section 6 - vulnerability assessment - mema district 1 regional hazard … · 2018. 9. 4. ·...

59
SECTION 6 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016 6:1 This section identifies and quantifies the vulnerability of the MEMA District 1 Region to the significant hazards identified in the previous sections (Hazard Identification and Profiles). It consists of the following subsections: 6.1 Overview 6.2 Methodology 6.3 Explanation of Data Sources 6.4 Asset Inventory 6.5 Vulnerability Assessment Results 6.6 Conclusions on Hazard Vulnerability 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(2)(ii): The risk assessment shall include a description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section. The description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of: (A) The types and numbers of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas; (B) An estimate of the potential losses to vulnerable structures identified in paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimate; (C) Providing a general description of land uses and development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions. 6.1 OVERVIEW This section builds upon the information provided in Section 4: Hazard Identification and Section 5: Hazard Profiles by identifying and characterizing an inventory of assets in the MEMA District 1 Region. In addition, the potential impact and expected amount of damages caused to these assets by each identified hazard event is assessed. The primary objective of the vulnerability assessment is to quantify exposure and the potential loss estimates for each hazard. In doing so, the MEMA District 1 counties and their participating jurisdictions may better understand their unique risks to identified hazards and be better prepared to evaluate and prioritize specific hazard mitigation actions. This section begins with an explanation of the methodology applied to complete the vulnerability assessment, followed by a summary description of the asset inventory as compiled for the MEMA District 1 Region. The remainder of this section focuses on the results of the assessment conducted. 6.2 METHODOLOGY This vulnerability assessment was conducted using three distinct methodologies: (1) A stochastic risk assessment; (2) a geographic information system (GIS)-based analysis; and (3) a risk modeling software analysis. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation, including historical occurrence information provided in the Hazard

Upload: others

Post on 24-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:1

This section identifies and quantifies the vulnerability of the MEMA District 1 Region to the significant hazards identified in the previous sections (Hazard Identification and Profiles). It consists of the following subsections:

6.1 Overview

6.2 Methodology

6.3 Explanation of Data Sources

6.4 Asset Inventory

6.5 Vulnerability Assessment Results

6.6 Conclusions on Hazard Vulnerability

44 CFR Requirement

44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(2)(ii): The risk assessment shall include a description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section. The description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of: (A) The types and numbers of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas; (B) An estimate of the potential losses to vulnerable structures identified in paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimate; (C) Providing a general description of land uses and development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions.

6.1 OVERVIEW This section builds upon the information provided in Section 4: Hazard Identification and Section 5: Hazard Profiles by identifying and characterizing an inventory of assets in the MEMA District 1 Region. In addition, the potential impact and expected amount of damages caused to these assets by each identified hazard event is assessed. The primary objective of the vulnerability assessment is to quantify exposure and the potential loss estimates for each hazard. In doing so, the MEMA District 1 counties and their participating jurisdictions may better understand their unique risks to identified hazards and be better prepared to evaluate and prioritize specific hazard mitigation actions. This section begins with an explanation of the methodology applied to complete the vulnerability assessment, followed by a summary description of the asset inventory as compiled for the MEMA District 1 Region. The remainder of this section focuses on the results of the assessment conducted.

6.2 METHODOLOGY This vulnerability assessment was conducted using three distinct methodologies: (1) A stochastic risk assessment; (2) a geographic information system (GIS)-based analysis; and (3) a risk modeling software analysis. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation, including historical occurrence information provided in the Hazard

Page 2: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:2

Identification and Analysis sections. A brief description of the three different approaches is provided on the following pages.

6.2.1 Stochastic Risk Assessment The stochastic risk assessment methodology was applied to analyze hazards of concern that were outside the scope of hazard risk models and the GIS-based risk assessment. This includes hazards that do not have geographically-definable boundaries and are therefore excluded from spatial analysis through GIS. A stochastic risk methodology was used for the following hazards:

Dam and Levee Failure Drought

Erosion Extreme Heat Hailstorm Land Subsidence/Sinkhole

Lightning Severe Thunderstorm/High Wind Tornado Winter Storm and Freeze

Many of the hazards listed above are considered atmospheric and have the potential to affect all buildings and all populations. For many of these hazards listed above, no additional analysis was performed. When possible, annualized loss estimates were determined using the best available data on historical losses from sources including NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center records, MEMA District 1 Region county hazard mitigation plans, and local knowledge. Annualized loss is the estimated long-term weighted average value of losses to property in any single year in a specified geographic area (i.e., municipality or county). Annualized loss estimates were generated by totaling the amount of property damage over the period of time for which records were available, and calculating the average annual loss. Given the standard weighting analysis, losses can be readily compared across hazards providing an objective approach for evaluating mitigation alternatives. For the erosion, dam and levee failure1, and land subsidence/sinkhole hazards no data with historical property damages was available. Therefore, annualized losses for these hazards are identified as negligible, though it should be noted that this does not indicate that future losses will not occur. Drought, extreme heat, hailstorm, lightning, severe thunderstorm/high wind, tornado, and winter storm and freeze have the potential to impact the entire MEMA District 1 Region. The results for these hazards are found near the end of this section in Table 6.11.

6.2.2 GIS-Based Analysis

Other hazards have specified geographic boundaries that permit additional using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). These hazards include:

1 As noted in Section 5: Hazard Profiles, Dam failure could be catastrophic to areas in the inundation area. Due to a lack of data,

no additional analysis was performed. Further, local MEMA District 1 officials indicate that separate dam failure plans have been

completed for some dams in their counties to identify risk and response measures. As additional data becomes available, more in-

depth analysis may be conducted.

Page 3: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:3

Flood Landslide Wildfire

The objective of the GIS-based analysis was to determine the estimated vulnerability of critical facilities and populations for the identified hazards in the MEMA District 1 Region using best available geospatial data. Digital data was collected from local, regional, state, and national sources for hazards and buildings. Communities in the MEMA District 1 Region generally did not have readily available geospatial parcel or building footprint data, though where it was available, it was used in the analysis. Despite this lack of data, the HMC wanted to have some estimate of potential building and dollar losses, so 2010 Census block data was extracted from Hazus MH that included building counts and dollar values of property in the region. Additionally, geo-referenced point locations for identified assets (critical facilities and infrastructure, special populations, etc.) were identified via Hazus MH 3.1 and used in this vulnerability analysis. ESRI® ArcGIS™ 10.3 was used to assess hazard vulnerability utilizing digital hazard data, as well as local building and exposure data described above. Using these data layers, hazard vulnerability can be quantified by estimating the number and dollar value of census blocks determined to be located in identified hazard areas. However, it should be noted that this method likely overestimates the number and value of property at risk. To estimate vulnerable populations in hazard areas, digital Census 2010 data by census tract was obtained. This was intersected with hazard areas to determine exposed population counts. The results of the analysis provided an estimate of the number of people and critical facilities, as well as the value of buildings determined to be potentially at risk to those hazards with delineable geographic hazard boundaries.

6.2.3 Risk Modeling Software Analysis A risk modeling software was used for the following hazards:

Earthquake Hurricane and Tropical Storm

There are several models that exist to model hazards. Hazus-MH was used in this vulnerability assessment to address the aforementioned hazards.

HAZUS-MH Hazus-MH (“Hazus”) is a standardized loss estimation software program developed by FEMA. It is built upon an integrated GIS platform to conduct analysis at a regional level (i.e., not on a structure-by-structure basis). The Hazus risk assessment methodology is parametric, in that distinct hazard and inventory parameters (e.g., wind speed and building types) can be modeled using the

Page 4: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:4

software to determine the impact (i.e., damages and losses) on the built environment. The MEMA District 1 Regional Risk Assessment utilized Hazus-MH to produce hazard damage loss estimations for hazards for the planning area. At the time this analysis was completed, Hazus-MH 3.1 was used to estimate potential damages from hurricane winds earthquake hazards using Hazus-MH methodology. Although the program can also model losses for flood and storm surge, it was not used in this Risk Assessment. Figure 6.1 illustrates the conceptual model of the Hazus-MH methodology.

FIGURE 6.1: CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF HAZUS-MH METHODOLOGY

Hazus-MH is capable of providing a variety of loss estimation results. In order to be consistent with other hazard assessments, annualized losses are presented when possible. Loss estimates provided in this vulnerability assessment are based on best available data and methodologies. The results are an approximation of risk. These estimates should be used to understand relative risk from hazards and potential losses. Uncertainties are inherent in any loss estimation methodology, arising in part from incomplete scientific knowledge concerning natural hazards and their effects on the built environment. Uncertainties also result from approximations and simplifications that

Page 5: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:5

are necessary for a comprehensive analysis (e.g., incomplete inventories, non-specific locations, demographics, or economic parameters). All conclusions are presented in “Conclusions on Hazard Vulnerability” at the end of this section.

