selective rearrangement of terminal epoxides into ... · s5 figure 1. complete conversion of 1a and...
TRANSCRIPT
Supporting Information
Selective rearrangement of terminal epoxides into methylketones catalysed by a nucleophilic rhodium-NHC-pincer complex
Eva Jürgens,a Barbara Wucher,a Frank Rominger,b Karl W. Törnroos,c Doris Kunza*
a Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen,
Auf der Morgenstelle 18, D-72076 Tübingen (Germany)
b Institut für Organische Chemie, Heidelberg University
Im Neuenheimer Feld 250, D-69120 Heidelberg (Germany)
c Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen,
Allegaten 41, 5007 Bergen (Norway)
Contents
1. Experimental procedures and analytical data S2
2. Crystallographic details for compounds 4a and 4b S17
3. 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the new compounds S19
4. IR spectra of 1 and 2a S31
5. Catalytic epoxide rearrangement: optimisation of the reaction conditions regarding additive and solvent S33
6. References S33
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
S2
1. Experimental procedures and analytical data
General Procedures. Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were carried out under an argon
atmosphere in dried and degassed solvents using Schlenk techniques. Acetonitrile and thf
were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, dried, and degassed using an MBraun SPS-800 solvent
purification system. All lithium and sodium salts used were obtained from commercial
suppliers, dried in vacuum and used without further purification. Epoxides were obtained
from commercial suppliers and degassed under vacuum prior to use. The rhodium complex 1
was synthesised according to the literature procedure.[1] 1H and 13C NMR spectra were
recorded using a Bruker ARX 250 and AVANCE II +400 spectrometer. 1H and 13C chemical
shifts are reported in ppm and calibrated to TMS on the basis of the residual solvent proton
signal as an internal standard (1.73 ppm, thf-d8; 1.94 ppm, CD3CN; 5.32 ppm,
dichloromethane-d2). Assignment of peaks was made using 2D NMR correlation spectra. IR
spectra were recorded on a Bruker Vertex70 instrument. The mass spectrum was recorded
on a Thermo Finnigan TSQ 70.
Synthesis of rhodium complex 1:
We already reported the synthesis of this compound.[1] Additional 1H NMR data of compound
1 in thf-d8 and C6D6:
1H NMR (thf-d8, 400.11 MHz): δ = 1.55 (s, 18H, t-Bu), 4.20 (s, 6H, NCH3), 7.45 (d, 3J = 2.0
Hz, 2H, H-4´), 7.82 (d, 4J = 1.8 Hz, 2H, H-2/7), 8.16 (d, 4J = 1.8 Hz, 2H, H-4/5), 8.23 (d, 3J =
2.0 Hz, 2H, H-5´).
1H NMR (benzene-d6, 400.14 MHz): δ = 1.56 (s, 18H, t-Bu), 3.74 (s, 6H, NCH3), 6.14 (d, 3J =
1.6 Hz, 2H, H-4´), 7.31 (d, 3J = 1.6 Hz, 2H, H-5´), 7.63 (d, 4J = 2.0 Hz, 2H, H-2/7), 8.49 (d, 4J
= 2.0 Hz, 2H, H-4/5).
13C{1H}NMR (benzene-d6, 100.61 MHz): δ = 32.5 (C(CH3)3), 35.0 (C(CH3)3), 40.3 (N-CH3),
110.9 (C2/7), 114.7 (C4/5), 115.7 (C5´), 122.7 (C4´), 125.4 (C1/8), 129.3 (C4a/5a), 37.3
(C1a/8a), 139.2 (C3/6), 182.5 (d, 1JRhC = 45.9 Hz, C2´), 199.8 (d, 1JRhC = 71.4 Hz, CO).
S3
General Procedure for the Meinwald rearrangement with rhodium complex 1:
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
Rh(bimca)CO[1] 1 (2 mg, 4 mol, 10 mol%) and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide) (1
mg, 10 mol%) were placed into a J. Young NMR tube and 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as
internal standard and benzene (0.5 mL) were added. At last dried 1,2-epoxyhexane (4.2 μL,
35 mol) was added and the reaction mixture was heated to 60 °C and monitored via 1H
NMR spectroscopy during the time given.
1H NMR (benzene-d6, 400.11 MHz): δ = 0.77 (t, 3J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, H-6), 1.08 (ps sext, 3J = 7.5
Hz, 2H, H-5), 1.34 (ps quint, 3J = 7.7 Hz, 2H, H-4), 1.64 (s, 3H, H-1), 1.87 (t, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 2H,
H-3).
Synthesis of rhodium complex 2:
In the glove box, 10 mg 1 (18.5 µmol) and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide) (5 mg, 1
eq) were dissolved in 0.5 mL benzene-d6 in a J. Young NMR tube. Propylene oxide (1.5 µL,
1.2 eq) was added to the reaction mixture, which was allowed to react at room temperature
for 10 minutes. The resulting species 2 (R1, R2 = CH3) was characterised by NMR and IR
spectroscopy in solution.
