server update february 28, 2007 tom kilroy vice president & general manager digital enterprise...

20
Server Update Server Update February 28, 2007 February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group Digital Enterprise Group

Upload: braeden-teaster

Post on 14-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

Server UpdateServer UpdateFebruary 28, 2007February 28, 2007

Tom KilroyTom KilroyVice President & General Manager Vice President & General Manager

Digital Enterprise GroupDigital Enterprise Group

Page 2: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

2

Legal DisclaimerLegal DisclaimerINFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH INTEL® PRODUCTS. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN INTEL’S TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR SUCH PRODUCTS, INTEL ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER, AND INTEL DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY RELATING TO SALE AND/OR USE OF INTEL PRODUCTS, INCLUDING LIABILITY OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT, OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. Intel products are not intended for use in medical, life-saving, life-sustaining, critical control or safety systems, or in nuclear facility applications.

Intel products may contain design defects or errors known as errata which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request.

All information provided related to future Intel products and plans is preliminary and subject to change at any time, without notice.

Intel may make changes to dates, specifications, product descriptions, and plans referenced in this document at any time, without notice. This document may contain information on products in the design phase of development. The information here is subject to change without notice. Do not finalize a design with this information.

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific systems and/or components and reflect approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware, software, or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate system or component performance they are considering purchasing. For information on performance tests and performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm

Intel Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, virtual machine monitor (VMM) and applications enabled for virtualization technology. Functionality, performance or other virtualization technology benefits will vary depending on hardware and software configurations. Virtualization technology-enabled BIOS and VMM applications are currently in development.

SPECint2000 and SPECfp2000 benchmark tests reflect the performance of the microprocessor, memory architecture and compiler of a computer system on compute-intensive, 32-bit applications. SPEC benchmark tests results for Intel microprocessors are determined using particular, well-configured systems. These results may or may not reflect the relative performance of Intel microprocessor in systems with different hardware or software designs or configurations (including compilers). Buyers should consult other sources of information, including system benchmarks; to evaluate the performance of systems they are considering purchasing.

Intel, the Intel logo, Xeon, the Xeon log, Xeon inside, the Xeon inside logo, and Itanium, are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.

*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.

Page 3: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

3

Process Technology

Microprocessor Design

Factory Network

The Innovation EngineThe Innovation Engine

Page 4: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

4

StatusStatus

Outstanding ExecutionOutstanding Execution

Deliverable DateDate

Xeon 5100 (Woodcrest) June ‘06June ‘06

Xeon 7100 (Tulsa) August ’06August ’06

Clovertown LV (50W) Q1’07Q1’07

Xeon 5300 (Clovertown) November ‘06November ‘06

Xeon 5148 (40W LV) September ‘06September ‘06

Caneland Platform Q3’07Q3’07

45nm Xeon 2H’072H’07

Delivering Reliable InnovationDelivering Reliable Innovation

All dates, product descriptions, availability and plans are forecasts and subject to change without notice.

4 MonthsEarly

5 MonthsEarly

1 QuarterEarly

1 QuarterEarly

On Track

On Track

On Track

Page 5: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

5

Five Processors One Platform

45nm

2 Y

EA

RS Shrink/DerivativePENRYN

New MicroarchitectureNEHALEM

Shrink/DerivativeXeon 5000

Intel Core MicroarchitectureXeon 5100 & 5300

65nm2 Y

EA

RS

Cadence for Sustained InnovationCadence for Sustained Innovation

All dates, product descriptions, availability and plans are forecasts and subject to change without notice.

32nm

2 Y

EA

RS Shrink/Derivative

WESTMERE

New MicroarchitectureGESHER

Page 6: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

6

ResultsResults

Solid Market PerformanceSolid Market Performance– Record Volume in Q4’06Record Volume in Q4’06

– Market Segment Share IncreasedMarket Segment Share Increased

– Average Selling Price HigherAverage Selling Price Higher

Key Segment MomentumKey Segment Momentum– Wall StreetWall Street

– Mega-DatacentersMega-Datacenters

– High Performance ComputingHigh Performance Computing

Page 7: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

7

Intel & Sun Alliance AnnouncementIntel & Sun Alliance Announcement

Broad multi-year strategic Broad multi-year strategic alliance alliance

SunSun** roadmap commitment roadmap commitment – 1P, 2P, 4P, >4P1P, 2P, 4P, >4P– Telco, WS, EnterpriseTelco, WS, Enterprise

Intel endorsement of SolarisIntel endorsement of Solaris** as a mainstream OS for Intelas a mainstream OS for Intel®® XeonXeon®® processors processors

