session 26 new competencies for succeeding in risk-based...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Session 26
New Competencies for Succeeding in Risk-Based Arrangements
Bobbi BrownSenior Vice President, Financial EngagementHealth Catalyst
Lynn GuilletteVice President, Payment InnovationsDartmouth-Hitchcock
Dan UngerVice President of Product Development, Financial Decision SupportHealth Catalyst
-
Learning Objectives
• Understand the current state of payment reform
• Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health’s experience in the Medicare Pioneer ACO program
• Learn how to monitor and more accurately capture the risk of your population
• Understand how one health system gets the most out of its quality incentives through analytics and reporting
• Learn how to leverage technology to identify creative, low-cost ways to improve population health
2
-
Agenda• Population Health: Understanding the Changing System of Payment
• Dartmouth-Hitchcock: Real-life Learnings from Participation in a CMS Pioneer ACO
• Insights from the Market: High-Value Competencies
• Q & A
• Complete Feedback and Lessons Learned
-
Population HealthUnderstanding the Changing System of Payment
-
State of the Market in Healthcare
5
Big question- When do we hit the tipping point?
Value orientation moving slowlyRecognition of future trendsNeed for preparation CMS role criticalMany models in use: p4p, bundles, ACO, shared risk (+, +/-)
ConsumerismGrowth in high-deductible plansInvolvement in price and value
Summarized from ANI Out of the Box, Martin Arrick, Managing Director, S&P Global Ratings
-
Goals of CMS
6
Alternative PaymentLink with QualityFee for Service
Legend
Sheet1
Alternative Payment
Link with Quality
Fee for Service
-
CMS Objectives
7
Aim to improve beneficiary outcomes and increase the value of care
Better care for
individuals
Better health for
population
Lower growth in
expenditures
-
Models
8
Payment Methodology Quality Cost
Cost low low
Fee for Service low medium
Per case / outpatient grouping low medium
% of charges low low
Add quality metrics medium medium
Shared savings (+, +/-) medium/high medium/high
Bundled payment low medium/high
Add quality metrics medium/high high
Shared savings (+, +/-) medium/high high
Capitation medium/high high
Add quality metrics high high
Shared savings (+, +/-) high high
Incentive for Improvement
-
Survey Results
9
-
Survey Results
10
-
Survey Results
11
-
Survey Results
12
-
Poll Question # 1
13
On a scale of 1-5, how effectively is your organization positioned for taking on significant risk via risk-based contracts like ACOs, bundled payments, etc.?
1) Not at all2) Somewhat3) Moderately4) Very5) Extremely6) Unsure or not applicable
-
Dartmouth-HitchcockReal-life learnings from participation in a CMS
Pioneer ACO
-
15
We are creating a sustainable health system to improve the lives of the people and communities we
serve for generations to come.
-
16
Imagine a health system that focuses on health, not just health care
Imagine a health system where care is based on value, not volume
Imagine a health system grounded in population-based strategy, not market share
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health System: Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital (DHMC) Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic New London Hospital Mt. Ascutney Hospital & Health Center Cheshire Medical Center Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital Visiting Nurse and Hospice for VT & NH “Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health ACO” Co-founder of OneCare Vermont ACO, LLC
-
Managing the Payment System Transition
19
The current fee-for-service payment system is unsustainable. Alternative payment models offer an avenue to transition from pay-for-volume to pay-for-value in parallel with healthcare delivery transformation. The trick is how to design new payment models that foster sustainability without producing unintended consequences for providers and/or patients.
