setting the stage for sem
DESCRIPTION
Setting the Stage for SEM. Enrollment Behavior. SEM Data Team August 22, 2012. ISU Retention/Graduation. Also: A bout 1 of every 2 transfer students to ISU graduate from here. Year 4+?. Year 4. Enrollment Profile. ISU Retention. Survey Findings. Retention. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Setting the Stage for SEM
Enrollment BehaviorSEM Data TeamAugust 22, 2012
![Page 2: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Year 4 Year 4+?Also: About 1 of every 2 transfer students to ISU graduate from here.
ISU Retention/Graduation
![Page 3: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ISU Retention
Enrollment Profile Retention Survey
Findings
![Page 4: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ISU Retention
Enrollment Profile Retention
Survey Findings
What percentage of the Fall 2011 First-time Freshmen are conditional admits?
a) 12%b) 15%c) 20%d) 22%
![Page 5: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
New FreshmenFirst-time Full-time Bachelors Degree Seekers (FTFTBDS)
HeadcountYear Total Unconditional Conditional2001 2016 1601 4152002 1925 1658 2672003 1836 1494 3422004 1672 1382 2902005 1519 1195 324
2006 1552 1204 3482007 1691 1328 3632008 1832 1354 4782009 1801 1441 3602010 2566 2068 498
2011 2512 2219 293
2012 2675 2337 338
PercentConditional
21%14%19%17%21%
22%21%26%20%19%
12%
13%
![Page 6: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2011 First-time Freshmen
![Page 7: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Race/EthnicityIndiana HS Graduates & ISU Freshmen
Source: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education
American Indian/Alaskan
Native
Asian/Pacific Islander Black non-Hispanic Hispanic White non-Hispanic0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
0% 2%
9%6%
83%
1% 2%
22%
4%
68%
82%
40%
26%
220%
4%
Race & Ethnicity Breakdown
2011 Indiana High School Graduates 2011 ISU Freshmen Projected Growth Through 2020
![Page 8: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
22%
4%4%1%2%
67%
All FTFT BDSAfrican AmericanAmerican IndianAsian AmericanHispanicMultiracialNot ReportedInternationalWhite
FTFT BDS – Ethnicity
20%
4%
4%1%2%70%
UnconditionalAfrican AmericanAmerican IndianAsian AmericanHispanicMultiracialNot ReportedInternationalWhite
38%
1%1%4%4%1%
51%
ConditionalAfrican AmericanAmerican IndianAsian AmericanHispanicMultiracialNot ReportedInternationalWhite
![Page 9: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
First-time Freshman Profile
High School Rank
9% - Top 10%29% - Top 25%69% - Top 50%
High School GPA
19% - 3.5 or higher52% - 3.0 or higher88% - 2.5 or higher
High School Other
23% - Acad Honors Diplomas20% - 21st Century Scholars
![Page 10: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
First-time Freshman Profile
What else?• 53% Women• 80% Live on Campus• Almost half are Pell Recipients• Over half are 1st Generation
Where are they from?• 85% Indiana• 13% Out of State• 2% International
Where in Indiana?• 28% Marion & surrounding• 19% Vigo & surrounding• 10% Northwest Indiana
![Page 11: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ISU Retention
Enrollment Profile Retention
Survey Findings
What is the national average 1-yr retention rate for 4-yr public institutions?