*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others

Page 8: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

8

Energy Efficient Performance LeadershipEnergy Efficient Performance Leadership

SPECWeb28%

TPC-C21% Java

72%

SPECInt

49%

Dual-Core IntelDual-Core Intel®® Xeon Xeon®® Processor vs. AMD Processor vs. AMD** Opteron Opteron**

Xeon 5160 – Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160Φ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 2220SE (2.80 GHz); β Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 2218 (2.60 GHz); Ψ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 285 (2.60 GHz)δ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 280 (2.40 GHz); ‡ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 275 (2.20 GHz); Ω Single-Core AMD Opteron* Model 256 (3.0 GHz) # Single-Core AMD Opteron* Model 254 (2.80 GHz)Data as of February 27, 2007

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Copyright © 2006, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

vs. Single-Core vs. Dual-Core

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

SPECapc*

Soli

dWor

ks* 2

005

- Ove

rall#

Star-C

D (A-C

lass

)‡

Top500Linpack

97%

Page 9: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

9

SPECWeb61%

TPC-C72%

Java175%

SPECInt

142%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

180%

Intel Xeon 5300 Series – BreakawayIntel Xeon 5300 Series – Breakaway

Quad-Core IntelQuad-Core Intel®® Xeon Xeon®® Processor Processorvs. Dual-Core AMDvs. Dual-Core AMD** Opteron Opteron**

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Copyright © 2006, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Xeon X5355 – Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor X5355; Xeon E5345 – Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor E5345; Xeon 5160 – Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160; Φ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 2220SE (2.80 GHz); β Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 2218 (2.60 GHz); Ψ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 285 (2.60 GHz)δ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 280 (2.40 GHz); ‡ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 275 (2.20 GHz); Ω Single-Core AMD Opteron* Model 256 (3.0 GHz) # Single-Core AMD Opteron* Model 254 (2.80 GHz)Data as of February 27, 2007

vs. Dual-Core

Top500Linpack227%

Page 10: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

11

PerformancePerformance(SPECjbb2005*)(SPECjbb2005*)

323 335322

System PowerSystem Power(measured system Watts)(measured system Watts)

Lower is better Higher is better

Multi-Core Energy EfficiencyMulti-Core Energy Efficiency

~4.5X single

core

Single Dual5160

QuadE5345

3.6 GHZ 3.0 GHZ 2.33 GHZ

Single Dual5160

QuadE5345

3.6 GHZ 3.0 GHZ 2.33 GHZ

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Copyright © 2006-2007, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

33114

153500

102313

Data Source: Intel measured results as of Nov 10, 2006

Page 11: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

12

110

12.5

PerformancePerformanceSPECint*_rate_base2000*SPECint*_rate_base2000*

Power per corePower per core(measured by processor TDP)(measured by processor TDP)

Lower is better Higher is better

Customer OrientationCustomer Orientation

Single Quad

Single QuadE5345

>5X single core

Single Quad

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Copyright © 2006-2007, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Data Source: Intel measured results as of Feb. 27, 2006

3.6 GHZ 3.6 GHZClovertown LV

Clovertown 3.0

41.2

215

Page 12: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

13

IntelIntel®® Xeon Xeon®® Processor 7100 Series Performance Processor 7100 Series Performance

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Copyright © 2006, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Compares Xeon 7140M – Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 7140M (“Tulsa 3.40 GHz”) vs AMD Opteron model 8220SE unless noted below¥ Xeon 7150N – Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 7150N (“Tulsa 3.50 GHz”) vs AMD Opteron model 8220SE‡‡ Xeon 7150N – Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 7150N (“Tulsa 3.50 GHz”) vs AMD Opteron model 885 (2.60 GHz)

2 – Published Data as of Feb 17, 2007.

1.00

4.05

2.802.50

• >2x Performance• Nearly 3x Performance Per Watt• 4x Performance Per Dollar

Gains over Previous Generation1

Leadership Benchmarks2

TPC-C*TPC-C* 1.26x1.26x¥

SAP-SD* 4PSAP-SD* 4P 1.08x1.08xSAP-SD* 8PSAP-SD* 8P 1.54x1.54x‡‡‡‡

SPECjbb*2005SPECjbb*2005 1.33x1.33x

SPECint*_rate_base2000SPECint*_rate_base2000 1.02x1.02x

SPECfp*_rate_base2000SPECfp*_rate_base2000 0.75x0.75x

• Broad new leadership publications • Up to 54% over Opteron*

vs. BestOpteron Pub

Previous Xeon

Perf. (SPECjbb*2005)

Perf/Watt (SPECjbb*2005

BOPS / Sys Watt)

Perf/$ (SPECjbb*2005

BOPS / CPU price)

1 - Compares Intel® Xeon® processor 7140 to the previous version, Intel® Xeon processor 7041Performance based on SPECjbb*2005 Fujitsu-Siemens* PRIMERGY* MP platform using Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® processor MP 7140M (3.40 GHz, 16 MB L3 cache) has submitted the best 4P SPECjbb* 2005 performance result as of 28 Aug 06.

