shelter nfi setor working group nigeria€¦ · setor a tivities: response overage at state level...

2
These partners were: ACF Internaonal, Save the Children, Oxfam, Tearfund, IRC, NRC, IOM, UNHCR, UNFPA, DRC, Majes- ty Rural Community Development Foundaon (MRCDF), Nige- rian Red Cross Movement, and Mercy Corps. 75% of the response was NFI kit distribuon. (133,975 families supported with NFI). The provision of emergency shelter focused on the influx from Cameroon in August and Septem- ber, when there was a small peak in the overall distribuon. At the end of the year, the coordinated construcon of new site develop- ments had begun in Maiduguri to enable relocaons of IDPs sheltered in schools. 9.2% of the response used vouchers as a modality. Response was highest in Borno State, followed by Ada- mawa, Gombe and Yobe. Internaonal actors established pres- ence in Maiduguri (Borno State) only in April 2015, when the security situaon improved in the town. Many partners who arrived in the Northeastern part of the country during the past year have only re- cently established presence there. Coverage has been limited and uneven, with enormous gaps remaining. Response has been restricted by access and secu- rity consideraons, as well as limitaons on capacity, as partners had to focus their resources on coping with the year’s major influxes. 50.5% of the response was delivered in host communi- es; and 41.9% in camps. (28.7% formal; 13.2% informal). The remaining response was delivered in return communies (5%) and to the populaon affected by floods in Adamawa State in October (2.6%). This does not reflect the complete picture of funding or delivery with- in the sector in 2015, as it does not include significant contribuons: ICRC’s extensive delivery (which has been consistently shared with the sector for operaonal coordinaon). Government of Nigeria response (NEMA, SEMA, Ministry of Rehabilitaon, Reconstrucon and Reselement, and other agencies). Nigerian civil society response (private sector, naonal NGOs, religious instuons and other organizaons) Internaonal partners that received funding for NFI or shel- ter, but did not report to the sector during 2015 —AconAid, Chrisan Aid, COOPI, and Help e. V (source: FTS). 89,575 Families supported in both Formal and Informal Camps 7,750 Families supported in flood affected communies 68,324 Families supported in host community 5,204 Families supported in Returnee community In 2015, 15 partners supported 1,195,971* individuals with shelter or NFI. SECTOR ACTIVITIES: Response Coverage at State Level ACTIVITIES BY LOCATION * This is an overlapping sum of all the supported households by all agencies. Flood Affected communities , 2.6% Formal camp, 28.7% Host Community, 50.5% Informal camp, 13.2% Returnee community, 5.0% SHELTER NFI SECTOR WORKING GROUP NIGERIA 2015 REVIEW

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SHELTER NFI SETOR WORKING GROUP NIGERIA€¦ · SETOR A TIVITIES: Response overage at State Level ATIVITIES Y LOATION * This is an overlapping sum of all the supported households

These partners were: ACF International, Save the Children, Oxfam, Tearfund, IRC, NRC, IOM, UNHCR, UNFPA, DRC, Majes-ty Rural Community Development Foundation (MRCDF), Nige-rian Red Cross Movement, and Mercy Corps.

75% of the response was NFI kit distribution. (133,975 families supported with NFI). The provision of emergency shelter focused on the influx from Cameroon in August and Septem-ber, when there was a small peak in the overall distribution. At the end of the year, the coordinated construction of new site develop-ments had begun in Maiduguri to enable relocations of IDPs sheltered in schools. 9.2% of the response used vouchers as a modality.

Response was highest in Borno State, followed by Ada-mawa, Gombe and Yobe. International actors established pres-

ence in Maiduguri (Borno State) only in April 2015, when the security situation improved in the town. Many partners who arrived in the Northeastern part of the country during the past year have only re-cently established presence there.

Coverage has been limited and uneven, with enormous gaps remaining. Response has been restricted by access and secu-

rity considerations, as well as limitations on capacity, as partners had to focus their resources on coping with the year’s major influxes.

50.5% of the response was delivered in host communi-ties; and 41.9% in camps. (28.7% formal; 13.2% informal). The

remaining response was delivered in return communities (5%) and to the population affected by floods in Adamawa State in October (2.6%).

This does not reflect the complete picture of funding or delivery with-in the sector in 2015, as it does not include significant contributions:

ICRC’s extensive delivery (which has been consistently shared

with the sector for operational coordination).

Government of Nigeria response (NEMA, SEMA, Ministry of

Rehabilitation, Reconstruction and Resettlement, and other agencies).

Nigerian civil society response (private sector, national NGOs,

religious institutions and other organizations)

International partners that received funding for NFI or shel-

ter, but did not report to the sector during 2015 —ActionAid, Christian Aid, COOPI, and Help e. V (source: FTS).

89,575 Families supported in both

Formal and Informal Camps

7,750 Families supported in flood

affected communities

68,324 Families supported in host

community

5,204 Families supported in

Returnee community

In 2015, 15 partners supported 1,195,971* individuals with shelter or NFI.

SECTOR ACTIVITIES: Response Coverage at State Level

ACTIVITIES BY LOCATION

* This is an overlapping sum of all the supported households by all agencies.

Flood Affected

communities, 2.6%

Formal camp, 28.7%

Host Community,

50.5%

Informal camp, 13.2%

Returnee community,

5.0%

SHELTER NFI SECTOR WORKING GROUP NIGERIA

2015 REVIEW

Page 2: SHELTER NFI SETOR WORKING GROUP NIGERIA€¦ · SETOR A TIVITIES: Response overage at State Level ATIVITIES Y LOATION * This is an overlapping sum of all the supported households

75% Of the households were supported with NFI Kits. The

biggest NFI response was in Borno State, followed by

Adamawa and Yobe States.

ACTIVITY TYPE ANALYSIS

10.2% Of the households were supported with Emergency Shelter

(ES). Borno was the more supported state with ES Response

followed by Adamawa State.

9.2% 5.6%

Of the households supported used

cash and/or vouchers as modality in

Gombe State.

Of the households were supported with Kitchen Sets.

Borno State received the largest response, followed

by Adamawa State.