6.3 EXPLANATION OF DATA SOURCES

FLOOD FEMA Digital Flood Rate Insurance Maps (DFIRM) flood data was used to determine flood vulnerability. DFIRM data can be used in ArcGIS for mapping purposes, and they identify several features including floodplain boundaries and base flood elevations. Identified areas on the DFIRM represent some features of a Flood Insurance Rate Maps including the 100-year flood areas (1.0-percent annual chance flood), and the 500-year flood areas (0.2-percent annual chance flood). For the vulnerability assessment, local improved property data and critical facilities were overlaid on the 1.0-percent annual chance floodplain (ACF) areas for counties that had digital parcel data available. No 0.2-percent annual chance floodplain areas were identified in any of the county DFIRMS. It should be noted that such an analysis does not account for building elevation.

LANDSLIDE The USGS Landslide Susceptibility Index was used to determine vulnerability to landslides. This index classifies different zones or areas of risk to landslides based on two evaluation criteria: incidence and susceptibility. Incidence is based on the previous reports of landslides incidents and susceptibility is based on the potential for future landslides in terms of soils types and other locational factors. Each zone is scored has “High,” “Medium,” or “Low” on both evaluation criteria, resulting in 6 different categorizations of landslide risk. For the vulnerability assessment, census block data and critical facilities were overlaid on these incidence/susceptibility areas.

WILDFIRE The data used to determine vulnerability to wildfire in the MEMA District 1 Region is based on GIS data called the Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment (SWRA). This data is available on the Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment website and can be downloaded and imported into ArcGIS. A specific layer, known as “Wildland Urban Interface Risk Index” (WUIRI) was used to determine vulnerability of people and property. The WUIRI is presented on a scale of 0 to -9. It combines data on housing density with the data on the impact and likelihood of a wildfire occurring in a specific area. The primary purpose of the data is to highlight areas of concern that may be conducive to mitigation actions. Due to assumptions made, it is not true probability. However, it does provide a comparison of risk throughout the region.

EARTHQUAKE Hazus-MH 3.1 (as described above) was used to assess earthquake vulnerability. A level 1, probabilistic scenario to estimate average annualized loss was utilized. In this scenario, several return periods (events of varying intensities) are run to determine annualized loss. Default Hazus earthquake damage functions and methodology were used to determine the probability of damage. Results are calculated at the 2010 U.S. Census tract level in Hazus and presented at the county level.

Page 6: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:6

HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM WIND Hazus-MH 3.1 (as described above) was used to assess wind vulnerability. For the hurricane wind analysis, a probabilistic scenario was created to estimate the annualized loss damage in the MEMA District 1 Region. Default Hazus wind speed data, damage functions, and methodology were used in to determine the probability of damage for 100-, 500-, and 1,000-year frequency events (also known as a return period) in the scenario. Results are calculated in Hazus at the 2010 U.S. Census tract level and presented at the county level.

6.4 ASSET INVENTORY An inventory of geo-referenced assets within the MEMA District 1 counties and jurisdictions was compiled in order to identify and characterize those properties potentially at risk to the identified hazards.2 By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. Under this assessment, two categories of physical assets were created and then further assessed through GIS analysis. Additionally, social assets are addressed to determine population at risk to the identified hazards. These are presented below in Section 6.4.1.

6.4.1 Physical and Improved Assets The two categories of physical assets consist of:

1. Improved Property: Unfortunately, building footprint and parcel data was not available for most

of the participating areas. Therefore the definition of improved property includes all improved properties in the MEMA District 1 Region according to building data extracted from Hazus MH 3.1. It should be noted that this data produced less accurate information concerning the number of buildings at risk than parcel data because the Hazus data was aggregated at a much larger geographic area, the census block level. Where local parcel data was available, it was used to improve analysis. Hazus inventory data provides an estimate of the number of buildings in the study region. The economic exposure is also presented to be referenced with any Hazus-related results.

2. Critical Facilities: Critical facilities vary by jurisdiction. For this Vulnerability Assessment, facilities

were initially collected from Hazus-MH which includes fire stations, police station, medical care facilities, schools, emergency operation centers, government buildings, shelters, water/utility infrastructure, and other facilities. This data was then reviewed by local officials who used local knowledge to supplement the Hazus data. It should be noted that this listing is not all-inclusive for assets located in the region, but it is anticipated that it will be expanded during future plan updates as more geo-referenced data becomes available for use in GIS analysis.

The following tables provide a detailed listing of the geo-referenced assets that have been identified for inclusion in the vulnerability assessment for the MEMA District 1 Region.

2 While potentially not all-inclusive for MEMA District 1, “georeferenced” assets include those assets for which specific location

data is readily available for connecting the asset to a specific geographic location for purposes of GIS analysis.

Page 7: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:7

Table 6.1 lists the estimated number of improved properties and the total value of improvements for participating areas of the MEMA District 1 Region (study area of vulnerability assessment). Because digital parcel data was not available for most communities, data obtained from Hazus-MH 3.1 inventory was utilized to complete the analysis. Grenada County provided parcel data for its jurisdictional area.

TABLE 6.1: IMPROVED PROPERTY IN THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Location Counts of

Improved Property Total Value of Improvements

Coahoma County 10,085 $2,115,582,000

Clarksdale 6,741 $1,461,759,000

Coahoma (town) 131 $19,739,000

Friars Point 440 $89,931,000

Jonestown 446 $63,072,000

Lula 146 $38,153,000

Lyon 249 $70,246,000

Unincorporated Area 2,181 $442,928,000

DeSoto County 58,878 $16,384,913,000

Hernando 6,576 $1,876,565,000

Horn Lake 8,470 $2,097,067,000

Olive Branch 12,779 $3,953,300,000

Southaven 19,594 $5,566,173,000

Walls 892 $227,950,000

Unincorporated Area 10,567 $2,663,858,000

Grenada County 16,265 $468,263,937

Grenada (city) 7,259 $243,355,688

Unincorporated Area 9,006 $224,908,249

Panola County 15,241 $2,611,950,000

Batesville 3,602 $937,897,000

Como 661 $106,541,000

Courtland 397 $49,625,000

Crenshaw 489 $63,160,000

Pope 241 $32,847,000

Sardis 1,081 $233,173,000

Unincorporated Area 9,851 $1,421,880,000

Quitman County 3,561 $622,982,000

Crowder 365 $49,246,000

Falcon 61 $7,583,000

Lambert 628 $90,657,000

Marks 1,010 $235,212,000

Sledge 210 $36,427,000

Unincorporated Area 1,287 $203,857,000

Tallahatchie County 5,718 $864,002,000

Charleston 1,302 $200,806,000

Glendora 65 $7,119,000

Sumner 201 $38,080,000

Tutwiler 458 $101,044,000

Page 8: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:8

Location Counts of

Improved Property Total Value of Improvements

Webb 294 $39,089,000

Unincorporated Area 3,398 $477,864,000

Tate County 11,307 $2,227,227,000

Coldwater 827 $156,835,000

Senatobia 3,119 $829,954,000

Unincorporated Area 7,361 $1,240,438,000

Tunica County 3,997 $956,560,000

Tunica (town) 709 $196,669,000

Unincorporated Area 3,288 $759,891,000

Yalobusha County 6,521 $1,076,236,000

Coffeeville 772 $119,450,000

Oakland 360 $101,606,000

Water Valley 1,885 $381,424,000

Unincorporated Area 3,504 $473,756,000

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL TOTAL 131,573 $27,327,715,937

Source: Hazus-MH 3.1, Local County GIS Departments

Table 6.2 lists the fire stations, police stations, medical care facilities, emergency operations centers (EOCs), schools, shelters, government buildings, water/utility infrastructure, and other facilities located in the MEMA District 1 Region according to Hazus-MH Version 3.1 data that was reviewed and updated by local officials. In addition, Figure 6.2 shows the locations of critical facilities in the MEMA District 1 Region. Table 6.12, at the end of this section, shows a complete list of the critical facilities by name, as well as the hazards that affect each facility. As noted previously, this list is not all-inclusive and only includes information provided through Hazus which was updated, as best as possible, with local knowledge.