Page 13: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

14

IntelIntel®® Itanium Itanium®® Processor Critical Mass Processor Critical Mass

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Q10

3

Q20

3

Q30

3

Q40

3

Q10

4

Q20

4

Q30

4

Q40

4

Q10

5

Q20

5

Q30

5

Q40

5

Q10

6

Q20

6

Q30

6

Q40

6

IPF/ Power IPF/ SPARC

IntelIntel®® Itanium Itanium®® System Revenue System Revenue vs. SPARCvs. SPARC** and Power and Power**Application GrowthApplication Growth

Building critical massBuilding critical mass

2003 2004 2005 TODAY

Open VMSWindowsLinuxUXNon-Stop

> 700

> 2,400

> 6,000

> 12,000*

• $6B+ cumulative system revenue$6B+ cumulative system revenue11

• 100% Volume Increase 2H’06 vs. 2H’05 driven by Dual-Core100% Volume Increase 2H’06 vs. 2H’05 driven by Dual-Core11

• Tokyo Stock Exchange committed to Itanium ArchitectureTokyo Stock Exchange committed to Itanium Architecture• 80% customer wins in top “G100” global accounts80% customer wins in top “G100” global accounts22

• Itanium Solutions Alliance $10B investment on-trackItanium Solutions Alliance $10B investment on-track• ~50% of New Itanium Application Ports on Windows~50% of New Itanium Application Ports on Windows** & Linux & Linux**

1Source: IDC Q3’06 Server TrackerSPARC Includes: SPARC I, SPARC II, SPARC III, SPARC IV, SPARC 64 and SPARC 64 V;

POWER Includes: Power RS64 II, Power RS64 III, Power RS64 III, Power 3, Power 4, Power 5, and PowerPCOther names and brands may be claimed as the property of others

Page 14: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

15

Innovation ContinuesInnovation Continues

New:New: 3GHz Clovertown 3GHz Clovertown

New:New: HPC/Workstation Chipset in 2H’07 HPC/Workstation Chipset in 2H’07– 1600MHz FSB, Larger Snoop Filter1600MHz FSB, Larger Snoop Filter

IntelIntel®® Core Core™™ Microarchitecture in Xeon 7000 Microarchitecture in Xeon 7000 SequenceSequence– On Track for Q3’07 On Track for Q3’07

– Enabling High Density BladesEnabling High Density Blades

– Dedicated Quad Independent BusesDedicated Quad Independent Buses

Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)

All dates, product descriptions, availability and plans are forecasts and subject to change without notice.

