sesar at world atm congress 2016 - sesar awards

Florian Guillermet & Benoit FonckSESAR Joint Undertaking

2016 SESAR PROJECT AWARDS

#SESAR @sesar_ju

2016 SESAR Project Awards

Recognises excellence within SESAR

26 Nominations (by WP Leaders)4 Best-in-Class projects10 Outstanding projects4 Best Releases8 Demonstration projects

JuryPC membersFabio Ruta (Alenia Aermacchi) & Patrick Souchu (DSNA) SESAR Joint UndertakingFlorian Guillermet, Benoit Fonck

2

Best in class: The nominees

Project Number Project name

06.08.08 Enhanced arrival procedures to reduce occupancy time using GBAS

05.06.01 Ground and Airborne Capabilities to Implement Sequence

3.0 Global Co–ordination & Management

14.01.04 Interface specifications and Services Technical requirements

3

2015 Best in Class Award

4

The winner is…..

2015 Best in Class Award

5

P14.01.04Interface specifications and service technical

requirements

Project ManagerAntonio Strano (Finmeccanica, formerly Selex Es)

SESAR Project AwardsBest in class Nomination for P14.01.04

Antonio Strano / FINMECCANICA, 14.01.04 PjM

7

© 2

016

Finm

ecca

nica

S.p

.A. –

All

right

s re

serv

ed

Outline

SWIM & P14.01.04

What is relevant in its work for the nomination?

What has the project achieved so far?

8

© 2

016

Finm

ecca

nica

S.p

.A. –

All

right

s re

serv

ed

SWIM (System Wide Information Management) consists of standards, infrastructure and governance enabling the management of ATM information and its exchange between qualified parties via interoperable services.

Information Systems Interoperability, especially in the ATM context, is a complex topic that may be faced from different perspectives: systems, data and governance.

Best in class Nomination for P14.01.04SWIM & P14.01.04

9

© 2

016

Finm

ecca

nica

S.p

.A. –

All

right

s re

serv

ed


Information SystemInformation System

Real World System Real World System

Organisation A Organisation BOrganisational Alignment

Semantic Alignment

Process Alignment

Syntax (XML,…)

Transport (HTTP, TCP/IP,…)

Interaction (SOAP,REST, OGC…)

Logi

cal

Tech

nica

l

Scope Of SWIM-TIScop

e O

f SW

IM

SWIM covers primarily the syntactical, the semantic and

technical interoperability levels.

Technical Interoperability is faced by SWIM Technical Infrastructure (SWIM-TI) that aims at enabling

proper consumption and provision of ATM services.

Network (Internet, PENS, AeroMax, …)

10

© 2

016

Finm

ecca

nica

S.p

.A. –

All

right

s re

serv

ed

Interoperability between ATM systems is based on properly designed services.

All technical interoperability needs of the System of Systems (SoS) are taken into consideration and segmented into groups for each of which a satisfactory uniform and standard based solution is defined: the SWIM Profiles.

The SWIM Profiles represent appropriate mandated solutions including the required SWIM Technical Infrastructure features, adopted standards, configurations and Quality of Services.

Currently 3 SWIM profiles have been specified: Yellow Profile, Blue Profile and Purple Profile.

SWIM Profiles Technical Specifications are defined by SESAR P14.01.04 according to authoritative SWIM-TI design artifacts provided by P14.01.03 (TAD, SWIM Profiles definition).


Technical Interoperability targets solution aspect of the service: main challenges are fragmentation versus

“one size does not fit all”.

11

© 2

016

Finm

ecca

nica

S.p

.A. –

All

right

s re

serv

ed

Best in class Nomination for P14.01.04What is relevant in its work for the nomination?

P14.01.04, in tight coordination with P14.01.03, delivers authoritative SWIM-TI design artifacts (SWIM-TI Technical Specifications (TSs) Catalogue):

SWIM-TI Identity Management Technical Specification including functional, non-functional and interface requirements for PKIs and Security Token Services.