1H NMR (benzene-d6, 400.14 MHz): δ = 1.04 (d,3J = 5.8 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.35 and 1.52 (each s
br, each 9H, t-Bu), 3.56–3.63 (m, 1H, CH), 3.69 and 3.85 (each s br, each 3H, NCH3), 6.32
and 6.49 (each s br, each 1H, H-4’, H-9’), 7.11 and 7.45 (each s br, each 1H, H-Carb), 7.16
(from 2D) and 7.49 (each s br, each 1H, H-5’, H-10’), 7.86 and 8.07 (each s br, each 1H, H-
Carb). The signal at 7.16 ppm is covered by the solvent signal and was assigned via 2D
spectra (1H1H-COSY, 1H13C-HMBC, 1H13C-HSQC) as well as the signal for the CH2-group
that is covered by the t-Bu-group (1.52 ppm) signals.
1H NMR (toluene-d8, 400.14 MHz): δ = 1.04 (d,3J = 5.8 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.31 and 1.51 (each s
br, each 9H, t-Bu), 1.37–1.44 (s br, 2H, CH2) 3.56–3.63 (m, 1H, CH), 3.65 and 3.82 (each s
br, each 3H, NCH3), 6.26 and 6.49 (each s br, each 1H, H-4’, H-9’), 7.09 and 7.40 (each s br,
S4
each 1H, H-Carb), 7.15 and 7.52 (each s br, each 1H, H-5’, H-10’), 7.74 and 7.95 (each s br,
each 1H, H-Carb).
13C{1H} NMR (benzene-d6, 400.14 MHz): δ = 19.1 (CH3), 23.2 (d br, 1JRhC = 23.0 Hz, CH2),
32.0 and 32.2 (C(CH3)3), 34.4 and 34.6 (C(CH3)3), 38.7 and 39.0 (NCH3), 80.5 (s br, CH),
109.6 and 109.9 (CCarb), 114.2 and 114.5 (CCarb), 115.2 and 116.6 (C5´, C10´), 118.5 and
121.7 (C1, C8), 123.4 and 123.7 (C4a, C5a), 124.5 and 124.7 (C4´, C9´), 135.5 (C1a, C8a),
138.2 (C3, C6), 174.1 and 174.5, (each d, each 1JRhC = 56.0 Hz, C2´, C7´), 207.1 (d, 1JRhC =
46.2 Hz, CO).
𝜈(benzene-d6, cm-1) = 2046 (vw br, Rh-CO), 1716 (w, acetone), 1645 (w), 1588 (w).
(Formation of complex 2 was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy prior to the IR-measurement.
Therefore benzene-d6 was used as a solvent.)
In situ generation of type 2 complexes by reaction of 1a/b and epoxides in benzene-d6:
Other unsymmetrical complexes of type 2 can be generated at room temperature by reacting
Rh(I) complexes 1a and 1b with 2 eq of epoxide and 2 eq of LiNTf2 in benzene-d6. Reaction
of complexes [Rh(bimca)(CO)] (1a) or [Rh(bimcaEt)(CO)] (1b) with propylene oxide and 1,2-
epoxyhexane lead clearly to the respective complexes of type 2, but the amount depends on
the steric demand of both reaction partners. Complex 1a (R1 = CH3) reacts with both
epoxides at room temperature completely to 2a/b, while 1b (R2 = C2H5) leads to a mixture of
1b and 2c/d.
2a/b (R1 = CH3, R
2 = CH3 (a), C4H9 (b))
2c/d (R1 = C2H5, R
2 = CH3 (c), C4H9 (d))
R2 = CH3, C4H9
1
R1 = CH3 (a), C2H5 (b)
S5
Figure 1. Complete conversion of 1a and propylene oxide (1, blue) or 1,2-epoxyhexane (2, green) at room temperature to
complexes 2a and 2b.
Figure 2. Reaction of 1b with propylene oxide (1, blue) and 1,2-epoxyhexane (2, green) at room temperature led to the
analogue complexes 2c and 2d. In this case the conversion of 1b is incomplete and led to a ratio of 1b:2c = 4:3 or 2d (1b:2d
= 8:1).
Eva344_Zugabe_Propoxid_30min.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Chemical Shift (ppm)
-0.035 -0.030 -0.025 -0.020 -0.015 -0.010 -0.005
0 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0.035 0.040 0.045 0.050 0.055 0.060 0.065 0.070 0.075
1
2
1b 1b
1b 1b
1b (N-CH 2 -)
1b (-C(CH 3 ) 3 )
and 4d 1b ( -CH
3 ) and 4d
2d 2d 2d 2d 2d 2d 2d
2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c
1,2-epoxyhexane
propylene oxide
1,2-epoxyhexane
1b 1b 1b 1b
1b (N-CH 2 -)
epoxyhexane and 2d
1b ( -C2H5 ) and 2c
2c
Eva340.010.001.1r.esp
9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 -0.5 Chemical Shift (ppm)
-0.10
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
1
2
2b 2b 2b
2b 2b 2b
2b 2b
2b
2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a
2a
2a
2a
2a
1,2-epoxyhexane
propylene oxide propylene oxide Standard (TMB) Standard (TMB)
benzene 2b
2b
1,2-epoxyhexane
2b
S6
After full conversion of the epoxide the starting complexes 1a/b are recovered (by NMR
spectroscopy).
