showplace/soma - sf planning · 2019. 9. 20. · showplace/soma neighborhood analysis and...
TRANSCRIPT
Showplace/SoMaNEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS & COORDINATION STUDY
DRAFT SCOPING PRESENTATION
Photo by Daniel Austin Hoherd, Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0).
2Showplace/SoMa Neighborhood Analysis and Coordination StudySCOPING
DRAFTShowplace/SoMa NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS& COORDINATION STUDY
THE STUDY WILL PRODUCE
• A guiding policy report• Potential programs and Planning Code updates to
implement the policies• A feasibility analysis
Several transportation and land use projects are positioning the Showplace/SoMa area for long-term change.
STUDY PURPOSE
This Study will identify strategies to coordinate these efforts
while analyzing opportunities to create:
• A cohesive urban design• Additional market-rate and affordable housing• Additional capacity for a variety of PDR jobs• A seamless network of open spaces & walkable streets
3Showplace/SoMa Neighborhood Analysis and Coordination StudySCOPING
DRAFTMajor Projects & PlansTransportationPLANNED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
• Central Subway
• 16th Street Improvements
• 7th Street Improvements
• Brannan Street Improvements
UNDER STUDY
• Caltrain Business Plan
• Caltrain Service, Storage, Development Analysis
• High-Speed Rail Environmental Study
• Downtown Extension (DTX)
• Pennsylvania Avenue Extension Study (PAX)
Land UseAPPROVED
• Central SoMa & Key Development Sites
• Showplace Square/Potrero Hill Area Plan
• Mission Bay Redevelopment Plan
UNDER STUDY
• Recology Site
• Mission Bay Amendments (e.g. 1450 Owens)
• Railyards Land Use Inputs
• Army Corps/Port Flood Study (SF waterfront)
K I NG
S
T
TH
E E
MB
AR
CA
DE
RO
B E R R Y S
T
C H A N N E L S
T
M I S S I O N R O C K S T
G R O V E S T
H A Y E S S T
K I NG
S
T
G O L D E N G A T E A V E
M C A L L I S T E R S T
E D D Y S T
7 T H S
T
7 T H S
T
3R
D S
T
ME
RR
IMA
C S
T
6T
H S
T
4T
H S
T
3R
D S
T
RH
OD
E I S
LA
ND
ST
SA
N B
RU
NO
AV
E
KA
NS
AS
ST
AL
AB
AM
A S
T
CA
RO
LI N
A S
T
FL
OR
I DA
ST
TE
XA
S S
T
MI S
SO
UR
I ST
CO
NN
EC
TI C
UT
T S
T
MI S
SI S
SI P
PI S
T
VE
RM
ON
T S
T
UT
AH
ST
BR
YA
NT
ST
HA
MP
SH
I RE
ST
I LL
I NO
I S S
T
AR
KA
NS
AS
ST
TE
NN
ES
SE
E S
T
S V
AN
NE
SS
AV
E
DE
HA
RO
ST
1 2 T H S T
MIN
NE
SO
TA
ST
I ND
I AN
A S
T
6 T H S
T
PO
LK
ST
8 T H S
T
LA
RK
I N S
T
MI S
S I ON S
T
MI S
S I ON
ST
1 0 T H S
T
8 T H S
T
9 T H S
T
1 1 T H S
T
3 RD
ST
HY
DE
ST
4 T H S
T
4 T H S
TD
E H
AR
O S
T
T U R K S T
TA
YL
OR
ST
E L L I S S T
T OW
N S E N D S
T
T OW
N S E N D S
T
2 ND
ST
DE
L AN
CE
Y ST
H OW
A R D ST
HO
WA
RD
S
T
5 T H S
T
5 T H S
T
F OL S O
M S
T
F OL S O
M
ST
FO
LS
OM
ST
VA
N N
ES
S A
VE
PO
TR
ER
O A
VE
H A R R I SO
N S
T
H A R R I SO
N S
T
HA
RR
ISO
N S
T
B R A N N A N S
T
B R A N N A N S
T
B R YA N T ST
B R YA N T S
T
JO
NE
S S
T
TR
EA
T
AV
E
B L U X OM
E ST
SH
OT
WE
LL
ST
CA
PP
ST
1 6 T H S T
C A M P U S W A Y
1 7 T H S T 1 7 T H S T
1 8 T H S T 1 8 T H S T
1 9 T H S T
M A R I P O S A S T M A R I P O S A S T
1 4 T H S T
1 6 T H S T
A L A M E D A S T
1 5 T H S T
1 5 T H S T
1 8 T H S T
1 9 T H S T
OW
EN
S S
T
S V
AN
NE
SS
AV
E
MA R K E T
S T
D I V I S I O N S T
H OO
P E R S T
I RW
I N
ST
H U B B E L L S
T
1 3 T H S T
6 T H S
T
OT I S
ST
S O U T H S T
N E L S O N R I S I N G L N
M I S S I O N B A Y B L V D S
M I S S I O N B A Y B L V D N
BR
IDG
EV
IEW
WA
Y
FR
AN
CO
IS B
LV
DT
ER
RY
A
SouthBeachPark
BrannanStreet Wharf
Park
Victoria ManaloDraves Park
Yerba BuenaGardens
Mision BayKids’ Park
Mission BayCommons
Bay FrontPark
Mission CreekPark
China Basin Park
Agua VistaPark
Koret Quad
MariposaPark
OraclePark
SouthPark
FranklinSquare
In ChanKaajal Park
JacksonPlayground
DaggetPark
Gene Friend
Civic CenterPlaza
UN Plaza
Mission RockPark (planned)
Bluxome Linear Park(planned)
Central SoMaPark (planned)
Crane CovePark (planned)
Freeway ParcelsOpen Spaces
(potential)
101
101 280
280
80
80
China Basin
Mission
Cre
ek
Centra l
Basin
Caltra
inCaltrain
0
Scale: 1 inch = 500 feet
1,000 2,000500 Feet
• Three different street grids converge
• Major Infrastructure Barriers
• Limited direct connections to surrounding neighborhoods.