SWIM-TI Run-time Registry Technical Specification including functional, non-functional and interface requirements. It includes standards such as UDDI.

Profile Name Scope Key Elements

Yellow Profile

Based on the Web Services stack of standards running over Internet and sufficiently secured.

Deployment options kept open as possible. Wide variety of interactions, flexibility and

affordable for the service consumer. Usable out-of-the-box with mainstream

tools. No real-time or near real-time uses. Non demanding high availability.

Yellow Profile consists of different parts: “Core”, “Messaging+”, “Advance” and “Security+”.

The Web Services family of protocols based on SOAP (SOAP 1.1 and 1.2, WSDL 1.1 and 2.0, WS-Security 1.1).

Transport level security controls (TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.2).

The AMQP v1.0 protocol. Cryptography (PKI X.509 v3, XML

Encryption, XML Signature and ECRYPT II).


Blue Profile

Primarily Real-time or near real-time uses (best effort also supported).

Demanding high availability with severe constraints with respect to the available resources.

Technical solution as much as possible supported out-of-the-box.

Secured interactions (different security levels).

Running over trusted and untrusted networks.

Blue Profile consists of different parts: “Core” and “Flight Data Domain”.

The Web Services family of protocols based on SOAP (SOAP 1.1, WSDL 1.1).

OMG Real-time Publish-Subscribe specifications (DDS v1.2 and DDS-I v2.1).

Transport level security controls (TLS 1.0).

Message level security controls (OMG DDS Security).

Cryptography (PKI X.509 v3, and ECRYPT II).


Purple Profile

High latency and/ or low bandwidth conditions.

No Real-time or near real-time uses. Need to minimize the communication

overhead and transport connections number.

Technical solution as much as possible supported out-of-the-box.

To enable proper information sharing in scenarios where availability of end-to-end connectivity over the communication infrastructure is intermittent and unpredictable.

Purple Profile consists of different parts: “Core” and “Messaging Bridging”.

Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) (version 0-9-1).

Transport level security controls (TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.2).

Cryptography (PKI X.509 v3, XML Encryption, XML Signature and ECRYPT II).

12

© 2

016

Finm

ecca

nica

S.p

.A. –

All

right

s re

serv

ed

Best in class Nomination for P14.01.04What is relevant in its work for the nomination?

P14.01.04 Technical Specifications are being adopted as European standards (e.g. PCP).

P14.01.04 Technical Specifications are being refined in global standardizations activities (e.g. ICAO/FAA).

P14.01.04 demonstrated high quality requirements management.

P14.01.04 is playing a proactive and key role in several SESAR programme level activities including WMS (Working Method on Services), Service Design (e.g. STDD), SWIM Global Demonstration, SEMG (predecessor of SWIM governance) and security and architecture threads.

P14.01.04 has ensured the timely delivery of the SWIM-TI specifications while maintaining synchronization with the rest of the SESAR programme.

13

© 2

016

Finm

ecca

nica

S.p

.A. –

All

right

s re

serv

ed

14.01.04 BP TS(#REQ = 535) 14.01.04 PP TS

(#REQs = 224)

Best in class Nomination for P14.01.04What has the project achieved so far?

SWIM-TI 3.0 Technical Specifications (approved by SJU in March 2015) represent valuable and mature SESAR achievements

P14.01.04 handed over (December 2015) SWIM-TI 3.1 TSs representing refinement of 3.0.

Green 2015 (and 2014) Gate without corrective actions concerning management and technical aspects.

