setting norms for and managing the process of evaluation of judicial officers
TRANSCRIPT
SETTING NORMS FOR AND MANAGING THE PROCESS OF
EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS
THE NEED FOR EVALUATION
• To identify and establish institutional objectives
• To try and attain such goals• To set standards of performance based on the
purpose of the institution and its desired objectives
MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION (INSTITUTIONAL)
• To focus on purpose and goals• To make course corrections• To plan systemic changes
INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION
• To promote performance• To check, arrest and weed out non-
performance
USE TO THE INSTITUTION
• Help identify merit based on institutional parameters
• Help detect personal deficiencies for correction
• Help discover the rotten apples
MODE OF EVALUATION
• Set the parameters• Determine the modes for assessment• Arrive at the parameters and the method of
assessment in consultation with judicial officers
THE PRESENT SYSTEM
• Unit method• Judgments appraisal• Complaints• Subjective personal perception
THE DESIRED PROCESS
• Based more on objectivity or, at least, subjective satisfaction of objective criteria
• Based more on promoting merit and good quality
• A process in which comparison would be possible
• Demerit should be dealt with in punishments, unless used as a tool in comparison
WHAT SHOULD BE THE ATTRIBUTES (I)
• Patience in hearing (qualified)• Behaviour• Acumen and knowledge• Disposal• Perception as to integrity• Quality of judgments• Punctuality – in court, in orders and in making
orders available
ATTRIBUTES (II)
• Speed in understanding• Communication with lawyers in court• Quality of judgments• Clarity in judgments and orders• Speed of disposal• Equal treatment to all• Openness of mind
SUGGESTIONS
• Qualities and attitudes• Functional skills• Domain skills• Knowledge
QUALITIES AND ATTITUDES
• Faith in Constitutional values• Personal rectitude• Commitment to personal service• Openness and human empathy• Vision• Decisiveness
FUNCTIONAL SKILLS
• Listening, including active listening• Reading• Speaking• Writing• Analysis – logic and reasoning• English language and communication (including
non-verbal communication)• Dispute settlement, negotiation, bargaining
abilities
DOMAIN SKILLS
• Appreciation of facts• Finding and appreciation of the law• Judging and decision-making; responsiveness in
judging• Managing the adjudication process; teamwork
abilities• Judgment writing• Administrative abilities• Foreseeing the impact of judicial decisions
KNOWLEDGE
• Basic legal knowledge• Awareness of key social challenges, including
the history of the Constitution• Jurisprudence• Development of the laws
FINALLY
• Identification of who will assess• Allocation of weights to the different
parameters• Use of technology both in evaluation and in
managing the process of evaluation