Figure 3. Monitoring the reaction of 1b with propylene oxide in benzene-d6; spectrum 1 (blue): before addition of
propylene oxide, spectrum 2 (green): after addition of 2 eq propylene oxide, and spectrum 3 (grey): after 16 h at room
temperature (full conversion of the epoxide to acetone and recovery of complex 1b).
Synthesis of rhodium complex 3:
Route 1:
In the glove box, 15 mg of 1 (26 µmol) were dissolved in 0.5 mL tetrahydrofurane-d8 with
propylene oxide (2 µL, 1 eq) and lithium chloride (1 mg, 1 eq) in a J. Young NMR tube. The
reaction mixture was allowed to react at room temperature for 4 days, after which the
complete formation of 3 was observed. Slow decomposition during workup prevents further
analysis.
Eva344_Startspektrum.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 -0.5 Chemical Shift (ppm)
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
1
2
3
1b 1b 1b 1b 1b N-CH2-
1b -CH2CH3
1b (-C(CH3)3)
standard (TMB)
Standard (TMB)
2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c 2c propylene oxide
propylene oxide
+ acetone
C6D5H
C6D5H
3
S7
1H NMR (thf-d8, 400.14 MHz): δ = 1.16 (d,3J = 6.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.50 and 1.51 (each s, each
9H, t-Bu), 1.65–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.55–3.66 (m, 1H, CH), 3.98 and 3.99 (each s, each 3H,
NCH3), 7.21 and 7.22 (each d, each 3J = 2.1 Hz, each 1H, H-4´, H-9´), 7.61 and 7.64 (each d,
each 4J = 1.5 Hz, each 1H, H-4, H-5), 7.99 and 8.00 (each d, each 4J = 1.5 Hz, each 1H, H-2,
H-7), 8.18 and 8.19 (each d, each 3J = 2.1 Hz, each 1H, H-5´, H-10´).
13C{1H} NMR (thf-d8,100.61 MHz): δ = 22.3 (CH3), 26.1 (d, 2JRhC = 30.0 Hz, CH2), 32.9 and
32.9 (C(CH3)3), 35.5 (2x C(CH3)3), 39.5 and 39.8 (NCH3), 79.4 (CH), 109.5 and 109.7 (C4,
C5), 114.3 and 114.5 (C2, C7), 117.6 and 117.8 (C5´, C10´), 124.6 and 124.8 (C4´, C9´),
125.7 and 126.3 (C4a, C5a), 127.6 and 127.5 (C1, C8), 136.9 and 137.0 (C1a, C8a), 136.9
and 137.0 (C3, C6) 180.5 and 181.0 (each d, each 1JRhC = 41.0 Hz, C2´, C7´), 229.4 (d, 1JRhC
= 43.3 Hz, CAcyl).
MS (FAB+): m/z = 628.3 (1 %) [M+H]+, 642.3 (100 %) [M-C3H6O2]+
.
Route 2:
In the glove box, 15 mg of 1 (26 µmol) were dissolved in 0.5 mL acetontirile-d3 with propylene
oxide (2 µL, 1 eq) and lithium chloride (1 mg, 1 eq) in a J. Young NMR tube. The reaction
mixture was allowed to react at room temperature for 24 h at 60 °C, after which the complete
formation of the new species 3 was observed. Slow decomposition during workup prevents
further analysis.
1H NMR (CD3CN, 400.14 MHz): δ = 1.14 (d, 3J = 6.1 Hz, 3H, H-15), 1.51 (s, 18H, t-Bu),
1.56–1.63, 1.64–1.73 (each m, each 1H, CH2), 3.55–3.66 (m, 1H, CH), 3.95 and 3.95 (each
s, each 3H, NCH3), 7.23 and 7.24 (each d, each 3J = 2.2 Hz, each 1H, H-4´), 7.68 and 7.70
(each d, each 4J = 1.5 Hz, each 1H, H-4, H-5), 8.07 and 8.08 (each d, each 4J = 1.5 Hz, each
1H, H-2, H-7), 8.18 and 8.20 (each d, each 3J = 2.1 Hz, each 1H, H-5´).
13C{1H} NMR (CD3CN, 100.61 MHz): δ = 22.4 (CH3), 26.6 (d, 2JRhC = 36.7 Hz, CH2), 30.0 and
32.9 (C(CH3)3), 36.0 (2x C(CH3)3), 40.0 and 40.3 (NCH3), 80.0 (CH), 110.8 (C4, C5), 115.0
and 115.3 (C2, C7), 125.7 and 126.0 (C4´, C9´), 126.2 and 126.7 (C4a, C5a), 127.2 and
127.4 (C1, C8), 136.0 and 136.6 (C1a, C8a), 139.0 (C3, C6) 179.6 and 179.8 (each d, each 3JRhC = 40.7 Hz, C2´, C7´), 228.8 (CAcyl, no coupling detected due to low intensity). Signals for
C5´ and C10´ could not be detected due to overlap with the signal for CD3CN.