14.01.04 IdM TS(#REQs = 177)

14.01.04 YP TS(#REQ = 370)

14

© 2

016

Finm

ecca

nica

S.p

.A. –

All

right

s re

serv

ed

Best in class Nomination for P14.01.04Project Members

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Antonio Strano ([email protected])

mailto:[email protected]

Outstanding Project- Nominees

16

Project Number Project Name07.06.02 Optimised Airspace Users Operations (UDPP)

04.07.08 Controller Team Organisation, roles and responsibilities in a trajectory based operation within En-route airspace (including multi-sector planner)

14.04 SWIM Exploitation

B.04.01 Development & maintenance of the ATM Performance and business aspects of the European ATM Enterprise Architecture

P06.08.04 Coupled AMAN-DMAN

P10.09.02 Multiple airport arrival/departure management

P12.06.02 The Airport Operations Plan (AOP), decision support tools and conflict detection tools to be integrated in APOC for managing the overall performance of the airport

P09.47 TCAS Evolution

P09.14 Airport Surface Alerts (ownership and traffic)P10.04.01 Enhanced Tools for Conflict Detection and Resolution

2015 Outstanding Project Award

17

The winner is…..

2015 Outstanding Project Award

18

P10.09.02Multiple airport arrival/departure

management

Project ManagerMustapha El Mizeb (Thales)

PROJECT 10.09.02

Project Overview• P10.09.02 contributes in building Arrival/Departure

Management solutions for complex TMA, including multiple airports with the objective of optimising delivery of traffic to

the various runways, with minimal route or time extension and to enable a constant throughput into the en-route

phase of flight.• P10.09.02 covers Step 1 & Step 2:

– Step 1 focused on AMAN Horizon Extension.– Step 2 is focusing on AMAN/DMAN coupling and Arrivals/Departures in complex

TMA (Multi Airport context)

• P10.09.02 contributes to :– OFA 04.01.01: Integrated Arrival/Departure Management at Airports– OFA 04.01.02: Enhanced Arrival & Departure Management in TMA and En Route

• Partners : DSNA, ENAIRE,INDRA, NATMIG, THALES

20

Project dependencies

Contribution to PCP and SESAR Solutions

• 10.09.02 strongly contributes to :• PCP AF1 (extended Arrival Management) and

AF5 (SWIM yellow profile)• SESAR Solution 5: Extended Arrival

Management Horizon. • SESAR Solution 6: Control Time of Arrival

(CTA) in medium density/medium complexity environment.

• SESAR Solution 54: Flow based Integration of Arrival and Departure Management.

22

RELEASE 4

RELEASE 5

RELEASE 4

Validation exercices : EXE05.06.01-VP477

23

• Arrival Management Extended to En Route Airspace

• Controlled Time of Arrival (CTA), including the use of i4D

• Very positives results and feedback • Implementation of i4D/CTA brings benefits

Validation exercices : EXE05.06.07-VP695XMAN V3 live Trials

24

•Operational environment– Reims UAC

• Manages traffic to London Heathrow

• Coordination point is ABNUR

– Frequent traffic overload•Objectives

– Meter/schedule traffic to EGLL

– Share delay between LTCC, LACC and Reims UAC

– Coordinate regulation in Reims sectors

– Provide speed advisories according to delay to tactical controllers

XMAN: Generic design with adaptable HMIsto cope with various working methods

ABNUR

Validation exercices : EXE06.08.04-VP358 AMAN/DMAN Coupling

25

fixedNetwork DCB

Airport DCB

AMANPre sequence

DMANPre sequence

DMANstable

Seq. & gap size update

AMANSequence

fixed

1 h 40´ 5´ 20

RUNWAY

TOD TMA CTA FINAL

TOBT TSAT

DMANSeq. & gap. update

ETA/ELDT

ETOT

fine tuning of sequence & gaps at the runway

early balancing of Arrivals and Departures – Refining Arr/Dep

ratio

Other validation exercices• Validations already completed:

– R2 V3 EXE-05.03-VP034 : Integration of Arrival Manager (AMAN) and supporting functionalities with point P-RNAV procedures in a complex TMA .

– V2 EXE.05.06.07-VP357: Validation of Advanced DMAN-Routing Step2.

– V2 EXE.05.06.07-VP485 : Arrival Management Supporting CTA/RTA.

