligible21800Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 360 87 207
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: SR 61 Feature Crossed: WILSON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
061-42-01163A Not eligible21820Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 373 87 239
Composite steel beam302G
//Feature Carried: SR 61 Feature Crossed: DESHEE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
061-42-01165A Not eligible21830Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 391 87 280
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 61 Feature Crossed: BRANCH KELSO CREEK
641
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
067-42-04640B Not eligible23690Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 428 87 291
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 67 Feature Crossed: US 41
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
550-42-01973A Not eligible32930Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 477 87 264
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SR 550 Feature Crossed: MARIA CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
550-42-03973 Not eligible32960Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 411 87 202
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: SR 550 Feature Crossed: BRANCH KESSINGER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00008 Not eligible4200243Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 41.2 087 29.9
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: WASHINGTON STREET Feature Crossed: KELSO CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00023 Not eligible4200213Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.8 087 24.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: DAVIS ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SMALLS CREEK
642
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00032 Not eligible4200152Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.5 087 18.3
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: BICKNELL ROAD Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00041 Not eligible4200149Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 44.7 087 24.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: WHITE OAKS ROAD Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK SMALLS CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00054 Not eligible4200177Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 47.3 087 16.3
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: SNYDER ROAD Feature Crossed: PURDY MARSH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00062 Not eligible4200174Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.0 087 22.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: GOLF COURSE ROAD Feature Crossed: ROBERSON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00066 Not eligible4200161Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 43.6 087 19.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: LONG ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF ROBERSON DIT
643
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00070 Not eligible4200160Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 43.7 087 20.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROYAL OAK CHURCH R Feature Crossed: ROBERSON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00072 Not eligible4200146Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 43.0 087 21.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: LOUDERMILK ROAD Feature Crossed: FLAT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00075 Not eligible4200241Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 46.0 087 26.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: KAISER ROAD Feature Crossed: SMALLS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00089 Not eligible4200164Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 46.0 087 19.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SCEPTER ROAD Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00090 Not eligible4200216Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 46.6 087 23.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROD AND GUN CLUB R Feature Crossed: BR SMALLS CREEK
644
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00092 Not eligible4200218Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 47.5 087 22.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ROD AND GUN CLUB R Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MARIAH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00104 Not eligible4200109Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 50.0 087 14.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: RIVERDALE ROAD Feature Crossed: POLLARD DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00114 Not eligible4200012Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.8 087 18.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: WATER WORKS ROAD Feature Crossed: TILLEY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00115 Not eligible4200013Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.8 087 18.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: WATER WORKS ROAD Feature Crossed: TILLEY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00119 Not eligible4200208Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.1 087 10.4
Steel thru truss310B
//Feature Carried: SAND ROAD Feature Crossed: BLACK CREEK
645
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00129 Not eligible4200271Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.0 087 28.9
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: OLD U.S. 41 Feature Crossed: SMALLS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00130 Not eligible4200272Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 46.4 087 28.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: OLD U.S. 41 Feature Crossed: MARIAH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00132 Not eligible4200007Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.6 087 24.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MOODY ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MARSH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00135 Not eligible4200023Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.9 087 20.8
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: FREELANDVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: MARIAH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00140 Not eligible4200223Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 51.3 087 20.1
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: LANE ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MARIAH CREEK
646
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00144 Not eligible4200190Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.3 087 26.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SPRINGTOWN ROAD Feature Crossed: COTTON BRANCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00149 Not eligible4200181Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.4 087 24.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: FREELANDVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: MARSH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00150 Not eligible4200016Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.8 087 18.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: LIME CRUSHER ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MARIAH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00156 Not eligible4200203Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.6 087 22.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: OAKTOWN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MARIAH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00168 Not eligible4200001Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 51.3 087 31.2
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: BLANN ROAD Feature Crossed: BUSSERON CREEK
