session 7 regulating ppps laws related to ppps alternative regulatory arrangements eu ppp related...
TRANSCRIPT
Session 7 Regulating PPPs
Laws related to PPPs Alternative regulatory arrangements EU PPP related regulations PPP institutional models
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 Public-Private Partnership training
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
Laws related to PPPs The Constitution of the country; legislative division of responsibility for service among
national, regional and local governments; contract law; employment law; public sector borrowing rules; access and right of usage rules; related natural resource, e.g. water resources
management law; health and safety laws and regulations and
environmental laws and regulations; and social policy matters, such as the provision of subsidies.
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
Alternative regulatory arrangements1. Setting up a single national regulator covering an entire
sector with responsibility for a number of private sector providers
PROS: ensuring universality and consistency of standards; comparisons between providers; and extensive customer involvement, in order to show how well
utilities are meeting targets and the service levels that can be achieved.
CONS: can be relatively inflexible and cumbersome for the one-off PPP contracts that are used frequently in the ECIS region
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
Alternative regulatory arrangements2. Creating separate regulators on a contract-by-contract basis E.g. national legislation covers service standards or customer
protection, the contract will define the obligations of each partner and the regulatory mechanisms.
CROS: relatively easy to implement can be tailored to specific circumstances and is therefore more easily
able to accommodate local needs and priorities. CONS:
it can result in greater focus on interpreting and applying contract terms rather than pursuing the wider regulatory principles;
the smaller scale of local regulatory operations can result in institutional constraints and insufficient attention being directed to secondary issues, such as protecting vulnerable groups or the poor;
Impossible for regulator to benchmark with similar utilities performance
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
European Union 1/2
There is no uniform PPP definition for the EU, nor a wide policy
Common characteristicsUtilization not only private sector ability to raise
finances but also its management and experienceRisks are allocated to the party better equipped to
manage themNeed to combine the EU funding and private
finance
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
European Union 2/2
Changes in legislation and institutional support on the level of each member state
PPPs are established as one of the tools which are available to the government
Still poor level of understanding of PPPs among public sector officials
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
In EU countries PPP initiatives start w/: changes in legislation to facilitate the
development of PPPs (Italy) the establishment of public sector
advisory groups (UK) and the set up of dedicated teams inside key
ministries or departments (Holland, IT, UK)
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
Important changes expected
PPP Green Paper http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/gpr/2004/com2004_0327en01.pdf
Report on Public Consultation on the mentioned PPP Green Paper (May 2005) http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/ publicprocurement/docs/ppp/ppp-report_en.pdf
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
PPP institutional models on the degree of centralization of PPP institutions in the overall state structure1. Highly centralized (Canada) – SuperBuild
Corporation and Ministries2. Highly decentralized (France, Portugal) –
PPPs – individual government departments and local authorities responsibility, although informal coordination IS taking place
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
PPP institutional models
3. Mixed centralized and decentralized (Ireland, UK, Italy, Netherlands)
central body, which coordinates and develops policies (usually is located in finance ministries)
with individual „spending“ departments having PPP Units, which are mainly focused on project development and procurement
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
PPP institutional development in EU Member states (Adapted from PwC Report 2004, WB Report 2004)
Country PPP Unit PPP LawRelative PPP experience (water and wastewater sector)
Austria ▲▲▲ - ☺Belgium ▲ □ □ ☺☺Denmark ▲▲ - -Finland - □ ☺France ▲ □ □ -Germany ▲▲ □ □ ☺☺☺☺Greece ▲ □ □ -Ireland ▲▲▲ □ □ □ ☺☺☺☺Italy ▲▲ □ ☺☺Luxembourg - - -Netherlands ▲▲▲ - ☺☺☺Norway (not EU) ▲ - -Portugal ▲▲ □ □ ☺☺☺Spain - □ □ ☺☺☺Sweden - - -UK ▲▲▲ - ☺☺☺☺☺
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
Legend▲
Need for PPP unit identified and some actions taken (or only a regional unit available)
▲▲ PPP unit in progress (or existing but in purely consultative capacity)
▲▲▲ PPP unit existing (actively involved in PPP promotion)□ Legislation being proposed
□ □Comprehensive legislation being drafted/some sector specific legislation in place
□ □ □ Comprehensive legislation in place☺ Discussions ongoing☺☺ Projects in procurement☺☺☺ Many procured projects, some projects closed☺☺☺☺ Substantial number of closed projects
☺☺☺☺☺ Substantial number of closed projects, number of them in operation
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
PPP institutional development in EU New Member states (Adapted from PwC Report 2004, WB Report 2004)
CountryPPP Unit
PPP Law
Relative PPP experience (water and wastewater sector)
Cyprus - - ☺☺Czech Republic ▲▲ □ □ ☺☺☺Estonia ▲ - -Hungary ▲▲ □ ☺☺☺Latvia ▲▲ □ -Lithuania - - -Malta ▲ - -Poland ▲▲ □ □ ☺☺☺Slovakia - - ☺Slovenia - - ☺☺☺
Bulgaria ▲ □ ☺☺☺Romania ▲ □ □ ☺☺☺Turkey - □ □ □ ☺☺☺
Applicant countries
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
EU Accession countries 1/2 High degree of public services
decentralizationcreates challenges with unclear distribution of
competencies between the municipalities leading towards conflicts between local and regional tiers
Turkey enjoys the best legal PPP framework among the accession countries. It started fin 1994 and went through the
Constitution amendments and structural reforms of the key public sectors.
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
EU Accession countries 2/2
Romania has developed legislation to entrust private sector with public assets management through concession, asset management, public - private partnership and rental. Specific PPP law defines five types of contracts (BOT, DBO, BOR,
LDO, ROT). Bulgaria has the weakest PPP legislation, yet more
advanced then other countries in the region. National Strategy for Bulgaria's regional development for 2005-2015 Some PPP forms between municipalities and private
companies: contracting establishment of joint venture or shareholding companies concession of municipal property or the rights to build and/or use.
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
Western Balkans 1/3 Clear publicly available policy promoting or restricting
PPP is absent This impedes the effective application of the existing
enabling legislation, such as Concession Law and Public Procurement Law.
Public Procurement Law is being drafted and implemented in recent years in all western Balkan countries. Yet, it has issues: lack of implementability for transparency and non-discrimination
policies; objectivity of the procurement processes; and in general presence of too many possibilities to shift to non-
competitive procedures.
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
Western Balkans: Challenges 2/3
The lack of a seamless, transparent, and predictable legal and regulatory framework very complex and challenging fragmented and in many ways inconsistent
The lack of consistent and transparent regulations and administrative procedures
The lack of effective, efficient, and adequately funded administrative and judicial systems administration, law enforcement, and the judiciary are marked by
a lack of impartiality, accountability, and transparency court proceedings are very lengthy, unpredictable and costly rife political interference in court decisions
PPPUE/Capacity 2015 PPP trainingJanuary 26, 2006
Western Balkans 3/3 most local infrastructure rehabilitation and
construction is carried out under contracts to local/intern. construction companies
solid waste collection, maintenance of green areasm management of public lightning are delivered by private providers (under competitive bidding procedures)
most big and medium size cities are privatizing service delivery; some assets of those services remain state-owned
private sector involvement legislation is being developed with the help of EU funds