session 26 new competencies for succeeding in risk-based...

45
Session 26 New Competencies for Succeeding in Risk-Based Arrangements Bobbi Brown Senior Vice President, Financial Engagement Health Catalyst Lynn Guillette Vice President, Payment Innovations Dartmouth-Hitchcock Dan Unger Vice President of Product Development, Financial Decision Support Health Catalyst

Upload: others

Post on 01-Aug-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Session 26

    New Competencies for Succeeding in Risk-Based Arrangements

    Bobbi BrownSenior Vice President, Financial EngagementHealth Catalyst

    Lynn GuilletteVice President, Payment InnovationsDartmouth-Hitchcock

    Dan UngerVice President of Product Development, Financial Decision SupportHealth Catalyst

  • Learning Objectives

    • Understand the current state of payment reform

    • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health’s experience in the Medicare Pioneer ACO program

    • Learn how to monitor and more accurately capture the risk of your population

    • Understand how one health system gets the most out of its quality incentives through analytics and reporting

    • Learn how to leverage technology to identify creative, low-cost ways to improve population health

    2

  • Agenda• Population Health: Understanding the Changing System of Payment

    • Dartmouth-Hitchcock: Real-life Learnings from Participation in a CMS Pioneer ACO

    • Insights from the Market: High-Value Competencies

    • Q & A

    • Complete Feedback and Lessons Learned

  • Population HealthUnderstanding the Changing System of Payment

  • State of the Market in Healthcare

    5

    Big question- When do we hit the tipping point?

    Value orientation moving slowlyRecognition of future trendsNeed for preparation CMS role criticalMany models in use: p4p, bundles, ACO, shared risk (+, +/-)

    ConsumerismGrowth in high-deductible plansInvolvement in price and value

    Summarized from ANI Out of the Box, Martin Arrick, Managing Director, S&P Global Ratings

  • Goals of CMS

    6

    Alternative PaymentLink with QualityFee for Service

    Legend

    Sheet1

    Alternative Payment

    Link with Quality

    Fee for Service

  • CMS Objectives

    7

    Aim to improve beneficiary outcomes and increase the value of care

    Better care for

    individuals

    Better health for

    population

    Lower growth in

    expenditures

  • Models

    8

    Payment Methodology Quality Cost

    Cost low low

    Fee for Service low medium

    Per case / outpatient grouping low medium

    % of charges low low

    Add quality metrics medium medium

    Shared savings (+, +/-) medium/high medium/high

    Bundled payment low medium/high

    Add quality metrics medium/high high

    Shared savings (+, +/-) medium/high high

    Capitation medium/high high

    Add quality metrics high high

    Shared savings (+, +/-) high high

    Incentive for Improvement

  • Survey Results

    9

  • Survey Results

    10

  • Survey Results

    11

  • Survey Results

    12

  • Poll Question # 1

    13

    On a scale of 1-5, how effectively is your organization positioned for taking on significant risk via risk-based contracts like ACOs, bundled payments, etc.?

    1) Not at all2) Somewhat3) Moderately4) Very5) Extremely6) Unsure or not applicable

  • Dartmouth-HitchcockReal-life learnings from participation in a CMS

    Pioneer ACO

  • 15

    We are creating a sustainable health system to improve the lives of the people and communities we

    serve for generations to come.

  • 16

    Imagine a health system that focuses on health, not just health care

    Imagine a health system where care is based on value, not volume

    Imagine a health system grounded in population-based strategy, not market share

  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health System: Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital (DHMC) Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic New London Hospital Mt. Ascutney Hospital & Health Center Cheshire Medical Center Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital Visiting Nurse and Hospice for VT & NH “Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health ACO” Co-founder of OneCare Vermont ACO, LLC

  • Managing the Payment System Transition

    19

    The current fee-for-service payment system is unsustainable. Alternative payment models offer an avenue to transition from pay-for-volume to pay-for-value in parallel with healthcare delivery transformation. The trick is how to design new payment models that foster sustainability without producing unintended consequences for providers and/or patients.