647
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00197 Not eligible4200089Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 37.8 087 23.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MOUNT ZION ROAD Feature Crossed: RIVER DESHEE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00201 Not eligible4200117Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 39.5 087 19.2
Simple steel girder302E
//Feature Carried: SOUTH WHEATLAND RO Feature Crossed: STEEN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00205 Not eligible4200114Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 38.1 087 21.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SOUTH WHEATLAND RD Feature Crossed: REEL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00219 Not eligible4200072Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.2 087 18.9
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: DUTCH HINKLE ROAD Feature Crossed: BRUSH CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00228 Not eligible4200105Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 36.1 087 17.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BURKE ROAD Feature Crossed: KESSINGER DITCH
648
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00237 Not eligible4200044Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 32.5 087 31.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: OLD DECKER ROAD Feature Crossed: MUDDY RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00243 Not eligible4200046Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 31.9 087 31.6
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: MAYS ROAD Feature Crossed: PLASS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00245 Not eligible4200058Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 30.1 087 32.2
Composite steel beam302G
//Feature Carried: DECKER CHAPEL ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WHITE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00255 Not eligible4200061Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 34.1 087 36.3
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CLAIRE ROAD Feature Crossed: VIEKE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00257 Not eligible4200060Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 31.5 087 37.8
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: BEAL ROAD Feature Crossed: RIVER DESHEE
649
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00261 Not eligible4200068Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 34.9 087 36.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 6TH STREET ROAD Feature Crossed: VIEKE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00265 Not eligible4200265Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 36.7 087 16.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: CR 800S Feature Crossed: FRICK DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00271 Not eligible4200051Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 35.6 087 35.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: FIVE OAKS ROAD Feature Crossed: VIEKE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00272 Not eligible4200038Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 35.3 087 35.3
Simple steel beam - floor beam system
303H
//Feature Carried: BULLDOG ROAD Feature Crossed: VIEKE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00277 Not eligible4200042Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.6 087 33.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: FIREMEN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF RIVER DESHEE
650
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00280 Not eligible4200078Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.4 087 30.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: DECKER ROAD Feature Crossed: MUDDY RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00283 Not eligible4200120Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 35.2 087 29.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MCCORMICK ROAD Feature Crossed: BR.OF UPPER RIVER DESHE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00290 Not eligible4200258Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 34.5 087 35.0
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BRIDGE ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SWAN POND
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00291 Not eligible4200122Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 37.0 087 31.8
Steel pony truss310A
//Feature Carried: KELLER ROAD Feature Crossed: VIEKE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00306 Not eligible4200062Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 34.1 087 35.0
Simple steel girder302E
//Feature Carried: CLAIRE ROAD Feature Crossed: VIEKE DITCH
651
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00308 Not eligible4200119Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.5 087 29.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: ALTHOFF ROAD Feature Crossed: MUDDY RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00320 Not eligible4200031Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 36.0 087 34.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SCHOOL HOUSE ROAD Feature Crossed: VIEKE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00329 Not eligible4200131Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 35.4 087 26.3
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: MIDDLE HART STREET Feature Crossed: BR.OF UPPER RIVER DESHE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00333 Not eligible4200054Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.2 087 25.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: RIDGLEYVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: WILSON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00335 Not eligible4200133Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 37.6 087 27.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: BUTLER ROAD Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS DITCH
652
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00336 Not eligible4200070Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.8 087 22.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: RIDGLEYVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WILSON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00337 Not eligible4200069Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.1 087 22.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: RIDGLEYVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: LONG POND
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00348 Not eligible4200139Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 40.1 087 23.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: OLIVER ROAD Feature Crossed: KESSINGER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00349 Not eligible4200259Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 34.8 087 26.1
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MCGIFFEN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WILLIAMS DITC
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00382 Not eligible4200273Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 51.3 087 27.3
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: OLD U.S. 41 Feature Crossed: CSX RAILROAD
653
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00402 Not eligible4200264Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 37.5 087 35.6
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: OLD U.S. 41 Feature Crossed: MANTLE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00405 Not eligible4200290Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 42.2 087 28.2