Page 15: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

16

This presentation contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These statements do not reflect the potential impact of any mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, investments or other similar transactions that do not reflect the potential impact of any mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, investments or other similar transactions that may be completed in the future. The information presented is accurate only as of today’s date and will not be updated. In may be completed in the future. The information presented is accurate only as of today’s date and will not be updated. In addition to any factors discussed in the presentation, the important factors that could cause actual results to differ addition to any factors discussed in the presentation, the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following: Intel operates in intensely competitive industries that are characterized by a high materially include the following: Intel operates in intensely competitive industries that are characterized by a high percentage of costs that are fixed or difficult to reduce in the short term, significant pricing pressures, and product demand percentage of costs that are fixed or difficult to reduce in the short term, significant pricing pressures, and product demand that is highly variable and difficult to forecast. Revenue and the gross margin percentage are affected by the timing of new that is highly variable and difficult to forecast. Revenue and the gross margin percentage are affected by the timing of new Intel product introductions and the demand for and market acceptance of Intel's products; actions taken by Intel's Intel product introductions and the demand for and market acceptance of Intel's products; actions taken by Intel's competitors, including product offerings, marketing programs and pricing pressures and Intel’s response to such actions; competitors, including product offerings, marketing programs and pricing pressures and Intel’s response to such actions; Intel’s ability to respond quickly to technological developments and to incorporate new features into its products; and the Intel’s ability to respond quickly to technological developments and to incorporate new features into its products; and the availability of sufficient components from suppliers to meet demand. Factors that could cause demand to be different from availability of sufficient components from suppliers to meet demand. Factors that could cause demand to be different from Intel's expectations include customer acceptance of Intel and competitors’ products; changes in customer order patterns, Intel's expectations include customer acceptance of Intel and competitors’ products; changes in customer order patterns, including order cancellations; changes in the level of inventory at customers; and changes in business and economic including order cancellations; changes in the level of inventory at customers; and changes in business and economic conditions. The gross margin percentage could vary significantly from expectations based on changes in revenue levels; conditions. The gross margin percentage could vary significantly from expectations based on changes in revenue levels; product mix and pricing; capacity utilization; variations in inventory valuation; excess or obsolete inventory; manufacturing product mix and pricing; capacity utilization; variations in inventory valuation; excess or obsolete inventory; manufacturing yields; changes in unit costs; impairments of long-lived assets, including manufacturing, assembly/test and intangible yields; changes in unit costs; impairments of long-lived assets, including manufacturing, assembly/test and intangible assets; and the timing and execution of the manufacturing ramp and associated costs, including start-up costs. Expenses, assets; and the timing and execution of the manufacturing ramp and associated costs, including start-up costs. Expenses, particularly certain marketing and compensation expenses, vary depending on the level of demand for Intel's products, the particularly certain marketing and compensation expenses, vary depending on the level of demand for Intel's products, the level of revenue and profits and impairments of long-lived assets. Intel is in the midst of a structure and efficiency program level of revenue and profits and impairments of long-lived assets. Intel is in the midst of a structure and efficiency program which is resulting in several actions that could have an impact on expected expense levels and gross margin. The tax rate which is resulting in several actions that could have an impact on expected expense levels and gross margin. The tax rate expectation is based on current tax law and current expected income and assumes Intel continues to receive tax benefits expectation is based on current tax law and current expected income and assumes Intel continues to receive tax benefits for export sales. The tax rate may be affected by the closing of acquisitions or divestitures; the jurisdictions in which profits for export sales. The tax rate may be affected by the closing of acquisitions or divestitures; the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed; changes in the estimates of credits, benefits and deductions; the resolution of are determined to be earned and taxed; changes in the estimates of credits, benefits and deductions; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; and the ability to realize deferred tax assets. Gains or losses from issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; and the ability to realize deferred tax assets. Gains or losses from equity securities and interest and other could vary from expectations depending on equity market levels and volatility; equity securities and interest and other could vary from expectations depending on equity market levels and volatility; gains or losses realized on the sale or exchange of securities; impairment charges related to marketable, non-marketable gains or losses realized on the sale or exchange of securities; impairment charges related to marketable, non-marketable and other investments; interest rates; cash balances; and changes in fair value of derivative instruments. Dividend and other investments; interest rates; cash balances; and changes in fair value of derivative instruments. Dividend declarations and the dividend rate are at the discretion of Intel’s board of directors, and plans for future dividends may be declarations and the dividend rate are at the discretion of Intel’s board of directors, and plans for future dividends may be revised by the board. Intel’s dividend and stock buyback programs could be affected by changes in its capital spending revised by the board. Intel’s dividend and stock buyback programs could be affected by changes in its capital spending programs, changes in its cash flows and changes in the tax laws, as well as by the level and timing of acquisition and programs, changes in its cash flows and changes in the tax laws, as well as by the level and timing of acquisition and investment activity. Intel’s results could be affected by the amount, type, and valuation of share-based awards granted as investment activity. Intel’s results could be affected by the amount, type, and valuation of share-based awards granted as well as the amount of awards cancelled due to employee turnover and the timing of award exercises by employees. Intel's well as the amount of awards cancelled due to employee turnover and the timing of award exercises by employees. Intel's results could be impacted by unexpected economic, social, political and physical/infrastructure conditions in the countries in results could be impacted by unexpected economic, social, political and physical/infrastructure conditions in the countries in which Intel, its customers or its suppliers operate, including military conflict and other security risks, natural disasters, which Intel, its customers or its suppliers operate, including military conflict and other security risks, natural disasters, infrastructure disruptions, health concerns and fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Intel's results could be affected by infrastructure disruptions, health concerns and fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Intel's results could be affected by adverse effects associated with product defects and errata (deviations from published specifications), and by litigation or adverse effects associated with product defects and errata (deviations from published specifications), and by litigation or regulatory matters involving intellectual property, stockholder, consumer, antitrust and other issues, such as the litigation regulatory matters involving intellectual property, stockholder, consumer, antitrust and other issues, such as the litigation and regulatory matters described in Intel's SEC reports. A more detailed discussion of these and other factors that could and regulatory matters described in Intel's SEC reports. A more detailed discussion of these and other factors that could affect Intel’s results is included in Intel’s SEC filings, including the report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2006. affect Intel’s results is included in Intel’s SEC filings, including the report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2006.