TABLE 6.2: CRITICAL FACILITY INVENTORY IN THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Location Fire

Stations Police

Stations Medical

Care EOC Schools Gov’t*

Water/ Utility*

Shelter* Other*

Coahoma County 2 5 1 0 22 1 0 0 0

Clarksdale 1 2 1 0 18 1 0 0 0

Coahoma (town) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Friars Point 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Jonestown 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Lula 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lyon 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Unincorporated Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DeSoto County 21 7 3 1 41 0 0 0 0

Hernando 5 2 0 1 6 0 0 0 0

Horn Lake 4 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0

Olive Branch 5 1 2 0 15 0 0 0 0

Southaven 5 2 1 0 11 0 0 0 0

Walls 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Page 9: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:9

Location Fire

Stations Police

Stations Medical

Care EOC Schools Gov’t*

Water/ Utility*

Shelter* Other*

Unincorporated Area 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Grenada County 14 2 2 1 10 14 0 5 29

Grenada (city) 14 2 2 1 10 14 0 5 29

Unincorporated Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Panola County 7 7 1 1 15 0 0 0 0

Batesville 3 3 1 0 7 0 0 0 0

Como 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Courtland 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crenshaw 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Pope 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Sardis 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0

Unincorporated Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Quitman County 1 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0

Crowder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Falcon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lambert 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Marks 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0

Sledge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Unincorporated Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tallahatchie County 17 4 1 1 7 11 20 0 0

Charleston 6 2 1 1 4 4 7 0 0

Glendora 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0

Sumner 1 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0

Tutwiler 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 0

Webb 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0

Unincorporated Area 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0

Tate County 5 3 1 0 11 0 0 0 0

Coldwater 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Senatobia 2 2 1 0 5 0 0 0 0

Unincorporated Area 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Tunica County 2 2 4 1 8 11 111 5 3

Tunica (town) 1 1 0 0 1 7 10 0 0

Unincorporated Area 1 1 4 1 7 4 101 5 3

Yalobusha County 11 4 1 2 10 13 0 0 16

Coffeeville 3 2 0 1 4 3 0 0 2

Oakland 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 4

Water Valley 5 2 1 0 6 5 0 0 10

Unincorporated Area 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL TOTAL

80 37 15 6 129 51 130 11 48

*All counties were not able to attain information on these facility types, however, this should not imply that these counties do not have any of these types of facilities. Instead, it should be noted that as this information is collected, it will be incorporated in future updates of the plan. Source: Hazus-MH 3.1, Local Officials

Page 10: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:10

FIGURE 6.2: CRITICAL FACILITY LOCATIONS IN THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Source: Hazus-MH 3.1, Local Officials

6.4.2 Social Vulnerability In addition to identifying those assets potentially at risk to identified hazards, it is important to identify and assess those particular segments of the resident population in the MEMA District 1 Region that are potentially at risk to these hazards.

Table 6.3 lists the population by jurisdiction according to U.S. Census 2010 population estimates. The total population in the MEMA District 1 Region according to Census data was 319,959 persons. Additional population estimates are presented in Section 3: Community Profile.

TABLE 6.3: TOTAL POPULATION IN THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION Location Total 2010 Population

Coahoma County 26,151

DeSoto County 161,252

Grenada County 21,906

Panola County 34,707

Page 11: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:11

Location Total 2010 Population

Quitman County 8,223

Tallahatchie County 15,378

Tate County 28,886

Tunica County 10,778

Yalobusha County 12,678

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION TOTAL 319,959 Source: United States Census Bureau, 2010 Census

In addition, Figure 6.3 illustrates the population density per square kilometer by census tract as it was reported by the U.S. Census Bureau in 2010. As can be seen in the figure, the population is spread out with concentrations in large municipal areas such as the Memphis suburbs in the north of the region as well as several other high density municipal areas such as Clarksdale and Grenada.

FIGURE 6.3: POPULATION DENSITY IN THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Source: United States Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Page 12: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:12

6.4.3 Development Trends and Changes in Vulnerability Since the previous county hazard mitigation plans were approved, the MEMA District 1 Region has experienced limited growth and development. Table 6.4 shows the number of building units constructed since 2010 according to the U.S. Census American Community Survey.

TABLE 6.4: BUILDING COUNTS FOR THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Location Total Housing Units (2014)

Units Built 2010 or later

% Building Stock Built Post-2010

Coahoma County 10,774 43 0.40%

Clarksdale 7,214 0 0.00%

Coahoma (town) 148 3 2.03%

Friars Point 466 0 0.00%

Jonestown 492 0 0.00%

Lula 166 7 4.22%

Lyon 144 0 0.00%

Unincorporated Area 2,144 33 1.54%

DeSoto County 62,703 1,081 1.72%

Hernando 5,278 208 3.94%

Horn Lake 9,971 12 0.12%

Olive Branch 13,432 375 2.79%

Southaven 19,414 144 0.74%

Walls 415 12 2.89%

Unincorporated Area 14,193 330 2.33%

Grenada County 10,173 134 1.32%

Grenada (city) 6,106 122 2.00%

Unincorporated Area 4,067 12 0.30%

Panola County 14,707 253 1.72%

Batesville 3,072 73 2.38%

Como 610 0 0.00%

Courtland 213 18 8.45%

Crenshaw 371 6 1.62%

Pope 127 0 0.00%

Sardis 880 4 0.45%

Unincorporated Area 9,434 152 1.61%

Quitman County 3,597 40 1.11%

Crowder 336 0 0.00%

Falcon 102 0 0.00%

Lambert 579 0 0.00%

Marks 756 0 0.00%

Sledge 204 11 5.39%

Unincorporated Area 1,620 29 1.79%

Tallahatchie County 5,538 2 0.04%

Charleston 875 0 0.00%

Glendora 37 0 0.00%

Page 13: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:13

Location Total Housing Units (2014)

Units Built 2010 or later

% Building Stock Built Post-2010

Sumner 126 0 0.00%

Tutwiler 568 2 0.35%

Webb 176 0 0.00%

Unincorporated Area 3,756 0 0.00%

Tate County 11,042 199 1.80%

Coldwater 540 0 0.00%

Senatobia 3,044 90 2.96%

Unincorporated Area 7,458 109 1.46%

Tunica County 4,810 11 0.23%

Tunica (town) 564 11 1.95%

Unincorporated Area 4,246 0 0.00%

Yalobusha County 6,350 18 0.28%

Coffeeville 510 0 0.00%

Oakland 268 0 0.00%

Water Valley 1,502 0 0.00%

Unincorporated Area 4,070 18 0.45%

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL TOTAL

129,694 1,781 1.37%

Source: United States Census Bureau, 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Table 6.5 shows population growth estimates for the region from 2010 to 2014 based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey.

TABLE 6.5: POPULATION GROWTH FOR THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Location Population Estimates % Change

2010-2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Coahoma County 26,681 26,376 26,099 25,813 25,527 -4.33%

Clarksdale 18,276 18,092 17,906 17,725 17,497 -4.26%

Coahoma (town) 351 466 415 425 408 16.24%

Friars Point 1,107 988 924 882 924 -16.53%

Jonestown 1,381 1,426 1,304 1,327 1,381 0.00%

Lula 286 347 382 339 348 21.68%

Lyon 483 492 360 319 308 -36.23%

Unincorporated Area 4,797 4,565 4,808 4,796 4,661 -2.84%

DeSoto County 154,715 158,486 161,536 163,975 166,266 7.47%

Hernando 13,253 13,679 14,117 14,437 14,723 11.09%

Horn Lake 25,495 25,901 26,120 26,350 26,486 3.89%

Olive Branch 31,910 32,796 33,484 34,050 34,543 8.25%

Southaven 46,743 48,005 48,981 49,728 50,389 7.80%

Walls 584 700 725 914 1,099 88.18%

Unincorporated Area 36,730 37,405 38,109 38,496 39,026 6.25%

Grenada County 22,619 22,302 21,886 21,754 21,660 -4.24%

Grenada (city) 13,415 13,270 13,121 13,028 12,951 -3.46%

Page 14: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:14

Location Population Estimates % Change

2010-2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Unincorporated Area 9,204 9,032 8,765 8,726 8,709 -5.38%