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: BRUCEVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SNAPP CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00415 Not eligible4200299Knox NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 42.5 087 29.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: OLD BRUCEVILLE ROA Feature Crossed: TRIBUTARY TO SNAPP CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(19)10-43-03201A Not eligible5080Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 146 86 29
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 19 Feature Crossed: TIPPECANOE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
013-43-01863A Not eligible3510Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 190 85 416
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: TIPPECANOE RIVER
654
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
013-43-03226A Not eligible3480Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 40 85 446
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: PLUNGE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
013-43-03227A Not eligible3490Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 107 85 427
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: DEEDS CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
015-43-00500B Not eligible4050Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 123 85 522
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: SR 15 Feature Crossed: WALNUT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
015-43-03944A Not eligible4080Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 174 85 515
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 15 Feature Crossed: TIPPECANOE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
025-43-01325 Not eligible6600Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 111 85 570
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: TRIMBLE CREEK
655
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00012 Not eligible4300005Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 19.2 085 47.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ARMSTRONG ROAD Feature Crossed: TIPPECANOE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00105 Not eligible4300043Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 14.6 085 58.7
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: CR 700W Feature Crossed: TIPPECANOE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00108 Not eligible4300046Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 12.2 085 58.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 200S Feature Crossed: TRIMBLE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00244 Not eligible4300096Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 19.0 085 41.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 800E Feature Crossed: TIPPECANOE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00277 Not eligible4300103Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 25.6 085 45.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: WEST MAIN STREET Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK
656
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00351 Not eligible4300225Kosciusko NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 16.9 085 40.7
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: CR 250N Feature Crossed: GRASSY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
009-44-04382C Not eligible2870LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 450 85 256
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: FAWN RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
020-44-03825A Not eligible5580LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 385 85 153
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 20 Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00029 Not eligible4400017LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 43.5 085 30.9
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 450 WEST Feature Crossed: PIGEON RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00033 Not eligible4400056LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 44.5 085 33.5
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: CR 675 WEST Feature Crossed: PIGEON RIVER
657
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00034 Not eligible4400057LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 44.5 085 33.5
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: CR 675 WEST Feature Crossed: PIGEON RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00047 Not eligible4400023LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 32.2 085 27.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 700 SOUTH Feature Crossed: N.BRANCH OF ELKHART RIV
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00057 Not eligible4400027LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 35.0 085 13.0
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 425 SOUTH Feature Crossed: MUD LAKE OUTLET
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00063 Not eligible4400033LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 40.0 085 16.5
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 150 NORTH Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00075 Not eligible4400044LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 42.4 085 24.3
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 100 EAST Feature Crossed: PIGEON RIVER
658
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00076 Not eligible4400045LaGrange NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 42.0 085 23.5
Composite steel beam302G
//Feature Carried: CR 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: FLY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(12)912-45-02353B Not eligible33050Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 379 87 260
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 12 & SR 912 Feature Crossed: N & S RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(12)912-45-02365B Not eligible33100Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 367 87 260
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 12 & SR 912 Feature Crossed: I-90 & NICTD RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(12)912-45-04112C Not eligible33110Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 363 87 260
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 12 EBL & SR 912 Feature Crossed: US 12 EBL & US 20
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(12)912-45-05084B Not eligible33090Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 368 87 260
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 12 & SR 912 Feature Crossed: GRAND CALUMET RIV&2 RDS
659
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(12)912-45-05085B Not eligible33060Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 378 87 260
Composite continuous steel girder
402E
//Feature Carried: US 12 & SR 912 Feature Crossed: SR 312 & RAMPS
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(53)55-45-01815 Not eligible19490Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 337 87 202
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 53 Feature Crossed: LITTLE CALUMET RIVER
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
(6)51-45-01933A Not eligible18860Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/12/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 336 87 145
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: DEEP RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(6)51-45-01934A Not eligible18880Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 344 87 144
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: DEEP RIVER
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
(6)51-45-01943A Not eligible18870Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/12/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 343 87 144
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: MUCK POCKET
660
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(6)51-45-03855B Not eligible18890Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 350 87 145
