senior portfolio rubric - lock haven · senior portfolio rubric ... skills, and dispositions. ......

Senior Portfolio Rubric

https://c1.livetext.com/doc/6055038?print=1[9/26/2011 12:23:19 PM]

show propertiesSenior Portfolio Rubricby LHUP Undergrad Admin

Assessment

Portfolio Artifacts (Knowledge and Pedagogy)

Target Not Met Target Met Target Exceeded

Introduction Very little information is providedby the student in the introductionsection.

Student provides sufficientinformation about him/herself inthe introduction. A resume, coverletter of interest, and Praxisscores are included.

Student provides insightful anddetailed information abouthim/herself in the introduction. Aresume, cover letter of interest,and Praxis scores are included.

RationaleforSelectionandAlignmentof ArtifactstoINTASC/SPAStandards

Some required artifacts aremissing.

All required artifacts are included.Rationale logically supportsalignment artifact with mostINTASC/SPA Standards.

All required artifacts are included.Rationale logically supportsalignment artifact with allINTASC/SPA Standards.

RationaleforSelectionandAlignmentof Artifactsto ISTENETS-TStandards

There is not an artifact for oneperformance indicator for each ofthe 5 NETS-T standards/or theperformance indicator is notproperly aligned to an INTASCStandard. Rationale is missing orinadequate.

There is one artifact for oneperformance indicator for each ofthe 5 NETS-T Standards. Theseartifacts are different from thoseincluded in their developingportfolio. The student hasattached the NETS-T artifactsfrom their developing portfolio. Allartifacts are at the beginninglevel. The performance indicatoris properly aligned to an INTASCStandard. Rationale is logical.

In addition to having one artifactfor one performance indicator foreach of the 5 NEST-T Standards,there is at least one artifactrepresenting a standard beyondthe beginning level. Theseartifacts are different from thoseincluded in their developingportfolio. The student hasattached the NETS-T artifactsfrom their developing portfolio.The performance indicator isproperly aligned to an INTASCStandard. The rationale is logical.

Conclusion Student provides a weakassessment of his/her ownstrengths. There is no plan ofaction for future growth.

Student provides a reasonableassessment of his/her ownstrengths and areas in need ofimprovement in Knowledge, Skills,and Dispositions. There is aclearly identified plan of action forfuture growth to improveKnowledge, Skills andDispositions in regard to specificINTASC Standards.

Student provides an insightful anddetailed assessment of his/herown strengths and areas in needof improvement in Knowledge,Skills, and Dispositions. There isa clear and achievable detailedplan of action identified for futuregrowth to improve Knowledge,Skills and Dispositions in regardto specific INTASC Standards.

Professional The student did not follow stateddirections, had numerous spelling,punctuation, grammatical errors,inaccurate information, and anexcessive use of “Attachments”.Headings were not used. Little orno creativity was shown.

The student had minimal spelling,punctuation, or grammatical errorsin the document. Errors do notaffect readers’ ability tocomprehend writing. Thedirections were removed prior tosubmitting the document andrequired headings were usedthroughout. There was a balancein use of narrative,tables/graphs/images, and

The student had no spellingerrors and only a few grammaticalor punctuation errors in thedocument. The directions wereremoved prior to submitting thedocument and required headingswere used throughout. There wasa balance in use of narrative,tables/graphs/images, and“Attachments”. Creativity wasevident throughout the document



PDE 430 Rubric (1st Placement)

PDE 430 Rubric (2nd Placement)

“Attachments”.

Unsatisfactory:(Minimum of 0points)

Satisfactory:(Minimum of 4points) (1 pt)

Superior: (Minimumof 8 points) (2 pts)

Exemplary:(Minimum of 12points) (3 pts)

Category I:PlanningandPreparation(1, 25%)

The candidate rarely ornever and

inappropriately orsuperficially

demonstrates indicatorsof performance.

The candidatesometimes and

adequately demonstratesindicators ofperformance.

