sep 3 0 2019
TRANSCRIPT
MLIMOSES LAKE INDUSTRIES A DIVISION Of TAMA CHEMICALS
September 27, 2019
Mr. Pat Hallinan Water Quality Program Eastern Regional Office, WDOE 4601 N. Monroe Spokane, WA 99205
8248 Randolph Road NE Moses Lake, Washington 98837 USA
www.mlindustries.com P. 509.7625336 IF. 509.7625981
RECEIVED SEP 3 0 2019
Depz,rtment of Ecology Easiern VVashi.1gton Office
Re: Moses Lake Industries - WW Permit Application Renewal ST0005375
Hello Pat,
Please find enclosed Moses Lake Industries (MU) application for renewal of our industrial wastewater permit #ST0005375 which has an expiration date of September 30, 2020.
MU anticipates amending the application later this fall to support positive environmental sustainability objectives associated with minimizing waste, reducing energy usage, increasing discharge water re-use and improving treatment efficiency associated with industrial wastewater Outfall #001. Additionally, MU is working with the Port of Moses Lake to support an increase in RO generated wastewater directed to the Port's beneficial crop irrigation system.
To assist in reviewing the application, comments are provided below, including some explanation of proposed changes from the existing permit (applied for January 28, 2011/issued August 26, 2015), as well as some anticipated path forward steps and discussion of additional information that will be provided in the future to supplem'ent the application .
Permit Comments:
1. Reverse osmosis generated water flow via Outfall #004 to Port of ML.
a. This water is basically a mineral enriched form of the incoming City of Moses Lake well water supply. Relative to the characteristics of the existing RO Reject water, going forward there is not expected to be any increase in concentrations of this water versus the existing permit limits, and due to updates to the RO system operation, there may actually be some decrease in TDS concentrations for some of the operating periods.
b. Due to anticipated future growth in plant production and staffing, MU anticipates some increased water usage and discharge flows. The existing monthly average flow to the Port of Moses Lake crop irrigation system is now typically in the range of 30,000 to 40,000 gal/day versus a monthly average permit limit of 50,000 gal/day. The updated subscription agreement with the Port will be for 80,000 gal/day on a monthly average basis to cover longer term growth projections. The updated subscription agreement should be finalized very soon and will be forwarded to Ecology. This should assure good coordination and input between the Port of ML, MU and Ecology on this section of the permit. MU is requesting an increase in our Outfall #004 limit to accommodate this change.
2. Reverse osmosis generated water for seasonal on-site landscape irrigation.
a. MLl's existing permit includes the option for irrigation of on-site lawn areas. Additionally, an engineering report was submitted during the last permit cycle for replacement of the perimeter tree-line irrigation system. While MLI does not currently implement on-site irrigation, MLI requests that this option be maintained in the permit should it become needed in the future. MLI understands that prior to implementation, appropriate irrigation and crop management plans and related documentation and monitoring would need to be submitted and implemented as described in the existing permit.
3. Outfall #001 industrial wastewater flows, future treatment upgrades and permit limits.
a. We believe the current permit limit flow of 13,000/22,000 gal/day (monthly average/daily maximum) is probably adequate at this point.
b. However, going forward, as part of anticipated future upgrades to the treatment system, such as treatment of low concentration metals waters via resin-bed ion exchange, MLI may request an increase in the daily maximum flow. This change would support the ability to collect and pretest treated wastewater in holding tanks followed by tank discharge after receiving passing lab results.
c. MLI is considering a project to increase the size of the existing neutralization tank located adjacent to the PB-95 building, internal Outfall #001 to reduce the number of times per day that employees must process/test and sample this flow. This will have no effect on discharge concentrations, and is simply a labor savings item, since the existing tank was installed decadesago when the facility was much smaller.
d. MLI understands that an Engineering Report and Plans will need to be submitted and appropriate approvals obtained from WDOE for these upgrades. We have been conducting onsite treatment trials to generate data that will be included in a future Engineering Report. In the event this project is implemented MLI would propose that the Subpart AJ concentration limits in 40CFR415.365 which refers to 40CFR415.364 would apply as well as potentially the analogous Subpart BM limits in 40CFR415.657 which refers to 40CFR415.654 in the event such water is processed.
e. MLl's existing permit includes a color discharge limit for Outfall #001 under Sl.A. of 15 color units. The 15 color unit limit does not appear to be appropriate as it was originally issued based on a City of Moses Lake Local Limit that was itself established incorrectly. We understand that the City of Moses Lake color limit issue was identified and then revised up to 100 color units. As such, it seems appropriate to coordinate the limit in MLl's permit. MLI made such request in 2016 and requests that it be updated in this permit cycle.
2 of 3
4. Source Control and Monitoring Improvements.
a. MU has implemented and continues to focus on source control and monitoring improvements. These include collection of sump water from the PB-97 area, PB-90 area as well as boiler blowdown wastewater and storm-water accumulation water from the DMC pad area.
b. Additionally, we have implemented on-line conductivity monitoring for steam condensate return to the boiler from the PB-97 evaporators. It is anticipated that the future resin bed ionexchange treatment system will be utilized to provide treatment for this wastewater along with certain streams from the PB-97 scrubber systems and possibly the boiler blow-downs.
5. Management of On-site Storm Water.
a. MU is located in a desert region of Washington and does not discharge stormwater off-site . The closest surface water body is over 1 mile to the east. The vast majority of stormwater from impervious surfaces immediately infiltrates adjacent to buildings and roadways, with a small amount directed to on-site drywells. As part of voluntary clean-up and source control activities MU submitted a report in November 2017 and received a No Further Action (NFA) letter from the Ecology MTCA program (with cc to the Water Program) on roof, soil, asphalt and drywell clean-up activities along with runoff water sampling in the vicinity of PB-97. MU anticipates closure of this drywell later this fall as part of changing the runoff sloping in the area and updated asphalt work.
Section J: POTW Certifications.
We will be separately forwarding the certifications from the City of Moses Lake for the Outfall #001 and Port of Moses Lake for Outfall #004.
MU appreciates the input and suggestions of Ecology relative to upgrades to our wastewater. We anticipate the generation of additional treatment and monitoring information and look forward to reviewing with Ecology later this fall.
Best Regards,
Patrick J. Blau EHSS Manager [email protected] Office: 509-762-5336 x236 Mobile: 509-761-8254
3 of 3
DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY State of Washington
Application for a State Waste Discharge Permit to Discharge Industrial Wastewater
to a Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (POTW)
This application is for a state waste discharge permit for a discharge of industrial wastewater to a publicly-owned treatment works (POTW) as required by Chapter 90.48 RCW and Chapter 173-216 WAC. It is designed to provide Ecology with information on pollutants in the waste stream, materials that may enter the waste stream, and the flow characteristics of the discharge.
Ecology may request additional information to clarify the conditions of this discharge. The applicant should reference information previously submitted to Ecology that applies to this application in the appropriate section.
SECTION A. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant Name: Moses Lake Industries Inc.
2. Facility Name:-------------------------------(if different from Applicant)
3. Applicant Mail Address: 8248 Randolph Rd NE Street
Moses Lake WA City/State
4. Facility Location Address: (if different from 3 above) Street
City/State
5. UBINo.
6.
98837 Zip
Zip
Sometimes called a registration, tax, "C," or resale number, the Unified Business Identifier (UBI) number is a nine-digit number used to identify persons engaging in business activities. The number is assigned when a person completes a Master Business Application to register with or obtain a license from state agencies. The Departments of Revenue, Licensing, Employment Security, Labor and Industries, and the Corporations Division of the Secretary of State are among the state agencies participating in the UBI program.
Latitude/longitude of the facility as decimal degrees (NAD83/WGS84):
48.20194 / 119.2944
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Check One: New/ Renewal D Modification D Date Application Date Fee I Application/ I Date Application Received -- Paid -- Pennit No. __ Accepted __
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 1 of 24
7. Person to contact who is familiar with the infonnation contained in this application:
Pat Blau EHSS Manager Name Title
509-762-5336 X 236 Telephone number Fax number
8. Check One:
~ Permit Renewal (including renewal of temporary permits)
Does this application request a greater amount of wastewater discharge, a greater amount of pollutant discharge, or a discharge of different pollutants than specified in the last permit application for this facility? ~ YES D NO
For permit renewals, the current permit is an attachment, by reference, to this application.
~ Permit Modification
D Existing Unpermitted Discharge
D Proposed Discharge
Anticipated date of discharge: __
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of a fine and/or imprisonment for knowing violations.
~=;rt:?= President Title
Hiro Era P1inted Name
* Applications must be signed as follows: corporations, by a principal executive officer of at least the level of vice-president; partnership, by a general partner; sole proprietorship, by the proprietor. If these titles do not apply to your organization, the person who makes budget decisions for this facility must sign the application.
The application signatory may delegate signature authority for submittals required by the permit, such as monthly reports, to a suitable employee. You can delegate this authority to a qualified individual or to a position, which you expect to fill with a qualified individual. If you wish to delegate signature authority, please complete the following:
Signature of delegated employee Date Title or function at the facility
P1inted name
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 2 of 24
SECTION B. PRODUCT INFORMATION 1. Briefly describe all manufacturing processes and products, and/or commercial activities, at this
facility. Provide the applicable Standard Industrial Category (SIC) and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code(s) for each activity (see North American Industrial Classification System, 2007 ed.). You can find the 1997 NAICS codes and the corresponding 1987 Standard Industry Category (SIC) codes at (http://www.census .gov/epcd/naics/frames3.htm).
Description: Mose Lake Industries (MLI) manufactures and repackages specialty chemicals for the semiconductor industry. Products include: 1) the manufacture of tetramethylammonium carbonate (TMAC) solutions in water (SIC 2869), 2) manufacture of tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) solutions in water (SIC 2869), 3) manufacture of organic polymer (SIC 2869), 4) manufacture of copper(II) sulfate and purification of cobalt sulfate (SIC 2819), 5) manufacture and formulation of copper and cobalt electroplating solutions (SIC 2819), 6) formulation of plating additive solutions (SIC 2819), 7) formulation of laboratory reagents (SIC 2819), 8) DI water production, and 9) QA/QC lab operations. The primary SIC for the facility is 2869. The secondary SIC is 2819.
2. List raw materials and products used at his facility:
Type RAW MATERIALS Quantity
Grapes (Example) 1,000 tons per year
Trimethylamine - input to make TMAC 17,000,000 to 25,000,000 lbs
Dimethylcarbonate - input to make TMAC 27,000,000 to 40,000,000 lbs
Tetramethylammonium carbonate solution 60,000,000 to 90,000,000 lbs (TMAC) - Intermediate raw material produced for on-site and off-site use as a raw material to make TMAH
Copper rod - Input to make copper sulfate 500,000 to 1,000,000 lbs
Cobalt Sulfate Heptahydrate to purification 160,000 to 240,000 lbs
Sulfuric acid - Input to make copper sulfate 1,800,000 to 2,800,000 lbs
Type PRODUCTS Quantity
Grape Juice(Example) 300,000 gallons per year
TMAH solution 6,000,000 to 8,000,000 lbs
Copper and cobalt plating and plating additive 3,000,000 to 5,000,000 gal solutions
Tetramethylammonium carbonate (TMAC) 20,000,000 to 40,000,000 lbs
Methanol co-product generated/used by TMAC 800,000 to 1,500,000 lbs process and ultimately consumed on-site as boiler fuel.
Organic Polymer 5 to 15 tons
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 3 of 24
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 4 of 24
SECTION C. PLANT OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS 1. For each process listed in B.1. that generates wastewater, list the process, assign the waste stream a
name and an ID# and describe whether it is a batch or continuous flow.
Waste Batch (B) or
Process Waste Stream Name Stream ID#
Continuous (C) Process
DI water production (8) RO reject water WS#l C
TMAH production (2) and Process Wastewater WS#2 B Lab operations (9)
2. On a separate sheet, produce a schematic drawing showing production processes, water flow through the facility, wastewater treatment devices and waste streams as named above. The drawing should indicate the source of intake water and show the operations contributing wastewater to the effluent. The treatment units should be labeled. Construct a water balance by showing average flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and points of discharge to the POTW. (See the example on page 16 of this application form.)
3. What is the maximum daily wastewater discharge flow? 22,000 to City of ML POTW gallons/day
4.
What is the maximum average monthly wastewater discharge flow ( daily flows averaged over a month)?
13,000 to City of ML POTW gallons/day
Describe any planned wastewater treatment improvements or changes in wastewater disposal methods, and the schedule for these improvements. (Use additional sheets, if necessary and label as attachment C4.)