Risk FactorsRisk Factors

Page 16: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group
Page 17: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

18

Intel Xeon 5160 Performance PublicationsIntel Xeon 5160 Performance PublicationsWORKSTATION WORKSTATION BENCHMARKSBENCHMARKS

Xeon 5160 Xeon 5160 over Opt over Opt

2xxx2xxx

SPECapc* SolidWorks* 2005 - OverallSPECapc* SolidWorks* 2005 - Overall 1.12x1.12x##

SPECviewperf* 9.0 (Non-SLI)SPECviewperf* 9.0 (Non-SLI) 1.55x1.55xΩΩ

SPECapc* 3ds Max* 8 - RenderingSPECapc* 3ds Max* 8 - Rendering 1.37x1.37xΨΨ

SPECapc* 3ds max* 8 - InteractiveSPECapc* 3ds max* 8 - Interactive 1.22x1.22xΩΩ

OCUS* for Pro/E WF2* x64 - ScoreOCUS* for Pro/E WF2* x64 - Score 1.37x1.37xδδ

SPECapc* Maya* 6.5 - OverallSPECapc* Maya* 6.5 - Overall 1.14x1.14xΩΩ

SPECapc* for Pro/E WF2* - OverallSPECapc* for Pro/E WF2* - Overall 1.06x1.06xΩΩ

SPECapc* UGS* NX3 – Overall (Non-SPECapc* UGS* NX3 – Overall (Non-SLI)SLI) 1.13x1.13xΩΩ

APPLICATION APPLICATION PERFORMANCEPERFORMANCE

Xeon 5160 Xeon 5160 over Opt over Opt

2xxx2xxx

BlackScholesBlackScholes 1.06x1.06xΦΦ

SunGard ACRSunGard ACR 1.20x1.20xΦΦ

WMLS - Windows Media Load SimulatorWMLS - Windows Media Load Simulator 1.12x1.12xΨΨ

PERFORMANCE PER WATTPERFORMANCE PER WATT Xeon 5160 Xeon 5160 over Opt over Opt

2xxx2xxx

SPECint_rate_base2000SPECint_rate_base2000 1.84x1.84xΨΨ

WebBenchWebBench 1.47x1.47xΨΨ

SunGard ACRSunGard ACR 1.43x1.43xΨΨ

BlackScholesBlackScholes 1.38x1.38xΨΨ

WMLSWMLS 1.33x1.33xΨΨ

SERVER BENCHMARKSSERVER BENCHMARKSXeon 5160 Xeon 5160 over Opt over Opt

2xxx2xxx

TPC-C*TPC-C* 1.21x1.21xΦΦ

SAP-SD* 2-TierSAP-SD* 2-Tier 1.18x1.18xΦΦ

SPECjbb*2005SPECjbb*2005 1.72x1.72xΦΦ

MMB3* (Microsoft Exchange)MMB3* (Microsoft Exchange) 1.12x1.12xΨΨ

Lotus Domino* 7.0Lotus Domino* 7.0 1.39x1.39xΨΨ

SPECWeb*2005SPECWeb*2005 1.28x1.28xββ

SPECint*_rate_base2000SPECint*_rate_base2000 1.49x1.49xΦΦ

SPECfp*_rate_base2000(Lin)SPECfp*_rate_base2000(Lin) 0.95x0.95xΦΦ

SPECfp*_rate_base2000(Win)SPECfp*_rate_base2000(Win) 1.07x1.07xΦΦ

SPECint*_base2000SPECint*_base2000 1.67x1.67xΦΦ

SPECfp*_base2000SPECfp*_base2000 1.26x1.26xΦΦ

Web Bench*Web Bench* 1.11x1.11xΦΦ

HPC BENCHMARKSHPC BENCHMARKSXeon 5160 Xeon 5160 over Opt over Opt

2xxx2xxx

LinpackLinpack 1.97x1.97xΦΦ

Fluent 6.3.xFluent 6.3.x 1.31x1.31xδδ

LS-DynaLS-Dyna 1.08x1.08xΨΨ

Star-CD (A-Class)Star-CD (A-Class) 0.93x0.93x‡‡

Data as of Feb 27, 2007

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Copyright © 2006, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Xeon 5160 – Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160Φ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 2220SE (2.80 GHz); β Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 2218 (2.60 GHz); Ψ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 285 (2.60 GHz)δ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 280 (2.40 GHz); ‡ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 275 (2.20 GHz); Ω Single-Core AMD Opteron* Model 256 (3.0 GHz) # Single-Core AMD Opteron* Model 254 (2.80 GHz)