-
20
Health IT Infrastructure &
Data Use
Governance & Culture
Financial Readiness
Quality & Process
Improvement
Care Coordination
Patient Risk Assessment
& Stratification
Patient EngagementReadiness to
Accept Value-Based Payment Models
-
Health IT Infrastructure & Data Use
21
-
Financial Readiness Capabilities
22
Shared Savings/Loss
distribution policies
Contract performance reporting & accounting
Staff & infrastructure investment
Patient attribution
methodology
Benchmarking methodology
Budget projections
Actuarial services/
consultations
Reinsurance/ stop-loss
Financial risk assessment
Provider financial
alignment
-
D-HH’s CMS Pioneer ACO Experience
23
Three full performance years with mixed financial results, but positive quality performance
Built out ACO infrastructure to manage Pioneer and commercial ACO contracts
Withdrew from program in 2015 primarily because of: Concerns with benchmarking
methodology Use of national vs. regional trends
-
Comparison of All Pioneers PY3 Benchmark PBPY (Beneficiary count shown in thousands for each Pioneer)
45K 20K 9K 29K 20K
42K
13K 13K 13K 31K 17K 53K 70K 10K 63K 20K 35K 77K 24K 17K $6,500
$7,500
$8,500
$9,500
$10,500
$11,500
$12,500
$13,500
$14,500
$15,500
$16,500
Average ACO Benchmark PBPY = $11,141
D-HH Benchmark PBPY = $9,297, which is 17% below the all Pioneers ACO average
-
It’s All About the Benchmark!
25
Applied and deferred participation for 2016
in the CMS Next Generation ACO
Re-applied for 2017 CMS Next Generation
ACO participation
Next Generation ACO vs. MACRA MIPS …. Lesser of two evils or
path to success?
-
Poll Question # 2
26
Has your organization been impacted by the benchmarking methodologies in a risk-based contract?
a) Yes - negativelyb) Yes - positivelyc) No significant impactd) I don’t knowe) Not applicable
-
Review –Readiness Capabilities
27
Health IT Infrastructure &
Data Use
Governance & Culture
Financial Readiness
Quality & Process
Improvement
Care Coordination
Patient Risk Assessment
& Stratification
Patient Engagement
-
Lessons Learned
28
• It’s all about the benchmark!• Investing in outside
actuarial/accounting/consulting services may be worth it–even if just to support your own internally drawn conclusions.
• Assessing financial and quality contract performance lags at least six months after contract period ends; ROI measurement also lags.
• You may have the data, but do you have insights into the data?
-
Insights from the MarketHigh-Value Competencies
-
Lessons from the Market
30
Realize Your True Risk Adjustment Factor Improve Self-Pay
Collections
Avoid Adverse / Unnecessary Events
Utilization Reduction via Public Health-ish Initiatives
Advanced Cost Reduction
Actively Manage High-Risk patients
Prioritize High-Value Quality Measures
-
Poll Question # 3
31
Which competency would you want to learn more about?
a) Realize your true risk adjustment factorb) Prioritize high-value quality measuresc) Avoid adverse eventsd) Clinical process improvemente) Advanced cost reductionf) Utilization reduction via public health-ish initiatives
-
Lessons from the Market
32
Realize Your True Risk Adjustment Factor Improve Self-Pay
Collections
Avoid Adverse / Unnecessary Events
Utilization Reduction via Public Health-ish Initiatives
Advanced Cost Reduction
Actively Manage High-Risk patients
Prioritize High-Value Quality Measures
-
Realize Your True Risk Adjustment Factor
You don’t have much control over reimbursement in a capitated world, but you DO have the data and the
capabilities to understand, track, and impact this important metric.
Minor changes in RAF can translate into millions of $.
33
-
Realize Your True Risk Adjustment Factor
Many health systems fail to get full financial credit for the risk they are taking due to lack of timely insights into:
34
Patient Access
Coding/ Documentation
Patients known to have persistent
conditions that you haven’t seen this year
Previously coded with higher-level, persistent
condition
Consistent coding across providers for high-risk conditions
High-risk condition in problem list, but not
coded
New patients to your network that you
haven’t seen this year
-
Hospital billingProfessional billingClaimsRisk Adjustment Variables
Risk score is calculated for a patient at a particular point in time off diagnosis codes and patient demographic information over the previous rolling year for that patient.