Panola County 34,782 34,763 34,675 34,558 34,507 -0.79%

Batesville 7,486 7,477 7,457 7,455 7,436 -0.67%

Como 1,309 1,391 1,406 1,563 1,689 29.03%

Courtland 495 626 604 623 562 13.54%

Crenshaw 1,093 1,132 1,118 1,058 895 -18.12%

Pope 153 182 214 221 183 19.61%

Sardis 1,485 1,786 1,810 1,778 2,038 37.24%

Unincorporated Area 22,761 22,169 22,066 21,860 21,704 -4.64%

Quitman County 8,551 8,378 8,171 8,028 7,902 -7.59%

Crowder 559 544 525 605 570 1.97%

Falcon 238 304 326 325 303 27.31%

Lambert 1,615 1,506 1,415 1,153 1,132 -29.91%

Marks 2,325 2,010 1,967 1,820 1,755 -24.52%

Sledge 601 564 544 507 482 -19.80%

Unincorporated Area 3,213 3,450 3,394 3,618 3,660 13.91%

Tallahatchie County 15,270 15,279 15,262 15,231 15,124 -0.96%

Charleston 2,065 2,323 2,233 2,171 1,801 -12.78%

Glendora 254 246 190 188 155 -38.98%

Sumner 298 415 328 334 317 6.38%

Tutwiler 3,161 3,321 3,432 3,505 3,530 11.67%

Webb 359 341 334 305 293 -18.38%

Unincorporated Area 9,133 8,633 8,745 8,728 9,028 -1.15%

Tate County 28,198 28,447 28,580 28,625 28,557 1.27%

Coldwater 1,735 1,771 1,778 1,379 1,167 -32.74%

Senatobia 7,958 8,040 8,071 8,099 8,063 1.32%

Unincorporated Area 18,505 18,636 18,731 19,147 19,327 4.44%

Tunica County 10,817 10,802 10,716 10,660 10,583 -2.16%

Tunica (town) 1,229 1,292 1,296 1,329 1,145 -6.83%

Unincorporated Area 9,588 9,510 9,420 9,331 9,438 -1.56%

Yalobusha County 12,869 12,787 12,647 12,554 12,433 -3.39%

Coffeeville 943 1,071 1,055 1,036 966 2.44%

Oakland 531 492 565 676 739 39.17%

Water Valley 3,485 3,444 3,399 3,393 3,345 -4.02%

Unincorporated Area 7,910 7,780 7,628 7,449 7,383 -6.66%

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL TOTAL

314,502 317,620 319,572 321,198 322,559 2.56%

Source: United States Census Bureau, 2006-2010, 2007-2011, 2008-2012, 2009-2013, and 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Based on the data above, there has been a relatively low rate of residential development and population growth in the region since 2010, and many jurisdictions have actually experienced population declines. However, it is notable that communities in DeSoto County and the Memphis suburbs seemed to experience a slightly higher rate of growth and development compared to the rest of the region, resulting in an increased number of people and structures that are vulnerable to the potential impacts

Page 15: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:15

of the identified hazards. Additionally, an overall trend in the region seems to be that there is a considerably higher rate of population growth in some communities within a county, while others have experienced significant reductions in population. As a result, there are now greater numbers of people exposed to the identified hazards in some areas while there are fewer in other areas. Therefore, development and population growth have impacted the region’s vulnerability since the previous local hazard mitigation plans were approved and there has been a slight increase in the overall vulnerability as well as a significant increase in certain areas and communities. It is also important to note that as development increases in the future, greater populations and more structures and infrastructure will be exposed to potential hazards if development occurs in the floodplains, landside susceptibility areas, or high wildfire risk areas.

6.5 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT RESULTS As noted earlier, only hazards with a specific geographic boundary, available modeling tool, or sufficient historical data allow for further analysis in this section. Those results are presented here. All other hazards are assumed to impact the entire planning region (drought, extreme heat, hailstorm, lightning, severe thunderstorm/high wind, tornado, and winter storm) or, due to lack of data, analysis would not lead to credible results (dam and levee failure, erosion, and land subsidence/sinkhole). The total region exposure, and thus risk to these hazards, was presented in Table 6.1. The hazards to be further analyzed in this section include: flood, landslide, wildfire, earthquake, and hurricane and tropical storm winds. The annualized loss estimate for all hazards is presented at the end of this section in Table 6.11.

6.5.1 Flood Historical evidence indicates that the MEMA District 1 Region is susceptible to flood events. A total of 211 flood events have been reported by the National Climatic Data Center resulting in over $1 billion (2016 dollars) in property damage as well as 7 fatalities and 10 injuries. On an annualized level, these damages amounted to $74,951,864 for the MEMA District 1 Region. In order to assess flood risk, a GIS-based analysis was used to estimate exposure to flood events using Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data in combination with improved property records for each of the MEMA District 1 Counties (with the exception of Quitman, Panola, and Tallahatchie). The determination of value at-risk (exposure) was calculated using GIS analysis by summing the values for improved properties that were located within an identified floodplain. Due to a lack of digital parcel data in most counties, it was determined that an analysis using the inventory from Hazus-MH 3.1 would be used, though it should be noted that the data will merely be an estimation and may not reflect actual counts or values located in the floodplain. Indeed, in almost all cases, this analysis likely overestimates the amount of property at risk. Table 6.6 presents the potential at-risk property. Both the number of parcels and the approximate value are presented.

Page 16: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:16

TABLE 6.6: ESTIMATED EXPOSURE OF PROPERTY TO THE FLOOD HAZARD3

Location 1.0-percent ACF

Approx. Number of Improvements

Approx. Improved Value

Coahoma County 1,583 $358,892,000

Clarksdale 492 $135,197,000

Coahoma (town) 0 $0

Friars Point 5 $13,482,000

Jonestown 249 $36,037,000

Lula 43 $6,377,000

Lyon 31 $20,136,000

Unincorporated Area 763 $147,663,000

DeSoto County 20,172 $5,759,613,000

Hernando 2,015 $560,554,000

Horn Lake 2,233 $588,993,000

Olive Branch 2,979 $1,057,233,000

Southaven 7,031 $2,064,184,000

Walls 832 $207,184,000

Unincorporated Area 50,82 $1,281,465,000

Grenada County 5,696 $1,129,049,000

Grenada (city) 3,489 $730,442,000

Unincorporated Area 2,207 $398,607,000

Panola County* -- --

Batesville* -- --

Como* -- --

Courtland* -- --

Crenshaw* -- --

Pope* -- --

Sardis* -- --

Unincorporated Area* -- --

Quitman County* -- --

Crowder* -- --

Falcon* -- --

Lambert* -- --

Marks* -- --

Sledge* -- --

Unincorporated Area* -- --

Tallahatchie County* -- --

Charleston* -- --

Glendora* -- --

Sumner* -- --

Tutwiler* -- --

Webb* -- --

Unincorporated Area* -- --

3 As noted in Section 6.4, no building-specific data, such as building footprints, was available to determine buildings at risk. As a

result of this data limitation, at-risk census block building counts and values of the structures were used.

Page 17: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:17

Location 1.0-percent ACF

Approx. Number of Improvements

Approx. Improved Value

Tate County 5,098 $1,003,140,000

Coldwater 379 $77,325,000

Senatobia 1,532 $393,601,000

Unincorporated Area 3,187 $532,214,000

Tunica County 1,769 $473,080,000

Tunica (town) 180 $40,301,000

Unincorporated Area 1,589 $432,779,000

Yalobusha County 3,301 $552,607,000

Coffeeville 582 $86,814,000

Oakland 74 $58,287,000

Water Valley 491 $116,668,000

Unincorporated Area 2,154 $290,838,000

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL TOTAL

37,619 $9,276,381,000

*Digital Flood Maps were not available, so this analysis could not be carried out. Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency DFIRM and Hazus MH 3.1

SOCIAL VULNERABILITY Figure 6.4 is presented to gain a better understanding of at-risk population by evaluating census tract level population data against mapped floodplains. There are areas of concern in several of the municipal population centers in this region including Grenada, Clarksdale, and Horn Lake. Indeed, nearly every incorporated municipality is potentially at risk of being impacted by flooding within some areas of its jurisdictional boundary. Therefore, further investigation in these areas may be warranted.

Page 18: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:18

FIGURE 6.4 : POPULATION DENSITY NEAR FLOODPLAINS IN THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Note: Digital flood maps were unavailable for Panola, Quitman, and Tallahatchie Counties. Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency DFIRM, United States Census 2010

CRITICAL FACILITIES The critical facility analysis revealed that there are 34 critical facilities located in the floodplain. (Please note, as previously indicated, this analysis does not consider building elevation, which may negate risk.) All of these facilities are located in the 1.0 percent annual chance flood zone, and they include 3 fire stations, 1 police station, 8 schools, 7 government buildings, 9 water/utility infrastructure, and 6 others. A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.12 at the end of this section. In conclusion, a flood has the potential to impact many existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in the MEMA District 1 Region, though some areas are at a higher risk than others. All types of structures in a floodplain are at-risk, though elevated structures will have a reduced risk. Such site-specific vulnerability determinations are outside the scope of this assessment but may be considered during future plan updates. Furthermore, areas subject to repetitive flooding should be analyzed for potential mitigation actions.

Page 19: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:19

6.5.2 Landslide Steeper topography in some areas of the MEMA District 1 Region makes the planning area susceptible to landslides. Although no major landslide incidents have been reported in the region, it should be noted that United States Geological Survey information on historic events is not well-documented so the data may be incomplete. There may be additional historical landslide occurrences that were not reported. In order to complete the vulnerability assessment for landslides in the MEMA District 1 Region, GIS analysis was used. The potential dollar value of exposed property can be determined using the USGS Landslide Susceptibility Index (detailed in Section 5: Hazard Profiles), census block data from Hazus or county-level tax parcel data, and GIS analysis. Table 6.7 presents the potential at-risk property where available. Only a portion of the region is identified as being in a moderate incidence/high susceptibility or low incidence/high susceptibility area by the USGS landslide data. These incidence levels were used to identify areas of concern for the analysis below.

