self-referencing sensors for characterizing microbial biofilm physiology · 2017-01-26 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Self-referencing sensors for characterizing microbial biofilm physiology
Eric S. McLamore1,5, D.M. Porterfield2,3,4,5, and M.K. Banks1
1School of Civil Engineering2Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering3Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture
4Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering 5Bindley Bioscience Center, Discovery Park: Physiological Sensing Facility
• Function• Ion/nutrient flux• Oxygen flux
• Structure– Shared analyses
• Atomic force microscopy
• Why is studying biofilm physiology important?– Wastewater treatment– Toxicity studies
Biofilm Physiology
Biophysical(physiological)
Biochemical(functional)
Morphological(structural)
• Respirometry• Invasive concentration (activity) sensors
– Oxygen, ammonium, nitrate, pH• Classic biochemical techniques
– In vitro detectors and assays
Techniques for characterizing biofilm physiology
Non-invasive techniques with greater sensitivity and temporal resolution are required
• Real time biophysical flux – Fixed excursion distance– Near pole– Far pole
• Corrects for mechanical motion through liquid solution– Reference measurement
• ≈0.4 cm from surface
Self-referencing sensors
drdCDJ −=
dC = difference in concentration between near pole and far pole
dr = excursion distance
N. europaea biofilm immobilized on silicon membrane
200 µm
• Very low detection limit (fmol/cm2-sec)• Non-invasive (non-destructive)• Real time temporal resolution• Direct quantification of analyte flux
– Dynamic measurement
Benefits of self-referencing technique
SEM of electrode tip
• Multiple sensor approach for measuring flux – cumulative signal error
• One sensor, one source of error
10 µm
Self-referencing sensor hardware
sample
video/zoomscope
vibration isolation table
faraday cage
amplifier
• Step-back experiments on N. europaea biofilmSensor calibration (dynamic)
N. europaea biofilm immobilized on silicon membrane
ε=dynamic efficiency
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Am
mon
ium
Influ
x [p
mol
-NH
4/cm
2 -se
c]
0
200
400
600
800
NH4 influxPredicted
ε=0.92
Distance from source [µm]0 200 400 600 800 1000
Nitr
ite E
fflu
x [p
mol
-NO
2/cm
2 -se
c]
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
NO2 effluxPredicted
ε=0.94
NH3 +O2 +2H+ → NH2OH +H2O → NO2- +5H+ + 4e-
• Ammonia oxidizing bacteria– Nitrosomonas europaea
• Ammonia monooxygenase (AMO)– membrane bound protein– copper at active site
• Hydroxylamine oxidoreductase (HAO)– Produces electrons required by AMO
Classic physiological study
AMO HAO
pKa = 9.2
NH4 → NH3 +H+
• Alternative substrates– AMO can oxidize over 40 substrates
• Mechanism-based (e.g., acetylene)• Reversible inhibition
– Visible light– Copper chelating agents
• Thiourea, carbon disulfide
AMO inhibition
Mixed culture nitrifying biofilm immobilized on silicon membrane
200 µm
• Microbes immobilized on oxygen-permeable silicon membranes
• Upflow membrane-aerated bioreactor– Lumen-side air flow
• Membranes transferred to flow cell for measurement
Cell harvesting and immobilization
MABR
N. europaea biofilmgrown in MABR
MABR limit the formation of anoxic zones
AMO inhibition study: Proton flux
Nitrosomonas europaea biofilm
pH at biofilm surface was 6.71 ± 0.10 c
Time [minutes]0 20 40 60 80 100
Prot
on F
lux
[pm
ol/c
m2 -s
ec]
-10
0
10
20
30
effluxinflux
CuCl2 addition
3 mM thiourea
6 mM thiourea
Time [minutes]0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Prot
on F
lux
[pm