1. In order to improve water treatment efficiency, increase water re-use/recovery, reduce waste generation and reduce energy useage MLI is evaluating the feasibility of installing a resin-bed ion-exchange treatment system to treat certain low concentration metals streams. MLI has conducted onsite non-discharge trials and anticipates providing an updated
permit application with a supporting Engineering Report and related documents later in 2019 for this project. This project supports efforts that have been made by MLI to improve source control, monitoring and positive environmental sustainability.
2. MLI is contracting with the Port of Moses Lake to increase the maximum existing RO Reject wastewater permitted discharge volumes from the existing 50,000 gal/day to 80,000 gal/day (monthly average). There will be no increase in the concentrations of allowable discharges.
3. MLI is considering a project to increase the size of the existing neutralization tank located adjacent to the PB-95 building, internal Outfall #001 to reduce the number of times per day that employees must process/test and sample this flow. This will have no affect on discharge concentrations, and is simply a labor savings item, since the existing tank was installed decades ago when the facility was much smaller.
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 5 of 24
5. If production processes are subject to seasonal variations, provide the following information. The combined value for each month should equal the estimated total monthly flow. Please indicate the proper flow unit by checking one of the following boxes:
[8J gallons per day D gallons per month
MONTHS Waste Stream ID#
J F M A M J J
WS #I to Pott of ML-Cmrent contract/limit
80000 80000 80000 80000 80000 80000 80000 50,000/day, future 80,000 listed is listed here and below.
WS # I to Onsite Irrigation -note currently active, but 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 available
WS #2 to Larson POTW 13000 13000 13000 13000 13000 13000 13000
Estimated Total Monthly Flow (GPD)
93000 93000 93000 93000 93000 93000 93000
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011)
D million gallons per month
A s 0 N
80000 80000 80000 80000
0 0 0 0
13000 13000 13000 13000
93000 93000 93000 93000
D
80000
0
13000
93000
Page 6 of 24
6. How many hours a day does this facility typically operate?
How many days a week does this facility typically operate? 1
How many weeks per year does this facility typically operate? 52
7. List all incidental materials, such as oil, paint, grease, solvents, and cleaners, that are used or stored on site (list only those with quantities greater than 10 gallons for liquids and 5 0 pounds for solids). For solvents and solvent-based cleaners, include a copy of the material safety data sheet and estimate the quantity used. (Use additional sheets, if necessary, and label as attachment C. 7.)
8.
Materials/Quantity Stored: Note: Key materials are already listed in the Section B-2 Raw Materials and Products section. Due to containment, production processes and other features there is a low probability of contact with the wastewater system for other materials.
A variety of other maintenance related items may be utilized which again are kept separate from water systems. Examples may include: 1) 30 gallons of oil based or epoxy paint for architectural painting, 2) 55 gallon drum of waste paint, 3) 55 gallon drum of d-Limonene (citrus base cleaner), 3) 55 gallon drum of used oil, 4) 55 gallon drum of used antifreeze, 5) 55 gallon drum of waste maintenance solvents (Acetone, MEK, Toluene, Mineral Spirits).
Other process materials for production of Specialty Department and Additive Synthesis Department production of plating additives are similarly not part of major water related operations.
Some types of facilities are required to have spill or waste control plans. Does Yes this facility have:
a. A spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plan ( 40 CFR 112)? • b. An Oil Spill Contingency Plan ( chapter 173-182 WAC)? ~
C. An emergency response plan (per WAC 173-303-350)? • d. A runoff, spillage, or leak control plan (per WAC 173-216-11 0(f))? ~
e. Any spill or pollution prevention plan required by local, state or federal
~ authorities? If yes specify: WDOE P2 Plan
f. A solid waste control plan? ~
g. A Slug Discharge Control Plan (40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(v))? ~
No
~
• ~
• • • •
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 7 of 24
SECTION D. WATER CONSUMPTION AND WATER LOSS
1. Potable water source(s):
~• Public System (Specify)
Do Private Well D Surface Water
a. Water Right Permit Number: ____ _
b. Legal Description of Water Source
__ ¼S, __ ¼E, _ _., Section, __ TWN, __ R
2. Potable water use
a. Indicate total water use_
Gallons per day (average) 70,000 to 100,000 future
Gallons per day (maximum) 90,000 to 140,000 future
b. Is water metered?
~ YES ONO
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 8 of 24
SECTION E. WASTEWATER INFORMATION
1. How are the water intake and effluent flows measured?
Intake: F~lo~w~m~et~e~r _____________ _
Effluent Ma'°g""""F""""l-"-ow-'-'--"-'m=e=te=r'-------------
2. Describe the collection method for the samples analyzed below. (i.e., grab, 24-hour composite). Applicants must collect grab samples (not composites) for analysis of pH, temperature, cyanide, total phenols, residual chlorine, oil and grease, fecal coliform (including E.coli), and Enterococci (previously known as fecal streptococcus at§ 122.26 (d)(2)(iii)(A)(3)),or volatile organics.
Samples collected by grab/composite from internal outfall #001 to City of Moses Lake and from outfall #004 that goes to the Port of Moses Lake Land Treatment System or if utilized on-site irrigation. Conductivity and pH via continous probes. Values above are based on monthly DMRs for the last year August 2018 to July 2019, and other through September 2019.
3. Has the effluent been analyzed for any other parameters than those identified in question E.4.? [l8ll YES O NO If yes, attach results and label as attachment E.4. This data must clearly show the date, method and location of sampling. (Note: Ecology may require additional testing.)
4. Provide measurements or range of measurements for treated wastewater prior to discharge to the POTW for the parameters with an "X" in the left column. If you obtain the application from the internet, contact Ecology' s regional office to see if testing for a subset of these parameters is permissible. All analyses ( except pH) must be conducted by a laboratory registered or accredited by Ecology (WAC 173-216-125). If this is an application for permit renewal, provide data for the last year for those parameters that are routinely measured. For parameters measured only for this application, place the values under "Maximum." Report the values with units as specified in the parameter name or in the detection level.
The Permittee must use the specified analytical methods, detection limits (DLs) and quantitation levels (QLs) in the following table unless Ecology approves an alternate method or the method used produces measurable results in the sample and EPA has listed it as an EPA approved method in 40 CFR Part 136. If the Permittee uses an alternative method as allowed above, it must report the test method, DL, and QL on the discharge monitoring report or in the required report.
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 9 of 24
Measurement Values Number Analytical Method Detection X Parameter of Std. Methods 191h,201h Limit/Quantitation
Minimum Maximum Average Analyses edition or EPA Level
X BOD (5 day) 9 200 89 12 SM 5210 B /2 mg/I
COD SM 5220 D /10 mg/I
X Total suspended solids nd<I0 ??AUG '18 12 SM 2540 D /5 mg/I
Fixed Dissolved Solids SM 2540 E . ..
··· .. ·• .·
X Total dissolved solids 64 192 420 96 SM 2540 C ··• . ·. ·•.· .. . .. , ,, :,,, ,' ,,,, ,,, ',
X Conductivity 87 1136 421 Continuous SM 2510 B 1· ... <· .. (micromhos/cm) • ..
X Ammonia-N as N .54 .84 1.6 12 SM 4500-NH3 C /0.3 mg/l
X pH 6.1 9.7 7.6 Continuous SM 4500-H 0.1 standard units
Fecal coliform SM 9221 E or 9222 D \ :\ .·
(organisms/100 ml) ... .. Total coliform SM 9221 B or 9222 B .. · ... •·
(organisms/100 ml) < •. .
Dissolved oxygen SM 4500-0 C/G .. .
.. • X Nitrate + nitrite-N as N .48 1.63 2.9 12 SM 4500-NQ3 E 100 µg/l
X Total kjeldahl N as N .89 3.26 16 12 SM 4500-Norg C/E/FG 300 µg/1
Ortho-phosphate-P as P SM 4500-P E/F 10 µg/1
Total-phosphorous-P as P SM 4500-P E/P/F 10 µg/1
Total Oil & grease EPA 1664A 1.4/5 mg/I
NWTPH - Ox Ecology NWTPH Ox 250/250 µg/1
NWTPH- Gx Ecology NWTPH Gx 250/250 µg/1
Calcium 35 35 35 I EPA200.7 10 µg/1
X Chloride 4.4 6.5 11.0 12 SM 4500-CI C 0.15 µg/1
Fluoride SM 4500-F E .025/0.1 mg/I
Magnesium EPA200.7 10/50 µg/1
Potassium EPA200.7 700/ µg/1
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 10 of 24
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Measurement Values Number Analytical Method Detection Parameter of Std. Methods 191h,201h Limit/Quantitation
Minimum Maximum Average Analyses edition or EPA Level
Sodium 9.8 16.8 41 12 EPA200.7 29/ µg/I
Sulfate 9.8 18.8 55 12 SM 4500-SO4 C/D /200 µg/I
Arsenic(total) .0024 .0024 .0025 I EPA 200.8 0.1/0.5 µg/I
Barium (total) .011 .01 I .011 I EPA 200.8 0.5/2 µg/I
Cadmium (total) ND<.0004 ND<.0004 ND<.0004 1 EPA 200.8 .05/.25 µg/I
Chromium (total) .0033 .0033 .0033 1 EPA 200.8 0.2/1 µg/I
Copper (total) .44 14 EPA 200.8 0.4/2 µg/I
Lead (total) nd<.0008 11 EPA 200.8 0.1/.5 µg/I
Mercury (total) pg/L nd<.0002 I EPA 1631E 0.2/0.5 pg/I
Molybdenum(total) EPA 200.8 0.1/0.5 µg/I
Nickel(total) .046 11 EPA 200.8 0.1/0.5 µg/I
Selenium (total) nd<.008 11 EPA200.8 1 /1 µg/I
Silver (total) nd<.0004 11 EPA200.8 .04/.2 µg/I
Zinc (total) .38 2 EPA200.8 0.5/2.5 µg/I
6. Does this facility use any of the following chemicals as raw materials or produce them as part of the manufacturing process, or are they present in the wastewater? [gj] YES D NO
(The number in the column next to the chemical name is the Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) reference number to aid in identifying the compound.)
If yes, specify how the chemical is used and the quantity used or produced: Copper (rod for CuSO4 production) 500,000 to 1,000,000 lbs/year. Wastes or byproducts from this process are collected and shipped off-site for disposal or re-use/recycling. Nickel - R&D - Not a potential part of wastewater process. Silver - production of lab testing materials, silver nitrate - Not a potential part of wastewater process.
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 11 of24
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011)
METALS, CYANIDE & TOTAL PHENOLS
Antimony, Total 7440-36-0 Nickel, Total 7440-02-0 Arsenic, Total 7440-38-2 Selenium, Total 7782-49-2 Beryllium, Total 7440-41-7 Silver, Total 7440-22-4 Cadmium, Total 7440-43-9 Thallium, Total 7440-28-0 Chromium (hex) dissolved 18540-29-9 Zinc, Total 7440-66-6 Chromium, Total 7440-47-3 Copper, Total 7440-50-8 Cyanide, Total 57-12-5 Lead, Total 7439-92-1 Cyanide, Weak Acid Dissociable Mercury, Total 7439-97-6) Phenols, Total
PESTICIDES
Aldrin 309-00-2 Endrin 72-20-8 alpha-BHC 319-84-6 Endrin Aldehyde 7421-93-4 beta-BHC 319-85-7 Heptachlor 76-44-8 qamma-BHC 58-89-9 Heptachlor Epoxide 1024-57-3 delta-BHC 319-86-8 PCB-1242 53469-21-9 Chlordane 57-74-9 PCB-1254 11097-69-1 4,4'-DDT 50-29-3 PCB-1221 11104-28-2 4,4'-DDE 72-55-9 PCB-1232 11141-16-5 4,4' DDD 72-54-8 PCB-1248 12672-29-6 Dieldrin 60-57-1 PCB-1260 11096-82-5 alpha-Endosulfan 959-98-8 PCB-1016 1267 4-11-2 beta-Endosulfan 33213-65-9 Toxaphene 8001-35-2 Endosulfan Sulfate 1031-07-8
VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
Acrolein 107-02-8 Acrvlonitrile 107-13-1 1, 1-Dichloroethylene 75-35-4 Benzene 71-43-2 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 Bromoform 75-25-2 1,3-dichloropropene (mixed isomers) 542-75-6
( 1,2-dichloropropylene) Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 Methyl bromide (Bromomethane) 74-83-9 Chloroethane 75-00-3 Methyl chloride (Chloromethane) 74-87-3 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 110-75-8 Methylene chloride) 75-09-2 Chloroform 67-66-3 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 Toluene ( 108-88-3) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (541-73-1) 1,2-T rans-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5
(Ethylene dichloride) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 Dichlorobromomethane 75-27-4 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 1 , 1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4
ECY040-177(Rev. 5/2011) Page 13 of 24
ACID COMPOUNDS
2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 4-nitrophenol 100-02-7 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 Parachlorometa cresol 59-50-7
( 4-chloro-3-methylphenol) 2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol 534-52-1 Phenol 108-95-2 (2-methyl-4,6,-dinitrophenol) 2,4 dinitrophenol 51-28-5 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5
BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (compounds in bold are Ecology PBTs)
Acenaphthene 83-32-9 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 Diethyl phthalate 84-66-2 Anthracene 120-12-7 Dimethyl phthalate 131-11-3 Benzidine 92-87-5 Di-n-butyl phthalate) 84-74-2 Benzyl butyl phthalate 85-68-7 2,4-dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 Benzo( a )anthracene 56-55-3 2,6-dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 Benzo(b )fluoranthene 205-99-2 Di-n-octyl phthalate 117-84-0 (3,4-benzofluoranthene) Benzo(j)fluoranthene 205-82-3 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as 122-66-7
Azobenzene) Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 Fluoranthene 206-44-0 ( 11 , 12-benzofluoranthene) Benzo(r,s, t)pentaphene 189-55-9 Fluorene 86-73-7
Benzo( a )pyrene 50-32-8 Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 Benzo(ghi)Perylene 191-24-2 Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 111-91-1 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4
Bis( 2-chloroethyl)ether 111-44-4 Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 39638-32-9 I ndeno( 1, 2, 3-cd)Pyrene 193-39-5
Bis(2-ethy/hexy/)phthalate 117-81-7 lsophorone 78-59-1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 101-55-3 3-Methyl cholanthrene 56-49-5 2-Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 Naphthalene 91-20-3 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 7005-72-3 Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 Chrvsene 218-01-9 N-Nitrosodimethylamine 62-75-9 Dibenzo (a,j)acridine 224-42-0 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 621-64-7
Dibenzo (a,h)acridine 226-36-8 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 86-30-6 Dibenzo( a-h )anthracene 53-70-3 Perylene 198-55-0 ( 1,2,5,6-dibenzanthracene) Dibenzo( a,e )pyrene 192-65-4 Phenanthrene 85-01-8 Dibenzo(a,h)pyrene 189-64-0 Pyrene 129-00-0
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 14 of 24
7. Are any other pesticides, herbicides or fungicides used at this facility? [gjJ YES D NO
If yes, specify the material and quantity used:
Small amounts utilized by contract vendor for lawn care and surrounding site vegitation control. Not believed to have a likely mechanism to enter site wastewater discharges.
