shrimp ppt
TRANSCRIPT
1
\
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF;Prof.T.S.SHIBIN
SHRIMPTHE INDIAN
MARINE
KING
Submitted to :IABMI
ANAND
PRESENTED BY:Dhanesh jivani
Reg no:04-1170-09
2
INTRODUCTION
Shrimp is a type of shell fish
It earns more capture & culture importance As it is easy to culture, availability of all materials, Good market value with high price.
It has good market value in domestic as well as in international market.
It has good health benefits
It has great nutritional value.
3
COMPOSITION
© 2001-2010 The George Mateljan Foundation
4
Objective of study
• To identify major marine commodities for export.
• To identify county wise export supply trend of Shrimp.
• To Study Monthly Export Trend of Frozen Shrimp
• To identify untapped Production Potential of shrimp in Gujarat.
5
Scope of Study
• It helps to predict major importing country of Indian shrimp.
• It gives idea about future trend of shrimp export from India.
• It helps to identify new strategies to overcome the declining market in existing country.
• It gives idea about untapped potential importing county.
6
Basic Factor affecting on shrimp Farming &
Export.Price
Demand
Exchange rate
Export subsidy
Land Holdings
Average Production Per Ha./catch
Avg. Cost of Production Per Kg. of Shrimp
Competitor species
7
Rating of Shrimp features in Processor purchase decision
Freshness
Smell
Price
Colour
Size
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9.5
8.5
8
7.5
7.5
Rating
Prod
uct f
eatu
re
Hariom Aquafarm:NavasariTable no :01
8
To identify major marine commodities for export
9
Species wise
• file 1.docx
Comparison
Items 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007FROZEN SHRIMP 121134 140831 123923 137815 143588 137397 136223FROZEN
FISH 185457 217195 145322 154793 179571 270751 220200FR CUTTLE
FISH 30062 42753 38076 44956 49104 55701 45955
FR SQUID 39994 36804 37675 46703 48464 47252 34172DRIED ITEMS 7623 10253 12774 8664 12714 24293 22414
CHILLED 3239 3867 3359 4220 4410 7200 6541
LIVE ITEMS 1564 2233 2150 2390 2331 2478 2498
OTHERS 35248 44026 383.72 51029 62414 67571 73698
(Quantity in tones/year)
Table no :02 Source :mpeda08-09
10
11
EXPORT ITEM IN VALUE (USD million)
12
In value
• file 2.docx
13
Comparison
Item 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
FROZEN SHRIMP 870.93 968.83 846.69 929.89 971.4 997.64 980.62
FROZEN FISH 162.74 188.4 137.98 161.15 220.35 321.95 326.29
FROZEN CUTTLE
FISH 57.58 88.51 90.86 105.25 122.92 175.75 185.64
FROZEN SQUID 68.54 71.41 84.81 98.57 118.82 126.25 101.29
DRIED ITEM 15.49 17.75 30.73 25.03 30.25 40.75 64.72
LIVE ITEMS 7.56 12.03 10.49 11.37 12.77 26.63 29.62
CHILLED ITEMS 13.69 14.27 11.86 16.21 16.31 14.22 17.21
OTHERS 61.88 92.07 83.26 94.15 133.96 149.72 193.68
Value in USD Million/year
Table no :03 Source :mpeda08-09
14
To identify country wise export supply trend of
Shrimp.