Continued Leadership vs. Latest OpteronContinued Leadership vs. Latest Opteron**

Page 18: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

19

Intel Xeon 5300 Series Extends Performance LeadershipIntel Xeon 5300 Series Extends Performance Leadership

IntelIntel®® Xeon Xeon®® 51005100 and and 53005300 Series Performance Publications Series Performance Publications

WORKSTATION BENCHMARKSWORKSTATION BENCHMARKS

POV-Ray 3.7B15 x64 Rendering - POV-Ray 3.7B15 x64 Rendering - ScoreScore 1.93x1.93xΨΨ

Monte Carlo Profit sim w/ Excel* - SecMonte Carlo Profit sim w/ Excel* - Sec 1.95x1.95xΨΨ

LightWave 3D* Rendering timeLightWave 3D* Rendering time 1.64x1.64xΨΨ

Cinebench* x CPU Rendering scoreCinebench* x CPU Rendering score 1.70x1.70xΨΨ

SPECapc* 3ds Max* 8 - RenderingSPECapc* 3ds Max* 8 - Rendering 1.90x1.90xΨΨ

SPECapc* 3ds max* 8 - InteractiveSPECapc* 3ds max* 8 - Interactive 1.17x1.17xΩΩ

OCUS* for Pro/E WF2* x64 - ScoreOCUS* for Pro/E WF2* x64 - Score 1.37x1.37xδδ

SPECapc* Maya* 6.5 - OverallSPECapc* Maya* 6.5 - Overall 1.17x1.17x##

SPECapc* for Pro/E WF2* - OverallSPECapc* for Pro/E WF2* - Overall 1.22x1.22x##

SPECapc* UGS* NX3 - OverallSPECapc* UGS* NX3 - Overall 1.61x1.61x##

APPLICATION APPLICATION PERFORMANCEPERFORMANCE

Xeon X5355 Xeon X5355 vs. Opteron vs. Opteron

2.80(F)2.80(F)

BlackScholesBlackScholes** 1.89x1.89xΦΦ

SunGard *ACRSunGard *ACR 2.09x2.09xΦΦ

Windows Media Load Simulator Windows Media Load Simulator (WMLS)(WMLS) 1.12x1.12xΨΨ

SERVER BENCHMARKSSERVER BENCHMARKS

TPC-C*TPC-C* 1.72x1.72xΦΦ

SAP-SD* 2-TierSAP-SD* 2-Tier 1.70x1.70xΦΦ

SPECjbb*2005SPECjbb*2005 2.75x2.75xΦΦ

MMB3* (Microsoft Exchange)MMB3* (Microsoft Exchange) 1.12x1.12xΨΨ

Lotus Domino* 7.0Lotus Domino* 7.0 2.18x2.18xΨΨ

SPECWeb*2005SPECWeb*2005 1.61x1.61xββ

SPECint*_rate_base2000SPECint*_rate_base2000 2.42x2.42xΦΦ

SPECfp*_rate_base2000(Lin)SPECfp*_rate_base2000(Lin) 1.18x1.18xΦΦ

SPECfp*_rate_base2000(Win)SPECfp*_rate_base2000(Win) 1.34x1.34xΦΦ

SPECint*_base2000SPECint*_base2000 1.67x1.67xΦΦ

SPECfp*_base2000SPECfp*_base2000 1.26x1.26xΦΦ

Web Bench*Web Bench* 1.47x1.47xΦΦ

WMLS - Windows Media Load SimulatorWMLS - Windows Media Load Simulator 1.12x1.12xHPC BENCHMARKSHPC BENCHMARKS

Linpack*Linpack* 3.27x3.27xΦΦ

Fluent*Fluent* 1.93x1.93xδδ

LS-DYNA*LS-DYNA* 1.26x1.26xΨΨ

Star-CD *(A-Class)Star-CD *(A-Class) 0.93x0.93x‡‡

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Copyright © 2006, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Xeon x5355/ Xeon 5160 vs.

Opt 2xxx

Xeon X5355 – Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor X5355; Xeon E5345 – Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor E5345; Xeon 5160 – Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160; Φ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 2220SE (2.80 GHz); β Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 2218 (2.60 GHz); Ψ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 285 (2.60 GHz)δ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 280 (2.40 GHz); ‡ Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Model 275 (2.20 GHz); Ω Single-Core AMD Opteron* Model 256 (3.0 GHz) # Single-Core AMD Opteron* Model 254 (2.80 GHz)

Xeon x5355/ Xeon 5160 vs.