8 Are there other pollutants that you know of or believe to be present? [gjJ YES D NO
If yes, specify the pollutants and their concentration if known (attach laboratory analyses if available as Attachment E8):
Trace amounts of the trimethylammonium ion associated with TMAH/TMAC has historically been identified as present. Methanol at 0.193 and 0.305 mg/L J flag. Cu, plus others typcially at background levels (attachment provided and via other reports to WDOE).
9. Is the wastewater being discharged, or proposed for discharge, to the POTW
10.
designated as a dangerous waste according to the procedures in Chapter 173-303 WAC?
0 YES [gjJ NO 0 DON'TKNOW
If the answer to question 9 above is yes, how did the waste designate as a dangerous waste (check appropriate box)?
For Listed and TCLP Characteristic Wastes only, also provide the Dangerous Waste Number(s).
Listed Waste D
Characteristic Wastes
Ignitable [gjJ Reactive [gjJ Corrosive [gjJ
TCLP • State Only Dangerous Wastes
Toxicity IZI
Persistent D
Dangerous Waste Number(s)
Dangerous Waste Number( s) D003
Dangerous Waste Number( s)
D00l, D002,
For questions about waste designation under the Dangerous Waste Regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC, contact Ecology's Hazardous Waste and Toxics Program at:
Northwest Regional Office - Bellevue Southwest Regional Office - Lacey Central Regional Office - Yakima
( 425) 649-7000 (360) 407-6300 (509) 575-2490
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 15 of 24
Eastern Regional Office - Spokane (509) 329-3400
SECTION F. SEWER INFORMATION 1. Is an inspection and sampling manhole or similar structure available on-site? [gj] YES D NO
If yes, attach a map or hand drawing of the facility that shows the location of these structures (Label as attachment Fl or this may be combined with map in H8, if H8 is applicable to your facility.)
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 16 of 24
SECTION G. OTHER PERMITS 1. List all environmental control pennits or approvals needed for this facility; for example, air
emission permits.
Air permit 19AQ-E002
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 17 of 24
SECTION H. STORMWATER I .Do you have coverage under the Washington State Industrial Stormwater
NPDES General Permit? If yes, please list the permit number here. __
If no, have you applied for a Washington State Storm water Industrial Stormwater General Permit?
If you answered no to both questions above, complete the following questions 2 through 5.
2. Does your facility discharge stormwater: (Check all that apply)
0 YES lf2JI NO
0 YES lf2JI NO
D To stom1 sewer system (provide name of storm sewer system operator: ______ _
D Directly to any surface waters of Washington State (e.g., river, lake, creek, estua,y, ocean).
Specify waterbody name(s) _____________________ _
D Indirectly to surface waters of Washington State (i.e., flows over adjacent properties first).
lf2JI• To a Sanitary Sewer
lf2JI Directly to ground waters of Washington State via:
lf2JI• Dry well
D Drainfield
D Other
3. Areas with industrial activities at facility: (check all that apply)
lf2JI• Manufacturing Building
lf2JI• Material Handling
lf2JI• Material Storage
0 • Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal (Refers to RCRA, Subtitle C Facilities Only)
lf2JI• Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal
lf2JI• Application or Disposal of Wastewaters
lf2JI• Storage and Maintenance of Material Handling Equipment
lf2JI• Vehicle Maintenance
D • Areas Where Significant Materials Remain
lf2JI• Access Roads and Rail Lines for Shipping and Receiving
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 18 of 24
Do Other (please specify): ____ _
4. Material handling/management practices
a. Types of materials handled and/or stored outdoors: (check all that apply)
Do Solvents [2]o Hazardous Wastes
[2]o Scrap Metal [2]o Acids or Alkalies
[2]o Petroleum or Petrochemical Products Do Paints/Coatings
[2Jj[J Plating Products Do W oodtreating Products
Do Pesticides [2]o Other (please list): Universal Wastes in containment
b. Identify existing management practices employed to reduce pollutants in industrial stonnwater discharges: (check all that apply)
Do Oil/Water Separator Do Detention Facilities
[2]o Contaim11ent Do Infiltration Basins
[2]• Spill Prevention [2]o Operational BMPs
Do Surface Leachate Collection Do Vegetation Management
[2]o Overhead Coverage On L; Other (please list): __
5. Attach a facility site map showing stonnwater drainage/collection areas, disposal areas and discharge points. This may be a hand-drawn map if no other site map is available (See example on page 16 of this application). Label this as attachment H.5.
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 19 of 24
SECTION I. OTHER INFORMATION 1. Describe liquid wastes or sludges being generated by your facility that are not disposed of in the
waste stream(s) and how they are being disposed of. For each type of waste, provide type of waste and the name, address, and phone number of the hauler.
/Hazarous and non-hazardous wastes are generated from laboratory and production processes. Corrosive wastes and trace metals containing wastes are neutralized and evaporated as allowed under the Treatement-By-Generator rules. Non-hazardous waste residue and other hazardous wastes including some limited flammable wastes are stored in DOT approved containers and disposed of off site at pennitted TSDFs.
Non-hazardous waters and residues are transported by GrayMar to the Finley Butte facility in Boardman Oregon (541)-481-2233.
Ingenium is our primary hauler/broker (206)-268-0406 for other wastes to Chemical Waste Management or US Ecology.
2. Describe storage areas for raw materials, products, and wastes.
Raw materials are stored in covered warehouses or on concrete containment pads, with sloped concrete floors and sumps. Wastes are stored in concrete secondary containment with blind sumps. Products are stored in covered warehouses with sloped concrete floors and sumps.
3. Have you designated the wastes described above according to the applicable IIZl] YES D NO procedures of Dangerous Waste Regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC?
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 20 of 24
r,.- n e tA,,q l .
SECTION J. CERTIFICATIONS
I . Approval by Publicly-Owned Treatment Works [required by WAC 173-216-070(4)(b)]
I approve of the discharge as described in this application. The applicant is:
(Please check the appropriate box below.)
Do u A Significant Industrial User (see Definitions at the end of this Section)
101• D A Categorical Industrial User
Do C Neither of the above
Name and location of sewer system to which this project will be tributary:
Internal Outfall #001 is combined with on-site sanitary sewage flows and then discharged as Outfall #002 to the Cit¥ of Mo es Lake Larsen Treatment Planl.
EJ zl/B R.c, nck> iph Roct::( Nt ~ J\A.o5es l4k~ l~t.ts.J.~,e s, 1tJG
Treatment Works Owner: City of Moses Lake ----------------------- ---
Street: 321 South Balsam Street f:=~ [' ~ ::--_M_o_se_s_L_a_k_e,_W_A ____ ..-__ Zip: 98837
Ill~ -~ 1ol:zsk o19 P11LJ,~ wo--ks Sw.f±· Signature ()fTreatmenl Works Authority Dnt~ ' Title
Printed Name
2. Application review by Intermediate Sewer Owner at point of discharge (if applicable)
I hereby acknowledge that I have reviewed the application for discharge to this sewer system.
Name and location of sewer system to which this project will be tributary:
Sewer System Owner:
Street:
City/State: Zip:
Signalure of Sewer System Authority Date Title
Printed Name
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 21 of 24
SECTION J. CERTIFICATIONS
I. Approval by Publicly-Owned Treatment Works [required by WAC 173-216-070(4)(b))
I approve of the discharge as described in this application. The applicant is:
(Please check the appropriate box below.)
Do O A Significant Industrial User (see Definitions at the end of this Section)
D o O A Categorical Industrial User
[gj]o O Neither of the above
Name and location of sewer system to which this project will be tributary:
MLI Outfall #004 consisting of RO Reject wastewater is directed to the Port of Moses Lake land application system
Treatment Works Owner: Port of Moses Lake
Street: 7810 Andrews Street N. E.
10-8- /OJ Date
Printed Name
Zip: 98837
/,-.,-ru& Y' if-x-~Y!rtf~ Title L),~
· 2. Application review by Intermediate Sewer Owner at point of discharge (if applicable)
I hereby acknowledge that 1 have reviewed the application for discharge to this sewer system.
Name and location of sewer system to which this project will be tributary:
Sewer System Owner:
Street:
L(l,,...,;., WA Zip: ~f-Bi<:- 5~7 __ _
Signature of ve System Authority
K,,M, Jbe_Jco(/ D
/-()- 8-1 °[ Date
I ,-j7 ~ ,ri 4Lvn v L. Title ~ I ~
Printed Name
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 21 of 24
Port of Moses Lake Industrial Process Water Treatment Facility
SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between THE PORT OF MOSES LAKE (Grant County Port District No. 1 0), hereinafter referred to as the "Port'' and MOSES LAKE INDUSTRIES_ INC, hereinafter referred to as "MLI".
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Port is the owner and operator of an industrial process water treatment system and has adopted Resolution No. 1329 setting user rates charges and fees, for the Port Industrial Process Water Treatment System (the "System"); and
WHEREAS, the Port has adopted Resolution No. 1336, the Industrial Process Water Treatment Facility Use Resolution ("Resolution No. 1336'); and
WHEREAS, MLI is desirous of subscribing to monthly capacity based on an average daily discharge of 80,000 gallons; and
WHEREAS, this agreement supersedes the original subscription agreement executed January 24, 2002, and the Subscription Agreement Amendme11t #1 executed on September 2, 2008.
NOW THEREFORE,
Based on mutual promises contained herein, the Port and MLI agree to enter-into this Subscription Agreement on the following ti-rms and conditions:
1. Subscription Capacity. The Port wlll provide MLI monthly capacity based on an average daily discharge to the System. Upon the commencement date of this Agreement, the monthly capacity is based on an average daily discharge of80,000 gallons. This ls the minimum amount under the term of this Agreement and for any future renewal terms.
1.1 Additional Capacity. At the end of each calendar year, or any time during the term of this Agreement and during any renewal terms, at such time as MLI requites to reserv.e additional discharge capacity, MLI will provide the Port with sixty (60) days' advance notice, stating the need and amount for additional capacity. It is within the Port's sole discretion to agree to additional capacity. ff the Port allows the additional capacity, it will calculate an updated System Development Charge and User Charge, and 1:Qis Subscription Agreement will be modified to reflect both the additional capacity and updated charges.
