shaima’a ahmed radwan
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan
![Page 2: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2- Implant related:
a)IMPLANT MACROGEOMETRY
The shape of the implant determines the surface area available for stress transfer and governs the initial stability of the implant.
![Page 3: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Fix
ture
Re
gio
ns
Crest module
Apex
Body
![Page 4: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Smooth sided cylindrical implants provide ease in surgical placement, however the bone to implant interface is subjected to significantly larger shear conditions.
Implant shape
As a consequence, cylinder implants require a coating to manage the shear stress at the interface through a more uniform bone attachment along the implant length
![Page 5: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Threaded implants with circular cross sections provide for ease of surgical placement and allow for greater functional surface area optimization to transmit compressive loads to bone implant interface
Implant shape
![Page 6: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
-Manufacturers describe root form implant in dimension of length -corresponds to bone height- and diameter -corresponds to bone width and length. -Some manufacturers propose implants with a crest module wider than body dimension
Implant diameter and length
![Page 7: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Implant Diameter
-Increase in surface area depends on implant diameter more than implant length.
Wider root form designs exhibit a greater area of bone contact than narrow implants of similar design because of an increase in circumferential bone contact
![Page 8: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1 mm increase in diameter 20% - 30% increase in surface area.
![Page 9: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Length of implants:
3 mm increase in length 10% increase in surface area. • Implant length is a more relevant factor in case of
immediate loading, especially in case of softer bone
![Page 10: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
(Implant neck (crest module/implant collar
Smooth parallel sided may result in a shear stress in the
crestal region
Crest module of an implant body is the transosteal region from the implant body and characterized as a region of highly concentrated mechanical stress
![Page 11: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
an angled crest module of more than 20 0 with a surface texture which increases the bone implant contact, might impose a slight beneficial compressive and tensile component to the contiguous bone, and decrease the risk of bone loss.
Crest module seats fully over the implant body osteotomy , deterrent to ingress of bacteria & fibrous tissue ,provides greater initial stability of the implant surface area .
(Implant neck (crest module/implant collar
![Page 12: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
THREAD GEOMETRY Threads are designed to maximize initial contact enhance surface area and facilitate dissipation of stresses at the bone- implant interface. Functional surface area per unit length of the implant may be modified by varying three thread geometry parameters
1.thread pitch, 2,thread shape and 3. thread depth.
b)IMPLANT MICROGEOMETRY
![Page 13: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1.thread pitch
Thread pitch refers to the distance from the center of the thread to the center of the next thread.
![Page 14: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Implants with more threads (i.e. smaller pitch) were found to have a higher percentage of BIC(bone implant contact) and increase resistance to vertical forces.
![Page 15: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2,thread shape
Square , V shape, buttress
![Page 16: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
V-shaped 10 times greater shear Caution in D3 and D4 bone Failure .
![Page 17: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Greater the thread depth , greater the surface area of the implant
![Page 18: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
c) Number, distribution and inclination of supporting implants:
Increasing the number of supporting implants increases the functional surface area upon which dissipation of forces occurs.
![Page 19: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The maximum compressive stresses, generated in an
Osseo integrated implant, increase as the inclination of the implant towards the load direction increases.
Thus, for a long term favorable prognosis, it is
necessary to take into consideration the antagonistic teeth and the positioning of the implants when designing the prosthetic appliances.
![Page 20: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan
![Page 21: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
3- Bone Related
![Page 22: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
A) Bone Quality (Density): In 1970 Linkow classified bone into three categories :
1) Class I consist of even spaced trabeculae with small cancellated spaces. 2) Class II consist of less uniform spaced trabeculae with larger cancellated spaces. 3) Class III consist of large marrow spaces in less uniform trabeculae.
![Page 23: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
In 1985 Zarb classified bone into four categories : - Quality 1 composed of homogenous compact bone. - Quality 2 composed of thick compact bone surrounding core of dense trabecular bone.
![Page 24: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
- Quality 3 composed of thin compact bone surrounding core of dense trabecular bone
- Quality 4 composed of thin compact bone surrounding core of low density trabecular bone
![Page 25: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
In 1988 Misch classified bone into four categories : - D1 dense cortical Ex: Anterior mandible - D2 porous cortical and course trabecular Ex: Posterior mandible
![Page 26: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
- D3 porous thin cortical and fine trabecular. Ex: Anterior maxilla. - D4 fine trabecular (Heals 50% faster than D1 bone). Ex: Posterior maxilla
![Page 27: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
olume):V(Quantity B)Bone
1985 Carl E. Misch proposed four basic divisions. The divisions are: 1) Division A 2) Division B 3) Division C 4) Division E
These divisions are based on bone height, width,
length and angulation.
![Page 28: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
A) Bone height: - Measured from the crest of remaining ridge to the opposing land mark.
![Page 29: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
B) Bone Width:
- Bucco-lingual dimension of bone around implant. - Minimum 0.5 mm of bone is needed.
![Page 31: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
C) Bone length: - Mesio-distal length of bone around implant. - Implant should be at least 1.5 mm from adjacent tooth \ implant to allow an adequate blood supply for the bone.