MS (FAB+): m/z = 628.3 (1 %) [M+H]+, 642.3 (100 %) [M-C3H6O2]+
.
S8
Synthesis of rhodium complex 4a:
In the glove box, 15 mg 1 (26 µmol) were dissolved in 0.5 mL thf-d8 with propylene oxide (2
µL, 1 eq) and lithium chloride (1 mg, 1 eq) in a J. Young NMR tube. The reaction mixture was
allowed to react at 80 °C for 4 days, after which the formation of yellow precipitate was
observed. The solvent was removed and the yellow residue dissolved in CD2Cl2 and
characterised NMR spectroscopically.
1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400.14 MHz): δ = 1.55 (s, 18H, t-Bu), 2.01 (br s, 3H, CH3), 3.96 (s br, 1H,
CH), 4.18 (s, 6H, NCH3), 7.17 (d, 3J = 1.7 Hz, 2H, H-4´), 7.65 (d, 4J = 1.3 Hz, 2H, H-2/7), 8.03
(d, 3J = 1.7 Hz, 2H, H-5´), 8.14 (d, 4J = 1.3 Hz, 2H, H-4/5).
13C{1H} NMR (thf-d8, 100.61 MHz): δ = 21.0 (CH3), 31.9 (C(CH3)3), 34.7 (C(CH3)3), 38.7
(NCH3), 93.6 (CH), 110.8 (C4´), 114.7 (C2/7), 116.3 (C5´), 125.3 (C4/5), 127.6 (C4a/5a),
135.0 (C1a/8a), 137.2 (C1/8), 139.3 (C3/6), 174.6 (d, 1JRhC = 112.6 Hz, C2´), 189.8 (d, 2JRhC =
89.0 Hz, CORh), the CAcyl signal could not be detected.
The equilibrium between Rh-catalyst 1 and complex 3a in thf-d8:
Experiment whether species 3a is able to release acetone and such reacts back to catalyst 1
or complex 3a gets only deactivated by dehydrogenation to 4a (Figures 4-7).
Complex 1 was dissolved with a catalytic amount of LiCl and propylene oxide in thf-d8 (Figure
4). After 20 h at room temperature a mixture of 1 and 3a (2:1) and a small amount of Rh
complex 4a was obtained. Upon evaporation of the solvent and redissolving the residue in
thf-d8, the ratio of complexes 1 to 3a remained unchanged, but all organic components were
removed (Figure 5). After 1 day at room temperature acetone was generated and the 1H
NMR spectrum shows complex 1 as the only organometallic species (Figure 6). The thf-d8
and all volatiles were evaporated again and the residue dissolved in dichloromethane-d2 (as
4a
4a 3a 1
S9
the solubility of 4a is much better in CD2Cl2). The 1H NMR spectrum gives evidence for the
formation of 4a (Figure 7).
Thus we could demonstrate that some amount of complex 3a releases acetone under
regeneration of 1 as well as it can be dehydrogenated to complex 4a.
Eva357_1H_Startspektrum.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
0.045
0.050
0.055
0.060
0.065
0.070
0.075
0.080
0.085
0.090
0.095
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
0.670.4513.063.962.3617.124.043.943.561.085.850.330.210.190.131.920.190.220.152.010.440.141.940.220.231.980.15
0.1
489
1.2
461
1.2
588
1.5
369
1.5
486
1.5
761
1.7
659
2.3
062
2.6
205
2.8
824
3.6
246
3.7
408
4.0
427
4.0
487
4.2
435
4.3
227
6.0
841
7.2
751
7.2
808
7.2
976
7.3
026
7.5
019
7.5
069
7.5
275
7.5
323
7.6
897
7.7
733
7.8
550
7.8
592
8.0
299
8.0
746
8.1
810
8.2
747
8.2
798
8.3
549
std
thf
thf
grease1
3
4
t-Bu's
std
3
Eva357_1H_Startspektrum.esp
8.25 8.00 7.75 7.50 7.25
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
0.210.190.131.920.190.220.152.010.440.141.940.220.231.980.15
7.2
751
7.2
808
7.2
976
7.3
026
7.5
019
7.5
069
7.5
275
7.5
323
7.6
501
7.6
897
7.7
733
7.8
550
7.8
592
8.0
299
8.0
746
8.1
810
8.1
848
8.2
329
8.2
573
8.2
747
8.2
798
8.3
492
8.3
549
1 1 1 1
333334 4 4 4
propyleneoxide
propyleneoxide
Figure 4.
1H NMR spectrum recorded directly after the addition of propylene oxide (std = 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene).