J\.: ~tl E §j ~ ill -
2. Rates. MLI agrees to the User Charges and Other Charges/Fines as ~ t forth ~ Resolution No. 1329. Said Resolution is incorporated herein by reference. A cost sample of the rates calculated from Resolution No. 1329 is attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. MLI has exercised the option to finance the System Developrnent Charge ("SDC") over a life of twenty (20) years at five percent (5%) interest per annum, with an initial annual amount paid to the Pott of Eighty-Six Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-Seven Dollars ($86,827). '
3. Technical Compliance. The 'Port and MLI agree to the terms and conditions as set forth in the Resolution No. 1336, the terms and conditions of which are incorporated herein by reference, including, without limitation, Section 8 - Administrative Enforcement Remedies. Fuithermore, :MLI shall comply with the terms of the State Waste Discharge Pennit issued to it by the Washington State Department of Ecology ("Ecology") as such permit currently exists or is hereafter amended or reissued ("MLI's Permit").
3.1 Biochemical Oxygen Demand. In addition to the terms and conditions of MLI's Permit, MLI shall monitor the Biochemical Oxygen Demand in its discharge to the Port's Industrial Process Water Treatment System on a bi-annually (twice per calendar year) basis to ensure compliance with Resolution No. 1336 Table 2.4.
4. MLl's Permit Reissuance or Change. MLI will provi the Port with a draft of any proposed renewal, reissuance, or modification ofMLI's Permit rior to MLI's submittal of an application to Ecology for the same. MLI shall not submit such application to Ecology imtil the proposed changes to MLI's Permit are reviewed and approved in writing by the Port.
5. Exceptions to Local Limits (mass limitations). Although extra fees may be cha:rged as authorized under Port Resolution No. 1329, the following exceptions apply to the local limits established by Resolution No. 1336 Table 2.4:
• Total Nitrogen is allowed to reach a maximum mass of205 pounds per year or an estimated six-month average concentration of 3 ppm (mg/1).
6. Maximum Daily Flow. MLI's allowable maximum daily flow into the System is capped at 180,000 gallons per day.
7. Indemnification. Except to the extent that such failure or release is caused or contributed to by MLI, to the extent permitted by law, the Port agrees to defend, release and hold harmless MLI from all claims,.costs and liabilities asserted against MLI due to failure of the Port or other subscriber to comply with environmental laws or permits relating to the Industrial Process Water Treatment System or from the release of any hazardous substances at or from the System. This provision shall survive any termination of this Agreement.
8. Tenn. This Agreement shall be effective for four ( 4) months beginning September 1, 2019, and then shall automatically renew on an annual basis, unless terminated in writing by either party no less than ninety (90) days prior to the renewal date.
2
9. Winter Storage Capacity. The Port agrees to give sixty (60) days w1itten notice to MLI, when the Port's waste water winter storage capacity reaches 70% or 42 million gallons.
10. Notice. All notices shall be deemed to have been given on the third business day following the date of mailing, if properly mailed to the address provided below. The parties may designate new or additional addresses for notice by providing notice to the other pa1iy as provided in this section.
To the Po1t: P01t of Moses Lake
ToMLI:
Attn: Executive Director 7810 Andrews NE, Suite 200 Moses Lake, WA 98837
Moses Lake Industries Inc
11 . Modification. No alteration, modification, amendment, or waiver of this Agreement shall be valid unless it is in w1iting and signed by both parties hereto.
12. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is for the sole and exclusive use of the parties hereto, and none of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be for the benefit of any other person or entity.
13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Any party may execute and deliver this Agreement by transmitting an authorized signature via email transmission, and copies of this Agreement executed and delivered by means of emailed signatures shall have the same effect as copies executed and delivered with original signatures.
14. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the patties with respect to its subject matter.
II II II
DATED this J_a_ day of fuA...81A,f::t- , 2o ~ 9 . PORT OF MOSES LAKE MOSES LAKE INDUSTRIES INC
~~ President
3
•
EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. 1329 COST SAMPLE
4
RESOLUTlONNO.1329
A RESOLUTION OF THE PORT OF MOSES LAKE (GRANT COUNTY PORT DISTRICT NO, 10) SETTING USER RATES, CHARGES AND FEES FOR THE PORT INDUSTRIAL PROCESS WA1ER TREATMENT SYSTEM. .
WHEREAS, this Resolution will supersede Resolution No. 1133, that was Passed and Approved by the Commission of the Port of Moses Lake (Pm1) on the 13th day of December, 1999; and
WHEREAS, the Port owns and operates an Industrial Process Water Treatment System (System), which has been operational since January, 2000 and has been available to v!ll'ious Industrial Subscribers for industrial waste water treatment, and
WHEREAS, due to increased demand for the use of the System, the Port has contracted with Forsgren & Associates (Forsgren) for Engineering Services for an expansion of the existing System, and
WHEREAS, the Port's expansion of the System is nearing completion and will become operational by the Fall of2014; and
WHEREAS, the Port is authorized by the Port's Facility Use Resolution No. 1336 to charge its System Subscribers rates, charges and fees associated with use of the System by such Subscribers; and ·
WHEREAS, the Port received professional engineering services from Forsgren to assist in determining ru1 adjusted rate structure and costs associated with the expansion of the System; and
WHEREAS, the spread sheet for computation of the rates and fees used by Forsgren is attached to this resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED THAT THE FOLLOWING RATES AND FEES BE ESTABLISHED FOR SUBSCRIBERS OF THE SYSTEM EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,2015
1) System Development Cl!arge (SDC)
Effective January l, 2015, the following SDC charges will be applied to any new subscription to the system. Existing subscriptions will continue to be charged using the SDC Basis that was established in Resolution 1133.
The System Development Charge is the Capacity Subscription Percentnge times the Current Value of System Project Costs
Cwucity Subscription Percentage is the user's subscription amount divided by the ·rated capacity of1he system.
Current Value of System Project Costs is the sum of all project costs depreciated by the straight line method. The estimated total project cost when completed in the Fall of2014 is $4,287,200.
System Development Charges may be ·paid:
1) hl full by lump sum prior to com1ection to System, or
2) Financed over a twenty year period at 5%, or
3) Combination of_ lump sum payment and financing over twenty year period (at the cost of capital associated with the fmancing · of a particular element of System).
2) User Charges
a) Fixed Components oflJser Charges:
i. Flxed Operation and Maintenance (O&M) • Capacity Subscription Percentage times $263,227.
ii. Cru,ital Reserve• Capacity Subscription Percentage times $213,000.
b) Variable Components of User Charges:
i. Hydraulic Flow • $0.2900 per thousand gallons discharged.
ii. Total Nitrogen - $0.1800 per pound discharged.
iii. Total Dissolved Solids - $0.0400 per pound discharged.
3) Other Charges/Fines
The Port is required to meet specific limits in its Washington State Department of Ecology Discharge Permit as related to hydraulic flow, total nitrogen and total dissolved solids. Each Subscription Agreement includes discharging limits for each of these parameters. Subscribers are responsible to meet the limits as set forth in the Subscription Agreement. In the event a Subscriber exceeds the
prescribed discharge limit, the unit cost for that parameter will be increased by 100% for each discharge over the pre.scribed limit, These charges will be calculated and invoiced on an annual basis,
Any Depaitment of Ecology fines imposed for excessive discharges will be billed to the subscriber at fault.
Other services provided by the Port, such as for special inspections, copies of documents, etc., shall be charged at cost.
4) Billing a11d Collection
Charges are set forth in each subscription agreement and are due the first of each month.
5) Annual Review
User Charges will be reviewed annually in the third quarter. Projection forecasts will be developed based on prior usage -and users will be notified of any changes to their subscription for the next calendar year,
THIS RESOLUTION shall become effective this 1st day of January, 2015.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the Commission of the Pott of Moses Lake (Grant County Port Distdct No. 10) this 8th day of December, 2014.
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PORT OF MOSES LAKE
Stroud Kunkle, President
Michael Conley, Vice President
David K. Joues, Secretary
Example 1 for application section C.2. (SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM)
ALL WATER USED IS FROM MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 6,000 gal/day Average, 11,000 gal/day maximum
TRUCKS
OIL TO RECYCLER
OFFHAUL SOLIDS
UNLOADING STORAGE (2) COOKING
1
CLEANUP LEAKAGE WASHWATER TO WASTEWATER ASTE STREAM #1
(A) SAN. SEWER (SS)
AVG. 100 GPD MAX. 600 GPD
WASTE STREAM #1 (A)
PRETREATMENT DETAIL (4)
SKIMMING
TOSS AVG 20 GPD MAX. 20 GPD
WASTEWATER TOSS AVG. 5000 GPD
MAX. 10,000 GPD
CHEMICAL ADDITION
LEAKAGE WASTEWATER TOSS
AVG. 20 GPD
WASTEWATER TOSS
WASTE STREAM #1 (A)
MAX. 20 GPD
WASTE STREAM #1 (A)
PRESSING
PRETREATMENT UNIT (4) (SEE
DETAIL)
STICK WATER SHORTAGE (5)
STICK WATER EVAPORATOR (6)
CONCENTRATED FISH PRODUCT
DRYING
CONDENSATE TO
STORM DRAIN AVG. 100 GPD MAX. 600 GPD
WASTE STREAM #2 (8)
WASTE STREAM #2 (8)
DRIED MEAL PRODUCT
COOLING WATER TO STORM SEWER AVG. 100GPD MAX. 250 GPO
Example 2 for application section Fl or H8 (FACILITY SITE MAP)
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011)
~N
STORMO IN
~ ciROOF
~-------~ DRAIN STORM DRAIN
10TH ST.
(A) SANITARY SEWER ACCESS
Page 22 of 24
DEFINITIONS
Significant Industrial User (SIU)--
1) All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 CPR 403.6 and 40 CPR Chapter I, Subchapter N; and
2) Any other industrial user that: discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the POTW (excluding sanitary, noncontact cooling, and boiler blow-down wastewater); contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the POTW treatment plant; or is designated as such by the Control Authority on the basis that the industrial user has a reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement (in accordance with 40 CPR 403.8(f)(6)).
Upon finding that the industrial user meeting the criteria in paragraph 2, above, has no reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement, the Control Authority may at any time, on its own initiative or in response to a petition received from an industrial user or POTW, and in accordance with 40 CPR 403.8(f)(6), determine that such industrial user is not a significant industrial user.
Control Authority - means the Washington State Department of Ecology in the case of nondelegated POTW s or means the POTW in the case of delegated POTW s.
Categoric Industrial User (CIU): An industrial user subject to national categorical pretreatment standards promulgated by EPA (40 CPR 403.6 and40 CPR parts 405-471).
Summary of Attachments That May be Required for This Application:
(Please check those attachments that are included)
~o Do Do ~o Do ~o
C.2. Production schematic flow diagram and water balance
C.4. Wastewater treatment improvements
C.7. Additional incidental materials
E.8.Additional results of effluent testing
F. I. Facility site map
H.5. Storm water drainage map
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 23 of 24
if you need this document in aformatfor the visually impaired, call the Water Quality Program at 360-407-6600. Persons with hearing loss can call 7 JJ for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341.
ECY 040-177 (Rev. 5/2011) Page 24 of 24
ATTACHMENT C.1 (SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM) 2019 AND SELECTED FUTURE ESTIMATED WATER FLOWS
ALL WATER USED IS FROM MUNICIPAL SUPPLY Average and maximum water flows shown in gallons per day
Incoming City Water Avg. 110,000 Max. 140,000
DI Water De-Ionized Water Chemical Products - Production -
Avg. 54,000 Max. 74,000 Avg. 23,000 Max. 130,000 Max. 30,000
! ~ Cooling WS#2
WS#l Towers Process Wastewater (PWW)
R.O. Reject Avg. 20,000 Production and Labs Max. 25,000 Avg. 6,000
Avg. 30,000 Max. 10,000
Irrigation Max. 40,000
Supplement Avg. -NIA
PB-95 Process Wastewater Neutralization Tank
Onsite Irrigation PmtofML Avg. 13,000 (Permitted Avg. Monthly) (April-October) Avg. 30,000 Max. 22,000 (Permitted Daily Max.)
Avg. N/A - Max. 40,000 (limit is: N/A) (limit is 50,000,
Future 80,000)
MLI Lift Station Domestic Water/Sewer Avg. 12,000 Max. 16,000
Average 6,000 (Permit Limit is 18,000/27 ,000)
To City of Moses Lake LarsonPOTW
September 2019 Moses Lake Industries, Inc. Permit ST-5375 Permit Renewal
TO CITY OF MOSES LAKE
LARSEN TREATMENT FACILITY
Outfall #002
SHOP
DOMESTIC WATER
Moses Lake Industries, Inc.
Simplified Drawing of
Wastewater Discharge
(Combined C2 and C4 attachment)
Revised 26 September 2019
()
'\ PB97fJ ---- scrubbers ~ _}<1111~~---.r STEAM CONDENSATE RETURN
SHIPPING OFFICE
SANITARY WATER
' LIFT STATION
• RECORDED PARAMETERS:
• pH,
• CONDUCTIVITY
• FLOW TOTALIZER
\
WH95 SANITARY WASTE WATER DISCHARGES
TO LIFT STATION
RO REJECT AND PWW
TRANSFERRED TO PB95
TREATMENT.