The candidate usuallyand extensively


Candidate consistentlyand thoroughly


Category II:ClassroomEnvironment(1, 25%)









CategoryIII:InstructionalDelivery(1, 25%)









CategoryIV:Professional(1, 25%)









Unsatisfactory:(Minimum of 0points)

Satisfactory:(Minimum of 4points) (1 pt)

Superior: (Minimumof 8 points) (2 pts)

Exemplary:(Minimum of 12points) (3 pts)

Category I:PlanningandPreparation(1, 25%)

The candidate rarely ornever and

inappropriately orsuperficially








Category II:ClassroomEnvironment(1, 25%)









CategoryIII:InstructionalDelivery(1, 25%)









CategoryIV:Professional(1, 25%)











Senior Portfolio Presentation

Scoring/Scale

Level 1 (1 pt) Level 2 (2 pts) Level 3 (3 pts) Level 4 (4 pts)

Professional(1, 33%)

- Does not modelprofessional attire.

- Does not exhibitenthusiasm or a highlevel of energy.

- Does not appearcreative or interested incontinuous learning.

- Presentation of portfoliois poorly organized andnot in accordance withthe INTASC/SPAStandards.

- Seldom exhibitsenthusiasm or a highlevel of energy.

- Demonstrates somecreativity and interest incontinuous learning.

- Portfolio is somewhatorganized using theINTASC/SPA Standards.

- Showed professionalappearance Usually showedenthusiasm and a highenergy level.

- Often demonstratescreativity and interest incontinuous learning.

- Portfolio is organized ina logical manner andproperly uses the INTASC/SPA Standards

- Always displaysprofessional appearanceand appropriate attire.

- Most alwaysdemonstratedenthusiasm and a highlevel of energy.

- Is most always creativeand resourceful in theportfolio presentation

- Shows a high degreeof interest in continuouslearning.

- Presentation of portfoliois highly organized andpresented in a logicalmanner using theINTASC/SPA Standards.

VerbalCommunicatSkills (1, 33%)

- Oral communicationskills fail to exhibitcorrect usage andgrammar; is neitherfocused nor organized.

- The student’s volume,intonation andenunciation is deficient.

- The student does notspeak with conviction.

- Oral communicationsometimes exhibitscorrect usage andgrammar; is focused andorganized.

- The student sometimesspeaks with propervolume, intonation, andenunciation.

- The student sometimesspeaks with conviction.

- Oral communicationusually exhibits correctusage and grammar; isfocused and organized.

- The student speakswith audible volume,intonation, andenunciation.

- The student speakswith conviction.

- Oral communicationmost always exhibitscorrect usage andgrammar; is focused andorganized.

- The student speakswith proper volume,intonation, andenunciation.

- The student oftenspeaks with conviction.

NonverbalCommunicatSkills (1, 33%)

- Does not maintain eyecontact.

- Demonstrates noconfidence and fails tointeract with theinterviewers.

- Does not project acomposed/relaxeddemeanor anddemonstrates distractingmannerisms.

- Seldom maintains eyecontact.

- Demonstrates someconfidence and interactsminimally withinterviewers.

- Sometimes projects acomposed/relaxeddemeanor anddemonstrates minimaldistracting mannerisms.

- Often maintains eyecontact with theinterviewers.

- Demonstratesconfidence andeffectively interacts withthe interviewers.

- Usually projects acomposed/relaxeddemeanor and avoidsdistracting mannerisms.

- Most always maintainseye contact.

- Demonstrates a strongdegree of confidence andleadership, alwaysinteracting respectfullyand cooperatively withthe interviewers.

- Most always projects acomposed and relaxeddemeanor and does notexhibit any distractingmannerisms.



Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinquished

< 5 points 6 -7 points 8 - 10 points 11+ points

Created with LiveText - livetext.com

senior portfolio rubric - lock haven · senior portfolio rubric ... skills, and dispositions. ......

Documents