Eva357_thf_aufgenommen.esp
8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.13
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
2.430.962.0517.146.0827.360.66111.440.675.368.941.4030.041.640.442.640.900.990.512.941.730.622.750.940.932.930.49
0.1
126
1.1
409
1.1
564
1.1
727
1.1
883
1.2
924
1.4
999
1.5
124
1.5
396
1.7
3003.5
892
3.7
042
3.8
8064
.0050
4.2
039
4.2
825
6.0
476
7.2
437
7.2
492
7.2
639
7.2
686
7.4
7077
.4932
7.4
987
7.6
129
7.6
5417.8
181
7.8
220
8.0
0008
.1438
8.1
477
8.2
363
8.2
417
std std
thf
thf
grease
1
1
3
4
Eva357_thf_aufgenommen.esp
8.0 7.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
1.640.442.640.890.980.512.931.730.612.750.940.932.930.49
7.2
798
7.2
852
7.3
000
7.3
046
7.5
013
7.5
067
7.5
293
7.5
347
7.6
489
7.6
528
7.6
863
7.6
901
7.7
741
7.7
780
7.8
541
7.8
580
8.0
251
8.0
360
8.0
702
8.0
741
8.1
798
8.1
837
8.2
490
8.2
544
8.2
723
8.2
777
8.3
516
8.3
570
1 1 1 1
33333
4 4 4 4
t-Bu's
3
std
3
Figure 5.
1H NMR spectrum after removing all volatiles in vacuo and redissolving the residue in thf-d8 (std = 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene).
S10
Figure 6. After 1 day at room temperature only species 1 can be detected and some acetone is produced (std = 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene).
Figure 7.
1H NMR spectrum after removing all volatiles and redissolving the residue in CD2Cl2 (std = 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene).
Eva357_thf_aufgenommen_1d_rt.esp
8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
1.781.5145.341.051.0114.13115.941.0910.5830.003.633.413.453.47
0.1
117
1.1
744
1.1
896
1.2
919
1.5
390
1.7
300
2.0
474
3.5
595
3.5
890
3.7
046
4.0
464
4.2
082
6.0
476
7.5
034
7.8
230
8.1
473
8.2
458
std
std
thf thf
grease
111
1
1
3
1 acetone
Eva357_2.040.001.1r.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 -0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.13
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
1.3625.201.100.530.230.241.435.270.651.920.220.492.002.440.572.01
0.1
181
1.2
995
1.5
745
1.8
022
2.0
458
2.3
701
3.5
963
3.6
723
3.9
567
3.9
852
4.2
313
4.2
561
5.3
504
6.0
998
7.2
031
7.3
079
7.5
499
7.6
817
7.7
789
8.0
551
8.1
828
8.2
173
std
std
thf thf
grease
11 + 31
1
1
1
33
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
dcm
4
4
4 4 4 4
4
S11
Dehydrogenation of complex 3 to the deactivation product 4:
Dehydrogenation of complex 3 to complex 4 is accompanied by hydrogenation of the
acetone (which is formed during the catalysis) to isopropanol (Figure 8).
Figure 8. After evaporation of all volatile compounds the signal at 1.08 ppm (isopropanol) is missing (std = 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene).
Eva355_WEand_1Tag_rt.esp
8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 Chemical Shift (ppm)
-0.10
-0.05
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
Normalised Intensity
1
2
epoxide epoxide
isopropanol
mixture of 1 and 4
THF THF
All volatile compunds (epoxide + isopropanol) are removed.
std
std
acetone
S12
The equilibrium between 1 and 3 in benzene:
Experiment, if complex 3 (generated in thf-d8) also released acetone upon dissolving in
benzene-d6. Two independent experiments were carried out.
Experiment 1: Complex 1 was dissolved with a catalytic amount of LiCl and propylene oxide
in thf-d8. After 16 h at 60 °C a mixture of complexes 1:3 (1:1) and Rh complex 4 was
obtained. Upon evaporation of the solvent and redissolving the residue in thf-d8 the ratio of 1
to 3 remained constant, but all volatile components were removed. The thf-d8 is again
removed and the residue dissolved in benzene-d6. The 1H NMR spectrum shows 1 as the
major organometallic species. As the acetone signal is covered by the t-Bu signal in
benzene-d6, a few drops of dmso-d6 were added to shift the acetone peak (Figure 11). The
outcome of this experiment gives evidence for the backward reaction of 3 into the catalytic
cycle also in benzene.
Figure 9. Reaction of catalyst 1 with propylene oxide at 60 °C; after 16 h at room temperature a 1:1 mixture of complexes
1:3 was obtained (Standard = 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene).
Eva353.020.001.1r.esp
8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
30.001.710.411.390.190.690.290.960.101.581.720.480.211.871.74
8.2
420
8.2
170
8.1
435
8.0
418
7.9
927
7.8
204
7.6
538
7.6
158 7.5
059
7.3
374
7.2
794
7.2
579
6.0
485
Eva353.020.001.1r.esp
8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
0.045
0.050
0.055
0.060
0.065
0.070
0.075
Norm
aliz
ed Inte
nsity
2.781.8011.1519.5313.441.673.783.583.051.530.776.115.880.841.970.472.551.831.990.560.242.162.01
8.2
420
8.1
435
7.9
927
7.8
204
7.6
538
7.6
158
7.5
059
7.3
374
7.2
794
7.2
579
6.0
485
4.8
927
4.8
443
4.2
089
4.0
191
4.0
103
3.7
056
3.5
909
2.8
361 2.5
871
2.2
729
2.0
490
1.7
300
1.5
400
1.5
130
1.5
007
1.2
232
1.2
105
1.1
915
1.1
760
1.1
573
1.1
421
1a1a1a1a
22
22
x
x
x
2
2
2
1a
Propyleneoxide
Propyleneoxide
Aceton
Standard Standard
Reaction of 1a and LiCl with Propylenoxide
leads to a 1:1 mixture of 1a:2 (60 °C, 16 h)
x
x
x
1 11 1
1
thfthf
2
S13
Figure 10. Reaction mixture after removing all volatiles and dissolving the residue in thf-d8 (Standard = 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene).