PB 95 PWW TO TREATMENT TANK. RO REJECT WATER TO
IRRIGATION
/
/
cf 95 PROCESS WASTEWATER {PWW)
/
,-------i TREATMENT TANK (Outfall #001)
pH NEUT. WITH H2S04, TMAH, NaOH
' • • pH & CONDUCTIVITY MONITORED
• NIJMBER OF DISrHARGES MONITORED
i OFFICE/LU NCH ROOM
SANITARY WATER ONLY
DISCHARGES TO THE LIFT
STATION
PB88 LAB and PRODUCTION PWW, RO
REJECT DISCHARGE TO PB95
TREATMENT TANK
LUNCHROOM
PB90 RO REJECT,
PWW AND FLOOR DRAINS
TMAC BOILER #1
BLOWDOWN TO:
PB 00 or Boiler #2
NEW TMAC BOILER #2
BLOWDOWN TO:
ACCUM/TREATMENT TANK
~--+---+----.Q l
,Ir
0 PB 00
RO REJECT TO IRRIGATION. LAB PWW AND BOILER BLOW-DOWN
DIRECTED TO PB95 TREATMENT TANK
, ..
FUTURE OPTION : POST TREATMENT
ACCUMULATION CHECK TANKS
_ --'--=--f'-'-=~=-'--- - -Q ~ ,/' PB 04 ...:- To ~vaooration V ,, ~ , .,..;;....._.✓,. PWW ROUTED TO PB95 TREATMENT TANK
,L RO REJECT ROUTED TO IRRIGATION
~ cf~ OFFSPECWASTEWATERTOTT-03
1---+-------_._~·-v ~ '--=-----=,-=. ----------------'
TRT
PB 08
\
OFFICE
'4--~ ------------------1,-~~oSewage pump
PWW ROUTED TO PB 04
SANITARY WATER ROUTED TO SHOP DISCHARGE LINE
GREEN= SANITARY WASTE WATER
BLUE= PROCESS WASTE WATER (PWW)
YELLOW= RINSE WATER RECOVERY
RED= RO REJECT WATER OR PROPOSED
UPGRADES (IN BOLD RED)
,, ONSITE IRRIGATION
IRRIGATION
TANK
, ..
RO REJECT (not currently used)
APRIL 1 THROUGH
OCTOBER31
TO ON-SITE IRRIGATION
SYSTEM FLOW IS
TOTALIZED
I I
I I RO REJECT
YEAR AROUND
TO PORT IRRIGATION PROJECT
FLOW IS TOTALIZED
,,
2
D
3
4
5
C 6
7
8
9 B
10
11
12
A
13
~ l i I--
!
8
j ! j G
f-------j--------f- '' ! l . i i
------+----1
! i ! r f-- ----j--------f-------+-i j i i i i i i
7
f---- --+-------f-------+---! ! ! ! ! l l l f------ -------f-------j-------, j j j
i I i i f----- --+- --- --f-------+-------! ! ! ! !
'1/-~
5 4
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
i i ------+-------f--- 10
! ! j j
------j--------f--- 11
j i i i
-----+-------f--- 12
! !
3
LEGEND/NOTES: GRID AT 100· SPAC ING
- DRYWELL LOC ATION
@ IMPERVIOUS- ASPHALT OR CONCRE TE
0 SPILL DRAINAGE AREA
~ SPILL l,AAT STATION
IN THE EVENT OF A SPILL:
.,,,--1-~
1. CALL EXT. 25 1; INDIC AT[ X(A_PHA) " (N UMCRIC)
COORDINA fE LDC A I ION 0" SPILL.
2. UN ROI L AND PL ACF A SPII I MAT OVER ANY DRY
W[.L Tli\T MAY BE IN DRAINAGE PATH .
II r' l "I
5.
7
DRYWELL LOCATION & INFORMATION
" ,ot1 RI>
f-:Qj f')f.J DF o.,r1N1 RJ..'!', o~·:; Nti
C TRI~ OHO
J, r- r:fi l .l'IIG J.~ .\ , A ..:;r ::.c,:.m,c.,.L s•1c,
,-,1 · ,,·c I< :..tM"O W·• - !)5
tl '<.\IE __ J,.' 1 -:GPNF~ OF P•-0'
o-+1::i:,1tF cs•1,; E
I! /,. jll,\' .T o;.,o 1.,.c:10E n.11., sr11ri:i
I r, IH,.. ~ VI
1"- ',~A-IL .. [. (;F' .,-_ ,J3 &(.) !Rl-1
1n· 1M c,r P6-·)l N /,DIN. P/IW
~"'-:'l,.IA'.. ~e,IL. 1"1<lt--A(;1 ~•
:.. .. :.. ~ rn1-: A'.. s-~c,.: -:,;1,, I'\~ ;.·,1,,vr
•l.\'EO ;.f;.' .\ '\. C' ·r, ·:,_ S,.H~.P •r ;r
C::.\"E"G:::-.,;:;v "ES:O"l'I':::: T;;>~J_ 'RS
1R1. --:~
LC;l.[ll'<C/i.JI .OAJll\;C PAIAP r"':p l'l-,--1."",
.JP,,."l'i:" r~f)I.' .t,<;; ,I. _T
' f.l V,',/G ,;.R( I, S/~[ or P -o·
I•'. '/.\. Al-'t..\ Id Vr::.LN TIAAC & ;:,= - 97: ... A~G[ ,.LI M ·I ~. 1·1'\l•I: J.J\i
Tr,;/.r"'7::.
A'::P-A._ - ":Pl\!'\:; tR• "t--- <'!I,.';
LOC ,noN or 'l[A"E5T 5;,1 Nf.SPGNSi Ml,
D- 6; Q\j \'f/,1._~ N.N CCR'I[ ~ t:i [LE(': fPII": 6
':-1-'(
D- o;; (I" Vl~~L9 ', N CCR"--:~,:; (lF.C "'l'
$f-1('r.
-<:": C:•'1 '-H. V./,l OF ·/tH - 4:"i .CAr,l'li,
R•\lr
D-£ t,1;1, :Or<\I:.~ '-" rm;;,._ s1101= on
D/[-t, 2 \'1-,-9! (Sf. A[\r'-V['
H/1 - 3.5; 01\ S. W/ILL 'if 'Cl DUILOI'
K- ~.6; ON \'/, NII.IL ·,r Pfl-'.JR A'),111.c rn- ·c
"'l,\:":l'l;C R"WP
TRJ ,( I t' - ·H, 0\1 \'/ Wfl.l __ L OF L_ ,DI',/ _,\'.'11\G P8 - 11:i A.,1,,,.(Ur TO iu,v;. - - ;.,a - ·B .:J ,\:,11\G R ~I.IP
N.t. A BM 1?,/_~(', J 0
D
C
B
! l l l ! j j M MOSF.S 1.AKF. INDUSTRIES, INC, A
t ::,:!,M:~:~=~~~ ~ :: :;:~:~ 13
B C D E F G H I ,J K L M N MOSES LAKE INDUSTRIES, INC . NO . 1<Ev1s1o w ·, 3 ~ ci-..u. ,\PPD oA>E M). RE, 1s101, s Bf cKo. t,P PD 01- >E REFLRE11c Es Mu. 1ssuED r oH 1R1-1~~M11 rl\L SIMPLIFIED SITE PLAN
IMPERVIOUS GROUN D LAYOUT
.'.'!L." I ·:002:,3 q 1- C - tJ02C•J
8 6 5 4 3 2
·············· LINKS ············
Review your project results through
Total Access
Have a Question?
~
k The Ex ert
Visit us at: www.testamericainc.com
~-: eurofins Environment Testing TestAmerica
ANALYTICAL REPORT Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane 11922 East 1st Ave Spokane, WA 99206 Tel: (509)924-9200
Laboratory Job ID: 590-1173Z-1 Client Project/Site: Outfall #001 Metals
For: Moses Lake Industries 8248 Randolph Road NE Moses Lake, Washington 98837
Attn : Patrick Blau
Authorized for release by: 9/13/2019 2:32:14 PM
Randee Arrington, Project Manager II (509)924-9200 [email protected]
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
II
Client: Moses Lake Industries Project/Site: Outfall #001 Metals
Table of Contents
Laboratory Job ID: 590-11737-1
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 o Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Method Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Page 2 of 16 Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
9/13/2019
Client: Moses Lake Industries ProjecUSite: Outfall #001 Metals
Job ID: 590-11737-1
Laboratory: Eurofins TestAmerica , Spokane
Narrative
Receipt
Case Narrative Job ID: 590-11737-1
The sample was received on 8/30/2019 10:21 AM; the sample arrived in good condition, properly preserved and , where required , on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 3.4° C.
Metals No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Page 3 of 16 Eurofins TestAmerica.,_, SP-Okane
::1/13/2019
El
Sample Summary Client: Moses Lake Industries Project/Site: Outfall #001 Metals
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix 590-11737-1 8/28- PB-95 Outfall #001 24hr Grab composite ~W~a-te_r ___ _
Page 4 of 16
Job ID: 590-11737-1
Collected Received Asset ID 08/28/19 23:55 08/30/19 10:21 ----------
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
9/13/2019
Definitions/Glossary Client: Moses Lake Industries Project/Site: Outfall #001 Metals
Glossary Abbreviation )]
%R
CFL
CNF
DER
Oil Fae
DL
DL, RA, RE , IN
DLC
EDL
LOO
LOQ
MDA
MDC
MDL
ML
NC
ND
PQL
QC
RER
RL
RPO
TEF
TEQ
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Percent Recovery
Contains Free Liquid
Contains No Free Liquid
Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dilution Factor
Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
Method Detection Limit
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
Not Calculated
Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
Practical Quantitation Limit
Quality Control
Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
Job ID: 590-11737-1
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
Page 5 of 16 9/13/2019
Client Sample Results Client: Moses Lake Industries Job ID: 590-11737-1 Project/Site: Outfall #001 Metals
Client Sample ID: 8/28 - PB-95 Outfall #001 24hr Grab Lab Sample ID: 590-11737-1 composite Date Collected: 08/28/19 23:55 Matrix: Water Date Received: 08/30/19 10:21
~ Method, 200.7 Rev 4.4 - Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae B Calcium 35 10 mg/L 09/03/19 09:00 09/12/19 13:48 --1-0
Potassium ND 10 mg/L 09/03/19 09:00 09/12/19 13 :48 10
Sodium 14 5.0 mg/L 09/03/19 09:00 09/12/19 13:48 10
Method: 200.8 - Metals (ICP/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
Aluminum ND 0.10 mg/L 09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 20:59 ---1
Antimony 0.00057 0.00040 mg/L 09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 20:59
Arsenic 0.0024 0.0010 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Barium 0.011 0.0012 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Beryllium 0.00040 0.00040 mg/L 09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 20:59
Cadmium ND 0.00040 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Chromium 0.0033 0.00040 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Cobalt 0.00060 0.00040 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Copper 0.060 0.0020 mg/L 09/09/19 09:47 09/11/1916:21
Iron ND 0.20 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Lead ND 0.00080 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Magnesium 13 10 mg/L 09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 20:59
Manganese 0.0034 0.0020 mg/L 09/09/19 09 :4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Nickel 0.010 0.0030 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
1
s,.,;,m ND 0.0080 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Silver ND 0.00040 mg/L 09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 20:59
Thallium ND 0.0010 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Vanadium 0.011 0.0040 mg/L 09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 20:59
Zinc 0.032 0.0070 mg/L 09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 20:59
[ Method, 245.1 • Me,cury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
Hg ND 0.20 ug/L 09/03/19 09:55 09/03/19 15:09 - --1
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
Page 6 of 16 9/13/2019
QC Sample Results Client: Moses Lake Industries Project/Site: Outfall #001 Metals
Method: 200.7 Rev 4.4 - Metals (ICP)
Lab Sample ID: MB 590-23879/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 23913
MB
Analyte Result
Calcium
Potassium
Sodium
Lab Sample ID: LCS 590-23879/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 23913
Analyte
Calcium
Potassium
Sodium
Method: 200.8 - Metals (ICP/MS)
Lab Sample ID: MB 580-310553/14-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 310862
ND
ND
ND
MB
Analyte Result
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Lab Sample ID: LCS 580-310553/15-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 310862
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MB
Qualifier
MB
Qualifier
RL MDL Unit
1.0 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
0.50 mg/L
Spike LCS LCS
Added Result Qualifier
50.0 53.0
50.0 47.4
50.0 49.8
RL MDL Unit
0.10 mg/L
0.00040 mg/L
0.0010 mg/L
0.0012 mg/L
0.00040 mg/L
0.00040 mg/L
0.00040 mg/L
0.00040 mg/L
0.20 mg/L
0.00080 mg/L
10 mg/L
0.0020 mg/L
0.0030 mg/L
0.0080 mg/L
0.00040 mg/L
0.0010 mg/L
0.0040 mg/L
0.0070 mg/L
Spike LCS LCS
Added Result Qualifier
20.0 19.6
1.00 0.907
1.00 0.902
1.00 0.873
1.00 0.989
Page 7 of 16
D
Job ID: 590-11737-1
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 23879
Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
09/03/19 09:00 09/03/19 14:41 1
09/03/19 09:00 09/03/19 14:41
09/03/19 09:00 09/03/1914:41 1
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 23879 %Rec.