Opt 2xxx

Data Source: Published or Submitted results as of Feb 27, 07

Data as of Feb 27, 2007

Page 19: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

20

Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5300 series Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5300 series based Server Platforms based Server Platforms

Energy-efficient Performance with Xeon E5345 using Energy-efficient Performance with Xeon E5345 using SPECjbb2005*SPECjbb2005*

What is Performance per System Watt?What is Performance per System Watt? Performance per system watt is calculated by taking the performance score from a benchmark or Performance per system watt is calculated by taking the performance score from a benchmark or

application and dividing it by the average system power usage (AC power from the wall). The application and dividing it by the average system power usage (AC power from the wall). The corresponding performance/power or performance per watt scores are normalized to a baseline corresponding performance/power or performance per watt scores are normalized to a baseline platform for comparison purposes. In these measurements the Intel® Xeon® 3.6GHz 2M cache is the platform for comparison purposes. In these measurements the Intel® Xeon® 3.6GHz 2M cache is the base platform (1.0). base platform (1.0).

Intel focuses on performance per watt comparisons using power measured at the system level as Intel focuses on performance per watt comparisons using power measured at the system level as opposed to component level TDP or max power ratings. Measured system level power is a more opposed to component level TDP or max power ratings. Measured system level power is a more accurate representation of the customer's true energy cost.accurate representation of the customer's true energy cost.

Basis for Comparison:Basis for Comparison: The above chart compares Intel measured results on SPECjbb2005* The above chart compares Intel measured results on SPECjbb2005* benchmark.benchmark.

Benchmark Description for SPECjbb*2005: Benchmark Description for SPECjbb*2005: SPEC Java Business Benchmark 2005 (jbb2005). Written in Java, this multi-threaded benchmark SPEC Java Business Benchmark 2005 (jbb2005). Written in Java, this multi-threaded benchmark

emulates an order processing environment in a company with multiple warehouses serving multiple emulates an order processing environment in a company with multiple warehouses serving multiple customers. Measures average transaction throughput of a heavily loaded server. Performance reported customers. Measures average transaction throughput of a heavily loaded server. Performance reported in Business Operations per Second (BOPS).in Business Operations per Second (BOPS).

Configuration Details: Configuration Details: Data Source: Intel internal measurement - November 2006. System power was Data Source: Intel internal measurement - November 2006. System power was measured during the steady-state of window of the performance run.measured during the steady-state of window of the performance run.

– Intel® Xeon® Processor 3.60 GHz based platform details:Intel® Xeon® Processor 3.60 GHz based platform details: Intel® preproduction Server platform with two 64-bit Intel® preproduction Server platform with two 64-bit Intel® Xeon® processors 3.60 GHz with 2MB L2 Cache and 800 MHz system bus and 8GB (8x1024 MB) DDR2-400 Intel® Xeon® processors 3.60 GHz with 2MB L2 Cache and 800 MHz system bus and 8GB (8x1024 MB) DDR2-400 memory, Microsoft Windows Server x32 Enterprise Edition. Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition. BEA JRockit(R) 5.0 JVM. memory, Microsoft Windows Server x32 Enterprise Edition. Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition. BEA JRockit(R) 5.0 JVM. Run with 1 JVM instance. Run with 1 JVM instance.

– Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160 based platform details: Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160 based platform details: Intel® preproduction Server platform with two Intel® preproduction Server platform with two Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4M L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 8GB (8x1GB) Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4M L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 8GB (8x1GB) 667MHz FB-DIMM memory; Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition. BEA JRockit(R) 5.0 P26.4.0. Run with two jvm instances667MHz FB-DIMM memory; Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition. BEA JRockit(R) 5.0 P26.4.0. Run with two jvm instances

– Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor E5345 based platform details: Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor E5345 based platform details: Intel® preproduction Server platform with Intel® preproduction Server platform with two Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor E5345, 2.33 GHz with 2x4M L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 8GB (8x1GB) two Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor E5345, 2.33 GHz with 2x4M L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 8GB (8x1GB) 667MHz FB-DIMM memory, Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition. BEA JRockit(R) 5.0 P26.4.0. Run with two jvm instances 667MHz FB-DIMM memory, Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition. BEA JRockit(R) 5.0 P26.4.0. Run with two jvm instances

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Copyright © 2006, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Page 20: Server Update February 28, 2007 Tom Kilroy Vice President & General Manager Digital Enterprise Group

21

TPC-C Performance– AMD Opteron* platform: Hewlett-Packard* ProLiant* DL585-G2 with 4x AMD Opteron* processor 8220SE (4 Processors/8 Cores/8

Threads), 32x 4 GB DDR2, Microsoft* SQL Server* 2005 Enterprise Edition x64 SP1 database, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Enterprise Edition x64 SP1. Results at http://www.tpc.org/results/individual_results/HP/HP_DL585G2_2.8DC_es.pdf. Referenced as published: 262, 989 tpmC; $2.09/tpmC; Availability Date March 26, 2007.