26

Thank you for your attention

27

Best Release Exercise - Nominees

28


07.05.02 - VP710 Sharing Real Time airspace status with ATC & NM, FOC

05.06.07 - VP695 Extended AMAN (XMAN)

06.09.03 - VP 063 Remote AFIS

05.03 - VP 805 Integrated validation i4D/CTA + ASAS + XMAN

2015 Best Release Award

29

The winner is…..

2015 Best Release Award

30

05.03 - VP 805 Extended AMAN operations supported by

i4D/CTA and ASPA and XMAN

Project ManagerLuigi Mazzucchelli (ENAV)

Best Release Exercise 2015

SESAR P05.03-EXE-VP-805

Advanced Arrival Management supported by CTA and ASPA S&M

VP805VP805EXE-05.03-VP-805Integrated Validation: To

demonstrate the compatibility between ASPA-S&M and i4D+CTA operations in combination with the E-AMAN.

Taking into consideration the lesson learnt from the previous exercises VP708

Validation method Real-Time Simulation


MERGEASPA Merging technique achieves

precise pair-wise time-based spacing at fix

SPACEIn trail time-based spacing

- precise final approach spacing in all wind conditions


There is compatibility per se between ASPA-FIM-S&M and i4D+CTA or full 4D operations. However, performance benefits of the first two ASPA-FIM-S&M manoeuvres selected by project 05.06.06 have yet to be demonstrated. Moreover, a first set of exercise integration validation activities of CTA+i4D and ASPA-FIM-S&M are described in a detailed manner for exercise 708. This work will be finalized in the VP805 represented by a RTS and a live trials in order to have a close out of V3 level.

• Environmental Sustainability & Fuel efficiency

• Predictability• Cost-effectiveness • Airspace Capacity –

TMA • Airspace Capacity – En-

route • Airport Capacity • Safety • Security • Human Performance

35

Storyboard of the Storyboard of the SESAR activitiesSESAR activities

EXE-05.03-VP-805: Context

The VP-805 represents the evolution of the VP-708 (R4) taking also into account the outputs coming from the initial exercise.

The VP-805 will be based on two following activities:1) A distributed Real Time Simulation involving “ENAV IBP Rome” and “AIRBUS

Integration Simulator” located in Toulouse;2) “Alenia C27J VCD IBP” as verified by P09.03 is contributing to the RTS sessions;3) The Flight Trial joint campaign will performed on ENAV IBP in shadow mode with

Rome ACC operational system and “AIRBUS Flight Test aircraft”.

A Rehearsal FT intermediate step will be also performed between RTS and FT in order to ensure the proper exchange of CPDLC and ADS-C messages via real ATN

VP-805: High Level RTS Architecture

ATGATG

4FF backbone4FF backbone

ACSACS

ATCOATCOCWCWPP

CWCWPP

CWCWPPCWPCWPAMANAMANi4Di4D

CTACTA

CPDLCCPDLC

AIS - TOULOUSEAIS - TOULOUSE

ASPA ASPA S&MS&M

SVSSVS ACSACSiA/CiA/C

ACSACS PilotPilot

ADS-CADS-C

ADS-CADS-CCPDLCCPDLC

SURV.SURV.VOICEVOICE

Airspace DesignAirspace Design

• 3 En-Route Sector• 4 Pre-sequencing Secotrs• 2 TMA Sectors• 2 Arrival Sectors • Sequence and Arrival Managers

supported by E-AMAN• CTR included in Rome FIR • IPA (Independent Parallel Approach) • Full representativeness of Rome E-TMA • Different Traffic Loads with different

mixed equipped ratio• RISA Last update AIRAC cycle• Realistic TMA environment with 3 IAFs

(ROM-LIGBU-TAQ) located at same distance from LIRF

• Inbound on LIRA

STARs Allocation for LIRFSTARs Allocation for LIRF

What’s New Airborne prototypeWhat’s New Airborne prototype• New CTA Position about 45 NM• New ASAS customization for the

Area • For LIRF 16L and 16R• Manouvres to accomodate

Remain and Merge behind • To maximize the use of ASAS to

improve the RWY troughput • Based on realistic environment • Customization of TMA area • Entry level in IAF FL130 and TAS