Unit D ¾Rec Limits --- -- --
mg/L 106 85-115
mg/L 95 85-115
mg/L 100 85-115
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 310553
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae
09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 19:41 1
09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09 :4 7 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:47 09/10/19 19:41
09/09/19 09:4 7 09/10/19 19:41
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 310553 %Rec.
Unit D %Rec Limits --- - - --
mg/L 98 85 - 115
mg/L 91 85-115
mg/L 90 85- 115
mg/L 87 85 - 115
mg/L 99 85 - 115
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
9/13/2019
B
QC Sample Results Client: Moses Lake Industries Project/Site: Outfall #001 Metals
Method: 200.8 - Metals (ICP/MS) (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: LCS 580-310553/15-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 310862
Analyte
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
lVanadium
Zinc
Lab Sample ID : LCS 580-310553/15-A Matrix: Water
I Analysis Batch: 310925
Analyte
Cobalt
Copper
lMagnesium
Manganese
Zinc
Spike
Added
1.00
1.00
1.00
20.0
1.00
20.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Spike
Added
1.00
1.00
20.0
1.00
1.00
LCS LCS
Result Qualifier
0.919
0.939
0.942
19.7
0.936
ND
0.964
0.935
0.926
0.940
0.938
0.942
0.952
LCS LCS
Result Qualifier
0.918
0.919
ND
0.949
0.973
Job ID: 590-11737-1
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 310553 ¾Rec.
Unit D ¾Rec Limits ----
mg/L 92 85- 115
mg/L 94 85 - 115
mg/L 94 85 - 115
mg/L 98 85 - 115
mg/L 94 85 - 115
mg/L 96 85 - 115
mg/L 96 85-115
mg/L 93 85-115
mg/L 93 85 - 115
mg/L 94 85 - 115
mg/L 94 85- 115
mg/L 94 85- 115
mg/L 95 85 - 115
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 310553 ¾Rec.
Unit D ¾Rec Limits --- ----
mg/L 92 85- 115
mg/L 92 85-115
mg/L 94 85- 115
mg/L 95 85 - 115
mg/L 97 85 - 115
I Lab Sample ID: LCSD 580-310553/16-A Matrix: Water
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup
Analysis Batch: 310862
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
l:~::~ium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Spike LCSD
Added Result
20.0 20.6
1.00 0.904
1.00 0.911
1.00 0.893
1.00 0.987
1.00 0.937
1.00 0.960
1.00 0.958
20.0 20.0
1.00 0.947
20.0 ND
1.00 0.986
1.00 0.945
1.00 0.939
1.00 0.962
1.00 0.951
1.00 0.963
1.00 0.979
Page 8 of 16
LCSD
Qualifier Unit
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 310553 ¾Rec. RPD
D ¾Rec Limits RPD Limit
----:rro 85- 115 5 20
90 85 -115 0 20
91 85- 115 1 20
89 85 - 115 2 20
99 85 - 115 0 20
94 85 - 115 2 20
96 85-115 2 20
96 85- 115 2 20
100 85 -115 2 20
95 85-115 1 20
98 85- 115 2 20
99 85- 115 2 20
94 85 - 115 20
94 85-115 20
96 85- 115 2 20
95 85 - 115 20
96 85 - 115 2 20
98 85- 115 3 20
Eurofins TestAmerica , Spokane
9/13/2019
II
QC Sample Results Client: Moses Lake Industries ProjecUSite: Outfall #001 Metals
Job ID: 590-11737-1
Method: 200.8 - Metals (ICP/MS) (Continued)
!Lab Sample ID: LCSD 580-310553/16-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 310925
Analyte Aluminum ---
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
lSelenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Method: 245.1 - Mercury (CVAA)
Lab Sample ID: MB 590-23883/9-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch : 23902
Analyte
Hg
MB MB Result Qualifier
---~N=D
Lab Sample ID: LCS 590-23883/8-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch : 23902
Analyte
Hg
Spike LCSD LCSD
Added Result Qualifier
20.0 19.1
1.00 0.969
1.00 0.928
1.00 0.911
1.00 0.909
1.00 0.947
1.00 0.934
1.00 0.936
1.00 0.926
20.0 19.1
1.00 0.941
20.0 ND
1.00 0.950
1.00 0.926
1.00 0.930
1.00 0.986
1.00 0.940
1.00 0.943
1.00 0.973
RL MDL Unit
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup
Unit
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 310553 %Rec. RPO
D %Rec Limits RPO Limit ---
85-115 --2 96 20
97 85 - 115 2 20
93 85-115 1 20
91 85- 115 0 20
91 85-115 0 20
95 85-115 20
93 85 - 115 20
94 85- 115 2 20
93 85- 115 20
95 85 - 115 2 20
94 85 - 115 4 20
95 85- 115 1 20
95 85-115 0 20
93 85 - 115 0 20
93 85-115 1 20
99 85- 115 2 20
94 85-115 6 20
94 85 - 115 0 20
97 85-115 0 20
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 23883
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fae ---- ---- - - --
09/03/19 09:54 09/03/19 14:56 ---1 0.20 ug/L
Spike LCS LCS
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 23883
Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec 103
%Rec.
Limits
85-115 ---- ----
2.00 2.06 ug/L
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
Page 9 of 16 9/13/2019
II
Client: Moses Lake Industries ProjecUSite: Outfall #001 Metals
Lab Chronicle
Client Sample ID: 8/28 - PB-95 Outfall #001 24hr Grab composite Date Collected: 08/28/19 23:55 Date Received: 08/30/19 10:21
Batch Batch Dil Initial
Job ID: 590-11737-1
Lab Sample ID: 590-11737-1
Matrix: Water
Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab -- - --
Total/NA Prep 200.7 50 mL 50ml 23879
Total/NA Analysis 200.7 Rev 4.4 10 24099
Total/NA Prep 200.8 50 ml 50 ml 310553
Total/NA Analysis 200.8 50 ml 50 ml 310925
Total/NA Prep 200.8 50 ml 50 ml 310553
Total/NA Analysis 200.8 50 ml 50 ml 310862
Total/NA Prep 245.1 50 ml 50 ml 23883
Total/NA Analysis 245.1 23902
Laboratory References:
TAL SEA= Eurofins TestAmerica, Seattle, 5755 8th Street East, Tacoma, WA 98424, TEL (253)922-2310
TAL SPK = Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane, 11922 East 1st Ave, Spokane, WA 99206, TEL (509)924-9200
Page10of16
09/03/19 09:00 CWD TAL SPK
09/12/19 13:48 JSP TAL SPK
09/09/19 09:47 ART TAL SEA
09/11 /19 16:21 FCW TAL SEA
09/09/19 09:47 ART TAL SEA
09/10/19 20:59 FCW TAL SEA
09/03/19 09:55 CWD TAL SPK
09/03/19 15 :09 SJK TAL SPK
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
9/13/2019
D
Accreditation/Certification Summary Client: Moses Lake Industries Project/Site: Outfall #001 Metals
Laboratory: Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane The accreditations/certifications listed below are applicable to this report.
[Authority Washington
Program State Program
Laboratory: Eurofins TestAmerica, Seattle
Identification Number C569
Unless otherwise noted , all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below.
Authority Washington
Program State Program
Identification Number C553
Expiration Date 01-06-20
Expiration Date 02-17-20
Job ID: 590-11737-1
The following analytes are included in this report, but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which the agency does not offer certification.
Analysis Method Prep Method
200.8 200.8
200 .8
200 .8
200.8
200.8
Matrix
Water
Water
Water
Analyte
Aluminum
Iron
Magnesium
Page 11 of 16
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
9/13/2019
Client: Moses Lake Industries Project/Site: Outfall #001 Metals
Method Method Description ------200. 7 Rev 4.4 Metals (ICP)
200.8 Metals (ICP/MS)
245.1 Mercury (CVAA)
200.7 Preparation, Total Metals
200.8 Preparation, Total Metals
245.1 Preparation, Mercury
Protocol References:
EPA= US Environmental Protection Agency
Laboratory References:
Method Summary
TAL SEA= Eurofins TestAmerica, Seattle, 5755 8th Street East, Tacoma, WA 98424, TEL (253)922-2310
TAL SPK = Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane, 11922 East 1st Ave, Spokane, WA 99206, TEL (509)924-9200
Page 12 of 16
Job ID: 590-11737-1
Protocol Laboratory EPA TAL SPK
EPA TAL SEA
EPA TAL SPK
EPA TAL SPK
EPA TAL SEA
EPA TAL SPK
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
9/13/2019
TestAmerica Spokane 11922 E. 1SI Ave
Chain of Custody Record Test America Spokane, WA 99206 phone 509 924 .9200 fax
Moses Lake lnduslrtes
8248 Randolph Road NE
Moses Lake/\/VN98837
(509) 762-5336 (XXX) XXX·XXXX
Client Contact
Phone FAX
Project Name· Outfa ll #001 Metals
Sile MU PO#
Sample Identification
8/28 -PB-95 Outfall #001 24hr Grab composite
Reg ulatory Program : D DW 0 NPD(S
Project Manager: Pat Blau
TeUFax: (509)762-5336
Analysis Turnaround Time
0 CALENDAR DAYS IJ WORKING DAYS
TAT I'! cn tcrc rit from Below _ ___
0 2 weeks
0 l week
D 2 days
0 I day :,amp,e
Type Sample Sample IC• Comp, # ol
Date Tim!! G• Grnb) Matrix Cont.
8128/19 2355 G w 1
Preservation Used: 1= Ice, 2= HCI; 3= H2S04; '4=HN03; S=NaOH: 6= Other Possible Hazard Identification: Are any samples from a listed EPA Hazardous Waste? Please List any EPA Waste Codes for the sample ,n the Comments Section If the tab Is to dispose of !he sample.
0 Non·HaLarcJ • Flammable 0 Skin trritanl D Poison B D Unknown
Special Instructions/QC Requirements & Comments:
Custody Seals Intact D Yes 0 No Custody Seal No .. Relinquished by Rob Cox Company: MLI Date/Time
8/29119-0930
Relinquished by: Company: DatefTime:
Rel111quished by: Company. Date/Time·
-w ,,.. 11 ~ •, ! • , •,·11, ,t,' 't ', •\I ;;, ' ,.•
0 RCV. • Other: TeslAmerica Laboratories , Inc.
Site Contact: Rob Cox Date: 8129/19 COG No:
Lab Contact: Randee Arrington Carrier : FedEx 1 of 1 COCs
Sampler· Rob Cox
For Lab Use Only : - Walk-in Client. I z - - Lab Sampling I z >-
>- 0 -<I)
Job I SDG No : ~::;; 0 ~- u "' . 0 .. <I) "' 5 <I):;: ~ .,
"' E c:, ::;; .. ~ ::;; ~ 0 ., :: 'C n; 0 :-:: QI 0 Sample Specific Noles: u. 0.. 0.. N
X N,tric Presered Bollie
111111111111
11 1111111111 590- 11737 Chain ~ Custody _
4 I I I I I I I I I I I Sample Disposal ( A fee may be assessed if samples are retained longer than 1 month)
0 Relum to Client f7] Disposal by Lab • Archive IO< Months
..., ~ Cooler 1 emp. ( C): Obs'd: ·...-.... '> Corr'ct · ....:, . .., Therm ID No
Received by Co~ ~l1 /
Date~ ime ZJ V\ irt ~ \ Q ("1/,ro U-- '(/ ~cit 1 /0
Received by· Company: DaterTime:
Received in Laboratory by· Company. Date!Time
Page 13 of 16 Form No. CA-C-Wl-002, Rev. 4.3, dated 12/05/201 3
9/13/2019
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane 11922 East 1st Ave
Spokane, WA 99206 Phone: 509·924-9200 Fax: 509·924-9290
Client Information (Sub Contract Lab) Cnent Contact:
Shipping/Receiving Company:
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
Sampler.