TABLE 6.7: TOTAL POTENTIAL AT-RISK PARCELS FOR THE LANDSLIDE HAZARD

Location

Low Incidence/ High Susceptibility Area

Moderate Incidence/ High Susceptibility Area

Approx. Number of

Improvements

Approx. Improved Value

Approx. Number of

Improvements

Approx. Improved Value

Coahoma County 7,641 $1,635,636,000 0 $0

Clarksdale 5,742 $1,219,561,000 0 $0

Coahoma (town) 131 $19,739,000 0 $0

Friars Point 440 $89,931,000 0 $0

Jonestown 0 $0 0 $0

Lula 146 $38,153,000 0 $0

Lyon 34 $31,207,000 0 $0

Unincorporated Area 1,148 $237,045,000 0 $0

DeSoto County 764 $163,879,000 40,211 $10,993,925,000

Hernando 0 $0 6,576 $1,876,565,000

Horn Lake 0 $0 8,094 $1,990,575,000

Olive Branch 0 $0 2,219 $614,236,000

Southaven 0 $0 19,498 $5,540,560,000

Walls 119 $36,656,000 175 $47,740,000

Unincorporated Area 645 $127,223,000 3,649 $924,249,000

Grenada County 0 $0 2,355 $72,724,262

Grenada (city) 0 $0 81 $6,677,346

Unincorporated Area 0 $0 2274 $66,046,916

Panola County 0 $0 9,017 $1,641,389,000

Batesville 0 $0 3,424 $901,263,000

Como 0 $0 637 $103,165,000

Courtland 0 $0 397 $49,625,000

Crenshaw 0 $0 0 $0

Pope 0 $0 241 $32,847,000

Sardis 0 $0 471 $70,291,000

Unincorporated Area 0 $0 3,847 $484,198,000

Page 20: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:20

Location

Low Incidence/ High Susceptibility Area

Moderate Incidence/ High Susceptibility Area

Approx. Number of

Improvements

Approx. Improved Value

Approx. Number of

Improvements

Approx. Improved Value

Quitman County 0 $0 0 $0

Crowder 0 $0 0 $0

Falcon 0 $0 0 $0

Lambert 0 $0 0 $0

Marks 0 $0 0 $0

Sledge 0 $0 0 $0

Unincorporated Area 0 $0 0 $0

Tallahatchie County 0 $0 3,420 $484,026,000

Charleston 0 $0 1,302 $200,806,000

Glendora 0 $0 0 $0

Sumner 0 $0 0 $0

Tutwiler 0 $0 0 $0

Webb 0 $0 0 $0

Unincorporated Area 0 $0 2,118 $283,220,000

Tate County 0 $0 6,472 $1,412,244,000

Coldwater 0 $0 827 $156,835,000

Senatobia 0 $0 3,119 $829,954,000

Unincorporated Area 0 $0 2,526 $425,455,000

Tunica County 3,601 $902,085,000 0 $0

Tunica (town) 709 $196,669,000 0 $0

Unincorporated Area 2,892 $705,416,000 0 $0

Yalobusha County 0 $0 983 $199,250,000

Coffeeville 0 $0 0 $0

Oakland 0 $0 360 $101,606,000

Water Valley 0 $0 0 $0

Unincorporated Area 0 $0 623 $97,644,000

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL TOTAL

12,006 $2,701,600,000 62,458 $25,797,483,262

Source: United States Geological Survey and Hazus-MH 3.1

SOCIAL VULNERABILITY Given low incidence across most of the region, it is assumed that the total population is at relatively low risk. However, some populations in the central and western part of the region are considered at slightly higher risk due to their location in areas of high susceptibility.

CRITICAL FACILITIES Several critical facilities in the region are located in a low incidence/high susceptibility area. There are 110 critical facilities located in this zone. This includes 3 fire stations, 6 police stations, 25 schools, 4 medical care facilities, 12 government buildings, 6 shelters, and 54 water/utility infrastructure. In the moderate incidence/high susceptibility area, there are 126 critical facilities including: 2 emergency

Page 21: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:21

operations centers, 34 fire stations, 14 police stations, 52 schools, 4 medical care facilities, 7 government buildings, 8 water/utility infrastructure, and 5 others. A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.12 at the end of this section. In conclusion, a landslide has the potential to impact all existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in the MEMA District 1 Region, though areas in the western part of the region and within a central strip running north-south through the region are at a higher risk than others due to a variety of factors. Specific vulnerabilities for MEMA District 1 assets will be greatly dependent on their individual design and the mitigation measures in place where appropriate. Such site-specific vulnerability determinations are outside the scope of this assessment but will be considered during future plan updates if data becomes available.

6.5.3 Wildfire Although historical evidence indicates that the MEMA District 1 Region is susceptible to wildfire events, there are few reports which include information on historic dollar losses. Therefore, it is difficult to calculate a reliable annualized loss figure. Annualized loss is considered negligible though it should be noted that a single event could result in significant damages throughout the region. To estimate exposure to wildfire, building data was obtained from Hazus-MH 3.1 for most counties which includes information that has been aggregated at the census block level and which has been deemed useful for analyzing wildfire vulnerability. However, it should be noted that the accuracy of Hazus data is somewhat lower than that of parcel data. For the critical facility analysis, areas of concern were intersected with critical facility locations. Figure 6.5 shows the Wildland Urban Interface Risk Index (WUIRI) data, which is a data layer that shows a rating of the potential impact of a wildfire on people and their homes. The key input, Wildland Urban Interface (WUI), reflects housing density (houses per acre) consistent with Federal Register National standards. The location of people living in the WUI and rural areas is key information for defining potential wildfire impacts to people and homes. Initially provided as raster data, it was converted to a polygon to allow for analysis. The Wildland Urban Interface Risk Index data ranges from 0 to -9 with lower values being most severe (as noted previously, this is only a measure of relative risk). Figure 6.6 shows the areas of analysis where any grid cell is less than -5. Areas with a value below -5 were chosen to be displayed as areas of risk because this showed the upper echelon of the scale and the areas at highest risk. Table 6.8 shows the results of the analysis.

Page 22: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:22

FIGURE 6.5: WUI RISK INDEX AREAS IN THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Source: Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment Data

Page 23: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:23

FIGURE 6.6: WILDFIRE RISK AREAS IN THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Source: Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment Data

TABLE 6.8: EXPOSURE OF IMPROVED PROPERTY4 TO WILDFIRE RISK AREAS

Location Wildfire Risk

Approx. Number of Improvements

Approx. Improved Value

Coahoma County 1,904 $401,136,000

Clarksdale 1,236 $280,249,000

Coahoma (town) 0 $0

Friars Point 122 $17,575,000

Jonestown 87 $13,086,000

Lula 6 $765,000

Lyon 31 $21,335,000

Unincorporated Area 422 $68,126,000

DeSoto County 24,571 $6,754,028,000

Hernando 3,300 $918,327,000

4 Parcel/Building Footprint data was not available for most of the MEMA District 1 counties. Therefore, building counts and

values were pulled from Hazus-MH at the census block level and approximate improved value was calculated. Grenada County

did have parcel data available, so it was used in place of the census block data.

Page 24: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:24

Location Wildfire Risk

Approx. Number of Improvements

Approx. Improved Value

Horn Lake 2,158 $513,199,000

Olive Branch 4,356 $1,452,851,000

Southaven 7,380 $2,063,413,000

Walls 367 $97,620,000

Unincorporated Area 7,010 $1,708,618,000

Grenada County 2,026 $99,329,374

Grenada (city) 548 $29,896,728

Unincorporated Area 1,478 $69,432,646

Panola County 9,183 $6,754,028,000

Batesville 1,050 $298,884,000

Como 397 $59,337,000

Courtland 310 $38,740,000

Crenshaw 116 $18,886,000

Pope 165 $23,534,000

Sardis 322 $84,388,000

Unincorporated Area 7,145 $975,861,000

Quitman County 932 $172,420,000

Crowder 0 $0

Falcon 1 $126,000

Lambert 242 $40,436,000

Marks 199 $36,114,000

Sledge 11 $2,749,000

Unincorporated Area 479 $92,995,000

Tallahatchie County 2,377 $350,311,000

Charleston 363 $50,097,000

Glendora 17 $1,981,000

Sumner 44 $5,376,000

Tutwiler 287 $78,119,000

Webb 39 $6,500,000

Unincorporated Area 1,627 $208,238,000

Tate County 7,196 $1,272,677,000

Coldwater 294 $55,510,000

Senatobia 956 $227,924,000

Unincorporated Area 5,946 $989,243,000

Tunica County 982 $167,492,000

Tunica (town) 155 $31,147,000

Unincorporated Area 827 $136,345,000

Yalobusha County 4,872 $746,642,000

Coffeeville 521 $69,372,000

Oakland 141 $67,136,000

Water Valley 1,258 $212,732,000

Page 25: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:25

Location Wildfire Risk

Approx. Number of Improvements

Approx. Improved Value

Unincorporated Area 2,952 $397,402,000

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL TOTAL

54,043 $16,718,063,374

Source: Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment and Hazus-MH 3.1

SOCIAL VULNERABILITY Given some level of susceptibility across the entire MEMA District 1 Region, it is assumed that the total population is at risk to the wildfire hazard. Determining the exact number of people in certain wildfire zones is difficult with existing data and could be misleading.