• Lack of connections to parks, waterfront and open space network
• How can we design for better connections to
− the north & south, including a future bike connection along 5th street?
− the east & west, to surrounding areas?
− existing and future open spaces?
0’ 250’ 500’ 1000’
1” = 500’-0”
LEGEND
Mission/Potrero Grid
South of Market/Showplace Grid
Mission Bay Grid
4Showplace/SoMa Neighborhood Analysis and Coordination StudySCOPING
DRAFT
SCOPING
DRAFTConnectionsChallenges Opportunities for Analysis
Changes to urban form must balance and consider:
• Railyards site
• Seamlessness between area plans
• Topography and San Francisco’s urban form
• Access to sunlight
• Preserving Historic Character
• How can height and bulk districts be designed to transition gracefully from existing to new neighborhoods?
• How can building form emphasize the importance of 4th and King station, while enhancing public view corridors?
• What policies can incentivize preservation and PDR, while allowing for additional housing?
K I NG
S
T
TH
E E
MB
AR
CA
DE
RO
B E R R Y S
T
C H A N N E L S
T
M I S S I O N R O C K S T
G R O V E S T
H A Y E S S T
K I NG
S
T
G O L D E N G A T E A V E
M C A L L I S T E R S T
E D D Y S T
7 T H S
T
7 T H S
T
3R
D S
T
ME
RR
IMA
C S
T
6T
H S
T
4T
H S
T
3R
D S
T
RH
OD
E I S
LA
ND
ST
SA
N B
RU
NO
AV
E
KA
NS
AS
ST
AL
AB
AM
A S
T
CA
RO
LI N
A S
T
FL
OR
I DA
ST
TE
XA
S S
T
MI S
SO
UR
I ST
CO
NN
EC
TI C
UT
T S
T
MI S
SI S
SI P
PI S
T
VE
RM
ON
T S
T
UT
AH
ST
BR
YA
NT
ST
HA
MP
SH
I RE
ST
I LL
I NO
I S S
T
AR
KA
NS
AS
ST
TE
NN
ES
SE
E S
T
S V
AN
NE
SS
AV
E
DE
HA
RO
ST
1 2 T H S T
MIN
NE
SO
TA
ST
I ND
I AN
A S
T
6 T H S
T
PO
LK
ST
8 T H S
T
LA
RK
I N S
T
MI S
S I ON S
T
MI S
S I ON
ST
1 0 T H S
T
8 T H S
T
9 T H S
T
1 1 T H S
T
3 RD
ST
HY
DE
ST
4 T H S
T
4 T H S
TD
E H
AR
O S
T
T U R K S T
TA
YL
OR
ST
E L L I S S T
T OW
N S E N D S
T
2 ND
ST
DE
L AN
CE
Y ST
H OW
A R D ST
HO
WA
RD
S
T
5 T H S
T
5 T H S
T
F OL S O
M S
T
F OL S O
M
ST
FO
LS
OM
ST
VA
N N
ES
S A
VE
PO
TR
ER
O A
VE
H A R R I SO
N S
T
H A R R I SO
N S
T
HA
RR
ISO
N S
T
B R A N N A N S
T
B R A N N A N S
T
B R YA N T ST
B R YA N T S
T
JO
NE
S S
T
TR
EA
T
AV
E
B L U X OM
E ST
SH
OT
WE
LL
ST
CA
PP
ST
1 6 T H S T
C A M P U S W A Y
1 7 T H S T 1 7 T H S T
1 8 T H S T 1 8 T H S T
1 9 T H S T
M A R I P O S A S T M A R I P O S A S T
1 4 T H S T
1 6 T H S T
A L A M E D A S T
1 5 T H S T
1 5 T H S T
1 8 T H S T
1 9 T H S T
OW
EN
S S
T
S V
AN
NE
SS
AV
E
MA R K E T
S T
D I V I S I O N S T
H OO
P E R S T
I RW
I N
ST
H U B B E L L S
T
1 3 T H S T
6 T H S
T
OT I S
ST
S O U T H S T
N E L S O N R I S I N G L N
M I S S I O N B A Y B L V D S
M I S S I O N B A Y B L V D N
BR
IDG
EV
IEW
WA
Y
FR
AN
CO
IS B
LV
DT
ER
RY
A
SouthBeachPark
BrannanStreet Wharf
Park
Victoria ManaloDraves Park
Yerba BuenaGardens
Mision BayKids’ Park
Mission BayCommons
Bay FrontPark
Mission CreekPark
