sensor and control development for existing and future power … › ... › fuel-cells-archive ›...
TRANSCRIPT
Sensor and Control Development forExisting and Future Power Systems
SECA Program
Review Meeting
June 18-19, 2002
Susan Maley, Sensors and Controls Project ManagerNational Energy Technology Laboratory
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Power Systems Advanced Research
Bridge the gap betweenfundamental andapplied technologies
Reflective of industryneeds and responsible fordriving new technologies
Ingenuity, Innovation and Implementation
Materials Instrumentation, Sensors, & Controls
SBIR, UCR & HBCU ProgramsModeling & Simulation
Cross-cutting Technologies and Programs
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
• Lost cost / high benefit technology− Comparatively small capital investment
− Lower operating and maintenance costs
− Enhance efficiency and reduce emissions
− Increase reliability
• Opportunity for existing facilities− Dated systems
− Deregulation
− Regulatory emissions monitoring and control
− Installation and operation of SCR systems
• A must for new facilities− High performance and reliability expectations
− Protect capital investment
− Minimize operational and maintenance cost
NETL’s Interest - Driving Advancements inInstrumentation, Sensors, and Control Technology
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
• Strategies− Develop technology suited for
harsh conditions− Screen and accept development
risk− Maintain stakeholder involvement
including developers and users− Take a whole system approach− Capitalize on technology
deployment skills− Direct recent advancements in
sensor technology towards fossilfuel applications
Instrumentation, Sensor, and ControlSystems Program
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
• Program Structure− Basic plan with specific road maps
− Defined metrics for AR projects
− Funding for a defined timeline
− Time-phased, results driven program to keeppace with Vision 21 program and industry
− Internal and external R&D in both fundamentalresearch and engineering development
− Collaboration with other developers and users
− Technology transfer through line organizationsand industry
Instrumentation, Sensor, and ControlSystems Program
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
ISCS Program Framework
Program Goals are traceable to projects
Goals
Objectives
Technical
Challenges
Approaches
ResultsProjects
Proj-1
Proj-2
Proj-4
Proj-3
Goals
Objectives
Technical
Challenges
Approaches
Prog
ram
Goa
ls
Focus Area Goals
• Project Reviews
• FY Program Planning
Primary Product Support Areas:
• Gas Turbines, Fuel Cells
• Gasification, Combustion
• Vision 21
Roadmaps
Physical MetrologyGas/Particle Metrology
Safety/Security Mon.
Control / Condition Mon.
Basic Research
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Vision 21 - Ultra-Clean Energy Plant of the Future
INPUTFossil-basedFeedstocks- Coal- Gas & Oil
OpportunityFeedstocks
- Biomass- Mun. Waste- Petcoke
OUTPUT
Electricity
Transportation Fuels
Syngas
Chemicals
Hydrogen
Steam
Materials Sensors & Controls
Computational Modeling& Virtual Simulation
Gasification
Gas Purification
Turbines
Gas Separation
Fuel CellsEnvironmental Control
Technology
Syngas Conversion toFuels & Chemicals
Combustion & High Temperature
Heat Exchange
Systems Analysis & Systems Integration
Flexiblefeedstock
Electricity & co-products
• Flexible feedstock• Electricity and co-products• Maximum efficiency• Near-zero emissions
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Vision 21 Technology Roadmap
Goals
Barriers
Approaches
Efficiency Environmental Cost Timing
• Component performance• Real time plant performance• Equipment health
Sensors• $35/kW
• Integrated with technologymodule cost
Program & Support
• Fragmented markets• Treated as add on
items
General Technical
• Limited & constrainedaccessibility
• Harsh operating conditions• Materials limitations
0-5Years
5-10Years
10-15Years
• Identify sensor needs and requirements• Extend sensor development program• Assess state-of-the-art sensors and identify gaps
• Revise priority needs• Demonstrate new sensors technology in operating
plants
• Demonstrate new sensors technology in Vision 21• Support Vision 21 plant design and operation
activities• Assess the payback
0-5Years
5-10Years
10-15Years
• Focus on in-situ, real time, fast response, fieldhardened sensors
• Develop sensors based on new concepts andtechnologies
• Continue supporting development of sensors• Test and incorporate new sensors into advanced
control systems
• Continue supporting development and sensordemonstration projects
• 0-5 year goals
• 5-10 year goals
• 10-15 year goals
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Vision 21 Technology Roadmap
Goals
Barriers
Approaches
