servant leadership examined

Upload: daniel-wyatt

Post on 06-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Servant Leadership Examined

    1/6

    Servant Leadership 1

    Running Head: SERVANT LEADERSHIP EXAMINED

    Servant Leadership Examined

    Alyssa Danielle Denmark

    Grand Canyon University: Leadership Styles and Development 600

    October 26, 2011

  • 8/3/2019 Servant Leadership Examined

    2/6

    Servant Leadership 2

    Servant Leadership Examined

    Servant leadership is a leadership philosophy which was created and defined by Robert

    K. Greenleaf in 1970. Many leadership and management writers have analyzed Greenleafs

    original philosophy. The 10 characteristics of servant leadership have been identified as:

    listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship,

    commitment to the growth of people, and building community. These characteristics support the

    main premise of servant leadership which is true leadership should call us to serve a higher

    purpose, something beyond ourselves.

    Servant leadership comparisons show some similarities to each of the other emergent

    theories. Servant leadership compared to authentic leadership reveals that the theories have a

    similar focus: integrity, trust, hope and commitment. In addition, both servant leadership and

    authentic leadership include either explicit or implicit recognition of the role of the leader self-

    awareness/regulation (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). Servant leadership compared to ethical

    leadership reveals these theories also have a similar focus in their approach to service and

    community. In the workplace, altruistic service behavior can be observed in activities such as

    mentoring, empowerment behaviors, team-building and citizenship behaviors, to name a few

    (Northouse, 2010). Servant leadership compared to FRLT shows that both styles focus on

    collaboration. Both approaches have the ability to create positive change within an organization

    or community. A look at all of the leadership styles mentioned shows a positive approach to

    moral and ethical leadership. The obvious undertones these theories present are one of integrity,

    honesty, and an overall intention to lead with the desire to positively affect the followers. They

    all display the genuine desire to serve others coupled with high importance on values, morals,

    and ethics with the use of a relationship approach to leadership.

  • 8/3/2019 Servant Leadership Examined

    3/6

    Servant Leadership 3

    There are differences between the theories as well. One difference between servant

    leadership and all the other leadership theories mentioned is that although all theories show

    concern for their followers, the main focus of each style is different. Servant leaders focus on

    service to their followers and the alternative theories focus on engaging followers to support

    organization objectives. Based on the comparisons and differences discussed, there is some

    information which can be inferred. Servant leadership in theory is the most appealing theory for

    those leaders who truly desire to impact and change followers lives for the better. Even though

    many corporations espouse servant leadership, unfortunately I dont believe true servant

    leadership is really in use. Often times, especially in these economic times, an organizations

    primary goal of increased revenue when compared with true servant leadership would not

    produce the results required by those leading the corporation.

    Conceptualization is one of the attributes listed for servant leaders. Servant leaders seek

    to nurture their abilities to dream great dreams. The ability to look at a problem or an organization

    from a conceptualizing perspective means that one must think beyond day-to-day realities. For many

    leaders, this is a characteristic that requires discipline and practice. The traditional leader is

    consumed by the need to achieve short-term operational goals. The leader who wishes to also be a

    servant leader must stretch his or her thinking to encompass broader-based conceptual thinking.

    (Spears, 2010). I agree this perspective requires discipline and practice for many. Not too many

    years ago, I was extremely short-sighted. In studying business I started to understand the

    importance of conceptualization. I do believe that some leaders are truly gifted in this arena. I

    have to work at it. It has become easier for me to conceptualize a product a year in advance, but

    beyond that I lose clarity. Ive personally experienced several leaders who had the ability to

    conceptualize the organization fairly accurately in the next 3 to 5 years. One leader who stands

    out in my mind as someone who truly had this gift was Steve Jobs. He introduced products to

  • 8/3/2019 Servant Leadership Examined

    4/6

    Servant Leadership 4

    consumers that they didnt know they needed, such as the iPad, iPod, and iPhone. After each

    introduction, consumers were hooked. That is the type of conceptualization that I strive to

    develop. I manage a product suite and although the suite has made some serious strides in the last

    15 months that Ive been involved, there is no ground breaking work. I really am proud of the

    work that has been completed, but I havent had that ah-ha moment with any feature, function,

    service or product that weve added to date. Its all been done before. Through the duration of

    this class Ive been thinking about supporting some sort of employee idea program. I know there

    is a really fantastic idea out there that will elevate the product suite to the next level. I just

    havent found it yet.

    It appears that servant leadership is compatible on some level with most religions. The

    characteristics of the servant leader would seem to build on this premise: listening, empathy,

    healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, and commitment and

    building community. This is compatible with many of the word religions who promote "human

    dignity, personal responsibility, character, community, the use of power, compassion,

    stewardship, and justice" (Wallace. 2007).

    Based on studies of all the leadership theories thus far, its clear there are benefits and

    limitations to all of them. I believe the transformational approach is the leadership approach that

    Im most naturally attracted to. That said, there are pieces of each of the theories which have

    made an impact on my current outlook. The one thing that is crystal clear based on all of the

    theories and studies and information is, there is no one right leadership style or approach that

    will fit every situation and/or organization. The best approach is to be informed of all styles and

    approaches that have been documented, and implement the best approach to the given situation.

    Great leadership involves the ability to switch between leadership styles fluidly and instinctively

  • 8/3/2019 Servant Leadership Examined

    5/6

    Servant Leadership 5

    according to the situation at hand, while balancing the goals of the organization with the needs of

    the followers.

  • 8/3/2019 Servant Leadership Examined

    6/6

    Servant Leadership 6

    References

    Northouse, P. (2010).Leadership theory and practice. (5th ed., p. 457). Thousand Oaks: Sage

    Publications, Inc.

    Avolio, B., & Gardner, W. (2005).Authentic leadership development

    Retrieved fromhttp://keyleadership.com/Downloads/Authentic Leadership Development

    .pdf

    Spears, L. (2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring

    leaders. Retrieved from http://www.leadershiparlington.org/EMAIL

    UPLOADS/Spears_Final.pdf

    Wallace, J. R. (2007). Servant leadership: A worldview perspective. Retrieved from

    http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol2iss2/Wallace/WallaceV2Is2.p

    df

    http://keyleadership.com/Downloads/Authentic%20Leadership%20Development%20.pdfhttp://keyleadership.com/Downloads/Authentic%20Leadership%20Development%20.pdfhttp://keyleadership.com/Downloads/Authentic%20Leadership%20Development%20.pdfhttp://keyleadership.com/Downloads/Authentic%20Leadership%20Development%20.pdfhttp://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol2iss2/Wallace/WallaceV2Is2.pdfhttp://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol2iss2/Wallace/WallaceV2Is2.pdfhttp://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol2iss2/Wallace/WallaceV2Is2.pdfhttp://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol2iss2/Wallace/WallaceV2Is2.pdfhttp://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol2iss2/Wallace/WallaceV2Is2.pdfhttp://keyleadership.com/Downloads/Authentic%20Leadership%20Development%20.pdfhttp://keyleadership.com/Downloads/Authentic%20Leadership%20Development%20.pdf