![Page 32: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
D) Bone angulations:
• Angled abutments are used to improve esthetics or the path of insertion of a restoration, not to determine the direction of load. • Angled abutments also result in development of dangerous transverse force components under occlusal loads in the direction of the angled abutment. 15 degrees = 25.9% force 30 degrees = 50% force
![Page 33: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
)1 ):Division A (abundant bone
≥ 5 mm width ≥ 12 mm height ≥ 7 mm length Up to 30o angulations
![Page 34: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
) Division B: 2
B+ 4-5 mm width ≥ 12 mm height ≥ 6mm length Up to 20o angulations
B-w • 2.5-4 mm width • ≥ 12 mm height • ≥ 6 mm length • Up to 20o
angulations
![Page 35: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
) Division C:3
C-w 0-2.5 mm width ≥ 12 mm height ≥ 6mm length Up to 20o angulations
C-h • 4-5 mm width • < 12 mm height • ≥ 6mm length • Up to 20o
angulations
![Page 36: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
) Division D:4 Severe atrophy Basal bone loss
![Page 37: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan
![Page 39: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
4- Mechanical properties of the bone-implant interface:
![Page 40: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
FUNCTIONAL SURFACE AREA:
as the area that actively serves to dissipate compressive and tensile non shear bonds through the implant to bone interface and provides initial stability of the implant following surgical placement.
![Page 41: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
D1 bone, is the densest bone found in the jaws is also the strongest bone and provides an intimate contact with a threaded root form implant at initial implant loading.
![Page 42: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
D4 bone has the weakest biomechanical strength and the lowest contact area to dissipate the load at the implant to bone interface.
![Page 43: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Osseointegration A direct functional and structural connection
between ordered living bone and the surface of a load-bearing implant. “Branemark 1985”
![Page 44: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Osseointegration (biologic processes) Blood clot
formation
Angiogenesis
Osteoprogenito
r
Deposition of bone
![Page 45: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
A) Bonding-Osseointegration: - This type of Osteointegration occurs in bio-active implants such as those hydroxy apatite coated or Plasma sprayed.
![Page 46: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
B) Contact-Osteointegration:
- This type of interface occurs in bio-inert implants made of titanium with no coating.
![Page 47: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
C) Distant-Osteointegration: - Fibro integration is the weakest type of interface and it
can be seen around stainless steel or cobalt chromium implants.
![Page 48: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Wolff’s law would suggest that implants reach their optimal integration only after being placed in function due to bone remodeling (Deposition and Resorption) that occurs around the implant as a consequence of loads applied.
![Page 49: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
5- Loading related:
![Page 50: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Timing of loading: A) Immediate ( On the same day of first surgery up to 48 hours ). B) Early ( 2 to 3 weeks after first surgery ). C) Late ( 3 to 8 months after first surgery ).
Elements of Progressive loading: 1) Time interval (3 to 8 months acc. To type of bone). 2) Diet (Soft diet). 3) Occlusal material and occlusal contact. 4) Prosthesis design (Avoid Cantilevers and wide occlusal tables).
![Page 51: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
6- Superstructure related:
![Page 52: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
a) Implant abutment connection
The misfit at abutment-implant interface and the missing of a passive adaptation between the prosthesis and the -abutment can lead prosthesis components, abutment screw or implants to fracture
![Page 53: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
a) Implant abutment connection
.
Functionally, this misfit can cause overload at the abutment and distribute non-axial load along implant and marginal bone. The gap generated bacteria colonization, which might cause inflammatory reactions in the per implant soft tissues
![Page 54: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Implant abutment interface:
![Page 55: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
External hex connection:
the two stage
method, an antirotational
mechanism retrievability
![Page 56: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
disadvantages :micro movements because of
the size of the hex, higher center of rotation that leads to lower resistance for rotational and micro gap leading to bone resorption.
butt-joint interface have shown an incidence of abutment screw loosening of up to 38%.
![Page 57: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Internal hex connection : distribute intraoral forces deeper within the implant to
protect the retention screw from excess loading and to reduce the potential of microleakage
Internally connected implants also provide superior strength for the implant/abutment connection.
![Page 58: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Morse taper connection abutment post is inserted
into the non-threaded shaft of a dental implant with the same taper.
vertical positioning and self-locking characteristics enhances ability to resist bending forces, abutment loosen in micro-movement and micro pump formation.
![Page 59: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
internal morse taper design is such that an essentially “cold weld” is produced when the precision fit tapered abutment
Internal hex connection :
![Page 60: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
![Page 61: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
![Page 62: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
![Page 63: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
.
![Page 64: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Joint clamping forces (preload)
the screw joint as 2 parts tightened together by a screw, such as an abutment and implant tightening together by a screw
![Page 65: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
![Page 66: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Joint Separating forcers : Opposing the clamping force is a joint-separating force, which attempts to separate the screw joint. Screw loose occurs when the joint-separating forces acting on the loosening are greater than the clamping forces holding screw unit together.
![Page 67: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Joint Separating forcers : separating forces may include: 1. off-axis occlusal contacts, 2. lateral excursive contacts, interproximal contacts
between natural teeth and implant restorations, protrusive contacts,
3. parafunctional forces and 4. non-passive frameworks that attach to the implants .
![Page 68: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
b) Artificial teeth cuspal inclination:
The greater cusp angles may incise food more
easily and efficiently yet the occlusal contact
along an angled cusp results in an angled load
to the crestal bone.
![Page 69: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
The magnitude of the force is minimized when the
angled occlusal contact is not a premature contact
but instead is a uniform load over several teeth or
implants.
![Page 70: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
This position usually is accomplished by: 1- Increasing the width of the central groove to 2 to 3 mm in posterior implant crowns, which are positioned over the middle of the implant abutment. 2- The opposing cusp is recontoured to occlude the central fossa directly over the implant body.
![Page 71: Shaima’a Ahmed Radwan](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012806/61bd45c561276e740b112114/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)