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: I-80 & I-94
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
002-45-03992 Not eligible560Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 175 87 254
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 2 Feature Crossed: CEDAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
002-45-05126 Not eligible575Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 174 87 188
Reinforced concrete box - under fill
119C
//Feature Carried: SR 2 Feature Crossed: BRYANT DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
020-45-01628A Not eligible5190Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 369 87 289
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: US 20 Feature Crossed: GRAND CALUMET RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
030-45-01733A Not eligible8140Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 283 87 133
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 30 Feature Crossed: DEEP RIVER
661
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-45-02177BNBL Not eligible15570Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 114 87 272
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: CONRAIL & 236TH AVENUE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-45-02177BSBL Not eligible15580Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 114 87 273
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: CONRAIL & 236TH AVENUE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-45-03801ANBL Not eligible15590Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 122 87 277
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: BROWN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-45-03801ASBL Not eligible15600Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 122 87 277
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: BROWN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-45-03802BNBL Not eligible15610Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 124 87 278
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: SINGLETON DITCH
662
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-45-03802BSBL Not eligible15620Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 124 87 278
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: SINGLETON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
041-45-03990 Not eligible15560Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 105 87 269
Reinforced concrete box - under fill
119C
//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: DIKE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
051-45-05052A Not eligible18850Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 300 87 156
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 51 Feature Crossed: DEEP RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
053-45-03246B Not eligible19500Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 341 87 202
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: SR 53 Feature Crossed: I-80 / I-94
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
055-45-06132B Not eligible19840Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 135 87 206
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 55 Feature Crossed: BROWN DITCH
663
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
055-45-06258B Not eligible19850Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 148 87 207
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 55 Feature Crossed: SINGLETON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
312-45-05403B Not eligible31320Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 378 87 283
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: SR 312 Feature Crossed: INDIANA HARBOR CANAL
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
912-45-02216B Not eligible33120Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 361 87 260
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 912 Feature Crossed: CONRAIL
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
912-45-02219C Not eligible33150Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 345 87 260
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 912 Feature Crossed: NORFOLK & SOUTHERN RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
912-45-02543B Not eligible33032Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 392 87 266
Composite continuous steel girder
402E
//Feature Carried: MICHIGAN AVENUE Feature Crossed: SR 912, RAMPS, & RR
664
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
912-45-04465C Not eligible33160Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 345 87 260
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 912 Feature Crossed: 25TH AVE / 177TH ST
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
912-45-04861B Not eligible33130Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 358 87 260
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 912 Feature Crossed: 165TH ST / 9TH AV-CLOSED
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-246-04894A Not eligible38330Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 148 87 178
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CR X-9 /205TH AVE. Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-252-04897A Not eligible38400Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 204 87 186
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CR H-10/153RD AVE. Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-254-04898A Not eligible38430Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 222 87 193
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CR H-4 /137TH AVE. Feature Crossed: I-65
665
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-256-04899 Not eligible38460Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 248 87 193
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: 113TH AVENUE Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-258-04902 Not eligible38530Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 261 87 193
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CR N-3 /101ST AVE. Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I65-261-04904A Not eligible38580Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 291 87 193
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: 73RD AVENUE Feature Crossed: I-65
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I80-10-03850B Not eligible45690Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 341 87 197
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: GEORGIA STREET Feature Crossed: I-80
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I80-12-03852A Not eligible45750Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 342 87 178
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: COLORADO STREET Feature Crossed: I-80
666
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I80-8-04510A Not eligible45660Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 342 87 226
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: CHASE STREET Feature Crossed: I-80
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
I80-9-03673A Not eligible45670Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 342 87 214
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: GRANT STREET Feature Crossed: I-80 (I-94)
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00004 Not eligible4500004Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 16.2 087 16.6
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RANGE LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: SINGLETON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00006 Not eligible4500006Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 20.5 087 16.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: RANGE LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: STONEY RUN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00022 Not eligible4500020Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 14.8 087 18.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MISSISSIPPI STREET Feature Crossed: VANNATI DITCH