Figure 11. The reaction mixture after removing all volatiles and dissolving of the residue in benzene-d6 (Standard = 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene).
Eva353.030.001.1r.esp
8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
0.045
0.050
0.055
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
3.070.852.7319.412.7719.310.500.452.646.125.780.372.060.160.101.971.010.982.002.120.351.982.222.08
8.2
471
8.2
420
8.2
008
8.1
445
8.1
404
8.0
384
7.9
921 7.8
220
7.8
179
7.6
703 7.6
538
7.6
117
7.5
113
7.5
059
7.3
368
7.3
320 7.2
785
7.2
737
7.2
604
7.2
557
4.8
934
4.8
443
4.2
095
4.0
172
4.0
096
3.6
330
3.4
785
3.4
015
1.5
377
1.5
108
1.4
988
1.2
907
1.1
893 1
.1545
1.1
389
Eva353.030.001.1r.esp
8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025N
orm
alized Inte
nsity
30.002.080.160.102.001.020.992.032.150.352.000.162.252.11
8.2
471
8.2
420
8.2
157
8.1
445
8.1
404
8.0
384 7
.9921
7.8
220
7.8
179
7.6
703
7.6
538
7.6
152
7.6
117 7.5
113
7.5
059
7.3
510
7.3
368
7.3
320
7.2
785
7.2
737
7.2
604
7.2
557
Standard
Standard
thf
thf
11
1 1
22
2 2
1
2
1a +2
2
Eva353.040.001.1r.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
2.949.5311.5021.434.2498.641.236.500.260.252.5530.002.720.602.650.562.39
0.9
245
1.3
543
1.5
365
1.5
580
1.6
920
1.7
110
3.3
153
3.7
531
6.0
495
6.1
597
6.2
541
7.1
600
7.3
200
7.5
144
7.6
339
8.4
393
8.4
903
Standard
1 (C(CH3)3 +
Aceton
Benzol
1 1 1 1
1
1 1 11
Benzol Standard
Eva353.040.001.1r.esp
1.5 1.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
2.949.5311.5021.434.24
0.9
245
1.3
543
1.5
365
1.5
580
1.6
920
1.7
110
Standard
H greaseH grease
Eva353.040.001.1r.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.025
0.050
0.075
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
0.252.5530.002.720.602.650.562.39
6.0
495
6.1
597
7.3
200
7.5
144
7.6
339
8.4
393
8.4
903
3 3 3 3
+ 3
3
benzene
benzene
S14
Figure 12. Addition of dmso-d6 to the solution shifts the acetone signal so that it is not covered by the t-Bu signal.
Experiment 2: Complex 1 is dissolved with a catalytic amount of LiCl and propylene oxide in
thf-d8. After 16 h at r.t. a mixture of complexes 1:3a = 1.3:1 was obtained. Upon evaporation
of all volatile compounds and dissolving the residue in thf-d8 the ratio of 1:3a remained con-
stant. All volatiles were removed again in vacuo and the residue was dissolved in benzene-
d6. The 1H NMR spectrum of the suspension clearly shows complex 1 as the only organo-
metallic species. Heating the sample for 1 h at 60 °C led to formation of a new Rh complex.
Upon removal of benzene-d6 in vacuo and dissolving the residue in CD2Cl2 this species was
identified as complex 4a which could have formed from precipitated 3a by dehydrogenation.
Figure 13.
1H NMR spectrum after 16 h at room temperature in thf-d8 (std = 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene).
Eva353.050.001.1r.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
6.381.504.2927.312.186.901.461.990.352.402.270.400.582.39
8.7
016
8.6
183
8.5
480 8.4
441
8.2
502
8.1
413
7.5
623
7.5
277
6.5
465
4.4
540
4.3
628
4.2
298
2.5
000
2.3
134 2
.0996
1.8
766
1.5
507
1.5
399
1.1
602 0.5
447
0.5
130
acetone
Eva356_16h_rt.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.11
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
5.5788.7334.5642.135.4126.7926.1423.04109.319.6113.6830.003.344.433.464.663.494.543.454.47
8.2
943
8.2
854
8.2
014
8.0
461
7.8
680
7.7
063
7.6
640
7.5
377
7.3
161
7.2
876
6.0
998
4.2
589
4.0
644
3.7
569
3.6
401
2.0
986 1
.7822
1.5
915
1.5
643
1.5
529 1
.2789
1.2
580
1.2
125
1.1
879
Eva356_16h_rt.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.025
0.050
0.075
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
3.344.433.464.663.494.543.454.47
8.2
943
8.2
854
8.2
545 8.2
014
8.0
461
7.8
680
7.7
063
7.6
640
7.5
377
7.3
161
7.2
876
1 1 1 1
1
1 + 3
33
3 3
3
3
propylene oxid
propylene oxid
acetone
thf
thf
Std
Std
S15
Figure 14.