Phone:
Chain of Custody Record 111~11~1111 illlll~IIII 1~11 llilllll Lab PM:
Arrington, Randee E E-MaH: [email protected]
Accreditations Required (See note):
State Program - Washington
Carrier Tracking No(s):
State of Orig;., :
Washington
;?: eurofins
COCNo: 59Q.4679.1 Page: Page 1 of 1 [Job#: 590-11737 -1
Environrr11-:"r.:t Tc,:;t ing Tr.stAmr~ri r: .!
Address: Due Date Requested: Preservation Codes: 5755 8th Street East. 9/6/2019 Analysis Requested A_ HCL
City: TAT Requested (days): 8- NaOH
Tacoma c -Zn Acetate Stale, Zip: 0 - N~~c ACl<f WA, 98424 E • NaHSO4 Phone: PO#: F • MeOH
253-922-2310(Tel) 253-922-5047(Fax) Email: WO#:
Project Name: Project#: Wastewater Investigation/Extra Tes ting 59000972 Sile:, SSOW#:
M•Hexane N • None o -AsNa02 P-Na2O4S Q-Na25O3 R-Na2S2O3 S-H2SO4 T - TSP Dodeeahydrate U - Acetone V-MCAA W-pH4-5 Z - other (specify)
S eclal Instructions/Note:
I ~ ffl 11/ ~~·i --.1• •• e.'l
I I ~"""'' --#'Al
~
11
\~";'l'F.:t -
Note: Since laboratory accreditations are subject to eharige. TestAmerica Laboratortes. Inc. places the ownership of method. an.aryre & acc,editation compliance, upon out subcontract laboratories. This sample shipment is fotwaroed under Chain-of-custody. If the laboratory does not currently maintain accreditation in the State of Origin isled above for analysis/tests/matrix being analyzed. the samples must bl? shipped back to the TestAmerica laboratory or other instructions will be provided. Any changes to accreditation status should be brought to TestAmerlea Laboratories , Inc. attention immediately. If all ret1ue-sted aeereditatlons are- current to date, return the signed Chatn of Custody attesting to said complicance to TestAmeoca Laboratories, Inc.
Possible Hazard Identification
Unconfirmed Deliverable Requested: I, II, Ill. lV. Other (specify)
Empty Kil Relinquished by:
IMlltbby: ~ RelinquiStledby:
·• ReU~~~l~~e,d by: =;:.\ .. ;,;., . .
· ·l \ ~~!oo,/e~eaL~s ~~a9~,i/!(:,~ustody Seal No.:
Primary Deliverable Rank: 2
Date:
Cate/Time: J [qJ(~OcL9 ( tf; t1tf<> oatemme:
Oaternme:
Sample Disposal ( A fee may be assessed If samples are retained longer than 1 month)
• Return To Client D Di§e_osal By Lab • Archive For _ ____ Months Special Instructions/QC Requirements:
Time: MelhOd of Shipment:
c~p R~by:4{~ Oa~/~///J' Cori µ.;,ompany
f-A.J~ Company Received by:
, Ol!Tlrrime: Company
Company Received by: Dale/Time: Company
Coo_ler Temperature(s) "C and Omer R_emark!:
Page 14 of 16 Ver: 01116/201~/13/2019
I f ,· J: ~-t r i· .
t
i
f:
~.
i < !' t t i : f: f
t ;
( .. V·· ,,
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Moses Lake Industries
Login Number: 11737 List Number: 1 Creator: O'Toole, Maria C
Question Answer
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey N/A meter. The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact. N/A
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice.
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
True
Cooler Temperature is recorded. True
COC is present. True
COC is filled out in ink and legible. True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate True HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. True
Containers are not broken or leaking. True
Sample collection date/times are provided. True
Appropriate sample containers are used. True
Sample bottles are completely filled. True
Sample Preservation Verified. True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is True <6mm (1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
Residual Chlorine Checked.
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane Page 15 of 16
True
N/A
Job Number: 590-11737-1
List Source: Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane
Comment
Lab does not accept radioactive samples.
10413
Thermal preservation not required.
No analysis requiring residual chlorine check assigned.
9/13/2019
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Moses Lake Industries
Login Number: 11737 List Number: 2 Creator: Harris, Terrence C
Question
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey meter.
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact.
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or tampered with. Samples were received on ice.
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
COC is present.
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate HTs)
Sample containers have legible labels.
Containers are not broken or leaking.
Sample collection date/times are provided.
Appropriate sample containers are used.
Sample bottles are completely filled.
Sample Preservation Verified.
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4").
Multiphasic samples are not present.
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
Residual Chlorine Checked.
Eurofins TestAmerica, Spokane Page 16 of 16
Answer
N/A
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
N/A True
N/A
True
True
N/A
Job Number: 590-11737-1
List Source: Eurofins TestAmerica, Seattle List Creation: 08/31/19 11:22 AM
Comment
9/13/2019
ACCOUNT:
ANALYTICAL REPORT September 11, 2019
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
Sample Delivery Group:
Samples Received:
Project Number:
Description:
Site:
Repo rt To:
L1135909
09/05/2019
OUTFALL #001 COMP
Sample of Outfall #001-PB95
MOSELAKE IND.
Pat Blau
8248 Randolph Road NE
Moses Lake, WA 98837
Entir e Re port Re v iew ed By :
J a re d Sta rk ey Proj ect Manage r
Results relate only to the items tested or ca librated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be reproduced, except in fu ll, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace Analytical National is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-SOP-MTJL-0067 and ENV-SOP-MT JL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided, and as the samples are received.
PROJECT: SDG:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA OUTFALL #001 COMP L1135909
DATE/TIM E:
09/11/19 10:40
PAGE:
1 of10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cp· CC'ver o,,,,,,.
Tc: Table of Contents
Ss: Sample Summary
Cn: Case Narrative
Ds: Detection Summary
Sr: Sample Results
OUTFALL #001-PB95 L 1135909-01
Qc: Quality Control Summary
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 8015M
GI: Glossary of Terms
Al: Accreditations & Locations
Sc: Sample Chain of Custody
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
PROJECT:
OUTFALL #001 COMP
SDG:
L1135909
DATE/TIME:
09/11/19 10:40
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
1
2
3
4
5
6
6
7
7
8
9
10
PAGE:
2 of10
• ~ • G l4cn j
E] ~ ~ E] E]
C E]
OUTFALL #001-PB95 L 1135909-01 WW
Method
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 8015M
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake. WA
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Collected by
Pat Blau
Batch Dilution Preparation
date/time
WG1342673 09/10/1911:25
PR OJECT: SDG:
OUTFALL #001 COMP L1135909
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
Co llected date/time Received date/time
08/29/1911:00
Analysis
date/time
09/10/1911:25
09/05/19 08:45
Ana lyst Location
DAH Mt. Juliet, TN
DATE/TIME:
09/11/19 1040
PAGE:
3 of10
CASE NARRATIVE ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature , in the proper containers, with the appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qua lified or notated within the report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOO) va lues reported for environmenta l samples have been corrected for the dilution factor used in the ana lysis. All Met11od and Batch Quality Control are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form or properly qualified within the sample resu lts. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potentia l to affect the quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been knowingly withhe ld that wou ld affect the quality of the data.
Jared Stark ey Project Manag e r
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake. WA
PROJECT:
OUTFALL #001 COMP
SDG:
L1135909
DATE/TIME:
09/11/19 10:40
PAGE:
4 o/10
DETECTION SUMMARY
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 8015M
Client ID Lab Sample ID Analyte
OUTFALL #001-PB95 L1135909-01 Methanol
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
Result
ug/I
305
PR OJECT:
Qualifier
J
OUTFALL #001 COMP
MDL
ug/I
163
SDG:
RDL
ug/I
500
L1135909
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
Dilution Analysis
date /time
09/10/2019 11:25
DATE/TIME:
09/11/19 10:40
Batch
WG1342673
PAGE:
5 of10
~ ~ E] l4cnl
• ~ l7oc I E] E]
C ~
OUTFALL #001-PB95 SAMPLE RES UL TS - 01 Co ll ected date / time: 08 / 29 / 19 11 :00 l1 135909
Volati le Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 8015M
Analyte
Methanol
Result
ug/1
305
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
MDL
ug/1
163
RDL
ug/1
500
PR OJECT:
OUTFALL #001 COMP
Dilution Analysis
date /time
09/10/201911:25
SDG:
L1135909
Batch
WG1342673
DATE/TIME:
09/11/19 10:40
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
PAGE:
6 of10
WG1342673 Vo lat il e Organic Co mpou nds (GC) by Met hod 801 5M
Method Blank (MB)
(M B) R3449147-1 0 9/10/19 11:00
MB Result
Analyte ug/I
Methanol u
MB Qualifier MB MDL
ug/I
163
MB RDL
ug/I
500
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY L 1135909 · 01
Laboratory Contro l Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
(LCS) R3449147-2 09/10/19 11 :05 • (LCSD) R3449147-3 0 9/10/19 11:11
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rec. LCSD Rec. Rec. limits LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPO
An alyte ug/I ug/I ug/I % % % %
Methanol 5000 4360 4250 873 85.0 61.0·132 2.61
ACCOUNT: PROJ ECT: SDG:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA OUTFALL #001 COMP L1135909
RPO limits
%
21
DATE/TIME:
09/11/19 10:40
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
PAGE:
7of10
~ ~ ~ l4cnl 150s I
~ • E] ~ rose I
GLOSSARY O F TERMS ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits. Project Name, Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On-Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Times, and Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
MDL
RDL
Rec.
RPD
SDG
u
Analyte
Di lution
Limits
Qualifier
Result
Uncertainty (Radiochemistry)
Case Narrative (Cn)
Quality Control Summary (Qc)
Sample Chain of Custody (Sc)
Sample Results (Sr)
Sample Summary (Ss)
Qualifier
J
ACCOUNT:
Method Detection Limit.
Reported Detection Limit.
Recovery.
Re lative Percent Difference.
Sample Delivery Group.
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
The name of the particu lar compound or analysis performed. Some Ana lyses and Methods will have multiple analytes reported.
If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation vo lume or weight va lues differ from the standard, or if concentrations of analytes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be di luted for analysis. If a va lue different than 1 is used in this field, the result reported has already been corrected for thi s factor.
These are the target % recovery ranges or % difference va lue that the laboratory has historically determined as normal for the method and analyte being reported. Successful QC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or duplicated within these ranges.
This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result reported. If a Qua lifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definit ions page and potentia lly a discussion of poss ible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
The actual analytical fina l result (corrected for any sa mple specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the resu lt in this column may state "ND" (Not Detected) or "BDL" (Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by eithe r an MDL (Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest va lue that the laboratory could detect or report for this analyte.
Confidence level of 2 sigma.
A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non-conformances to protocol observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report.
This section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or analytica l methods to assist in evaluating the va lidity of the resu lts reported for your samples. These analyses are not being performed on your samples typica lly, but on laboratory generated materia l.
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercia l shippers) that have had contro l or possession of the samples from the time of collection unti l delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided by sa mple ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sa mple. The header line of each analysis section for each sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
This section of the Analytica l Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates and times of preparation and/or analysis.
Description
The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
PROJECT: SDG:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA OUTFALL #001 COMP L1135909
DATE/TIME:
09/11/19 10:40
PAGE:
80110
ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
Pace National is the only environmental laboratory accredited/certified to support your work nationwide from one location. One phone call , one point of contact, one laboratory. No other lab is as accessible or prepared to handle your needs throughout the country. Our capacity and capability from our single location laboratory is comparable to the collective totals of the network laboratories in our industry. The most significant benefit to our one location design is the design of our laboratory campus. The model is conducive to accelerated productivity, decreasing turn-around time, and preventing cross contamination, thus protecting sample integrity. Our focus on premium quality and prompt service allows us to be YOUR LAB OF CHOICE. • Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report. • Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace National.