667
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00023 Not eligible4500021Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 15.4 087 18.9
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: MISSISSIPPI STREET Feature Crossed: SINGLETON DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00025 Not eligible4500023Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 10.8 087 26.3
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: 241ST AVENUE Feature Crossed: FULLER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00034 Not eligible4500031Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 23.0 087 12.8
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: 129TH AVENUE Feature Crossed: NILES DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00040 Not eligible4500036Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 14.1 087 24.9
Timber beam702A
//Feature Carried: 211TH AVENUE Feature Crossed: CEDAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00047 Not eligible4500043Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 15.4 087 26.9
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: BELSHAW ROAD Feature Crossed: BRUCE DITCH
668
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00050 Not eligible4500046Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 20.5 087 24.6
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: 153RD AVENUE Feature Crossed: LAKE DALECARLIA
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00051 Not eligible4500047Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 19.7 087 24.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 161ST AVENUE Feature Crossed: CEDAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00052 Not eligible4500048Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 18.5 087 24.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 171ST AVENUE Feature Crossed: CEDAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00064 Not eligible4500060Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 26.1 087 29.5
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: 101ST AVENUE Feature Crossed: BULL RUN DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00065 Not eligible4500061Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 23.5 087 29.4
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 125TH AVENUE Feature Crossed: WEST CREEK
669
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00068 Not eligible4500063Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 26.5 087 23.5
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: CLARK STREET Feature Crossed: BRANCH BEAVER DAM DITC
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00077 Not eligible4500072Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 14.8 087 27.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: 205TH AVENUE Feature Crossed: BRUCE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00089 Not eligible4500084Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 26.1 087 18.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 101ST AVENUE Feature Crossed: DEEP RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00099 Not eligible4500093Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 27.1 087 15.5
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: GRAND BLVD. Feature Crossed: DEEP RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00102 Not eligible4500096Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 30.5 087 16.6
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: 61ST AVENUE Feature Crossed: DEEP RIVER
670
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00103 Not eligible4500097Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 30.7 087 17.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: ARIZONA STREET Feature Crossed: DEEP RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00110 Not eligible4500103Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 13.3 087 27.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: 219TH AVENUE Feature Crossed: BRUCE DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00116 Not eligible4500107Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 30.0 087 25.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: FAIRBANKS STREET Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00138 Not eligible4500110Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 30.2 087 20.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: HARRISON STREET Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00143 Not eligible4500112Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 34.2 087 27.7
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: KENNEDY AVENUE Feature Crossed: LITTLE CALUMET RIVER
671
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00196 Not eligible4500118Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 33.3 087 27.7
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: RIDGE ROAD Feature Crossed: KENNEDY AVENUE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00227 Not eligible4500130Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 18.0 087 25.2
Timber slab701
//Feature Carried: 176TH AVENUE Feature Crossed: CEDAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00239 Not eligible4500132Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 36.8 087 26.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: OLD CLINE AVENUE Feature Crossed: GRAND CALUMET RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00240 Not eligible4500133Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 37.5 087 31.1
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: HOHMAN AVENUE Feature Crossed: GRAND CALUMET RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00259 Not eligible4500150Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 32.2 087 29.5
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 45TH STREET Feature Crossed: HART DITCH
672
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00260 Not eligible4500151Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 31.3 087 30.0
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: MAIN STREET Feature Crossed: HART DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00261 Not eligible4500152Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 30.5 087 30.6
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: 213TH STREET Feature Crossed: HART DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00262 Not eligible4500153Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 30.0 087 31.0
Riveted plate girder - floor beam system
303F
//Feature Carried: EDMOND STREET Feature Crossed: HART DITCH
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
00265 Not eligible4500156Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 36.8 087 30.0
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: COLUMBIA AVENUE Feature Crossed: CONRAIL RAILROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00276 Not eligible4500167Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 18.2 087 25.2
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: MORSE STREET Feature Crossed: MCCONNEL DITCH
673
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00277 Not eligible4500168Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 16.3 087 22.4
Timber beam702A
//Feature Carried: 191ST AVENUE Feature Crossed: SPRING RUN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00306 Not eligible4500175Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 29.9 087 25.6
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: BROAD STREET Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK
This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
00361 Not eligible4500182Lake NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 21.8 087 25.3
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: BINYON AVENUE Feature Crossed: CEDAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(421)43-46-00986A Not eligible32500LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 389 86 537