1H NMR spectrum after removing all volatiles in vacuo and dissolving the residue in benzene-d6 (std = 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene).
Figure 15. After heating the suspension for 1 h at 60 °C, the dehydrogenated rhodium species 4 can be detected in the
1H
NMR spectrum (std = 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene).
Eva356_benzol.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
13.2473.247.712.5297.4917.510.825.5929.945.437.391.891.527.74
8.4
707
8.3
145
7.7
455
7.6
150
7.3
002
7.1
416
6.2
354
6.1
382
3.8
772
3.7
327
3.2
966
1.8
999
1.6
932
1.6
085
1.5
393
1.3
566
0.2
778
1 1 1 1
1
thf
Std
Std
1
benzene
Eva356_benzo_60l.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
10.66131.641.37115.472.9633.100.440.409.8629.9310.850.6710.990.7210.89
8.4
899
8.4
432
7.6
333
7.5
144
7.3
186
7.1
600
6.2
537
6.1
550
6.1
076
4.3
169
3.7
495
3.6
982
3.3
158
1.8
608
1.5
592
0.2
970
1 1 1 1
1
Std
Std
1 + 4
benzene
4 4 4 4 4 4
S16
Figure 16.
1H NMR spectrum after removing all volatiles in vacuo and dissolving the residue again in benzene-d6 (std = 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene).
Figure 17.
1H NMR spectrum after removing benzene-d6 and dissolving the residue in dichloromethane-d2 to verify complex
4 by its chemical shift (std = 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene).
Eva356_benzol_benzol.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
13.55182.931.401.79118.875.2049.930.511.7214.9330.020.0917.111.2715.411.0415.45
8.4
788
8.4
262
7.6
195
7.5
034
7.4
616
7.3
098
7.1
488
6.8
314
6.2
415
6.1
409
4.3
030
3.7
379
3.6
868
3.3
044
1.8
490
1.7
932
1.5
470
1.2
962
0.2
852
1 1 1
1
1
Std
Std
1 + 4
benzene
4
4 4 4
4
4
Eva356.080.001.1r.esp
8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
161.172.100.843.5535.522.2330.021.2512.841.8113.2715.792.2714.40
1.2
945
1.5
710
1.7
959
2.0
433
3.6
726
3.7
771
3.9
517
4.2
326
4.2
554
4.3
856
5.3
482
6.0
967
7.2
015
7.3
086
7.6
801
7.7
739
8.0
526
8.1
802
8.2
132
1 1 1 1
1
Std
Std
1 + 4
dcm
44 4
4
4
4
thf thf
S17
2. Crystallographic details for compounds 4a and 4b
Crystallographic Data. Data collection was carried out on a Bruker APEX Duo CCD (4b)
with an Incoatec IµS Microsource with a Quazar MX mirror, or a Bruker APEX CCD (4a)
diffractometer, using Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) and a graphite monochromator in both
cases. Corrections for absorption effects were applied using SADABS.[2] All structures were
solved by direct methods using SHELXS and refined using SHELXL.[3] Further details of the
refinement and crystallographic data are given in the respective CIF-files. CCDC 1018408
(compound 4a) and 1018409 (compound 4b) contain the supplementary crystallographic
data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Crystal structure of complex 4a:
In the glove box, 15 mg 1 (26 µmol) were dissolved in 0.5 mL thf-d8 with propylene oxide (2
µL, 1 eq) and lithium chloride (1 mg, 1 eq) in a J. Young NMR tube. The reaction mixture was
allowed to react at 80 °C for 4 days. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were
obtained from a saturated solution of the reaction mixture at room temperature. The structure
contains three thf solvent molecules, two of which are disordered.
S18
Crystal structure of complex 4b:
Rh(bimca)CO[1] 1 (2 mg, 4 mol, 10 mol%) and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide) (1
mg, 10 mol%) were placed into a J. Young NMR tube and 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as
internal standard and benzene (0.5 mL) were added. At last dried 1,2-epoxyhexane (4.2 μL,
35 mol) was added and the reaction mixture was heated to 60 °C. Single crystals from
pentane/thf, suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained from a saturated solution of the
reaction mixture upon cooling to room temperature. The structure contains a region with
heavily disordered solvent molecules. These could be identified from the shape to be a
pentane and a thf molecule. The two add up to 144 electrons. The Squeeze procedure[4] in
programme package PLATON[5] reports the equivalent of 167 electrons per asymmetric unit,
in total 344 electrons. One ordered thf solvent molecule is included in the reported structure.