State Accred itati ons Alabama 40660 Nebraska
Alaska 17-026 Nevada
Arizona AZ0612 New Hampshire
Arkansas 88-0469 New Jersey-NELAP
California 2932 New Mexico 1
Colorado TN00003 New York
Connecticut PH-0197 North Carolina
Florida E87487 North Carolina '
Georgia NELAP North Carolina 3
Georgia 1 923 North Dakota
Idaho TN00003 Ohio-VAP
Illinois 200008 Oklahoma
Indiana C-TN-01 Oregon
Iowa 364 Pennsylvania
Kansas E-10277 Rhode Island
Kentucky '• 90010 South Carolina
Kentucky ' 16 South Dakota
Louisiana Al30792 Tennessee 1 4
Louisiana 1 LA180010 Texas
Maine TN0002 Texas 5
Maryland 324 Utah
Massachusetts M-TN003 Vermont
Michigan 9958 Virginia
Minnesota 047-999-395 Washington
Mississippi TN00003 West Virginia
Missouri 340 Wisconsin
Montana CERT0086 Wyoming
Th ird Party Federa l Accreditations A2LA - ISO 17025 1461.01 AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP
A2LA-ISO 17025 5 1461.02 DOD
Canada 1461.01 USDA
EPA-Crypto TN00003
' Drinking Water ' Underground Storage Tanks 3 Aquatic Toxicity 'Chemical/Microbiological 5 Mold 'Wastewater n/a Accreditation not applicable
Our Locations
NE-OS-15-05
TN-03-2002-34
2975
TN002
n/a
11742
Env375
DW21704
41
R-140
CL0069
9915
TN200002
68-02979
LA000356
84004
n/a
2006
T104704245-18-15
LAB0152
TN00003
VT2006
460132
C847
233
9980939910
A2LA
100789
1461.01
P330-15-00234
Pace National has sixty-four client support centers that provide sample pickup and/or the delivery of sampling supplies. If you would like assistance from one of our support offices, please contact our main office. Pace National performs all testing at our central laboratory.
\ l MT
\__7-1D
WY
- -/ SD
' )"' "' NV
\ CA
~
//j~ co•
l-1
1 fl
NE
.. ·"' / I
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
NM
HI I
I j"' TX
PROJECT:
OUTFALL #001 COMP
SDG:
L1135909
DATE/TIME:
09/11/19 10:40
PAGE:
9 of1 0
Moses
8248 Randolph Road NE
RPOOrt !c;
Pat Bl;iu
Project
D~scripilon·
rhonp:
Billing lnform2t1uri:
Pat Blau
8248 Randolph Road NE Chh
Moses lake, WA 98837 I
,m,no '"'"•m''"'"'w' mm -j '
r.o.
Quote#
i ~ __ l5/4;JX·-r's;li/l ::
I WW
__ -------- I I :: I
'"'Matrix: SS So1 1 AIR - 1\,r
GW Groundwatl'?r WV\./ - \Vc1,;t 1.:\Vatn DW • Drinking
OT - Oth,2r
F
R 8io<1c;sny
WW
emarks:
Samples reti.Jmt?d via;
UPS FedEx Courier
·-·-··· . ·-····· ----·+--· -···--·····--·· ·-j
,,
T1n1e
T,rnc: R,:.:cc-1vcd
u :t: ' '-u
E 0 ~
RPlinqu!shrci hv [Slr;n.:,ti1r2/ [ Dote. IHT11?" Rece·,ved for lab by: \Slf,nature)
··----- -···-----·--- .... ------~•--,--------·-----·----~--------~--
Analysis/ Container/ Preservative Chin of CusiCtd\
cH ren1p _
Otr'i::r
Blank Received:
1 ldJ,\r•Dr1
1 !vhw,r Jul1t:~, TN 371 n
Ternplate:T149342
Prelogin: 1'705108 TSR: 546 -Jared Starkey
Pf3:
Shipped Via:
If preservation required by
Hold:
ACCOUNT:
ANALYTICAL REPORT September 19, 2019
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
Sample Delivery Group:
Samples Received:
Project Number:
Description :
Report To:
L11 39598
09/14/2019
Outfall #001 Grab Sample
Pat Blau
8248 Randolph Road NE
Moses Lake, WA 98837
Enti re Report Rev iewed By:
Ja re d St a rk ey Project Ma nager
Results relate only to the items tested or ca librated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be reproduced, except in fu ll, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace Analytical National is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-SOP-MTJL-0067 and ENV-SOP-MTJL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, resu lts relate to the accuracy of the information provided, and as the samples are received.
PROJECT: SDG:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA L1139598
DATE/TIME:
09/19/19 11:26
PAGE:
1 of10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cp Cover Page
Tc: Table of Contents
Ss: Sample Summary
Cn: Case Narrative
Ds: Detection Summary
Sr: Sample Results
OUTFALL #001 I PB-95 L 1139598-01
Qc: Quality Control Summary
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 8015M
GI: Glossary of Terms
Al: Accreditations & Locations
Sc: Sample Chain of Custody
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
PROJECT: SDG:
L1139598
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
DATE/TIME:
09/19/19 11:26
1
2
3
4
5
6
6
7
7
8
9
10
PAGE:
2 of10
• B • E] ~ ~ ~ l7oc I
~ ~
C ~
OUTFALL #001 I PB-95 L1139598-01 WW
Method
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 8015M
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake , WA
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Collected by
Pat Blau
Batch Di lution Preparation
date/time
WG1346862 09/17/1915:49
PROJECT: SDG:
L1139598
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
Collected date/time Received date/time
09/12/19 08:45
Ana lysis
date/time
09/17/19 15:49
09/14/19 08:45
Ana lyst Location
DAH Mt. Juliet, TN
DATE/TIME:
09/19/19 11:26
PAGE:
3 o/10
CASE NARRATIVE ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the appropriate preservatives, and within method specif ied holding times, un less qua lified or notated within the report. Where app licab le, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOO) va lues reported for environmenta l samples have been corrected for the di lution factor used in the ana lysis. All Method and Batch Qua lity Control are within estab lished criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form or properly qua lified within the sample resu lts. By my digita l signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the qua lity of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been knowing ly withhe ld that would affect the qua lity of the data.
Jared Starkey Project Manager
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
PROJECT: SDG:
L1139598
DATE/TIME:
09/19/19 11 :26
PAGE:
4 of10
DETECTION SUMMARY
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 8015M
Client ID Lab Sample ID Analyte
OUTFALL #001 / PB-95 L1139598-01 Methanol
ACCOUNT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
Result
ug/1
193
PROJECT:
Qualifier
J
MDL
ug/1
163
SDG:
RDL
ug/1
500
L1139598
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
Dilution Analysis
date /time
09/17/201915:49
DATE/TIME:
09/19/19 11:26
~
WG1346862
PAGE:
5 o/10
B ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ E]
C ~
OUTFALL #001 / PB-95 SAMPLE RESULTS - 01 Collected date / time: 09 / 12 / 19 08:45 L 11395 98
Volatil e Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 8015M
Result Qualifier MDL RDL Dilution Analysis
Analyte ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 date / time
Methanol 193 :!. 163 500 09/17/2019 15:49
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA L1139598
Batch
WG1346862
DATE/TIME:
09/19/19 11:26
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE •
PAGE:
6 of10
WG1346862 Vo l at il e Organic Co mp o und s (GC) by Method 8015M
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3451597-1 09/17/1913 30
MB Result
Analyte ug/1
Metha nol u
MB Qualifier MB MDL
ug/1
163
MB RDL
ug/1
500
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY L 113959 8-0 1
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
(LCS) R3451597-2 09/17/19 13:35 • (LCSD) R3451597-3 09/17/19 13:41
Spike Amount LCS Resu lt LCSD Result LCS Rec. LCSD Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPD
Analyte ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 % % % %
Methanol 5000 5460 5790 109 116 61.0-132 5.73
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA L11 39598
RPD Limits
%
21
DATE/TIME:
09/19/19 11 :26
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. •
PAGE:
7 of10
EJ ~ E] l4cnl
~ ~ • E] E] ~
GLOSSARY O F TERMS ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE. ..
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better expla in the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. Th is is not intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name, Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On-Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Times, and Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the sa mples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
MDL
RDL
Rec.
RPD
SDG
u
Analyte
Dilution
Limits
Qualifier
Result
Uncertainty (Radiochemistry)
Case Narrative (Cn)
Quality Control Summary (Qc)
Sample Chain of Custody (Sc)
Sample Results (Sr)
Sample Summary (Ss)
Qualifier
J
ACCOUNT:
Method Detection Limit.
Reported Detection Limit.
Recovery.
Relative Percent Difference.
Sa mple Delivery Group.
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
The name of the particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes reported.
If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the standard, or if concentrations of analytes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the laboratory can accurately report, the sa mple may be diluted for analysis. If a va lue different than 1 is used in this field, the resu lt reported has already been corrected for this factor.
These are the target % recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historica lly determined as norm al for the method and analyte being reported. Successfu l QC Sample analysis w ill target all analytes recovered or duplicated within these ranges.
This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result reported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and potentia lly a discussion of possible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
The actual analytical fina l result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the result in this column may state "ND" (Not Detected) or "BDL" (Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL (Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect or report for thi s analyte.
Confidence level of2 sigma.
A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non-conformances to protocol observed either at sam ple receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there wil l be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifie rs used in the report.
Th is section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses requ ired by procedure or analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity of the results reported for your samples. These analyses are not being performed on your sa mples typica lly, but on laboratory generated material.
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initia lly collected. This is used to verify the time and date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession of the sa mples from the time of co llection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section for each sa mple will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
This section of the Ana lytica l Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates and times of preparation and/or analysis.
Description
The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
PROJECT: SDG:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA L1139598
DATE/TIME:
09/19/19 11:26
PAGE:
8 of 10
ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
Pace National is the only environmental laboratory accredited/certified to support your work nationwide from one location. One phone call , one point of contact, one laboratory. No other lab is as accessible or prepared to handle your needs throughout the country. Our capacity and capability from our single location laboratory is comparable to the collective totals of the network laboratories in our industry. The most significant benefit to our one location design is the design of our laboratory campus. The model is conducive to accelerated productivity, decreasing turn-around time, and preventing cross contamination, thus protecting sample integrity. Our focus on premium quality and prompt service allows us to be YOUR LAB OF CHOICE. • Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report. • Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace National.
State Accreditations Alabama 40660 Nebraska
Alaska 17-026 Nevada
Arizona AZ0612 New Hampshire
Arkansas 88-0469 New Jersey-NELAP
California 2932 New Mexico 1
Colorado TN00003 New York
Connecticut PH-0197 North Carolina
Florida E87487 North Carolina '
Georgia NELAP North Carolina 3
Georgia' 923 North Dakota
Idaho TN00003 Ohio- VAP
Illinois 200008 Oklahoma
Indiana C-TN-01 Oregon
Iowa 364 Pennsylvania
Kansas E-10277 Rhode Island
Kentucky' • 90010 South Carolina
Kentucky 2 16 South Dakota
Louisiana Al30792 Tennessee 1 4
Louisiana 1 LA180010 Texas
Maine TN0002 Texas'
Maryland 324 Utah
Massachusetts M-TN003 Vermont
Michigan 9958 Virginia
Minnesota 047-999-395 Washington
Mississippi TN00003 West Virg inia
Missouri 340 Wisconsin
Montana CERT0086 Wyoming
Th ird Party Federa l Accreditations A2LA- ISO 17025 1461.01 AIHA-LAPJLC EMLAP
A2LA- ISO 17025 ' 1461.02 DOD
Canada 1461.01 USDA
EPA- Crypto TN00003
'Drinking Water 2 Underground Storage Tanks 3 Aquatic Toxicity 4 Chemical/Microbiological 'Mold ' Wastewater n/a Accreditation not applicable
Our Locations
NE-OS-15-05
TN-03-2002-34
2975
TN002
n/a
11742
Env375
DW21704
41
R-140
CL0069
9915
TN200002
68-02979
LA000356
84004
n/a
2006
T104704245-18-15
LAB0152
TN00003
VT2006
460132
C847
233
9980939910
A2LA
100789
1461.01
P330-15-00234
Pace National has sixty-four client support centers that provide sample pickup and/or the delivery of sampling supplies. If you would like assistance from one of our support offices, please contact our main office. Pace National performs all testing at our central laboratory.
, C)
HI ' ·r~
ACCOUNT: PROJECT:
Moses Lake Industries - Moses Lake, WA
AR
LA
I { MS
SDG:
L1139598
DATE/TIME:
09/19/19 11:26
PAGE:
9 of10
•
8248 Randolph Road NE
Report to:
Pat Blau
Project
Description:
Phone: 509-762-5336 Fax:
• Matrix: SS - Soil AIR - Air F - Filter
GW - Gro,mdwater B - Bioassay
WW - Wastewater
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Bttling Information:
Pat Blau '8248 Road NE Moses lake, WA 98831
Email To: [email protected]
Site/Facility ID II
Rush? (Lab MUST Be Notified)
__ Same Day __ Five Day
__ Next Day ___ S Day (Rad Only) __ Two Day __ 10 Day (Rad Only) __ T11ree Day
Matrix• I Depth
WW --WW --WW --WW --WW --WW --WW
emarks:
Date:
Lab Project IJ
MOSLAKMLWA-MEOH
P.O.//
Quote#
Date Results Needed
Time:
} , ,j ,. 'j ''"'' r..,, .... , l ~ ...... ~ ....... r''-' ' , '-,~,__, ¥ ~ ~ .. '- l Chain of Custody
1706') Lebanon Rd MountJutiN, 1N 3712-2 PhoM: 615 758-5858 Phorw· 800•767-~8S9
Page of