short-term plasticity and long-term potentiation … plasticity and long-term potentiation mimicked...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Supplementary Information
Short-term plasticity and long-term potentiation
mimicked in single inorganic synapses
Takeo Ohno, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, Tohru Tsuruoka, Kazuya Terabe, James K.
Gimzewski and Masakazu Aono
1. Current-voltage (I–V) characteristics of the Ag2S atomic switch
Figure S1 shows typical I–V characteristics of the Ag2S atomic switch when
bias voltage is swept to a value large enough to cause bipolar switching. The I–V
characteristics are similar to those observed in the operation of conventional resistance
random access memories (ReRAMs), although the operating mechanisms are different.
Namely, the switch was turned on at around +80 mV when the bias voltage was swept
to +100 mV, and it was turned off at around –30 mV. The on-state is achieved by the
formation of a metallic atom bridge.
After formation of the atomic bridge, widening/thinning of its diameter takes
place depending on the polarity of the applied bias voltage. The manner of
widening/thinning shows memristive behaviour, as described in our previous paperS1.
The stability of the atomic bridge is the origin of the long-term potentiation (LTP)
demonstrated in this paper.
On the other hand, as described in this paper, the Ag2S atomic switch shows a
spontaneous decay in conductance (or current) before the metallic atom bridge
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATIONDOI: 10.1038/NMAT3054
NATURE MATERIALS | www.nature.com/naturematerials 1
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
2
formation without any bias application. This decay phenomenon, which is a
characteristic unique to atomic switches, enables the operation of the synaptic
behaviours reported in this paper.
Figure S1. I–V characteristics of the Ag2S atomic switch under the ON/OFF
switching operation. The bias voltage was swept as indicated by the arrows.
2. Retention time of a robust atomic bridge in the LTP state
Figure S2 shows the change in the conductance of an inorganic synapse versus
the measurement time, when a metallic atom bridge is formed by input pulses. Once an
atomic bridge is formed, the inorganic synapse shows a longer retention time. For
instance, the atomic bridge formed by a voltage pulse (V = 100 mV, W = 0.5 s) had
existed over 400 s, as shown in Figure S2. Since the range of the measured conductance
(about 2 G0, where G0 indicates the quantized conductance unit) corresponds to the
contact size of a few atoms, the result supports the contention that the point contact
formation is the origin of the robustness of an inorganic synapse in the LTP state.
Although the conductance changes due to the atomic rearrangement soon after
2 NATURE MATERIALS | www.nature.com/naturematerials
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3054
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
3
the bridge formation, especially for a thinner bridge showing a conductance of about 1
G0, it mostly occurs in a few seconds. Therefore, we decided to judge the robustness of
the atomic bridge after 20 s has passed from its formation.
In Figure S2, we believe that the sudden increase and the decay in the
conductance at around 400 s was due to an accidental mechanical caused by the
scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) system. This is because our STM has a
capability to maintain a relative position between a tip and sample over 600 s, as
discussed in the following.
Figure S2. Change in the conductance of an inorganic synapse after a robust
atomic bridge was formed. The atomic bridge had existed over 400 s. Input pulse
was applied at 0 s, followed by a bias of 10 mV to measure the conductance of
the inorganic synapse.
Usually, a STM system has thermal/mechanical drift that changes the relative
position between a tip and sample. Since the thermal/mechanical drift may modify the
formed atomic bridge, we confirmed the stability of STM we used in this study. Figure
S3 shows the change in the tunnelling current when the feedback circuit of STM was
NATURE MATERIALS | www.nature.com/naturematerials 3
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATIONDOI: 10.1038/NMAT3054
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
4
switched off. The constant current suggests that the STM maintained a constant
nanogap without any feedback over 600 s, which is longer than the measured retention
time and much longer than the LTP formation judgement time of 20 s.
Figure S3. Change in the tunnelling current during the feedback off condition of
STM system.
Although LTP retention time over 400 s was confirmed as shown in Figure S2,
we measured a potential retention time using a crossbar-type inorganic synapseS2, in
which the two electrodes can be fixed completely for a longer period of time such as
months. Ideally, the inorganic synapse made by STM and the crossbar-type inorganic
synapse should show similar characteristics. The reason why we employed a STM to
make an inorganic synapse in this study is that a STM can make the initial condition
such as a nanogap size same among the measurements, whereas the crossbar-type
inorganic synapse still has a variation of the initial condition due to the fabrication
process at the present stageS2.