ol/c
m2 -s
ec]
-10
0
10
20
30
effluxinflux
3 mM thiourea
6 mM thiourea
Time [minutes]20 30 40 50
Prot
on F
lux
[pm
ol/c
m2 -s
ec]
-10
0
10
20
30
efflux
influx
30 µM CuCl2
55 µM CuCl2
85 µM CuCl2
110 µM CuCl2 140 µM CuCl2
168 µM CuCl2
...from 6mM thiourea
195 µM CuCl2
Time [minutes]50 60 70 80 90 100
Prot
on F
lux
[pm
ol/c
m2 -s
ec]
-10
0
10
20
30
efflux
influx
250 µM CuCl2275 µM CuCl2
300 µM CuCl2
1500 µM CuCl2
...from 195µM CuCl2
Position 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prot
on F
lux
[pm
ol/c
m2 -s
ec]
0
10
20
30
40
50
steady statepost thiourea dosingpost copper relief
effluxinflux
Real time data collected at position 1
AMO inhibition study: Ammonium flux
Nitrosomonas europaea biofilm
Time [minutes]0 20 40 60 80
NH
4 inf
lux
[pm
ol/c
m2 -s
ec]
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700thiourea dosing copper dosing
Real time data collected at position 6
100 µM CuCl2sufficient for
restoring steady stateNH4 influx
Time [minutes]0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Am
mon
ium
influ
x [p
mol
/cm
2 -sec
]
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1.5 mM thiourea
3.0 mM thiourea4.5 mM thiourea 6.0 mM thiourea
(b)
Time [minutes]40 50 60 70 80
Am
mon
ium
influ
x [p
mol
/cm
2 -sec
]
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
28 µm CuCl2
...from 6.0 mM thiourea
56 µm CuCl2
85 µm CuCl2
112 µm CuCl2
168 µm CuCl2
195 µm CuCl2
140 µm CuCl2222 µm CuCl2
(c)
Position2 4 6
NH
4 flu
x [ µ
mol
/cm
2 -sec
]
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600steady statepost thiourea dosingpost copper relief
effluxinflux
• Successfully demonstrated reversible inhibition of AMO by copper chelation in a biofilm• Non-invasive • Real time response
• More copper required to restore steady state oxygen and proton flux levels than required to restore NH4 influx • Oxygen and copper are required for many cellular
processes other than AMO activity
• Use of self-referencing sensors will allow non-invasive investigation of real time biofilm stress response to chemical toxin exposure
Conclusions
• Chemical toxicity in pure and mixed culture biofilms– Uncoupling of aerobic respiration– Glutathione gated-potassium efflux
• Associated with deflocculation– Additionally measuring efflux of cross-linking ions (Ca2+,
Mg2+)
– Aerobic biodegradation of respiratory-inhibiting compounds
– Heavy metal exposure
Ongoing studies
• Advisors– M. K. Banks– D.M. Porterfield
• Purdue School of Civil Engineering• Discovery Park• Al Shipley (Applicable Electronics, Inc.)• Jon Shaff (Cornell, USDA)• Aeraj ul Haque, Rameez Chatni (Electric. and Comp. Engr.)
Acknowledgements
Also currently investigating effect of laminar bulk flow on sensor behavior
AMO inhibition study: Oxygen fluxNitrosomonas europaea biofilm
Time [minutes]0 50 100 150 200 250
Oxy
gen
influ
x [p
mol
/cm
2 -sec
]
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30thiourea dosing copper dosing
Time [minutes]0 20 40 60 80
Oxy
gen
influ
x [p
mol
/cm
2 -sec
]
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
302.5 µM thiourea
3.5 µM thiourea 5.0 µM thiourea
6.2 µM thiourea 7.5 µM thiourea
8.7 µM thiourea
10 µM thiourea
Time [minutes]120 140 160 180 200
Oxy
gen
influ
x [p
mol
/cm
2 -sec
]
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
...from 10µM thiourea
0.3 mM CuCl2
0.6 mM CuCl2
0.9 mM CuCl2 1.1 mM CuCl2
1.3 mM CuCl2
1.6 mM CuCl2
1.8 mM CuCl2
2.0 mM CuCl2
Spatial location [µm]1 2 3 4 5 6
Oxy
gen
influ
x [p
mol
/cm
2 -sec
]
0
5
10
15
20
25
steady statepost thiourea dosingpost Cu dosing
Real time data collected at position 1