a) 72%b) 75%c) 78%d) 81%
![Page 12: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
National 1-yr Retention Rates
National Average = 78.4%
74.3%
Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment
![Page 13: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
72.4 72.2 72.3 71.6 71.6 71.574.0 73.6
71.7
66.7 63.1 66.3 62.6 62.9 64.3 69.6 62.0 54.7
TraditionalLiberal
National1Yr Retention RatesTraditional/Liberal 4Yr Publics
• Traditional (18–24 ACT, 1290–1650 SAT, Majority admitted from top 50% of H.S. class)• Liberal (17-22 ACT, 1230-1530 SAT, Majority admitted from bottom 50% of H.S. class)
ISU: 17-22 ACT, 1200-1520 SAT, 69% admitted from top 50% of H.S. class ACT Institutional Data Questionnaire
![Page 14: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
State benchmark retention rates:
four year publics
NameMiddle 50%
ACTMiddle 50th
SAT totalClass rank percentile ACT Category
Average one-year retention
rate
Purdue University 23-29 1530 - 190071% from top
quarterSelective -
highly selective 87%
Indiana University 24-29 1625 - 184574% from top
quarterSelective -
highly selective 90%
Ball State University 20-24 1440-1720 89% from top half Traditional 79%
IUPUI 18-25 1369 - 1699 85% from top half Traditional 70%
Indiana State 16-22 1210 - 1520 64% from top halfLiberal -
Traditional 66%University of Southern Indiana 18-23 1270-1590 69% from top half Traditional 67%
Source; US News
![Page 15: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Potential retention peers – retention and graduation rates
Main 2009 6-Year Grad Rate 1st Year Retention Rate
Illinois State University 69.00% 83.00%
Ball State University 58.30% 78.00%
Central Michigan University 57.20% 77.00%
East Carolina University 56.80% 76.00%
Indiana University of Pennsylvania-Main Campus 54.20% 74.00%
University of Northern Colorado 49.30% 70.00%
Louisiana Tech University 46.40% 72.00%
The University of West Florida 45.30% 71.00%
East Tennessee State University 42.50% 67.00%
Indiana State University 40.40% 66.00%
Source: AACRAO SEM Consulting
![Page 16: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
ISU Retention
Enrollment Profile Retention Survey
Findings
What group showed the greatest decrease in 1-yr retention rates from 2009 to 2010
a) Conditional Admitsb) Unconditional Admits
![Page 17: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
HeadcountYear Total Unconditional Conditional2006 1552 1204 3482007 1691 1328 3632008 1832 1354 4782009 1801 1441 3602010 2566 2068 498
2011 2512 2219 293
2012 2675 2337 338
New FreshmenFirst-time Full-time Bachelors Degree Seekers (FTFTBDS)
1yr Retention RateTotal Unconditional Conditional
69.1% 71.8% 59.8%66.2% 69.4% 54.5%63.9% 67.6% 53.6%63.9% 68.6% 45.3%58.1% 61.9% 42.2%
PercentConditional
22%21%26%20%19%
12%
13%
60.7% 63.3% 41.0%
![Page 18: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
TotalConditionalUnconditional
ISU 1-Yr Retention Rates (FTFTBS)
![Page 19: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 20050.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
1-yr Retention2-yr Retention4-yr Graduation6-yr Graduation
Cohort
ISU New Freshmen (FTFTBDS)Retention & Graduation Rates
![Page 20: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ISU 1-Yr Retention Rates (FTFT BDS)
African Americans and Whites
African American White African American White African American WhiteTotal Conditional Unconditional
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
55.2%
66.1%
48.9%
43.1%
59.2%
70.1%
43.2% 63.2% 37.8% 45.1% 45.8% 66.4%
20062007200820092010
![Page 21: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ISU First-time Freshman Retention Rates by Region
![Page 22: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ISU FTFT BDS Illinois 1Yr Retention Rates
SE Ill Counties Cook County All Other Counties0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%73.00%
50.00%
63.00%62.00%
39.29%
70.00%
20062010
Entering Cohort2006 902010 81
Entering Cohort2006 162010 140
Entering Cohort2006 182010 44
![Page 23: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Living On Campus Off Campus Pct Living Hdcnt 1yrRet Hdcnt 1yrRet OnCampus
2006 1123 70.4% 429 65.5% 72.4%2007 1291 66.4% 400 65.8% 76.3%2008 1418 63.6% 414 65.0% 77.4%2009 1418 64.4% 383 62.1% 78.7%2010 2078 59.0% 488 54.5% 81.0%
FTFT BDS 1-Yr Retention RatesLiving On/Off Campus
FYE Res Hall Oth Res Hall Hdcnt 1yrRet Hdcnt 1yrRet
2006 850 68.9% 273 75.1%2007 916 67.6% 375 63.5%2008 935 65.8% 483 59.4%2009 942 65.4% 476 62.4%2010 1258 63.5% 820 52.0%
![Page 24: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
No pell Pell No pell Pell No pell PellAll Students Conditional Unconditional
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
200520062007200820092010
ISU 1-Yr Retention Rates (FTFTBS)Pell Recipients
![Page 25: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Not in Honors Program
Honors Program Not in Honors Program
Honors Program
2009 2010
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
77.8%
93.1%
68.5%
82.3%
1Yr Retention of Honors-Eligible FTF BDS who did or did not enroll in Honors Program
High Achieving High School Students
![Page 26: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
High Achieving High School Students
African American White0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
66.7% 66.7%
78.6%82.9%
1 Yr Retention of Honors-Eligible FTFT BDS who did or did not enroll in Honors Program
Not in Honors ProgramHonors Program
![Page 27: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Ethnicity Gender Residency CondAdm HSGPA HSPctRank HS_Dipl Pell 21stCS LaptopSch MeritSCH,
ACTComposite ACTEng ACTMath ACTWriting SATMath SATVerbal SATWriting FAFSA MotherHiGrade FatherHiGrade EFC Total gift aid Need gap (direct costs less
gift aid)
Cluster analysis variables
![Page 28: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
See your handouts
![Page 29: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
ISU’s Student Success & Progress Rate College Portrait
![Page 30: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
ISU Retention
Enrollment Profile Retention
Survey Findings
NSSE Senior Survey results show ISU compares favorably to its peers in which area?