  • 20

    Health IT Infrastructure &

    Data Use

    Governance & Culture

    Financial Readiness

    Quality & Process

    Improvement

    Care Coordination

    Patient Risk Assessment

    & Stratification

    Patient EngagementReadiness to

    Accept Value-Based Payment Models

  • Health IT Infrastructure & Data Use

    21

  • Financial Readiness Capabilities

    22

    Shared Savings/Loss

    distribution policies

    Contract performance reporting & accounting

    Staff & infrastructure investment

    Patient attribution

    methodology

    Benchmarking methodology

    Budget projections

    Actuarial services/

    consultations

    Reinsurance/ stop-loss

    Financial risk assessment

    Provider financial

    alignment

  • D-HH’s CMS Pioneer ACO Experience

    23

    Three full performance years with mixed financial results, but positive quality performance

    Built out ACO infrastructure to manage Pioneer and commercial ACO contracts

    Withdrew from program in 2015 primarily because of: Concerns with benchmarking

    methodology Use of national vs. regional trends

  • Comparison of All Pioneers PY3 Benchmark PBPY (Beneficiary count shown in thousands for each Pioneer)

    45K 20K 9K 29K 20K

    42K

    13K 13K 13K 31K 17K 53K 70K 10K 63K 20K 35K 77K 24K 17K $6,500

    $7,500

    $8,500

    $9,500

    $10,500

    $11,500

    $12,500

    $13,500

    $14,500

    $15,500

    $16,500

    Average ACO Benchmark PBPY = $11,141

    D-HH Benchmark PBPY = $9,297, which is 17% below the all Pioneers ACO average

  • It’s All About the Benchmark!

    25

    Applied and deferred participation for 2016

    in the CMS Next Generation ACO

    Re-applied for 2017 CMS Next Generation

    ACO participation

    Next Generation ACO vs. MACRA MIPS …. Lesser of two evils or

    path to success?

  • Poll Question # 2

    26

    Has your organization been impacted by the benchmarking methodologies in a risk-based contract?

    a) Yes - negativelyb) Yes - positivelyc) No significant impactd) I don’t knowe) Not applicable

  • Review –Readiness Capabilities

    27

    Health IT Infrastructure &

    Data Use

    Governance & Culture

    Financial Readiness

    Quality & Process

    Improvement

    Care Coordination

    Patient Risk Assessment

    & Stratification

    Patient Engagement

  • Lessons Learned

    28

    • It’s all about the benchmark!• Investing in outside

    actuarial/accounting/consulting services may be worth it–even if just to support your own internally drawn conclusions.

    • Assessing financial and quality contract performance lags at least six months after contract period ends; ROI measurement also lags.

    • You may have the data, but do you have insights into the data?

  • Insights from the MarketHigh-Value Competencies

  • Lessons from the Market

    30

    Realize Your True Risk Adjustment Factor Improve Self-Pay

    Collections

    Avoid Adverse / Unnecessary Events

    Utilization Reduction via Public Health-ish Initiatives

    Advanced Cost Reduction

    Actively Manage High-Risk patients

    Prioritize High-Value Quality Measures

  • Poll Question # 3

    31

    Which competency would you want to learn more about?

    a) Realize your true risk adjustment factorb) Prioritize high-value quality measuresc) Avoid adverse eventsd) Clinical process improvemente) Advanced cost reductionf) Utilization reduction via public health-ish initiatives

  • Lessons from the Market

    32

    Realize Your True Risk Adjustment Factor Improve Self-Pay

    Collections

    Avoid Adverse / Unnecessary Events

    Utilization Reduction via Public Health-ish Initiatives

    Advanced Cost Reduction

    Actively Manage High-Risk patients

    Prioritize High-Value Quality Measures

  • Realize Your True Risk Adjustment Factor

    You don’t have much control over reimbursement in a capitated world, but you DO have the data and the

    capabilities to understand, track, and impact this important metric.

    Minor changes in RAF can translate into millions of $.

    33

  • Realize Your True Risk Adjustment Factor

    Many health systems fail to get full financial credit for the risk they are taking due to lack of timely insights into:

    34

    Patient Access

    Coding/ Documentation

    Patients known to have persistent

    conditions that you haven’t seen this year

    Previously coded with higher-level, persistent

    condition

    Consistent coding across providers for high-risk conditions

    High-risk condition in problem list, but not

    coded

    New patients to your network that you

    haven’t seen this year

  • Hospital billingProfessional billingClaimsRisk Adjustment Variables

    Risk score is calculated for a patient at a particular point in time off diagnosis codes and patient demographic information over the previous rolling year for that patient.