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 421 Feature Crossed: NORRIS DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
002-46-04130B Not eligible650LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 319 86 559
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 2 Feature Crossed: FORBES DITCH
674
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
006-46-01374A Not eligible1670LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 9/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 308 86 416
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: KINGSBURY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
006-46-03487 Not eligible1660LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 310 86 419
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: KINGSBURY CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
008-46-01514 Not eligible2170LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 191 86 538
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 8 Feature Crossed: DAHL DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
008-46-01932 Not eligible2220LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 191 86 454
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: SR 8 Feature Crossed: DAVIDSON DRAIN
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
008-46-03212 Not eligible2200LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 191 86 483
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 8 Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS DITCH
675
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
008-46-03213 Not eligible2210LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 191 86 466
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 8 Feature Crossed: HANNA ARM
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
008-46-03214A Not eligible2230LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 191 86 448
Prestressed concrete I-beam
502
//Feature Carried: SR 8 Feature Crossed: KANKAKEE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
020-46-01789C Not eligible5290LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 417 86 489
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: US 20 Feature Crossed: EAST BR. TRAIL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
020-46-021-4 Not eligible5305LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 407 86 401
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: US 20 Feature Crossed: I-90 (TOLL ROAD)
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
030-46-00600D Not eligible8200LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 261 86 541
Precast concrete slab101B
//Feature Carried: US 30 Feature Crossed: SLOCUM DITCH
676
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
030-46-04159AEBL Not eligible8220LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 249 86 464
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 30 EBL Feature Crossed: HUNSLEY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
030-46-04159AWBL Not eligible8230LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 249 86 464
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: US 30 WBL Feature Crossed: HUNSLEY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
035-46-03386B Not eligible11420LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 424 86 514
Continuous reinforced concrete girder
202A
//Feature Carried: US 35 Feature Crossed: TRAIL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
039-46-03583 Not eligible13500LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 226 86 443
Reinforced concrete slab - under fill
119A
//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: MARQUARDT DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
039-46-03634 Not eligible13520LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 284 86 443
Reinforced concrete slab - under fill
119A
//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: HICKLESON DITCH
677
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00014 Not eligible4600008LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 39.9 086 49.6
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: CR 400N Feature Crossed: TRAIL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00034 Not eligible4600018LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 32.1 086 29.9
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: CR 500S Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS LATERAL
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00040 Not eligible4600022LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 35.6 086 35.1
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 100S Feature Crossed: LITTLE KANKAKEE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00054 Not eligible4600030LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 27.0 086 53.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 1025W Feature Crossed: BRANCH TOPPER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00089 Not eligible4600051LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 29.6 086 46.7
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: RAILROAD STREET Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK
678
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00126 Not eligible4600171LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 21.7 086 51.8
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: CR 1700S Feature Crossed: ECKERT DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00158 Not eligible4600089LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 24.6 086 46.2
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: OLD US 30 Feature Crossed: HUNSLEY DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00233 Not eligible4600120LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 24.6 086 46.2
Continuous reinforced concrete slab
201A
//Feature Carried: OLD US 30 Feature Crossed: WERNER DITCH
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00247 Not eligible4600123LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 43.0 086 40.1
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: FAIL ROAD Feature Crossed: NICTD RAILROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00508 Not eligible4600156LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 37.0 086 44.9
Multiplate arch - under fill319A
//Feature Carried: WAVERLY ROAD Feature Crossed: CHANNEL-PINE/STONE LAKE
679
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00605 Not eligible4600150LaPorte NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 43.9 086 39.7
Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple
505
//Feature Carried: CR 200E Feature Crossed: TRIBUTARY GALENA RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(158)58-47-03026 Not eligible28010Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 515 86 403
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 158 Feature Crossed: SILVERVILLE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(158)58-47-03027 Not eligible28000Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 516 86 406
Reinforced concrete girder
102A
//Feature Carried: SR 158 Feature Crossed: SILVERVILLE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(50)37-47-03416JDEB
Not eligible11930Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 496 86 308
Continuous steel girder402B
//Feature Carried: US 50 EBL Feature Crossed: EAST FORK WHITE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
(50)450-47-02196C Not eligible32730Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 517 86 301
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: SOO RR & SPIDER CREEK
680
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
037-47-02171BNBL Not eligible11920Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 437 86 291