250Kts

The Scenario considers a military flight C-27J (IM – Interval Manager) departing from Turin Airport to Rome Fiumicino + a civil flight Airbus A320 (target) departing from Toulouse to Rome Fiumicino. Close Cooperation with P09.03

Star Allocation and DistanceStar Allocation and Distance

VP805 Operational LayoutVP805 Operational Layout

Validation documentation Validation documentation

44

Best Demonstration Project - Nominees

45


RPAS05 TEMPAERIS

LSD.02.09 PROuD (PBN Rotorcraft Procedures under Demonstration)

RPAS.06 ODREA Operational Demonstration of RPAS in European Airspace

LSD.01.05 FREE Solutions - Free Route Environmental Efficient Solutions

Demo 02.05 NASCIO

RPAS07 Project CLAIRE (RPAS Demonstration Project)

Demo 02.02 FAIR STREAM

Demo 01.02 REACT Plus

2015 Best Demonstration Award

46

The winner is…..

2015 Best Demonstration Award

47

FAIRSTREAM

Project ManagerEstelle

Le Guilcher (DSNA)

FAIR STREAMFABEC ANSPs and AIRlines in SESAR TRials for Enhanced Arrival Management

49

The Context

A demonstration project with Live Trials : paving the way for the Network Collaborative Management (#AF4 in PCP)

Closely linked to :- SESAR WP 7 « Network Operations » - Exercise « Palma Trials » led by EUROCONTROL

50

FAIR STREAM Objectives

Objective 1 : Demonstrate the feasibility of the use of TTA (Target Time of Arrival) instead of / complementary to CTOT Can the pilot manage his TTA ? How is this information shared between all the stakeholders ?

Objective 2 : Evaluate the predictability of TTA flights Evaluate ATC and aircrew workload

51

FAIR STREAM Exercises

Live Trials on 3 airports located in the Core Area :

Paris-CDG ArrivalsZurich Arrivals

Munich Arrivals

2 to 3 flights per day in 2 periods : -Spring 2013-Autumn 2013 (Refinement of the scenario)

52

Paris

Bruxelles

Munich

Zurich

The Current Situation

Calculated Take-Off Time

CTOT

?

With CTOT, aircraft take off…but the real constraint in saturated airspace is not taken into account in the flight management system

53

Paris

Bruxelles

Munich

Zurich

The FAIR STREAM ConceptWith TTA used by all stakeholders, the effectiveness of network solutions to saturated airspace will be improved

During the flight, the pilot can adjust aircraft speed in order to respect TTA

Target Time of Arrival

TTA

Target Take-Off Time

Before departure, the pilot can adjust TTOT

based on actual situation

54

FAIR STREAM Results

Total Live Trials: almost 1,000 flights Short, medium and long-haul flights

PREDICTABILITY Adherence to TTA clearly better during the trials CDM and TTA concepts are compliant

WORKLOAD No significant increase due to the use of TTA for ATCOs and crews

BaselineFAIR STREAM

Toulouse > Paris-CDG Zurich Arrivals

55

Operational Actors talk about FAIR STREAMATCO’s Speech

ATCO’s Speech Pilot’s Speech

56

FAIR STREAM Conclusions

TTA information was shared by all the actors(Network Manager, aircrews, AOC, FMP, ATCOs)

Predictability of flights with TTA was clearly better

TTA was manageable with current ground and on-board equipment

57

Next Step

FAIR STREAM: a first step to validate the feasibility of the use of TTA

Several points need to be further investigated: Testing on complete flows Studying synergies between TTA and AMANFinding a way to give a TTA to long-haul flightsWorking on the reduction of time uncertainties between gate and take-off

XMAN

A-CDM

TTA

Ext-AMAN

A-Flex

AOP/NOP

Trafficcomplexity

dDCB

STAM

Fair StreamCTOT to TTA

PCP = AF1+AF4+AF6

sesar at world atm congress 2016 - sesar awards

Technology