Efficiency Environmental Cost
• Real time management of thepower plant assets
• Closed loop process optimization
• $35/kW
• Integrated with technologymodule cost
• Development of advanced controls is underfunded• Long response times for associated hardware (e.g. valves)• Insufficient knowledge of some processes such as NOX
generation and trace elements
0-5Years
5-10Years
10-15Years
• Define process control needs• Evaluate state-of-the-art control technologies• Direct plant and component development programs
toward intelligently controllable systems
• Direct devlopment of components and plants to leverageadvanced control and predictive maintenance
• Update program to reflect new plant needs and technologydevelopment
• Demonstrate innovative process control technologies
Controls
Timing
• 0-5 year goals
• 5-10 year goals
• 10-15 year goals
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Sensors and Controls Needs - Workshop Results
Computational Modeling andSimulation/Virtual Simulation
GasPurification
GasSeparation
Fuel Cells
Turbines
Advanced MaterialsSystemIntegration
POWER
FUELS
Fuel Cell
Anode
Cathode
Gasification and Advanced Combustion
• Temperature
• Fuel / air ratiocontrol
• Robust sensors
• Feed flow andanalysis
• Particle sensing
• Mercury
• Standardizedsignaling
• Alkali monitor
• O2 control
• Sensors forcatalyst or anodeprotection
• Gas Sensors
• Flow & Pressure
• Diagnostic toolsfor fuel cellmanufacturingand operation
• Other needsunder discovery
• Temperature
• Particulate
• Fuel ratio / burnerbalancing
• Pressure pulsation
• Thermal barrier coating
• Fast sensors and actuators
• Control algorithms forcombustion instability
ProcessHeat/Steam
Electricity
HydrogenSeparation
Gas StreamCleanup
Gasification
OxygenMembrane
Coal & Other Fuels
LiquidsConversion
High Efficiency Turbine
• High temperature sensing materials
Controls• Supervisory control
• Integrated control
• Neural nets
• Predictive, adaptive control
• Modeling
Environmental Control Technology- - - - Mercury- NOx- Particulate
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
POWER
FUELS
Fuel Cell
Anode
Cathode
ProcessHeat/Steam
Electricity
HydrogenSeparation
Gas StreamCleanup
Gasification
OxygenMembrane
Coal & Other Fuels
LiquidsConversion
High Efficiency Turbine
Overlapping Sensor Needs and Barriers
Needs
Physical Measurements - Temperature, Pressure, FlowGases - H2, CO, O2, hydrocarbonsDiagnostic Sensors
Barriers
High temperature - High rate of failureEnvironment - Cross sensitivitySystem Interface - System access - Protective housing
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Instrumentation, Sensors and Control Active ProjectsComputational Modeling andSimulation/Virtual Simulation
Gas Separation
Fuel Cells
Turbines
Advanced Materials
SystemIntegration
Gasification and Advanced Combustion
Electricity
OxygenMembrane
Coal & Other Fuels
POWER
FUELS
Fuel CellAnode
Cathode
ProcessHeat/Steam
HydrogenSeparation
Gas StreamCleanup
Gasification LiquidsConversion
High Efficiency Turbine
Controls
• Temperature sensorsfor slagging gasifiers
• Solids Velocity Probefor circulatingfluidized beds
• On-line carboncontent monitor
• Coal content/Oregrade sensor
• On-line rapidcorrosion indicator
• Refractory laser-based contouringtechnique (PPII)
• Micro-valve designfor flow control
• Identification ofdiagnostic tools forfuel cell platemanufacturing
• Temperature and Pressure
− Embedded thermographicphosphors for temperature andpressure indication
• Fuel ratio / burner balancing
• Thermal barrier coating
− Infrared sensor for coatingdiagnostics
• Condition Monitoring
− Flashback sensor
− Eddy current sensors andparameter analysis
− RAM monitoring and controlalgorithms
• Smart Power Turbine
− NETL, GE, Sandia sensor andcontrol development andintegration
• Neural Network-based Intelligent Soot blowing (PPII)
• Distributed PowerSources - ControlRequirements
• Identify combinationsof technologymodules (V21)
• Silicon carbide-basedsensors for hightemperature
• V21 technology modulemodeling and flow sheetsimulation (V21)
• Non-destructive technique todetermine candle filter integrity
Environmental Control Technology• Elemental mercury
spectrometer• Micro gas sensors for
NOX, SOX, NH3, H2Susing metal oxides
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Project Objectives:• Fuel LHV measurement - Sandia micro-calorimeter• Flame temperature sensor - GE CRD High bandgap semiconductor photodiode• Coating life odometer - Taggants which detect incipient coating loss• Adaptive supervisory control / optimizer
GE, NETL, Sandia
Smart Power Turbine Project
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
0.0000
0.2000
0.4000
0.6000
0.8000
1.0000
EE-C1 EE-C2 EE-C3 EE-C4Cell Voltages
Vol
tage
(V
)
MEMSValves
Example of stack non-uniformityin NETL fuel cell test.