China Basin Park
Agua VistaPark
Koret Quad
MariposaPark
OraclePark
SouthPark
FranklinSquare
JacksonPlayground
DaggetPark
Gene Friend
Civic CenterPlaza
UN Plaza
Mission RockPark (planned)
Central SoMaPark (planned)
Crane CovePark (planned)
Freeway ParcelsOpen Spaces
(potential)
In ChanKaajal Park
Bluxome LinearPark (planned)
101
101 280
280
80
80
Pennsylvania Ave Extension
Downtown Exte
nsion D
TX
3rd Street
Brannan
Street
Central Subway
China Basin
Mission
Cre
ek
Centra l
Basin
4th & King Stat
ion
4th & King Stat
ion
Caltrain
Central SoMa
Showplace Square
Mission Bay
Western SoMa
0
Scale: 1 inch = 500 feet
1,000 2,000500 Feet
0’ 250’ 500’ 1000’
1” = 500’-0”
LEGEND
48’-85’
20’-45’
125’-250’
90’-120’
Above 250’
5Showplace/SoMa Neighborhood Analysis and Coordination StudySCOPING
DRAFT
SCOPING
DRAFTHeight and BulkChallenges Opportunities for Analysis
6Showplace/SoMa Neighborhood Analysis and Coordination StudySCOPING
DRAFT
SALI90 acresPDR in Mission/Showplace - 140 acresIndustrial Port Land406 acresCentral Waterfront/Bayview - 638 acres
• Limited supply, increasing demand
• Affordability for PDR businesses
• Ensuring new PDR construction meets needs of PDR businesses
• PDR zoning framework has evolved since Eastern Neighborhoods (e.g. office cross-subsidy)
• As the neighborhood grows and mixes different uses, how can we ensure PDR spaces are viable and affordable?
• What else can be leveraged to build affordable PDR space?
• How can planning code support PDR businesses and needs in Showplace/Soma (e.g. prototyping, advanced manufacturing, repair)?
Challenges Opportunities for Analysis
Produc tion, Distribution & Repair
K I NG
S
T
TH
E E
MB
AR
CA
DE
RO
B E R R Y S
T
C H A N N E L S
T
M I S S I O N R O C K S T
G R O V E S T
H A Y E S S T
K I NG
S
T
G O L D E N G A T E A V E
M C A L L I S T E R S T
E D D Y S T
7 T H S
T
7 T H S
T
3R
D S
T
ME
RR
IMA
C S
T
6T
H S
T
4T
H S
T
3R
D S
T
RH
OD
E I S
LA
ND
ST
SA
N B
RU
NO
AV
E
KA
NS
AS
ST
AL
AB
AM
A S
T
CA
RO
LI N
A S
T
FL
OR
I DA
ST
TE
XA
S S
T
MI S
SO
UR
I ST
CO
NN
EC
TI C
UT
T S
T
MI S
SI S
SI P
PI S
T
VE
RM
ON
T S
T
UT
AH
ST
BR
YA
NT
ST
HA
MP
SH
I RE
ST
I LL
I NO
I S S
T
AR
KA
NS
AS
ST
TE
NN
ES
SE
E S
T
S V
AN
NE
SS
AV
E
DE
HA
RO
ST
1 2 T H S T
MIN
NE
SO
TA
ST
I ND
I AN
A S
T
6 T H S
T
PO
LK
ST
8 T H S
T
LA
RK
I N S
T
MI S
S I ON S
T
MI S
S I ON
ST
1 0 T H S
T
8 T H S
T
9 T H S
T
1 1 T H S
T
3 RD
ST
HY
DE
ST
4 T H S
T
4 T H S
TD
E H
AR
O S
T
T U R K S T
TA
YL
OR
ST
E L L I S S T
T OW
N S E N D S
T
T OW
N S E N D S
T
2 ND
ST
DE
L AN
CE
Y ST
H OW
A R D ST
HO
WA
RD
S
T
5 T H S
T
5 T H S
T
F OL S O
M S
T
FO
LS
OM
ST
VA
N N
ES
S A
VE
PO
TR
ER
O A
VE
H A R R I SO
N S
T
H A R R I SO
N S
T
HA
RR
ISO
N S
T
B R A N N A N S
T
B R A N N A N S
T
B R YA N T ST
B R YA N T S
T
JO
NE
S S
T
TR
EA
T
AV
E
B L U X OM
E ST
SH
OT
WE
LL
ST
CA
PP
ST
1 6 T H S T
C A M P U S W A Y