15
country wise export
• file 3.docx
16
Comparison
country 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
CHINA 143336 185212 128764 127327 133864 203513 139792
EUROPEAN UNION 77375 98876
94906 109439 133186 149773 149381
JAPAN 68325
56446 49285 53560 60493 67437 67373
SOUTH EAST ASIA 49138
49481 48320 63295 61042 67650 63818
USA 45802 62921 51410 53567 55241 43758 36612
MIDDLE EAST 19678 22795 13834 15860 21596 23585 25752
OTHERS 20666 22232 23209 27520 37174 56924 58972
country wise export/year in tones
Table no :04 Source :mpeda08-09
17
MAJOR MARKETS FOR INDIAN MARINE
PRODUCTS IN VALUE
18
• file4.docx
19
MAJOR MARKETS FOR INDIAN MARINE PRODUCTS IN VALUE
Item 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
JAPAN 425.11 330.5 246.23 255.86 266.3 299.2 305
USA 273.4 417.76 359.51 360.91 376.44 297.08 253
EUROPEAN UNION 223.85 298.04 316.62 368.81 439.1 610.95 663
CHINA 139.92 165.14 146.8 159.29 185.95 259.06 253
SOUTH EAST ASIA 102.67 139.11 115.67 144.32 134.9 136.43
MIDDLE EAST 41.66 43.34 40.57 50.1 67.89
Table no:05 Source :mpeda08-09
Value (USD million)/year
20
Major Markets For Indian Frozen Shrimp
21
• D:\SHRIMP KING\file 5.docx
22
CULTURED SHRIMP
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
VALUE (Rs/Kg)
434.46 444.989999999999
419.09 379.479999999999
356.479999999999
2575
125175225275325375425475
VALUE (Rs/Kg)of CULTURED SHRIMP
VALU
E (R
s/Kg
)
source:mpeda
23
IQF SHRIMP
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
VALUE (Rs/Kg) 277.489999999999
302.02 282.55 262.15 232.02
25
75
125
175
225
275
325
VALUE (Rs/Kg)of IQF SHRIMP
VALU
E (R
s/Kg
)
source:mpeda
24
BLOCK FROZEN SHRIMP
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
VALUE (Rs/Kg) 272.53 268.28 286.16 250.89 232.21
25
75
125
175
225
275
325
VALUE (Rs/Kg)of BLOCK FROZEN SHRIMP
VALU
E (R
s/Kg
)
source:mpeda
25
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
VALUE (Rs/Kg) 1562.26 1485.14 1146.65 931.98 794
100300500700900
1100130015001700
VALUE (Rs/Kg)of FREEZE DRIED SHRIMP
VALU
E (R
s/Kg
) FREEZE DRIED SHRIM
Source-mpeda08-09
26
To Study Monthly Export Trend of Frozen Shrimp
27
• D:\SHRIMP KING\file 7.docx
28
To identify untapped Production Potential of
shrimp in Gujarat.
29
Analysis of shrimp culture potential, usage, and production in the maritime states in India
state Potential area available (Ha)
Area under culture (ha)
% of Total Production (MT)
% of Total
Andhra Pradesh 150000 69638 45.04 53124 47.10
West Bengal 405000 49925 32.29 29714 26.35
Orissa 31600 12116 7.84 12390 10.99
Tamil Nadu 56800 3214 2.08 6070 5.38
East Coast total 643400 134893 87.25 101298 89.92
Kerala 65000 14029 9.07 6461 5.73
Karnataka 8000 3085 2.00 1830 1.62
Gujarat 376000 1013 0.66 1510 1.34
Maharashtra 80000 615 0.40 981 0.87
Goa 18500 963 0.62 700 0.62
West Cost total 547500 19705 12.75 11482 10.18
Total 1190900 154600 100.00 112780 100.00
Source: MPEDA magazine (2008)
30
District wise Potential Brackish Water Area in Gujarat
Valsad,5139 Ha.
Navsari, 12037 Ha.
Surat, 19200 Ha.Bharuch,33208 Ha.
B'nagar, 1125 Ha.Amreli, 2001 Ha.
J'gadh, 1493 Ha.
J'nagar, 4104 Ha.
Rajkot,3200 Ha. Kachchh,7834 Ha.
Valsad Navsari Surat Bharuch Bhavnagar Amreli Junagadh JamnagarRajkot Kachchh
31
Recommendations
• More Thrust is given on “Ready to Eat” and “Ready to Cook” kind of processed items.
• Farmers need to adopt new farming techniques to boost the shrimp production in the country.
• Value addition and diversification is very good opportunity for Indian shrimp.
• IQF and Cold chain facility to be created to boost the Quality and price of product.
• New technologies should be developed to decrease the Production cost and increase the Profit margins like Automatic feeder, aerators, harvesters etc. it will help in Proper supply of feed, Optimum use of energies and Prevent loss occurring due to traditional harvesting practices respectively.
• The crop should be taken considering the peak months of rise in markets.
32
Conclusion
Due to large coastline India has tremendous opportunity for shrimp export oriented business. Value addition has been considered as the thrust area. Indian seafood processing units should be encouraged for value addition and export through setting up new units. Due to entry of Private Players in this sector leads to stiff competition.
33
References
• www.mpeda.com• www.cift.com• www.cmfri.com• www.cift.com• HARI-OM aqua farm-navsari
34
THANK YOU
THANKS