    Data sources

    Hospital Billing

    Professional Billing

    Claims

    Data Needed

    Variables

  • Risk Adjustment Factor VariablesCMS Risk Variables Age Variables

    Sources:https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Risk-Adjustors.htmlhttp://www.nber.org/risk-adjustment/2016/2016-Midyear-Final-Model/CMS-HCC_software_V2216.79.L1/hcccoefn.csv

    Demographic Variables

    Disease Interaction Variables

    Disability Interaction Variables

    Prevalence of disease: Prevalence of ~ 80 different diagnoses in the population

    Age and gender: Distribution of age and gender in the population ~24 variables

    Demographic (aka Medicaid status): Prevalence of Medicaid eligibility in the population, which is essentially a proxy for economic status. 8 variables.

    Comorbidities: Prevalence of ~20 disease comorbidities

    Disability with disease: Prevalence of ~20 diagnoses comorbid with a disability

    https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Risk-Adjustors.htmlhttp://www.nber.org/risk-adjustment/2016/2016-Midyear-Final-Model/CMS-HCC_software_V2216.79.L1/hcccoefn.csv

  • Prioritizing Risk Adjustment Gaps

    37

    • High-level view of potential score gap and actionable buckets

    • Drill down by PCP, specialty, and location

  • Coding Benchmarking

    38

    • Compare providers and locations for specific condition groups

    • Goal is to improve coding accuracy, not to up-code

    • Leverage for discussions with coding and physicians

  • Prioritize High-Value Quality Measures

    39

    START SIMPLE!!!

    • Centralize tracking of quality measures across contracts

    • Estimate high-level financial impact

  • Prioritize High-Value Quality Measures

    40

    Long-term Goal• Understand $ impact from

    quality incentives

    • Timely reporting and trending of measures

    • Proactively improve results

    • Improved contracting

    • Which of these actually impact utilization, too?

  • Reducing Utilization via Public Health Initiatives

    41Source: http://www.governing.com/topics/transportation-infrastructure/gov-can-roadside-witticisms-save-lives.html

    In Iowa, road deaths decreased approximately 10% in both of the years following the start of this initiative

  • Lessons Learned

    • Payment reform is real, but overall impact is still minimal…for now

    • Understanding the benchmarking methodologies for ACO contracts is critical

    • Don’t be afraid to leverage outside expertise

    • Two ways that health systems out there are using data and analytics to improve their ability to survive in at-risk contracts:

    Receiving appropriate credit for the risk you are taking on

    Improving financial performance through simple monitoring of quality measures

    42

  • Analytic Insights

    AQuestions &

    Answers

    43

  • What You Learned…

    44

    Write down the key things you’ve learned related to each of the learning objectives

    after attending this session

  • Thank You

    45

    Session 26��New Competencies for Succeeding in �Risk-Based Arrangements Learning Objectives�AgendaPopulation Health�Understanding the Changing System of PaymentState of the Market in HealthcareGoals of CMSCMS ObjectivesModelsSurvey ResultsSurvey ResultsSurvey ResultsSurvey ResultsPoll Question # 1Dartmouth-Hitchcock�Real-life learnings from participation in a CMS Pioneer ACOSlide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Managing the Payment System TransitionSlide Number 20Health IT Infrastructure & Data UseFinancial Readiness CapabilitiesD-HH’s CMS Pioneer ACO ExperienceComparison of All Pioneers PY3 Benchmark PBPY �(Beneficiary count shown in thousands for each Pioneer)It’s All About the Benchmark!Poll Question # 2Review – Readiness Capabilities Lessons LearnedInsights from the Market�High-Value CompetenciesLessons from the MarketPoll Question # 3Lessons from the MarketRealize Your True Risk Adjustment FactorRealize Your True Risk Adjustment FactorData sourcesRisk Adjustment Factor VariablesPrioritizing Risk Adjustment GapsCoding BenchmarkingPrioritize High-Value Quality MeasuresPrioritize High-Value Quality MeasuresReducing Utilization via Public Health InitiativesLessons Learned�Analytic �InsightsWhat You Learned…Thank �YouSession Feedback SurveyUpcoming Session