CRITICAL FACILITIES The critical facility analysis revealed that there are 14 critical facilities located in wildfire areas of concern, including 5 fire stations, 3 schools, 4 government buildings, 1 water/utility infrastructure, and 1 other. It should be noted, that several factors could impact the spread of a wildfire putting all facilities at risk. A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.12 at the end of this section. In conclusion, a wildfire event has the potential to impact many existing and future buildings, critical facilities, and populations in the MEMA District 1 Region.

6.5.4 Earthquake As the Hazus-MH model suggests below, and historical occurrences confirm, any significant earthquake activity in the area is likely to inflict moderate damage to the planning area. Hazus-MH 3.1 estimates a total annualized loss of $8,752,000 which includes structural and non-structural damage to buildings, contents, and inventory throughout the planning area. For the earthquake hazard vulnerability assessment, a probabilistic scenario was created to estimate the average annualized loss5 for the region on a county by county basis. The results of the analysis are generated at the census tract level within Hazus-MH and then aggregated to the county level. Since the scenario is annualized, no building counts are provided. Losses reported included losses due to structure failure, building loss, contents damage, and inventory loss. They do not include losses to business interruption, lost income, or relocation. Table 6.9 summarizes the findings with results rounded to the nearest thousand.

TABLE 6.9: AVERAGE ANNUALIZED LOSS ESTIMATIONS FOR EARTHQUAKE HAZARD

Location Structural Damage

Non-Structural Damage

Contents Damage

Inventory Loss

Total Annualized Loss

Coahoma County $83,000 $254,000 $99,000 $4,000 $440,000

5 Annualized loss is defined by Hazus-MH as the expected value of loss in any one year.

Page 26: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:26

Location Structural Damage

Non-Structural Damage

Contents Damage

Inventory Loss

Total Annualized Loss

DeSoto County $941,000 $3,541,000 $1,397,000 $60,000 $5,939,000

Grenada County $50,000 $136,000 $57,000 $5,000 $248,000

Panola County $118,000 $351,000 $131,000 $7,000 $607,000

Quitman County $25,000 $76,000 $31,000 $2,000 $134,000

Tallahatchie County $25,000 $70,000 $24,000 $1,000 $120,000

Tate County $119,000 $392,000 $143,000 $4,000 $658,000

Tunica County $72,000 $256,000 $92,000 $3,000 $423,000

Yalobusha County $35,000 $103,000 $42,000 $3,000 $183,000

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION TOTAL

$1,468,000 $5,179,000 $2,016,000 $89,000 $8,752,000

Source: Hazus-MH 3.1

SOCIAL VULNERABILITY It can be assumed that all existing and future populations are at risk to the earthquake hazard. CRITICAL FACILITIES The Hazus-MH probabilistic analysis did not indicate that any critical facilities would sustain measurable damage in an earthquake event. However, all critical facilities should be considered at-risk to minor to moderate damage should an event occur. A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.12 at the end of this section. In conclusion, an earthquake has the potential to impact all existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in the MEMA District 1 Region. Specific vulnerabilities for these assets will be greatly dependent on their individual design and the mitigation measures in place. Such site-specific vulnerability determinations are outside the scope of this assessment but may be considered during future plan updates. The Hazus-MH scenario indicates that minimal to moderate damage is expected from an earthquake occurrence. While the MEMA District 1 Region may not experience a catastrophic earthquake (the greatest on record is a magnitude VII MMI), localized damage is possible with a moderate to larger scale occurrence.

6.5.5 Hurricane and Tropical Storm Historical evidence indicates that the MEMA District 1 Region has some risk to the hurricane and tropical storm hazard. There have been two disaster declarations due to hurricanes (Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Isaac). Several tracks have come near or traversed through the MEMA District 1 Region, as shown and discussed in Section 5: Hazard Profiles. Hazus-MH 3.1 estimates a total annualized loss of $392,000 which includes buildings, contents, and inventory throughout the planning area. Hurricanes and tropical storms can cause damage through numerous additional hazards such as flooding, erosion, tornadoes, and high winds, thus it is difficult to estimate total potential losses from these cumulative effects. The current Hazus-MH hurricane model only analyzes hurricane winds and is not capable of modeling and estimating cumulative losses from all hazards associated with hurricanes;

Page 27: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:27

therefore, only hurricane winds are analyzed in this section. It can be assumed that all existing and future buildings and populations are at risk to the hurricane and tropical storm hazard. Hazus-MH 3.1 was used to determine average annualized losses6 for the region as shown below in Table 6.10. Only losses to buildings, inventory, and contents are included in the results.

TABLE 6.10: AVERAGE ANNUALIZED LOSS ESTIMATIONS FOR HURRICANE WIND HAZARD

Location Building Damage Contents Damage

Inventory Loss

Total Annualized Loss

Coahoma County $29,000 $6,000 $0 $35,000

DeSoto County $140,000 $17,000 $0 $157,000

Grenada County $41,000 $9,000 $0 $50,000

Panola County $38,000 $6,000 $0 $44,000

Quitman County $9,000 $1,000 $0 $10,000

Tallahatchie County $20,000 $4,000 $0 $24,000

Tate County $30,000 $6,000 $0 $36,000

Tunica County $10,000 $1,000 $0 $11,000

Yalobusha County $20,000 $6,000 $0 $26,000

MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION TOTAL

$336,000 $56,000 $0 $392,000

Source: Hazus-MH 3.1

SOCIAL VULNERABILITY Given some equal susceptibility across the entire MEMA District 1 Region, it is assumed that the total population, both current and future, is at risk to the hurricane and tropical storm hazard.

CRITICAL FACILITIES Given equal vulnerability across the MEMA District 1 Region, all critical facilities are considered to be at risk. Some buildings may perform better than others in the face of such an event due to construction and age, among factors. Determining individual building response is beyond the scope of this plan. However, this plan will consider mitigation action for especially vulnerable structures and/or critical facilities to mitigate against the effects of the hurricane hazard. A list of specific critical facilities can be found in Table 6.12 at the end of this section. In conclusion, a hurricane event has the potential to impact many existing and future buildings, critical facilities, and populations in the MEMA District 1 Region.

6.6 CONCLUSIONS ON HAZARD VULNERABILITY The results of this vulnerability assessment are useful in at least three ways:

Improving our understanding of the risk associated with the natural hazards in the MEMA District 1 Region through better understanding of the complexities and dynamics of risk, how

6 Annualized loss is defined by Hazus-MH as the expected value of loss in any one year.

Page 28: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:28

levels of risk can be measured and compared, and the myriad of factors that influence risk. An understanding of these relationships is critical in making balanced and informed decisions on managing the risk.

Providing a baseline for policy development and comparison of mitigation alternatives. The data used for this analysis presents a current picture of risk in the MEMA District 1 Region. Updating this risk “snapshot” with future data will enable comparison of the changes in risk with time. Baselines of this type can support the objective analysis of policy and program options for risk reduction in the region.

Comparing the risk among the natural hazards addressed. The ability to quantify the risk to all these hazards relative to one another helps in a balanced, multi-hazard approach to risk management at each level of governing authority. This ranking provides a systematic framework to compare and prioritize the very disparate natural hazards that are present in the MEMA District 1 Region. This final step in the risk assessment provides the necessary information for local officials to craft a mitigation strategy to focus resources on only those hazards that pose the most threat to the MEMA District 1 counties.

Exposure to hazards can be an indicator of vulnerability. Economic exposure can be identified through values for improvements (buildings), and social exposure can be identified by estimating the population exposed to each hazard. This information is especially important for decision-makers to use in planning for evacuation or other public safety related needs. The types of assets included in these analyses include all building types in the participating jurisdictions. Specific information about the types of assets that are vulnerable to the identified hazards is included in each hazard subsection (for example all building types are considered at risk to the winter storm hazard and commercial and residential are at risk to repetitive flooding, etc.). Table 6.11 presents a summary of annualized loss for each hazard in the MEMA District 1 Region. Due to the reporting of hazard damages primarily at the county level, it was difficult to determine an accurate annualized loss estimate for each municipality. Therefore, an annualized loss was determined through the damage reported through historical occurrences at the county level. These values should be used as an additional planning tool or measure risk for determining hazard mitigation strategies throughout the region.