a) Active and Collaborative Learningb) Level of Academic Challengec) Enriching Educational Experiencesd) Supportive Campus Environment
![Page 31: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Providing Enriching Educational Experiences is an area in which ISU compares favorably to others in its Carnegie class. ◦ Highest ISU participation in internships/coops and
culminating senior experiences – also most valued by faculty
Other favorable results:◦ service learning participation (seniors)◦ making class presentations (first-year)◦ working with other students (first-year)
Very little difference in quality of academic advising rating Lower rating of the entire educational experience compared
to our Carnegie class
Summary of Results NSSE/BCSSE/FSSE
![Page 32: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Prepari
ng for c
lass
Working o
n campus*
Working o
ff campus*
Particip
ating i
n co-cu
rricu
lar ac
tivities
Relaxin
g and so
cializi
ng0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%%
spe
ndin
g 11
+ ho
urs p
er w
eek
NSSE/BCSSE/FSSE% spending 11+ hrs/week
![Page 33: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
0102030405060708090
100
Student Faculty Interactions
Students: % Often or Very Often
NSSE/BCSSE/FSSE
![Page 34: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
MapWorks ReportsBenchmark, Factors & Question Details
Our Select 6:
• Central Washington University• Eastern Kentucky University• Indiana University-Purdue University (Fort Wayne)• University of Akron• University of Southern Indiana• Western Kentucky University
![Page 35: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Individual Questions in Factor
![Page 36: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
MapWorks Fall Transition Survey
![Page 37: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
MapWorks - The Positive Side
![Page 38: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
MapWorks 2010 Responses Intent to leave ISU
Freshman who intended to Leave ISU after 3 weeks N=108
All MapWorks survey respondents
Peer Connections Avg: 4.85Social Aspects Avg: 4.59Social Integration Avg: 4.17Homesickness: Separation Avg: 2.82 Commitment to Institution Avg: 3.41
Avg:5.53
Avg:5.31
Avg: 5.31
Avg: 4.12
Avg: 6.04
![Page 39: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Urban vs Rural Responses
Indi-anapo-
lis*
Chicago* Chicago Suburbs
Rural Illinois*
1234567
Commitment to Institution
* significant mean value
Mea
n
Indian
apolis
Chica
go*
Chica
go Su
burbs
*
Rural
Illino
is*1234567
Financial Means
* significant mean value
Mea
n
Indi-anapo-
lis*
Chicago*
Chicago Suburbs
Rural Illinois*
1234567
Homesickness
*significant mean value
Mea
n
![Page 40: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
19%
81%
PredictableUnknown
Homesickness Study Skills
Self-Confidence
Motivation Paying for school Relationships Support Systems
Predicting Retention (1-r2)
![Page 41: Setting the Stage for SEM](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062218/568161ce550346895dd1c03b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
How could the first year at ISU better engage students with our expectations for them, academically?
Social engagement appears to have a strong impact on our first-year students:◦ What are the opportunities to leverage this to
improve their academic performance?◦ How can we identify and engage those students
who show greater risk for lack of social engagement, early in their first semester?
Guiding questions