- Intel Xeon 7150N platform: IBM* Server System using 4x Dual-Core Intel® Xeon® processor 7150N (3.50 GHz, 16 MB L3 cache, 4 Processors/8 Cores/16 Threads), 128 GB memory, IBM* DB2* UDB v8.2 database, SuSE* LINUX Enterprise Server 10. Results at http://www.tpc.org/results/individual_results/IBM/IBM-x3950-3.5-061215.es.pdf. Referenced as published: 331,087 tpmC; $5.30/tpmC; Availability Date February 14, 2007.

• SAP-SD 2–Tier Performance (4P)– AMD Opteron* platform: Hewlett-Packard* ProLiant* BL685c using 4P AMD Opteron* processor 8220SE 2.80 GHz/2x 1 MB L2,

Windows* Server 2003 Enterprise Edition 64-bit SP1, MSSQL Server 2005 64-bit database, ERP 5.0 64-bit release. Certification #2007007.

– Xeon 7140M platform: Hewlett-Packard* ProLiant* DL580 4P Intel Xeon processor MP 3.00 GHz/800 FSB/16 MB L3, Windows* Server 2003 Enterprise Edition 64-bit, MSSQL Server 2005 database, ERP 5.0 64-bit release. Certification #2006060.

• SAP-SD 2–Tier Performance (8P)– AMD Opteron* platform: Fujitsu Siemens* Computers PRIMERGY* Model BX630 (8-way), 4x AMD Opteron* processor 880 (2.40

GHz), 64 GB DDR-400, Windows* Server 2003 Enterprise Edition (64-bit), SQL Server 2005 (64-bit), ERP 2004 (64-bit). Certification #2006040.

– Xeon 7140N platform: IBM* System x* 3950 used the Dual Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 7140N at 3.30GHz with 1MB L2 cache per core (8 processors/16 cores/32 threads), Microsoft* SQL Server 2005 Enterprise x64 Edition, Microsoft Windows® Server 2003 Datacenter x64 Edition, and mySAP ERP 2004 solution. Certification #2006061.

SPECjbb2005– AMD Opteron* platform: HP Proliant BL45p G2 with four AMD Opteron* processor 8220SE (2.80 GHz), 16x 2 GB DDR2-400,

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition with SP1, BEA* JRockit* JVM. Results at http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2006q4/jbb2005-20061121-00224.html

– Xeon 7140M platform: HP Proliant ML570 G2 with four Intel Xeon 7140M processor, 3.40 GHz, 16x 2 GB DDR2-400, Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition with SP1, BEA* JRockit* JVM. Results at http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2006q4/jbb2005-20061121-00222.html

SPECint_rate_base2000:– AMD Opteron* platform: HP* ProLiant* DL585G2, 4x AMD Opteron* processor 8220SE (2.80 GHz), 32GB (16x2GB) PC2-5300P

CL5.0, Windows* Server 2003 SP1 (32-bit), Intel* C++ Compiler 9.1. Source: http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2006q4/cpu2000-20060918-07377.html

– Xeon 7150N platform: IBM system X 3800 4P Intel Xeon processor MP 3.50 GHz/667 FSB/16 MB L3 cache, Windows* Server 2003 Enterprise Edition SP1, Intel C++ Compiler 9.1 for 32-bit. Source: http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2007q1/cpu2000-20070122-08363.html

SPECfp_rate_base2000– AMD Opteron* platform: HP Proliant DL585 G2 with four AMD Opteron* processor 8220SE (2.80 GHz), 16x 2 GB DDR2-400,

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition with SP1, Intel C++ Compiler for 32-bit applications. Results at http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2006q4/cpu2000-20060918-07373.html

– Xeon 7140M platform: HP Proliant DL580 G4 with four Intel Xeon 7140M processor, 3.40 GHz, 16x 2 GB DDR2-400, Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition with SP1, Intel C++ Compiler for 32-bit applications. Results at http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2006q3/cpu2000-20060818-07054.html

Intel® Xeon® Processor 7100 Series PerformanceIntel® Xeon® Processor 7100 Series Performance

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Copyright © 2006, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Data Source: Published results as of Feb 27, 07