The alkyl product suffers from disorder in all three unique molecules. The current model still
suffers from large displacement parameters, in particular at the terminal end of the alkyl
product; also the C-C-distances in those regions suffer from large variations.
S19
3. 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the new compounds
Exemplary 1H NMR spectrum for a Meinwald rearrangement (100 min, 60 °C, 30 mol% LiNTf2, 10
mol% 1, benzene)
1H NMR spectrum of 2 in benzene-d6:
Eva340_Nachtmessung.010.001.1r.esp
8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.18
0.19
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
16.506.4418.0017.6613.435.575.545.022.936.426.391.922.001.754.651.852.26
8.0
469
7.8
492
7.4
695
7.4
337
7.1
416
7.0
900
6.4
755
6.2
946
6.2
284
3.8
373
3.6
808
3.5
864
3.3
023
2.5
443 2.2
909
1.9
707
1.5
773
1.5
060
1.3
379
1.0
160
0.9
118
0.8
988
0.2
761
benzene
std
std
pro
pyle
neoxid
e
propyleneoxide
aceto
ne
S20
13C{1H} NMR spectrum of 2 in benzene-d6:
1H NMR spectrum of 3a in thf-d8:
Eva340_13C.esp
208 200 192 184 176 168 160 152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 88 80 72 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 8 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
208.0
288
207.5
700
207.5
373
175.5
282
175.0
929
174.9
712
174.5
592
162.6
834
138.9
458
136.2
308
125.4
456
125.2
209
124.3
971
124.1
536
122.3
889
119.2
338
117.3
053
115.9
431
115.2
362
114.8
992
110.6
301
110.3
399
93.8
766
81.2
424
55.1
877
48.4
891
48.0
303
39.7
542
39.4
500 35.2
932
32.9
433
32.7
139
30.5
513
24.0
165
23.7
591
20.6
368
18.2
027
1.7
441aceto
ne
benzene
std
std
std
pro
pyle
neoxid
e
pro
pyle
neoxid
e
S21
13C{
1H} NMR spectrum of 3a in thf-d8:
13
C-DEPT-135 NMR spectrum of 3a in thf-d8:
S22
1H
13C-HSQC NMR spectrum of 3a in thf-d8:
S23
1H
13C-HMBC NMR spectrum of 3a in thf-d8:
S24
1H NMR spectrum of 3a in CD3CN:
13C{
1H} NMR spectrum of 3a in CD3CN:
S25
13C-DEPT-135 NMR spectrum of 3a in CD3CN:
1H1H-COSY NMR spectrum of 3a in CD3CN:
S26
1H
13C-HSQC NMR spectrum of 3a in CD3CN:
S27
1H
13C-HMBC NMR spectrum of 3a in CD3CN:
S28
1H NMR spectrum of 4a in CD2Cl2:
13
C{1H} NMR spectrum of 4a in CD2Cl2:
S29
1H
13C-HSQC NMR spectrum of 4a in CD2Cl2
S30
1H
13C-HMBC NMR spectrum of 4a in CD2Cl2
S31
4. IR spectra of 1 and 2a
IR spectrum (benzene-d6) of complex 1.
S32
IR (benzen-d6) of complex 2a.
S33
5. Catalytic epoxide rearrangement: optimisation of the reaction conditions
regarding additive and solvent
Table 1 Optimisation of the reaction conditions: additive and solvent.a
Entry Additive Solvent T [°C] Time [h]
Yieldb,c [%]
1 LiCl thf-d8 60 24 4
2 NaCl thf-d8 60 24 2
3 LiCl CD2Cl2 60 24 0[d]
4 LiCl CD3CN 60 24 0[d]
5 NaBF4 thf-d8 60 24 13
6 NaBPh4 thf-d8 60 24 45
7 NaBPh4 C6D6 60 24 61
8 LiB(C6F5)3 C6D6 60 24 90
9 LiNTf2 C6D6 60 24 >99
a Reaction conditions: 1 (10 mol%), additive (10 mol%), all reactions were carried out in a J. Young NMR tube with 1,2-epoxyhexane (35 μmol) as substrate and 0.5 mL solvent. b The ketone was observed as the sole reaction product. c The yield was determined by 1H NMR using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard. d Catalyst deactivation due to organometallic side products.[6]
6. References
[1] M. Moser, B. Wucher, F. Rominger, D. Kunz, Organometallics 2007, 26, 1024–1030.
[2] G. M. Sheldrick, SADABS 2012/1; University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 2012.
[3] a) G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Cryst. 2008, A64, 112-122; b) C. B. Hübschle, G. M. Sheldrick, B. Dittrich,
J. Appl. Cryst. 2011, 44, 1281−1284.
[4] SQUEEZE routine: van der Sluis, P.; Spek, A. L. Acta Cryst. 1990, A46, 194-201.
[5] PLATON: Spek, A. L. J. Appl. Cryst., 2003, 36, 7-13.
[6] In dichloromethane oxidative addition (trans) of the solvent to complex 1 is observed which leads to
[Rh(bimca)Cl(CH2Cl)(CO)]. M. Moser, PhD thesis, Heidelberg University, 2007.