TABLE 6.11: ANNUALIZED LOSS FOR THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION

Hazard Coahoma

County DeSoto County

Grenada County

Panola County

Quitman County

Flood-related Hazards

Dam and Levee Failure Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Erosion Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Flood $118,894 $814,334 $226,641 $99,129 $2,005,796

Fire-related Hazards

Drought Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Lightning $788 $55,307 $19,345 $2,062 $0

Wildfire Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Page 29: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:29

Hazard Coahoma

County DeSoto County

Grenada County

Panola County

Quitman County

Geologic Hazards

Earthquake $440,000 $5,939,000 $248,000 $607,000 $134,000

Landslide Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Land Subsidence/Sinkhole Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Wind-related Hazards

Extreme Heat Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Hailstorm $2,085 $6,356 $14,539 $1,021 $870

Hurricane & Tropical Storm $35,000 $157,000 $50,000 $44,000 $10,000

Severe Thunderstorm/High Wind $40,078 $295,592 $121,630 $62,966 $8,547

Tornado $1,780,370 $1,445,532 $93,536 $2,046,348 $1,665,468

Winter Storm & Freeze $2,720 $2,485 $222,449 $2,023 $2,328

Note: In this table, the term “Negligible” is used to indicate that no records of dollar losses for the particular hazard were recorded. This could be the case either because there were no events that caused dollar damage or because documentation of that particular type of event is not well kept.

TABLE 6.11: ANNUALIZED LOSS FOR THE MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGION (CONT.)

Hazard Tallahatchie

County Tate

County Tunica County

Yalobusha County

MEMA Region 1

Total

Flood-related Hazards

Dam and Levee Failure Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Erosion Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Flood $292,565 $33,182 $71,357,374 $3,949 $74,951,864

Fire-related Hazards

Drought Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Lightning $4,457 $904 $954 $1,004 $84,821

Wildfire Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Geologic Hazards

Earthquake $120,000 $658,000 $423,000 $183,000 $8,752,000

Landslide Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Land Subsidence/Sinkhole Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Wind-related Hazards

Extreme Heat Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible

Hailstorm $1,093 $815 $1,204 $38,381 $66,365

Hurricane & Tropical Storm $24,000 $36,000 $11,000 $26,000 $392,000

Severe Thunderstorm/High Wind $71,112 $16,756 $53,244 $10,834 $680,758

Tornado $1,688,412 $23,649 $194,812 $1,452,286 $10,390,413

Winter Storm & Freeze $2,268 $1,794 $2,485 $2,268 $240,820

Note: In this table, the term “Negligible” is used to indicate that no records of dollar losses for the particular hazard were recorded. This could be the case either because there were no events that caused dollar damage or because documentation of that particular type of event is not well kept.

Page 30: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:30

As noted previously, all existing and future buildings and populations (including critical facilities) are vulnerable to atmospheric hazards including drought, lightning, extreme heat, hailstorm, hurricane and tropical storm, severe thunderstorm/high wind, tornado, and winter storm and freeze. Some buildings may be more vulnerable to these hazards based on other factors such as construction and building type. Table 6.12 shows the critical facilities vulnerable to the hazards analyzed in this section. The table lists those assets that are determined to be exposed to each of the identified hazards (marked with an “X”).

Page 31: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:31

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Page 32: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:32

TABLE 6.12: AT-RISK CRITICAL FACILITIES

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Coahoma County

Clarksdale Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coahoma County Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coahoma County Courthouse Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Merit Health Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X

Clarksdale Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coahoma Sheriff's Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coahoma Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Friars Point Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Jonestown Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Clarksdale High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Carl Keen Voc School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coahoma Agricultural High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sherard Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lee Academy School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

St Elizabeth Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Presbyterian Day School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

7 As noted previously, these facilities could be at risk to dam failure if located in an inundation area. Data was not available to conduct such an analysis. There was no local

knowledge of these facilities being at risk to dam failure. As additional data becomes available, more in-depth analysis will be conducted.

Page 33: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:33

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

St George's Episcopal Day Scho School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Heidelberg School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coahoma County Jr/Sr High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Kirkpatrick School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Oakhurst Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Jerome W Stamply Elem School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Thomas Shaw School Of Excellance School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Myrtle Hall Iv Elem School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Booker T Washington School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

W A Higgins Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Geo H Oliver Elem School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Friars Point Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Jonestown Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Jonestown Learning Center School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lyon Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

DeSoto County

De Soto County Civil Defense EOC X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hernando Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Alphaba Cockrum Ingrams Mill Volunteer F Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Love Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 34: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:34

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Hernando Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Eudora Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Walls Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Horn Lake Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Horn Lake Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Horn Lake Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Nesbit Volunteer Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Bridgetown Fire Dept Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Olive Branch Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Olive Branch Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Fairhaven Vfd Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hernando Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lewisburg Vfd Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven City Hall Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven Fire Department Station 1 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven Fire Department Station 2 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven Fire Department Station 3 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven Fire Department Station 4 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Parkwood Hlth System Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X

Methodist Olive Branch Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 35: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:35

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Baptist Mem Hospital-Desoto Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X

De Soto County Sheriff Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hernando Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Horn Lake Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Horn Lake Police Substation Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Olive Branch Police Chief Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven Police Dept East Precinct Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hernando Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hernando High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hernando Elem School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Oak Grove Central Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Desoto County Alternative Center School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hernando Hills Elem School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Horn Lake Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Horn Lake Elem School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Horn Lake High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Shadow Oaks Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Horn Lake Intermediate School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pleasant Hill Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 36: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:36

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Lewisburg Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Olive Branch Intermediate School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Olive Branch Elem School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Olive Branch High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Olive Branch Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Chickasaw Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Center Hill Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lewisburg Primary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lewisburg Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Center Hill Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Center Hill High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Overpark Elem School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

DCS Career Tech Center- East School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lewisburg High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hope Sullivan Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Desoto Central Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Desoto Central Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 37: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:37

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Desoto Central High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

DeSoto Central Primary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Southaven Intermediate School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

DCS Career Tech Center- West School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Greenbrook Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Walls Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lake Cormorant Elem School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lake Cormorant Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lake Cormorant High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada County

Grenada County Civil Defense EOC X X X X X X X X X X X X

Gore Springs Volunteer Fire Department 1 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Gore Springs Volunteer Fire Department 2 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Holcomb Vfd 1 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Holcomb Vfd 2 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tie Plant Vfd Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Geeslin Corner Vfd 1 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Geeslin Corner Vfd 2 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Geeslin Corner Vfd 3 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Elliott Vfd 1 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 38: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:38

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Elliott Vfd 2 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Fire Dept. Sta 1 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Fire Dept. Sta 2 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Fire Dept Sta 3 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Fire Dept Sta 4 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada City Hall Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada County Correctional Facility Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Municipal Airport Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada County Health Dept. Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada County Complex Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Mississippi National Guard Armory Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

County Barn Beat 1 Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

County Barn Beat 2 Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

County Barn Beat 4 Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada City Hall Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Wastewater Treatment Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hugh White State Park Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

County Landfill Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Ummc Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X

Ummc Ambulance Service Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 39: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:39

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Bowater Newsprint Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Garner-Harper Funeral Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Graceland Of Grenada Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grandview Health Center Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Health & Rehabilitation Center Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Manufacturing Llc Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Heatcraft Adp Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Heritage Manor Nursing Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Kidney Care, Inc. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Mediquik Clinic Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Rosemont Personal Care Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Wal-Mart Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Poorhouse Wells 1-6 & Booster Station Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Young’S Landing Water System Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Emanuel Baptist Church Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Lake Dam Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Camp Mccain Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hankins Lumber Co. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hankins Wood Preserving Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Thomas Wood Preserving Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 40: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:40

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Georgia Pacific Corp. Osb Plant Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

National Funeral Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Robinson & Sons Funeral Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Clark Funeral Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Townes Funeral Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Mckibben & Guinn Funeral Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Fox Funeral Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Trulite Glass (Binswanger) Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Quick Care Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Police Dept. Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada County Sheriff Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Lower Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Upper Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Vocational Tech Complex School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Kirk Academy School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Voc Complex School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Faith Christian Acad School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 41: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:41

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Tie Plant School (Alternative School) School X X X X X X X X X X X X

City Auditorium Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pleasant Grove Church Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X

First Baptist Church Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X

Friendship Baptist Church Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lewis Johnson Sr Citizens Complex Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Police Dept. Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada County Sheriff Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Lower Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Upper Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Panola County

Panola County Emergency Operations Center EOC X X X X X X X X X X X X

Mt Olivet Fire Department #4 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Batesville Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Batesville Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Bynum Fire Department District 9 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Courtland Volunteer Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pope Volunteer Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 42: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:42

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Pleasant Grove Volunteer Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tri-Lakes Medical Center Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Batesville Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Panola County Sheriff's Office Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Panola County Sheriff's Office Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Como City Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Crenshaw Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sardis Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Panola County Sheriff's Office Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

North Delta School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

South Panola Alternative School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Batesville Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Batesville Junior High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

South Panola High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Batesville Intermediate School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Batesville Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Como Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

North Panola Voc Comp School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Como Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Crenshaw Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 43: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:43

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Pope Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Greenhill Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

North Panola High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Alternative Learning School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Quitman County

