shift, not drift: towards active demand response and beyond
TRANSCRIPT
http://think.eui.eu
Shift, Not Drift: Towards Active Demand Response and Beyond
Smart Grids Task Force Steering Committee meeting 9 July 2013, Brussels
http://think.eui.eu
Project leader Leigh Hancher
Research team leader Xian He
Research team Isabel Azevedo, Nico Keyaerts, Leonardo Meeus, Jean-Michel Glachant
Project advisors Władysław Mielczarski, François Lévêque
http://think.eui.eu
Why active demand response?
2
GENERATION
- Centralized - Predictable - Dispatchable
DEMAND
- Inelastic
Before
GENERATION
- Decentralized - Less predictable - Less dispatchable
DEMAND
- Flexible
Now with more RES
ACTIVE DEMAND RESPONSE FL
EXIB
ILIT
Y
FLEX
IBIL
ITY
FLEXIB
ILITY
To keep the balance
…The flexibility challenge
www.florence-school.eu
That’s why we find demand response in…
3
Energy Roadmap 2050 “energy saving and managing demand: a responsibility for all”
Smart Grid Task Force “smart grids can be a useful tool in enabling consumers to take action to more effectively manage their energy consumption”
Energy Efficiency Directive “demand response is an important instrument for improving energy efficiency ”
Internal Market Communication “stronger demand response in distribution networks”
Smart Appliances
Smart box
Smart Meters
DR benefits
DR potential
Sustainability first
Dynamic tariff
Regulatory barriers
www.florence-school.eu
But significant skepticism in reality
4
No future for demand response!!
www.florence-school.eu 5
We challenge this view by adopting
a consumer-centred approach
1. How to assess consumers’ potential and willingness to participate in active demand response?
2. How to realise active demand response?
TOPIC #11
Shift, not drift: Towards active demand response and beyond
www.florence-school.eu 6
How to assess consumers’ potential and willingness to participate in active demand response?
Part 1
www.florence-school.eu
How consumers will be engaged?
7
……? Potential to participate
Willingness to participate
Consumer engagement Contract
€
kW
DR contract • Consumer-centred
Analytical approach • Focus on contract
www.florence-school.eu
Consumers’ potential to participate in active demand response
• Not only about the smart appliances
• But also about the way we use the ‘smart’ and ‘dumb’ appliances
8
More flexible
Load Non-storable Storable
E.g. heating and cooling, electric vehicles
Non-shiftable Shiftable
E.g. laundry and dish washer
Non-curtailable Curtailable
E.g. lighting and TV
E.g. Alarm, automation, TV,
Base
www.florence-school.eu
Consumers’ potential expressed by load mix
9
Load mix
Base20%
Curtailable15%
Shiftable25%
Storable40%
Shiftable mix
Curtailable mix
Storable mix
www.florence-school.eu
How consumers will be engaged?
10
……?
Consumer engagement Contract
€
kW Willingness to participate
Potential to participate
www.florence-school.eu 11
Interaction between load mix and demand response contracts
Shiftable mix
Curtailable mix
Storable mix
Fixed capping
contract
TOU contract
Direct load
control
Dynamic pricing
contract
Dynamic capping
contract
5 contract types
Price-based, fixed tariffs for fixed intervals, determined annually
Volume-based, fixed load cap and intervals, determined annually
Price-based, dynamic tariff with day-/ hour-ahead notice
Volume-based, dynamic load cap with day-/ hour-ahead notice
Control-based, automatic operation by a 3rd party
www.florence-school.eu
How consumers will be engaged?
12
……?
Consumer engagement Contract
€
kW Willingness to participate
Potential to participate
www.florence-school.eu
Consumers’ willingness to participate in active demand response
13
Preferences
Financial compensation
Social motivation
Price risk
Volume risk
Autonomy/ privacy
Complexity
http://think.eui.eu 14
Interaction between consumer preferences and demand response contracts
Contract
Preferences
Price Risk Volume risk Complexity Autonomy/ Privacy loss
Financial compensation
TOU Low None Low None Limited
Dynamic pricing
High None High None High potential
Fixed capping contract
None Low High Limited Limited
Dynamic capping contract
None High High Limited High potential
Direct load control
None None None High High potential
Lots of trade-offs
www.florence-school.eu 15
Can consumers be engaged to participate in active demand response?
Yes, if we provide them enough options and
tools to choose the right contract.
www.florence-school.eu 16
How to realise active demand response?
Part 2
www.florence-school.eu 17
……? Potential to participate (load
mix)
Willingness to participate
(preferences)
Consumer engagement Contract terms
€
kW
Intermediaries
How to have an adequate range of contracts?
www.florence-school.eu
Pros and cons of different intermediaries
18
Intermediaries
Electricity Suppliers
3rd parties
Consumer cooperatives
Pros Cons
Expertise in energy sector
Possible conflict with core business
Limited competition pressure
No conflict with core business Lack of expertise
Full incentive of profit sharing Lack of expertise
www.florence-school.eu
How to have an adequate range of contracts?
19
A single intermediary may not have the incentive/competence to provide an adequate range of contracts.
But We do not need to correct their business motivation, as
long as an adequate range of intermediaries exists.
How to have an adequate range of intermediaries?
www.florence-school.eu
Recommendations to ensure an adequate range of intermediaries
1) Demand response license provides a ‘quality label’ to build trust.
2) Disaggregated billing allows better comparison of offers from intermediaries who offer bundled services (e.g. supply and demand response) and those who do not.
3) Non-discriminatory access to electricity markets and to data.
4) Output-based regulation for regulated services (congestion management and ancillary services)
20
www.florence-school.eu
How to make choice out of this range? • Need for consumer empowerment and protection measures
21
4 Steps in contract selection
Qualifying their load mix
Recognizing their preferences
Selecting an appropriate contract type
Finding the right contract implementation
Challenges
Lack of knowledge of appliances; lack of skills to use them
Not aware of the risks and rewards implied by the contract; lack of skills to evaluate them
Difficulty in aligning load mix and preferences
Lack of comparability in contract design
www.florence-school.eu
Recommendation on a toolkit of consumer empowerment and protection
1) Mandatory consumer profiling reveal consumer’s load mix and preferences
2) Independent contract comparison tool facilitate consumers in choosing the appropriate contract
3) Monitoring and optimisation of the range of contracts limit the complexity of contract terms
4) Adequate data protection raise consumers’ trust to reveal personal information before and after signing a contract.
5) Effective dispute resolution mechanism fall-back option to enable efficient switching of contracts or intermediaries by consumers.
6) Special scheme for vulnerable consumers prevent them from being penalised for their inability to provide active demand response.
22
www.florence-school.eu 23
Conclusion
1. How to assess consumers’ potential and willingness to participate in active demand response?
2. How to realise active demand response?
Consumers can be engaged if they have options that reflect their diversity and are adequately empowered to make choices.
Toolkit of consumer empowerment Measures to facilitate market entry
www.florence-school.eu
Thank you very much for your attention [email protected]; http://think.eui.eu
24
THINK reports (published 2011 - 2013)
1) Public Support of RD&D
2) Smart Cities
3) Energy Roadmap for 2050
4) Public Budget of EU Member States
5) Offshore Grids
6) Transmission Grid Tariffication
7) Building refurbishment
8) Electricity Storage
9) EU technology policy for 2050
10) CBA for infrastructure package
11) Active demand response
12) DSO Regulation