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: SR 37 NBL Feature Crossed: CSX RR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
054-47-01093 Not eligible19680Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 561 86 384
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: SR 54 Feature Crossed: BLUE SPRING CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
054-47-01095 Not eligible19710Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 554 86 340
Reinforced concrete slab101A
//Feature Carried: SR 54 Feature Crossed: GOOSE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
158-47-04977B Not eligible28040Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 517 86 319
Continuous steel girder402B
//Feature Carried: SR 158 Feature Crossed: SALT CREEK
This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
00021 Not eligible4700123Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.3 086 30.5
Reinforced concrete arch - open spandrel
111B
//Feature Carried: OOLITIC RD Feature Crossed: SALT CREEK
681
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00025 Not eligible4700001Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 51.7 086 27.4
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: LEATHERWOOD RD Feature Crossed: LEATHERWOOD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00046 Not eligible4700021Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.5 086 26.8
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: BARTLETTSVILLE RD Feature Crossed: LITTLE SALT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00055 Not eligible4700030Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.1 086 17.8
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: LEESVILLE RD Feature Crossed: GUTHRIE CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00060 Not eligible4700034Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.8 086 20.2
Composite continuous steel girder
402E
//Feature Carried: TUNNELTON BONO RD Feature Crossed: EAST FORK WHITE RIVER
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00062 Not eligible4700036Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 43.9 086 22.5
Metal pipe arch-round pipe
311
//Feature Carried: STONINGTON RD Feature Crossed: FISHING CREEK
682
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00067 Not eligible4700041Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.3 086 22.7
Composite continuous steel beam
402D
//Feature Carried: LAWRENCEPORT RD Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00069 Not eligible4700043Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.7 086 22.1
Reinforced concrete arch - under fill
119B
//Feature Carried: HUMPBACK BRIDGE RD Feature Crossed: HENDERSON CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00070 Not eligible4700044Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 54.0 086 28.2
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: MT. PLEASANT RD Feature Crossed: PLEASANT RUN CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00075 Not eligible4700049Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.5 086 24.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: DUNN BRIDGE RD Feature Crossed: LITTLE SALT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00076 Not eligible4700140Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 42.2 086 21.8
Aluminum plate arch - under fill
919B
//Feature Carried: MAGNER RD Feature Crossed: FISHING CREEK
683
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00077 Not eligible4700050Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 43.2 086 19.6
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: BONO RD Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00078 Not eligible4700051Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.9 086 24.8
Reinforced concrete arch111A
//Feature Carried: PUMPHOUSE RD Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00084 Not eligible4700057Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.0 086 28.8
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: DONICA CHURCH RD Feature Crossed: LITTLE SALT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00089 Not eligible4700062Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 58.6 086 30.4
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: GUTHRIE RD Feature Crossed: SALT CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00098 Not eligible4700070Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.1 086 38.3
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: POPCORN RD Feature Crossed: LINDEN HOLLOW
684
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00106 Not eligible4700076Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.5 086 40.1
Simple steel beam - floor beam system
303H
//Feature Carried: POPCORN CHURCH RD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF POPCORN CRE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00112 Not eligible4700080Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 57.3 086 36.2
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SPRINGVILLE JUDAH Feature Crossed: SPRING CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00113 Not eligible4700081Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 56.9 086 36.6
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SPRINGVILLE JUDAH Feature Crossed: SPRING CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00114 Not eligible4700082Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 56.6 086 36.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SPRINGVILLE JUDAH Feature Crossed: SPRING CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00121 Not eligible4700089Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 50.0 086 39.8
Precast concrete beam - channel beam
122
//Feature Carried: WILLIAMSILVERVILLE Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK
685
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00129 Not eligible4700097Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 43.5 086 40.2
Composite steel beam302G
//Feature Carried: HURON WILLIAMS RD Feature Crossed: BEAVER CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00135 Not eligible4700102Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 50.4 086 28.6
Continuous steel beam402A
//Feature Carried: SOUTH I ST Feature Crossed: LEATHERWOOD CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00160 Not eligible4700128Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 8/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.9 086 29.9
Concrete tee beam104
//Feature Carried: OOLITIC RD Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RAILROAD
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00170 Not eligible4700112Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 52.7 086 22.8
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: STOVE RD Feature Crossed: S FORK LEATHERWOOD CR
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00171 Not eligible4700113Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 58.3 086 24.5
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: SIPES BRANCH RD Feature Crossed: BRANCH LITTLE SALT CREE
686
Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges
This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.
00176 Not eligible4700115Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: 10/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 42.2 086 18.8
Continuous encased steel beam
402C
//Feature Carried: SUGAR CREEK RD Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00182 Not eligible4700129Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 51.4 086 39.7
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: IRON BRIDGE LN Feature Crossed: SILVERVILLE BRANCH CREE
This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.
00204 Not eligible4700150Lawrence NBI No.Bridge No.
Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 58.1 086 24.9
Simple steel beam302D
//Feature Carried: MEADOWS CHURCH RD Feature Crossed: BRANCH LITTLE SALT CREE
687