The potential retention time was much longer, as shown in Figure S4. The
atomic bridge formed by a voltage pulse (V = 130 mV, W = 0.5 s) had existed for 2 ×
4 NATURE MATERIALS | www.nature.com/naturematerials
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3054
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
5
104 s, until stopping the measurement. This result further supports our contention that
the point contact formation is the origin of the robustness of an inorganic synapse in the
LTP state.
Figure S4. Change in the conductance of a crossbar-type inorganic synapse
after a robust atomic bridge was formed. Although a small change in the
conductance can be seen, the atomic bridge had existed for a longer time. 5 mV
was applied to measure the conductance of the inorganic synapse.
3. Threshold value distribution among inorganic synapses
Device-to-device reproducibility is discussed in relation to the distribution of
the threshold values achieving unstable potentiation. Each inorganic synapse operating
in the short-term plasticity (STP) state shows a certain distribution of the threshold
value of the number of input pulses. For instance, the threshold value is four in the
measurement shown in Figure 1b.
Figure S5 shows the distribution of the number of input pulses required for
unstable potentiation. Both inorganic synapses #1 and #2 show similar distributions,
NATURE MATERIALS | www.nature.com/naturematerials 5
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATIONDOI: 10.1038/NMAT3054
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
6
which secures the device-to-device reproducibility of the switching threshold for use as
inorganic synapses in certain future circuits.
As described in the method section of the main paper, the device structure of
the inorganic synapses was made using a scanning tunnelling microscope. Therefore,
the distribution shown in Figure S5 was measured at two different positions of the Ag2S
substrate surface.
Figure S5. The number of input pulses required for unstable potentiation. The
conditions of the input pulses were V = 80 mV, W = 0.5 s and T = 10 s. #1 and #2
indicate different inorganic synapses.
4. The effect of electronic phenomena in Ag2S
We considered the purely electronic phenomena, such as the trapping and
detrapping of electrons in Ag2S, which might cause the decay in the conductance of the
STP state after a pulse input. It is expected that the defect levels in the Ag2S film,
1 2 3 7 8 9 10 4 5 6
6 NATURE MATERIALS | www.nature.com/naturematerials
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3054
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
7
originating mainly from the non-stoichiometric composition of the Ag2S, trap electrons
by a pulse input. Detrapping of the electrons could cause the change in the conductance
after the pulse input. Since the time-scale of the trapping and detrapping phenomena
could be similar to the conductance decay in the STP state in this experiment, we
performed the following experiment to confirm the purely electronic effect.
The change in current was measured using a platinum tip in contact with Ag2S
film, in order to observe the effect of the phenomena occurring in the Ag2S film. Figure
S6 shows the change in current when the input pulse was applied. As can be seen, the
current levels before and after the pulse input are almost the same. The decay after the
pulse input, such as seen in Figures 1b and 1c, was not observed in this experiment. We
believe that this is because the low level of resistivity of the Ag2S film we used makes
the effect of trapping and detrapping invisible. From this experiment, it is expected that
the spontaneous decay in the conductance discussed in this paper is caused by a
phenomenon occurring in a nanogap due to atomic/ionic movement; as discussed in the
main text.
Figure S6. Change in current when a platinum tip is intentionally in contact with
the Ag2S film. The condition of the input pulse was identical to Figure 1b.
NATURE MATERIALS | www.nature.com/naturematerials 7
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATIONDOI: 10.1038/NMAT3054
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
8
5. Supplementary movie
Movie demonstrating image memorizing into an inorganic synapse array.
As shown in the supplementary movie, we carried out the storing into a 7 × 7
inorganic synapse array of two images; the letters ‘1’ and ‘2’, with intervals of T = 2 s
and 20 s. The movie shows the input image (left-hand side) and the stored image
(right-hand side). The darker color in the stored image indicates the higher conductance
value of the inorganic synapse. The conductance which corresponds to sensory memory
(SM) is not actually displayed in the movie because its conductance (a few µS) is much
smaller than the full scale of conductance (100 µS), as shown in Figure 4a. The movie
replay time is ten times faster than the actual time.
References
S1. Hasegawa, T. et al. Memristive operations demonstrated by gap-type atomic
switches. Appl. Phys. A 102, 811–815 (2011).
S2. Terabe, K., Hasegawa, T., Nakayama, T. & Aono, M. Quantized conductance
atomic switch. Nature 433, 47–50 (2005).
8 NATURE MATERIALS | www.nature.com/naturematerials
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3054
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.