Lambert Volunteer Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Quitman County Hospital & Home Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X

Lambert Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Quitman County Sheriff's Ofc Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Marks Chief Of Police Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Quitman County Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Delta Academy School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Quitman Co Vocational Complex School X X X X X X X X X X X X

M. S. Palmer High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Quitman County Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tallahatchie County

Tallahatchie EMA Operations Center EOC X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Cascilla Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Enid Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Paducah Wells Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 44: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:44

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Paynes Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Phillip Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Rosebloom Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Springhill Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Springhill #2 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Teasdale Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tippo Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Webb Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Vance Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sharkey Hampton Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Charleston Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Glendora Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sumner Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tutwiler Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Charleston Dispatch Center (Jail) Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tallahatchie County Road Dept Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tallahatchie Health Dept Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tallahatchie Health Dept (Sumner) Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sumner Jail Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Charleston Courthouse Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 45: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:45

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Sumner Courthouse Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tallahatchie Correctional Facility Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Webb Town Hall Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Glendora Building Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Town Of Tutwiler Building Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tallahatchie General Hospital Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Charleston Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tutwiler Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Webb Town Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tallahatchie County Sheriff Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Charleston Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Strider Academy School X X X X X X X X X X X X

East Tallahatchie School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

West Tallahatchie School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Eva Covington Head Start School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

West Tallahatchie Ics Head Start School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Emmett Hill Multipurpose School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Webb Water Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Charleston Water Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sumner Brazil Water Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 46: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:46

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Tutwiler Water Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Glendora Water Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Rural Water Association Of Tallahatchie Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Blue Cane Cowart Tippo Water Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Phillip Water Well Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

North Tallahatchie Water Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Paynes Water Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

West Tallahatchie Utility Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Cascilla Water Association Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Shell Oil Pipeline Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

West Tallahatchie Electric Communication Tower Water/Utility

X X X X X X X X X X X X

New Cingular Wireless (Oakland) Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

New Cingular Wireless (Charleston) Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

New Cingular Wireless (Webb) Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

American Towers Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Cellular South Real Estate Inc Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Cspire Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tate County

Poagville Volunteer Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Greenleaf Volunteer Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 47: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:47

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Arkabutla Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

District One Vfd Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Senatobia Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

North Oak Regional Medical Ctr Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coldwater Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tate County Sheriff Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Senatobia Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coldwater Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Senatobia Tate Co Regional Voc Ctr School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

East Tate Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coldwater High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Independence High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Strayhorn Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Senatobia Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Senatobia Jr Sr High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Senatobia Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sen./Tate Co. Optional Learning Cen School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Magnolia Heights School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County North Tunica County Fire And Rescue And Sheriff's Substation Fire Station

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 48: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:48

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Tunica Fire Dept Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

City Hall/Fire Department Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Justice Complex Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Town Of Tunica Water Works Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Courthouse Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Administration Building Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Planning Commission Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Emergency Operations Center Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Justice Court Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Road Department Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Human Services Building. Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Health Department Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Utility District Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica Resort Medical Center Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica Medical Center Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Fresenius Kidney Care Tunica Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica Nursing Home Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Ryals Road Texas Gas Pumping Station Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sunrise Rd Texas Gas Pumping Station Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Josephine Rd Entergy Substation Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 49: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:49

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Tunica Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Sheriff Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dundee Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tcs Alternative School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Robinsonville Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica Academy School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Rosa Fort High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica Voc Tech Center School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Robinsonville Community Center(Shelter) Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Paul Battle Arena(Shelter) Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X X

G.W. Henderson Recreation Center(Shelter) Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X X

White Oak Community Center(Shelter) Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dundee Community Center(Shelter) Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dundee Community Center(Shelter) Shelter X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Main Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sewage Lagoon Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Cotton Land Apts Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Bus Shop Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 50: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:50

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Walker Magee Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Clayton Henderson Meadows Apt Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Billy Webb Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Nickson Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hospital Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Jacks Lumber (Town) Well Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Industrial Park Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Bobby Early Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Nellie Johnson Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Aaron Henry Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

New Sub Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Shady Lane Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grand Oaks Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sanders Warehouse Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Cumberland Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Shady Lane Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

North Town Water Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Austin Road Water Tank 1 Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Austin Road Water Tank 2 Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Buford Road Abd Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 51: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:51

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Casino Center Dr Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Casino Strip Resort Blvd Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Casino Way Water Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Clack Rd Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Cobb Rd Water Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Drexel Rd Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dubbs Road Abd Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dubbs Road Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dundee Road Water Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dundee Road Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Fitzgeralds Blvd Number 1 Water Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Fitzgeralds Blvd Number 2 Water Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Main Street Water Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Mhoon Landing Way Water Tower Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Old Commerce Road Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Old Hwy 61 North Number 1 Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Old Hwy 61 North Number 2 Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Old Hwy 61 South Water Tower 1 Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Old Hwy 61 South Water Tower 2 Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Peepers Street Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 52: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:52

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Tunica Lake Road Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Us Hwy 3 Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

White Oak Road Water Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Cutoff Well/Tank Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Return Sludge Plant #1 Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Fitzgeralds Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Casino Strip Resort Blvd Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pump Station #1 Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Treasure Town Inn Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Emergency Services Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pump Station #3 Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

River Pointe Appartments Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Kings Inn Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pump Station #4 Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Cypress Lake Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Exxon II Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

River Park Museum 3719 Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Club House Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Rv Park Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grand Influent Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 53: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:53

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Kids Quest Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Club House Maintenance Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

North Pump Station Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

South Pump Station Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Gold Strike Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grand Vista Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Casino Way Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Golf Course Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica County Golf Maintence Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tunica National Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Soleil Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Steel Plant Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Robinsonville Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Alpha Creek Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Alpha Creek Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Bowdre Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Robinsonville School Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hambrick Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Kirby Road Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Orchard Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 54: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:54

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Tunica County Airport Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tuncia Exposition Center Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hollywood North Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hollywood Central Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Hollywood South Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

White Oak Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Highway 4 Pump Station Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Crenshaw Road Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Big Johns Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Ryals Road Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tommy Harrison East Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tommy Harrison West Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dundee Wwtp Pump Station Sewage Plant Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dundee Main Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dundee School Sewage Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Stl Luke Church Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Bear Lake North Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Bear Lake South Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

President's Building Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Goad Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 55: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:55

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Verner 2 Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Bond Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Verner 1 Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Dogman Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Thomas Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Prichard Lift Station Water/Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha County

Yalobusha Civil Defense EOC X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha County Eoc EOC X X X X X X X X X X X X

Skuna Valley Fire Station Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Clear Springs Fire Station Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coffeeville Fire Station Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Oakland Fire Station 1 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Murphreesboro Vol. Fire Dept. Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tillatoba Fire Station Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

O’Tuckalofa Fire Station Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sylva Rena Fire Station Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Velma Fire Station Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Pine Valley Volunteer Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Water Valley Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 56: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:56

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Coffeeville City Hall Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coffeeville Wastewater Treatment Plant Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha County Courthouse(Coffeeville) Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Grenada Reservoir/Dam Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Oakland City Hall Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha County Multi-Purpose Building Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Tillatoba Creek Ws Str. & 17B-04 Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha County Health Dept. Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha County Courthouse (Water Valley) Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Water Valley City Hall Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Water Valley Housing Authority Government X X X X X X X X X X X X

Water Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

O’Toucalofa Creek Ws Str. 23 Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Enid Reservoir/Dam Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha General Hospital Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coffeeville Natural Gas Facilities Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Downtown Business District Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Graeber Brothers Lp Gas Distribution Facility Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Downtown Business District Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Windsor Foods Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 57: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:57

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Yalobusha Natural Gas Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha Nursing Home Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Water Valley Poultry Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Borg-Warner Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Valley Tool Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Valley Tool Washing Division Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Caterpillar Industries Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Scott Gas Storage Tanks Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Sayle Oil Company Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Amerigas Storage Tanks Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Downtown Business District Other X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha County Sheriff Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coffeeville Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Yalobusha County Sheriff’S Office Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Water Valley Police Dept Police Station X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coffeeville Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coffeeville High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coffeeville High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Coffeeville Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Water Valley Head Start School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 58: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:58

FLOOD-RELATED FIRE-RELATED GEOLOGIC WIND-RELATED

Dam

an

d L

eve

e F

ailu

re7

Ero

sio

n

Flo

od

– 1

00

yr

Flo

od

– 5

00

yr

Dro

ugh

t

Ligh

tnin

g

Wild

fire

Eart

hq

uak

e

Lan

dsl

ide

– M

od

/Hig

h

Lan

dsl

ide

– L

ow

/Hig

h

Lan

d S

ub

sid

en

ce/

Sin

kho

le

Extr

em

e H

eat

Hai

lsto

rm

Hu

rric

ane

an

d T

rop

ica

l

Sto

rm

Seve

re T

hu

nd

ers

torm

/

Hig

h W

ind

Torn

ado

Win

ter

Sto

rm a

nd

Fre

eze

FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE

Faith Christian Academy School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Water Valley Public Schools School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Faith Christian Academy School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Water Valley High School School X X X X X X X X X X X X

Davidson Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Page 59: Section 6 - Vulnerability Assessment - MEMA DISTRICT 1 REGIONAL HAZARD … · 2018. 9. 4. · SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT

SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

MEMA District 1 Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT – October 2016

6:59