Data sources
Hospital Billing
Professional Billing
Claims
Data Needed
Variables
-
Risk Adjustment Factor VariablesCMS Risk Variables Age Variables
Sources:https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Risk-Adjustors.htmlhttp://www.nber.org/risk-adjustment/2016/2016-Midyear-Final-Model/CMS-HCC_software_V2216.79.L1/hcccoefn.csv
Demographic Variables
Disease Interaction Variables
Disability Interaction Variables
Prevalence of disease: Prevalence of ~ 80 different diagnoses in the population
Age and gender: Distribution of age and gender in the population ~24 variables
Demographic (aka Medicaid status): Prevalence of Medicaid eligibility in the population, which is essentially a proxy for economic status. 8 variables.
Comorbidities: Prevalence of ~20 disease comorbidities
Disability with disease: Prevalence of ~20 diagnoses comorbid with a disability
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Risk-Adjustors.htmlhttp://www.nber.org/risk-adjustment/2016/2016-Midyear-Final-Model/CMS-HCC_software_V2216.79.L1/hcccoefn.csv
-
Prioritizing Risk Adjustment Gaps
37
• High-level view of potential score gap and actionable buckets
• Drill down by PCP, specialty, and location
-
Coding Benchmarking
38
• Compare providers and locations for specific condition groups
• Goal is to improve coding accuracy, not to up-code
• Leverage for discussions with coding and physicians
-
Prioritize High-Value Quality Measures
39
START SIMPLE!!!
• Centralize tracking of quality measures across contracts
• Estimate high-level financial impact
-
Prioritize High-Value Quality Measures
40
Long-term Goal• Understand $ impact from
quality incentives
• Timely reporting and trending of measures
• Proactively improve results
• Improved contracting
• Which of these actually impact utilization, too?
-
Reducing Utilization via Public Health Initiatives
41Source: http://www.governing.com/topics/transportation-infrastructure/gov-can-roadside-witticisms-save-lives.html
In Iowa, road deaths decreased approximately 10% in both of the years following the start of this initiative
-
Lessons Learned
• Payment reform is real, but overall impact is still minimal…for now
• Understanding the benchmarking methodologies for ACO contracts is critical
• Don’t be afraid to leverage outside expertise
• Two ways that health systems out there are using data and analytics to improve their ability to survive in at-risk contracts:
Receiving appropriate credit for the risk you are taking on
Improving financial performance through simple monitoring of quality measures
42
-
Analytic Insights
AQuestions &
Answers
43
-
What You Learned…
44
Write down the key things you’ve learned related to each of the learning objectives
after attending this session
-
Thank You
45
Session 26��New Competencies for Succeeding in �Risk-Based Arrangements Learning Objectives�AgendaPopulation Health�Understanding the Changing System of PaymentState of the Market in HealthcareGoals of CMSCMS ObjectivesModelsSurvey ResultsSurvey ResultsSurvey ResultsSurvey ResultsPoll Question # 1Dartmouth-Hitchcock�Real-life learnings from participation in a CMS Pioneer ACOSlide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Managing the Payment System TransitionSlide Number 20Health IT Infrastructure & Data UseFinancial Readiness CapabilitiesD-HH’s CMS Pioneer ACO ExperienceComparison of All Pioneers PY3 Benchmark PBPY �(Beneficiary count shown in thousands for each Pioneer)It’s All About the Benchmark!Poll Question # 2Review – Readiness Capabilities Lessons LearnedInsights from the Market�High-Value CompetenciesLessons from the MarketPoll Question # 3Lessons from the MarketRealize Your True Risk Adjustment FactorRealize Your True Risk Adjustment FactorData sourcesRisk Adjustment Factor VariablesPrioritizing Risk Adjustment GapsCoding BenchmarkingPrioritize High-Value Quality MeasuresPrioritize High-Value Quality MeasuresReducing Utilization via Public Health InitiativesLessons Learned�Analytic �InsightsWhat You Learned…Thank �YouSession Feedback SurveyUpcoming Session