setting norms for and managing the process of evaluation of judicial officers

16
SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

Upload: aubrey-washington

Post on 29-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF

EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

Page 2: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

THE NEED FOR EVALUATION

• To identify and establish institutional objectives

• To try and attain such goals• To set standards of performance based on the

purpose of the institution and its desired objectives

Page 3: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION (INSTITUTIONAL)

• To focus on purpose and goals• To make course corrections• To plan systemic changes

Page 4: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION

• To promote performance• To check, arrest and weed out non-

performance

Page 5: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

USE TO THE INSTITUTION

• Help identify merit based on institutional parameters

• Help detect personal deficiencies for correction

• Help discover the rotten apples

Page 6: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

MODE OF EVALUATION

• Set the parameters• Determine the modes for assessment• Arrive at the parameters and the method of

assessment in consultation with judicial officers

Page 7: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

THE PRESENT SYSTEM

• Unit method• Judgments appraisal• Complaints• Subjective personal perception

Page 8: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

THE DESIRED PROCESS

• Based more on objectivity or, at least, subjective satisfaction of objective criteria

• Based more on promoting merit and good quality

• A process in which comparison would be possible

• Demerit should be dealt with in punishments, unless used as a tool in comparison

Page 9: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

WHAT SHOULD BE THE ATTRIBUTES (I)

• Patience in hearing (qualified)• Behaviour• Acumen and knowledge• Disposal• Perception as to integrity• Quality of judgments• Punctuality – in court, in orders and in making

orders available

Page 10: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

ATTRIBUTES (II)

• Speed in understanding• Communication with lawyers in court• Quality of judgments• Clarity in judgments and orders• Speed of disposal• Equal treatment to all• Openness of mind

Page 11: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

SUGGESTIONS

• Qualities and attitudes• Functional skills• Domain skills• Knowledge

Page 12: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

QUALITIES AND ATTITUDES

• Faith in Constitutional values• Personal rectitude• Commitment to personal service• Openness and human empathy• Vision• Decisiveness

Page 13: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

FUNCTIONAL SKILLS

• Listening, including active listening• Reading• Speaking• Writing• Analysis – logic and reasoning• English language and communication (including

non-verbal communication)• Dispute settlement, negotiation, bargaining

abilities

Page 14: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

DOMAIN SKILLS

• Appreciation of facts• Finding and appreciation of the law• Judging and decision-making; responsiveness in

judging• Managing the adjudication process; teamwork

abilities• Judgment writing• Administrative abilities• Foreseeing the impact of judicial decisions

Page 15: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

KNOWLEDGE

• Basic legal knowledge• Awareness of key social challenges, including

the history of the Constitution• Jurisprudence• Development of the laws

Page 16: SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS

FINALLY

• Identification of who will assess• Allocation of weights to the different

parameters• Use of technology both in evaluation and in

managing the process of evaluation