1 7 T H S T 1 7 T H S T
1 8 T H S T 1 8 T H S T
1 9 T H S T
M A R I P O S A S T M A R I P O S A S T
1 4 T H S T
1 6 T H S T
A L A M E D A S T
1 5 T H S T
1 5 T H S T
1 8 T H S T
1 9 T H S T
OW
EN
S S
T
S V
AN
NE
SS
AV
E
MA R K E T
S T
D I V I S I O N S T
H OO
P E R S T
I RW
I N
ST
H U B B E L L S
T
1 3 T H S T
6 T H S
T
OT I S
ST
S O U T H S T
N E L S O N R I S I N G L N
M I S S I O N B A Y B L V D S
M I S S I O N B A Y B L V D N
BR
IDG
EV
IEW
WA
Y
FR
AN
CO
IS B
LV
D
TE
RR
Y A
F OL S O
M
ST
SouthBeachPark
BrannanStreet Wharf
Park
Victoria ManaloDraves Park
Yerba BuenaGardens
Mision BayKids’ Park
Mission BayCommons
Bay FrontPark
Mission CreekPark
China Basin Park
Mission RockPark (planned)
Bluxome LinearPark
(planned)
Central SoMaPark (planned)
Freeway ParcelsOpen Spaces
(potential)
Agua VistaPark
Koret Quad
MariposaPark
Crane CovePark
(planned)
EspritPark
OraclePark
SouthPark
FranklinSquare
JacksonPlayground
DaggetPark
Gene Friend
Howard & LangtonMini Park
Boeddeker Park
Civic CenterPlaza
UN Plaza
In ChanKaajal Park
101
101 280
280
80
80
China Basin
Mission
Cre
ek
Centra l
Basin
Caltra
in
Caltrain
0
Scale: 1 inch = 500 feet
1,000 2,000500 Feet0’ 250’ 500’ 1000’
1” = 500’-0”
LEGEND
PassiveRecreation
ActiveRecreation
Playground
Bay Trail Bay Trail (planned)
Open Space
Planned/PotentialOpen Space
7Showplace/SoMa Neighborhood Analysis and Coordination StudySCOPING
DRAFT
SCOPING
DRAFTOpen Space
• Lack of open space
• Connectivity between Showplace/Soma and Mission Bay open space
• Barriers to western edge of Mission Creek
• Where are opportunities for passive open spaces, recreational sports and playgrounds?
• How can the public realm support neighborhood heritage?
• What are the open space needs of established cultural activities?
• How can we better link to open spaces and create a cohesive public realm network?
Challenges Opportunities for Analysis
8Showplace/SoMa Neighborhood Analysis and Coordination StudySCOPING
DRAFTPublic Benefits
ENSURING THAT ADDITIONAL GROWTH CREATES ADDITIONAL PUBLIC BENEFIT
CHILDCARE & COMMUNITY FACILITIES
4th & King Railyards
Planning for the Railyards must serve the region’s transportation needs first
4 th & King Railyards
TOWNSEND STREET
7TH STREET
Only after studies identify future transportation needs at the 4th/King Railyards can we study land use and development potential on the site.
10Showplace/SoMa Neighborhood Analysis and Coordination StudySCOPING
DRAFTShowplace/SoMaNEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS & COORDINATION STUDY
STUDY TIMELINE
Date Milestone
SEPT/OCT 2019 Stakeholder Outreach / Context Setting
NOV 2019 Workshop 1: Urban Form, Land Use
FEB 2020 Workshop 2: Public Realm, Transportation Updates
APRIL 2020 Workshop 3: Public benefits, Refined Land Use & Design
2020 - 2022 Environmental Review Process TBD
JEREMY SHAW415.575.9135
THANK YOU!