UoP ME Dept. Novel Micro-valve Design- Electro-Mechanical FEA Model predictsthe required 60 micron deflection
• Challenge: Fuel cell output varies cell-to-cell: stack suffers.
• GESD research: Local flow control using “MEMS” micro-valves.
• Benefits: Greater cell life, stack performance, and flaw tolerance.Fuel cell flow passages (red)
with MEMS valves
Jimmy Thornton & Randy GemmenUniversity of Pittsburgh
Fuel Cell Flow and Energy Management
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Silicon Carbide Based Gas SensorsSemiconductor silicon carbide (SiC) for hightemperature chemically reactive environments:
- Device operation to temperatures > 900 °C- Chemical stability- High thermal conductivity
Michigan State University & West Virginia University
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Semi-conducting Metal Oxide-based Sensor
• Real-time, in-situ,continuous monitor
• Robust in flue gasenvironment
• High sensitivity (<ppm)• Selective detection• Low cost
Nitric OxideNitrogen DioxideAmmoniaHydrogen SulfideSulfur DioxideCarbon MonoxideCarbon Dioxide
File DOE Normalized plot of SnO
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0 5 10 15Time (min)
No
rmal
ized
Res
ista
nce
(o
hm
s/o
hm
)
NONO2NH3H2SSO2
Gas Exposure
Filename:DOE Normalized plot of SnO; SnO nano Thick Film on UST (100 ppm each gas 200 °C) N-points
0.1
1
10
100
NO NO2 NH3 H2S SO2
No
rmal
ized
Fil
m R
esis
tan
ce (
oh
ms) 30s
60s90s120s“Fingerprint”
Processing
x
Sensor Research and Development Corporation
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Current Status for Sensor Development
• Numerous innovations with silicon-based devices forambient / low temperature applications.
• Automotive industry and partners most experienced indeveloping and applying micro-sensors.
• In general, prototypes available for applications withtemperatures 500 oC and lower.
• R&D in gas sensing for elevated and high temperatureapplications is ongoing.
• Issue of selectivity appears to be primary focus.
• Low interest in high temperature micro-sensordevelopment for physical measurements (e.g. TPF)
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Outlook for Sensors - 5 year
• Prototypes and 500 oC operation with reasonablesensitivity
• Select sensors and sensor systems commerciallyavailable
• Issues to examine
− Novel / new materials for high temperature applications
− Reliability and longevity relatively unproven
− Packaging and protection systems for sensors havereceived little attention
− Accuracy range needs established for application andincorporation into control systems
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Outlook for Sensors - 10 year
• Commercial/industrialapplications of both at-line and in-situ applications
• Novel approaches to integratedsensing and control
• Promotion of a whole system
• Vision 21 type demonstrations
• Competitive commercial market forcertain types of gas sensors operationaround 500 oC.• Market includes automotive, power,chemical, others.• Breakthrough to 800-1000 oC withsustained operation.
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Conclusion
• Opportunities for improvement and development
− Instrumentation improvement
− Sensor development and
− New control methodologies
− Whole system approach
• Technology to overcome barriers
− Materials, electronics durability,
− Interferences, sampling
• Research and development programs are
− Focused, industry driven, and time-phased
− Internal and external research efforts
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
ISCS Program Related Activities
• Collaboration and Communication– ISA, EPRI, PIWG, SECA– National Laboratories, Government Agencies– Users and vendors
• NETL Sponsored Workshop– Program review & roadmapping
• Issue Program Plan
• Innovation and Implementation– Seek out new or novel adaptations through focused, industry driven, and time-phased program and project portfolio– Strive towards implementation– FY03 and FY04 Solicitations
SECA Program Review Meeting - Pittsburgh, PA 6/18 & 6/19, 2002
Additional Program Information
• Robert Romanosky
Advanced Research Product Manager
NETL
304-285-4721
• Susan Maley
I,S&C Project Manager
NETL
304-285-1321
• www.netl.doe.gov/coalpower/advancedresearch/